TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Some_Random_Asshat Archive

View 0 posts and 22 comments by Some_Random_Asshat on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

You're either trolling or you're an idiot. Removing the foreskin has medical benefits. Doctors have studies that prove so. Saying it doesn't just points out your ignorance. All of the articles I've seen, even on mostly anti-circumcision sites, say that circumcision becomes more painful and dangerous the older a person gets. Doing it shortly after birth makes sense. Nipples may be useless, but there's no medical benefit to removing them. Fingers and toes are useful (I just used my little finger t…
/r/MensRights03/07/12 08:14 PM
0

I don't see where the article indicates that removal prevents the conditions, but I also don't think that is the point. "A Cochrane meta-analysis of studies done on sexually active men in Africa found that circumcision reduces the infection rate of HIV among heterosexual men by 38%-66% over a period of 24 months,[22] and studies have concluded it is cost effective in sub-Saharan Africa.[23] The WHO currently recommends circumcision be part of a comprehensive program for prevention of HIV transmi…
/r/MensRights03/07/12 06:22 PM
0

I'll assume you're a doctor with expertise in this area, and take a note that the benefits are limited. cut off a piece of your penis I'm not sure circumcision is what you think it is. You might as well cut off the nipples of your daughter. Reduces risk of breast cancer. Source? Again, there are minor health benefits. What are the reasons that it should not be done? What are the risks or costs? I'm yet to see an argument against it, and feel like there has to be one that people just are not educ…
/r/MensRights03/07/12 05:09 PM
1

Got it, thanks. I didn't see any other reasons other than issues of principle. I can't see where there is a benefit to withholding circumcision.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 02:30 PM
-2

That's it? Seems like a weak argument, especially since there are health benefits associated.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 12:17 PM
-2

Other than, "I hate religion," why are people in MR so adamant about boys not being circumcised? Honestly curious as the only ideas I'm seeing for it have to do with 'rights' and 'mutilation' and other non-medical arguments. Please educate me! I'm hoping to have a son soon.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 09:25 PM
1

Because most relationships don't end in marriage, and plenty of us lack that end goal entirely. As such, the long term goals of these romantic partners needn't necessarily be a deal breaker. I can accept that. This is why God created condoms. Before you talk about breakage like that's a real concern, it is not. Anyone who has had a condom break during sex knows it broke. If you don't stop and re-bag, you're inviting the inevitable. Try getting was as an unmarried, childless guy in your early 20'…
/r/MensRights30/05/12 02:39 PM
1

I'll give you that my short reply is lacking. I was responding to what I perceived to be an idiot making excuses why he could not control his seed. If you're with someone that you think may lie to you about whether she is on birth control, you probably should not have sex with her. My larger point is that accountability is important, and that it seems some others here want to remove that as a requirement. Essentially, if you don't want kids today, take steps to prevent it. That could mean abstin…
/r/MensRights30/05/12 02:23 PM
1

No, I just have enough self control to not have sex with every person I meet.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 02:18 PM
3

Not all relationships are based on a desire to be together forever, ie. highschool and college students Then don't have sex if you're not willing to deal with the consequences women think they can change the man, so go along and even pretend to agree with him. Ignorance like this has no place in an educated discourse; this goes both ways and does not provide any excuses for being lazy and lacking accountability. Because children may be wanted at a future date Then wait to have sex, or take preca…
/r/MensRights29/05/12 10:35 PM
0

If you don't want kids and she does Why would one continue a relationship with someone who has such a different long-term plan for life? Furthermore, if kids are not wanted, why does this person simply get a vasectomy and remove all chances? And how do you mean that it does not work in the real world? Maybe we just don't know enough about each other before engaging in such a potentially life-changing set of actions. It's like handling a gun; always assume it is loaded and be prepared to deal wit…
/r/MensRights29/05/12 08:06 PM
1

Seems like the easy solution is to abstain from sex until you're sure you're willing to make a commitment to someone. If you don't want to end up 'on the hook' for 18 years, avoid intercourse. Am I missing something?
/r/MensRights29/05/12 07:16 PM
0

You're not seriously comparing the plight of 21st century males to that of blacks prior to the civil rights movement, are you? There are no females-only water fountains, restaurants, or schools. Males can vote and can ride in the front of the bus. A male does not fear gangs of hate-mongering females showing up in the middle of the night to burn the Mars Symbol on his front lawn, then dragging him out of his home and hanging him from a tree. You're delusional, or a troll. I sure hope it's the lat…
/r/MensRights22/05/12 03:49 PM
1

That's the major problem with most of the people in this subreddit. There's usually little support based on actual studies. And I suppose that supports the idea of a giant conspiracy to keep men down, which just adds lube to the circle jerk, but so many of the responses are what I heard from Femnazis in my Women's Studies courses in college. I can say something like, "It is so hard to get a job as a male because employers feel obligated to hire women so that the work environment is diverse." Wha…
/r/MensRights22/05/12 12:23 PM
1

Source?
/r/MensRights21/05/12 08:23 PM
2

Guess it's time to start banging dudes.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 08:21 PM
0

You must not work with women.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 06:20 PM
3

I must have missed it.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 07:44 PM
1

While scientifically true, this has been one of the social measure we have used to determine discrimination. It is a litmus test, of sorts. I understand fully that correlation is not causation, but there are underlying, testable, and consistently seen trends that indicate there are flaws in the current system. As I stated, I disagree with inequality in most circumstances, and do not support women's-only grants as that's not the right solution for the problem. In support of the theme of this subr…
/r/MensRights08/05/12 05:42 PM
6

Interesting. Thanks for the explanation.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 03:57 PM
3

What's the point of this?
/r/MensRights08/05/12 03:13 PM
0

The science field is still biased against women, particularly in tenure-track faculty positions at university. Part of the reason is that biological clocks for women line up pretty closely with the timeline to earn tenure. Because of this fact, women trying to earn tenure, or obtain tenure-track positions, have a more difficult time as the body responsible for the hiring decisions are still largely male. Source: www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/forum/story/2012-04-25/women-college-professors-presid…
/r/MensRights08/05/12 02:04 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter