Solid_Asparagus8969 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
29	"Of Course, That Doesn't Mean You're Invalidating Women's Issues" If the issues they're not invalidating are fake issues like the "wage gap" that end up discriminating men and boys even more, that tells you they are man hating feminists pretending to be moderate. Simple as that. They're not evolving, they're lying. Have you read about Diverting Hate? The US Deparment of Homeland Security is funding research and organizations to deactivate MRM and convert them. https://x.com/Gynocentrism/status/1787712826897006965	/r/MensRights	21/02/25 09:31 PM
1	UK: Female who falsified baby's DNA test to stop partner from seeing his daughter has been freed after serving 3 months of a 32 month sentence. So many reasons.	/r/MensRights	15/02/25 04:41 PM
2	UK: Female who falsified baby's DNA test to stop partner from seeing his daughter has been freed after serving 3 months of a 32 month sentence. Google "UN Bangkok Rules on women offenders and prisoners". Its an UN agenda to keep women from going to jail when they commit crimes, and the UK is one of the top countries implementing it. You'll find news from 2024, 2020, 2018 about the steps they're taking.	/r/MensRights	15/02/25 04:40 PM
1	Men, how do you feel about female teachers getting away with sleeping with underage male students? The first thing is to separate "GENERAL age of sexual consent" from "age of sexual consent with people that have privileged access to kids" (like teachers, extra scholar activities monitors and such). A decent general age of consent right now is 15-16 in the western world at least, for many elaborated reasons. But for teacher-student relationships under 18 it should just be illegal no matter what, for the obvious risks and to preserve the nature and purpose of the educational institutions. The s…	/r/MensRights	14/02/25 07:21 PM
3	Why is men’s right seen as group “ negative affects some people “ by some popular reddit sub? You're falling into their trap. They will keep calling you a misogynist because that's how they justify their belief system. For feminists, some feminists are not man hating enough so they're also labelled as misogynysts. If you're a decade or more in this movement, you dont really care about PR or appearances. I suggest you stop wasting your energy and helping them by talking about the non existing misogyny in this movement. I don't blame you tho, its a phase that everyone goes through. Men's r…	/r/MensRights	12/02/25 08:40 PM
0	I didn't know it was this bad for men Second time you miss the main reply, that's strike 3. And yes, 1848 declaration of Seneca Falls was published 7 months after the publication of the comunist manifesto, emulating it and putting males as oppressors. That doesnt invalidate the fact that nazism blames jews, like comunism blames rich people, like feminism blames men. And doesnt invalidate the absolute fact that feminism has emulated nazi criminal laws. Learn how to address the points of other people, will be good for you.	/r/MensRights	11/02/25 05:38 PM
1	I didn't know it was this bad for men I didnt say it was the same, I made a comparison that is extremely accurate, since both ideologies blame someone else, and both ideologies produced predisposed-perpetrator criminal laws (feminism has emulated nazism in this regard in countries like Spain, Mexico, Argentina etc). But that's off the point, and I see you have no interest in addressing that you're irrationally trying to save feminism despite being cancer.	/r/MensRights	11/02/25 03:14 AM
1	I didn't know it was this bad for men Im pretty sure you wouldnt say that about nazism. The people you can bring to your cause, but the ideology is corrupted in both cases. You're not only lying to yourself, but helping the enemy by white washing it. Ey, comunism can be good. Feminism can be good. Nazism can be good, we just need to change it. The only way to purify feminism is to show the truth of it and have "Feminism Museums" that mimic Holocaust Museums so we warn the future generations about it.	/r/MensRights	07/02/25 12:55 PM
1	I didn't know it was this bad for men It was never about equal rights. Read the declaration of Seneca Falls in 1848, considered the birth of the feminist movement by many historians. They advocated for women by lying about men and society, and criminalizing men specially. You were lied to, and you're spreading feminist propaganda.	/r/MensRights	07/02/25 01:44 AM
1	I didn't know it was this bad for men Study the origin of feminism, understand that it was man hating cancer from its very inception in the 1800s (read Seneca Falls declaration), and that protofeminism (1100 to 1800) before that was a status seeking strategy that also harmed men and society. It's easier to put the work and wake up to reality that to try to hold on to your wrong convictions.	/r/MensRights	07/02/25 01:41 AM
1	When discussing men's issues what term do you use to describe your views and beliefs? Never saw your comment. If you want equality, you have to put men first, because men are socially and legally discriminated. You see what happened here? You're doing the dirty work of the enemy by talking about supremacy when I only advocated for men and explained why you have to put men first in this context.	/r/MensRights	11/01/25 10:50 PM
24	When discussing men's issues what term do you use to describe your views and beliefs? MRA. If you really care about men's rights, you have to use men, man, or male in the branding/labelling. I understand the appeal to cater to a broader audience, but if you want to shift the culture that hides, ignores or relegates men's rights/problems to a second place... you have to lead by example and put men first.	/r/MensRights	09/10/24 01:48 PM