TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SovereignLover Archive

View 0 posts and 53 comments by SovereignLover on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

You don't respond to it because you don't have an intelligent response, like most r-wingers. There is no response to you making accusations about me that you have no way to prove and I have no way to disprove. Anyway, I refuse to talk to Russian shills, so peace out.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/20 08:26 PM
1

The majority did no such thing, and several had to for their job. The contact wasn't just one way, and to use a small amount while ignoring the majority who didn't in order to create a half baked argument is pretty pathetic. Enough did to establish a pattern; there is no evidence of assault, but there is evidence of quid-pro-quo. I like how you ignore my accusation that you'd do a complete 180 if the genders were reversed. Hard to deny something that's true isn't it hypocrite? I ignored it becau…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/20 07:58 PM
1

The evidence of these women's alleged post-assault existences is clear; many maintained contact with him, were affectionate, etc. They were not assaulted. I understand you're an imbecile, but surely even that isn't too complex for you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/20 07:47 PM
2

Just willing to admit truths leftists find unpleasant. Weinstein clearly didn't assault anyone. He traded sex with status-hungry women who were more than happy to indulge in a relationship with a powerful man in return for power of their own. That, in and of itself, can certainly be condemned -- but not as a sexual assault.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/20 07:28 PM
0

Incorrect. Weinstein seems pretty obviously innocent, judging by the behavior of women after their alleged assaults. Trump, too, seems pretty obviously innocent.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/20 07:14 PM
1

Correct.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/02/20 05:45 PM
-1

This is a left-wing forum, so it's unlikely you'll find anyone making good arguments.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/20 09:40 PM
1

My outer not-taking-your-shit would see that as a reason to pop you in the mouth.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/16 09:22 PM
1

It's not bad. I never called it bad. Directing you to read the post was done in the hopes you'd focus on what I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 06:57 AM
1

Read the rest of the post. It answers your question.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 05:53 AM
1

First of all, I'm not fully straight; indeed, I certainly have a bit of a soft spot (OK, maybe a hard spot) for some of men's body parts. You repeatedly insist the desire to fuck fertile women in the cunt is too important for you to give up. That's the important part. Other men with those desires manage. Also, out of curiosity--how exactly would you feel if I put you in a position/situation where you had to risk your life? I'd just kill you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 05:42 AM
1

Every other straight man manages somehow. You're unique in your degradation. This suggests you're an unhealthy anomaly best purged.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 05:30 PM
1

Absolutely. She'd condemn you too, and probably in harsher language.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 09:00 AM
1

Look, if you're serious, I hope the surgeons refuse and you bleed out in an alley somewhere trying to do it yourself. You're too fucked up to be allowed to exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 08:21 AM
1

Yeah, I disagree, and see no compelling evidence of your claims. Gender equality is a byproduct of cultural success in a sufficiently post-industrial revolution society, not a cause of that revolution. Women gained rights because a modernized society can't affordably be on the cutting edge if roughly half its potential workforce isn't available. You have cause and effect backwards.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 08:08 AM
2

I don't get why people take you seriously. Every post you make is the most low-effort concern trolling imaginable.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 07:31 AM
1

The success of these cultures, I posit, has little to nothing to do with marriage ages, and more technological development and geopolitics.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 07:22 AM
1

No one will admit their forum is trash, but garbage is all you'll find.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/16 10:13 PM
1

That's not a devolution. That's the purpose of these subreddits.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/16 09:17 PM
1

These debate subreddits are universally worthless. They don't work. They exist solely to let people who hate each other take shots.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/16 09:00 PM
1

I generally pick tanks, but more broadly I prefer physical-oriented warriors. Also, since /u/MisgenderedCactus brought up Werewolf, I have to say two things: Forsaken > Apocalypse, and the Predator Kings beat all.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/16 06:30 AM
2

Get her tested and sleep with her, but absolutely never move it past that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/16 11:52 PM
1

You need a genie. The lamp is just the usual way to get one.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/16 05:02 AM
1

Short, busty, and obedient is my usual type.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/16 11:31 PM
1

I hope you one day find the lamp with the genie that will make this fictitious man real.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/16 11:28 PM
2

The one joy I take in your existence is that every sub I find you on considers you a joke.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 03:27 PM
3

C'mon, princess. Put that royal education to use and look at her many posts with a keener eye.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/16 03:17 PM
1

You are not entitled to compensation for your personal choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/16 03:16 PM
1

All industries that cater primarily to men and male interests. For instance, much of the gaming and entertainment industry. Also, any industry that relies primarily on male labor- after all, we should not permit men to profit off women's bodies, and so the reverse is only fair. So.. all industries. With precious few exceptions. All industries should eliminate women from any higher rungs. And, since men are superior laborers, they'll push women out of the lower rungs. But, never fear - women can,…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/16 02:43 PM
1

Do you support women being unable to profit off industries that cater to primarily men? I'm genuinely curious how consistent you are. Either way, you're still the enemy, and still lack legitimacy; your desires are rooted in nothing more than some weird femdom Reddit roleplay, selfishness, and the potentially mental-illness-ridden inadequacies of your youth. Which leaves us at "in your world, women are just going to be raped constantly". You have a very strange opinion on... everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/16 02:20 PM
1

It's oppressive to ban men from producing porn and sex toys? Why? Because it restricts what you're allowed to do? Yes, that's literally what the word means. There are all sorts of restrictions about what we are allowed to do. Is it oppressive that we aren't allowed to piss on the street? All laws are oppressive. They are, however, fair, and designed - in theory and philosophy, if not always in execution - to facilitate the well-being of the people being governed, their safety, their autonomy, an…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/16 12:54 PM
1

Yes. You want to use state violence to restrict what I, and other men, are allowed to do, strictly so that you can exploit us. You will not be allowed to weasel around this by qualifying. You are advocating the use of physical force to oppress me. Why, in this theoretical world of yours, am I not going to use physical force to oppress you?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/16 12:49 PM
1

Right. So you're creating laws that ban men from these things. We're seemingly agreed that you desire the use of state violence to oppress men. Once again, then: why should I respect your autonomy or desires? You are my enemy. You actively advocate for a world wherein my quality of life and legal freedoms are diminished.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/16 12:37 PM
1

The banning of male sex toys and pornography: https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/53wyrt/men_want_relationships_love_more_than_women_do_or/d7x1ch2 Mass censorship with the explicit goal of coercing male support: https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/54actr/to_acquire_the_most_benefit_from_sexuality_on/ Tell me why, in your ideal dystopia, I'm not going to just rape and beat you when I want something. You're the enemy.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/16 12:24 PM
1

All laws. All laws are the same thing: mandates enforced by state violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/16 12:09 PM
1

You've already spoken about changing laws. What do you think laws are?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/16 12:05 PM
2

Do not misrepresent your position now. You are advocating a society wide enforced prohibition on sex with men unless men do what you want, change the laws the way you want, obey you, etc., etc. I can quote your posts saying such if you need me to, but I want you to be honest, instead. You have advocated for the infringement of constitutional rights and are, essentially, pushing the creation of a pussy cartel. Your every post, every comment, every blog makes it clear you do not acknowledge the hu…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/16 11:57 AM
2

In your theoretical pink pill world, women are universally evil and undeserving of sympathy. They have taken to blatant manipulation of men for material gain. They have even sought to infringe on constitutional rights. At that point, you've declared war, and we all know who winds up a victim in war.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/16 11:36 AM
1

I gotta say: you're a much more entertaining version of OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/16 10:58 AM
2

I support your pink pill theory. Here's my counter proposal: men force women to do what we want and ignore your desires and autonomy entirely. What's your plan for that scenario?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/16 10:55 AM
1

Nothing. I'm not paternal and don't consider it my concern what sort of partners any theoretical future spawn want. My ideal is no children.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/16 02:23 AM
1

Haha. Your way worked fine for you, I'm sure. If I encountered a woman with your strategy I'd move right on. There's always good looking girls with more obedient attitudes.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/16 02:14 AM
1

Red pill is very bad at doing that, though. It's why most red pill men are bitter losers. :)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/16 01:52 AM
1

Submissives have the real power in a relationship. They absolutely do not. This is "pop wisdom" in D/s; that a submissive technically can put down limits ignores the inherent coercive elements of being rendered vulnerable and trained to obey another's will.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/16 02:34 AM
1

"if we ignore the primary reason ultimatums are wrong, there's nothing wrong with ultimatums" I am rejecting the notion ultimatums count as coercion. You have not been coerced in any meaningful sense if I have limits and requirements and stick to them. Or to flip the script, why do you (seem to) think a man is entitled to a woman's body if she is unwilling to give it to him? A woman has every right to refuse a man. I would never think to suggest a man is entitled to rape or that she is wrong for…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/15 03:25 AM
2

I've been reading this forum after hearing about it elsewhere, and I found the answers you got to this question weren't satisfactory to me.. I wouldn't really identify with RP -- I think they're right on the whole but get messed up in the details -- but I do agree with the ones saying "If you did something with someone else, but not me, I'm done with you." It's not about shit testing, it's not about a woman having to do anything (no one ever does).. It's simply principle. I will not ever be with…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 12:23 AM
1

Similarly, if you leave because she asked you to and you're respecting her choice, that's fine. If you leave with the intention of making her feel like she has to offer sex or else you're gone, that's coercive. There is nothing whatsoever wrong with ultimatums. Ignoring the coercion argument -- I find it silly -- I keep seeing a trend in replies here that indicates "punishing" a woman by withdrawing affection and attention is wrong. Why do you (seem to) think a woman is entitled to a man's energ…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/15 11:46 PM
2

What do you think unmarried people/couples did in times past when casual sex was taboo and virtually unheard of? I think they had sex. I struggle to believe there was ever truly a time when horny teens and adults didn't fuck. That said, I wouldn't just make out with a girl either. That's a waste of time. Kissing and any sort of touching are foreplay: they exist solely to segue into orgasm. If a woman really didn't want to fuck and just wanted to makeout, OK. She can go do that with someone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/15 10:52 PM
2

I found this through someone else's comment history on a different subreddit, but.. As a dom with no experience with red pill / blue pill stuff, but a ton of experience with D/s, a lot of it does seem like a reasonably vanilla and laid-back take on D/s. I get the feeling a lot of red pill men and women would enjoy that sort of thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/14 11:03 AM
2

Oh, I have no problems whatsoever with the nail polish thing. What I'm saying is that it's enormously difficult for me to believe you're right when you say it's actually common when the actual studies consistently indicate it's not but people think it is anyway.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 10:46 PM
4

You understand, I hope, why I can't take your anecdotal data saying it happens frequently seriously when part of the actual non-anecdotal data is that people mistakenly say it happens frequently.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 07:36 PM
6

I can agree this post doesn't belong here! But it's tearing into SRS, so it'd be more accurate to call it /r/antiSRS.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 01:34 AM
14

You ought not confuse feminism with SRS.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 01:11 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter