TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Soulofbuddha Archive

View 4 posts and 275 comments by Soulofbuddha on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

According to reddit its enough to contain ”shocking” or ”offensive” content for a subreddit to get quarantined. Facts doesnt matter, and in those terms I dont think this subreddit is that much different from theredpill
/r/MGTOW02/10/18 05:59 PM
1

yes, minority women especially those from asia including india, become some of the worst types of women in the west, since women adapt to their newfound privileges, but women who had less freedom before really relish in this, and also spit on their own culture and men at the same time and distance themselves from it. This is also partly because asian countries and men are very misrepresented by media in a racist way of course. All women are like this, but the easiest way to realize this is to wi…
/r/MGTOW17/09/18 05:22 AM
4

yes of course the ancient hindus where aware of the nature of men and women, and the reproductive dynamic, the ancient indians where some of the most advanced and intelligent civilizations on earth and one of the first to exist. But hypergamy well works when its controlled. Women need limitations towards their instincts just like men are kept in check. Which is why arranged marriages where a common thing in India and still exists to this day, and the average man had more value and status than th…
/r/MGTOW17/09/18 03:59 AM
2

we can take those rights back if all/most men just collectively told them to stfu and deal with it. The current generation would bitch about it but they have no power to stop us since women are weak. the next generation would be easier to teach early about the fact that men are superior to women.
/r/MGTOW17/09/18 12:01 AM
7

It doesnt happen in India, or at least India is the country with a growing economy with the least ammount of issues of this kind. They are still growing in population because vast majority of their communities still are conservative and the men are still given more authority overall than women, and women are still shamed alot for acting slutty etc, even divorce is looked down upon if a woman does it in India, which is good.
/r/MGTOW16/09/18 06:56 PM
3

men are more intelligent on average than women as well, its not just more men at the extremes.
/r/MGTOW12/09/18 04:49 AM
2

this case is not really a good example though,the second guy is better looking than the first, she would have dated the second guy before getting a kid as well
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/09/18 01:48 PM
4

its sad because the biological reality is that men are vastly superior to women.
/r/MGTOW28/08/18 01:38 PM
5

Im okey with society being gynocentric in that it pushes greater responsibility on men as long as society admits that men are biologically superior to women and allows us to have our natural authority over them. This will happen eventually one way or another.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/08/18 12:20 PM
3

When the economy collapses women will lose their rights anyway, society will technically still be gynocentric but at least it will be a hard patriarchy at the same time.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/08/18 11:36 AM
1

Nah, Asian/indian men get the worst of it.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 03:50 AM
3

Okey I understand, I thought you meant asian women from traditional households are unlikely to initiate divorce. Then there is no disagreement between us 👍🏾
/r/MGTOW14/08/18 08:38 AM
2

I know, but my point was (and it was relevant) that asian women who grow up in such a conservative household are most likely either: 1. Not going to marry a non-asian due to the fact that it also would bring shame onto the household, or 2. Disregard that and marry a non-asian anyway and already bring shame towards the traditional family values, and at that point that kind of woman is unlikely to care about the shame associated with divorce. Btw those female cousins of yours, are they goodlooking…
/r/MGTOW14/08/18 01:54 AM
2

Nah, black people are among the most racist, they just hide out behind their massive victim complex and deflect by saying other races are racist to them. Indians do not want to be white, as in like europeans. skin color and caste/socio-economic background has more to do with the fact that most of the people in power in India where lighter brown compared to those in the south, also the people who where rich/noble/royalty didnt work much and stayed indoors more so they didnt tan as much. Imo hispa…
/r/MGTOW14/08/18 01:07 AM
10

I agree with most of that, however it doesnt seem likely that most of these asian women in the west would care about the shame associated with divorce if they married a white guy or non-asian guy, and a very large ammount of these asian women do marry other races (mostly white men). In such a situation, she is also very likely to divorce you eventually especially if you are a below average white guy who simply managed to get an asian woman due to her selfhate/white worship mentality.
/r/MGTOW14/08/18 01:00 AM
4

Theyre wrong, men/boys are vastly superior to women/girls at math, its a biological fact. The reading and writing difference is pretty much negliable though.
/r/MGTOW09/08/18 02:18 PM
5

its because even they know deep down that men are vastly superior to women biologically, and women are very bitter about it and in denial about it.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 01:02 AM
21

Womans stock is not actually high, they are overinflating their own value. They could always fuck men hotter than themselves, its just that society used to tell women how bad sleeping around with alphas without settling down would be for their future by shaming them. Today they are encouraged to do it but the negative longterm effects are still there, so not much have changed in the end.
/r/MGTOW01/07/18 10:07 AM
1

Men dont associate kindness and warmness with weakness in women though, because we know women are weak regardless of their personality. Men would be fine with dating up socio-economically as well as looks obviously if/when we can, but we almost never can date up in terms of status because women are not attracted to that, and we can only date up in looks if we have significantly higher status/wealth than them.
/r/MGTOW24/06/18 09:09 PM
2

Looks/height are 99% on online dating apps and when you are hunting girls in the clubs and nightlife etc, and the better looking you are the more shit you can get away with. However status and wealth are just as if not more important, if you have that and can prove it, girls will pick you over some average looking guy. That obviously dont work as well on tinder though because its harder to portray status there.
/r/MGTOW24/06/18 09:03 PM
1

I think certain cargo pants look really good when you are just out and about, casual style, combined with a higher quality hoodie and a cap (a regular cap, not those big hip-hop ones).
/r/TheRedPill22/06/18 05:34 PM
1

difference is, men usually have a realistic idea of what type of woman they ”deserve” or are worth. Since we arent hypergamous. We can evaluate looks separately without being influenced by personality and status/wealth. We are also aware that height and strenght, as well as wealth increases our sexual market place value while it doesnt for women. Women however just look at the kardashians etc and realize that there is a small chance they can get a celebrity with riches just as long as they have …
/r/MGTOW18/06/18 05:07 PM
1

Agreed, however these women who supported feminism and wanted their own career and to fuck chads freely, they where not aware of the concept of ”the wall”, and thats why they are doomed. After they hit 30 or so chad will stop giving them attention and with mgtow on the rise soon the betas wont give her anything more than a pump and dump if she tries to hook them at that point. Another thing women didnt realize before felinism is that most of them cannot handle working 5 days a week until they hi…
/r/MGTOW18/06/18 04:59 PM
1

I disagree, after getting redpilled, simply by knowing the truth about how women experience love, made me automatically unable to love women, not because of fear or anything like it, im not afraid in the slightest, but the feeling just doesnt trigger anymore regardless of how good a woman seems to be. They are just not interesting anymore considering they will only be with me on the basis of brifaults law. You give women to much credit in the way yu write, they are not sophisticated in their des…
/r/TheRedPill17/06/18 11:44 AM
5

True, they will usually fuck a guy better and more ”passionately” if he is goodlooking. However, one common thing with hookers is that they become mentally damaged (more so than the average thot) and eventually start to crave some emotional intimacy although only temporarely. If you are a ugly or below average looking guy with a kind aura you can still get lucky and meet a hooker in this state and she will fuck you with passion. many of these hookers have fucked hundreds of men, eventually even …
/r/MGTOW10/06/18 11:03 PM
3

I try to look at it in a positive way, first of all i never like or comment womens pics on social media, very rare exceptions if its someone I have known for a long time buts its only friendly jokes not any compliments. I act like this mainly because i have way to much pride to give women attention which I know they 90% of the time wont truly appreciate. And ultimately this extra attention women get will just make it harder for them to make rational choices and its much more likely for them to m…
/r/MGTOW10/06/18 10:53 PM
1

im not stupid enough to write my personal adress online for anyone to see, if you want to fight come to Arlanda and then we can pick a place from there where I will kill you little whore.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/18 09:27 PM
0

come to sweden, stockholm to be precise, arlanda airport. Let me know when you are there. I dont need any help to kill you. It will take me 10 seconds to make you cry like a little feminine bitch, and just like you are an ugly incel, your mother looks like a disgusting whore.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/18 09:18 PM
1

Im sure they would like to do that but they cannot because i would just chew them up and spit them out and then step on their weak small little bodies. You have mentioned India many times before so its no secret what you meant you pathetic little cocksucking whore. You would never be able to beat me up, I would easily kill you with my bare hands without breaking a sweat, and I would do the same to any woman who tried to fight me.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/18 08:59 PM
0

Nah, such a book would do well in any country that values truth. And India does not smell curry, and its not fucked up and only certain parts are dirty, it doesnt undermine women, women are in their natural place on India since women are naturally inferior to men.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/18 08:53 PM
-1

Its better to argue back at them with a violent tone to make them fear you because deep down they know they dont stand a chance against a man, and even if they think/”know” you wont hit a girl they are still pussies both literally and figuratively so a little threatening bodylanguage tone will often shut them up. Of course in 90% of cases its a waste of time to argue with logic and in a calm manner since feminists are always wrong and they dont care.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/18 05:54 PM
1

nope completely false. Kendrick lamar is short and so was lil wayne, neither has a body that is anything special. Also in addition majority of modern rappers are ugly and not masculine in terms of facial features, which is why they didnt get much if any attention before they got famous. They where not even close to a chad before fame. Its all about knowing the right people and having a decent idea about a song essentially, then if you make a one hit wonder you can milk that for as long as possib…
/r/MGTOW23/05/18 08:14 AM
1

Oh I agree about that to a certain degree, but some of the old school rappers where talented for sure. But like I said its mainly their fame and money that makes them successful with women, and women dont really care if that fame is earned or not, they just want to get a piece of it themselves by riding along.
/r/MGTOW23/05/18 07:41 AM
3

not true, majority of rappers where completely invisible and considered unattractive to women before they got famous and rich due to their musical talents. That includes dudes like Tupac who isnt even close to as badlooking as many of the mumble rappers today. Those guys where not even close to chad before they got famous.
/r/MGTOW23/05/18 07:03 AM
2

You can be mgtow and still ”love” the vagina, im mgtow and engage in casual sex alot. Just avoid relationships and marriage and youre still mgtow as long as you know about redpill truths. This guy youre talking about sounds mgtow unless he means he wants to get married when he talks about finding the right one.
/r/MGTOW10/05/18 01:07 AM
-1

People like to call india cuckistan but at least this region produced Mgtow pioneers, Siddhartha Gautama aka the original Buddha was an indian prince.
/r/MGTOW10/05/18 01:03 AM
3

Nah, He was an alpha, Buddha is described as a good looking indian prince.
/r/MGTOW10/05/18 01:00 AM
1

Men are needed for ”real” reasons by women such as a provider and protector, and to give the sperm and resources to make children and allowing them to grow. in addition to that men are needed by women because they become unhappy being alone, far more so than men do, men are biologically more suited for being alone and thriving like that compared to women. So no, im not confusing anything here.
/r/MGTOW30/04/18 02:36 AM
2

Im not trying to convince you, I already know im 100% correct in what im saying, im just responding so others who may read this know the truth. You are wrong because you made a blanket statement that women wont care or that women dont need men, both statements which are 100% factually wrong and have been proven to be so. Women are unhappy about men not being willing to commit and there are countless of articles being written by women about that subject. As I already said womens happiness have st…
/r/MGTOW30/04/18 02:20 AM
3

It isnt a service although leftists and feminists are trying to make it so because they are basically communists, they want to extract resources from the work men perform and redistribute it to people who dont work and are liabilities (mostly women) However communism never works because it disincentivizes the productive people from working hard and thus they will leave for other nations or they simply wont perform at their highest level. Money runs dry and then people starve. Men earn more money…
/r/MGTOW30/04/18 01:55 AM
3

You dont get it, do you realize how much work it takes to build and maintain a modern society? Majority of that work including construction, digging in mines, powerplants and pipelines, cleaning water and removing thrash, maintaining security and order (police) etc, the most dangerous and physically demanding jobs are all done almost completely by men, and many jobs these days are still physically demanding and dangerous, which is why they pay well and why men are willing to do them. Women for t…
/r/MGTOW30/04/18 01:36 AM
1

My point was simply that Mgtow will be the norm unless we go back into a hard patriarchy. There is no path in this world where women get what they want. Either mgtow makes the system collapse and we go into hard patriarchy again, or women admit their inferiority and give uo their feminist laws willingly and we go back into a soft patriarchy. and you are 100% factually wrong that women only need men because we allow them to be needy. Women are biologically inferior to men because of hundreds of t…
/r/MGTOW30/04/18 01:12 AM
2

wrong, because ultimately women need men more than men need women, so unless the feminist laws get removed, you are going to see a lot more women in desperation working to get a man when they approach the wall, while more and more men will enjoy single life pumping and dumping and some even settling down with a sexdoll instead of real women. Feminism is not natural, patriarchy is, so its women/feminists who will eventually have to give up their current behaviour and revert back to their submissi…
/r/MGTOW30/04/18 12:39 AM
6

its you who are wrong, women are very unhappy being alone and studies have repeatedly shown than womens overall happiness have declined with every year since third wave feminism became widespread. They are not built for working full time until they get old like men are, and when noone wants to marry them anymore they cant access mens resources. This makes them bitter and once their beauty fades no man will even want to fuck them anymore, this makes women suicidal.
/r/MGTOW30/04/18 12:31 AM
9

The 20% of top tier men are not enough to satisfy the needs of 80% of women, these alpha chads grow tired of an individual woman after fucking them once, many women will be left out including hot ones, and even if they get to have sex with these men they wont get much attention or money and no relationships for the most part. Women still need the money from the men below the 20%, and that includes tax money being used for welfare etc, as well as finding a man to settle down with once they get ol…
/r/MGTOW30/04/18 12:28 AM
-2

stfu moron, there are sources in the video, youre pathetic and too dumb to even realize it. Bye you inferior piece of shit.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 12:18 AM
1

delete
/r/MensRights16/04/18 12:17 AM
1

sorry but its you who are an idiot and not me, im superior to you in every way, and my post history being offensive is irrelevant since I ALWAYS prove my argument, you just lack the IQ to realize it or too dumb to read properly I just posted a video with the evidence but you now admit that you are too pathetic and emotional to look at it simply because I am an aggressive person, and you will remain clueless and dumb as a result. The difference between me and feminists/feminazis is that I have th…
/r/MensRights16/04/18 12:16 AM
-1

Not sure why you mention the word incel, i have never been anything even close to an incel, in fact I have alpha looks and personality, and I get laid easily, I just look down on women for legit reasons and dont want a relationship with them. As for facts, just look at this video for a summary of the empirical facts:video
/r/MensRights16/04/18 12:12 AM
-6

Does not matter wheter you disagree or not, the empirical facts prove that what im saying is true, and thats all there is to it. Personal feelings about the subject are irrelevant.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 12:05 AM
-4

that fact is regardless of what anyone personally wants to believe, that men are superior to women, and we have more to offer than they do, which is the reason why they need us more than we need them, which again is the reason why they want and need marriage and we dont want nor need it. If they at least admitted their inferiority men would still want to sacrifice for them, but instead they are behaving as narcisisstic as they can get away with and take things for granted, which is why I treat m…
/r/MensRights15/04/18 11:50 PM
-3

It started getting very obvious in late teens and adult life that women are inferior to men in most areas of life, and the fact that they cant even admit the more minor biological advantages men have over them like being less emotional and more rational, and instead blame patriarchy and want to make people believe they are opressed. In fact everything women whine about these days seem to be for selfish interests trying to mask their own lack of ability as evidence of them being victims to get st…
/r/MensRights15/04/18 11:42 PM
-15

she should be put in a male prison and the guards let her be raped over and over again until some male prisoner finally kills her in brutal fashion.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 12:11 PM
1

actually no, what I said is true, black men are considered less physically attractive by non-black women. And beyond comparing anecdotes the best evidence we have of that is the dating app statistics like that study from ok cupid about race and dating. Now of course like I said, if you have money that compensates from a mans lack of physical attractiveness for women.
/r/MGTOW20/03/18 10:55 PM
1

not really, they often want to show off their alpha mates if they manage to land them as boyfriends. and its the alphas who will have most success in the nightclubs where looks and game is everything. so that still goes in line with what ive said previously.
/r/MGTOW20/03/18 06:41 PM
2

Dude this whole story you speak of is a fantasy and no that doesnt happen. Majority of white women especially the attractive ones do not find black men physically attractive. They dont want you for sex either because nobody truly believes in the bigger dick myth except people who are basement dwellers and only watch porn. Im sure there are a decent number of white men who have cuck fantasies but thats not exclusive to white men, such men exist in the black community as well. Most women dont real…
/r/MGTOW20/03/18 05:47 AM
6

Not sure how you interpret what you see but almost everywhere ive been and including where i live, blacks have to work harder to get similar quality of girls compared to white or latino men, or even compared to middle eastern men in my country. By working harder i mean have more money, status or being more physically fit compared to the competition, and the hottest girls still go for non-blacks almost exclusively. Now the girls who are extreme golddiggers (who there are quite many) will go for a…
/r/MGTOW20/03/18 04:09 AM
16

thats a myth, a minority of white bitches love blacks.
/r/MGTOW20/03/18 04:01 AM
4

What do they have to offer besides sex and children though? As long as you use a condom and/or can control your ejaculation perfectly like I can, having casual sex with many women is not that big of a risk for me. I might want children in the future and if I do of course I will stop being a ”slut” and start looking for a higher quality woman in terms of personality as well rather than just going for looks. But if I dont find a mother material woman thats fine. Never getting married though and wh…
/r/MGTOW18/03/18 10:24 PM
2

They will fail though, they can never win since biology/nature will automatically return things to balance, mgtow is the natural male response to cultural marxism/gynocentrism/feminism. And they cannot really make the laws much more extreme against single men without causing a revolution among men. Collapse is imminent and then we will have patriarchy again.
/r/MGTOW06/03/18 05:57 AM
12

its common sense, and also just look at what people vote for, and why mens rights activists cannot get any change done since the feminists keep outnumbering them and always vote against things that only benefit men. Finally even these so called tradcon women with high profiles on youtube claiming to be against feminism have all stated to still want marriage in its current form, which is all the clues you need. Just ask any woman you know if they would agree with getting rid of no fault divorce, …
/r/MensRights05/03/18 12:06 PM
51

Thats because women are only avoiding the feminist label these days because they know its repulsive to pretty much all high quality men (which are the men they all compete for pretty much) and also because they dont want to be associated with the extremists. However even these same women who claim to not be feminist, still silently support many of the feminist laws which screw over men at womens benefit, particulary in regards to marriage, divorce, reproductive rights and custody of children. As…
/r/MensRights05/03/18 04:00 AM
21

feminism will eventually die out for good, its not sustainable.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 02:18 AM
1

thats at least realistic, men are biologically superior to women and stronger mentally and physically, so in real life you will always have majority of men in positions of power and authority, and in 99,9999% of the time, when a man and woman fight, the man will curbstomp/rapekill the woman without effort. If fiction becomes too unrealistic, and feminist propaganda in movies become to common, just the knowledge that they are trying to force false narratives onto us is making most modern movies a…
/r/MGTOW04/03/18 11:33 PM
3

its perfect since the focus is on the male, its realistic in that the men are stronger and more capable in the movie, and the fact that women are shown to have basically been replaced by AI, as the only romantic relationship in the movie is between the main hero and his AI girlfriend who doesnt even have a physical body, she is a hologram. I truly see this in the future unless some huge war puts us back into a wild patriarchal anarchy type of lifestyle.
/r/MGTOW04/03/18 11:10 PM
2

I keep telling them because I know it triggers them like crazy, including you. Doesnt change the fact that I did win. Nobody here has yet posted anything close to even resembling a concrete argument. edit* wrong, you just dont like what I said because it hurts your feelings.
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/18 09:40 PM
0

Yeah I know there is no point in trying to prove anything personal here, but it was you who tried to attack my credibility first since you cannot argue with the video evidence Edit* Im 6 feet 1 inch, or 186 cm rather, so no he does not beat me in that department. And I will make more money than him when im done. I would beat the shit out of him in a fight most likely since I practice mma. Its pathetic and hilarious how you try to compete with me by using your husband, and dont be delusional you …
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/18 09:39 PM
1

nope, your poor assumption was made simply because youre dumb. no backtracking, you made many assumptions based on my use of the word deserve that where extreme strawmen assumptions. I thought it was obvious so thats why I didnt specify what I meant, if you had watched the video it would have made sense. Dominance is the ability to make people bend to your will on your own. In real life since I am far stronger than you both physically and mentaöly I could easily dominate you. Men as a group woul…
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/18 09:34 PM
2

I couldnt care less, but its obvious youre butthurt.
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/18 09:25 PM
0

thot.
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/18 09:25 PM
0

Sure thats a decent argument but so far he is behaving like a typical white knight beta cuck, and those men tend to be quite emotional and lacking of testosterone.
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/18 09:24 PM
1

No, the video adresses this, men are more intelligent on average, the result you speak of came from comparing pre puberty children. Everything ive seen indicates that if women where as powerful as men, they would be just as violent, afterall, lesbians report the most domestic violence of all types of couples.
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/18 09:23 PM
0

nope, she lost the argument, just like you did. Get over it little beta cuck.
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/18 09:19 PM
1

Wrong again as always. You lost the argument. And I won since everything in the video is established fact. deal with it. Its not me who is whining, its you since you cannot deal or argue with any of it. And im not a pussy but youre a dumb bitch, grow up. And sure I definitely believe a girl with double digit IQ whos favourite word is ”pussy” work in neuro research, nice joke.
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/18 09:16 PM
1

Nothing weak about it, and its not trolling. Its just facts that deeply hurt your feelings.
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/18 09:11 PM
1

I assume most people getting triggered here are women, and im responding to like 10 different users so its easy to mix who you are writing too. regardless, unless he has proof of his IQ then thats irrelevant. And based on his response and inability to accept the facts in the video strongly suggests im more intelligent than him.
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/18 09:10 PM
1

No I didnt demand it, I simply wanted to know how you would react to see if you are truly redpilled or not. And even though many of you are in denial, I know the facts in this video and my posts hurt you, the only way the hurt will go away is if you accept the truth.
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/18 09:08 PM
1

Decent post. However, since men carry most of the responsibility in this world (since we are mentally and physically more capable than women in general, and also more exposable due to infinite sperm) why do you think women deserve the same rights and authority as men? rights and authority must be in line with responsibility. Just like how a parent is responsible for a child, the child has less rights than the parent. So what you are doing is essentially pretending like equality cant be defined a…
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/18 09:06 PM
-2

Youre completely wrong but feel free to believe in whatever makes you feel good about yourself. And what im doing is not whining whatsoever. Women are submissive with me in person for sure. This is not about that.
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/18 09:01 PM
1

This is a decent post but you made some dumb assumptions on my stance. When I say men deserve to be dominant, im simply saying that in response to the feminist narrative who demands equal outcome without deserving it. of course dominance is not based on a single factor, but vast majority of men will always be dominant over women, the strongest individuals (mentally and physically) will always be men. So we will always live in a patriarchy. The fact is women need men more than the opposite, so wo…
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/18 08:55 PM
2

Thats pointless because for it to have any meaning I would need to dox myself and not about to so that. Many of the things ive been saying here could make me lose my job even though its all true.
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/18 08:47 PM
0

I dont care what you think, the video is presenting the facts so I dont bother to attempt to convince you with my own posts, I know already that you are hurt from this and in denial and its quite funny.
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/18 08:43 PM
0

Your pathetic attempt at attacking my credibility is pointless. I dont care what random loser women on the internet think about me personally, im also anonymous, so why would I care about writing with perfect spelling when I try to save time lecturing all of you mental children? im not insecure, but I do enjoy putting people who deny reality in their place. I know one single IQ test is not enough to determine the true intelligence of an individual, but I know im smart and I dont need to prove it…
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/18 08:41 PM
1

Wrong, since I won this debate against you, and you are clearly an idiot. And it is already established fact, you just dont want to admit it. Women dont want to admit it. PC culture tries to hide it but the intelligent people are fully aware, soon even the average joes will all start to become aware. And im not whining, Im just pointing out that you women are not actually redpilled unless you realize and accept the facts in the video I posted. I get respect, in fact women dont get respect for a …
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/18 08:36 PM
3

Nah, thats a strawman. I dont need men, I am a man. Its women who need men. However, when you try to pretend everyone is equal, you ruin the free economy, and you disincentivizes the people who are actually talented and productive from working to their full potential, while letting the low performers get by living like parasites on the money the higher achievers make. Eventually this ruins the economy and the welfare runs out. Feminism/socialism is pretty much communism only its less extreme but…
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/18 08:23 PM
0

Its you who are behaving like a dumb little kid. You are clearly not a grown-up. And no I dont plan on remaining in Sweden for long since the feminist government is ruining the country. But dont worry about that, worry about growing up first silly little inferior girl.
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/18 08:18 PM
2

There is nothing incoherent about my post, everything ive said here is 100% cold hard established fact. And I have far higher IQ than you, get over it silly little girl. I dont care if some spelling errors get made since I write fast on the phone and want to save as much time as possible while educating you. You simply cannot attack the argument since you know im right so you make a pitiful attempt at attacking my character, losers always do that.
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/18 08:15 PM
2

okey. You already lost the argument to begin with.
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/18 08:12 PM
-1

No, Im just very straightforward and I dont care if I hurt someones feelings. The truth is important for society as a whole. All of my arguments have been more than decent since they are all confirmed with facts. You just dont like them and dont want to admit it being true. Of course when some of you show such childlike and laughable arguing skills like simply saying ”no” and not even wanting to watch the video then obviously I will look down on you even more and be more disrespectful in return.
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/18 08:11 PM
2

My appearance is masculine, and my personality is as well because im very logical and not sensitive/emotional. I always prioritizes the truth over feelings because the truth is the most fair way to base your decisions on, while feelings are subjective and often very selfish. I already make a lot of money and I will make more when my economy degree is finished. I own an apartment which I bought myself. And when I did an IQ test I scored 133. Not that I need to prove myself, none of you have shown…
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/18 08:08 PM
0

Pathetic argument. Anyone who has regular access to a computer or smartphone has 20 minutes to spare. And no doubt about it im more productive than you, and superior to you, and my time is worth more to the world than your time is. Period.
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/18 08:04 PM
3

why dont you write down what you specifically dont agree with based on what I already wrote? then I can adress that. However if you truly care about the truth and not just believe in what makes you feel good, you should just improve your attention span and watch the video.
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/18 08:01 PM
2

Quotation laws, quota, whatever its the same thing. Im from Sweden so Its not even my first language. You know what I meant which is the point here. Your argument was completely irrelevant. And its safe to say im way above you on the bell curve.
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/18 07:59 PM
-8

Men will be able to create life with the artificial womb and stemcells from male bodies. Women will never be able to create civilization and maintain it like men, women will never be the dominant gender even though they try with the aid of some of the most powerful men. Women are simply too weak on their own. Wrong, the best and most talented people deserve to be dominant, and men are better than women by a significant anmount on average. Women simply do not have the gifts that makes one suitabl…
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/18 07:57 PM
1

Sorry but you already lost this debate before it began. literally everything you said there was wrong. Its already established that men are mentally stronger, and we can control our emotions better than women. We also are more intelligent on average compared to women, this is fact regardless of what you say. The sources in the video has credibility unlike you being in denial. men are naturally superior to women so using feminism to prevent men from ruling is not fair and not natural, and not sus…
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/18 07:46 PM
1

20 minutes is not much, and this subject is to big to be summarized in a few lines of text. The video already condenses most of the information but adds sources just to preemptively refute the most common counter arguments feminists and non-believers tend to have.
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/18 07:29 PM
-3

No. Like I already said, watch the video before you argue. Men are smarter on average as well, the bell curve you are describing used data from pre-puberty children, grown adults show different results, the video directly adresses this. And it wouldnt surprise me if it got removed or I got banned, its still fact regardless, and not low quality at all. The modern western world including reddit still gives safe spaces for women who cannot handle the truth without getting their feelings hurt.
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/18 07:20 PM
2

womens value decrease far more and faster witv age than men do, you should go for kids if you want it but never get married.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/18 01:02 PM
1

Nah dude, I didnt let anybody step on me, but when I was a teenager I didnt really realize what effect being nicknamed ”gandhi” had, only when looking back after being redpilled did I realize that. I didnt let it affect my game back in the days but I still noticed the signs. I ignored it but now I know exactly why it happened. There is no point in complaining, but no doubt we brown guys need to acknowledge that girls and people in general are often racist towards us south asian guys (and its mai…
/r/TheRedPill17/01/18 04:24 PM
1

How old are you? and do girls realize you are indian? Cause in my case girl never knew I was indian during my teens by just looking at me, but my white friends started calling me Gandhi around that time which made the girls aware of it. Many instances of being cockblocked for that alone, where girls showed interest while at a party but after hearing people calling me gandhi they stopped talking to me and walked away alwardly. Now when im older (late 20s) people dont call me that anymore and im s…
/r/TheRedPill17/01/18 11:54 AM
2

yeah but that doesnt matter since he has money and fame, many women dont care that much about looks if the guy has significantly higher wealth and status/fame compared to her. Which is why you see these really ugly rappers with hot golddigger girlfriends and wifes all the time.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/18 08:34 PM
4

or maybe this tactic of his has worked many times before and thats why he didnt bother with trying to be smooth? His looks really does not matter much considering he is famous, hot women are willing to fuck almost anybody as long as they have money and fame, which is what you see in porn, or many of these ugly rappers with gold digger wifes and girlfriends.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/18 08:32 PM
2

Leo is an expert mgtow, he always avoids questions regarding marriage etc, he is also very attractive so many women are probably satisfied by just getting the D and potentially getting another booty call rather than trying to smear his name. Just my guess.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/18 08:27 PM
-3

Banfield is a stupid whore dont give her any credit these disgusting women are only thinking about themselves ultimately, anyone who supports metoo is a joke.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/18 08:22 PM
4

they could always pay prostitutes or buy a sex doll, its not that different from having sex the regular way since beta men wont be appreciated by women for anything other than their money anyway. We need to keep trying to redpill them about those options.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/18 08:16 PM
1

Yeah im not american I live in Sweden but its pretty much the same issue here, many minorities though that have come in large number EXCEPT south asians and east asians, there are way fewer of us since we are not considered refugees like most from middle east and africa (even though many of them are economic migrants) I have fucked attractive girls of almost every race but It would have been alot easier If I looked the same but had latin american background or something, for the simple status an…
/r/TheRedPill16/01/18 03:48 PM
1

When I was younger I also thought that but people had less exposure in general back then, so most girls I fucked or in general didnt even know I was indian or what an indian is other than Apu from simpsons, as there are very few of us in the country i live in. However ever since I got redpilled and realize how status affects womens attraction to men, I realize that just being associated with negative stereotypes based on race reduces your sexual mating value as a man. This is why I had to be bet…
/r/TheRedPill16/01/18 02:13 PM
-1

its a fact that men are superior to women, doesnt matter what you say, the emprirical data has already confirmed it in many ways.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 10:39 AM
1

many things, for example the indian accent westerners are familiar with is usually extremely exaggerated, most indians dont sound like that even though a few isolated villagers might, its like saying all americans speak like those redneck southerners even though its only a minority. Then you have the limited set of roles offered to indians in western media, like cab driver or doctor, usually played by older and unattractive dudes, and that would be fine if it was balanced with some main roles wi…
/r/TheRedPill16/01/18 10:38 AM
0

its unfortunate that you think cold hard facts ruins this sub.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 10:33 AM
8

women are weak though, but the issue is the double standard, women cannot handle equality yet we keep giving it to them and they keep abusing it
/r/TheRedPill15/01/18 09:43 PM
13

sorry but nope, women can never win this game, as ultimately they need men more than we need them, and men are vastly superior to women biologically. Feminism can never enforce anything without men doing the dirty work for women, and now that even feminist men are targeted by these false accusations of rape and sexual misconduct, the powerful beta men who used to support feminist causes will stop funding them, more men will go mgtow, less children will be born, women wont find any man to marry, …
/r/TheRedPill15/01/18 09:32 PM
22

yep. Same here, im goodlooking and masculine, im not stereotypical though and most girls dont realize im indian/south asian even though im quite darkskinned. Most think im latino. I get a huge ammount of tinder matches but on many occassions when they have asked my ethnicity and I told them the truth they have stopped responding or their interest very noticeably dropped. Just being ”indian” is associated with low status and unattractiveness when it comes to men, all due to racist misrepresentati…
/r/TheRedPill15/01/18 09:19 PM
5

yeah thats true, but its all because of racist media image and stereotyping, but youre right.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/18 09:13 PM
16

women werent taught that, women are unable to beat the shit out of men because women are too weak. However they at least could say no and walk away back then, these days they cannot even do that in many cases it seems, and their pathetic excuse seem to be because the guys are famous. So basically they cant take responsibility for being greedy about attention from famous guys.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 08:56 PM
-7

feminism is awful in all forms, equal opportunity is good but anything beyond that doesnt work, women are simply inferior to men so we cannot expect the same representation and to treat them the same as men in all situations.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 08:43 PM
-1

wow you dont realize how wrong you are, its women who are obsolete, as men are vastly superior to women in pretty much every way. The only thing they are good for is having children, everything else like maintaining society is done by men and will collapse if we stop doing it. Sex robots that cater to male sexual needs will be waaay cheaper and arrive loooong before they can make robots that can replace men in all the advanced jobs we do. Also if we did that, those robot men would not serve wome…
/r/MensRights14/01/18 09:33 AM
8

thats not going to happen, because long before we have such robots, the female sex robot will have already made women obsolete, since no many will marry or work for women when they can fuck a sex robot who can never say no, and never gets tired etc. has an artificial womb etc. Women will go extinct since men have no reason to take care of them any longer.
/r/MensRights14/01/18 09:20 AM
-1

I dont agree that being taller alone makes you superior automatically unless its correlated to strenght and it to some degree is. but otherwise I agree, men are also more rational, logical and intelligent on average compared to women, we are defintely superior to women overall.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 07:01 PM
5

Men are not beta for not approaching women, definitely not in this modern environment where false accusations can ruin your life and women overvalue themselves like crazy and will pretty much cry #metoo for every guy who she thinks isnt good enough who flirts with her. And the so called alphas who approach them anyway will only pump and dump them, so women wont be happy regardless. #metoo has made it lose/lose for them, regardless what typr of guy they meet.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 07:01 AM
3

Women should be shamed for using sexuality to get ahead in life as long as we keep pretending the genders are equal. Same with casual sex, if we ignore all the biological differences that make men superior, then women should be judged harder for casual sex since its so much easier for them to sleep around. Only if we are honest with ourselves and admit why women need to use sex to get ahead (because majority of them dont have any other talent or skill) and that having many casual partners for wo…
/r/MensRights12/01/18 06:56 AM
2

Yeah I guess that might have been the purpose, although ive used that term and heard many other dudes say it without any thought of any sexual/romantic aspect to it. The girls in my various social circles seem to think its funny/cute when guys have bromances but Im pretty sure they are aware its just a close friendship between guys. There was also that avicii song called bromance and he is from the same country i live in(sweden) so maybe thats why we have this view of the term. The music video o…
/r/MensRights12/01/18 06:33 AM
1

I know. Im just saying that what she did is nothing groundbreaking, no new ideas or anything really, she intended to do a movie from a feminist perspective from the beginning but the MRA:s she met changed her mind. Im sure the simple idea to present the information from the MRAs in a movie has been thought of many times before, only most people assumed (with good reason) that such a movie made by a man wouldnt have gotten any publicity and most likely would have been buried by feminist backlash.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 04:36 PM
8

I would never cuddle or kiss, not any physical aspect to it, but I still value my brothers/close male friendships more than any romantic relationship I have had (which has only been with women of course)
/r/MensRights11/01/18 09:01 AM
1

although nothing in the movie was her idea, its all old ideas, studies and facts that men figured out long ago, even the movie title ”red pill” is a concept created by men. The only difference is that the movie would not have gotten any publicity if it was made by a man, which is why it inevitably was a woman that got to present it.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 08:58 AM
1

We dont need women to do this, the difference is that men will listen to women in most cases, while women wont listen to men unless we force them. Men could easily force women to accept our worldview if not for the other men that will get in our way, but that is changing sooner or later regardless if women start taking our side or not.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 08:54 AM
1

tired of bullshit feminist articles that are as wrong and twisted as they could possibly be, we all know why they do it, they are incredibly insecure about the real biological differences that put men on top
/r/MensRights11/01/18 07:19 AM
4

what a pathetic article, full of fantasy and wishful thinking. She is wrong about everything she says, women will never ever become stronger or even close to mens physical strenght, same with mental strenght, men will always be vastly superior. And men are better than women at virtually everything other than nurturing children and lack the ability to give birth. She claims women have been surpassing men in recent decades in some fields but thats factually untrue, men still dominate since we are …
/r/MensRights10/01/18 04:51 PM
-1

I would drop her if I where you, by this point you would have smashed that puss enough that it wouldnt be a loss. Why would you care about someone that is so selfish?
/r/MensRights10/01/18 04:33 PM
6

one day sooner or later you should probably tell her the truth that men are more disadvantaged in western society when it comes to laws and social norms, while the disadvantages women have in comparison to men are mostly biological. TLDR: Nature discriminates against women, while society discriminates against men.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 04:31 PM
1

we all know men are biologically much stronger than women both physically and mentally, women are weak in comparison to us. The only reason they make false articles like this is because they know men are vastly superior to women, they are insecure.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 11:28 AM
3

I can guarantee you that absolutely nothing coming from these pro-feminist studies is accurate at all. Its all insecure damage control/projection since deep down women and feminists know that men are vastly superior to women in almost all categories, most men who dont take the feminist brainwashing for granted but actually look into the subject deeper on their own will also be aware of this.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 04:20 AM
1

Well you and I obviously have different definitions of ”basic respect”. I do give everyone including women basic respect unless they give me a reason not to. But basic respect for me is simply being a decent person and not being rude for no reason. If they ask for help nicely I will try my best etc. However this does not change the fact that I respect men more in general (as a group) than I do women and when it comes to people I dont know personally I will take the personal statements and opinio…
/r/MensRights08/01/18 09:45 AM
2

Nope, im being perfectly logical unlike you. You fail to see the big picture. You are talking about individuals, im talking about men and women as a group. Men easily outperform women as a group so its not suprising that majority of men will have more respect for other men compared to women. This is relevant since so many feminists demand that we must respect women in general for simply being women (this is why its relevant to look at the genders as a group) My point is simply that this demand w…
/r/MensRights07/01/18 07:24 PM
2

I was referring to the biological differences between men and women, of course individuals decide who they want to respect, but since majority of men are logical and not emotional like you, its predetermined that most of us will have less respect for women since they are less capable than us.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 06:36 PM
2

everything I said was fact though, so i guess you are unable to hear facts.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 05:57 PM
-3

this is why the truth is so important, men are never going to treat women with as much respect as they treat other men overall because men are more capable, superior and can handle more responsibility than women can. Women would still recieve chivalry from men if they just admitted to this fact and were grateful to men instead of bitter.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 07:49 AM
20

Nah man, Metoo will massively backfire as more and more companies are considering work segragation between genders or even outright deciding to not hire any more women, because the risks of false allegations and the media commotion etc can bankrupt small companies pretty easily. Men are more likely to go mgtow when they become more aware of the risks. Imo metoo is the beginning of the end of feminism. It was always destined to kill itself but this sped up the process alot.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 11:07 AM
1

I remember reading that you can only create sperm from male stem cells, while eggs can be created from both male and female stem cells. The reason women cannot create sperm probably has something to do with the fact that they dont have any Y-chromosomes in their cells. So in a way that makea women more irrelevant than men in if this became widespread, considering they also are working on artificial wombs.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 01:48 AM
5

exactly.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 08:02 AM
6

Since the genders are not the same biologically, and not equal in capability, but equal in terms of human rights (in fact women even have more rights than men in the west) then why are women still complaining about equality in the west? If its not legal rights and opportunities they are referring to then it must be the biological differences, otherwise the word equality has no meaning if they cant define it. And yes, Im tired of people avoiding the reality just because it upsets some people. Peo…
/r/MensRights31/12/17 07:32 AM
10

no, im simply over trying to make people in denial like yourself see the extremely obvious double standard in society. But il try to make it simple for you. If you think anything or at least 95% of the things posted on this subreddit is ”harsh” compared to the shit women complain about in the news articles and in the media, then you are either blind or dishonest. The things you see here is a reaction to womens behaviour in more widely exposed platforms. And the things women complain about is ver…
/r/MensRights31/12/17 07:04 AM
12

well your response would be false, while my earlier statement was factual. Its as simple as that. its women/feminists who are easily triggered and hypocritical, and deserving of most criticism they get on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 06:53 AM
16

nope, just stating the facts without any regard to anyones feelings.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 06:49 AM
21

the point is the double standard, women get extremely butthurt for even the slightest criticism even though women in general are deserving of a lot of it. While men can risk their career for saying something half as bad as this tweet towards women.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 06:45 AM
4

its a combination of higher motivation but also the fact that men are biologically more capable than women in most types of work.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 03:25 PM
1

nope, men are objectively better than women. The only reason girls score higher on average in school is because of the biased feminist school system. End of story.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 11:16 PM
1

yeah, even when you know the girl is attracted to you, like when im talking to a tinder match, she will very rarely give you a compliment, and im a pretty good looking and masculine guy, and hav around 400 matches on currently on tinder. I think maybe 10 times at most do i get a straight up compliment on my looks even though body language in the girls shows attraction anyway. Girls are just insecure and prefer to be pursued rather than pursuing, so they want compliments first, however since i go…
/r/MensRights27/12/17 10:09 AM
1

The reason I said that is because its very likely to be true given the information we have. First of all im a man and you are a woman, vast majority of men are better/more capable than vast majority of women. Im also above average for a man, in looks and in education. You said you where very strong for a woman and a lesbian which means you are unlikely to be very feminine thus not attractive, and also you are most likely not going to give birth to any children, reducing your value. Your reasonin…
/r/MensRights26/12/17 08:15 PM
1

There is more to value than economic productivity, but the areas in which women are ahead do not come even close to compensating for their weaknesses compared to men. Communication advantage is a very slight one at best, it is highly disputable but it doesnt even matter if you dont put it to good use, and the stereotype that women are vague in their intentions and want men to read their minds exists for a reason, thats not effective communication. As for raising children, studies show that child…
/r/MensRights25/12/17 10:12 PM
9

It cannot be as succesful for two main reasons, 1: women are almost always the majority of voters in most western countries (due to more men dying doing dangerous jobs that women dont want to do or cant, not living as long and more men being in prison partly because punishments are harder on men and men have more incentive to become criminals as we get less help in society) 2: Women have an in-group bias while men have an out-group bias. This means that majority of women treat other women better…
/r/MensRights25/12/17 05:27 PM
0

You also fail to realize that even if we entertained your idea of equal value between the genders (even though that is demonstrably false), the sexual dimorphism between the genders and the advantages men have vs the advantages women have, still heavily incentivizes and pushes us into the traditional gender roles where men have higher authority, since men are simply more capable of handling power and responsibility compared to women.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 04:01 PM
0

sorry but no, youre wrong. You are free to give some examples of things that women are better at and I will go ahead and refute your claims. overall men have far more biological advantages over women than vice versa. ignoring this fact is ignoring basic biology. You saying men and women are equally valuable is meaningless unless you can show some economic evidence that indicates this is true. So far all the comparisons ive seen strongly indicates men on average are significantly more productive …
/r/MensRights25/12/17 03:07 PM
-1

I dont care, my point is just that women should be aware that men are biologically superior to them, now if you want to present that fact in a more gentle way go ahead, but the reason gender relations are so bad is because women are told false information that they dont need men even though they do, and women dont really want to interact with men unless there is some kind of benefit for them. aka briffaults law. men and women are NOT equal and that will never change, equal rights and opportuniti…
/r/MensRights25/12/17 07:03 AM
-4

we are superior because we are stronger mentally and physically, this is why men are the dominant gender, its a biological fact only difference between mgtows/redpills and you bluepill white knights is that we have accepted the uncomfortable truth, and you avoid it at all costs because it scares you. women are better at childbirth (duh) and child nurturing, however that does not compensate for the things men are better at. Because of womens biological limitations they are not capable of handling…
/r/MensRights25/12/17 03:09 AM
4

this is the truth. The reason why they go so far in trying to portray men as below women on TV and movies is precisely because they deep down know the opposite is true in reality, men are superior to women. And women are bitter/insecure about this so to feed their ego and also trying to brainwash young people into thinking reality looks like a matriarchy. boys become less motivated and girls get attitude problems, but of course boys can still see reality for what it is once they get experience. …
/r/MensRights25/12/17 12:21 AM
-4

except that stating a biological fact ie that men are superior to women is not ”misogyny” unless you believe nature is misogynistic (even though nature has no agenda and does not care about equality)
/r/MensRights25/12/17 12:14 AM
0

I didnt shift anything. From the very beginning I just claimed that woman seems likely to have gotten help to get her STEM degree by manipulating beta blue pills with her looks. She does not seem like a smart person at all considering the overall way he described her. Even dumb people can fake intelligence by just talking about subjects at a certain dept. Very few women are in the upper echelon of intelligence anyway. I have nothing to learn from someone like you.
/r/TheRedPill24/12/17 07:18 PM
-1

its actually the opposite. Men are superior to women, but when women get more rights like they have now, it becomes somewhat ”equal” on the surface, even though true equality is impossible.
/r/MensRights24/12/17 04:30 PM
1

feminists lack the IQ to play chess, they are just behaving like children. And long before AI dominates us (which is not set in stone) men will put women in their place below us first.
/r/MensRights24/12/17 01:37 PM
1

no im not, feminists are the least intelligent and most pathetic group of people in human history. And what would that accomplish posting facts like this if I was a feminist in disguise? Its not going to matter because feminists still view most of us as misogynists regardless of what we write here. And for women in general, I dont care even a little bit about there feelings, facts are facts, and they will still have to deal with men even though we will dominate them, since they cant survive with…
/r/MensRights24/12/17 01:15 PM
1

Always remember, men are VASTLY superior to women, we can kill them easily with our bare hands if we wanted to, they are weaker, less intelligent and inferior in every way except when it comes to taking care of children. Put women in their place when they try to act up. if they hit you, hit them back. consider getting a small camera hidden on you at all times when you are outside your home and when interacting with women. If i where you I would try to kill that bitch mother and make it look like…
/r/TheRedPill24/12/17 12:58 PM
-2

you are the moron. Not me.
/r/MensRights24/12/17 12:48 PM
-1

im serious, and its a fact that men are vastly superior to women. And the best way for these brainwashed people to stop believing in the propaganda feminists speak of, is to intimidate them because they dont listen to facts anyway.
/r/MensRights24/12/17 12:09 PM
-3

the truth is that men are vastly superior to women in pretty much all areas except child nurturing. its a biological fact. We need to start putting women in their place and intimidate them with degrading words and threat of violence every time they talk shit about men. I do it all the time except at my workplace, which fortunately doesnt have many women around. Women are weak and easily dominated without even having to get physical.
/r/MensRights24/12/17 11:57 AM
-9

it ultimately doesnt matter what women/girls think, we actually do not need their sympathy. Men are vastly superior to women and all we need to make sure is that the next generation of boys are aware of that fact despite the feminist brainwashing, make sure these boys abandon girls and women and go mgtow, then the girls will start to realize how inferior they are to us and come begging to be saved again when the economy collapses.
/r/MensRights24/12/17 11:53 AM
-1

well what you said was pretty much irrelevant since judging by the OPs description of that woman, she is very unlikely to be as smart as someone like me or even smart in general.
/r/TheRedPill23/12/17 06:36 PM
-1

unlikely, and even if so they are extremely few in number.
/r/TheRedPill23/12/17 01:37 PM
0

that might have been true back in the days when populations where small and we where always at risk of going extinct. However today when we are overpopulated, women do not have more intrinsic value on average than men do. most women in the west do not have more than two children, many of them do not have kids at all. And as I already proved with that tax study, the average man provides more value to society than the average woman does. The value of having a kid can be estimated by looking at mar…
/r/TheRedPill23/12/17 12:05 AM
1

yeah I agree with that, im also fit and lift regulary. However that proves my point, if you are fit and look good overall and want to fuck hot girls who are also fit, then with TRP mindset and abiding to the feminist narrative of equality, we simply want to avoid the double standard of these women that also want us to spend lots of money on them to fuck them. They are hypocritical, and trp teaches us to not play by their rules.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/17 11:07 PM
1

but I still stand by my point, women wanting a financially well off man is not equivalent to a man wanting a fit girl. First of all, no man expects to date a hot fitness girl unless he either is a fit and physically attractive man himself, or if he can compensate his own looks with money (which usually means a whole lot of money) However, women want to date up, if they are a ten in looks, they want a man who is also in the 9-10 range in terms of looks, bu he also needs to be wealthy, its far eas…
/r/TheRedPill22/12/17 10:47 PM
1

oh shit yeah youre right, I mixed you up with some other dude I was arguing with. nevermind
/r/TheRedPill22/12/17 10:41 PM
2

wtf whats the whole point of sources if youre not going to read them? You didnt take my word for it before, and ive already said what they prove. first link proves that men have higher iq on average compared to women, and that the vast majority of humans with genius level iq are men. second link shows that increased number of women in corporate boards/firms reduced their ROI (return on investments) and their overall performance. last link shows that in general, women take more money out of the w…
/r/TheRedPill22/12/17 10:36 PM
1

I didnt hamster at all. Okey I will waste my time proving you wrong. Here are some links. IQ differences in gender more women in corporate boards reduces performance only men technically pay tax theres more but start with these.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/17 10:09 PM
1

yeah of course they are sad, but they rather project bitchyness in public but cry tears when they are alone or with their best friends in private.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/17 08:43 PM
1

thats pretty easy though even for people who dont have a STEM degree, I still think she got lots of help with it from blue pill men.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/17 08:42 PM
1

they are all over the internet, ive posted them before but its pretty much pointless because some people just believe what they want to believe, but I only care about facts. You can google for studies showing men have higher iq on average and larger brains. its common sense and obvious to anyone sensible that men are stronger physically and mentally, but there are all kinds of studies proving this comparing stress level capacity, muscle mass and durability and hand eye coordination etc. Our bodi…
/r/MensRights22/12/17 05:31 PM
1

its fact that men are superior to women, it doesnt matter what anyone believes in, the statistics speak for themself. I believe in a true meritocracy, not this kind of fake equality we have today, equality of opportunity is the way to go but women will always believe they are discriminated against in such a system since men will outperform them by a large ammount.
/r/MensRights22/12/17 04:33 PM
1

there is definitely bias against men in employment, and men still dominate in ammount of doctors. Men are superior to women but most of us are not interested in being nurses
/r/MensRights22/12/17 12:33 PM
3

im almost certain that the woman C is not actually that smart, most likely got her STEM degree by getting favors and help from horny bluepill men in school. interesting take none the less and honestly just by looking at the demeanor of hot women in the older bracket (30+) you can tell that such experiences like these you describe are the most logical explanations why women that hot who likely gets free shit and attention all the time still manage to convey bitterness and having a permanent bitch…
/r/TheRedPill22/12/17 06:39 AM
1

I also know that, me talking about feminists here is not picking a fight since they are to scared and emotional to read this reddit anyway, you picked a battle against me and all youre doing is wasting time and not saying anything of value.
/r/MensRights22/12/17 05:56 AM
1

I know, but logical people wont care if feminists try something like that to attack this movement. And the rest of the people dont really matter. When it comes to voting we are always going to be outnumbered by selfish idiots, so just let feminism kill itself instead, then we can laugh at them and their failure.
/r/MensRights22/12/17 05:27 AM
1

no it isnt, learn to spell before talking about someone elses intellect, but its not like I care about your opinion regardless.
/r/MensRights22/12/17 05:25 AM
1

I dont care, there feelings should not matter, all that matters is the data, and the data supports my stance heavily.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 11:28 PM
2

It wont really matter, because the data proves feminism doesnt work, also just because im controversial and antagonistic should not be able to do any damage to the whole mens rights movement considering how many radical feminists that get put into the spotlight, it would be extreme hypocrisy to use this post againstall of us, and regardless im stating facts.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 11:26 PM
2

and all the countries with feminism, ie western countries, have low birthrates when it comes to the local/native population, only immigrants still breed alot as you say
/r/MensRights21/12/17 12:54 PM
1

resources for feminism will run out as more men become redpilled and avoid marriage. Men who only live for themselves and dont have wife snd kids to provide for tend to work less and be less productive, so less money to tax. It also means less children for future generations, which forces governments to take in more economic migrants/refuges to have a large enough workforce to tax, but problem is these migrants often end up being a welfare sink as well. Its not sustainable.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 12:41 PM
0

Just saying how it is. Women can contribute but they always downplay the differences when it comes to male advantages, on the other hand feminists have no issue with presenting stats like the fact at women graduate college more than men as some sort of indication that they are smarter, when we all know deep down thats not true and that its simply part of quotation laws, feminist organisations and sponsorships, and the fact that most women who graduate avoided STEM.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 08:03 AM
1

If you know brazilian jiujutsu sure. Thats why i said this is only possible if they get a surprise attack on the man. I can guarantee that Kelly Forbes when she strangled her man, did it either from behind in a surprise, or he was half asleep or intoxicated, incapacitated in some way, otherwise he would have easily been able to forcibly remove her hands and beat her down in defense. also in that specific case you mentioned, Kelly Forbes used an electrical wire to strangle her husband, which agai…
/r/MensRights21/12/17 06:19 AM
1

Extremely few women can do this, men are far stronger than women. Drugs of course is a gamechanger, but the women who successfully strangled their husbands must have incapacitated their husband in a surprise attack or something intially otherwise men can pretty much always overpower women.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 05:07 AM
1

You mean young boys right? because i dont see how grown uo men wouldnt defend themselves unless they fear white knights or police being on the womens side. I also suspect that alot of the female on male rape, is perpetrated by grown up women on young teenage boys, otherwise men would be able to physically stop women unless they where intoxicated.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 05:04 AM
2

The reason why men rape women more than women rape men, is mainly because of our different reproductive instincts and the fact that men are far stronger than women. But women have no moral/ethical genetic advantage like some people seem to believe, they are sinply just more adverse to risk and its a bigger risk for them to attack a man than vice verca. Regardless its a statistically really small minority of men and women who rape, and these people are anomalies who have no self control of their …
/r/MensRights21/12/17 04:39 AM
2

Men can fight women and it would be a very easy onesided battle for us, but it just takes a very long time and lots of bullshit before we decide to do it, we are too kind and forgiving of women in general. It would be a good thing for us to be unbiased if not for the fact that almost all women have a in-group bias and favor their own gender while men dont.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 04:17 AM
1

This is where redpill comes in, because it truly is a perfect analogy to the movie, do you accept even the possibility that something that will gravely upset your worldview can be true, or does it scare and hurt you too much that you rather choose to not belive in it without even looking at the information available. Thing is, the world is not always going to be the way you wanted it to be, nature and the universe does not care about equality or our own made up concepts and ideas of ”love”. The …
/r/MensRights21/12/17 04:09 AM
1

”brilliant” is subjective and also relative, relative to male scientists vast majority of female scientists are not really on the same level in terms of acheivment and contributions, just compare the number of patents from each gender even from just the last decades of feminism.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 03:53 AM
1

difference is women/feminists who say they dont need no man, they are basically lying to themselves by a false sense of pride and bitterness coming from a feeling of inadequacy. While saying men dont need women for anything other than sex and reproduction is a fact, sex is technically not a need in itself other than to procreate, but soon we will have artificial wombs and then we really dont need them for anything, but women will still need men for resources and protection.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 03:47 AM
1

But thats the only thing that will work unless majority of men one day decide to put women on their place, but thats unlikely to happen due to the high level of brainwashing that takes place for majority of our future sons being raised by single moms and thought by mostly female teachers. So the best thing to do is to wait and basically be mgtow/redpilled and let feminism kill itself, after that happens on a large scale and we have economic collapse, patriarchy will reassert itself and nobody wi…
/r/MensRights21/12/17 03:43 AM
-4

Yeah thats pretty obvious to those of us who only care about facts, historical data and biological studies to compare the genders. Without letting feelings which are always subjective getting in the way. Patriarchy is completely natural because the genders are not equal, men as a group are superior to women and the dominant gender. This is because of biological differences which means that no ammount of social engineering can change it without a huge load of resources being wasted for the sole p…
/r/MensRights21/12/17 03:32 AM
1

its not really any different, its not women who restrict men from anything, its feminist men who enforce womens will for their own benefit st the cost of other men, women are too weak to enforce their own will on their own.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 03:23 AM
2

Agreed. Feminists are probably the least intelligent and most pathetic group of people that has ever existed throughout human history. They are too dumb to even realize that they long term go against their own goals because they dont want to admit their biological limitations. Just by looking at the pitiful subreddit that is /twoXChromosomes , you can tell that a large percentage of women are this delusional. These women have such a strong belief that they are morally right and that the facts su…
/r/MensRights21/12/17 03:19 AM
2

its an average made from the stats of hundreds of individuals, its representative. And the top percent of women are still below the average man when it comes to strenght and athleticism. 15 year old boys beating the best grown up women easily is just one obvious piece of evidence of that.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 12:10 AM
2

there is countless ammounts of evidence and proof of what im saying. But just based on the fact that on average men have 30% more lower body muscle mass, and 40% more upper body muscle mass compared to women, and pound for pound, male muscles are around 10% stronger than female muscle, shows us how large the difference is. Then you can factor in the difference in sports, many female national teams in football from all over the world keep losing badly to 15 year old boys. Common sense can tell yo…
/r/MensRights19/12/17 11:15 PM
2

I was comparing natural strenght, the average male who trains will be stronger than the strongest women who trains (without steroids of course) the average men has a higher strenght potential than the strongest women.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 08:28 PM
2

again you are comparing the average UNTRAINED man to the strongest woman who trains all the time and is on steroids. So its not an accurate comparison by any measure, an average guy could take steroids and focus on powerlifting and become stronger than Becca Swanson. never mind the fact that if we are talking about an actual fight which is more relevant when it comes to dominance, an average guy doesnt even need to lift nearly as much as the best female powerlifters but would still be able to de…
/r/MensRights19/12/17 05:33 PM
2

nah, im very clearly correct, and you are very clearly wrong
/r/MensRights19/12/17 05:29 PM
2

nope, youre wrong, and im correct. We are talking about overall strenght here, which I assumed you realized since you posted a video of an mma fight. The average man still has higher lifting potential than the strongest women, now if he hasnt trained much at all then he wont lift as much as a upper echelon woman who has been in the gym for years, but he will still surpass her quite easily eventually if he starts lifting as well.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 05:11 PM
14

thats bullshit, if you have power you have power, the female brain doesnt make much of an distinction on that. Harvey is ugly but you see hot women fucking ugly guys with lesser status than anyone in hollywood in porn all the time, its not a big deal what the guy looks like especially if you had such status as harvey did. These actresses do not resent Harvey for being a ”false” alpha and having sex with him, they are just bitter that their career didnt go the way they thought it would and are de…
/r/TheRedPill19/12/17 04:39 PM
2

nope, what I said is fact, average men are significantly stronger than the strongest women. That clip you have is of a 120 pounds 5’5 short teenager boy vs Ronda Rosey, a female ufc champion, and she barely won it almost seemed like the boy had instructions to give up from the beginning.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 04:18 PM
1

Im not saying there arent any brave women, im just saying there are never going to be women who are that brave and strong as depicted in modern TV-shows where they enforce their own will and become leaders among men in a setting of anarchy, that has never happened throughout history and it will never happen. But since its fiction I think its fine if just a few women where depicted that unrealistically, but as you said, its all over the place. Funny enough, it actually somehow makes some women ac…
/r/MensRights19/12/17 02:48 PM
1

No there arent any women who are that brave/talented/skilled. keep in mind im not saying there arent any brave women, im just saying there arent any women capable of taking that level of responsibility while her own life is at risk, as depicted in most major TV shows these days. Im talking about fictional women like Catniss from Hunger Games, the main female cast from the 100, etc. Now the fiction where women have superpowers like Wonder Woman etc, of course its unrealistic but I can believe tha…
/r/MensRights19/12/17 02:44 PM
0

thats not what I was referring too. Obviously the technology available in sci-fi superhero movies are unrealistic (even though an iron man like exosuit doesnt seem like an inconcievable thing in the future) my point was the mentality and the actions/choices the heroes do in comparison to the heroines in fiction. Its not unrealistic at all to see men be brave and do crazy things and take crazy risks to achieve their goals, and a good number of men through out real life history has had the mental …
/r/MensRights19/12/17 08:01 AM
6

its funny how pretty much none of the female role models we have in entertainment, TV, movies and litterature, pretty much none of them are realistic, real women simply are not that strong, brave or talented/skilled in comparison to men.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 06:02 AM
1

I dont care about what these women say, ultimately they are just afraid of the fact that if men dont want to work with them alone and wont initiate romance with them, they will have to step up and let go of their privileges that their sexuality gives them. But they wont do it because they know that without special privileges given to them by men, men will outperform women easily in pretty much all walks of life. Feminists with the #MeToo movement essentially overplayed their hand and now these s…
/r/MensRights19/12/17 05:55 AM
2

we are though, because being right is all about facts and not about how you present them, ultimately. Feminists fail on both ends since they barely have any facts that support them while also presenting their false narratives in a very bitter, condenscending and hypocritical manner. So since we have the facts on our side, I dont think we need to take the moral high ground as well in how we present our information, I would rather we keep on putting women in their place whenever an opportunity ari…
/r/MensRights19/12/17 05:14 AM
1

The only thing that needs to be said is that this individual Stephanie Pio, is the one who is trash, so bitter and pathetic. She doesnt even realize that she wouldnt even have existed without patriarchy because humanity would have gone extinct long ago if we didnt follow patriarchal rules.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 04:59 AM
1

yeah man youre exactly right.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 02:04 AM
2

Yeah exactly, in my case, i often avoid the subject because some women will leave immediately if you reject the idea of marriage, but after ive gotten laid with a woman and she seems like a good match I usually tell them indirectly that marriage will always be off the table unless the laws change. I havent met one who wasnt offended by that yet. Pressure is a big redflag but even if there is no pressure thats not enough for me to consider them a nawalt, they would have to completely accept that …
/r/MensRights18/12/17 11:22 PM
2

agree with you 100% feminism goes against female interests as well, because they artificially empower women at the cost of men, and since women want to date up in social and financial value, they have very few men available due to feminism, and also because many of the quality men available would never seriously date a feminist woman. just pump and dump, which just makes these women even more bitter. Feminism is essentially women wanting it all, best of both worlds, but men are increasingly not …
/r/MensRights18/12/17 09:32 PM
2

Alright man sounds like we are on the same page 👍🏾 I like refuting feminist bullshit as well but they literally every time block me because as you said they dont like facts that make them feel bad, they prefer staying in their fantasy echo chamber, whic means we need to invade their safe spaces, we will never get a big mainstream platform to say these things so only societal collapse will force them to abandon their false narratives.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 08:34 PM
1

imo it was a mistake getting married, i hope she doesnt change dor your sake mate. The main point is, if we as a population dont acknowledge and document the true reason why feminism failed and will always fail (womens biological inferiority and always voting for more welfare) then the risk that someone will try it again is higher.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 03:07 PM
2

yeah, but im tired of their pathetic spinning of results. I would rather we tell them how it is and put women in their place, and when they get butthurt about it we just tell them to shut up. They will eventually go along with everything regardless because they are dependent on men for survival. They cannot handle mens work and patriarchy is natural and the only way we survive and progress.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 03:52 AM
0

men are better than women, just get over it. Women need to learn to adapt to men if they want to work in male dominated fields, either that or gtfo, take it or leave it.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 03:14 AM
1

i guess..for me the only thing thats keeping me interested in more than pump and dump is the prospect of having a son, but i can see the benefit in dating a goodlooking postwall woman but they are rare and often come with previous kids which is annoying.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/17 07:03 PM
1

im just saying that at that age (around 40) women are likely to be infertile and their looks could be gone over night. So they are still technically post wall, good for pump and dump but not more than that imo.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/17 03:02 PM
11

very good article. It almost gives me nawalt hope to realize a woman wrote that. its 100% based on truth.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 04:35 AM
2

if you have some more free time to spare could you come up with some actress or model which you think has a similar body and/or face as this woman had? Also at that age and partying, does she work part time or fulltime? i assume she didnt have any kids. Its interesting because you rarely see that kind of relationship and what dynamics it has especially if it turns into a ”serious relationship” hmm so your cousin is willing to risk it all with marriage despite being redpilled..even chads get fuck…
/r/TheRedPill08/12/17 03:23 AM
-4

i assume that 38 year old had lots of surgery. Is your cousin a chad looking guy? I mean this woman did have kids or not from the previous marriage? if she already got kids and dicorce money i guess hse just wants to have fun with some young dick. However at 38 she is going to get ugly fast, im trying to imagine her looks, i have never seen a woman close to 40 ans above that didnt have some wrinkly skin, most noticably in the neck area. But if she has a tight ass i guess she squats? still not su…
/r/TheRedPill08/12/17 02:34 AM
1

well it wasnt exactly uninhibited. I was shy when i was bluebill and more insecure since I had no real idea how women worked and what exactly they found attractive. I believed the bullshit that all women like different things and even though they also said be yourself so you find the right woman that part didnt stop me from hiding my weaker aspects and tried to present myself as a ”cool” guy who didnt treat women that different from a friend or guys in general, but still showed a bit more curios…
/r/TheRedPill07/12/17 02:38 AM
1

i dont really agree with the second stage after developing narcisism. I feel like my beta nice guy mentality actually changed permanently into an alpha zero fucks given personality after I realized the true nature of women, hypegamy and the fact that love from them will always be conditional. I kind of thought about it like this: why would I love someone who will never love me for who I am and what I look like, but rather for what I can do for her? especially when they all expect more from you t…
/r/TheRedPill06/12/17 09:49 PM
3

sorry but youre wrong and im correct. You definitely dont need to be smart to be wealthy. You could have inherited wealth or just gotten lucky. Many of these musicians dont actually have good genes they where just one hit wonders, same with people who got lucky with investments etc. Also you can lose your belongings pretty easily, while if you lose your looks its either due to aging or some accident/injury which is likely to make you less capable of doing anything if it ruins your looks without …
/r/TheRedPill06/12/17 01:15 AM
1

He needs to build an really advanced AI fembot that would be his ideal partner imo, something like the AI in the movie ”Her” except with a physical body/avatar.
/r/TheRedPill05/12/17 10:53 PM
2

thats because we are very open and straight forward with women, we only lie about comittment quite often but this is obvious why we would have incentive to do so and women are aware of this. Men who are alpha however can afford to be honest about just wanting to fuck in most cases. Woman have so many more reasons to lie about her intentions than men do, but once a man knows about women mating strategies and hypergamy, all of their vague behaviour becomes obvious what their intent is.
/r/TheRedPill05/12/17 10:02 PM
5

yeah, its because most of these black rappers didnt get any attention from women at all before they gained fame and wealth. As you notice most of these black rappers are quite ugly and physically unattractive according to women, and coming from the hood means they lack socioeconomic status and potential as well, most of those who live in the hood and try to be gangsters or rappers fail. Being a badboy gangster on its own really doesnt make women interested in you unless they are also stuck in th…
/r/TheRedPill05/12/17 08:21 PM
9

thats not an equal comparison. Dont try to justify womens attraction to material needs with mens attaction to physical beauty. physical beauty is part of who you are, and signals good genes, and women are quite picky with this as well when it comes to which guys they date unless the guy is super rich/famous. not dating someone because they arent wealthy and because you think you have better options (even though those options only want them for sex, not relationships) is very superficial and mate…
/r/TheRedPill05/12/17 08:06 PM
3

yeah the western media is always lying abot India, they are deliberately trying to portray it in a negative light.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 06:44 PM
7

thats such a retarded and irrelevant statement to this discussion that i now question your intelligence. First of all, aryan is not a race, it used to be a social class in ancient india and iran. It has literally nothing to with white people except hitler who stole the term. And the racial disparities are smaller and more nuanced compared to the gender differences. But overall european and various different asian people including indians and west asians have better IQ than the rest on average, a…
/r/TheRedPill03/12/17 08:52 PM
7

thats not the issue, the issue is weak and dumb emotional people who refuse to believe in anything that doesnt paint them in a positive light. The world doesnt care about fairness or equality, it has always been survival of the fittest, and some species fail to adapt and go extinct. Sometimes due to competition with other superior species. There is no reason to believe or assume that the human genders are equal when we dont witness equality in most other animal species, especially when all data …
/r/TheRedPill03/12/17 08:10 PM
6

but its indisputable fact that women are biologically inferior, women would get easily out competed in tje work force today if it werent for all the feminist help programs and quotation laws that favor them over men. This is also the case in the education system. In spite of all these handicaps, men still outperform women in STEM fields and jobs that are still physical, almost all contruction jobs still require strenght in spite of the use of machines, and womens bodies are to fragile to handle …
/r/TheRedPill03/12/17 07:51 PM
5

welfare budget is running out in these western countries other than the US as well, feminism is not sustainable because it ruins fertility rate, and women are incapable of replacing men in the work force due to being biologically inferior to men.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/17 07:37 PM
19

men are biologically superior to women, so we dont need any unfair social advantages for women to be able to marry up. In a meritocracy the average man will be a catch for the average woman. However with feminism, women are given unfair privileges for free by blue pill men, which inflates these womens self percieved value, so they think they deserve better men than they actually are worth.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/17 07:21 PM
1

now its you who are simplifying, im aware its not completely black and white and i already suggested that in my forst post, but majority of the things redpillers claim have basis in research on our evolutionary instincts and many surveys and other related studies show a pattern with strong correlation. there is to much for me to source it all but if you have looked at a youtuber called turd flinging monkey he has most of the info with sources, there are many guys speaking about this but he expla…
/r/MensRights01/11/17 05:50 PM
1

both. Many girls ive known growing up, typical girls of all sorts of backgrounds, many of them are feminists and either they have been completely brainwashed by the feminazis so they repeat the lies being said by the feminists in the media, or they are aware its bullshit but still want to protect the false narrative for their selfish needs. and btw many of these girls only revealed what they truly felt in regards to feminism by the facebook posts or comments they like, or instagram posts with re…
/r/MensRights01/11/17 05:33 PM
2

redpillers at least base a lot of their rhetoric on facts, while most feminists are completely delusional and claim things that are directly contradicted and refuted by statistics.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 06:37 AM
1

i think women should have the same opportunities as men, be allowed to pursue whatever education they want etc, but we need to remove all laws which favor women simply to remove responsibilities from them. Women should not be entitled to a mans money just for getting married, unless you are willing to remove no fault divorce and give back men authority over women in marriage. Women have many biological limits that prevent them from being equal to men in a meritocracy, so either you need to let g…
/r/MensRights17/10/17 06:33 PM
1

they have found a correlation between high IQ and academical as well as economical success, even though of course many factors are involved. Also all of the very high achievers and inventors in science where found to score very high IQ. So its pretty accurate, and until someone finds something else to might disprove current findings we have to accept that all evidence points to men being smarter than women.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 12:10 PM
1

its fact
/r/MensRights17/10/17 11:29 AM
1

wrong and its you who are retarded, brain size and IQ are one of the only ways we can accurately meassure intelligence so far.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 08:28 AM
1

its not that women used to dominate in relationships, they have always been to weak to do that. its that the people two millennia ago already where aware of hypergamy and female nature, which is of course sinful considering greed and being selfish is considered sins. I assume this is why Eve is portrayed as the sinner and the one who doomed mankind into being expelled from paradise.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 12:57 AM
1

the areas in which men are better than women at are far more significant and numerous compared to the biological advantages women have which are all insignificant, so men are superior as a whole.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 11:50 PM
1

im smarter than you by far, im smarter than vast majority of women. most men are smarter than most women, and the most intelligent people in the world are all men. deal with it.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 11:36 PM
1

youre not a doctor, everybody who has seen your posts knows this. now shut the fuck up about that. my sources came from real empirical studies and they are factual, be as butthurt about it as you want. im not delusional at all, its you who are delusional. Men are better than women, its 100% fact. and i use women for sex, but just like men in general, we dont need women for anything else unless we want kids (and we can even use surrogacy and soon artificial wombs for that). women however literall…
/r/MensRights16/10/17 10:44 PM
2

nope, its you who are dumb and probably has two digit IQ at best, while im in the upper echelon of intelligence. sooner or later that fantasy ideal world of yours is going to crash and then you will cry while having to admit how vastly superior men are to women. you are not rational at all so you wont even see it coming. bye trash.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 10:23 PM
0

i didnt say women cannot be doctors (although the best doctors and scientists etc have always been and always will be men) but YOU are definitely not a doctor because even a woman doctor would be able to comprehend the facts i have presented and would not write like a ghetto thot like you. i havent been brainwashed because the mainstream media goes against everything we woke redpill people talk about, the only way you would talk about these things i do is if you tried to look deep for the truth.…
/r/MensRights16/10/17 10:12 PM
2

hahahah you are even more stupid if you think youre fooling anyone that youre a doctor considering the awful way you type, and also the incredibly low iq you are displaying in your lack of reasoning skills. youre not a doctor, end of story. Men have more grey matter than women do, and overall more braincells. men are more intelligent deal with it. im better at math than you. i was talking about the west, women are not able to do much against men in the east because patriarchy is still alive ther…
/r/MensRights16/10/17 10:01 PM
1

youre wrong again, everything i said was fact. and i dont care about ten random people when the streets are filled with brainwashed trash like yourself. and youre to stupid to realize i said women are the majority in western countries. in china and india because of favoring boys, they have a very skewed man/woman ratio, but in pretty much all of the western world we have majority of women and its over here that feminism is spreading like cancer. you didnt prove anything other than how stupid you…
/r/MensRights16/10/17 09:51 PM
1

listen, its you who are triggered, and you are retarded. Anyone with common sense can see that you arent a doctor, youre most likely some welfare parasite thot. lmfao. you can compare male elephant brain size to female elephant brain size, but not across species. elephants have evolved to survive in very different conditions compared to humans. But human women and men both have the same anatomic functions except for their genitals, so the reason men have bigger brains and more IQ cannot be expla…
/r/MensRights16/10/17 09:44 PM
1

wrong again, the things i have said here are indisputable fact, and not simply because i said them, its because anyone with even average or above intelligence knows this from the facts and data that is available. and women are discriminating against men by taking advantage of being majority voters and voting for more feminist laws which favor them at the cost of men. so yeah its already proved conclusively that men are superior to women and nothing you say can change that fact.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 09:37 PM
0

nope, someone who is so obviously retarded like you is certainly not a scientist or doctor. i get to question whatever i want you cannot stop me. FACT: you cannot compare the brains of two completely different species to make an assesment on gender differences within a single species. Elephants are very different to humans while human male and females are 99,9% identical in their genomes. another fact, youre wrong about everything you said. Men are factually superior to women and this will alway…
/r/MensRights16/10/17 09:19 PM
1

we dont need the law to interfere for that, vast majority of men would just insult you right back, you know this is common sense unless youre a sensitive bitch.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 09:07 PM
-2

youre wrong and equality is not possible because men are biologically superior to women, which in turn means that for society to try to make things ”equal” they actually need to discriminate against men, which is exactly what we are witnessing in modern times.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 09:05 PM
0

you are definitely not a scientist. And its 100% indisputable cold hard fact that men are superior to women. Just look at history, and today we know that women are far more welfare dependent, and we also know they have on average 10% smaller brains than men and lower IQs, then you have the physical and mental strenght disparity which men outclass women in. and just because both genders are needed for reproduction does not make us equal, just like many other species of animals and pretty much all…
/r/MensRights16/10/17 09:01 PM
-2

thats not the only reason why men achieve more than women though, we are in general inherently more capable and superior to women, based on biology. Higher average IQ is just one of those examples.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 08:54 PM
-1

thats a laughable argument, nobody including you women would exist if not for men either, we are created from both sperm and eggs, so that cancels out. And no, feminism is not a legit movement anymore, we now have the statistics to prove that men are biologically superior to women and thats why we have always been held to higher responsibilities which women simply cant handle. The reward for that was that we where allowed to have authority over women when in marriage without the government inter…
/r/MensRights16/10/17 08:52 PM
-8

we cope by the fact that we know men are biologically superior to women, so we basically just laugh at all the feminist bullshit claims as we can just look at the real world and how things play out to see how wrong feminists are about basically everything. Going mgtow and only using women for sex also helps.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 08:42 PM
3

its very important to point out (even though im sure many here have said it already) that men are smarter/more intelligent than women. The only reason more women get "degrees" and graduate and get more job spots than men today is because of school bias, affirmative action which prioritizes women in education and work. its hilarious how many of these delusional women actually think they are on our level or even smarter
/r/TheRedPill01/10/17 12:05 AM
7

as for your edit, nope, men are far stronger than women psychologically. your proof is useless because women actually attempt suicide more often than men do, they just fail to complete it as often. The reason being womens attempts are often used as a cry for help while men in general do not get nearly the same ammount of aid from society and help organizations when it comes to depression and suicide. men do things all the time that would make women cry and cover in fear like being on the frontli…
/r/TheRedPill11/09/17 07:14 PM
5

nope. not fooling myself at all. women are inferior, its scientific fact. emotional intelligence is pretty much a made up term that has no real scientific basis, women are simply more emotional but due to hormones they have less control of their emotions compared to men. And women are not complex socially, their behaviour is all linked to their hypergamy instinct and group thinking because they have a hard time making decisions on their own. and it has been proven that men have better eye/hand c…
/r/TheRedPill11/09/17 06:32 PM
10

its not even up for debate, its been long confirmed in many ways that men are vastly superior to women overall, not just in terms of physical strenght, but also in creativity, mental stenght, logic, endurance and productivity. also our moral logic is justice based while womens moral system is "care" based or rather based on emotion. women are also not skilled manipulators, because all of the things they "accomplished" through feminism was only possible because the men in power allowed it to happ…
/r/TheRedPill11/09/17 12:26 PM
2

that worthless cocksucking whore who wrote that article actually believes she is in the correct, even though im sure she couldnt argue against any of the facts that where presented by the trump supporters she fucked. Point is, feminists and leftists are pretty much always wrong, but they are to pathetic to admit it.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/17 12:03 PM
26

sure, but the misogyny is completely deserved and based on facts. women simply are inferior to men and dont deserve even half of what they think they do. the very biological reason women only want the top 20% of men is because women are biologically inferior to men and are reliant on us. So to better ensure her own safety and survivial she will submit only to the most powerful men. Men developed a dominance instinct partly because resources where limited and nature was dangerous, this made us co…
/r/TheRedPill11/09/17 11:55 AM
2

hypergamy is a very primitive instinct and women have poor control over it, it is useful might even be necessary in combination with male dominance instinct, however men have more control over their dominance instinct and it has less effect on how they treat women and more on how they treat other men. basically women have hypergamy because they are inferior to men and need to rely on men to protect and provide for them. if men didnt have to compete with each other to secure survival of their lin…
/r/TheRedPill11/09/17 11:46 AM
2

sorry but no, women are the problem here and the ones who are being unrealistic, not men. most men are fine dating a woman who is equally physically attractive to himself and with the same income, however due to biology, such a woman will have a lot more men chasing her for sex compared to women chasing that same level man. Even higher level men will hit on her in hopes of getting an easier hookup. women make the mistake of thinking she is the same value as these higher level men who hit on her,…
/r/TheRedPill11/09/17 11:27 AM
2

"Equality" actually is anti-male, since men are biologically superior to women, we have always carried responsibilities that where to much for women to handle but we where also rewarded with more rights and authority alongside that responsibility, now when society is safer and more convenient to live in, women start to demand all the rights we men have while not having to carry the same responsibilities. So basically women want all the advantages of being a woman to remain while removing all the…
/r/TheRedPill04/09/17 05:21 PM
1

But it makes no sense to me why someone like alba would want the genes of some random average guy, when all he can provide is essentially his personality, she could do much better without having to sacrifice anything but she still chose to have kids with him.
/r/askTRP28/05/17 09:41 PM
1

Yeah i get that, but "emotions" of men really isnt that valued by women, especially not when its something most men can provide, and these celebrity women also happen to be very goodlooking so im sure they could have gotten som famous or at least wealthy guy who also could provide them with emotions, and probably relate to their lifestyle more easily. So these examples still dont make much sense to me if awalt and if hypergamy is still always in effect even when women are superwealthy themselves…
/r/askTRP28/05/17 09:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter