SoraIsRoxas Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Problem solved!! Sigh. There exists more than 2 options. Both you and the sign holder don't seem to grasp that concept.	/r/MensRights	12/01/16 10:26 PM
1	Problem solved!! I've now grown weary of this debate. But I ask you do you honestly think that teaching people that "marital rape is rape" would result in the end of marital rapes. People have been taught for years that smoking is bad, and yet it is still very prevelent. Society naming and teaching something as "bad" doesn't eliminate its existence. Murders exist and its widely accepted its bad and people are taught at a young age not to murder people just as everyone growing up knows that its bad to rape people…	/r/MensRights	12/01/16 05:46 AM
1	Problem solved!! That doesn't make what you're asking any less of a false dichotomy	/r/MensRights	12/01/16 01:20 AM
1	Problem solved!! Once again you have presented a false dichotomy giving only two possible answers where multiple exist...	/r/MensRights	11/01/16 10:05 PM
1	Problem solved!! It is a risk reward scenario. Staying in has a 0% risk. Whereas going out on a given night may have a 0.0001% risk. If that level of risk is unacceptable to someone then yes; staying in at night is a resonable outcome. However one can still go out at night but avoid dodgey areas or take precautions to limit the danger they are in which is once again the idea behind the analogies. By taking precautionary measures the already small risk might drop by half for example making it less risky to go out…	/r/MensRights	11/01/16 09:41 PM
1	Problem solved!! Being aware of dangers and acting appropriately is the point that was veing made by those analogies. And the sign is very straightforward and hard to misinterpret. You are strawmanning those who made the analogies in order to misrepresent their arguments to make it easier to attack.	/r/MensRights	11/01/16 09:06 PM
2	Problem solved!! No one is advocating that woman shouldn't go out. But people must understand that rapisits sadly exist and it is a risk if they go out. Just in the same way that you might be robbed or mugged if you go out. The issue that they have taken is that the answer to the issue at hand is not to "teach men to behave" a point that you have now repeatedly ignored. This once again comes down to your false dichotomy: that if people dont think all men need to be taught to behave then they must think that woma…	/r/MensRights	11/01/16 08:54 PM
2	Problem solved!! Once again I have already fully explained the assertion that you have now quoted twice in my original argument, which you have clearly failed to read.	/r/MensRights	11/01/16 08:36 PM
2	Problem solved!! You have just moved the goal posts rather than responding to the flaws in your initial argument. Which was already a loaded question based on a false dichotomy.	/r/MensRights	11/01/16 08:17 PM
2	Someone has described how the new feminist DV intervention system in Australia works in menslib and askfeminists. Its absolutely disgraceful. Have a read. You respond to everyones comments but dont ever actually engage in debate. Lol	/r/MensRights	11/01/16 08:07 PM
1	Problem solved!! You seem to be implying that anyone who disagrees with the premise that the way for girls to safely go out at night is for boys to behave, which is fallacious. There are two main issues with your argument. Firstly that boys are responsible for girls being raped, whereas in reality rapisists are responsible, some of which a boys. A subset of boys may be rapisits but this neither makes all boys rapists nor all rapisits boys. Futhermore the premise on which your argument hangs: idea that teaching t…	/r/MensRights	11/01/16 04:31 AM