TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Sotokun3000 Archive

View 3 posts and 57 comments by Sotokun3000 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Your conclusion has been what I was thinking too. In TRP we talk about having “Game” but what happens if we view romantic relationships as Games which people try to eventually win? => Then it could be that romantic relationships are born and sustained out of greed (acquisition to play the Game) and then once a certain security / safety threshold is met, they proceed to evolve via power plays (domination <=> master | slave) until one prevails over the other after complete domination. Then you can…
/r/TheRedPill14/03/22 11:35 PM
9

Romantic love is a topic that affects both sexes. Each one of them experiences it differently but at least they share some parts in the experience. I am trying to explain the existence of female hypergamy from a perspective of evolved consciousness and of course when one dives deep they see additional implications. Too many perhaps to write in one post 😂. This approach I view it complementary to evolutionary forces of breeding not as antagonistic. The thoughts are after reading many philosophers…
/r/TheRedPill14/03/22 02:05 PM
10

Run before you get syphilis!! She seems to not only be banging more people than some prostitutes do, but she also bangs them unprotected unlike prostitutes! Run!
/r/TheRedPill08/01/22 09:17 PM
1

Can you point exact source? Page number, chapter as I’m searching for keywords but cannot find this quote in the book
/r/TheRedPill03/04/19 01:44 PM
5

I can’t find this quote in the text despite searching for keywords. Can you point the page/chapter?
/r/TheRedPill02/04/19 08:07 PM
5

Haha nice one, was trying to draw a similar payoff diagram quite recently with a former LTR. Was having suspicions whether she had cheated or not, and it’s amazing how putting it down on paper on what would have been her best move can clear your thinking. The numbers show the truth when emotions can skew logic. It’s always prudent and wise to have in mind what your “opponent’s” best move is. When in doubt, put it down on paper. It obviously reduces your expected spiritual/partner payoff but it r…
/r/TheRedPill19/11/18 10:06 AM
2

The thing is this: Marriage is a contract. What is there to gain from it ? What is there to lose ? What do I lose if it goes wrong ? Does my probability adjusted expected gains justify the potential losses? Don’t forget that conditional probabilities are a thing, but they must always be balanced according to the priors (statistical known facts/50% of divorces). After signing, you play the same game again and again every day, but there is no way out without repercussions. Viewed as a sports /casi…
/r/TheRedPill09/06/18 05:18 PM
16

This is an underrated comment. Truth is, that some activities are easy to spot as time wasting ( constant social media scrolling for example), but others are harder to price in. As you said, reading (say Math or Physics) is a high investment activity. The rewards have a high variance. If you are not stupid and you grasp the material, then maybe you can land 6 + figure job at some point in the future. If you are stupid, you can end up at some min wage job and question yourself daily. (Important s…
/r/TheRedPill31/05/18 03:06 PM
2

Of course bringing in the foundations for new age bombs is massive. But the path to quantum physics and advanced math understanding is quite lonely. Who remembers a quote from Markov or Kolmogorov? Who knows any detail about him? The nice thing about Feynman is that similar to Russell and Einstein, he has a thing to say that could help other people in their daily lives.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/18 04:25 PM
12

Never take her back. Nothing to win, only to lose. It’s a suboptimal choice in terms of benefits/cost . Any argument your mind may play in order to justify taking her back is an illusion, the hamster that puts you back where you were, Newton’s inertia law. Taking a turn in direction is hard
/r/TheRedPill23/05/18 09:44 AM
15

Was about to buy it anyway, Faynman’s philosophy has vast applications..especially his focus in learning to think rather than memorizing Adding it to amazon basket now. Thanks
/r/TheRedPill22/05/18 04:32 PM
2

You should say something along the lines of: “ you are not obedient enough for an LTR”. It is a confident statement that she should try more while you are not being needy or insecure (Wtf do you expect “it’s not like you’d commit to me” is signaling ???) This may subconsciously force her to start making you favours etc. Isn’t that the goal after all?
/r/TheRedPill09/03/18 04:22 PM
1

Did you read the post? If yes then you missed the whole point
/r/TheRedPill20/12/17 02:57 PM
1

That’s some quality commentary. Thanks!
/r/TheRedPill20/12/17 01:43 PM
1

I suggest you play with the initial probabilities as you see fit and see the output by following the calculations. It’s exactly what you assume it will be with the red pill lens.
/r/TheRedPill20/12/17 01:35 PM
1

You don’t see that the model works for the red pill world as well. It validates red pill as rational and blue pill as irrational. No matter what prior probabilities you use
/r/TheRedPill20/12/17 01:32 PM
1

It’s nice to see that different perspectives on a matter, converge to the same results. It gives solid ground to reach “truth”
/r/TheRedPill20/12/17 12:24 PM
2

Feel free to tweak the model for more realistic assumptions. I just use the those priors to highlight that blue bill choices are irrational given even blue pill beliefs
/r/TheRedPill20/12/17 12:23 PM
3

True! Thanks , editing now
/r/TheRedPill20/12/17 12:16 PM
1

You see a person about to get hit by a truck and you don't even bother to warn him. Good job being a proud "alpha". Grow up
/r/TheRedPill10/11/17 02:56 PM
0

With cooperation you can reach desired goals quicker. It isn't beta to offer insight to a blind person. I don't see why you shame voluntary help for raising awareness as it is in our best interest to do so long term
/r/TheRedPill10/11/17 02:25 PM
3

It's better to help each other see the deception of women isn't it? Otherwise how will the rape culture stop?
/r/TheRedPill10/11/17 01:44 PM
16

Congrats for letting him know. At this environment where the entire society is pro men-oppression it is important that we help each other see the true nature of the game played against us. Far more important than a fickle female "friendship"
/r/TheRedPill10/11/17 01:43 PM
1

I agree but in the end it does it matter? From rick & morty -> "Beth: - Am I evil? Rick: - Worse. - You're smart. - When you know nothing matters, the universe is yours. - And I've never met a universe that was into it. - The universe is basically an animal. - It grazes on the ordinary. - It creates infinite idiots just to eat them, not unlike your friend Timmy. Beth: - Tommy. Rick: - Yeah, it hardly matters now, sweetie. - You know, smart people get a chance to climb on top, take reality for a …
/r/TheRedPill13/10/17 09:43 AM
1

When she cheats, (and the probability of this now is very high whether you like it or not..) you will have lost value and dignity etc. I suggest you withdraw now, break up , therefore dodging you being cheated on. Then after the dust settles after a while you can have her as a plate, paying dividends for a while. This is the rational thing to do, anything else is similar to holding a time bomb waiting to explode
/r/TheRedPill03/09/17 12:57 PM
4

The risk of having her cheat due to a fickle moment is one thing. Now adding the risk of revenge cheating on the equation is another. Time to exit this stock before margin calls kick in
/r/TheRedPill03/09/17 12:02 PM
7

Can you tame a whore though? I think there is some short of threshold beyond which attempts to tame are not worth and abandoning mission altogether may be better. Even in temporary taming, occasionally her conscious brain will advise her to rebel and then taming will need to start all over again. But at this point every taming session will be less and less effective, thus converging to a breakup as time passes
/r/TheRedPill10/08/17 05:27 PM
1

You should if your cock is big. Openness "should" allow criticism since the term implies open views thus dialogue. Let's not masturbate with words here dude
/r/TheRedPill08/08/17 03:02 PM
17

My argument is simple. It's a paradox to promote LGBT and racial openness and on the other hand condemn criticism of those. Openness should allow criticism. It's a paradox to say "people should be allowed to have whatever sex orientation they want and be allowed to talk openly about it and have the right to be offended and vocal about it if criticised But there is no right to be offended if the source of offence is discrimination in favour of minorities
/r/TheRedPill08/08/17 01:03 PM
6

Let me know if you want the Bitcoin deal, the rate is fair I think so if you are interested on the insight it will be worth it since you are so eager to dig deep.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/17 11:22 AM
1

Ok troll replies deserve the equivalent treatment-> Pay me with the fraction of Bitcoin worth 20$ and I'll find the statement you seek. Not in my interest to waste any more time on this , showed you a couple of examples where the institutions implicitly support an open environment through their marketing efforts but what happens in reality is different. Please confirm if you agree with the payment and I'll attach here the corresponding Bitcoin address. Once payment is received +6 confirmations, …
/r/TheRedPill08/08/17 11:04 AM
6

Lol man quite persistant: there you go, another example that discussions other than work related are encouraged in the work environment. https://www.home.barclays/about-barclays/diversity-and-inclusion/LGBT.html " Imagine being worried that people will judge you simply because of the person you love, or the gender you identify with. I can’t imagine not being able to come into the office and talk about what I did on the weekend. "
/r/TheRedPill08/08/17 10:49 AM
4

Don't be a troll mate it's bad for your health. I attached another link on one of your comments above. Have a good day
/r/TheRedPill08/08/17 10:30 AM
6

It's institutions acting different to their public marketing efforts that im pointing . Another example: http://www.bbc.co.uk/careers/why-join-us/values Remember Recent pay gap debate: "We respect all our colleagues, whoever they are. We’re honest, direct and always courteous. We challenge others’ ideas but we respect decisions once made. We are ambassadors for our organisation; we speak out if something is not right and deal with it within the BBC."
/r/TheRedPill08/08/17 10:28 AM
7

Do you work alone or at a company? In many big companies you are encouraged to discuss issues for example racial discrimination etc. There are even clubs set up for this within the companies, LGBT clubs etc. All have political content. Open discussions are encouraged. Therefore I point out the discrimination in allowed political content which is contrarian to the marketing efforts. I'm off this debate as it may be a waste of my time
/r/TheRedPill08/08/17 10:23 AM
7

Do you read what I'm typing? I just argue that what happens in reality is different to what is stated publicly in company marketing efforts. That's all there is to it. Pointing this fact, nothing more nothing less.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/17 10:16 AM
16

Here you go : http://www.ucla.edu/about/mission-and-values Remember the recent riots against trump and milo yanopoulos? " We value open access to information, free and lively debate conducted with mutual respect for individuals, and freedom from intolerance. "
/r/TheRedPill08/08/17 10:07 AM
18

Man it's a statements game. I agree that reality is different but it's the companies themselves that advertise how they value diversity and openness in expression. Just pick up any company marketing booklet.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/17 09:48 AM
38

But there is a culture of wanting all voices to be heard and not condemning minority views. I agree maybe he can't win a case In a lawsuit but-> That's why this case is interesting because it shows selection bias on what is considered an acceptable view. It shows that in reality a company's culture of openness and inclusion can fall into paradoxical behaviour. It is one thing to say that a company does not allow different views, and another to say that it values all views as equal but some are m…
/r/TheRedPill08/08/17 08:26 AM
77

Both articles on wired and Bloomberg are interesting reads, especially the interpretations by several parties. Interesting to see that there is an acknowledgement of "free speech" awkwardness and what is allowed and what not. The battle of free speech and "culture" within tech companies. Hamster overdrive
/r/TheRedPill08/08/17 07:41 AM
3

Ok the Eiffel 65 reference was a stroke of genious
/r/TheRedPill29/07/17 11:07 AM
1

It's the skew in the distributions which is different..i commented more analytically somewhere here where a more detailed stat explanation started.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/17 11:03 AM
3

Averages are the same. It's how the data among age and frequency are different. Men have thin very long tail distribution and women have thick right tail with smaller maximum. In men, Ncount is more evenly spread through the years in order to be able to explain all these observations. The median in women is higher, the average is the same. Just women converge faster to the average than men do.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/17 10:16 AM
4

That was the best thing I've seen in a while
/r/TheRedPill23/07/17 03:41 PM
5

Exactly. It seems many women (and men) try to live life as everyone else dictates how life should be lived. Its only more visible in women since the need for approval and acceptance for some reason is stronger. Since many of society's proposals are conflicting + norms of ideal life change, the strategy of experiencing life in this way resonates only vanity. The concept of a sense of purpose is tossed in the garbage bin. This though, we observe is the only common attribute in people who are satis…
/r/TheRedPill23/07/17 02:55 PM
1

2 different random samples approaching the same expectation. You can't derive clear statistical properties but it's fun anyways. You can try it too on your female friends
/r/TheRedPill23/07/17 09:44 AM
1

I had a conversation at work and just shared it here. There is no reason for the participants to lie. Random sampling that's all there is to it, you can try it on your friends as it's fun
/r/TheRedPill23/07/17 09:42 AM
5

I disagree due to std risks.
/r/TheRedPill22/07/17 09:52 PM
4

Shit. Hadn't thought of this but makes perfect sense. Or to say it differently -> there is literally nothing to gain by introducing her to your friends, you can either win nothing or lose big time!
/r/TheRedPill22/07/17 09:16 PM
4

Well said. It's just looks like men's ncount distribution is very skewed to the right with a thin long tail. Women's is more likely a fat tailed one again skewed to the right, with larger median but smaller possible maximum. Of course for both distributions, the total sum is equal. Edit: the average is the same (expectation) but the median is different
/r/TheRedPill22/07/17 08:44 PM
7

But that probability would be even closer to 0 since you have to multiply the individual probabilities. No different than ghost hunting
/r/TheRedPill22/07/17 08:21 PM
31

Its interesting to observe them chase conflicting goals and play the golden beauty card so poorly. On the one hand they want to party and have lots of fun & sex as society tells them to do so in order to feel free and independent. That way they can be happy. On the other hand they want to find the perfect guy who will be the husband & father of her children, again having society saying that this is the road to happiness. On another (3rd?) hand they must have good career prospects to be financial…
/r/TheRedPill22/07/17 07:28 PM
31

Almost scary. Not the act. But the level of deceit and lying. I assume that was my case too as I cant know for sure how many she banged at the time The feeling that remained which you reminded me just now is as if you survived a terrific car accident. Glad for the luck that you didn't have to get through this while being married and it was only an ltr casualty but still shocked with the potential damage
/r/TheRedPill22/07/17 05:26 PM
18

The most probable scenario (and what happened to me is this). They socialise quickly with coworkers (also foreigners usually who do this sort of rotation thing or locals) since they are alone in the beggining. Within 1 month of socialising with new people, attending parties, clubs, bbq's etc, the probability of kissing at least 1 of these dudes approaches 100%. I didn't know she banged someone till many months later (9m). All I could observe is that she became more flacky in her texts to me, les…
/r/TheRedPill22/07/17 04:22 PM
13

Funny I was in a 2y ltr-oneitis with such a woman. She flew around for 3m internships then we lived together for 1y. Easy to guess how it ended lol
/r/TheRedPill22/07/17 03:48 PM
29

The more I read the more I observe a similarity in men's and women's ideal version of partner. Men would want a 9-10, intelligent, loyal , honest, ambitious and fun woman. Women would want a 185cm, 9 inch viking entrepreneur who is a faithful, arrogant, devoted and fun to be around husband. Within both ideal scenarios, the traits are mutually exclusive, they can't coexist in the same person. Both men and women are literally chasing a ghost whose traits are amplified by each new positive attribut…
/r/TheRedPill22/07/17 02:58 PM
4

"Generosity given without asked is treated without value. This goes for all facets of life. " - Well said
/r/TheRedPill05/07/17 10:00 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter