TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SoloMan98 Archive

View 0 posts and 6 comments by SoloMan98 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Now the article above is locked behind a paywall for me, but does it actually say “the majority of women prefer men as their boss because they’re more emotional”? Or that “the majority of female college graduates select professions that conform to traditional female jobs because women are more emotional”?
/r/MensRights14/11/18 11:13 PM
4

I’m not saying it’s an unnecessary study. I’m just saying some fucko is gonna go “this woman is gonna be super emotional because the study said women are more emotional than men” without actually understanding what the study means, or the context of the study, or that people are different, or that studies can be flawed sometimes, etc. And everybody is prejudice, regardless of what you try to teach them (not that we do a good job of teaching people not to be prejudice)
/r/MensRights14/11/18 08:08 PM
8

Taking the information at face value is fine. If a study says “men are 2x more likely to become computer programmers than woman (made up fact)” then that’s just a fact. The issue is when people take the study entirely out of context and use it to make baseless and prejudicial claims, such as “men are better programmers than women” without looking at the context of the study or having any supporting evidence. When the feminist says that these studies inspire prejudice, he/she isn’t saying that th…
/r/MensRights14/11/18 08:03 PM
14

She’s right. If the studies say “women are more likely to react to x in a certain fashion” and I see a woman I’m going to think that she’s more likely to react to x in that way. Same goes for men as well. Whether this is a bad thing or not is debatable, but making scientifically backed blanket statements about a group will definitely influence my prejudices towards that group. But at the end of the day don’t be a dick, don’t judge a book by its cover, etc etc.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 06:12 PM
8

I'm guessing JuJu Smith-Schuster is like the mortal enemy of HaHa Clinton-Dix?
/r/PussyPassDenied26/10/17 04:25 AM
6

But you can be a rapist and not be a man So it shouldn't be in a general definitional if it isn't always true
/r/MensRights28/04/17 02:22 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter