TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SoooDisappointed Archive

View 0 posts and 171 comments by SoooDisappointed on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Bro, you wish it was only the US.
/r/MensRights08/03/26 03:32 PM
0

Guys probably talk about sex the most because it's that important to them + it's the topic that causes most divergences between the genders. Let's be honest, most women are excellent in other parts of romance and that must be appreciated. It's just not enough. The fact that we want to feel desired doesn't mean that's the only thing we want, It just means that it's fundamental, and that is not being considered in most cases. About your friend, I'm sorry that she's so insensitive but that's not ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 04:02 PM
0

Jesus Christ lilith, what the fuck happened in your life that makes you think that wanting sex = not caring about the woman. We can be both romantic and horny, and we need sex to feel loved because we need to feel that our partner cares about us feeling desired. There are many women that get it as you can find in subs like /r/deadbedrooms where they simply feel the exact same thing men do. That is not the same as to say that sex is the only thing important for love, but it is important.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 03:06 PM
0

It doesn't show anything, there's no contradiction with the facts that sex can be done casually and also be important for romantic love.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 02:43 PM
0

I'm sorry to hear that, but "almost 40" is still young, so talk with him about it and end it if it doesn't work out. I can suggest nothing but the basic.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 02:58 AM
0

As I said, the proof comes in other forms. So many other life sacrifices to spend quality time with you and make you happy and you want exactly the one that, without It, makes him feel unloved? That's cruel. Sounds like a battle of insecurities.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 08:12 PM
1

Sex can be made both with love and without love, it's malleable this way. But what you're saying is that men should give up casual sex as a way to prove that the sex inside the relationship is special? That's a weird concept because the fact that it's being done by people who love themselves should alone be the reason to understand why it's special in first place. That's absolutely how we feel about it, and it sounds more like an insecurity on the woman's side than anything else to say otherwise…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 07:46 PM
1

But what is wrong with that exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 05:41 PM
1

I'm sorry, after all your explanation I still can't see where the contradiction is. Sex with the person you love is special, as it communicates you're desired by someone special herself, casual sex is not. What I understand though is that it's very insensitive to have sex with someone you *know* that she's expecting more than just that, because you know that for that person sex is not just sex, and you're helping to harm her, so if a guy at least cares about the woman as a person, he would not d…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 05:35 PM
1

I am so sorry that rape and harassment are so hard to prove, but people still need to be considered innocent until the contrary is proven.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 04:55 PM
1

It's simple, for us romantic love cannot be possible without sexual desire, it's not that desire = love, but a pre-requisite for love. So desire can exist without love, but not the other way around. And we suppose when you love someone you will want to make your partner feel desired as well, so the logic is "how does she love me if she doesn't care to try to make me feel desired?".
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 04:46 PM
2

We want both: being desired and spending quality time, why is that so hard to understand?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 10:12 PM
–

Exactly. It's elitist.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 01:39 PM
4

One thing doesn't exclude the other. Ironically, it was feminism which taught me about empathy with marginalized groups, but now that they have more power they claim feelings don't matter. They do.
/r/MensRights23/12/25 02:27 PM
3

You're not very good with analogies, are you?
/r/MensRights28/11/25 10:07 PM
1

Not misandrist. Just because you can't find any water, it doesn't mean that the one you find will be clean. But it means that most will not reject the water as soon as they find it, no matter how dirty.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 06:04 PM
1

Basic human decency? Concern for the future of society and any sons you or your peers may have? Reciprocation of the ever increasing male support for feminism (well, at least until recent years...)? At this point we better just give up. They don't give a fuck. Whenever I read "why should I care" i lose respect and hope. Tbh, if things were swapped, do you think this would not be an agenda from feminism that somehow blamed men for the situation? I doubt it. I remember when it was believed that bl…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 01:06 PM
1

Today I saw a thread on threads with women talking about how tinder increased their self-steem. Hell, that's happening with my ex rn.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 05:42 AM
–

Here in my country whenever a man criticizes something about women, women say "men really take an effort to like women".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/25 07:13 PM
1

In this thread: people cannot accept 1+1 = 2.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 01:30 AM
–

"Guys who don't dress well" hahahaahahahaahahahahahahaahaha. A pyschopath is an excellent choice if following your criteria. That isn't stirring away from creepies, which is a terribly vague and generalist word such as ick btw, that is being elitist. Proudly.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 11:22 PM
1

That's not a real question. Like, I don't know, very horny? Not even that much horny but not wanting to deal with dating inconveniences?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 04:58 AM
2

Only takes a woman offering the service.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 03:02 AM
1

If they don’t hate fat people then why is their number one complaint in regards to dating, repeated across all platforms, that “I don’t want fat bitches reeee” Because we are at gender wars and this is men's response to women's obsession with height. In reality hardly someone cares about it, and hardly won't date a girl because she is fat. To which you will respond "of course, because men will fuck anything XD" which is another form of having a negative perspective of men's characteristics aka h…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 03:00 AM
3

Most men don't hate fat people. Most men don't hate women who are over 30. Most men can appreciate a woman who degree and career, just because sex might be a bigger piority for them in terms of what they want for their lives doesn't mean they don't admire real powerful women. Single moms are considered red flags to most. Icks on the other hand are nitpicking the most absurdly normal things men do to go and hate. Our sexuality is also hated, and it's an important part of who we are from the facto…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 10:03 PM
4

"So then why bother going into any relationship at all if its superficially just for sex?" You are saying if he's not ready now then he will never be ready? If someone just wants sex for a period it means he will only want sex within his entire lifetime? "Also If you were that horny just jack it off my guy, I know it may be boring and not completely fullfiling but seriously how do you think women cope when they are horny? They just fap it out no matter how desperate they are for dick." Oh yeah, …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 09:55 PM
2

The concept of icks says otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 09:43 PM
3

I do. "just gonna pay to be sexually satisfied" seems like a logic conclusion to the "I'm not going to join this rigged shitty game" line of thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 09:17 PM
9

Yeah, because guys are so appreciated.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 09:15 PM
6

"They also likely resent paying for meals because they see paying for dinner as the same as paying for an escort without a promise of sex.' I still get impressed by how much some women will fight over their right to foodie call.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 08:58 PM
–

Subtle? Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 06:10 PM
9

Lilith, some of us simply will NOT eat ze bugs. But no, you don't have to do anything. If you don't wanna risk, don't risk. Me and other men aren't going to risk things like foodie calls and sexless relationships either. You defend yourself, we defend ourselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 12:33 AM
1

Because "a guy looking for a LTR but only if there's early demonstration of sexual compatibility" is a complete valid possibility. As is the possibility that it's a pump and dump scheme from a manipulative guy who knows women want LTRs and use the knowledge as a way of getting a free fuck and running away. If you choose to believe that it will always be the case or that it's not worth risking it, it's your right. I am of the opinion that it's not worth for a guy to risk an incompatible sex life.…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 07:18 PM
1

Well, I think it's a fair strategy that women don't have sex early fearing getting relationship baited as much as I think it's fair for guys to expect early sex to avoid getting into a sexless relationship. In the end there's no way to confirm anything and taking risks will be necessary for both, but if I was in this situation, not having sex is not a risk I would take knowing how sex is important for me. And other guys with the same profile shouldn't either. But ace guys exist, you know, as do …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 06:58 PM
1

But I have no problem with hookups. I am just saying that guys who want a relationship and are sexual should not give in to said relationship oriented women who aren't interested in fucking guys in the early stages, even if they are the majority.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 06:24 PM
0

I'm not against hookups. But hookups are not for guys who are interested in a relationship and are not baiters. Expecting sex from your date is a way to get an indicative that she likes sex and is interested in having sex with you, potentially avoiding a dead bedroom in the possibly soon to be relationship. And yes, it doesn't mean everything that is important for the guy to take the final decision that you're the right person to enter the relationship is there. How does it benefit you? Well, yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 06:19 PM
1

Doesn't mean sex is the only thing the guy wants, but it might be fundamental. That being the case, he'll expect early sex as an indicator, as I think a guy should. I'm not saying relationship baiters don't exist though.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 06:04 PM
0

Men should not risk a dead bedroom. It'll be suffering for both parties.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 05:58 PM
1

I said you don't have to give birth, said nothing about menstruating.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 10:08 PM
2

Don't be. If you pay the date it might be more enjoyable for the man. :) And this situation simply screams "you are not as attractive", why would guys enjoy to get their self-steem punched?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 07:25 PM
1

This is not how preferences work, this coming from someone who even prefers a girlfriend with experience, who enjoyed and still wants to enjoy her sexual life over a frigid one.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 07:10 PM
2

You don't have to give birth
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 06:55 PM
–

"VeRy FeW" yeah right. Stop projecting.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 05:36 PM
1

Being nice does a lot for guys, like, a whole fucking lot. But, if isolated, it's not enough. Your point went even more downhill with your example of "hot". Non-prudeness would be a much better example of what guys find hot overall, specially in this context because it'd be a good argument saying that being nice doesn't matter if you're sexually absent in terms of attractiveness, at least in the long run.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 12:35 AM
1

The real issue on the dating imbalance are the simps, not women. But you do well in taking a lesson on the lack of empathy women exhibit towards the subject, which will be specially useful for when you get to a position where empathy is expected on a woman's issue, so you can think before tricking yourself into getting overdosed by "empathetic thoughts". Also, by keeping your standards instead of settling you are already doing your part against the problem. In my case, I am genuinely attracted b…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 12:05 AM
0

Never is such a strong word.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 11:31 PM
–

Nah, it's the simps. Do you like chocolate, OP? What if you were tried to be fed chocolate everyday and everywhere you looked at you saw chocolate that was easily accessed, do you think you'd still like chocolate as much as you like after a week? A month? What about years?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 11:38 AM
1

I don't know, do you? Why are you asking us that?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/24 06:14 PM
0

Inexperienced guys could really fall for all this "women are angels" sentiment being spread in this thread and stay ignorant about the fact that women will pretend interest for free food and that, although the urge for just sex does not come as often as it does for men, whenever it does happen, women pretend shit and use guys for sex if she ever feels like it without second thoughts. It's not a matter of who has the best morality compass among the genders.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 05:11 PM
–

You're not supposed to count that it will happen, but risk it anyway since it's the only way guys can be selective in today's society. Observe and wait for the person who actually like exactly who you are instead of risking finding someone with shitty expectations. Independant life enjoyers are the only ones who can save the world from the simps' curse.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 04:29 PM
2

Straight men don't want to fuck men = correct. Straight men don't feel more worthy because gay men find them attractive = incorrect.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/24 02:41 AM
1

This reads like an elaborate version of sour grapes. I got no idea what you're talking about If you think intimate, long-term relationships are nonsense Most, yes. What is your interest in participation on this sub? 2. Why are you so angry at women? 1) depends on my mood. Sometimes I want to unmask shit some woman is saying, sometimes I want to unmask shit some man is saying, sometimes I wanna answer to a question by giving my perspective, sometimes I wanna laugh at free mealers. And also get to…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/23 07:06 AM
1

It's much more complex than a "conspiracy theory", it's about how humans work, how we tend to "solve" our problems and create more problems among the way. It's about being careful with what you wish for, or in a more modern and sophisticated way to put it, "problem X, Y". Why in hell would I give that up if I had any kind of choice? That's the joy of being human. It's not. But sure, go get what you want first and get drunk with it, you'll love each second of it, remember this post and laugh at h…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/23 05:37 PM
1

Btw I know you want to believe otherwise because you want to know how it's like to have those experiences that "some guys" have. My posts will probably make more sense at some point in your life. You'll eventually get exactly what you want and convince yourself even more that this was all bullshit from my part, until you get more of what you didn't want and reach the point where you cannot say anymore things compensate and finally admit that you wasted time. 15 years from here seems realistic, 2…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/23 05:16 PM
1

Part 2: So, this thing about guys being the ones who ask out isn't random, you know. The "tradition" exists for a reason, and it isn't a simple matter of "what's your favorite way of dealing with things" nor "leave an open mind to everyone's favorite way". Marriage was more contractual, and it was mostly women who were offered as property and currency trading, not as radically this way as feminism implies but this is true for the most part. Then we had protestantism making pressure and enforcing…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/23 05:09 PM
1

Part 1: True, paying someone's meals per se isn't the worst thing, but to be with someone who deep inside is proud of not having to pay for anything is very bad, unless you're into that like a kink or something. My fiancée is proud of paying her half, and this is a reflection of the type of person she is, this is the whole point. Sometimes she's in worse monetary situation and I absolutely help her with that. Sometimes it is me, and I could count on her help without any worry, cannot say the sam…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/23 05:08 PM
1

Did you read the rest, my dude? Not everyone you meet in your life is relevant enough for you to throw away your authenticity to avoid pissing him/her off. Also, talking about authenticity, if people perceive you as an asshole at first and accrpt you, you're going to have a more wide range of things you can say and do. If you come off as a "nice guy", you'll have to keep that image and walk on eggshells more consistently and whenever you decide to prioritize yourself on anythng that will come of…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/23 03:22 AM
1

You focus to much on this "being chosen" thing, which is a wrong interpretation. The "wait" actually means living without caring about women until any reveals to be worth it, in other words, letting more checkboxes being checked before he even considers romancing the woman. And generating attraction just by being himself instead of playing a shit seduction game on someone who might be batshit crazy for instance, is just part of the strategy; the person being attracted to you is one of the checkb…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/23 03:14 AM
1

By taking a moment to think by yourself. To look around by yourself. To look inside you by yourself. Are you expecting consensus in a world of conflicting interests? Sorry but this will not happen, or even worse, the consensus might be the wrong answer. It might seem to you that you're no inteligent enough to reach the right conclusion yourself but start by being honest with yourself: why are you obsessing with not pissing people off? Do all those people getting pissed off really have good reaso…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/23 05:00 PM
1

...but at the end of the day I still want somebody to experience life with, Why? Also, good friends are great people to share your life with. my pursuit of happiness is diminished You are letting this happen to you. it's about family and community and legacy Your mind got intoxicated and obsessed with those concepts and now you see them as fundamental. But you don't even need a relationship to have all that, you probably already got a family and friends for your "community" needs. Legacy? What l…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/23 04:18 PM
1

How about you ignore that "meanwhile suggestion" and focus on OP's? Stop letting people confuse you, this is the way. Don't touch grass if you don't want to. Enjoy life the way you want to.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/23 03:50 PM
2

Bravo. This is what I've been trying to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/23 03:46 PM
1

I'm sure you can guess the risks from dating widely vs dating selectively. Loose criteria is for desperates.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/23 03:43 PM
5

Some men would have sex with you because they can fuck anyone as long as they are fucking, yeah those exist. Some men would have sex with you because they find other things about attractive despite you not being physically attractive at first sight, making you attractive overall. Those men also exist, and I believe most women are like this but specially in terms of relationship. Some men would have sex with you because they both find you attractive despite you not being in the overall beauty sta…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 04:13 PM
1

Unless it's some sort of a kink, taking unnecessary risks is for desperates, simps and clueless. There's no two ways about it. True choosers wait for the right, quality person(s), and it's not a matter of what women find attractive. It doesn't matter what women find attractive. You either find a person who just wants their free meal, or you risk finding vending machines.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 01:48 PM
1

I want to see whether they wanna invest their money on me. I’ve never had to half anything! Wow, pathetic and dehumanizing. I rest my case. For the rest of the insults I won't even bother, you're missing every single shot. But I'll be telling your tale the next time me and my friends are playing games with our fiancées/wives. From now on, each time you act like a vending machine, imagine me pointing at you, laughing and saying "pathetic". Lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 01:07 PM
1

Firstly, my bank account is doing okay, thank you for worrying. But it's not like you need to be rich or anything to be taken advantage of, you know? Regardless if men or women. Generally being a fool is what will make you a better target. Secondly, it has nothing to do as seeing dating as transactional. It has everything to do with making sure we are on the same page and equally into each other. This is my way of dating regardless of how dating is nowadays, just because I can analyse it from fa…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 06:50 AM
1

Hahahahahahahaha normies are so cuuuute
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 05:16 AM
1

Cool if it's working for you but tbh you deserve to decide that even earlier. If she's only interested on the food you pay then you'll be giving what she wants with the illusion of getting to filter them. Maybe you'll get less "pussy" but you'll probably get more quality women, experience and moments to remember if you set their enthusiasm to split the bills as one of your expectations.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 05:06 AM
2

First case: the asker puts himself in the position of someone who's trying to win the woman over. Second case: the asker wants to know if she is already into him as he is into her so both can take a step together. If that's the case then she's already been gifted because he did the very first move. So not only men are expected to make the first move but also risk being led by people who consciously accept the "invitation" only for the free food? Damn, what a deal! And yeah, there are women who d…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 04:45 AM
2

What doesn't make sense? Hahahaha First paragraph: When you ask women who expect free meals to FUCK OFF you eventually find women who don't expect free meals. Second paragraph: If you have a normal and functional body, it's pathetic to expect for free meals, but being simp enough to accept this is even more so YOU do you, they deserve it! I'm giving you this justification to caress your conscience as a gift, a sign of kindness, so please enjoy it! lmao And how cute(and even more pathetic) of you…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 04:16 AM
2

Ah yes of course, and where's the book with those etiquette rules? Lmao. There's a difference between "asking to date" and "asking if she wants to date". Expecting free meal from men as an independent woman is only less pathetic than the simps themselves who accept being in this position. But gratz for being so smartass, long live the queen of fools! xD
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 03:59 AM
0

Nah dude I'm out of this madness already, who would guess that the secret to find a non-free mealer was to deny free mealers hahaha Honestly If I was a woman with 2 arms and 2 legs I don't think I would be this pathetic, but you do you, little woman. Enjoy your free meals, it's not like the simps don't deserve it xD
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 03:49 AM
2

Ya'll use such weird words and excuses to justify your expectations of having a free meal xD It's like the whole tipping culture thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 03:40 AM
3

Cause women expect that. And do you find it worth it to try to meet their expectations? What about your expectations, are the women you're dating as eagle to meet them? If not, what makes you lesser than them?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 03:33 AM
2

Kindness hahahaha.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 03:25 AM
1

And why are you taking care of the logistics?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 03:24 AM
4

A woman who's really into you will be down to sit on a park bench and talk. Ding ding ding! We have a winner. Surprisingly majority of the women I dated didn't mind. Not surprising at all, it's your mentality. Gratz for not being a simp.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/23 03:23 AM
0

Wrong. Work on yourself and stop caring.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 08:55 PM
-1

Short answer: Caused by =/= intensified/catalyzed. And the level of intensification may vary, something like from not related, to causing trouble, to being a wall, to becoming the cause itself. This is a crude way of putting it, it's more nuanced. Long answer: tbh this is what happens when "one gaze wants to overlap the other". We're living times of transictioned ideologies and feminism also came blaming every problem the women ever had and have as men's fault, with the oppressed-oppressor model…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/23 06:24 PM
1

My messages order are down to top. Reddit wasn't letting me send it all at once.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 10:44 PM
1

With this on mind, let's go back to the topic of "niceness vs assholeness" in relationships. I'll tell two stories about some female friends of mine. One of them was dating a weird guy for a while until one day, out of nothing, she told me she got into a crazy religious cult by influence of that guy, and since then she changed completely, gave up on many of her rights by choice, and only ended the madness after she was basically raped by the guy and his friend. Guess who hates men now? The other…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 10:43 PM
1

People can choose who they can tolerate. There is a difference between accepting a passive person who becomes an asshole later on, who you wouldnt accept if they were an asshole when you first met vs someone knowing they’re getting an asshole and is okay with the asshole. True. People deliberately accept "assholeness" for a variety of reasons, and I won't deny we have at least a minimum level of agency over our social circle. But this changes little, as people still hate changes, are stimulated …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 10:42 PM
1

No. From the r/NiceGuys stories I have seen, some guys just become pieces of shit. Telling a woman you hope she gets cancer and a miscarriage after she rejects you is not assertive behavior. I never denied the existence of guys who do that and that attitude is not what I'm defending either. Just because I understand where their obsession and their frustration come from, and the fact that I despise all the blindness and gaslight people do to "nice guys", incels and men as a whole by denying any n…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 10:41 PM
1

Being nice is doing that job FOR FREE. Being good at your job is either just having a good work ethic or trying to get a raise. That has nothing to do with being nice. Again, there's a line between the extremes. You can "be nice" at different contexts, your work, being nice depends on your intention, which is something we probably agree since you think men who are nice only because of their return expectations are not really nice. If you went out of your way to do a better job than expected thin…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 10:40 PM
1

Correction: divorce rate was never low.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 10:19 PM
1

No. In conclusion, people are lying or lied about their own happiness. As long as divorce rate is so high, marriage is an illusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 01:59 PM
1

A JOB. Not volunteering. A JOB. Where you’re doing the job FOR MONEY. See, we are so used to be pragmatic about it, that we sometimes forget that a job is supposed to be the way we are actually useful in society. It's hard to believe, but going out of your way to be better at your job would actually be an act of niceness, as you compromise to be a best service giver, being useful to more people, and/or just contributing to increase the average quality of said service in society as a whole. But o…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 07:36 AM
1

But I admited the yearly decrease of divorce rate, although it's very shy. My point is that no matter how you look at it, the rates are still high. It's sure as hell not 75% as the third link is implying. The cohort measure rate is, indeed, a projection as your first link "smartly" stated, but it's the most educated projection we have, and it already takes in consideration all of the influence combinations such as race, education, etc., with the reached estimatives traveling from 40 to 50%. In c…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/23 06:38 AM
1

As we were talking specifically about marriage, I'll stick talking about it to exemplify how you are wrong. Marriage is a common object of complaints, internet or irl. As it was since, ever? From ancient times to medieval. Peaking its transactionalitty in the medieval world, presented as a social contract the only survival method besides celibacy for women, getting reformed to a less contractual but perhaps more oppressive religious-driven institution, and getting more transactional once again. …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 07:58 PM
-1

No, I never said you need to be a psycho to be successful. But at the same time, what percentage of those men are happy? Isn't marriage constantly memed as being a bad deal? And how often do women complain that men get into relationship as a desperate move to get sex? 2023 and some people are still black 'n white about life smh.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 05:48 PM
4

Ok wait, common, are you serious? Do you really believe in all this? Do you even live? On most jobs if you don't stick to your boundaries, if you don't leave companies often to get more experience, if you accept to rush any project demanded and accept any function deviation because you decided to wear the company shirt, if you don't negotiate your salary from time to time, you'll be a treated like a slave. This is already 50% of life. If you don't usually say no to people, you will be more expec…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 05:20 PM
3

Yeah, I don't know if no one's saying that a person shouldn't be rewarded for being a good person. And I don't think anyone should stick to "being nice" if people are only seeing that as an opening to shit on your head. Getting frustrated, changing yourself and pointing out this situation as to why you did so do not mean that you were never nice in the first place. And sometimes this frustration grows even more not because you're so vengeful on what happened to you, but because you'd like to sti…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 05:05 PM
7

You are also twisting it. The thing is: no one likes to feel punished for being nice, and then observing that people are actually being rewarded for being pos adds to the frustration. From this point, learning not to be so nice because the person is tired of said situation and wants to care about his/her own health for once is valid, and this is not only true for sex and relationship, but in such context, this is often misinterpreted as "you were nice only to get rewarded, therefore you were nev…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 04:53 PM
2

Except there is an atome to where fairness can reach and what's worth of you pursuing, so you should stop obsessing over it. You need to accept unfairness at some point, and not everyone needs to be a martyr or a fighter to change the world, because as beautiful as it might sound trying to be so will only bring resentment. We're still in the middle of the transformation, so instead of trying to force your way against the strong winds of revolution, you can choose to become a stone yourself and j…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 04:36 PM
4

Dude, no. I'll say it once again: don't be a simp, do what you like, be who you are, enjoy yourself, and let the possibility of the right woman or women entering your life a matter of luck. And control your sex-drive via medication if necessary. This is all there is to it. The only reason why I still spend time here is to debate lies about how shit supposedly works and dumb accusations and conclusions that some women do about men, but you guys better stop being so clueless too. No one, men or wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 04:16 PM
1

Nope. Those who do are the infamous "simps", the origin of all evil.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 02:06 PM
1

Is this really still true for the majority of men or does that come from an endless insecurity despite things having changed a lot? I know men in this sub are very obsessed about "n-count" but I don't really think they count as majority. And as that perspective became less prominent among men, the train of thought in feminism that says that women smashing "easily" equals to going in favor of the interests of the patriarchy got popular. Furthermore I don't know, as the guy said, we work different…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 02:03 PM
2

Much on the contrary. Suppising the numbers of 20% of guys being considered medium and above while the other 80% being considered non-physically attractive aka ugly are real, they are so absurd that men should really spend their time and efforts somewhere else.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 10:51 AM
–

Poor kids being put in this shit world just for that. Ensure the human race is extincted should be our real society thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 04:55 AM
1

Ew socializing in 2023.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/23 04:09 AM
1

It's really not that hard. Resentment from sexual satisfaction is a build up thing. It's perfectly normal for couples to have colder periods and hotter periods. Problems happen, everyday stress, sickness, etc., I never made a point that implied the contrary. It's when it becomes the norm and you let years pass by without worrying about your partner's take of what you deem unimportant that it becomes a problem, with high chances of exploding at some point. I also already stated that there are men…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 08:05 PM
1

And you know that because he tells you so, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 05:05 PM
1

I never doubted that. Asexual men exist, and low libido men exist as well. We can check reports from women in /r/deadbedroom and from men in /r/lowlibidocommunity. Again, if you know through communication and good faith that your boyfriend is satisfied with a lower than average sex frequency, and is not just projecting your own views and (lack of) needs on him, then you're fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 02:43 PM
1

Low libido not always mean low testosterone, ever meant to imply this, only that high libido is a common symptom of high testosterone. Crucial =/= the most important. Of course companionship and every value expected from it are more important than sex for a healthy relationship, but that's supposing a minimum of sex frequency because seeing how harmful the lack of sexual satisfaction is in the long run. I think indeed that once in 2 weeks is harsh but still acceptably for many couples. But as yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 02:12 AM
1

I'll tell you a secret, promise you won't tell anyone? Okay, here it goes: all those guys saying they are unhappy because they are sexually unsatisfied actually mean it. This is why I advocate that people take medicine to control their libido. You Low libido people can't conceive for the life of you that high libido people(most guys included on this group because testosterone) are really unhappy and affected on multiple ways(feel undesired, can't concentrate at work or studies, gets high irritab…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/23 01:03 AM
1

Live yes, functioning well nope. So life becomes shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/23 11:56 PM
1

I had a discussion about it recently. Women voted 20% of men as averagely attractive to very attractive but that's in terms of physical attraction only. Another study shows that they are actually well-rounded on who they swipe on. On the other hand, this still means that they find 80% of men ugly. Not average, ugly. From those 20%, half(10%) are considered medium, so the top 10% would actually be the "chads" if you want to put it like this. So they seem to message and reply to a lot of guys cons…
/r/AllPillDebate16/10/23 11:13 PM
1

...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 06:53 PM
12

I just can't understand how you can type such a thing without relating, and the lack of pragmatism in refusing to accept a different perspective when considering it would benefit you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 03:04 PM
1

I just answered that... Those are all real and not mutually exclusive. Women are still straight, still have their necessities, instincts, and socially constructed desires. It's not hard. I'll try to explain it again. You probably have your belief that society is misogynistic, that men are misogynistic. Yet multi millions get married every year, why? Supposing that's true, it would be for the same reasons, except that the "necessities, instincts, socially constructed desires" would have their gen…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 02:32 PM
1

Which part? Women can seek for relationship with men despite any negative perception, just like you supposedly "swipe" on men you don't find physically attractive. But then men should prove that they are worth of your attention, and must work really hard for it as to pay for the fact that the queens overlooked their ugliness. I mean, radical feminists get their pets despite any direct hate. And I never said you can't love a man. When you dig through the trash in search for a gem, you value that …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 08:26 AM
1

Nah, you don't like men by default, common now. Everything else just adds up. Just like humans hate cockroaches but love butterflies.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 07:42 AM
0

I said nothing complex. Women don't like men by default. Anyone with at least one brain cell should be able to look at reality and conclude everything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 06:35 AM
-1

Wait, this is actually very interesting. Let me compare the same hypothetical situation where I am an OLD user: if I had a graphic of my own physical attraction toward women in okcupid and my distribution of messages superimposed, it wouldn't look any close to that either. Lmao. Mine would have attraction and distribution of messages very weird alligned, because I would rate 95% of women as medium ~ most attractive based on looks, but my messages distribution line, despite not moving up in propo…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/23 12:08 AM
2

As someone who's been out of the "market" for 10 years, I'm confident that my advice is timeless although directed to men: Don't date/stop dating people who hate your gender out of desperation for fucking sake. Stop getting baited into thinking that men-hating shit screamed out loud IRL are harmless because "misandry never raped or murdered anyone". Those who do it make themselves very obvious nowadays so they're not at all hard to filter, so stop rewarding mysandry, else you got no right of acc…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/23 05:15 PM
-1

Really? So many women accuse men of "fucking anything" as if they are these primitive creatures, and misinterpret the fact that men find more women attractive as "men can fuck even women who they are not attracted to", but women actually reach out to men they do not find attractive, while men who are desperate animals reach out to less women? Confusing. If I ever used OLD, I would probably be out of curve too, as I would totally prioritize the profile info over aesthetics upon reaching out to an…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/23 02:08 PM
1

Yeah, but you said men pretend to be hornier than they actually are and to care about sex less than they actually care. We do care about it a lot, most often more than we admit than the inverse. Not that there's anything positive on admiting on it, there's nothing "manly" about showing desperation. Generally women take this information with disgust, get defensive, feel objectified, go full FDS. In terms of caring less about women vs women caring more about men than it meets the eye, it's a more …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/23 06:54 PM
6

Jesus fucking christ, dude. Me having to prove you sex is important to men is like a woman having to prove that women menstruate. Stop being oblivious.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/23 05:26 PM
4

No. Saying men don't care about sex so much is a completely oblivious take no matter how you look at it. The importance men give to sex is legendary and the reason of wars and conflict in stories since the old age. If we don't actively fight our instincts, our entire life end up revolving around sex. Women legitimately hate this on men and thus, very often actually hate men because this love for sex almost defines most men. It dictates what they do, how they live. IMO It's actually much easier f…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/23 04:43 PM
1

Well, introvert or not, in terms of dating you're a woman and therefore, by default you can be much more flexible in your selectiveness without affecting your chances of getting experiences out of it, and I imagine guys(who are not pos) actively try to make you comfortable as they court you. I also imagine that the Women-are-wonderful effect also plays a great role for fitting in purposes. Now try to look at it from a male's perspective, who lacks all those. I'm supposing that the "IT geek" guy …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/23 02:19 AM
1

For me, in practice, "experimenting" as an introvert is kind of the same as pretending to be something we're not. It doesn't feel natural to go talking with people whose interests are not the same because that pretty much means those people are also uninteresting in most contexts, so what's your intention on doing so? You're getting to know better someone you actually don't want to know better. I agree with you that experience is very important and beneficial though, which I tend to think is one…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/23 10:43 PM
3

Hmm I don't know. Dating people you don't share interests with to practice your social abilities and gain sexual experience sounds like PUA level of advice, isn't that exactly the same objectification? I'm seriously confused. I thought "getting better at dating" for the sake of it was always heavily criticized because of its lack of authenticity and considered manipulation, which was the PUA way of dealing with "the dating game". Then PUA gives origin to the redpill movement who makes deeper and…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/23 07:13 PM
3

If the person can spend 3 hours talking about linux that actually says a lot of good things about him, and the right one for him will catch that.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/23 03:51 PM
1

Just a popular way radicals been calling themselves these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 11:11 PM
1

You don't care because you think you can do it all among yourselves, all among the queens. But the thing is, you're too blind by the power you gained so far to see that you just happen to be in this position because your pets were convinced that you have the moral ground and helped you reach there. Now you're leaving traces of your own animality by shitting the entire house and barking unstopabbly. Once your pets see you're just as animals as they are and snap out of this hypnosis, we'll see if …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 11:01 PM
2

Compassion fatigue is what happens when, among other things, you make someone believe that he must care about every small detail that bothers you, using an obnoxiously chaotic movement that constantly problematizes every little rule in life and tries to force reflection to the point of convincing him to accept your hate with open arms and that he must also hate himself and his equals because of how much he makes you suffer.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 10:29 PM
2

I mean, sure, not trying to do better than the ones you criticize and pushing people to compassion fatigue via manipulation is always a choice. A very dumb one, but it's indeed a choice and we shall see where this will lead us to. In the end what will matter is that you had the opportunity of venting, right? At this point I'm confident that if many women had more testosterone and strength they would murder and rape guys as a revenge and use plumbos logic to justify it, but since you don't have t…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 10:01 PM
2

Women don't "have to" remain in silence, and I don't have to listen to complaints and insults all the fucking time and I don't care if you think it's justified. If misandry is a consequence of misogyny, what do you think the consequence of misandry will be? Do you really think this "me hating you is okay because plumbos" manipulation will eventually lead to matriarchy and happiness?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 08:29 PM
1

If it really involved avoiding men, I would be all about it because then we would just be left alone. But even some of the most radical of radfems have boyfriends and male friends who I affectionately call radpets. It's pathetic. All power to feminists and hopefully misogyny can be "beaten" but I won't take hate lightly just because it's supposedly "not as consequential" as the hate they suffer, and if they think misandry is necessary to beat misogyny then I'm sorry but I don't support this figh…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 07:51 PM
4

Disagree. In terms of friendship to romatic relationship, lusting may happen and be confused with romantic feelings, but for guys it makes much more sense to catch romantic feelings for someone after you get a better understanding of someone's personality, habits, way of viewing life itself that generally comes with long friendships so they do happen very often as well, even if it comes along with sexual attraction. It's unfortunate that to women, in general(exceptions do exist and are not too r…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/23 06:27 PM
2

I understand you know them very well, but for the good or for the bad no matter how well you know another person, as long as that person is "another" what you know is merely an impression. As they probably don't know everything about you. Does your cousin know the way you talk about him and uses him as an example of an incompetent person? Maybe he does but if he doesn't that could change his perspective on you at least a little bit. And it seems your cousin is competent on staying happy, because…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/23 09:52 PM
1

Would need more intimate information about both, that you as a mere third would not be able to get, in order to give an answer about decency and even then I'd have to base on my own understanding which, for example, would take in consideration how both treat other day to day people much more than the qualifiers you gave for example. Now when you say "positive or negative" you mean it from a moral perspective, right? Because there are other perspectives to question if confidence itself is positiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/23 09:16 PM
1

Wait. I agree with you a little bit, but it depends on the situation and to who you're speaking to. If he was in a circle of friends when the question was made and there was a couple of fat women there, his "thin praising" would probably lead to him being accused of fat shaming and that would sort of have the same effect. Or they would save the feeling and blurt out later with someone else and the word of his now fat-shaming episode would spread, like how he made her friend feel. Her feelings wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 08:04 PM
1

He seemed to answer the exact opposite of what you asked. I don't think he really meant that he doesn't consider his friends dating material because they share his hobbies but I might be wrong. In case he did tho, I totally think that most men would be happy to find a woman who does. As I found mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/23 11:33 PM
1

She's asking you what does NOT make them relationship material.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/23 10:10 PM
1

I think he didn't get your question.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/23 10:09 PM
1

And when you find out that fear is the foundation stone of hatred, you get a better understanding of the mentality from radfems, the women from femaledatingadvice, etc. and then all you can feel toward them is pity.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/23 04:12 AM
4

Not being adventurous is a dealbreaker to me, which isn't limited to anal. Still, if you can never get a man because every man expect you to do something specific that you don't feel comfortable at all, you should choose to be alone. There's not much we can do about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 06:18 PM
1

It has nothing to do with redpill. If the only thing that takes to get intimate with someone is being aesthetically attractive, that's how far the person is going to go to get intimate with you. This is true for both men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/22 07:45 PM
3

...Priorities I guess. Well, you do you then. Overall I stand with the opinion that caring about the partner's personality before intimate acts is positive for any gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/22 02:15 PM
5

I understand that in the "starving state" it is harder to choose. But at the same time, being selective also makes guys attractive so it's not counter intuitive, it's actually necessary. Yes, girls don't need personality to attract needy boys. That's the point. Setting that as a basic standard is the only way to change this situation and stop FDS/radfem bullshit in the "dating market". At the same time, we avoid potential horrible experiences.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/22 11:48 AM
8

There's just one thing that should change imho: men should not have sex with people with shit personality. I'd say no one should but i don't want to be falling in the cliche of criticizing women's choices since I'm not one, and then receiving the something something machine something something insert coins/niceness something something get sex comparison. But having a good personality should be in our standards to motivate people to be empathetic and less hateful. If I ever get single again(pls g…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/22 11:19 AM
2

All the replies in this thread contradict that. Also, it so happens that the so supposed purple pill women here never accept a single criticism toward their gender; it always have to be blue. Not that some redpilled boys don't get too deep into their own failures and blame others but how there's never a single drop of truth on any man's experience in the dating scene that carries any sort of negativity toward women's behavior. Women are just perfect, and men are always pathetic. I find it fascin…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 07:44 PM
1

Yeah, and that degree is subjective, which i repeated over and over again that it is fine to have that as your personal boundary. In mine, there are others much, MUCH more abusive that are seen as normal but muh wasted time, muh wasted time.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 04:13 AM
1

I never thought i could disagree so much with someone in my life, it's poetic, really. This black and white mentality is exactly the opposite of everything i believe and i struggle to think how anyone can be like this and be happy in any relationship, exactly because I'm pretty sure they are not black/white as they think(because no one is, wtf) and demand the partner to be. You are so sure on your comparison between gaming and other hobbies because they don't have the exact same defects, but if …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 03:53 AM
1

Nope, I meant unwilling to communicate, and I wasn't affirming that's your case as i don't know the type of you relationship you had and its details. Of course, it's also important to be flexible about each other's defects but as i said before, you are entitled to your boundaries and if you're not willing to "waste time", that must be communicated and put as a deal breaker if necessary. But maybe you had problems on your own that he didn't feel any safe to communicate, and maybe that was because…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 08:04 PM
1

Inflexibility is the enemy of any relationship, since all of them demand communication.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 07:24 PM
1

You're really putting too many things in the same sack. Not all games take 5 hours, not all gamers lack (so much) awareness. Again, it might be a way, not a reason. And again, being "rude as fuck" is subjective. There are much worse, unbearable things in my personal list of boundaries. Some abusive, really, that i might prefer spending my time doing something i actually find pleasurable aka gaming than dealing with bullshit, but in a relationship we need to communicate and not fall into the trap…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 05:13 PM
1

Yeah, well. If that's really such a sacrifice for you it makes sense. You're entitled to your boundaries. For me, there are many worse things than waiting the person i supposedly love to end something that he cannot quit as long as it's not an abusive amount of time. Indeed, he should communicate that he wants more time for himself to spend on the activity he likes, as you should communicate how much it bothers you that he's not ready right away when you meet each other. If that would not make t…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 04:26 PM
1

Were you spending two hours with him and waiting an entire hour for him to finish his game, or are you spending the entire day? And how often did you visit him expecting full attention: did he have time to play at all or did he only have time to do his responsibilities and see you all week? I don't know if the case you used as comparison is also a characteristic of him, but that kind of bad time management is typical of ADHD.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 02:04 PM
2

Yeah I got that bit, you're just horrible at arguing in favor of your point.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 01:20 PM
2

Ah the low value/high value talk. This is such a sad way of seeing life imho.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 02:58 AM
1

That's great, fellow gamer! But I never said you weren't, i was just giving my interpretation of his point. I also spend a lot of time on social media. xD
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 02:52 AM
0

I agree. But for gamers, some of the time we'd "waste" on social media we end up "wasting" playing videogames, that's the point i guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 02:39 AM
1

True. Depending on the perspective though, a $5000 setup may look mucb better than a $5000 wookworked furniture room. Have you seen some of the game rooms out there? Some of them demand so much knowledge, engagement and passion. They are great projects. Me and my fiancée drool over some of them and intend on making a great one as well. :) But yeah, something being "childish" or useless is subjective, not objective, and depending on who the person is he/she will give reasons that make as much sen…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 02:37 AM
2

Are you supposing games are not part of this reality? Lol. Becoming good and knowledgeable at games and becoming good and knowledgeable at tasting wines, both are hobbies. Heck, even guitar is as much of a useless hobby if the person don't get money from it and maybe the people around dislike his taste in music.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 02:25 AM
2

This is a good mentality. Everyone needs free time by themselves, some more than others, and being with someone demands an understanding of that for it to be healthy. So am agreement is the best case to balance things out.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 02:22 AM
1

Games are indeed a double-edged sword. But hey, I'm glad you're happier, that's what matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 02:05 AM
2

Thank you. As I predict, as videogames become more accessible to women(and male gamers become less misogynists), the bad things aboit games will also stop being pointed as "men things", and the good things about games will become more emphasized. For now i keep my opinion that gamers should try to date other gamers if they can to avoid becoming miserable.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 02:02 AM
3

That's fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 01:56 AM
4

Now this is what I'm talking about. Nongamer x gamer relationship seems even more dreadful with amount of reports I'm seeing here, and i'm glad that you guys are just another couple that found peace by being hardcore gamers together. <3
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 01:54 AM
3

Although what you said about games being addictive is true, I don't think this addictive characteristic of games can be linked to "immersion", but with the seratonin and other hormones that it stimulates. "Immersion" i suppose, is more in the sense of the media as an art, which games are, just like you can get immersed to movies and series. Besides being indeed an addictive activity, it's a mix of decision making, reaction and coordenation training, along with having story, soundtrack, visual an…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 01:51 AM
1

In this dreadful scenario of gamer and non gamer relationship it seems that balancing is key. Yes, i agree with the guy that if gaming is important to one's partner he/she will try to at least leave him/her to it for some of his/her free time. How much of the free time we're talking about should be discussed. It's an activity that demands some engagement after all. Trying to join and make it good for everyone isn't directly translated into love but it's for sure an act of love. Not the only one,…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 01:36 AM
1

Thanks for reminding me not to have children, i need a daily of that. lol
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 01:13 AM
1

Indeed games have some particularities to them and this is exactly why i never saw myself dating someone who's not into games as well. Unless the person who doesn't play is ultra inspired to understand and accept that the person he/she loves will have to stick to it sometimes, i can see how that it might be the core of lots of fights and disagreements. That being said, one thing is to wait some minutes so your bf can finish a game with his friends, the other is to spend your entire time watching…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 01:12 AM
1

My advice: find yourself a gamer. When you're depressed and use games to escape reality, she's going to understand. When she does the same, you're going to understand. It's just as simple, you just need to have that as your personal boundary for relationships, just like some people want to smoke a blunt together, you want to play videogames and chill. Me and my fiancée go around the town looking for arcades to play and we're building a game room together. She's just as into games as i am and hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 12:57 AM
1

Not discussing whether what the guy said is true or not, supposing it is, you said there's no point for a fat guy to look for a thin girl if he is fat himself, but as the guy affirmed, fat guys are able to find thin women who are into that, so the point of a fat guy to look for a thin woman is that he's able to date thin women eventually(and the other way around might be also true). What's left to be answered? Now don't get me wrong, I think people should be realistic about what's their position…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 12:46 PM
1

I think one of the biggest feminist complaint, if not the biggest one, was about the supposed man's "unrealistic" standards for women. It was totally ok and fair to complain about that until men refuted it and they began complaining that the reverse was actually true. Then all of a sudden complaining about high standards wasn't fair anymore, exactly because of the title of this thread. Imo it was always a pathetic thing to complain about, but apparently it's something that put the right and enou…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 12:09 PM
3

Hm. I think it depends on a lot of things, it's really hard to tell. For instance, a friend of mine got in love with the hottest guy in our college classroom. The guy's tall, handsome, outgoing. My friend is fat, kinda baldy and very introspective. She had the feeling like there was something going on between them and for me, who know them both, it felt like she was simply deluded, but of course i didn't say anything. The guy ended up dating the hottest girl, and my friend acted all "surprised p…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 11:52 PM
6

I'm reading all these answers from both men and women and they are making me wonder: where's the love? Everyone's relationships seem too rational. It's like you all are dead inside and you don't even know it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/22 07:40 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter