TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Solid-Savings5362 Archive

View 1 post and 85 comments by Solid-Savings5362 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

We are exceptions, right?
/r/MensRights03/08/26 10:25 PM
1

You would still get "examinated", but could choose where it happens i think. it is about body height, body weight, other things (likely hearing and seeing), a stool examination, urine examination, did i forget anything?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/26 10:20 PM
1

I think it's caused by decadence and misandry, (at the very least) indifference about men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/26 09:30 PM
1

I already said that, unfornutalely phrased awkward which gives me push-back
/r/MensRights03/08/26 09:27 PM
1

What do you even mean?
/r/MensRights03/08/26 09:25 PM
2

I mean if even 1 woman on the planet kills her boyfriend/partner, the statement "not all men but always a man" is utterly wrong. Glad you gave me that link!
/r/MensRights03/08/26 09:21 PM
7

Feminists, please do not tell me that is equality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/26 08:44 PM
2

I also was like that for 2 years some years ago (2022-2024), then drifted away from "auto-misandry" & feminism, then became MRA! even those boys/men can change & become MRA, atleast sometimes.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/08/26 08:42 PM
7

Aiming for equality by excluding half of population based on an unchangable biological feature, that's equality! IRONY.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/08/26 08:38 PM
1

Just like "all women are gold-diggers that only care about men's status" or "all women want agressive men & dislike nice men" or "all women only care about men's height" are "kinda true"? if we oppose overgeneralisations in women, we either should oppose them also in men or never oppose them at all!
/r/EverydayMisandry03/08/26 08:33 PM
15

It shows that "not all men, but always a man" is utterly nonsense if even 1 woman kills her partner/boyfriend. She allegedly was swinging the knife because of anger but did not expect it to hit her boyfriend. People will say "he provoced her", women are seen as innocent (by society) until they aren', and a woman's guilt is downplayed even if she is guilty. men in contrast are seen (again by society) as guilty until proven not guilty.
/r/MensRights03/08/26 08:18 PM
1

important points. feminists will say that women's preference for "protecting" men is caused by the "patriarchy" and/or "social conditioning". you should not date if you feel risk of false accisations is to big. and there's definately a risk.
/r/MensRights03/08/26 08:04 PM
1

but feminism, like feminine and female comes from latin "femina". doesnt that mean feminism is focussed on women, even if "intersectional"? and what does intersectional feminism think about the "male privilege" concept?
/r/MensRights03/08/26 07:50 PM
4

You describe why i oppose feminism, despite i want equality.
/r/MensRights03/08/26 06:14 PM
1

ts true that men often suffer from traditional rigid gender roles (both genders did/do), but i feel men are more subject to them than women in 2026. i also saw a statement from a german feminist: “Equal rights mean having the same opportunities, not the same obligations!“, it was last year when germany talked about “new millitary service“, which then was accepted by parliament in december 2025. to me, this quote and the new law perfectly illustrate why many MRAs feel gender expectations are asym…
/r/MensRights03/08/26 05:10 PM
7

Feminists say "feminism is for men too", but i don t see it.
/r/MensRights03/08/26 04:18 PM
4

That's why i dislike feminism.
/r/MensRights03/08/26 04:17 PM
7

That's correct. the nazis blamed jews for everything (capitalism, bolshevism, central powers loosing world war 1), feminists blame men & a perceived patriarchy, both act according to the principle "Whoever is not with us is against us", as seen by the horrifying treatment (physical violence & death threats) against critics like Esther Vilar or Erin Pizzey, both feminists and nazis demand reducing/eliminating a certain population (jews for the nazis, men for feminists saying "kill all men" or "re…
/r/MensRights03/08/26 02:23 PM
18

I agree to you, but feminism already IS selective equality rather than genuine equality!
/r/MensRights03/08/26 01:12 PM
13

OP, I relate to this so much. i would feel guilty for women's problems for some time (4-2 years ago), even though i am a shy young man. but i was/am NOT responsible for what people in Afghanistan, Iran or other countries do to women. many men in those countries also suffer and/or oppose these dictatorships, and many women also support them. i could create my own post about my "feminist to mra transformation".
/r/MensRights03/08/26 01:04 PM
2

Do you have more information about the case now?
/r/MensRights03/08/26 12:52 PM
5

Yes, women (always) are the fairer sex! /s
/r/MensRights03/08/26 09:40 AM
0

The thing is that women expect men to make the first move (but only men they find attractive) & that many women have no respect for guys they find unattractive. men who are like that are critized endlessly by society & feminism, but it's tolerated in women.
/r/MensRights03/08/26 08:58 AM
3

Yes, exactly. we need to stop seeing women as innocent angles if women just are capable of being as cruel, mean whatever as men. as you said, they just mask it better. all humans, even women, have their flaws.
/r/MensRights03/08/26 08:48 AM
6

Unfortunately, That's to expect. men are seen as guilty (by society) until they are proven innocent.
/r/MensRights03/08/26 08:35 AM
24

The feminist slogan "Not all men, but always a man" seems to be wrong, even sexist, doesn't it?
/r/MensRights03/08/26 08:15 AM
1

Dude, you didn't "detect" anything, I literally told you myself in my first reply. It’s incredibly elitist to think everyone online has to write with perfect English slang just to be seen as a real human. I used a tool to fix my grammar because English isn't my first language. The actual empathy and support came straight from me, not a machine. The OP is literally in a life-or-death situation in the MENA region. He doesn't care if my phrasing looks too clean; he cares that someone actually gave …
/r/MensRights03/08/26 08:12 AM
1

I have that feeling to, that feminism only is concerned with challending female roles but leaving men's roles like they are. that's why i critize feminism.
/r/MensRights02/08/26 09:56 PM
1

Most feminists either are to ignorant or to stupid to see men's problems despite saying that "patriarchy hurts men too", but i don't see their actions towards men as being helpful.
/r/MensRights02/08/26 09:43 PM
22

Good point. Both society (by expecting men to always be "strong") and dogmatic feminism (by claiming men are universally privileged and women always have it worse) contribute to maintaining an unfair system. You're entirely right not to blame women as a whole. While most women aren't MRAs, most men aren't either. Historically, several women were actually crucial to the foundation of the MRA movement. Ideological movements often rely on rigid scapegoats and enemies—in this case, men & a perceived…
/r/MensRights02/08/26 09:30 PM
5

That's a simple yet great way to put it. i am talking very complicated sometimes, haha!
/r/MensRights02/08/26 08:50 PM
4

Yeah, that's to expect. the more things change the more they stay the same.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/26 08:40 PM
4

exactly, especially as feminism frames men's expierence as "male privilege". it also doesnt help that men are expected to be "stoic", which prevents many men from talking about problems.
/r/MensRights02/08/26 08:32 PM
18

Yet feminists say "Not all men, but always a man." I'll never understand that, and i'm not alone with that lol. toxic behavior & even many kinds of violence in relationships are much more gender symmetrical than expected (Erin Pizzey got hate & death threats for saying that), men just cause more damage than women because they are stronger. men on the other hand are expected to "man up", to be "strong", not "weak", thus avoid talking about that, which likely skews the ratio even more towards male…
/r/MensRights02/08/26 08:19 PM
1

Exactly, an important point. idk why it's so difficult to understand human attraction & talk about it.
/r/MensRights02/08/26 07:53 PM
1

Damn, caught red-handed. Beep boop, my bad. 🤖
/r/MensRights02/08/26 07:49 PM
1

That's correct. it's not always "please be taller than 6 feet", but almost always "please be taller than me", which obviously depends on the woman. that said, taller isnt taller, visibly taller (often being atleast ~5 cm taller) is considered better, and acc.to a dutch study with people from many countries, women are most satisfied when their partners are 21 cm (nearly a head) taller than themselves, but many accept simply "taller", atleast outside off online dating. and yes, couple's height dis…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 04:43 PM
2

Interesting take, OP, but social competence dosent get your foot into the door, height & looks (which i consider both as appearance) do for men. why do people think that women care less about appearance than men? don't they need a baseline of attraction to care about a man's personality, such as social competence, kindness, empathy, whatever? that said, short men (can have success & tall men may struggle to attract women, but women's height standards are a real thing. it's researched exensively.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 04:26 PM
2

At the risk of getting downvoted too, i am also worried that the west gets dragged into the war. but i have no solution, neither for ukraine, russia, and different western politicans.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/26 03:54 PM
2

Good comment from you. feminists will say "men cause wars", but which men?! not ordinary or poor men in my opinion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/26 03:53 PM
0

Very good explanation. i don't get the sentence "men care more about mate's looks than women" from people generally & science, are women able to see a man's personality at first glance unlike men & require no baseline attraction? isn't men's height also appearance? and yes, women also care strongly about status, for example the 6-6-6 rule, that rule is true atleast for some women. it means 6' tall, 6 figured incomes, 6 pack. but i believe height and status are more important for most women than …
/r/MensRights02/08/26 03:13 PM
2

What changed for you?
/r/MensRights02/08/26 03:08 PM
6

How dare you doubt it? /s
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/26 03:00 PM
3

What should countries do to defend themselves in your opinion? whould you accept being drafted? do you think women should gave birth then at rate 2,1 (maintenance niveau) per person to stabilize populations?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/26 02:58 PM
6

Do you believe heterosexual women never do that?
/r/MensRights02/08/26 02:52 PM
1

You are critizing that the west doesnt help ukraine enough against putin, the perceived hatred against the ukraine in that sub & also opposing men's conscription. How do you want the west to change its policy regarding the ukraine & the ukraine to change its millitary service?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/26 01:35 PM
1

It's a constant thing ever since in dogmatic/hateful circles. spot on observation.
/r/MensRights02/08/26 01:15 PM
1

okay, that's possible.
/r/MensRights02/08/26 01:07 PM
12

Excactly, this isn't a favor to young men. They didn't do this to make things easier for them, it's just a bureaucratic shortcut to save money. Chasing down millions of unregistered guys is a massive administrative headache and wastes agency money + resources. Making it automatic is entirely about their budget and efficiency, not convenience for the male citizens.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/26 12:15 PM
1

haha, that's good!
/r/MensRights02/08/26 09:29 AM
2

It's great that OP still got another answer focussing on serious problems. after i leaved the first comment all what other redditors talked aboout my style being to ai like, as if we have no bigger problems. How should i deal with such a situation, visible in the chat?
/r/MensRights02/08/26 08:54 AM
32

Germany just did the exact same thing, and the state is already bringing down the hammer on guys who resist. For context on our new system that started this January: Every citizen turning 18 now gets an official military readiness questionnaire. According to the official Federal Government FAQ, it’s 100% voluntary for women, but legally mandatory for men. [1] The Ministry of Defense just confirmed that they are actively preparing the first official fine proceedings against men who ignore it, as …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/26 08:34 AM
1

Men’s status & wealth do matter to women, moreso than reversed. But will a woman who is (just as an example) focussed on a man‘s heigh overlook being short if he’s rich enough?
/r/MensRights01/08/26 11:07 PM
4

Yeah, I used an AI to clean up my English because it's not my first language. My bad. But I'm a real guy who genuinely wanted to support this OP. He is literally a gay man in a dangerous MENA country talking about his trauma, and you’re here playing internet detective over a writing style. Y'all actually could orientate yourself on my posts & ai, you may get as much upvotes as i did, appeare more friendly & empathetic. Your paranoia is so exhausting. People like you repel potential MRAs. Grow up
/r/MensRights01/08/26 09:37 PM
14

that rhetoric is mainstream in entire west in my opinion, and maybe even in other areas.
/r/MensRights01/08/26 09:30 PM
2

Appreciate your perspective. "men need to make the first move", "pay for all dates" & "be chivalrous" seem to be related in my opinion. it's easy for men to either be "benevolent sexist" or "misogynous", can a man ever win? male tradcons, male feminists and MRAs all will catch hell.
/r/MensRights01/08/26 09:20 PM
2

Fair point, my style was definitely giving off AI vibes. I'll watch that. But the issues we're discussing here are still real
/r/MensRights01/08/26 09:05 PM
2

i appreciate your information, thank you very much!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/26 09:00 PM
6

Many women also are bad, many people of both genders are. yet people face hate if they critize women, but also if they are "benevolent sexists", you really can't win!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/26 08:47 PM
3

I also theorised if people show their true colors online.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/26 08:43 PM
0

Not just so called “soy boys“ or “cucks“
/r/MensRights01/08/26 08:34 PM
1

It's also possible-and likely-that many women wont care about a man's status if he does'nt reach the baseline attractiveness I talked about.
/r/MensRights01/08/26 08:32 PM
3

"real feminists" basically don't exist or are extremely rare if those statements are true!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/26 08:27 PM
0

I feel you so much, OP. I went through an extremely similar phase of "auto-misandry" a few years ago after diving way too deep into online gender debates. It completely wrecked my self-esteem and made me incredibly hypervigilant around women, constantly fearing they’d think I’m inherently evil just for being born a guy. What you are feeling is heavy, but please hear this: You are NOT responsible for the actions of other men across the world. Being a man does not make you a bad person. You didn't…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/26 08:10 PM
0

i agree with you. they want attractive men to approach them. do you think most women would choose a short, rich man over a tall and handsome man?
/r/MensRights01/08/26 07:56 PM
1

I've the same feeling. for example, most love songs are from men, not women. women are not the romantical gender. women are more choosy than men, like in many species. do you believe women even are grossed out by "tall, dark, and handsome" men? if it's interesting for y'all, "dark" in that phrase refers to hair color.
/r/MensRights01/08/26 07:53 PM
14

Spot on. Women, like men, care about physical attractivity, yet people & even science insist that "men, on average, care more about a mate's appearance than women", which i don't get as said. don't women also need a baseline of attractiveness to even care about a man's personality? Men's status and height are very important for women's attraction to men, moreso than women's status and heigth for men's attraction.
/r/MensRights01/08/26 07:48 PM
1

An extremely good point, my style was definitely giving off AI vibes. I'll watch that. But the issues we're discussing here are still real.
/r/MensRights01/08/26 07:40 PM
2

Do you mean my comments?
/r/MensRights01/08/26 07:11 PM
10

Spot on. Choosing not to play is the only logical way to protect your mental health when the game is completely rigged. The reality is that physical attractiveness dictates the rules and acts as the only shield against being labeled a creep. Since average men don't have that shield and can't control how they are perceived, navigating dating becomes a minefield where the juice just isn't worth the squeeze anymore.
/r/MensRights01/08/26 06:35 PM
18

Exactly. The irony is palpable: women complain about the "death of chivalry," yet the social and legal architecture has made chivalry a liability. When the definition of (benecolent) sexism or harassment is weaponized to include normal human proximity or giving a simple gift, "not playing" becomes a survival strategy rather than a choice. The goalposts have been moved so far that flawless behavior is no longer a shield. Even if you completely opt out of dating, you are still one baseless accusat…
/r/MensRights01/08/26 06:34 PM
6

Exactly. Physical attractiveness acts as a built-in safety shield against the 'creep' label—if you have the looks, it’s charming; if you don’t, it’s a boundary violation. When the baseline requirement to even attempt an approach without social risk is a genetic lottery, it forces the average guy to realize that the only winning move is to opt out. Walking away isn't quitting; it's basic risk management. i don't get why women allegedly care less about appearance than men, can they see character a…
/r/MensRights01/08/26 06:31 PM
23

You are not ignorant at all; you are pointing out a very real and exhausting double standard that many men face today. The issue stems from a mismatch between traditional expectations and modern social risks. Here is a breakdown of why this happens: The Initiative Burden: Society still expects men to make the first move and take 100% of the risk of rejection. The "Creep" Label as a Safety Shield: For some women, labeling an unwanted approach as "creepy" is an easy way to reject someone without f…
/r/MensRights01/08/26 05:20 PM
25

Promoting equality by banning half the population. Brilliant strategy to win over male voters! /s
/r/MensRights01/08/26 04:44 PM
3

That's the impression I get from some spaces too. I don't expect everyone to agree on the causes, but I'd at least expect genuine engagement instead of downplaying or outright dismissing the issue. Also, "Those aren't real feminists" doesn't really address the criticism. Whether they count as "real feminists" or not, communities like AskFeminists are influential and shape many people's perception of feminism. If this attitude is common in prominent feminist spaces, I think it's fair to discuss i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/26 12:57 PM
14

You are highlighting a very real and painful double standard, and your feelings of erasure are completely valid. In many MENA countries, state media adopts "women's empowerment" initiatives partly due to international pressure. It functions as performative public relations to look modern on the global stage. Meanwhile, gay men are left entirely exposed because homophobia is actively weaponised to enforce rigid patriarchal structures. This creates a brutal paradox: society says you to hold male p…
/r/MensRights01/08/26 12:37 PM
11

This shows a dangerous double standard. Abuse is just as horrific when committed by women, yet society constantly ignores or downplays it. Worse, replacing the failed school with a female-only scholarship project shows how boys are excluded even when female-led institutions fail. We must stop minimizing violence & systemic exclusion based on gender.
/r/MensRights31/07/26 08:20 PM
8

This is a crucial point. Statistically, men pay the majority of income taxes in most European nations, yet funding for male-specific crises (like male victims of domestic abuse, sexual violence, or homelessness) is virtually non-existent compared to the resources allocated to feminist campaigns. We are legally mandated to pay into a system that actively erases our unique vulnerabilities and the experiences of male victims.
/r/MensRights31/07/26 06:59 PM
1

Great initiative. For an IMD campaign, I think a heavy focus on men's workplace safety, mental health, and reducing the stigma around seeking help would be incredibly impactful. We could brainstorm a campaign centered on ”Checking in on your male friends“ and colleagues, but backed by structural demands—like calling for safer working conditions and more male-specific therapy resources. It’s a progressive, health-and-safety-focused angle that everyone can get behind.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/26 05:49 PM
1

Thank you so much for this link! The All Survivors Project does incredible, crucial work on a topic that is tragically heavily stigmatized and rarely discussed openly. This is exactly the kind of factual source I was looking for to understand the situation better. Really appreciate you sharing this!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/26 05:23 PM
2

This is an incredibly critical issue that desperately needs more light shed on it. When people talk about education under the Taliban, the focus is almost exclusively on the tragic ban for girls—which is obviously horrific—but the complete destruction, radicalization, and systemic collapse of the education system for boys and men is completely ignored. By replacing actual schools with purely religious, hardline madrasas, they are essentially taking away any future for young men and systematicall…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/26 05:17 PM
1

Absolutely. It is a completely heartbreaking situation for the vast majority of ordinary citizens trapped under that regime, while those at the very top face zero consequences.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/26 05:02 PM
3

That is a very deep and accurate breakdown of the cultural dynamics. The forced segregation definitely builds a wall between the sexes, making healthy human bonding so much harder. It creates an incredibly toxic environment where silent suffering and false accusations thrive on both sides. Thank you for adding this perspective.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/26 04:59 PM
6

You are completely right. It is easily one of the most heartbreaking and horrific forms of exploitation, yet it rarely gets the global outcry it desperately needs. When discussing the hardships of boys in the region, this absolutely has to be at the forefront of the conversation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/26 04:57 PM
3

Thank you so much for sharing these pointers! I didn't know about the 'tinmen' compilation from 2021, and Bacha Bazi is definitely a horrifying aspect that deserves much more international attention and research. It's a shame that so much scholarly research on this is hidden behind paywalls, but these insights are a great starting point for me. I appreciate the help!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/26 04:54 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter