TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Southern_Source_2580 Archive

View 0 posts and 355 comments by Southern_Source_2580 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)

The fact that its been a comedic joke in comedian circles to point out straight men are okay with their woman being into girls too, but women are hostile to their man being into dudes as well is funny of just how women operate in relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 04:21 AM
1

"MF CLOSE YOUR SCRIPT AND RESPOND LIKE A HUMAN BEING" "You’re upsety" Lol lmao even "Let me tell you that what we are discussing doesn't matter and will use shaming tactics when a societal issue doesn't concern me, also Idk what I'm talking about despite labelling myself as bluepill"-bluepiller Ironic on the respond like a human being comment, because holy, goodluck in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 06:11 AM
1

Thats ironic with the self absorbed insult considering you are the one who just proves OP right that you bluepillers don't want to acknowledge hypergamy because you don't care, and or actively deny it. Its the equivalent of calling someone self absorbed when they mention politics in general that pertains to our everyday lifes and you can't grasp it and or care about it in general. Also obviously you do, or else you wouldn't even be replying let alone be in this subreddit. You don't hold up to sc…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 05:46 AM
1

You don't understand that putting your head in the sand also works for knowing something exists but refusing to care about it, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 01:52 AM
3

Valuable input, just proving OP right. No one is owed anything either yet we do better than putting your head in the sand and pretend you don't notice human behavior that don't align with what people say vs what they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 11:35 AM
1

Which sex do you honestly think not only uses the term settling but actively does said settling while the other doesn't even cross their mind they think they made it with someone?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 10:37 AM
5

So you went through your whole life never witnessing how the opposite sex is capable of manipulation, narcissistic darvo tactics or something? You don't even realize how ironically you are proving my point that when one holds women like people, the dismissal and shaming tactics come out rather than address the criticisms. I doubt you were born yesterday. Either you were raised around saints who happen to be women or you are a woman larping as a man on reddit of all places and think we can't tell…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 09:13 PM
3

Minus the last one really, those don't hold up to scrutiny in practice. Whenever women do in fact get treated like people ie with the same lenses of criticism for ones actions because we know they have agency, the rationalizations, lack of accountability and emotional reactions with shaming tactics come out from women when they have to face the valid criticisms of their actions. That especially is notable in your second quote. Third one is grey area because no duh no one deserves to go through t…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 08:17 PM
4

This whole post reminds me of that one stonetoss panel of the male feminist hiding in plain sight to get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 05:40 PM
2

Lmao, "no one told men being nice gets pussy" is pure gaslighting. Media, schools, romcoms, and women themselves pushed "just be kind and respectful" as the key to attraction for decades. Plenty of average guys believed it and got LJBF'd after simping. Pretending that's not common is why red pill exists. Attraction obvious? Then why the flood of "I did everything right but she friendzoned me" stories? Most men aren't asexual — they just got lied to about what women actually select for. AWALT poi…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 01:09 AM
4

Lmao, "society lied" doesn't mean men are stupid — it means they were deliberately fed bullshit from childhood while being punished for noticing reality. "Just be nice" was pushed hard, and plenty bought it until it failed hard. Attraction being obvious? Tell that to the hordes of guys who got "let's just be friends" after years of simping because media/schools told them personality trumps everything. Exceptions don't disprove the pattern. AWALT is about shared female biology and incentives, not…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 12:43 AM
6

Lmao, "sexist to men" for saying society lied to them? That's peak blue pill cope — can't even let men acknowledge they got played. AWALT = All Women Are Like That in core female nature (hypergamy, etc.). Not clones. If you can't grasp the difference between biological patterns and "every single woman is identical," that's on your reading comprehension, not us. Calling it toddler behavior misses the mark. The propaganda was relentless and most guys swallowed it whole until reality hit. Red pill …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 12:25 AM
2

Most guys aren't observant because society actively lied to them for 20+ years: "just be nice," "personality matters most," "women want the same as you," "divorce is rare if you pick right," etc. Red pill isn't "basic dating 101" — it's the corrective shock after decades of gaslighting. AWALT isn't "every woman is a clone." It's "women share the same biological software: hypergamy, branch swinging, dual mating strategy." Exceptions exist, but betting on them without vetting is how men get destro…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/26 11:31 PM
2

What do you think would happen if you stopped cooking, and other affectionate acts indefinitely but claim you respect him? Also money wasn't the issue let alone ever mentioned I think you know I never referred this as affection deep down. That analogy doesn't work lol nobody is confusing mustard for ketchup. People are saying these acts demonstrate respect through service and care — the same way a man fixing shit around the house, killing spiders, or taking the lead is showing respect by fulfill…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 06:00 AM

Genuine question are you ugly?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 07:11 PM
1

Do you still if ever do this affection of fantasy for your husband? Do you think men are insane for thinking a woman can be affectionate and respect him at the same time? Do you honestly believe women are a monolith who think like you do when it comes to this affectionate behavior for men so it must be a lie not respect majority of the time?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 07:08 PM
-1

Dude its the fact that women deny hypergamy and try to gaslight that its not real, when they actively promote it for their benefit just like lying its in our heads benefits them in hypergamy. OP never denied hypergamy nor how he contributes to it, its the gaslighting. You pulling, it goes both ways card is a sky is blue question. Thats it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 11:06 PM
-1

No not, "Right...", they are there as well as here in this post just find them it's not difficult.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 07:57 PM
0

Well that's not true, they're are just hidden in endless threads of replies reddit likes to make into a maze.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 07:40 PM
-1

Nobody is forcing anybody here lol. They openly admit to it then cry foul when the point made under scrutiny holds up. Nobody would notice enough to care to make a reasonable rebuttal if they didn't post publicly for others to have the opportunity to reply back. You have strong bias to give women leeway from scrutiny. The evident dismissal of accountability even as to accuse some sort of oppression from freewill actions of admittance is quite something to say the least.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 10:44 AM
-1

Then you should be able to answer your own question. It makes your counterpoint moot because regardless men/males aren't and will never be afforded the luxury of leeway from scrutiny.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 10:33 AM
-1

If telling someone who missrepresented what you said and to reread with clear intention to understand what you said is somehow a personal insult then I genuinely do not know what else to say to that. First of all, taking accountability is not a label, it's taking accountability. Someone who willingly admits to doing certain actions and tries to deny they are a person who can be identified as one who does said actions is oppression then they should recognize aka take accountability that they will…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 10:29 AM
-3

You speak as if you've ever seen how well it went when a male of any age who wasn't gay thought people of both sex's would treat him with leeway like a female of any age.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 10:19 AM
-1

I didn't call these women fools. Please reread with reading comprehension. Foaming at the mouth is exaggerating, they simply see the lack of accountability under scrutiny that these women get away with not being called out for what they are bi and or closeted at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 10:16 AM
-2

OP is referring to another post that called out women who look at lesbian porn who claim they're 100% straight. The notion that there is no evidence of this phenomena is frankly disingenuous. Even posting articles and source for these claims.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 10:13 AM
1

The fact they are men and women?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 10:07 AM
-2

OPs post is likely a reaction post of said, "women in the room with us" and wanted to address it more openly. That's the point. Exactly, it's meant as a means to address the denial that doesn't hold up to scrutiny of what they are. Its one thing to force a label and completely different for someone who doesn't want to admit it let alone say they do an act that only said labels do and expect others to rationalize the closet with them like they're fools.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 10:05 AM
2

What difference
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 09:59 AM
-1

He is referring to women who claim the equivalent explanation of watching women's bodies instead You aren't the women he is trying to convey the message to so you speak as if you are all women by saying women don't get aroused by looking at women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 09:56 AM
9

Its the denial that they are at least bi by said women and how women are given room to deny without much scrutiny vs men who aren't given the luxury of denial of reality under scrutiny.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 09:53 AM
-2

There was another post about how there are women denying that they are closeted lesbians or bi given the equivalent scenarios made by OP. In that post women which he refers to doing the equivalent deny they are gay and claim 100% straight despite doing gay acts and admitting they liked it. What OP is doing is trying to get these same women to look at the ridiculous denial a man when he does the equivalent scenarios as self reflection of how ridiculous they themselves try to deny who they are und…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 09:50 AM
-8

Men hate old hoes who were at the time young hoes who had high standards and still have high standards but are now old and same amount of entitlement is off-putting. Also do not equate identifying a hoe to hating all women or just making the statement that they hate women for being a woman and not the content of character that doesn't hold up to scrutiny let alone on who hides behind woman like a shield of he aforementioned character which is identifiable.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 09:17 AM
8

You're a deeply closeted bi woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 09:10 AM
5

What makes you think saying, "There's nothing wrong with X" then proceeding to not address the wrongs you know people have likely mentioned to you as to why, under scrutiny, is a disingenuous dynamic largely on part of the woman? It never fails to amaze me how much y'all insist upon yourselves in your arguments when the elephant in the room is right there lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 08:51 AM
6

Literally proving my point that the issue is that these men aren't competent sociopaths not the fact they are being misogynistic sociopaths. Nowhere in your post did you say not to behave this way, but rather that they are incompetent at it aka being sly with it that women want to be lied to convincingly. What is, "I can change him". For $500, Alex. Lmao be so fr rn.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/26 01:52 PM
9

What a bogus rationalized take. Do you not realize that you are ultimately telling men to not show their red flags and learn to lie to women to gain their affection? Let us also not ignore that women do not like taking responsibility when they engage with men who do actually do the misogynistic actions women claim to dislike so much they immediately leave and tell everyone how evil the person is. Only for them to stay and work things out because they love the man for being able to lie and feed t…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/26 12:28 PM
1

Expecting a woman to NOT want you to pay for her is as improbable as a dead bedroom lasting long term, let alone short term if you proposed that deal right off the bat to the vast majority of men. To not know this and then type out your response as if it was sound leads me to believe you were born yesterday, have cognitive dissonance in this topic, or being disingenuous.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 05:10 PM
3

What makes you think this deal isn't what men are faced with after women have their "fun"? Lol I hate to break it to you, but the notion of a woman saying they love their man but never want to have sex with him is hilarious to anyone who isn't the following; the women trying to sucker a man to be their trained paypig, the men who were stupid enough to get suckered, or women who enable women like this. You realize a dead bedroom is a common denominator for why cheating and divorces occur right? Y…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 04:44 PM
2

Oh now you can't BS? lol. Look the context here is love of your life and you blatantly accused me of thinking women in general are sex dolls (just no nice try really nice try lmao) by merely mentioning the double standards of adherence to your partners desires and needs. This isn't some random nor someone you dated for a bit but someone you made a commitment to each other not just one party adhering to the other it's both. Please keep your comments up it's funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 04:05 PM
3

What part specifically says about calling YOU being a sex doll, let alone anyone?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 03:58 PM
3

Who said you are? Quote who said it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 03:55 PM
4

You resorted to insults rather than address the argument good to know.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 03:54 PM
5

"relationships is supposed to be about compatibility, companionship and love." And we aren't women's daddy to finance their lives. No man owes women financial stability but we adhere to it because we know women like it, whats more we don't ever tell women this truth because we know thats a quick way to end a relationship with a woman. Yet you and people like you have the audacity to expect women to be financed without applying the same absurd logic to what men want, you would rightly call men wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 02:49 PM
4

Can YOU even define what masculinity is? You go on about claiming it's selfish according to him implying you know what masculinity is by what it isn't. Also, try replacing selfish into everytime he says the term masculine. Your last point doesn't hold up.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 01:51 PM

"Men are generally sheepish and follow what is popular like looksmaxxing." What is the billion dollar cosmetics industry? Which sex can't walk outside without painting a mask on everyday? Which sex is taught in marketing to pander to because they follow whats popular to buy? LMAO
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 07:23 AM
1

Elaborate your first point.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 04:16 AM

"you must also argue that also 100% responsible for any time they pick a good guy" Yes? LMAO If you pick a good car with good payment plan it's on you, if you pick an overpriced lemon you didn't bother checking for a bad engine and got interest payments out the butt it is 100% your fault for being this stupid. Lol your attempt at a strawman in the first follow up interpretation is funny. Nowhere in his argument did he state the man isn't to blame, in order for your first rebuttal to work it requ…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 09:51 PM
2

Hold on, you're doing it again. First off, I never claimed people can't pick and choose when they want to be sexualized and by whom. Please reread my first response idk how you aren't seeing what you're doing. 2nd I started my argument that objectification is happening regardless of consent in both cases. The only difference is the use of saying objectification is bad without consent when again it's done regardless all that is noted is that she must confront that undesired men are also doing it …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 04:19 PM
-3

Dude, sincerely, can you tell me specifically where I argued women aren't allowed to that??? I'm over here saying 1+1 = 2 and you're claiming I'm doing subtraction when I never said anything about subtraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 03:52 PM
-3

You don't seem to understand. So I'll lay it out. According to your logic, when you see that man do all that objectification you automatically see that as consent because he is desired. Once you don't see this ideal man do aka an undesirable man you automatically assume it's not consent. And if it's not consent then it is equivalent to sexual harassment because in order for flirting to be considered harassment the person must not consent. Which is true, what we are trying to get you to understan…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 03:46 PM
19

You just missed the point. The objectification was done without her consent in both cases, he is mentioning how if its done by men she doesn't desire then suddenly its objectification and that is bad, when its not about consent, its about making her confront the fact even those she deems unworthy are doing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 03:00 PM
28

Trying to get women to take accountability for their choice in men, they ultimately desire enough to tolerate red flags (same of which attracted them to him) from, is like trying to get the captain save a ho to stop getting with single mothers with 2 different baby daddies. The most we can do is warn them but if they respond with dismissal and or insults then it's free game to clown on them.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/26 12:04 PM
17

Women have Autogynephilia But since of double standards, its not seen as a disorder but a default in women, if you pay close attention its the same narcissistic lust for themselves that require a proxy to truly enjoy, men with this are noted to want people to desire them as they desire themselves via proxy, if you also notice how women describe men they want its always that they themselves are irresistible and to simp for, combine this with the need to appeal to sociopathic violent men throughou…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/26 09:02 PM
31

Are you serious? You genuinely think women aren't also doing this? The only difference is that women get a pass because they often get the, "insists upon itself" pass no one calls out unless you're at least redpilled. It takes going online and writing about experiences that even gave men the ability to figure out that significant amount of women aren't innocent and more so enabling by others.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/26 05:04 PM
1

Oh brother, misogynists are successful with women, because they see them for what they are and act accordingly. The same men to tell you that women aren't at fault since thats how they are emotionally and act how women want to be treated not what they say they do. If we all listened to what women say as in to treat them nice and like any other person then simps and non mysoginists who haven't got a clue on womens nature would be the most successful, the notion of players and mysoginistic woman b…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 02:31 PM
1

Notice how women get denied financially in a relationship suddenly it's the biggest problem, when the money isn't the man, but sex entails ones body being shared with the person you supposedly romantically love yet somehow when it's a dead bedroom and the man is forced to give up his money to a woman who hold divorce rape over his head if he even remotely suggests she hold up her side of the reason they were even together. Unless its rape, or too damn old to get the gear working, a relationship …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 12:17 AM
1

First off, yes there is evidence that it destroys pair bonding are you that delusional? Try telling anyone being known as the town tramp/fuckboi doesn't correlate with them being red flags unable to pair bond LMAO. Second, it's disproportionately a woman term because women disproportionately monkey branch let's not act like she just now got the epiphany that a good man is her best chance at a stable financial future, of course she'll play up the smooching to secure the signature on the dotted li…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 01:12 AM
2

You're dismissing the dynamic that is ultimately set by women, whenever settling comes up no one who genuine means it a man setting for a woman. And of course the situation changes, looks fade and the prospect of still getting hit up let alone committed to by players who are fun her is delusional if she doesn't at least face the facts she'll end up working single and let's be honest even if a woman can support herself she ultimately still wants a man to take care of her.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 01:06 AM
2

They want that fun aka same physical attraction they gave to strangers but to them who their women supposedly love enough to "settle" with. Dead serious how would you react if one of your friends said how much fun her ex friends were but settled with you since they don't want to have fun anymore? Are you seriously going to brush that off as if it's not insulting
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 10:11 PM
2

Good enough to settle with aka take and expect resources but not good enough to have fun with someone you supposedly love? Right...only makes sense if you want a sucker to fall for it. The guys she had fun with certainty didn't, since they all knew better than to put a ring on that finger. Its not delusional to think your partner would love to have fun with you since no one is forcing them to be with you. Shocker.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 06:00 PM
1

Funny, specifically what did I not get right about damaging social bonds?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 05:55 PM
2

Because now the guys you go for to settle with want the same fun you punish them by not having fun with them and settling with them for the money? Are you aware what you are implying?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 05:53 PM
3

Both are bad one is before irreversibly damaging her ability to pair bond and the other is then the woman trying to monkey branch onto whatever man simps for her. No father wants their future daughter have these genes let alone allow her to become this kind of woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 05:51 PM
3

They want both, how do you not see the blatant dismissal in your own case? Then insist upon yourself again. They want to be the fun and relationship, no one wants to be told they are being settled for after the person who supposedly loves you has had their fun as in past tense implying and confirming not with you. How you don't see this is evident that you are the type of woman who will say this to your man and not see a single issue with it, because you need it to be dismissed of your past or e…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 01:48 PM
7

How? They are explaining why you just insist upon yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 01:14 PM
0

Obviously the green flags are feeding your delusions and the red flags are not being a shallow douchebag. LMAO. UM like, tell me specifically how you avoid scams as a customer? Like are you serious? lol
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 01:39 PM
-1

Ironic
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 12:04 PM
-5

Guess who enables the guys you hate and passed on those shitty genes and go lalala can't hear you when you warn them? Oh wait! LMAO
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 02:40 AM
-1

We blame both idiots for making us witness their dumpster fire which could've been avoided if they took off the rose tinted glasses they refused acknowledge about.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 02:34 AM
-3

The red flags were there, she still chose him and somehow surprised no one takes her seriously?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 02:27 AM

No offense. Have you considered that the reason why she doesn't want to irl is simply because you aren't the man that would get her into the manifested fantasy, I mean idk if you're rich tall handsome and kind of a psycho but I doubt you have all these traits for her to pass up on the opportunity to make her fantasy into a reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 12:53 AM

Its more autoerotic with male validation as a proxy for their autoerotism, similar to males with Autogynephilia (arousal of the female version of themselves often cross dressing/trans like thoughts/gender bent) but in the gay stories case, like I explained its more about the bromance rather than the male bodies, liking the masculine yet effeminate looking male bodies makes sense, however, women are known to consume lesbian porn but claim straight because they themselves claim as self inserting t…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 04:27 PM

I answered this in my 1st paragraph already.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 03:24 PM

If anything it proves it even more. Women aren't primarily lusting after men as sexual objects the way men lust after women. They're using male-male stories as a proxy to enjoy male emotional/sexual energy on their terms — free from the autoerotic self-objectification trap ("am I hot enough?") and from disappointing real heterosexual dynamics. It's why the main audience is women (often self-ID'd straight), not actual gay men. Gay male porn made by/for gay men (bara, etc.) is different and less a…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 02:37 PM

the male side sounds straightforward but the woman side sounds even more like a lie to even claim they are romantically straight when they describe using a man as a proxy to self masturbate herself like a proxy cuck while being the center of attention, it sounds like that transgender thing men dressing up like women get aroused at the thought of themselves as a woman and get erections in dresses being witnessed by others when they cross dress. Could it be that more women have this mental phenome…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 02:31 PM
2

Dude even women admit the men they do desire are always getting away because they are too cowardly to do all that for the man. In their entitlement even the men they not only consider better than other men but themselves, they will not initiate rarely if at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 02:24 AM
1

Nice story, never claimed someone has to date anyone let alone entitled to someones body LMAO, still hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 05:20 PM
2

Okay, you're still not acknowledging the context here, the problem here, again, is the fact one is talking about say a person shouldn't smoke indoors when there's a baby indoors with them, they proceed to stop you in the middle of your argument, and abruptly say (not in a compliment voice, maybe monotone or hostile), "you're a man", when you are not. Do you comprehend that regardless if YOU think it's not an insult because being a man is okay, they are implying you are hiding that you are a man …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 08:19 AM
1

Look the context here was debate in the pill sphere, if someone calls you lesbian abruptly with no basis nor relevance mid debate, especially when you are obviously opposing their worldview, what on earth (like my initial example clearly showed already) makes you think we are at all talking about a compliment example which we weren't aren't even talking about to begin with? Even you acknowledge it can be used as an insult regardless if you are or see nothing wrong with gays/lesbians. Idk if this…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 08:09 AM
2

Are you serious? Did you blatantly ignore the line of nothing wrong with being lesbian? Now reply honestly instead of cherrypicking something I don't even disagree with you about...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 06:52 AM
5

Why wouldn't call them a woman or giraffe then? You know why people like that resort to calling them that. Say they were, regardless why feel the need to say that? Let alone relevant to a debate? Imagine if I randomly called you lesbian then say the same rhetoric of saying you must be homophobic if you took it that way, then say you just said not lesbian and nothing wrong with being lesbian, you would then ask (rightfully so) what on earth goes being gay/lesbian has to do with the discussion? Un…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 11:39 PM
30

Women tell on themselves when they call men gay whenever a man calls them out on objectively bad behavior. Not only admitting that they deem gay men are lesser than them because you wouldn't insult someone as better than you, you try to bring them lower than yourself. Its more interesting when gay men insult straight men like this as well, imagine best you got is to imply your opponent is as gay as you LMAO.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 08:26 PM
8

They say this irl too, do you not interact with people irl lol
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 08:23 PM

"And bisexual men are "worse" because women have to compete for them without an inherent advantage." Could you elaborate on this with an example? Genuinely curious how being bi makes a woman lose her inherent advantage. I assume this advantage is sexual power?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 01:21 AM

Even bisexual women are known to discriminate against bi men for being bi, they could act straight but the moment they realize the man they date is bi they cut him off. Its hypocrisy and rooted in homophobia.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 12:44 AM

There was a thread about bisexual women not wanting to date bisexual men yesterday that made me realize even some bisexual women refuse to admit its hypocritical to reject bi men when they themselves are bi. Its rooted in homophobia.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 12:42 AM
3

No you don't seem to understand hypocrisy. You are hung up on the false notion OP at all argued that bi women like this are not bi, being told to accept bi men. So here is a similar example. A black man that says they exclusively date white women and say and show that they won't date black women due to preference. Then you can call him a hypocrite. Why? He is like not totally showing behavior that contradicts what one claims to believe or feel right? Wrong. Because he is that group yet discrimin…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 06:35 PM
3

It's ironic to discriminate a fellow person who is your group, therefore hypocritical, ergo falls under the definition of biphobia, it's ironic discriminatary biphobia to be more specific but it still is. A black person who exclusively dates whites, and when questioned why since it wouldn't make sense not to like your own group hits you with, OMG are you implying I am not able to choose who I date? How dare you claim I am not black anymore because I exclusively date whites? This is you and the p…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 08:47 AM
7

It's not a dilemma it's an observation of hypocrisy. You guys are making it a dilemma when it's just calling out hypocrisy. You prove this by steering the hypocrisy to the notion that their argument was at all about not acknowledging this preference that a bi person can have of liking only straight men, let alone that they argued it doesn't make that person bisexual anymore. Are you following? It makes them a hypocrite if they do not like bi for being bi, if the example was a man who didn't like…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 08:35 AM
5

They are not arguing men liking other mens penises should be liked by bisexual women he is saying not wanting a bisexual man because he is bisexual is hypocritical, no where in their argument do they tell them to do so, again the fat people example was supposed to showcase this but went over peoples head and took it as you should and not y'all hypocrites.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 03:00 AM
5

Definition of Biphobia: a range of negative attitudes, behaviors, or discrimination toward bisexual people. Then they proceed to use accurate examples of hypocrisy. Do not act like this was making those who are being hypocrites to stop their preference its to showcase the hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 02:55 AM
-2

You have a very surface level ability to read between the lines of studies, social dynamics, and most of all its because when its gets close to even the notion that women have agency and accountability for their actions which include ignoring red flags, we live in the most informative time in history of women posting blatantly admitting they ignore red flags and those who talk as if that's not what they are doing resort to, "I'm just a person too", you forget a person is subject to criticism. Wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 11:13 PM
0

Are you serious? Do you not understand punctuation?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 10:42 PM
2

Yes. No duh.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 10:40 PM
16

Do you genuinely think they are saying they are not allowed to? Do you not realize they are addressing hypocrisy as an anthropological stand point not a public announcement to date bi men even if you don't want to? Do their examples fall on deaf ears?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 09:19 PM
1

It reminds me of when my bi classmate told me that he genuinely thinks the ick that women get (bi or not) are incapable of loving their own behavior shown in men. I think it is hypocritical as well its ones own preference and you are allowed to discriminate since no one can force anyone into what they like but its still very telling and the shaming tactics arise the more closer to the truth (homophobia towards men etc) the reasoning why such behavior arises is even more telling.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 09:16 PM
-2

What makes you think a successful man doesn't also experience hard ships with their position as well? Divorce rape in courts, false rape domestic abuse claims because a woman cried enough times, baby trapping? Not to mention not allowed to express themselves vulnerability is punished even if its a fraction of what women like this show worse? They themselves exhibit it yet get the ick of their behavior. The most women with sexual power (access to whats desired is power sorry to break it to you) d…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 08:37 PM
10

Are you serious? Ask any maneater how they go about boasting they got a man to pay for them for many things and it always boils down to sexual power they wield. Those are obvious but even average young women can use their looks to their advantage all the time. A pretty woman looking like they need help will always have men racing to help in hopes of winning her over hoping it results in a relationship aka sex. Stand an short ugly man looking like they need help and people at best would only relu…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 08:07 PM
1

Nah nah nah 😂 don't get it twisted, do I need to remind you that you are the one that talking about pleasure to the act of sex when that wasn't my point at all??? The mutual exchange of sex is the point LMAO. I used the example of rape to show you that your point is irrelevant and moot (wow I used it right) about orgasms that required for the exchange, it may or may not happen regardless the exchange of sex was equal due to agreement to do so if it was unequal it would be rape, that's why rape w…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:59 PM
0

So you agree how asinine that thinking is when orgasm is used to steer away from the fact it was rape?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:33 PM
-3

Thanks grammar police. Regardless, you are aware I didn't argue equivalent orgasm yes? Imagine for a moment if a rapist claimed because the victim did orgasm that it wasn't that much of a rape since it was mutual exchange of orgasm when the fking point is the sex not an orgasm as if it changes the circumstances, its asinine to think this way. You are arguing an after thought of preference of the already set exchange of agreement to partake in said sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 07:46 PM
-4

Sex is the mutual exchange, again unless you want to argue one didn't want it and rape your point is mute.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 07:12 PM
-5

Takes two to have sex, unless it was rape, they both wanted an equivalent exchange in an act of lust. Money plays no part in this. Why? The 50 bucks in your pocket during the act wasn't the one doing the bonking let alone part of you like your downstairs parts. If the 50 bucks were to disappear and the woman no longer wants sex let alone spend time with him anymore once she finds out its not there, then she obviously didn't get used for her body, she used her body to get that money, making her a…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 06:41 PM
1

Its not exclusive to after one has children with their wives, that is a separate topic entirely, and once again it was associated with Freud who took the shallow notion of a respectable woman in a mans life to want to marry to his mother and therefore others must totally want to fuck their own mothers when he was projecting that he could only associate a respectable woman to his mother and took that as an actuality not the nuance of his mother happened to be a respectable woman in his eyes. Mind…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 08:15 PM
1

Lmao no, also even in cases of both parties working, the man still pays for majority of expense and luxury spending, don't lie. Do exceptions make the rule?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 07:26 PM
1

LMAO. You are the one who has no idea what you are talking about. People think a man considering a woman respectable that they don't view her like a whore is such a phenomena that its gained recognition from the guy who thinks men want to fuck their mothers when all it is, is wanting a respectable woman to build a family with, because trying that with a whore is reasonably a bad idea, leading to your daughter becoming a whore and correlated with your descendants being screwed over because you co…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 07:20 PM
-2

Its the madonna whore complex gaslight. It implys men should not or even be able to tell the difference between a whore and a respectable woman to marry have kids with. Since women aren't providers by the vast majority of cases then the rule is that it takes a provider even if they partook in whores that its not a good idea to wife up a whore but a respectable woman. It is women who are lead astray to be a whore and whores who can't fathom the idea that someone who needs to make the most importa…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 03:36 PM
1

YES. Use their own arguments against them.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 03:31 PM
1

Hey guys so like I like sex and like if I get it from slutty women who are highly likely to be cheating on me I don't consider it cuck behavior its like good for the poon, huh? Why yes all my relationships never lasted long term how could you tell? Women who engage in this behavior don't last and you are too focused on the cat brother, long term goals? Family integrity? Your daughter not being the community squeeze? Hello?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 02:10 PM
5

Its the bluepilled women and men who want to gaslight that not simping and falling for the, "as you should" and or "bare minimum" is the reason why you can't get women as if you are the assholes, then gaslight you that you let yourself be used implying that you should have not simped and fallen for said "..." sayings. They don't want to acknowledge this cognitive dissonance because it would mean they aren't bluepilled they are just cognitively dissonant redpillers in the closet. Enabling and gas…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 12:53 PM
7

"It is entirely possible to be nice, charming, funny, and interesting." You completely ignore the fact that women take advantage of men like this that they ultimately don't find attractive enough to sleep with but just good of a man to leech off of when the men who may or may not be assholes (highly likely they are) get laid and knows better than to commit to someone using others for resources as if they are moral playing the innocent girl card when these men see first hand how they really treat…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 09:02 PM
1

What you fail to realize is that men are perfectly willing to do all that if they want to but it's just the sheer amount of entitled two faced behavior often from women. Who did all that relationship easiness for some guy who did give them a thrive thru date and then smashed for less because she was sexually attracted to him. THEN starts this standards BS after they get dumped by the dark triad man like that was going to work out at all long term. Men who are simping fools that don't want to be …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/26 09:59 AM
1

Holy, that's alot of rationalized thinking. Do you think the Madonna Whore Complex is a dysfunction in men and not a reasonable mind that can tell the difference between investing in a whore vs a respectable woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 08:28 AM
1

They are definitely on the same side as one who sleeps around alot, if not worse because you may have focused on partners easily but any reasonable man looking at the reality here, that they also break up easily...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 08:52 AM
3

Do you want me to explain how someone who kills animals at a young age tends to indicate they're a future serial killer while I'm at it? Do cause and effect negate you blind?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 09:54 AM
-2

Do you think I was talking about having serial partners or sleeping around alot? Genuinely, do you not understand generalizing when you know the difference someone is talking about in an analogy is equivalent to a child refusing to understand what a message of a story is?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 07:43 AM
-1

You don't consider it relevant like someone with a bad backround check doesn't want to waiver a potential employer to see their past because its "shameful" not for themselves nooo no, its shameful for the one taking the risk to sign on the dotted line if this person (lets not hide behind the title woman free from criticism) is at all untrustworthy and shows signs of remorseless backstabbing behavior which OP is utterly disgusted by as am I. Two wrongs don't make a right, F snakes regardless of s…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 06:48 AM
1

You can't be serious...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 05:30 PM
-1

You are literally proving him right.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 12:00 PM
1

You are not being genuine if you think they are warning about an obvious snake, and not the snakes in the grass. Plus the enabler simp/or covert snake in their grass who tell you you're snakeist for not wanting to walk on the grass after a red pill person warned you that there's a snake in there don't do it be careful. If this person doesn't head the warning and gets bit and confronts the bluepillers they have the audacity to say, "well...we didn't say there wasn't a snake thats like on you". Kn…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 02:21 AM
2

I hear what you're saying. If you can find a genuinely kind woman who is realistic and not shallow to the point of calling getting with you settling? Then hey glad for you. What is being addressed is that women are shamelessly admitting in the most informative time in human history that they do not love men and just settle delusionally with a man they can leach off of and have the audacity to say they are settling with their looksmatch or even status/financially equal partner. Meanwhile the poor…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 01:33 AM
2

Please answer this honestly as if you are evaluating a person without knowing the sex. Now what happens when one group is reasonable with accepting their looksmatched so the concept of settling doesn't even arise it's simply realistic, while the other only considers the top 20% of their sex preference as not settling while considering their looksmatched as setting? In case the term wasn't self explanatory. Looksmatched literally means looks that are matched, in your league basically.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 09:28 PM
2

What is settling? What is simping? What is lying about hypergamous nature? What is dishonesty and hypergamous nature intertwined? Answer these and you know why you never ask a fish to get in your boat when you don't even have a boat. Patrice O'Neil (may he rest in peace) made a great joke about the asking the fisherman how to fish and how its the fish who are the problem. https://youtu.be/6KzCfIYArmQ?si=UdrpPQcxVjx8-4nw
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 04:05 AM
1

Men do, women do as well yet the term settling and monkey branching are heavily used to describe women's hypergamous nature. Men will think not all women are like this, but in the most informational time of humanity its blatantly obvious to anyone who isn't delusional (bluepillers) that even women feel like they are settling with their looksmatch and monkeybranch (often unsuccessfully) whenever some man who she deems better than her and importantly her current partner gives her attention. Ask le…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 03:22 AM
0

Higher as in better than themselves not just height and boiling it down to legal rights is strawmaning and goofy attempt at debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 10:48 PM
0

To be fair even y'all place yourselves below men, considering it's blatantly evident with modern media by self reporting women that they must require men higher than themselves to be with. It's inherently enabling and hypocritical if viewed under scrutiny, honestly.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 09:24 AM
2

Full stop. The reason why people tend to stick it out in relationships is because they want to get laid the personality is a tolerable afterthought. If all those people who are in their most attractive time of their lives weren't capable of having sex without commiting, then very few would be in a relationship because personality isn't enough for man or woman to be together. They eventually want the very reason why they are attracted to eachother and get it on. If what I am saying isn't true the…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 05:10 PM

"saying a woman who wants to be romantically involved with a murderer is evil, crazy, or both is misogyny. Or something." Please repeat that until you realize how insane you sound rationalizing how that isn't the case. LMAO.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 05:18 AM

So are you the provider of the relationship as in your personality is tied to the fact that you're providing not only financial stability but also fixing things around the place when its needed? You seem to underestimate how many people only have placement holder relationships until its time to monkey branch when the monkey branching is good...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 04:54 AM

If I described an entitled person you are expected to marry by all of us to provide for and I replied how you just did when you understandably reply with hell no, what kind of person do you think I am?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 02:12 PM

No disrespect but that wasn't the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 01:43 PM

Which do you think straight men are going to choose to hangout with and why? A typical woman A gay man A tomboy woman
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 01:41 PM

TLDR: "This is an irrelevant study even the researchers conducting the tests decided it was inconsistent. That 4% is statistically insignificant (per capita again), they did note that the men were better at detecting lies vs the women (being honest with themselves). Also the game was literally a numbers game and that is why that difference is insignificant. In both experiments (low-stakes ball-hiding game with points as fake "money"), men lied slightly more often when claiming the ball was white…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 01:12 PM

Reread my original comment and understand reality of human nature before playing that card that ironically proves my point about shaming tactics to avoid the truth. You never acknowledged the truth the feminine absolutely behaves this way by complaining getting mad by solutions etc. I have no obligation to take you seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 12:58 PM

If you genuinely think those men weren't feminine minded and aren't exactly what I was referring to I don't know what to tell you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 12:49 PM

Again per capita and being honest with oneself alludes the bluepillers.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 12:45 PM

Bluepillers operate on dishonesty because it's ultimately a feminine ideology. Feminine ideology doesn't operate on honesty, because if it did then it wouldn't be feminine. Per capita and to be honest with oneself is foreign to the bluepiller, it's almost as if you can sit them down and watch the literal scene in the matrix where it originates from and they still wouldn't understand wtf I just said is true about their reality they choose. Let's not act like it's significantly far too common for …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 12:37 PM

Its not irrelevant, if anything it shows how hubris it is when they are the providers capable of being the bread winner yet still want someone better than them, aka date up. Are you unaware of this or being fictitious?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 10:04 AM

Yes it is and holy good luck to those husbands down the line that hear that from you and your ho mutuals LMAO You wouldn't know you don't have their lifestyle mindset lol Sure they do, only less than a century of flawed studies vs the last millennia's of human history hahaha Its because it's true, you think stereotypes come out of thin air?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 08:20 PM

1.No he isn't, he knows better than to commit to a woman who can't pair bond A virgin woman who manages to marry a player who provides is smart History and stats disagree they'll divorce vs you and your mutuals You and your ho mutuals didn't marry prince charmings, you married simps and they likely have a cuck fetish of some kind
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 08:05 PM

The context is with abusive men, I am straight not abusive and not a virgin, and didn't sleep around, didn't get into relationships with abusive women. Try again bud.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 07:57 PM

You don't seem to understand the worth it part because unlike the woman who just made herself not worth it and still expecting to be treated like a princess, the one who is will be desired to be invested into. Not only are a significant amount of women not capable of the love they desire to receive from men, they still expect to receive his resources when she clearly shows the inability to reciprocate any herself as if it's at all equivalent to what he brings often via his innate self sacrifice.…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 07:54 PM

A virgin woman who doesn't have a history of stupid behavior vetting men because she isn't stupid and knows to make the vetting worth it for her future husband Vs A woman who does have a history of stupid behavior and still shows it by only now vetting men when her history of stupid behavior only vetted out men who would've committed to her let alone married her because she would've been worth it. Hmm, I wonder why analogies are required for to get the message across easier because even as plain…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 07:27 PM

Also to add on to that, the game of hot cold saves the trouble of guessing on both sides, well more so one side but helps nonetheless.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 12:51 PM

You clearly don't understand what scrutiny is let alone understand that as a person she isn't free from scrutiny when questioned how the hell did she end up in that situation. The gaul of you to act naive as if ignoring red flags isn't a thing or women having a tendency to find assholes attractive to sleep with, if we only focused on what women say and not what they do like cross examination questions tend to reveal, then women would be seen as innocent people 100% of the time. This lack of acco…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 02:15 AM

When was the last time you saw a post go viral about women taking accountability and women not coddling her? Its hidden and shadowbanned before it can take off. For every video you can find of accountability there's thousands of videos of women coddling each other and not a single one looking nor questioning her decisions under scrutiny.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 11:42 PM
-1

Odds are you would never take up the mantle of being the sole provider from the start AND stay the sole provider. Ask any man this similar question for a woman who loves him and they wouldn't hesitate to say yes the vast majority of women would hesitate let alone say yes. Relevant short video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suCm5oW0bv0
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 11:47 PM
21

Narcissism turned borderline gay similar to guys who like looking at muscular men who they aspire to be.
/r/BlackPillScience28/12/25 07:28 AM
12

How
/r/BlackPillScience28/12/25 07:26 AM
1

That's ironic coming from you, the lack of accountability and enabling behavior of what kind of men y'all are choosing and still attempting to shame someone warning y'all is crazy to read. If y'all had this strong of intuition for "nice guys" as you did for "master manipulators" y'all excuse behavior for then there wouldn't be as many single mothers and abusive households. Y'all pick violent irresponsible mfs to procreate with and blame every man other the ones you choose for the situation y'all…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 12:09 PM
2

I mean this sincerely, you come off as one who chooses violent mfs and blaming men who aren't violent as worse than these guys. How you don't realize how insane it sounds reading that second paragraph out loud is beyond any psychological evaluation past, "needs help now".
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 07:04 AM
5

You are aware that simply stating the equivalent of, "UM women are like different" while ironically enough not acknowledging that this doesn't exempt them of criticism of their choices makes your entire argument null and in bad faith right? Especially using the term "nice guy". As others have mentioned these guys aren't even the violent manipulative mfs hurting y'all its the assholes y'all are willing search to tolerate abuse from then somehow making anyone but the ones hurting you to blame. Wha…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/25 05:45 PM

Right...no hostility.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/25 08:34 PM

That hostility when simply being asked for clarification, that you willingly choose to answer btw, leads me to assume it wasn't 100% all him as to why that relationship didn't work out due to 1 immature person considering you are way older than your 20 year old self...and still act like this
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/25 08:29 PM

By childish what do you mean when he didn't get his way? Not taking care of say a leaky sink?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/25 08:23 PM

Can you name 1 example of him being immature
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/25 08:13 PM
1

...You can't be serious. I just laid out the means of how people communicate past surface level dismissal, addressed how your question was ignorant as if I have to tell you how to brush your teeth because you never seemed to grasp the concept. But to answer your question, which was a poor attempt at saving face as if you brought anything of value to the conversation. One example would be fat people coming online to talk about how they are treated by non fat people even supposedly kind people ena…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 01:24 PM
2

Objectively speaking, the dynamics of human interactions are anything but surface level, we have all of human history of philosophy, blunt historical records of how humans were decieving in retrospect when at the time everyone thought they were "chill", and at the bare bones stories via movies hell even children's books let you know early on as a warning to wisen up and to think critically about dynamics in interactions. TLDR: You asked me an example as to why I think it is common and as blunt a…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 10:50 PM
5

You severely underestimate how common it is. We're not talking lottery tickets here, saying this kind of talk without acknowledging people aren't always genuine just enables it irl where people like that get away with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 01:22 PM
4

It does reflect reality, just because you don't want to hear it doesn't mean others have experienced it even witnessed it and by having thorough explanations where before TikTok was just he said she said there's undeniable proof with videos etc that "chill" interactions aren't all but a significant amount aren't surface level.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 01:10 PM
6

...it's being outside then going inside to reflect wtf just happened and relaying back what others experienced too so you know you're not crazy someone/something was off in the group. It's only chill if you ignore or benefit from it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 12:58 PM
14

That and not have materialistic things a woman can leech off of, they say provider but if they openly admit the only thing keeping them around is said provided material then it's just prostitution with extra steps. What's worse, their stronger desire to tame a beast of a man, aka evil men, with their power of love aka coochie, just results (with stats) in abusive households and or single motherhood, because they really thought a evil man who has options was going to treat her well, and if not sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 05:56 PM

The Madonna whoie complex implies that men can't and or shouldn't be able to differentiate between a slooot vs a respectable woman to be the mother of his children and become responsible for said woman and children. If you have a reasonable mind and or not insane you can understand how exactly this is nothing but projecting gaslighting. Considering that it is constantly shown via women's choice of certain bad men resulting in significant single motherhood, abusive households, that it is in fact …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 05:26 PM
1

People want it to be both for it to be sure love. When it's skewed to only looks, or money (any social action), it's obvious for what it is. It doesn't help the case of both sides when women openly admit they aren't even physically attracted to their man just that he provides, and when men admit women aren't funny and bad with money but are hot. It's understandable when looks fade one might not be attracted to their partner anymore, it's blatantly obvious that woman never loved her man if he los…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 04:59 PM
0

No duh, dude. The context was shallow short term relationships but as a foundation it is sociopathic to use people's bodies whether its consensual monetary or not. Try telling people you mutually use a strangers body to have sex with and never think about them again. It would immediately clock to them what you are. Also you realize even if what you said was true, its not remotely a significant percentage of the demographic engaging in this context right? I hope you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 06:47 PM
1

LOL. I'll walk it through with you how I got the word dumb out of that and how you enable and condone this behavior. Women who have short term relationships are already not in a good place mentally. Given the outright outcomes of short term relationships. You would have to be a sociopathic and or don't know better person who lacks critical thinking (dumb) to participate in it. Next you say a male who happens to engage in said short term relationships aren't bad guys when the foundation of short …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 06:31 PM
-4

<image> I focused on the discussion and the facts of the matter YOU willingly initiated and elaborated on. Then unable to give a proper response you resorted to not addressing the facts of the matter after it was revealed how you weren't logically sound, to then react like clockwork as a woman such as yourself would react when given the circumstances you created under scrutiny. This image is another assumption men are aware of btw, they just don't outright admit they know irl.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 06:10 PM
2

You can't be serious...I just explained how logically men think about what these, "assumptions". They are not assuming you ate or will eat a giraffe here. You then try to make it seem men can't deduce accurate "assumptions" that you have slept around throughout those years. You can attempt to mitigate it by saying it a different way that is ultimately the same thing and not fooling anyone other than yourself. Next you willingly admit that you only had 3 relationships that lasted more than a year…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 06:02 PM
1

...you can't be serious, you just admit that women are dumb prostitutes who willingly choose bad guys (sometimes attractive I've seen too many rich mid dudes being evil with beautiful women) to sleep with then think they are at all smart for doing what a prostitute does in exchange for their bodies? The only difference between a legitimate career prostitute and the women you advocate for is that a prostitute knows better than to get her heart broke by a shitty client LMAO.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 05:47 PM
0

It's because of context. Such as they have to ask themselves, "Did she make him wait till marriage or engagement while the others hit it for a McDonald's meal?" Also, if this guy was a virgin or had like 2 sexual partners max, that made him wait a long time after paying for everything as well. If this guy was like you and slept around then whatever its birds of a feather, but if not then that's where the negative perspective comes from not merely for being "nice" or marry at 29 with no context..…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 05:42 PM
2

You realize you're acknowledging that women themselves acknowledge that they willingly become prostitutes with extra steps? Its called the worlds oldest profession for a reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 05:21 PM
1

How would that make him a simp? There's more to this than just getting married at 29 lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 05:19 PM
0

Okay I'll bite. You don't see how one side gets sympathy while the other is met with rightful criticism. And it's because you simply fall under people who for sure don't understand per capita and most of all, definitely think the Madonna Whore complex is a complex at all. (Quick note women control who have sex, men decide who gets married) The Madonna whore complex implies that men can't and or shouldn't be able to differentiate between a slooot vs a respectable woman to be the mother of his chi…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 07:16 PM
8

Do you know what per capita means?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/25 04:34 AM
0

Imagine this for a moment. Men already get shamed by being called gay or in the closet whenever they get a clue about women's not so innocent nature even by not as confrontational combative women. Now let's say all men got chemically castrated but still have the ability to have children then not only would the thinking with their dick would be done but that very tolerance of women's behavior would be gone as well. They would be straight of course but that overdrive that men's minds tolerate in w…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 07:07 AM
2

Oh man...if you knew how women describe men they sexually desire as the love of their life's you would feel bad for men who are obviously not their sexual desire and know they don't love them. "Settling" is a woman concept no man says settling unironically.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 08:06 AM
2

To answer your question yes they are wrong. In the context of a relationship and I can't stress this enough, not talking about situationships/hookups. It's blatantly obvious what they are. A relationship is two people who love eachother. They could be broke and still show affection towards eachother, they could be rich and show affection towards eachother. If one person doesn't laugh, smile let alone have sex with their partner regardless of a straight couple or not, we know they don't love each…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 08:04 AM
1

Okay you still don't understand that "no duh" is my agreement with you but how it's applied is the issue here. So let's get past this ok? It's fundamentally because you simply don't see how sex is THE form of affection regardless if a man or woman say it isn't. It's the most intimate form of it and the context here is relationships not situationships not hookups.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 07:43 AM
2

It does make sense. We are both boiling down what people will do to be with someone. My scenarios were meant to highlight how nonsense our situations are. What's more show just how blatantly not love it is and merely a transaction. You may be focused on men wanting sex only if everything else that comes along with it is a literal hell of an existence. But fail to realize two things. The sex is the bare minimum requirement of a relationship or else it's not a relationship but a false relationship…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 07:25 AM
2

Okay let me put it in a way you understand because it may be "proving" your point it's not addressing how flawed that thinking is and how it's used to manipulate men when it's just expected from two people who supposedly love eachother. Person A tells everyone they are in a sexless relationship and will never have sex but they are providing financial security and praise their partner everyday. Person B tells everyone they are in a sexual relationship but provides no financial security and barely…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 06:58 AM
1

I highly recommend you look around at how lesbian relationships have problems and that the common denominator of unhappy and violent relationships aren't a man. But to answer your post, try explaining to someone that person A still expects money, security, etc from person B but won't even show any affection to person B. They would think person A is a unappreciative child and B as a parent who deserves someone who appreciates them. But if you mention they are adults in a relationship they would i…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 06:45 AM
1

Dude you're focusing too much on the autism here rather the original reply I gave for the focus of online spaces just like old writing between people's that facilitated discussion away from irl environments. Again autistic groups was a place holder not the main focus at all like I said could've been interchangeable with literally any other disenfranchised group. I'm sure if people came along and shared their experiences then hear you say this dismissal they would hear you out but ultimately iden…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 07:38 PM
1

No duh autistic people have different experiences. That's not the point of what I said. I could've easily have said gays or blacks who gained the skill to read and write to other blacks how they get treated that in their irl environment would be unwise to do so for similar reasons of dismissal at best and subjected to a form of ostracization at worst. My point was that online has helped people with different experiences share keyword share their experiences away from their irl environment. Their…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 07:23 PM
1

No I compared people with autism as a disenfranchised group with people who are also disenfranchised. Difference is I didn't dismiss the latter as autism. I acknowledged they have experienced certain behaviors and simply shared this online and via paper because clearly merely sharing it irl gets dismissal like yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 07:15 PM
1

Believe it or not people are experiencing life in different ways yet similar enough to share experiences by simply telling their stories. By that, they end up being an identifiable group. You saying the equivalent of touch grass is the same dismissal that autistic people faced back then when they tried sharing their experiences with eachother by normals who wouldn't even acknowledge let alone hear out why their experiences tell something about human nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 07:08 PM
1

His argument is just, "muh dik" and "bops need love too mang". Would he ever marry one of these ladies? I highly doubt it. So his comment was just a truthful humble brag.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 02:06 PM
6

Lol I'd argue the only reason why autism or any disenfranchised group got to where they are today is BECAUSE of online talks. Because you know full well irl they have no voice and told to shut up and likely won't hear from others like them with the experiences if they never have an outlet to share. Online with blatant proof of videos, pictures, screenshots, detailed testimonials that are similar from people who never met eachother align you as a reasonable person know this shouldn't be dismissed…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 01:55 PM
1

Not enough attractive tall rich guys for women to go around, you as not a rich tall attractive guy are not the most effected it's women because they have to settle for you the non attractive tall rich guy and it's somehow also your fault for not doing the bare minimum aka give them everything hand and foot for a facade of love for your material possessions. It's literally the same thing when women willingly search to take abuse from said attractive tall rich guys by offering their bodies ignorin…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 07:18 PM
1

No, we all have standards, what isn't good is women being hypergamous to the point of conning a guy she doesn't hold that standard to to raise a bastard unknowingly from said men she does have that standard for. If you're in any way in favor of this then you're the problem and simply hide behind the woman card that women can't be fallible human beings.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 01:35 AM
1

Game is just catering an archetype to a certain kind of woman. Women pull the same archetype men lust for all the time for who they want. Compliment a man's competency and jokes with some flirtatious rizz and compliment a woman's beauty and show yourself as a status ladder likewise and the other person will know what's up. Looks are the leagues, game is how you play in your game.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 06:17 AM
0

No duh...What is settling? Again, I said who says it more in the context of the dynamic of the rush to get married?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 01:39 AM
-1

Ask yourself this. "Is settling" used by women or men more (its not a coin flip now) to describe the dynamic of the rush to get married? If you can answer this honestly, then you know full well what the question reveals how ignorant you are of what this hypergamy really means and how men view this hypergamy as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 10:09 PM
8

Oh PLEASE, its blatantly obvious when someone is a snake, any guy can tell a guy is a piece of shit, the rest of the group has to tolerate the dickhead because of you couldn't see a red flag if it hit your face as hard as his fist did.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 02:18 PM
0

Tell me, would you skydive with a worn out parachute that has been known to not open? Say this probability is at most 50% and low end 10%. Would you or would you not go skydiving with this parachute?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 10:29 PM
8

Thats not hard to believe, also I argue that women absolutely know full well the toxic guy they are dating is toxic, they just get surprised that the toxic guy they are feeling power from via proxy turns and is toxic to them and win against her. Ex making fun of someone like a dork looking guy, or some older woman she doesn't like, then he makes fun of her bs she didn't think he was judging her for and then she cries wolf.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 01:59 PM
2

Its the gaslighting and dwells on the aspect of lookism. It wouldn't be a problem if women weren't shamelessly using men they don't desire for resources, when men want to just hang out and be themselves with eachother they get shamed for not putting enough effort ie money, weekly flowers, paying for trips she wanted to go on that he had to read her mind for. All the while calling this the bare minimum. Meanwhile these same women let themselves be put through the ringer of mcdonald's drive thru d…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/25 03:57 AM
11

Its the gaslight of behavior is the key factor when its blatantly obvious is about looks, when it isn't the main focus its because the person's kink isn't in that kind of behavior. An ugly bad boy is universally hated but when the mugshot is a tall hot guy suddenly its sympathy and empathy for second chances, then love letters get sent to prison like clockwork.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 06:16 AM
9

Do not confuse settling with first choice. Shallow dating apps show this, shallow irl scenes show this, most women are going to settle with a guy through friends and family connections, meanwhile I'm sure friends of this woman have stories amongst themselves of how they were with their first choice short term no matter if it was on good terms or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/25 12:05 AM
4

Its women who push for marriage rather then men. Older men would like to but aren't going to borderline coerce a woman to marry because his clock is ticking. Getting down on one knee is like tipping culture, it started as a genuine act of good faith for the other, while now it's heavily implied to do it or else you're a bad person while the other party receiving it was the one who originally wanted the easy money. If you didn't understand my analogy reread until you get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 11:58 PM
5

The only anger I have is towards monsters, not people who happen to be women. I get frustrated with lack of accountability that hurts others that doesn't mean I hate the person I hate the mentality.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 12:14 PM
1

Obviously not, yet how do I know what they were like? Simple, pull asides by many relatives concerned if my sister and I were okay, told how they both behaved before I was born, sometimes as a child sometimes as a teen and young adult. Based on what? I haven't abused any women in my life and have warned others of the red flags only for them to either be hit, abused, and used. If that makes me a red flag then I want to know what's a green flag to you. Please link those stats while you're at it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 11:04 AM
6

>Again doesn't acknowledge the red flags women ignore >The exact reason why the "switch up" happens completely dismissed as if adult relationships are different >Because of the previous obvious willingly ignorant dismissals still doesn't acknowledge a womans part in the ripple effects of her choice >Complete dismissal of a real story so they don't have to give ground of a woman's rationalizations of said choice, worse, does a shallow shaming tactic that boils down to you're just insecure >Tries …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 10:57 AM
7

I acknowledge there's guys who switch up THOSE are rare, yet I again have been on the inside of the know of how the guy behaves and red flags the women were willingly ignoring. While others who would later hear about the fallout between them would think the mf did a complete 180 out of nowhere when its complete BS. I was a child who grew up with this dynamic then as a teen it dawned on me how blatantly obvious the red flags were, yet I was still expected to pretend my mother had no part in choos…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 10:31 AM
6

Ironic considering you seem to refuse to acknowledge any accountability on a woman's part. I clarified who I was referring to and who I wasn't, yet you and the other person become hostile as if I am saying an innocent person deserves any abuse. I have been in relationships, and witnessed relationship dynamics I am referring to and it's always a lack of accountability on the woman's part of staying in a toxic relationship no one is forcing her to stay in and causing ripple effects on everyone aro…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 10:04 AM
6

Its like you completely disregarded wtf I said about keywords and what I was not saying. Reread until you get it and realize all people (unless mentally handicapped) especially adults, have their own agency and know the consequences they simply thought not to care, this doesn't suffice in a court of law and it certainly doesn't suffice for God or whatever higher power you believe in.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 09:03 AM
10

Thats why I think women deserve the abuse they willingly tolerate from men they find attractive enough to sleep with. Keywords "willingly tolerate", I'm not saying women who are being coerced and don't have the freedom to leave, I'm saying women who do have the freedom to leave whenever but still chose to stay with a toxic asshole. If a man kept going back and tolerated being used by a gold digger no one would have sympathy for him, because at that point its a matter of how stupid can you be thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 08:29 AM
2

Lesbian couples have the highest rates of domestic violence per capita where's gays are the lowest. With straight couples in the middle logic would say it would be on par with the lesbians.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 08:04 AM
1

No it doesn't, you are only seeing what you want to see, you aren't even acknowledging my take that this dynamic does happen to exist even slightly. You genuinely thought I meant all attractive guys are "jerks", which leads me and any reasonable person to know you're not arguing in good faith. It's essentially nuh uh from you.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 04:19 AM
0

I didn't say ugly men they were exempt I said they are much more shamed into not even daring to even resemble being arrogantly confident aka an asshole. Also I didn't say only attractive guys are jerks I said if you read it again, would know I said tall attractive guys who are also happen to be assholes get away with behavior that ugly average guys couldn't even think of doing a fraction of or else their life would be over with social consequences. Try another take because you have it wrong of w…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 04:06 AM
2

There's a huge overlap between males who are evil lil bastards looking for a nut vs guys who don't have that in their hearts they are simply ugly and then there are attractive tall males who are the evil bastards y'all seem to exempt the most of evil behavior when that happens and it's obvious y'all aren't innocent princesses either then it makes the average to ugly guys realize it's all about looks because if you're evil but nice to a woman yet you are tall attractive you get away with it all.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/25 09:28 PM
2

You likely aren't unattractive, and or have attractive people in your life who don't need to be gaslit into thinking it was their normal behavior that made people be repulsed by them when telling them they just didn't like your looks aka existence was the real reason because its difficult to be the bringer of bad news like that, an asshole stranger unironically is more honest and often lets these types learn the real world friends and family don't have it in them to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/25 07:59 PM
13

Guys absolutely enjoy being approached, it's women's ego and frankly cowardice that makes them lose their shot with guys who would've likely gone on a date with them. What I was referring to is that ugly men with the confidence of an attractive guy is punished by everyone for behaving how woman want, the only difference is they're ugly. Guys can be hostile, but it's understandable since they learn the reason why they're being denied is purely looks based so therefore behavior doesn't and never m…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/25 07:19 PM
19

Saying it's in general doesn't diffuse the disproportionate difference in how one reacts to it. If a guy was suddenly seen as sexy to all women he would be thrilled, even for ugly women, don't deny it. If a woman blows up and is desirable by all men, only the ugly ones would be massively shamed for thinking the same things the attractive guy is thinking about her.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/25 06:50 PM
2

I genuinely think it's just hormonal cycles. Men are constantly horny by a daily basis while women only understand this on a few days of the month. You should see what women say when they are ovulating. Replace the female perspective and you'd think you just walked into a guy's sexist locker room. Add onto the fact the lookism skewed view that men view women fairly accurate in looks while women have a strong threshold of what's an attractive man in looks. Talking like 8+/10. Also men may pretend…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 02:03 PM
1

No one is allowed to expand on what OP has said? Everyone here must be a contrarian to start a reply?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 01:30 AM

They say all the bluepilled stuff because if they actually gave the truth to said guys it would require these women to view them in a sexual light, and that thought is like thinking about naked grandma, instant ladyboner/boner killer. Also all that good nice stuff is only desired by women from evil men/bad boys, because a shhity plucked flower after an nasty argument makes women go, "OMG he really IS NICE on the inside!", while some nice guy gives a bouquet of flowers THEN gets in an nasty argum…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/25 08:01 AM
10

They have to be trolling, its so blatantly ignorant of the reality of womens agency
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 07:14 PM
-1

If only women would stop getting aroused by evil men then that number would go down.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 03:30 AM
1

The way that you ironically enough are too vague when someone tells you clear examples just to dismiss them leads me to believe you're not telling the whole story and likely kept making Jabs at him you don't even recognize are fighting words if you were a guy saying it. But nonetheless, either he is entirely psycho and revealed himself over not wanting to clean up his mess at that moment and you immediately left him right? Don't tell me you stayed because holy woman you're just proving my origin…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 12:41 PM
3

Lol no honey, it's called an analogy please reread until you understand it's similar and applicable. If someone makes a deal that's too good to be true, most the time it ain't. Specifically love bombing, promises of long term prosperity with constant excuses long term with nothing to show for it other than cheap flowers that die off by the end of the week etc etc. I've been around enough people to know how easy it is to be a player you would think some of these ladies would wisen up but holy it'…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 12:32 PM
5

Woman, if I say that's on you for choosing and staying with a scammer do you honestly think the best rebuttal is the equivalent of, "So, a scammer/s aren't responsible for their behavior at all?" Followed by, "How do you 'choose' a non scammer?" My answer is wisen the hell up, don't wear rose tinted glasses duh and also fools ignore red flags and fall for flattery because they choose to. Those who aren't a fool can think long term and see a scammer come from a mile away. Wisen up and stop blamin…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 12:25 PM
4

Would be cool if the ones who did still weren't still choosing and staying with said men...
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 12:21 PM
11

Even if he wasn't it's entirely on you for choosing AND staying with said guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 12:09 PM
1

You're completely disregarding how the dynamic is switched with Chad involved. It's not longer if she wants to marry him it's if Chad wants to marry her. Because unlike the average guy that needs to compensate with money and or status socially to get a woman to want to marry him, Chad has options by default who wants to marry him. He gets to have fun and still choose who he wants rather than settle for who he has to. Women if they're unlucky in bagging a wealthy Chad in their prime looks years t…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 10:01 AM

Guys who get laid alot know that in order to do so you have to pretend like women aren't exactly what incels claim women are, it's not surprising that they also give women what they want as well aka be treated like a princess despite all the markers indicating they're a wench. This is why bluepilled men are snakes and so defensive of women when other men call out the discrepancy of the undeserving treatment of hypocritical women. It's simply because that's their whole mating strategy, agree with…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 07:05 AM
0

Like a fingerprint your face is your own even if the incredibly rare doppelganger were to pop up next to you, there's still enough variation to be uniquely you to which people can tell who's who. Also your genes are literally you might as well say why is this genetic trait considered me its just me. No duh its you and no duh you're your genes and your genes are you.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 09:08 PM
0

Listen, I am not denying the shallowness of it all, I am saying that only one is the person, whether it be an accident that removes their beauty they were always that person unique to themselves. Like a fingerprint, meanwhile if the rich man lost it all then he never lost his uniqueness just his materialism. The only similarity is shallowness; under scrutiny there's a clear distinction.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 08:30 PM
0

Meanwhile if they do it without this its just simping. Also lets not pretend this isn't the default relationship dynamic men are expected to do in the modern day. As if they should be a provider simply because the woman considered his financial situation is acceptable for her to use. Men want sex from a woman they are willing to take care of, and women want to be taken care of. The balance is appreciation from both parties. When a woman says she takes on the burden of being financially dependent…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 08:13 PM
2

How doesn't looks have to do with anything when the entire reason we are here is bc the posts title is "lusting after a body =/= unconditional love" You clearly do because you are repeating how women select for partners on behalf of women when presented with opposite takes on the matter I highly doubt it because under scrutiny you're not being genuine in your replies
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 07:59 PM
-1

Not at all, and you're not acknowledging the difference I am pointing out. Say you are handed 1 billion dollars as yours now no strings attached by a anonymous person never to be contacted again by them. Are you now intelligent and a hard worker? Or are you just in possession of money?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 07:55 PM
1

Anyone who offer nothing are not necessarily parasites, people who take from those who have more are though. Say we talk about women for a moment, looks in particular, by your logic if a woman is ugly she is to be called a parasite? Another, if a man has something but doesn't offer it to anyone would he be called a parasite to you? Lastly, are you a woman pretending to be a man on here, because no reasonable minded man would talk like this. Please change your flair to the appropriate sex/gender …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 07:40 PM
2

Who said anything about a parasite? Its also ironic for you to say that, considering wanting someone who is more wealthy than you is indicative more of a parasite than majority of men who would glady take in a homeless girl indefinitely never expecting her to be the one to make the majority of money eventually, meanwhile women in a large part wouldn't do the same for a homeless guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 07:30 PM
-1

Majority of people who have wealth are generational, say they had a small loan of a million dollars (lol) from their parents and turned it into a billion you'd argue that it was because he was intelligent and "worked hard" with those connections his family just happened to have, meanwhile when a man who started from nothing becomes a millionaire knows full well he's the same person, but when he made it, he suddenly has so much charm and lovable by the same women who wouldn't give him a chance no…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 07:22 PM
8

<image> "On October 7, 2006, shortly after discharge from the hospital, Tyler Ziegel married Renée Kline, whom he met before being sent to Iraq. They got engaged during Ty's short vacation, when Renée's father died in an accident. Ty and Renée's wedding was widely reported by the press in the United States. Their marriage day was declared a holiday in Illinois. The wedding was attended by American photographer Nina Berman. She took a series of shots, one of which won First Prize among portraits …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 06:53 PM
1

If you can't tell which young men/men are chads idk what to tell you other than its genetic superiority. In looks, height, voice, charisma, etc. If you think being wealthy automatically makes one a chad then I need you to look at jeff Bezos and seriously tell us you do consider him a chad vs a barely average looking guy who essentially won the lottery in wealth. Women won't care if a chad is broke or works a minimum wage job, they'll still look at him with butterflies the same way guys see a smo…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 09:52 AM
1

If someone regardless of sex, puts others down, makes fun about shallow features even if its a person you dislike then its on that woman for genuinely thinking this snake wouldn't do the same bs to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 04:24 AM
0

Its because all these guys have to do is pretend like they align with the snake behavior that the specific woman has and wants to unleash being a snake. They want to be a parrot on a monsters shoulder then cry when the monster chucks them aside. Then claim he was a master manipulator as if she wasn't just a donkey with a carrot dangling in front of them just to find out the carrots plastic.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 04:22 AM
0

Once is a rare occurrence twice is a choice
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 01:32 AM
6

Imagine getting called the almost serial killer cause you off by one... 😔
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 01:25 AM
4

LMAO dude pls look up the chadfish experiment then comeback and look at what you wrote with scrutiny because you have no idea how shallow and hush hush the dating scene and hookup culture really is with your takes on how women would legitimately reject a attractive man when presented the opportunity.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 12:43 AM
0

Sure dude killing one person or two doesn't make one a serial killer duh
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 12:40 AM

The bluepill is essentially Jordan Petersons cope of, act properly as what place you have in the hierarchy. In a sense its like telling a deformed ugly monster of a little person to stop acting like kindness and being a doormat isn't their only option. Blackpill is realizing you are never going to be liked without doormating yourself to be tolerated, and the bluepill are those who either don't know its cope, or just want you to know your place like them as a fellow bottom of the barrel person to…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 11:02 PM
11

You people seem to gaslight others for "anecdotals" yet when boiled down and unreputable that this happens far more than people let on, then its suddenly what you commented first. Also you're not being genuine if you think women wouldn't choose the conventionally attractive type she has if she could keep him and the only reason why keeping is an issue is because he gets as much if not more attention than an average woman, just like women he has so many options that he doesn't see reason to choos…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 09:36 PM

Crazy thought...can both be occuring to various degrees? Also you realize you need experiences and and common sense to see how social dynamics work? You are also aware that studies are often manipulated to tell a story that isn't true under scrutiny that unless peer reviewed and replicated it's worth basically nothing? You immediately falling back to, "Um Source?" Leads me to believe you don't have experience or common sense to see past the surface level.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 01:46 PM

Maybe not all, but you would have be fooling yourself if you don't think some few men are being shared with a significant amount of women often knowing they're sharing just not caring until the guy seems to go from a meal ticket to a lottery ticket.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 11:59 AM
3

I literally explain it in the same 2nd reply you highlighted. Also men aren't out here in significant amounts wanting a wild woman and I say evil as a means to show the epitome of rationalizations that often delve into evil means because it disregards the well being of themselves and others for desires with no long term good but plenty in long term detriment. You are completely once again not comprehending why labelling something as misandrist is just shutting down discussion that again is highl…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 03:43 AM
5

I just explained this labeling is just identifying groups in my last reply as to why it's used more accurately than simply saying a imprecise version "person". Pls reread it. I'm using an analogy that a pattern of behavior was and is identified in groups, to which it can be explained for a persons motif, in regards to the clearing up of convoluted and often misconceptions of the use of labels as bad, when you're trying to explain said phenomena in an authentic anthropological manner. And also no…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 04:10 PM
5

Remove man and woman and replace with person a and b its simply not misandrist its the truth. Patterns show up, not all persons have this dynamic its just a significant amount of one persons behavior is noticeable as to why they pick certain traits in anothers behavior as a mate choice. To put a label as such ist this lia that you just identify the group but refuse to discuss the behavior anthropologically authentically either via lack of experience studying or just being disingenuous. Its not c…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 02:19 PM
6

Women don't like misandrists they like a competent (at least in her criteria) man if that man lets her explore her wild side aka evil side rather than attack her personally aka let her laugh alongside the bully towards the perceived loser then she feels like his power is somewhat hers via proxy because she genuinely believes that her love for him aka coochie giving is what's going to keep him choosing her by liking her more than said coochie. Eventually her personality shows and he remembers tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 11:59 AM
1

Username checks out and irony 👹🍇👩🏼‍🦯👎🏼🥀🤓
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 06:46 AM
2

If you as a woman get attracted to a asshole even if they are, "just joking" when it's directed at someone else, worse behind close doors about someone, then just letting you know you're not fooling anyone when y'all cry the loudest about abuse, cheating or being treated like shit as if no one saw that shit coming from a mile away. Are there hidden psychos? Yes. Are y'all angels either? No Roll around in the blood money comes with dealing with a monster you chose knowing full well they are. Leav…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 06:39 AM
1

LOL yea sure. If you see a guy go on a date with a femboy looking woman just to find out they're a guy being a woman and they still go out with them? Idk what to tell you other than bi's exist even bi curious and might not even know it until you point it out, plus that person you're referring to proved the opposite really, none of those relationships worked out, and they even argued for how men are also subjected to the hierarchy of life while women claim its only men at the top because they're …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 03:58 AM
1

"passive party" lol reread my comment and find out how what I said went over your head then try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 08:11 PM
1

They're not I'm simply trying to shed light upon the fact that it took two irresponsible pieces of shitty people to tango. Yet people come on here somehow devoiding all responsibility to one party while making the other party take more responsibility for their actions as if one party has no agency. Because imagine that a scammer who looks and acts like a scammer ended up scamming you and taking your money n runs off shocker if we call you a dum dum. I'm being fair in calling out both, you people…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 05:02 PM
2

Who ignored red flags because they genuinely thought a bad boy fuck boy was going to stick around LMAO
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 04:47 PM
-1

Infinity now what? What's your rebuttal?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 08:46 AM
3

Oh stop being pedantic you know damn well it's more than that and near infinity is helping your case btw. What isn't and if so what's the percentage capita I doubt you even know what that means. Can you explain what pov is?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 08:34 AM
1

Who opens their legs for them? Answer that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 08:31 AM
7

"emotional geniuses" I'll bite if women are emotional geniuses then why are there too many single mothers? Also evil behavior is present in both sexes but unless you know what per capita means then we can never convince the other to change.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 07:20 AM
1

That's not all they want unless that's all you got, if you are give it once or twice that's excusable bc you were young and had to learn vet better, but if you've been giving it up then at that point the bodies show you have no critical thinking for long term consequences. Long term guys notice this and silently judge and make their exit. So you come on, did you not have a father figure who spelled this out?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 12:05 AM
1

No lol, the same way you don't to kiss everyone but only one special person doesn't mean you want the person who's kissing everyone to just do it for you. A friend to all is a friend to none type of deal. Its worthless to them but to others they want to be intimate only with them. If they have qualities such as motherly and virtuous guys will wait, but women who aren't like this give in to the fk boys and wonder why they're not landing a man, because they fail to realize they aren't worth it. No…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 05:34 AM
1

Crazy concept but learn to be an asshole in a big brother way, your fault was playing kiss ass with a girl they categorized you as a lil brother filler guy friend possibly even thought you were closeted gay. I've had girl friends confess in a drunken stupor that they thought their two guy friends (who are clearly friendzoned btw) are probably "m"aggots. This was coming from seemingly kind girls who you would never think would think like that. Treat them like a bro who deserves to be called out f…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 05:14 AM
-2

Men need to earn their value, while women are automatically born with value. Same reason we don't allow men to hit women despite claiming equality, is the same reason why there's this distinction. Not apples to oranges here.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 09:50 AM
-1

No duh, what comes to mind when you think someone has a chance at surviving in a desert with no water? Exactly. When the hell have you ever heard someone say they wish they'd find a swamp to drink from? It's as if you didn't read my part about the process of purifying the water even with tools. I gave a bone for the logistics of this and you come along with acskually 🤓 you for sure Grammer Nazi on here lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 05:00 AM
-3

Oasis's exist and have saved many desert travelers from death, while no one drinks out of a swamp and lives to tell the tell they just die from some disease from the muck. It's a good analogy because the man knows full well even if there's water in the swamp he likely doesn't have the equipment necessary to purify it thus not finding clean water rather trying to do an impossible task that if done wrong even barely right, they are sure to die regardless. Meanwhile the woman in this is meant to sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 11:48 PM
1

You'll learn, life will teach you how silly your mentality was and it will be too late. Enjoy the therapy and try not to lobotomite yourself with pills.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 01:36 AM
1

When you're capable of thinking more than what you desire particularly rationalized desire you refuse to take your hand out of the cookie jar because the cookies too much then you'll have enough introspection to know what I meant.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 12:50 AM
0

You understand the concept of players and fuckboys yes? You know full well they don't want nor can't be in a relationship long term because they make too many short term decisions out of impulse because thats who they are. If you go for them then thats on you and the women like you, just as men would make fun of a guy for trying to be with a gold digger long term expecting love that isn't superficial. Its an oxymoron to think you can defy perception of those who don't want that nonsense and call…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 10:24 PM
-1

Me: Gives reasons of how the dynamic works to introspect You: Literally hating mee No just no lol good luck with therapy
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 08:52 PM
-4

Sorry to break it to you, but men hate hores when they deny them because sex is the only value they bring to a mans life and they hate hores when they only have sex to offer yet want to be treated like they aren't hores with emotional support and more money for their habits that are a net negative to most men.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 06:29 PM
2

They tend to say they want those characteristics in a man but they want it in a guy who they consider a man tho. And then trying to tame the beast to be nice is much more of a thrill than them coming home to a genuinely kind man of the same looks genetics etc, he will look the part but doesn't play the part that allows her to feel (keyword feel) needed, so she basically gets bored with "nice guys" (aka genuinely kind guys who haven't gotten the memo that being kind with no fight in them 'toxicit…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 09:11 AM
2

More like 1 in 4 women she knows has done it maybe she only meets them at them LMAO
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 10:50 PM
2

In other news studies have also shown if you're beautiful you tend to have a better life another study shows you may even be a model. Coming up the sky is still blue or is it? Stay tuned
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 03:50 PM
6

You definitely do not understand what per capita means ✋😂
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 02:05 PM
1

Completely disregarded the context of how it goes down via relationship dynamics, the notion of paying for the woman on the first date doesn't ring a bell how traditional roles of being a provider as a man? You ignore how men as a rule earn much more than women in marriages with kids? You clearly are ignorant to how the vast majority of custodial battles end in since you naively say just don't do x and x and you'll be fine, yeah maybe see your kids as a man on the weekends because the judge is b…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 06:45 AM
1

Not necessarily, one is a rank the other is wanting to fuck. You were a simp and at your job you were just an employee. One is respectable the other isn't. Like a drug that makes an addict rob to get their next fix isn't power despite controlling him it's just vice. Also, I am not referring to power as solely strength you led with that, despite I had to point out it wasn't relevant as a whole in their dynamic twice. Its just lust, if those men had no power for her to use via proxy then it wouldn…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 05:16 AM
1

Stop, again that power in strength is only there towards the end years later. All that supposed power isn't from that during all that time before. So again I ask how does she have power over them? I mentioned it's just lust which isn't really power just simp manipulation with her using the real power from those guys via proxy. If they weren't lusting after her she'd have nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 04:52 AM
1

That strength is only prominent at the end tho lol, also they were more so lusting after rather than giving her any real power, treating her like a child to be taken care of really. You're clearly viewing this a woman but if you replaced the sexes with just person 1 and person 2 you'd have a different viewpoint.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 04:34 AM
1

Majority of the time the man is the one who paid majority of those jointly owned marital assets you're being disingenuous if you think the one side that barely inputs money due to traditional roles doesn't have an incentive via getting the best end of the deal of breaking the contract...Also those tax breaks just adds onto what I said, plus the blatant bias for mothers to have majority of the custody despite not making enough to support even herself, you either have no idea what you're talking a…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 02:45 AM
1

how exactly do they go about having power over him?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 02:41 AM
0

Looks at majority of female sexual fantasy media, uuh...?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 10:07 PM
-1

Women police men who don't simp or act like they're not a beta when they are, from women who are snakes to women who don't come off as snakes. They don't have respect for them like a man. If they don't benefit them or women around them and asked why if it isn't meek answer but that women have shown him exactly why he shouldn't have shown weakness they gaslight him and if he really got fucked over and saying how his scenario was purely the actions only a woman would do, they'll be hostile to him …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 10:05 PM
1

Numbers still don't lie, and the parachute analogy is supposed to showcase the danger men risk when they marry taking their kids losing half their stuff paying a lifetime of money even after you separate etc. Now did you know that of that 50% divorce rate around 70%+ are initiated by the wife? Back to the analogy, imagine pair jumping out the plane with someone but solely bc they're a woman they have a 35% chance of pulling a latch to let you fall while they stay safe with the parachute? You're …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 05:09 PM
1

It's unironically 50/50 tho half of people who jumped out with a parachute landed safely but the others...you wouldn't jump out the plane with those odds and you know it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 04:36 PM
-1

Plenty of men have had your mentality only to be kicked in the nuts when reality determined her love was lie. Hope you have a great marriage but just throwing it out there you could've been together without getting the government involved that incentivises one member of partnership to break it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 06:14 AM

Women don't realize that just as they realize a significant amount of men are rapey and toxic view experiences and stories from others that align with the worst of that group, men also realized a significant amount of women not only know this fact but lust after these men if they are attractive enough for them. You're far more likely to hear a woman complain to everyone how awful and such an asshole her man is for years to DECADES as if anyone is surprised every time her clown ahh goes right bac…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 10:36 PM
2

lmao you wouldn't bet your life on whether you can predict one or the other in a person since there's only one anomaly here and you know it
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 01:02 PM
1

One is an anomaly the other is predictable human behavior... what train of logic did you through to think that was at all applicable here?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 12:03 PM
1

Are you aware of the chadfish experiment? You could be a literal woman beater and still have women want to be with you if you're "Chad" aka a good looking tall man.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 11:26 AM
27

The ick list
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 11:30 AM
1

People who have options are sociopathic but then again how many men are there who have options like this vs women? That's without makeup btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/25 10:48 AM
1

It's more so seeing how much abuse women tolerate even with barely above average guys for YEARS, then have the audacity to tell guys it's because they are flawed aka either do the exact behavior they have tolerated and lied about never happening to to protect said abuser and or worse are deemed nice guy when they're just good natured unlike the toxic guys she gravitates towards, which is why they don't have a gf. It's a joke that either breaks a guy into apathy or competent sociopathy y'all want…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 12:48 AM
2

Lol ,You make black holes look light as a feather
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 12:42 AM
1

People on here lack critical thinking Didn't deny obsession and ownership which what infatuation not uncommon with in love couples do anyway, plus you acknowledge this nuance yet say it's still stalking which no poop genius just giving motive. I am, you guys just get incredibly hostile when talking about the motives and nuance of actual non normal people.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 11:21 PM
0

1.Yea...no poop it is Motive does matter it's what differentiates a vengeance stalker and infatuation stalker When the hell did I say it was morally right??? Try telling that to a stalker, while you're at it tell a serial killer not to like murder anyone anymore it's like bad and stuff
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 11:16 PM
1

Hey remind me real quick, was the context a person who wants to know the location of a person at all times to track them to kill the person they hate or was it someone wanting to be around someone who thought loved them? After you answer that, can they or can there be a variant of both together? yes, I don't deny that, you however deny the latter. Now that's insane or just plain naive from lack of thinking or experience where even a cheesy simple crime documentary could have wissened anyone a bi…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 08:57 AM
1

🆗
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 08:23 AM
1

It's unrequited love. But they can't cope with the fact they can't be with them. And stop with the obsession bit, when it's reciprocated it's not a mystery to anyone watching a couple being at each other's faces in public with showing affections.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 08:16 AM
-3

It's fucked? Yes. Is it unrequited obsession? Yes. Does it still fall under the crazy infatuation not uncommon when it's reciprocated? Not really given cheating, murdering etc to secure ones "love" by any means necessary. Maybe I should've put this before as a disclaimer but mid people get into a frenzy with lack of understanding nuance and most of all automated hostility, feeling someone critically thinking of the situation that could cause stalkers to be born occurs. Hell even normal people wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 08:14 AM
0

Obviously not condoning it, just pointing out only what they did is something reminiscent of what lovers do. Plus you didn't mention the first part why is that?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 08:05 AM
3

One never loved you and didn't care if you did vs one thought you loved him and still loved you Not difficult to figure out
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 07:44 AM
1

"That all being said, if you’re the kind of person who’d just leave cause you’re not getting sex, the person you’re leaving is seriously dodging a bullet cause frankly, you’re doing them a favor by removing them from your grasp" "This statement is either sociopathic, or a desperate attempt at trying to one up someone" Lmao people who are capable of using others for less than their worth by manipulating love for sex are absolutely sociopathic you are assuming they are exclusive either you think p…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 01:15 AM
-3

Manipulators love you
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 01:10 AM
1

She should, did I ever say she shouldn't? Ask yourself that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 09:55 PM
4

One side says more men cheat then the next it's said it's women. Idk dude if I had to bet it would be women because if it was required by law for there to be a paternity test before the man signed the birth certificate women would clutch their pearls. Hell in France paternity testing is illegal and holds no weight because even their government is fully aware how that outcome would go lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 03:01 AM
6

Family and friends and friends of family, strangers stories etc etc life experience does exist and y'all act like 50% of divorces aren't initiated by 70% by the wife... y'all ain't angels btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 01:43 AM

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 06:28 PM

Yea? Lmao You've either been coddled your whole life, choosing to ignore certain behaviors, or simply suck at reading people.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 06:21 PM
1

Elaborate?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 06:19 PM

Oh please that's so disingenuous. There's tells, some people are horrible at telling who's a fake friend and you sound like you get the run around lmao. Good luck in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 06:15 PM
1

Tell me what "myth" you're denying exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 06:13 PM
1

Its usually bit of both. Denying this is being naive.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 06:10 PM

Non manipulative guys who want to be loved not for what they provide but for themselves and be childish together yet trust each other since there's no manipulation when I say childish vs Women complaining about not being treated good by manipulative men with red flags out the ass they continue, not only often, when know how they are from the get go, but STAY once said bad guy does some unforgivable shit to them Yes, we absolutely can tell the difference, not enough of you girlies seem to and thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 06:07 PM
1

Don't need and want are two different types which aren't mutually exclusive for all women btw. Either or is usually a bit of both,
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 06:04 AM
1

Wow nice, I'm sure some kid being abused will love to hear that toxic positivity getting negative when confronted with reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 04:36 PM
1

You must live around real nice people who are never shallow nor superficial that don't throw each other under the bus when someone gets in the way of their desires then. That's reality too dude, hope you never encounter it but to deny it is in fact lala land.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 04:31 PM
3

Oh please, do you live in lala land? Where people hold hands in kumbaya? No snakes ever dominate spaces, nobody has ever enabled snake behavior for a sadistic joke at others expense? Are you a bot serious question.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 03:37 PM
1

I basically showed you an example of addition and you ask me what else is mathematics like dude think.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 03:27 PM
-1

This is so disingenuous. Why do people insult each other by calling them losers and others who otherwise aren't feel like one because of the narrative of the game of life?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 03:27 PM
0

Yes...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 02:48 PM
-3

By noting something as simple as the cliché of girls liking bad boys. We address it by logically showing how domestic violence is not a surprise when a woman chooses a guy who shows signs of being a snake aka asshole and thus telling women, "hey don't date assholes you absolutely knew he was like this him joking about shit he shouldn't be didn't send out any alarm bells??" and normally we get bullshit rebuttals like manipulators are sneaky etc when if this was someone you weren't attracted to ph…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 02:25 PM
-2

Literally everything in their statement is pointed out by others in various discussions about said hypergamy even if they don't know the specific term, that they're aware of which is why they tried insulted them by saying main character syndrome.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 02:11 PM
-4

Your mentality is essentially saying it is what it is/life's not fair/shut up no one cares While people point out why and how exactly it is and what we can do to address it and maybe try to change our behavior because history keeps repeating. People become go from toxic negative to toxic positive about it. To win is what matters there's no use complaining about the game that's what losers do, but the game is a free market with heavily ingrained corporatism gaslighting us of the illusion of choic…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 02:02 PM
3

Question do you consider a man telling a woman that her angry frustrated almost whiny opinion of wanting to go out to the movies & eat out in fancy restaurants every week has stopped being consistent despite the man not having enough money because he needs to work extra shifts to support her lifestyle which she can't even afford herself btw, and not having enough time for her because he must work extra to please her ends up making him upset that it is fucking stupid that she doesn't recognize th…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 12:29 PM
3

They still tell that to guys, ironically they get both shunned for listening to red pill guys yet expect them to behave like them like you're doing now by saying its their fault for still believing be good and a good woman will want you. That's the thing there's plenty of guys who can provide financial stability but become settled for by women who would never match themselves with them if they had no money otherwise, this compatibility btw is literally what I'm saying about growing up and taking…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 11:18 AM
3

Nice guys are seen as pushovers even if they're genuinely kind all through like a saint just a good person, can this good person get liked by women? Yes, can this good person elicit lust in most woman as is (pedophiliac dynamics exist in women)? No, they will only be seen as a friend or a little brother, almost like a boy. When guys who have been kind all their life grow up aka take the red pill etc they realize that even though they've been kind not to get something out of people as the nice gu…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 06:06 AM
7

The fact that the blk pill and "incel" deemed posts are banned on here tells you guys all you need to know it's too true to validate. Even those on here saying well are you going to do nothing lol, then completely disregard how much of a lie was sold to get guys to contribute in the rat race just for there to be no cheese (love) for them is some brutal "deal with it" mentality in an otherwise "supposedly" down the middle discussion place.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 03:43 AM
-1

>average to below average guys never shown human decency based on looksim (lets not be disingenuous here we know we don't treat people ok when we think they'll take it as flirting chicken or the egg) >these same guys are given a sliver of positive affirmation >somehow wrong in pursuing this as flirting for once in their life's they should check themselves This disconnect of the average guys love life is exactly why guys take decency as flirting because we rarely seldom experience it without some…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 03:44 AM

You shared a seat with strangers whenever you sat on a chair unless you're willing to argue you're the only one that had a turn on that chair lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 04:06 AM

Women know they're delusional they even joke calling it delulu is the solulu, what becomes dark AF is when they see the end isn't going the way they want no matter how much complaints so they settle for a guy with enough money where she isn't suffering slaving at work and if they still want to be impregnated by said 6'3 guy with charisma (asshole lying) then she'll cheat, fool the guy she's with, for DECADES that their kid is really his and feel no remorse about it even after the crocodile tears…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 03:40 AM

Knowingly or unknowingly is irrelevant still taking turns therefore sharing
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 02:56 AM

"Not sharing men" Woman: "I like him he tells me sweet nothing's so I gave it up and he like agrees with my political opinions so he like gets it but idk why he won't commit" The Man: *lies *pretends to agree with her dumb AF opinions *act unsure about being serious with her "These women are so easy time to go with girl #2 in my roster" Do you live in lala land where bops and players don't exist or what?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 02:27 AM

How are you not getting it...? It's a controlled area...do I need to dumb it down even more?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 03:39 PM

Ok say 10 men and 10 women are in an area, 8/10 of the men aren't getting any play no situationships, nada just single, meanwhile 6/10 of the women are not single. Now how are the women who say they are not single getting the men to date, if 2/10 men are not single?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 03:33 PM

Dude I never said they were in communes nor polyamorous, although small I don't deny they exist, it doesn't represent the typical dynamic of guys who get play hide the fact they are players to keep their roster of women coming. If anything, you seem to be going towards the outliers and thinking it throws off the average to a significant degree and again the maths not mathing brother.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 02:52 PM

Then you see the irony of your previous statement given you are basically saying what I am but more polite about the sugar coating?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 01:19 PM
6

Ironic, but explain how the fuck a situationship isn't a fuckbuddy hookup or put more politely a friend with benefits then? Go on
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 01:03 PM
11

Nope dishonest answers on part of women about the situation they are in. Situationships is toilet/sugarcoated language to describe hookup fuck buddy culture, guys know they're not relationships ffs lady understand that.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 12:55 PM
5

Lady...I forget the stats but apparently most young men are single while a significant amount of women aren't, the only way that math works out is if said women are "sharing" the men who aren't single. Those men tend to be assholes because they afford to be they're pickers not some nice guy beggar. So it only seems like there's a disproportionate amount of assholes, like there's a disproportionate amount of sand on the ground well that's because they're playing around at the beach.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 12:49 PM
5

Yea pretty much guys know beggars can't be choosers to a degree obviously you gotta find her attractive enough not super model level but someone you don't mind talking to and smile at them, and if you're smiling odds are you like their personality as well so done deal. Meanwhile women aren't beggars (except for the top % of men) and are rather choosers, most will share a needle in the haystack willingly or unknowingly, but this dynamic switches once looks decline and if she never worked on her a…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 11:50 PM
1

I remember telling my cousin this and my other cousin came and overheard and got hostile by saying that's why you won't have girlfriends and I asked her if her mother allows her father to have woman friends and just walked off. Now she's in a relationship and gets so damn jealous if her man even mentions someone gender neutral he HAS to specify if he talked to women that day.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 03:48 AM
1

Again you disregards how appeasing can back fire and you ignored the illogical nature I pointed out. You reach the conclusion based on women's benefit either just saying it sucks both sides, well you do something for someone for them it's like your fault. You're a woman aren't you lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 11:40 PM
1

Common sense and intuition as a passing joke hoping others realize this is considered low effort shit posting then so be it I won't try it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 09:35 PM
1

Kinda lame but understood
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 09:30 PM
2

I did? I'm debating if they can introspect LMAO
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 09:24 PM
1

It's obvious you think in whataboutism, ironically behaving like the other poster which I was addressing. This place isn't being genuine about the points made by OP. It's like a math equation and I point out how y'all aren't carrying the 2 and people will go why do you dude by 2 why do you hate my argument about how math are just symbols they are a social construct anyways. It's so disingenuous my God.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 08:36 PM
0

Yea pointing out even now how the point wasn't addressed means I think men can't be shitty, good one.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 08:07 PM
0

Yes they did they address the points about Caucasian men treatment by women of the political side? That's just naming one. It's literally all in the same paragraph.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 08:00 PM
4

Oh stop it, your premise assumes women don't manipulate to secure their partner even if it means making them downgrade. You also ignore the man is appeasing her out of love that she'll accept him despite keeping up appearances that pulled her in and don't be disingenuous looks absolutely mattered, and let alone ignoring the fact of the illogical nature OP pointed out, made about working too much brings more money in but makes her feelings hurt cause lack of attention so stop working as much to g…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 07:57 PM
1

NO you're not getting it, not only are you using the fact he wasn't a Chad that evil men exist to make it seem like men don't know evil isn't limited to Chad it's the fact many of y'all STILL go and tolerate it, did you leave him? You didn't mention it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 07:50 PM
1

"by all means I should not have been cheated on" *After naming traits like he didn't have the opportunity to because of them LMAO unreliable author we don't even know who you are
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 10:24 AM
1

Well, this is a long-revised way to just say, "Hey it sucks for the other side too" while dismissing the situation that's become increasingly evident to most young men that you pointed out.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 07:11 AM
0

Men like this obviously. It's despite it all its not him it's an act, more restrictive than women even in today's standards. It won't change what is desired by women to love a man and frankly majority of men end up some woman's settlement rather than love him as if he wasn't a settlement(settled for). THATS damned.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 02:12 AM
1

That's the damning part...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 01:51 AM
3

Its their need for love, the love that a friend simply can't fulfil
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 01:17 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter