TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Somobro Archive

View 0 posts and 23 comments by Somobro on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Look, I agree with you because religion is a tool of persecution, but it's definitely not gynocentric. I believe in the equality of the sexes and won't deny that men are discriminated against by most faiths in the way you describe but it would be intellectually dishonest of me to call religions, particularly abrahamic ones, gynocentric. The level of dehuminasation shown towards women in abrahamic faiths especially is way more intense than what's shown towards men. They do force men into provider…
/r/MensRights18/07/26 09:41 AM
48

Psychology as a profession is very quickly becoming female dominated and it doesn't make sense to take it, or general psychologists, particularly seriously. Neurologists, developmental psychs and neuropsychologists are still doing good, critical work in treating illnesses but that's because they're much closer to hard science or geared towards supporing developmenal disabilities. Psychology generally though has always been an extremely flawed profession because it was, in its infancy, heavily ma…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/26 05:10 AM
102

The types of people who read those types of books aren't going to buy ones that portray men as victims in an abusive relationship. It won't sell, so it won't print.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/26 03:50 AM
3

This is by design, so it isn't going to change. I'm in Australia, I know many educators, literally none of them care and almost all of them are women. Nobody cares if boys are being left behind in the public system because that's the point. The people who govern society recognise that educated young men are, historically, major catalysts of revolution so as they tighten the noose around the working class neck it is imperative that young males be intellectually and psychologically neutered to min…
/r/MensRights19/05/26 01:02 AM
83

The people who are upset about this aren't going to let the simple logical concept of "62 million people" get in the way of a chance to vilify men. For context by the way, 62 million people is more people than the population of Italy, which is the 25th most populous country in the world. The last US election's popular vote was won by 77m to 75m votes. This isn't to make a political point, it's more to highlight how fucking staggering of a number 62 million is when it comes to people. It is rough…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/26 01:28 PM
-18

You've made a lot of claims without producing a shred of evidence. Care to share a source regarding any of this? I'm not keen for my mens rights sub to turn into unscientific, emotionally driven bashing of women or the rewriting of history. Don't stoop to the level of the propagandists.
/r/MensRights08/04/26 10:08 PM
8

I mean, shit dude what even is an ideology if you're excluding feminism from being an ideology? As for it being a list of fabricated grievances, that's also not necessarily true? I think the suffragettes had legitimate grievances. I think that the women who were banned from running in the Boston marathon back in the 60's because of their gender had a pretty legitimate grievance lmao. This sub exists to discuss the issues that affect men, and do it in a way that's intellectually honest, right? Th…
/r/MensRights11/10/25 12:05 PM
1

I live in Australia and there's definitely a prevalence of anti-intellectualism in our society, and a really big blue collar culture that's not very welcoming to women. On the other hand, having been to university, there's a lot of rhetoric that isn't particularly welcoming to young men as well. Couple that with high school attitudes still veering towards "if you're good at school but not at sports you're a nerd" and it turns into crabs in a bucket for young men. This is the kind of attitude tha…
/r/MensRights24/09/25 01:51 AM
14

Yeah, honestly I can see that 32% stat being abused without context in headlines that say "32% of men have been emotionally abusive" without taking into consideration what the definition they've used is. It's also telling that they're not reporting front and centre the number of men who have themselves felt emotionally abused by the same definition. What does alarm me is that 9% reported physicality. Unless it's in self defence that's not cool at all, and as an Australian there's definitely some…
/r/MensRights02/09/25 06:54 AM
1

Yeah just got banned from there. Go figure.
/r/MensRights08/07/25 12:19 AM
19

If someone can't be with you unless you agree to express an opinion that you don't hold, the relationship isn't going to be healthy for either of you. It doesn't even matter what the opinion is. If you don't choose to hold that opinion, expressing it is just lying to others and to yourself. With that said, the kind of person who would say something like this is almost certainly going to use your refusal to say the words to smear you. The statement you've been expected to make lacks any nuance wh…
/r/MensRights03/07/25 03:06 AM
1

An Instagram group in India that was swapping nudes, making pro-rape comments that sometimes involved planning hypothetical gang-rapes. Multiple minors also had their nudes leaked on the group, and another "2.0" group too. I'm just filling you in on what "Bois Locker Room" is btw. I haven't read enough into this to enter into a debate around it, or on the tweet from OP's post.
/r/MensRights08/05/20 07:14 AM
2

So anything that doesn't tackle every issue you consider to be at the forefront of injustice is somehow less important? I've been made to feel like "not a man" for not being a car person and it made me feel horrible. Are you saying greater injustices invalidate lesser injustices? Are we going to stop pretending gender roles in society harm young men just because there are other issues which harm them less often but far more deeply? Every single guy I know has had to deal with the humiliation of …
/r/MensRights20/03/18 03:11 AM
3

Calm down dude, there are worse issues but at least this is raising a degree of awareness that life isn't easy as a guy? The part where he's obliged to know how to fix a car resonated with me for sure. Maybe there's a guy problems 2 that'll be more serious but I don't see you creating any content to even begin to make a difference. It isn't always the major issues that are hard to deal with. Every day problems matter too. If you want to be angry for the sake of being angry instead of contributin…
/r/MensRights20/03/18 03:03 AM
1

Yeah, couple of people pointed out that there's more than one variety of female circumcision. A question though; I know that the clitoris is essentially a tiny penis but I've also heard it contains the same number of nerve endings. Wouldn't removing the hood be more painful for women because the nerves in the clitoris are more concentrated as compared to the penis?
/r/MensRights01/05/14 01:35 PM
7

Wow, fair enough. So there was definitely intent to deteriorate sexual pleasure for men and force them onto a more "moral" path. That's more than a little bit disconcerting :/ I wouldn't have guessed at this at all, and honestly I should probably have read into this a bit deeper before putting my two cents in. I'll defs read up on what this is all about though. Cheers for the info btw mate
/r/MensRights01/05/14 01:33 PM
12

Fair enough! Looks like I am a bit misinformed. I was under the assumption that it was a flat out removal of the clitoris. Looks like I have some reading to do on FGM. Cheers for the informative response though, friend :)
/r/MensRights01/05/14 01:28 PM
3

my foreskin had become stiff and rigid, it was next to impossible to urinate and at I remember how I used to refuse to drink water so as to avoid having to piss because it would hurt like all hell. The opinion to circumcise came from my grand-uncle, who's a urologist. I'm inclined to trust that there was a legitimate medical condition because my family is Hindu, it couldn't have been religious or cultural.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 10:35 AM
0

This really isn't much except my own speculation but did circumcision originate as a safeguard against potential infection? I was circumcised at age 4 because I was passionate about my own nudity and refused to wear clothes, resulting in an infection under my foreskin. Truth be told, I don't know how much it affects my sensitivity, and the first time I had sex I'm sure I was as disappointingly quick as an uncircumcised man. I think the big decider has to be in the quality of the procedure. Altho…
/r/MensRights01/05/14 10:10 AM
1

I agree that something as common as "hello" can sound creepy and that's because there are so many ways to use things like tone to alter meaning, like how we do with sarcasm. All said and done though, even with the most cultivated PR and public-speaking skill, the idea that a politician; a lawmaker, a legislator and the representative of a people's ideological standpoint; should in any way be required to have "physical attractiveness" as a quality is completely demeaning to their intellectual pro…
/r/MensRights02/09/13 07:38 AM
7

While I agree that over-political correctness continues to be a workplace issue that creates undue tension for men who are simply trying to be nice, or cordial, Tony Abbott was clearly in the wrong with his comments. He is introducing a candidate of his party to the public and making any comment as to her looks is unnecessary and inappropriate. She's a politician, not a model, and her job in no way requires her physical appearance to be called into question. If she happens to be attractive, that…
/r/MensRights02/09/13 01:11 AM
3

Yeah, that's fair enough, I could have stood to phrase that better. I meant more along the lines of if there was one mixed league there would be a very, very limited amount of (if any at all) female players due to the aforementioned athletic predisposition. From what I can see in the proposition however the current rule by the governing body in charge of the TdF has a rule limiting the distance a female rider can ride. I don't think they're proposing actually putting in place a parallel race wit…
/r/MensRights13/07/13 02:25 AM
11

I think the idea is that they too recognize that in terms of raw athleticism, biologically men are going to be naturally superior (generally speaking). Much in the same vein as separate events for both sexes in the Olympics and other international sporting tournaments, they want a separate TdF to accommodate for the fact that it would be stupendously difficult for a woman who would be capable of winning the hypothetical Womens TdF to compete with the cyclists who are in the head of the pack in t…
/r/MensRights13/07/13 12:12 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter