TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SoldierofNod Archive

View 5 posts and 174 comments by SoldierofNod on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
76

It's frustrating to see that men aren't even allowed to decide what masculinity is for themselves.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 11:50 PM
10

The thing to bear in mind is that you can at least make your own decisions, even if you have to live in a less than ideal society. Even if the law doesn't, you can still treat people as equals.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 11:49 PM
21

A person who calls her blog "conservative woman" is likely going to believe in traditional values, which are harmful for both men and women. I believe everyone should be able to pursue whatever position they like, not be forced into given roles. Traditionalism is no better than feminism in regards to individual freedom.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 07:34 PM
5

I do think that people need to uncouple the idea of speaking of certain demographics as groups and judging people as individuals. Saying that men and women, as groups, have different interests isn't making any judgment on any particular person. Both are extremely diverse groups and any given individual will have a ton of variance. What's important to me is equality of opportunity so everyone can pursue their interests and goals without discrimination.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 09:32 PM
5

I can't wait until we have self-driving public transportation. Genderless AI will have all of the advantages with none of the disadvantages.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 03:24 AM
9

There is, unfortunately, a lot of racism between the black and Asian communities, but the regressive left speaks little of it. That is, unless they can blame it on white supremacy.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 03:47 PM
5

http://archive.is/X08Ng Please archive articles from SJW sites.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 03:46 PM
2

TERFs and SJWs get into a fight. MRAs are to blame. That's interesting!
/r/MensRights16/09/17 06:03 AM
65

I'm not really sure what you expected from Jezebel.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 12:22 PM
5

I really do wish people could put aside their partisan bickering to stand against any genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 06:23 AM
3

Gay German men can now get married. It's progress.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 04:29 PM
1

Yeah, I'm not trying to justify things like rape at all.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 05:44 AM
11

I dislike how many people think /r/incels is fair game because they're just whiny men. That being said, I do think they'd be better off if they instead focused on building their own lives, difficult as that might be, rather than being unhappy over being alone.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 06:57 AM
9

"Men can't show their feelings!" "lol male tears"
/r/MensRights24/04/17 09:32 AM
3

They're an interesting example of how one can be both self-degrading (through constant virtue signalling and apologizing for being male) and self-serving (through acting superior due to their beliefs).
/r/MensRights29/03/17 11:13 AM
1

/r/nothingeverhappens
/r/MensRights29/03/17 11:11 AM
2

Scenarios like that, as well as many others, are really a case of "show, don't tell". Someone who desperately tries to shout how they're not like others isn't going to have much luck. Someone who shows it through their actions, through genuine conviction rather than an attempt to put up an image, is going to have a much better time.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 06:11 PM
2

I don't think it's productive at all for feminists to constantly seek to demonize and demean their allies. They're not exactly going to make much progress that way. While I believe in individual accountability for absolutely everyone, the author of this piece seems determined to seek out and zero in on the misdeeds (perceived or actual) of their allies. It's also contradictory for her to state that men are not essential to the success of feminism while also believing they hold power within socie…
/r/MensRights28/03/17 06:09 PM
1

Well, if the majority of people in combat are men, the majority of people who see a benefit from this will be men.
/r/MensRights25/12/16 03:16 PM
1

I don't know.
/r/MensRights25/12/16 03:16 PM
-5

Well, this bot is stupid and unfunny.
/r/MensRights25/12/16 02:32 PM
3

I'm far from an expert, so don't quote me on this, but I believe your salary gets a tax exclusion if you're in a combat zone.
/r/MensRights25/12/16 02:31 PM
1

Seems like they only care about GSM people when they can virtue signal using them.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 04:09 AM
-1

It would be a better idea to have people pledge the non-aggression principle. It's not perfect, but it would achieve the same purpose without being sexist.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 08:20 PM
2

It's another term used for anarcho-capitalism.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 11:39 AM
14

I don't really think that the life of someone like her is worth celebrating.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 08:04 AM
2

I believe that's harmful and counterproductive.
/r/MensRights25/07/16 01:05 AM
0

I think that's naive. There are neurological differences between men and women that should be acknowledged. However, there's a ton of individual variance. So, my ideal is equality of opportunity, where people can be what they like without judgment.
/r/MensRights24/07/16 09:58 PM
1

The article seemed to be from the perspective of traditional conservatives who believe God handed down gender roles to men and women, they should stay within them, yadda yadda. I believe the point OP was trying to make is that young women are being forced into a new set of roles entirely. This would go along with much of what I've seen with boys being dissuaded from traditionally masculine interests, too. It's counterproductive, since rather than establishing equality of opportunity and letting …
/r/MensRights24/07/16 08:30 PM
6

It's fucked up and very much a disgusting double standard, but you can't legislate morality. Past the age of consent, people can make their own decisions.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 02:33 AM
1

Simple, win the hearts and minds of voters. It's exactly why we exist. Organize protests, events and demonstrations. Recent events have taught me that extremist positions bring blowback. It's my hope to channel it positively.
/r/MensRights01/07/16 06:08 AM
1

Well, I can't speak for UK issues, since I don't know a whole lot about the UK, but I can say that I am in favor of government programs to help the disadvantaged, regardless of demographic. I agree that men are disproportionately bereft of aid, but I don't see the solution as cutting off aid entirely. Rather, I see it as ensuring men have aid, as well. Business regulations and welfare initiatives really took off during the industrial robber baron and FDR years. I certainly would not want to retu…
/r/MensRights01/07/16 03:59 AM
2

The burden of proof is on the person who makes a claim. So, it's up to you to back that up, not me. I couldn't just say, for instance, that there's a gender gap in college enrollment without providing a citation and expect others to look it up. A 2000% increase in government relative to what? Correlation does not equal causation, and indeed, your assertion is sparse of detail.
/r/MensRights30/06/16 10:06 PM
1

That all being said, I'm much happier here being able to post on Reddit and play video games than I would scavenging for food and water in a wasteland. I'm not a primitivist by any sort. I'm also not religious at all, but I've read a bit about Buddhism and what they say about desire and accomplishment is pretty interesting. Nothing is ever enough, nothing will ever make us happy. I suppose our success as a species is because of that drive. Why else would we continuously innovate, expand and conq…
/r/MensRights30/06/16 09:49 PM
1

Not necessarily. I'll hop on any (safe) transhumanist opportunity I have, but those opportunities are created by us as humans. Therefore, we decide what they are and what options we will take. I doubt we'd become something completely distinguished from humans.
/r/MensRights30/06/16 09:08 PM
1

Fix what we can, in other words. We can't change innate characteristics yet, but sooner or later, we'll have things like commercially available mechanical augmentation. Eventually, we'll fully understand the brain and be able to modify it. Should we not fuck up, I think we'll eventually have a society like the Culture.
/r/MensRights30/06/16 08:00 PM
1

Gonna need a citation on that. I'm alright with anyone who needs help, regardless of demographic, getting it. I'm not alright with stopping people from voting because you don't like what they vote for. That's for the Republican Party.
/r/MensRights30/06/16 07:59 PM
1

In a sense. Culture can be analyzed to see what elements it promotes and how it influences people. The line between inborn traits and socialization can be muddy, but nevertheless, the latter can and should be influenced.
/r/MensRights30/06/16 08:18 AM
2

Well, equality of opportunity creates the ability for everyone to have the same shot at success, regardless of demographic. I'd say a lack of restrictions on people is worth the price. (Honestly, restricting people based on demographic seems pretty fascist.) I'd say single-mother households are created by both irresponsible men and women. You can't legislate responsibility, I'm afraid, only create an environment where it is encouraged. I wouldn't say woman's suffrage is the cause (and it's certa…
/r/MensRights30/06/16 08:18 AM
3

Ah, I see. For things like that, the solution shouldn't be to put up different barriers for different groups. Rather, whatever causes them to perform differently should be addressed. Otherwise, you'd just end up reinforcing these disparities. As an example, urban communities often have higher crime rates. Rather than being willing to pre-emptively charge people with crimes, the solution would be to look into what causes crime in the first place and address it. (Typically, poverty and a violent c…
/r/MensRights30/06/16 03:28 AM
2

What's your evidence that equality of opportunity is what leads to women dropping out of the workforce? These are pretty tall claims. I find it really odd that you're using collectivist-style arguments when you're promoting individualism. But nevertheless, what I believe is that individuals should have the opportunity to better themselves. I simply do not wish for this help to be available based on demographics outside one's own control.
/r/MensRights30/06/16 02:28 AM
1

Obamacare was the result of a congress which impeded any attempt to create a bill of its kind. What resulted isn't optimal, rather, the end product of numerous cuts and changes. Even so, everything, save the individual mandate, is a step in the right direction. I don't have an issue with the government funding things like women's shelters and abuse hotlines. I have a problem with women getting exclusive help. So, for most things, I simply want men to get the same aid. (This is tangential, but I …
/r/MensRights30/06/16 01:32 AM
1

Perhaps I didn't make myself clear. By equality of opportunity, I mean that the same standards are given to everyone. As an example, anyone, from any group, would be able to apply to a job and be measured by the same standards. However, only those that fit the standards, regardless of the groups they belong to, would be accepted. Why do you believe doctor shortages would be created? I have no problem with programs such as abuse shelters for women being funded with men's tax dollars. I merely bel…
/r/MensRights30/06/16 01:32 AM
2

Total equality of opportunity means that everyone has the same chance, not that everyone will behave in a similar fashion. For a simpler example, someone might choose to work longer hours than someone else so that they can receive more pay. Yet this opportunity is available to both workers. Competition would still exist.
/r/MensRights30/06/16 12:10 AM
2

Well, that's why we exist, to advocate for this assistance.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 11:37 PM
1

We can compensate for inequalities that people face, though, through things like scholarships, single-payer health care and food stamps. We can't do anything about people's inherent attributes (yet) but we can account for external conditions.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 11:27 PM
8

Equality of opportunity is completely possible. Equality of outcome is naive and counterproductive.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 11:17 PM
1

I don't think that pointing out the actions of one female leader that have nothing to do with gender equality really helps anything, either.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 05:05 AM
9

I don't really think this is a good /r/MensRights post. It doesn't indicate discrimination against men or bad behavior by feminists as a group. All it shows is one feminist who did one bad thing, which doesn't really apply to anything as a whole.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 12:19 AM
1

Ah, I see. Forgive my misunderstanding, then.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 07:46 PM
1

I agree with your post, but I should say that tranny is a slur. It's better to say trans people.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 07:38 PM
6

Well, I'm not one of those people who believe taxes are theft. I don't have a problem with the government funding social services. I just want them to be egalitarian, and I agree, men aren't really getting anything.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 05:59 PM
7

To be fair, there's nothing wrong with the government funding women's shelters. I just wish they funded more men's shelters.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 01:43 PM
12

I don't agree with him on everything, but he shares around 80% of my views, so I'll vote for him.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 06:32 PM
6

This sort of thing is exactly what I mean when I say identity politics is used as a distraction for economic issues. Why do you think the media fans the flames of racial incidents but gives so little coverage to economic inequality? Hell, OWS fell apart when these people hopped on. If Bernie weren't in the running, I'd totally vote for Elizabeth Warren, though. I like her policies.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 06:31 PM
7

>linking 9gag rather than the Youtube video Really, dude? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9uccExOPMrI
/r/MensRights30/01/16 06:26 PM
2

This is more comical than anything else. I'm not threatened at all. stop fascism where it starts Preventing people from expressing certain opinions is fascism... I also loved how he was so concerned about his face being leaked when he tried (and hilariously failed) to dox someone.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 08:40 PM
9

https://archive.is/2zlDZ Please use archive links for sites like this.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 01:32 PM
2

Unsure, I just heard that it was made by a Mormon and looked it up on Wikipedia to verify. I haven't ever watched it.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 10:27 AM
11

Battlestar Galactica was created by a Mormon, so that's unsurprising. They live in an actual patriarchy.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 09:21 AM
1

The upper classes are utilizing feminists as a distraction from the foremost injustice in the Western world: Income inequality. Think about it: Why do they say next to nothing about wealth as a privilege? Why are so many of their ringleaders very wealthy?
/r/MensRights03/12/15 01:11 AM
6

Men are seen as normal and disposable. Women are seen as special and, as such, valued more. Both genders face their own issues, but men's are swept under the carpet. When they are acknowledged, they're characterized as extensions of women's issues. It's depressing.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 03:49 AM
2

Its most vehement enemies are SJWs manipulated by the establishment to institute authoritarianism.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 03:47 AM
1

Should the ACLU be included? They've defended Neo Nazi demonstrators pro bono even though they fucking hate librulz like them.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 03:47 AM
15

https://archive.is/XsRA9 In the future, when linking articles like these, please use archived links. We don't want to give them adbux or SEO juice.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 09:41 PM
2

So long as everyone involved gives informed consent, I don't think it's an issue.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 03:57 AM
13

We all know black people can't think for themselves so they need white upper middle class trust fund babies to do it for them. /s
/r/MensRights27/06/15 03:27 AM
3

http://8ch.net/redchanit Check it out, they even made Redchanit.
/r/MensRights21/02/15 02:39 AM
3

Kill or Be Slaughtered, the Call of Duty parody featured in the infamous GamerGate episode of SVU.
/r/MensRights21/02/15 02:15 AM
3

Isn't CoD just a KOBS ripoff?
/r/MensRights21/02/15 01:00 AM
2

How about everyone respects each other, regardless of gender, and takes reasonable steps to ensure their own safety?
/r/MensRights12/10/14 08:41 PM
8

Acknowledged, I will remember that.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 02:56 AM
10

Would be better to require http://donotlink.com/ links.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 02:05 AM
1

I haven't read into that matter so I can't comment on it.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 02:10 AM
28

It's still incredibly misogynistic to say that it's impossible for a woman to affect a young male.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 02:05 AM
–

That's what really confounds me. They say 14 year old males can give consent and that 14 year old females can't, implying males are on a higher mental level than females. Then they call us misogynists.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 09:04 PM
1

The best thing would be magazines that don't go on and on and on about what someone with a persecution complex said and would actually, you know, focus on the games.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 01:06 AM
1

It's because the gaming journalism industry pushed it as 10/10 GOTY ALL YEARS when it was more a piece of interactive fiction than anything else.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 09:14 PM
2

The thing is, not everyone uses Adblock, and even those who do still contribute to its search engine ranking by linking it.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 07:59 PM
0

If you must link to that awful site, can you please use http://www.donotlink.com/ so as not to give them ad money?
/r/MensRights28/08/14 04:15 PM
22

Somewhat. The horrid gaming journalism industry was pushing her visual novel Depression Quest as the greatest thing ever, just like they did with Gone Home. They're more focused on promoting games with PC messages than they are with promoting games that are actually good. The really ironic part is, to promote her game about depression, she framed a community of depressed people for harassing her.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 04:14 PM
1

What I posted is about a previous event that took place.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 05:11 AM
3

https://imgur.com/PhGltrv,uj6fWZj,GR2f4Va,yKyiPov,tpulwdI Here's info on something she previously did.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 11:19 PM
11

Believe me, I'd absolutely love to just ignore them, but they're subverting the entire industry to cater to their standards rather than to just focus on making a good game.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 06:07 PM
2

In chaos, there is opportunity. I'm hoping that something like this will spark a conversation about feminists, and SJWs in general, censoring the opposition. As it stands, attempts to stop discussion of this issue are just completely backfiring. It's blowing up all across the internet and everyone's flipping out. Pretty hilarious, to be honest. More and more facts about how deep SJW control goes are coming to light. Hell, what she did to Wizardchan is becoming well known, and that place is absol…
/r/MensRights20/08/14 06:05 PM
2

When they pull that card, I like to pull up examples of people against those groups that they supposedly represent. AFPE for feminists and Neturei Karta for Zionists.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 05:56 PM
-1

No, you just ignored the bulk of what I said while nitpicking a few out of context clusters of words with an incredibly condescending tone. As I said, I'm not going to bother discussing this with you if you don't actually address my points.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 02:05 PM
-1

If you're going to just completely ignore my points rather than actually addressing them, like a feminist, no less, I'm not going to bother discussing this with you.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 01:50 PM
-1

I was asking specifically which rule on Wikipedia that this violated. Desiring further clarification as to your viewpoint isn't making a claim based on burden of proof. Though, if you wish to play it that way, your initial claim that feminists are violating Wikipedia's rules, made by submitting that link, puts the burden of proof on you. Upon reviewing the article and the Wikipedia page once more, I don't see how the rules are violated. This is an initiative to write about people they believe ar…
/r/MensRights16/08/14 01:19 PM
-1

Which one, specifically? May I see it?
/r/MensRights16/08/14 06:46 AM
-1

Then go right ahead adding people who meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 12:22 AM
1

Well, I personally believe that people should be able to do anything, so long as it doesn't violate other's rights. Private institutions have a right to discriminate, but at the same time, I think they're awful for choosing to exercise this right.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 12:22 AM
33

"Feminists will agree to quit it with the misandry jokes if anti-feminists cease making scurrilous accusations that feminists are motivated by man hatred." Anti-feminists will stop accusing feminists of being motivated by misandry if... they stop being... motivated by misandry! "Stop pretending that one has to hate men in order to believe that men should not be unfairly privileged over women." Stop pretending that one has to be trying to promote patriarchy in order to oppose feminism! "We should…
/r/MensRights15/08/14 11:54 AM
-1

Honestly, I don't see this as a bad thing. So long as they're following Wikipedia's rules, are creating entries for people of enough note to be included and aren't demeaning males, they should be allowed to do as they wish.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 11:38 AM
16

Your point being? It'd be reprehensible if a male wore a Female Tears shirt and acted like they cared when a female celebrity died.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 07:29 AM
3

It's still brigading, and it's still something we're above. Upvote important posts when you come across them from places other than meta subs if you want to help.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 11:44 AM
1

True. In no way am I saying that MGM isn't a problem. I'm simply saying that FGM is also one, though I very much wish MGM got the attention that FGM does. Of course, this isn't the appropriate forum for discussing anti-FGM strategies.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 11:43 AM
15

No, we're not going to stoop to their level. What would we brigade anyway? FGM? That is a serious issue, though not in the first world, that needs addressing.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 01:03 AM
5

It's incredibly misogynistic for feminism to say that no woman could be against it unless a man was behind them...
/r/MensRights30/07/14 12:29 PM
1

Are you banned? That much will tell me everything.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 11:20 PM
1

39 posts in SRS Clearly, it's a strawman. Clearly.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 09:36 PM
2

I think my favorite thing about this sub is that I've never seen anyone banned for expressing an opinion not held by most or being part of a certain demographic (excepting troll, if you count that). You will never be judged or demeaned just for being a women. What you will be judged for is what you have to say and contribute, as it should be everywhere.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 09:35 PM
1

I'm just lurking. I want to see how long until it crashes and burns and people start getting banned for disagreeing with minor, inconsequential things.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 04:37 AM
1

Thank you very much, appreciate your response.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 05:22 AM
-1

They've been spouting this nonsense for years and getting in a tizzy about it isn't going to help anyone. We should focus on solving problems.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 07:22 AM
9

Who is actually advocating that abusive fathers have custody of children? The vast, vast majority of MHRAs would have no problem with a mother holding sole custody if the father were abusive. This is yet another strawman meant to demonize fathers as caregivers.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 02:58 PM
2

We have the moral high ground. We should demonstrate that we have nothing to fear by letting our opponents engage in free speech. The more feminists prove that they're afraid of what we have to say by trying to shut us down, the better we look.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 05:06 AM
1

I don't know enough to speak for its truth. I just know it isn't fair to say that men deserve to be drafted because a very, very small minority of them that are in power declared the wars.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 05:02 AM
1

So long as she doesn't do anything violent or disruptive, I see this as a good thing. If she has ridiculous criticism, it'll bolster us in the eyes of the fence-sitters. If she has legitimate criticism, it'll help us to improve. The MHRM is, by no means, perfect, and I relish any opportunity to solve any problems it has. Hell, if we're lucky, she might learn something.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 03:19 AM
7

Naah, brigades won't help anything. In the long term, bringing up double standards to individuals will.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 02:52 AM
5

True, but our focus should not be on dismantling feminism, at least not beyond the individual scale. Our focus should be on rectifying inequality for men any way we can. If feminists make themselves an obstacle during this, we'll overcome them, but we should not needlessly engage when the time, effort and money can be spent on helping men.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 07:17 AM
0

Yeah, I admitted that was a pretty stupid thing to say. I've gone back and downvoted it myself, actually.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 05:16 AM
2

Good point. Need to keep our eye on the ball. Focus on accomplishing goals rather than petty achievements that mean nothing. My bad.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 11:19 PM
4

It matters for many reasons. This is one more. It might get SJW types to care about it if they see it affects trans women, actually.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 10:23 PM
4

No, because it's an organization meant specifically for women. Calling it misandrist would be like calling disallowing women from a fraternity misogynist. What I'm thinking of in particular with religion is their view of women as subservient to men, meant for housework and taking care of children. While there's nothing wrong with women (or men) fulfilling these roles, they should be able to choose whatever path in life they wish, so long as they don't violate other's rights.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:44 AM
1

Assumption. Unless stated otherwise, it's reasonable to assume that a high-ranking member of a group shares the group's beliefs. It's why you'd also think that any given Catholic is likely anti-abortion.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 01:10 AM
9

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex,_gender_and_the_Roman_Catholic_Church https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_and_women http://www.catholic.com/quickquestions/what-is-the-catholic-view-of-women
/r/MensRights11/06/14 12:15 AM
4

"Many feminists don't support conscription — for anyone. But regardless of whether you agree with a draft in theory, it's important to remember that military action (including the decision to go to war in the first place) has been legislated almost entirely by men, and that women historically have shown less support for war." Yet you'd have a problem (And rightfully so!) if I said that Valerie Solanas were representative of all feminists. The actions of one member of a group, particularly one th…
/r/MensRights10/06/14 11:50 PM
7

http://puu.sh/9o6Ks/f8ee2a2800.gif I know I post this too much but it seriously pisses me off. Most feminists have the tact to at least pay lip service to MGM being bad, but this one can't even do that. The reason MHRAs are angry with the attention given to FGM is because it's very, very rare in the first world, and performers of it are prosecuted and hated. (As they very well should be!) But of course, barely anyone cares about MGM, and people who bring it up are seen as just whiners. Sorry for…
/r/MensRights10/06/14 11:46 PM
12

Agreed. Religious institutions are one of the few places in the first world where institutional misogyny is a problem.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 11:34 PM
25

We believe that, regardless of gender, people should be allowed to fulfill whatever capacity that they wish. He believes in the Catholic perspective that inherent differences between men and women mandate them fulfilling certain roles.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 11:33 PM
3

You could feed a whole stable of horses with all that straw.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 09:32 PM
2

So they're saying that male children are on a higher level than female adults, but they call /us/ misogynists? Wow.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 02:22 AM
4

Though I'd love to see this happen, I'm not sure how much good it will do. The courts are biased against men as is.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 02:20 PM
5

Don't forget, the sociopaths who commit violent crimes will totally stop if you tell them to!
/r/MensRights19/05/14 09:12 AM
7

If we're really as bad as they say we are, they shouldn't have to resort to disingenuous false flag tactics to criticize us. Come on, hit us with your best shot. Show us how horrible we are. I'd love to hear it.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 04:56 PM
5

I have seen very, very little misogyny on this subreddit, and what is posted is usually straw men who are promptly downvoted into oblivion. If anyone would like to present examples of misogyny on this subreddit, please do. I acknowledge that the MHRM isn't perfect and I'd absolutely love to do my part in rectifying negative elements.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 04:54 PM
1

I don't say this as an insult but rather a request for readability. Please start using paragraphs, it would be much easier to understand what you say. But that's just the thing. We don't discard the input of females. In fact, some of our prominent figures, such as Christina Hoff Summers, are females. But we're not about anything but male issues. We're willing to accept anyone's support, male or female, so long as they recognize that. In fact, female MHRAs make me really happy, because they're su…
/r/MensRights18/05/14 04:36 AM
1

It's convenient, certainly, but it's still undue discrimination. We shouldn't endorse the continuation of misandry just because it benefits us in certain instances.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 04:30 AM
1

In my view, rape is a problem in the same sense that assault is a problem. It's a violent crime that should be worked on. But blaming it on culture and vilifying any attempt to make people safer is absolutely ridiculous. http://puu.sh/8QFJj.png The head of feminist groups support things like maternal custody being the default and scholarships for women, despite women making up 2/3rds of college attendants and scoring higher across the board in schools than males. It is, as you said, just a case …
/r/MensRights18/05/14 04:26 AM
3

You do somewhat have a point, but we can't shield children from human sexuality forever. Such things should be avoided until they have the context and reasoning skills to understand them, but seeing a Playboy isn't going to hurt them.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 03:55 AM
2

It's just mental gymnastics to justify misandry. Recognizing this helps to see it for what it is.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 03:54 AM
3

Sitting next to kids on airplanes makes men rapists.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 03:53 AM
2

What? Um. How?
/r/MensRights18/05/14 03:53 AM
5

Nope. Post history. Just thought people should know where you're from, so they can recognize your banal attempt at performing a strawman.
/r/PussyPass18/05/14 01:16 AM
3

SRS [59%, 16] | SRSSucks [41%, 11]
/r/PussyPass17/05/14 11:40 PM
0

I thank you for coming by to discuss this. Though I do acknowledge that there are a few feminists that aren't horrible, the vast majority really couldn't care less about male problems. In fact they're content to deny their existence and even exacerbate them in certain situations. A group is defined by its majority, and the majority of feminists aren't focused on true equality. I am happy that you are willing to oppose misandry and speak for male rights, but the majority of feminists are not. I, …
/r/MensRights17/05/14 10:40 PM
3

I disagree but I'm upvoting for relevance. I don't see anything inherently discriminatory in focusing exclusively on the problems of one group. Think about it: Does volunteering at a soup kitchen make you a horrible person because you're not donating to help starving kids in Africa? Why, then, should focusing on male issues make you a horrible person for not focusing on female issues? There are problems unique to each sex. For males, it is MGM, being considered disposable, the draft, et cetera. …
/r/MensRights17/05/14 10:35 PM
1

Ah, well. I don't know what to tell you, then. Sorry.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 06:45 AM
1

You could send them an E-mail. I sent one asking for them to accept crypto, because I have a lot of that but little USD.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 06:26 AM
1

I believe it will be regrown. But honestly, I'm not the expert. You should read the site.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 05:50 AM
1

3 and 5 are contradictory, but focusing on domestic violence committed against women isn't exactly discriminatory, so long as they acknowledge that men face domestic violence as well. They likely don't, though.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 04:22 PM
1

Still, the point I was trying to make is that it's not the perfect movement that modern society likes to promote it as. It had its flaws and its downfalls, as do we. I appreciate measurable examples of bias, so that people aren't just circlejerking over anecdotal evidence confirming the views. Everyone has a confirmation bias, and being aware of it helps to mitigate its effect. From the measurable things I have seen (people being much nicer to women just for being women, MGM being legal but FGM …
/r/MensRights16/05/14 12:41 PM
1

I believe they can obtain that from a person's circumcision scar.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 08:06 AM
1

From my understanding, they seek to establish a precedent for decellularizing foreskins so they can learn to regenerate new ones. You should read the site, since I'm super overtired right now.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 07:07 PM
1

My initial opinion of historical feminism was that it was necessary and wholly just, but I am now questioning it. I do not deny that they earned many essential rights for women, but they had their fair share of horrific acts, as well. For instance, they campaigned against the right of black women to vote. Look up the White Feather Society, as well. The Boko Haram girls kidnapping exploding is indicative on a larger problem: Most people in this country value women more than men. I'm not sure if t…
/r/MensRights15/05/14 02:10 AM
0

I thank you for coming by to discuss this with us. The reason we have such a hatred for feminism is because it endlessly promotes a model where men are always the brutish, stupid aggressor and women are always the dainty, intelligent, helpless victims. This dynamic is all too prevalent in society as it is (look at how men and women are portrayed in advertising, for instance. Or how much of a fuss was made when Nigerian schoolgirls were kidnapped by the Boko Haram when they've been slaughtering s…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 03:30 AM
2

Still, man, reversing the damage is something. I'm also hopeful that people will wonder why people want to regenerate their foreskins in the first place and look into the reasons.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 11:54 PM
3

It's something, man. And I've learned to take what I can get.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 03:54 PM
2

They've made progress. They're moving slowly, but they're moving. It might be five years, it might be ten, it might be twenty. I might be an old man. I don't know when. But I find it inevitable that, eventually, technology will advance to the point where foreskin regeneration will be possible. And this makes me happy.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 03:17 PM
7

Best shot we have right now, really. If I were a scammer, I'd say things along the lines of foreskin regeneration happening very, very soon. Foregen acknowledges that these things take time.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 03:02 PM
8

I'd like to start by saying I appreciate you coming by to discuss this and dislike the vitriolic response you received. To be perfectly honest, I don't think it's really a good idea to fracture the MHRM any further. As it is, we're small and devoid of supporters. I would be more than happy to have you supporting us, but I don't think we need to separate the movement at all. I'm apprehensive to do this, as well, because I believe most feminist rhetoric (patriarchy, intersectionality, etc.) is eit…
/r/MensRights12/05/14 01:19 AM
1

Supporting free speech means supporting speech you don't like. Though I don't agree with feminists, I support their right to say what they want to say. Though I don't agree with anti-abortion activists, I support their right to say what they want to say. In this sense, I believe someone shouldn't be banned unless they're blatantly trolling and not even trying to bring an argument to the table. Whenever someone says that the MHRM endorses misogyny or redpill content, I encourage them to look at t…
/r/MensRights10/05/14 11:32 PM
2

http://real-justice-luigi.tumblr.com/post/78639750525/debunk-feminism This is one of my favorite lists. Scroll down to "Feminists being horrible".
/r/MensRights10/05/14 11:28 PM
2

What do you suggest we should do, then? So far, I don't really see an effective alternative to maintaining the moral high ground.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 11:23 PM
2

http://foregen.org/ Not necessarily.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 11:21 PM
2

By and large, the majority of feminists aren't going to be convinced. But the purpose of the MHRM is not to oppose feminism. It is to advance the rights of men. Feminists are not our enemy. Misandry is our enemy. Anti-male laws are our enemy. Bigotry against males and masculinity is our enemy. Though feminists may set themselves up as obstacles to be overcome while working on these problems, eradicating them is not our be-all end-all goal. Deal with them as they come up, but work independently o…
/r/MensRights09/05/14 08:12 AM
2

Eh... To be frank, I wish I were rid of my social drive. It's nothing but a nuisance.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 09:54 PM
6

Calling intactivism antisemetic would be like calling anti-smoking racist, because the Nazis promoted it. It's criticizing a horrible, unnecessary medical procedure, not Jewish people themselves.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 09:23 PM
7

My view is that teachers should have the option, not the responsibility but the option, to have guns in a highly secure, palm and code locked safe in their offices.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 07:02 PM
-2

Ah. Still, I have to say this much to be fair, as I'd be a little miffed if someone said "I was listening to a podcast where someone made a point that men resort to emotions when arguing rather than logic. Of course, this isn't true for everyone, but with an argumentative man..."
/r/MensRights05/05/14 04:49 AM
3

http://puu.sh/8zPsj.jpg
/r/MensRights05/05/14 04:39 AM
1

Eh, it's his call. Whatever he feels is right for the situation.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 04:35 AM
1

I have to be fair and point out that saying that every women is driven by emotions and not logic rather than just some (some men, too, for that matter) is really misogynistic. She certainly was, but not all women are.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 04:30 AM
3

Sometimes, for benefits associating with them gives you or simple lack of better options, you can't afford to be picky with who is your companion.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 04:28 AM
54

This is actually incredibly misogynistic, to imply that women crumble at the first sign of negativity and can't just continue on, or yell something back.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 06:56 PM
7

I have to be frank and say that name-calling isn't going to get us anywhere. There's plenty of things we can attack without resorting to personal insults.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 06:55 PM
2

I'm interested in seeing this.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 04:41 AM
-1

The thing is, certain people are convinced that feminists are the be-all end-all enemy and everything will be okay when they're defeated. They are not the enemy. Misandry is the enemy. We shouldn't be focused on countering their vitriol toward us, we should be focused on eliminating laws which discriminate against men and amending laws which protect women exclusively to protect people. (VAWA, shared custody, et cetera.) There is no problem with engaging with feminists and converting people to yo…
/r/MensRights18/03/14 03:08 AM
0

I believe that patriarchy was previously institutional due to systemic discrimination against women in their inability to vote, hold office, own property, et cetera. This has now been rectified. I was hoping that she would bring up the apex fallacy but she did not. She seems to believe that patriarchy, in general, promotes gender roles which are harmful to both men and women. While I do agree with her in seeking the abolition of gender, I don't believe that the origin of gender roles is due to p…
/r/MensRights18/03/14 03:04 AM
2

I think you sort of missed the point I was trying to make about this post. My friend and I mutually define patriarchy as a system in which men hold all or most political, cultural and economic power. I believe that it existed in the past but no longer does. What I am asking is how to convince her that feminists aren't co-opting patriarchal gender roles when they carry out horrible actions. I am asking how to convince her that they are acting on their own, rather than to perpetuate a patriarchy o…
/r/MensRights18/03/14 12:56 AM
1

I'll ask her about these and report back with how it went.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 12:40 AM
2

She has conceded on a few points during our numerous discussions. She's a smart person. I have confidence that she can be brought around and hope I am capable of being the one to do it.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 12:39 AM
8

His question wasn't whether or not he was raped. Non-consensual sex, no matter the genders of the victim and the perpetrator, is rape. He was asking if he could file it as rape under the legal system.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 12:39 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter