TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SouthernTop7 Archive

View 3 posts and 48 comments by SouthernTop7 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

In the study Asians were referred to as East Asian. They had separate groups for middle east and South Asian. Yes you are Asian but the study very likely didn't sample on Kyrgyzstani
/r/BlackPillScience11/02/26 09:23 PM
2

I really don't know what your trying to get at. Because my original reply to the original commenter was to give a credible explanation that relationship length does have an association on women sexual desire. Which you admitted your self saying "Yes this seems to be what is happening with the couples in these studies, but I truly don't believe relationship length is the only cause." Which was my whole point I never argued that it was the only cause just that it was a independent and robust assoc…
/r/BlackPillScience29/08/25 06:55 AM
1

So is it with only East Asian women then? Because south Asian is much more traditional in culture but interval marriage rates point to the fact that south Asians men/women have similar interracial marriage rates. Same with Latinos/Latinas. Akon with that East Asians is born if I remember in study actually have one of the lowest beliefs in sexism. Yet in us born female/male East Asian the gap is still present. I think it’s just an excuse the two groups are just mutually attracted to each other.
/r/BlackPillScience28/08/25 07:52 AM
7

Nope, the study controlled for age and used a relatively young sample 19-32.
/r/BlackPillScience28/08/25 07:46 AM
2

Part 2 (read part1 first) The 2019 study did keep things separate. They kept things separate sexual desire, sexual satisfaction, marital satisfaction, and sex frequency were all different measures. Reading the study again the methods used to measure these four variables were very robust. But generally Wives declining desire predicted later drops in both partners’ marital satisfaction, but not vice versa. Also the pathway was through sexual satisfaction, not how often couples had sex. So it’s qua…
/r/BlackPillScience27/08/25 10:51 PM
2

Part 1 Might be errors as I didn't proof read. Also divided into 2 parts because character limit. It wasn't 2 statements that was tested it was a scale from eight partner comparison descriptors (you vs. partner). Which are "(1) wishing the partnership to endure, (2) wanting to possess the partner for herself or for himself, (3) wanting to spend much time with the partner, (4) wanting to talk to the partner, (5) being jealous, and (6) being in love. Stated negatively, (7) fear of intimacy may be …
/r/BlackPillScience27/08/25 10:51 PM
2

You brought up some good points On “commitment imbalance is a bad measure” Sure, it’s imperfect. But even with that limitation it points the wrong way to explain the decline Women’s greater commitment was positively tied to desire and slightly increased with time. In regression, adding it actually made the “duration -> lower desire (women)” link a bit stronger (a suppressor), not weaker. So even if you dislike the scale, it can’t really be the reason women’s desire drops. On “gender norms” proxi…
/r/BlackPillScience27/08/25 09:28 AM
4

That being said you really shouldn't let a study posted on reddit affect your way of life. Desire is dynamic and very context sensitive. Don't let a fucking study change your way of life. Go into the relationship and see if its worth it.
/r/BlackPillScience27/08/25 02:11 AM
5

Heres the actual study https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12049023/ The study in the post I linked was Klusman 2006 the one above is where the graph and what I meant to link Klusman 2002. However they had the same exact goal to see sexual desire change in relationship except different sample size. There was also a 2019 study that found the same results Tldr; for below is yes all four variables you mentioned can't explain why women sexual desire dropped Read on ahead if you want its detailed. I'll h…
/r/BlackPillScience27/08/25 02:07 AM
1

There's no empirical evidence for that. Just looking at divorce rates Wmaf are significantly more likely to divorce than Amaf. Along with that AmWf has a lower divorce rate than WmAf. Along with that Asian men are the least likely group to commit domestic violence I think it comes to mutual attraction. White males find Asian female attractive and vice versa.
/r/BlackPillScience27/08/25 12:29 AM
2

Looks like your comment got removed instead of responding to my point you go into another racist rant and attacking my character. A WHITE person thinking I have some racial superiority complex for your race and self hate for my race when there is no evidence of that lol. I literally stated a sociological trend I did raise some good points south Asians which is even more patriarchal has similar interracial rates between both genders. East Asians don’t exhibit the same thing, the reason being whit…
/r/BlackPillScience05/08/25 03:51 AM
3

lol another Ad hominem this dimwit does not know how to respond. You have not once given a good rebuttal to any of my responses and instead made assumptions and attacked my character. No I don’t have an Asian inferiority complex. Ik dating might be harder as Asian but that doesn’t mean I’m gonna somehow believe my culture is inferior to western/white culture. Then you tell me to please stop watching porn and to seek help? What? You don’t see how dumb your responses are?
/r/BlackPillScience04/08/25 12:59 PM
2

Lol you act like you know me irl. I don’t entertain any of this ideals irl and don’t let any bp stuff leak into my real life. Love how you go into attacking me instead of having an actual rebuttal (Ad hominem). My way of thinking isn’t fundamentally broken I just stated facts and likely reason that apparently someone like you can’t find a counter argument for. Again I don’t think you read my comment which shows how much of a dimwit you are. I didn’t state that women dating decision is irrational…
/r/BlackPillScience04/08/25 11:10 AM
3

Nah you don't see the same results with South Asians. South Asian men and women have negligible difference in interracial marriage between immigrant Indians and Us born.They are even more into the idea of marrying into their own race (with some second gen immigrants being pushed into arranged marriage). The simple explanation is mutual attraction between whites and asians thats it. Asian women typically rate white men very highly and vice versa. Based off online dating info.
/r/BlackPillScience02/08/25 03:27 PM
8

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31471791/ This one is in 2019 and controleld for various other factors such as child birth and found the same result men sexual desire remained same at start of relationship while women sexual desire plummeted. Your statement doesn't even make sense and has me guessing you didn't even read what I wrote. The question and data taken by both studies is what percent of women/men say yes to wanting sex frequently basically the sexual desire. Not how many times you and …
/r/BlackPillScience02/08/25 03:20 PM
1

No lol <image> Marital Dissolution Among Interracial Couples - PMC
/r/BlackPillScience30/07/25 10:32 AM
1

The recent data still shows the disparity.
/r/BlackPillScience29/07/25 01:16 PM
5

I have more studies about this but you’d be surprised. I think it has gotten slightly better tho.
/r/BlackPillScience29/07/25 01:13 PM
1

But you don’t see the same with south Asian women were the difference in interracial dating between men and women of south Asian descent is minimal.
/r/BlackPillScience29/07/25 01:12 PM
1

I’m not sure about that part but I know it is lower than black men black womena and black men white women.
/r/BlackPillScience29/07/25 01:10 PM
3

You just linked two random articles that aren't doi . Also neither of your articles even entertains the idea that feminist are really about “punishing high‑value men” and they discuss a completely different topic. Instead you just cited a doi that doesn't exist, citied two random entries and made up your own theory which doesn't fit into a science sub That being said I saw your other reply and find myself somewhat agreeing with you which you should've elaborated in your post.
/r/BlackPillScience29/07/25 05:11 AM
13

Basically when tested straight women actually showed more attraction to women than men.Straight women respond to both male and female erotic content and sometimes even more to female content. This is different form men as straight and gay men tend to only get aroused by the sex they prefer. So basically women’s sexual attractions are more flexible than men’s and women may be drawn to other women even if they are straight. Might be some wrong.
/r/BlackPillScience29/07/25 03:03 AM
5

Yeah I live in an Asian heavy area the ratio of like wmaf vs amwf is insanely skewed.
/r/BlackPillScience26/07/25 01:21 AM
5

That’s a very outdated concept. My parents are 1st gen Asian immigrants and they did not do this nor do any of my relatives that reside in an Asian country. Second generation definetly do not do this as Asian women do not really do a caretaker role.
/r/BlackPillScience26/07/25 01:20 AM
3

I’m not doing much better 5’6
/r/BlackPillScience26/07/25 01:18 AM
2

No Asians in this study are East Asian.
/r/BlackPillScience26/07/25 01:17 AM
6

Yeah I realized that problem with my post. Because I didn't really distinguish between the sample of those with racial preference and those without and assume people would catch on. The 91% figure is 91 % of women with racial preferences exclude Asians. In reality it is 454/680 ≈ 66.8 %.of women exclude asian men. Same thing for the 61% exclude Asian women figure. Of the men with racial preference 61% exclude Asian women but for the overall sample 27% exclude Asians. So if your looking at the pe…
/r/BlackPillScience24/07/25 10:53 PM
10

Ehh that wasn’t the most surprising result. I remember seeing more recent data and the trend still holds that black women in general dislike white men as potential dates/partners. Edit: It's actually 58% that exclude white men. Among black women with racial preference 76% exclude white men but the overall sample(including those without racial preference) is 58%
/r/BlackPillScience24/07/25 02:49 PM
38

Asians in the study are East Asians. The study had 10 options that included middle eastern and South Asian/indians. It focused on the four main groups white,Latino,blacks and East Asians.
/r/BlackPillScience24/07/25 10:14 AM
9

Once again conflating age and relationship length. Find me where I said those claim in this comment chain. First off, I never claimed that women want less sex as they age. You’re probably confusing that with this line “Instead you see women's reported desire declines as relationships lengthen.” That’s clearly about relationship duration, not age. Second, I never said women want more sex as they age either. What I said was: β = +0.072 (ns) Which means that older women reported wanting sex slightl…
/r/BlackPillScience04/07/25 10:37 PM
9

No it isn’t point it out. Are you misinterpreting my comment age when controlled is not significant on saying yes to wanting sex
/r/BlackPillScience04/07/25 09:05 PM
12

The study was done on 19–32 year old Germans. So physical aging isn’t really present in this sample. Along with that, when controlling for age Klusmann found no significant effect. So a younger or older couple within that range still shows the same pattern. That is women desire declines with partnership length, and men’s remains steady.
/r/BlackPillScience04/07/25 09:54 AM
10

Again stop trying to do guesswork. Women’s age coefficient is β = +0.072 (ns). Which means there’s no significant age effect on “want sex often.” The data shows that older women do not under report out of modesty. In fact +0.072 means that older women actually say yes to wanting sex more often. Which goes against your age modesty theory. However its not significant so its just saying that age doesn't affect saying yes to wanting sex more often. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12049023/
/r/BlackPillScience04/07/25 09:48 AM
11

Because sexual desire is inherently subjective, self reports are some of the best and only ways to gauge sexual desire. If men’s over reporting (“pride”) or women’s under-reporting (“modesty”) were driving these results, you’d see a constant gap across all relationship lengths. Instead you see women's reported desire declines as relationships lengthen while men’s stays flat. In fact if you looked at the graph I posted in the comments. At the start of the relationship Men and Women have near iden…
/r/BlackPillScience04/07/25 02:59 AM
30

Problem is if you pick the wrong person for marriage and it results in a dead bedroom. Only way out is divorce and lots of people cannot afford to do that.
/r/BlackPillScience04/07/25 02:38 AM
25

First off your anecdote do not disprove a study. Second off the study isn't even about age and sexual desire. Obviously a 17 year old has a higher drive than a 70 year old. Its about length of relationship and sexual desire and the sample was 18-32 year old German students. It also studied 35, 40 and 60 year old and found the same exact findings.
/r/BlackPillScience04/07/25 02:34 AM
81

<image> Click to Enlarge Raw data Percent saying yes to wanting sex at 2, 12, 30, 56, and 90 months. Men: 75%, 80%, 72%, 74%, 77% Women: 70%, 55%, 52%, 31%, 27% Sample: German students aged 19–32. Women’s “want sex often” drops from 70% at 2 mo to 27% at 90 mo; men’s remain constant at ~75%. Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12049023/ (Note in the og post I linked Klusmann 2006 instead of 2002 which is what the graph and data is from. However both have the same exact findings. Just differe…
/r/BlackPillScience03/07/25 04:01 AM
1

https://preview.redd.it/xyoo8d20nkaf1.png?width=5000&format=png&auto=webp&s=547afb552bd161f970ad0374458418a6ca7dd243
/r/BlackPillScience03/07/25 02:36 AM
1

https://preview.redd.it/kb5zsqxolkaf1.png?width=2370&format=png&auto=webp&s=1930a6764b023ce7d779b688e29dc00375cbf908
/r/BlackPillScience03/07/25 02:28 AM
1

https://preview.redd.it/ngfvjgcukkaf1.png?width=1580&format=png&auto=webp&s=2774555a46d4f038ccb8c7656399a86b716f69ab
/r/BlackPillScience03/07/25 02:24 AM
5

Are you mad? Is that seriously your take away from my response. How am I coping? I never said women were physically attracted to rich men, just that they were attracted to them you illiterate pig. FYI The definition of attracted. “of people, things, places, etc.) to pull or draw someone or something towards them, by the qualities they have, especially good ones:” Being rich is a good quality I never said physically attracted.
/r/BlackPillScience23/05/25 10:26 PM
7

This study confirms the widely held belief that women are generally attracted to wealthy men. With data collected from 24 countries and 1.8 million users, it’s a very comprehensive analysis making it difficult for blue pill people to dispute it. If anybody ever tells you that women don’t care about money just throw this study at them. Most blackpill theories can be derived through common sense. Studies just allow us to confirm it
/r/BlackPillScience23/05/25 01:57 AM
17

If you want to verify my claims go ahead use sci hub on the doi from the link or read it from here. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/10707596_Truth_and_Consequences_Using_the_Bogus_Pipeline_to_Examine_Sex_Differences_in_Self-Reported_Sexuality
/r/BlackPillScience19/05/25 10:34 PM
13

First off that is not how it works jsut because men overestimate height doesn’t mean they overestimate body count. Again I’m not saying the study is definitive proof that men dont overestimate there body count. As there are conflicting studies. Second you’re wrong, men actually tend to underestimate themselves when it came to weight. https://www.sciencenordic.com/denmark-men-obesity/men-say-women-weigh-too-much/1457587
/r/BlackPillScience19/05/25 10:19 PM
23

Are we seriously going to use anecdotes to disprove a study? I suppose, by that logic, I’m free to dismiss any study whose conclusions I dislike under the pretext of anecdotal evidence.I don’t necessarily agree that it’s definitive proof that men don’t over report their sexual partners but brushing it off just because it doesn’t match your personal experience isn’t really a strong rebuttal.
/r/BlackPillScience19/05/25 08:54 PM
2

I never really understood why women would make assumptions such as this. You’re not a man you do not know what are thoughts or our perspectives are.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/01/25 08:41 PM
2

You don’t see the same initiative of men being supported into women’s role such as nursing. For women they have programs and clubs that will help them in stem which can’t be seen for men in women dominated fields.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 03:47 AM
3

Just a question was the judge a female?
/r/Divorce_Men15/05/24 03:45 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter