TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SpanishGuy Archive

View 0 posts and 827 comments by SpanishGuy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Educate yourself. The main reason for slavery all over the human history has been workforce at zero or near-zero cost. The more hard work those slaves were capable to do without dying, the more value they had. Machines have existed only for a tiny fraction of our history, before that everything was done by hand, be it working the field, stockbreeding, construction and so many other things. Guess who's able to do the hardest work. "Sex slaves"?... Yes, but that's a fraction of all the forced labo…
/r/MensRights15/05/14 02:12 AM
3

Good video. Bookmarked for reference.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 01:47 AM
3

The long and painful descent of Wired to the sewers...
/r/MensRights13/05/14 10:05 AM
1

There are some related links under the article: Jilted doctor who paid gang to chop off fiance's PENIS jailed for six years Brazilian woman 'saws off husband's penis' - Telegraph LiveLeak.com - Brazilian man gets his penis cut off and stoned to death (Explicit) I'm of the opinion that feminists should see more pictures like the ones in the last link. Because mainstream news never show them, and they are usually of men.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 10:10 PM
3

This. Feminism -and courts- assume the motive of the crime without even investigating. That is, when the aggressor is a man and the victim a women (and never vice versa), they assume the motive is "sexism". But, WHY!?... Well, because they say it so. "How do you dare to question the Inquisitor, you damned creature from hell??..." Strange days these we're living.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 08:17 PM
6

Agreed. I would prefer them in r/MensRants. The thing is, except a few cases of whole accounts or pages dedicated to a relevant initiative, there are too many 14 years-old brats. ...or maybe, as sergeant Murtaugh usually said: "I'm too old for this shit!".
/r/MensRights10/05/14 11:34 PM
7

Patriarchy theory basically states that no matter what a woman does, she'll never "truly" be successful because of men That's why we know they are playing the victim card. They don't want any solution, they just want to remain as victims. Forever.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 07:12 AM
2

We should talk more about Biden and NOW. They are like a cancer.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 06:55 AM
3

The mens movement has been complaining about jokes about men for a long time. My personal view is not explained at all, unless we add: "...because jokes about women are seen as horrible, and therefore not acceptable". My position is, I'm OK with sexists jokes (because they are jokes, which imply a dissociation from any negative outcome that would occur in real life). So that's not the problem for me. I protest because most people have decided that jokes about men are funny, but the ones about wo…
/r/MensRights08/05/14 05:18 PM
2

Mirror: http://youtu.be/HanpH8yszt8 Mirror: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=734_1399423969 Mirror: http://www.frequency.com/video/female-paedophile-sexually-assaults-boy/166191405/-/5-809325 Download: http://bayfiles.net/file/1dovE/Rf1gIg/bus_assault.mp4
/r/MensRights06/05/14 11:23 PM
1

http://youtu.be/HanpH8yszt8 Please, mirror.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 10:07 PM
53

This is a weird issue. The residence is for children and grandchildren of Guardia Civil officers. The Guardia Civil is a kind of federal military-status police force. Nowadays they have specific competences like highway patrol, counter drugs operations, ports of entry control, airport security, safety of prisons and safeguarding of prisoners, security of border areas, bomb squad and explosives, anti-terrorism, coast guard, Internet crime, hunting permits and environmental law enforcement, etc. T…
/r/MensRights06/05/14 12:53 PM
1

I don't understand what you mean. Can you develop it a little? Anyway keep in mind that this is like the Murphy's Law, just funny and crazy metaphysics and philosophy.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 09:01 PM
3

I'm pretty sure if there were an article about a woman doing this to her boyfriend, Nah. Slate/DoubleX would never publish an article about a woman doing something "wrong" (in their views). The article is so stupid that it took TWO feminists to write it.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 08:24 PM
2

gaming the good will of others Well, the author was actually addressing the human stupidity from a "benevolent" point of view. Indeed, the 3rd law says: "A person is stupid if they cause damage to another person or group of people without experiencing personal gain, or even worse, causing damage to themselves in the process." Therefore he doesn't include a willful or egotistical stupidity (which seems to be the case of this girl), because he thinks this would be rather a case of "malice", and no…
/r/MensRights05/05/14 05:04 PM
19

The next will be a Gitmo for boys. Maybe they are already working it. This boy is not likely to trust the law enforcement in the future, once he's reached 18 years old or so. He's learning at a very early age that the law is not necessarily on the side of the abused. That's a very dangerous game.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 03:15 PM
3

"Non-stupid people always underestimate the harmful potential of stupid people; they constantly forget that at any time anywhere, and in any circumstance, dealing with or associating themselves with stupid individuals invariably constitutes a costly error." (4th Law of Stupidity) Be careful, man. The cost may be higher than you can imagine ;) Edit: Spelling
/r/MensRights04/05/14 06:26 PM
15

Certainly, its a troll
/r/MensRights04/05/14 12:49 AM
29

"It was considered that in the case of an allegation of rape an unscrupulous complainant could hide behind the anonymity provision while destroying the character of an innocent accused person if anonymity were not also granted to the accused unless and until found guilty," according to a Department of Justice report. This implicitly presupposes that a higher number of false allegations are made in rape cases than in other criminal trials. There is no evidence to support this contention. No, it d…
/r/MensRights03/05/14 03:23 PM
1

As a Spaniard, I think the author is getting it wrong. Homophobia in Spain?... Well, it depends on who you ask. If you ask feminists they will say "too much". Some LGBTs will say "a lot" and some "Meh, it's not a big deal", and heterosexuals will likely say that it's not usual. It's mainly a gender-policing issue, as YetAnotherCommenter says, and not much an experienced issue. Indeed, feminists complain more than the very gay people, and inside the gay group there are very different opinions. I …
/r/MensRights03/05/14 03:00 PM
6

I was going to say that. It's a little late: The opposite idea (NAFALT/NAWALT) was already addressed around the beginning of the Stone Age. Duh!
/r/MensRights01/05/14 03:51 PM
1

No news about that case. At a lower level some moves keep going on. "Experts" in violence against women are being heavily questioned, recently a doubtful report made by some of those "experts" has been sent to the High Court, it seems that more men are getting an innocence verdict... Well, little steps. But things in general are a mess, many economical issues (with serious cuts, raising taxes,...), unemployment, corruption cases being uncovered... Obviously, all this is takes priority and other …
/r/MensRights01/05/14 04:58 AM
1

Yep.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 02:50 AM
1

Yes, I know it. I was talking about the very beginning. The disappointment came quickly. I've said that the U.S. is a police state, nothing to do with "the land of the free". And that's sad, the people doesn't deserve to be treated that way, not in the U.S. nor anywhere else.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 12:41 AM
2

:) No, it's not a surprise. It's that this subreddit doesn't like talking about politics, so I've been avoiding it. And while I understand (and share) the idea that the MRM does not relate to any political ideology, if I criticize a group of democrats then I am seen as a pro-republican, and vice versa. It's almost funny, because what I loathe the most is the partisanship that rules many western democracies -like my country-.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 12:00 AM
1

Don't put words in my mouth. That's childish and low. It doesn't make you sound credible.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 04:50 PM
6

"Weapons of Mass Destruction, Vol. 2". Honestly, I thought Obama was better than this, but I was wrong. And that's sad, because I don't like the current Republican leaders either.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 04:24 PM
1

We're not animals that need women to wear burqas lest lust tempt us beyond our virtue. We're civilized human beings that can be trusted in the company of women without turning into some kind of drooling rapey heap of fail. Isn't that the entire fucking point? Civilized human beings of the male sex, at certain age, are horny as hell (that's not culture, that's biology). And it's not that they can't be trusted, but they get heavily distracted with the view of a female belly -for example-, particul…
/r/MensRights30/04/14 02:30 PM
3

To be fair, I wouldn't recommend commenting on anyone's undergarments, it is a bit creepy. In an ultraconservative society, yes, it would be creepy (or something like that). And showing them too. But I don't think underwear is still a taboo in the western world.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 01:20 PM
20

How about: Dear girls: You are gonna stop shaming boys and lying about a supposed "rape culture", and start behaving like an adult Otherwise you're perpetuating the weak, incompetent and stupid little girl stereotype. I really believe that. So it's up to them choosing if they wanna be women or brats.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 09:47 PM
4

But still, you can (and must) know the law regarding common things that may affect you. This usually happens in a "natural" way. As you grow up you learn not only what is legal or not, but also what could be subjected to regulations. In case of doubt you can ask. However, this law punishes something that you can not always know. There can be some signs that makes the situation look suspicious. Marks of violence, fear, worrying/alarmed behavior... Those things are not easy to hide. In that case I…
/r/MensRights29/04/14 12:39 PM
3

The sites have become a forum for ‘the loathing of women’, says Greer This is a extremely sexist line. People -men and women- are "loathed" for many reasons, but she establishes two classes, men and women, and focuses in women. This is the essence of feminism: Fighting sexism with more sexism. Obviously, it doesn't work.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 02:51 PM
15

Maybe because it shows that men have feelings too, which is something that feminists tend not to believe. And in this particular case it's not the feeling that his favorite football team is winning or something like that. See those tears? He has been "touched" deep inside. It's probably been a long and hard road, but now a little-big reward is coming. Looking backwards he can see it was all worth walking.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 01:29 AM
6

What I see is two women mocking/gossiping about everything, which is actually a pejorative portrait, and a stereotype. I'm not sure if that's the message they wanted to send. Otherwise, this is this quote from a movie: "Don't tease me about my hobbies. I don't tease you about being an asshole" :)
/r/MensRights27/04/14 03:43 PM
6

She a tumblr feminist too (link on the header). I guess that explains it all.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 12:49 AM
14

In the name of the women's sexual liberation: Where is the part where I take the "harasser" to my house and we fuck like possessed??? Sorry but I can't approve the script. It has many reasoning errors.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 06:49 PM
1

Keep calm and know the things you can and cannot change.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 06:30 PM
2

You can't hijack an entire wiki thread to create events in history out of thin air can you? That's not what they do. They do the same thing you're doing: Raising the importance of some facts while avoiding or silencing others. Yeah fuck her for believing that people could be polite on the internet, turns out you can't stop people from being assholes. I didn't say "fuck her". Indeed I said "anxiety can be a nightmare". See how you're twisting things? The fact that the Internet is full of impolite…
/r/MensRights26/04/14 05:07 PM
6

Wikipedia as a source for women's roles??? You must be kidding... The hijacking of wikipedia by feminist has been discussed here a few times. Regarding women's issues, wikipedia is a cesspit of lies, that's quite obvious. So, please... And PTSD is much more severe than an anxiety crisis. Yeah, anxiety can be a nightmare, but there are virtually no limits in the amount of panic that a person can experience, be it due to war or another completely unrelated situation. If you have PTSD you are not g…
/r/MensRights25/04/14 07:40 PM
5

Man, you killed me :')
/r/MensRights24/04/14 04:55 PM
3

It's not that I think you're a douche, but there are some differences between buying someone a drink or a book. When you buy someone a drink, you're asking her (or him) to stay with you for a while, be it to get laid or just to share a good conversation. Whatever the reason you have, it's not a big "commitment" for the other person (15, 30 min. for example). A drink is something that doesn't stay, but rather is to be consumed. You drink it and you don't see it anymore. On the contrary, you're li…
/r/MensRights24/04/14 04:51 PM
4

He's so boring that he falls asleep with his own rhetoric.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 01:17 PM
0

Amanda Hess (Slate) and Effie Mann (Dailylife) lend her a hand: http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2014/04/22/anna_gensler_gets_back_at_tinder_and_okcupid_creeps_by_drawing_them_naked.html http://www.dailylife.com.au/dl-people/artist-uses-talent-to-get-back-at-men-who-objectify-her-on-dating-app-tinder-20140423-3732y.html And these two must mean something: http://www.annagensler.com/uploads/1/1/8/8/11887706/_2792716_orig.jpg http://www.annagensler.com/uploads/1/1/8/8/11887706/_6855174_orig.jpg…
/r/MensRights23/04/14 07:34 PM
2

So true. People are lazy. Critical thinking requires an effort, while resting on the couch at the first confirmation bias is very pleasant. Besides, being skeptical may lead us to an uncomfortable truth ("so, better not to think, and tomorrow we'll see"). Facepalm. Human stupidity is a real threat for our survival as species :/
/r/MensRights23/04/14 05:49 PM
1

When did we as a society agree that people are no longer responsible for the way they feel about themselves? Every time a personal issue is politicized. That is, when it can be exchanged for votes. Basically, it's a perversion of socialism. It allows the State to enter in a personal area "with the intention to protect people". I wouldn't say socialism is wrong. It just requires the government AND the people to be very responsible and honest, otherwise you will soon have your house full of people…
/r/MensRights23/04/14 04:28 PM
5

This show should have been hosted by Jules Winnfield, so the talking would have gone like: -- [...] What do you think, Jules? --What does your husband look like? --What? [...] --Does he look like a bitch? --What? [...] --DOES HE LOOK LIKE A BITCH? --No! --Then why you try to fuck him like a bitch? Yes, it's from the Jules and Brett scene in Pulp Fiction. For a more politically correct version, just change to "Does he look like an ATM?" and "Then why you try to take money from him like from an AT…
/r/MensRights23/04/14 10:28 AM
2

How is it okay to discriminate against a gender when it's not okay to discriminate against a race? It's called "feminism". In this doctrine being sexist against men is not only forgivable, but encouraged (like racism in the past). It gives them power over half the population of this world. That's a HUGE lot of power. Some people think that such unmorality -as a big movement- is not possible in the current civilized 21st century, but when I ask them "Why is it impossible?" I never get a reasonabl…
/r/MensRights21/04/14 10:15 AM
14

Well, it is no secret that we need better reporters, people with principles, some honesty and ethics. The slutification of the media know no bounds.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 09:15 AM
4

Basically you pulled the lever named "Ejection" X-) Now seriously, they think that body issues is a women's thing, and as everything in feminism it's not debatable, it's just "the truth" (because "patriarchy"). In their view you are disrupting the class by arguing that "the earth is round" when they "know" it's fucking flat (this actually happened, but many years ago). You can't challenge a doctrine without sounding "offensive" to most of its believers. What's sad is that universities are teachi…
/r/MensRights20/04/14 04:19 PM
6

For once, female privilege works in our favour. Not necessarily. Not all jobs/companies/environments are feminist or somehow biased in favor of women. There are still places where you are valued for your work, and not for whatever you have between your legs. BTW: In the long term feminist companies are likely to fail. They are so focused in the female ego that they just can't compete. Avoid them, as an employee and as a customer. They are damned to death. Yeah, karma is a bitch.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 02:58 PM
3

The more research I do the more I find that gender is not the major determiner of how people were treated in the past. Of course it isn't. Feminism is built upon a huge lie. The "evidence" they show is just anecdotal, cherry-picked. They are rewriting history and teaching it to the new generations. That's one of the reasons why feminism is so dangerous. While it may not be classified as "violent", it's a very aggressive movement.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 02:07 PM
11

The "explanation" is that they believe that "male violence" is a special category, a plague that doesn't belong to the occasional crime that exists in society due to the fact that there is always some bad people. They think "male violence" is a special social phenomena, with an specific origin, and that it's promoted and/or tolerated by the system. It's a consequence of "patriarchy". The walk is a protest against "patriarchy" and "the violence that it carries". A walk against violence in general…
/r/MensRights18/04/14 03:05 PM
3

Well, I'm openly anti-feminist, online and AFK, and I'll keep being so until I fucking die. Being against a totalitarian ideology is nothing to be ashamed of. So, I don't see the problem with that screenshot.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 01:37 AM
1

She said she got a legit diagnosis, so my big concern is the mental toughness of today's society. A justified concern. But still I don't trust her. And regarding psychiatrists, -unfortunately- half of them are not honest enough. You just have to take a look at the APA.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 03:31 PM
3

She doesn't have PTSD. Among other things, PTSD requires of a previous trauma of the kind "I'm gonna die NOW, and I know it because everyone around me is getting killed in a horrible way" -or something like that-. So no, you don't get PTSD from stupid online comments, even if you perceive them as "threats". If anything it wold be annoying, unpleasant, but that's all. Or maybe she had a latent psychotic disorder about to show up one way or another. If she had PTSD she wouldn't be on Twitter with …
/r/MensRights16/04/14 02:36 PM
1

Except that having and raising children is not a job. It's an investment in genetic survival, NOT in your personal survival.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 12:01 PM
1

"Ethics?... I AM A FEMINIST!! I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE HELL YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT!!" Well done. Kudos to the University of NSW Human Research Ethics Committee!
/r/MensRights15/04/14 09:54 AM
6

That's the face of an abused child, yesterday or 30 years ago. He was told to "man up". How does it make you feel, Walker Hansen? And how does it make you feel, Chris Lavergne?
/r/MensRights12/04/14 02:06 PM
9

increasingly common That's a good sign. It's a response to an increasing pressure that is reaching more people than ever. Don't respond. And don't feel judged by random people.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 01:08 AM
1

X-)
/r/MensRights11/04/14 02:21 PM
11

I have noticed the beginning of a backlash to feminism on Tumblr. I guess people are tired of so many feminist shit. BTW: In that same blog, this post dismantles a myth about sexism in the suggested searches at Google. That myth has been used in an advertisement campaign by UN Women
/r/MensRights10/04/14 12:14 PM
7

I'm sure it works very well for women: It feeds their confirmation bias "men are violent". Once they are scared enough, it's time to ask daddy government for measures "to protect women against those violent monsters". I must recognize it's an excellent marketing job. It's dirty, unethical, malicious, disgusting... but hey, it sells. Anyway... I think I have seen women hitting ATMs out of rage. There must be any video of it ;)
/r/MensRights10/04/14 11:56 AM
5

Yes, but if "misandry doesn't real", then "it doesn't count as sexism nor as anything else".
/r/MensRights09/04/14 09:07 PM
4

they're not even aware of the damage they are causing. How ironic. It's incredible how easily some people swallow a whole doctrine without questioning the most fundamental issues. We should call it "wide-throating" (no pun intended).
/r/MensRights08/04/14 03:55 PM
3

The law is very interested in punishing someone, not necessarily the guilty. This is a symptom of a sick society seeking for revenge at any price. "Bring me someone to blame, to punish, to sacrifice". Once done, the people is satisfied. And that's all that matters. This is what happens with the social alarm. The general public becomes the actual jury, an angry jury that just want to punish. The judicial system is supposed to make true Justice, but...
/r/MensRights07/04/14 09:20 PM
8

I think it was yesterday, or the day before, that I took my time to read the whole thing, including comments, the Typhon's video and everything. I share the views of AVfM. Adele Mercier is a victim blamer, a rape apologist, and due to the age of the boys she was talking about, a pedophilia supporter. Oh, and I don't like her despotic and threatening tone, it's very inappropriate for a "philosophy professor". Now Queen’s University has something to say.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 07:25 PM
5

I hate to be that guy, but this is a slight variation of a classic. (Vague translation): Friend #1: Who has the pants in your home? Friend #2: I have the pants in my home while my wife is out Of course feminists won't agree, but to a big extent it's been this way for many years. The reason why it works this way is because there will always be different opinions about what to do regarding this or that issue, and even if the couple applies the common sense and give up alternatively (also according…
/r/MensRights06/04/14 12:08 AM
3

I believe it's more the opposite: Many drug addicts become prostitutes as a way to earn the money they need for more drugs. No need to say that this is hell for them and a problem for the public health (STD).
/r/MensRights05/04/14 10:40 AM
9

I'm not the most appropriate person to tell if she's right or not, because I'm not American. That said, "laws" are one thing and "moral/ethics" another. Slavery has been legal for so many years. Just don't forget to question authority.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 11:07 PM
1

Fucking Poe's Law... I always forget April Fools. In my country it's on Dec 28th. Off-topic: It doesn't match the pun but: FAP: Formerly "Fundación Anti-Piratería" ("Anti-Piracy Establishment").
/r/MensRights02/04/14 12:33 PM
1

I see. The feminist hypocrisy knows no bounds. They never see individuals, only groups, and assume the worst for each group. At the end they are exactly what they fight. They are creating and reinforcing classes. That's low, and sad.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 12:31 PM
3

It's about victimhood. She's saying "we understand sexism because we are the victims". It implies that men don't experience sexism. And it also implies that men lack the ability to distinguish what things benefit us and what don't. After all sexism is only one of the thousands conditions that can work for or against you. To sum up: "Men are idiots. They have no social conscience and no self-consciousness".
/r/MensRights02/04/14 10:27 AM
9

So, basically: "the trial should be a bureaucratic play with no effect whatsoever. Jury?... Verdict...? What for...? We KNOW he's guilty". Not long ago that's how black people were treated. Too often there wasn't even a trial, they were hanged from a tree by an angry mob. Strange fruit. And if there was a trial it was more like a ritual before hanging the fucking nig**r, because everybody "knew" he was guilty. To think that these feminists believe they are fighting for "EQUALITY" and "CIVIL RIGH…
/r/MensRights01/04/14 08:33 PM
2

Oh, I didn't get it. You're right :)
/r/MensRights31/03/14 09:03 PM
5

I don't think you can fight political correctness with more political correctness, because that concept is dishonest by definition. Another way to see it: If you want to fix your car engine you're gonna get dirty.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 08:51 PM
4

Nooo!, this is a must-see! I mean... well, it's sadistic, but it's also when David Starkey puts her in her place: "I will not be lectured to by a jumped-up public* schoolgirl like you!" * As the article explains: "in England, unlike elsewhere in the world, a 'public school' is an expensive, posh private school". Edit: format
/r/MensRights31/03/14 08:15 PM
7

X-) Yeah, I think her speeches are used by the CIA as psychological endurance material to train agents.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 07:51 PM
1

I'm not that good, but thank you :)
/r/MensRights30/03/14 10:03 PM
2

I’ll grant that my experience has influenced my view. No doubt. Social schemas abound of deaf women as exotic, animal-like (this usually has a sexual connotation), voiceless, and dependent. I think that part of the popularity of these viral videos of young deaf women with cochlear implants is a subtle response to these schemas and social expectations. What the fuck?... I've seen a few of those videos with one and only one thing in my mind: People who have never heard don't know what sound is lik…
/r/MensRights30/03/14 04:25 PM
52

That's "rape culture". An American women's invention to try to manipulate men: Women can become victims whenever they want. Of course not all women do this. It takes a whore to use so easily the word "rape" to try to put herself above you. Because the status of "victim" is very powerful: It "gives" her the support and sympathy of the whole society while you become the "perverted criminal". Even when they use it for a given moment and then it vanishes: It doesn't matter; they feel powerful in tha…
/r/MensRights30/03/14 01:59 PM
9

There is a name for this: Sabotage.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 12:21 PM
2

There is a related story too: Liv here, with another high school story and how it relates to this; As you all may know, my high school was fucking sketchy and skeevy. It was full of hicks and in the middle of a fucking field. The closest thing to it was a run down museum and church, a useless fire hall, and a DIRT FLOORED CONVINIENT STORE WITH AN INDOOR OUT-HOUSE. Let that sink in for a minute. That being said, all the kids were pretty much the normal fucking high school kids; jackasses with no …
/r/MensRights28/03/14 07:33 PM
2

Yes, that's probably part of the problem. Definitely men and women have different communication "codes". It's not only language (verbal or not), but a wider set of things. That makes us different. Not more, not less, just different. And it's not reasonable to ask the opposite sex to communicate like people of one's own sex. We all have to learn how to "read" the other sex code. Those who don't do this are lost. I guess that at a young age we all have thought: "Humm... what a strange creatures ar…
/r/MensRights28/03/14 05:01 AM
1

Damn!. You caught me. X)
/r/MensRights28/03/14 03:11 AM
8

This video is the perfect demonstration of how sexism hurts both genders — and why feminism can release both women and men from the shackles of oppression. What??... No, feminism doesn't do that. Men shouldn't be told that being kind to half the population is equivalent to being untrue to themselves. They should be taught to show love and respect for women. A man treating the opposite sex as his equal shouldn't be funny, it should be expected — for both genders' sake. What??... It implies that m…
/r/MensRights27/03/14 07:21 PM
2

Thanks for noticing, I got it wrong. Edited to correct the "from" and "to". My apologies. Reading again the OP I see the FBI actually didn't say a word, they just retired the SPLC from their list of resources, maybe due to this letter, or another non-published pressures, or both. That's another different scenery, and there is an interesting point here. If it has been due to right wing Christian groups, I'm not gonna say I agree with them. I'm an atheist (not the annoying kind) and I don't even s…
/r/MensRights27/03/14 05:33 PM
0

That thread has 3,570 comments now. You bring 5 comments... Good job, excellent job!. But even if there are 3,000 comments like that, you're still wrong. That's not a significant sample of the male population. And... what do you expect from a bunch of kids and their over-sized mouths, hidden behind a TFT monitor while seeing crappy webcam videos?... Crème de la crème, but not the average young man. There is life beyond Reddit and those shitty videos. There is life even outside Internet!! Geez...
/r/MensRights26/03/14 10:37 PM
5

These are some excerpts from the FBI letter the letter sent to the FBI: [...] The presentation of SPLC to the public as a trusted source of information on the serious matter of hate crimes is completely unacceptable. The SPLC is a heavily politicized organization producing biased and inaccurate data on “hate groups” – not hate crimes. [...] The SPLC has used its website to inflame public sentiment against those who disagree with some of the group’s goals, resulting in tragic consequences. On Aug…
/r/MensRights26/03/14 09:08 PM
14

"Los hombres se asemejan al vino: el tiempo agria a los malos y mejora a los buenos." ("Men are like wine: Time turns sour the bad and make better the good") --Marcus Tullius Cicero (3 January 106 BC – 7 December 43 BC) It is a well-known quote, at least here in Spain. I haven't found it in the English version of wikiquote, but it exists in the Spanish version. So this is my personal translation -feel free to correct if it doesn't sound OK-. Oh, and Jimmy John can go fuck himself ;)
/r/MensRights26/03/14 11:38 AM
16

Same here. It's a domestic violence case. If roles were reversed it would classify as violence against women, with a harder punishment. You know, men's value is lesser than women's.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 04:27 PM
6

Excuse me for my English. I was going to ask "Regarding feminism, what's wrong in Toronto?". I've never been in Canada, but AFAIK it's a nice and non-extremist country. However, since I'm here I've seen many awful feminist stories. I guess it's just feminism by itself. It looks like a new kind of fascism, a word that I'm increasingly hearing in discussions, meaning in general terms a spark of authoritarian ideas in a liberal society. There is an interesting concept called Unprincipled opportunis…
/r/MensRights24/03/14 12:47 PM
11

The inspector said Bisma killed the baby boy by strangulating him and threw the daughter in a water tub after tying her hands and feet. Driven by poverty... Sure. Like every other poor family in Pakistan, India, Africa...
/r/MensRights23/03/14 02:36 AM
21

You're always on my mind, Hillary.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 02:17 AM
0

If you change "gender" for "God", I'm sure this has been said by the Catholic Church about many science men before burning them at the stakes. Dogmas, you know.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 02:31 AM
17

Yes, it is a fabricated story. From this post: This is a picture of 7 year old Makayla McEvoy, who was attacked by a kangaroo in January of 2012 And this is another source (video included) of the same news. That's about the picture. About the story, if you search a piece of the text (literal, with double quotes) you will see there is no such news, only this same meme reposted. I checked two separate sentences. Now, in the first link you can see it was originally posted in Tumblr by this psychobi…
/r/MensRights22/03/14 12:00 AM
2

Save these pictures, they are priceless. And in the future, when someone yells "Misogyny!" because there is a protest against a female politician, show them. Too often there is no argument like a past event. Hypocrisy has a very bad memory.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 03:46 PM
3

Usually they are falsely flagged (by feminists and another idiots), and it seems that when one video have many flags it gets automatically hidden. Youtube employees just can't review so many videos flagged as "inappropriate", and that system is likely to work in most cases (porn, racism...). Now the user can complain, and this time it will be reviewed and allowed if it happens to be OK. But this takes time. To get Europol (or whatever) involved is not that easy. They work in serious crimes. I ha…
/r/MensRights17/03/14 05:18 PM
2

Thanks for the link. That's a really good speech about the issue. He nails it when he says "...replace one kind of intolerance with another".
/r/MensRights17/03/14 03:41 PM
18

Good video. That's also why I loathe those campaigns telling men to do something when a woman is in danger. It may not be the same situation than someone stealing her pocket, but in my experience (Spain) men already do whatever is necessary, particularly when the subject is a woman. So, feminists: Big news!: Men are human too!. Geez... who would have said... Also, I have serious doubts about the bystander effect. It's probably not as simple as it's usually described.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 11:41 AM
1

Maybe I'm not getting it (my English sucks), but... isn't she being ironical?
/r/MensRights14/03/14 03:30 AM
3

Protip: Don't treat disabled people differently than ordinary people. They nearly universally hate that. Wise advice.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 12:41 AM
4

Thanks!
/r/MensRights14/03/14 12:38 AM
6

Yep. The "fashionable" diseases. They should take this issues more seriously.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 10:17 PM
-1

It's a strange thing that exists in the feminist theory.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 10:10 PM
5

Agreed. Indeed, what I mean is that I'm not gonna take that blog seriously because it's clearly fucked up. Other blogs... well, it'll depend on the case. There are some recovered (or recovering) victims who are quite clever.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 10:02 PM
7

It's called "the pussy pass". Male privilege /s
/r/MensRights13/03/14 08:28 PM
0

Quotes from the page "Meet the mods": Capn: White ciswoman. Death Fat. Pansexual. [...] Recovered from self-harm (9 years strong!). Has issues with depression and anxiety, but has never been formally diagnosed with anything thanks to not having healthcare. Displays common signs of dyscalculia, but has never been formally diagnosed. Very passive-aggressive largely due to being raised with a very aggressive parent. [...] Dance: [...] Survivor. Recovered from self-harm (over 1 year free!), anorexia…
/r/MensRights13/03/14 07:54 PM
1

I was going to say (paraphrasing The IT Crowd) that whoever wrote the whole text must be from the past. However: Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie[note 1] (born 15 September 1977) is a writer from Nigeria.[2] She has been called "the most prominent" of a "procession of critically acclaimed young anglophone authors [that] is succeeding in attracting a new generation of readers to African literature".[3] (...) Adichie, who is married, divides her time between Nigeria, where she teaches writing workshops, a…
/r/MensRights10/03/14 11:39 PM
8

‘Girls are less interested in leadership than boys because they worry about being called ''bossy'',’ If you're afraid of being called "bossy", you're not a good leader. Does anybody think Madonna gives a shit about being called "bossy"? LOL OK, that may be an extreme example. But seriously, leaders know what kind of criticism matters what doesn't.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 03:49 PM
11

Poor kid. He's gonna be bullied to death. Dressing their boy as a girl may not be intrinsically a bad thing, but you can't force society to change as fast as them, or in the same direction than them. Gender ideologues and other similar species don't understand this. It's a huge adaptive mistake.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 01:21 PM
3

Imagine this: When a woman is convicted she is sent to a prison where other women -prisoners or guards- will rape her on a daily basis. This is: Forced to endure vaginal, anal and mouth penetration with fingers or any object, forced to suck/lick other women's clit, labia, the opening of the vagina... the entire vulva, and breasts. And vice-versa: Forced to penetrate other women, or being licked. [Add here whatever thing your imagination may find]. Sometimes it will be individually and sometimes …
/r/MensRights10/03/14 12:17 AM
4

Disgusting propaganda. The purpose of this crap is to perpetuate the idea of women as victims, while real victims will be lost like tears in the sea. That's why I have no respect whatsoever for feminism.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 04:56 PM
13

From IMDB: A mafia boss and his family are relocated to a sleepy town in France under the witness protection program after snitching on the mob. Despite the best efforts of CIA Agent Stansfield (Tommy Lee Jones) to keep them in line, Fred Manzoni (Robert De Niro), his wife Maggie (Michelle Pfeiffer) and their children Belle (Dianna Agron) and Warren (John D'Leo) can't help but revert to old habits and blow their cover by handling their problems the "family" way, enabling their former mafia croni…
/r/MensRights09/03/14 04:11 PM
14

Just forward it to the big fishes: NOW, UN, UN Women, the White House, UK Parliament (or whatever top UK govt. speaker is in twitter), as well as every country's govt. top speaker you know in twitter. Mainstream newspapers are worth too. Just add "FYI" to let them know that's what feminists are thinking and saying, and let the shit hits the fan. Too often, spreading the feminist hate as it is (with a FYI label) is way easier than spreading our claims.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 11:46 PM
3

The channel is named "Catholic Daily Reading" Join us TODAY at: https://www.facebook.com/HealingPraye... or https://www.facebook.com/WeServeTheLord or Watch The Divine Tv Channel At: https://www.youtube.com/TheDivineTv To change your life forever... I think this explains it all. This and her new design of "Godly" $wimsuits, of course. Edit to fix link.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 07:50 PM
-1

I think you call "prejudices" (not OK) what is actually "reasonable expectation" (OK). You forget there is a generalized assumption that woman are likely to be sexually assaulted by men. This assumption has brought laws, specific procedures for law enforcement agencies, it has created a deep fear in women as a collective and it's ending the presumption of innocence for men. I mean it hasn't had the impact of a water drop, it rather had the impact of multiple nuclear warheads. Of course some wome…
/r/MensRights05/07/13 02:21 PM
5

Indeed there is a high controversy on this "disorder", and I'm not taking the position of anti-psychiatry groups (quite the opposite). Heck, just see this from wikipedia: In North America, the DSM-IV criteria are often the basis for a diagnosis, while European countries usually use the ICD-10. If the DSM-IV criteria are used, rather than the ICD-10, a diagnosis of ADHD is 3–4 times more likely.[10] Factors other than those within the DSM or ICD, however, have been found to affect the diagnosis i…
/r/MensRights03/07/13 10:31 PM
1

Relevant: Misandry - Men Don't Exist
/r/MensRights01/07/13 10:06 PM
37

The word "violence" is being completely redefined by feminism. Following the same rules, almost everything that the law is doing as a result of feminism is violence against men (unconditional arrests, disregard for the principle of innocence, guilty verdicts without enough proof, harder punishments...) So, what's gonna be?... Because if everything is "violence" now, we have an epidemic of violence, but it's not against women.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 09:41 PM
4

Yep. At least the "social" feature. Tumblr has no comment system (you can add Disqus to your account, but most people dont use it). So they reblog and add some text as a comment, but depending on who you reblog from, the thread will look different. However, the counter is showing the total amount of different threads. That's not indicative of the "impact" of what you're seeing. Otherwise Tumblr is quite cool as a picture-sharing site* -for example-, memes, quotes... But don't pay much attention …
/r/MensRights29/06/13 12:04 PM
24

Note this: Unless it has changed, Tumblr increments the counter despite the text added or edited (it's a video post with a comment). This means that not necessarily the 12,000 notes and reblogs contain the same text. Reposts aren't actually linear, but an inverted tree structure: Each repost is a new node (son). At the same time these nodes may have different sub-nodes (grandsons), and so on. So depending on the "parent" node, the repost can contain different texts (or even threads of text). Exa…
/r/MensRights29/06/13 01:54 AM
9

Looks like a prudish conservative protest. "You sinners!! May God have mercy, or you will burn forever in the flames of hell!!" xD On the other hand, it's an interesting catalog of available magazines. There is enough skin on the Internet, but thanks anyway, Guardian. "Women's sexual liberation"... what a joke.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 01:57 PM
2

Not for physiological reasons and neither due to their aptitudes. But if they are gonna make politics under the feminist ideology and with feminist attitudes, then you can expect a complete failure.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 11:15 AM
11

In other words, it is acceptable to mock the Articles 10 and 11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Regarding feminism, it violates the Article 7.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 03:19 PM
21

most recently in CBS's "The Big Bang Theory," discouraged women from pursuing computer science degrees. If The Big Bang Theory discouraged you from pursuing computer science, you're not good at computer science. It's very simple. STEM is about how things are, not what they look. If you're genuinely interested in STEM, you're not likely to be influenced by stereotypes (even less by a fucking TV show). Otherwise you may choose some of these fields (like the women in the experiment), but I doubt th…
/r/MensRights27/06/13 01:59 PM
2

Couldn't agree more.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 03:36 PM
1

In their site there seems to be a "print it yourself" kit: http://www.survivorsuk.org/male-sexual-violation/ Now click on "Real Men Get Raped" There is some problem with my browser, but in that page I can see both "Print" and "PDF" links. If you can't find an already posted version, I guess you can do it all (technically it's the same). Or ask them for an actual sample, they probably have some.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 03:23 PM
22

It's not that women do not commit crime, it's that it looks like an accident, or self-defense, or get a pussy-pass, or isn't mentioned in the news... Sociology: The art of deceiving.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 01:48 PM
0

As a general rule I would avoid dating woman who think there is some diabolic entity under the bed. I mean, that's normal for a child, but that girl is supposed to be an adult. Can you imagine if she wakes up in the middle of the night and thinks you're Chucky in XL size? [Police officer]: So you stabbed your boyfriend 37 times... [She]: Well, it was a little dark and... I confused him with Chucky. I did it in self-defense! I was scared! [Police officer]: Oh. Well, don't worry, you're safe now. …
/r/MensRights25/06/13 11:55 PM
1

Certainly, the first time I read this I thought it was quite stupid because the Schrödinger's cat is dead and alive at the same time, and we know it by indirect measurement (but it's a paradox). Then we proceed to a direct observation opening the box, and in that moment the two simultaneous states become one, either dead or alive. So the analogy is a disaster. But then I thought that maybe the author made a Freudian slip: She thinks "all men are rapists" (like in Marilyn French's The Women's Roo…
/r/MensRights25/06/13 01:08 AM
1

20, student nurse, slightly insane, has an unhealthy obsession with Tony Stark, likes to eat grapes in lectures. Tumblr users tend to describe themselves with the word "insane" or some specific disorder listed in the DSM IV (seriously). For the age, certainly most are 16-22. That's actually the behavior of some 8-11 year-old girl, but -as I've said already- there seems to be an epidemic of immaturity nowadays.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 11:55 PM
14

Thanks to the medicine I take, and the cognitive/group therapy offered to me, I'm far saner than most people without mental illness. That's something many people say, but some of then also say they are Jesus Christ, Napoleon Bonaparte or Winston Churchill. I mean, therapy and medication work well for some people, but -unfortunately- not for everyone. You do not say it worked for you, you rather demonstrate it. And here Mr. "Saner" is doing it wrong. As for men killing themselves more, it's becau…
/r/MensRights24/06/13 01:05 PM
37

"How come mom keeps yelling and hitting dad?" ...a few weeks later... "Why can't I see dad?"
/r/MensRights21/06/13 01:37 AM
3

As shvedsky says, it seems Google thinks that page is orphan at this moment. Your link to that page is now at http://news.mensactivism.org/node?page=2 (it will soon change to ...page=3). But Google is missing it. If you check the Google cache for the home and successive pages you will see it's missing the one that contains the link to that article. AFAIK Google used to keep orphan pages in its index, but maybe this has changed (or its relative weight is near zero, too low compared with the "vict…
/r/MensRights18/06/13 10:35 AM
18

That's from April 17th. There is another article from a few days later saying she has been found guilty. Facing life without parole. Scheduled to be sentenced June 28.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 01:28 PM
7

There is no such thing as "sexism" against men in any legitimate sense of the term. It simply does not exist. Uh?... There must be an explanation for this. Michael Laxer lives in Toronto where he runs a bookstore with his partner Natalie. Michael has a Degree in History from Glendon College of York University. He is a political activist, a two-time former candidate and former election organizer for the NDP, was a socialist candidate for Toronto City Council in 2010 and is on the executive of the…
/r/MensRights16/06/13 11:44 AM
9

My point (and you probably know it) is that the whole world is yelling "men are violent, women are the victims", so "there is a problem of violence against women" and laws to throw men in jail just for saying "boo!" to a woman. But that's far from the truth. Violence is not a gender problem -it's a human problem-, and those laws are not helping, they are wrong. Women as aggressors and men as victims are systematically silenced, while the opposite thing is world-wide published with all kind of de…
/r/MensRights14/06/13 02:16 PM
110

As you probably know, most of the Amanda Todd's bullies were girls. I wonder where do girls learn so much cruelty.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 01:16 AM
2

They proposed doing something similar here in Spain, but the jokes about it were so many and so brutal that they just gave up.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 05:18 AM
3

http://thomasjamesball.com/
/r/MensRights13/06/13 02:11 AM
6

Seems to be this same case. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1g1vb9/so_alimony_in_florida_slavery_man_has_to_pay_4k_a/ I'll let it here. It has a high score, many comments and include video.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 09:17 PM
3

Of course. As internal organs they are protected. The idea comes in part from a conversation about sex, when a woman mentioned that positions allowing deep penetration might lead to the cervix being hit by the penis, which she said was very painful. Obviously, this possibility depends on the length of both penis and vagina, but that was not what the conversation was about; we were talking seriously and honestly about sexuality.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 11:12 AM
21

I think that due to the anatomical differences between male and female reproductive organs, hitting a guy in the testicles is more like hitting a woman directly in the uterus, or cervix. I wonder if they have ever considered this.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 08:57 AM
2

Don't worry. It's an AMR troll.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 07:27 PM
3

Agreed. What I mean is that it's a completely irresponsible action, and people who have access to private data must be very responsible (which is part of professionalism) for many reasons.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 02:50 AM
6

Regarding Presumption of innocence in UK: The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of the Council of Europe says (art. 6.2): *"Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law"*. This convention has been adopted by treaty and is binding on all Council of Europe members. Currently (and in any foreseeable expansion of the EU) every country member of the European Union is also member to the Council of Europe, …
/r/MensRights11/06/13 02:02 AM
8

They shouldn't, it's a matter of professionalism. Not all companies guarantee your privacy. Some do, others don't.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 12:50 AM
1

Good catch, I had forgotten this. In this same movie there is a previous scene 100% explicit about the sex market being dominated by women. As we already know, it's all about power. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cr04KncHozI We've addressed this issue when talking about prostitution abolitionists. Prostitution is a competitor, and these abolitionists want to be a monopoly.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 08:08 PM
10

They are like those fundamentalist religious people. Whatever you say against them "is a crime". I don't know who the hell is Tyler the Creator, but that group of goddamn whores may go fuck themselves, if you know what I mean.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 06:08 PM
6

Regarding their apparent lack of rational thinking, there is a concept in psychiatry/neurology that explained in a easy and simplistic way goes more or less this way: The amygdalae is one of the most primitive parts of our brain. "Primitive" as in developed early throughout evolution of species. Other parts are more "recent" (that's in terms of many, many thousands years). Among other things, the amygdalae deals mainly with emotional reactions, and has a high priority so to speak. That region of…
/r/MensRights10/06/13 05:50 AM
-3

More than leftist, I would say anti-republican. Bipartisan systems tend to become more "anti-the-other" and less "pro-my-ideology". With time they both lose their original direction. Many feminists say they are leftist, libertarian, socialist, etc., but they are actually socially-conservative, authoritarian and capitalist. It looks paradoxical, but when you consider the consequences of losing your own direction, you realize you're likely to end in a very unsuspected place (usually far from your …
/r/MensRights08/06/13 03:22 PM
2

Smells like honeypot.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 04:24 AM
2

Not really. He's using a feminist rhetoric. Have you never heard a feminist saying she proud of her vagina? It's a colloquial/dirty speech, but not pejorative. Men -particularly young men- sometimes talk with certain "pride" about their dicks. But women don't usually do the equivalent thing. What these feminists do is like saying: "So dudes are proud of her penises, uh?... Well, we are proud of our vaginas. Yes, I have a vagina! I love my vagina!". It seems like a counterweight to the "phallocen…
/r/MensRights08/06/13 01:38 AM
4

The rampant cynicism about VAWA or "vagina owners" is really fucking disgusting, It's not VAWA or "vagina owners". You misquoted OuiCrudites. He said: Clearly Feminism is faltering in the US, as this woman has obviously not been educated on VAWA provisions for vagina owners wanting to make good on a divorce. vagina owners = women (women have vaginas, right?), but there is no cynicism about "women". There is nothing wrong with women. But about VAWA (and the women who use it as a weapon against me…
/r/MensRights07/06/13 10:34 PM
14

a girl pretended to have been raped so many times that when it actually happened to her her mother didn't believe her The moral of "The Boy Who Cried Wolf" Aesop's fable, dating more or less from the 5th century BC. 2,500+ years and some people still don't get it...
/r/MensRights07/06/13 03:48 PM
20

The two random men were detained, questioned, and forced to undergo forensic and medical examination. Attridge has been sentenced to do 200 hours’ community service. Feminists: "Women don't lie about rape" Yeah, sure. Their "equality" makes men a lower class. Now that's a paradox. These two men have been "lucky" after all. They are not in jail as many other who just were pointed with a finger, either intentionally or due to misidentification. You really need a lot of power to make half the popul…
/r/MensRights07/06/13 01:40 PM
5

That's a good testing material for a feminist teacher. You know, to ask her what she thinks about it. But before I would make sure she's in optimal health conditions, to avoid a possible heart attack :S
/r/MensRights06/06/13 03:57 AM
31

I think it's been here already. The book is from 2009 From: http://lesliemargolis.com/annabelleunleashed/#boysaredogs BOYS ARE DOGS: Annabelle’s all-girls elementary was very different from Birchwood Middle School where the boys run through the halls like wild animals. But with a little experimenting, Annabelle realizes that like her new puppy, maybe boys can be trained too. Featuring Annabelle’s hilarious take on friendship, boys, and her all-new life, this novel / survival guide perfectly capt…
/r/MensRights06/06/13 12:49 AM
1

That's a quote attributed to Gandhi. "Be the change you wish to see (in the world)". As I understand it, it could work in certain circumstances if you can reach a critical mass with your example. "Be peaceful instead of fighting fights" (debate, do not use violence). A different scenario: "Don't read stupid men/women's magazines"... well, I don't read them (and it certainly makes my life better), but that's not gonna stop enough people from reading them. However, I still can tell tell some boys:…
/r/MensRights06/06/13 12:07 AM
2

Deliberately obfuscating? Definitely not. I guess it's my English or my ideas what you find incoherent.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 10:54 PM
3

No, that's not wh... Jesus, how I hate the absence of the voice tone... You just ruined my comment, but... OK, let me explain: Yes, I'm being intentionally cheesy here. It's called rhetoric. And you're right, there's absolutely no evidence at all that all of us are amazing. Indeed, there seems to be certain evidence of the opposite thing: Human stupidity knows no bounds. As a software engineer this is one of my favorite quotes: "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to …
/r/MensRights05/06/13 09:30 PM
2

There is a mention about isolation in my reply to Neurotikitty. you don't solve problems by withdrawing completely, Well, you don't remain passive at all because you're acting in a certain way as a consequence, you're being selective, and this has an impact (some will cause more impact, others not so much). Anyway I mainly agree with you. I have to think about it.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 04:43 PM
4

As far as I understand, MGTOW doesn't mean avoiding women. Relationships and even marriage are valid options as long as he knows what he's doing (the risks he takes in his particular situation). As you said, "do what makes you happy as a man". "Boycott" probably sounds heavier that it really is. This is not about women or society, it's about feminism. Some women are into feminism, and part of this society has joined feminism. Avoid only that. And there is no need to become paranoid: As a custome…
/r/MensRights05/06/13 03:19 PM
22

Yes, this is very important. Society can't tell you what or who you are. They can talk (they will talk anyway), but as The Dude said: "Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." I can't stress this enough, for all men, but particularly for the younger ones, they are more prone to absorb the idea that they aren't good enough, worth enough. Guys: You're fucking amazing! Don't fucking forget it.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 11:49 AM
3

(Excuse me for my English) The answer to your problems is MGTOW. Take it as a kind of "temporary boycott" until things start to change (they will, otherwise leads to chaos). The way I see it is that -fortunately- I haven't had to live through a war (my grandparents had); I haven't had to live through a military dictatorship (my grandparents and my parents had), but unfortunately I'm not that lucky at all, this democracy I live in is quite fucked up. Here in Spain the biggest problem is not femin…
/r/MensRights05/06/13 11:26 AM
11

Its a satire of the concept of misandry, the existence of which they deny. It isn't a satire of feminism. Exactly. However (as an answer to them), I don't think "oppressed" is the correct term for men. Mean are disposable like a diaper (you take a shit on them and throw them to the garbage bag), or like a bullet-proof jacket (if stops the bullets until it's too deteriorated), or the money you ex spends in unnecessary shit without worry or remorse. For everything else, "men are rapists, child pre…
/r/MensRights04/06/13 09:06 PM
4

Poe's law is our eternal problem. But in my experience here, the worst option is 99% of the time the correct answer :/
/r/MensRights01/06/13 11:47 PM
5

I don't hate psychology. Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see people here denying they like beautiful women; quite the opposite. And what I'm sure as hell people here doesn't think is "Due to my status, this or that girl isn't enough for me". No; men do not like/love women depending on those men's own status. We all have our preferences despite our status. This may not be true for some "high class" and/or extremely rich men, but these men far from the average, they are not representative…
/r/MensRights01/06/13 11:42 PM
2

IMO there are two mixed messages. Most times you won't do something you want because you're afraid. It's good to tell people not to be afraid and go ahead. But the other message is telling women they are afraid of (or because) men, and that's not true, that's blaming someone else for your own faults/flaws. It's dishonest and awful. The thing is, women can do whatever they want. If they choose not to do it, it's their problem. Two possible reasons for this behavior are: A) Victim complex. B) Fear…
/r/MensRights01/06/13 03:58 PM
10

Nothing. This is not about making friends. I think you still don't understand what we're dealing with.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 03:35 AM
1

You're right. The girl says: They were about to move onto the next question when Sir Patrick looked at me and asked me “My Dear, are you okay?” I said yes, and that I was finally able to move on from that part of my life. He then passionately said that it is never the woman’s fault in domestic violence, and how wrong to think that it ever is. That it is in the power of men to stop violence towards women. The moderator then asked “Do you want a hug?” (Bolds are mine). In the video -as you said- P…
/r/MensRights31/05/13 07:50 PM
1

Well, those were true bastards motherfuckers (from the Catholic Church, BTW). But I promise that 500 years ago I had not been born yet :)
/r/MensRights31/05/13 03:46 PM
22

Indeed, hate as a verb means "to dislike (sth/sb) intensely", and as a noun, "intense dislike". I'm glad to say I hate feminists for what they do. They are harming individuals and society -that motion full of lies is yet another proof of it-.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 11:21 PM
4

I'm not too familiar with this thing. Are Spaniards considered white (European descendant) or Hispanic? Because I'm as white as a glass of milk, while Hispanics (Latin Americans) can be white, mestizos, native Americans... I mean, I look like more like the average white American than like the average Latin American. I would like to read your opinion, I have little to no idea about this.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 04:13 PM
2

(Excuse me for my poor English) I find offensive some of them, others don't. "Chris Brown's Greatest Hits" pun is clever as hell, but that doesn't mean I find anything funny in a beaten woman (or men), indeed what jokes often do is disassociate two things, but it ends there. Any mentally sane person can distinguish fiction from reality. Drama (either as stories, or as a play or whatever) is very old. Today almost every movie is a bout killing people, even in comedies. And there is nothing inhere…
/r/MensRights30/05/13 01:25 PM
16

SRS/AMR infection, probably. But I'm glad to call their attention :)
/r/MensRights30/05/13 09:53 AM
84

Ignorant dirty-minded egotistical little bitch about to create serious problems to any man (not for the wink, but for whatever other thing). These kind of people are a real threat for any male employee.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 02:41 AM
4

Don't be surprised. In Spain, feminism went from "a weird thing" to the most hard set of laws in only 7 years (the last "socialist" government). I quote "socialist" because I don't know what the fuck that party is, but sure as hell it's not "socialism" (if is that such thing as "socialism" exists actually). And to be honest, the other big party (center-right) is not much better, only different. They just fuck up some slightly different things, but at least they are not feminists (although there …
/r/MensRights29/05/13 11:49 AM
9

Looks like your friends have a serious prejudice problem. You need new friends.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 01:43 PM
2

Sorry, I have no time to comment by now, but yes, I can confirm almost all what the article says. Anyway this is likely to end very bad, not only because of this, but in general because this country can't stand the political and judicial corruption much more time.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 12:49 AM
2

Look at how she said it: "I’m not into sports. I’m not into violent games. I’m not into a lot of things boys represent and boys do," I think there is a difference between being excited about some expectations, and being driven by selfish reasons ("I, my, me"). In this context, expectations are dreams about things you would like to happen, but if they don't, well, that will be OK too because it's your child, you like and love him. But it doesn't seem to be the case. Interestingly, she doesn't tal…
/r/MensRights27/05/13 01:38 PM
-2

"'I’m not into sports. I’m not into violent games. I’m not into a lot of things boys represent and boys do,' Jennifer Merrill Thompson, author of Chasing the Gender Dream, told Slate.com, explaining her decision to choose the sex of her daughter." It looks like she wants a toy instead of children. An object, a possession for her convenience. Or maybe she wants a friend. In this case I'd recommend her to buy a cat (a dog will hate her, dogs are smart, they know the difference between good and bad…
/r/MensRights27/05/13 02:50 AM
8

I recently tried once again to read George Orwell’s 1984. As always, I got a few chapters in and had to stop because it was so depressing that I couldn’t live in Orwell’s evocation of mind-controlled totalitarian world for a minute longer. How ironical.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 05:21 PM
1

Yeah. Basically, they are troublemakers. I'm not going to hire people like that, it would be a professional suicide.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 10:38 PM
0

Wrong sub. The subreddit for Tumblr assholes is /r/TumblrInAction.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 10:38 PM
3

Agreed. Silence doesn't mean that someone "agrees" or that "doesn't have a counterargument" and things like that. I hardly talk about masculinity, because there is nothing to talk about it. I go my own way and that's where the story ends. If there is a debate about masculinity, it must be inside their rather empty heads, not in the Real World. Their cheap pseudo-cultural shit is not my business.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 09:08 PM
2

Very interesting. Thanks for posting ;)
/r/MensRights21/05/13 02:26 AM
2

Software development is a serious activity. There is no place for feminist troublemakers.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 08:33 PM
4

Typical radfem wet dream at Factcheckme. Too bad that when she's about to have an orgasm, the French Revolution enters in the dream xD
/r/MensRights20/05/13 08:03 PM
4

It would be interesting to have a web page with some big-sized counters in real time. For example: Male suicides today Estimated time for the next male suicide Male suicides this year It could have also some average numbers. Taking as a reference the last year's total amount, a simple division is all it requires. With Javascript it should be easy, but unfortunately I barely know it. If you're asking "what for?", the reason is that this -as well as many other info- needs visibility, as much graph…
/r/MensRights19/05/13 09:46 PM
14

About this particular issue, there is the recurrent and apparently only idea that these poor kids are going to become violent abusers. To some extent it's true, some of them will, but many others won't. Little kids exposed to traumatic experiences -particularly for a log time period- and deprived of affection are likely to develop any type of psychological disorder listed in the DSM-IV. One or more. Many of those kids won't become violent and/or abusive. They will rather kill themselves, fail at…
/r/MensRights18/05/13 01:10 AM
2

Well, certainly that's how Ched Evans was convicted. In UK -and increasingly in other places- the presumption of innocence is pretty fucked up in some cases (see the paragraph for UK here). Besides, this case smells. There is a reward for information that can be used as evidence leading his acquittal. I'm aware that for many cases there is no hope, but if human rights are being overlooked we have the moral duty to fight for them.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 01:39 PM
2

Yeah, she's the craziest in the whole asylum. And about the quote, it's crime in general what has increased, particularly theft and robbery. Predictable of course. Europe doesn't know how to fix this mess, so feminism is gonna have a particular bad time with funds and all the blood-sucking. Good video, BTW :)
/r/MensRights17/05/13 03:19 AM
25

Civil disobedience exists for this.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 09:26 PM
2

Yes, but if there is some way to get the confession and give it to the guy, he would be safe (or at least will have something). I know, it's kind of complicated, but... Oh, and my comment is awfully written :S What I mean with the example in the court is it's what I suggest when dealing with someone like her: Cut the bullshit with that simple question, let her know that if she consented the story is over, and advice her that otherwise she will be in trouble.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 07:28 PM
1

Good catch. I have the impression that rights are a little like common sense. There seems to be a problem with it, we often say that "They are not that common" :) One explanation I read for this is that we tend to attribute to common sense things that actually don't belong to it, and when someone doesn't meet that expectation we feel surprised. Common sense actually comprises a very limited set of things. So, if some cultural issues are confused with legal issues, then I'm not surprised about ma…
/r/MensRights16/05/13 05:30 PM
7

In a court this would go: Defense attorney: Did you consent the sexual intercourse? Accuser: Well, I... I later thought that... Defense attorney: Please, answer my question: Did you consent to that sexual intercourse, yes or no? Accuser: Uhmm... Yes. And that's all. It seems she's trying to abuse/manipulate the legal system with very serious consequences for an innocent person (or threatening to do it). I think that's a crime in most states/countries... What I mean is that there is nothing to di…
/r/MensRights16/05/13 03:36 PM
4

How about: "Most likely because the environment you grew up in indirectly taught you that murder was inherently wrong. However, this upbringing isn't present in every American home. The Manson Family exemplifies this," What the fuck is wrong with you? Oh, I know: Tabula rasa. You believe that human beings are born blank, and from that moment everything that happens is the result of nurture. You're sooooo wrong, like most feminists. It is known that babies have empathy before they develop the bas…
/r/MensRights15/05/13 12:53 PM
-2

Google is your friend ;) https://www.google.com/search?q=womyn
/r/MensRights14/05/13 07:36 PM
4

“The Departments of Education and Justice are out of control,” For what I read in r/privacy and here, this is so true. Get a copy of Orwell's 1984. It's no longer a novel, it's an reference manual :(
/r/MensRights13/05/13 09:51 PM
1

This.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 12:34 AM
3

BWAHAHAHA!! Oh my, that's the most pathetic imitation of Anonymous I've ever seen. Whoever this is (and also these others), that's not the style of the usual Anonymous, not even close. This is probably another angry couple of feminist bitches. Sure they can do some harm, leak some names and things like that. But they better know what they are doing, because since Wikileaks some guys there in the US are a little nervous and have no sense of humor at all. So good luck, "femonymous" xD BTW: These i…
/r/MensRights13/04/13 05:43 PM
1

Different author, but same site that published You’re a Pussy if You Think There’s a War on Men: ... it gives the Shit Reddit Says subreddit something to react against. . If you’re a man who thinks that there’s a “War on Men,” you probably deserve to get beaten by the women. Fuck off, Vice.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 03:56 AM
1

This.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 01:08 AM
3

In these cases there is a parallel trial where the people -fed by the mainstream media- are the jury and judge. They are angry, they want someone to be punished, and they make all kind of mistakes. It's a form of lynching in times of political correctness.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 04:02 PM
5

A UK newspaper reader summed up the feeling when she wrote: "Yes sometimes women lie but an overwhelming number of rape cases result in no sentence so there are men getting away with rape and the least they deserve is for their names to be dragged through the mud." The chilling implication is that the "few" innocents who might also be dragged through the mud are acceptable collateral damage in the war on rape. This reminds me to the infamous Time Magazine article quoting Caterine Comins: Comins …
/r/MensRights11/04/13 03:44 PM
2

Facebook knows it, this service is using Facebook Connect. Facebook doesn't care too much about harassment when it's against boys or men, unless the FBI or some other authorities tell them to shut down certain accounts or agreements with third parties. It is known for being probably the most slutty Internet company regarding privacy and their own ToS.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 12:42 AM
1

AFAIK, it does.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 04:24 PM
1

Edit: as sigil1 points out below we are not formally listed as a hate group on their site. Still, last time I searched men's rights hate group there was a bunch of sites saying the SPLC considers the MRM as a hate group. Given the number of angry feminist out there, that was predictable. IMO the SPLC is anything but stupid. They know what they did, but they don't care.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 04:16 PM
68

there's something powerful about the way this episode of Louie threw every possible objection at Laurie, made her as unsympathetic a spokeswoman as possible, and acknowledged that she was right anyway. Yeah, you know what's that "powerful" thing?: Violence. Alyssa Rosenberg thinks "No means yes", she justifies violence to get sex, and instead of seeing the whole thing as an unfortunate sex experience ("unfair" because he doesn't want to eat her pussy in return for the blowjob), she thinks he owe…
/r/MensRights08/04/13 11:34 AM
2

Agreed. Also, the complete quote that every feminist article intentionally omitted: "[Harris] is brilliant and she is dedicated and she is tough, and she is exactly what you’d want in anybody who is administering the law, and making sure that everybody is getting a fair shake. She also happens to be by far the best-looking attorney general in the country." Feminists... What a bunch of prude whiny idiots.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 07:25 PM
2

When a mother kills her kids she is depressed. People who commit suicide because of depression and similar disorders don't kill another people, even less their children husband/wife/parents or whoever. Actually that's the last thing they would do, they don't want to harm anybody but themselves. Even if the cause is rooted in external circumstances, their ultimate pulse is self destruction. They leave, but they leave alone. What happened in Columbine or more recently in Connecticut is not the sam…
/r/MensRights06/04/13 12:56 PM
2

qgyh2 is a "power user" here in Reddit. Moderates AskReddit, among others subreddits. Check this comment (from an admin) and the complete thread. The Amazon affiliate ID "reddit2-20" is common in the ads. More info: https://www.google.com/search?q=qgyh2
/r/MensRights06/04/13 12:36 AM
7

Prudish countries. Age of consent in Spain (an EU country) is 13, with the exception that if deceit is used and the individual is under 16, it will be considered abuse -upon parental complaint. There is no pedo-hysteria, nor rape hysteria here. What's interesting is the moral side of the story. Laws aside, that young guy is considered a disgusting child abuser there, while he would be a normal guy here.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 11:30 AM
1

Indeed I stopped it at "patriarchy" (5:08). I'm not interested in hearing any more beyond that point.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 10:59 AM
1

Is she saying something like there is "rapey" and "rape" (like "rape-rape")?... Because this idea was not welcome last time...
/r/MensRights02/04/13 10:33 AM
2

Agreed. Toxicity in the workplace is not welcome, whatever origin may have.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 10:28 AM
2

Agreed. It depends on the field and the company, but aside that 60-hour workweek, a (good) CEO is likely to be available 24/7 via mobile phone or whatever, they get a lot of shit from inside AND outside the company, they don't need cold blood but frozen blood, and even so they're likely to age at a 10x speed. Not to mention that today you're the CEO of that company and tomorrow you're Mr/Ms Nobody, not necessarily because you did a bad job, but because the wind now blows in another direction. I …
/r/MensRights02/04/13 08:51 AM
16

Please, realize that Tumblr is full of 14 years old maladaptive angry brats with an intelligence quotient that tends to zero. Maybe it's not their fault, they probably never saw Sesame Street and the amazing lessons of Grover and Kermit. So I'm not sure those brats really contribute to anything (good or bad) outside Stupidland. Anyway that's just my opinion. Otherwise Tumblr is not less full of nude girls and porn photoblogs. If you know GGW and others subreddits alike... well, that's nothing co…
/r/MensRights01/04/13 07:53 PM
2

Didn't know that show, but I have found many scenes on Youtube. Funny :) Yes, I was talking about something really serious. I mean blood, a broken nose... We are supposed to be more "civilized" than that, but not to forget that as a last resort -self defense for example-, someone might get hurt. Otherwise I don't find Hyde "violent", he's not going to send Kelso to the hospital :)
/r/MensRights01/04/13 12:52 AM
18

Well said. Most adults find babies (particularly) and children in general cute and adorable. They spark our protective and caring instincts. I'm not afraid of saying that I love babies. I think they are cute and funny as hell (sure they are incredibly annoying sometimes, but... well, nobody's perfect :) I have to nephews that grew up in my house since they were born (that was long time ago, now they're taller than me). We had a great time almost every day, and it was easy for me -I think to some…
/r/MensRights31/03/13 09:00 PM
2

I hold it as true. It may not be the best human behavior, but most boys learn this in elementary school: If you behave like an asshole, you're likely to get punched before the teacher realizes there is a "conflict". Once we grow up, we all (hopefully) are able to manage conflicts without hitting another guy, but... well, you never know how the other is going to react. Girls are much less likely to learn this. We all learn that hitting a boy is a bad thing, but that hitting a girl is the end of y…
/r/MensRights31/03/13 04:42 PM
6

By Amanda "time-wasting" Marcotte. [Reader discretion is advised] (Thanks to Auntieanti ;)
/r/MensRights31/03/13 12:22 AM
3

Me too. I don't know, it seems like publications have to sell shit in order to keep going on. I'm not talking about MRA-related stuff only, but in general terms. It's pretty much like garbage TV. And I think it's a symptom of an ill society (very ill actually), that should be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 02:35 PM
8

Internet Animator & Full-Time Feminist Internet what...??? From the page "Consulting": I start discussions in traditional and social media about things that matter: women’s rights, education, politics. I organize, host, and facilitate attention-grabbing events and thought-provoking workshops with a record of active engagement from participants on and offline. Wow. I must recognize that's the most elegant description of an attention whore I've ever seen.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 04:31 AM
22

Agreed.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 04:28 AM
12

(Telling to men): Feminists are your best friends. We are the only group that really believes in your humanity. She -intentionally- forgot to add "...after castration". Seriously, how's that different from a cult?. "We are your best friends, we are your best friends, we loooooove you...". Geez, I'm not sure if that's laughable or creepy.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 03:21 AM
2

CET here. So I think you're correct.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 11:08 PM
2

He just apologized a few hours later: "I apologize. I was wrong taking data from Feder.Gen as corroborated in such a serious issue as the gender violence." (Feder.gen is an association of people affected by the gender violence laws). Twitter was on fire against his initial declaration. Socialists are asking for his resignation. OK. To give you some background: This guy is a representative for a new and minority political party. He usually make controversial statements, I guess he's trying to cal…
/r/MensRights25/02/13 06:15 PM
3

It seems like they've changed it, I see another sidebar. Take a look at this edit. Revision as of 08:14, 25 February 2013 (Don't know what timezone is that)
/r/MensRights25/02/13 12:32 PM
2

"For some guys, there is only one subject" That's not exactly the moral of the story. It's rather "For some guys, people are innocent until proven guilty", and this is above any other thing. That girl in the comic is pretty much an old conservative asking you to sign a petition for another Guantanamo or another NDAA. My answer is "no". Fight against terrorism? Of course. The end justify the means? No. Yeah, there is often a lot of irony in the so-called "social justice".
/r/MensRights25/02/13 11:45 AM
0

That's the page Terry O'Neal uses as toilet paper.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 09:56 PM
1

This is low even for a scorned woman.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 12:28 AM
3

r/WTF/comments/18z36i/why_were_there_no_women... C'mon, it's funny, but let's not confuse people. Edit: Link
/r/MensRights23/02/13 10:10 PM
1

Couldn't agree more. And about this: "Feminism Is For Everyone" I think feminism should be rated R.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 09:07 PM
2

The text belongs to this campaign (2008), but genders are reversed. That image exists in a few sites, but none of them are too serious. I mean it's probably made by some random guy as a meme, with honest intentions, like saying "I'm tired of being accused, women abuse men too". Now, I can't tell if they posted this as a joke or as true concern. There are differences between Mexican Spanish and Spanish from Spain, and the culture is quite different. Because of this and the nature of the band, I d…
/r/MensRights21/02/13 04:51 PM
0

Feminism is supposed to be compatible with men's rights since they are BOTH asking for equality. Feminism is what feminism does. Today, the most important thing feminism has done (and keeps doing) is changing the laws in a way that clearly makes men and woman no longer equal under the law. ("Women are innocent victims, men are evil aggressors"). This opposes the Universal Declaration of Human Rights -in case you didn't notice-. It's not even "a conspiracy" as some like to say. It's rather quite …
/r/MensRights20/02/13 11:00 PM
5

All kind of psychological abuse. And since the myth is that men have little or no feelings, they often push hard (and/or in a persistent way). As a consequence of that myth, I think many women are unaware of the harm they can cause. And I'm not talking about the so-called "male ego".
/r/MensRights19/02/13 03:10 AM
1

No. It's honesty what sometimes makes people seem like a dick, particularly to those who have a thin skin. But I don't care.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 05:54 AM
5

In the mind of a feminist, is there any way to have consensual sex? In the mind of a feminist there is too much greed and no space left for reasoning. But this is probably more useful: The short answer is no. The long answer is yes, but they can revoke the consent at any time and by any reason, which will make you a rapist. So no.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 08:21 PM
24

It's the Dailykos. These people have serious mental issues. Take a look (old, but illustrative): http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/10/18/399755/-Birth-Control-Pills-for-11-Year-Old-Girls-Ford-Has-a-Better-Idea
/r/MensRights17/02/13 06:33 PM
2

It probably is. It takes a lot of stupidity to write that in public, even thou human stupidity knows no bounds. The thing is... it would work.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 02:36 PM
0

I don't know if that's the case here, but it could be. And if it is, I think feminism is not helping, because it's promoting a false self-esteem. They say "we are strong, independent, yadda yadda yadda", but the truth is that they see themselves as victims, they promote the learned helplessness.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 04:37 AM
1

The #ineedfeminismbecause as a whole is quite exclusive. It blames men for almost everything that's wrong on earth. Add some perspective. So why are we hating on her in the first place? I think "hate" means something much more heavy that you think it means. Anyway I've downvoted a couple comments.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 01:40 AM
4

Not insulting her looks, just being completely honest: She's not attractive. And you know what makes her particularly unattractive? The sign she's showing. This works both ways, and despite the sex/gender. Attitudes can make people look more attractive or less attractive to an extent that it's often impressive. I know feminists think this doesn't work this way for men, but then again, they are unable to accept what doesn't benefit them.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 12:31 AM
1

I don't know the reason why many people with tyrannical attitudes choose to label themselves as "progressive", but that's what I see everywhere. Slutification of a term, that's how I call this seemingly trend. It's happening to many words. The problem is that, if more and more words have different meaning for different people, this becomes a Tower of Babel (or to be more accurate, a bigger Tower of Babel than the one that already exists).
/r/MensRights15/02/13 04:35 PM
2

But surely if we can send a man to the moon, we must be able to tackle porn on the Internet. Good luck with that ;)
/r/MensRights15/02/13 04:22 PM
7

Yes, I agree. That train needs more speed. Let's push full forward the speed lever. Popcorn anyone? ;)
/r/MensRights15/02/13 01:23 AM
9

I need Men's Rights because in my country men and women are no longer equal under the law.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 11:49 PM
1

Agreed.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 04:57 AM
1

She was. Now retired.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 07:06 PM
3

Do you seriously think there's some big secret "war on men" conspiracy? Oh man... It's not a "secret conspiracy". It's public, and using lawfare has been made legal, YOU IDIOT! Jesus fucking Christ... Fighting against these levels of stupidity is exhausting.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 06:22 PM
3

Melissa McEwan @Shakestweetz I started #tellafeministthankyou b/c of feminists harassed on Twitter. Now ppl are using the tag to harass feminists. Prove the point more! (https://twitter.com/Shakestweetz/status/301360394931404800) Ugh, McEwan...
/r/MensRights13/02/13 04:17 AM
1

Oh, just the appropriate correction, that's all :)
/r/MensRights13/02/13 04:16 AM
26

It's from a French documentary called Sex Workers and Proud!, by Jean-Michel Carré. http://saff.ilovebildwechsel.org/programme/sunday/sex-workers-and-proud-of-it/ http://scorpiontv.com/human-stories/sex-workers-and-proud/ Interestingly, it doesn't appear on IMDB and there is very few information in Google. Edit: Oops, that's not correct at all. Hollybegin found it, it's "Les travailleuses du sexe", from the same director.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 12:36 AM
4

They don't see the rape, they see the man, and then "hit" him. But there is even more. Read their manifesto and you'll see the set of phobias they have.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 10:14 AM
0

It's not "for all women", it's for VAWA. Under that law every single man is guilty until proven innocent.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 09:02 AM
5

The imaginary men that exist in the feminist collective mind. These imaginary men have been taught all that shit by feminists. That's the only "explanation" I can find ;)
/r/MensRights12/02/13 05:22 AM
2

Agreed. That was just to notice that it was addressed. But I bet they'll be back with a similar message any day. I'll be waiting.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 02:58 AM
3

Seems like it's from 2008. From Google image search: http://glennsacks.com/dart/ http://www.fathersandfamilies.org/2008/10/27/thousands-protest-father-bashing-domestic-violence-ads/ http://www.shatterdmen.com/DART.htm ...and some others, as well as some feminist sites criticizing the protest, of course. BTW: In the same search this showed up: The full movie Men Don't Tell TV movie (1993). Searching Reddit I see it was posted about 2 months ago, but I missed the post. I'll let it here just in cas…
/r/MensRights11/02/13 11:43 PM
7

One thing is for sure: Images can be very powerful, but not "any" picture, only good ones. Stories too, of course. This is interesting: I hardly see pictures of men who are in true emotional pain, and it's not because they don't exist. Mainstream media often shows women in pain, but it seems they don't like showing men in pain. I'm not sure about the translation, but I think the saying is: "What the eyes don’t see the heart doesn’t grieve".
/r/MensRights10/02/13 05:36 PM
2

I think white knights are too flattering and not honest at all*, like if they were seeking approval or even get laid (I think in English it's called "buttering up"). Their words, their tone, their behavior... There is something that doesn't convince me.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 04:48 PM
4

by saying essentially the same thing? I think what we say is very, very different. We don't deny women's problems, we don't say they are unimportant, we are not systematically against everything. And we try to debate, but when we do, we find their complete denial. That's why we have women here, who support us disinterestedly (this can't be said about white knights supporting feminists). What I care the most is not feminism by itself (they may think or say whatever they want), but the fact that t…
/r/MensRights10/02/13 01:57 PM
1

I will.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 10:04 PM
0

Yes. Feminism don't want the problem solved, because they are the problem (and take benefits from it). If they wanted to fix it (although I don't see WTF is broken), they would be working to produce wealth instead of whining. But as any other form of parasitism, it's doomed. It's a matter of time -the sooner it crashes, the better, otherwise it gonna take decades to recover-. What amazes me the most is that parasitism is probably as old as the firsts forms of life on Earth (that's about 3 billio…
/r/MensRights09/02/13 09:46 PM
2

Good comment. Yes; in Spain the hysteria is not that heavy, but still our VAWA-equivalent is clearly unconstitutional. It's not that complicated: If every person is equal under the law, they can't come with feminist rhetoric to twist that principle. Indeed, that law was sent to the Constitutional Court because many family court judges were worried about it. Finally they ruled "constitutional" by 7 against 5 votes. Suspicious but not surprising; we know the judicial and legislative powers here ar…
/r/MensRights09/02/13 03:57 PM
3

Scottsboro: An American Tragedy. In 1931, two white women stepped from a box car in Paint Rock, Alabama to make a shocking accusation: they had been raped by nine black teenagers on the train. So began one of the most significant legal fights of the twentieth century. The trial of the nine falsely accused teens would draw North and South into their sharpest conflict since the Civil War, yield two momentous Supreme Court decisions and give birth to the Civil Rights Movement. In addition to its hi…
/r/MensRights09/02/13 03:01 AM
4

In Spain (at least), men are at a higher risk of death by heart disease, and at an early age than women. My father is a survival of a heart disease. I could have lost him 15 years ago, but fortunately a quick response and a good care keeps him alive and in good conditions. And when you visit the hospital enough times, you see how another people die from the very same problem when they are relatively young. That makes the whole thing more hard and sad. Of course, whatever have to happen, it will.…
/r/MensRights06/02/13 10:58 PM
3

"Most people that get death sentence are men. Hardly any are women, " FTFY. Maybe it's still incomplete, but I think it's more accurate.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 11:58 PM
1

Cannibalization -> Canibalización Cannibalism -> Canibalismo Cannibalize -> Canibalizar Here is an example applied to marketing.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 01:49 AM
1

I've heard it here in Spain, the first time I think It was on a radio talk about political issues. After that I've heard it many times in another contexts. It's only a metaphor about attacking members of their own group. They are supposed to attack "the enemy" (they think it's us), but not women. The purpose of these attacks is taking the rights of men and giving them to women (figuratively speaking, "eating" our rights), but when they do this to women, they are "eating" their own group. That's …
/r/MensRights04/11/12 01:49 AM
9

Sometimes this is called "cannibalization": When a group gets enough power to dominate another, eventually their members start to use that same power against each other. To misuse the power is probably the easiest thing in this world. This has nothing to do with being men or women, it's just that as human beings we're not as great as we like to think. I'm sorry that happened. You're welcome to the club.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 08:51 PM
2

Because once you're accused of rape, even if you are found not guilty by a court, society still considers you guilty. Your life won't be the same again, ever. This has been addressed here before. Just a few days ago someone posted an article about a man whose life is a hell just because he was accused of rape and then cleared. He can't get a job, and was recently assaulted "for being a rapist". Society is sick, obsessed with rape (of women) and child abuse. If you're named, "you're guilty".
/r/MensRights02/11/12 05:20 AM
4

She probably took the picture from the Facebook account "Women's Rights News". At this moment it has more than 685,000 likes, 56,800 times shared, and growing. It's fucking disgusting.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 01:11 AM
2

No. And stop worrying about everyone else's psychosis, or you will become psychotic.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 05:35 AM
6

Jesus... That's why I don't like politics. It's a clown contest, but without the funny part.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 06:43 PM
2

You're welcome :)
/r/MensRights31/10/12 04:03 AM
6

Bitch #1: She's tries not to hate her body, but is quite bad at it. Projects her hate towards men. Bitch #2: Transgender (male to female) man-hater*, denying misandry. To sum up, troubled people, feminists and keyboard warriors. Brave behind a TFT screen, but probably harmless IRL (which doesn't mean they can't encourage other people who are violent). I'm sorry they have personal problems, but that's no excuse for their bigotry. . * Possible ambiguity. In no way I mean MtF transgender people hat…
/r/MensRights31/10/12 03:55 AM
2

I think you missed the point. Firstly, I don't buy the "real man" thing. Indeed, to anyone who read this: If you're ever told "you're not a real man" for whatever reason, I encourage you to answer something like: "You're right, I'm UNREAL, I'm actually A HALLUCINATION you're having, and you're talking to me because you're fucking crazy". But if you're not in the mood, just say "Whatever" :) Secondly, a man can be "weak" (or behave temporarily in a "weak" way) for many reasons. For example, he's …
/r/MensRights31/10/12 01:26 AM
10

Honest question: Doesn't that SRS initiative constitute sabotage?
/r/MensRights30/10/12 01:44 PM
1

Strangers and non-strangers, since a good relationship -for example a married couple- can always deteriorate. That aside, yes, much better. I understand the original statement is incomplete. Indeed I was going to reply anyway adding some context. But you spotted the statement first, so I replied to the whole thread :)
/r/MensRights30/10/12 12:30 PM
6

Well, it is a known hate site, like many other sites -if not all- in the blogroll.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 05:38 AM
20

He needs feminism because he's weak, or a man-child, or has Dependent Personality Disorder, or hates himself for whatever reason, or want to make a living from state funds, or he's stupid, or deluded,... But there is no way feminism can make me feel guilty.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 12:10 AM
0

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/120wss/rebecca_watson_is_at_it_again_trying_to_subvert/
/r/MensRights29/10/12 11:37 PM
27

I think he doesn't mean "never trust a woman because she's a woman", it's rather because the system gives women -as a social group- complete immunity. There are good people and bad people, and you're supposed to be able to spot bad people and avoid them. But if in spite of your caution you're tricked into something wrong, you can take legal actions (at least in certain situations). But women are exempt of many legal responsibilities because lawmakers screwed the system ("thanks", feminism). Ther…
/r/MensRights29/10/12 04:00 PM
18

Then, she's certainly wrong. The idea that women's issues are far more important than men's issues leads government and judicial system to give more attention (or even all the attention) to women. That's a problem. But there is yet another -even worse- problem: In the stupid idea of "patriarchy", men are the root of all evil. Yes, I know they say "society" instead of "men", but we all know what they really mean. So, at the end, fighting against "patriarchy" is actually fighting against men. We s…
/r/MensRights28/10/12 03:38 PM
6

Unfortunately, it isn't a joke. This seems to be the original. Posted August 10, 2012 (555 notes at this moment). That post is an external submission: Posted by kocamanbirsincap In the header there are links to "Start a Campaign", "Website", "Facebook", "Twitter" and "Submit Your Poster" From the "Website", under construction ("about us"): Identify yourself as a feminist today and many people will immediately assume you are man-hating, bra-burning, whiny liberal. Perhaps a certain charming radio…
/r/MensRights28/10/12 06:28 AM
4

The report is an account of the Ms. Project on Campus Sexual Assault. There seems to be some controversy on whether Mary Koss was hired or not by Ms. Magazine to do this survey. See this post (Warning: feminist blog). Of course the problems are always the same: This is a survey, we don't have the complete list of questions, the people involved are an interested part, etc. Regarding Ms. Magazine... well, we can hardly find a more biased group. It was co-founded by Gloria Steinem. Go figure.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 04:36 AM
9

You just criticized someone for misusing a word by misusing a word. Not really. She has a reputation, this is only the piece that completes the puzzle.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 04:10 PM
30

Now "misogyny" officially means "the disagreement with the feminist regime". Congratulations Gillard, you've achieved the status of tyrant.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 01:37 PM
2

Yeah, it's cool. And thanks for the link (I should have said this in first place, but I'm a little dense today ;)
/r/MensRights25/10/12 01:27 PM
5

I see Feminisnt (aka Furry Girl) is linked there as a resource. Don't get fooled by its name (note it ends in "nt"). This is from the header: I'm an atheist who has been a pornographer and sex worker my entire adult life: 10 years. I'm also a former "sex-positive feminist" who tired of trying to shoehorn my life into a useless ideology like a pair of ill-fitting high heels. I oppose the feminist doctrine that women are inherently feeble victims, brainwashed by "the patriarchy," and in need of so…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 12:56 PM
4

Then she said something about how men just don't want to "take responsibility" for things, The feminist in the mirror.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 09:40 PM
5

Sociology is bullshit, Amen brother. And it's also very profitable. You know, there is always a reason for every thing ;)
/r/MensRights24/10/12 09:23 PM
3

Good to know. But still, the highly upvoted response matters.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 08:00 PM
1

I think it's more "everything's fair" or "the ends justify the means". We're living in the information age. Lies and secrets are weapons. You don't see too much blood because now we are a "civilized society": Instead of beheading men the governments jails them or just steals their children. Western "democracies"... what a joke.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 10:02 AM
72

who were left 'shaken' Jesus... It seems the campus policies have a powerful effect on girls. I mean, they are definitely scared to hell. An unwanted effect of these policies is the pathological fear they are inflicting in women. This is likely to restrict the women's lives forever. And technically speaking, a person with a limiting pathological fear is a mentally handicapped person. I think they don't realize what they are doing.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 03:46 PM
0

Oh, the cat. They don't understand that the Schrödinger's cat is simultaneously alive and dead inside the box, and when we open the box, the two simultaneous states become one: Alive or dead. So, it's not a perception issue, it's not a logic uncertainty. We know for sure that the cat is alive and dead inside the box. That's why it's called quantum superposition, it's two superposed states. But they just see it as a simple uncertainty ("I don't know what you are until I have enough data"). This h…
/r/MensRights19/10/12 12:23 AM
1

I'm sorry to be the bastard here, but I think she's not "trashing whiners", she's criticising Anne-Marie Slaughter, the woman who left the State Department, AND giving a little break to the people that are tired of the "war on women" argument. This is politics, guys, the beast never sleeps. Here is where she winks at women: Clinton wasn't totally unsympathetic toward issues raised by her former employee. "It’s important for our workplaces … to be more flexible and creative in enabling women to c…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 08:53 PM
5

In this context, "you just don't get it" actually means "I ran out of arguments (and I'm angry because I can't impose my ideas on you)". It's disguised as an attack on you ("you're stupid"), but it's childish. That's exactly what a 5 years-old would do. So, you're dealing with a child inside a grown up woman's body. What to say?... Nothing, just realize she's a child, and smile. Sometimes it's difficult not to get furious, because after all what you're seeing is -for example- a 50 years-old woma…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 11:46 AM
3

As we live our dictionary lives we are alerted to new words and new meanings in a whole variety of sources. It doesn’t matter what the starting point is. Once a word is up for consideration we need to assess whether there is evidence for the use of this word in the language community. I completely agree. That's what the Royal Spanish Academy does in my country. As I usually say, words evolve. The problem is that in this feminist dictatorship, they want to name any dissidence as "misogyny".
/r/MensRights17/10/12 09:06 PM
8

FTA: Despite the fact the woman carried the knife with her, Justice Vanstone said she could not find that the attack was premeditated. Yeah, sure. Now no jail time and a $500 fine is... "being punished very hard"??? Stabbing a man is so cheap in Australia. And yet Julia Gillard dares to talk about "misogyny"...
/r/MensRights16/10/12 08:27 AM
0

You're making a mistake. I'm not the kind of guy who post stupid things in r/atheism, actually I don't participate in any atheist community. Not believing in God is a personal choice for me, and that's where the story ends. It's highly unusual for me to have any problem with believers, mainly because I understand that those who believe have a reason to do it. But this doesn't give you the right to feel offended when I say that you hold a doctrine. Of course you can say whatever you want, but don…
/r/MensRights16/10/12 01:06 AM
1

That line without any context is certainly a sweeping generalization. Add the the doctrinal nature of feminism, the devotion with which it's professed, etc. But if it still doesn't make sense to you, then call it a metaphor.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 11:33 PM
-3

Atheist here. Atheism is the lack of religion. Actually, atheism is the lack of belief in God. But religion is not God, they are different things. In a broad sense, religion is any belief system that opposes logical thinking, for example feminism. And how does feminism opposes logical thinking? Assuming hypotheses (proposed explanations) as the truth, even when those hypotheses are known as false, weak, inconsistent or simply unproven. Feminism is a doctrine. It holds a collection of beliefs tha…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 09:49 PM
1

/r/beatingwomen also exists, and you can see how they mock Paul Elam with that drawing (up right corner). They are SRS or people alike. Hostility towards Men's Rights is blatant in Reddit. BTW: I don't know how Reddit counts the readers, but that number is probably the total amount of existent subscriptions active or not. I mean, many people leave registration-based websites but do not delete their accounts/subscriptions, they just forget about it. The usual amount of votes -even if many people …
/r/MensRights15/10/12 10:13 AM
12

FYI: It's being sabotaged: I just want violentacrez to commit suicide like the pedo swine he is. As a racist pedophile, I am concerned my viewpoints are no longer being allowed on Reddit. those damn SRSters are making it hard for me to jack it to teh kiddies :( If I were you I would take it down before it makes r/mr look even worse than it's already seen. But of course this is only my particular advice, you don't have to listen to it.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 04:28 PM
1

SRS is the moral police of Reddit, but they are sociopaths. As you can imagine, nothing good or logical can came out from there. They are anti-male, it's one of their particular obsessions.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 08:38 PM
1

I did, but I was thinking "why?"... OK, I've read your other comments now. Those things are unusual in Spain. Here it's more like... you know... "all or nothing" ;)
/r/MensRights12/10/12 04:49 AM
1

Yeah, I use the variant: "So why aren't you screaming in fear?" :)
/r/MensRights12/10/12 04:32 AM
4

The problem is, we have a mutual friend who is an attempted rapist. And that's their main strength, it's more real to them. This effect is called availability bias.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 04:27 AM
13

I think it's a strip club. Points 3 and 4 make references to the staff members. That's not sexism.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 09:12 PM
3

The tumblr account is back. Jezebel published an update, via betabeat.com.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 08:35 PM
8

Hollaback posts pictures of people who are at a minimum, accused of harrassment. So they take the law into their own hands... Yeah, justice porn.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 06:51 PM
9

True or not, the tumblr linked in the Jezebel article can be seen using the Google Reader cache: http://www.google.com/reader/view/feed/http://predditors.tumblr.com/rss It has cached 20 items. You can see the images because Tumblr doesn't delete them when you delete a post or even the entire account (otherwise reblogs wouldn't work). Edit: Link corrected. Note that you can only see all items if you're logged.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 04:15 PM
7

Very often the only way to get people to actually think about what they're saying or doing is to do it to them . We , as a society have forgotten this fundamental way of dealing with bullies . Instead , we try to reason with them while simultaneously forgetting that if they cared one bit about what you were saying , you wouldn't have a problem with them in the first place . Wise words.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 02:09 PM
4

Explode?... Why? Nowadays people do all kind of weird and stupid things on TV shows or the Internet, for money, popularity or whatever. It's not a very interesting achievement for the human race, that's for sure. But as long as he does it voluntarily and without causing harm to himself or others, it's not my business.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 11:42 AM
1

Is Kenneth Ross this dude?
/r/MensRights09/10/12 10:55 AM
1

it would be like the deacons of your church calling out individual members of your church and forcing them to say "I'm okay with being called by the church a pedophile," or "It's fine if you want to call me a faggot" Well, that's not exactly what I was trying to say. My country is mainly Roman Catholic (I'm an atheist, but for me that's a very personal thing, I don't participate in any atheist group, and those A+ look ridiculous to me). Here, the Catholic "humility" crosses too often the line, d…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 11:43 PM
1

Pierce: In that case (big drop mainly male students, or even 50/50), do you consider the possibility of male students being scared of false/doubtful accusations? The user "Black Rhino" at huffpo makes a point: I'm saying the whole discussion on 'rape' has to be looked at. There are ridiculous, puritan rules like 'women can't consent' if inebriated...what is that? Every wine bar would be an accessory to rape. On college campuses, these rules have become quite extreme...there are countless article…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 09:55 PM
24

And yet: "It's a girl!. She has a 50% chance of being sexually or physically abused in her lifetime." I wonder where is the Canadian Women's Fundation now. The least they should do is making a public statement condemning this shameless act in the name of the real victims. Because they care about women... don't they?
/r/MensRights08/10/12 02:36 PM
-1

In no other part of society are people expected to contribute to the discussion by proclaiming their criminal tendencies or risk further damage to society; Well, Christians (or is it Catholics?) believe they inherited the condition of sinners. It's not only that they are born in sin (the "Original Sin"), but also the tendency to commit a sin driven by evil thoughts -which is not the same than making a mistake-. What I mean is, yes, there are social groups where members are expected to proclaim t…
/r/MensRights08/10/12 12:11 AM
3

Besides the starring liar son-of-a-bitch detective Anthony Silvestro, here is the co-starring bitch: The case began when Dockum’s wife, Megan, found unconcealed adult pornography last fall on the couple’s home computer. Rather than confronting her husband, she called the police, court records state. Dockum recalls that he and his wife had been having trouble in their relationship. They had become “increasingly distant,” he said. Megan Dockum, in the midst of the divorce proceedings, could not be…
/r/MensRights07/10/12 11:27 PM
3

There is also a link to /r/SuicideWatch in the sidebar.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 04:23 PM
9

Self-defense mechanisms exists to cope with situations. Suicide is not a defense mechanism; it's the ultimate destruction mechanism.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 01:44 PM
4

Suicide is the consequence of an unbearable suffering. Whoever is in such unbearable suffering needs help, not a cheap advice on philosophy. And no, it's not a choice. Quite the contrary, it's the lack of choices, the end of everything.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 01:38 PM
5

Is This Famous Photo Fueling Rape Culture? In that article (excluding the comments) you can count up to 11 times the term "rape culture". Now here is the transcript of the interview with the woman in 2005. They look like two completely different stories. Yes, I knew the story already. What they are doing by calling it "Sexual assault" or "The Selective Blindness of Rape Culture" is rewriting history.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 04:50 AM
1

Koss, Lebowich, Roth, Kilpatrick, Miller... "Crème de la crème". Oh, C'mon... These people are the creators of the "rape culture" myth. BTW: You're telling people here that they have that bias because they do not validate it. That's circular reasoning.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 08:32 PM
2

Antonio, 44, is divorced and living with his mother. He split with his wife partly because of constant fights about money and his lack of a job. There is the saying: "When poverty knocks at the door, love flies through the window". If you haven't heard it before, it means that love is highly tied to money -particularly in marriage or any other equivalent relationship-. Being men the main providers, it reveals how materialistic are women (against the popular belief of women as unconditional lover…
/r/MensRights06/10/12 11:19 AM
7

For those feminists who think that Assange ran away from justice: Julian Assange remained in Sweden in order to be available for interviews for five entire weeks, until 27 September, when he left the country after receiving permission from the Prosecutor's Office. This is the context in which Marianne Ny issued a European arrest warrant. Thereafter, Assange offered on several occassions to be questioned in London either in person or via video link. Oddly, Prosecutor Ny categorically rejected the…
/r/MensRights05/10/12 10:12 AM
5

The Big Lebowski: What makes a man, Mr. Lebowski? The Dude: Uhh... I don't know sir. The Big Lebowski: Is it being prepared to do the right thing, whatever the cost? Isn't that what makes a man? The Dude: Hmmm... Sure, that and a pair of testicles. --The Big Lebowski (1998)
/r/MensRights05/10/12 04:51 AM
2

but to say something as blatant as Obama use taxpayer money to buy X votes is a gross oversimplification of the process held in an egregious light... Well, I didn't mean to be offensive. Trying to say some things in a few straight words may certainly sound gross -even more in my poor English-. This would be a very long conversation. Long story short: I dislike today's politics and politicians, a lot. It doesn't have to be that dirty, particularly in western democracies, but somehow it has become…
/r/MensRights05/10/12 04:47 AM
-1

Do not take offense but you're being very naive. No only Obama, but all candidates use taxpayer dollars (or euros, or whatever currency is used in a given country) to pander lobbies. Politics is not only a hard thing by its own nature. It's also a (very) dirty game. It shouldn't be, but unfortunately it is. If you're not too blind by ideologies (most people are), sooner or later you will see it for yourself.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 10:51 PM
6

These are the last two lines: And unlike some judges they have zero tolerance for violence against women and kids. Kelley. Johnson. McCormack. These three protect families. I got the feeling that they are... missing something.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 03:07 AM
7

A sort of TL;DR here, courtesy of user "jurupa"
/r/MensRights03/10/12 12:21 PM
3

In this context, yes. The sentence is making a comparison: "...chose the wrong job". I don't think it's correct to compare two occupations that by nature are so different. Doing something in exchange for money has little to do with taking care of your children.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 09:59 AM
8

She was jailed after spiking her partner's dinner with sleeping tablets then cutting his penis off, causing him to bleed to death. The court accepted the guilty plea to the lesser charge, and withdrew the murder charge, because Chen was suffering from an "abnormality of the mind" due to mental illness and the belief Peng was going to take their child to China. "Abnormality of the mind"... Justice Monika Schmidt gave her a 25 per cent reduction for the guilty plea. It's interesting how judges use…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 09:31 AM
4

Being mother -or father- is not a job.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 08:01 AM
4

Let's not forget that both the commentator and the blog are man haters, liars and probably sociopaths too.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 11:36 PM
1

Oops! :) Well, the epidemic is reaching other countries too.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 05:04 PM
4

What I think of these posters is that blaming men is not gonna help. Quite the contrary, it's likely to generate contempt or indifference. Actually, after so much blame, what I see in this poster is a drunk girl that can't even go back to home by her own means. I'm starting to wonder if there is an epidemic of alcoholism hitting young American women.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 01:06 PM
3

With Thibodeaux’s release Friday, he became the 300th wrongly convicted person and 18th death-row inmate exonerated in the United States substantially on the basis of DNA evidence, according to the New York-based Innocence Project, It’s now clear, however, that there is no DNA evidence in the vast majority of cases. In the first 15 years of DNA testing, almost all exonerations fit a basic pattern in which the defendant was accused of rape, or both rape and murder — because sexual assaults are th…
/r/MensRights29/09/12 11:07 PM
1

The sun goes "up" in the morning and "down" at night. It doesn't matter. If the Earth were flat you would see the same. Think about a flat plate revolving (vertically) around the Sun. Or vice versa, the Sun revolving around the plate (geocentric model). I say "a flat plate" because the idea was that the Earth had a limited size, instead of being an infinite plane. Long time ago (not too long actually), sailors going to the high seas were "afraid to reach the border of the Earth and fall down" (h…
/r/MensRights29/09/12 08:10 PM
21

Well, it's quite clear: ...women believe that... Some people still believe the earth is flat. And I know it looks fucking flat, even from a plane at 30,000 feet (and pictures from spacecraft can always be photoshopped), but, c'mon...
/r/MensRights28/09/12 11:54 PM
2

Yep. For some time I didn't know what to think about the police, but then I knew about Krans. Every piece on this puzzle is rotten.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 10:03 PM
2

Yep. She's angry. She doesn't agree with the London group, and feels like it's a kind of "heresy".
/r/MensRights28/09/12 04:37 PM
5

She's angry at this statement: Slutwalk London (@SlutwalkLondon) We support Women Against Rape. We think Assange should be prosecuted, just that he should not be extradited to Sweden because it is likely he will then be extradited to the US and treated the same as Bradley Manning. We are not saying the women lied or that they should not get justice. But we think he should stand trial here. It is pretty clear the authorities are not pursuing Assange because of the rape allegations. Look at how th…
/r/MensRights28/09/12 02:31 PM
18

The assumption behind this poster is that society excuses men who rape by saying "He couldn't control himself". Exactly. And then, in a false condescending way, it concludes: "men deserve [...] the responsibility" -as if we were not responsible-. Let's remember also that "All men are rapists", even when a woman change her mind but doesn't say a word we are still "responsible" (women aren't, ever). It's sheer feminist propaganda.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 02:06 PM
7

Maybe it has something to do with this: http://www.reddit.com/r/WikiLeaks/comments/10k7p7/us_military_classifies_wikileaks_as_enemy_of_the/ Edit to add: As a clarification, I've said before -and keep saying- that I don't believe this started as an U.S. "conspiracy", but as a Swedish feminist issue, a sort of "demonstration of power". But things went out of hands. That's not to say U.S. doesn't want him, but I think this is a secondary issue. The two alleged "victims" (particularly one of them), …
/r/MensRights28/09/12 12:16 PM
23

Recently we were forced to watch a video titled "Unless There's Consent" This is fucking Orwellian.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 12:02 AM
1

/r/TalesFromTechSupport Great! Thanks :)
/r/MensRights25/09/12 07:45 PM
1

That is sort of my take on it, ... for animals. :) Well, Maybe "conditioning" is not the best word -too generic-. Let's say "influence", a heavy emotional influence on the child regarding the other parent. Yes, by this means you can cause a disorder in another person after enough exposure and intensity. Indeed, some people develop excessive anxiety, depression, fear, etc. just by living with a troubled person. What I mean is that a parent can instill indifference or contempt in the child toward …
/r/MensRights25/09/12 04:20 PM
6

You may find this interesting: 2nd fundamental law of stupidity: The probability that a given person is stupid is independent of any other characteristic possessed by that person. Certainly, human stupidity is a very complex and amazing phenomenon ;)
/r/MensRights25/09/12 03:04 PM
2

Most consequences of conditioning aren't disorders. That said, a judge denying that a child can be intentionally conditioned by a parent against the other is an act of supreme ignorance (or malice).
/r/MensRights25/09/12 01:36 PM
1

No idea. The article doesn't say anything about that.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 08:20 PM
2

When I use cuss words to describe politicians, lawyers and judges in Family Courts, is for a reason.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 04:16 PM
4

Only 127 samples, and restricted to the academic scientists (6 American Universities)... Well, It is something, but be careful with the interpretations.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 02:54 PM
4

I can't tell the difference between a feminist and a cult memb... oh, wait!
/r/MensRights24/09/12 01:06 PM
7

You did the right thing. She seems the typical person who does not know where the boundaries are. They hug and rub others -particularly little kids- in an annoying way. This people aren't usually "bad persons", but they ignore the most basic rules about physical contact. And you're no longer a little kid, now it's more than annoying, it's disgusting. Even when you pushed her off, she tried again. At the end you have to get angry and say -for example- "Leave me the fuck alone!". It's not a pleasa…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 11:40 AM
5

Let's reverse the genders: "Girls are slutty, let's stone them!" Doesn't look very nice. I would like to hear the opinion of UN WOMEN anyway.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 05:46 AM
0

Oh, I see. Well, good luck with the blue pill then.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 02:16 AM
3

No problem. I think you need to know more about feminism, what's supposed to be and what it is actually. Stay here for some days and keep reading about different issues ;)
/r/MensRights23/09/12 12:17 AM
2

Not really... it's more like "if you get a girl drunk in order to impair her ability to consent, it's rape" or "If you know that she cannot give full consent in her state but take advantage anyway, it's rape". This would work in a world with honest politicians, lawyers and judges, who do not obey the ferocious fempire. But that's not the case, and lawmakers know it. If a woman uses the "alcohol card", game over, she wins.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 10:43 PM
0

Well, in the feminist "theory" that's a mathematical singularity ;) That is, the feminist hypotheses don't have answers for these two examples, because feminism is about men vs. women exclusively, and everything else doesn't matter. Another way to explain such singularity would be that there is actually an answer for both questions, something like: "Who the fuck cares?", but the political correctness doesn't allow them to say that :)
/r/MensRights22/09/12 03:39 PM
1

Aside the usual poor translation there is a big mistake -obvious due to the context, but anyway: The article says that the man spent 621 days jail because he didn't give 45,000 pesos to the father of the girl who demanded the money in order to "forgive" him.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 03:35 PM
5

Yeah, I wasn't born yesterday, that's the typical law that is made to be abused. In this feminist western world courts are biased. Those laws exploit the bias. There is an interesting concept called "Lawfare", which I think applies here. Social engineering, that is gold. We should learn much more about social hacking.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 10:47 PM
0

Jill Filipovic -the rape apologist- says she "does not support violence", but she's having an orgasm with this. The question is, that's the law in Iran. FTA: The government condemns short, tight and colorful coats and loosely tied head-scarves, and routinely organizes police patrols to enforce the Islamic dress code. Public surveillance increases in summer when some women opt for flimsier clothing. Now, is that law unfair? I think it is very unfair. So are many U.S. feminist laws, the very same …
/r/MensRights21/09/12 04:02 PM
24

It's beyond the mens rea, this is actually a trap. I change the rules but don't tell it to you, so you're "a criminal" now. Or as simple as a Stop sign that must be in a crossroads, but it isn't, so you pass it and then you "broke the law". This is a company, BTW.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 02:19 PM
3

Why does this user page throw a 404 (Not found)?.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 08:28 PM
2

Depends on what you mean with "attacking". Feminists see everything as an "attack", so in her view it's easy to "justify" kicking someone in the balls. I sense a trap here. That said, a kick -besides the knock out- can cause permanent damage. Your defense should be proportional.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 09:20 AM
4

IMO the male model is trying (unsuccessfully) to imitate a very typical pose of Tom Cruise in his films (before he claimed to be "the authority" on everything as a scientologist, of course). It's something like a look of "great interest" + "surprise", as if he were thinking "what to do", in a somehow mysterious background. But of course the character needs a previous "halo" of attractiveness and "goodness" that this picture can't reflect. Regarding the girl, she's not scared, she's rather attrac…
/r/MensRights18/09/12 11:58 AM
9

I'm a little surprised by this whole thing. Is this common in Vancouver or is it only against the MRM? Another question (related): In my country Derek Bedry could be sued for libel, and likely to be found guilty. Because he stated as a fact (and not as an opinion) that the MRM "has links to terrorism". This is libel here. Isn't it the same in Canada?
/r/MensRights16/09/12 01:59 AM
17

The 20 points and links are here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/uwekw/facts_and_statistics_detailing_male_oppression/
/r/MensRights16/09/12 01:24 AM
3

a couple years on death row, Well, this guy, Terry Williams is been 28 years there. And those years are a torture: A repetitive pattern of knowing you're gonna be executed AND the hope that brings every appeal. Now this is hell. What do they think? With a few exceptions, people in the death row don't want to die, they would choose life in jail. Those who wanna die, when asked "why?" they usually say "That's enough, I want this hell to end". That is, they become suicidal, but can't commit suicide…
/r/MensRights15/09/12 03:32 PM
8

I think that if feminists fear Hanna Rosin is because she is revealing (unintentionally, I guess) that feminism is a zero-sum game, which feminists deny.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 04:13 AM
13

Couldn't agree more.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 12:38 AM
22

I'm against the death penalty. I think life sentence is enough for the worsts crimes, an if there is a mistake or a justice miscarriage, there is the opportunity to restore that person's life, at least to some extent. Partially off topic: Don't take offense, but I think the American retributive justice has a lot to do with the way feminism is acting there. It seems like in many cases all they want is to punish somebody -even if that person is innocent-. I say this because the amount of people co…
/r/MensRights14/09/12 11:46 PM
1

I wasn't sure. Thanks :) That's the issue, the false accusations. This is not going to help "conviction rates", it will increase "convictions". More innocent people going to jail -and still they call it "Justice"-.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 11:40 AM
2

Excuse me but my English is not good enough. Did she say (at 1:06) "...the Scottish parliament is considering abolishing the need for corroboration of evidence, which many believe will help in prosecutions and conviction rates"?
/r/MensRights14/09/12 02:14 AM
1

It's a very low level conversation, IRC-like. Almost all are Latin American, very few Spaniards. As native speakers their spelling is awful, most of them wouldn't pass an elementary test. I wouldn't say this is something serious at all.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 10:41 PM
8

No MRAs allowed. As an atheist and MRA (or something alike), I couldn't be less interested in posting or commenting in r/atheismplus, freethoughtblogs, skepfreak or any of those sites. They are a bunch of clowns high on crack. They are exposing themselves, the more noise they make, the more they expose their stupidity and hate. Sooner or later they will make a huge mistake -they already have made a few-, and then... "Hasta la vista, baby" ;) Edit: they their
/r/MensRights13/09/12 02:28 AM
7

Orwell would be proud! :) Awesome.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 09:38 PM
18

told us that we weren't allowed to discuss abortion because we were men, and it wasn't our bodies. I think the whole "our bodies, our decision" idea is a fallacy, because that decision has consequences way beyond their bodies, it involves the fathers, the State and therefore the society in general. Besides, they say "it's women who make babies", but that's not true*. She claimed that if men could give birth, there would be abortion clinics on every corner, and that men would get abortions all th…
/r/MensRights12/09/12 10:06 AM
4

Someone posted this other screenshot in the "Breastfeeding" page, August the 28th. It's highlighting she got over 2,000 comments, mostly bashing her. http://i.imgur.com/fa447.png It seems all her posts have been deleted.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 03:42 AM
9

She’s just saying women are adapting to today’s economy more flexibly and resiliently than men. Well, that "adaptation" doesn't look like a real "adaptation", but more like a forced move. Anyway, am I the only one who thinks that the U.S. economy is unsustainable and that the crash is gonna be colossal? I mean, with the lost of so many jobs in the manufacturing, construction and other very profitable industries, who's gonna pay the education, health care and all those "new women's jobs"? Because…
/r/MensRights12/09/12 02:27 AM
13

Aerik is a well-known scumbag.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 09:32 PM
1

Jesus, what a bitch.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 02:30 AM
1

According to the video series that all students at the University of Montana are required to watch in order to stay enrolled [...] As someone said: "I thought 'Nineteen Eighty-Four' was a novel, not an instruction manual".
/r/MensRights06/09/12 01:00 PM
3

Jesus. That's pathetic even for Jezebel. See? That's why you don't do drugs. They crush your brains.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 08:38 AM
2

Thanks :)
/r/MensRights05/09/12 08:33 PM
1

I can't find it in the DSM (?)
/r/MensRights05/09/12 04:10 PM
8

Girl beats up a defenseless boy in the back room. (Anti Violence Commercial) Danish Girl tries to take advantage of a guy, fails, then whoops his ass. All I have to say is that if this was reversed and the girl was the victim, it would be rape and this would be flagged . Sexism at it's height. Violence in all forms is not acceptable Very good ad.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 03:30 PM
7

Almighty Google says this text was found in: http://boards.4chan.org/pol/res/5282130 and http://4chon.net/new/res/2404059.html No need to say that these are not "very reliable" sources, you know. I'll try to find something more. BTW: This seems to be the original upload of the video, or at least another pulled down copy: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbqR28wtjJo Source: http://bostinno.com/2012/09/03/crazy-landlord-video-cathy-tretola/
/r/MensRights05/09/12 02:22 PM
1

Yes, that's their pre-programmed answer. It's arguably a bias. I would like to see more women in the men's shoes, because opportunity matters. I mean, women are probably as good and as evil as men can be. But crime requires the opportunity. If we put women in all and every situation that men -as a whole- experience (including poverty, marginalization and all the most extreme ones), they will probably end committing the same amount of crimes than men, or a close number. Of course this doesn't jus…
/r/MensRights05/09/12 10:50 AM
1

:) I know, I know. He should have started with the "Oh dear women forgive me because I'm a miserable bastard and I feel shame for my gender and yadda yadda yadda". You know, the Mega White Knight plea bargaining or whatever it's called ;)
/r/MensRights05/09/12 09:38 AM
6

Politics is not about truth, it's about beliefs and emotions. And we humans are emotional creatures who constantly overestimate our rational thinking abilities.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 11:43 PM
3

Oh, I see. Its fairly reasonable to ask children to treat strangers starting up conversations and offering sweets with suspicion. Good. That's a better -more accurate- description than mine. Do you believe that its reasonable to advise women that being out in a short skirt is akin to children accepting conversations from strange adults? I believe that is reasonable to advise women -particularly the younger ones, and of course without making them paranoid- that being in certain places, acting in …
/r/MensRights04/09/12 04:44 PM
2

Of course not. Where did you get that idea? Well, maybe the last line is ambiguous... The "I want to believe" meme is a sarcasm, meaning that whatever the truth is, some people will deny it because they "want to believe" (in the feminist doctrine, for this case). So, their conclusion is obviously false, but even if we explain it to them, they'll still believe what they want. Those people are a lost cause, we can't help then (or at least I don't know how). Is it more clear now?. My English sucks,…
/r/MensRights04/09/12 02:58 PM
4

That line of thinking presumes that you are incapable of control. Bolds indicate where is the false conclusion. It requires a HUGE amount of stupidity to write that statement. So if I warn you about a potential danger, does it mean that I am the one who's going to do the harm?... Of course not. Or: If mom told you "don't talk with strangers", did she mean that she's a sexual predator who goes to the other side of the city to pick a child in her free time?... Of course not. But then again there i…
/r/MensRights04/09/12 11:23 AM
0

Comments are... "interesting".
/r/MensRights03/09/12 11:57 PM
6

Asking men -- who after all are 99% of the rapists [...] Nice try. That's not true, but even if it were, that old trick is designed to be confused with "99% of men are rapists" -which is a completely different statement-. OK; let's push further. Due to the lack of distribution figures, these assertions are as true as the quote above: All U.S. presidents have been men, who after all are 99% of the rapists. 443 members of the U.S. Congress are men, who after all are 99% of the rapists. All the dad…
/r/MensRights03/09/12 05:51 PM
3

Where are all the American males killed in every other circumstances (non related to war or terror attacks) in that 11 years period...?
/r/MensRights03/09/12 04:13 PM
33

Bullshit aside I think the question is: Are illiterate and hateful professors of biology and criminal justice who write female supremacist propaganda in the New York Times necessary?... No, but that's not the most important issue. What's really interesting is that the Boise State University has a Goebbels teaching biology and criminal justice. That bastard is called Greg Hampikian and he should have been fired already. See, William Tucker? It's not that difficult to say, but whatever.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 01:17 PM
1

Well, I think there are some good ideas in the comments already. I'd say: Take it easy. Yes, it's an unfair situation, but don't let it scares you. Maybe you can change your appearance a little, look at it like if you had a job that requires to wear an uniform, short hair or something like that. Walk an extra mile?... Well, do it some day, and if you feel safer keep doing it. All those feminist freaks and their terror campaign are a pain in the ass. Someday this is going to end bad for them, no …
/r/MensRights03/09/12 12:27 AM
3

Yes, it's from April. http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/04/20/who-stopped-robinson-the-inhibition-of-responsibility/ UK has little or no shame, but that's nothing new.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 01:02 PM
1

In a teen horror movie maybe that's "creepiness". In real life that's just an imperfect human being trying to TALK with another. Actually I don't know who's more socially awkward, if the guy or the girl.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 02:31 AM
6

Irrational fear of men. This comment in the same thread tells it quite clear: To be even more blunt to OP: she's afraid you might rape her. Let that sink in and then realize what you've been doing here and how it's come across. Well, it's not my (our) fault if they are so irrationally scared. Maybe they better stay in a panic room. I don't think that's what feminism wants, but...
/r/MensRights01/09/12 09:22 PM
1

Also: http://www.cafepress.es/boysrstupid And of course: http://www.amazon.com/Boys-Stupid-Throw-Rocks-Them/dp/0761135936
/r/MensRights01/09/12 06:49 PM
1

Honest question: So you have experience in your county's jail. What about federal prisons? For what I've read they are quite different...
/r/MensRights01/09/12 02:51 PM
7

Wise creature, little old Yoda :)
/r/MensRights01/09/12 01:34 PM
8

"Men are the scum of the earth" Maybe it's not misandry but androphobia. Remember that sometimes fear leads to hate. Some (not all) of the feminists posts that I read -particularly those related to "rape culture"- seem to show an irrational fear of men. I mean, it's like if they weren't mentally sane at all. I'm not saying this in a pejorative way. Phobias are mental disorders, some cases can be treated, some not; some will be due to a real traumatic experience, some will be vicarious and others…
/r/MensRights01/09/12 11:32 AM
-2

Nobody mentioned "patriarchy", because this is not a problem of "the patriarchy". A few years ago this sort of things were very strange or didn't happen at all, but in your crazy delusional world patriarchy exists since many, many years ago. Strange thing, isn't it?... BTW, you said: The only reason I came here was because I thought it would be a space to talk about real issues and get away from the MRA and their BS. That's what I was told. Sorry I got confused. Yeah, you get confused too often.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 12:32 AM
2

Besides Selective service, the "men's problems" are problems that the actual men cause for themselves. The "men's problems" are problems that the 1% cause for men FTFY.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 07:26 PM
8

Once you see the documentary The Gender War, nothing can surprise you from feminism in Sweden.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 07:06 PM
2

I use a lot of cuss words, particularly when speaking -in writing we lack the tone-. And I do it for a reason. I don't think "bitch" in this context is an insult. Actually an insult is something you say to offend another person, and I'm not interested in offending this person. As you say it would be counterproductive. "Bitch" means -among other things- "spiteful woman". And yes, I do think that Cathy acts with malice. So, that's what I'm saying: she's a known malicious person. I just use the pol…
/r/MensRights31/08/12 06:36 PM
5

Cathy Middleton. She's an already known bitch. Since then she has written another book: "Boy Drop That Child Support". It seems she's playing both sides now.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 03:00 PM
1

I feel like I should have the right to be angry at this woman who tried to ruin my life. You DO have that right. You're not killing her, you didn't "create" her cancer, you're not responsible of it, and there is nothing you can do to help her. You're not doing any harm to her, neither actively nor passively. Your feelings are yours, and BTW, that's a normal human response, it help us to protect ourselves and the ones who we love. That aside, religious people and moralists will tell you that you …
/r/MensRights31/08/12 12:41 PM
2

Politicians don't work for the people, they work for themselves. All of them.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 08:04 PM
4

It's implicit in the ad: Invest in me. Because I am a Girl. Marketing basics, short version: It doesn't say "Help (me)", but "Invest (in me)". "Investment" is a heavily loaded word. It's only attractive when associated to whatever has the better potential, in contrast to whatever has the worst potential. It's blatant. Also, from their website: By investing in a girl and her future, we know for a fact that she can lift herself out of poverty, altering the economic condition of her family, her com…
/r/MensRights30/08/12 03:51 PM
4

Frankly, I think using children's education in the third world as a means to rail against reverse discrimination in western society is crass. I think it's the reverse thing. The ad is using the "female superiority" for its cause. There are two major problems with that. One is that they are keeping up this idea that women are better than men, worldwide. The other is even worse: It doesn't matter how much you educate women in the 3rd world if you don't educate men too. People need education, not o…
/r/MensRights30/08/12 09:11 AM
5

SRS shit, but I keep saying this TL;DR: Just put women to do all that men have to do, and in the same conditions and circumstances. Now see how the numbers change.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 09:56 PM
3

I know judicial discretion exists for a reason. A trial is not a math operation and it's hard -when not impossible- to know the truth. But the social and political pressure ("thanks to" the feminist lobby) is exploiting this margin. In some fields this is called social engineering. Long story short: It would work if judges (the judicial system actually) were independent, but we all know that's not the case. That's the crack.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 09:26 PM
9

If you don't want to go to jail stay away from drunk girls. Leave if you have to. Let the MR haters be the ones who go to jail.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 07:45 PM
13

The moral: judges can interpret the law. BINGO. And that's a HUGE crack in the system.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 12:45 PM
8

Many women (not all) expect you to read their minds, particularly during sex. I'm not talking about "being aware of their reactions", but literally read their minds. They don't realize that we can't guess everything because -among other things- men's and women's bodies are different (not to say that every person has different tastes). That is: If they don't say what they like and don't like, they will hardly enjoy sex. Particularly young women seem to feel ashamed or embarrassed of talking, and …
/r/MensRights28/08/12 10:09 PM
1

I've seen this picture (no blurred face) in the documentary Sex, Lies and Julian Assange (46 min.) You should watch the documentary, it's very eye-opening for those who don't know much about the case.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 01:39 PM
1

Same here. I'm hardly surprised by anything those days, but these illiterate university professors... Well, that's heavy. And they call it "education"!
/r/MensRights26/08/12 09:01 AM
2

That's not true. You're mixing two separate things: The ability to fight when men are in conflictive situations, and the aim to cause harm to others without any reason. The first is a result of our roles as workers, protectors and a wide range of tasks we have to do. In other words, men find ourselves in "fight-or-flight" situations way more often than women. And this includes men from many marginalized groups who live in extreme circumstances. The second would be due to a lack of empathy, and a…
/r/MensRights25/08/12 03:00 AM
2

Well, some people -particularly women- are very quiet (others don't). I have heard quite times women complaining: "Hey, women don't necessarily scream 'FUCK MEEEEEE, FUCK MEEEEEEE, OH GAWD, YEAHHH, YEAHHH!!!!' like in porn movies, you know!?". But this whole "enthusiastic consent" thing seems to me like a porn scene. I'm starting to get a little confused. Edit: Somehow I hit "save" before finishing.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 02:03 AM
5

So you think VAWA is an MRA "projection"???
/r/MensRights20/06/12 01:15 AM
1

Right after explaining that he was let off (of a false-rape charge) after only a few hours. Well, isn't that actually proof that the system works??? No. There is a thing called "(previous) investigation". The police can't take the word of a man or a woman as a reason to arrest another person (at least not in a so-called "civilized" society), because the accuser may be lying or in a mistake. They need something more to arrest you, some proof that what he/she is saying is the probable truth. Only …
/r/MensRights19/06/12 10:54 PM
4

That reminds me to the XKCD comic "Something is wrong on the internet!". But this is even worse: In another video (only 3 weeks old) he seems to say quite the contrary. Pay special attention to his reason number four.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 12:37 AM
2

Create a website to publically shame rapists? What kind of asshole would do that? The U.S. government?
/r/MensRights18/06/12 02:53 PM
6

Thread highlights, by the same order: . 1) http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2012/feb/21/us-more-men-raped-than-women According to Rainn, there are 213,000 victims of sexual assault in the US every year. More than 9/10ths of those victims are women and girls. The numbers Rainn uses come from the DOJ National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS). The NCVS, though, is clear that its methodology for gathering sexual assault stats is pretty limited, and probably doesn't present a 100% …
/r/MensRights18/06/12 02:51 PM
2

I don't hear this from feminists, ever. I do, a lot. Not that exact sentence, but men are constantly accused of not caring about the housework and the raising of children. That's often reflected in commercials too, they show the mom as the caregiver and the dad as a (probably stupid) lazy, irresponsible, sports-TV addict. Hell, that's so embedded that since more and more fathers take their kids to the school or to the park, they are seen as... pedophiles! Some households don't have fathers I und…
/r/MensRights18/06/12 10:47 AM
30

Actually it's the opposite thing. Youtube comments are known for its stupidity. Nobody listens to the trolls on Youtube comments, except 12 years old idiots... and feminists. That's the point. She's a victim of nothing, she's being attacked by nobody, and feminists are defending themselves from nothing. Do you know what's laughable? The feminist fight against ghosts is laughable. And yet, governments in many western countries are fighting with them -this is not laughable, it's rather disturbing-…
/r/MensRights18/06/12 09:51 AM
1

Some say "it's about single moms". Really?... The first thing that came to my mind is how many times I have heard from feminists: "Women do it all for kids while men are lying down on the couch". There is a mother's day, and it's well respected. Actually it's always about mothers, every single day of the year -take a look at courts and see it for yourself-. Can't we just give fathers one day in recognition?... No, it's not the single mother's day, it's the father's day. What part of "father" don…
/r/MensRights18/06/12 12:56 AM
3

That's public information. Judges act on behalf of the justice and they are supposed to be neutral. It's the accuser and/or accused who (sometimes) have the right to stay unknown to the public. From the thread Another Mother Rewarded for False Allegations: Magistrate Tom Altobelli: http://www.fmc.gov.au/html/fmaltobelli.html
/r/MensRights12/06/12 03:47 AM
2

You won't be the only one, I promise.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 01:22 AM
1

http://girl-mom.com/ It's a forum and some general pages. The author got an article published at The Guardian (link here) By that article and the post called "Why WE LOVE being single and/or young mamas" it looks like they felt marginalized at some point. Hence (I guess) that kind of unfriendly/contemptuous behavior.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 02:31 PM
3

Some weeks ago, the 4th entry ("A term created by a group of straight white men who habitually confuse...") was the first, and it was being upvoted at a steady rate of 1 per minute -it looked like targeted by some bot-. Then it stopped after a few hours and up/downvotes became randomly dispersed in time -more realistic, I'd say-. Next several entries were all the same "Dear editor, this entry does not violate any of the rules on the editor..." So yes, it looks like it is (or was) being heavily m…
/r/MensRights11/06/12 08:14 AM
2

Of course I don't mean "women", that would be stupid. I mean women who buy that false stereotype.
/r/MensRights11/06/12 03:32 AM
12

It's a collective idea. The female friend talks for the teacher: "How is it that you felt uncomfortable? Don't you like women making advances on you?... You must be gay, there is no other explanation". Whether individually or collectively, the idea remains the same: "It can't be that I/she/we don't like him, hence there must be another reason (he's gay)". In their system of beliefs men never say "no". That's like one foundation of their alternative reality. Challenging their "reality" is unaccep…
/r/MensRights09/06/12 02:46 AM
1

She's bitching about the female characters in videogames... and begging money to do more of that shit??? Is this the "new economy" that Hanna Rosin talks about?? She could learn programming and make different games, but whining in front of a camera is a lot easier, of course. Besides, it fulfills her exhibitionist side (many women have a strong exhibitionist side). -Sigh-. If only they wanted to do something useful...
/r/MensRights06/06/12 03:25 AM
5

About the source, almighty Google says: http://www.squidoo.com/TeenBoysNSexEd. The author seems to be George McCasland. There is also a Yahoo group called Dads House. These Facebook links seem broken. Try for example: http://www.facebook.com/Papa.Bears.Cabaraoke http://www.facebook.com/groups/ChildSupportRights http://www.facebook.com/groups/VisitationRightsDadsHouseEdCtr BTW: I haven't read anything, I just searched for the text. Google is your friend, he doesn't hate you like feminists. Use Go…
/r/MensRights03/06/12 01:19 AM
3

Hanna Rosin is a contributing editor at The Atlantic and founder and co-editor of DoubleX Ugh, do you remember "The End of Men"? Well, that's the same idiot.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 12:32 AM
2

That's it. There are reasons hard to demonstrate. For example, some people are very good doing something, they easily find solutions to problems, contribute with good ideas, make the professional relationships easier, etc. This value is not always measurable in terms that everyone can understand; some coworkers may not see it, and think they are being discriminated by gender, race or whatever. "I am as good as he/she!", but this is not necessarily true. If this happens to a man (he doesn't under…
/r/MensRights23/05/12 03:36 AM
2

It seems the subreddit was created by the user Black_Visions, then he offered the moderation to someone else and disappeared. He was planning to commit suicide. Do you know anything about him since then?
/r/MensRights21/05/12 09:56 PM
6

People drink to lose the inhibition that prevents them from doing certain things, for example giving consent. So yeah, according to the feminist view, when people finally are able to consent... they are unable consent. Like an old wise man said once: "What the fuck!?"
/r/MensRights20/05/12 08:51 PM
9

The way I see it, feminists are saying: "Women can't drink and have sex, whatever the circumstances are". Because, how do you know she can consent? I mean, you don't know how much alcohol can tolerate another person, right? She may look completely aware but not being that aware. Some people can't barely tolerate one drink. It's not whether she's passed out or not, it's about being able to make a conscious, willful, unquestionable decision, and by the feminists standards you don't really know how…
/r/MensRights20/05/12 04:35 PM
2

Oh, I see. Thanks for clarifying :)
/r/MensRights18/05/12 09:23 PM
2

A neighbor, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the incident began Tuesday after the divorce became final. She said the vehicle was spray painted by several people and the items put in the front yard between 4 and 8 p.m. That’s when people started stopping for a closer look. Looks like it was a revenge party :-S
/r/MensRights18/05/12 04:59 PM
3

I don't think it's that complicated. Your first point is OK, the rest are exaggerated IMO. Look, there is always people who want more; more power, more control, more money... They are selfish people with common interests, and eventually they will meet each other and join groups. Now it's just a matter of opportunities. If there is a chance to start an economic bubble, speculators will be there. If politicians need more voters, they will start to listen some lobbying groups. It's always the same.…
/r/MensRights18/05/12 01:39 PM
2

Nothing at all?. OK, let's see if I can explain it better. I was going to say the uterus, since many women experiment painful uterine cramps during menstruation. That's because of contractions (your uterus has pain receptors), now imagine an impact. I know, it's not the perfect example because the uterus is also very protected. Let's move to another organ. Your stomach is an internal organ too, it has pain receptors, and it's partially protected: If you tense your abdominal muscles you can take …
/r/MensRights18/05/12 03:02 AM
7

Not trying to give a lesson on anatomy here, but I think many girls don't realize that testicles are more like the ovaries than like any part of the vulva. I mean, of course every part of the vulva is highly sensible (so is the penis), but there is no external female genital organ equivalent to testicles, we have to look at internal organs to find any anatomically similar part. So, when a man gets punched in the balls it's more like if a woman gets punched in the ovaries. Just keep this in mind.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 10:17 PM
1

Same thing can be said about the original chain mail. No, that's the attack, it's serious. The parody is the response, not serious. You're stupid. Yeah, well, I love you too.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 09:32 PM
11

Any group?? Murder apologists from radical feminism haven't ruined feminism (?).
/r/MensRights17/05/12 09:03 PM
2

I dont give a fuck. Parody, not parody, I don't care You should, because a parody is not meat to be taken seriously. It's not "Well, then I think [reversed text]", it doesn't state what's said as the truth. But when you refuse to see it as a parody, you "acquire the right to feel offended by it". I'm sorry but you don't have that right, nobody has. Is this place full of 15 year olds? It's called "adaptive behavior". If you try to offend me like a 15 year old, I'll give you back a 15 year old sty…
/r/MensRights17/05/12 08:49 PM
12

Look, I think this is a big opportunity. Spread the video. Yes, just spread it, you don't have to explain anything about the feminist rhetoric, the video is so blatant that there is no need to. Let it work by itself. Let the world know how deep the stupidity and the bigotry goes in universities (where future leaders are supposed to be learning something about the world). This time it's a Canadian university; well, say it so, and do the same with similar cases regardless of the country. Remember …
/r/MensRights17/05/12 07:39 PM
3

?? [–]NancyGrace 1 point (+2/-1) 8 hours ago* i think it's fairly telling that most MRA will whine and mope rather than act like activists. -instead of bringing awareness to prostate cancer or finding ways to fund awareness, they will just bitch about how society only cares about breast cancer. then they will attempt to control women's funds and women's efforts and direct it towards their own goals (as if it was impossible to care about both prostate cancer and breast cancer at the same time) -i…
/r/MensRights17/05/12 02:10 AM
1

Yeah, Arthur Goldwag is not a very smart dude, and yet he dares to make judgments about who is or isn't a hater. :Facepalm:
/r/MensRights16/05/12 08:28 PM
1

Yes. Unfortunately, sometimes we're not going to find the actual criminal, but the hurry may easily lead to discard further efforts, and this could be catastrophic :/
/r/MensRights16/05/12 03:45 PM
0

I'm not sure if this is "gendered" or not, but the site is spreading the rape hysteria, and we know that such rape hysteria points at men as the guilty ones. So, the title may not be the best, but I think it's still a men's rights issue. I'm sick of this culture of the "rape culture".
/r/MensRights16/05/12 03:15 PM
1

-A woman might really want to have a baby, and it's not fair for her husband to have any control over the decision. FTFY.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 11:33 AM
1

Oh, that explains why I didn't understand your other comment at all :) Thanks for noticing.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 11:53 PM
2

Nancy18ht: redditor for 2 days. Three comments at this moment. toddmra88: redditor for 45 minutes
/r/MensRights15/05/12 11:24 PM
0

Even "all the relatives of both Carloses mistook them," and DeLuna was sentenced to death and executed based only on eyewitness accounts despite a range of signs he was not a guilty man, said law professor James Liebman. "Unfortunately, the flaws in the system that wrongfully convicted and executed DeLuna -- faulty eyewitness testimony, shoddy legal representation and prosecutorial misconduct -- continue to send innocent men to their death today," read a statement that accompanies the report. I …
/r/MensRights15/05/12 10:14 PM
2

Also, (12:15) As of now, the tips are just reinforcing the trope that feminists are angry man-haters. Men who see these are getting offended because the tips just seem to assume they are all rapists who can't control their dicks (7:25) It's not just Reddit. Look at what Diana said. She said her friends are approaching her about them and that the campaign is pushing people away [...] The link in her first comment goes to: http://www.reddit.com/r/ucla/comments/tdzwo/brotip/
/r/MensRights15/05/12 01:46 AM
1

Now I understand you even less. And by co-opting the comics logic verbatim, you're projecting a counter straw-man argument onto the feminists who supposedly say its wrong for men to fantasise about being raped. Maybe it's because of my poor English -sorry about that-, but I don't know what you're talking about. Only one thing: I didn't mean "men fantasise about being raped", I meant the complementary fantasy in which the man is the "rapist" so he fulfills the female fantasy. Of course the fantas…
/r/MensRights14/05/12 05:36 PM
1

I don't understand your rage. She's pointing to the double standard and bigotry held by feminists: But I ask [to feminists] if its okay for a man to have the same fantasy and they say absolutely not and go into psychobabble about how fucked up society is for teaching men that rape is acceptable behavior. Well, it's true, they are completely wrong here. So, what's the problem?
/r/MensRights14/05/12 04:37 PM
27

The article they criticized was taken down the next day (October 19): http://wesleyanargus.com/2011/10/10/wesleyan-v-wellesley/ I love when feminism censors another woman's speech because she is telling things like they are. Who said that feminism was about "rights"??
/r/MensRights11/05/12 03:25 PM
1

You're right, my comment is not correct at all. I was thinking about the distribution, since the data is about the number of lawyers and not the number of cases. We can assume an increase, but it's not measurable. I'm going to remain a little skeptical about the quantity by now. Thanks for noticing :)
/r/MensRights11/05/12 01:05 AM
1

Yeah, the author did a "good" journalism job, I was thinking WTF!? This one seems to be a non-Reuters version: In all, 56% of AAML members cited an increase in mothers who pay child support, while 44% said no change, and there was not an observed decrease. Additionally, 47% have noticed an increase in the number of women paying alimony, while 53% said no change. So, about 50% said yes and 50% said no. Where is the news then?...
/r/MensRights10/05/12 08:18 PM
6

Exactly. Telling people to be careful has nothing to do with blaming the victim. We tell each other these things all the time and we don't feel blamed.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 04:41 PM
7

Look what we have here: "Rape prevention tips": My co-worker recently created this list, inspired by sites like this. As I was reading, I couldn’t decide if I should laugh or be horrified by the reality that violence prevention tips are always aimed at what the targeted person should do (judgment strongly implied) to protect themselves. Take a look at the "inspirational" page, it's long but very illustrative. TL;DR: It seems the origin is an e-mail by a radical feminist who was "tired" of seeing…
/r/MensRights10/05/12 03:38 PM
1

Again: I see you're new here. I'm not talking about hypotheticals. That's what happens every day, that's the norm, it's a fact. You don't know it? Well, you should because it's a primary issue. And BTW: I'm not saying he should hit back. Walking away is probably the best he could do. Edit: I see this is a downvote-y subreddit. Clearly not the place people are ready to argue for their views. No, no. The problem is that you're arguing about how to add and subtract, but you're at the university. Ob…
/r/MensRights10/05/12 12:01 PM
2

Have you seen the video?... Fuck, that makes me sick.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 10:47 AM
4

--Man up --Go fuck yourself Don't get me wrong, I don't want to be mean, but when they ask for it so passionately I just can't say "no". I'm a good person, can't help it :-P
/r/MensRights09/05/12 03:22 PM
13

I see you're new here. OK, two things: If he calls the cops, they arrest him, not her. This is a courtesy of VAWA and its Duluth model. It's OK to think in the reverse situation because it shows the hypocrisy of feminism. It's not about violence, it's about everything. Feminism beats every double-standard world record known till today.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 11:16 AM
28

Social "scientist" Social pseudoscientist. Fixed.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 12:19 AM
2

This sensationalism in the media is what feeds the availability bias. In short: "Estimating what is more likely by what is more available in memory, which is biased toward vivid, unusual, or emotionally charged examples". I love the example given by Paul Bloom in the Introduction to Psychology course at Yale. This is the excerpt (transcription): This can show up in the real world. What are your risk of getting killed — What's your risk of getting killed by a shark? Well, if you ask people what t…
/r/MensRights08/05/12 11:21 PM
3

True. We have little or nothing to offer to politicians. Saying this is sad because it should be the opposite thing: Politicians are the ones who must offer things to people. I guess this game has become too dirty. In the long term it's gonna be hell, but politicians are more interested in the votes they can get in the next elections. Politics is supposed to be the means, not the ends, but this is FUBAR. Duh!
/r/MensRights08/05/12 10:07 PM
2

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/sffrw/the_man_box_tedtalk/ Fortunately, New York (particularly that part between Harlem and the Bronx) is not the world. And fortunately for me, my father is not like Tony Porter, he never told me to be or act like "a man", he taught me to be responsible and understanding, and that I should learn from mistakes. Regarding my friends, I did almost always what I wanted to do, and not what my friends told me I had to do (I was an obstinate kid and still I …
/r/MensRights08/05/12 10:20 AM
1

Well, I don't expect a formal change of this word, but personally, I do that change and it works for me. Misogyny has been hijacked by sociology as part of a feminist "theory", but that's useless. The whole "theory" uses non-falsifiable arguments, therefore it's invalid. It will persist, probably, but as an easy label, nothing more.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 09:11 AM
1

Well, in that case it's certainly weird. A delay of a few hours until the story goes "hot" is normal, but 8 days is not. Something similar happened to me with a popular blog that was still sending me traffic when the link was no longer in the home, but at least there was a peak the day they linked and the rest was residual. I attributed that to some browser's caches and the messy behavior of the referrer (that damn thing it's a little tricky :)
/r/MensRights08/05/12 02:35 AM
1

For feminists, if it contains half-naked girls -and it's for men- then it counts as very "misogynistic". But anyway, while men continue to exist, almost everything will be "misogynistic" for one or another reason. The word misogyny has lost its meaning. It happens from time to time, some words evolve, their meaning changes, and some become meaningless. Keep in mind that despite the etymology and the original meaning, words are ultimately defined by it's use. It's a slow process, it takes decades…
/r/MensRights07/05/12 10:17 PM
2

It seems because of this: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/syeb9/the_purpose_of_circumcision_is_to_ruin_male/ As you can see there, it's a direct link. If your stats show /r/MensRights as referer, it must be because 8 days ago the post was here in the first page ("Hot" section) for some time, until it went out displaced by other posts.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 09:12 PM
6

This is what greed looks like. The rich demanding the rights of the poor without a trace of shame or guilt.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 04:12 AM
2

Yep. That's probably a couple SRSs messing around.
/r/MensRights05/05/12 12:26 AM
7

Troll. Downvote.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 08:02 PM
3

Fear mongering creates antisocial people. The child was not alone, she was with her mother. In the situation you describe there is no reason for the mother to fear you, but she was irrationally frightened to the point of giving you orders about how to behave in public. Next time tell her: "I don't know what you are, ma'am, but I'm not a pedophile, OK?" -or something like that-. Shame her behavior. I wish there were a better way to tell people to stop the hysteria, but I'm afraid there isn't. If …
/r/MensRights03/05/12 07:00 PM
5

It's We The Robots, a well known sarcastic and politically incorrect comic. You're not getting it -or don't want to get it-. Whatever.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 09:28 PM
4

The comic doesn't say any woman, neither at any time.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 08:34 PM
2

From the original site: This was probably the most heavily debated strip. Some people found it offensive. It's based on an actual conversation I witnessed in my high-school cafeteria. Like Sandi here, a friend of ours had a gender unit in her social studies class and briefly went around loudly conflating the concept of political and social equality with biological sameness. Briefly.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 08:34 PM
5

The belief is that the differences are sociological in nature and not biological. This is called "tabula rasa". Please, note this: Scientists recognize that the entire cerebral cortex is indeed preprogrammed and organized in order to process sensory input, motor control, emotions, and natural responses.[5] These programmed mechanisms in the brain then act to learn and refine the ability of the organism.[6][7] For example, Steven Pinker argues that while the brain is "programmed" to pick up spoke…
/r/MensRights01/05/12 07:50 PM
2

And this seems to be the following one, but it doesn't appear in the history (scroll down to the bottom).
/r/MensRights01/05/12 07:29 PM
2

OK. Version for dummies: I've read the article. I think the article is the same load of provocative bullshit that we see everyday. It's so blatant that it doesn't require my explanation. Of course I don't expect people to believe me. You should go and read it, and -if you want- say whatever you have to say. I don't want to sound arrogant, it's just that when something is so evident I think there is no need for details. Time is precious.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 04:34 PM
1

How to spot attention whores: You don't have to; they reveal themselves. *Sigh*
/r/MensRights01/05/12 04:11 AM
4

That's easy: Arguments supporting the existence of the "rape culture" are not falsifiable, therefore they are not valid. who I consider friends who are very smart. Do not take offense, but if they can't tell the difference between correlation and causality, they are not that smart.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 04:04 AM
3

Only a few hours ago
/r/MensRights28/04/12 01:45 AM
1

The mentioned article was posted here. Women jealous of other women is something that happens a lot, and the workplace is not en exception.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 02:57 AM
1

That's exactly what I see. And to be honest, I don't care if the author's real intention was another thing. To me it's crystal clear. I've seen many times feminists talking about misogyny in countries like Turkey or Pakistan until they get angry, and then yelling at the E.U. because they want more measures here. WTF!? That's shameful, that's an insult for those women that don't have any right. Obama said this because he has to be politically correct as any President or diplomat, that's politics,…
/r/MensRights26/04/12 01:27 PM
4

Cached user page, still open in one of my tabs: http://i.imgur.com/vdAdV.jpg
/r/MensRights26/04/12 03:00 AM
2

Yeah, that's exactly what they did. And this is where journalism dies and the attention whore is born. Such a shame.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 09:03 PM
1

I'm amazed by this craziness. I mean, for fuck's sake, it's a campus, people are too young to endure this religious fanaticism. That's like a cult. This comment: I don’t understand how DORM being all-female is affecting your life and am quite frankly worried that you seem so concerned about it. Seems like you have some paternalistic ulterior motives. Take whatever motives you may have and leave this school!" It's like she feels you're her enemy, but in a sort of psychotic way. I don't know what …
/r/MensRights24/04/12 11:00 AM
0

When men and women aren't equal under the law, someone is peeing on the Constitution.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 01:18 AM
2

What I understand is that having casual sex is perfectly OK. But using this casual sex to destroy a man's life just because of the girl's remorse, lack of accountability, or just because the man wasn't chivalrous enough... that's called "being a slut". Of course, one can agree or disagree in the use of curse words, but I think the political correctness is eating us alive.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 10:06 PM
7

It's not a secret that journalism has been becoming shallow, cheap, unwisely provocative, not serious, and to sum up: Stupid. Previously it was called "Infotainment", but it didn't last long because that concept was not enough. I don't mean that all journalism is stupid, I mean that stupidity is becoming more and more frequent in mainstream journalism, and that there isn't any news source free from this phenomenon. Sign of the times, I guess.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 05:47 PM
2

"Procter & Gamble proudly presents: A world where all the dads have been restrained from their sons and daughters". Fucking sad, but that's the first thing that came to my mind.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 03:48 AM
1

This is the result of the Duluth Model. It's embedded in VAWA, a fascist law for a fascist organization called NOW.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 02:02 AM
1

12 Lies Men Tell Before Sex Those are not lies, they are encoded versions of "What about getting laid?". It's necessary because women usually don't like being told: "hey, let's fuck". I find annoying that women talk to us in a strongly encrypted language and expect a full understanding, but yet they don't bother to learn our easy code. Duh!
/r/MensRights21/04/12 12:43 PM
1

Pseudoscience.
/r/MensRights21/04/12 12:27 AM
2

My opinion is a secondary issue.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 08:03 PM
11

Here is what my son learned in class the other day. A man's mind tends to be slightly less developed than a woman's. As a science dude (used to good and bad news), as far as I know there is no difference between men's and women's mind development level. At this point I don't know if the teacher is an ignorant or a bad-intentioned person, but whatever the case, it's a huge fail in the education system. Regarding car insurance costs I know that in Spain the mileage per year doesn't count as factor…
/r/MensRights20/04/12 05:21 PM
3

Why do you call "conspiracy" to something that's just in front of your eyes? I mean, there are always groups of selfish people trying to get power over other people, that's what lobbies -for example- usually do. That's not a conspiracy, it's fucking clear. Actually, who needs conspiracies when the biggest problems of the world are on the news everyday?
/r/MensRights20/04/12 05:19 PM
4

and we'll consider it when the time comes again at the end of the year. Wrong answer. SPLC did something very wrong and they know it. Many days later the text is still there, no correction, no apology, no mention to radicalhub, no nothing. As far as I'm concerned, the SPLC is no longer trustworthy or credible, and definitely is not honest. It's yet another dirty business disguised as a nonprofit organization. I didn't create the concepts "credibility", "confidence" or "trust", they already exist…
/r/MensRights20/04/12 04:32 PM
-1

This.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 10:21 PM
1

In my experience they don't delete blogs for this reason. Same goes for Wordpress or Youtube. If you're not him trying to gain confidence and generate confusion, don't worry. As some people already said, your account seems legit. I just wanted people to know about that mention.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 09:45 PM
3

Are the mods aware that this account and Police_Murdering_Us were claimed by the psychopath? I'm not saying it's true, only that he/she/it claimed both accounts.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 11:24 AM
6

Those bitches at radicalhub are trying it hard: In what was also an act of domestic terrorism by Ball, where he committed an illegal act that was dangerous to human life and was apparently intended to intimidate and coerce both civilians and the government, this self-immolation by the leader of the Worcester branch of the Massachusetts-based Fatherhood Coalition was also apparently a declaration of war against the family court system and against women and children: [...] "Terrorism" (said the ge…
/r/MensRights18/04/12 11:00 AM
1

Yeah, that's the problem. Feminism is a lobby, and when they reach their target, men get fucked up. Politicians are to blame because they sell themselves. That's corruption.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 10:48 AM
1

Prosecutor Marianne Ny, the one who signed the EAW after letting him go from Sweden Oh, and his friend, the lawyer Claes Borgström. Meanwhile, the suspect (he's not charged) has been in house arrest for 500 days.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 10:37 AM
2

Certainly. That's what make me sick.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 03:57 AM
1

It's on the news. Lena Adelsohn Liljeroth is the Swedish Minister of Culture. The Swedish government makes me vomit.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 01:37 AM
2

[Editor's Note: The author of this article is neither pro nor anti feminism. He is in fact a married man with a child on the way, who votes in favor of women's rights in exchange for unlimited use of the words "hoes," "bitches," and "sluts." Also, blowjobs.] That says it all.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 01:21 AM
2

SRS, eschatology, sisterofblackvisions, Futrelle, Jezebel... They are trolls, bullies and psychopaths, and they attract even more trolls, bullies and psychopaths. They all are the same scum. One day they will lead somebody to suicide (maybe they've done it already but we are not aware).
/r/MensRights18/04/12 12:10 AM
3

It's a misleading message. /r/MensRights is against treating women as superior than men (see for example VAWA). Feminism is not fair, it's abusing men, and we don't want it. But when we raise our voices against this abuse, feminists say "we don't want women to be treated equally", which is a lie (a very stupid and childish lie BTW). They say "It's not a zero-sum game"... MY ASS. Of course It IS a zero-sum game. Tales are for children, I wasn't born yesterday, I'm 43 years old. It's not the first…
/r/MensRights17/04/12 04:36 PM
15

Erin and her employer Gawker do this shit for money, don't forget it. But let's talk about a couple serious things: How men are responsible for all human achievement (except, uh, actually making other humans) Many feminists believe women "make" babies, and take this as a sort of superior human quality above men. But this is not true. Women do not create life -neither men do-, this is only a rhetorical expression. The zygote is already a living organism produced by the union of two gametes, an ov…
/r/MensRights17/04/12 01:04 AM
5

One of the better lessons I've learned in my life is this: Politics has nothing to do with reality. When I say this, people usually tell me I'm an ignorant or a cynic. But there is a blue pill and a red pill for this too, and most people choose the blue pill because it matches their beliefs and expectations. There is little or nothing that I can do to change that.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 09:16 PM
2

OK, thanks ;)
/r/MensRights15/04/12 03:43 PM
4

The way you ask "What can the judge do?" is too literal, I didn't mean they should let go everybody because of this. The judges are part of the judicial system. I don't know the details about how this works in the U.S., but in my country (and I think this is common in many others) judges must send feedback to the upper layers when they see the system has such big problems. They are very important pieces of this puzzle. The state must warrant the compliance of the current legislation, and this in…
/r/MensRights15/04/12 03:29 PM
11

Troll or not, that's the radical feminism (aka "feminazi") philosophy. Take a look at AVoiceFormen for further information. Obviously this will never happen. But some of those people are teachers and kindergarten workers. So the question is: Are your children safe from physical and (mainly) psychological harm? Edit: Link format
/r/MensRights15/04/12 02:08 PM
46

“The prison guard warned us not to mention we were in for rape, but somehow the inmates got to know and wanted to kill us. So when a judge sends you to jail for rape, he's virtually signing your death sentence. And he knows it. It's said that "the measure of a society is found in how they treat their prisoners". So true.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 11:51 AM
3

If you want the feminist version, brace yourself and take a look at this: "Rape Culture 101". [Warning]: That post was written by a known angry feminist blogger called Melissa McEwan. I believe this person may have PTSD or a similar disorder, since I vaguely remember some comment from her saying that she went through one or more scary/traumatic experience. So, in case some of you want to contact/discuss with her, you're already advised.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 09:39 PM
2

Errr... I don't get your point. Do you think the paper is right or that it's not a good research/presentation (but it's still there)?
/r/MensRights13/04/12 01:57 PM
2

No. The article says "appears to be a hoax", and I guess it's because the author, Joe Coscarelli, either didn't talk to the Tukwila PD or he did but he's not sure the information is clear. If the NYMag is a reliable source for you, for me it's not enough (sorry, it's called meritocracy, and virtually every newspaper lies or distorts the information on a daily basis). So, I SUGGEST to you and other people (particularly those who are writing comments in the Sister of black visions thread to stop a…
/r/MensRights13/04/12 04:31 AM
4

I think it's more "...feminism is insensitive of Men's Rights issues" instead of "...women are insensitive of Men's Rights issues". But it happens too often that women blindly trust feminism. It's a sort of leader/follower issue. Regarding men I agree with Sigil1. In my experience many men don't realize the problem they face until it's too late -for example at the divorce, or after being unfairly accused of assault-.
/r/MensRights13/04/12 12:23 AM
1

I don't harass people. I don't encourage anyone else to harass people. Yes you do. Yes you do, David. You can deny it, so what? You have thousands web pages full of harassment. You harass people and encourages others to do. You are a bully and encourages others to bully, because you just enjoy laughing at people who are suffering. That's what bullies do. And you know what? You're triggering the fears of people who have been bullied when they were child. That's horrible. You are inflicting pain a…
/r/MensRights12/04/12 07:23 PM
2

Uppsala University The first time I heard about Eva Lundgren -probably the craziest feminist in this world- was in the Swedish documentary The Gender War (Könskriget). It's not a coincidence that she was appointed in 1989 a Docent (Reader) in Theology at Uppsala University, and that in 1993–2011 she held a government-appointed chair of sociology at the same university, to study "the relation between power and gender in family and society, in particular men's violence against women". There is ano…
/r/MensRights12/04/12 04:31 PM
6

I agree, nothing has to change. But I don't think it qualifies as "trolling", I think it's a scam, a fraud, sabotage. The lives of many men are being put at risk with the current laws. Discrediting the MRM "because it's funny", is offensive and dangerous. Yes, that's what this psycho is doing, he's trying to destroy the lives of many innocent men by obstructing a pro-rights movement. Trolling is another thing. This person comes here and tells a story that can be true (yeah, the spermjacking coul…
/r/MensRights12/04/12 02:14 PM
13

I'm sorry, deeply sorry. And I hope you all the best, including of course justice for Jerry.
/r/MensRights12/04/12 01:08 AM
1

If someone still don't get it: Most of you are Americans, right?. Pick something (very) wrong that some U.S. people do. Now say: "Americans can stop [that_wrong_thing]". You don't say that because it sounds awful. It's a wrong construction. Even if their intention was "those Americans that do [...]", it's incredibly stupid, because the subject is "Americans" and that's what people read. Hell, I'm starting to think that it's a stupidity problem instead of sexism. You know the Grey's Law, don't yo…
/r/MensRights11/04/12 09:18 PM
1

That's a correlation, not a cause.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 08:24 PM
1

Errr... maybe I'm getting it wrong, but I think Paul was telling what's happening in courts now, if roles were reversed. I don't know if this was his intention or not, but that's exactly the result: Horrible.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 02:01 PM
2

I'm sure those blacks aren't "absolutely prone to drug use" and don't "perpetuated drug-use" because they are black, but because they are poor, marginalized or any other reason that has nothing to do with their race. Maybe he's not racist, but he's acting like a racist. The same goes for with men and rape. Being men is not the reason for rape, but that's what the tagline suggests. he was specifically talking about blacks in America I know, but it doesn't change my point. As far as I know there i…
/r/MensRights11/04/12 01:28 PM
20

The man was able to disarm his wife and run from their Oswestry Way apartment seeking assistance after she was heard exclaiming that “if she could not have him, no one else would,” the affidavit indicated. I've heard feminists claiming countless times that a women will never say that because it means property, and "only men can think of a woman that she is owned by him", never the reversed situation. I always say the same: There is no evidence to claim that men and women are different when it co…
/r/MensRights11/04/12 11:38 AM
1

Good news!
/r/MensRights11/04/12 09:54 AM
1

I'm quite aware of that. I try to be explicit about feminists vs. women, criticizing the former, not the latter. Women are not to blame, why should they? The moment I see posts or comments that blame women I downvote them. This is reminded from time to time: Not constructive comments should be downvoted, and persistent wrong behavior should be reported to the moderators. We are not the best writers in the world; it happens that some posts and comments could be better written. I wish I could writ…
/r/MensRights11/04/12 09:50 AM
2

A lot of men think "well, I'm not a rapist, so I don't need to worry about it!" and then inadvertently perform or advocate rape or sexual harassment. This is a false conclusion that you probably made out of that infamous survey in which young men were tricked with questions that avoided the word "rape". That survey is making a lot of harm because it created a false target. The people who made it should be fired. Black communities and leaders are fully aware that drug-use is perpetuated by blacks…
/r/MensRights11/04/12 08:04 AM
5

Increasing pressure makes people explode. This is not something that I "defend" or say, it's a fact. But even when it's a predictable thing, neither the society nor governments give a shit. Those things end in fatal collapse. It happened before, it happens now and will happen in the future.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 01:01 AM
11

Yep. And the "woah woah woah..." comes -of course- when he defends himself, not when she pushes or kicks him. Women are allowed to use the force, men don't, not even in self defense.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 12:38 AM
0

Go fuck yourself
/r/MensRights10/04/12 09:49 PM
2

I got banned yesterday, and I've never posted there. Out of curiosity I told them that, because I thought it could be a mistake. It turned out that it's because I post here. So I couldn't care less. SRS seems to be like a weird subproduct of 4chan, a kind of "amoral moralist" group. This is the kiddo that replied to me. If you look at the context you will see how fucked up is the whole thing. Just ignore them.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 06:39 PM
6

Some comments here are saying NAFALT. Well, that's the problem with NAFALT: A couple days ago someone said something like "feminism represents a big spectrum of people". I couldn't agree more. It's SO HUGE that no longer means anything. A radical feminist who would kill half men if she knew she wouldn't go to jail, calls herself a "feminist". People who think VAWA is OK even when it breaks the legal principle "every human being is equal under the law" (literal translation), claim they are "femin…
/r/MensRights10/04/12 05:04 PM
14

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:gCnnbfXvNyIJ:merryfarmer.net/2012/03/13/where-have-all-the-good-men-gone/
/r/MensRights08/04/12 11:59 PM
2

Are you talking about the radical feminist term "PIV"?
/r/MensRights08/04/12 07:06 PM
12

The point feminists are making is the two are based on two entirely different socially constructed histories. Just because at its most basic the words both describe genitalia doesn't mean the impact is the same. He already answered that: You're treating women, their vaginas and the language used to describe them with more reverence than men. That's sexual preference, the very definition of sexism.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 07:02 PM
2

I just don't care about the kiddo. I mean, he/she did a very disgusting thing: That was not a "trick", it was a scam (there is a huge difference). So, big mistake; the only thing the kiddo proved is his lack of morals. About the "accusation" of "violence against women" by the MRAs, that's something I don't buy. If I were the victim of a theft, attempted paternity fraud and blackmail threat, in a situation of "panic" and high distress, I would have punched the criminal. By the way: Don't get fool…
/r/MensRights08/04/12 05:03 PM
1

I'm interested in this issue, and as far as I know you're right. But we don't know exactly why it happens. Experts say suicide attempts are sometimes a kind of "last call". But be careful here: It's not "a simple call for attention"; it's actually much deeper, a desperate last try to get out of that hell. Now, the line between the "last call" and a definitive decision to kill oneself is often not clear. Even more, sometimes accidental circumstances are hiding a suicide attempt (some examples are…
/r/MensRights06/04/12 10:13 PM
1

Oops, I didn't realize your question was rhetoric, and then I explained it all, he he. Yes, agree.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 03:30 AM
1

Simply put, that's not enough information for me to say it is or it isn't rape. But sure as hell that if I were in that situation, at the second "no" I go to home, jerk off, and never see her again. Anyway I was wondering who the hell is bringing an example like that. At this point in the thread they say this presentation comes from the "SHARP training", which I guess is this Note this comment: PriscillaPresley: Yep, and the examples are more ambiguous every time. Are you a soldier who has had s…
/r/MensRights05/04/12 09:42 PM
17

Oh, I didn't mean that. What I mean -more or less as Mylon says- is that whores think there is nothing wrong with them, and yet they think prostitution is something "wrong", "dishonest", "awful", etc. But the truth is that whores are selling sex for money, although they lie about it and abuse as much as they can -that's quite dishonest-. Meanwhile, prostitution is the opposite thing: Two people make a deal, no lies, no tricks, the client pays for a service and he gets it. That's honest. In my co…
/r/MensRights05/04/12 03:16 PM
144

That's exactly what a parasite does. I mean, even if those two men were "irritating", marrying them is not a job, nor any kind of "contribution" to this world, it's just a failure, her failure. But I welcome yet another proof of how family courts promotes parasitism and create whores. BTW: That's why I value prostitution so much. Prostitutes are honest, whores aren't.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 01:35 PM
4

Don't feed the troll.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 03:42 AM
4

Women jealous of another women!!... Who would have said!? /s Years ago I was reading about women's competition for men. It was (more or less): Simply put, women compete between them for the best men, and they know their looks is a powerful factor -since it is an indicator of good health and successful reproduction-. Therefore, having other beautiful women around is "not good" for them. Here is where they yell: "We don't go to work to find a husband, you idiot!". Well, maybe not, but even in this…
/r/MensRights04/04/12 09:56 PM
6

...is damaging to the credibility of the MRM. I don't think so. Not getting married is a very good advice when governments are giving women all they want and men get out as slaves. If you don't like the advice, that's OK, but calling the OP "stupid" and "idiot" in the name of MRM... that's a mistake. Or do you represent the whole Men's Right Movement?...
/r/MensRights04/04/12 05:17 PM
1

There have been studies that show a disturbingly large percentage of college males who have admitted to rape during a survey (when the act was not described as "rape"). I can't trust those kind of "studies". Rape is not a "black or white" issue, many times it falls into a grey area. This is the kind of survey where you can get the result that you want, it depends on how you make the questions. Politicians and marketing people know this very well, it's one of their best tools.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 04:23 PM
2

You mean the same constitutional rights that VAWA stole from men??? I think "tyranny" is not a very good issue to bring here. But that aside, she kept lying when she was 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 23. Meanwhile her innocent father was in jail like a fucking rapist. He's not the first, and sure as hell he won't be the last. That's a fucking shame.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 01:28 PM
1

Prosecutor Sue Baur (pictured) said she feared charging Cassandra might discourage other girls from reporting sexual assaults. And... what kind of logic is that?. I mean, a real victim is a victim, and a liar is a liar. Completely different situations, one thing has nothing to do with the other. By the same "logic", if she's not charged false accusations might be encouraged. 11 years old is too young, I agree, but she kept lying at 18, 19, 20... until 23. And she should not be charged? What.the.…
/r/MensRights03/04/12 02:33 PM
6

I can't believe how calm and cool headed the guy is about this how the hell can you not want to kill your ex wife in that situation It's called fear. Sometimes you don't flight-or-fight, and neither neither get paralyzed because none of these things help in this situation. You just stay cool and do whatever they tell you to do. But that's an automatic response, I mean you don't choose it, and definitely you're far from being calm, you're rather frightened. It could be said that to some extent yo…
/r/MensRights02/04/12 10:54 AM
0

HAHAHAHA!! That's just epic. Kudos!
/r/MensRights31/03/12 09:16 AM
1

Non-technical summary The socio-economical composition of a company’s executive board is highly relevant for economic and social policy. For example, gender quotas are often advocated to improve career outcomes for females and ‘break the glass ceiling’. Similarly, educational requirements for bank boards have been proposed in the past as a means to improve corporate governance. However, little is known about the effects on firm outcomes of having more female, more educated or older board members…
/r/MensRights28/03/12 01:39 PM
4

Well, I refuse to become a cash machine. That's why I don't commit myself. I guess it could be called... "phobia". Hell, yes, I'm phobic. I have a terrible panic attack every time I'm about to be converted into an ATM, so I run away, far away. I told my psychiatrist about it, but he told me not to worry. And I'm happy. And that's all ;)
/r/MensRights28/03/12 04:15 AM
26

This is a middle aged woman projecting her own desires onto men and wondering why no one wants her. She justifies it with the classic "men are afraid of strong women" line. I couldn't agree more. And I think there is a pattern here. They always make a correlation: "Strong women (whatever they think it is) -> afraid men". It matches the feminist wet dreams, but I'm yet so see a proof of this. Why am I going to feel "afraid" after all? In a relationship I will be glad of the best qualities of my p…
/r/MensRights28/03/12 02:26 AM
1

(Excuse me for my English) On one hand, Penny can't be perfect, that wouldn't work because it's very unrealistic. In every story, even the "good/cool" people have their issues. On the other hand, those characteristics of Penny reinforces the social incompetence of the nerds. Even with all her imperfections, Penny's portrayal is way more normal, cool and "human" than the nerds -which are kind of "robotic creatures"-. At the end, the "silly", "stupid" or "loser" ones are the guys. Why is this abou…
/r/MensRights26/03/12 07:36 PM
3

You're right, no social engineering, conspiracy or any shit like that. It just happens that nowadays this is accepted by people as something funny, but if we reverse the roles it would be found "offensive". Therefore, companies only make shows where people can laugh about men -and not women-. It's a double standard, unfair, hypocritical, and that is what bothers me. Otherwise I find the show funny -not my preferred one, but it's OK-. But I feel that humor about women is censored by society (not …
/r/MensRights26/03/12 12:09 AM
1

Well, actually a "disorder" is not the same as an "illness" as we mean in common speech. "Disorder" is a wider technical term to name a condition where something is out of it's normal working state. For example, anxiety, some types of depression, more or less common phobias, some neurosis, etc. are usually called disorders, meaning that people who suffer from that are not necessary "mentally insane", but there is something that's not OK at all. Of course, external circumstances may lead a person…
/r/MensRights24/03/12 06:01 PM
3

Yeah, sort of. Suicide is jumping from a skyscraper on fire. You're getting burned, that's an unbearable pain, then you just jump through the windows. From a "cold", logical point of view you're making a choice, but from a human point of view you don't have a choice. The thing is, "normal" people can't imagine being in an emotional situation so unbearably painful that breaks their survival instinct. I mean we can think about it, but we can't imagine the actual feeling that makes people kill them…
/r/MensRights24/03/12 02:36 PM
8

A selfish motivation implies freedom of choice, and that's not what happens to the individual. Suicidal people feel they have no choice. If they had, then they were not able to break the survival instinct, which is deeper and stronger than our own conscious power to choose. You can't do this unless there is something really bad going on inside your mind, either motivated by external or internal reasons. If you understand Spanish, here is a 30 min. TV program program about suicide. Eduardo Punset…
/r/MensRights24/03/12 05:02 AM
2

Definitely the SPLC people are scared to hell: They could lose their marvelous fraudulent bu$ine$$. What can we do to sink them faster??
/r/MensRights24/03/12 03:30 AM
2

Yep, the girl is sick. In her twitter profile she calls herself "beauty queen". Maybe she's jealous... And in her website http://prettylittlestatemachine.com/: User guru, platform geek, constructive propagandist, agilista, funnel hacker and analytics junkie. WTF!? But let's not ignore our white knight here: Charles Arthur, who writes male bashing material for the Guardian Oh, and it's not clear to me, but it seems there was also a mess involving a group called The Ada Initiative. Take a look aro…
/r/MensRights23/03/12 04:35 PM
4

That's why I said "they are hard to organize", there will be always people not interested, like you. It will work when the entire group -or most individuals- are angry enough, but that's not the case... already. IMO that's one of the problems of MRM, there is not enough angry people by now.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 11:15 AM
8

Behind "men pay, women don't" it's the supply and demand concept. But you can break this vicious circle boycotting the party: If men don't go, women won't want to go. Then you keep the boycott until the organizers decide to charge both men and women. Boycotts are highly efficient tools to fix this kind of inequities, but they are hard to organize. Now, the part where this girls says "pigs" and "rape" is a mental illness issue (a collective psychosis induced by feminism and sponsored by the state…
/r/MensRights23/03/12 03:16 AM
0

That's what the London School of Economics teaches people. Anyway the site name says it all: "THIS IS ABUSE".
/r/MensRights22/03/12 11:34 AM
5

Feminist immunity
/r/MensRights21/03/12 02:05 AM
1

Excuse me for my English. In fact, it is usually the woman officer who is prone to being more skeptical of the female, because she herself has probably dealt with inequality and as such is better suited to deal with the situation because she can look at it with an unbiased eye. That's not necessarily a reason to be unbiased, actually it may be as well a reason to be biased. While there is an abundance hatred for women who are perceived as having an agenda geared toward inequality, there is no me…
/r/MensRights20/03/12 11:06 PM
1

Yes, that's the point -I didn't clarify this enough-. Thanks ;)
/r/MensRights26/02/12 02:38 AM
4

The Schrödinger's cat teaches a paradox: It's not that we don't know the state of the cat until we open the box (that's fucking obvious); it's that our logic tells us that the cat is simultaneously dead and alive (quantum superposition), and when we open the box those two states become one, either dead or alive. Of course that's impossible. The Schrödinger's rapist is a try to sound intellectual, but it's quite stupid. Simply put, you don't know the intentions of a stranger until you come to kno…
/r/MensRights24/02/12 10:17 PM
6

That's the feminist ideology. Feminism is teaching women a very dangerous idea: "Men can solve their problems, but women can't. Next time you have an issue, cry for government help". No need to say how childish, counterproductive, dangerous... wrong is that message, for women and men.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 03:40 AM
5

Try this: http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/the-disappearing-male/
/r/MensRights20/02/12 03:07 AM
1

A very sad story. And I'm sure it happens much more often than most people think. Since VAWA we all have a ticket to jail, no matter how good citizens/persons we are. This should be a reminder for those who are too busy to think about prison systems.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 08:30 PM
8

Yep. I saw it a couple days ago at Big Think. The last part is the "If You're Not a Feminist, Then You're a Bigot" fucking damn thing. Gloria Allred is a "high profile feminist attorney", some people call her a "celebrity". Go figure. Her website: www.gloriaallred.com Her law firm site: www.amglaw.com Register-her.com?
/r/MensRights18/02/12 09:22 PM
1

1: Out of context. It's not a joke, it's an example of an hypothetical event that must be analyzed before making an easy judgment. 2: As it's directed towards feminists, the most efficient example is one where a woman kills his ex-husband (we don't know yet if it was a deliberated action or an accident), because this way feminists will consider the possibility of she being innocent of a crime -in the reverse case they will tend to deny the possibility of the man being innocent-.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 07:59 PM
3

As a note, I'm not sure if David Futrelle is actually a "feminist". It looks more like if were an attention whore, specialized in MRA blaming. Maybe it's a sort of fetish for him. Neither he nor feminists who quote him sound serious to me; they sound childish. His tag-line "We mock misogyny" doesn't appear to be reflect a serious concern. That doesn't mean he's not causing harm to MRA; it just means that his motivation could be craziness and not actual feminism. I bet he's a troubled and disturb…
/r/MensRights18/02/12 06:37 PM
5

To me, the name "Good Men Project" implicitly says that men (or the vast majority of men) are bad, and then the website is somehow trying to "teach" men to be good human beings. Among other things, Hugo Schwyzer's articles corroborate the idea, even though he no longer writes there. Despite some good articles, I loathe the whole thing. If they have actually changed their mind, I think they'd better start a new site.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 05:36 PM
6

The standard usage of this claim is to tell feminists to shut up when they’re talking about rape or to claim that feminist lie with statistics. She is missing the part "...because I say so". Does anybody here know the Grey's Law?. It says: "Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice." It explains why some of you will think she's intensely stupid, while others will think she's a fucking bitch. There is no know solution for this dilemma ;)
/r/MensRights17/02/12 05:02 PM
-7

It says that no matter what men say; feminist rule #1 is "Deny men". Also, the resolution is often called "reverse psychology", which points to a situation where your opponent will negate whatever you say. Sometimes it works with children: Edit: Following text was cropped: (You): No (Child): Yes! (You): No! (Child): Yes! (You): Yes! (Child): ...No!
/r/MensRights17/02/12 04:28 PM
5

Don't be afraid of being called "misogynist", "oppressor" or any other thing. It's part of this fight. Besides, they're gonna do it anyways...
/r/MensRights17/02/12 01:28 AM
32

Newspapers don't like to link their sources. *Sigh...* Students’ Perceptions of Teacher Biases: Experimental Economics in Schools. Abstract Full Paper
/r/MensRights17/02/12 01:08 AM
3

Troll. Downvoted.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 11:54 PM
4

Here is a recent link ;-)
/r/MensRights15/02/12 05:55 PM
6

Aside the fact that corruption in the legal system is one of our main problems, because of this: Judge Ballentine also appears to be a false rape accuser.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 05:32 PM
9

"Family law is nothing less than a system of organized crime" >(Fathers4Justice) Great statement.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 12:30 AM
1

FTA: [Allegedly, moms earn less than no-moms. And follows...] Parenting is only part of the equation. The rest is all perception, with mothers persistently seen as less dedicated than fathers or childless women. In his article “The motherhood penalty: It’s not children that slow mothers down”, Curt Rice observes that “women who have children are discriminated against simply because they are mothers, and not because their job performance is actually different.” Well, that's called either a dogma …
/r/MensRights14/02/12 05:01 PM
8

I say this a lot IRL. As they lower the standard, the only option will be staying away from any women.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 04:12 PM
9

Metzger offered him three or four beers and then suggested they go outside to the garage. When they arrived there, the boy told that Mrs Metzger asked him whether he wanted to have sex with her and after her told her yes they had sex on a couch. If he was drunk it's rape. Therefore this woman won't go to jail for raping a minor. Does Joey Biden know this?... I mean, does he know that we know it?
/r/MensRights14/02/12 04:08 PM
1

Excuse me for my English. I don't bookmark them, it's so blatant that I don't need to keep particular sources. There are some discussions and references spread all over this subreddit any some other sites like those in the right bar. As a hint, the sources for the main statistics on RAINN are the CDC and the U.S. DoJ. They make their statistics of assault by surveys, which not only is far from scientific methods, but the results depend on how/what the questions are. This is a recent press releas…
/r/MensRights14/02/12 01:31 PM
0

The song: Gunpowder and lead I think this murder apologist deserves some attention
/r/MensRights14/02/12 03:05 AM
2

I got it because of this line: You don't love me? All I want you to be is my Slave--I mean husband... That made me think that something was already going on (she sees marriage as a mistress-slave relationship)
/r/MensRights14/02/12 02:03 AM
3

Educated women worry that they are scaring away potential partners, and pundits claim that those who do marry will end up with unsatisfactory matches. As a self-taught man, I've never felt scared by educated women (neither by educated men), unless -of course- they had a gun pointing at my head and were about to pull the trigger, so to speak. But the smell of vanity is something I can't stand for more than 20 seconds, and I think I'm not the only one with this olfactory characteristic ;) What the…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 09:55 PM
1

Do you have cookies blocked? If so, unblock and try again.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 07:49 PM
1

I'm not completely sure of that. Because if you can make profit from the whole thing, "violence is welcome" (but shhh! don't tell anyone) /s No, I'm not saying it was made up or something like that, but we all know that if there wasn't a grievance industry, things would be very different. This dude has been treated way better than others, and I don't believe that's a coincidence. ♫ Rum pa pa pum, Rum pa pa pum, Rum pa pa puuuuum... Man down ♫
/r/MensRights13/02/12 05:49 PM
5

I wish I had acting skills to make a parody with the genders reversed.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 05:04 AM
33

Adrian Chen does it for money, while others do it by hate. Knowing your enemy is an important thing.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 01:42 AM
1

I think it's a good idea. I'm for exposing all this shit, be it people, corporations, media or whatever.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 10:34 PM
10

but there are very good reasons why they did what they did Yep. It's called "Police State".
/r/MensRights12/02/12 10:24 PM
5

Nievera next dives into the theories of Dr. Barrie Thorne, a Professor of Women's Studies at UC Berkley, concerning gender constructs in children. I've classified "Gender and Women's Studies" as Goebbelsian propaganda. Yes, it's a Nazi thing, let's start calling things by its name.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 08:46 PM
5

Excuse me for my English. If I've got it right this is the usual "guilty until proven innocent". I'll try to explain: What the test wrongly proved is that the accused belongs to the same biological group of people (non-secretors) than the perpetrator. That group is THE 20% OF THE GLOBAL POPULATION. In other words, despite the test result was wrong, it didn't prove that Vinson was guilty, but neither proved that he was innocent. As the child identified him as her attacker, they reversed the burde…
/r/MensRights12/02/12 04:49 AM
2

If you cut the RAINN lies I promise I'll try again.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 05:23 PM
8

Of course it is. Some of those people are highly dangerous. But that dude called Joe Biden thinks the government must give them the whole earth. That's scary as hell.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 03:55 AM
9

Marriage? No, thanks. It's like playing the Russian roulette, but you get a ticket for slavery instead of a bullet in your head. Seriously, no, thanks.
/r/MensRights14/12/11 09:31 PM
2

So true.
/r/MensRights14/12/11 02:09 AM
7

As the linked post says, her name seems to be Jessica Sporty. A second version of the original news at Business Insider was titled: MATCH.COM GOLD DIGGER: This Young Woman Scored $1,200 A Month In Fancy Dinners (Google cache) It says also: [Editor's note: The subject of this story is a friend of the reporter. In the first version of the story, which we published two weeks ago, we changed her name out of concerns for privacy. But now she has appeared for an interview on network TV, so we have put…
/r/MensRights14/12/11 02:07 AM
1

If they do it, prostitution will go completely underground. That's the worst situation you can imagine. Nine out of 10 prostitutes were victims of trafficking, he said. That's not true and everybody knows it. Prostitutes are not hidden, they put ads in journals, Internet, etc., and there are known brothels everywhere. They are accessible to any adult, and the police don't touch them because it's not illegal and there is nothing else wrong.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 10:53 PM
2

It's not a trouble, it's an educational issue.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 09:24 PM
2

I've been following the case since the very beginning. What I've seen is that almost every feminist either "know" he's guilty or that he's likely to be found guilty. They want him in Sweden to answer the prosecutor's questions, despite the fact that Swedish is a dangerous country for men when it comes to potential sex crimes (Swedish prosecutor could interrogate Assange by video-conference, but she refused). If Assange is not extradited to Sweden, they think it's because "rape is not being taken…
/r/MensRights13/12/11 08:56 PM
1

Take a look at Jonathan Dean's profile. This motherfucker is another swindler in the modern gender industry. Here is another article, regarding the radical feminism: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/feb/09/radical-feminism-assange-case
/r/MensRights13/12/11 06:29 PM
2

Thanks ;-)
/r/MensRights13/12/11 02:06 PM
40

I am witnessing large groups of men who really do consider feminism the anti-Christ — and that terrifies me. Well, I do not consider feminism the anti-Christ because I'm atheist and I don't believe in god, the devil and all those dudes. I may say "Jesus fucking Christ!", but you know, it's rhetoric, it's about the myth, as if I name Zeus. That said, it's true that feminism is becoming more and more like the Spanish Inquisition. So, I understand if Bree Rody-Mantha feels terrified by "a bunch of …
/r/MensRights13/12/11 12:20 AM
1

...surely to oppose programs that help to keep women safe... Political rhetoric, so old, so shameful, so stupid, so incompetent... Weren't women supposed to be "better" than men in politics? Yeah, sure. Oh, and "VAWA has been under steady attack"? Well, not really, that was just a little test. THE HELL is yet to come, ma'am.
/r/MensRights12/12/11 10:50 PM
1

You know? Even being next to France there is very little information here. Spanish media only talks about Sarkozy's meetings with the rest of the EU people, that's all. And unfortunately I don't understand French enough to follow news and blogs by myself. So, we don't know too much about everyday's life there. But this news about a man being ordered to pay wife for lack of sex is... insane :-S
/r/MensRights12/12/11 10:02 PM
3

The unfortunately famous picture of Thomas Shipp and Abram Smith hanging from a tree comes to my mind often. "They had been arrested the night before, charged with robbing and murdering a white factory worker, Claude Deeter, and raping his white girlfriend, Mary Ball. A large crowd broke into the jail with sledgehammers, beat the two men, and hanged them." "Mary Ball later testified that she had not, contrary to the accusations against the three men, been raped." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tho…
/r/MensRights12/12/11 03:56 AM
1

Reply to myself as clarification: I was trying to say that many people (not she) quote (by mistake) her character from The Women's Room. But what she actually said -the second paragraph- is not too different: Some men use physical force to subjugate females, others don't need to, because all women feel threated by that possibility. That is, we're all monsters, our only presence scares women.
/r/MensRights12/12/11 02:35 AM
4

"Buy", "Donate"... No doubt it's business, but it also looks like a cult.
/r/MensRights12/12/11 12:08 AM
5

In her novel The Women's Room (1977), the fictional character Val (a feminist woman) says: "Whatever they may be in public life, whatever their relations with men, in their relations with women, all men are rapists and that's all they are. They rape us with their eyes, their laws, their codes." (p. 433) Now, in The War Against Women (1992) she wrote: "As long as some men use physical force to subjugate females, all men need not. The knowledge that some men do suffices to threaten all women. Beyo…
/r/MensRights11/12/11 08:41 PM
1

Excuse me for my English. Well, I'm talking about men's rights, which are also civil rights and ultimately human rights. Maybe "human rights" sounds too heavy, but if you take the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, it's clear that feminism-government alliance has stolen some of those rights from men. Human rights are egalitarian (the same for everyone) by definition. So, if men, or women, or black people or whatever social group don't have the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilt…
/r/MensRights09/12/11 09:13 PM
1

The way I see it, the poster suggests that women have little or no control on drinking. Even more: It normalizes the "irresponsible drunk chick" image. But of course, the ad is intended to point to the other side of the double standard.
/r/MensRights09/12/11 01:35 AM
3

So is my country, Spain. I'm afraid western Europe is full of shitholes :/
/r/MensRights08/12/11 04:16 AM
-2

My name is Lauren Rosewarne and I am a political scientist who writes... mmm... "political scientist" is an oxymoron. For the rest, another well educated feminist cunt, who likes cheating and writing a book about it. Why don't feminists do something constructive or useful for the world? Gosh, what a waste of oxygen.
/r/MensRights07/12/11 02:37 AM
1

I understand It's hard to do, but in these cases it should be done many times in different places, every time with small groups, and add up the results, so they have a bigger sample and a wide distribution. After all they only have a small correlation, not a causality. There could be one thousand reasons why sperm DNA became damaged, and the temperature increase by radiofrecuency exposure is not one of them. We already know that the frequency and the strength of a WiFi transmitter is insignifica…
/r/MensRights06/12/11 04:11 PM
3

I think this is not related to MR at all, but just in case you're concerned by the headline: The article is awful. First says they have found a difference of a 9 % on a sample of ONLY 29 men (WTF!?), and then follows: "At present we do not know whether this effect is induced by all laptop computers connected by Wi-Fi to the internet or what use conditions heighten this effect." But there is more. Conrado Avendano is a known PR of Nascentis Medicina Reproductiva (Argentina). It's not the first ti…
/r/MensRights06/12/11 03:40 AM
0

I don't know this cunt. Is she a celebrity? If so, she must be on Register-her.com. If no jokes about ripping out uterus, no jokes about cutting testicles.
/r/MensRights06/12/11 02:04 AM
1

Five posts were caught by Google Reader: http://www.google.com/reader/view/feed/http://avoiceforcreepymen.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default
/r/MensRights06/12/11 01:23 AM
2

Fear is the most powerful tool ever known by humans. It brings countries to their knees easily. But people have a hard time accepting how many evil bastards and cunts there are. I understand this thinking; it's painful to recognize that we the human species as a whole are not that beautiful creatures at all. Meanwhile, a part of what we call "civilization" consists in the ability to condemn one-to-one violence while promoting the System violence.
/r/MensRights02/12/11 02:47 PM
1

Link to Verizon male-hating campaign: http://www.multivu.com/mnr/52044-verizon-foundation-national-domestic-hotline-video-launch-monsters "Monsters In The Closet" video on Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=367JvtoTm34
/r/MensRights30/11/11 04:50 PM
1

Laws aren't respected because they are laws, but because we feel they are [reasonably] fair, even if we don't like some of them particularly. That said, FUCK VAWA. Yeah, I know, you can go to jail. But this situation has no good options, it's a win-win for woman and a lose-lose for men. That's VAWA, an injustice. As ambroaz has said: People like you are why they get away with this shit. 1) He was trying to end the relationship. 2) Maybe if they started getting hit back they'd actually learn. Not…
/r/MensRights29/11/11 09:59 PM
3

Because the implication that some of them are making is that men in general approve rape - that the group of people who condone violence to women is called "men" rather than "criminals". Yes, that's their message, and that's why it's offensive to men. I don't know how will they react if you ask them (in person, and politely): "Do you think that I'm a rapist?". I know how they react on the Internet, but face to face (which is how people naturally communicate with each other) is another story. Con…
/r/MensRights29/11/11 01:38 PM
1

BTW: I know that this is not an "answer" to their "no means no", but I don't have any good idea at this moment.
/r/MensRights29/11/11 01:19 PM
5

What about "Women Can Stop Child Abuse"? Just my 2 cents.
/r/MensRights29/11/11 01:12 PM
2

Oh, no, that's not what I meant. I should have said "biomechanical engineering student", because her attitude is more typical of a functionally illiterate person. I said "Stanford" as I could say any other university that is relatively known to me. I guess it's a fail from a foreigner like me. I could be anything but an expert in North American universities. Besides, I'm very skeptical about the "quality" of any university or another learning center -unless it's an extreme case-. While the envir…
/r/MensRights29/11/11 01:05 PM
2

OK, it's my fault. Look, kiddo: You're in denial -your comment history also says something about that-, and you're trolling me pretending that you don't understand anything I say. Or maybe you're too young, or too patriotic (I'm neither one thing nor the other). Whatever. You're not my problem. This pseudo-conversation ends here.
/r/MensRights29/11/11 11:07 AM
1

I have a hard time understanding why you would seek out the most fringe sources you can find. Because I wanted you to tell me exactly what you've told me. Now, I hope you find the wikipedia less "obscure": http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%B6nskriget See the documentary and believe whatever you want to believe. I told you "don't be so naive" because it seems like if you ignored how many people are blogging from inside of almost any country.
/r/MensRights28/11/11 08:12 PM
1

Yep. I stopped reading when Mudge mentioned the gadfly as her source. The Internet is infected by shitty magazines. Cheap platforms for advertisement.
/r/MensRights28/11/11 02:58 PM
1

I find that very hard to believe, Here you have: http://www.daddys-sverige.com/3/post/2011/03/the-truth-about-swedish-feminism-do-not-watch-this-film.html And no, I've never been in Sweden (your country, I guess). I don't need to. C'mon, don't be so naive, kid.
/r/MensRights28/11/11 03:46 AM
2

Emily Liang studies Biomechanical Engineering at Stanford University in Stanford, CA. The shocking thing is that this shit came from a Stanford student.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 04:17 PM
4

The documentary The Gender War (forbidden in Sweden) is a must-see, but brace yourselves, you're gonna freak out. Here it is with English subtitles, thanks to user figaropravda (2 parts x 6 clips) You can also read Three Women, it's a 4 page document about this craziness. Aside that, the Assange case brought a lot of news about what's going on with feminism in Sweden now. It's horrible. Unfortunately, all that information is scattered all over the Internet, but you can search for Marianne Ny or …
/r/MensRights27/11/11 03:48 PM
3

The original article is from The Guardian (who else...) OK. Those two pseudo-professors forget that Britain is going to extradite an innocent man to Sweden -after having him under house arrest for 355 days-, because of a feminist plot which involves the Sweden government and it's judicial system. That said, the world would be a better place if people like Cynthia Cockburn and Ann Oakley weren't fueling a gender war. That is violence too.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 11:05 AM
8

Well done.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 01:23 AM
17

Yep. Just boycott those venues. It may not be the most comfortable option, but... are there options at all? Don't go there. Write the worst critics online (there is a lot of "social" directories on the Internet), tell to friends, if you go to a hotel in Sydney tell them not to send people there because you were mistreated, and spread the news in any other way that occurs to you. The way I see it, people, business, and organizations are becoming tough bitches. Sooner or later we will have to rais…
/r/MensRights25/11/11 01:51 AM
3

You can purchase a "Sydney White Walk" t-shirt on the day for $10, with all proceeds going to White Ribbon. White Ribbon Foundation Foundations and non-profit organizations are the easiest way to make some money in most countries. I'm not saying that every non-profit org is a scam (that'd be stupid), but many of them are. Watch out.
/r/MensRights24/11/11 05:10 PM
6

So true. On one hand, feminism -as a doctrine- can only make inventions. On the other hand, sex is not worth slavery. Yeah, they thought it was worth for men, but it's not. In other words, they can't buy us with sex. This is not the only myth that falls down here. There was another myth about women's empathy (supposedly higher than men's), the female intuition and all that crap. Besides the fact that science hasn't found any evidence of that women's superior empathy, every try by feminists to pu…
/r/MensRights24/11/11 11:55 AM
11

The answer is already out there. Any person who had been lied for years about his father, mother, brother or sister and finally discovers the truth, may react with indifference -because the lack of developed feelings-, or with a deep hate towards the liar -because he has been intentionally and maliciously deprived of a kin-. Regarding the point (2), love and hate are the two sides of the same coin. The most you love a person, the most you can hate it if you feel betrayed. So, yes, I'd say that a…
/r/MensRights22/11/11 12:33 PM
2

I don't see nothing offensive. As far as I know they usually don't have hair chest. About the suit, most times they use a hose, not a leotard. In that sense the draw looks to me more like an athlete doing some ballet, which is a little absurd. But that's just my opinion -non expert- on the looks (check some pictures here) Maybe you find the answer to your question here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_stereotype_of_the_male_ballet_dancer
/r/MensRights22/11/11 11:16 AM
-1

Oh, I see, thanks. Anyway, nothing serious IMO.
/r/MensRights21/11/11 10:47 PM
1

http://www.clotheslineproject.org/
/r/MensRights21/11/11 04:07 PM
0

but they are talking about inviting death for these women for real Where? I can't find it.
/r/MensRights21/11/11 12:38 PM
0

I think the context makes clear what I mean with "the truth" here. It's not dreams or fiction, and above all, it's not what someone wants it to be (delusion). Rather, it's reality. Of course, at this point we can get into metaphysics and ask ourselves what is reality, but that is beyond r/mr.
/r/MensRights21/11/11 11:57 AM
1

I guess this is part of it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtTz6pXmER0 It made me laugh a lot. Good response.
/r/MensRights21/11/11 10:50 AM
6

I'm sorry, but beauty and youthful matters. It mattered before Playboy; always did. Nonetheless, a century ago a 30 years old woman would hardly find a husband, while today a lot of women get married a that age or more. So, it seems like fashion and magazines haven't shaped people's thoughts at all. Aside that, what young people needs to know is that Playboy pictures (and pictures in girl's beauty magazines) are not realistic, but more like a caricature. Do fathers tell this to sons and daughter…
/r/MensRights20/11/11 07:02 PM
7

Well, feminists are afraid of science in general (Sociology is not science at all), because science tells the truth whether you like it or not. Science is not for ideologists, politicians or weak-minded people. What Amanda Marcotte is defending is called Tabula rasa. In the book The Blank Slate, Steven Pinker explains in an easy way what is tabula rasa and why it makes no sense. But you don't have to believe me or Pinker, just ask a reputed neuroscientist.
/r/MensRights20/11/11 05:31 PM
1

doyoureallycare99 is a troll
/r/MensRights20/11/11 03:12 PM
1

doyoureallycare99 is a troll
/r/MensRights20/11/11 03:11 PM
3

doyoureallycare99 is a troll
/r/MensRights20/11/11 03:10 PM
2

Sheer prejudice in action. A honest and mentally sane mother will do whatever she have to do to protect her daughter, even taking the beating for her. Same goes for a father -I'll do whatever to protect my children-. But people rationalize the situation making up different excuses for the mother ("she was trying to this/that"). She did nothing actually. Now, when a wife kill her husband they say: "Surely she had a good reason".
/r/MensRights20/11/11 02:58 PM
2

Inferiority complex? The text is the eternal self-victimization, that is, the excuse they give to themselves to feel inferior (it's always an external cause, of course). The poem at the foot rationalizes the self-compensation for such feeling of "external oppression": "no matter what you have done, i am still here. and it has made me dangerous, and wise.". Wow, I'm shaking in fear, but I like the romantic style (seriously). Now look at the sign on the picture. It says: "Sisterhood is powerful"..…
/r/MensRights20/11/11 05:47 AM
1

What women should know about a kick in the nuts is that, aside the intense pain, it's relatively easy to cause bleeding and permanent injury. Now, I think that's not related to MR. But as off-topic: Renal colic caused by kidney stones: The pain typically begins in the abdomen and often radiates to the hypochondrium or the groin. The pain is often colicky (comes in waves) due to ureteric peristalsis, but may be constant. It may come in two varieties: dull and acute; the acute variation is particu…
/r/MensRights19/11/11 11:28 PM
1

Well, that explains a lot. Certainly, a look at Hate speech in USA and its footnotes makes things more clear to me (I'm European). Thanks for the comment.
/r/MensRights19/11/11 11:32 AM
0

Yep. Authorities should be already searching for her. That is, if they act according to the law.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 05:06 PM
1

First time I knew about Sady Doyle was when she started a harassing campaign on twitter against Michael Moore, while Julian Assange was on the first trial. The hashtag was #mooreandme, and she sentenced Moore "rape apologist". It was a quite aggressive campaign, a lot of man-haters (including most well-known feminists) came to harass Moore for a week or so, without any pause. But that was only one of her "contributions". She deeply hates men, and she's always ready to start or fuel any outrage a…
/r/MensRights18/11/11 05:01 PM
2

What part of "Go fuck yourself" don't you understand? My English is not very good, but I'm sure the expression is crystal clear.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 04:53 PM
2

It's still feminism.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 11:23 AM
4

Also, I'm not a feminist and I have nothing to do with them. I don't even respect feminists unless they're militant. I am a female supremacist. (Link) Go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 05:25 AM
0

Well done.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 02:37 AM
1

I broke free and kicked him as hard as I could right in the balls! He fell down and puked and I left. She seems to know very well what happens in the moment you kick a dude in the balls, except the possible bleeding and permanent injury. The question has been deleted, but it's still in the cache. User is soccergirlie, but the bitch is in private mode by now.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 01:54 AM
0

Yep. Neologisms and the control of language are important parts of an Orwellian society. At the begining I thought that women were made of thin crystal or something like that, so they couldn't stand some dirty words/jokes. But eventually I realized that this is just another way to expand the definition of sexual harassment. Tell dirty words and jokes, for fuck's sake. Tell them in an adequate context, but do the fucking thing.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 03:52 AM
0

MIT is pretty famous, but I had no idea about its sex segregation :O
/r/MensRights15/11/11 03:21 AM
8

Also: Feminist Camille Paglia criticised Ensler's "obsession with male evil", suggesting that this combined with her "claimed history of physical abuse and mental breakdowns" made her "the new Andrea Dworkin".[14] Bernard Goldberg listed Ensler at #96 in his 100 People Who Are Screwing Up America (And Al Franken Is #37).[15]
/r/MensRights15/11/11 02:13 AM
1

Just that we can't multitask
/r/MensRights14/11/11 03:11 AM
1

Where does the "single-tasking men" myth comes from? I know it's a common myth, but don't know the origin. Anybody?
/r/MensRights13/11/11 11:50 AM
-1

Same here. Actually I don't know any gay men who hate women, but I know lesbians who hate men. And It's not the "ugh, naked men", I mean a deeply rooted aversion, blind hate for men. I don't know if the feminist lawyer roommate hates men, but if she's a feminist (and understands what's feminism), she will be biased to some extent.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 01:31 AM
12

What a bitch. Her timeline is full of shit. But this is epic: --Will criminalising unsafe sex not result in men being falsely accused of rape?" --What's to stop them being falsely accused anyway? # Edit: Format
/r/MensRights10/11/11 02:03 PM
2

I have seen it already, but I laugh every time I see it again :) And as a note: I'm sure many feminists will say this joke is sexist, but I don't think so. It could say "you old friend Joe" instead "your spouse", and it's still the same joke. It's feminism what makes (or try to make) it sexist, because they only can see the world through the gender glasses. And I don't like the idea of feminism having the monopoly on humor. I'm not going to tell to the MRM what is or is not a sexist joke, just w…
/r/MensRights09/11/11 09:49 PM
1

i hate animals Why do you hate yourself?
/r/MensRights09/11/11 08:48 PM
0

Yep. Even more: I suggest upvote her comment, it's relevant (for worse), people should see it.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 02:59 PM
5

Ah, OK. Then it could be illegal for a different reason: The release of private communications to third parties, not the recording, which is inherent in a voicemail. Nonetheless it would be lesser, from misdemeanor to crime, according to the (potential) harm and the intentions.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 04:16 AM
10

Is it lawful in USA to record someone's phone call without his knowledge and make it available to a group of people? You can't do this in Spain, even without revealing linked identification data like phone number, name, address or whatever.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 03:45 AM
1

Uh?... Oh, Ha ha ha! I didn't notice your user name. I usually do, but this time I forgot. Don't worry, I trust you. Her writing/barking style is unique ;)
/r/MensRights09/11/11 01:17 AM
0

Over-analyzing, meaningless article.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 11:38 PM
0

I couldn't say it better. And while they can't (or don't want to) tell the difference between a troll and a thought out response, it's impossible to have a conversation with them.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 11:37 PM
3

Philip Zimbardo has a name in social psychology, no doubt. But I don't know why this video is only four minutes long. Zimbardo usually takes his time to explain what he says, no less that one hour or even one and a half. This issue is far from easy, and he has left unexplained many questions. I think TED Talks is playing dirty here, it wouldn't be the fist time. Of course it's just my opinion, but I have my reasons.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 05:35 PM
2

It seems to follow that article at the Guardian, a couple days ago. The Twitter bullshit was probably started by a Feminist bitch called Sady Doyle, the same that started the campaign harassing Michael Moore when the Assange trial. She's really sick. Her post: http://tigerbeatdown.com/2011/11/07/why-are-you-in-such-a-bad-mood-mencallmethings-responds/
/r/MensRights08/11/11 11:34 AM
2

Any variation of the group's message was banned by Clear Channel, CBS, Lamar, Regency, Van Wagner, Avant Outdoor, LA Transit Authority, and Outdoor Solutions, but was finally picked up by a mobile billboard company. They fear feminist threats.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 12:36 AM
2

I guess you don't want to make this case public (names) because then it could be worse -possible retaliation-. I hate this situation. There are probably thousands of fathers who can't speak. They can't tell to the world their terrible stories with the names of the exes and their layers, because of the fear of retaliation. The feminist use of the law reminds me the mafia.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 08:45 PM
3

Yeah. If she got $6,500 BEFORE the wedding, in a divorce she would get his fucking blood. Damn vampires...
/r/MensRights07/11/11 08:04 PM
3

First time I hear something like this. But: The O Estado de S. Paulo newspaper reported there have been at least two similar cases since 2004. In that year, a judge in the state of Sao Paulo ordered a man to pay his fiancee $4,500 for getting cold feet days before the weddings. A year later, a woman in Rio de Janeiro state received $2,000 after her fiance decided not to get married 75 days before the wedding.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 07:53 PM
2

I don't know the Australian laws, but in Spain it would be a VERY different case if genders were reversed. This is how it works: Woman attacks husband/boyfriend/(ex)sentimental_partner = DV (lesser crime, or even misdemeanor) Man attacks wife/girlfriend/(ex)sentimental_partner = Sexist Violence (a very serious crime) in a DV context. That's it. In Spain, "Sexist Violence" (actually "Violencia Machista") is a definition for violence against women only. There is a specific law only for this (VAWA-…
/r/MensRights07/11/11 07:43 PM
1

I was paraphrasing Walter Sobchak in The Big Lebowski. Obviously you haven't seen the movie.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 04:14 AM
5

Google Safe Browsing says: Of the 32 pages we tested on the site over the past 90 days, 5 page(s) resulted in malicious software being downloaded and installed without user consent. The last time Google visited this site was on 2011-11-06, and the last time suspicious content was found on this site was on 2011-11-06. Malicious software includes 5 scripting exploit(s), 5 exploit(s), 1 trojan(s). Successful infection resulted in an average of 7 new process(es) on the target machine. Malicious soft…
/r/MensRights06/11/11 09:20 PM
-3

Treated poorly by the opposite sex, they end up hating them so much that they turn them into some other and are unable to have any empathy whatsoever. Forget it, this doesn't work. It's a well-known feminist "argument": "He is a loser who can't get laid. Feels poorly treated by women, he ends up hating them. He lost his empathy." Actually, it's a lot easier: Feminism (supposedly) wanted equal rights and opportunities, and that's fair, but in the transition they became greedy, irresponsible, negl…
/r/MensRights06/11/11 09:06 PM
1

I'm happy to see Harriet Harman at Register-Her.com.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 07:02 PM
1

You seem like a 10 y/o. Grow a little, and then make intelligent questions.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 01:40 AM
3

Oh, c'mon... 23/f Guys don't talk to me or are only interested in sex by letmeknow87
/r/MensRights06/11/11 01:39 AM
1

Successful men with dating skills don't need this movement Until they end in jail or enslaved, but then it will be too late. You think this can't happen to you, right? Good luck, dude. No, I'm not enslaved, nor have I gone to jail. I'm reasonably successful, but the danger is still there. Now, it's not my fucking problem if you can't tell a MRA from a dork. But above all: If that's the most intelligent thing you have to say after "thinking about this the last few days", you better don't think, i…
/r/MensRights05/11/11 08:05 PM
2

Yeah, some of them look hotter than some of my girlfriends :)) But their hands, arms, shoulders, etc. betray them. And how they walk, the gestures, all the motion than can't be seen in a picture, that's also very revealing.
/r/MensRights05/11/11 05:37 PM
3

I don't watch TV, it gives me headache. I like House M.D. and some other, but see it online or DVD.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 01:25 PM
4

This thread is from five days ago: The Hattie Cabinet: Harman 'riding roughshod' over Miliband as she launches women-only frontbench team Feminists said they would make a change in politics. My ass.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 01:01 PM
4

It seems like this woman got out from a sort of cult called "Quiverfull Movement" or something like that. Looks like a religious fundamentalist group with a strong and sick belief in "the biblical authority of the father" (click on "What Is Quiverfull?"). I mean she's probably affected by her living into that shit, don't be too hard with her.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 01:18 AM
1

From dailymail.co.uk, a well know "scientific" publication (LOL): The report, called 'Porn-Induced Sexual Dysfunction is a Growing Problem', explains that the loss of libido 30 years early is caused by continuous over-stimulation of dopamine, the neurotransmitter that activates the body's reaction to sexual pleasure, by repeatedly viewing pornography on the internet. A 'paradoxical effect' is created whereby with each new thrill, or 'dopamine spike', the brain loses its ability to respond to dop…
/r/MensRights03/11/11 12:18 PM
2

A thief doesn't necessarily have a bad aspect (I think in English it's called "white-collar crime"). There are probably more well educated people today than ever before. Some of them are liars, thieves and corrupt people. In the age of information you should expect a lot of plain false -or intentionally biased- studies, statistics, etc. I know psychologists who sell themselves out, and they are not few. In social sciences this is a serious problem today, and specifically in Sociology this is fuc…
/r/MensRights03/11/11 03:08 AM
3

Of course there are places in the world where being a woman is a hell. In those places there is little or no respect for Human Rights, and/or are ruled by religious laws or any other doctrines in a collective hysteria. Feminists often talk about a kind of "average" women, which is stupid or bad intentioned, because there are HUGE differences between countries. But then again, the moment I spot a religion (and that means "the way some countries live their religion") as the cause of so many inhuma…
/r/MensRights03/11/11 02:01 AM
3

Warning: PZ Myers is a world-wide known mangina. His post is an exception in his long career as an advocate for the worst feminism.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 11:26 PM
1

If that makes feminists wet... Meanwhile, the Western world keeps falling down.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 11:10 AM
24

DON'T DO THAT If she's drugged, he may hurt her unintentionally and she won't be able to say STOP. There is a high risk of vaginal tear by lack of lubrication, or by a wrong position. Also, WTF is wrong with that girl? You don't play with drugs. Ambien is a nonbenzodiazepine hypnotic. Benadryl is an antihistamine drug, probably doesn't need prescription but still is a drug. Tell them to DON'T fucking do that. If she wants to play rape fantasy she must be conscious, and they have set a safe-word …
/r/MensRights02/11/11 09:33 AM
2

Among other things, feminism is not respecting Human Rights. When they come to start doing it, maybe I can talk to them. Meanwhile, I consider feminism hostile.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 03:38 AM
2

I've downloaded it already. Will upload to other sites if they remove this one.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 03:22 AM
2

Some women have the attitude that females should be the sole arbiters of male sexual pleasure, to dispense as they please. Absolutely. The sole arbiters and the only dispensers.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 02:30 AM
12

Go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 01:23 AM
9

I don't know. Maybe because he's a judge, and some judges are bastards motherfuckers. I hope he ends in jail. This is the text under the video. Look at the weird excuses for the mother (in bold), and the alleged sign of the daughter: 2004: Aransas County Court-At-Law Judge William Adams took a belt to his own teenage daughter as punishment for using the internet to acquire music and games that were unavailable for legal purchase at the time. She has had ataxic cerebral palsy from birth that led …
/r/MensRights02/11/11 01:22 AM
1

Agree. I suffer from stress when I see women dressing in VERY revealing clothing. I mean, they are boner-provokers (if such expression exists), and unwanted boners are really annoying. "why cant men control themselves"... Well, I can control myself (barely my eyes, to be honest). But my boners go their own way, they don't listen to me -it's called "biology", I think-. As for catcalling, I never was into this thing at all. I can't even remember the last time I did it (many years ago), but I do re…
/r/MensRights01/11/11 07:53 PM
0

The problem with this line of thinking is its logical endgame: the burqa. This is the logical endgame if you don't have brakes. There is a reasonable equilibrium, a point more or less in the middle. Most people know it, as well as most people know the difference between good and evil. And no, religions are not reasonable things (by definition, not because I say so)
/r/MensRights01/11/11 06:55 PM
3

I am specifically not interested or attracted to the types of women who require studying Game to interact with successfully. Same here.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 03:54 PM
3

Of course it's not rape. Anyway, don't play rape-fantasy or any other sexual role-play with unexperienced people, they often feel confused and even scared of themselves. Fantasizing about sexual role-play is easy, but doing it is a very different thing. The way things are now, this is a free ticket to jail.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 03:49 PM
1

Good point. In other countries we are exposed to the same advertising, by quantity and level of eroticism (sorry, I won't call it "pornography"). So?
/r/MensRights01/11/11 03:35 AM
2

"Black stones/rocks", actually ;) Spanish from Mexico and other Latin-American countries is slightly different than Spanish from Spain, and connotations may differ a lot. But as far as I know it's not the case here.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 02:26 AM
1

I love discovering little treasures. Thanks!
/r/MensRights31/10/11 04:29 PM
6

This is really fucked up. No surprise at all, I've seen before hijacked sections, but Men's Rights hijacked by feminists and experts in Male-bashing Studies is serious shit.
/r/MensRights31/10/11 12:45 AM
9

This is the "softcore" part, they have other more private places: I just wanted to say that if you want to have more private conversations with other radfems online (regarding action plans and stuff), Rain has just re-opened the registrations for the WLM forums: http://radfemspeak.net/forum/ I would love to see you there radfems. We might need a more private forum sometimes when we feel like it. Please register while you still can. Rain will be closing registrations again in a week (to avoid tro…
/r/MensRights30/10/11 09:36 PM
0

OP says that prostitution is not the same concept that sex trafficking (which is obvious). You say that sometimes prostitution may be the result of sex trafficking. You're not fixing a phrase, but trying to change its meaning.
/r/MensRights30/10/11 07:53 PM
3

My guess is it would only be a small percentage of the population, and if thats true, then it would weaken the feminist argument about how society (as a whole) blames women for their rape if they are wearing revealing clothing. Agree. Anyway this feminist argument is tricky, and they know it. "Being partly to blame" is a wide meaning expression, it doesn't necessarily means "being guilty". A "factor" is not the same as a "cause". But they take the expression as an absolute statement: "You're bla…
/r/MensRights30/10/11 07:15 PM
6

Hugo Schwyzer is a bastard motherfucker. With that post he's probably looking for some credit, nothing more. He can't be sincere, that would be a huge contradiction. But even if this disgusting piece of shit believes what he says there, it's like a drop of clean water in a swimming pool full of infectious bacteria. Of course, this is just my opinion.
/r/MensRights30/10/11 02:38 AM
7

Bitter towards women?? No, I just want some corrupt judges and politicians jailed.
/r/MensRights29/10/11 11:42 PM
7

Harriet Harman and Theresa May: The UK feminist Inquisition.
/r/MensRights29/10/11 11:23 PM
6

As far I can see all they are bikers. And of course "all bikers are bad guys", but just in case you don't think so, the video makes it clear: "148 bad boys". I'll accept this ad when feminists stop banning ads that they think "objectify women" (whatever that means).
/r/MensRights29/10/11 10:41 PM
3

Judge David G. LeFrancois seems to be in the wrong side of the JAIL.
/r/MensRights29/10/11 02:35 AM
0

The 1st amendment has limitations, and outside USA most constitutional laws about freedom of speech have limitations too. Besides, Constitutions and Amendments make generic statements that may be addressed by other specific laws in more detail. So, it's a little more complicated.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 11:19 PM
1

ROTFL!! Oh my goodness, I love this guy.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 07:51 PM
1

I haven’t read the book, but I have seen at Edge Magazine the lecture with its Q&A (it's 1:26' long and the complete transcription is also in the same page). The paragraph that theantifeminist.com quotes (the second one in italics) is all you can hear in the 1 hour and 26 minutes of lecture, that is, a grain of sand. Even if that paragraph sound feminist, you have to consider the background: The civil rights movements, the ’60 and ’70s, and all those years when a lot of changes happened in socie…
/r/MensRights27/10/11 04:38 AM
3

Yep, there is a lot of hate there. I think it's counter productive for them because mainstream people don't like that extreme feminist shit, but let's see what happens. Oh!, they are not too happy with this: http://hotchicksofoccupywallstreet.tumblr.com LOL
/r/MensRights27/10/11 02:17 AM
1

Uh, that guy is not Futrelle. I'm Futrelle. That guy is a troll impersonating me So what? Who cares? "Futrelle", "manboobz"... It's propaganda for us. The more noise is done under those names, the best for us. You still don't get it, do you?
/r/MensRights26/10/11 11:49 PM
1

You know that in the DV hysteria the police arrest men without evidence whatever the law says, because you live in a corrupted country -like mine-. C'mon, you can do it better. Don't be so lazy, put some effort in your trolling. You're our best propaganda, don't disappoint us now.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 11:29 PM
2

I don't know much about diets and calories, but according to the product website, 250 ml of normal Dr. Pepper have 100-110 calories, and the Diet Dr. Pepper has 0. Then, the 10 calories one is actually very low, almost like the Diet. The ad seems more like a joke about the masculine stereotype instead "perpetuating stereotypical gender roles", no? Anyway, NOW wasting the money of taxpayers in this shit is just crazy.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 04:15 AM
2

Exactly. It's just that someone has to kill the motherfucking spider in the room, and the girlfriend is quite often "not available" for such disgusting task. As selling the house is not a valid option, I say to myself: "Courage!, and good luck" ;)
/r/MensRights25/10/11 07:02 PM
3

FYI. This is one of the reactions, by The Slacker Mom. I don't like the post, neither its 200+ comments with some lies, blame and hate towards MRAs and especially Paul.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 06:07 PM
1

I think you're right. It's sad, it's terrible, but there is no other explanation. That's why I said some days ago I think it's time to expose negligent and corrupt judges.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 04:50 PM
7

As i said in the other thread: I think she should stay at Register-her for some time. There is a link to her apology in the first paragraph, in my opinion it's fair enough. She apologizes for what she said out loud, not for what she thinks. Actually she still doesn't want a father "touching" her child, because you know, it's "abuse" or at least "creepy". I wonder if she will let a male pediatrician "touch" her daughter. It's her right to educate her child as she wants, of course. It's also our r…
/r/MensRights25/10/11 03:05 PM
1

Completely, absolutely out of place. (facepalm) Excuse me. Thanks for the notice ;)
/r/MensRights25/10/11 02:56 PM
3

The second post was this: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://www.chicagonow.com/high-gloss-and-sauce/2011/10/im-a-registered-offender/&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en Picked from here
/r/MensRights25/10/11 02:41 PM
4

One of the reactions: http://www.theslackermom.com/2011/10/20/shes-not-a-bigot-shes-just-a-mom/ 200+ comments, with some lies, blame and hate towards MRAs and especially Paul. Edit: Wrong thread.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 04:05 AM
1

It's a playlist, but I get by default the video "RockingMrE at the Occupy LSE Protest ". The correct link is Female Entitlement Mentality The dude has a point: From an evolutionary perspective, a cultural disruption -feminism- comes to fuck up the whole thing (so to speak). Another video is "Patriarchy Conspiracy", quoting Warren Farrell. Worth watching, IMO.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 03:46 AM
4

I think she should stay at Register-her for some time. There is a link to her apology in the first paragraph, in my opinion it's fair enough. She apologizes for what she said out loud, not for what she thinks. Actually she still doesn't want a father "touching" her child, because you know, it's "abuse" or at least "creepy". I wonder if she will let a male pediatrician "touch" her daughter. It's her right to educate her child as she wants, of course. It's also our right to be considered human bei…
/r/MensRights25/10/11 01:31 AM
1

In my opinion Joe Biden should be in Register-her as a bigot. Since other countries copy his sick ideas (like VAWA), he's a dangerous person for half humanity.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 05:12 PM
3

Today feminism is like a cult. Some feminists (usually the leaders) know the scam, while others are just blind believers. Equality is the hook, not the goal. Have you ever seen a discussion between a lucid person and a cult follower? It's pretty much like a discussion between a feminist and a non-feminist.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 02:36 PM
6

From the ToS of thisisabuse.direct.gov.uk: The Site is wholly owned and operated by the Secretary of State for the Home Department, referred to as the Home Office Current incumbent is Theresa May, Member of Parliament for Maidenhead, Home Secretary and Minister for Women and Equalities.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 08:05 PM
1

"Men start wars" the feminists will once again say. "These men too are victims of the Patriarchy," the feminists will continue. Let's make this clear: Politicians (and bankers) start wars. "Men start wars" is a false syllogism, not acceptable anymore. Some women have started or supported wars (google it), and they will do it again when the situation and opportunity make it a plausible option or a necessary way out. Therefore, the second statement ("These men too are victims of the Patriarchy") i…
/r/MensRights23/10/11 03:13 PM
1

The Site is wholly owned and operated by the Secretary of State for the Home Department, referred to as the Home Office Incumbent since 11 May 2010: Theresa May. She is also the Minister for Women and "Equalities". Go figure. Her predecessor was Harriet Harman, who must be also real bitch, look at her fanclub: http://www.harrietharmansucks.com
/r/MensRights23/10/11 10:45 AM
1

IMHO it would cause more impact if you change the last line. I don't know, maybe "I was born a boy" or something like that -my english is not good enough-. It's known that children know boys and girls are somehow different even before they see the each other naked in the bathroom or wherever. At an emotional level they don't see sexes like a "penis/vagina" thing, it's a more subtle concept. Boys may feel discriminated for being boys, and then they feel bad and guilty (the picture is quite good).…
/r/MensRights22/10/11 09:31 PM
1

People love reading surrealistic shallow crap. New York Post and most newspapers and magazines sell it. Big business in this era of massive disinformation. But my hypothesis is that it could help the process of natural selection (social selection actually) making stupid people even more stupid, that is, 'undateable'.
/r/MensRights22/10/11 01:21 PM
4

Men take dangerous jobs because women don't want them. That is, women don't want to share bad jobs, only good ones. At the same time they benefit from dangerous jobs being done (because someone has to do them if we want the world keeps going on). In feminist language, the first is a sort of individual privilege and the second a collective one. Both are for women, and it costs to us a price.
/r/MensRights22/10/11 12:03 AM
9

Wow, that's the longest false rape punishment I know (twenty-something was the record until today). How do you give back 30 years of his life? How do you ask pardon to this man? Since 2000, 206 prisoners have been exonerated using DNA testing, a technology that wasn't available until 1989. In 75 percent of those cases, eyewitness identification was used to convict the accused, according to the Innocence Project. It's not that I don't believe in Justice, it's just that they often see an "error" w…
/r/MensRights21/10/11 09:31 PM
2

You're welcome. I guess the community has a webmaster or any other person responsible for the website, its ToS and the respectful behavior of members. Obviously I meant that person.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 02:19 PM
3

Some comments on the deleted post: Don't tech her child to trust in men: Jenna Myers Karvunidis It annoys me that the school is challenging me like, "shouldn't you teach your child that men can be trusted?" instead of letting me parent the way I want to. Gay dads would be concerned too (only hetero are predators): AmandaP I would think that the gay dads would be just as concerned about men helping their daughters in the bathroom. Just because they are gay doesn't mean that other dads who might h…
/r/MensRights21/10/11 09:37 AM
9

The deleted page in PDF format: http://register-her.com/images/6/6c/Keep-dads-out-of-preschool-potty-duty.pdf Gosh, that woman is disgusting.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 04:37 AM
1

Well, I had my "stupid moment of the day" and got the reverse message (maybe I couldn't believe the actual message). Sigh. OK, deleted my previous comment. The ad is fine, portrays reality.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 04:05 AM
1

Another day, another libelous post, feminists cheer.
/r/MensRights20/10/11 10:34 PM
8

I think it's time to expose negligent and corrupt judges, world-wide. Too many double standards in law.
/r/MensRights20/10/11 12:21 AM
0

...I wish they had some notion what is like to be at the other side of the gun We already know what is like to be at the other side of the gun, all the time. The gun name is VAWA, it's manufacturer is Joe Biden, and a bunch of crazy politicians who call themselves "Government" are submitting us with that gun. Now don't get me wrong, democrats vs. republicans is none of my business, I couldn't care less because I've seen every political ideology destroying people and things in almost every countr…
/r/MensRights19/10/11 11:54 PM
1

I should have added that cognitive bias has a very important role in judgment and decision making. Feminist "arguments" are often the result of one or more cognitive bias. Everybody should learn a little about this. Actually, I find weird that because of technology advances today we have to learn many things, and yet we aren't taught about ourselves. Even tho we'll always be far from perfect, it's not surprising at all that we're making so many mistakes.
/r/MensRights19/10/11 10:21 AM
1

Read this and freak out (it's Paul Bloom, from Yale): This is Robert Young. Does anybody know the part he plays? He played an — He played a doctor called Marcus Welby in this famous show "Marcus Welby, M.D.," and Marcus Welby was a wonderful doctor. He was compassionate and kind, he made house calls, he saved lives, he counseled people, and it turned out that Robert Young was then deluged with mail, thousands of pieces of mail, by people asking for his advice on health matters. [laughter] And he…
/r/MensRights19/10/11 09:49 AM
3

Of course he must be asked. And if the mother can abort, the father should have the opportunity to refuse support. Today women have reproductive rights, men don't. And please, don't say "It's for the child, they can't be denied support", because this is deeply hypocritical.
/r/MensRights19/10/11 09:24 AM
2

You're a troll, no need to challenge
/r/MensRights19/10/11 09:06 AM
-1

He's not a monster. Not a monster, just a troll, the original troll. Also, likely "She", not "He", and European.
/r/MensRights19/10/11 09:04 AM
3

That's heavy. Vampire ex-wifes. And as perrym has quoted from Dailymail: She is also believed to have secured a large increase in maintenance payments for their daughter – from £150 a month to £2,000 – and was seen just before her monster pay day with another man and a bottle of champagne. Whether this specific fact is true or not, I know many cases where alimony is too high for the purpose that it's designed. Whoever receives the alimony (mother or father) should have to justify child's expense…
/r/MensRights18/10/11 09:41 PM
1

Some people don't understand that there will be reactions, lawful or unlawful, moral or amoral. That's what happens when someone starts a war. It's called reality. They better get used, because unfortunately there will be more damage. I know, I know, they will keep in denial. But then again, this won't save the victims.
/r/MensRights18/10/11 07:39 PM
2

The thing I have a problem with is when someone questions whether or not the guy acted in self defence and everyone acts like he was justified without even discussing what happen. Actually there are three or four other threads discussing this. Maybe I should have mentioned that my comment follows all that discussion.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 07:12 PM
13

Yeah, because "men are supposed to know how to deal with an unexpected violent situation, anytime, anywhere", aren't we? I loathe the smell of mainstream judgments in the morning. Smell like failure.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 03:15 PM
5

Yep. Here in Spain, the "Indignados" has been a failure for seven months, precisely because they just can't reach consensus and focus on specific issues; can't unite. They had my support until feminists arrived a few days after it all started. Then I said "Good luck" and forgot about it. They keep protesting, but it's just some noise that government and corporations ignore without effort.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 02:11 AM
3

That's a sort of predatory behavior, which is not the same than parasitism. Predators are vigilant, and when opportunity happens they attack. Parasitism is more a long term living off unearned income, which is already known.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 01:31 AM
1

I said "yes" to the statement made by NovemberTrees: "Looks like there's evidence...". It means "could be that...", not "actually there is...". So, of course it's an hypothesis. I left the links here. Now, meaning has a lot to do with the tone and the relation between both parts, and weigh -as well as many other appearance and even health related issues- are sensitive things. The review talks about a big lack of sensitivity -besides some other inadequate manners- by the waitress, and she was not…
/r/MensRights16/10/11 01:45 PM
3

Long but worth reading. I find this part very interesting: In fact, the system is not meant to assay guilt or innocence: it is meant to get convictions in conformity to feminism's judicial worldview. And feminism's judicial worldview is collectivistic. Women-as-a class have been violated by men-as-a-class; such is the feminist narrative. Therefore men-as a-class must pay the penalty as a class. This means that a certain percentage of the class "men" must be sacrificed to meet the requirements of…
/r/MensRights16/10/11 11:42 AM
7

In Spain suicide is the first external cause of death for all ages since 3 or 4 years ago, surpassing traffic accidents. Last available data (year 2009, Source: Instituto Nacional de Estadística): Total: 3,429 (9.4 per day) Men: 2,666 (77.7 %) - Women: 763 (22.3 %) Preventing programs: N/A. Hotline: N/A. To give you some context: Women deaths by gender violence in 2009: 55 (unusually low. Year 2008: 75. Year 2010: 78) Preventing programs: Various. Hotline: Yes (016 inside Spain). Other resources…
/r/MensRights16/10/11 02:01 AM
2

CHS connected with the couple when Meyer's wife Jennifer sent us this mail about the impact the situation has had on their lives: *To Whom It May Concern: I just finished reading your article - Another Andrew Meyer apology - and would like to make a response. I am absolutely sickened by the amount of press coverage Victoria Liss is receiving from the media regarding the public social media crusade she started against my husband, Andrew "Andy" Meyer. Andrew Meyer is a common name and I am not cer…
/r/MensRights16/10/11 12:49 AM
1

Yes, this is the comment: It leads to this comment on SeattleWeekly. There is no link to the dumped Yelp review, but almighty Google says: http://www.yelp.com/biz/bimbos-cantina-seattle#hrid:l43bqj41G6HaGq5j1le00w It seems to be the same couple but it's not for sure. Also It could be made up. In another comment: "Victoria Liss, 'Loose Weight' Bartender in Wrongful-Shaming Incident, Once Got Two Wrong People Arrested and Jailed" Edit: Format
/r/MensRights15/10/11 09:51 PM
7

That's not self defense, that's homicidal rage. Have you ever being in a dangerous, violent situation? Have you noticed there was two against one? Do you know how many knifes, sharp tools and dangerous instruments are there in a kitchen? Do you know what's the "fight-or-flight response"? All these things (and many more) count. And yes, I think the result would be very different if roles were reversed. Last time I checked, Biden's VAWA said "men are deadly, women are weak", and as far as I know J…
/r/MensRights15/10/11 02:39 PM
0

--The truth? I thought we were talking about a court of law. Come on, you've been around long enough to know that a courtroom isn't a place to look for the truth. (A Civil Action, 1998)
/r/MensRights15/10/11 11:30 AM
0

If he wanted to draw attention, congrats, he did. But... my eyes... MY EYES...!!
/r/MensRights14/10/11 07:43 PM
7

You all really need to tone down your paranoia Wow, David, that coming from you is funny. Feminist academics really don't spend all of their time thinking about killing men. Of course not, they also copy and paste men killing jokes, which are funnier that rape jokes... or not... Gosh, what a mess.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 11:58 AM
0

Just in case, here is a content cache (no styles): http://backupurl.com/ew14kq Note that not all URLs work, Backupurl service is far from perfect. For local copies try the Firefox extension ScrapBook Plus.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 10:00 AM
-2

Men can't stop rape. The childish fallacy "Men can stop rape" is designed to make us look responsible of every rape as if we were "passive" and didn't care about it, and of course "because only men rape". This is not only a fallacy, it's an insult too.
/r/MensRights11/10/11 03:53 AM
2

You nailed it. There is a big misconception regarding the abuse and dependence of alcohol and other substances, but it's all in the DSM-IV -not a easy read, I know-. Besides, it's still a taboo (or near-taboo) for society. A physician told me once his concerns about the symptomatic (unconscious) abuse of alcohol as an anxiolytic, which is one of the possible triggers. Given the higher incidence on men, I think this could be related to the high demand and responsibility that society puts on men b…
/r/MensRights04/10/11 08:28 AM
1

The post fails to define "alcoholism". From Wikipedia: It is medically considered a disease, specifically a neurological disorder, and in medicine several other terms are used, specifically "alcohol abuse" and "alcohol dependence" which have more specific definitions.[1] In 1979 an expert World Health Organisation committee discouraged the use of "alcoholism" in medicine, preferring the category of "alcohol dependence syndrome" Alcoholism is called a "dual disease" since it includes both mental …
/r/MensRights03/10/11 02:18 AM
4

Seen time ago, while doing my own research. Certainly this is a BIG issue. A lot -if not all- policies on DV are somehow based on this, even here in Europe.
/r/MensRights02/10/11 03:17 PM
2

Mental masturbation. It's easy to point to someone with a gun. Pulling the trigger is a much more difficult thing, even in fear.
/r/MensRights01/10/11 09:05 PM
5

Something similar happens to the falsely accused. See Male primary school teacher banned for letting pupils hug him Once you're seen as a sexual offender, you're done.
/r/MensRights01/10/11 11:01 AM
2

Good post. Some time ago I was thinking that the term "feminazi" was not right at all, because for feminism the "cause" of "patriarchy" was cultural. But that was not enough. Now it's this a biological issue, just like what German nazis thought about Jewish people, "they are not good enough", "they are inferior creatures", "not human at all"... Mmmm... I can't wait to know what's their "Final Solution". Greed leads people to burn themselves, sometimes you just have to wait.
/r/MensRights01/10/11 01:44 AM
0

I'd say: None of the two is better. Conservative Christianity (or whatever other fundamentalist religion scheme) is as dangerous as the current Marxist feminism. This is a very long story, but in short: We have outdated, stupid and delusional socio-political theories that doesn't work in the current complex society. Many western countries are lost in the middle of this war of lobbies. Politicians are not very smart people, actually they are mostly stupids. Sign of the times. [Disclaimer: I'm ath…
/r/MensRights01/10/11 12:04 AM
3

Robert Jensen making jokes about eugenics is not surprising at all. I wouldn't say he is a neo-nazi, he's more like an Orwellian leader.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 11:16 AM
1

Feminism is a recent "acquisition" of the Brazilian government. It's a shame because their culture has been very open about sexuality, but now the Inquisition has arrived. By the ads description I guess it's this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pa3tyut6tCQ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ThDs5k14Q6g http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmqZVMcMoWA
/r/MensRights29/09/11 07:57 PM
2

Jackson Katz is a sort of professional mangina, he does it for a living. In this doc he talks about media, but keeps portraying men as "bad" with the help of awful statistics. It's actually propaganda of his own shit. Here you can see the 53 min. version: http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/tough-guise/
/r/MensRights29/09/11 01:59 AM
0

Feminist men and women are basically bullies. Their reasons may be different, but they are bullies. You're being verbally harassed and psychologically abused, as most of us. Unlike a sudden traumatic event, this bullying is a subtle and persistent psychological abuse which gradually accumulates. It has been happening for years. According to your sensitivity and the time you have been exposed, you may feel annoyed, mistreated, abused, intimidated, coerced, threatened, bashed... Yep, these are the…
/r/MensRights29/09/11 01:02 AM
2

In Spain we have quotas in politics. Man and woman make no difference in that field: Same lies, same corruption, same manipulation, same despite for people, etc. Power tends to corrupt people. Also, politics attracts to many greedy and manipulative persons, as well as some naive people. For the rest, you may enter with very good intentions, but the system won't let you do whatever you want, you need support from other politicians. Dirty field, you know. Another issue is that people tends to over…
/r/MensRights27/09/11 04:19 PM
3

Page has changed. Now it's: http://www.thefrisky.com/2011-09-25/teaching-boys-to-be-feminists/
/r/MensRights27/09/11 07:10 AM
2

She is usually fueling comments in manboobz. It says a lot.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 07:47 PM
1

Agree. I remember I was very influenced by the environment, inside and outside school and college, my motivation could raise or fall in a high degree. I have two relatives in teaching, and we couldn't agree more about the consequences of unequal focus even if unintended. I mean It's not easy to be a teacher, that’s for sure, but the whole system must remain neutral, can't allow any bias. Now, I'm not for a highly strict system where everything is “potentially sexist in one way or another”, it's …
/r/MensRights26/09/11 02:22 PM
4

There’s no question that the percentage of women receiving bachelor’s degrees has climbed in recent years—and that at the same time, slightly fewer men are attending or finishing university. There are a host of hotly debated reasons for this shift. Some, like Leonard Sax, argue that boys lack... It seems they don't know the Pygmalion effect. Bold mark is mine. It's curious how this shift is happening in education -a female dominated field- at the same time that feminism is on top, uh?
/r/MensRights25/09/11 09:36 PM
2

Ideologies often create fear, which is the most powerful tool to manipulate people. And then the fear becomes hate (under proper conditions: Intense fear, there is somebody to blame, etc.)
/r/MensRights25/09/11 06:51 PM
3

This links could be useful: Sex Work Activists, Allies, and You. Furry Girl is one of the girls ruling that site. They are from my "To See" bookmarks folder, which means I don't know much already about it.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 03:29 PM
0

Like a cat. Oh wait!, no, I mean... It's... like a man -any man-, but this man is a rapist and a no-rapist at the same time, and when you try to know what the hell he is, then sometimes he will be a rapist but sometimes he (the same man) won't. But then again this is actually not true, because when you try to know, you're changing his mind to an unknown degree, and since you don't know how much degree is that, you can't know if he is a rapist. Well, that's an awful metaphor made by somebody who …
/r/MensRights24/09/11 03:02 AM
2

To avoid her. She committed a crime and wasn't punished, she didn't learn the lesson that crime is not free, she made suffer another person, and could do it again. She is dangerous. I don't want to be in touch with her, neither professionally nor personally, and I will be grateful if a simple google search gives to me this information.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 06:46 PM
3

I wouldn't say that our aim is to get men angry. We tell men how they are mistreated in the western world because of the feminism. When they see it they get angry.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 12:15 AM
3

Her blogroll says a lot. And this post is very ilustrative, she says she has it all and yet the thing doesn't work (because of her genitals, of course). First lesson: No paradise at the end of the feminist way. Feminists have to get out of their delusion and realize that hating and blaming half of the population, being so narcissistic and blatantly anti-social doesn't help. Then, if they are actually that good, things will work. I know it because I've been working with brilliant women, intellige…
/r/MensRights15/09/11 04:13 AM
1

Thanks!
/r/MensRights14/09/11 12:29 AM
1

I think your comment is good, as well as the InfinitelyThirsting's. I replied the first I saw. It's just that (maybe) there is a mistake in the conversion from yearly-rate to life-rate, and if it's true It could be improved. Whatever the case, sharing things is the best way to move forward, so I appreciate both calculations.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 12:00 AM
1

Thanks, I just read it. I edited my comment after realizing one line was cut. The upper limit doesn't change the results actually.
/r/MensRights13/09/11 06:54 PM
3

Excuse me for my english. I think there is a big (but also very common) mistake here. there are 103,129,321 women between the ages of 16 and 64. If you add up yearly victim rates, then you're adding up the number of victims over 49 years: 191,670 * 49 = 9,391,830 victims. But the base population (potential target for rapist) was not 103,129,321 woman, that's only in one year. The base for that 9+ million victims is the total amount of alive women between 16 and 64 all over that 49 year span, whi…
/r/MensRights13/09/11 05:33 PM
1

About nocturnal erections, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nocturnal_penile_tumescence! About penetration, a woman only have to push her vagina against an erected penis while the man is lying face up (I can't even believe I'm explaining this). Apart from that, I guess If -under deep sleep- a woman can be penetrated without waking up by the physical sensation of pressure, a man won't wake up by the equivalent pressure on his penis.
/r/MensRights11/09/11 11:42 PM
5

Excuse me for my english. Beautiful story, but wrong conclusion and bad target. Here is my suggestion: Take the first part -your dad was great and still is-, add something like "See? Dads are not molesters!" and send it to Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, to every member of Congress, to DOJ, NOW, UN Women... [add your suggestion here] The issue is not that dads love their children -we all know this- but that those who rule (want to) believe dads are predators. Let them know the truth.
/r/MensRights07/09/11 12:52 AM
2

Excuse me for my english. This may be the actual quote: "As long as some men use physical force to subjugate females, all men need not. The knowledge that some men do suffices to threaten all women. Beyond that, it is not necessary to beat up a woman to beat her down. A man can simply refuse to hire women in well-paid jobs, extract as much or more work from women than men but pay them less, or treat women disrespect- fully at work or at home. He can fail to support a child he has engendered, dem…
/r/MensRights01/09/11 03:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter