TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SoraDevin Archive

View 0 posts and 20 comments by SoraDevin on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Yeah I get what you mean, on analysis it's probably less of an inconvenience than I first thought, but I stand by the idea there will be some cases where that inconvenience will be more than a disproportionate split
/r/MensRights31/03/18 02:02 AM
1

Ah, I meant that it seems to me moving a young child between two homes every 3-4 days (or every month or whatever the time split is) makes things like school difficult, particularly if the parents live far from one another. It's pretty dependant on each case though.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 12:27 AM
-6

I agree with the concept, although it's not exactly realistic
/r/MensRights28/03/18 10:09 AM
2

This comment is too far down
/r/MensRights29/12/17 05:29 AM
0

Women are naturally more motherly in the same way men are naturally more fatherly, what does that even mean? You're presenting a clear bias in your comment
/r/MensRights29/12/17 05:26 AM
10

There's still individual freedom to account for, she has a choice all along and by choosing to stay in whatever position she's effectively choosing not to go develop a career. It's not the responsibility of a guy she isn't legally attached to via marriage to make up for that.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/09/17 12:02 AM
25

Honestly, if pick-up is where your mind goes to I can think of 3 places off the top of my head that are leagues better than redpill
/r/MensRights16/09/17 12:31 PM
1

I can still reply on this subreddit :) I'm familiar with Blackstone's formulation, however it is 10 to 1, not 1000 to 1. What makes this interesting is that here it has been changed to 1000, essentially an extension of the principle, and that makes me really wonder if that thinking is flawed (based on what you value more, i.e. society in general or minimising false positives in justice). I get that it is a good foundation point for the innocent until proven guilty principle we operate under - wh…
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/17 03:13 AM
1

The quote isn't talking about whether there is evidence or not, it is about false positives in sentencing; There would be evidence (however valid) in all 1001 cases in this hypothetical. In the hypothetical situation, it's 1000 people who have definitely done the crime (sentenced, correctly, with evidence) and 1 person who didn't (sentenced, incorrectly, with evidence). That is a false positive ratio of 0.001 which, I am asserting, on a societal health basis is actually pretty good. The 1000 for…
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/17 03:07 AM
2

Given that innocent people do get locked up your statement seems evidently untrue. Our legal system is innocent until proven guilty, not never going to get a conviction unless the evidence is 1000% unrefutable. Edit, lol: "You have been banned from participating in r/TwoXChromosomes. You can still view and subscribe to r/TwoXChromosomes, but you won't be able to post or comment. Note from the moderators: You've been banned for repeatedly posting to subreddits that a majority of our problem users…
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/17 09:38 PM
1

Not that I necessarily disagree, but you're arguing from a principle. If we argued this from a societal health perspective, and assuming all 1001 people are being charged with the same thing, then the false positive ratio seems pretty good wouldn't you think? Also, if it's all a charge for something minor that 1 person isn't too bad off. If it's all for murder or rape, it sucks for that person yeah, but then you've also got rid of 1000 murderers/rapists. Not ideal sure, but 1 for 1000 isn't too …
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/17 09:35 PM
13

....is it though?
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/17 12:34 PM
18

First date should be icecream or something, dinner is too formal and things like a movie are shit ways to get to know the other person.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/01/17 11:44 PM
18

Maybe they did and it means even more people hated it
/r/PussyPassDenied10/01/17 11:40 PM
3

I heard they bond to the fat cells and just suck them right out. It's like liposuction from the inside.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/06/16 01:22 AM
1

"But a jury of 12 women and three men found her guilty after a nine-day trial earlier this month at Edinburgh Sheriff Court." What the fuck kind of jury is that, even if they did vote that way.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/04/16 11:31 PM
-4

I'm not pretending, my views are my own and don't fall under one cohesive group, but if you've got such an ideological axe to grind against the left you go right ahead. Socially left, censorship and sexism doesn't fall within any tenets, which is what is happening here
/r/MensRights10/04/16 04:43 AM
-3

Or yknow, it's not a fallacy if we're going by the definition of words
/r/MensRights10/04/16 02:52 AM
23

This is regressive though, you're thinking far left wing or the regressive left
/r/MensRights09/04/16 09:28 PM
2

It sounds like you've answered your own question
/r/MensRights27/06/15 09:38 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter