TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SokalDidNothingWrong Archive

View 36 posts and 203 comments by SokalDidNothingWrong on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1427

HealthSokalDidNothingWrong/r/MensRights23/02/21 08:56 AM
1164

Social IssuesSokalDidNothingWrong/r/MensRights14/04/21 12:55 AM
336

Marriage/ChildrenSokalDidNothingWrong/r/MensRights09/09/21 10:49 AM
242

ProgressSokalDidNothingWrong/r/MensRights25/03/21 09:24 AM
177

FeminismSokalDidNothingWrong/r/MensRights06/09/21 02:56 AM
155

Social IssuesSokalDidNothingWrong/r/MensRights21/06/21 09:46 AM
149

Social IssuesSokalDidNothingWrong/r/MensRights24/06/21 10:47 AM
138

Social IssuesSokalDidNothingWrong/r/MensRights21/07/21 09:38 PM
97

FeminismSokalDidNothingWrong/r/MensRights05/01/21 12:12 AM
54

Social IssuesSokalDidNothingWrong/r/MensRights20/06/21 08:55 PM
47

Social IssuesSokalDidNothingWrong/r/MensRights29/09/21 07:35 AM
34

Social IssuesSokalDidNothingWrong/r/MensRights29/08/21 08:45 PM
29

Social IssuesSokalDidNothingWrong/r/MensRights09/05/21 09:28 AM
28

FeminismSokalDidNothingWrong/r/MensRights29/03/21 07:54 AM
25

FeminismSokalDidNothingWrong/r/MensRights17/03/21 11:10 AM
21

Social IssuesSokalDidNothingWrong/r/MensRights07/03/21 06:16 AM
19

Anti-MRMSokalDidNothingWrong/r/MensRights24/12/20 02:21 AM
19

HealthSokalDidNothingWrong/r/MensRights02/07/21 10:31 AM
17

Social IssuesSokalDidNothingWrong/r/MensRights07/09/21 03:06 PM
15

HumourSokalDidNothingWrong/r/MensRights24/01/21 08:02 AM
11

Social IssuesSokalDidNothingWrong/r/MensRights16/01/21 12:10 AM
10

Social IssuesSokalDidNothingWrong/r/MensRights30/08/21 11:24 PM
9

Social IssuesSokalDidNothingWrong/r/MensRights06/07/21 06:25 AM
8

Social IssuesSokalDidNothingWrong/r/MensRights20/01/21 10:25 PM
7

Social IssuesSokalDidNothingWrong/r/MensRights10/09/20 05:46 AM
7

Social IssuesSokalDidNothingWrong/r/MensRights21/12/20 03:19 AM
6

Social IssuesSokalDidNothingWrong/r/MensRights06/03/21 09:15 AM
6

FeminismSokalDidNothingWrong/r/MensRights23/03/21 08:29 PM
5

FeminismSokalDidNothingWrong/r/MensRights22/12/20 12:32 AM
5

Social IssuesSokalDidNothingWrong/r/MensRights20/01/21 12:35 AM
5

Social IssuesSokalDidNothingWrong/r/MensRights28/09/21 03:34 AM
4

FeminismSokalDidNothingWrong/r/MensRights08/01/21 07:49 AM
3

Social IssuesSokalDidNothingWrong/r/MensRights24/01/21 02:02 AM
2

SokalDidNothingWrong/r/MensRights17/10/20 06:17 AM
1

FeminismSokalDidNothingWrong/r/MensRights03/02/21 03:28 AM
0

SokalDidNothingWrong/r/MensRights31/08/20 09:23 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Testosterone isn't taken orally. There's similar steroids that can be taken like dbol (the blue pills that Arnie took) but it's not quite the same (e.g. natural testosterone changes into estrogen which men also need). Orals are also usually a bad idea for long-term use because they tend to need to go through your liver or kidneys before they are active in your blood, which will damage those organs if you take large amounts. There's new formulas that seem safer but they're very new - https://www.…
/r/MensRights29/10/21 06:22 PM
29

I can’t take your statement seriously if your being aggressive and just throwing numbers at me Yet you are being aggressive and just throwing numbers at people.
/r/MensRights13/10/21 09:11 PM
5

You occasionally hear "When You’re Accustomed to Privilege, Equality Feels Like Oppression". Quote investigator looked it up. Apparently this was first referring to women, in this 1997 on a Usenet discussion, as an explanation for feminism then it spread to atheists (like the "Women are Human?" blog) - https://quoteinvestigator.com/2016/10/24/privilege/#note-14655-1 Original Usenet post - https://groups.google.com/g/bc.general/c/c8aGhd93M5A/m/QqAGONH4J-UJ?pli=1
/r/MensRights06/10/21 02:43 AM
0

If you ever had a look at the old incel subs, that's how they thought about women. So I guess you could say that incels treat women the way the mainstream media treats men.
/r/MensRights02/10/21 08:31 PM
13

She was lazy, thought working is easier than housework (it's not) and her husband showed her up by doing the housework. She was also probably unhappy about having to work, she probably thought it would just be chilling in a break room 90% of the time, like on the soap operas.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 09:30 PM
6

The problem with "toxic masculinity" is it's a tautology but no-one agrees on the meaning. There's academics who argue that it has a specific meaning. But they'll disagree on the specific meanings. I think it's part of a larger problem in academia - if you can't contribute hard facts, you need to write bullshit. You can either write stuff that is specific but probably wrong (and it won't get published because one of the reviewers will pick up that you've made a statement that can't be proven, an…
/r/MensRights30/09/21 06:26 AM
3

True. But White Ribbon only exists because it's message supposedly stops men doing bad things. Yet some of the very people delivering the message seem to be doing bad things. It seems like its message must not be very useful. You could say the same about a church that's claiming its message makes people more moral, while a number of its priests do bad thing, couldn't you?
/r/MensRights29/09/21 01:15 PM
6

They never said it's for women I never said they said it's for women. I said even their defenders said it's by women, for women: https://mumbrella.com.au/abc-lifes-rebrand-is-a-loss-it-published-pieces-that-would-never-find-homes-with-its-commercial-critics-632395 It’s predictable and boring to scoff at stories written for young people on sex, food, travel, money, work and relationships. And why is lifestyle content – often written by women for women, like the above-mentioned story about the gen…
/r/MensRights29/09/21 01:03 PM
7

Anyway (double reply) im just saying a women's section doesn't hurt anyone It is taxpayer dollars, though it's pretty cheap (between $2m and 3m I think). I'm not annoyed it exists. I'm annoyed that a public broadcaster is creating a service for women, but not men. They really should have stuff from a male perspective, for men (even defenders of ABC Life / Everyday said it was by women, for women). I think it's pretty telling that the ABC didn't think of that. Especially if they are at risk of ha…
/r/MensRights29/09/21 12:47 PM
5

If I seem mad to you, you might be prone to overreacting And yet you don't deny being mad ;)
/r/MensRights29/09/21 12:39 PM
5

There are probably more important things to be mad at than a few articles that you feel are more geared towards women. And you seem "mad" at someone who typed a few words into a form on a website.
/r/MensRights29/09/21 12:20 PM
13

And if more women are reading, a women's section will generate more ad revenue. This was likely a decision to make more money. It's taxpayer funded. There's no ads. It's entirely funded by taxes.
/r/MensRights29/09/21 12:14 PM
13

Count the women vs men in photos. Just look over the interest sections: Food Money Travel Family Work Wellbeing Sex & Relationships Entertainment Home & Garden Yes, some are unisex. But most of it is written from mostly a female perspective. And there's certainly no male interests (auto, fitness, video games, whatever). And it's weirdly gendered. It's all pink and purple, and very "women's magazine". The ABC is kind of feminist, but they seem to have no problem with this. I guess they had the re…
/r/MensRights29/09/21 07:56 AM
3

What's your point? All other things being equal, larger stronger people cause more serious violent crime. If you asked me to qualify it, you'd be right. But you're arguing in bad faith because you're saying the evidence refutes my main point, despite your evidence merely backing it up (with a qualification).
/r/MensRights28/09/21 10:06 PM
6

Lux seems to be a bad-faith troll - https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/px55gy/uk_police_should_tell_men_to_stay_indoors_when_a/henawn5/?context=3 edit: Maaaybe not, but they are contrarian and don't explain themselves very well.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 09:56 PM
4

No you didn't. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24453240/ Conclusions: Although shorter stature was associated with increased risk of violent offending, our analyses strongly suggested that this relationship was explained by intelligence and other confounding factors. Hence, it is unlikely that height, a highly heritable physical characteristic, accounts for much of the unexplained heritability of violent criminality. If you literally crop out that "although" in a sentence, you're not arguing in …
/r/MensRights28/09/21 09:54 PM
3

Can't get the source, but I'd guess it's hard to disentangle things like childhood nutrition (well-off people tend to be taller). Wait, I found the article: However, when simultaneously controlling for all measured confounders, height was weakly and positively related to violent crime. So the study you linked really shows the opposite to what you said.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 09:42 PM
5

Obviously larger, stronger people cause more serious violent crimes, for the same reason why good-natured Labradors cause more serious attacks than vicious little corgis. We need to also investigate why men don't commit more crime. Maybe gender roles actually reduce domestic violence.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 08:58 PM
6

Bravery in a male was shown to be the stronger factor influencing female choice of short-term partners, long-term partners, and male friends, with altruism playing a lesser part in their choice. Altruism was deemed important in long-term relationships and friendships, but for short-term liaisons, non-altruists were preferred to altruists. Sounds like "toxic masculinity" (low altruism and risk taking behaviour) is what women want in short-term relationships? And since most relationships (other th…
/r/MensRights28/09/21 03:37 AM
2

Seems a bit like mental illness. She assumes the men are dangerous, then validates it based on her sense of relief once she escaped "danger". Classic anxiety disorder?
/r/MensRights27/09/21 10:11 PM
1

Because they're reductionist ideologues. Fun wiki link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideology#Unifying_agents_(Hoffer) Unifying agents (Hoffer) The American philosopher Eric Hoffer identified several elements that unify followers of a particular ideology:[23] Hatred: "Mass movements can rise and spread without a God, but never without belief in a devil."[23] The "ideal devil" is a foreigner.[23]: 93 Imitation: "The less satisfaction we derive from being ourselves, the greater is our desire to b…
/r/MensRights26/09/21 09:07 PM
2

Her comments come as public sector workers appear to be resisting a return to the office, with more than 100 government buildings earmarked to be sold as a result of the shift in working patterns. Let them wfh until after the buildings are sold. Then see how many you really need to keep.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 09:35 PM
2

The virus was caused by eating meat, international travel, dense living conditions in a built environment, capitalism, and trade, and ALL of those are associated with patriarchy.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 08:53 PM
2

Feminists are very good at reductionist explanations. They are "hedgehogs" - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mwdoFA1dig Look at any other extremist group, they can always explain how "achually, it's all because of the thing I think is bad". Libertarians can explain how everything is due to government interference. Communists can explain how everything is due to capitalism. Religious nuts can explain how everything is due to not enough religion. Atheist nuts can explain how everything bad is bec…
/r/MensRights21/09/21 04:40 AM
3

Meanwhile I've never seen a woman be told she has to 'work on herself' to get what she wants. Women, despite in many ways being spoiled by society, have worse mental health than men (except in extreme cases). 99% of the time, being told to work on yourself is the tough love you need. Being told to blame other people or expect someone else to fix everything is well-meant but often quite damaging. Imagine two identical twins, separated at birth. One gets a hardline family that tells them to take p…
/r/MensRights19/09/21 11:47 PM
4

a well-meaning, and probably unconscious, attempt to redress a perceived disadvantage to girls I can name plenty of hate groups who would say they're attempting to redress perceived disadvantage. They're not seen as "well meaning".
/r/MensRights14/09/21 09:21 PM
2

It's also worth looking at the severity of the assault. A good test on severity (since reddit is hysterical and acts like slapping a bum is basically forcible rape) is how much force would be justified in defending yourself. I'm using a female perp and male victim as examples, but it should be basically the same in most cases. Also, while you should use a minimum of force and try to retreat, I'm talking about the maximum force that should be permitted (assuming there was no other way out). A wom…
/r/MensRights13/09/21 07:53 AM
3

Sort of. It's a Murdoch rag exaggerating things to make the news look spicier. I'm pretty sure they're trying to make them look silly. But there's more than a grain of truth behind it. The current Australian group-think is that domestic violence is all about the Duluth model and some gender inequality original sin. Here's the left-wing Guardian with an old story (sadly not outdated) that goes into more detail and is more self-critical than rage-baity- https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/feb…
/r/MensRights13/09/21 12:56 AM
1

It was weird. It sounds like someone has brainwashed him into thinking that practically all sex could be rape, and men have to go to enormous lengths to validate that the women is actually OK with it because they're fragile creatures who will suffer enormous trauma if a guy puts his penis in her vagina without first making a contract that would be considered enforceable under consumer law.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 08:32 PM
1

Yes, it's a similar case. But as for Batty, remember how when she first spoke it was all about mental health? And then after meeting all the experts, she is convinced it's the Duluth Model. She starts off hoping to solve problems, and then all the experts (who are presumably pretty good at acting convincing) just convince her "no, blame the ex". And he was easy to hate on.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 08:27 PM
1

Bad, but this assumes it's the movement that self-identified feminists belong to. This feminism is reductionist - it reduces pretty much every problem in the world to a gender struggle with men as oppressors and women as victims. Reductionist theories are sometimes right. A stopped clock is right, once a day. The theory itself isn't completely worthless, but doggedly clinging to one big theory (especially a fairly braindead and reductionist one) is shown to make you literally have worse judgemen…
/r/MensRights10/09/21 10:54 AM
25

Inquest has a lot of details the abc ignores - https://www.courts.act.gov.au/magistrates/decisions/inquest-into-the-deaths-of-anne-wachera-muhoro,-ezvin-munene-mugera,-furaha-murathime-muhoro-and-inquiry-into-a-fire-at-6-peter-coppin-street,-bonner edit: Here's the more relevant bunch of details that might shed some light. Mr Munene and Ms Muhoro separated on a number of occasions but subsequently got back together. Ms Muhoro was strongly opposed to divorce due to her strong Christian beliefs. T…
/r/MensRights09/09/21 10:49 AM
1

The vast vast majority of straight men have very similar views on abortion to their partners. In fact, it's often the women who drive the view (the vast majority of men chalk it up as a women's issue, and listen to their partner's opinion). For pro-choice advocates to change the public view on abortion, they need to convince conservative women to change their minds, not hassle their own boyfriends or husbands.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 11:02 PM
1

Milquetoast conservative (a little too right for my taste, but he'd be a RINO or Blue Dog Democrat if he was a US Republican) who is just very strident in his opposition to what he considers bullshit. Apparently people think that makes him a Nazi. Note, I don't think he's ever actually said that trans women aren't women, or that he won't use their pronouns. Maybe he has, I dunno, but I haven't heard any of his opponents say that. He's mostly just said he doesn't think it should be outright illeg…
/r/MensRights08/09/21 09:22 PM
4

They try to be fair and look at both sides of things.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 09:20 PM
1

A lot of hardcore MRAs are also tools, but most of us aren't blaming that on le matriarchy. I guess some MGTOWs and incels are a bit more "all my problems are due to feminism / women" types, but they are pretty extreme. And if you went on a MGTOW sub and suggested otherwise, you probably would get a discussion rather than a ban (you can no longer test that though because they're banned from reddit).
/r/MensRights08/09/21 09:14 PM
3

Most bias training is so shit it actually backfires and makes people more racist / sexist. HBR had an article on this (I think it's linked in the article I posted).
/r/MensRights07/09/21 09:19 PM
4

"Linked to" = they're often poor and antisocial because they got fucked over for about 200 years, so they're in relationships with people who are also poor and antisocial. (Note, Aboriginal Australians are a hugely diverse group in terms of conditions, lots of middle class, some live in conditions that are rarely seen outside a war zone).
/r/MensRights06/09/21 11:05 AM
18

Source - the old plan: https://www.dss.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/08_2014/national_plan1.pdf Highlights: This strategy focuses on encouraging people throughout Australia – from individuals and families, to community, health and education organisations, to businesses and governments – to embrace their responsibility as a community member and take a role in preventing and reducing violence against women. The strategy includes supporting men to take a leading role in discouraging violent …
/r/MensRights06/09/21 02:58 AM
29

Feminist use "men" and "patriarchy" interchangeably, it's the classic motte and bailey used by hate groups - blaming a group on a bunch of things you disagree with. Double points if you don't actually agree on a lot of specifics, as long as you can hate on an abstract enemy (and blame it on the scapegoat group).
/r/MensRights04/09/21 01:30 AM
2

It's from feminist theory "patriarchy hurts men and women". It's typical radical thinking. There's one big problem responsible for all the world's problem, and that get very good at explaining why everything is related to their personal favourite scapegoat. If they fall off a bike, it's patriarchy's fault (society brainwashes women out of riding bikes properly?). A lot of feminists also blame capitalism, so they've got two scapegoats, but they often think that either capitalism is a part of patr…
/r/MensRights03/09/21 09:49 PM
2

I'd break it into 2 main groups - gender empathy gap, and gender issues where the male side is ignored (often because of the gender empathy gap). The gender empathy gap - men in general are seen as unlikely to be victims, and likely to be perpetrators. Then there's gender issues: Prison sentences (as well as policing). Name two women killed by the police (note - if they shot her by accident while trying to shoot her boyfriend this doesn't count). Children after a split. There's not much real evi…
/r/MensRights01/09/21 01:48 AM
0

Some of the more hysterical MGTOW or incel types (even a few here) are like that as well. But it's a tiny fringe, not something you see being mainstream.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 09:40 PM
6

You point to the door, and say "You're trying to make some kind of power play. That's not cool. I respect your opinion, but you can head that way if you don't want to respect mine."
/r/MensRights29/08/21 08:17 PM
1

And even if it isnot used in self-defense, the impact of that violence is much different on theman as he is usually larger than her and knows he can stop her if he needs to. So what's he advocating men do in this situation? I'm not too worried, I'm a big guy, I kind of know how to handle myself and can stop a much smaller opponent without causing serious harm, but how about someone who's less capable than me?
/r/MensRights28/08/21 07:54 AM
2

If I don't see male victim stats, I know the work is trash. It's almost guaranteed that they set the bar as low as possible (cat calling is harassment, drunk sex is always rape, etc) to get a scary sounding figure. They don't want to include male victims because they are obsessed with proving that women are victims (so they want to exclude actual male victims) and they want to lower the bar (so they don't want to show that their most impressive seeming stats are irrelevant).
/r/MensRights25/08/21 09:09 PM
1

Psychology is a mixed bag, but from what I can tell (background - science but not psychology) it's mostly OK. Economics, some of it is very very silly. Not all economists, but there was a big physics envy, and they have these towering theoretical proofs that only make sense with the dodgiest of assumptions, it's like trying to use a statistical mechanics approach to explain the digestive system.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 09:29 PM
2

People get mad at being unfairly accused. When they say "if it bothers you then you're probably the problematic people we're talking about" that's flat wrong, innocent people are more likely to be annoyed at an accusation than guilty people.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 03:19 AM
15

I read somewhere (Quora I think) that a lot of cops will say they can always spot an innocent suspect because they get mad and flustered when accused. Sometimes they hold it in, but they still usually look extremely upset / angry. This is not always true, but it's the standard reaction. Here's an example of an innocent man (who ended up getting a $46,000 settlement) who was jailed because he WASN'T acting angry at being accused, and the cop assumed that he must therefore be guilty (since people …
/r/MensRights23/08/21 09:52 PM
2

Thinking you're legally entitled to be repaid by a favour is a bit weird. Also, how often have you seen a "favour" used to justify something that's not actually really a favour? "I'm doing my parents a favour by not getting a job and staying home, that way they have free security and lots of company!" So in your mind, couples never make decisions together? It is always one person’s choice or the other’s, never both? If that’s the case then I feel sorry for you and for any partner you may have. I…
/r/MensRights16/08/21 09:16 PM
13

OK, say an adult child doesn't get a job, stays about home, and does some cooking and cleaning to help their parents out, maybe also doing some babysitting if they have siblings. If they then move out do they deserve to get paid just because they helped their parents instead of working? Unless the husband has forced the woman to stay at home, it's her choice.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 09:41 AM
5

IIRC it's more level of intent rather than intent. Any suicide attempt should be treated as serious (most are), but some are more serious attempts than others.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 10:08 PM
1

Worth noting that the feminist definition of "fragile masculinity" is "men who are anxious they don't live up to male norms. It's kind of like saying that women have "fragile femininity" if they're anxious over their looks, or not having kids, or maybe being bad parents or being bad at cooking. I think that would be a pretty shit thing to say. Maybe we could have "fragile feminism" though - a feminist who did gender studies instead of STEM, is submissive with her boyfriend (who she met when he h…
/r/MensRights15/08/21 05:37 AM
1

About 100 years of research consistently finds that teachers have problems with boys. There's studies with blind grading vs grading with names, it tends to show boys are unfairly penalised if the teacher sees their name. Partly this is that boys tend to misbehave in annoying energetic ways in class.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 03:23 AM
3

I feel like a lot of the 'overrepresentation' of boys in STEM is because assessment is more objective, so the teacher can't be as biased. Why would you pick history, if a teacher can fail an essay on subjective grounds, and you suspect some of the teachers hate boys.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 03:22 AM
1

IIRC it's actually mixed. For less serious cases, men are healthier, partly because they're encouraged to solve their own problems. For more serious cases, men are worse off, partly because they're encouraged to solve their own problems.
/r/MensRights10/08/21 08:15 PM
3

Note, that saying is by some neo-nazi type guy. I think it's worth noting that it's popularly quoted, because it kind of rings true. I think it's also worth noting why it doesn't really apply to anti-Semitism. People don't get nearly as mad over anti-Semitism when it's by people who clearly can't be accused of being Nazis (the far left, people who aren't white). The reason anti-Semitism is taboo isn't really because the Jews are supposedly a super-privileged class, it's because people just hate …
/r/MensRights05/08/21 09:26 PM
7

I wonder if Brock Turner had a drinking problem?
/r/MensRights03/08/21 09:30 PM
9

Unless the judge decides to give her a second final warning.
/r/MensRights03/08/21 09:29 PM
5

IIRC one of the ones that loans out small apartments mentioned that they accept men in response to a social media comment, but I don't think the media wants to make a big deal of this.
/r/MensRights23/07/21 10:47 PM
5

Mainstream feminism today is very close to radfem. But FDS are mostly TERFs who are like the radfems who even other radfems think are a bit too extreme in their hate of men.
/r/MensRights18/07/21 02:08 AM
3

FDS is a trans-exclusionary radical feminism sub. They're women who hate men so much that they'd rather lose all their other feminist friends than pretend to not hate a tiny fraction of the people with Y chromosomes.
/r/MensRights18/07/21 02:07 AM
29

Fine, but people should keep it to themselves, especially when it comes to things that people can't control. If I have a friend who mentions he likes redheads, I'm not going to say that only a desperate loser would date one of those, even if I'm not a big fan of them myself.
/r/MensRights17/07/21 06:45 AM
2

It's a simple, parsimonious theory that can explain virtually everything. It's a "Hedgehog" theory (see the 1 hour video here if you have time - https://longnow.org/seminars/02007/jan/26/why-foxes-are-better-forecasters-than-hedgehogs/) Here's a few important points: Hedgehogs (radicals) are the most willing to make predictions. Hedgehogs are the most confident in their predictions. Hedgehogs make the worst predictions (especially in their area of expertise). The media and audiences tend to like…
/r/MensRights11/07/21 03:44 AM
3

I'm pretty sure this is not going to include any potential jury nullification, police not bothering to charge, etc.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 09:47 AM
2

When sociobiology is wrong, it can be shown to be wrong. Science is self-correcting eventually.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 02:48 AM
1

The problem with blankslatism is that it creates a utopian fantasy that if we just stop toxic masculinity then every problem will magically go away, so you can claim that things that effect women are super-double-plus-ungood because they're not just a problem to be reduced, they're the very root cause of all evil. Blank slatism is an excuse to take the existing women are wonderful bias to an extreme. With blank slatism, you no longer have to argue that women are higher on the priority list for s…
/r/MensRights06/07/21 01:31 PM
5

Looking at the data, about 50% of the victims report being physically attacked. It's always fun to mention this on reddit. Some male feminist will always point out that men can physically win a fight with a woman if they really have to; then it's fun to point out that they're advocating beating women (and maybe throw in a "reset the clock" joke).
/r/MensRights06/07/21 01:20 PM
1

She’s also grabbed my balls and squeezed them as hard as she can and wouldn’t let go I had to push her off me in front of 3 witnesses (one of them is a police officer). I have not pressed charges because I don’t want my kids to lose their mother. In Canada, I doubt they would lose their mother. A light bit of battery with a male victim would most likely result in at most a judge wagging a finger.
/r/MensRights05/07/21 06:52 AM
0

I think they're mad at the word "needs". Men don't need sex, but they don't need the girl either. What's really funny is if you suggest "hey, maybe the guy should just dump her if he's not happy with her" and they suddenly backtrack, like you've suggested abandoning a dog if it's not a cute puppy anymore.
/r/MensRights05/07/21 06:49 AM
0

Most of the time, it's this: "I want to do some big thing, my husband is helping but not helping the way I want, and if I get mad he doesn't respond the way I want and just half-asses it!"
/r/MensRights05/07/21 06:45 AM
1

"My co-worker doesn't help me enough on our joint project! I have a plan, but I haven't properly explained it, and I get mad when they do the wrong thing, but for some reason I have to tell them everything to do! It's so stressful being a control freak with no people skills!"
/r/MensRights03/07/21 11:06 PM
5

Calling people insane over an internet discussion is not always a sign of sanity and good faith.
/r/MensRights02/07/21 10:23 PM
2

The KKK maybe got stuff done, does that make them better than BLM?
/r/MensRights25/06/21 09:07 AM
4

Men who commit violent crimes are FAR more likely to target men than women. Women who commit violent crimes are more likely to target men than women. It's quite correct to say that male violence (against men mostly, but also against women) is a huge issue, but that the feminist analysis is extremely narrow and reductionist, and anyone capable of understanding multiple factors would be very leery of giving it too much weight.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 03:07 AM
23

Hindsight is 20/20. People do dumb shit when they don't have time to think. Not having a good response is an issue. No-one is offering exactly what to say either. I'd suggest jokingly saying "Is she abusing you? Does she do this often? Does she get angry about you wasting money on dumb things"? (Trust me, every couple fights over what's a dumb thing to waste money on, so they can keep up the joke if it's no big deal but it's also maybe a valid point).
/r/MensRights03/06/21 09:19 PM
1

So you're claiming that husbands control the majority of shared finances?
/r/MensRights14/05/21 08:58 PM
1

The cost of living is $1. So the husband will pay the wife $1 and the two kids $2 and $1 for his own cost of living. He will then keep the remaining $1 as profit for himself. This is a raw deal for the woman. If she had convinced the husband to stay home and take care of the kids, she could have had the benefit of kids and kept the $1 profit for herself. You're aware that couples share finances right?
/r/MensRights14/05/21 01:37 PM
13

OK, so let's get back to what you're angrily trying to defend, and why people think you're full of shit: The article that contains the statistic you're referring to makes it a point to note that men & women generally use violence for different purposes. It says that men tend to use violence to control and dominate, whereas women tend to use it as a last resort method of self-defense. This is your claim. You seem to be claiming Murray's article concurs on this point. Am I correct? Here's a line f…
/r/MensRights14/05/21 10:30 AM
17

However, he disagrees with most of your other claims Which ones, on what basis? Do you know what I'm claiming or just making angry assumptions? I'm mostly just dismissive, not angry. I generally assume that people trying to run in and say "All MRAs are wrong" are usually extremely ignorant. My assumption was that you were implying that there's some "power + control" or "instrumentality" thing that makes male violence super-different, but can only be determined by mind reading. It's a fairly comm…
/r/MensRights14/05/21 09:28 AM
18

generally science isn't about good or bad, but simply "why?" How much would you be willing to bet that the stuff you reference is science, as you just described it? I strongly suspect that it's done by advocate researchers who are VERY interested in what's good or bad (and even might bend the truth a bit if they deem it's for a good purpose).
/r/MensRights14/05/21 08:56 AM
44

OK, so if you just get mad and murder your girlfriend that's not a bad thing, because it wasn't real domestic violence, since it wasn't about power and control?
/r/MensRights14/05/21 07:42 AM
3

Internalised misandry?
/r/MensRights13/05/21 09:09 PM
8

FDS are all bitter manhating TERFs mostly larping as desirable women who want a good man. TERFs can be every stereotype of manhating feminists. I wouldn't be surprised if some have all female cats which they refuse to desex because that's putting an unfair burden on females. I wouldn't be shocked if a few even had any male kittens destroyed. Most TERFs really do hate men. Like, imagine you're a hardcore radical feminist. Your entire social circle is feminists. Hating on transwomen is basically g…
/r/MensRights09/05/21 08:25 AM
1

Didn't read. Sorry. Whisky. Costco Irish. Anyway, the other maximum of radfem is that men and women are equal (literally, not in terms of rights) and that any difference is due to le patriarchy. Men hurt women more in extreme domestic violence cases? It's not because they're stronger, it's because of patriarchy. Men are more likely to forcibly rape women? Le patriarchy, men aren't just naturally hornier and stronger than women (and culture today certainly doesn't attempt to redress this). Men ar…
/r/MensRights06/05/21 11:33 AM
44

It's easier if you look at why they think there's a rape culture. Rape against women is a problem, far more so than rape against men (if we're talking victims and perps both being adults). The feminist lens is that all gender imbalances are primarily due to the oppression of women, in this case it's "rape culture". The sane lens is that men are more likely to sexually assault women than vice versa mostly because men are far stronger (90+% of the time). If a man is really uncomfortable, he can le…
/r/MensRights06/05/21 10:29 AM
5

In Australia, I think it would be illegal to say anything rude about a judge. It's also exceedingly rare for judges to be sacked. I can only count 3 cases since Federation (1900 - when Australia became a country) where a judge has successfully been removed (one case being the father of the judge the article mentions) - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Australian_judges_whose_security_of_tenure_was_challenged
/r/MensRights05/05/21 09:41 PM
11

Misleading title, there was a whole laundry list of accusations (but not a lot of evidence).
/r/MensRights05/05/21 10:59 AM
3

Girls talking about the guy on the left: "I like that look, he's toned but not too bulky, like, I bet he watches his weight and does a bit of cardio". Reality - power lifting, isolation exercises, maybe something like primobolan and testosterone to compensate for the fact that the primobolan shut down natural production plus maybe a bit more extra t for to get more water in the muscles for a fuller look. No prizes for anyone who can guess the last fitness Youtube channel in my history ;) To be f…
/r/MensRights03/05/21 09:51 AM
3

OK, but on the flip side, if a guy isn't happy with his wife not putting out, he's fine if he goes to a prostitute or cheats right? (I find some people get really mad if you bring this up).
/r/MensRights02/05/21 10:55 AM
3

I think in UK terms, middle class means "not nobility" so Jeff Bezos is middle class and Lord Fulford despite being pretty much bankrupt is upper class.
/r/MensRights20/04/21 08:08 PM
1

How about calling misandrists "Feminist-adjacent"?
/r/MensRights02/04/21 09:26 PM
1

Most people don't like criticism, and in a lot of situations will defend / deflect. Give most people an excuse and they'll turn into a whinger with a victim complex.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 08:14 AM
1

All or nothing thinking is not healthy.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 11:09 AM
1

This relationship would be hard to really disentangle from a whole host of other variables, and figuring out causation would be even harder.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 11:01 AM
1

We need at entire change of culture. So how much more successful do you think feminism would be at engineering this than, say, the Catholic Church?
/r/MensRights12/03/21 09:52 AM
1

What's more likely to work: Teaching bad people not to do bad things. Teaching people to avoid bad people.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 09:32 AM
1

It's not me who feminists are criticising, it's also the IRL proponents of the programs that actually work.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 02:22 AM
1

I think you’re misunderstanding victim blaming - teaching women self defence isn’t bad, I think most would take up classes if offered. Do all feminists agree with you? https://theconversation.com/rape-at-universities-one-program-is-proven-to-reduce-it-82636 Some feminists have expressed the view that all interventions for women are implicitly or explicitly holding women responsible for men’s behaviour.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 01:52 AM
1

I don't think training women to become hand-to-hand combatants is a realistic strategy here Self defense is largely not hand-to-hand combat. A lot of it is just enforcing boundaries (verbally, with a shove, with reasonable escalation to a reasonable level of force, etc), basic situational awareness, and how to avoid dangerous situations (based on evidence not just feelings and myths). At least, that's my understanding of the programs that in double blind tests got really good results (but no fem…
/r/MensRights12/03/21 01:23 AM
2

I've never met a woman insist they know how to avoid rape? You hear it quite often online. use car keys to protect themselves OK, and that's widely considered to be useless. Women DO NOT (usually) know how to defend themselves. They (usually) have a bunch of superstitions and bad advice. Most of it is geared towards defending themselves from some random street attack (which almost never happens) and it seems to work because random street attacks just don't happen very often. Car keys for self de…
/r/MensRights11/03/21 10:12 PM
1

While there's some value maybe in "teaching men not to rape", it only works on the guys who might accidently commit rape (which seems a bit of a contradiction to me, you can only commit a crime if it's intentional, a little negligence is very rarely a crime unless you're dealing with someone with less than adult competence e.g. baby sitting small children). Teaching women not to get raped seems more likely to work, as they actually have an incentive to put it into action. Indeed, I've seen studi…
/r/MensRights11/03/21 08:24 PM
3

You should also check up the myth that vibrators were invented because psychologists were sick of finger-banging female clients. They were just massagers. They sometimes called them "vibrators" sometimes because they vibrated. They weren't designed or marketed as sex toys (though I guess anything can be a sex toy). Doctors have never widely brought female patients to climax for therapeutic reasons. Like today, a few probably did, but it was not something the general public or medical profession …
/r/MensRights04/03/21 06:49 AM
38

I didn't invent the term "retard". It was a disability advocate that did. But I'm not going to use it because it's offensive and needlessly polarising.
/r/MensRights23/02/21 08:18 AM
1

Doesn't the lack of sensitive and lack lubrication (the foreskin essentially works like a lubricant for about 2 inches of thrust) mean painful, dry jack-hammer action?
/r/MensRights09/02/21 05:44 AM
5

inb4 "allegedly" - yeah I'm just speculating Look at all the people defending Manson. Oh wait, no-one does, because he was pretty obviously a complete train-wreck. Everyone (then and now) knows that Manson was off his rocker. And I don't think it was just a case of him being a little bit of a stoner like Depp. I'd even go to say that dating him was kinda abusive in a sense, given that he was clearly mentally ill (albeit in a way that made him a total assholes). Hanging around fun crazy people be…
/r/MensRights02/02/21 09:06 PM
2

Most outright conservatives are just conservatives. MRAs tend to be relatively centrist or progressive, because hardcore conservatives aren't going to give a shit about the nuances of gender theory in liberal academic circles.
/r/MensRights31/01/21 12:42 AM
0

losing their minds Mind reading isn't healthy.
/r/MensRights30/01/21 11:01 AM
7

The biggest problem with feminism for women is that it's just one way of solving women's issues, but feminists chase out all the other viewpoints that try to solve women's issues. There's self-defense courses (mostly about calling for help, enforcing boundaries, fighting back using reasonable force, being aware of surroundings, etc) that were shown to cut campus rape in half. They're not popular though, because teaching women to avoid rape is bad, because it's not feminist theory. Domestic viole…
/r/MensRights30/01/21 02:10 AM
12

Note - uncalled for positive reinforcement is usually not a good thing. Like criticism, praise is only healthy if it is constructive.
/r/MensRights29/01/21 01:28 AM
13

Ask why it's almost always men who seem to be the one who take the responsibility to buy and carry condoms despite women being effected (arguably more) by pregnancy and STDs. Ask if it's because men can't always trust women to be telling the truth about using the pill correctly.
/r/MensRights29/01/21 12:54 AM
6

You could just say "It's not all men who are dirty just because she blows guys with dick-cheese".
/r/MensRights28/01/21 10:12 PM

I think there's shades of grey. Everyone is maybe not 100% truthful about everything. But contraception not being used is something almost everyone would agree is an obvious deal-breaker.
/r/MensRights26/01/21 06:28 AM

Briefly, but it sounds more careless. She impulsively let him back (being a bit hormonal because of where she was in her cycle?) and just didn't think. I suspect the guy didn't think to ask. I wouldn't quite rate it as bad as stealthing. She took it out thinking there was no relationship. They got back together and she passively lied by omission (lots of women are a bit precious about buying condoms, and the guy thought there was no need). She was probably thinking "yeah, I should tell him" but …
/r/MensRights26/01/21 05:37 AM
4

She previously has a "no sex / nudity" clause in her contract. She's probably just trying to walk it back after being sold to do a movie with a sex scene and it happens to have a female director (who probably reassured her it would be tasteful). Her next movie "Silent Night" has a female director but it's a Christmas movie / comedy so maybe not that movie but the next one?
/r/MensRights26/01/21 05:31 AM

Let's say Brock Turner passed out in the park instead of Jane Doe. And she shoved her hands down his pants, groped a bit, and grinded on him. Or if a guy is not really sure, but he's blind drunk so goes along with it. That's the kind of rape men are more likely to suffer. Is that what the "yes but it's different" people mean - that only forcible rape is real rape?
/r/MensRights26/01/21 04:09 AM

It doesn't even sound like she tried to get pregnant, just messed up and then figured out they better stick together after the fact. Add in all the drama and I'm thinking very little was carefully thought out. Though I bet she'd have been a bit more careful if the father was presumed to have custody and she'd be paying child support if it didn't work. Given women have all the options (and yes, women can buy condoms) surely it should be their responsibility?
/r/MensRights26/01/21 04:00 AM
0

I wonder why more men don't get into social sciences? Surely there's no discrimination against them in those fields, and being driven into STEM because getting the right answer is more important than having the professor / teacher like you?
/r/MensRights25/01/21 09:19 AM
1

Is it a reddit sub?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/21 01:47 AM
3

Does Sargon of Akkad still ever just read this kind of thing out loud while doing belly laughs?
/r/MensRights24/01/21 08:03 AM
3

Or they went to FDS.
/r/MensRights24/01/21 03:21 AM
5

There's also discrimination against men in other fields, especially at school (where the "pipeline problem" mostly exists), partly just because in STEM there's right answers so a teacher can't discriminate as much.
/r/MensRights23/01/21 09:25 PM
29

"Teach men not to rape" is code for "create a feminist utopia where the patriarchy is eliminated, because rape is caused by our patriarchal society". Bullshit. Rape is not really a result of society being messed up. It occurs in pretty much any society unless strict measures are in place to prevent it. Bad people exist (we can argue that this is because our culture is imperfect, but about a billion years of human society has failed to find ways of eliminating this, it's arrogant to think that th…
/r/MensRights22/01/21 01:04 AM
5

Most crimes are committed against people in close proximity.
/r/MensRights21/01/21 08:15 AM
7

5 factors are missing that I can see: Women spend more time with kids. Obviously if someone is a bit crazy, they're more likely to be a danger if they're around more. This doesn't look into biological vs step-parents. Step parents of both main genders seem more likely to abuse or kill, but step-fathers are far more likely to be present (since women are likely to choose or be awarded much greater amounts of physical custody). This tends to result in a lot of men killing kids, since kids are often…
/r/MensRights20/01/21 10:27 PM
1

"And the culture that enables them" We're not mad that feminists want to change culture to make it safer for women. Most of us are just mad because you're absolutely cat-piss crazy and yet universities have enshrined your unhinged conspiracy theories as legitimate studies (while feminists bully every other legitimate researcher out of the field, what sensible sane researcher would touch a topic where the wrong results will have protesters screaming "RAPE APOLOGIST" at them?), which has led to go…
/r/MensRights20/01/21 06:24 AM
1

She just might be retarded. Now I don't want to be ablest, but looking after children with learning disabilities is not for everyone, especially if your partner also has a learning disability. You might want to consider whether you really want to be with her for the long haul.
/r/MensRights20/01/21 01:48 AM
5

LoL, she's obviously lashing out because she's blaming herself for being a bad mother (at least by her own judgement, maybe she's OK but just being neurotic), but wants to transfer the blame. Everyone does this kind of thing - transfer blame away from themselves - but no-one has the guts to say it when it's a mother.
/r/MensRights19/01/21 04:23 AM
2

Yeah, you can get a situation like GamerGate which started because a male feminists said his girlfriend was abusive because they didn't agree on everything so they had conflicts, and because they had conflicts he ended up having to compromise (thus was being controlled aka abused) or leave the relationship (fleeing abuse).
/r/MensRights16/01/21 12:58 AM
1

As I said, there must be an implicit "fair / reasonable" factor in it. I think it's kinda detrimental to tell couples that essentially any disagreement they think is unfair or unreasonable is actual abuse, but then I guess I don't entirely agree with the nutters writing the law in the UK.
/r/MensRights16/01/21 12:40 AM
3

I think the funny thing is, certain feminists might think this is a good idea (both suggesting that men self-sabotage by not bothering with a lot of personal obligations cough bullshit and because of earnings gap reasons).
/r/MensRights16/01/21 12:14 AM
9

Whenever I hear a woman talk about hygiene and circumcision, I just assume she's blown too many guys with dick-cheese and doesn't realise that it's a lack of showers rather than the foreskin that caused it.
/r/MensRights14/01/21 02:13 AM
3

Despite Feibleman’s detailed record of his evening spent with the female student who accused him of rape, including 744 photos, 13 videos and 30 minutes of audio recording that includes their sexual encounter, there remained significant questions in court about what occurred between the two students, said Jake Sapp, a legal researcher for the Stetson University Center for Higher Education Law and Policy, who focuses on Title IX, the law prohibiting sex discrimination at federally funded institut…
/r/MensRights14/01/21 02:09 AM
42

It seems like it was the team (rather than the manager) who had a problem with him, the managers gave him a high score on the interview then for some reason changed their minds after introducing him to the team: After the interview he and the other top ranked applicant - a woman in her 20s - were introduced to other members of the team, including a woman named Rose, the tribunal was told. They were then asked what they thought of him as part of an exercise to see who would be the 'best fit'. As …
/r/MensRights13/01/21 09:19 PM
4

The judge actually handing down a serious sentence should be an indication ...
/r/MensRights13/01/21 02:35 AM
3

Sounds like academia is the equivalent of the kind of forums where incels run wild.
/r/MensRights12/01/21 08:41 PM
1

multipling the number of years lived Generally a 90 year will have fewer than a 25 year old. Age should not necessarily change utility but it should change average life expectancy.
/r/MensRights10/01/21 05:51 AM
1

You are absolutely wrong. QALYs do not measure age in that way. I don't think I said whatever you think I said.
/r/MensRights09/01/21 11:27 PM
2

Because people under 70 are much less likely to die from COVID.
/r/MensRights09/01/21 08:51 PM
8

QALYs is actually important. Giving a sick 90 year old one more year is less important than giving an otherwise healthy 25 year old 70 more years. But don't mention this on a discussion on COVID. People get upset. Actually, DO point this out on a discussion on COVID, but then bring up prostate cancer.
/r/MensRights09/01/21 08:50 PM
10

The UK and Australia have pretty limp-wristed penalties for a range of violent crimes. There was a really prominent rape-murder of a journo. The killer had previously kidnapped a young woman and raped her in his basement, then attempted to kidnap a teenage girl WHILE ON BAIL and got like 13 months (for everything). Then he got let go, did it again, but in prison he did some rehabilitation course where he learnt to overcome his toxic masculinity, so they let him out after about 2 years. Then he r…
/r/MensRights09/01/21 05:37 AM
11

Well, it's kinda like the pay gap, in which married men work more and earn more, and married women work less (at work) and do more housework and earn less, but they share a bank account so why is anyone whinging?
/r/MensRights08/01/21 08:13 PM
1

I'd say that MRA opponents would more lean towards the PCA side. Liberal political correctness is IMO wrong on a lot of points, but willing to talk and maybe listen. PC Authoritarianism is a lot more cultish. I think it's also a problem that "SJW" is the term we often use for PC, whether it's PCL or PCA. Vague snarl words like SJW and toxic masculinity are not conductive to an intelligent debate.
/r/MensRights08/01/21 07:48 PM
1

Survey questions on PCA (Authoritarian pro-censorship PC) and PCL (Liberal PC - also extreme political correctness but not censorious) are here (page 121, about page 130 on the pdf) - https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/75755/3/Brophy_Christine_201511_MA_thesis.pdf
/r/MensRights08/01/21 07:51 AM
18

Men are forced into industries where results matter, because they can't get rewarded for sitting around looking pretty. Industries where results matter end up being well paid, because of competition and innovation. See also - ethnic groups who are forced into results-focused industries then eventually do very well for themselves. People also get jealous of them.
/r/MensRights08/01/21 03:04 AM
10

You can go back to at least 1937 to see bias against boys being discussed - https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/440074
/r/MensRights08/01/21 01:25 AM
2

Does it exist? I mean maybe. But it's caused by historical and present discrimination against black people. So blaming racial issues on thug culture is basically just victim blaming. I don't think "victim blaming" is itself entirely bad. Even if it's not the fault of black people, a lot of problems are (at least now) self-inflicted to some extent. But "thug culture" is vague enough that a lot of people will hear it and think it's just a thinly disguised racist / ethnic stereotype, so it's a usel…
/r/MensRights06/01/21 12:22 AM
3

It's like saying "Does Black Lives Matter agree there's problems with 'toxic black culture'"? Why pick a divisive term? Why pick a vague term? Why pick a term that seems to paint everyone with the same brush? When you say "toxic masculinity" do you think all masculinity is bad, or some bits of masculinity? How do you define "masculinity"? What are the bad traits? When are "bad" traits good? Psychology is complex, and context matters. Everyone can agree "bad masculinity is bad", it's tautological…
/r/MensRights05/01/21 11:39 PM
7

See /u/mhandanna's comment on teachers marking lower across the OECD (multiple studies show this, and IIRC they stretch over like 50 years). Boys often do STEM because they face discrimination in other fields. A boy who with a reasonable amount of work can get a B in math or science and a C in humanities will be likely to focus on STEM subjects. It's kind of like how Asians will do better at STEM, because the teacher can't say they lack creativity when marking their work. Whenever you hear about…
/r/MensRights05/01/21 11:23 PM
24

Bonus: That is, at least, apart from the "one time" he "stuffed up". In Craig's telling, he and his partner were arguing about the children by the side of the road recently when she grabbed his genitals and squeezed hard. Just as he reached up to grab her breast in retaliation, he said, a police officer drove past, and Craig was swiftly arrested and charged.
/r/MensRights05/01/21 12:16 AM
6

Feminists are just too reductionist. Women are always worse off, and it's always the fault of men. If there's a rare exception to this, it's part of the "gilded cage" oppressing women, or part of the "toxic masculinity" that oppresses women, so it doesn't count. And it's the fault of men. And even if it's not, you shouldn't think about it because thinking about things that don't help the cause of feminism is bad. Like, piss off, human society is actually kinda complicated, and gross simplificati…
/r/MensRights01/01/21 11:14 AM
2

The first thing a lot of Suffragettes did once getting the vote was joining the BUF. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Richardson https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norah_Elam https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Sophia_Allen See https://historyatkingston.wordpress.com/2017/09/21/blackshirts-and-women-new-study-looks-at-suffragettes-who-became-fascists/ Also - the moderate Suffragists won the vote for women, the "activist" Suffragettes actually slowed things down - parliamentarians actually used them …
/r/MensRights31/12/20 07:29 AM
61

Not many subs actively talk about sexism and discrimination.
/r/MensRights31/12/20 06:02 AM
11

Daughter changes the story from time to time that it is her being the victim and that someone in her child care group is the victim (sort of know about the family, supposedly living hidden from the father). But it all sounds like excuses I suspect she's in contact with an actual victim, or may be a victim (and may have been coached to blame someone else?). Little kids say stupid shit all the time, but it's got to come from somewhere. I'd take her to the police and say that she's telling various …
/r/MensRights31/12/20 05:11 AM
1

I don't think MRAs can usefully lobby for gay rights without feminists turning on gay men. Personal thoughts - it's interesting how vicious homophobia is against gay men (to the point where they hide in the closet) while a woman being gay is so meh that one of their bigger issues is people just assume they made it up for attention.
/r/MensRights26/12/20 03:30 AM
3

You seem ... a bit obsessed with this. You're probably pissed off that everyone disagrees with you, despite the obvious issues with prostitution. Let me tell you a little secret - most people are a bit hypocritical on this. They'll say "sex work is fine" but they'd never consider it, and they kinda despise anyone involved (providers or customers). Even the people involved in prostitution are usually contemptuous of the whole deal. But no-one wants to be mean and judgemental over it, so we all ju…
/r/MensRights26/12/20 03:08 AM
-7

"Those are kinds of evidence"
/r/MensRights25/12/20 09:32 PM
6

It's funny how feminists use "feminists" and "women" interchangeably. It's like some medieval king ranting about how an insult to them is an insult to the entire kingdom.
/r/MensRights25/12/20 09:18 PM
6

It is the patriarchy that saturates our society with the idea that only women are victims. Feminists are a part of patriarchy then?
/r/MensRights25/12/20 09:47 AM
1

You should have a case for asylum. If there's any way to leave the country for a more tolerant one then I'd try to get there (you might be able to negotiate with your family to help leave).
/r/MensRights24/12/20 09:22 PM
2

Saving money on a lawyer is like saving money on a dentist or mechanic - you end up paying several times as much if you skimp too much. Also, they might be able to amicably work things out, but it's best to have lawyers make sure that they won't sue each other later when they start changing their minds.
/r/MensRights24/12/20 02:51 AM
9

If you get bored and stretch it out, housework can grow to fill the time available. Just clean everything every day while watching daytime TV. Cook the most elaborate meals you can. Go shopping every day. Make things from scratch. Get a smoker or make bread. Redecorate. It's like washing a car. Some people do it in 20 minutes every few months. Some people take several hours a week.
/r/MensRights24/12/20 02:49 AM
23

Humanity is like a million years old. When people talk about "tradition" rather than nailing down a specific time period and location then "traditional" is usually just some deluded imaginary "this was how it's always been done". This goes for both the advocates and critics of tradition.
/r/MensRights23/12/20 09:53 PM
1

Why would that be ironic?
/r/MensRights22/12/20 04:25 AM
4

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julie_Burchill Context of the quote: Prostitution reinforces all the old dumb clichés about women’s sexuality; that they are not built to enjoy sex and are little more than walking masturbation aids, things to be DONE TO, things so sensually null and void that they have to be paid to indulge in fornication, that women can be had, bought, as often as not sold from one man to another. When the sex war is won prostitutes should be shot as collaborators for their terrib…
/r/MensRights20/12/20 08:19 AM
5

counting the rape of males at the fbi in the US officially as a crime, if it is true that feminists are responsible for that It wasn't making it a crime (that's usually state law which has nothing to do with the FBI). It was counting it in uniform crime statistics. Feminists insisted that any penetration with a penis is rape, rather than just vaginal penetration, because some women were upset that non-vaginal rape was not counted in FBI uniform crime statistics. It wasn't about gender equality o…
/r/MensRights18/12/20 09:00 PM
3

Wouldn't this create an incentive for gangs to groom women to be dealers?
/r/MensRights17/12/20 10:55 AM
6

I think most people are just laughing at how stupid these rules are.
/r/MensRights15/12/20 08:05 PM
4

Democrats having their usual issues with "To Kill a Mockingbird".
/r/MensRights14/12/20 04:40 AM
1

So Mary Koss, the respected feminist academic, argues that rape is only real rape if it's forcible rape? Bill Cosby, Harvey Weinstein, and Brock Turner are not, by her definition, rapists - just unwanted contactists? Can I get a link I could use to back this up in other online discussions?
/r/MensRights13/12/20 07:31 PM
1

If feminists believe that problems men face are a key part of patriarchy, why don't they try to fight these problems a little harder? The must be some low-hanging fruits (since they're clearly not making any real progress anymore with their current focus on things that proximately "harm" or annoy women). If it was 1900 and women didn't have the vote, then they'd have a reason to prioritize. But at a certain point, if their goals are cultural rather than fighting for legal equality then it's no l…
/r/MensRights13/12/20 01:30 AM
3

Just bite the bullet, admit you cheated and beat them to the punch. If you lose your girlfriend because a bunch of women are pissed at you and want to let her know you cheated, that's what you get for cheating.
/r/MensRights12/12/20 11:24 PM
21

One of the reasons there's more men in STEM - teachers can't be so biased on a math test, so a lot of boys are "good at math" (compared to English where their teacher might discriminate against them).
/r/MensRights12/12/20 11:13 PM
3

Women are maybe even more likely to be physically aggressive - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10896-007-9067-1 The present study examined sex differences in initiation of physical aggression as observed during discussion tasks and in the likelihood of a similar response from the partner. In addition, patterns for men and women in the prevalence of aggression initiation and partner reciprocation across 4 time points spanning approximately 9 years from late adolescence through the mid-…
/r/MensRights11/12/20 08:58 PM
8

Women got the vote AFTER the suffragettes disbanded. They were so obnoxious (literally assaulting Parliamentarians) that they were used as an example of why women shouldn't vote. Also, a lot of them joined the British National Front once they did get the vote. Literally feminazis.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 06:35 PM
13

20 years for assault in Australia, fake. The 50% sentence reduction does seem somewhat legit though.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 07:11 PM
5

Peterson has his flaws, but is OK. My pet theory is the reason Peterson is so hated is he represents a disruptive alternative to "postmodernists". The purpose of a lot of education courses is to teach dumb teenagers how to write like adults. But most teenagers have very little of value to say, and have little to support their argument. "Standpoint theory" lets students talk from experience, which means they don't need to actually read before they write. Various "Critical Theory" variants are sof…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 10:48 PM
2

The problem with the American system is that they have disproportionate penalties for drug crimes.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 01:09 AM
1

often superficial things like being bought drinks and ‘being able to sleep with whoever you want’ That's kinda like an answer to manspreading. But like having guys hit on women all the time is a normal (but mostly inconsequential) problem for women that highlights the more serious issues women can have with this (e.g. sexual assault), "buying drinks" is a minor symptom of more serious issues (e.g. sympathy gap, serious differences in expectations). You don't see many women sleeping in the park o…
/r/MensRights11/11/20 07:49 PM
2

Ask if they meant "men" or "patriarchy", and point out that it's hard to take a feminist seriously if they get these basics confused. Like, when FGM happens it's usually women who do it. But they probably think patriarchy is to blame. Mothers and teachers are usually women, but if they have a problem with the way children are brought up they attribute it to patriarchy (not the women). So are they being logical and consistent? If they admit that a lot of mens rights issues are (in their minds) a …
/r/MensRights08/11/20 11:24 PM
2

He lost the libel suit. That doesn't mean the judge thought he was a wife beater, just that The Sun had enough legal wiggle room (IANAL, I haven't even really read up on it, but he's a public figure, they had reason to believe Amber as she released pictures, "wife beater" could extend to self defense arguably, whatever else the lawyers could think of). Defamation in commonwealth countries is easier to sue than the US (where there's free speech), but if you can claim you were making a good-faith …
/r/MensRights07/11/20 11:36 AM
2

Look at any public freakout style video where a guy is being hit by a woman and just takes it, then fights back. He ends up using more force than necessary, either because he wants to use some martial arts "soft takedown" (no such thing, unless you're on a matt with a trained opponent who knows how to fall without smashing their head on the pavement) or he uses a strike in anger. Anyone who gets really hurt will turn into a wounded animal and fight back hard. The only way to avoid this is to def…
/r/MensRights04/11/20 05:12 PM
1

I suspect there's a big confounder here. If a mother wins full custody, it could be a range of factors, including court bias. If a father wins full custody, it was probably something pretty extreme, e.g. the mother was such a trainwreck that it was an unambiguous danger to the kids. In that case, the mother would also be unlikely to be capable of paying much child support.
/r/MensRights02/11/20 08:48 AM
1

It's because stupid feminists confuse "men" and "patriarchy" all the time, and it seems that the smarter feminists aren't too worried about correcting them. "That's a part of patriarchy" was probably the original line. Even "Big Red" got it right - https://youtu.be/zH_ZryBfCtU?t=26 But then dumbasses recycle it, but eventually change "patriarchy" to "men". Eventually they end up with some weird idea that "feminism" = women, and "patriarchy" = men. If you disagree with feminism, you're attacking …
/r/MensRights01/11/20 01:17 AM
3

If your view of society is sufficiently negative, then I guess a powerful and competent winner is a likely role-model.
/r/MensRights01/11/20 01:13 AM
1

Without getting into what the "real" definition of anti-hero is ... Arthur Flecks live in a fucked up society and fights against it. You could argue that in a lot of ways, he's pretty similar to Batman - a violent vigilante who violently punishes bad guys in ways that are very morally dubious. Sure, his actions are less justified. He's crossed the line. That's part of why people like it, he really is the yang to Batman's yin. Walter White, Tony Montana and Jordan Belfort live in a fucked up soci…
/r/MensRights31/10/20 09:34 PM
1

Higher expectations. Men are expected to fix their own shit, and most of the time this works out well. It does result in a minority of men failing hard - people should be encouraged to get help if they really need it, but it's good to encourage people to solve their own problems if it is possible.
/r/MensRights30/10/20 08:48 AM
2

A lot of MRAs don't care that much about men, they just think radical feminism is stupid. For example, if a lot of serious violence against women is caused by women hitting men (and the men eventually hitting back). Or ragey dickheads who simply don't fit the Duluth Model (e.g. drug users, mental illness, just guys who are generally fuckwits ... the kind of people who aren't really about control but are just a problem for everyone and it just happens that their girlfriend / wife just happens to …
/r/MensRights27/10/20 08:01 PM
1

It's Australia. For a first offense of this order I'm surprised they didn't just give her a stern warning. And she was diagnosed batshit crazy. She also warned state carers (she was an adult ward of the state) and the police before committing the murder. Maybe they wrote it off as attention seeking (which I'm guessing is an issue with people like her). I think the judge bought that if someone is going on some kind of mental episode and they actually try to turn themselves in, then it's a mitigat…
/r/MensRights23/10/20 05:10 AM
1

Any trait is bad in the wrong context. Men have the best mental health, because they sort their own shit out. But a few men have the worst mental health because they tend not to seek help when they aren't able to sort their own shit out.
/r/MensRights20/10/20 07:45 PM
2

Get a decent haircut, talk properly, carry yourself better, and make sure to dress like a middle class kid. Anyone who looks like a chav will get treated by teachers like a chav. It's not about money (middle class kids often have cheaper clothes than some chavs) but more just style. You know what I'm talking about, and so does everyone else. I don't think this is fair, but it's the way it works. Statistics show that teachers are tremendously prejudiced, mostly against the groups who cause troubl…
/r/MensRights18/10/20 06:54 PM
2

among
/r/MensRights17/10/20 10:02 PM
2

If you view violence against women as a public health crisis, and want a harm reduction strategy, shelters for men is a smart move. There's research (e.g. Deborah Capaldi's) suggesting a lot of serious (e.g. requiring hospital) violence is men getting hit until they hit back. It's not too different to guys fighting each other - most guys only go into "fight or flight" mode and try to do serious damage if they've been physically hurt. Ironically, the Duluth Model puts fight or flight mode violenc…
/r/MensRights17/10/20 10:01 PM
2

Sure.
/r/MensRights17/10/20 09:41 PM
2

This is the reason feminists and women in general do not take things about our problems seriously. No it's not. It's wrong, and it's rude, but you can have someone who behaves with a lot of decency like Jordan Peterson (who I'm no huge fan of, but he certainly was quite polite as far as I can tell) and they won't like that either.
/r/MensRights17/10/20 05:59 PM
6

This is really depressing to see since he seemed like such a self confident and sincere person with his own views about the world before he was indoctrinated. Alternative view - he was always kinda messed up, shallow and a big attention seeker - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Harry,_Duke_of_Sussex#Personal_life Drug and alcohol abuse, edgy racist dress-ups ... he could practically be a Canadian Prime Minister. In his youth Harry earned a reputation for being rebellious, leading the tabloid…
/r/MensRights05/10/20 05:20 AM
1

Successful firms attract the interest of diversity hustlers, because that's where the money is. Yeah, that's the other one. An office with nice decorations like plants is a good office to work in, because they're making enough money to buy plants. If the plants go, then things are tightening up, and it's time to brush up your resume.
/r/MensRights11/09/20 12:08 AM
1

hn discussion - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24420177 Where the actual details are: https://longtermstockexchange.com/static/principals_for_lt_success_white_paper-52e153e1e0be49bd178f74475f274ef0.pdf Principle: Long-term focused companies should consider a broader group of stakeholders and the critical role they play in one another’s success. Policy: A policy explaining how the company operates its business to consider all of the stakeholders critical to its long-term success, including:…
/r/MensRights10/09/20 05:55 AM
3

Companies with 30% female executives rake in as much as six percentage points more in profits, according to a study, feeding into a global debate over the scarcity of women in decision-making business roles.The conclusion stems from a study of about 22,000 publicly-traded companies in 91 countries ranging from Mexico to Norway and Italy conducted by researchers at The Peterson Institute for International Economics, a Washington, DC-based think tank. IIRC this comes unstuck once you have mandator…
/r/MensRights07/09/20 01:10 AM
7

They try to remain fair and balanced, carefully examining both sides of the issue, at least by ABC standards on this issue.
/r/MensRights01/09/20 02:55 AM
2

Not everyone who disagrees with feminism hates women. It's like hearing a Christian say "why do you want gay people to burn in hell", um .... no that's not it.
/r/MensRights23/08/20 06:01 AM
1

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/119631779/auckland-man-joseph-ngapera-beat-his-partners-until-one-stabbed-him-to-death Both of them seem to have records of being in multiple abusive relationships, and the guy was definitely not some innocent victim in them.
/r/MensRights08/08/20 02:23 PM
1

Most of them against different guys. So yeah, there's evidence she got into a lot of violent altercations with men.
/r/MensRights08/08/20 02:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter