TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Sonic_Bluth Archive

View 0 posts and 48 comments by Sonic_Bluth on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'm talking about the General discussion. It's not direct at you. And yeah, it's a shitty thing for anyone to do. This is the third time I've acknowledged that here.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/16 07:28 PM
3

Whenever I've seen penis size brought up in manosphere-adjacent contexts like this, the conversation always devolves into one of those weird incel pity-parties about how western women are so entitled that they'll only be satisfied with 8 inches or more. I just wanted to do my part to nip that line of thought in the bud here. And yeah, as I alluded to in the second paragraph, most of the women quoted here come across as real assholes.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/16 06:53 PM
2

Ok, so to clear up one preconception that folks in this subreddit who talk about penis size like to make: "tiny dick" does not mean "anything smaller than a down-to-the-knees baby-leg monster cock that we will assume for the purposes of discussion is owned by a black man." I think the illustrative references those women make show consistently that they are talking about men with considerably smaller-than-average penises. But onto the subject at hand, I think women who make fun of small penises d…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/16 05:26 PM
1

See, you're looking at "forcing" too narrowly here. In your mind (and, admittedly, maybe OP's as well) it's not enforcing a gender role unless you're literally pushing a kid into the bus to military school. You're maybe imagining a dad calling his son a pussy for not wanting to try out for the football team, or a mom grooming her daughter to be a full-time mom herself. Sadly, I'm sure these kinds of gender role enforcement do still happen, and I'm glad we can all agree they're bad. But I think t…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/16 01:32 PM
1

Are you fucking with me right now? Are you Hillary Clinton's speechwriter or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/16 02:55 AM
2

It's a complex situation, but that question is pretty cut and dry.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/16 12:18 AM
1

In what way?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/16 06:31 PM
5

Nobody is expecting you to give a ten-step plan for how we eradicate all gender roles if you say "No," it's just an abstract question on your position on a social issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/16 05:34 PM
5

This is such a non-answer. It would be like if the question had been "should marijuana be legalized?" And you had answered "sure, if you want to sell weed, who am I to tell someone how to make a living? They should just expect to go to prison if they're caught distributing." I appreciate the pragmatism, but surely you can see how it sidesteps the actual question.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/16 05:15 PM
1

First of all, I know the media has been hate-sucking trumps dick for what seems like forever, but in the grand scheme of things, he's winning a plurality of votes in a crowded race for the nomination of a party that constitutes roughly half of the voting population of a country whose total population accounts for a tenth of the global population. One poll found that 69% of Americans have anxiety about the idea of Trump as president. It's a bit of a stretch to claim that the "Trump phenomenon" sa…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 12:54 PM
4

Evidently not. How many suns does your system have? Mine has one G-type.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 12:40 AM
3

Yeah, I guess in my experience I haven't felt infringed upon by any "feminine imperative" ever. I'm really not even sure what you mean by "financial and emotional interests."
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 08:57 PM
12

I'm a man, and it really bums me out that the most famous, vocal advocates for my "rights" fixate so much on "having an awesome sex life" as a right. I genuinely don't see any pro-female agenda in believing that. Also, as someone with severe clinical depression, if someone says they are "depressed" because they don't have something in their life, and their depression goes away once they get that thing in their life, I'm more inclined to label that state of mind "sad." Actual mental illness goes …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 08:17 PM
1

The frustrating thing about this thread is that going after the pimps and people who operate prostitution rings is what Law Enforcement puts the majority of its anti-prostitution resources toward. They investigate massage parlors and places like that, and bust the ones that are doing prostitution on the side. In the United States, the sentence for solicitation is a fine. Maybe some jail time for repeat offenders. It's on the level with a fairly severe traffic violation. It's clearly not about pu…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 07:49 PM
0

Sorry, I guess I spent too much time outside when I should have been watching porn today, or I would have remembered that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 10:27 PM
7

I really don't know what this has to do with that I said. But if I'm going to be honest, I think someone had a widdle crushy-wushy on "the 4" there and what I'm reading is the whine of fermented sour grapes. Otherwise why the fuck would you care if girls are "punching above their weight class"? What about "good for them," or at least "more hb8's for me"? Also, on the subject of "entitlement," I have literally never heard a woman express that she feels that she deserves a relationship with someon…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 04:39 PM
10

I would say that most people in the real world would agree with you that being smart, morally upstanding and hardworking has nothing to do with getting laid. I believe this is what TRP would call "outcome independence." You want to talk about a just world fallacy, take a look at the one where you accuse women of a "moral failure" because the aren't awarding sex according to some karmic distribution system.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 03:28 PM
0

Brah the only analogies I've been using here have been yours...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 01:39 PM
1

I'm not offended, it's just funny. Like it's a cliche for misogynists to compare women to cars, and of the infinite number of things you could have used in that analogy, what did you use? Also, in you're stupid-ass analogy, you said "cars get their tires rotated." It's pretty easy to make the inference from that that motorcycles and semi trucks also get their tires rotated, but it's not actually what you said. Like if I said "white men are subhuman scum," your natural reaction is not going to be…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 05:05 AM
1

Y'all really can't resist an opportunity to analogize women to cars, huh? Anyway, in the unlikely event that you aren't just being a pedantic dong here and really believe what you're saying, I would suggest you go and actually read some of the posts at www.reddit.com/r/theredpill before commenting again, because it's an incredibly misinformed view of what they do there. The entire purpose of the sub is for men to work together to puzzle out a psychology that is entirely different from their own.…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 03:22 AM
2

Superhero fiction is pretty much categorically about individuals standing up for naive ideas of right and wrong, though. And they typically are trying to save the city or the world, which are going to be half male. OP's argument is so odd because a) "white knighting" as he describes it doesn't happen in any superhero texts I can think of, even dark "deconstructed" ones ... Superman probably least of all. And b) the "damsel in distress" trope is heavily and routinely criticized by feminist writer…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/15 09:16 PM
3

Man, really? I would say that TRP is more or less founded on the idea that "chads" are utterly reprehensible people and women are sexually repulsed by men who are actually nice to them. These are the guys who look to the "dark triad" as part of their "sexual strategy" and say things like "sexual strategy is amoral" all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 09:26 PM
15

But the whole "women don't date unattractive nice guys, only hot assholes" complex is a Just World Fallacy two times over. There's the assumption that the unattractive guy is actually nice and the hot guy is a douchebag, and there's also the fantasy of the girl who rejects the unattractive guy for the good looking guy getting treated badly in her relationship as punishment for her shallowness.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 04:48 PM
4

Pretty much. If it quacks like a duck and looks like a duck... Although personally I'm guessing that your reason for wanting a virgin is more misogyinistic than you think it is, and that generally people are more misogynistic than they think they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/15 09:01 PM
3

I wasn't assuming that you did, I'm just saying that a lot of redpillers who are obsessed with virginity are pretty open about those beliefs, and that's what people take exception to.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/15 08:41 PM
3

Protip: if you're trying to convince people you're genuinely open to having your opinion changed, or that your just asking a question, don't include a section at the end of your post that reads like a card in the game Taboo and lists all the best counterarguments to your claim. Don't say LTR are above love so its different, I don't want to hear any Disney movie references Yeah, "love" and "romance" are often idealized, but are you really saying that you don't think LTRs are different from ONS to…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/15 08:00 PM
2

I actually agree that there's a bias in a lot of prestigious, high-visibility media voices in the west in favor of women. I see it as a hypercorrection for a historical marginalization of women. It's not fair, but it's a hypercorrection. Think of it like a swinging pendulum--the ideal position is it hanging stable in the middle, but the laws of inertia suggest that that won't happen right away, or ever at all. I'm not going to lie, I went to Journalism School, and it's mostly women going into me…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/15 12:17 AM
5

This is my problem with amorality folks. They like to ask a question where the answer is invariably going to involve someone making a negative moral judgement about something, then you spring your trap. It's like going around challenging people to chess, and then for your very first move you just flip the whole board over. If you're an amoralist asking questions about morality, then you're asking questions you already know the answer to and wasting everybody's time I'm actually on the side of am…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/15 10:10 PM
4

Yeah, that's what I figured, this is a "sexual strategy is amoral" thing. Here's the thing with that: you can't have it both ways. If you were really serious about the amorality thing, you would have quoted some Nietzsche at me and asked why I was being so judgemental of the woman, who I literally described as a villain. Instead you just asked about the man, who I said was committing the lesser of two evils. If you want to give him a pass because amorality, go ahead, but that means she gets to d…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/15 09:11 PM
4

Yeah, I agree. But, if we're playing shitty person olympics, then the woman in that scenario would win the gold and the man she was cheating with would win the silver. And, again, this is irrespective of gender: in my book, the mistress would be less culpable than the philandering husband. Same thing using whatever terms you want to use to describe genderqueer infidelity.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/15 08:57 PM
2

Because it takes two to tango. He could say "no, cheating is wrong, I'm not going to be part of this," but instead he chooses to be complicit in an act he knows to be immoral.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/15 08:51 PM
2

Yeah...If a woman tries to have sex with someone other than her SO, then yes, she is the one in the wrong, not the guy who just thinks he's sleeping with a single woman. If the guy finds out and still goes along with it, he's a dirtbag, but I'd say the woman is still the "villain" of the scenario because the infidelity was her idea. Swap the genders of any of the three people in this scenario and the answer is exactly the same. Why are you even asking? What are you fishing for?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/15 08:03 PM
6

I mean, I have seen people actually say that the reason (for them) is penis size or sexual performance inadequacy. But even the "official" TRP Sidebar reason, that a high "n-count" inhibits a woman's "ability to pair-bond," pretty directly expresses a fear that the woman will find the relationship experience you provide to be lacking in comparison to relationships she's had in the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/15 07:14 PM
5

I doubt that there are very many women out there who actually find strength (not necessarily physical) and leadership qualities unattractive. And, while I've seen some people on TRP be weirdly boastful of how shallow they are, I'd wager most men would find those same qualities attractive in women. The problem is that the definition of "alpha" is as slippery as an eel. Some people talk about it like it means you're built like a linebacker and an actual felon, others make it sound like doing model…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/15 12:21 AM
14

What is the point of this post, dude? Every single time someone pulls this kind of thing, the red pillers say "oh, textbook example of hypergamy, it is inherent in women." And the blue pillers say "that woman sounds nuts," and the red pillers call that a no true scotsman, despite it being a totally rational conclusion to draw, and nothing gets solved.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/15 01:43 AM
1

Ok, like, a master key in the sense of being a key that a landlord or superintendent has? You do know that those aren't special keys, right? They're just keys that several specific locks are coded to for a specific reason. The only reason someone would hold a master key in any specific esteem over other keys is if they wanted to steal one to easily enter a bunch of people's homes. Yeah, it would be really convenient to have one key that opens all the locks in your house or whatever. You can do t…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/15 10:21 PM
2

Ok, I don't see how that has anything to do with what I said, but whatever. The analogy works in that it illustrates your reasoning for why that particular double standard makes sense to you. Its application, however, is very limited in that it doesn't persuade anybody that your reasoning is objectively logically sound. I mean, ok, a magical key that opens all locks is going to be more valuable than just a normal key. But that value is going to be entirely based on the key's ability to break int…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/15 04:34 PM
1

.....explain
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/15 11:59 AM
1

But even then, the master key doesn't have the ability to open a bunch of locks because it is an expertly designed key. It, just like every other key, can open whatever locks are keyed to accept it. You could just as easily point to highly sophisticated security systems that grant access to hundreds of different keycards at multiple points of entry (heyooo), but are still effective locks in that I can't get past it by sliding a Best Western card into the card reader. It's just not at all persuas…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/15 02:04 AM
3

See, that's not an analogy. That's just pointing out a single superficial similarity between two things. Imagine if I said that murder is funny because farting is funny and murder and farting are both things that people do. That would be a good example of how an analogy can work internally, but is rhetorically useless because I highly doubt I just convinced you that murder is funny, and I also failed to get across my opinion on murder. I do not think murder is funny. You were trying to persuade …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/15 10:32 PM
3

For one thing, it's totally a fool's errand to expect any internal logical consistency when it comes to the way the contemporary western world talks about sex. But I think you're also discounting time and setting. Are you telling me that you had the same attitude about the last time you had sex than you did the very first time? Or sex with some girl you hooked up with after you'd both had too much to drink vs. The first time with a girl you could really see yourself settling down with vs. The th…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/15 10:10 PM
3

She never claimed that having sex for the first time had no effect on her. Actually she claimed the exact opposite, and furthermore She says it's definitely possible for someone's first sexual experience to have a negative psychological effect. She regrets the particular context of her experience, but there wasn't anything intrinsic to the act of sex itself that made it an unhappy memory. There's nothing intrinsic to the act that means you must lose part of yourself. If sex is analogous to murde…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/15 07:53 PM
6

Dude, what are you after here? The scenario you're describing definitely happens in the world. It would be considered prostitution, and would significantly overlap with child prostitution, and probably human trafficking. i.e not something you do because you really want to earn a quick buck over summer break. That's a very sad couple sentences I just typed, but I don't see what it has to do with "the pills."
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/15 07:15 PM
4

Ok, I'll tap in for a little: When someone says "lost her virginity," yes, it is understood that they are saying that she had sex for the first time. But it's an idiom. It does not literally describe what has objectively occured. There is not a thing in the human body called "virginity" that disappears upon penetration. The custom of describing the act of having sex for the first time as "losing" something, and that something being an essential state of being, is a product of culture, and she di…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/15 06:39 PM
3

Like, do you mean in the sense that some hypothetical futuristic society of all female people who procreate by pairing up their chromosomes in a lab would only be able to produce females, while a similar all-male society could produce males and females? That's the only way I can make this make a lick of sense. The Y chromosome does not have a "be nice to men" gene on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/15 05:35 PM
4

Look, if the Men's Rights Movement ever wants to be taken seriously, here's what it needs to do: With this Boko Haram thing, them not only killing boys, but actually going on missions to target them, that's an interesting story , and I had not heard it. It's probably been overlooked for the sad reason that, in every war story these journalists have ever written, "only men were killed" has not been a newsworthy detail. There's probably some intern in the Reuter's Nigeria bureau sifting through re…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/14 12:59 PM
2

What I was suggesting is that most of the questions on ppd are practically rhetorical, let alone leading, so for this mod to tell you to delete your post because it is leading is some seriously biased moderating.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/14 03:22 PM
7

Man, if your job as a mod is to be on the lookout for "leading questions," you are doing a god awful job.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/14 02:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter