TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Soldier4Christ82 Archive

View 0 posts and 86 comments by Soldier4Christ82 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

In a different situation, sure, benefit of a doubt, blah blah blah. However, given the fact that she's already been overly friendly to OP you're giving the woman way more credit than would ever be given if she were a man. It's one thing to suggest that OP should make believe that there's a chance the two aren't connected to cover his butt, but realistically given the past interaction there's just absolutely no way.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 05:52 AM
4

Welcome to America.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 07:54 PM

And keep in mind mothers don’t get praised for providing childcare like fathers do Oh, please. Moms get pampered and thanked endlessly on Mother's Day and what do Dads get? A tie, if they're insanely lucky, and that's it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/23 06:31 PM
1

Not really, no...at least not now. I'm not going to lie; was a younger man, I was a bit more about outward appearance, as is common among young people who feel the need to make outward appearance a shield to protect the world from seeing their insecurities, but the more I've gotten older and learned to see through superficial appearance and matured past the need for approval based on my own outward appearance, the less I care about appearance and the more I care about character, genuinely, etc. …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/23 03:20 AM
0

If a woman is such an unbelievably shallow, vapid bimbo that all it takes for her to be turned off is a haircut she doesn't like, a sock color she doesn't like, or a guy not spending way longer than any man ever should grooming himself then she deserves to be single for the rest of her life, because no man should ever have to put up with such ridiculous expectations, the same way men shouldn't be unreasonable about their expectations of women. You say men look angry? Having to deal with the stup…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 09:11 PM
0

How classy of you.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 07:14 PM
0

You refer to yourself as a gentleman and a scholar and yet you don't think that's sanctimonious..especially when you go around telling people to "stick it"...interesting.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 11:08 PM
0

Charming. You are a gentleman and a scholar.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 05:31 AM
1

That's not even a thought; it's an ignorant assumption...but by all means, continue to keep making ignorant assumptions about me and then act like I'm the bad guy for calling you out on it.
/r/MensRights05/08/19 11:58 PM
1

Congratulations on being both stupid and immodest. Go you.
/r/MensRights05/08/19 01:14 PM
1

Am I really? Or am I pointing out that the whole world doesn't need to see your crotch?
/r/MensRights05/08/19 04:53 AM
1

Is it? I thought you were all about freedom and letting people do whatever they want wherever they want without regard to others.
/r/MensRights04/08/19 08:40 PM
0

No man's testicles are big enough that they have to have their legs spread nearly as far apart as they are physically able to go. Just because you might falsely boast that they're that big doesn't mean that they actually are. Not only is it indecent but if you're on a bench or a pew you're taking up a completely unnecessary amount of space that someone else could be using as a buffer.
/r/MensRights04/08/19 06:23 PM
0

So is it also OK to dry hump in public? For that matter, why not just dry hump in the middle of a playground; you're not naked, so obviously there's nothing wrong with that, even with kids watching, because 'Murica, right? EDIT: a word.
/r/MensRights04/08/19 06:16 PM
-26

So is being a decent human being, and that's literally all it takes not to spread your legs in public. I'm not exactly crazy about radical feminists myself, but you shouldn't need to be told something that should be common sense to anyone with the faintest hint of decency.
/r/MensRights04/08/19 08:33 AM
-38

As true as that may be, I would also think that the kind of alt-right zealots who get angry about feminists wanting to stop men from "manspreading" would be the last ones to ever want to defend such a consciously immodest display. "Manspreading" is a conscious choice, and one that anyone who remotely cares in any way, shape, or form about public indecency should go out of their way not to make, rather than going out of their way to intentionally do so.
/r/MensRights04/08/19 07:10 AM
-2

I can't help but notice how you've conveniently omitted a screenshot of the conversation so that we can decide for ourselves what "a lot" is and whether or not she has That, in and of itself, is suspicious; that you are deliberately pushing the narrative that she's evil without providing context as to why the clothes are being burnt. If the comments are inciting violence then the people making them are the problem, not the person who posted the picture.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 12:00 AM
9

To say that hard times create strong men is an example of survivorship bias. The untold number who killed themselves or otherwise went into a permanent downward spiral during the hard times were not made stronger by them, nor the family and loved ones who had to endure their loss, but the ones that were made stronger will never tell you that because it doesn't fit their narrative, and neither will the idealists who want to believe that it's true because they would first have to admit it to thems…
/r/MensRights04/07/19 08:29 PM
1

Yep. Nor am I entitled to not fall victim to any other crime.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 01:32 PM
0

So if I see you being raped and murdered, instead of calling the police, you're saying that I should grab a bowl of popcorn and watch the show?
/r/MensRights14/06/19 06:31 AM
1

So you're not entitled not to be raped by a woman then.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 06:21 AM
1

That seems like a little bit of a stretch to me. Are you sure that's the reasoning behind the decision?
/r/MensRights13/06/19 12:53 AM
1

That's not helpful; you still haven't explained what supposed situation there is that's so infuriating that you feel the need to stir up manufactured outrage.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 06:49 AM
1

Where are you getting that from this picture?
/r/MensRights11/06/19 05:51 AM
-6

Wait, what am I looking at that's supposedly so offensive?
/r/MensRights10/06/19 06:08 AM
2

As well they should..and so do many of their fathers.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 05:53 AM
-1

No. Being a creepy, disgusting pervert is not acceptable whether you are male or female.
/r/MensRights19/04/19 12:18 AM
1

If you have a psychological need to believe I'm a child rapist to defend your vicious attacks against me, that's your problem; not mine.In fact I find it entertaining enough to not bother to try to correct you or defend myself. I mean, the comic level of stupidity required to make the leap from me acknowledging the difference between a toddler and a teenager who is well able to tell right from wrong, at least when they are not drugged... But, whatever....you're going to believe whatever you want…
/r/MensRights13/04/19 11:28 PM
0

You know what, you're right...there are no sex crazed teenagers, there never have been anywhere at any time in any place, and there never will be; they are all perfect saints who think nothing but pure thoughts, and certainly thoughts of sex never enter their minds; what I was I thinking? I really couldn't care less what it sounds like; in reality, what I am saying is that people are refusing to differentiate between young children and teenagers in an attempt to evoke an emotional response. In t…
/r/MensRights13/04/19 05:35 PM
0

The fact that you got that from what I said suggests that are the troll here...but it's a win-win if your misconception means I don't have to hear anything further from you.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 06:19 AM
-3

When you don't even have the intellectual capacity to communicate without profanity, that doesn't exactly put you a place to have the right to judge anyone else as stupid.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 12:33 AM
-3

Who said that it made anything right? That's an entirely separate issue.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 12:32 AM
-6

Ah, the old "My personal experience speaks for all of society". Nice.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 12:31 AM
-6

It's not an assumption I am making wholesale of all people everywhere, it's an assumption I'm making of men in this pity party echo chamber known as r/MensRights.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 12:30 AM
0

Right, because my response was directly aimed at this particular instance...why don't you take another hit of that bong?
/r/MensRights13/04/19 12:28 AM
-10

The point I'm making is that this is yet another among many instances of a teenager being labeled a "child" so that the phrase "child abuse" can be used purely for shock value to create manufactured outrage. If it were a male teacher, you wouldn't even care, because you people are so caught up in promoting the image of the modern man as a helpless victim being perpetually oppressed that you would rather mangle the truth until it suits your agenda than to simply admit that rape is a legal term, o…
/r/MensRights12/04/19 10:30 PM
-27

Since when do (most) 14 year old boys have inhibitions about sex with literally any attractive woman? Unless she was exceptionally unattractive I don't see I'm not saying that it's appropriate or right, because it's not; I'm just saying that you have to be pretty ignorant...perhaps even willfully ignorant if your'e a man...not to know that typically teenage boys have one thing and one thing only on their mind at that age, and it's not schoolwork.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 09:29 PM
-5

For all the dense folks....in here...whatever....who cling to the lie that what is being taken issue with is masculinity itself rather than legitimately toxic masculinity, this is the difference between toxic masculinity and masculinity itself...if your go-to reaction to everything is anger and violence, you are toxic, period. That said, a lot of men are written off as "toxic" for the way they behave in the face of intentional and persistent provocation. In a perfect world, people would be able …
/r/MensRights26/03/19 12:19 AM
1

I have the intestinal fortitude; what I don't have is the slightest sliver of trust in you, because you've done everything within your power to show me that you're not worthy of it by actively seeking out excuses to go for my throat. Regardless of what you might think I'm not stupid; I know that this isn't about you asking a question in good faith, but rather you trying to trap me, and I'm through giving you that pleasure. For the record, if you want to know a prime example of toxic masculinity,…
/r/MensRights06/03/19 12:47 AM
-17

Are we still on this Gillette nonsense? Do I need to start handing out Tampax and Midol for you whiny, immature little crybabies? I mean seriously, if you're going to throw a tantrum over a commercial of all things, because you're too ignorant and simple-minded to even have the capacity differentiate between actual masculinity and toxic masculinity, how do you ever expect anyone to take you seriously as the strong, tough men you honestly believe yourselves to be? As offended as some of you are o…
/r/MensRights02/03/19 01:50 AM
3

I'm sad to hear it, assuming that this wasn't just made up for reddit karma, but if it is true, then isn't that just a little bit stupid? I mean, guys, once you kill yourself, she has officially won, because at this point you have now permanently given your ex complete and absolute power over your children, who you have at that point made absolutely sure will never be able to see you again, even supervised, and along with it power to use your own suicide as a weapon against you, because I guaran…
/r/MensRights13/02/19 06:02 AM
-5

I like how you're trolling while accusing me of being a troll; it lets me know just how much your input is really worth, so that I can save myself the trouble of taking you even remotely seriously, so thanks for that.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 07:17 AM
-4

OK come on, let's be real here; aside from Christian men and homosexuals, there is positively no way that a woman who looks like this would have to force heself of any man, and for you complete and utter morons who want to try to pulls this nonsense about "Bu...bu....if the roles were reversed", please just get real. Men as a whole have higher sex drives, that's a fact, so it is false equivelancy to try to reverse the genders and try to prove anything.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 06:19 AM
-5

Right, becasue there totally aren't thousands of male cops who get away with rape to the one woman who does it.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 06:10 AM
25

Proverbs 21:19 "It is better to dwell in the wilderness, than with a contentious and an angry woman."
/r/MensRights27/11/18 07:21 AM
0

When you do a hashtag you have to use a backslash () at the beginning of it, otherwise reddit's code will automatically make it bold, so in this case it would be "\ #metoo", without the space. Maybe the #metoo movement has, but this sub, from my experience, has been very hostile toward women in general, even if only passively at times, and what I was referring to is a bastardized version of #metoo that is basically just an echo chamber of men feeling sorry for themselves and blaming women for ev…
/r/MensRights29/10/18 05:23 AM
0

First of all, you are having your own pity party for yourself in this post, crying about some non-existent issue you so desperately wish was real. I'm pretty sure you're confusing me with yourself. Ever since the Kavanaugh trial there has been an influx of men who, isntead of standing with female victims of sexual assault and acknowledging that it's completely wrong to paint all victims with the same broad brush of lying for fame and fortune, either use sexual assault as a punchline, or use the …
/r/MensRights29/10/18 03:50 AM
-5

I've had about as much as I can stand of this effeminate male wannabe male #metoo pity party and the whole false narrative that women who have been abused can't be helped without it being ta direct assault on men. If you noticed that your next door neighbor's house was englulfed in flames and firefighters were feverishly trying to put them out, would you angrily run over and yell at them that they should stop what they're doing immediately and be putting out the small fire on your stovetop sinte…
/r/MensRights28/10/18 11:56 PM
1

I truly loathe the phrase "human nature" in general, because so many people use it as a blanket excuse to not improve themselves, but this is very much something that is part of human nature...peolpe hear someone criticizing a behavior that theyr'e guilty of and they manage to convinve themselves that they are the one special snowflake who has a legitimate reason to engage in said behavior.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 05:48 AM
2

Ironically the only reason participation trophies exist is because previous generations' literal obsession with trophies and their attempt to pound into their children's heads that winning is everything and very literally nothing else is important.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 04:00 AM
1

Women like this don't even deserve crumbs. It's a public playground; if you want to have private girl time go somewhere private.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 05:12 PM
3

There is absolutely, however, such a thing as retalliatory racism; people using the fact that either they personally, their family, or their race were targeted for racial discrimination as an excuse to hate an entire race just because of what was done to them by a small handful of people of said race, or worse, even just one person of said race.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 01:36 AM
3

Why is it such a horrible thing to defend women, or even just to treat them less than absolute garbage? Why must literally every man who treats women as human beings be accused as "white knighting"?
/r/MensRights26/02/18 03:33 AM
21

So, to summarize, you're complaining that it's futile to complain? If so, why are you bothering to complain about others complaining? What awareness have you raised by your comment, other than awareness of your delusions of superiority? Am I missing something?
/r/MensRights12/02/18 12:42 AM
2

I don't know about it being the same number of lives, bot otherwise it's also what could be achieved if literally any cancer that isn't or can't be sexualized to appeal to the absolute lowest common denominator received the same funding. Everywhere you turn, you can see bumper stickers, shirts, etc that say "Save the [ insert obscene slang for breasts here], meanwhile there are a lot of types of cancer few to nearly none have even heard of because they aren't connected with a woman's privates.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 10:31 PM
1

Women...and yes, I said women, because I don't care how feminists want the word spelled; that's how the word is actually spelled...who are petty enough to turn the way they percieve in their own minds that they're being addressed, through no fault of anyone but themselves, into an issue of sexism should be rather thankful that men are willing to talk to them at all, because frankly the kind of passive aggressive women who see every conversation as an opportunity to play the victim and blame men …
/r/MensRights20/01/18 06:46 AM
0

How is it that you're the ones actively defending silencing victims and yet I'm somehow a tool for pointing out the fact that they need to be raped so that they will realize what it feels like and quit blaming the victims and treating them like attention whores just because they are trying to increase awareness of how common rape and sexual assault are?
/r/MensRights26/12/17 04:29 PM
-1

The press needs to hear it too, and anyone who would tell a victim to shut up, or to tell it to the police instead, deserve to be raped so that they know what it feels like, and subsequently so that they know how necessary it is for victims to speak up and be heard and how necessary it is for others to actually listen, especially in cases where the victims were children when it happened, because children are so often still told that they must do anything an adult tells them to.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 08:00 PM
-2

Oh, did you not get the memo? When feminists use sexist language they're not sexist; they're "empowered".
/r/MensRights20/09/16 07:28 PM
1

So you're telling me that child support is never spent on luxury items? Are you even thinking?
/r/MensRights18/09/16 01:11 AM
1

Not that it's right (because it's not), but it only seems fair to me that, if women can abuse the system and live in the lap of luxury on child support and/or welfare instead of providing for her children, men should absolutely be able to do the same; gender equality and such.
/r/MensRights17/09/16 11:20 PM
0

Wait, California? Are you serious? This whole thing is ridiculous enough on it's own, but how can people rubber stamp gay marriage and yet act like a teenage boy is a pedophile for having sex with someone his own age?
/r/MensRights16/09/16 01:53 PM
1

If your'e an adult male (and I say adult male because if the following applies then you don't deserve to be called a man) and you are so incredibly effeminate that you honestly believe that someone is trying to steal "your" day just because they want to give credit where credit is due to mothers who have to try to do their best to fulfill both roles because of whatever situation that led to them being a single mother, then you need to put on your big boy boxers and get over yourself.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 06:14 AM
0

How it a stupid argument? You freely admit that you believe that existing laws should be followed at all costs, so at absolute best you would have no problem with other people having slaves because, according to you, laws should be upheld and enforced no matter what because they're "THE LAW"
/r/MensRights17/06/16 08:56 PM
0

Whether you feel that law is wrong or not doesn't change the fact that it's the LAW I see. So what you're saying is that if it were legal to own slaves you'd be defending slavery because, hey, who cares about right and wrong? The law is the law, right?
/r/MensRights17/06/16 08:35 PM
0

Becasue only a pedophile can see that it's wrong to falsely accuse someone against someone that carries such weight and stigma? Please. Anyone with any sort of a conscience at all should know that it's wrong to falsely accuse someone of a crime, let alone one that carries the social stigma and punishment that pedophilia does. On the slim chance that you didn't know already, ephebophilia =/= pedophilia. Pedophiles are attracted to pre-pubescent minors; 17 year olds, who are but a year from adulth…
/r/MensRights17/06/16 04:20 PM
0

Ugh. Can we please stop pretending that teachers who have sex with "children" who are literally 1 year from adulthood are pedophiles? Unprofessional and immoral, you bet, but rape is a dead serious charge and should be reserved for times when there is not even a shadow of a doubt that the teacher forced him or herself on the students, and I can tell you from that picture, and knowing how young men are at that age because i was there once, that is nearly impossible for coercion or force to be nec…
/r/MensRights17/06/16 05:31 AM
1

I have been saying/thinking this this for quite a while now. I find the idea of either parent being abandoning their duties contemptible in general, but if we're going to continue to let women to do so, allowing men to so is the only just course of action.
/r/MensRights11/03/16 02:20 AM
-2

Nowhere near as trashy as publicly posting other people's.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 11:04 PM
2

Relevant
/r/MensRights18/12/15 08:14 AM
0

In the eyes of society, yes, but from a legal standpoint, it's stil "rape" either way.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 06:15 PM
-1

It's beyond priceless that, in a country where homosexual couples are revered as "brave" and "heroic" by people who call themselves "open minded" and "tolerant", two heterosexuals can't have sex without it being "rape" and the elder being a "sex offender" because gasp one of them is a year or two under the legal age. Now as a Christian, I'm not one to promote or condone pre-marital sex, but at the same time, rape is a very serious charge that not only carries heavy legal consequences, but a stig…
/r/MensRights01/08/15 05:52 PM
-3

If a woman is promiscuous she should feel shame without anyone saying a word to her, but so should a man if he is. That's the thing many people of both genders don't grasp these days; just because we live in a society that wants to glorify whoremongers and adulterers doesn't mean that men aren't just as guilty for their promiscuity as women as for theirs, nor should it be a source of pride for a man to sleep around with as many women as he possibly can.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 06:13 AM
-7

If there were a penis to slice off, I'm pretty sure it wouldn't be happening to a girl.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 07:50 PM
2

So it's the Roman Methodist Church?
/r/MensRights08/11/14 10:00 PM
-1

So now you have only acknowledged the fact that you are ignorant, but that you're immature to boot. I'm not quite sure how that's supposed to work in your favor.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 08:11 PM
-1

Thus proving my point about your ignorance.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 05:29 AM
1

Yes, being a janitor is one of my jobs, but that doesn't define me as a person, other than perhaps my willingness to do what i need to to pay the bills and contribute to society. However, since you seem irreversibly that it speaks to anything larger, what does it say about you and your own level of education if even a lowly, supposedly uneducated janitor like myself can communicate withour profanity with ease and you can't? I can't admit what isn't true, but thank you for once again revealing yo…
/r/MensRights09/09/14 02:37 AM
-2

You have proven time and time again that you lack the so much as the mental capacity necessary to communicate your ideas without profanity, yet you still, through some manner of mental gymnastics, have convinced yourself that you are intellectually superior to me. How does that work? Homosexuality isn't illegal, but until very recently gay marriage was, but even now that it is, hypocritical idiots like you feign morality when any other but your own pet perversion is addressed, and then all of th…
/r/MensRights08/09/14 08:04 PM
-1

Dude, you are LITERALLY saying that instead of having the government say so, that you want a different branch of the government to say so, based on what one government employee happens to think about a person in what is likely to be less than 2 hours of total interaction IN THEIR ENTIRE LIFE. That's not the case. I like strongly urge you to pay attention before you continue to put more words into my mouth and just make a fool of yourself in general. What I'm LITERALLY saying is that if the gover…
/r/MensRights07/09/14 09:28 PM
-1

No. What I said is that it's a step up from merely painting huge groups of people with the broad brush of immaturity based entirely upon their age. I'm not saying that's what the government should do; I'm saying that if they're going to forbid two heterosexuals to have a natural relationship based the concept that people magically become mature on their 18th birthday and not an hour sooner then they need to be able to have at least something to back their claim; something, anything at all rather…
/r/MensRights07/09/14 08:35 PM
-2

I didn't say that it's infallable; what I said was that it provides more substance than a mere claim of immaturity based on what age they happen to be.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 04:43 PM
0

At least with psychological testing there would be some form of substance, something, anything rather than just "LE GUBBERMENT SEZ SO". I'm not saying that it's infallible, just that it's a step in the right direction instead of just painting everyone under 18 with a broad brush of immaturity.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 04:29 PM
-4

I don't expect you to agree with me; that would be stupid, but I'm still right regardless of how many peolpe disagree. There's gonna be exceptions, no matter where you set the baseline. If you made the age 25, my sister in law is STILL dating abusive [men] after managing to leave 2 others. That's exactly my point. There is no one universal age where people become mature, so to try to dictate to people what age they're mature at is ridiculous. It would be far more effective to have them undergo a…
/r/MensRights07/09/14 04:12 PM
-7

Ephepbephiles =/= pedophiles I said pubescent minors and I meant it, just as much as I meant it when I said I don't approve, but the fact of the matter is that if you're going to bend the rules for one group of sexual deviants then you set a precedent for the rest of them. Furthermore, for a cheerleader for homosexuality such as yourself to say that having a relationship with a sexually mature minor is wrong is laughably hypocritical. Also, using profanity doesn't strengthen your argument; in fa…
/r/MensRights07/09/14 05:58 AM
-14

The problem I have is with the idea that people above the age that suposedly immature children magically become fully mature adults at the stroke of midnight are pronounced as universally mature and below it as universally immature. I mean there are literally people out there who are so unbelievably stupid that they either believe it's true or they are willing to blindly defend the lie because it's the law. The day our courts decided to say that two people of the same sex an be a "couple" is the…
/r/MensRights06/09/14 09:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter