TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Sockmonkeyaccount Archive

View 1 post and 50 comments by Sockmonkeyaccount on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

A cute single guy actually showed up at the studio I take classes at, but almost everyone else there is coupled. This studio is a little pricey and you have to pay for a program in advance. The last place I went had cheap drop in classes, mostly old men.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/23 11:11 PM
2

Maybe the women who are interested in hardworking men are just in shorter supply than the ones who fuck drug dealers and felons due to the former being more likely to settle down than to keep making the rounds. One thing that frustrates me about this sub is no one takes into account there are different types of people. So, I’m curious, do you think your hardworking friends would even be interested in any of the women you’re hedonistic friends have been with? And vice versa? What do you think are…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/22 01:26 PM
1

I actually was assuming that’s not all you do. My point is you’re just taking what someone does in their day to day activities and framing the description of them in way to make it sound like their whole life can be reduced to nothing. So I did it back to you to demonstrate that. For heck’s sake, you threw men going to college in the list like it’s something to do for its own sake and not to further life goals.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/22 12:52 PM
1

Ok, so you do nothing but go to work, go to gym, cook, read and sleep. What’s the difference?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/22 12:33 AM
1

Oh, yikes lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 02:53 AM
1

They’re all weird in their own ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/22 05:17 AM
1

It’s not a contradiction it’s being goal oriented and focused lol
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/22 05:08 AM
1

Haha I’ve totally judged people harsher for not putting enough effort into their photography than for what they look like. Why do dudes think we want to see their dirty bathroom mirror selfies in fluorescent lighting; that’s what I really want to know.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/22 04:59 AM
1

Good point that it is low effort enough to cause offense.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/22 04:54 AM
1

I think, my theory is, when looking at instincts the “we have to be mentally seduced by you first” means you have to demonstrate being interested enough in us to make us think you’ll stick around long enough to help raise offspring, in addition to being quick witted enough to prove generally useful while you’re at it. 🤷🏻‍♀️ But beyond, or rather in keeping with that, we aren’t as visually turned on for the sake of immediate gratification. My own fiancé sent me a dick pic once and I was just like…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/22 04:38 AM
2

It’s the propinquity effect.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/22 07:23 AM
1

I would be attracted to number three but know I’m probably more compatible with two or one.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/22 07:10 AM
1

I agree with the other comments that have pointed out that just because there are more women who like that type of guy than there are that type of guy to go around to them doesn’t mean ALL women like that type of guy. And even if you do find it attractive … I actually dated a competitive body builder, and between the irrational obsessive insecurity about not being ‘big enough’ while already being huge and having to hear the mind numbingly boring rants about workout and diet routines and the amou…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/22 06:56 AM
3

Neither is division of labor.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/22 06:40 AM
–

Why are you concerned about how validated he feels if you aren’t trying to date him? Just stop leading him on.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/21 11:21 PM
1

Kinda depends what you mean by “being” red pill I guess. I mean, I think at the root red pill is just a certain situational analysis. What they do with the analysis from there depends on their values. Like they say, you can’t get “ought” from “is.”
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/21 05:26 PM
3

What I meant was, the original question mentioned that men get depressed and insecure from repeated rejection, so if that’s their response to hearing a bunch of “no”s, I don’t see how “no, and I find you unattractive” would be any better for them, especially since someone else might find them attractive. (And, I was thinking of cases where they give you a definite “no” that they don’t want to go on a date at all ever, not cases where they aren’t being clear if they are interested or not.)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/21 10:51 PM
5

“Sounds like an assumption in a specific scenario. Guys who act distraught over a woman not liking them aren't being jerks. A man calling a woman a bitch for rejecting him would be, but these men aren't included here.” Yeah, I’m having trouble picturing a scenario where the guy lets the woman know that he thinks she’s rejecting because of x,y,z for her to be able to respond that “it’s not because of x,y,z but of his insecurity about them” (as it’s put in the OP), where he isn’t at least giving h…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/21 07:16 PM
0

No, what’s owed it is not irrelevant to the question because the question seems based on the premise that she has to give an explanation and so intentionally picks one that won’t make her look shallow. If she’s worried about looking shallow, the easiest thing to do is just not answer. The fact that she is answering shows that her intention is something else. Edit to add: the post says “and women defer to this second cause as a scapegoat to avoid addressing the first cause”. My point is they don’…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/21 06:47 PM
0

Um, ok. I was giving an explanation not expressing approval.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/21 06:42 PM
25

Would guys even want a woman to say “sorry, you’re not attractive enough for me” instead of a plain “no, thank you” and not give a reason? He may be attractive enough for someone else so there’s no reason to say he’s unattractive period. That would just seem like being mean for the sake of it. Now., in a case where a man gives a woman a bad attitude, her commenting on it is not meant as a helpful tip for the next time he asks someone out. So, again, there’s still no reason to “confront” the real…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/21 05:23 PM
1

I don’t think anything prevents wandering eye except being intentional about not letting yourself do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/21 06:23 PM
2

Human nature hasn’t changed since the Victorian era. When even feminists and conservatives agree on something, there’s probably something to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/21 09:33 PM
1

They are too effeminate because average testosterone levels keeping falling. Just say no to endocrine disrupters, kids. I saw a video the other day comparing pictures of father and son actors at the same age. It’s not just imagination that the younger generations are getting more effeminate. Like physically, you can see it in the faces.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/21 04:36 PM
1

People may be over-intellectualizing the fact that they aren’t attracted to obese people by saying its :because: it’s unhealthy. That is probably the distal reason, but not the immediate one. Immediately, they just aren’t attracted. Like with any mating animal, physical signs of good health will be more attractive than physical signs of bad health. Just because people :know: something is healthy or unhealthy doesn’t override the instinct to be attracted based on just visual cues of health. And j…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/21 02:03 PM
3

Yeah, I don’t understand why it seems so hard for guys to understand that after a few times of scenario #1 happening we might try adjusting our strategy to avoid that going forward.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 02:47 PM
1

So if the guy starts treating the NSA woman as his GF, should she be considered to be taking advantage of him at that point?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 10:44 PM
1

Do you think that’s self-destructive behavior on their part? Is it in their best interest or not to get that sexual attention?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 10:31 PM
2

If women seem to be more fragile and childish in their outlook, does that warrant taking a more paternalistic attitude toward them?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 10:28 PM
2

In the first example, what if she doesn’t have him doing favors and is otherwise as comforting/helpful as they are to other friends? Does just getting the sense that someone might have an unrequited crush on you mean you should distance yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 10:18 PM
2

Maybe at some point people just have to rely on their own judgment of how likely a particular person is to be concerned about a particular bit of info. Of course that doesn’t help if one person wants to point the finger at someone else and say they should have known to disclose such and such, but for one’s own conscience’s sake it should probably be the main consideration, I think.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 10:09 PM
2

Yeah, recognizing differences between sexes and planing accordingly is sexist.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 05:16 PM
1

Thank you
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 11:42 PM
1

What was it called?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/21 06:06 PM
1

Probably at that point they are just using the physical trait as an excuse to explain it because they can’t consciously think of any other reason they aren’t attracted to them but still aren’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/21 04:36 PM
1

I saw some before and after pics on an article about tailoring once. I couldn’t believe how much difference the fit really makes in how attractive the men and women looked. I 100% would recommend finding some cheap or 2nd have clothing and taking it to the tailor over expensive clothing that doesn’t fit right if you don’t know how to do it yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/21 04:26 PM
2

I just did a search on that website with the word “suspect” and didn’t see pictures of any of either sex.
/r/MensRights03/06/21 07:25 AM
1

I don’t even know what you’re talking about enough to explain how you misunderstood me
/r/MensRights18/03/21 10:15 AM
2

Oh, I see. That does contradict the feminist portrayal of women as sole victims. That’s interesting that female crime doubled since 1970. Wonder if the women’s movement fostered some of that somehow. Very interesting. I think I’ll look into that more.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 05:45 AM
1

How would I feel if it were the other way around? I’d feel much better. I’d rather men stick to killing their girlfriends instead of going out and committing armed robbery or something like that where I could get mixed up in it. I still don’t see how any of that would hurt the argument about the homicide disparity being men’s doing since they are still committed homicide more regardless of what proportion of sexes women kill. But eh let’s just disagree. Have a good night.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 04:44 AM
-1

Yes I realize men commit 90% of the homicides which is why it’s stupid to get hung up on the proportions. All it really shows is men are probably going around killing indiscriminately in addition to intimate partners and women are probably mostly sticking to intimate partners. I don’t see how any of this is supposed to make women look worse compared to men.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 03:59 AM
-1

Women being 2.5x more likely to kill men does not disprove the belief that male on female violence is more likely. That chart shows in 2014 that there were 1523 male on female murders versus 421 female on male murders, that’s 3.6x as many opposite sex victim murders committed by men than women. The chart also shows if a woman is murdered it’s <10x more likely to have been by a man than by another woman.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 03:38 AM
1

Not going by rate...
/r/MensRights18/03/21 03:18 AM
1

“Basically enforced by society frowning on you” is basically the majority of what enforced monogamy is (plus marriage, fault divorce and anti-bigamy laws) Is this talking about married or unmarried relationships? Theoretically adultery should get you a better divorce settlement if it’s not a no-fault divorce, so that’s already kinda like a fine. (Not sure how many states and countries still have that though)
/r/MensRights17/03/21 06:17 PM
1

Mm, not sure if there might be some unforeseen consequences to having everyone’s genetic information on record somewhere..
/r/MensRights17/03/21 05:58 PM
-7

My guess is women are more likely to kill intimate partners and men are more likely to kill random people, but they are still killing women at a higher rate than vice versa, sooo... not sure how that proves anything interesting
/r/MensRights17/03/21 05:36 PM
2

But, for example, if someone says that looks or money aren’t the most important things to them that doesn’t make it a reason to reject people with looks or money if they like other things about them, too. Plus, people tend to be irrational during the initial crush/falling in love stage but that doesn’t mean they were being dishonest about what they wanted the whole time up until then. I think I read once that the Ancient Greeks considered it like a temporary mental illness.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 04:32 PM
2

The first one definitely because the men who complain about promiscuous women the most are the quickest to deliberately advocate for behaviors on men’s part that create more and makes the associated problems worse. They place all the blame on women and then use that as an excuse to be opportunists and arguably unethical. On the women’s side it’s the not paying thing if they say they want gender equality. Most of the other stuff is probably not so much hypocracy as ending up following natural pro…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/21 04:09 PM
1

Well, basically yeah.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 07:45 AM
1

Try female condoms like F2C, they are non latex and huge. Might be hard to get nowadays though because I think they became prescription only for some reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 05:41 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter