| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Men's rights and conservatism (anti gay, anti trans, etc). Did they advocate for removing the 'opposite sex' part? No. They could have, instead they advocated for 'gay marriage'. "Same thing" you say, and technically it is, but it's the narrative that proves divisive. No it's not, it is the same thing, the narrative was that it would allow gay people to marry also. That shouldn't be divisive, the reason is it is because people think being gay is wrong. Not because it wasn't "inclusive". You see, it's harder for the extremists to drum up opposition to … | /r/MensRights | 11/02/17 02:05 PM |
| 1 | Men's rights and conservatism (anti gay, anti trans, etc)And that's the rub, we should all be equally protected from discrimination, shouldn't we? We all are. Put in race into that context, you're race is a characteristic on which you are protected, it doesn't matter which race. The only one this might not apply to you is disability, and if you ever became disabled it would apply to you. There is equal protection. Mine are so incredibly bunched up that I felt the need to criticize someones opinion. Oh... wait... that wasn't me, was it? Because apparen… | /r/MensRights | 11/02/17 01:50 AM |
| 1 | Men's rights and conservatism (anti gay, anti trans, etc)Let's see what you said about laws: I would disagree. when a law is passed to explicitly protect one group, or provide for one group, it's not equal rights for all is it. Hate crimes can apply to anyone. Protected classes protect anyone. Race being a protected class means it's illegal to discriminate on race, that includes white people. Gender being a protected class means its illegal to discriminate based on gender, including being male. And I'll note that there are cases where that happens, su… | /r/MensRights | 10/02/17 07:08 PM |
| 0 | Men's rights and conservatism (anti gay, anti trans, etc)Then what laws are LGBT right laws in your factually wrong opinion? Because those are LGBT rights laws, by any reasonable definition. | /r/MensRights | 10/02/17 11:35 AM |
| 1 | Men's rights and conservatism (anti gay, anti trans, etc)Those are LGBT rights laws. | /r/MensRights | 09/02/17 10:20 PM |
| 1 | Men's rights and conservatism (anti gay, anti trans, etc)And laws which allow any person to marry people of the same sex or laws which prohibit discrimination of any sexuality are equally as equal. | /r/MensRights | 09/02/17 08:48 PM |
| 1 | Men's rights and conservatism (anti gay, anti trans, etc)Then a law which allowed men to financially abort responsibility would be unfair in your opinion? | /r/MensRights | 09/02/17 06:53 PM |
| 5 | Men's rights and conservatism (anti gay, anti trans, etc)That's purely semantics, LGB rights are equal rights for LGB people. They just don't effects others that's why they are called that. Men's Rights is the exact same. That is literally the name of the sub and it's activists. | /r/MensRights | 09/02/17 05:26 PM |
| 2 | Men's rights and conservatism (anti gay, anti trans, etc)There is research into transgenderism, and the current best option is transitioning. That's the medical recommended treatment. | /r/MensRights | 09/02/17 04:58 PM |
| 5 | Men's rights and conservatism (anti gay, anti trans, etc)How are LGB rights special interest rights? If you don't have the same rights you shouldn't fight for them? What does that make men's rights? | /r/MensRights | 09/02/17 04:46 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter