TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SoftWaterHol4 Archive

View 0 posts and 92 comments by SoftWaterHol4 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

I'm quite curious: what do you mean when you claim that women are considered "inherently valuable without having to perform"? In countries like China and India baby girl are quite often treated as disposable compared to baby boys, to a point where they'd be abandoned or killed off to make room for a boy. So can you give me an example of that "inherent value" women's lives have without having to perform at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 02:18 PM
1

Of course there are nuances and things aren't black and white, but ultimately the fault always lies in the cheater. Relationships are a two-way road. If one partner is giving the other "incentives to cheat" then that's the point where the other partner should either speak up about the issues or simply break up. "My partner made me cheat" is quite literally a perfect example of someone not taking accountability. So while I'm glad you're at least consistent, I cannot understand your logic here at …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 04:13 PM
1

A man cheats and a woman needs to take accountability for it? Interesting. Does it work the other way around too? Is it usually the man's fault if his girlfriend cheats on him?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 12:46 PM
–

Nobody deserves "porn sex" if their partner is not willing to do that for them. That's all there is to it. There's no deeper meaning based on her body count or past, or his body count or past. If a guy is truly unsatisfied with the sex he has with his gf then he should talk to her, and if the problem persists he's free to leave. Just as nobody is owed "crazy kinky whore slutty shit", no one has to settle in a relationship if the sex is bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 04:19 PM
–

Why is "vanilla sex" so disappointing to a guy who's never had anything else? What is he comparing it to? Porn..? And if he is indeed comparing his gf's bedroom performance to porn and upset she isn't acting like a paid actress, then calling him porn-brained is quite accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 03:18 PM
–

Labeling dating/sexual preferences as bigoted is not helpful even if it's technically true, you're just watering down the meaning of the word. By calling people bigots for having preferences those people will eventually get annoyed and start pushing back by saying stuff like "lol I guess I'm a bigot then hahah" as a joke. And now that regular people are joking about being bigots because of accusations like this, genuine bigots can spout their hate even more openly with even less fear of repercus…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 02:08 PM
0

I feel like a lot of redpill men genuinely forget that gay and bi men even exist at all, so to bring up biphobia to win an argument against feminists just sounds hilariously out of character. Why would a redpill man need to indirectly stand up for bi men when they can justify their preferences with a simple "women want Chads"?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/26 01:11 PM
2

I get that you're weirded out by stuff like orc or minotaur smut, but I'm confused as to why you think women are reading such things due to "negative motivations" and not simply because they like it or it excites them. The examples you gave ("This character is yearning something insane for this woman. No man has ever done that for me") ("This minotaur/orc/vampire is undyingly loyal in no way no real man could ever be") don't convey any kind negativity to me, they're just common fantasies of havi…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 05:39 AM
58

Why do you make it sound like women choosing partners who sexually excite them is a bad thing? Shouldn't that be a baseline for any relationship that involves sex, both partners finding each other exciting?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 07:21 AM
4

"Why would a man leave that unless the woman chased him off?" this is like the final boss of blaming women for men's actions, completely avoiding all accountability. What if a man simply finds another woman who is younger, hotter and has bigger tits? Is that the old girlfriend's fault too, or could it be that the man is an autonomous human being capable of making his own decisions, even if those decisions end up breaking one relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 01:06 AM
1

Of course a study isn't needed to prove a phenomenon, but proof helps a ton. The topic was which one is more common: abusive men vs gold-digger women. Without relevant studies we simply do not know and can only guess. Your speech doesn't really matter here because gold-digger women aren't a minority and abusive men aren't a minority either. So what's your goal here?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 05:31 AM
1

I don't interpret your post or your comments as if you said validation doesn't matter. However, it does feel like you're trying to put the cart before the horse. Validation shouldn't lead the process, but all sides should get a share of it before the process begins. Women are stuck on stage 1 of trying to get some kind of validation, meanwhile men already cleared stage 1, they were validated by their wives/partners, and were able to move on from that onto stage 2. Then people wonder why women ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 07:13 PM
1

Only people who have been validated in their relationship can move onto resolution. Through validation they will find out they aren't always in the wrong, aren't stupid or insane, and are actually able to fix things. The issue in a lot of relationships is that the woman validates the man, but the man will not do the same for her. To so many men, they believe their woman constantly being by his side and supporting him no matter what is her natural state of being, so once he has that devoted wife …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 06:07 PM
3

Of course I disapprove of the "all men" hyperbole when it's phrases like "all men are cheaters", "all men are creeps" or "all men are violent". Those phrases are no better than the examples of "all women bad" I gave. However, the quote in the very first paragraph of this post is quite a bit different. It's basically just saying that men raping and abusing women is men's issue, so men must resolve it. Even if the speaker is talking nonsense or simplifying things beyond belief, there's still a lot…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 05:16 PM
6

You're creating fictional scenarios in your head based on your own biases. I get it, it's fun to do that sometimes, but when you start using your own ramblings as proof of something you've lost the plot. If you actually want to "use data" and "be a smart man", how about you show some proof that it's more common for women to be gold-diggers than men to be abusers. Once you present that data, we can argue which is actually worse: getting finanially taken advantage of or getting physically beaten u…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 12:14 AM
13

Just because you've never seen it happen doesn't mean it doesn't happen. I've seen people bring up the mother so many times, especially on discussions about male murderers, serial killers or rapists. "His mother was an alcoholic", "his mother was distant", "his mother was a whore", all those phrases and more I've seen people use to move blame away from men and onto their mothers.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 10:24 PM
29

I struggle to understand why you feel so strongly about women who condemn men for abusing and raping women. If the hyperbole of "all men" is the problem, then surely you must have noticed how often men use "all women" when saying women are gold-diggers, whores, bad drivers, irrational, emotional, stupid, and so much more. So many men excuse a man's awful behavior because of "what was his mother like?". So no, usually it all does not lead back to men, it leads back to how we can blame his mother …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 08:48 PM
1

What does this even mean? It's insane you labeled this as "debate" when all you're doing is spouting nonsense and debating nobody.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/25 12:12 AM
1

Is your reply incomplete? Anyways, I don't see how you setting up a fake profile on a dating app would somehow be an indication on how average women *act*, since y'know... you're not an average woman. But out of curiosity, have you tried setting up a dating app profile using a woman's picture before? Because that kind of social experiment could affect your perception of the situation. The dating app scene is notoriously fucked up, which is exactly why so many women don't want to dabble in that m…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/25 12:57 PM
1

You should probably edit "women" to "attractive women", because that's who you're really complaining about here, isn't it? You don't even know what an average woman is or looks like, because you've been conditioned into believing all women enjoy the perks that come with being attractive, such as constant validation and attention, plenty of men wanting to date them, expensive dates and whatnot. If we translate this to what you actually mean (average man being a 6/10 and average woman being a 8/10…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 05:48 PM
–

Porn isn't always inherently misogynistic, I'm talking about specific subs and communities that depict misogynist and abusive content but just call it "porn" and "kink". Aside from the ones I mentioned earlier, there are active subreddits where men get off to female circumsicion. It might be easy to just brush stuff like that off as a weird fetish, but it's directly tied to very real and very harmful practice usually directed at baby girls against their consent. Its rebranding misogyny and real …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 02:11 PM
–

There are plenty of misogynist subs that are very active and very popular, it's just that they're branded as "porn" and "kink", and by Reddit rules anything that makes a man's dick hard is allowed. The worst "misandry" on reddit is just women complaining about men and making angry generalizations and memes, meanwhile the worst misogyny is literally hundreds of men sharing rape videos, assault, violence and child abuse directed towards girls and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 06:17 PM
1

What do you mean by "women have always been the domesticated sex"? What is women's domestication in your mind? Is it the way men force women into acting a certain way through hierarchies such as religion, where women are seen as lesser and their actions are heavily restricted (such as in Muslim countries with Sharia law)? Or do you think women are biologically and inherently "domesticated" just on the basis that they are female?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 06:02 PM
3

Without laws that disallow men from wielding their physical strength over women (aka beating women or assaulting them), most men would do so all the times with no restraints. So, how is a woman not having to be subjected to constant male violence translate to her having "power over men" in your mind? And if women "using the natural power of pussy" is such a big problem, how should we restrict and control it? What laws should be written to prevent women from wielding their pussies as weapons agai…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 07:26 PM
3

So, do you think there are women out there who know more about men's experiences than some men do?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 04:30 PM
–

Where did I imply you were transphobic? Was it the part where I questioned why you'd respond with "it doesn't make sense" when I point out the lived reality of many trans men? You still haven't told me what part of trans men being victimized at a higher rate compared to other groups doesn't make sense to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 05:17 PM
–

No need for name calling. Just because it doesn't make sense to you personally doesn't mean it doesn't happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 04:59 PM
–

What part of trans men being victimized is so unbelievable to you? You can look up the studies done about this or listen to trans men's testimonies. Trans people, men and women, are quite literally being specifically sought out by a relatively large group of people called chasers. You can look that up too. Please, before you start saying how things "don't make sense", try to at least do surface level research on the topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 04:40 PM
2

The reason why trans men are so often miserable is because they hope transitioning will free them of the vulnerability of femaleness, which it doesn't. Trans men, despite transitioning, face higher rates of sexual assault compared to trans women and cis women, and especially compared to cis men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 01:15 AM
1

Where did you get that definition? Did you just make stuff up? According to Cambridge "inherent" is: existing as a natural or basic part of something. According to Merriam-Webster "inherent" is: involved in the constitution or essential character of something: belonging by nature or habit Accodring to Collins: existing in someone or something as a natural and inseparable quality, characteristic, or right; innate; basic; inborn You're calling me autistic but you're the one unable to understand a …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 11:10 PM
2

If a person has to work in order to get attention then the attention they receive is not inherent. It doesn't matter how much they have to work or how little; any work at all means that whatever "privilege" they have is NOT inherent. To have something inherently is to have it automatically and permanently. How is this so difficult for you to comprehend? You're so arrogant yet you don't even know what you're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 08:34 PM
7

No, women do not *inherently* get more attention. Women get attention by performing femininity and being sexy, submissive and/or kind. If a woman objectifies herself and pleases men she gets attention. Women who do not do that are so invisible most men don't even know they exist. So no, it is not "inherent". I find it so weird how so many men use that word without understanding what it means. If anything, women are *inherently* at a disadvantage, because in every country in the world parents pre…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 09:08 PM
6

It's usually those who lack self-awareness themselves, who accuse others of not having self-awareness. As for using Esther Vilar's book as a "source", I find it rather laughable. Men will systematically refuse to listen what women say until it benefits them, so a simp like Vilar gets massive praise from the male crowd and her words are treated like gospel, even if what she spouts is just one person's biased opinion. As for your argument(?), what makes you think women believe the world revolves a…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 06:00 PM
0

From the moment when you're in your mother's uterus, if the doctor confirms it's a baby boy the parents will rejoice and the family is happy. If they say it's a baby girl then... well, too often the girl gets aborted to make way for a baby boy. China and India are prime examples of this phenomenon. It got so bad that India had to forbid parents from knowing the sex of their baby before birth, and even still parents could just throw the baby girl in a trash can and start hoping for a boy. In thos…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 10:54 PM
2

To answer your initial question: I hate murderers and rapists more than I hate incels. But just because I hate them more doesn't mean I hate incels less. Those screenshot examples that are supposed to prove that women would rather be with a murderer than an incel are just a few random trolls on twitter. That's not a very reliable source. I can find you more men on twitter who believe the earth is flat, should I use that as a proof that men are ignorant and deny science? I've also never understoo…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 02:29 PM
21

I see a lot of discourse about women's actions causing men to become radicalized misogynists, but very little conversation of how it works the other way around too. I find that odd, because shouldn't it at least be mentioned in a single sentence? It's kind of an important detail: men's actions are also radicalizing women. It's not a one way road, it's a cycle, and just focusing the blame on women's behavior is ignorant. Yes, a woman saying how she gets hundreds of matches on dating apps and has …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 01:35 PM
–

Yet another case of a male posting ragebait content with no intention of actually debating anyone. I wish this subreddit had better moderation.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 11:16 PM
18

So only women are influenced by their moods? That's a wild way to word it. I'm pretty sure men are also influenced by their moods, judging from the way they behave when they get upset their favorite sports team loses (or alternatively, they lose in a video game). It's an interesting phenomenon how blind men are to their own emotional behavior, while also overestimating how emotional women are.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 02:51 PM
–

People pay for food, water and shelter, because even though those are necessities, they're not free. So if sex is to be treated the same way then men should just pay for it. However, if you're talking about reproduction in particular, then by following this logic, a man's right to impregnate a woman and carry on his genepool would have to trump a woman's right to not be impregnated by a man she didn't choose for herself. And that sounds rather male-centric. Biologically speaking it's important f…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 02:07 PM
28

This is yet again a classic case of men not listening or believing women about their own lives and experiences. A woman says she's an unwanted, lonely femcel? Men will tell her she's lying because all women have 100 simps orbiting her and women can never know true loneliness like men do. A woman says she's happily single? Men will tell her she's lying, because she must be bitter that the Chad she wants chose someone else. There is no way for a woman to be seen as "truthful" in the eyes of these …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 01:46 PM
5

There are plenty of examples of spaces that are mostly male only, but OP is throwing a tantrum because they're not exclusively male. Well, guess what? Female-only spaces are also not exclusively female anymore, they're accepting of diverse genders and that includes male people. So the playing field is actually even, and you're still complaining. If the only way for "the sex war" to end is for women to stop being visible, then maybe the sex war shouldn't end at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 01:57 PM
1

Nothing what you quoted explains why the agency of the target of this supposed 'mate poaching' is suddenly completely removed. Do they just become hypnotized zombies because of some primal instincts? Are they unable to keep themselves from cheating all of a sudden? I know multitasking is real hard for males like you, but try to remember that cheating has to involve at least two (2) people.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 08:45 PM
1

Did you accidentally reply under the wrong comment, my guy? I just don't see how your comment relates to anything what I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 08:15 PM
4

I feel like the word "stealing" just removes the agenda from the other person and makes them seem like some kind of victim, even though most cases of cheating are between two (or more) willing participants. But that's just semantics, it's not that important now that I understood what you meant. As for your question about my flair, redpill men and redpill women are quite different. The reason they both use "redpill" is because both groups believe they're cracked the code and think they've discove…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 03:41 AM
6

A homewrecker can be anything that breaks up a marriage. It's just most commonly used for mistresses, since men are the ones who cheat the most throughout history. If you were going to make a neutral statement about some women being promiscous in the past then I would not have had any issues with your story, but your wording was extremely biased. A woman cannot "steal" a man unless she literally captures him, in which case it's a crime and the police should be involved. For (nearly) every "homew…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 03:17 AM
9

> They constantly talk about how the past was better and how women were more chaste. Wdym? Yes, they talk about the past being better because they've never experienced the past, they just think times must have been better before feminism. "Back in the day women were happy to cook for their families and to serve their husbands obediently, until feminism ruined it all" - that's the kind of thing redpills sometimes say. They want subservient, submissive women, but history shows time after time that…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 02:59 AM
1

There is no one-size-fits-all answer to this, you acknowledge it yourself in your post. So what exactly are you trying to accomplish with this question? Is it just meant as a "gotcha" towards women and to make them admit having previous sexual partners can indeed be traumatic to their current partner, or something like that? Obviously finding out your partner used to lynch people would be way worse than finding out they engaged in mild firting with a random person at a bar. That's a non-brainer.…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 02:40 AM
48

Redpillers have never thought women were perfect at any period of time, that kind of belief would go against their whole shtick. They only bring up the past in an attempt to trash on feminism. Also, a side note: Your grandma's best friend did not "steal" your grandpa away. Your grandpa willingly decided to cheat even though he was married, and he decided to go with his mistress, leaving his wife behind. Your grandpa is the homewrecker, he's the scum in that particular story. It's so very strange…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 02:13 AM
3

The "woman who wants a top 1% man" is a boogeywoman created by redpill incels. Those types of women are as common as men who assault children. People like to exaggerate their numbers for various reasons, but they're not actually around every goddamn corner.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 09:11 PM
–

Women weren't sent to war because women had to remain and take care of children and the industry back at home. Ignorant males like you seem to believe women were just chilling at home while men were dying at war, when in reality women had to step into every job previously held by men while simultaneously continuing the legacy of their country by keeping the kids alive. Who do you think farmed the food while men were off fighting the war? Who made the materials, weapons, ammo, etc? Not to mention…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 09:44 PM
–

If you seriously think women 200 years ago were just housewives happily taking care of their children, with no issues except having to be below their husbands in hierarchy, you're extremely naive. So naive in fact that I don't understand how you have the gall to speak on a topic like this. I don't understand how males can act so proud when they're so ignorant. Women back then had no choice regarding their autonomy. Their right to work and to their own income was extremely limited, they could not…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 08:49 PM
–

That is the dumbest logic I've heard in a while. "They were given as many rights as the society of the time believed were right and proper", and that's why they could not possibly have been oppressed? Were slaves also never oppressed because slavery was considered right and proper at the time? What about child brides? That was also considered normal and proper.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 08:11 PM
0

I see where you're coming from, and I do appreciate the moderate viewpoint, but you as a man cannot truly comprehend how frustrating existing as a woman can be with misogynistic men all around us. Feminism didn't just "stop working" because men refurse to stop being misogynists. Feminism is working better than ever. The rise of 4B, young women refusing to date men, the whole childfree movement, etc. It's been amazing to witness. Feminism is doing exactly what it's supposed to do: giving women a …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 09:42 PM
1

Of course misandry isn't a solution to misogyny. It's a response. Misogynistic men caused misandrist women to exist. But I'll try to understand your viewpoint, so I'll ask you a question: If women retaliating against misogyny with misandry is wrong, what are women supposed to do to stand up for themselves? Should women just wait obediently until men stop hating them and treating them as subhuman?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 05:31 PM
-1

no way, a cute little henchman! so adorable!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 04:42 PM
0

Oh for fucks sake... The starting point of this argument is that men are misogynistic without even realizing and then they complain about misandry. That's the goalpost unless you forgot. You, as an emotional male, will try to appeal to feelings by bringing up racism and whatnot, but you completely ignored the fact that misogyny has never stopped. The source of women's anger towards men has never stopped.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 04:35 PM
-2

Except when it comes to misogyny it's not "in the past". Oppression against women is the oldest form of oppression. White men oppress white women, black men oppress black women, etc. I know you're a male and your perception of reality is limited, but surely even you can't seriously think misogyny is something that's just been dealt with and can now be safely forgotten about. As for your concern about my wellbeing, thanks! I definitely need a male to tell me what to do. Thanks for filling up that…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 04:09 PM
-1

In your attempt to be so righteous and kind you completely ignored the long history of men literally oppressing women. Who do you think has more right to resentment: the oppressor or the oppressed?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 03:25 PM
–

Misandry and misogyny aren't comparable. The worst case misandrists are saying cruel things about men and distancing themselves from men. Worst case misogynists on the other hand are saying cruel things about women and actively hurting, assaulting and killing women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 12:54 PM
3

What are you even talking about? There was no rape here. She took the condom off and ASKED him to nut inside her, and he agreed. If he was a smart man who *actually* didn't want to father any kids he would have simply said "no", but he didn't. That right there was consent. Similarly, if a woman didn't want to get pregnant, but she still willingly allowed a man to remove a condom and creampie her which resulted in her getting pregnant, that right there would not be rape. If you know the other per…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 01:07 PM
2

The real reason is because women see men as humans first and then as males, while men see women as females first and then *maybe* as humans, but not always that either. A lot of men genuinely believe women are NPCs who lack any kind of personal interests, and only exist to be someone's girlfriend/wife. That's why the notion of just being friends with a woman is so foreign to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 12:17 PM
17

So you believe women want men to handle all the "masculine" tasks like changing tires, but you don't seem to think men want women to handle the "feminine" tasks like cleaning and laundry. Why's that? Or is doing housework already included in the "don't be a feminist SJW"-part?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 02:44 PM
1

Of course women trash talking men online doesn't affect men in any meaningful way - that's literally the point. Also, you're kinda contradicting yourself here. At first you stated how "helpless potential victims don’t have the privilege of taunting their “oppressors”", and now suddenly all women who taunt men are entirely helpless and at the mercy of any man? Which one is it? As for your "women being mean towards men online increases male violence towards women"-speech, that's bs and everyone kn…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 10:05 PM
13

If a woman has had a scary encounter irl she goes online and berates men to take some power back to herself. It makes her feel better without putting her at risk. It's a win-win situation for her. Your whole "either you're afraid and behave accordingly, or you aren't"- statement just screams you've never been afraid once in your privileged little male life. Fear easily turns into anger. The women who hate men online are simply expressing that anger, and they're doing it without actually hurting …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 10:59 AM
5

The do exist and are rather well developed, but they're not readily available because of their side-effects that often affect a man's libido in a negative way. The medical industry treats male libido as a holy thing that must never be harmed - they'd rather make women shoulder all the negative side effects of birth control alone. (That's also why there is more research done to prevent and cure erectile dysfunction, compared to stuff like endometriosis..)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 04:51 PM
-1

Men use the "it's just a joke"-excuse to shit on women all the time, especially through misogynistic memes online, but when the situation is flipped suddenly such jokes aren't acceptable anymore. It's all double standards and hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 04:43 PM
-2

So if you're so keen on taking my words at face value all of a sudden, why did you assume my initial reply was "gritted-teeth passive aggressive support"? Where did that come from? All I did was support men decentering relationships. Why did you take that as a negative thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 04:54 PM
6

Using all your energy to complain about the opposite sex is literally the opposite of decentering, I really hope even you can understand that. Besides, men get lighter sentences when they kill their girlfriends/wives compared to women who kill their boyfriends/husbands. Men are so privileged.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 04:51 PM
1

Ah yes... because a woman didn't show her support in a way you, as a man, find acceptable, that must mean she's a sarcastic bitch who's only here to tear men down. How very logical of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 04:44 PM
6

Go for it. *Actually* de-center women from your lives and live for yourselves, and don't fall into the same pitfalls as the men's rights movement or the MGTOW, where all they ever talk about is women and how to demonize women. Good luck!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 03:17 PM
–

And? What is that supposed to prove, exactly? It just shows girls are depressed, which is rather understandable given the current climate of things. Nowhere does that article specify whether those girls are single or in a relationship, nor does it specify the reason why they're feeling depressed and hopeless. All of those depressed girls could have a boyfriend for all we know, while girls without boyfriends are happier. So what part do you 'not buy' based on that chart and article?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 08:50 AM
–

Ah yes. Because single mothers are often depressed and overworked due to having to take care of small humans alone, that means all single women must be unhappy regardless if they have kids or not. Perfect logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 08:42 AM
0

Some women do enjoy attention from stranger men, but to say that about ALL women who go to a bar alone? That's just untrue. Sometimes people go to a bar to have a drink after a shitty day. Those people aren't looking for attention, they just want to be alone and have some alcohol away from home. There's a difference between a woman who *seeks* male attention/approval, and a woman who doesn't care or want male attention/approval but receives it anyways. For some reason men have deluded themselves…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 06:06 AM
–

"See the stats", what stats exactly? The stats that show mothers are more likely to gain custody of children, or the stats that show most fathers do not even show up to the court for custody hearings to begin with, and thus they lose by default? Oh right, they are two sides of the same coin. But if you do have some actual evidence on how men are disproportionately "walked over by the courts", do share. I'd like to take a read.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 05:04 PM
–

Children do not just "get taken away" from men. If a man loses custody it's usually because he himself did not care. Men who do care about being fathers to their children have a statistically higher chance of winning custody compared to mothers. Courts favor fathers.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 02:57 PM
27

A rather interesting choice of words. You're asking a question to women in general, but then you specify you've never seen an *attractive* woman alone at a bar without her female friends. Does that mean you have indeed seen unattractive women alone at a bar but simply chose to ignore them because you're not into them? Either way, the answer to your question is yes. As for a woman's motivations for going to a bar/pub/club alone, that I cannot say because women are individuals. Not everyone is the…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 10:28 AM
36

In an attempt to "avoid unnecessary repeated arguments" you're literally repeating an unnecessary argument that's posted about 10 times a week on this subreddit alone. I know mansplaining is in your nature as a male, but when will you men realize women aren't asking for your opinion about our preferences?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 08:00 AM
1

If you want as much sex as possible: men If you want someone with actual interests and personality: women
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 05:21 PM
-3

Yes, absolutely! Do not approach women. Leave women alone. If she likes you she will make it very obvious! Good job with this "revelation", spread the word amongst other males so maybe they can learn a thing or two. Be apathetic and ignore women!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 05:15 PM
0

Do men actually think that spamming women with "LOWER YOUR STANDARDS, YOU'RE TOO PICKY, YOU THINK TOO HIGHLY OF YOURSELF" will actually make women want to date them? Though you did bring up one rather interesting aspect about common heterosexual relationships: the way men always try to find ways to leave their families, and to blame everything on women when she dares to imply she's not cool with it. There's a very good reason why women are sometimes apprehensive when men say they're gonna leave …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 02:41 PM
–

How many of those vegan women you know around the campus are your friends? Do you talk to them often? Hang out with them? I could observe a quiet guy sitting alone on a table, and make the quick assumption that "man, he must be so lonely and miserable, i feel so bad for him! he has no friends!" .. and once he goes home he opens his computer and logs in to have dozens of friends to talk and game with. What makes you think those obnoxious vegan women can't be the same way?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 12:57 PM
1

A paternity test is more often than not a sign of mistrust towards the woman, so it's no wonder women tend to react negatively to it, especially if it comes from a long time partner. As for your question: Men should not have an obligation to act father towards children who aren't their own, or support those children monetarily. But I feel like this is a pretty big non-issue compared to the men who simply refuse to support their own offspring despite a court proving that kid is his.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 12:47 PM
–

A quick question: How many vegan women do you know, and how many of those women are obnoxious and lonely? Because you're talking a whole lot like you understand what every vegan woman's life is like, even though you know nothing. I have a vegan friend who likes being loud, obnoxious and annoying online and towards strangers. Her fiancé, family and friends all love her. Also, why do you act like vegetarianism and veganism are a woman-only thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 12:32 PM
2

This post is a fun look at the thought process of an incel. Though I am a little disappointed you didn't mention a man's dick size in the list of requirements all women have for men. Maybe that slipped your mind, because of course no woman would be satisfied with a man who's penis is less than 15 inches, even if he has 5k instagram followers and blue eyes.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 01:23 PM
–

It's very ironic that you think women are the "parasitic" ones in the relationship, when that has always been men. Men are the parasites. The only thing they can truly bring to a relationship is money, otherwise they're absolutely useless. It's easier to be a single mother than a married woman with a penniless husband. The reason women initiate divorces so much more is because men benefit from being with women, women lose when they're with men. So women want away from men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 07:23 AM
1

"I am going to stop responding at this point" is always the best way to show maturity when interacting with another adult. But if that's how you want to roll then I will not counter your arguments even if I could. I'll save us both the time, we will never see eye to eye. Take care.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 10:14 PM
1

You almost get it and yet you're so far away. Just goes to show age and "experience" don't correlate with intelligence, old males can be dumb as hell. Women have always done basically all of household works from cleaning to cooking to taking care of kids. Back in the day women were not even allowed to work jobs even if they wanted to, the only job they could do was being a housewife. Nowadays women have a choice, they can work and bring in money too, and many choose to work. And yet males still …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 08:35 PM
1

Everyone needs money to survive, at least in the West. A woman can spend 20 years raising five healthy, happy kids to a man and the man decides to cheat on her because she is now older and less attractive. The man was able to spend 20 years working and making money BECAUSE he had a wife taking care of everything at home. Having a wife and children raised his social status and made him more appealing to employers. The wife spent 20 years taking care of kids and the house but she has nothing to sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 07:06 PM
1

Just looking at early marriage laws it's pretty clear who had a say in it and who didn't. It was all about controlling women and binding her to one man, preventing her from doing anything other than being a babymaking machine while ensuring that man (even if he is of lower class) can have his own biological offspring. That's why women having affairs was viewed as way worse than men having mistresses. Marriage was invented as a tool of control.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 06:42 PM
0

Google Michfest and you'll see how males ruined a feminist women's event.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 10:22 AM
15

Marriage was created by men for men. It only benefits men by forcing women into the position of unpaid housekeepers, maids, nannies, babymakers etc. The reason divorce rates are high because women wake up and realize they don't NEED to be unpaid slaves to males.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 10:13 AM
1

Red flag subreddits are every incel, male, porn or fetish subreddits. FDS was funny as hell, it's a shame they migrated.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 06:47 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter