TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Soulful_Sadist Archive

View 0 posts and 283 comments by Soulful_Sadist on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No. If they're still actual biological men (even if they're not masculine), by definition that's still misandry or misandry-adjacent.
/r/MensRights25/07/26 08:19 AM
-1

In fact, feminism has NEVER been about ANY of the commonly circulated narratives within society that everyone's become familiar with. It's always been about destroying society, starting with God, men, and the nuclear family unit.
/r/MensRights22/07/26 06:40 PM
-6

It's also not a thing. "CIS" is a made-up word... just like "trans" isn't a thing. Let 'em use their pretend words. Whether you're a biological Male OR female (which <spoilers> is effectively every human)... you don't truly have any reason to be offended by a word that represents a non-thing. You're welcome.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 11:05 PM
24

Sounds like quite literally a 'her' problem. I hope she goes away for a VERY long time.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 08:31 AM
2

Yeah, first she'll have to prove herself worthy of a good Man's time, attention, and affection (and, maybe *eventually* his resources post-marriage) before she'll have a shot. The Man needs to become her TOP priority and divorce should FOREVER be removed from the table. Every single woman should know that none of them automatically "deserves" anything from a Man merely for existing. The unfortunate reality is that if a woman has a child from a failed relationship because she chose poorly and/or …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/06/26 08:40 AM
1

Wendy's seems to still be doing okay. 🤷‍♂️
/r/MensRights17/06/26 08:00 PM
4

🤬
/r/MensRights15/06/26 06:10 AM
1

Correct. Disagreements do not amount to hatred on any level.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 06:21 AM
9

I love how somebody went through the whole hassle of drawing and explaining a pyramid all formed around baseless nonsense instead of getting to the punchline of harping all manner of unjustified misandrist gibberish.
/r/MensRights08/06/26 05:50 AM
1

The perception that they're less of a 'threat' than heterosexual men. Again... perception. They're still men, every bit as flawed with potential for possibly maliciously dangerous behavior as any other... person (be they Man or woman).
/r/MensRights05/06/26 11:30 PM
5

That's a truism across all of humanity. Some PEOPLE have it easier than others. That's just a given... for a wide variety of factors AND in a wide variety of contexts.
/r/MensRights05/06/26 09:37 PM
6

Yeah, the problem rests with those people writing about it, and getting it all wrong.
/r/MensRights31/05/26 09:35 AM
1

Becoming? They already have been for decades... at very least physically. Mentally and emotionally most definitely especially the more captured by left-leaning indoctrination they've become. There are arguments to be made and all manner of (not-so-much) conspiracies regarding treatment of foods and medicines to reduce men's ability to develop testosterone and so forth. I'm no mad scientist, so I don't have any data at hand about that... but it's certainly something I've read and heard abundantly…
/r/MensRights29/05/26 12:27 AM
14

The only "feminists" who would disagree with this basic premise are typically those who call themselves feminists but only have that bubble-gum-and-lolly-pops-rainbows-and-puppy-dogs narrative about what feminism even is. "Oh, it's about equality and rights" (they apparently fought so hard for, NO YOU DID NOT). With any luck, those are the exact women who come to their senses and sooner than later become former-feminists or, or they're truly smart, actual anti-feminists. The category you're most…
/r/MensRights29/05/26 12:14 AM
1

The very fact that so many misandrist women feel COMPELLED to harp on about that... proves it's not true. Things that are just universally known and accepted never get talked about. The sun is out. Well, yeah, duh, it's 2:30 in the afternoon. Not exactly worthy of mentioning. To rail desperately on & on & on & on & (well, you know)... is pure projection about their own situation.
/r/MensRights27/05/26 07:10 AM
4

Re. headline: And I call that 100% blasphemous BS... and provably so. Rape is NOT merely penetrative. By definition, it is unwanted physical sexual aggression of virtually any type. Yes, it can include penetration to ANY orifice whether to a Male or female. But it can also include unwanted AGGRESSIVE touching that also can lead to the other things. If it's MERELY unwanted sexual touching, groping, etc., then it falls under "SA" which is bad enough. But it's an insane notion that Men cannot BE ra…
/r/MensRights26/05/26 06:20 PM
2

Ryan Long & Danny Polishchuk FTW!
/r/MensRights25/05/26 11:50 PM
1

Yeah, that headline is statistically and blatantly inaccurate. BOTH sexes have been and are guilty of all manner of horrific child-related crimes. However, for example, just go to r/WomenAreViolentToo and it becomes pretty clear pretty fast how biased a headline statement like that is.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 09:46 AM
3

Oh, people are talking about it... like here, for instance. The problem is NOT ENOUGH of the right people with any power to change things are talking about it.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 03:58 AM
4

Oh, there is... except it's just called rational logic and common sense, and it gets perpetually demonized.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 03:34 AM
48

It's typically a mixture of (A) not lacking access or exposure to adequate information AND (B) simply not desiring to seek it out WHILE (C) merely believing the information provided by their carefully curated and comfortable echo chamber.
/r/MensRights23/05/26 11:02 AM
0

Feminism proves excuses for a great many destructive attitudes and behaviors. Misandry is certainly one of them... and virtually always when it's least justified.
/r/MensRights11/05/26 09:05 AM
10

Because they're indoctrinated by feminism and misandry. The end. You're welcome.
/r/MensRights08/05/26 11:44 PM
2

One of the best ways for women to "educate" themselves about the average Man's reality is to create a 'fake' profile on one or more dating apps... AS A MAN seeking a woman... trying her hardest to get this chap some dates, and watch the confusion and frustration sink in. I'm sure all or most of us have read or watched stories online where other women have done that either on their own or at the request of a Male friend only to go through that experience ("being red pilled") for themselves. Any l…
/r/MensRights04/05/26 02:52 AM
1

From its inception, if not even well before the term 'feminism' was coined and put into common use... the feminist ideology was fundamentally born out of Marxism which explains why feminism WANTS (A) the destruction of the nuclear family unit, (B) the destruction of Men, masculinity, and the distinctiveness of the Male sex, and (C) the destruction of God or more specifically the three main mono-theistic Abrahamic religions each of which share a claim to at least part if not all of the Bible as t…
/r/MensRights20/04/26 01:22 AM
2

Re. heading: Bingo! And that's why women who aren't aware they're being that way BUT then suddenly become aware they are AND all the other women in their circle ALSO are... and if they actually have an intelligent mind not ruled 100% by fickle ego and emotions... do tend to make a shift more in favor of Men (as well as women) RATHER than solely a female-only interest.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 02:25 AM
1

It's been a while since I've seen this subreddit pop up in My feed. While not necessarily specifically related to this individual post... I just want to express a word of appreciation and gratitude that... IN THE TORRENTIAL FLOOD of anti-Male, pro-feminist, pro-misandrist subreddits all throughout this platform... that this space exists. Without hyperbole, you ladies are doing God's work. Keep it up. 🌺 - - - However, yes, in response to this specific post and its associated video... while I tend…
/r/RedPillWives16/04/26 12:55 AM
1

Re. heading: Yes. Women will routinely say they want the nice guy, etc., but actually go after the chad with muscles and high status but treats 'em like crap. The sweet spot... the unicorn... is the hot guy she gets wet for who ALSO gives her safety, security, and provision. So, Men... you can kind and you can AND SHOULD be good Men, but NEVER be "nice". Never bend the knee. Never chase. Instead, be chase-worthy.
/r/MensRights14/04/26 03:55 AM
8

It was never "made". It's always existed. It's far more a force of nature than any kind of political ideology as some claim it to be. It's buried in the DNA of every human being deeply on an instinctual lizard-brain level. Patriarchy, which simply means 'Rule of the Father', has been around since humanity's very first social structures helping mankind build, shape, and govern every society whether a single nuclear family unit, or a continental empire. One of the biggest reasons the world (not to…
/r/MensRights14/04/26 12:41 AM
11

Here's the deal. Maybe some INDIVIDUALS who have a hyper-commercial understanding of feminism (aka not its real definition) may still think that way. HOWEVER... actual, genuine feminism (from its inception, if not before) has never truly been about 'equality', 'rights', 'the vote', 'workplace opportunity', and so forth. Read the founders' words themselves, and they'll admit as much. It's quite literally, and provably, always been built on Man-hate and a dark Marxist passion to destroy the nuclea…
/r/MensRights11/04/26 08:35 PM
10

It went too far upon its own inception. In fact, if we want to get Biblical about it... the first feminist lie happened at the Fall in the Garden when the Serpent deceived Eve trying to convince her she was far more "deserving" than she was currently being treated. (Sound familiar?) But then Adam simped out and didn't do His job of keeping her in line. So between the two of them came the entire fall of humankind. Just checked out that link... while it's impressive, it's not even close to all the…
/r/MensRights11/04/26 07:44 AM
3

Usually it's driven by a clear sense of right versus wrong. Abortion = Killing (with intent) = Murder. The end. You're welcome.
/r/MensRights04/04/26 06:13 PM
1

Anyone... ANYONE... who has the nerve to suggest that Fathers don't matter, (A) never had a Father, (B) never had a GOOD father, and/or (C) is infected by the demonic leftist scourge of feminism. If that statement triggered you... good. Do your homework, read the words of the leading voices that started and and drove the "movement" forward. They'll admit themselves that feminism has never been about freedom, rights, or the vote... but about the destruction of the nuclear family unit, of Men and …
/r/MensRights31/03/26 09:03 PM
1

While I absolutely get why you might come to that conclusion... you're unfortunately (or fortunately as the case may be) provably in error about that. There are Men and women in happily loving relationships and marriages all over the place. That part's not likely to change. The problem is that the disastrous ones are what get sensationalized all across social media... which is totally understandable, human nature being what it is especially in our current society. So don't give up hope entirely.…
/r/MensRights30/03/26 04:05 AM
2

Agreed. That's full-on BS and bias. To Me, that looks like MASSIVE bias-based "extrapolation". It's as if women aren't fully capable of seeing the same stuff Men are capable of... as if Men and women have wildly different kinds of eyeballs or whatever. That alleged "research" is... completely asinine.
/r/MensRights28/03/26 08:50 PM
20

No, they mostly laugh about it.
/r/MensRights27/03/26 01:25 AM
3

Re. heading: Correct. Accurate. All manner of pay gaps exist, but not merely because of someone's sex category.
/r/MensRights25/03/26 01:40 AM
5

Excellent channel, btw. All her research and content are rock solid.
/r/MensRights24/03/26 09:01 PM
5

Yeah, it's worth remembering that in MANY cases... even women hate working for other women. This is just one more clear example why.
/r/MensRights24/03/26 08:19 PM
2

Correct. What's more despicable about that... it's all purposefully by design to bring about the ultimate destruction of the family unit and western civilization entirely. Thus, the ideology itself harms people at literally every level... individually, familially, spiritually, economically, and legislatively. And... it's all on purpose and has been since the beginning.
/r/MensRights23/03/26 10:13 PM
2

As challenging as it admittedly might be sometimes... Put more focus on the ideology they've been captured by that directs their world view... RATHER THAN the women (and/or male feminists) themselves. It's not necessarily a flesh & blood fight... but a battle of ideas. Learn the truth of feminist history. Learn to (or become better at) logically defeating feminist and Marxist talking points (because they're 100% interrelated) and, meantime, try maintain peace within yourself. Until a woman (or a…
/r/MensRights22/03/26 07:03 AM
1

For the record, and very respectfully... that's a bit backwards. There's nothing predominantly wrong with Capitalism in and of itself. For ALL of feminist history, they've been linked arm-in-arm with Marxism (aka Socialism & Communism). So, if anything, that is where the focus should be. And, btw, your suggestion of how things SEEM to be is a very far stretch. Look into feminist history as well as how society has evolved to this point today... it's all predominantly Marxist-based (divide & conqu…
/r/MensRights21/03/26 07:19 PM
5

Blame the parent(s).
/r/MensRights20/03/26 10:51 PM
1

Wrong. So, so wrong. It's FAR less to do with ANYTHING related to feelings as much as a clear imbalance of social and legislative justice between the sexes, when women are (and have arguably been for centuries) increasingly so the most prominent 'protected class'. With all the talk about so-called (and, btw, non-existent) "Male privilege", try though one might, in today's world no amount of "privilege" is afforded to average Men whatsoever distinguishable as compared to that of women. What does …
/r/MensRights20/03/26 07:09 AM
36

Welcome to the club. In leftist world where facts don't matter and feelings are their god, I guess just be glad you're still on the platform at all.
/r/MensRights19/03/26 01:56 AM
1

It's also worth noting the women ruined their own lives as well. That what buying into the lies of feminist dogma will do to a society, and to women most of all.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 04:40 AM
1

None of those specimens are worth any Man's time... or, frankly, any sane and actually mentally and emotionally mature woman's time. They have man hate because (A) they've been literally trained to, and (B) because they think they can actually get away with since weak men and our legal structure allows them to. If Men, collectively, rose up and said 'no more', there would be nothing those women could do to stop it. They, however, are obviously clueless of Men's benevolence. Every good thing wome…
/r/MensRights16/03/26 12:37 AM
5

Feminism. You're welcome.
/r/MensRights09/03/26 05:18 AM
1

You at least have to admit... it's fairly admirable how honest, out & open they are with what feminism is GENUINELY all about... rather than being all cutesy making it all about mere rights, etc. The ice cream & puppy dogs feel-good narrative most people have about feminism is blatantly false. Anyone who reads even a few sentences of what the leading originating voices have said about its main driving force will know it in a heartbeat. This poster comes RIGHT OUT FRONT with it. So... points for …
/r/MensRights08/03/26 06:17 AM
-2

Only a marriage that is mutually grounded in the sacred (Covenant Marriage anchored in religious/Biblical faith) has a chance of surviving. Yet, even as I say that, it's not lost on Me that even there it's still a gamble. As always, being always prepared to walk away if things go sideways, always secure in your own ability to sustain a life for yourself and any offspring that are actually allowed (oh so benevolently by said woman in question) to be brought into the world. If you're a Man of some…
/r/MensRights05/03/26 11:54 PM
1

Just because they say a thing, slap on an interesting picture, and type the words in a semi-attractive font... does not mean that even a syllable of it is accurate. So many are so quick to just believe anything. Most of us are, in fact, I've sadly found Myself caught in that trap a time or three in previous years. And, of course, it's no fun to be called out on. However, on this platform, more often than not people who attempt to 'call BS' on something presenting what they think is refuting "evi…
/r/MensRights05/03/26 11:49 PM
10

😐 WT everluvin' A F!
/r/MensRights05/03/26 11:08 PM
3

Yeah, Jones is a full-on brainwashed, unattractive inside & out, Marxist, feminist misandrist. The girl is not even funny... she's just loud and obnoxious. Nothing she has to say holds any value or validity.
/r/MensRights05/03/26 10:16 PM
1

Because feminism.
/r/MensRights04/03/26 01:34 AM
2

No-fault divorce: Gone, permanently. Automatically presumed 50/50 shared custody (unless there is hardcore proof of illegal and/or SA or DV or especially anything child-related) then it's either 100% to the plaintiff parent or next of kin in the event that BOTH parents are guilty of horribleness: Effective immediately and permanently. Automatic mandated DNA Paternity test AT BIRTH: Effective immediately and permanently. Make prenups far more routine and FAR more enforceable. The language should …
/r/MensRights28/02/26 08:29 AM
6

Good. LOL Some things are done merely to amuse Myself anyway. That would probably be one of 'em.
/r/MensRights28/02/26 08:06 AM
8

Then in the next breath too many women will complain how men never approach them, talk to them, pursue them. Can't have it both ways, sweetheart.
/r/MensRights28/02/26 06:47 AM
5

I'd have fun with it by simply messaging them to say "no... not unless it's reciprocal" just to watch the wrong kind of fireworks fly. lol
/r/MensRights28/02/26 05:25 AM
7

First off... no it's not. In a relationship, it's not "controlling", nor is it 🙄 "violence". What it is... is protective. There are a lot of sleazy guys (and even women) out there that want nothing more than to do her harm, and don't care in the least that she might be in a relationship already. As long as she understands and respects that He's looking after her, it's all good. Though, c'mon, let's face it... if she doesn't... then WHY TF are they both even together in the first place? If it's c…
/r/MensRights26/02/26 04:43 AM
1

Prove it... you can't. If modern women want "equality", then they can accept personal accountability, be responsible for their own choices, and stop blaming Men for things that Men were never the cause for. Oh, that's right.... most modern women apparently aren't wired for accountability. For most women, if they truly understood what it was to equal with Men in a real socially practical way... they'd never want it. The smartest, most insightful women have figured that out and know how to (A) ide…
/r/MensRights16/02/26 09:35 PM
2

They don't "have to" but in most cases many Men want to and/or must to fulfill normal survival obligations. This is partly because those professions then to pay so well, plus the idea that Men tend to be more risk-taking than are most women... AND, by and large, they're usually the most physically capable. The only women that meet the standard necessary for success in some of those vocations simply prove the rule that most women don't. In fairness, I wouldn't necessarily say the most easy or mor…
/r/MensRights09/02/26 03:00 AM
3

feminism & misandry
/r/MensRights08/02/26 10:41 PM
2

With respect... this just proves that you're blinded by propaganda. There is no such thing as "current" feminism. It's always been about man-hating and female supremacy at the expense of Men. Core tenets of feminism, highly paraphrased here (these prove it's sourced from the same poison as Marxism, Socialism, and Communism): 1. The destruction of the nuclear family unit (anti-Male, anti-marriage, anti-natalist, anti-motherhood) 2. The destruction of Men and all things masculine (a'la alleged "to…
/r/MensRights06/02/26 05:23 PM
2

Correct.
/r/MensRights06/02/26 05:05 PM
1

Do your own research. The feminist ideology goes back WAYYYY farther than most people ever guess because it didn't start out being called 'feminism'.
/r/MensRights06/02/26 05:04 PM
15

While she means well, she's wrong. From before its inception, it's always been Marxist. Do the research on the core principles behind Marxism, Socialism, and Communism, and those concepts translate in many cases word-for-word to the feminist ideology. It's never been about freedom, but about female supremacy at the expense of Men.
/r/MensRights06/02/26 04:30 AM
3

Yeah, her SEG looks like the type that would.
/r/MensRights04/02/26 07:26 AM
1

Men and women not equal... and never have been, never will be, nor should be even try to be. But that's not a bad thing. That just IS how it is. What you're largely describing is the impact of, yes, feminism upon western culture (and still more broadly across the globe)... but also flat-out misandry. While the examples you give are, sadly, too common... they're not the case for every person in existence. Men, simply don't be so needy with women. Sure, you may want a woman for companionship and/o…
/r/MensRights03/02/26 11:22 PM
8

feminism.
/r/MensRights27/01/26 08:32 AM
7

Agreed on the heading, as well as several of the suggestions. Most anything older that would be considered 'sexist' or 'misogynist' by today's milktoast standards is probably right on the money.
/r/MensRights27/01/26 07:03 AM
3

Ohhhhhhhh, the tragic irony. A woman that forced mutilations upon minors trying to force another type of mutilation upon a Male whistle-blower simply because He brought attention to the heinous truth.
/r/MensRights25/01/26 12:39 AM
1

(...cont'd from above) The feminist ideology has hijacked too many minds (sadly, female and male) to believe that for a woman to be successful, it MUST look, sound, and be precisely the same as for Men. All the while, they're forgetting or outright ignoring that humanity DOES NOT work that way. There are only two sexes. Even with all of our inevitable human similarities... both of those sexes are hardwired in PROFOUNDLY different ways. Fight it as hard as you might, but what a Man needs and what…
/r/MensRights25/01/26 12:07 AM
5

Precisely. Yet, it's even worse than that in how it's hardly limited to merely the millennial generation. It's very nearly women and, with profound sadness, even young girls of almost every generation... at least of ages beyond actual childhood... though look around and even those ages are being infected by the scourge of feminist ideology. Also in fairness, with all its flaws, at least MGTOW is a literal response to conditions, consequences, and unjustified entitled behaviors of modern women AN…
/r/MensRights25/01/26 12:06 AM
0

If you genuinely have the goal to be married with an eye toward motherhood, etc., then try to find the best balance between where your gifts are BUT also whatever can best equip and ready you for domestic management and domestic service. Too many women forget the strength, power, intelligence, and GRACE required to effectively be a mother and homemaker. It IS, itself, a career... and many, including many women, would argue it is THE most vital career a woman can undertake. It's no mistake why it…
/r/RedPillWomen21/01/26 07:43 AM
22

I agree that it makes a Man happy. What I will disagree with is the notion that it's the ONLY thing that does that. That much is provably inaccurate. What makes most Men happiest is to find and execute a PURPOSE in life, to have a mission, and to pursue it with confidence as well as competence. Then, add to that potential marriage and Fatherhood, and you have a powerful mix for a great many Men.
/r/MensRights20/01/26 01:01 AM
20

Probably should let each Man decide that for Himself. It works. It just depends on the individual if or how well it works. The question isn't about conservatism. The question is about discerning who is and isn't genuine about it.
/r/MensRights19/01/26 09:42 AM
2

Yeah, use of 'radical feminist' is pretty much appropriate in this case. After reviewing this girl's YT channel, just about every video screams, 'hey, look how much smarter and better i am than you so pay attention to me-me-me'. The girl might (technically) be attractive but that's only by virtue of her youth. In about ten years, if not sooner, her tune will be changing... probably to something a lot more bitter and misandrist sounding.
/r/MensRights18/01/26 09:55 AM
5

9/10 times, those words are purely nothing more than shaming language based on a girl's unfounded biases. If people actually thought about it... if a man literally fit those words in a genuine way, in truth, there would automatically be far more severe words to describe him. So... in that vein, there are PLENTY of women that easily fall within those parameters. So it's hardly a sexed issue... though people wouldn't think that to hear them talk about it. Also, by now, it's worth stressing that th…
/r/MensRights18/01/26 07:53 AM
9

Yes, but with the caveat that she is provably "high value" by whatever measure system is significant enough to said Man. Btw, other Men would be able to tell almost immediately if she is "high value" or not simply by her mode of appearance, style of dress and grooming/hairstyle, etc., body language, manner of speech, and the general energy she broadcasts. If she is very respectful, attentive, and deferential to her Man... that speaks volumes as opposed to looking bored, distracted, and disrespec…
/r/RedPillWomen18/01/26 04:56 AM
13

Be strong and independent, sweetheart. Not only has chivalry (as modern society understands it) always been a bad idea... but modern women ACTIVELY killed it. False allegations and hubristic self-entitlement will - not - win you any points... ever. Pay that check. Lift that dumbbell. Initiate that conversation. Lady... by necessity YOU be your own leader, until you're WORTHY enough to attract a good Man to lead. Never forget... women are gatekeepers of sex. Men are gatekeepers of relationships a…
/r/MensRights17/01/26 09:44 PM
1

It doesn't matter of it's being explained by a Man because it's true. It's also been similarly explained by women before, too. It was still accurate. Everything about the feminist ideology is destructive... by design.
/r/MensRights17/01/26 07:25 AM
9

Don't hold your breath. For society ever will create that... Men, themselves, will have to. Thus far, Many have tried... but of course, soon enough after, entitled feminists *DEMAND* the space be shared with girls in the name of "equa...🤢...lity". See: Boy Scouts of America, et al. I will say, however, that legislation is now to such a place where Men can create a space and then legally fight to protect it proactively. It can almost be assumed that the moment such a place is established, ka-boom…
/r/MensRights17/01/26 04:37 AM
3

If she's not outright anti-feminist... at this point, the chances are astronomically high that she is, in fact, misandrist or at very least holds misandrist tenancies within her which both feed their ego and sense of (often wildly unjustified) self-importance RATHER THAN recognizing things for what they are and responding accordingly. Operating solely on feelings and perceptions instead of facts and reason will create that almost every time.
/r/MensRights16/01/26 11:04 PM
5

Government and academia. It should be pointed out this applies to female feminists as well as (and, in some cases, especially) male feminists.
/r/MensRights16/01/26 06:53 AM
6

In the way of agreement... Points of fact: Sexism, by default, is an inescapable part of human nature. Thus, benevolent sexism is a good and, in fact, necessary thing. The notion of 'Male privilege' is provably false, particularly in this current era. In the West, average Men have virtually NO privilege today as compared to average women. It has, in fact, always been that way on some level since at least the Industrial Revolution. Only the top few 1-5% of Men (and, by extension, women) in wealth…
/r/MensRights15/01/26 10:40 PM
2

It's not "tolerated" as much as people simply aren't aware there is anything NOT to tolerate in the first place. In short, it all comes down to one word: feminism. And that, itself, is RARELY understood to be and mean anything close to what it truly is and has always been about. More on that below. It's an ideology going back easily at least two centuries, being an influencing force upon as much as being influenced BY Marxist Socialism and Communism. Go back and read the words of the founding vo…
/r/MensRights15/01/26 02:06 AM
32

Looks like he just lost access to the child... at least for a predetermined duration of time. That is YOUR child... not his. By default, he is "extended" family. Thus, any time he gets to spend with the child is effectively a favor... that can be yanked away at any time. If he tries to pull some "but we're family" nonsense... it's easily explained that if he keeps pulling these kinds of stunts in the future, it could be arranged that that's no longer the case. Harsh, maybe, but I think many if n…
/r/RedPillWomen14/01/26 09:42 AM
3

Agreed. "Epidemic" is too hyperbolic. However, it's understandable given the vast numbers of Men, younger and older alike, sharing similar experiences on one level or another. But, no, listen... of course SOME Men feel lonely? Why? Because they're human. However... apart from mental or physical illness or injury, most Men pick themselves up and get sh|+ done ANYHOW, because they have to; they have no other choice. Most women, on the other hand, do have that choice... IF they choose to pursue it,…
/r/MensRights14/01/26 02:03 AM
0

Any self-proclaimed feminist that ALSO demands a Man pay for dates, lead, etc., outright concedes that authentic Patriarchy is not only true and necessary, but unavoidable. The second a Man (capable of paying and leading or not) suggests He won't or shouldn't have to, such a woman automatically gets angry and resentful. Frankly, too, I might say rightly so. However, the way she demonstrates those emotional states also matters. It is possible to be put-out and frustrated without acting like an ab…
/r/MensRights10/01/26 11:44 PM
2

Re. heading: Correct.
/r/MensRights10/01/26 11:08 PM
3

As long as there is a need for Men's advocacy... it won't ever be innately "boring". Given the current landscape between the sexes... that need isn't going anywhere for a very long time.
/r/MensRights10/01/26 08:32 AM
4

Red flag. A Man should never have any desire for that. Yes, it could be argued that there are certain ways a Man submits to His girl (but especially wife) but only in the sense of devoting Himself to her, not sleeping around, taking on Manly responsibility and obligations, rather than just goofing off all the time or whatever. However... that's clearly different than submission within the context of physical intimacy. THE more important issue is if he wants that and you don't... that automatical…
/r/RedPillWomen10/01/26 07:23 AM
2

Welcome to being Male. That's modern culture for you. Thank feminist ideology directly for that.
/r/MensRights10/01/26 04:04 AM
5

Two words: feminism & hypergamy. Men, if a girl isn't willing to at least entertain (if not outright concede to) your boundaries... she simply isn't worth your time. Make sure, also, that your boundaries are reasonable and warranted... not childish, etc. Have some self-respect. Remain steadfast. Do BOTH of you a favor and, respectfully, part ways and be done with her... the earlier the better.
/r/MensRights10/01/26 03:59 AM
14

No. Not erod-ING. Erod-ED. It's already happened. It's been happening since before its inception well over two centuries ago.
/r/MensRights10/01/26 03:54 AM
11

Precisely. It's actually pretty impressive. In their one misandry-nonexistence statement was simultaneously their irrefutable proof of its existence.
/r/MensRights08/01/26 04:38 AM
1

(cont'd from above) The biggest reason for the insanity with relationships today, the fall-off of marriage and birth rates, is a direct result of the impact of feminist ideology. Women have been sold a sack of lies that they can "have it all"... no they cannot. NO ONE can... but certainly not all at once, as they're led to believe. They sacrifice their youth and most fertile years to hunt after ME-ME-ME "priorities" instead of looking at the bigger picture. As to your question of what can be lea…
/r/MensRights07/01/26 04:16 AM
1

Okay, respectfully... I'll push back on the initial suggestion in the start of the post, then move forward through it. Do enough research and it soon becomes apparent that, IN NO WAY, has feminism EVER been a success in the broad scope of things. Of all the freedoms and privileges in society women have today that pre-vote women actually cared about and found essential... pre-vote women ALWAYS, and I repeat, ALWAYS had them. The MANY women who were supporters of anti-suffrage knew this and that b…
/r/MensRights07/01/26 04:16 AM
3

Oh... of course they are. How precious. 🙄😒 The problem with data is that it must be interpreted, and that opens the door to all manner of crooked manipulation of it to "conclude" whatever they want. Data must be interpreted with INTELLECTUAL HONESTY otherwise it's pointless. The misandrists are SO desperate to prove their inverted world view that they all-but make-up data to fit a false narrative... time and time again. And then time and time again, they're ultimately debunked.
/r/MensRights06/01/26 03:35 AM
3

Because we're in a gynocentric social order. When the self-labeled "oppressed" class are routinely treated better than the alternate 50% of the population... it's definitely an upside-down world.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 11:55 PM
17

Maybe, to Me, among the saddest parts about this story is that the YouTube post about it was from EIGHT years ago... and literally nothing of any real substance has changed. Meanwhile, an entire litany of women's "movements" have come and (thankfully) gone.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 02:00 AM
0

Assessment Correct: We are, in fact, living in Clown World. That being said... that is not a universal truth, just a predominant one. There, of course, are plenty of sane and reasonably-minded individuals of both sexes; with occasional variances of degree. In full disclosure, I've not read the original post linked. However, I can see it being a bit of a dick move IF (for instance) the gf was running late for work or an otherwise important appointment somewhere, etc., and the car issue was comple…
/r/MensRights02/01/26 11:23 PM
9

🤣😂💀 Well ALL of that BS is blatantly and provably false. That is the problem with data. It must be interpreted. So when the only moral standard people live by are mere subjective preferences, then nothing is right or wrong but what a person perceives is so. That reasoning holds about as much water as a literally bottomless cup. The feminist ideology, like Marxist Socialism & Communism which it both influenced and was influenced BY, has NEVER proven successful. Just because it might take consider…
/r/MensRights01/01/26 08:56 PM
1

NOT an astronaut. At best, they were orbital tourists. If they want to be strong, independent women equal with Men, then they should learn to take criticism just like Men have to... every hour of every day. So, ladies... cry Me a river... especially since you're all predominantly A-C-grade celebrities.
/r/MensRights31/12/25 07:20 AM
3

Yeah, well that graphic was a complete waste of time for somebody to bother making. The entire premise for all of it is complete BS. It's arguably worse than the Duluth Wheel of Power & Control... another work of absolute BS hyper-biased fiction.
/r/MensRights31/12/25 12:40 AM
3

Love these dudes. Hilarious comics.
/r/MensRights29/12/25 04:23 AM
1

They'd like to think so. But western civilization would implode on itself in a mere matter of weeks, if not days, if suddenly every Man were "disposed" of. If every Man vanished, women would start dying out almost immediately. In mere days, the world as we know it would devolve to a post-apocalyptic 'Mad Max'-esque wasteland. Within the first year, even the healthiest women would die from either starvation, sickness, and/or violence (no power, no clean water, no stores, no medicine, so on and so…
/r/MensRights29/12/25 03:42 AM
3

We have neither. We have an issue with criminal activity and INDIVIDUALS (by they male or female) engaging in criminal behavior no matter what type it may be. There is (literally) as much "problematic" behavior of women as that of men. Technically, if you break down the specific types of crime, women FAR outweigh in numbers as compared to numbers of men. It's always case-by-case. To look at it in any other way is, on its face, sexist in the most malicious and malignant way.
/r/MensRights28/12/25 05:51 AM
5

Absolutely. Perhaps to the most casual observers among women they might not perceive it that way... but they would be the exception to the rule. That entire "movement" started as a big F-U to Men as a group. Yes, there are horrible Men, obviously. But there are also women just as horrible. PEOPLE have the capacity to be horrible just in general. So to partition and demonize half the population as if every person within an entire group behave just as heinously as a rotten few of them... this, by …
/r/MensRights28/12/25 05:21 AM
3

Mine is a categorical disagreement based on the fact that the stated presupposition is anchored in biased and faulty assumptions by default. Frankly, the argument comes off as distinctly feminist in nature which, in itself, is misandrist. The notion of "far" right is an anomaly; a label that gets slapped upon people who may or may not even be accurately understood as to their motives, viewpoints, etc. Much of that mischaracterization, too, is the faulty product of mainstream media which routinel…
/r/MensRights26/12/25 09:20 PM
5

Re. heading: Right. The reason we know that is faulty logic is because ALL of those claims are provably false. When theirs is feelings-based supposition... Ours is fact-based truth. Yet another way we are not the same.
/r/MensRights23/12/25 07:59 AM
2

Correct. While, in fairness, 'feelings' do have a certain utility... they are, however, too frequently not anchored in objective factual reality. The OP raises a very valid point. If (forget even girls or women, but if ANYONE) foolishly puts themselves in situations or certain locations at certain times when the likelihood of anyone to be 'attacked' (and the definition of that can also be argued, the context being situationally dependent)... then why subject yourself to that IF it's unnecessary?…
/r/MensRights22/12/25 08:35 PM
2

Authentic Patriarchy is not oppressive. What is oppressive is the feminist ideology which invented a fictionalized boogie-man myth that they hijacked the term 'patriarchy' to use as a name for their invention. Genuine Patriarchy is profoundly reciprocal and far more pro-woman than feminism ever has a hope of being. Do enough homework into the true origins of the feminist ideology and it becomes apparent VERY fast after a certain point. If there is anything "oppressive" especially in today's west…
/r/MensRights22/12/25 05:52 AM
12

It's simply a fact that, at least in the West, Men and boys (as a category of person) as well as White people in general (as a category of person) have both been and still are demonized is WILDLY unjustified ways. Men and boys (as a group) and White people (as a group) are - not - bad - people. Human beings... ALL OF US... are and/or have to capacity to be toxic or exhibit toxic behavior. That, itself, IS human nature... regardless of one's sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, so on and so fort…
/r/MensRights22/12/25 01:33 AM
2

As the saying goes... 'even a broken clock is correct twice a day'. Just because (I'll be respectful and address him by) Mr. Galloway occasionally says things that are technically true has never kept Me from being at least somewhat (if not outright) distrustful of him and others of his ilk. He is little more than an academic 'wolf in sheep's clothing'... a captured male feminist trying to 'white knight' on the broader social and academic stage attempting to couch his "advice" as help for Men and…
/r/MensRights21/12/25 08:15 PM
3

Men and especially boys CAN, in fact, be raypt... have been... and continue to be just as horrifically as it is and would be for anyone else. Any dispute involves the symptoms of lacking intelligence and/or lacking empathetic depth of forethought, not to mention the likely clear overabundance of bias. Just this year (if not month) alone has an overabundance of such cases in the news reports at least in the US if not elsewhere globally as well. This is especially true when not counting the heinou…
/r/MensRights21/12/25 07:07 PM
7

Meaning what? I'll trust (potentially foolishly) presuming you're not afraid of factual truths.
/r/MensRights21/12/25 08:08 AM
3

Any woman coming at it from that perspective I guarantee is a hard-leaning feminist, and likely a (not-so) closet misandrist. Being a wife, mother, and homemaker (in that order) is THE greatest privilege AND honor any woman could possibly fulfill and embody. That the West, and especially western women, have been convinced otherwise is literally the deconstructing of what made the West good, strong, and beautiful in the first place. Any woman that carries on like that might as well admit she hate…
/r/MensRights20/12/25 11:33 PM
2

Well done. Ultimately, everyone (well, almost everyone) who once considered themselves an "ally" to the feminist "movement" reaches some sort of breaking point where they finally 'see the light' and recognize all the lies and horrific consequences the feminist ideology have brought upon western society overall, as well as themselves individually. Better now than later. Exactly right. Anything masculine, boys and Men, are considered trash (and that's being polite about it). The false narrative th…
/r/MensRights20/12/25 10:48 PM
20

One thing to constantly remember... the feminist ideology and any of its hardcore adherents if not in the beginning then certainly across time become MASTERS in the art of projection. Every human has faults and has perpetual room for improvement in some ways. However, when the problem is always someone else... ALWAYS??... no, that's a them problem. At that point, nothing such a person says (be they male OR female) has any value or even an appropriate level of applicability to whatever they're tr…
/r/MensRights20/12/25 06:21 PM
1

Very possibly, the way things are looking. Wherever it's happening, as long as enough profoundly rigorous fight back is enacted whether by government or self-motivated citizenry... it's possible there is still a chance at overcoming all of it. There are a lot of speculations flying in either direction about it all.
/r/MensRights19/12/25 04:30 PM
1

So sad... the UK is lost (nearly)... but with a large enough fight there is still a chance to conquer the ideological takeover.
/r/MensRights19/12/25 02:15 AM
1

(CONT'D) I know anyone that says what I just did will get hate and ridicule... until people do enough research into the history and foundations of the party but, more importantly, the ideologies and social contagions that its fallen prey to. Now, that being said... the machinations behind the organizations of EVERY party obviously and sadly do and will likely always contain some measure of corruption because every person is fallen and corruptible. It is ultimately VERY hard to be and remain cons…
/r/MensRights18/12/25 05:36 PM
1

I don't... or, at least I didn't used to. As a general rule – I've usually always allowed for the fact that any party is made up of individuals. Thus, each individual should be judged based upon their own words and actions. HOWEVER... particularly in recent years (but, yes, historically always) it's all too true and obvious that both as a party as well as (certainly not all because that's never the case with virtually any group, but...) the vast majority of individuals in it, the Democrat party …
/r/MensRights18/12/25 05:36 PM
8

feminism.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 08:17 AM
15

Yeah that, itself, will contribute to that very misogyny forming in boys. Plus, seeing that the article is from the UK... not exactly shocking at this point.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 07:13 AM
1

Re. heading: To accurately answer that... there's not a number for it. Since children are not born with prejudice... if a young girl isn't yet trained to dislike boys by primary school... there is so much indoctrination in the world from every angle (peers, family, school, work, as well as print, broadcast, and digital media... among others)... there is no escaping it for anyone at least by adulthood starting from the moment of birth. The only real hope anyone has is growing up in a secure and l…
/r/MensRights17/12/25 01:13 AM
5

Re. heading: That is, of course, if they even recognize they have responsibility at all in the first place. That's a big factor as well.
/r/MensRights16/12/25 08:00 PM
4

Right, so all the students are essentially guaranteed to either be taught inaccurately and/or have inaccurate ideology forced into the seemingly unrelated curriculum. But that's alright because, by the time they reach those courses, they likely will have already been completely brainwashed by woke leftism anyway.
/r/MensRights16/12/25 07:31 PM
3

Not entirely sure what you might mean by "trying out dudes"... but as I am 100% hetero, I don't really have that option. lol Each to their own though, I guess. Whatever works.
/r/MensRights16/12/25 07:22 PM
57

Another clueless leftist feminist (at that point it doesn't even matter if they're male or female)... and... yet one more Male victim of a gynocentric society and legal system. So then, we can genuinely ask... who precisely has all the "privilege"? AT LEAST in this context, if not a great deal more... it sure as hell isn't Men. Hint: it never was. Added thought: No shade on those dudes... but I think I'll be avoiding the snip. Instead, I'll just employ a couple things called personal discipline …
/r/MensRights16/12/25 03:57 AM
2

Exactly right. Maybe the worst part is... that those people (at least on the surface) aren't "bad" people and in most other areas of life are usually fairly civil and well-meaning, law-abiding(-ish) people is what keeps those people from seeing anything wrong with (if even recognizing at all about) holding these feminist views... (most aren't even aware of that)... so 'of course' they're perfectly fine people. For the record, nobody is "perfectly fine". Every human is flawed and every human prov…
/r/MensRights15/12/25 04:53 PM
6

No thanks. And this CANNOT stand in court. Btw... don't blame this on the Republican party. Blame it on the FEMALE covert feminist legislator. Okay, don't listen to this guy with his criticisms of the Republican party. He'd say the same if it was the other party. This isn't a Republican issue. It's an issue having to do with that woman legislator and not enough Male perspective injected into it. Hammer back at that woman, not the party. By definition... she's RINO (Republican In Name Only). I gu…
/r/MensRights15/12/25 05:06 AM
3

Yeah, how about a law (in Europe as well as the US) that makes it illegal to convert post-activity "regret" into alleged retroactive lack of consent? That would be super-duper great if they could go ahead and do that. (inferred eye-roll intended) Fun times. It's not surprising to see more anti-Male legislation still being pushed. Btw... if it passes, it'll never survive for long. It's wholly counterintuitive to how human nature works.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 04:10 AM
9

Nope. As I said, I was generalizing. It's just an unfortunate fact that so many woke-indoctrinated feminist misandrist also tend to lean heavy into prejudice (of ALL kinds). They'd never admit it because to confront them with their damaged biases would be "offensive" to them (ironically). But again, that was merely one potential quality many of them develop through the influence of the ideology. For example... go look up why 'Planned Parenthood' even started up in the first place (profoundly pro…
/r/MensRights15/12/25 03:55 AM
9

As far as I can tell... whether they're male or female... they (generally speaking) tend to fall into two camps: Either only the casually surface-level informed what feminism is based on what amounts to social hearsay (which also includes the quality of content within university textbooks), so they're still deluded that it's merely about "rights" and "opportunities" (which, btw, all women already had before the vote). AT BEST, this is the most benign version of feminist out there. However, give …
/r/MensRights15/12/25 01:21 AM
1

🤣 Good luck with that. Oh, My mistake. This is in the UK? 😖 Yeah... good luck with that (but to the other folks).
/r/MensRights14/12/25 01:53 AM
2

Anybody have any bets precisely to what degree the curriculum will also be taught the other way around? Yeah, didn't think so. Don't blame ya.
/r/MensRights13/12/25 08:20 PM
3

Well done, man. That and other situations like it nothing short of brutal, to say the least. That's what being a warrior for Your family looks like. Bravo. 🤝
/r/MensRights12/12/25 07:08 PM
7

Already? It's far more like since its inception. Everything about feminism and leftism has ALWAYS fought against anything and everything Man and Masculinity going back at least two centuries. So the profoundly recent "gender studies" departments which birthed these anti-life pro-death ANTI-MAN students could've been (and, in fact, were) predicted since before Steinem got behind a podium.
/r/MensRights12/12/25 02:28 AM
5

Vaguely familiar. I just did a quick web search as a refresher. Yes, a very fascinating story, and very brave and proper women showing exemplary loyalty to their Men. Any truly good woman of loyalty and integrity would easily say she'd do the same for her Man.
/r/MensRights12/12/25 01:07 AM
11

ALL of this is based on the lies fed to society for over two centuries by feminism; fueled by self-important hubris. No, being a homemaker (yes, home MAKER... making it a home, not merely a residence)... is not the ONLY thing women are for or capable of being or doing. However... being a wife, mother, and homemaker (in that order) for a good Man who also takes care of His family and household, helping Him properly raise healthy and strong-in-character children... could LITERALLY not be a more no…
/r/MensRights11/12/25 09:52 PM
1

Exactly. It's a very controversial topic, but the statement in the image makes the assumption that Men are never victims of abuse, assault, even murder by the hands and actions of women. Worse yet, some of the worst things women ever do to Men never involves laying a hand on them... yet the outcome is often worse. Too often it drives the Man to end Himself out of despair from false allegations (which happen WAYYYYY too often), being legally and financially rayped in divorce and child custody cou…
/r/MensRights11/12/25 04:38 AM
-1

Men are masculine by default... it's only a question of (from 0-100) to what degree, about what, and why. Men have to be strong... yes, always... for Themselves as well as others; regardless whether or not they're in relationships, etc. Others still depend upon good Men. Similar to the above, however, it's not as if it has to be perpetually turned up to 100. It's a question of priorities. What requires the most masculine strength and resolve the most, at what time, for what reason, and for what …
/r/MensRights11/12/25 02:48 AM
1

I'd almost wager FAR less than claim that they do... if they, deep down, were truly honest about it. Too many of them are just trying to be "sneaky fuckers" (an actual term) aka trying to gain women's favor in order to potentially gain (eventual) sexual access. It's actually really sad how often this is true. It's even more sad how often (though, of course, less often anymore than some might suspect) some less savvy girls fall for it. That's what a good Father *and* mother are for to prepare and…
/r/MensRights10/12/25 05:37 AM
1

99.5% The other half-percent is the part of foolish women and benevolent but also weak men who each bought into the ideology enough to steer the world to where it currently is.
/r/MensRights09/12/25 11:03 PM
2

Respectfully... Re. heading: Disagreed, fully. Re. post body: Disagreed, partially. The lives of women are, in no way, more valuable than those of Men OR of children. If there is one point in the universe (and I say this as a Patriarchist) where "equality" truly exists, it's in the value and dignity of every human life without regard for sex, age, or culture. Abuse of any type, SA or otherwise, is not "gendered". Don't believe Me? Go ask Erin Pizzey. It happens to Men as much as (or, in some cas…
/r/MensRights09/12/25 10:58 PM
2

Too often, yes. However, most institutions of higher learning (if not also high school or even lower still)... boys and young Men just aren't taken seriously overall. Most campuses are profoundly left-leaning and overrun by feminist propaganda if not outright misandry. So the 'cry-me-a-river- response too often is felt or outright spoken to young Men with issues of virtually any kind. Those outlier professors and/or counselors who are NOT this way are to be commended... but, rest assured, they a…
/r/MensRights08/12/25 09:02 PM
2

🙄
/r/MensRights08/12/25 08:58 PM
11

How so? Evidence would suggest otherwise, in most cases.
/r/MensRights08/12/25 08:46 PM
16

I'm sure this notion has been stated here already... However it can absolutely be argued that most crimes against Men are, in fact, some variation of misandry.
/r/MensRights08/12/25 08:00 PM
7

Answer in one word: feminism. You're welcome.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 06:13 PM
3

Of course they are.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 09:02 AM
2

The key takeaway is that EVERYONE is either violent and/or *capable* of violence against another. Even (and probably especially) the most timid people we know definitely fall under that banner. The best Men are the most capable of violence yet also the most self disciplined and controlled. Such Men know what violence looks like and how it can end, so they're always the last to instigate but... if necessary, often the most prepared to end it. So I always find it laughably offensive to base claims…
/r/MensRights04/12/25 06:44 AM
4

That's based on assumption and insecurity. So tf what if a woman laughs at you? You don't need 'em. They need YOU. That some women believe that is the product of completely baseless propaganda. More Men are killed and assaulted by other Men than women ever are. There's a reason why lesbian same-sex marriages have the highest rate of divorces. Men are not the problem to the degree as they're made out to be in the media anymore than anybody else is. The fact is that women are just as lethal as are…
/r/MensRights04/12/25 02:27 AM
3

Re. post heading... that could not possibly be more accurate. As you've described it, so it is AND as it's literally always been since its inception long before the term 'feminism' was even coined and in common use.
/r/MensRights02/12/25 05:52 AM
1

Well done. Quite right. It's always beautifully refreshing to see a woman who finally understands the truth behind the principles of genuine Patriarchy, and not the fetishized version or the false boogie-man narrative feminism dishes out. Every lie feminism tells the world, authentic Patriarchy proves it is the solution for and both is and has always been far more pro-woman than most give it credit for. In a profoundly reciprocal fashion, it's Men taking care of women and women taking care of Me…
/r/MensRights02/12/25 05:31 AM
1

Life is fully documented as beginning at conception, and humans are endowed by their Creator rights (which, at least in the US, the Constitution protects) to life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. Thus, I'm against voluntary cessation of a baby's life outside of the most extreme genuine life-or-death emergency room sorts of situations. Even then, it should be avoided when possible. Where necessary, post-delivery adoption should always remain available. Plus, safe and anonymous emergency child …
/r/MensRights30/11/25 05:46 AM
3

100% incorrect on all counts. Have your opinions, sure, but educate yourself more fully before claiming you actually know what you're talking about. In this case, you don't.
/r/MensRights26/11/25 01:18 AM
12

Shhhhhhhhhocking. OF COURSE feminists would give you crap about that. Notice, I didn't way 'women', I said feminists. Those aren't always the same thing, thankfully. And let's be real... those giving you trouble about that are likely far more accurately labeled as misandrists. To the bystander reader wanting to scoff and give rebuttal at that notion... yes, misandry is a real thing... and yes, it does FAR more damage than whatever false narrative you have of so-named "THE (evil oppressive) patri…
/r/MensRights21/11/25 11:40 PM
3

One primary problem is a general disagreement on what "gender roles" even means. There is a DNA, lizard-brain-level wiring that all of us (by and large) have on a biological level that simply cannot be socialized away. As humans, both Men and women are apt to occasionally behave in 'toxic' ways. Thus, 'toxic masculinity' is no more real than is 'toxic femininity'. Some people are toxic sometimes and that's where that issue ends. Whether people want to accept it or not, men are hardwired to want …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/23 07:56 AM
7

First of all, somebody needs to show her there is a prime difference between 'boys' and 'Men'. Real Men know how to be respectful, but also not take shyte from little bratty girls like her. That one is nothing close to a genuine responsible, respectful, and respectable woman. "Modern" women are the source of their own hell. The problem with that is their hell is like a virus that makes life hell for others around them. And may gawd save your soul if you do have a daughter. In your current mindse…
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/23 02:47 AM
2

With factual statistics about how often women rape (yes, rape) men as well as other women. It drives me crazy, btw, that the law usually reads "rape" as solely nonconsensual vaginal penetration when rape really is any form unwanted and forced sexual penetration. Technically, males have just as many holes in their bodies as do females. So, there's that. But, yes, sexual "assault" can be anything (including rape) that is unsolicited and forcibly delivered. HOWEVER... mental and emotional assault i…
/r/MensRights15/08/22 10:30 PM
1

"Culturally framed"? "Culture" as in everybody... including you. So, then... you also mean that as in virtually globally, right? After all, most of the world has (sadly) become socially Westernized by now. Btw, Men resist marriage these days most largely because of homo sapiens not unlike yourself. The only way marriage is of genuine benefit to both women and Men is when they're BOTH of the same ride-or-die mindset in which divorce is just not on the table. However, tragically, that is apparentl…
/r/AntiFeminists15/08/22 09:18 PM
5

Textbook definition of willful denial and total disregard for obvious facts.
/r/AntiFeminists15/08/22 09:05 PM
2

This appears clearly polarizing in that these women are (generally speaking) split between those who are smart enough to understand why they (probably) shouldn't... and... those who are grade-A, fists-raised, 'you go girl', feminist hypocrites who will blame everything on everyone (mostly Male) rather than where the blame properly exists... their own choices in life... which, btw, is generally true for every other Earth-dwelling homo sapien. But oh, no, not them... they float above the ground an…
/r/AntiFeminists05/08/22 06:59 PM
0

Then the chances are equally high that they'll die childless and alone, too. And, for the record... when I say 'childless', even if offspring are generated, chances are high they'll be stripped from their birth parents in short order.
/r/AntiFeminists05/08/22 06:48 PM
31

And with that attitude, she'll die childless and alone. At least she has the right name. #shutupmeg
/r/AntiFeminists05/08/22 04:27 AM
1

Right. Then they complain about how they can't understand why they're still single... or single again.
/r/MensRights02/08/22 03:11 AM
1

💯
/r/AntiFeminists30/07/22 03:13 AM
7

This same BS is happening in the US even as I type this, and has been for decades. No matter where this happens, or the excuses for it, it is wholly indefensible.
/r/AntiFeminists29/07/22 11:12 PM
2

Some, in fact, are. The only people telling women not to not get married... are other women.
/r/AntiFeminists29/07/22 10:59 PM
2

The award she "earned" from designing that is effectively life's participation trophy for being female. Good on ya... you made a flat surface on which to rest human buttocks. But I've seen people (female and Male alike, including Myself) lounge sideways (arm-to-arm) across a living room recliner. So... 'life will find a way'. Also... that smug look on her face, she might as well make use of her chair Mork-from-Ork-style. (look that up, kids) lol
/r/AntiFeminists27/07/22 02:11 AM
0

The real unfortunate truth is that the people she's referring to aren't actually Men, at all. They're asshats and children. Genuine Men don't have time to be bothered behaving that way... unless, of course, the girl makes it known she enjoys it (however unlikely that might be).
/r/AntiFeminists22/07/22 03:57 AM
1

It's a shame that account was deleted. The person should've embraced the courage to maintain it, even if as a private and separate account from that all their other acquaintances and associates are familiar with. These are beautiful words of revelation and discovery... that should be happening far more often.
/r/AntiFeminists16/07/22 11:39 PM
2

Agreed. However, I would modify your comment by saying "there's nothing in society-at-large incentivizing women to be good women." It's all in the priorities driven by an individual's personal set of values, whether developed on their own and/or nurtured through the earliest years of being raised. But yes, absolutely, society is all about me-me-me... especially where it comes to the female half of the population.
/r/AntiFeminists16/07/22 03:23 AM
17

#notwrong It's important to notice, too, that most 'abortion clinics' are located within walking distance of lower-income neighborhoods. Why? Hmm. But also, statistically, the majority of abortions have been received by the top-most earning women... rather than lower-income woc, etc., etc., as the narrative often goes. So, yeah... tough pill to swallow for some but, overall, the post in the image above isn't wrong. Men get pressed all-the-time about personal responsibility. How commonly is that …
/r/AntiFeminists15/07/22 08:33 PM
1

👍
/r/AntiFeminists15/07/22 06:58 PM
1

Precisely. Now, I would never go as far as actually proclaim that much. However, I will always and accurately proclaim that every woman is absolutely capable of being one... just as every Man is fully capable of having moments driven by assholery.
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/22 10:53 PM
10

🤬🤬🤬
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 04:26 AM
0

Way to be childishly condescending. No, I'm proud of you. ​ But maybe not.
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 10:16 PM
6

"some"
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 08:13 PM
1

lol Yeah, okay.
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 08:10 PM
1

Clearly blind and only seeing what it wants to see. That's one of the main potential problems with the Internet and search engines overall. Confirmation bias. Of course what she read supported her own personal thesis. But, I can almost guarantee it, even what she did read she wildly misinterpreted. Virtually 0% of anything in its post is accurate... just her own hate-filled propaganda. That post is proof why (apart from those women who claim the label of feminist who, in fact, are barely surface…
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 07:11 PM
1

Except that that's exactly what she's trying to turn that into. It's ridiculous. I'm no fan of every law that comes out of Texas or even Florida, but there is a serious lack of logical thinking at play. That's why this article is very accurately placed in a subreddit like this.
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 06:31 PM
-1

Yeah, okay, you're right. 🙄
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 06:28 PM
-1

Regardless of the politics... it's still a textbook definition of when entitlement meets simply missing the entire point of that lane's purpose.
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 01:54 AM
1

I've heard of this before and seen images of it... but still every single time I'm reminded it's a real thing I feel the same way. 🤬
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 07:41 PM
3

No, for all that BS... she better be the one forking over the cash. But, also no. Not gonna happen. I can pretty much guarantee, any man willing to do all that she's not gonna want anyway.
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 10:06 AM
2

Excellent! FAR more 'daytime talk show' Hosts NEED to take this stance. Just call the ENTIRE audience out on the carpet the second any snickering begins.
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 04:00 AM
6

Yeah... I love how their heading is "hope she'll be okay"... and not something more appropriate like wtaf. What about those EIGHTEEN people she and her boyfriend killed? Right. Crickets. Yay feminism. 🙄🤬
/r/AntiFeminists04/07/22 08:46 PM
3

her right to resist forced marriage? Yes, okay. Run away. Emigrate. Something. her right to murder people? No, not okay, arguably in any society. I get the laws and religious culture there can be quite extreme, but lowering herself to that level just proves the influence of 'poisonous' (pun intended) feminist ideology. Yes, I have pity and sympathy for the plight she was in, but that doesn't excuse the extremes she took to retaliate. With the help of a (no doubt male feminist) 'boyfriend', no le…
/r/AntiFeminists04/07/22 08:38 PM
2

The truly pathetic part is they'd likely react the same if you said that to them but reversed the genders. And the choir sang: HYYYYYP - AWWW - CRIIII - SYY - YYY - YYY - YYYYYYY!!
/r/AntiFeminists30/06/22 09:06 PM
1

It's pretty obvious. That doesn't require further explanation.
/r/AntiFeminists30/06/22 09:00 PM
2

☝️
/r/AntiFeminists29/06/22 08:13 PM
5

I mean... I get it. But 'cmon, illegally defacing property is hardly the proper way. And let's face it, apart from this one massively important issue, women are protected in FAR greater and more numerous ways than Men are, or possibly every will be. All the feminist rhetoric just gets old really fast when it becomes plain that what you're fighting for is your own interest, period. End of story. Introduce even the idea of Men and suddenly you're just as ugly as the recent SCOTUS decision.
/r/AntiFeminists29/06/22 08:09 PM
1

I do fight for particular rights, among other things. I vote. So, there's that. I know it's not the only way to 'protest', etc., and some may say it's even the least effective... depending. But, sadly, I know too many who just don't bother to do even that much. So at least I feel like I'm part of the process.
/r/AntiFeminists29/06/22 12:07 AM
3

1,000% That is a grade-A clear example of the absolute absence of "male privilege" especially where family courts are concerned. Things are (slowly) getting better, but nothing close to how far female-based legislation has come... of course, with the heinously ridiculous exception of what's happening currently. Outside of that, however, it's not even close how much women have it over Men, by and large.
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 09:54 PM
3

🤬 I know there are plenty of dudes out there that play ding-dong-dash with women's vaginas. But JFC... when it's the Men actually trying to be honorable and properly Fatherly, they also get shytted upon as if They're those other man-boys. As an only child of a single mother who, she and I, were both deserted by my so-called father before I was even two years of age and living the challenges that creates in a boy's and man's life... now, especially as an older adult, I simply cannot avoid empathy…
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 07:06 PM
4

That one's probably gonna be lonely. I mean... the 'f-u' attitude coming off of that image alone is enough to make a guy cross the street a block away.
/r/AntiFeminists28/06/22 05:22 AM
8

Agreed.
/r/AntiFeminists27/06/22 04:44 AM
29

100% At best, it's straight-up gaslighting. At worst (and, sadly, likely most frequently), it is pure malevolent butthurt attempts at retribution which too often is successful when a man commits suicide after the court takes away his kids, or he is falsely accused, or, or, or, or... any combination of the sick things men get unjustifiably labeled by most usually without a single shred of evidence. Naturally, we don't have to go very far to find clear examples of this.
/r/AntiFeminists27/06/22 03:23 AM
3

🤬🤬🤬
/r/AntiFeminists22/06/22 03:39 AM
3

Connor is My hero for this Monday morning.
/r/AntiFeminists13/06/22 05:34 PM
1

🤣🤣 you're here TOO! What's that say then? JFC!
/r/AntiFeminists13/06/22 05:26 PM
2

Yeah, of course... everyone will be divorcing their Men... except you. Right? Right. Clearly the logic escapes them that if Men will be left alone, et. al., therefore... so will they... regardless of their claims to the alternative. Human nature simply is what it is. Stop fooling yourselves. Homo sapiens are meant to have companionship. Crack a book.
/r/AntiFeminists13/06/22 05:23 PM
2

And the choir sang... 🎶 H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-S-YYYYY!!! 🎶
/r/AntiFeminists13/06/22 05:17 PM
1

With that, I agree fully.
/r/AntiFeminists12/06/22 10:08 PM
2

Very much the opposite, actually. With respect, whether it was intended or otherwise, your comment does come off suspiciously feminist in nature. The fact is that, overall, courts are still heinously in favor of women, more specifically mothers (and whether such an individual is deserving of a favorable finding or not). Thankfully, however, that is (too slowly, but still is) changing. While there are always exceptions... by and large, the courts are in favor of whatever side can present the most…
/r/AntiFeminists12/06/22 08:18 PM
2

Right, clearly another broken sect that never bothers to consider THE FACTS OF REALITY! And, I can almost guarantee it, not one of them watched the entirety of the recent trial and/or recognized what was proven there.
/r/AntiFeminists12/06/22 06:28 PM
2

Well then... if the online communities are that bad, there's no reason to think it's any different IRL... because it's not. Welcome to the light, btw.
/r/AntiFeminists11/06/22 07:01 PM
5

I'm not surprised by their reaction at all. In fact, if I walked into the proverbial belly of the beast like that... I'd pretty much expect to be "cancelled" in such a manner. It's their safe space where logic and reason are works of fiction and fantasy in their small minds.
/r/AntiFeminists11/06/22 06:56 PM
6

Oh, yeah! AH is totally a victim. But of HERSELF! She's magically sociopathically convinced herself that she's the victim of the ENTIRE world. 🙄 She needs to grow TF up! Entire cities in Ukraine are dead and dying and all she can cry on about are her many-times-disproven allegations... oh, right, and that supposed money she "pledged". Well, here I am "pledging" an arse-ton of respect to her right now. Enough with the "imperfect" crap! EVERYONE is imperfect. That's what it is to be human. So stop…
/r/AntiFeminists07/06/22 01:28 AM
10

I don't really care what they think because any female with such a mindset I've no interest in anyway. Besides... "In a partnership, both parties have to contribute in ways that benefit the partnership"... what this individual themselves describes as "fine" with them... she is clearly ASSUMING that there can't possibly 🙄 be any women in the world that want the same things as such a Man which is being referenced. If she doesn't want a life that looks like that... great. Kudos to them. But STOP sh…
/r/AntiFeminists30/05/22 09:26 PM
13

Not only is that blatantly sexist, but clear-as-day racist. I mean... projecting, anyone?
/r/AntiFeminists26/05/22 01:00 AM
2

Differences of opinion are one thing. But, obnoxiously dissenting opinions on this subreddit should be banned post haste. Especially true is when personally attacking the entire page without any justifiable proof; a massive sign of immaturity and, oh yeah, feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists26/05/22 12:01 AM
3

🤬🤬🤬
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/22 11:58 PM
0

Nobody 'confirmed' jack squat... not until this trial. If anything... it's already been 'confirmed' that the UK judge is corrupt and bent the verdict in the favor of the newspaper that published the defamatory piece of "journalism" (using that term very loosely). And I quote... "An obvious conflict of interest Let's face it, the UK trial is a sham. The Judge, Andrew Nichol is intimately connected with Dan Wootton, The Sun's journalist who posted the defamatory allegation that JD was a 'wife beat…
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/22 09:35 PM
9

If he's suffering with that... he's better than that one anyway. Especially if he's merely her 'boyfriend' and not spouse, no kids, etc.... just walk away.
/r/AntiFeminists23/05/22 06:25 AM
11

Was literally about to post the exact same thought.
/r/AntiFeminists23/05/22 06:23 AM
3

I love a good scientific paper based solely on guessing, speculation, and hearsay. Whatever helps them believe their false narratives.
/r/AntiFeminists22/05/22 10:26 PM
16

Of course she's a victim! Duh! BUT... the only person she's truly the victim of... is herself!
/r/AntiFeminists22/05/22 10:24 PM
1

🤬🤬🤬
/r/AntiFeminists22/05/22 09:27 PM
2

First off... enough with this BS "the average" anything. Until a person can show Me empirical data to back up what they're saying... it's purely fictional speculation, which amounts to nothing. And, yes, I mean that whether they be Male or female, feminist or not. I'm not going to 'assume' whether this so-called "cookie goblin" (lesbian, perhaps?) is male or female. But they're clearly a self-proclaimed feminist, and it's ridiculous, the constant hypocrisy demonstrated by such individuals as sho…
/r/AntiFeminists22/05/22 07:14 PM
2

By that logic, I guess they'll all just have to throw out all their dildos (vibrating or not) and male sex mannequins, etc. Oh, let me guess... for them, it's a completely different thing. Right.
/r/AntiFeminists19/05/22 08:56 AM
7

He was a tough love, no nonsense, purveyor of cold hard truth that (ideally) was meant to inspire people (Men and women, alike) to face reality and become better... if, in fact, they chose to accept his advice. If people could look past the no-time-for-BS'ing straight shooting (usually described as hateful by those not paying attention), they would see it all came/comes from a good place, but also from a person who's heard it all and didn't suffer fools.
/r/AntiFeminists18/05/22 03:26 AM
3

Sure. Because we're aaaaaAAAAAAaallllll just the same, right? M'hmm. Right. 🙄 What's all that about 'not all women'? What's that? The same idea doesn't apply to men? Right, okay.
/r/AntiFeminists18/05/22 02:01 AM
2

Then some people still have the gall to wonder what all the commotion is about with the JDvAH trail... landmark case! Hey, girls... IT CAN'T BE BOTH WAYS. It's called 'equality' not 'equality when it's convenient for you.' If you truly want equality... swallow the bitter pill of reality.
/r/AntiFeminists17/05/22 10:35 PM
8

The goth white girl [1:34] seems to have a solid decent mindset. That one black girl [1:42]… He asks=He pays, she asks=she pays, but she'd never split the bill... UNLESS He was her Man? Uhh, right... but how TF does He become your Man with that mindset? 🙄 Srsly. And STOP with the making assumptions. That black dude, dating coach [2:18] is right, in My book. Cackling Soviet white girl... does she think this was her acting reel??? wtaf Is that Asian girl on speed? tf Blonde girl... grade-A feminis…
/r/AntiFeminists15/05/22 10:53 PM
1

👍
/r/AntiFeminists12/05/22 09:53 PM
1

Yeah, again you're both wrong and ignorant. Go take a nap, kid. Come back when you've grown up.
/r/AntiFeminists11/05/22 06:38 PM
8

> "Hi. I'd like one helping of Hep-C." > "Yes, miss, coming right up." If you can't trust your new partner with that information, maybe you shouldn't have done it in the first place. And/or... once they do find out, the next inevitable thought is 'what else might they be hiding from me?' Purposely being deceptive, for any reason, is 180° from a win-win.
/r/AntiFeminists11/05/22 06:35 PM
1

With respect... it's a lot easier for a person to get their point across if they format their comments considerably easier on the eyes into lines, and paragraphs, etc., rather than presenting them as a large brick of text. Just for thought.
/r/AntiFeminists11/05/22 06:50 AM
1

Alright, first off... I don't know you, so I have no reason to claim that you're anything. I never once called you a feminist. I merely described the way what you wrote came across. "...being feminist isn’t a bad thing." Wrong. End of story. Full stop. It, in fact, is destructive. If a person looks around enough they'll see that feminism is at least as harmful to women as it is to Men. It's not about equality, and it ultimately never has been. It's about female supremacy. (Hello, pot? Meet kettl…
/r/AntiFeminists11/05/22 06:34 AM
1

Right but, whether you mean it or not, your words are directly out of the feminist handbook. Btw, just because a highly prominent legal right is currently being contested (which I totally get the vitriol over the major hot-button issue), women still are not losing all of their basic human rights. I would easily add that Men have far fewer rights in other areas than women have ever had for decades. Yet when Men try to speak up about particular applicable issues, feminists too often swarm out in p…
/r/AntiFeminists09/05/22 03:40 AM
8

Right... and then they act confounded when people act disgusted at feminism. Like, duh! Hey, feminists in denial... get off your high horses and smell the scat-covered roses!
/r/AntiFeminists08/05/22 01:41 AM
1

No, you clearly didn't read and interpret correctly what I actually said. But that's all good. I don't have any control over anyone else's ability to do that. The facts are, ultimately, if there are romantic feelings... the human impulse is to lead eventually to physical/sexual attraction at least on some level, even if only holding hands. Thus, it stands to reason. Besides, you're still not contradicting what I said in the beginning anyway. Not a problem. Have a good one.
/r/AntiFeminists08/05/22 01:37 AM
1

Right, and that's not in disagreement with what I just commented. That's all good.
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/22 11:53 PM
2

Right, exactly. Look, I have no issues with anyone who might not sit cleanly under the umbrellas of hetero- or homosexual. More are like that than might be thought, and it's all good. So, IF they were romantically attracted BUT both completely a-sexual... then just maybe I can see that. But that's relatively rare as far as society typically is aware. Beyond that... if two individuals of a same gender are fnoking... most obviously they're homosexual (which is totally fine) but, at very least, the…
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/22 11:46 PM
4

My guess is nobody will miss that one. Besides, any properly-minded women that Men would genuinely be interested in likely aren't on Tinder in the first place.
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/22 10:02 PM
3

That still doesn't justify broad-brush hatred for an entire gender, much less an entire group of any sort. No one group acts any one way, or is responsible for any one thing. In that respect, women are and have been just as responsible arguably for as many heinous behaviors as Men are and have been... just different things. Figuratively speaking, many of them are (effectively) the Iago to Shakespeare's Othello. The unfortunate part is most of 'their' less than ideal behaviors don't make it into …
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/22 09:59 PM
2

There's really nothing wrong with 'demisexual' as it's a legit state of sexual/romantic attraction to others. BUT... what really got Me was its nerve to put 'bisexual' in front of and in addition to it. Like SO many other things those creatures feel entitled to pull, YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS. Either claim one label or the other. To put both is, at best, confusing and, at worst, disingenuous.
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/22 09:51 PM
4

That thing inside its skull that it got instead of a proper brain.
/r/AntiFeminists07/05/22 09:43 PM
7

a'la Sam Jackson: Critical thinking... can you do it?! Answer: Clearly not.
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/22 09:09 PM
2

🤣 And the choir sang... HY-POCRI-SYYYYY!
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/22 04:30 PM
2

#brittlespirit For a group often talking about 'womaning-up'... they could take their own advice.
/r/AntiFeminists30/04/22 10:19 PM
5

This, folks, is textbook delusion... believing only what they want to believe. Would be nice if said post writer (and their ilk) bothered to consider actual facts. I'll be the first to agree that genuine abuse in any context is wrong... but also that it DOES happen whether by man or woman. BOTH are capable and often responsible for it. DV is not even close to being purely a male-on-female issue. Those are the facts.
/r/AntiFeminists28/04/22 03:25 AM
29

Right... then they act butthurt and confused when Men won't talk to them at work unless forced to, or flirt with them much less pay them any attention socially, or won't react to their online dating profiles, or... or... or... Yeah, Men have had it with that BS. By and large, only the women that know how to actually be adult and respectful are those that Men gravitate toward. Frankly, Shane was making a very valid point. But VDM's only comeback was snark. The only "children" I see in that image …
/r/AntiFeminists27/04/22 08:57 PM
2

So, the question must then be asked... if organizations lead profoundly by misguided feminist ideology have so much control over who sees what on powerful platforms like YouTube, how in the world can those that follow feminist ideology justifiably claim that Men and so-called Male privilege hold the vast majority of the power? Answer: they can't. That math just doesn't check out, and any rational mind (very few of which are apparently being dealt with in these situations) can see that. Equality.…
/r/AntiFeminists27/04/22 08:37 PM
0

Right. I'm not in disagreement with what you're saying. My response was specifically to the sentiment in the image. If you're genuinely happy with your life, then that's good.
/r/AntiFeminists19/04/22 08:43 PM
1

Right. I'm not in disagreement with what you're saying. My response was specifically to the sentiment in the image. If you're genuinely happy with your life, then that's good.
/r/AntiFeminists19/04/22 08:43 PM
0

Right. Either be a grateful and proper housewife and mother... or be "free" (aka alone and miserable) and completely abandon your post and responsibilities. The only ones that begrudge the joy and, indeed, the privilege of true motherhood are those that don't understand what they're missing without it, and don't really deserve it anyway with that attitude. But, oh, let someone try to tear their kids away from them and suddenly their truer colors shine. Btw... stop speaking for Men unless you are…
/r/AntiFeminists19/04/22 07:37 PM
2

That's gotta be chargeable in some way, right?? Just the threat of it... and posted on Twitter, no less. The guy JUST wants some ink art on his body. WTF did he actually do to her? NOTHING! Oh, boo-hoo... he annoyed you with language. It's not like he threatened your physical well being or anything.
/r/AntiFeminists16/04/22 04:34 AM
0

Exactly... I am, at least in part, with u/Moldy_Gecko and u/Mycroft033 on this. Unless you wish it to merely be your opinion (which opinions, as W/we all know, are ultimately worthless beyond some expression of catharsis), you might want to present actual factual information as basis for your opinion. To claim patronage of a sex worker is somehow 'abusive' toward Men is to, frankly, ignore that actual statistical crime data about how often sex workers are the victims of abuse, and on various lev…
/r/AntiFeminists14/04/22 09:04 PM
0

In your opinion. And that's all it is, is an opinion. Ultimately, any sub's Mods have the ultimate authority just as if it was a subreddit you had created and were in charge of. So, while a Mod's response may be one an individual may (understandably or not) dislike, it is still our job to respect it and just move forward. That's why it is always advisable to proofread (with a cool head) before clicking that send/reply button.
/r/AntiFeminists14/04/22 08:55 PM
1

Present current and verifiable stats, as you suggest, or your point has no merit. At best, the ratio between Men and women who are victims of physical violence both in general, especially at the hands of females, and even more so their female relationship partners, is nearly equal. That it is thought of as any differently is itself a major problem, and that's one kind of 'equality' the world does not and will never need.
/r/AntiFeminists14/04/22 08:50 PM
0

Okay, listen... you completely misread what I said, and your chastisement is ridiculously unwarranted and unnecessary. I said nothing about a 'free pass'. What I did say was exactly matching your point. AND... I said nothing about him punching anyone being 'right'. What I did say was that it's understandable... not justified, but understandable. Overreaction? Not in the least. His reaction was completely valid and human. Any one of us might've potentially reacted in the same way given similar ci…
/r/AntiFeminists14/04/22 08:42 PM
1

Okay... right. Skin color means nothing. The SIZE of the dude should be ENOUGH for that couple to chill. This, right here? This is a portrait of entitlement and a Man who'd had about enough. Sure, using violence (publicly) on any level is never cool (in most circumstances). But I challenge anyone to put themselves in that guy's shoes. And, yes, then remember that he's black Man in America... simply there trying to enjoy a friggin' ball game, like everyone else. I don't know what started the inte…
/r/AntiFeminists13/04/22 06:16 PM
3

It's not exactly as if nobody had any warning.
/r/AntiFeminists12/04/22 07:22 PM
1

Step one, world: PROOF READ! O....mg! Not only in this case, but almost across the board with most people, do at least a quick once-over before hitting send. Do Google searches on words and phrases that seem 'off' (even if they're correct). Even then, if you catch an error don't just let 'em fly. Hit that edit button and fix it ASAP. The insane degree of the mixture between misguided self-confidence, self-entitlement, and complete intellectual ineptitude is dizzying. THIS special flower is a tex…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/02/22 08:48 PM
9

Anyone with locked-and-loaded defensive responses to the most benign and, indeed, actually helpful comments is surely a homo sapien specimen not worth spending any further time around than that one encounter, online or otherwise.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/02/22 07:43 PM
4

Great. I guess next time I go out on a date, I'll need to wear Kevlar. Then they'll know I meant it when I said I was wearing protection.
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 04:37 AM
58

Let's just pause to count how many swings she took (and missed) and how many times he allowed it to happen WHILE holding her off literally at arm's length to avoid unnecessary further conflict. But when he threw her down like a rag doll, nobody in their right mind can justifiably say she didn't deserve it. The video alone should exonerate him completely. That's why every guy needs at least one or two faithful female friends who will get in there, get behind this kind of girl, lock her arms behin…
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 12:24 AM
10

This is some F'ed-up backwards logic and completely indicative of feminism at its core.
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 06:55 PM
1

Except that feminism isn't "normal". It's merely perceived as normal. But... if feminists are (in theory) pro-female... then yes, by that measure, I'm sexist.
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 06:13 AM
1

(insert majestic facepalm here)
/r/MensRights07/02/22 11:10 PM
9

🤣
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/22 04:36 AM
11

(tries to control the internal quiet rage...)
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/22 03:30 AM
3

Neither has anyone, nor can anyone 'create' the Patriarchy. Something that's always existed long before it was even given a name can neither be 'created' nor can it end despite the efforts of anyone. It's as human nature as our very DNA. But, credit where credit is due... at least they got no. 2 correct. Men never have been privileged. Men fought, died, took, made, and built everything they had and have. And today that's called privilege.
/r/AntiFeminists05/02/22 07:14 AM
4

F period T period B period. Those men(?) kept calling the first guy 'inbred', etc., shouting 'fuck your mom' 'fuck your sister'. I'm sure at least a few of the guys in that group were wishing they could. Yeah, I saw zero honor of any kind displayed in this scenario... except perhaps by the One Man who was at the center of the misguided mass hysteria. Frankly... he showed an extraordinary degree of restraint, knowing what he was probably capable of. He was quite literally giving back what He was …
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 01:39 AM
7

Exactly. To be completely honest, when I initially read the image... the question seemed more antifem in spirit and the comment seemed (under normal circumstances) far more of a feminist response in that context. Yet, in their upside down world of truth-doesn't-matter-reality-is-what-we-say-it-is... even a feminist-ish response to (by their measure) a stereotypically male question gets burned at the stake. wtaf FEMINISM IS CANCER!
/r/AntiFeminists29/01/22 07:57 PM
1

I have, a bit. Right, I have My own feelings about that, too.
/r/AntiFeminists26/01/22 08:12 AM
1

This is the US. Yes, as far as I know there is new legislation being either debated or actually enacted making women eligible for the draft. Check reliable news sources for the latest details on it. But that's what the entire "controversy" is all about. Women/feminists fighting for decades to be "equal" to Men. Then they throw a fit whenever they get their wish, but only when it's not in their favor. You can't have it both ways! This proves they don't really want "equality" but preferential trea…
/r/AntiFeminists26/01/22 08:05 AM
2

When the government requires legally eligible I/individuals to enter the military during exceptional periods of war-related activity. The last time it was put into effect was many, many decades ago, but it's still on the law books. In theory, it could still happen anytime if things got bad enough.
/r/AntiFeminists26/01/22 07:40 AM
9

Right... would be nice if Males had that privilege. Oh lol right... I guess We (allegedly) do... according to them. But no, in reality, that's only the domain of females and Male top %ers.
/r/AntiFeminists26/01/22 12:26 AM
5

🤬
/r/AntiFeminists25/01/22 02:08 AM
2

My Body My Choice! {take that, feminazis}
/r/AntiFeminists25/01/22 12:47 AM
1

If you want to turn every intimate act hyper-clinical with no affection or excitement whatsoever... then, fine, fill out this document. Half-way through page one, the desire to mate will have faded. If every Male refuses to mate with every female for a solid year, that will show exactly how ridiculous and, in fact, socially destructive this obsessive level of consent tracking is. If sustained long term, this would be a fast track to massive depopulation, if not complete extinction. The aim of th…
/r/AntiFeminists24/01/22 01:00 AM
1

f.t.s.
/r/AntiFeminists24/01/22 12:53 AM
3

🤬
/r/AntiFeminists18/01/22 10:28 AM
2

fts... lies across the board.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 07:36 AM
1

Personally, I find a female body as natural as possible (and virtually as unshaven as possible) to be sexy, delicious and, yes, even beautiful. However... I cannot stand too much makeup (most of which is completely unnecessary). I don't have an issue with makeup as a general concept. To My mind, if there's enough that can be detected, there's too much of it. It should only be used to accentuate what already exists rather than augment it. I also find it an instant turn-off when females have those…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen15/01/22 05:51 AM
5

This is golden.
/r/AntiFeminists11/01/22 05:50 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter