TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SomeGift9250 Archive

View 1 post and 322 comments by SomeGift9250 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

SomeGift9250/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 04:25 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

I've noticed that it's never ok for men to have an opinion on women if it's not positive. One podcaster mentioned about how he preferred overseas women, and this chick on the panel lost it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 11:21 PM
4

Then why oh why is (was) there a fat acceptance movement? And why are there numerous YT clips of perpetually single women with fancy degrees complaining about how they intimidate men? Let's not forget the "he must make more than I" chants that go viral. And is this "entitled" behavior to control men?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 11:19 PM
2

You know, it's kinda weird how people cling to idealistic and largely false perceptions of Red Pill. When you try to explain how they're wrong, they resort to personal attacks and calling you out your name.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 11:15 PM
1

No jerking here. Just truth from a non-simp.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 11:17 PM
7

This is why the Fat Acceptance movement is such an interesting case study. Unselected women are angry and upset they are seen as less attractive. The solution was not to exercise or work on your appearance, but cajole evil dirty men into liking you and wanting to watch you on television. I remember hearing of an interview where they showed an FA woman a picture of a large man and asked if she would date him. She said no quickly, then realized her mistake when asked why. When you're a man, the re…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 05:02 AM
6

It's no use. She'll resort to the typical feminist handbook for her responses.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 04:51 AM
–

Don't point out the truth so much. They'll insult you and call you an incel because of it...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 04:50 AM
3

What's sad is that men have had to hide their attraction to the opposite sex like we've been neutered. There's nothing wrong with being attracted to women, but they make us seem like monsters when we do it in public. I'm not talking about leering, but just observing. Also, men liking pornography invites shaming (I do not condone watching it, but for other reasons). Of course men like naked women, it's natural. But you'd think we were all creepy pedos the way women view us. It's quite ironic give…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 04:49 AM
1

Even as a misanthropic Red Piller, I must admit this is the correct answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 05:13 PM
1

Problem being most don't use the best criterion for determining financial value. They often fall for the "I work at this bank", "I went to this college", or "I make this income". A better determinant is 401k value, profit/loss, and debt. I know many people with Ivy type degrees and shiny jobs that have a negative six figures net worth.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 05:12 PM
1

Maybe older men struggle to understand modern day courting, but eventually, it turns into a relationship correct? So maybe it's the initialization routine that's broken? A wise man learns from others mistakes. Younger folks could learn alot. As I've gotten older, many of the lessons I learn on my own, someone told me about them years back. Just was too dense to understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 05:04 PM
1

>>The ones who post on here or who post in red pill spaces definitely aren’t getting laid.. If you say so.... >>I don’t know any openly red pilled men, if I did I wouldn’t be friends with them and would ridicule them profusely.. Got it. So it's about labeling and not realizing the truth. Like I mentioned. These conversations have taken place all over the country. People aren't going to admit to it because they don't want to lose their jobs or social standing. Then again, you strike me as the typ…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 05:00 PM
1

Maybe the truth? Hold yourselves accountable. It's like a disease to your kind.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 04:57 PM
7

More deflection....
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 04:56 PM
5

See how triggered people are at the hint of criticism?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 04:35 PM
6

I still see you have problems with substantial criticism. Maybe you do need therapy. lol
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 04:35 PM
2

Moral people do hate based on character. And women often exhibit poor character. Also, RP is larger than you think. It's funny how you know how we think. Still see you're talking out your behind as usual.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 04:32 PM
2

LOL Let's use a little logic here. Women have valid complaints about men. Men have valid complains about women. It's hilarious on how the former is fine, but the latter gets you the social outcast treatment. I could care less about getting laid. I've rejected numerous women, that stuff doesn't light my fire. The fact that you're using that as a measure of value shows your age and naivete. I actually pity you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 04:20 PM
2

I highly resent your statement. I'm a very happy loser. It's way more fun for us to argue online when people like me lack the social stamina to relate to the real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 03:33 PM
1

I'd urge you to look at online dating shows. Also, check the statistics of dating apps. It literally flies in the face of your arguments. I know you want to seem cool to women by dumping on Red Pill, but at least have some intellectually honesty about yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 03:30 PM
1

Say this again for the simps in the back.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 03:28 PM
2

"There’s a reason why I get laid and red pill people don’t." "It’s even more pathetic to be married and believe in this dumb pill shitp" Aha. A contradiction....
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 03:27 PM
3

LOL Most men I know that are red pill actually raise children. They may not have had the share of women they wanted, but they did have several choices. Personally, some of the women who were interested in me sexually were feminists. Quit relying on the media for what defines RP. We aren't a hateful cult, we're quite prolific.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 03:25 PM
0

I agree with this. To put it another way, some of the more delusional women hoping for a prince realize the reality, and "settle" for someone their price.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 03:22 PM
1

I never really bought the older woman shaming from people in my community. I believe it's more a perception thing. If we're basing this on attraction, men are attracted to younger women for whatever reason. So in that way, yes an older woman doesn't hold the same value as a man of similar age. TL;DR It's not "men age like fine wine". It's more like "we enjoy the taste of fresh wine" better.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 03:19 PM
1

BINGO. A depressed, promiscuous, overweight woman in her 50s elicits support group vibes. The male equivalent is an incel shamed infinitely.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 03:12 PM
1

Not true. I have a long term relationship with a helpful gf. And a job that puts me in the top 20% of all earners. Also, there are statements by professional athletes and celebrities that echo Red Pill sentiments. This sounds like a thinly veiled ad hominem.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 03:11 PM
2

And then they wonder why they're not getting approached. Of course, their favorite recourse is saying we're not "real men", lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 03:05 PM
1

I laughed incessantly when Hinge changed their app because women were tired of getting rejected. Welcome to our world. What happened to skrong and independent?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 03:02 PM
1

I laughed incessantly when Hinge changed their app because women were tired of getting rejected. Welcome to our world. What happened to skrong and independent?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 03:01 PM
1

Let's phrase this differently. Should women complain about sexism and the pay gap, or work to improve their performance? By your logic, we should just ignore any women's social movements...because they can get "better". See how that works out? Improving one's outcome doesn't necessarily solve the societal problem as a whole.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 02:58 PM
1

Fair point. What say you about the large, overweight, promiscuous women who aren't attracting the volume of guys they want? Instead of fat acceptance campaigns, should we try to change weight standards and shame them for wanting thin women? (This is purely devil's advo, BTW.)
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 02:55 PM
1

What's your view on feminism and the constant male bashing? Isn't it alright to criticize when one does wrong? There's nothing wrong with airing your frustrations, this is a free country.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 02:52 PM
2

Wow, lol. Where do I start. I'm not sure citing Red Pill as an extension of the Patriarchy is accurate. Red Pill is largely about the lack of power in dating dynamics. Patriarchy implies power. Of course, any issue men feel strongly about is likely to get misinterpreted as some kind of misogyny.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 06:05 AM
1

Hmmm..... There is a lot of middle ground between wanting a well-to-do man and not wanting a broke man. Why not a man who manages his $70k well? The flashier men I've seen attract lots of good-looking women, but aren't financially stable. A bigger bank account often means a higher credit limit and more things to get into trouble with. I rarely hear a woman say "a man with good management skills". More often it's "a rich man", or a "generous man". Show me a man's investments and debt profile, and…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 06:01 AM
1

As a staunch Red Piller, I agree. Hear me out, though. I'd ban everyone from Red Pill until they are in their mid thirties and have experienced more life on their own. Here's the truth. Red Pill talking points aren't new. These conversations took place decades ago. In barbershops. During bachelor parties. In computer labs. Men complaining about the actions of women isn't news. The Passport Bros have been going to the Caribbean and Asia to get their rocks off since the 80s. Mail order brides aren…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 05:50 AM
-4

Just as are the simps cosigning women's every move. And by the way, most men I know in the Red Pill are in long term relationships. That's getting laid, btw. *Ouch*
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 03:43 AM
0

LOL. Another clueless man who's idea of the Red Pill comes from the media and Destiny.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 03:12 AM
1

Doesn't that defeat the purpose? Yeah.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 03:04 AM
1

I think most Christian men would agree that she's forgiven. Dating is a different story. You see, we men are fragile creatures with egos. Here's something most of my fellow Red Pillers won't tell you. We don't like dating women with high body counts because we're insecure that the woman has a sexual experience that's better than what we can give her. Women are the same (though not to that extent). I still get asked about previous girlfriends, their performances, and if I was in love with them. W…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 09:34 AM
1

I believe you're deflecting, and getting twisted around. Bottom line, class/money/prestige matters more to women than men. We can always find counterexamples, there are billions of people on the planet. I'm speaking generalities. Just like we can find open minded men, but lots of us are misogynistic. Examples don't disprove tendencies.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 04:42 PM
1

I'm speaking of the criterion to date someone seriously. When it comes to the sack, standards vanish "on many sides". lol
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 04:28 PM
1

Who hurt you
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 03:14 AM
1

>>It’s more of an axiological side effect of creating narrow definitions of high value men. Sounds like you don't understand RP. Which channels are you getting it from? Andrew Tate? It's not narrow. It's actually reflected in society. If you're triggered by it, ... >>It’s kind of like how a lot of “girl talk” has made it online and led to men feeling even more rejected and dejected. That's hilarious, especially since there have been campaigns to ban it. Reminiscent of how there are campaigns to …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 03:01 AM
1

>>Women in general and feminists especially are sympathetic to men's issues Nope. They're sensitive to mental health in general. A campaign to help "males" would elicit disdain. Look at the responses on this board. I will admit, women do a better job of seeking mental health help. >>Why do so many in the manosphere lay these problems at women's feet? Not as simple as you're making it. If men were 100% in charge, wouldn't women be in aprons or pregnant? So, I guess women do hold some power, corre…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 02:56 AM
0

BAM!!!!! Instagram
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 02:46 AM
3

The times I've made less than my gf, I still end up spending more. It's culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 02:45 AM
1

That doesn't tell the full picture. Women with degrees tend to look down on men with bad grammar and rougher backgrounds, even when those men make more money. Also, women tend to judge men more by clothes, car, etc. These are class attributes, not necessarily just money. Were it about financial responsibility, it would be purely about financial management and not whether they went to Stanford or dressed in fancy shoes. I'd urge you to follow dating shows both tv and online. While we can't exactl…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 02:33 AM
2

It actually makes them look worse. They're willing to lay down with a loser with masculine instincts, but would marry an equally toxic rich man. But don't expect the radfems to admit to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 02:31 AM
1

If only "fucking" and marrying were the same, though...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 02:28 AM
2

Which still doesn't disprove the author's point, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 02:27 AM
1

OK, put simply RP doesn't want to "lessen Chads". It's more a way of blowing off steam. These conversations existed the past few decades, but there was no practical way of getting these views through the MSM. Social media is far less restrictive now, allowing some "fringe" views to be publicly aired. The Young Turks reference wasn't to be taken literally.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 02:00 AM
1

This is specifically for the women who think male issues are worthless. You'd be surprised at the radfems here with utter disdain for anyone with a penis. Remember, this forum is speaking towards the opposite gender. Politically, I'm torn on why, though. I think a male-centered help movement would falter because of it's non-PC implications. Still, since men overwhelmingly run things, you'd think it would be easier, wouldn't it?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 01:38 AM
0

Oh yeah, and you can't complain about that out loud. Or you're an incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 01:30 AM
3

That's what amazes me about women. They slick thirst after men, it's just more subtle. A unappealing man showing attractiveness to a woman is creepy.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 01:29 AM
2

So WRONG. but oh, so right.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 01:26 AM
1

Incels....interesting. I guess we enjoy debating leftover women as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 01:24 AM
1

I'm not sure that's a fair question. Remember, many political-type movements have been spearheaded by men. MAGA is largely a male-dominated movement for instance. The Civil Rights movements back in the day, as well. Minority and female dominated groups operate from a position of lack, which gives them a different flavor. It's tougher for strictly male groups like MRA to gain traction from a pop perspective. It's "why are those whiny men b_tching about now." Admittedly, this is a problem we men c…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 01:21 AM
2

Because maybe we are straight shooters and don't feel the need to be artificial?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 01:10 AM
1

Methinks you know nothing of the Red Pill except for what the Young Turks tell you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 01:07 AM
1

I believe RP would be much better if it advocated for those things. Remember, though, our movement is largely online. Also, most RP channels are for entertainment purposes. Much of the political rhetoric has ignored individual issues, and resulted in the message "screw Kamala, vote for Trump." PS Some Red Pill content does actually focus on improving yourself. Lots of the channels mention financial stability and avoiding gold digging women. Investing, saving, and hustle culture are key tenets. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 01:03 AM
1

Tinder is halfway between reality and porn. Work with me, now. In person, it's a bit harder to reject someone in their faces. You may be intrigued by their personality, or aura. You don't want to them to feel bad so give them a chance. Online, it's a lot more about physical attraction (and other artificial filters). So those short haired, thicker women don't get picked. Those evil average height men with moderate bank accounts don't get picked. So, I don't believe apps are a true reflection. Als…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 12:49 AM
1

And that matters why? More ad hominems. I know nothing about crime, but a thief should be arrested. Remember, many married men share my opinion...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 10:12 PM
1

lol
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 10:11 PM
1

Then keep your skillsets up. What happens is most SAHM focus purely on raising children. This is admirable, but there's some middle ground. Right now, I can name 10 industries with low barriers to entry allowing you to work from home. This isn't a black or white solution. Women do need to protect themselves. A 9 to 5 isn't the only way. For instance, I can go onto Reddit and find mention of several open source projects. Network, write some code, gain skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 10:11 PM
1

I'd also add the key here is legal obligation. My wife will be taken care of even if she treats me poorly. Because that's the person I am. I'm actually too nice for my own good. However, my issue is forcing someone legally to fund their ex-wife's lifestyle en masse.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 09:33 PM
1

WHAT?! For a second, I thought one of your sisters hacked into your account.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 09:24 PM
1

Half of your arguments are about how stay at home parents aren’t entitled to shit. Yes. My point is about couples in general and what happens after a divorce. I only mention your marital status in response to your bringing up your hypothetical wife. This is personal. See the difference?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 09:19 PM
1

By that logic, maybe we all should get prenups? I love doing anything that makes rich PLLC's richer. <This is bad humor by the way, don't try to analyze it too hard>
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 09:17 PM
1

Of course I could be wrong in that regard. But it's not the crux of my argument. Your arguments are full of personal attacks and mention of my personal circumstances. I'm advocating for SAHM's, not you. Half of your arguments involve my marital status and how I'd treat my wife. My mention of you is in passing.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 09:08 PM
1

Prenups are meaningless when the person at hand doesn't have much.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 09:03 PM
1

Actually, your entire argument is ad hominem. You're always referring to me and my situation, when my original assertion was the discretion of the SAHM. Don't get upset at how I point out the truth. Apparently as "dumb" as I am, you've spent half a day debating me. That's somewhat fulfilling, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 09:01 PM
1

I? Me? What about the woman who decides to stay at home? What does she think? I understand by virtue of being male, I'm wrong, but at least be clandestine about it...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 08:59 PM
1

Sounds to me an emotional being who wants to get the last word, that can't comprehend when they've lost.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 08:53 PM
1

Once again class. Sentimental value. Financial value.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 08:52 PM
1

LOL you haven't found any. Remember, reading comprehension is about context. Your failure to comprehend this is mind-blowing.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 08:51 PM
1

I've said at least two occasions I'd like my wife to work. Again, you have short term memory. Tends to happen when all you want to do is attack fruitlessly.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 08:50 PM
1

Wow, you really don't understand context, do you? When I say "it", I'm referring to food, clothing, shelter. Yes, a (wo)man who takes care of child rearing and other domestic duties does welcome the obligation of a spouse to take care of them financially. Where it becomes an issue is if the spouse has $800,000 in the bank. She (or he of course) doesn't deserve half of that by virtue of divorce. She deserves child support as long as she has custody of the children, along with some temporary alimo…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 08:47 PM
1

Actually, she deserves it "while married". And rightfully so. When she decides to leave the man, she's no longer entitled to what he makes. The original intent for alimony was NOT what the woman deserved during. It was due to lack of opportunities for women. Nowadays, that definition has been stretched to keep it alive.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 08:38 PM
1

Pointing out the lack of financial value in a task doesn't mean I'm showing disdain.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 08:30 PM
1

It’s a debate sub. It’s literally in the title. You're not debating. You're not trying to understand the main idea, nor self reflect. You take my words out of context, and equate two different things as if they have the same meaning. While meanwhile accusing others of denigrating the role of a stay at home parent Financial value and sentimental value are two different things. Why can't you understand that? Here's an example. I see jobs all the time paying twice what I make now; however they're i…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 08:28 PM
1

You're making the faulty criticism. Isn't the onus on you?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 08:23 PM
1

Yes, what was the context?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 08:17 PM
1

I honestly believe you're here to argue and attack instead of a reasoned discussion. You're all over the place, and your grasp of logic is concerning.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 08:15 PM
1

test
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 08:05 PM
1

I never called you anti feminist. I said forcing an ideal on a woman for a choice she made is anti-feminist. And I stand on that. As far as feelings go. Look at your first response. You deemed SAHM's worthless, using vulgarities in the process. Ever since then, you've backtracked, while still launching baseless attacks. It seems to me you're the emotional one. And then claiming you were finished arguing. You've had more retirements than Jay-Z.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 07:41 PM
1

lol….typical lack of responsibility or agency. Let the government pay. Absolutely. Temporarily. I believe in safety nets. My view on alimony is the same, briefly and temporarily. It's a bit different than taking half a man's pockets. How did you do that face? I like that, Oh yeah 🙄🙄🙄 You know how you keep those skills sharp? And the bank account solvent? Genius. For those who want to watch their kids grow up in pictures. Unfortunately, the 9-5 is everything in America. Also, people are too obtus…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 07:38 PM
1

women should waste their lives away being a sahm bangmaid Here it is. So staying at home raising your children is a waste of life? Like I mentioned earlier, I know several women with promising futures who stayed home. Apparently, it's not a waste to them. You’re also profoundly arrogant Wouldn't describe it as arrogance. I've seen these arguments countless times, and have destroyed many. Confidence comes with the territory. Funnily, the amount of vitriol and vulgarities seems to correlate with h…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 07:32 PM
1

Nope. I'm pointing out the hypocrisy. Again, you have comprehension issues. I honestly believe both of you are arguing through emotion and not the facts. Typical
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 07:28 PM
–

>>Divorce significantly increases women's risk of poverty due to systemic economic disparities, It's my ultimate belief that SAHM's should keep their skills sharp in the case of divorce for that very reason. Whether that involves leadership roles, non-profit, or remote employment... I believe in child support. I believe in a form of divorce government assistance that allows divorcees, male or female, some temporary aid until they get back on their feet. 80% of divorces are initiated by the woman…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 07:19 PM
1

Viewing the body as a “vessel” is religious nonsense. That wasn't my intention with that one...then again, I you've proven yourself incapable of discerning intentions. You only like arguing. I can only imagine the peace of mind you'd give your husband, lol. Also this whole second paragraph shows you struggle to comprehend very simple concepts. Actually, it shows your deficiency and lack of depth. You made a blanket criticism of SAHM's, deeming them useless. You also held contempt because they ch…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 07:02 PM
1

I don't think you're understanding. If we don't force children to pay back their parents, why would we expect the same of people who we financially carried? You skipped around the question after you misunderstood the analogy. Please speak in English..I have no clue what this means Simple. I made a very good point and am patting myself on the back for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 06:57 PM
1

Sentimental value doesn’t pay the rent. And money doesn't raise children. Ouch. It should be unimportant to a stay at home spouse It should? Maybe we let the woman decide what "should is". That's your problem, always trying to push your ideal wife on others.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 06:55 PM
–

>>Women are people not “vessels” you deranged loser. Everyone is a vessel, dimwit. >>It’s funny how people who have no grasp of what feminism actually is about make idiotic statements I get it. Only feminists can criticize feminism. If women fight for freedom of choice, why criticize others who don't do things the way you want? It's a simple question. Your claim as a feminist does not insulate you from intellectual dishonesty. >>Sahms are financially vulnerable and their decision to be sahms doe…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 06:50 PM
1

No. I'm comparing the HUSBAND to a complete liability. You're confusing the logic. Son owes parents who raised him nothing. Husband owes wife who he carried financially for several years nothing. As far as your people in the back comment, I do feel like I'm cooking. I'm about to start taking tithes in this hoe. Ayeeeeeeeeeeee
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 06:41 PM
1

No. I'm comparing the HUSBAND to a complete liability. You're confusing the logic. Son owes parents who raised him nothing. Husband owes wife who he carried financially for several years nothing. As far as your people in the back comment, I do feel like I'm cooking. I'm about to start taking tithes in this hoe. Ayeeeeeeeeeeee
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 06:38 PM
1

There's financial value and sentimental value. Again, you fail to comprehend this simple fact. The money that’s simultaneously so unimportant, yet still all yours? Where did I imply money was unimportant? Bottom line: Let the woman assess the value she places on raising kids. You were the one forcing 9-5 on women, not I.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 06:30 PM
1

Or maybe it's the woman who'd seemingly charge her son money for raising him?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 06:26 PM
–

>>No woman dating men has ‘peace of mind’ the fuck are you on. By peace of mind, I'm referring to not worrying about making money. If you want to argue about peace of mind in general, I can name several relationships where the woman is a complete and utter drain on the man physically and mentally. The implication is that female vessels are perfect beings not capable of emotional abuse. This is far from it, and it's jocular that your kind would suggest it. It exhibits your lack of wisdom and gras…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 06:19 PM
1

I do, but admittedly man men don't. This still doesn't imply giving them tons of money. It's purely an attempt to get at our bank accounts when there are other ways of generating funds.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 06:08 PM
1

Whoa, somebody's getting vitriolic. Remember, not all valuable things hold financial value. You can definitely appreciate someone without giving them tons of money. I'm not the biggest fan of the prices you assess to such things.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 06:05 PM
1

But if we ever split, he gets half. There's an issue with that. The only reason women don't mind is because they tend to benefit from it. If men were the ones staying at home, your (women in general) view would change overnight. We aren’t arguing about the value of 9 to 5 work or getting rich. Almost verbatim, your original argument was "women should work 9 to 5". I never advocated women to just stay at home and raise kids; far from it. Just think there are other ways that don't involve leaving …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 05:59 PM
–

Man, someone's triggered. You already are compensated. You get meals, spending change, baby care, food, shelter, and peace of mind. Moreover, if a man makes quite a bit of money, you essentially do the same work a poor woman would, but at a higher lifestyle. If you want to be rich, make the damn money on your own. Nicole Murphy is an eight figure sister...but yet I haven't heard her tell one joke! (Man, no wonder certain genders underperform on logic tests....) Child support, yes, but for the ne…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 05:37 PM
1

Of course if she wants to be a stay at home mom and still have financial security, she can marry someone who actually values her contribution or she already has her own money. No argument here.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 05:31 PM
1

Perhaps; but as someone who's built his own nest egg, it takes lots of discipline and skill not everyone is built for. Some don't care. For me, it was easy, too much intelligence can hurt you financially, easy to overthink things. That couple I mentioned was a hippie type that would balk at getting rich for the sake of having money. Which brings me back to my main point. 9-5's aren't for everybody, and looking down on women who choose not to is another form of oppression. Start a business, take …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 05:30 PM
1

Also, I noticed something else. Did you big up the fact that you no longer needed a 9-5? Wow! So it's okay to not want to work a 9-5 while raising children? Thanks for making my point. There are ways to sustain income without a regular job. It's hard, but doable.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 05:11 AM
1

A wife who raises your children instead of working doesn’t deserve money Correction. A wife who raises your kids, living off your money, and having other things taken care of for her does not deserve a proportional piece of wealth once she's no longer living there. No. She deserves enough money to help raise the kids, assuming she has custody. In addition, a man of means more than likely has given her a high lifestyle. So she does the same work as someone with a poor man, and gets more out the d…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 04:42 AM
1

If you think any of these sectors provide more value to society than rich white men, I can’t help you. I was explaining that the rich white man was one example of many. The bottom line is that some people prefer to spend those 8 hours with their kids. I work for the rich white man, and he pays me well. Methinks you don't comprehend. If people actually want to be financially poor, I can’t drag them into any other life with tinderhooks. Wow, imagine that. A woman who stays at home actually would b…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 04:32 AM
1

Not wealthy, but comfortable. That's admirable, I wish I could say the same; however, I don't think you're quite catching on to what I'm saying. I'm not saying you in particular. It's about empathizing with women who don't care to do the 9-5 grind. To each their own, if someone wants to work 9-5, that's their prerogative. But it's not a requirement for financial viability. Some place more value on child rearing than others. Again, it goes back to my point about financial and emotional value. You…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 04:07 AM
1

Here's a story you may appreciate. In undergrad I know a couple in grad school. The woman was extremely bright, talking top of her department bright. What was next for her? A cushy position at a top engineering firm? A small company executive seat? After two years, I saw her fooling with a baby seat. She dropped out of school. Her husband, who didn't make much was footing the bill. Not every successful person wants the grind. Some women who seem the progressive type want a domestic life where sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 02:38 AM
1

Even without a prenup, nobody deserves a sizeable chunk of another's wealth. Male or female. Child support is different, as you are raising someone else's kids. Alimony (at least the permanent type) is bullsh-t, funny how modern women like keeping this portion of traditionalism...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 02:24 AM
1

That’s exactly why she needs her own career, and her own money, and not be financially dependent. No. Maybe that's what she wants, but a job is not necessary. For many, it's worth being around your kids all the time than bowing to a slave for 8 hours a day. Now, you seem intelligent, so work with me on this one. You can keep your skills sharp without a 9-5. -starting a business -part time employment as data entry or Amazon MTurk (this is employment, but does not fall under your "stacking" condit…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 02:15 AM
–

>>A woman over 30 who is still single almost certainly already has a career and likely at least one long term relationship she has experience with. This is an unwarranted assumption. Remember, the job market has been rough. Also, not everyone has the typical career. Some people work at gas stations and in home health care. Jobs. One relationship can take someone from minimum wage to a comfortable lifestyle. Women are not naive to this fact, that's why they make statements like this. I know when …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 02:01 AM
1

Stop pissing on my leg and tell me it’s raining with now changing tack on how it’s “important “ and “valuable “. <Sigh> Unfettered idealism at its finest. Someone can make the best girlfriend. Can they sell that on the market? Love for $100! There's nothing contradictory about what I said. Unfortunately, not everything is for sale. The only thing smelling of urine is your grasp of reality. <BAM>
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 01:54 AM
–

I guess my original response was to the statement "capitalism benefits only the rich". I'm no means a corporate apologist. Just that we tend to ignore what capitalism has done for us. It's not as cut and dry as they make it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 01:50 AM
–

>>I’m telling women not to let men blow smoke up their ass about how important their role in the home is. The work in the home is very important. Realize this. There's sentimental value. Then there's financial. Because you supported a man emotionally making tons of money doesn't make you entitled to it. Women blur the lines because they stand to benefit from it. Remember, "stacking dough" (specifically in the 9-5 sense) isn't for everyone. There are plenty of ways to keep your skillset up while …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 01:44 AM
–

On a side note, some of them are older women tired of the grind. Now that I think of it, I know several women from grad school. Brilliant as ph*ck. They're raising children now for a living. The grind ain't for everyone. You'd be surprised. One girl in particular from Ghana used to kill the curve in engineering class. One of the smartest people in the building. She ended up leaving school and doing things like the pampered chef and changing diapers. This was 15 years ago, she may have entered th…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 01:33 AM
–

How do you know their ages?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 01:30 AM
–

That's you. I've seen several women online who want provider boyfriends balk at the thought of feeding him. Nothing's free, they should get their asses in the kitchen.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 01:24 AM
–

Interesting. I'd argue no. He didn't deserve 20k in monthly alimony. If he wanted to raise the kids to that tune of green, his ass should have gotten a job. >>I can make a shit ton more than a nanny.... Interesting. You would make this all about you, wouldn't you? Bottom line, there is a value in raising children. According to the law of supply and demand, it's not exactly the most valuable skill since everyone does it, correct me if I'm wrong? The market speaks for itself. Because it doesn't sa…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 01:19 AM
–

Wow. When did I ever state I was against women working? Far from it. I don't think taking half of anyone's assets is worth it. Do you believe Kevin Federline deserved that chunk of Britney's cash? As far as I'm concerned, one can easily calculate how much 24/7 care is (or nannying to be more general). Take that, deduct rent/food/car note/miscellaneous. That's how much she's worth. And while we're at it, if the father fixes things, cuts grass, etc., deduct those as well. This vitriol towards dome…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 12:41 AM
–

>>They used to pay a lot more. Now most of it goes to offshore bank accounts instead investing in their workers and businesses. I'm in agreement; still doesn't change my answer. Think about this. Not everything is outsourced. Also, even when it is, quite a few of those dollars make their way back to the taxpayer. You provide some decent counterexamples, but that still isn't proof that capitalism only benefits the rich. They do get a disproportionate share, admittedly. >>You can thank the governm…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 12:30 AM
–

“she takes half of his shit”. Are you implying there's nothing wrong with taking half?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 12:24 AM
–

Nope. I normally would concur, but this choice involves another life. It's akin to saying you can't tell me who to shoot with my gun. When the fetus is old enough to breathe, eat, and have brain activity, it's technically alive. The magic skin barrier definition of life doesn't hold up. Now, in the case of abortion being legal, I don't think it's fair the father has no abortion rights over a child that's half his; but it still should be the woman's discretion. Everyone has a choice before concep…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 12:17 AM
–

On that note, it's quite hilarious when I hear kept women complaining about fixing a man a meal. Whomever stays at home needs to take the lion's share of domestic work, regardless of gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 12:12 AM
–

That's not what happened. When women entered the workforce, companies raised prices. Higher income means more demand for goods, and as a result, higher prices. On an individual level, yes, it's more income; however on a macro level, this benefit has eroded. (For the record, I do believe women should be allowed to work, not a caveman here.)
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 12:10 AM
–

I don't all the way believe that. I believe voting with the patriarchy harms average men from a financial standpoint. In addition, studies have shown ignoring men in society (which is a direct result of paying more attention to certain SIG's) has lead to college dropout rates and depression. Your statement has shade of "everything about the Patriarchy is bad". That's quite idealistic. A rich man definitely benefits from voting against the Patriarchy. Less competition, more ways of keeping money …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 12:06 AM
–

I don't think so. Lots of our infrastructure is subsidized by oil companies and large businesses. Also, the top 1% pays 40% of our taxes. So for all the talk of the rich not paying a dime, it's not borne out by the facts. (They don't pay their fair share, though.) Also, the reason for the internet, fast computers, and iPhones is capitalism's push to find better solutions. It has its kinks, but on Reddit, people take the anti rich thing a bit too far.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 11:57 PM
2

Sensitive qualities will get you the pillow treatment. They'll get you to carry their books, while they find the nearest masculine male. Admittedly, the few women who do like this tend to make better mates, not cheap hookups.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 04:17 AM
11

And most of the women here are angry and on meds. ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 04:15 AM
1

Problem is some of those losers are actually good partners. You unwittingly equate "not able to get a date" with "losers". I know lots of good men making an average salary with good morals. Nobody is knocking their door down. Also, studies and data show that women tend to want the top percent of men, while the opposite isn't as true. I would show the studies, but they trigger people, they start shouting, and calling you chauvinistic. No rebuttals, no intelligent replies. And what's with this "pa…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 04:02 AM
1

I don't mind high standards...but what kind of standards? Needs to be this tall. Needs to have this size.... Needs to make six figures. Needs to have an advanced degree. Needs to have a certain social standing. None of these...and absolutely NONE make a good partner. None of these will tuck you in at night. None of these will greet your parents and treat them with love. (And, yes, I have to admit a body count is not the best standard either. And a few extra pounds or a 40+ age won't kill you.) T…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 03:54 AM
1

And how many of them are specialized for transgender care? People hate trans people, some doctors as well. Even hate doesn't warrant mutilating a child. Doctors specialized for trans care most likely will take the trans side regardless. Your original assertion was that doctors were against it. I proved your assertion wrong. Now, you're moving the goal posts. Accept defeat. Yes, listen to experts. Experts? Many experts are against it as well. When you're in a high position, you can't exactly expr…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 05:09 PM
1

That thing is biologically alive, like a skin cell or a plant. Plants can't heartbeat. Nor can they think. At least not the complex functions of a human. Is there some new biology that came out? I haven't read the paper, yet. Because it is not in his body. Man, you're insufferable. I told you, I don't think the man should have a say in the abortion. I'm just explaining how women aren't always the victims. So you also think unborn are not exactly the same as children? Nope, not my logic. Just lik…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:59 PM
4

>>You’re trying to make this about women because you don’t want to acknowledge that men just don’t give a fuck about men. Look at the original post. I'm simply pointing out the flaw in your assertion. If I wanted to defend Trump and how he's good for men, I probably would have voted for him. I did not. You're actually making yourself look worse. >>Because you have decided anyone who calls out men for their bullshit is a raging feminist. No, I call you a raging feminist because everytime I'm on p…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:52 PM
1

The one who is pregnant must decides what should be done with the body. Again. Why is the child considered alive after crossing the skin barrier when they have the exact same functions? The pregnant one already made a choice nine months ago. It was her body her choice when she opened her legs. And no, statistics show the vast majority of pregnancies arise from consensual encounters, so don't make the exception the rule. It's also funny how the father has no say in a pregnancy, but is expected to…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:43 PM
1

Medical institutions are all agreement with trans people that our procedures are life saving. This is purely hogwash. Lots of doctors are against such procedures, especially as minors. The health administrators are largely influenced by what's popular and politically correct. In Florida (one example), actually most physicians oppose "gender affirming" care for minors. I guess we should just dismiss the lowly doctors and only listen to the ones at the top? How elitist of you. You wantto control w…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:37 PM
3

This is a good point, but the original premise of the OP was that Trump's success was purely a product of bigoted MAGA men. I was pointing out the error in her logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:30 PM
1

Actually, at 2 months, the child is breathing, has lung activity, brain function. By the third trimester, the child can actually move. What clump of cells can think like a human, ma'am? If the abortion is before six weeks, I'm actually for it. Once those vital functions start forming, it's a child. I find it jocular that killing newborn babies because of poverty is murder, but killing it weeks before is OK. Let's you know how demented some people are. Again, if we put the child on death row, may…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:28 PM
1

So you're OK with mutilating a 15-year old kid without parental consent? NO PROCEDURE of the type should be allowed until the child is 18. I'd even venture to ban it longer if I could. You really don't know yourself and your body until you're well into your twenties, but at least at 18, you're grown enough. It's also funny how trans people psychologically abuse those who detransition. I'm all for the right of a anyone to change their parts; however, I don't want to pay for it. It's like non-esse…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:25 PM
1

LOL Abortion? You mean the procedure where you kill a small child because you want to backpack through Europe? I can't think of a more feminist thing to do than kill female babies who did nothing to you. Maybe if we put unborn babies on death row, you'll run to save them.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:21 PM
3

It's funny, you're the most confident, but on Reddit, your rationality/logic skills are some of the worst. Let's review. You're complaining about MAGA, which is only 1/3 voters. You completely dismiss the fact that most voters are female, but continue to elect men to office. You completely ignore the 1/3 independents that swing the election. Your arguments are purely emotional, and anecdotal. You only focus on what triggers you, and not the big picture. Even if you can claim moral high ground, t…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:15 PM
2

>>Not really. Wasn’t exactly written on your flair LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 04:05 PM
1

You do realize I’m an independent who voted Kamala, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 03:14 PM
1

Trump never formally addresses men’s issues. I think he wins men over because he’s a confident alpha. Also most men are conservative. His views on abortion, big business, and LGBT resonate with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 03:13 PM
2

Statistically, the US is 1/3 GOP, 1/3 Dem, 1/3 independent. You can’t win an election strictly based on voter turnout of your own. Why do politicians move toward the center after winning their primary?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 03:08 PM
5

I’ll repeat. People voted for Trump for other reasons than feminism. This is why he got over forty percent of the female vote. Lots of women are conservative and don’t care about that. The answer is there you just refuse to see it. So those women voters hate themselves? These women don’t even voice their opinion because your kind demonizes them for having an opinion. So the vote with their hands.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 03:07 PM
1

lol vet? We are the ones who propose. Women desire long term while men are more short. Women manipulate. Women cheat though not the same level as men. Women pilfer resources using income disparity as a scapegoat. Women disrespect based on how nice a guy is. Women will dismiss good men for terrible reasons and laugh about it. I urge you to check out pop the balloon. A lesson in rudeness and arrogance. So the Manosphere exists without merit? Ha!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 03:01 PM
1

Wow, this got personal quickly. So we’ve gone from dismissing women’s faults to insulting undesirable men! Since you want to go there we can… it’s feed the troll morning. As a statistician it’s funny to me how the small amount of murderers define all men! Lovely! Also funny to me how most liberal women are undesirable. Tend not to take care of themselves and always on meds. I know one now and she’s insufferable! Makes sense why these leftover women are angry. I actually pity you! I also find it …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 02:54 PM
1

There are plenty of good men. You don’t want them. The reason you don’t like addressing women’s faults is because they trigger you. Women commit wrongs too and are not perfect. I repeat cause I know you hate it. Women are not perfect. Deal wit it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 02:28 PM
1

That makes no sense. You’ll never get a satisfactory balance with respect to the genders. Also even as a Red Piller I admit disenfranchised men are more dangerous. So ignore men’s issues at your own peril.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 02:26 PM
1

Western Feminism is more contradictory and antagonistic. My encounters with Euro feminists have been pleasant and productive. Also Euro women aren’t afraid to embrace femininity. American feminists are hell bent on imitating men. Hence posts like this one.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 02:24 PM
2

I think he’s referring to how the Left labels everybody who votes for Trump as a monolith.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 02:16 PM
0

You’re not making sense. The elections are decided by independents. This is proven statistically. Yes, fringe voters dominate the headlines, but the moderates decide. You wouldn’t understand this if you only listen to MSNBC and other echo chambers. I see you devote a large portion of your time screaming in the dark. This raging turns people against you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 02:13 PM
7

People vote for several reasons. We know misogyny is your whole world but it’s not to everyone else. Also your constant badgering turns voters off. Even though I agree with you about the bigotry on the Right. I’m a minority but am constantly annoyed at how my people make everything a race issue. You have to be careful how you approach voters. Dems found that out the hard way.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 02:06 PM
3

Wheres the smoke for the femalez who voted with MAGA?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 02:03 PM
1

You’re missing the point. Maybe you should talk to the large amount of women who voted with MAGA. You sound like a raging feminist who can’t see wrong in women. You’re largely the reason why Kamala lost and don’t even know it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 02:00 PM
7

Women make up most of the voting populace. MAGA makes up one third. I am RP, but voted for Kamala. Maybe your should redirect your misplaced anger. Udemy has stats courses for cheap, BTW.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 01:06 PM
1

My theory is that women possess the same narcissistic tendencies as men, but have been oppressed. Now the have freedom, they’re taking in the same negative qualities that we dominated originally.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 01:01 PM
0

Nahh, it says the truth. Look the the OP. She blames men for ALL dating woes. Why don’t you criticize her instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 01:00 PM
2

For real. The other day I found out I was a r-pist. Now my rough childhood is explained.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:57 PM
1

I actually agree with everything but the last statement. Both sides have fault in the date debate. You should listen to women who decide they’re not straight anymore. They whine about how they understand how men feel after dating women. And don’t get me started at how you all are strong and independent, but a large factor in choosing is how rich your mate is. Or how in divorce court that strength vanishes suddenly. Or how you want a strong alpha male, but will put up with sht from a man with bad…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 12:55 PM
1

Huh? Is it true the vast majority of men have never committed SA? Amazing how that works! Now let’s see who’s responsible for most baby deletions. 100% of women choose, so this means we can blame 100% of all women for the actions of a few. I like this game!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 10:36 AM
1

What exactly is encouraged by men that leads to rape?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 12:20 AM
1

Nobody excused abusers. Where did you get that from? My issue is with people taking a small percentage of offenders and making that the description of the whole...It lacks rationality and intelligence.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 04:04 AM
1

But BOTH are wrong. You can't justify one from the other. It gives a carte blanche for bad behavior from women. And many wonder why they're single. The same reason many men are single. Insufferable personalities, and inability to look within.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 03:38 AM
1

Yes, therein lies the problem. Women's faults in modern relationships are justified because of the tiny fraction of men who commit SA. This is why feminism has hit a wall. It's harder for people to listen to you when your movement becomes largely about pointing out the extremes. I argue this is what happened after the Floyd protests (and I'm a minority, BTW). The movement became less about rights and more about forcing your opinion on others.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 03:37 AM
1

Again, this is the straw man argument. The Red Pill spaces contain a lot of men raising families and with successful relationships with women. Try again, ma'am.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 03:34 AM
1

Incels and Red Pill aren't really the same. They hold some of the same opinions, but this is like painting all conservatives as the KKK. Maybe feminists shouldn't behave as misandrists? They'll get more respect from us then....
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 03:33 AM
1

Case in point, I was destroying a woman on a debate here. She then exclaims “you’ve laughed at a rape joke before.” There are is a large contingent of women who believe they have the upper moral hand simply because of a few bad men. Amazing.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 03:00 PM
1

As someone who studies data and stats for a living, one of the biggest misconceptions is that a study is needed to prove a phenomenon. Also, many studies are buried because the academic community is largely progressive. Case in point, testing and IQ studies are largely discouraged because of how they make minorities feel. When I did research, when presenting, we had to be mindful of the story it told, and not necessarily the cold hard truth. I’m a minority, by the way.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 02:47 PM
1

Yes, I think we all agree that this “everybody in group X” argument is used by both genders. That being said, doesn’t he still have a point?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 02:44 PM
1

Thank you. Finally one admits this.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 02:42 PM
1

Because it’s a bit more complicated than that. It’s akin to saying “why can’t white men do anything about political correctness”. Women wield serious financial and political control , even though men are the big decision makers. You don’t believe me, let a politician say “men are stronger in general”, which is a fact. Women also vote more often than men, so they largely put these men in power. Reminiscent of how GOP members have to fall under Trump, or he can get them out of office. Whose really…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 02:39 PM
1

It’s a man’s fault. It’s not men’s faults. I refuse to take responsibility for another nut.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 02:36 PM
4

No. It’s the fault of the guilty party.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 02:34 PM
1

“ If you're experiencing any anti man behavior in your personal life you need to look at your own life and how you act and who you surround yourself with…” I actually agreed with your post. Then you post that. You kinda proved his point. When we mention these things, we’re referring to the mainstream response. In general, people don’t care about the man’s plight. Even men are guilty of this, with our suck it up approach. Maybe instead of complaining about men who’ve mistreated you, focus on the …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 02:34 PM
1

This is very fair. I’m only referring to women who complain about sexual performance not knowing the work it entails. It’s a bit like men who don’t understand the work it takes for a woman’s hair to be fixed when we simply get a cut. I’ll address one remark. If a man is truly enjoying the experience, the session will be a quick one. If a man finishes quickly, the woman will have far less enjoyment. Hence the phrase “you finished already”?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 12:52 PM
1

I disagree, I've had women tell me about their past partners that sucked in bed. Husbands included. They just most likely won't tell them that to their faces. My conjecture includes hookups as well. It's funny watching women trying to work strapons, lol! I'm not against women having opinions. I think sometimes they underestimate what men put into relationships. I remember one social experiment, the women took the guys out to dinner. There was a lot of McDonald's. I also think men underestimate t…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 09:18 PM
–

As a Red Piller, I approve this respone.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 09:14 PM
1

You can't support your view with facts. Only feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 09:11 PM
1

Nope. You are deflecting. The point is that women don't understand how much work the guy puts in during sex. It's not a crime. I'm not sure what hookup culture and degradation have anything to do with. You are going off on a tangent. I never have participated in hookup culture, it produces diseases and is unsafe from a security standpoint.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 09:10 PM
1

You will also see this with dating preferences. Case in point, body positivity. An overweight, unattractive woman wants feels unwanted. There are media campaigns to make them feel better. Plus sized models show up more on screen. There are support groups to help them psychologically. Damned be those jerk, shallow men. A fat man is told to suck it up and go to the gym. Imagine telling a woman publicly to lose weight. You'll get shot at.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 09:06 PM
1

Actually as someone who studies data/statistics for a living, I'd be happy to discuss background, conjectures, methodologies, and motivations of the author (as no study is perfect). I'm just not sure you're up to the task. Typical rhetoric: I can't, so I choose not to. Try again. I see you like to ad hominem. Doesn't work in this case, as I match the standards of many women, and am happily in a long-term relationship with one. Some of us just like discussions. Try again. Tinder isn't necessarily…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 08:52 PM
4

What baffles me is that it's on the guy to seduce, foreplay, penetrate, stay hard, not be too rough, and bring the woman to orgasm. I don't think women have a clue how much it takes to accomplish that. All for her to sneer in front of her friends about a guy's prowess (lack thereof).
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 08:48 PM
9

Women do this because they're more likely to get judged for it. There are still countries where women can't enjoy sex without repercussions. Even as a Red Piller, I think we should let women speak out more about their sexual preferences.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 08:44 PM
1

I actually think apps are more accurate. In person, we are afraid of judgements and hurting people's feelings. Apps are a bit like p*rn in that you can find what you're looking for in secret. This phenomenon has actually been studied as well. App preferences are even more extreme than in person.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 08:41 PM
1

>>What do you think should be done, if anything? Excellent question. Some men are whining because the standards don't fit them. I'm only questioning the judgement of women when selecting mating partners. Men have dumb standards, too. I'm still wondering why a big round posterior makes a good mate. >>My point was some men act as if there are no exceptions. Of course that's preposterous. There are short, broke men with attractive wives.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 08:38 PM
1

OK, let's review: Dating shows Men's experiences Statistics from Dating Apps Academic studies All reflect the same thing. Sounds like you're making things up, weak refutations if you ask me. Also, the dating shows are actually catered towards men, as the host has the reputation as a pickme. So my guess is that the truth is actually closer to my conjectures than appears. One study showed that 6'3" men had a 60% higher chance of attracting women. This is the truth. You can cover your eyes, it's a …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 08:35 PM
1

I think we agree we all are individuals. There are always exceptions to the rules. I'm speaking of generalities and trends. These also have been proven statistically by studies from dating apps. A man has a 60% higher chance of attracting women if he's 6'3" or taller. Men have resorted to lying , adding on average two inches to their height (I don't like dishonesty from men, either).
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 08:32 PM
1

Also, here is another study of someone not on Medium. How Men and Women Rate Each Other on Dating Websites I'm still trying to figure out how the 80% percentile mark is average. Women creating new statistical methodologies. 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 08:27 PM
1

Actually, he provides statistics to back up his conjectures. If you'd like, you can try to pinpoint where he's wrong by attacking his reasoning. You can't refute them, this is why you choose not to. This is akin to a conservative Republican dismissing Rachel Maddow because she's on MSNBC. More ad hominem attacks to hide your lack of rationality. You are only one person, statistics provide more illumination than your sole perspective. >>I personally preferred to socialize. <Applause.>
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 08:24 PM
1

Tinder Experiments II: Guys, unless you are really hot you are probably better off not wasting your time on Tinder — a quantitative socio-economic study | by worst-online-dater | Medium
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 08:17 PM
2

As a tall man with a decent bank account and an engineering degree, I still find these standards disgusting. I remember a very attractive woman trying to figure out how much money I made (she worked with my company, so it was easy for her to find out). Also, it's annoying going to the account and watching suddenly interested bank tellers insinuate they want to date me. If I wasn't sh*t to you before you saw my phat paycheck, why the change? It's annoying. I don't tell women up front because it m…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 08:05 PM
2

For me, it's not about "lowering standards". If a man protects you, is there for you emotionally, and you click, is it exactly "dating down"? I'm not asking women to lower anything. I'm just questioning their judgement. I've seen the same types of toxic dudes run through women. Funnily, these same women are in denial about their standards. They say one thing publicly, then continue. Also, in an online dating show, there's a pattern. Women will speak about what they want. Their inbox will pile up…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 08:02 PM
2

THANK YOU. Finally a woman who can admit this. I'm not even mad at you, now.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 07:58 PM
1

True, women aren't as visual as men; however, the shallowness is still there: college degrees, wallet, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 07:57 PM
1

Yes, they don't want to admit it because it sounds bad. You should hear a group of women speaking about past dudes when no other one is around. You'll hear everything about bedroom performance, small c*cks, broke wallets, and social awkwardness. You should also peep podcasts like Call Her Daddy and Angela Yee. The dynamic is quite different.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 07:55 PM
1

No. Haven't you heard of the code switching phenomenon? The discussions on Purple Pill spaces are far different than on the feminist spaces. People in general aren't going to admit to incendiary ideals because they fear blowback. If you don't believe me, watch a Black person in front of white people vs when he's with his friends. Completely different story.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 07:54 PM
1

Well in that case, both sides should admit to frivolous standards. Also, if the study is over 15 years old, it doesn't mean it's inaccurate. Just means it warrants a more modern study. My guess is that these same preferences exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 07:52 PM
1

Also, if you watching online dating shows, the most common rejection of men has to do with height. Here's the link to an actual study: Height Obsession Is Everywhere On Dating Apps. What Experts Think About That.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 07:49 PM
1

We all understand there will be exceptions. However, these generalities are pretty accurate. There have been studies on this topic. There are also reveals about race, even though people act as if there's some kind of equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 07:48 PM
0

Actually, they did a study on a popular dating app. The 20% statistic has truth to it. If your conjecture were correct, the percentage would be much higher. I know you all like making things nebulous, but the data speaks otherwise...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 07:46 PM
1

Can we not like overweight, outspoken, masculine, high body count women? Then deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 07:43 PM
1

Yes, it's a well-known fact. "You're such a p*ssy" is a common phrase from women when you do the safe option.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 07:49 PM
1

It's called epiphany.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 09:22 PM
1

I'll say the quiet part out loud. Women until recently have been seen as men's property. Stepping out of line brings shame to the family/village. We also have issues with women expressing freedoms. In the Middle East, some women have to act as if they don't enjoy sex. Imagine squirming to fake the funk. In Africa, female mutilations aren't uncommon. We still aren't advanced as much as we'd like. Yes, I know what my flair says.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 03:04 AM
–

This has actually been studied and documented. When someone resorts to nebulous arguments, it's an indication they don't want to handle the truth. I've seen it with my own two eyes. When a man is a doctor, he automatically becomes a major dating prospect, regardless of age. I've had women ask me about my family because some are doctors.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 10:54 PM
–

It's not that hard. Doctors, lawyers, politicians, or anybody wielding considerable clout, professionally.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 10:51 PM
–

This is akin to eating sugar and letting it trick you into believing it's satisfying your nutritional needs. I'm a firm capitalist, but supply and demand aren't necessarily the best tools for determining utility. Case in point drug dealing.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 06:50 PM
2

Drugs aren't the only vice: -cheaters and liars -poor character -alcoholics -scammers -just all around _ssholes Also, many virtuous women I know have at least one guy in their past that was pure trash. Sometimes the nerdy type women are looking for excitement they lack in their own lives. I often hear Christian women wanting a "reformed bad boy", indicative that they still want some element of danger. Even my own girlfriend likes it when I run a red light, she says she's tired of the boring me. …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 06:45 PM
2

They're ignoring red flags before the reveal, that's why.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 06:40 PM
3

I don't believe this. Tons of women have criticized men for being safe, honest, or good. Especially in my youth, the ones with more women had awful character. I honestly believe there's a biological impulse that equates poor behavior with protection.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 06:36 PM
2

While there's some truth to this, in my experiences, being a slight jerk to women gives better results. The fact that good men often are taken off the dating market doesn't account for the fact that women still prefer traits that don't make good dating partners. If that were the case, the ones that fell for these type of guys would just ignore them until they found a good one. They don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 06:32 PM
3

I don't condone your behavior, but every now and then I'll treat my gf like sh_t to see how she takes it. Nothing abusive, just a "be quiet and get me my pen" type quip. It turns her on.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 06:27 PM
1

Does my Huffy BMX count?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 06:23 PM
2

Men in prison often have tons of suitors. One attractive woman was recently killed because she felt her jail bae was "misunderstood" by society.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 06:21 PM
7

Actually, this has been reflected in sitcoms, media, and is a widely known secret. Women often use other women as vetting. A married man has at least one approval.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 06:19 PM
8

My only retort is that this has persisted for millennia. It's not changing.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 06:17 PM
1

I also think we need to add an assumption about STD's. That's quite important, and affects the practical viability of your inquiry.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 06:09 PM
–

That argument is also blown away by choice of profession. I'd generalize the most beneficial ones are teachers, professors, non-profit, social workers, doctors, and engineers. Financiers and lawyers, however, trump almost all of those from a desirability perspective. Lawyers don't really "help" society in general. One can also argue businessmen, while they do create wealth, are also somewhat destructive. I do realize there are exceptions, but teaching is a far more noble profession, they prepare…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 06:01 PM
2

Did you read the part about the Russian bots?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 11:06 PM
3

This also is why balloon pop/dating shows are popular in RP spaces. They are full of unkempt, shallow, vapid women who want a man to play the welfare game like he's the government. Offering nothing in return, and snickering at any hint of cooking or cleaning. When asked what she brings to the table, she virtually exclaims, "a vagina". They want 2025 freedom with 1950s finances.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 12:57 AM
2

I upvoted you; but my theory is that in practice, most Red Pillers are actually kind of "Pink". In our circles, we whine about women, how they mistreat us, and trauma. In real life, most of us have jobs, friends, and entertain a decent circle of women. We aren't Incels. And we have just enough social skill to realize the rhetoric we use online will get you hurt or fired in real life. Most of my friends entertain Red Pill in some form or fashion. They are all in long term relationships. Some are …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 12:46 AM
1

You'll get laughed at for being a wuss. Ditto for filing sexual harassment complaints. I can hear the laughing in the background now...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 12:02 AM
1

I disagree, as men are often the aggressors of the dating field. I do believe women get away with doing what a creepy man would do. I've been grabbed several times at nightclubs...and not on the shoulder.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 12:01 AM
18

I remember my girlfriend complaining because out of all the hits she got on Tinder, she wasn't interested in any of them. I then reminded her the only hits I got were basically Russian bots asking if I wanted company. Privilege seems like oppression sometimes.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 11:46 PM
1

>>Someone says they are redpill and you say it’s semantics. Can you read? Wow. I'll give you another chance to redeem yourself...
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 10:11 PM
1

Again. Your body decisions are virtually meaningless if it involves another life. To put it another way, I'm advocating for the MALE babies that will die because someone wants to snowboard in Alaska. Craziness how you fall for that narrative. I'm not sure what's fake about my outrage. And I am not going to keep repeating myself. Why not, you seem to keep wanting to entertain me. Dance. Most of the unwanted children in foster care are children of color. Yes, because we don't encourage deleting ba…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 09:05 PM
1

Again I don't care what you think about "innocent" life. This speaks volume. "You". Wow.... I know there are many men who think like you, Funny. "Men". "Many". Let's do some math. There are over 150 mil. women in America, roughly 1/3 of them pro-life. This means 50 million women believe child-killing should be legal. That's an awful lot of women. Now it means nothing for my reasoning, but it certainly destroys yours. few men admit that they would even Whoa. Now you're just spouting off the deep …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 01:28 PM
1

No. It matters not what the woman thinks. Let me repeat that for the people in the back. It matters NOT what the woman thinks, because there is another life on the end of that decision. What if a killer told you "it's mah right to do what I want with my gun?" No. The fact that a human life is at stake renders what the gun man thinks m-e-a-n-i-n-g-l-e-s-s. You've been catered to for far too long for people not trying to hurt your feelings. I'll say it one more time. When you murder (yes, murder) …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/25 01:54 PM
–

There is a balance. I can agree even as a Red Piller. Still, we must allow an outlet for men to vent their frustration, while keeping toxicity to a minimum. A lost man is 100 times more dangerous than his female counterpart. I have testosterone and statistics to back this up.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 10:54 PM
–

As an oppressed minority, I second this motion. There's current a movement about social media to hold our own accountable. It's refreshing because any criticism of your own group years past would get you ostracized socially.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 10:52 PM
–

It's an issue of being triggered by the truth. I'm the antithesis of a Red Piller. I'm college educated. I'm a firm believer of women's rights. My girlfriend is a corporate woman with an advanced degree. I cringe at kitchen and period jokes. Still I find there's some value in Red Pill content. Still, I remember various episodes in my life where I was treated poorly and dismissed for speaking the truth. It mattered not how much sense I was making, the fact there was a female on the other side inv…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 10:45 PM
1

>>It does not matter what you think. Wow, what an excellent debate point. I'll accept the white flag. >> It is easy for you to judge because it is not a situation that you will ever be in. Again, this is faulty logic. I won't act as if my view wouldn't change based on gender; you could say that for almost anything. What I will say is my viewpoint is based on ending lives, and not necessarily the emotional ramifications. I can't think of a less feminist thing to do than ending a female's life wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 10:01 PM
1

Fine, I stand corrected. Still, even given my faulty example, height does not mean protection. If that were the case, then they'd choose based on muscle mass and quickness. Height is misleading.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 09:47 PM
1

Wow, I don't know quite where to start... >>And it is nothing more than opinion as to whether it is murder. Can we agree that it's killing? You ended a life purposefully to, say, backpack through Europe. It's quite revealing that knifing newborns is considered preposterous, but yet seconds before leaving the womb is thought to be ok. The attempt to buttress the argument for ending a life to fit with social conventions is highly faulty. >>Nearly 93% of reported abortions happen before three and a…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 02:09 AM
1

>>You are not the one having to make the sacrifice or go through the discomfort, or the horror of childbirth. And that' doesn't stop it from being murder. Remember, a large portion of women are still against it. It was a woman who became the swing vote against it. It's funny you mention men as murderers. Your entire premise is to blame men for other problems to avoid the topic at hand. It's called deflection. Plain and simply, the kid stops breathing because of our actions. That's killing- not t…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 01:34 AM
1

LOL.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 01:30 AM
3

That's mere semantics. Notice they target mostly women, and have largely the same talking points. It's like the dating coaches claiming they're not PUA. It's an attempt to avoid potential purging. I'm not human, either.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 04:02 PM
2

It's all good, I was half joking. Yes, there are statistic on revenue, market share, and volume. OFans apparently has 80% of the market share of paid creator content (whatever that means). Wikipedia has an article, and there are probably sources on the bottom. I've never watched adult material so I wouldn't know by experience (look around stealthily...)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 02:51 AM
2

>> (Successful) women prefer tall, imposing, strong, masculine men. I agree with this sentiment (if you replace successful with ALL), I just find that men are called pigs for even wanting a cooperative woman, while they're allowed to like tall men. Yes, men can be shallow, but the general sentiment seems to be one-sided. >>I can also link studies that point to taller men being more successful and earn more $$$ over their lifetimes as compared to short men. <Rubbing hands like Birdman> Oh, boy, I…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 02:34 AM
2

No, you don't have to censor, I just can't get out of Youtube mode. >>I would like to learn more about these trends in "cornography" consumption. LOL are you trolling me? I googled "adult studios losing money to ofans", and according to google, it's true. We all know Google is never wrong....
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 02:14 AM
4

>>Investigations in 2020 led to millions of videos being removed due to containing child sexual abuse material and non-consensual material ( I did research on that (I'm a weirdo), and according to many who watch, the vast majority of the removed videos did not contain questionable material. Going through every single video would be costly (AI slips through the cracks, and wasn't as sharp at the time), so there was mass deletion of much more than needed. So while I do agree that thousands of vide…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 02:06 AM
2

"Grape" and incest "corn" is few and far between. As with many such arguments, the extreme is use as the norm, and it all becomes a victimfest. Matter of fact, most "corn" is shifting to people's bedrooms as opposed to a studio. All you need is a tripod and an iphone. Also, the viewers are mostly married men, which tend to have lower incarceration rates and crime accusations.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 01:24 AM
1

Are we counting second trimester abortions where the baby has lung, brain, kidney, and heartbeat function?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 01:20 AM
7

While I definitely understand the power dynamic, that doesn't excuse poor behavior. There's a serious double standard, with men being made to feel like pigs, where similar criticisms in the other direction lead to perpetual victimhood. Poor behavior should be called out on both sides, regardless of who is in power.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 01:18 AM
2

I guess my issue with that is there's watching porn. Then there's the porn industry. There's a distinction. It's akin to not shopping online because of poor practices at Amazon labor. Throwing out an entire industry because of poor practice smacks of ad hominem. Due to the advent of phone cameras and sharply lowered camera prices, much of the industry is now in private bedrooms, and not male-dominated studios. One would actually argue women have zapped their power back (except for those OFans co…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 01:12 AM
-4

Let's not forget those who abort their children...or those who support third trimester abortions... Oops! I wasn't supposed to say that!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 12:59 AM
11

Aba and Preach Kevin Samuels Medium Man Single by Choices You wouldn't know these men because your knowledge of Red Pill probably stops at Mr. Tate.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 12:57 AM
-3

Wait...he didn't say strong. Matter of fact, height can actually be a liability. The best boxers and fighters seem to be slightly less than 6 feet. By your theory, this would be garbage. Also, confidence and leadership aren't necessarily correlated. Some of the best leaders are soft spoken, and introverted. People project confidence as talent. Steve jobs himself would hire quiet bricklayers as leaders. Some of the boisterous people are poor managers with bad people skills. Narcissists. This has …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 12:54 AM
4

Another case of the exception being used as the rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 12:51 AM
1

What about the others?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/25 09:07 AM
2

Yes, it’s very important to me. It’s an illogical preference, but it’s no different than asking a man’s income, height, dck size, etc. women have the right to choose based on frivolous things, but we don’t? Not my idea of equality…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 12:31 PM
1

As a proud Red Piller who prefers low body counts, I think the two are separate. If a woman prefers to keep her count silent, that’s her choice. It’s a bit different than going outside the bounds of a relationship. Her past was before you. I’m not condoning lying, but it’s far different from cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 12:29 PM
1

This is a very good point. What is exactly Red Pill? Still, my thought is that they are Red Pill and maybe are trying to avoid blowback. Most of their targets are women, and it has a men’s rights flavor to them. I’ve noticed my favorite Red Pillers are reasonable and can see both sides. Greg Adam’s will occasionally go off on a rant about how pathetic men can be and how they should pick themselves up. I agree the space needs to be cleaned up of toxicity. There are non toxic aspects of RP, but no…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 12:18 PM
1

>>So, wait, because men are likely to be violent towards us, And therein lies the problem. You're using a false equivalency to implicate that most incels are violent. Trust me, most are harmless. Using victim mentality as a generalization is poor rationality.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 03:48 PM
1

Thank you, glad someone bought this up. Everytime I bring up generalization based on facts, someone always talks assault. As if extremes define the norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 06:42 PM
0

>>Catholic saints performed abortions and it was considered a miracle. Catholics also had brothels, etc. We can't exactly use them as a moral compass. Bad example. >>You fell for Republican propaganda. I'm not Republican. Kamala voter here, and proud. There are actually pro-life groups that are Democratic-based. >>Babies don’t die in abortion. You’re thinking of infanticide, which is illegal. This is akin to saying I didn't kill him, he died from smoke inhalation in the fire I set. Most humans a…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 06:38 PM
5

Actually, I do spend time with good women; and even they resort to some insane actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 06:34 PM
3

LOL. Trust me on this one. Most RP men, you'd not be able to tell by looking. I know you're looking for someone with glasses, unkempt appearance, and an unshaven face.... Maybe we should avoid killers, too.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 06:33 PM
1

Actually Bumble/Tinder have done studies showing how much harder it is for the average men to connect. The existence of couples doesn't disprove this theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 06:30 PM
2

I have zero issues with this post, it's very truthful. Now, why isn't the other side held with the same amount of contempt.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 06:29 PM
3

Man, it was only a matter of time before SA arose. Most women I've discussed such topics with haven't mentioned anything about SA. It's usually men who have cheated on them, lead them astray, or left them with children. Also, most of the women continue to entertain certain types of men. When you tell them about "Brett", you get "Brett's boring!" Because someone has had a bad experience, doesn't mean they're correct by painting with a broad brush. (Granted, I'm not making light of your situation,…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 06:27 PM
1

Fair enough. I'm just trying to dispel the notion that RP is the same as Incels. Trust me, many men you know digest (or at least agree) with RP and just won't tell you. I'm not even saying most married men are RP. Just that my personal circle, coupled with the men in the chat rooms, coupled with advice from my older uncles/mentors leads me to believe it's similar to a silent majority. If you make an RP statement, you could get fired, or lose your social standing. So we have to be careful not to …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 01:33 PM
1

That's a good question. I think I meant to reply to someone else in this thread, but failed...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 01:29 PM
-2

Yes, and add to the fact that any criticism of female behavior ends with "well men rape and assault women". They take the extremes to hide their own imperfections. Then they look for the right words, and try to ban you. You should see the amount of posts I have that are purely statistical and factual, that get tagged for bullying. I've never seen such a sensitive group of people. They want the whole world to be a safe space.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 03:58 AM
1

This is hilarious. Where do you get your notion of Red Pill? The media? Figures... Here are several channels. - Mediocre Tutorials and Reviews - Kevin Samuels - Coach Greg Adams - Medium Man - Aba and Preach If you aren't afraid of the truth, peruse the videos and examine the comments sections. Some of these men have families. Some of them make six figures. Others have had a steady string of women. There are even discussions of education, certifications, and the professional world. Matter of fac…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 03:50 AM
1

I don't disagree that a strong push has focused on educating both women and underrepresented minorities; but I don't think it's the biggest reason. In general, men mature more slowly, are more hyperactive, and tend to commit more crimes. Women follow rules, and are less likely to question authority. The attitude I hear from most men who don't go to college is "why should I? What can they teach me?" Women are not perfect, trust me. I'm in danger of getting banned from Reddit by pointing that out.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 01:24 AM
1

>>Nobody in their right mind claims that men can’t be treated poorly by women.Nobody in their right mind claims that men can’t be treated poorly by women. Then why can't men complain about it publicly? >>You are the one that sounds tone deaf if you think that a woman rejecting a man is even comparable Of course not. But I never implied it was. The victim narrative is stealthily used to dismiss concerns of the opposition. I remember on Reddit I made factual statements about a sensitive political …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 06:06 AM
2

>>First of all the media barely even covers this topi There are articles in USAToday and the Guardian. I know that Red Pill creator Pearl has been on various headline news shows. Anton Daniels has been on Fox News. >>Nobody is needlessly demonizing incels and red pillers Hmmm, interesting. I've seen countless counterexamples. On Reddit. Jubilee. What's funny is that RP is reduced to extremist caricatures. It's funny, on the one had you seem reasonable, but then you resort to labeling and stereot…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 05:56 AM
2

I guess what I'm saying is that incels don't receive more support because they're men. Men aren't supposed to elicit empathy. Most of the views on incels/RP are largely pushed by the media, which tends to favor women. Also, the notion that men need to pick themselves up factors in (men share blame in this, since we're not supposed to be emotional). I don't believe it's because of violence. I do agree support is needed because men are more likely to be prone to violence. I also believe that most …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 01:29 AM
0

>>What you are talking about is incredibly uncommon and typically women who have been very seriously traumatized by men in the real world. Aha! Are you saying that men haven't been traumatized by women? I've seen some of the nicest guys disrespected, ridiculed, laughed at, and dismissed for not fitting some mold. Women are constantly making fun of people with speech disabilities, accents, and shyness. Let's not forget men who have been cheated on, verbally abused, etc. I know several men who wer…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 01:08 AM
2

See Reddit's own trollYChromosome. A putrid pool of male hatred.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 01:00 AM
2

Given that men are more prone to violence, shouldn't there be more of a support group for incels? Contempt in that case would prove even further from rationality. Only women can elicit empathy, correct?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 12:57 AM
1

As a staunch Red Piller who has serious issues with American women and their dating choices... You are absolutely correct, sir. We can't blame loneliness on not being able to satisfy the needs of other women. There are several different ways to combat it. Support groups. Meetups. Psychologists/shrinks. Truth is relationships with women come when you aren't looking and least expect it. This is also a good part to find an older man who's been through the same thing. If I had a choice, I'd limit ce…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 12:23 AM
1

The trouble here is that women and job seekers are two different markets. An educated woman will more than likely see a fellow educated man as equal even if he makes less. A job is interested in increasing profits, and will be more likely to discriminate based on the value (e.g. major) they bring. A degreed woman will be more forgiving of a "lesser" man if he has a degree as well. I do like many of the points you bring up.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 12:10 AM
1

Dude, let me repeat. I. have. heard. women. say. these. things. with. their. own. mouths. Repeatedly. One more time for the people in the back. Women have told me DIRECTLY they look down on men who don't act or sound a certain way. They do this because they know I have a degree and won't be offended. I see this all over the internet and in interviews. This has been studied repeatedly. Also, I've had women dismiss me, only to circle back when they find out my degree and occupation. Their whole de…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 12:02 AM
-1

>>Men shame women who settle. Not in general. It's rare I hear a man say "look at her, she dates a plumber!". This is highly idealistic and not borne out by facts. While I do agree with the rest of your shaming points, you haven't really addressed my post accurately. Red Pill is more a reaction than an action. Women would rather be single than deal with someone who doesn't satisfy their list. In general, men aren't as picky. These have been proven statistically, though generalizations and averag…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 11:58 PM
1

Can you even lift a screwdriver (j/k). 😂 😂 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 11:43 PM
3

Hmmm, not the same. Studies even show women care more about social standing and funds. Rich men will date just about anybody within limits (e.g. Tiger Woods, Gene Hackman). Accomplished women will almost always want someone of equal or greater "value". Watch some of the dating shows online. Perhaps the biggest factor is a man that " can take care of me" or "hold his own". Men desire loyalty and agreeableness.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 11:42 PM
1

Also, let's not forget class and finance matter much more to women. Hypergamy is real. A degreed woman mostly wants someone in her socioeconomic clas and earning bracket
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 11:41 PM
3

HA! I speak with many of these same women. I've heard: How would it sound if someone said I date the dishwasher at the university Blue collared men are dumb. They can barely read. They don't use their brains. Look at how he speaks. He's ghetto and has a limited vocabulary. Matter of fact, I've been looked down upon by women who think they're smarter because I dress down and use common jargon. It's borderline bigotry. Where I'm from, big words can get you in trouble because you dare put yourself …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 11:24 PM
3

I don't agree with this mostly. While I do believe there has been a push to get more women into education and the STEM fields, I think the educational system falls right in line with how women tend to follow rules and "behave". Men tend to question authority. I have intelligent friends who hated school because they felt someone was telling them how to think.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 11:20 PM
0

Trigger Alert: staunch Red Piller I don't believe that. I don't have the facts to back this up; but in general, school tends to fit how women think and behave. Ever since grade school, I remember the boys going up the wall, driving the teachers crazy, while most of the girls sat and got lesson. Women tend to follow rules, and do as they're told, while men are always questioning authority and asking why it matters (a generalization, of course). Also jives with the fact that men mature more slowly…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 11:12 PM
3

Ain't that the truth. Preferences are only an issue when they don't want you. This trait transcends gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 11:06 PM
5

Don't use facts in Reddit. It causes meltdowns.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 11:05 PM
2

I think there will be problems initially; but everything will reach a steady state. Right now, we're seeing a glut of established, elevated, enlightened women matched by an abundance of putrid male dummies (eyeroll). Eventually, the situation will even itself out as loneliness becomes a bigger factor than the number of books one reads.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 11:00 PM
4

I don't think there's anything wrong with filtering body count. I think the trouble comes when 1) the chooser himself has a high body count 2) the chooser ignores other good attributes because of body count A trend I've noticed is that men's preference becomes a problem only when the woman in question is filtered out. The reverse is true as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 10:57 PM
1

Nah, it's the other way around. I think male loneliness is what's driving Red Pill. Statistically, dating apps show an abundance of women going after a small cadre of men that most won't get. Instead of "settling" for what they need, they do "bad all by themselves"...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 10:52 PM
2

I'm with you on that. I don't like bringing up my experiences, but it's not static, and can change in time. Also heard tightness sometimes is a sign of lack of arousal, so it's not something men can all the way brag about...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 02:17 PM
1

The only laugh I'm having is people afraid to test and denial about varying sizes. ;)~ FYI, it's called an incontinence test. I just asked the person who took it. To your credit, it is not sold commercially as a tightness test, but it's used for it nonetheless. There were only three sizes used. Also, while statistically small sample size yield limited results, the person who did take it "scored" for high tightness. Also at her gyno, the doctor had trouble inserting various objects, even remarkin…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 05:48 PM
1

I love the downvotes without arguments. Folk can't handle the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 12:45 PM
1

It's not medical, but there are tests out there. I know some that have partaken.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 12:44 PM
–

LOL You all blame red pill for everything. These issues have gone on for centuries. Only women are allowed to be angry, huh? Trust me, these topics have existed for decades amongst male circles. Just that speaking the truth can have consequences for one's career. Matter of fact, you will hear Red Pill talking points amongst successful, desired men. But yet trollYChromosome is allowed carte blanche. >>If such a man has access to a willing naked woman, she's done enough by providing her body for f…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 09:23 PM
–

There are plenty can do. -Ride. -Wiggle hips. -Kegel exercises/squeezing -Arms to caress. And you can also use your fingers and tongue. You mention how riding is uncomfortable. Well, so is standing up for 10 minutes and maintaining and erection. Also, keeping your mouth/tongue in the same position sniffing a bean is not easy, either. This isn't to say men are blameless, we're not. I just don't believe the onus of performance is on the woman. I also believe you're largely correct about the gap, t…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 09:18 PM
–

Do you know how many laughs I’ve heard from women when a guy tries to pleasure them? Staying hard and having the stamina to pump without catching a cramp is not easy. It’s funny when women try to use strap ons they get tired and don’t know how to move. Most women just lay there. It’s hard for me to see women as victims in this scenario. As progressive as we claim to be, dating and sex still have a traditional tinge. You talk about communication, but the man also has to balance between confident …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 01:10 PM
–

Yea, because women understand each others bodies. I’ve also heard from other men that men give better head. It’s just hilarious as how men are painted as these clueless oafs. Most women just lay there and some wouldn’t know how to give oral if they majored in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 01:05 PM
–

The female discourse on sexual satisfaction in America is interesting to say the least. The man must figure the right game approach, enable foreplay, feel out consent without spoiling the mood, stay erect, and anticipate how she likes it. All for the woman to just lay there and shame the man to her friends on how much he sucks in bed. You try it and see how easy it is... I’m reminded of the social experiment where the women had to take the men on the date. They took them to fast food restaurants…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 01:01 PM
–

You don’t know what bright skinned means?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 10:36 PM
1

LOL There are no logic holes in my argument. I pointed out hypocrisy. You went on a tangent with an unrealistic conjecture. Let me tell you what I mean by “tough”. Proving the truth is simple. Convincing someone they’re wrong about it is far more difficult. ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 10:35 PM
0

Many women claim to “deserve” an attractive rich men. Maybe your case isn’t an entitlement, but in other cases… Then when asked why they’re single, it’s because the men aren’t good enough. It’s never because they’re picky. The market speaks for itself with both genders. If someone isn’t able to pull what they’re looking for, maybe they can’t “afford” it… I have a friend that stopped going after hot young bright skinned women. It’s amazing how his dating life improved.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 10:20 PM
4

LOL. So not true, I know tons of women who are always complaining about unfair treatment by men. To the point where they’ve hated on attractive women. This is across the spectrum. Give you an example. An attractive woman with a rich husband lots of times is worried about her husband stepping out with a younger, more attractive woman. So if a well kept woman sees the disparity, a woman with a broke husband definitely would. Of course you don’t see it because you don’t want to. I get tired of my G…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 10:07 PM
-1

Again. Most men are not rapists. Vast majority. So using rape as a catch all to bolster attacks against any male behavior makes no sense. Laughing at a joke, while in poor taste, doesn’t make you a rapist. Most men don’t even find rape jokes funny. I’m with you, we should banish toxicity, and anything suggesting violation is ok. This does not mean discarding the entirety. You’re actually proving the point that feelings over facts is the trend nowadays.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 09:57 PM
1

Man, this is a tough one. I didn’t make that OP. Someone above complained about men treating women better in relationship based on their looks. Your vitriol should be directed towards them, not me. But again, I’m a dude, so I’m the lightning rod.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 09:53 PM
-1

-Liking a woman’s butt and breasts. -Locker room talk. -Locker room behavior such as rubbing hair, towel slapping, etc. It’s essentially been banned from the media. There’s more it’s just a Sunday afternoon. The trouble is that toxicity has been a catch all. You can display typical male behavior without glorifying rape. Now to be in media today you have to be some neutered Trader Joe enthusiast.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 09:50 PM
2

Should we men treat a woman in a relationship better because she’s slim-figured? In general, my belief is that your love and respect for your mate should be based on his/her actions, values, and feelings for you. Not on something as dumb and superficial as funds. And women don’t understand why richer men mistreat and discard them like recycled newspaper. It’s human nature, but it’s vapid.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 09:35 PM
–

I think you’re missing it. The point is women pushing conditional femininity/submissiveness are often triggered when a man displays the same behavior. You’re going into extraneous detail on a hypothetical. Let’s try to bring it back home, here.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 09:28 PM
–

I’m only gonna explain this one more time. Men often treat women their with better based on their attractiveness. This is BS. Women often display submissiveness based on a man’s resources. This is also BS. If you’re ok with one and not the other it shows your hypocrisy. I’m guessing you’re trolling, this is Logic 101.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 09:22 PM
1

Hilarious and true. But I lost my virginity in my late 20s. You’d be surprised at the women who see it as a challenge. Especially the older ones…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 09:18 PM
1

1) Yes, while you’re correct about socially awkward youth, a large portion of Red Pillers are older men who have been through the wringer dealing with women in the contemporary American dating game. Most Red Pillers I know are married men over 35. Some of them have social standing ( think community leaders and administrators). They actually have female suitors, some of them large body counts. Here’s what women miss about relationships. Because you have some success with women does not mean you h…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 09:12 PM
0

I wouldn’t say that. Men are largely looking for sex, while women tend to look for relationships. Your shaming of availability is hilarious, as women themselves simp for men way out their league. What’s funny is how many women know you’re in a relationship, but still will entertain you if you are in this group. A wedding ring actually make you more attractive. Amazing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 08:56 PM
0

I think it’s largely because of dating dynamics. The men will go for tons of women in the hope that two of them are down for sex ( or that he can convince more later). The women take suitors as proof the man wants to be with her…erroneous as many just want sex. So women are tricked into thinking they hold more sexual marketplace value than they do. Oops did I say that out loud….
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 08:54 PM
1

Why would a man simp for an overweight, unattractive woman? (This is for argument purposes only, personally I think both anpproaches are reprehensible.)
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 08:49 PM
-1

Not to mention how all masculinity is now seen as toxic. It’s funny how women are allowed to size a man up by penis size, wallet, social standing, height, and fitness. The second you mention a woman’s weight, there’s a protest march downtown within minutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 08:44 PM
-2

But why do women make the habit of blaming entire male populations for the sins of a few? Most men are not rapists. This is what’s largely driving the abortion debate. Take aspect “X” which applies to a small subset of the group, but is highly triggering.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 08:42 PM
7

This is an EASY one. -Gates is freaky deaky and had a hall pass deal with his wife. He prefers the brainy analytical types, but I digress… -Bezos divorced his school mom wife for a hot Latina. -Musk is working on his 12th kid. Who is he trying to beat, Nick Cannon? Many of them are models. Also we don’t know of the escapades of the other geniuses you mentioned. A lot goes on in secret and money is paid to keep it that way. You also are using a special subset of rich men. Trump, Jordan, Magic, an…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 08:39 PM
8

This holds the unqualified assumption that reputation is the end goal. It is not. A man would much rather sleigh 100 women than not and still hold bragging rights he did.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 08:35 PM
1

And therein lies the problem. I wasn’t the one who made the original assertion, I was pointing out the hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 08:27 PM
2

But many women do dress for men. Especially those wanting likes. Reminds me of why men go to the gym or like fancy cars. Yes there are exceptions, but it’s largely to attract women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 08:26 PM
-2

Again, goes both ways. I’ve heard MANY women claim their submission is in direct proportion to a guys funds. Reprehensible.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 08:22 PM
1

Wouldn't classify Locario as Red Pill. There's def. some overlap, as Red Pillers tend to be single men who desire to be more successful with women. Locario and his crew often mock Red Pillers for being "betas", whining about female behavior, and lack of dating success. Locario is extremely intelligent emotionally and knows Red Pillers view his content. So he attempts to siphon them off for his Bad Boy Membership. He's had beefs with prominent Red Pill creators (e.g. Auston Holleman). source: I'm…
/r/ExRedPill15/08/23 11:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter