TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SocraticPotato1 Archive

View 2 posts and 117 comments by SocraticPotato1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Evolution is just playing a sick joke on all of us 😔
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 09:42 PM
3

No we aren’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 09:38 PM
4

I don’t know a single guy that’s done that. Those guys are probably dl or bi-sexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 08:34 PM
3

🤷 I suppose I will never fully understand female sexuality then. Cause me, and most men would just go home and masturbate, alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 08:28 PM
2

Why not kiss another man? I mean if your straight after all
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 08:24 PM
–

That would be good. 😊
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 08:07 PM
–

So if we are already embarrassing why would this make any difference?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 08:06 PM
0

Cool 😎
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 03:36 PM
3

Yes you are correct, we are different in that, nothing external has ever driven me toward same-sex attraction and acting upon such attraction, which like I said has never been present…because I’m straight. But this has been a great chat. 😊
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 05:36 AM
11

So, desiring an orgasm drove you to same-sex attraction? Sheesh you guys have some powerful sex drive. That’s never happened to me
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 05:22 AM
3

No, I don’t know any man that says they think the male gender as a whole is gross. Sounds like you are just projecting how you feel onto the male gender, because that’s how you think of them. Even if granted you all those things. Our hygiene practices and habits are sub par, and we were on the mustier side. It still wouldn’t rationalize you a straight woman choosing to voluntary make out with other women. Unless you conceded there was actual same sex attraction. In that case OPs intuitions would…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 05:16 AM
2

Ah I see. We are now moving into the realm of “what ifs?” What would be stopping them from doing so? Even if you used the social shaming argument, they would just do it behind closed doors. Heck men are so on the edge 24/7, stone sober wouldn’t you see men forming ways of acting on that if it where a true desire?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 05:10 AM
8

A truly straight person with zero same-sex attraction wouldn’t rank “kissing no one” as worse than “kissing someone of the same sex.” For most straight men, if not all, kissing no one on a given night is completely neutral, it’s just Tuesday. Not the end of the world. But I guess for women your arousal needs an outlet and women are the only viable candidate for it. Sounds quite non-straight at best bi to me. 🤷
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 04:51 AM
9

No I am just straight that’s it. If you ask gay men if they have issues kissing other men, (straight or gay) they have no issues; also men aren’t inherently gross, maybe like OP said theirs a lot of women, including yourself, who are simply borderline not-straight but simply won’t admit it
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 04:14 AM
10

No it’s because I’m a straight male. If no girl wants to kiss me, which was the case more nights than not, I kiss no one, not one of my homies, or bros. I just go home 😂.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 04:06 AM
7

😂 trust me I did my fair share of drunken parties, bar hopping, house parties, it’s never been an impulse, not even a little to make out with another guy, like ever. This is exclusively a woman thing. Which somewhat proves ops intuitions
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 03:55 AM
11

Huh?? I know, that’s fair. But even with that, what prompted you to make-out with other women as a straight woman? Like if you don’t want to make out with men cool, but how does that justify making out with women?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 03:42 AM
-5

So not over weight = super fit??
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 03:37 AM
12

I mean you could also just not kiss women if you are straight 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 03:33 AM
-8

Why would anyone date an overweight person if they aren’t over weight? That’s like not entirely genetic. Height is thought. So is balding. And I think I’ve seen tons of posts of women degrading those guys
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 03:27 AM
1

Happy for you 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 04:57 PM
2

You keep using the word “force” that’s a word I never used. Also you can’t “make” someone desire you if that’s not their from the jump. That would be forcing it using your own definition 😉
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 04:40 PM
1

I am not making an argument concerning you and your girlfriends. This is a debate panel discussing dating dynamics at scale. And once again you are simply reasserting the same line of reasoning without actually addressing the primary argument. Your argument is basically. If women don’t find men attractive > it must automatically be men’s fault. Thats just reasserting a conclusion without any logical basis for it. Dating is a two way street. If men are showing up with desire and women are not rec…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 04:33 PM
1

I am not making an argument per myself, you or any individual person. This is a debate panel discussing dating dynamics at scale. Thought that was some what obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 04:30 PM
1

You can’t become something someone wants if they lack the implicit capacity to experience the wanting. Women are okay without men but it’s not because of something men are doing or not doing. It’s just the disposition of the woman to be a passive, and responsive not spontaneous or active. Women sit on the sidelines there expecting men to perform and provide the spark. While provide zero initiative, unction or anything in reciprocation. Just stays their like a sack of potato’s waiting to be swept…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 03:48 PM
1

If it’s just “paying for a cheap meal only worth $15” then you shouldn’t have any issues footing your portion of the bill since it’s so cheap. Your making an assumption that the universal, or general cost of an average date $15 per person which is just not even remotely verified by any source whatsoever. It can be that cheap sure but it can also be a lot more. “Men always paid for the woman they used to court in the past even though women didn’t have sex with them until the wedding day and didn’…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 03:40 PM
2

Ah I see what you mean…I don’t think anyone can dispute men have a criterion from which they evaluate women. But it’s no where near as rigid, narrow or strict as is female counterpart. That’s barely controversial observation.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 03:25 PM
2

Yes and women aren’t, so men can’t become interesting to someone who lacks the capacity to generate genuine interest. Like I said in the post, the dating crisis boils down to a desire issue, and men aren’t the one who lack it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 03:22 PM
1

It’s not men fault women lack implicit desire for the mLe form. Men have no issues generating desire for women. And no it’s not because women have a 5 step skin care routine, or “take better care of themselves.” or are just so wonderful. It’s because we have the hunger. Women don’t. So again it’s a desire issue, which would make it a woman issue not a male issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 03:15 PM
-3

All due respect bro, I appreciate all the effort you went through to give your own rendition of my post, but I am not interested in responding to someone who essentially called what I spent time writing garbage. So respectfully, you can take this make your own post like I did or you can shove this one wherever you’d like. Makes no difference to me. Thanks 😊
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 09:18 AM
2

Where are you getting the idea men don’t want relationships with women?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 07:41 AM
4

Society probably should fall apart, thanos is long due a visit
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 06:30 AM
7

Ugh yes dude I understand it’s the way things are I still want to talk about it. It’s like saying taxes suck and then you say “that’s just the way things are” like come on let a guy rant 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 06:30 AM
4

Agreed 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 06:23 AM
2

Depends on how you’re defining attractive. Being a nicer looking ATM is one way of looking at it
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 06:17 AM
7

Cool so the goal post shifts from income and safety to personality and entertainment. Got it. But notice the frame never changes; “men must become something worthy of a woman’s interest.” implying their inherent presence isn’t good enough. Nobody ever asks women to work on being genuinely interested. Men are always in a state of auditioning, earning approval, and women are always evaluating and judging. Same game different costume. Men are tired 🥱 let’s play something else.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 05:29 AM
2

Women can’t get status or wealth? Also what type of status will compensate for a lack of quality genetic material, especially now that the income gap has closed quite rapidly? Lastly, why would you want your smv to be tied to something as detached as money or status?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 04:10 AM
5

That logic only works if the goal is actually reachable. If the desired party is fundamentally disinterested by nature, not circumstance, then telling the pursuing party to just try harder isn’t rational advice. At some point the rational move is to stop chasing something that was never really available to begin with. Step off the hamster wheel to be free.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 03:50 AM
9

Exactly. And notice what’s still happening even in this thread. men are being told to close a gap that women are actively widening. Men observe what women are saying, take notes, and arrived at rational conclusions based on those observations. Nothing radicalized about that 🤷
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 03:46 AM
9

Right, which is exactly my point. If this is just biology and women have always been less interested in men by default, then where’s the actual suffering? Men are struggling to access something they genuinely want. Women are simply not pursuing something they were never that drawn to. Those two things don’t generate equal sympathy and they shouldn’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 03:42 AM
5

But why is the solution always men changing? If it’s a desire problem on women’s end, the logical conclusion is that it’s women’s problem to solve—not men’s. You wouldn’t tell someone with a low appetite that the food needs to be better. You’d ask why they’re not hungry. 😋
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 03:41 AM
-1

That’s relative so not relevant” is itself a relative statement. So by your own logic, not relevant. Good try though 😊
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 01:19 AM
2

You’r making a conflation of general income with who’s earning more in the marriage. The more relevant data point is that when women out-earn their husbands, divorce rates are nearly three times higher. Female breadwinners are 16% of households but 42% of divorces. That actually supports my point more specifically than general income brackets do.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 12:25 AM
5

Women who make more money are more likely to divorce and or stay single all together; which would actually support that quote echoed by many women. Also I don’t take the quote itself as fact it’s simply something that’s echoed by women themselves. The data seems to support it though
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 11:50 PM
7

Which premise specifically? I’m happy to defend any of them, but ‘your whole post is wrong’ without pointing to a single example isn’t a counter argument. Name one and we can actually debate it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 11:31 PM
1

🫡
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 10:20 PM
2

They aren’t mutually exclusive. Also the post is about (both, and) not (either, or) you can’t really discuss one without thr other in the context of hetero sexual dating. Your still playing the semantics game and derailing any real argument from happening,
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 09:28 PM
1

Nah, nothing I said was inherently unhinged, personal or emotional. You might just be projecting. Also if reporting me, makes you feel better go right on ahead. They will read the thread and determine for themselves if I violated any of their rules.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 09:19 PM
1

I’m just giving the same energy I thought it was mutual 😊.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 08:42 PM
2

Semantics
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 08:06 PM
1

Let me rephrase. You think it’s irrational for someone to want to sleep with someone else upon first encounter, but it’s rational to court—invest financially and emotionally into someone upon first encounter. One isn’t more rational or irrational, it’s just a reflection of what you value as a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 08:03 PM
0

Men aren’t utilities out on earth to bring anything to your life. We aren’t a some stock or investment that needs value to be extracted. We have inherent value. It’s your own damn fault for not recognizing it. So maybe it’s not men that lack value, but women who lack go eyes or appreciation to recognize value when it’s right in front of them. No one to blame for that but yourselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 07:51 PM
–

🤔 you are correct I think I didn’t read that part carefully enough. But it’s kind of confusing on how you can have passionate sex, which in itself you could say is emotion. So both of you are passionately having sex but lacks emotional intimacy. I feel if it’s passionate then it’s almost impossible for there to be zero emotional intamacy…no?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 10:42 AM
–

Yeah you don’t need a “sex object”, but you have one… they are willing and able to satisfy your needs for you so you don’t have to do it yourself and plus it’s hot and passionate.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 10:35 AM
–

Okay let’s say for the sake of the hypothetical person A could do a better job than you could would you still opt out?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 10:29 AM
1

A and it didn’t even take me a second to think about it. The clear choice is A to me because that’s simply biological desire I have that and I am essentially horny every day. It’s no more complex of an answer than that, at least to me I wouldn’t want to talk about anything to anyone no matter how deep the topic for that long, because it has no end no, no goal it’s just talking for its own sake, to fill empty space. I’d rather talk to the wall then have sex with a model after lol. Ngl sounds like…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 10:23 AM
–

rape is non consensual, sex implies your consenting to the act because it’s implicitly mutual.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 10:18 AM
–

😂 cant make this up. Woman saying, “who says looks don’t matter”
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 09:52 AM
2

Dude just scroll up a little you will see women are not stating the contrary they are saying men’s bodies don’t turn them on
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 04:37 AM
–

Sorry I don’t date crack addicts
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 02:07 AM
–

Yeah so obvious “meeehhhh”
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 02:06 AM
1

You said two words in response to my comment. Which proves it’s second premise “women just don’t seem all that interested in men to begin with.”
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 10:09 PM
1

That’s the most honest thing anyone has said in this entire thread. You just proved my point flawlessly. Thanks 😊
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 09:27 PM
1

Yes like their implicit lack of desire maybe…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 08:50 PM
1

Women don’t do anything to mitigate or create systems that account for this. They just say there are dangerous men outside and hide in their house. Your just not all that interested in dating men, where their is real desire their is action to resolve potential danger.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 08:49 PM
1

Having access to net negative experiences and zero still isn’t the same
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 08:40 PM
1

Can you link a source that says the opposite?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 08:38 PM
1

This is the most detached, low-awareness comment I’ve ever seen in my life
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 08:35 PM
1

Your demands for courting is coming from too many episodes of Bridgeton
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 08:09 PM
1

It’s irrational to expect paying for dates of someone you don’t know, and being emotionally invested in a stranger vs having sex with them?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 08:08 PM
1

lol women compare dating men to doing hard drugs.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 08:05 PM
1

Your presenting feeling used as something that happened TO women rather than examining the decision making that led there. Two adults agreed to a sexual encounter. If one party hated it and said nothing that’s not exclusively the other party’s moral failure. It’s lack of clear communication and boundaries.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 08:04 PM
–

I can eat from the bottom or the top? Someone is jelly
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 07:34 PM
–

Who doesn’t like cake?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 07:34 PM
–

I watch the healthiest porn on the market 😊
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 07:32 PM
1

….speaking into a void
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 12:15 PM
1

Yeah you don’t have to of course. But like I said if the reason is arbitrary, then it’s proof you probably never really liked that person all that much from the start, if your that easily put off
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 11:49 AM
1

Most straight women yet alone bi prefer women to men anyway. So that doesn’t surprise me
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 11:12 AM
–

Oh seems rather contradictory to your user flag “hypersexual.” lol but okay
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 09:49 AM
1

Those men are weak men who adhere to irrational demands out of fear of losing female approval. Those aren’t men, they are simps.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 09:48 AM
1

I’m not trying to change your mind about anything. If someone wants to believe the sun revolves around the earth that’s their prerogative, it doesn’t change anything about the actual nature of the cosmos. If you want to think something is cheating that categorically isn’t, I won’t stop you, but I also want agree with lies Ps no one is crying except you
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 09:43 AM
1

Yes you can define cheating however you want but not without being a moron in the process. This would be the case in any other context if someone where actively manipulating definite to suit their arguments
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 09:41 AM
–

No talking crosses the threshold and is now reasonable grounds for cheating. Passively consuming content of people naked or having sex and actively communicating with someone of the opposite gender at two completely different things
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 09:39 AM
–

Yes it is in the theater of his mind, that’s what’s fantasy is. The moving pixels are a catalyst. You don’t know this? It’s pretty basic understanding of psychology
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 09:35 AM
–

Being a free woman doesn’t equate to linguistic revision. You can be free and still formulate informed, coherent and good-faith arguments that don’t deviate from rational thought. Again cheating has a clear meaning—breach of agreed exclusivity. Watching pixels in a screen doesn’t breech that contract by any means.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 09:34 AM
–

That’s not what I said was irrational. Read carefully before responding. What’s irrational is breaking up with someone for something that doesn’t effects the relationship in any material way, and is purely a private self pleasuring activity in the theater of his own mind, then calling that “cheating” when it isn’t
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 09:31 AM
–

You can’t change the definition of the term to suit how you feel that’s not how language works. You’re essentially trying to redefine cheating to include a private mental act that uses external stimulus. That’s a significant definitional stretch. Cheating has a reasonably clear meaning—breach of an agreed exclusivity. Watching pixels on a screen doesn’t meet that threshold by any coherent definition regardless of how it makes you or any other woman “feel”
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 09:29 AM
–

I know you don’t care about what’s rational. Your emotions>rational thought sums up this entire thread
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 09:27 AM
1

I like a little story line
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 08:55 AM
1

Calling something cheating that isn’t actually cheating doesn’t make that thing cheating. It’s just changing the definition of words to suit your feelings and when it’s convenient for you. He’s engaging in a self-pleasuring act in the private theater of his own mimd and using a video as a catalyst. The mind is the vehicle not the video, that’s just a kick starter and that kick starter is, as the other commenter said two-dimensional pixelated picture in motion. If your threatened or feel insecure…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 08:50 AM
1

What in the false equivalence
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 08:48 AM
0

That’s a you issue. Your feelings aren’t reality. You don’t need to worry about what he’s watching in his private time especially if he’s not asking you to do any of those things
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 08:47 AM
0

Stop caring what your partner does in the private theater of his mind especially if it doesn’t affect actual dynamic you have. It’s a stupid reason to breakup with someone because what they do behind clothes doors gives you the ick. Just don’t look.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 08:46 AM
1

He isn’t pursuing attraction with other women by getting off to pixilated images but nice try
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 08:44 AM
1

If you arbitrarily leave someone because someone likes the color orange then you probably didn’t like them that much in the first place. But it’s starting to make to sense to me why women initiate the majority of divorces. probably to many men who like the color orange
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 08:40 AM
1

If your tired go to sleep don’t even bother replying with some lazy ass deflection
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 08:36 AM
2

Survivorship-bias: How do you explain all the average non chad guys not in relationships?? Also just out curiosity what do you think the ratio is of average men in happy relationships where the woman is genuinely attracted to her partner and average guys who are not in any relationship but seeking out? Also you’re putting that cart before the horse. Do you think men would say “I will take any woman” if that already had plenty of options with women like women have with men? Do you expect men to j…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 08:25 AM
1

Men don’t dictate the market, we cast the net then sort after the fact not the other way around. Not saying men should not seek out a decent woman but you need to generate enough volume and have enough experience to figure out what is decent or not decent for you. Can’t do that if your net only has one fish with disease and another obese fish and that’s it
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 08:24 AM
1

So the only women who are manipulated by bad men are 15-17?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 08:18 AM
0

You’re essentially criticizing men for being rational actors while completely ignoring the incentives, or lack there of that produced the behavior. You blame men for something that’s a two party system, it takes two to tango as they say, and women seem to not want to dance, and men are blamed for it
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 08:16 AM
1

You do realize that consistent failure across contexts doesn’t automatically make something a skill issue, right? That logic works for chess or coding because those have objective standards skill can close the gap on. Attraction has no objective standard; it’s entirely subjective and largely involuntary. You even said it yourself; ‘it’s a me issue.’ Exactly. But a ‘me issue’ and a ‘skill issue’ aren’t the same thing. Sometimes it’s just who you are, not what you’re doing wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 08:06 AM
3

I do not see this ≠ it doesn’t exist. Hope this distinction is clear. Watching you debate is nauseating.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 08:01 AM
1

Unattractive men getting girls is an oxymoron if I’ve ever heard one.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 07:52 AM
1

What you’re actually saying underneath all this pseudo masculine bravado: “Women are prizes that require a performance to unlock.” Which means men have no intrinsic value; they only acquire value through skill and effort directed at obtaining female approval. Aka a man’s role is to jester and the prize is sexual access—if your lucky
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 07:51 AM
1

To answer your question directly (even though you were asking the question rhetorically): Yes. Attraction essentially is a spontaneous natural force. Not magic—just biology and chemistry expressing itself. The fact that it feels mysterious is precisely because it operates below the level of conscious skill and performance, even intellect. You can’t think your way into it any more than you can think your way into being hungry, it’s just nature. You have it or you don’t
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 07:46 AM
1

It may reveal women are very shallow or that they simply just aren’t that interested in men in a sexual romantic sense which arguably is more brutal
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 07:38 AM
–

Two things: The 'low effort message' complaint is pure hypocrisy on two levels. Women complain about men sending 'hey' while sending the exact same messages to attractive men (chads). Scroll through any good looking guy's DMs and it's wall to wall 'hey’ or ‘hey’ with two ys (if shes feeling really dedicated) from women. The effort standard you're demanding from men is one you don't apply to yourselves. If you genuinely want something why would you want it to be hard to get? When you're actually …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 06:54 AM
–

Not sure why your getting down voted, you said nothing that was not observable relaity
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 06:42 AM
–

Male sexuality grosses you out that much?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 06:41 AM
–

Men aren’t being drowned by perfect options either but some how seem to find a way to dance in the rain? Why can’t women?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 06:40 AM
1

You're literally one sentence away from the answer and then you swerve. You correctly identified that framing sex as a reward erases your own desire and enjoyment. Great. So the solution is... to assert your desire and enjoyment. Communicate what you want. Be an active participant not a passive observer. But instead you landed on 'men use this as an excuse to be bad at sex.' You diagnosed the problem perfectly then somehow made men responsible for the cure too. 🤨
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 05:54 AM
3

It’s a straw man to mask a deeper issue. They already months idea of 100% safety is irrational but then you overlook the fact that women are simply not attracted to most men safety or no safety
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 02:43 AM
1

Well safety doesn’t exist in a vacuum though. You are more likely to perceive a guy as safe if he meets the prerequisite looks threshold you deem viable for sex; aka if a guys hit enough for you to sleep with him upon first encounter theirs a high probability you would assume he would be “safe” or would at-least risk it
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 02:40 AM
0

Men would be lonely no matter what. Women don’t pursue men for sex
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 02:37 AM
0

Does this account for the majority of men. This sounds like some strange straw men to indite men as a whole.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 02:36 AM
1

Women don’t do a very good job of communicating this to the men they supposedly desire. You have to learn to communicate your needs and what makes you cum if you want to close that gap, men aren’t mind readers
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 02:32 AM
2

The overwhelming majority women don’t consult you when they decide to hookup with a guy 😂.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 02:31 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter