TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Song_of_Laughter Archive

View 2 posts and 97 comments by Song_of_Laughter on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
126

misandrySong_of_Laughter/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 02:54 AM
101

DiscriminationSong_of_Laughter/r/MensRights16/04/25 02:50 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

just that Fascism is too specific to apply. Right, and you're wrong. Germany was more than 60% Protestant during the Nazi period.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/25 09:06 PM
-1

It's also not useful if you say "It's only bad when Catholics do it."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/25 08:20 PM
0

Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't think the Japanese imperialists called themselves Fascists. Is that really the issue, though?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/25 07:56 PM
1

Most of the American racists disagree quite a bit with self-identified Fascists like Mussolini and his supporters (which still exist today in Italy, former Yugoslavia, and South America), as there are many non-racial reasons to oppose Fascism. I have yet to see it. They might disavow other fascists for reasons of optics, but they don't actually disagree with how they operated.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/25 07:53 PM
2

But calling them Fascists even tho they don't identify with that ideology in any way is how definitions get watered down, and that's how dysphemism treadmills form. Except the only reason they don't identify with that ideology is because they are afraid of the label being applied to them, not that they disagree with any of the ideology itself.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/25 06:42 PM
3

It was still mostly from Catholic influence, altho it's not strictly Catholic. Sounds like something Evangelicals would say to claim that it's "not fascism when we do it."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/25 07:05 AM
5

Right-wing Americans and actual Fascists is that the former support a free market Right-wing Americans do not. They are all in on punitive tariffs and selectively denying social benefits to certain workers to force them to work more.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/25 07:05 AM
27

I wouldn't call them Fascists either for similar reasons to "incel". Fascism was a very specific movement that occurred in Catholic countries. Huh? The Protestants in Germany were very much on board. And, inasmuch as Imperial Japan was fascist, it definitely wasn't Catholic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/25 04:50 AM
-2

If your need to feel safe requires that Arabs be excluded from society then fuck your feelings.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/25 06:10 AM
-2

You would too if you were a short, old, Jewish, man. Not everyone old is racist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/25 01:29 AM
0

I don't like living in a police state but I am frightened be large groups of angry Arab men who have already tried to hurt me. Are you saying you find groups of Arab men inherently scary?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/25 07:03 AM
2

I'm a socialist and I broadly agree with your assessment of feminism here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/25 06:45 AM
2

What point are you trying to make?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/25 06:06 AM
9

Emotional labor is pure bullsh!t. Just another form of virtue signaling women do to make themselves feel better about their meager contributions in relationships. Why are you censoring yourself? This is reddit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/25 06:04 AM
10

It's Buzzfeed, it's particularly insipid and designed to get clicks. I don't even think that the feminist movement takes Buzzfeed seriously anymore.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/25 06:03 AM
3

That people don't dislike the left as much as they actually dislike mainstream Democrats.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/06/25 10:27 PM
5

Some commenters on this sub who feel the need to stick "especially black and brown boys/men" after every single discussion of men's struggles would do well to remember that the entire tree of identity politics is poisoned, not just the fruits that happen to be feminist. Eh, it's relevant if it's accurate. Like when I talk about discrimination against boys in education.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/06/25 03:34 AM
-1

Whew, let me tell you about right-wingers then... they'll kick you out of the country for not agreeing with them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/25 07:27 AM
4

That's not what left-wing means.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/25 07:23 AM
36

I think it came from the mainstream Democratic party. You'll notice that they're shitting a brick over Mamdani, who is a brown, left-wing socialist who did well with young white men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/25 07:22 AM
4

This is literally a leftist subreddit, or at least it's intended to be.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/25 07:19 AM
1

Depends on what you mean by different. The centrists and mainstream Democrats are also not as different from Trump supporters as they claim they are. Trump supporters don't care if people's constitutional rights are being violated; they have a degenerate morality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/25 07:17 AM
1

Interesting. That's why these policies did so well among young white men in New York.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/25 07:13 AM
-1

Most leftists these days are called left wing authoritarianism. You sound fairly right-wing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/25 01:05 AM
3

You seem to be on the wrong subreddit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/25 01:05 AM
3

I teach in a low status rank at a super leftie university and even helped out with the faculty union. I was and am sick of the snobbish elitism and hypocrisy. They are clueless about what the students are going through, especially the higher ranking TT faculty. College professors are primarily PMC or aspiring PMC. Rarely are they true leftists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/25 01:04 AM
5

They don't care if bad things are done, so long as the person doing them is likable enough. That's generally how Trump supporters work, though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/25 01:03 AM
0

Something I can’t stand about arguing or even speaking with left wing people is that they force me to defend Trump when I didn’t vote for him and don’t even like him. That's weird, I'm an anti-feminist and I never feel that urge. Why would you defend Trump? He supports men being imprisoned on false rape accusations. Trump's anti-immigrant policies seem to be motivated by Stephen Miller's raging white supremacism, so it worries people more. That's perfectly rational.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/25 01:03 AM
0

Far too many people on the left have the same cringe AF "government please be my daddy and make everything perfect for me" views that crazy MAGAs have. I don't see this very often, and this seems like a bad-faith argument to try to protect vulture capitalism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/25 01:00 AM
1

In the US the Democrats seem to reject you if you don't adhere to everything (as per your example) whereas the Republicans welcome you in with one shared belief. Meanwhile, Mamdani won the Dem primary (and likely will win the general election) with a very left-wing platform that wasn't trying to alienate anybody.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/25 12:59 AM
1

It seems like leftists You're describing the mainstream liberals, not the leftists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/25 12:58 AM
3

Too thick headed to understand that satire is not meant as a mantra There is legitimately a thing where people who are deeply racist, sexist, homophobic etc will frame their bigotry as a joke so as to claim people who are against it are just too uptight.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/25 12:58 AM
5

Mainstream democrats are not left-wing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/25 12:57 AM
0

So this is literally from 10 years ago. I think you should have started a discussion post instead; this is very low-effort.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/25 04:53 AM
0

Cool, what's your source of this? Anybody can post a jpg image of some text.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/06/25 11:54 PM
1

/u/waythurstfrancis wants us to leave the oligarchs alone and focus on hating working-class men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/25 05:37 PM
11

Well, it's because people like you find the idea of advocating for or having compassion for men as misogynistic in and of itself. Like how intersectional feminism advocates against targeted interventions to help black boys in education.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/06/25 12:32 AM
19

The majority of feminists use it that way, just like the majority of feminists use the phrase "toxic masculinity" to mean something men should be blamed and shamed for. And I'm talking about academic feminists as well, the core of the movement.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/06/25 12:31 AM
8

What is the argument? Because as I see it, "The Patriarchy" is often meant to describe a society in which power is held by men, with the implication that men are using that power to help all men and hurt all women. It's not accurate, of course, but that's what's being argued.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/06/25 12:29 AM
22

I'll spell it out really cleanly since you seem confused: most of the "developed" world very explicitly afforded more rights to men than women until very recently in the grand arc of history. If you don't believe me, look up the history of marital rape. I think you'd be surprised by how recently you could get away with it. Marital rape goes both ways, actually. So that's not a good example. Both men and women were afforded the right to rape their spouses without recourse until recently. And this…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/06/25 12:28 AM
1

Thanks but this isn't quite the evidence I was hoping for. I was really looking for something that shows a correlation between feminism and willingness to inflict harm on men. That study goes into feminism if you scroll down. If we can produce evidence that feminists are actually more likely to endorse male disposability than non-feminists of the same sex that would be extremely significant. That study does, inasmuch as it measures male disposability.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/25 06:42 AM
1

This one is a good start.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/25 05:58 PM
12

Supporting the rights of trans people is not somehow antithetical to workers' rights and economic populism. The capital-holding class desperately wants you to think it is, however.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 10:05 PM
9

Makes sense in the idiot logic in the UK where men who are victims of sex crimes are victims of violence against women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 10:01 PM
16

Exactly. Nothing has made more more supportive of trans rights than seeing how rotten and bankrupt the morality of TERFS are.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 09:55 PM
9

Yup. People might want to get sober about why reality is so alienating to these boys and young men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 08:57 PM
5

I actually would claim that republican politicans are more misandrist than democrats since republicans believe more strictly in Patriarchy. As a left wing voter, I don't think there's that much of a difference at this point, since mainstream Democrats are very much neoliberals who want to throw men into the capitalism grinder.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 08:56 PM
5

He’s essentially blaming young men for reacting to the discrimination in healthcare they face. I guarantee this guy isn't a fan of Obamacare either.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 04:58 PM
12

Right, and casually being misandrist along the way.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 04:58 PM
5

Weird, in the US my doctor tries to get me in at least once a year.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 09:12 AM
4

By that logic of unsubstantiated generalisations, it's accurate to say anti-feminism is consistently misogynistic across the board. Nah. How feminist someone is directly correlates to how much harm they're willing to see inflicted on men in psychological studies.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 04:08 AM
11

I highly recommend /r/GuyCry for the fellas that are fed up with the rehortic in this space. The guy who runs that sub is a psychopath, and also banned the use of the word "misandry" in his sub. He's not a friend to men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 04:04 AM
88

Mike Johnson justifies Medicaid cuts based on the idea that "able-bodied men" don't deserve medical care if they're not working. Male bodies are treated as disposable. He claims that mothers and the elderly are more worthy of medical care than young men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 02:54 AM
61

Mike Johnson justifies Medicaid cuts based on the idea that "able-bodied men" don't deserve medical care if they're not working. Male bodies are treated as disposable. He claims that mothers and the elderly are more worthy of medical care than young men.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 02:52 AM
2

Given their origin in a right-wing temperance movement, honestly, yes, I think they are right-wing but people haven't apprehended that fact.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/25 08:53 PM
14

Despite there some differences between men and women's bodies genetically speaking, when progressives and feminists say there's no difference they aren't talking about bodies. No, feminists circa 2010 had some wild and unscientific ideas about the differences between male and female physiology.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/25 08:52 PM
3

An ideology can exist as a concept even if nobody is actually practicing it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/25 08:51 PM
6

Has this person never heard of intersectionality before? Intersectionality does not allow for men being disadvantaged because they are men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/25 08:43 PM
3

Read up on his thoughts on the Exonerated Five/Central Park Five. He's not an ally to men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/25 08:42 PM
3

And still, teachers consistently and systematically discriminate against boys, especially nonwhite boys.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/25 05:28 AM
3

That's wild, because I work in academia and they're whole-hog on the Kimberlé Crenshaw intersectional feminism that doesn't give a toss about boys, even brown or black boys.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/25 05:27 AM
52

I say "prove it," not to convince them, but to show to other people how intellectually bankrupt that position is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/25 04:16 AM
0

I assume you're being sarcastic?
/r/MensRights02/04/25 06:55 PM
-3

You also have the current right-wing administration deporting men without due process and holding them in an extrajudicial prison in El Salvador. So there's no honest support from the right either.
/r/MensRights02/04/25 06:05 AM
8

Maybe not MAGA, but who don't like the DNC much anymore. Remember, it was voters who stayed home who truly decided the last presidential election.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/25 06:46 AM
5

This is feminism saying it’s bad to treat penises and men like that. Not what I see; I see feminism as the loudest voice saying those things. Feminism broadly decided it would rather be sex-negative towards everyone than not shame men for having normal male sexuality. How does that cultural norm help men? It doesn't, which is one of the reasons why mainstream feminism endorses it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 06:40 AM
0

There isn’t any reason to know or hear about the sexuality of someone you aren’t dating, period. Well, there might not be a good reason for it, but it happened. So now what? If a man overcharged, he committed a social gaffe that no one else is responsible for. What if it's just something like hitting on a woman of a higher caste, that a third party thinks is inappropriate? Or racism? The world is not just. Why are you pretending it is?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 06:18 AM
1

It's also caused by parents excessively curating their childrens' life, and especially how that differentially affects boys - boys aren't allowed to be around mentors as often as girls are.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 06:15 AM
2

Beyond that, he makes fun of manosphere nonsense That could definitely be good or bad depending on what you mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 06:12 AM
12

What do you do if the outside world is actually hostile to him?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 06:10 AM
1

Irrelevant to the point, which is that many women treat an attractive or "fuckable" man doing that in their social circle very differently than an unattractive one - if he's unattractive he's a "creep," if he's attractive he's "flirty." Moreover, they will shun women who respond positively to attentions of the "creep" as a way of enforcing their judgment on his sexuality. It's not about whether or not he approached them; it's just toxic and shitty behavior based around punishing people based on …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 06:06 AM
3

Holy shit, you went right for the threat of violence, huh? He did not. /u/wtknight, why is this poster allowed to insult and misrepresent people's points here? Are we all allowed to do that?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 06:04 AM
3

FDS is/was a sub about creating rules in order to get high value men to behave better It also promoted abusive and manipulative behavior that exceeded that of TRP. The issue is that on reddit saying bad shit about women is treated much differently than saying bad shit about men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 06:02 AM
0

Because a lot of men are angry at fat women for just posting a picture, let alone having a guy they think is too good looking for her. "A lot" relative to what? Generally women slut-shame other women more seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 06:01 AM
5

Use your imagination. Maybe they're part of the same social circles.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 05:59 AM
1

Not wanting to fuck someone isn't a phobia Let's clarify - it's saying that bisexual men make inferior partners in general that's the problem, and that can be divined from these womens' behavior. There is nothing wrong with being a straight woman who is only interested in straight men It makes you a bigot. There is a problem with it. This is just more policing of women's sexual attraction and dating preferences, which wonderfully comes from both the left and right Well, bigoted women deserve to …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 05:54 AM
1

If men don’t want to face rejection It's not about rejection. Read the OP again.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 05:52 AM
5

She's just "anti-man" pill, whatever that color happens to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 05:51 AM
7

Unwanted sexual attention is nearly always rude and unpleasant. They're disgusted by those mens' sexuality, even if they're not expressing it towards the women in question.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 05:50 AM
1

Why are people so insistent on making women date and fuck men we don't want to date or fuck I don't want to make women fuck anyone they don't want to fuck. I just want to be clear that women who don't want to fuck men because they're bisexual are homophobic/biphobic, and therefore bigoted, and to remember that the next time they talk about how horrible men are for judging a woman by her past.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 05:45 AM
1

Ah, so your heart is just rotten then.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 05:41 AM
6

This is what Phallocentrism refers to. It sees the penis as powerful but also corrupting, which imo is pretty harmful for men in some ways as well. Man, feminism sounds like the most phallocentric ideology out there then. "The penis is a weapon" and "male sexuality is evil" are like the core of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 05:30 AM
2

The patriarchal messaging is what most of them will say when pressed: they are concerned they are actually gay, and gay men are often seen as lesser due to being effeminate, unmasculine, like women. It's also that they don't want their male partner to be not seen as dominant enough among their female peer group. That motivates a lot of female sexual behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 05:29 AM
2

both sort of stem from a lack of respect for things deemed “unmasculine” Not quite - many of these women find it entirely acceptable for a woman to do the things they find repugnant for men to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 05:28 AM
5

they associate it with femininity in a negative way, and what does that say about their view of femininity? It's more complicated than that. It's generally cast in the idea that women have the right to be feminine, but men do not, they are not. It's a misunderstanding of how gender roles work in the West to assume that the male is valued over the female.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 05:27 AM
1

Clearly you cast a moral judgment on men for being bisexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 05:23 AM
1

I still think it's weird to demonize straight women who only want to date straight men I think you'd demonize men who only wanted to date straight women. You know what's wilder, though? As per the statistics that someone else posted in this thread, there are bisexual women who don't want to date bisexual men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 05:23 AM
1

Please explain to me how having a particular preference in a partner matches prejudice, fear or hatred. Saying someone is a less worthy partner just because they're bisexual. Of course it's tied up with misandry too because these people might even be bisexual women who date bisexual women but they think bisexual men are "icky" and unclean.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 06:53 PM
1

Ah, so biphobic then.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 09:45 AM
1

It will never not be wild to me how it's considered a phobia to merely be a heterosexual woman exclusively interested in dating heterosexual men As a straight guy, I don't care if my partner is attracted to both men and women or not, as long as she's attracted to and faithful to me. It's kind of alien to care about which gender she's boinked in the past. Maybe she experimented a bit during college, I don't know, that's her business.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 09:44 AM
4

Or men are actually less homophobic than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 09:41 AM
0

She isn't biphobic she just has a preferences That's exactly biphobic though. Do you think people would let men be if they didn't want to date bisexual women?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 09:38 AM
7

"Frame" implies you aren't guilty of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 09:34 AM
2

OP is pretty much calling me a monster for not wanting "low-tier" men No. OP is calling out women who think that "low-tier" men don't have a right to a sexuality at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 03:12 AM
2

Why do you think that a lot of women find the idea of men off enjoying erotica on their own dangerous and repulsive?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 03:03 AM
7

I'd argue that intersectionalist feminism, while still bad, isn't the same thing as white feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/03/25 08:29 PM
8

She’s a bourgeoisie feminist. Just look at her up bringing. She criticizes "white feminism" a lot, and seems to have some pro-working class views, but her record on men isn't great.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/03/25 08:10 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter