TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Sonols Archive

View 1 post and 65 comments by Sonols on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
42

Sonols/r/MensRights17/07/13 12:48 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-2

I speculate leftist women mostly like men whom share their values of equality. But whatever you say David French, if you found it on fucking Instapundit, it has to be true amirite?
/r/MensRights05/01/16 02:48 AM
16

Likely a metastudy. Thus we have an average range rather than an average of averages. It is also, of course, possible that average is the wrong word here.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 12:36 AM
3

Actually, I recall seeing landlords post "female only" - is that legal? In most of the western world it works somewhat likes this: – You cannot rent to one gender specifically to being with. – If you are looking for a second occupant, you are allowed to demand that the second occupant have the same gender as your first one. In my town larger collectives typically strive for a 50/50, because it seems that everyone is at their best behaviour when both genders are present.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 03:23 PM
1

It's illegal in Norway? I thought it was illegal to purchase and to "facilitate" for others to sell.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 04:57 PM
21

We draft women in Norway. There where issues with cliques forming with the girls and claims of unwanted attention. After some reasearch and what bases and few (or none) incidents and whom had many, turns out the solution was to cut all segregation. All, except bathrooms. This mean that you typically have 3 boys and 2 girls in each room. That creates a team, rather than two groups formed on the basis of gender. http://www.nrk.no/troms/fellesrom-i-forsvaret-er-en-suksess-1.11596780 (Norwegian sour…
/r/MensRights18/10/15 11:18 PM
-1

Sure, I can relate to that. But this cartoon does not make it easier for me to discuss men's rights issues with feminists in the future. To the extent that you view men's right and feminism as competing movements, I wish to be part of the one not resorting to slinging shit.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 07:40 PM
0

Yeah I was aware and "convinced" as you put it. I just don't see how this cartoon makes anything better, how it creates friends or makes the men's right movement look better. I understand that people are upset about modern feminism and about how its "achievement" nowadays, seem to be waging war against men. I would not be here if I was not "convinced" but I still do not believe that smearing the entirety of feminism outside of relevant circumstances achieve any fruitful results.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 05:00 PM
0

So obviously sharing this cartoon is the correct way to go about things then? This is obviously fruitful activism worthy of attention.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 04:48 PM
2

How is this a men's rights issue? This is just smearing shit over feminism on the internet, how is this helping our movement?
/r/MensRights11/07/15 04:30 PM
1

I would personally employ someone with a political sciences background. I am not to judge the degree or the institutions that offer them, such as Lanchester. My point is that it is unreasonable to trash other peoples career just because they are not dangerous enough.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 02:46 PM
5

Plenty of academies offer masters in HR though. If you want a good HR job I'd expect you are trained for it. I think the trick here is to spread the fact that women are taking less dangerous jobs than men, and yet trying to weasel out more money than men. And at the same time not bash on teachers and HR managers.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 01:50 PM
0

You are most welcome
/r/MensRights17/05/15 09:03 AM
0

Yeah exactly. Using a subreddit as an outlet for your own anger is not very fruitful for any discussion. Absolutely no one whom replied to you wanted to discuss the matter with you because of the title. And the post has zero points. It is really not the way to achieve a discussion.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 05:30 AM
0

I believe the poster is attempting to promote a small wish of professionality to you. It seems rather emotional to be using insults of any kind in a title, and we can all agree that whilst it is justified, it is still optimal to avoid them.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 11:57 AM
1

It's meaningless to do so though.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 05:41 PM
0

Sheesh, the downvote hammers sure hailed down on your comment. I kinda agree with you. Feminism as a movement is home for many different discourses, many different groupings with different worldviews.Some are more on the equality bit, and some more on the female superiority side. I believe we see a polarization within the movement, which has caused the negative view on feminism both responsible for your downvotes and the females lashing out against feminism for attacking the men they care about …
/r/MensRights07/05/15 02:32 PM
6

She got convicted and has a criminal record now. She had her punishment suspended, not her verdict.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 06:17 PM
2

Even as a non american, this is interesting. Usually american culture is very strong. If you guys colored your pants pink, I'd probably be wearing pink pants tomorrow. Yet things like "trigger warning" and "victim is always trusted" policies have not reached Norway, yet Sweden seem to be gobbling the shit like there is no tomorrow. And these countries are not very different. Where do these odd and often sexist policy suggestions come from? How do I as an active student guard my own community fro…
/r/MensRights05/04/15 04:30 PM
1

Obviously you are not getting a whole lot done with OP's attitude. His intentions may be noble, but the execution is clearly counter–productive.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 07:06 AM
3

Yeah you hear how you get your panties in a twist you circlejerkings morons? Now have the conversation I dictate or fuck off! I am OP, I am god of this thread!
/r/MensRights04/04/15 01:20 PM
1

Because there is a trend in the logic I follow. If I take a lot of the political ideas and cause I support, they are often found supported by parties on the same side of the classical public -- private axis. By identifying as a left person, I immediately announce to my surroundings what my stance would probably be on a lot of political causes, which is very convenient compared to filling out a list every time I meet someone and we engage in a debate. Additionally the axis is helpful to navigate …
/r/MensRights02/04/15 09:42 PM
2

Thanks for elaborating. I had no intention of labeling her as "just" a part of a right wing think tank. Rather it was my urge of knowing where I get information from, not being completely satisfied when I watch Sommers. It's interesting that she has written for Time and NPR, as those, at least Time, is very well recognized here in Europe.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 03:09 AM
2

I thought that she was a member of a right wing think tank and not currently a professor? I'm personally leaning to the far left (at least by US standards) but that does not mean I have to disagree with every opinion a right–winger came with.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 02:39 AM
1

Not with that attitude!
/r/MensRights07/03/15 06:04 AM
7

Within they reach the age of 80, not everyone live that long. So it's not the same as 80% necessarily.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 03:26 AM
8

Very low, just under 1%. However it is very common among men. Even with a very low mortality rate, it is the second largest cause of cancer deaths among men, only beaten by lung cancer. According to Wikipedia, 8/10 men will experience Prostate cancer by the time they have reached 80. Furthermore – symptoms such as bone pain can have a huge impact on the quality of life. There are plenty of reasons to prioritize Prostate Cancer.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 01:16 AM
8

And I totally get that. I instantly had the same thought as you when I saw the picture, but after 5 seconds of thinking, it's good that we have this campaign. Heart stroke is often mentioned as only a problem men can get, but fact is it's rekkin' our female population as well. Women do tend to not see the doctor for "male symptoms" such as excessive sweating etc. Also- the symptoms for a heart disease in men is typically numbing in arms and the chest area, whereas females might experience nausea…
/r/MensRights12/02/15 04:47 PM
4

Shit. I'm a rape-victim.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 12:50 AM
0

An insurance company where I live wanted to sell insurance to female customers only. They where quickly shut down. The notion that you'd even think it could be legal?
/r/MensRights11/11/14 05:28 PM
2

I just gave some mental plus-points for my local newspaper on something similar. Facsimile of front page. Roughly the translation goes as followes: Equality department least equal. Solveig Horne (Frp) [Equality minister, progression party] struggles with equality in her department. 71.2 percent is women. It's good to see that Norway is not quite taking the same road as Sweden. The countries are so similar, yet there seem to be some criticism left in one of them.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 06:48 PM
34

I like the "a voice for men website" and it's work. In the gender-discussion the overwhelming feminist discourse makes it hard for others to be heard, and cool-headed websites become small bastions for different views. Shit like this does not however. Unsupported claims with some kind of nice background, like a sunset or in this case; a candle, just makes a movement look a bit tumblr-ish. Besides, draining the humor out of rape-jokes is not the pinnacle of Feminist achievements. No matter how an…
/r/MensRights03/10/14 10:14 AM
1

Misinformation eventually breeds bad decisions and opinions.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 06:36 PM
1

Vice is not doing journalism, and they never have. Vice is a publisher, the reporters are working generally in a freelance-esque way. The reporters have a connection to the situation they are reporting from, and as such should be considered to have an agenda. This gives Vice as a publisher platform a lot of material otherwise unknown. For instance have Vice been filming within ISIL boundaries, though with an ISIL press officer and Muslim reporter. This, mixed up with other internet-popular artic…
/r/MensRights12/08/14 02:12 AM
1

Well. Yes. I guess there is that.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 03:30 PM
1

I've met girls who could pummel the shit out of me. I've also gone 3-0 (I lost) in a best of five MMA match against a girl (regional champion though). But you are right of course. There are more girls who are stronger than me than there are sand-corns on a beach, but I, simply because I'm a man, am still way stronger than most girls.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 05:43 PM
19

I've assisted (administratively) some "self-defense women only" courses held by a feminist branch of a socialist party in my country. The feminists in said branch are generally levelheaded and have outed for cases such as longer maternity leave for the father. And, well, it does nothing no matter how perfect the instructor is. One simply cannot teach someone a magic trick in one day that would suddenly make you capable of overwhelming a physically superior opponent. Self-defense courses is bulls…
/r/MensRights30/06/14 04:17 PM
1

/u/LieBaron did not impress me either... Though your post is not exactly a work of art either.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 09:04 PM
1

I totally did this too when I was a little kid! Today I got my own place, and the dog sleep with my parents. Who is perverted now Onion?
/r/MensRights24/04/14 12:31 PM
5

It's with a heavy heart I must agree with you. In a case of "pick your fights." This is not it.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 06:19 PM
19

Norwegian here. Ellingsen in the article above sums it up pretty well actually, I can vouch for that text. It's not true that we are getting unisex rooms, it's still experimental. Note that Norway, like Israel, drafts it's citizens for army-duty. In 2015 the conscription becomes gender-neutral meaning women need to serve alongside men. This is why research such as this is important now. There is sexual harrassment, at least according to this article: http://www.vg.no/nyheter/innenriks/positivt-m…
/r/MensRights01/04/14 01:10 PM
1

Own whatever you want. That does make bearing arms a natural right.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 01:59 PM
1

I used Locke's definition as he was the one to popularize it in a modern age. Please see earlier post.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 10:55 AM
14

This is how it works nowadays. I've met nurses, having to put a pricetag on the comfort they give patients during treatment. Everything has a price.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 12:15 AM
1

Why are you telling me? I did not draw such a conclusion. I argued that carrying arms is not a natural right, not it's lethality.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 06:00 PM
1

I am basically not saying that. You can have guns without that being a natural right, which is the root. I am not saying you cannot have or use guns, but that owning a gun is not a natural right.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 05:59 PM
3

This is a false belief I have no idea where comes from. Natural rights are identified (by Locke who largely started the popularization of them) as the right to life, property and estate. This has then been interpreted as the right to defend yourself, and furthermore into the right to bear arms. Using this logic, you roughly land on the idea that "a natural right is the right to everything unless it hurts other people." Then natural rights become meaningless. If it is not defined as such, then it…
/r/MensRights15/03/14 01:04 AM
3

Carrying arms is not a natural right. A natural right is a right you are born with, whereas a law is something that is bestowed upon by the justice system. The right to carry a rifle is mentioned in a law text, and is thereby bestowed by the justice system. Often when you hear people preaching pro-guns, they mention the constitution and not the birthrights, such as right to life.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 12:46 AM
1

It did
/r/MensRights04/03/14 08:19 PM
-1

Keep going at it! We need innovators more now than ever before.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 05:15 PM
5

Absolutely. Whilst I have no similar experience, I can imagine that yours do align with reality. However that does not call for labelling women as lazy and un-innovative.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 04:38 PM
14

It's a bit unfair to say that women do not even try. This man is not an ordinary man, I do not think that he represents how most men behave. I for one would have given up. More so, the females in the story represent themselves, and their treatment of a man whom only wanted them good.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 03:54 PM
5

Top comment on that article: Weird how women's sexual harassment is more approved than the same unacceptable behavior for men. Then the commentator make parallels on how female sex tourists seldom face punishments, whilst men quickly will be prosecuted. The word she use, stuerent, directly translates into "living room clean." The more you know …
/r/MensRights23/11/13 03:43 AM
1

It should not be allowed unless it is utmost necessary. In performance sex and race is one of the few places where by law in most countries, may be used within reason to hire someone. A theme for a restaurant is not deemed as important. The Kingpin in what-now?
/r/MensRights30/09/13 02:46 PM
3

Employment should not be based on gender, unless for obvious reasons. Both male and females can server at a sushi restaurant just as well, but both cannot portray Storm in X-men. Not allowing employment based on sex, ethnicity and the like, is of course not acceptable. If it said "Server wanted, only whites may apply" there would be a shitstorm like no other. But if you need a white actor to play a white man, it is of course acceptable to only hire male white employees only for that position. De…
/r/MensRights29/09/13 11:00 AM
3

Heh, yes. Because anyone is portrayed well in this game...
/r/MensRights29/09/13 10:50 AM
2

Pretty certain my female friends pay much less than me in car insurance. Not because they are safer drivers than me, but because they are women. Edit: There was also a serious proposal considering making it illegal for young males to drive in the evenings. Not too related, especially not to your comment, just threw it out there.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 12:46 PM
1

The full article is by Aftenbladet and can be found here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1igbkr/norway_boys_rejected_job_because_they_are_boys/
/r/MensRights17/07/13 09:18 PM
3

What is happening to waitresses/waiters?
/r/MensRights17/07/13 03:11 AM
4

Thank YOU for reading! Hope the translation is bearable. On the facebook page belonging to the newspaper, a reader replied: "Women probably meet this daily. This, woman has faced since the dawn of the labor market." I beg to differ though. I do not think woman face this every day, in fact, I believe it is the other way around. Of course I'd prefer that no genders where discriminated either way, but I think men are hit hardest here. Recently the police in Stavanger went out and announced that mor…
/r/MensRights17/07/13 01:21 AM
11

Oh wow. I'm a bit scared of having sex now.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 07:35 PM
3

Bit off topic but what the issue with off road cars? Roads are in bad shape. Unforgivable terrain to build roads on. Also political reasons, but the off-topic bells are already dingling in my pants. Not surprising really. Feminism seems to have a strong grip in first world nations. Which is sorta good and all. We want woman to have the same rights as men, the same opportunities. At least I know I will. I guess I am kind of a feminist myself. However I don't like the turn much of the modern femin…
/r/MensRights13/04/13 12:16 AM
1

Funny thing is; men and women have the exact same amount of heterosexual sex. Just like there are just as many uphills as there are downhills. Gangbangs and the like are too rare to be taken into consideration of course. Men cannot be more slutty than women. What is then, a woman with the morals of man, but a woman?
/r/MensRights12/04/13 08:29 PM
3

There are of course huge problems like in any other country. Health care got long queues, politicians don't trust our teachers and off road cars are also suited on-road. However it still seems that people are not participating in the public debate. In my politics class, only two where actually organized. The feminist groups stand strong, whilst no one dares to see if the pendle swings too much in one way than the other. In stead of thinking it through in a group, then calling the media. People o…
/r/MensRights12/04/13 08:16 PM
3

The king only open malls and drinks. It's a normal democracy with 7 parties represented, compared to two in USA. It's very easy to get a debate going in Norway, however most people are too lazy because their needs are often taken care of anyway. There are few large newspapers, and journalists are easy to reach. If you really believe in something, you will be heard. Anyone saying otherwise do not have any experience with active politics, organized work or the media. A braze statement maybe, but I…
/r/MensRights12/04/13 08:04 PM
1

Page 35 got the panels recommendations in English.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 04:45 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter