TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SpanishM Archive

View 0 posts and 436 comments by SpanishM on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
25

The "Until you become capable of putting yourself in other people's shoes" is kinda funny here. This person has the self-awareness of a stone, smh
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/22 07:09 PM
15

Imagine trying to be the authority on equality while having no idea about the opposite sex. One day we should address the stupidity as a group phenomenon, because that's a thing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/22 02:19 PM
4

Well, I wouldn't say "never", because there are very different men. I, for one, do not tend to follow absurd "expectations", or the herd. Indeed some of my friends say I'm kind of weird (in the good sense) regarding some issues. Other friends don't say that because they are as weird as me :) But I understand that each one has different personality traits, and therefore, the things we do or don't do are different. And it's true that -generally speaking- you'll get less help if you're harassed or …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/22 01:45 PM
33

Some of them have acquired victim mentality. These are no longer playing; they see reality through a victim lens.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/22 10:29 PM
3

I saw the discussion a few days ago on Twitter. 2.) I believe the men who do this think women get aroused by it, more or less as men (may) get aroused by a photo of a vulva. I don't do this, and neither do my friends, but that's what I heard from a bunch of acquaintances when I was younger. And I must say that these people didn't seem to be very educated. So, in my experience, it seems to spark from ignorance, not only about the fact that men and women are different, but also about social norms.…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/22 08:15 PM
1

As legal as "marital stalking". Just because the term "marital whatever" isn't mentioned in the laws, doesn't mean it's legal. Rape is rape.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 05:28 PM
1

That's not a very good example. People are saying that "rape was legal" because that word wasn't explicitly mentioned in the laws, but abusing your wife could take you to jail. Is "marital stalking" legal? I mean, you won't find that term in the law, so you could say it's legal. But it isn't. It's abuse. Laws don't mention everything you can do wrong, particularly in the family environment, because lawmakers understand that as family members you'll be able to understand each other and behave pro…
/r/MensRights20/03/22 05:24 PM
2

That's irrelevant. In most countries firearms are not allowed. My country is a example of this; the male/female ratio is around 3:1.
/r/AntiFeminists19/03/22 09:27 PM
3

Marital rape was literally legal back then It was not legal. It just was not regulated by laws, as many other things.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 08:45 PM
13

Yeah, they use absolute numbers (instead of rate) in order to make it look this way. According to the National Violent Death Reporting System, the rate of american women killed by their male spouse/intimate partner (current or former) is 0.8 per 100,000 per year. This means that for a population of 150 million women, it’s 1,200 women in a year. Lightning strikes injure about 1,000 people in the U.S. each year. And since lightnings don't care if you're man or woman, the odds are the same for both…
/r/AntiFeminists17/03/22 05:15 PM
13

Here is the original article. Also: How To Crush A Man Ego (13 Intentional Ways) The Best Ways To (Un)Intentionally Hurt A Man’s Ego 7 Effective Ways To Intentionally Deflate A Man’s Ego
/r/MensRights16/03/22 04:04 PM
1

They are the only sex able to gestate babies, and if most of the men men die out or are killed, the population can recover by most of the remaining women getting pregnant. I don't think this is the reason why men are treated as disposable. AFAIK, this has never happened in human history. The population has never been in danger due to the lack of men, so that threat (or the mechanism to avoid it) is unlikely to be ingrained in our genes. There must be another reason.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 09:06 PM
2

most women suck at fighting irl Yes, but wars nowadays are very different than they were in the past. We have a lot of machines and technology. same in video games [just like the simulations] I'm not familiar with women's performance in simulations, but there is a lot of them in jobs that require certain skills like for example precision. Not all men are equally skilled either. A good selection process is important.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 04:30 PM
46

Feminism: the belief that women should be allowed the same rights, power, and opportunities as men and be treated in the same way, or the set of activities intended to achieve this state. doctrine that sees men as the cause of all women's problems, or class warfare against men. That's the conflict.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/22 03:20 PM
7

It's more effective because it hurts their ego. Say that a woman is not good enough for something, and you'll see what happens.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 03:05 PM
19

Apparently, "gender equality" is not gender equality, but women having privileges at institutional level. Maybe we should stop saying that the world thinks men are expendable, and start saying that women are not seen as good enough for the military. I think the latter is more effective.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 01:27 PM
1

It's not clear to me that these people are transphobes. They don't seem to have problems with trans men, but only with trans women and every other biological men. If you don't have problems with trans men, by definition you can't be a transphobe. I think they are just misandrist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/22 07:36 PM
3

This is the post: https://np.reddit.com/r/relationship_advice/comments/hlgv6r/my_32f_husband_36m_became_a_robot_and_i_dont_know/
/r/MensRights13/03/22 08:58 PM
37

It makes sense. For the most part of human history, people had a life expectancy of roughly 40 years. This doesn't mean people died at 40, because a lot of people died early, particularly children. Families had a lot of children, in part because some of them wouldn't survive. Also, many women would die due to pregnancy or birth complications. This means that, on average, adult women spent a lot of time pregnant. This is one of the reasons women have had less opportunities of doing other things. …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/22 06:06 PM
8

I don't think the mob wants revenge against specific men, but against all men. The #YesAllMen proves that. These individual men become the personification of "all evil". They are "the proof" that "men are bad". This is one of the biggest problems with feminism. It's not about individual men, but about "men as a group".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/22 04:25 PM
9

The narrative is that men have been -and still are- "monsters who oppress, rape, kill and torture women since thousands years ago". And some people believe it. That's what they want revenge for. There is even a meme that says "men should be glad we want equality and not revenge". Whoever says this not only thinks revenge would be justifiable, but they are also saying that they wish it. Why else would they mention it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/22 02:44 PM
4

It's appalling :(
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/22 02:06 PM
46

This is a list of 262 people that have been judged and sentenced for life by the court of the public opinion. The list is there so no one forgets. Others say they are 379. But there were only 7 convictions, and the Cosby one was overturned. I can understand that some women were hurt, but this is not justice. The MeToo was (and still is) just a revengeful movement pushed by a hysterical mob. I guess the reason why these two women are cool with the MeToo is because they know they will never be jud…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/22 11:58 PM
3

Some married or otherwise coupled people envy single people's freedom. I'm not saying this is always the cause of the attacks, but I'm convinced it's the most common one.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 04:27 PM
1

But what about the fact that marital rape wasn‘t considered rape until only a few centuries ago? Women‘s bodies being property to men in history? The law as we know it today is a product of civilization. A few centuries ago the world was not as civilised as it is now. Today everything is regulated, but in the past people had to solve many of their problems on their own. That doesn't mean these things weren't considered bad, they just weren't protected by law.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 10:40 PM
9

Once people have crossed the line of hate it's very difficult -if not impossible- to bring them back. Anyways: "I have no pity for men because they have ruled the world" Most men have not ruled the world. Only a few did. "men abuse woman" and "men oppress women". When she says "men do this or that", try to switch "men" by another group, like muslims, black people or whatever. For example, ask her: is it ok to say "muslims are terrorists"? If she has a good relationship with his dad, ask her if s…
/r/AntiFeminists09/03/22 09:26 PM
29

I think this fits here. Judgments About Male Victims of Sexual Assault by Women: A 35-Year Replication Study The 2019 male cohort was less likely to judge that the victim initiated or encouraged the incident (40% in 1984 compared with 15% in 2019) and derived pleasure from it (47.4% in 1984 compared with 5.8% in 2019). In contrast, the 2019 female cohort was more likely to attribute victim encouragement (26.9% compared with 4.3% in 1984) and pleasure to the male victim (25% in 2019 compared with…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/22 05:45 PM
15

Bruh, there is nothing more fragile than feminists. Everything "oppresses" them.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 03:16 AM
17

Actually she wasn't fired. This happened in 2011 (it was about the case of Catherine Kieu, not Bobbitt). She was terminated in 2021 for some unrelated comments.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 08:23 PM
23

That "advice" don't help paranoid people to be less paranoid. Beware of paranoia. It's very contagious.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/22 07:21 PM
-1

Let's assume "he" isn't actually a she (a feminist), or that he is not writing it just for karma or attention: You shouldn't feel guilty for this, because when you do, you're participating in the paranoia. Some kinds of paranoia are very contagious. Be careful with this. And another thing: There is this latin phrase: "Excusatio non petita, accusatio manifesta": The meaning of this phrase is: if one has nothing to justify themselves for, they should not apologize at all. Struggling to justify one…
/r/AntiFeminists08/03/22 06:52 PM
1

Yeah, "it's advocacy when we say it". BTW: In the United States, using FoodNet data from 2000 to 2007, the CDC estimated there were 47.8 million foodborne illnesses per year (16,000 cases for 100,000 inhabitants) with 9.4 million of these caused by 31 known identified pathogens. 127,839 were hospitalized (43 per 100,000 inhabitants per year). 3,037 people died (1.0 per 100,000 inhabitants per year). Source If I remember correctly, the rate of women killed by their male partner in the US is 0.8 p…
/r/MensRights08/03/22 12:10 AM
8

They say these things because they are not the ones being sent to fight. What you're witnessing is herd behavior. And herds are everything but smart.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/22 11:09 PM
20

I don't know what this has to do with god. That said, Reddit is not representative of the world. If it were, the world would be a socialist/communist matriarchy.
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 11:06 PM
2

Maybe the reason why he transitioned is because as a man he hated himself too much. Listening to people who are detransitioning is very interesting. Too often, they say they were not aware of the actual reason why they wanted to be the opposite gender. You don't know what's happening in your subconscious. Whatever the case, I see a pattern in a lot (not all) of trans woman: they have very negative feelings, are often angry, and some (particularly activists) are even violent. I am not surprised t…
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 08:34 PM
8

The post has been deleted by its author, apparently because he has finally realized it was wrong. Took him more than one day though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/22 03:14 AM
179

Radical feminist theorists have suggested that representations of aggression in pornography are entirely driven by the desires and preferences of male viewers, while the preferences of women regarding such representations of aggression have not been systematically explored. They do not suggest, they state that it is because of men. But they will never acknowledge what the study says, even though they probably know it.
/r/MensRights05/03/22 11:53 PM
5

You're right, thanks!
/r/MensRights05/03/22 10:49 PM
16

It can be reduced to this: The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman This is an accusation. No jury, no trial, we were found guilty. So yes, it's quite misandrist. This started the whole feminist grievance industry.
/r/MensRights05/03/22 08:34 PM
1

The video. Site in german (english). I have no idea if that "project" is real of fictional. Poe's Law.
/r/MensRights05/03/22 04:12 AM
13

The fundamental difference between the two is that Feminism believes gender discrimination needs to be eliminated That's not true. Among many other things, feminism supports women being a protected group, affirmative action and every other discrimination that help women at the cost of men.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 03:21 PM
4

There is a discussion going on (don't know if I can paste the link). Someone is asking why. Why must there be more articles about women? The article says: "Not even 20% of those are about women. If Wikipedia wants to become the sum of human knowledge, this needs to change." Why? This isn't explained? WHY must there be more articles about women? For what REASON? Almost ALL important historical people have been men. If Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, shouldn't it reflect ACTUAL HISTORY instead of in…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/22 02:47 PM
6

as someone said previously, 1 man & 20 women have a better chance at sustaining a population than 20 men and 1 woman. So many people are replicating this meme. All of them forgot the genetic problem of incest.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 03:43 AM
23

The article 27 of the 1949 Fourth Geneva Convention explicitly prohibits wartime rape. And there is also the U.N. Declaration on the Protection of Women and Children in Emergency and Armed Conflict. And the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1820 was unanimously adopted on 19 June 2008. It condemns the use of sexual violence as a tool of war, and declares that “rape and other forms of sexual violence can constitute war crimes, crimes against humanity or a constitutive act with respect to…
/r/MensRights04/03/22 03:00 AM
6

Yes, agree. About the arguments: Men, on average, are more physically capable than women and are therefore better placed to serve in the armed forces, That's no longer an issue. We have a lot of military machines and technology that don't require too much physical strength. War fatalities among women of childbearing age has a disproportionately large effect on future population growth - a small number of men can impregnate many women, but a small number of women can only carry the children of a …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/22 11:26 PM
2

On the surface feminism claims to be a movement seeking equality, but its theories prove that's not true, they are misandric in nature. The problem is that these theories take advantage of some cognitive biases, so many people do not realize the problem. I think feminism is better defined as the cult of female supremacy.
/r/AntiFeminists02/03/22 03:51 PM
21

I just noticed that sub is selling merchandise. FDS had a patreon account (don't know if it still exists). So, add "money" to their motivation.
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 11:34 PM
5

I think you're misinterpreting evolutionary psychology, probably because of pop evopsych. It happens a lot in psychology in general. First, "men wanting to impregnate everything that moves" is an apparent drive, but not the fate of every human male. This impulse seems to exist in men as a trend, but not everybody has it, and among those who have it there are many degrees. And then there is an hypothesis for that apparent drive, proposed by the evolutionary psychology approach. Evopsych doesn't s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/22 08:52 PM
1

"We all want to hurt men emotionally and financially" https://archive.fo/jP9aA I have no words.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/02/22 07:07 PM
1

This post talks about the CMNI. It's appalling. Power Over Women Violence Disdain for Homosexuals Playboy ... WTF?
/r/MensRights25/02/22 03:27 AM
2

I was not trying to doxx her, I was trying to prove she's an activist and not an actor. And in order to do that, I linked some instagram posts where you can check it (how else am I supposed to prove that?) Fair enough, I know that rule now, but I just wanted to let you know I'm not for doxxing anyone.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 02:49 AM
10

That seems to be related to (verbal) erotic humiliation. I don't think it's a problem, but anyway I'd suggest you to do some research, try to figure out where it comes from and -in case you want to continue- learn how to do it in the most healthy and safe way. For example, there is a difference between someone playing a misandrist role and someone being an actual misandrist. The former is safe and healthy, the latter is not. BDSM is about roleplaying, not about being assholes (or worse) to other…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/22 01:46 AM
1

The premise of the patriarchy is that "men feel superior to women, so they try to dominate/oppress them". There are two main reasons why I don't talk with people who believe that: One is that they are blaming me and every other men, and the other is that they do not live in the same reality I live.
/r/MensRights21/02/22 07:40 PM
2

From r/Documentaries: Reddit is Being Manipulated by Professional Shills Every Day (2018) [00:12:00] Another interesting one: Reddit For Sale: How We Bought The Top Spot For $200 My point is, feminist lobbies might be doing this too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/22 04:36 PM
2

By that definition ("an extreme reaction towards anything that challenges X"), feminism is extremely fragile. So is any dictatorship. Maybe they are projecting their own fragility.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/22 04:32 PM
2

Yes. That's a quote (paraphrase actually) from Margaret Atwood. "Why do men feel threatened by women?" I asked a male friend of mine. (I love that wonderful rhetorical device, "a male friend of mine." It's often used by female journalists when they want to say something particularly bitchy but don't want to be held responsible for it themselves. It also lets people know that you do have male friends, that you aren't one of those fire-breathing mythical monsters, The Radical Feminists, who walk a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/22 04:07 PM
1

I'm not saying extremist feminists are radical feminists. I'm saying radical feminists (among others) are extremist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/22 11:33 PM
1

Radicalism, fundamentalism and fanaticism are extremist qualities. I do believe both second and third wave feminism are extremist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/22 10:56 PM
5

If the feminist concept of "patriarchy" is not extremist, I don't know what it is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/22 10:27 PM
19

You're right, but they always try to use it (any mental disorder actually) as an excuse... if the accused is a woman.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 10:03 PM
76

A police report says Fournier was moving up the aisle of the Regional Transportation Commission bus just before 5 p.m. on March 21, 2019, when he asked a woman who had been cursing at other people to be nicer to passengers, the Las Vegas Review-Journal reported. Looks like she got mad at him when he told her to be nicer to passengers. I've seen a lot of feminist react with anger when they are told things like that by men. Her attorney added that she suffered from Bipolar Disorder and PTSD. Yeah,…
/r/MensRights20/02/22 05:32 PM
18

Nice post. This survey is being conducted on behalf of Stop Street Harassment, a nonprofit organization dedicated to making public places safer, and Raliance, a nonprofit organization working to end sexual violence in one generation. This work is also supported by University of California San Diego’s Center on Gender Equity and Health (GEH). How to make your own business: create a nonprofit with a bunch of friends, get funds and donations, produce fraudulent reports and offer related services, g…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/22 03:43 PM
1

I don't see men trying to inflate these figures. That's the difference.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/22 12:35 PM
9

Today, my two (female) friends were discussing how they like men who are attracted to all types of women, regardless of size, height, etc., because those men are “open-minded” and “not insecure,” unlike men who have preferences. Attraction is a very complex thing, it depends on many factors, and most of them are unconscious. That's why we sometimes say we like this and that but then become attracted by a person who doesn't have these characteristics. So they are not only wrong about men, but pro…
/r/MensRights18/02/22 06:56 PM
1

Meta's Manager of Community Development was allegedly caught in an amateur child sex sting. Reddit deleted the video and the account of the person who posted it. https://twitter.com/simpbloodbath/status/1494464226907156496 This gives you an idea of what Reddit is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/02/22 03:34 PM
7

What do sexual assault statistics ACTUALLY show? It depends. Many statistics feminists show are self reported (no court or police involved), and sometimes they include even the most harmless catcall. Another thing they do (for example United Nations) is to conflate figures from underdeveloped countries with the first world. Have you seen the UN Women twitter account? It's appalling. They do this in order to inflate the figures. I'd love to have a resource where reports are reviewed. A kind of "f…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/02/22 01:50 PM
1

Fetlife dot com is a social network for kinky people. I don't know how it works, but maybe it can help you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/22 04:30 PM
2

I think this has no other purpose than filling a webpage with words so they can insert ads (if you disable ad blocking plugins you'll see it's displaying AdSense ads). Talking bad about men is cheap. Any low wage freelance writer can do it, and they bear no responsibility for it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/22 12:36 AM
1

Here it is: https://archive.is/xogET
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/22 05:53 PM
0

No. What I'm saying is that people in my country do not believe in "dog whistles".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/22 07:03 PM
1

when women do it, they are fighting against the patriarchy. "The patriarchy" does not exist. And anyways, what she says is not an argument, it's just an excuse. People react to hate with more hate. So, you can tell her "we'll see how it works for you".
/r/MensRights15/02/22 05:28 PM
0

The "dog whistle" is a conspiracy theory that exists only is some countries. I don't live in these countries, and I'm not a "dog".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/22 04:21 PM
2

The dictionary definition of feminism has never been true. Neither the theory nor the practice of feminism is about equality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/22 04:11 PM
9

I've been called "transphobe" by trans activists just for saying that the dictionary definition of woman is "adult female human". Several times. It's not hard to guess where we are heading.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/22 06:45 PM
2

Social psychology.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/22 09:32 PM
17

Talking about female supremacists: Nicola Sturgeon claims world would be a ‘better place’ if ruled by women (alt link) “But when you see women, and I’m not talking about myself here I’m talking about other women in senior positions: by and large, they’re better than their equivalent man and, more often than not, they’ve had to push themselves a lot harder to get to where they are." “I often think the world would be a much better place if it were ruled by women." The First Minister of Scotland.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/22 07:37 PM
10

There is not much logic behind it. It's an assumption. The whole thing was coined by radical feminists (second wave feminism) back in the 60s-70s by people like Kate Millett, Shulamith Firestone and others. I've been thinking about this lately. Modern feminists offer different definitions and refuse to explain how it is supposed to work. I try to sum it up here in these 5 points: Men believe they are superior to (or at least more rational than) women. Because of (1), men act in order to (activel…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/22 06:55 PM
9

Labels. Unfortunately they don't mean too much. Some feminists are female supremacists. Some "anti-racist" people and BLM supporters are racist. Some trans activists are intolerant, and even violent. They just hide behind well-intended labels.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/22 05:16 PM
6

I think if they are spewing its tenets it's because they understand it. They seem to not understand it, but in many cases it's because they are playing the motte and bailey defense.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/22 04:48 PM
9

For the most part of human history, life has been characterized by scarcity, illnesses, hard jobs, short life expectancy (with high infant mortality) and a lot of misery. Under those circumstances, people did the best they could. For example, women spent most part of their adult life having children. The different roles were not caused by culture, but by necessity, in order to survive. As life became easier (very recently in history), both men and women started to enjoy more options and freedom.…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/22 07:53 PM
5

The entitlement. And the idea that men always want sex. Also this: "I mean you can, but that would give me an impression that he's like gay or maybe I'm ugly..." Looks like she can't stand the idea of her not being attractive enough, so she rather "blame" the guy, assuming he's gay. I think this is quite common. Some people say men are not good at handling rejection, but I don't agree. In my experience, women are as bad -or even worse- than men at this. Maybe it's because they are not used to it…
/r/AntiFeminists11/02/22 05:26 PM
7

I don't think people in western countries are preventing women from certain occupations currently. There may be cases, but I don't think this is widespread or systematic. I don't like Hillary Clinton, but that has nothing to do with her gender/sex. I don't buy the idea that "men feel superior to women and want to dominate them". That's a prejudice.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/22 04:56 PM
2

lack of empathy is how I would put it Agree. It "makes sense" if you look at it as a war on men and boys. In a war, the people with less empathy towards the enemy flourish.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/22 04:23 PM
14

However, I feel this is honestly best attributed to misogyny Misogyny is hatred or contempt for women. If men/society felt hate or contempt for women, we wouldn't be pushed to take care of them, but the opposite.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/22 04:09 PM
5

This reminds me to the "genie in a bottle" jokes. This is a very short one I've found: "I told my genie I wished not to die a virgin. He granted me immortality" X) Sometimes people refer to this same thing by saying "be careful what you wish for, because you might get it". "Men showing emotions and crying" may mean many different things, and have very different consequences. I think these women who say they prefer men like that, are thinking only about the "good side" or the "best meaning" of it…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/22 09:24 PM
5

Maybe. I don't see the questions they asked in the survey. The main author posted this info on her twitter account (May 25th 2021). Also, from the study: Sextortion victimization was examined by asking participants if they had ever been the victim of sextortion. Sextortion was defined for participants as “the act of threatening to expose a nude or sexually explicit image in order to get a person to do something such as send more nude or sexually explicit images, pay someone money, or perform sex…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/22 08:33 PM
27

Agree. I'm not american either. I started noticing it before 2010, but at the beginning it was a fringe thing. Progressively became mainstream. With Trump it became worse. Suddenly, there were "white male supremacists everywhere". I have never seen anything like that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/22 01:59 PM
5

"Severity" isn't the metric by which abuse should be judged. Abuse is abuse. Severity is just a factor, but it's important because it says a lot about the intentions of the perpetrator, which matters a lot. It's not whether you did wrong or not, but how much wrong you intended to do. The harm you caused AND the harm you intended to cause, both matter. That's why -for example- voluntary and involuntary manslaughter exist. Nobody is saying "so shut up" or "ignore the suffering". A judge wrote some…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/22 04:55 PM
9

I don't know. Maybe our experiences as sons/daughters when we were children have something to do with it. Other experiments in this study found people showed automatic preference for their mothers over their fathers, or associated the male gender with violence or aggression. Rudman and Goodwin's suggested that maternal bonding and male intimidation influences gender attitudes. (wikipedia) The study: Gender Differences in Automatic In-Group Bias: Why Do Women Like Women More Than Men Like Men? In…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/22 03:15 AM
18

Nice work, as usual :) As a side note, if I recall correctly, in this lecture ("The uncomfortable facts on IPV") from Tonia Nicholls discussing the work of Dr. Murray Straus et al., she states that in a fight men usually employ less physical force against women than against men. I'm aware feminists will say "oh, so should we be glad that men hit women less harder?". Well, not glad, but I think this says something about the nature of the aggressors and the aggressions. All violence is bad, but se…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/22 05:58 PM
8

I want equality for all, but I think most feminists just think if you truly want equality then you have to be against all males. It makes no sense, It does make sense for them, because they believe "men feel superior and want to dominate women". You should be against men in order to counteract this "fact". Do you know Kurt Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron?: In the year 2081, the 211th, 212th, and 213th amendments to the Constitution dictate that all Americans are fully equal and not allowed to be sm…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/22 05:23 PM
2

But I would caution stating that men are one way and women are another since that plays a part in how men and women end up socialized in different ways. Are we supposed to not talk about it because it can be dangerous? Ignoring these differences can be risky too. And there is evidence plenty of evidence they exist. This is an interesting article about differences in personality traits between men and women. It covers different studies. Among others, Yanna J. Weisberg et al. and Marco Del Giudice…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/22 08:20 PM
15

To assess the role of gender equality, we created a Gender Equality Index as a joint measure of four indices of gender equality: (A) the Global Gender Gap Index of the World Economic Forum (WEF), (B) the Gender Equality Index of the United Nations (UN), (C) the ratio of female and male labor force participation rates, and (D) years since women’s suffrage. The Gender Equality Index was constructed as the predicted main component from a principal component analysis of the four indices. Links to th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/22 02:13 AM
6

Most feminists believe patriarchy exists. And the premise of patriarchy is that "men feel superior to women and want to dominate them", which is false, and an awful prejudice. So, to me the word "feminist" hasn't good connotations. However, there are people like Camille Paglia or Christina Hoff Sommers, who don't hold this prejudice but call themselves feminist. I think the label "egalitarian" suits them better, but it's ok.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/02/22 10:52 PM
4

Eliminating poverty will of course decrease crime. I'm not saying the opposite. What I'm saying is that crime is also committed out of anger, jealousy, revenge, pride, greed and many other things that are unrelated to poverty. Postmodern theories tend to claim that men abusing or killing their female partners is "misogyny", but we know there are many more causes. And if we don't address those causes we can't prevent these crimes in the future. Imagine a man who has personality issues (not severe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/02/22 10:29 PM
6

People don't commit crime because they're bad people. They commit crime because they don't have other options. Sometimes it's the former, and sometimes the latter. The privileged are literally privileged enough to never have to resort to a life of crime. Some of them steal, abuse and kill too. Their reasons are different. Postmodern framework just assume the reasons, and one of these reasons is "being a man", because "men [insert here your most crazy ideas about social dynamics]". For these peop…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/02/22 07:26 PM
10

Not an easy thing to do. There are several biases involved. Group attribution error: refers to people's tendency to believe either 1: The characteristics of an individual group member are reflective of the group as a whole, or 2: A group's decision outcome must reflect the preferences of individual group members, even when external information is available suggesting otherwise. The group attribution error shares an attribution bias analogous to the fundamental attribution error. Rather than focu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/02/22 05:41 PM
136

She's been well indoctrinated.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 03:37 PM
1

Ok, but I'm not saying you did it, I believe you. I'm just explaining how the system works. Men are considered "guilty" until proven otherwise :/
/r/MensRights03/02/22 03:35 PM
0

He asked if she would be okay with just extending the TRO for one year and then it drops away. She agreed. I agreed. My lawyer agreed. So, I was NOT found guilty or charged Yes, but the restraining order is to protect her from you. I mean, it's not "a sedative" he gave her so she can sleep peacefully. It's a measure against you, because you're seen as a threat. In other words, the judge believes you probably abused your wife and can abuse her again, but doesn't have enough evidence to convict yo…
/r/MensRights03/02/22 04:31 AM
5

How can a person say such things Hatred of or contempt for men (misandry). If you really believe that "men feel superior to women and want to dominate them", I guess you have a reason to hate men, or at least feel contempt for them. But then the question is why do some people believe such thing. Because even if they have been victimized by one or more men, there are other 4 billion of us, and needless to say, every man is different. This is a very interesting article about the psychology of hate…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/22 06:51 PM
3

I understand this entire phrase is figurative: "There are a lot of, I think, cowardly genes that lead to people surrendering their jeans and putting on a skirt.” Jeans/skirt are metaphors for masculinity/femininity. And because he previously said: "I don’t think that being a brute or having insensitivity or disrespect for women is anything to do with masculinity, or ever did" ...which basically means "toxic masculinity is bullshit", I believe "cowardly genes" means a predisposition to tolerate a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/22 01:10 AM
62

Patriarchy -as defined by feminism- does not exist. The premise of patriarchy is that "men feel superior to women and want to dominate them". The people who believe this are ignorant, paranoid, sexist or plain stupid (or all these things together).
/r/MensRights31/01/22 04:19 PM
28

The premise of "patriarchy" is that "men feel superior to women and want to dominate them". This qualifies as misogyny, since it's a kind of contempt for women. So, they believe men are misogynists (which is a book example of prejudice). That's the answer to your question. Don't get fooled by the "men as a group/class, but not individually". That's an abstraction, it makes no sense unless they mean "all men" or "most men". An abstraction doesn't feel or want anything, only people can do that. An…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/22 03:46 PM
20

Always Be Recording. Annoying as it is, it can save you. Recording video may be impossible (or just completely inappropriate), so record audio. I'm not saying 24/7, but in any potentially dangerous situation. Modern mobile phones can record many hours of audio. Dump the files regularly on your computer/pendrive/hard drive and encrypt them for safety. Check the laws in your country regarding recording. Usually, what's illegal is not the recording, but broadcasting/sharing the recorded material. A…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/22 02:55 PM
2

Yes. There are many social benefits for them, economical or administrative. This is not a bad thing by itself, but as you say, it creates very perverse incentives.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/22 02:20 PM
2

I understand it's stalking when you do it repetitively and with the intention of controlling that person. In other words, it's something that would (rightfully) annoy/scare the other person if he/she knew it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/22 01:37 PM
14

The other way (women to men) it would be regular violence -DV if it's between partners-. No especial attention, protocol, measures or anything. It's not on the radar, and it's harder to prove. That is, DV from men to women is always "Gender Violence", and DV from women to men is always... DV. As an example, in this case (Spanish, Google translated) a couple had a fight and there was mutual aggression. The man got 6 month jail for Gender Violence, and the woman 3 months for Domestic Violence. And…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/22 09:01 PM
49

You are correct. Any violence a man exercises against his current or past female partner is automatically considered "Gender Violence (against women)", regardless of the motive. That is, they assume the motive is patriarchal in all cases. This is a violation of the Istanbul Convention, which Spain subscribed. It's also a clear violation of our Constitution, but the Constitutional Court has ruled it's OK. "Violence" here may mean anything, not only physical violence. The moment you're reported to…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/22 04:05 PM
12

Can we have a day without men tomorrow? https://twitter.com/msemilymccombs/status/839686893029699584 ​ I texted my ex a picture of a smushed dead rat I found on the street with the caption “Your new girlfriend.” https://twitter.com/msemilymccombs/status/942780814588293120 She has an adoptive son: 4 Tangible Things I Do Every Day To Raise A Feminist Son I Don't Know If I Can Raise A Good Man Poor kid. Sadly, the fact she's Deputy Editor at the HuffPost does not surprise me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/22 08:55 PM
1

There is this screenshot showing 421 retweets and 944 likes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/22 08:40 PM
10

Nah, it's hate. Plain and simple hate. Fancy terms don't help to see the problems.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/22 04:55 PM
16

This is the reason why they are replying like that: Only girls will understand what I'm doing And here is another.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 06:20 PM
19

However, that doesn’t mean you’re special or significant. Yes, it does. The oppressed have the status of victim, and victims are granted special treatment. Victimism is a thing: The Victim Identity Recovering From the Victim Identity Anyway, it's not true that women have been oppressed for millennia. Or at least no more oppressed than men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/22 02:52 AM
12

I think there is a little more awareness. This may not be the best example, but I think it's something. Remember the incident a week ago with the AA? Well, it's interesting that despite it was published on BBC News, Daily Mail and others, the main tweet has only 3,646 likes (that's nothing for twitter), and 652 replies, some of them are saying "That is equality", "Isn't this what feminism is about?" or something alike. But the best part are the mentions, 667 so far. The vast majority are calling…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/22 02:40 AM
11

When I read about "toxic masculinity" and other bullshit, it always lead me to sociology. I don't know why, but that field is completely out of control. The way it's actually treated, that's not a science, it's more like astrology, a pseudoscience.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/22 05:07 PM
14

Too many comments to read them all, but what I see at first glance is that feminism isn't blamed there. Quite the opposite: Overall mental health resources and support. Patriarchy left women as fragile creatures to be cared for and left in the kitchen. And men as strong, stoic supporters of the household with no weakness or fragility. We got women out of the kitchen and gave them a place in society, but men were never relieved of the burden of never being able to show vulnerability without being…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/22 03:39 PM
6

Nice observation. Related: projective identification. It's one of the two main origins of hate.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 04:22 PM
4

I’m a male feminist. You're supporting this: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/j018cf/is\_pseudofeminism\_even\_a\_thing/g6n373j/?utm\_source=reddit&utm\_medium=web2x&context=3
/r/AntiFeminists16/01/22 12:55 PM
21

I don't know the australian laws, but you should be able to sue them.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 12:42 PM
2

Yep. That movie has awesome quotes. Totally recommended.
/r/MensRights13/01/22 12:29 PM
51

>I will be happy regardless... Happy people rarely spit hate, even less this amount of hate. It looks like she's drowning in her own misery. Next time tell her: "I'd tell you to go to hell, but I think you're already there" ;)
/r/MensRights13/01/22 12:16 AM
7

Thanks.
/r/AntiFeminists06/01/22 11:01 PM
5

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/j018cf/is_pseudofeminism_even_a_thing/g6n373j/?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=web2x&context=3 Edit: Wow, thanks for the Gold Award, anonymous redditor!. Although the merit goes for u/EmirikolWoker, who wrote the comment :)
/r/AntiFeminists06/01/22 10:57 PM
9

Where is this from? I'm curious.
/r/AntiFeminists06/01/22 10:35 PM
4

That's not my case. I don't consider myself socially conservative. But if I were I wouldn't be afraid to say so. I, for one, am not afraid of my beliefs. Maybe it's because I'm too old for that, or because I'm quite unapologetic. I don't need to virtue-signaling. As I said, Helen Pluckrose calls it "critical social justice ideology", because it comes from Critical Theory. There is absolutely nothing progressive in Critical Theory. Not only that; it's a very dangerous thing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/22 08:09 PM
6

But I still think women are as humans as men. As good, as bad as men. Of course. Any decent -and realistic- person knows that. But that's only the "presentation card" of feminism. The moment you go deeper into it, you realize it's actually a bunch of unfalsifiable sociological theories that blame men for everything that's wrong in the universe. It's being "sold" as a good thing, but it's not. It's horrible.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 07:16 PM
11

I’ve never really liked the “progressive” argument that people should just shut up and listen to minority groups. That's probably because there is nothing progressive in that. A minority group is just one side of the story, and experiences are often subjective, not just because our cognitive biases, but mainly due to our emotions -although sometimes both are related. And in this story there are not two, but three sides. The third side are the woke\* people. One of the reasons I'm very skeptic of…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/22 06:35 PM
13

I call myself a feminist, I think you don't know what feminism actually is. BTW: I can't see your comments in r/Feminism. I guess you've been shadowbanned.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 06:48 PM
108

I vote "things that never happened". Very unusual The man was serving a woman because another woman ordered him ("femdom" fantasy) She never feared this man (how so?) "Sisterhood" (smells like teenager feminism) Of course I can't be sure, but I'd bet $100 it's as fake as their idea of equality. These kind of stories are not uncommon.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/01/22 11:30 PM
1

I've seen this addressed as "incel, not incel(TM)". I think it was here. But as you say, this probably won't be understood outside of this sub. I believe it would be a good idea to create a sub or a forum for involuntary celibates -not incels(TM)-, in order to break the stereotype. Moderation should not allow misogyny, entitlement to sex, and all these things incels(TM) do wrong. You should try to use "involuntary celibates" or something similar as the sub/forum name, specifying in the sidebar w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/01/22 04:41 PM
40

The reason it's not allowed is because there is a "trick" here. When they say "men" they really mean "all men". The patriarchy theory states that all men (actively or passively) oppress women, and benefit from it. They blame men "as a group", not individually. But a group has no consciousness, no agency and no will. Groups don't act, only individuals act (collectively or not, on behalf of a group or not). In order for men (as a group) to oppress women, each and every man has to oppress women. Ot…
/r/MensRights03/01/22 03:33 PM
22

Saying "if you believe in equality then you're a feminist", is more or less like saying "if you believe in a more equitative distribution of wealth you're communist". It's so reductionist that it's absurd. A couple days ago we were talking about feminism and the "patriarchy". Take a look at the comments. If a self-labeled feminist does not believe the patriarchy exists, she's discrediting her own movement to a large extent. Most things in feminism no longer make sense if you don't take patriarch…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/22 03:12 PM
1

Feminism, marxism, communism... You don't learn what these things are just by reading the definitions in a dictionary.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 02:33 AM
1

Do you have the link? I'd like to read it.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 02:25 AM
29

This sub does not hate women. Many people here -including myself- loathe feminism and feminists, and that's OK. "Feminists" and "women" are completely different things.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 12:51 AM
11

Those aren't real feminists. "No true Scotsman" fallacy. Your idea of feminism is very naive. Teach yourself feminist theory.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 12:38 AM
2

Telling a woman "you're desperate for male attention" just because of the lack of an argument to give, sounds like that person is stupid/childish, to say the less. "Pick me" is the new "slut", as when women use "slut/whore" to bully other women. And "incel" is the new "gay".
/r/AntiFeminists01/01/22 07:44 PM
90

I think the vast majority of feminists believe in patriarchy. It's been at the heart of feminism since the second-wave, and all their theories are based on that. Some take it more seriously than others, and probably many of them don't realize the significance of believing that men systematically oppress and dominate women, but at the end of the day it is what it is: the hatred of men. I believe most people are aware of their feelings, but for example, not all racists are aware of their racism, a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/12/21 09:16 PM
5

Teach yourself feminist theory.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 10:08 AM
17

If it doesn't blame men, then it's not feminist. Feminism has been -and still is- about blaming "patriarchy" (that is, men) since the second-wave. Without this, no feminist theory makes "sense".
/r/MensRights30/12/21 11:31 PM
10

I've managed to download 3,671 comments (out of 4,641 so far) including replies. Don't know why the rest aren't shown. Searching for "[space]man[space]" or "[space]men[space]" I've found (related to the issue): I like how this character despite being a woman explains a lot of feelings a lot of men experience all the time. "What am I if I can't handle it" is a mentality a lot of young men endure ​ Unironically this is a song so many men could relate to ​ Sadly it needs to be said that a man can e…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/12/21 06:14 PM
5

You're right, but I've taken a look at that sub and it's horrible. I don't know what you're doing there. I'm not going to defend here neither the left nor the right. Quite the opposite: there are people in both the left and the right trying to paint the other as the devil. I hate when people do this. It's hateful, and childish. Most people on both sides of the spectrum are not like that. Right wingers are not nazis, and left wingers are not genocidal communists. I'm sure there are some, but this…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/12/21 03:30 PM
27

If you check the training page you'll see the prices of webinars and conferences (click on each category). There is also the Men’s Nonviolence Classes, but prices are not shown. Being this the default model, imagine the money they make. Ellen Pence died in 2012, but co-founder Michael Paymar is alive and profiting from his lies too. Now, the most repeated lies: >When women use violence in an intimate relationship, the circumstances of that violence tend to differ from when men use violence. Men’…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/12/21 04:12 PM
9

>his masculinity does not require oppression of women because he is a feminist. You can see in some of his other photos that he has a flag of Cuba in the wall, with the face of Che Guevara. Apparently he doesn't know what that guy did to other people, including gays (google translated).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/21 07:59 PM
86

>difficulties processing emotions. I don't believe men in general have difficulties processing emotions. You don't get the help women get when they express their emotions, so, sometimes it's like "what for?". But then again, the problem is not processing, nor even expressing them, but that institutions are not sensible to it. About other things they call "toxic masculinity", it's all bullshit: "men don't cry", "men have to act violent"... where the heck are men taught this today? Nowhere. Yes, t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/21 08:25 PM
14

Means Low Value and High Value Men, respectively.
/r/AntiFeminists18/12/21 07:35 PM
12

>I genuinely believe people don’t understand what its like to be dehumanised unless they’ve experienced it. When someone believes you're a male supremacist, they don't care if they dehumanize you or not. Why would they believe that? Well, because they are being told that "MEN rape, beat and murder women, because they are women", that we've been doing this since always, and keep doing it. And when I say I didn't do any of that, they reply "but all men benefit from patriarchy". I mean it's not tha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/12/21 04:49 PM
6

Excellent speech by Melanie Phillips (32:00 - 49:00 and 1:27:18 - 1:30:00). Sadly, victimism wins.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/12/21 04:55 PM
6

I think they don't. If they ever praise men, they mean hypothetical men that exist "outside patriarchy", which is by their own definition impossible. They do not see a man as an individual, with responsibility and agency, but as a member of a group. And by doing that they deny our personal agency.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/12/21 04:32 PM
24

This is from her book Feminism is for Everybody: Males as a group have and do benefit the most from patriarchy, from the assumption that they are superior to females and should rule over us. But those benefits have come with a price. In return for all the goodies men receive from patriarchy, they are required to dominate women, to exploit and oppress us, using violence if they must to keep patriarchy intact. ​ Most men find it difficult to be patri­archs. Most men are disturbed by hatred and fea…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/21 01:54 PM
1

https://reddit.app.link/RedditRecap2021 It should be on your front page (top and right bar module).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/21 04:09 PM
10

I understand you need a source, but unless those cases are investigated we will never have a source. It's a self perpetuating problem. My point is, if you have a bag and there is a hole in it, you already know what's gonna happen.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/21 06:03 PM
15

>isn’t actually any higher than the rate of false accusations for other crimes Disagree. Those are the proven false accusations. Most false accusations are never investigated, even when they are obviously false. Also, in order to do a false accusation of murder you need a dead person. For a false accusation of rape you only need to be a woman (and have no morals at all). It's that easy. The risk of false accusations depends on how easy are them to make and what you can get out of it. Remember Wa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/21 04:46 PM
11

>When I say other groups I mean groups like "incels". The problem with saying that "incels" have killed people is the same with saying that "muslims" have killed people. But for some reason, MSM and organizations like SPLC or HopeNotHate will say one thing but not the other.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/21 07:46 PM
2

Thanks! BTW: there is a typo in the 2nd link.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 05:41 PM
11

> we won’t stop Oh yes, they will. People are starting to get tired of this bullshit.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 05:30 PM
8

That comment isn't very representative of this sub, you won't see many comments like that. Indeed, it has 0 karma at this moment. Many people scrutinize this sub searching for anything that makes us look bad. They've been doing it since always, and they don't care if the comment has karma or not, because they don't have good intentions. I've taken a look at that subreddit you mention (justneckbeardthings) and the posts don't look very smart or well intended, so don't worry about that. Haters gon…
/r/MensRights29/11/21 04:56 PM
5

Actually it's very easy: "Patriarchy exists", "dominates everything" and "If you have another opinion, it is because patriarchy has gaslighted you to do so" are assumptions, no different from "earth is flat". Whoever makes those statements has to prove them. They don't prove themselves.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 03:42 PM
2

Yeah, I know. It's technically easy for twitter to show the tweet(s) that started a recent TT when you search for a hashtag. But they are not interested in making it better, they just want page views and interactions :/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/11/21 02:14 PM
30

Looks like this time there are some tweets defending men. Progress, I guess. Anyway, I wanted to see who started the trend. This is the first tweet (archived). It's weird, the account just promotes randoms hashtags, not the usual misandrist speech. That account led me to @\CrossyPondTags, and then to @\HashtagRoundup, which is the twitter account for an app called Hashtag Roundup. What is a Hashtag Game? A fun Twitter game focused on a specific hashtag that will challenge you creatively. Tweet w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/21 10:38 PM
70

And apparently, she's married. WTF. Read My Stuff (I Get Paid Per View!) Yeah, too often is all about clicks. If people didn't get paid for writing stupid things, we would see way less garbage. Aside "attention economy", there should be a name for this garbage content made for money.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/21 03:21 PM
54

> Speaking in the debate, he [SNP's Gavin Newlands] criticised the concept of International Men's Day altogether, calling it "a rather cruel joke concocted in response to feminism, women's rights and International Women's Day". > he added that first, "we need men in general to take responsibility for what men have done and continue to do" - including making misogynistic comments or committing violence against women. I call this institutional misandry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/11/21 05:23 PM
17

Just had a question: is there a reason why you blame the silence of vets on "toxic masculinity" instead of "internalized misandry" ? In case you wonder what's the diff: the former blames the victim whereas the latter blames systemic sexism. That's clever. It reveals the double standard. I believe they need an enemy, and that enemy must be people (men), not a system. They try to disguise that fact, blaming "patriarchy", but I don't believe them: "patriarchy" as a system does not exist nowadays, t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/11/21 04:58 PM
11

[7] M&W strongly dislike when women's issues are attacked. [8] It's counterproductive to talk about men's issues in relationship with women's issues, this just [9] degrades the image of the movement and pushes other men away (and make them *less* open to list about it). [10] Attempts of debunking feminists theories helps radical feminists attacks on MsI by giving them "proof" that MRM are just misogynists. On the other hand, women are view positively when men defend MsI without attacking feminis…
/r/MensRights25/11/21 12:27 AM
10

Thanks for posting, that's a must-see. Unfortunately Prof. Straus passed away in 2016. Here you can see Dr. Tonia Nicholls talking about the same issue. He's mentioned in the lecture.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/11/21 03:42 PM
2

You're right. Indeed, they have modified that page recently. Good advice, thank you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/11/21 03:17 PM
29

Tell them "incel" is the new "gay".
/r/MensRights22/11/21 09:08 PM
3

Was it menslib? Yep.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 03:50 AM
126

> Why aren't we doing this? Because they can't stand each other, LOL.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 07:07 PM
8

This sums up my opinion about the WEF: Capture of democratic structures and institutions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/21 05:59 PM
7

> Please, can someone enlighten me, where's the antifeminism? Feminism is "men are oppressors, women are oppressed". What you wrote is (rightfully) denying that. That's not a men's rights sub, it's a feminist sub.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 05:28 PM
1

I know what you mean, but I don't think "women" are the problem. Feminists, politicians and MSM are the problem. The rest are just sheeps following the flock. Also, you can't address the whole thing in a tweet or any other short messaging system, but at least you can start by denying the major premise ("women are oppressed"). I believe that acknowledging women are not oppressed is enough hard for them as a first step, let alone acknowledging that it's not women but men who are oppressed. But I a…
/r/MensRights21/11/21 03:47 PM
4

Same author: chapter 5. From sexism to misogyny, of the book "Misogyny as Hate Crime".
/r/MensRights20/11/21 10:35 PM
156

Next time say "neither are women". In the western world women are not oppressed. They just want privileges.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 10:19 PM
3

Her manners show lack of respect, and disrespectful people are always disrespectful. Very unattractive. She'll probably end with a guy as shallow and disrespectful as her. Karma is a bitch ;)
/r/MensRights20/11/21 10:13 PM
32

Everyday is rather "International Male Bashing Day" :/
/r/MensRights19/11/21 11:01 PM
97

"Incel" is the new "gay". Tell them that. With “pick me" they mean "I'm desperate for men". It's how they try to insult other women. Childish as hell, but that's what they are, angry little girls.
/r/AntiFeminists18/11/21 09:26 PM
4

> – Anonymous Medical Doctor with a PhD. > To the woke males out there: Looks like satire ;)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/11/21 05:04 PM
9

I've seen some posts where people say this video is about men and male loneliness, but I disagree. I think it's about women. It's saying that women don't like when we talk to them about our things (including our emotions). It "annoys" them. It turned out that they are not the super-empathic creatures that they claim to be. We already knew that. But it would be unacceptable to show women as "not capable of something", so the solution is showing men as simplistic creatures, like dogs. I'll say it …
/r/MensRights15/11/21 11:59 PM
3

she concludes by acknowledging the probability that you are a perfectly decent person with no harmful intentions. Yes. So? We humans have the ability to tell -with high accuracy- whether another person or situation is a threat or not. Among paranoids, this ability doesn't work properly for a variety of reasons. But that doesn't mean they think always, everyone, are a threat for them. Now, the problem is that nowadays people are telling paranoids that it's ok to be a paranoid. No, it's not ok. It…
/r/MensRights13/11/21 05:58 PM
2

Yes, that's always a possibility :) Sometimes we overanalyze things. We tend to forget that human stupidity knows no limits.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 05:01 PM
11

> I think there is an important distinction between tears and composure. Agree. > Women often tell men to show their emotions more. I think they mean "...emotions I like, and when I like them", because it's quite obvious that they don't like men showing certain emotions.
/r/MensRights12/11/21 08:23 PM
52

A common symptom of paranoia is the attribution bias. These individuals typically have a biased perception of reality, often exhibiting more hostile beliefs. A paranoid person may view someone else's accidental behavior as though it is with intent or threatening. Source.
/r/MensRights12/11/21 05:18 PM
47

> “We don’t mean it” A few hours ago I wrote this comment in the MensRights sub: If she doesn't mean it, why is she saying that? > Her: yeah, that's okay since women were oppressed for centuries That's the answer. Revenge. I don't think there is any reason for revenge, since the past is not what she think it is. We all were oppressed, life in the past was very different, very hard, full of illnesses, misery, scarcity and many other things. Ignorance is not an excuse. They have been told for year…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/21 01:18 PM
80

> She's a sweet kid, No, she isn't. If she doesn't mean it, why is she saying that? > Her: yeah, that's okay since women were oppressed for centuries That's the answer. Revenge. I don't think there is any reason for revenge, since the past is not what she think it is. We all were oppressed, life in the past was very different, very hard, full of illnesses, misery, scarcity and many other things. Ignorance is not an excuse.
/r/MensRights12/11/21 02:18 AM
4

Fake charities are a problem. They are everywhere, making some of the most aggressive propaganda. And they don't care about people, but only about the money.
/r/MensRights11/11/21 11:07 PM
3

But if we sum up "can't afford a wedding", "don't have a good job" and "afraid of getting divorced" we get 44-72%. Although "afraid of getting divorced" may be there for different reasons. Money is one, but also child custody. Anyhow the article is very interesting.
/r/MensRights11/11/21 10:30 PM
-1

men who have lost their testes to injury or disease. I didn't say "have", I said "born with". I don't buy the "transphobic" argument. Sex is an immutable characteristic. I can refer to a transwoman as "she", but you can't force me to believe "she" is a woman, as you can't force me to believe god exists... unless you're a sort of religious right-wing person.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/21 10:00 PM
1

I don't get what "left wing" or "transphobia" has to do with it, but I do get the message of the downvotes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/21 08:47 PM
-8

> What defines a man in 2021? Being born in 2003 or before with a pair of balls attached to your body :)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/21 12:24 AM
15

I'd wish I'm wrong, but I think feminism can't evolve. There is something missing in the dictionary definition of feminism: they blame men; men are the enemy. Every feminist theory is based on that idea. They can't stop bashing men because that's what feminism is. They see men as a class, but why? Rich people are a class because they have money and they can do certain (bad) things with it, but... what do all men have? Nothing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/21 04:49 PM
5

You can see at Amazon that it's out of print. But you can download a digital copy of the full book if you search google. It's been there for months.
/r/AntiFeminists09/11/21 12:08 AM
12

Most of those self-diagnosed "traumas" aren't actually traumas, they are excuses to impose their ideas. You just don't talk with these people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/21 12:43 AM
10

Progressive judges are not different. The problem is not tradcon/progressive judges, but a corrupt system.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 09:42 PM
236

Certainly "papi" means "daddy" in Spanish. That's how every child calls his/her dad. Fucking hysteria. It's infuriating.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 12:48 AM
5

Those "tips" sound familiar to me. It's an old list, written -I believe- by a feminist as sarcasm. Like a meme. I mean her level as a politician is so low.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 05:36 AM
3

It's a dude: left pic, right pic.
/r/AntiFeminists05/11/21 04:17 AM
5

Where this is from. Those are phone screenshots. I supposed you took them from your phone, of your own private conversation in a chat or messaging system. If not, it's always good to say where you've found it (webpage, social network, another subreddit...), or "from a friend of mine" or whatever.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 03:36 AM
3

Whoever was. That's why quoting the source is important.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 01:16 AM
5

There seems to be some missing messages between 11:09 and 11:37. I'm not sure why she called you a pedo, but there are some things you're not getting. Short people aren't "excluded from the dating market", they just have some bad luck, but still they can find someone. Apparently, she understood "you have to date me even if I'm short", and that's why she said "you sound like a rapist". Also, just because she asks if you're indian doesn't mean she's racist. Culture is a thing, even if she's being …
/r/MensRights05/11/21 12:46 AM
5

It follows a similar move in Spain where teachers and children have worn skirts to show solidarity with a boy who was expelled for wearing one last year. November 4 is now ‘wear a skirt to school day’ in Spain. I live in Spain. That's not true. This happened in 2020 at the high school of one small town (Bueu, province of Pontevedra, 12k population). This article erroneously claim that there were "4 million videos" on Tiktok about this initiative. The hashtag #4denoviembre ("november 4th") was no…
/r/MensRights04/11/21 04:18 PM
22

Jenny McCarthy assaulted Justin Bieber at the American Music Awards. She kissed his neck and grabbed his ass. Afterwards she said "I couldn't help it, he was just so delicious", and also (if I understand it correctly) "I think that's cougar rape"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/21 03:50 AM
2

It's hard to tell whether these people believe what they are saying or if it's just an excuse to make money. In this case I don't mean the climate change issue itself, but all those "how to" address it. There is an army of them around any social cause. They write articles, sell books, make conferences, offer consulting services, have patreon accounts, etc. I'm not surprised when they link climate change to women empowerment. Both things are priorities now, so it would be a pity to not take advan…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/21 03:20 PM
3

> because it looks good for marketing to a 2021 audience. I think it's rather because they don't want to be seen as "bad companies". It's not the same thing. Feminists are bullies. They are harassing every organization and company under the threat of naming them "bigots". That's what many of those feminist and DEI organizations are doing.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 01:18 PM
15

> While I do not agree with certain aspects of the movement like the feminism bashing, "Men = oppressor, women = oppressed" is the basis of modern feminism. It is not compatible with human rights. Let me remind you that human rights are individual rights. Feminism is not an acceptable movement in a developed country.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 12:46 PM
12

Do family courts respect a man's right to a due and fair process? Do feminists and MSM respect men's dignity when they constantly bash men and assume us guilty of everything that's wrong? These are humans rights. No, you don't understand what's happening.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 12:40 PM
1

Awareness. That's a very positive thing. It allows you to modify your behavior and avoid certain people and groups, so you don't fall into traps. It shows you who and what you shouldn't support.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 05:31 PM
6

Nice post. Misogyny is a myth in the sense feminism is using it. Certainly they use that word to: 1) Erroneously explain the motive of some behaviors. For example, if a man is selfish, they look at his behavior towards women and say he is a misogynist. But they do not realize (or intentionally ignore) that he does the same to anyone. The same for any other bad trait a man can have. "It's misogyny", they say. No, in most cases it's not. There is a loooooong list of motives for bad behavior and fo…
/r/MensRights02/11/21 05:07 PM
4

> any anxiety we express is shamed right out of us? Agree, but that's because men are expected to be the protectors. Even those who say "we don't need men" also say "men need to do this and that [in order to protect us]". And I do not think that this is (mainly) a socially constructed thing. Otherwise these people wouldn't be contradicting themselves all the time. That means that we are never going to get 100% rid of what they call "gender roles", because that's -to some extent- a biological/evo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/11/21 03:58 PM
16

I think this is because they see themselves as weak and delicate flowers. Despite the "women power", the "strong women" and all that, they are always claiming they are victims of everything and hurt by everything. If that's not emotional weakness I don't know what it is.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 06:17 PM
29

Fucked Up Beyond All Repair ;)
/r/AntiFeminists01/11/21 02:02 PM
46

Yes, I've read some articles and many mentions on twitter. It happens here in Spain too. If there is some evidence of abuse -no matter how small or old it is-, they attribute the killing to "self-defense" without any further consideration. They generalize with concepts like battered woman syndrome, coercive control and things like that. But in the end all comes to "men bad, women victims". Apparently, this couple had a very unhealthy relationship, but murder is murder.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/21 01:55 PM
34

Yes, this. Also, when they say "imagine you have a box a chocolates and one of them is poisoned, but you don't know which one": This is funny because people actually die from (accidental) food poisoning: One in 55,000. But still, people are not scared of food -thank goodness, because otherwise it would be a miserable life :) For reference (and this is a related topic), this is where I got the idea from. I remembered Paul Bloom (psychology professor at Yale university) explaining that, statistica…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/21 01:02 PM
10

Yes, I think it is. But let's be clear: showing narcissistic traits doesn't mean the person has narcissistic personality disorder. In order to be diagnosed as such, the person must meet certain criteria in quantitative and qualitative terms, and that's something only an expert can observe. In other words, narcissism is one thing, and narcissistic personality disorder is another. That said, yes, it has some narcissistic characteristics. > 7. Lacks empathy That's a very interesting one. Feminists …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/21 12:12 PM
63

It's a for profit FUBAR femcel community. Childish, zero emotional intelligence, deluded, frustrated women venting their miserable lives. Sometimes you will see some delusions of grandeur. It's a narcissistic behavior they use as a defense mechanism. Unfortunately, feminism and wokeism promote mental disorders. But that's a profitable thing for some people.
/r/AntiFeminists01/11/21 11:08 AM
18

> FCKH8 is a for-profit company that was founded in 2010 and sells T-shirts and accessories featuring slogans with a social justice theme. The website is down. I believe it's been down for a while.
/r/AntiFeminists31/10/21 05:48 PM
4

> Brittney Cooper A few days ago this person said some racist and stupid things. It gives you an idea of the current state of universities. That aside, if you google "women's anger", "women's rage" or things like that you're gonna find some articles and books. It's like they don't have enough with regular feminism, they now claim the "right to be angry". Their entitlement knows no limits.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 03:10 PM
17

> how women have always been, and will always be, under the boot of men. That's not correct, humans are essentially cooperative. Despite all past fights for power, we have been able to build civilizations in which people are reasonably free and safe. They are not perfect -and never will-, but we keep working. This wouldn't have been possible if the ultimate goal of men were the domination. Indeed, many wars have been fought to end domination. Besides, I think what they call "patriarchy" has been…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/21 08:03 PM
53

"A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle" + 20 years of male bashing... Well, there you have it. As the saying goes: "Be careful what you wish for, because you might get it"
/r/MensRights30/10/21 03:59 PM
28

I guess it's about getting attention of the media, so someone hires her for a movie or theatre play.
/r/MensRights30/10/21 03:48 PM
4

I don't think this would make any difference in this particular context.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 11:41 PM
96

They are scared of trans women in public toilets and in jail. They don't want trans women in women's spaces. That's a very specific problem. Should men not be allowed to break gender norms? Only if it benefits women (they don't say this but it's what they think)
/r/MensRights29/10/21 11:35 PM
20

Yes, of course. Also, in the second video I think the woman looks intentionally like a cougar. Would the reactions of the girls be the same if the woman looked more "prudish"?
/r/MensRights29/10/21 11:08 PM
5

Nice post. Yes, I'm familiar with Mary P. Koss, she's quoted in every "study". I just read this article today: Research reveals rapes and assaults admitted to by male UK students In study of 554 university students, 63 admit to rape, sexual assault and other aggressive forcible acts The "research" is IMO awful. It's self reported, the questions are not available, and the conclusions are not causality but correlations. Guess who's quoted in it? Koss, of course. I've found the author on twitter. H…
/r/MensRights29/10/21 08:20 PM
1

I see. GHB is illegal here (not used in medicine nor as recreational). And unlike other illegal synthetic drugs, it isn't popular either. But of course each country is different.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/21 01:55 AM
7

I think it's fake. I'm not a doctor, but c'mon, there are many things that don't fit. Intramuscular or subcutaneous injections don't go unnoticed. You need some time to inject the liquid -the needle is too thin. You need the drug, with its correct mix of excipient and active ingredient. Drugs hard enough to knock you fast like heroin or propofol (common anesthetic in medicine) must be injected intravenously. The dose is very important, it may not work or it may kill you. How about spiking a drin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/21 12:11 AM
1

I've seen it. She uses the flair "African Queen". Queen of femcels, I guess. Her hate is just a reflection of her frustration.
/r/MensRights28/10/21 07:25 PM
6

Wow. I know reddit is fucked up, but seeing how they admit it is priceless.
/r/AntiFeminists28/10/21 06:52 PM
3

It's a conspiracy theory. But feminists see it like a sort of supernatural evil entity (the devil or something like that): It's powerful, it's omnipresent, it may "tempt" you even if you're against it. Being born male is the original sin. You have to reject patriarchy by promising you'll embrace feminism (as in the christian concept of baptism), but still it doesn't mean you're free from evil, because you can commit the capital sin of misogyny anytime. There are other minor sins, like mansplaini…
/r/MensRights28/10/21 03:11 PM
7

"Men" do not start wars, they are started usually by one person or a small group of them. European queens have started wars too. I believe there was an article claiming that during certain time period women have started more wars than men. Also, incest is not a crime in many countries even though it's considered immoral by most people. Statutory rape is a crime. Women do this too, but it doesn't get as much attention.
/r/MensRights28/10/21 02:35 PM
5

I'd suggest you to first take a look at what deconstruction really means and where it comes from. Derrida's philosophy is postmodern philosophy, a very stupid and dangerous set of ideas. Many postmodern claims are a deliberate repudiation of certain 18th-century Enlightenment values. Such a postmodernist believes that there is no objective natural reality, and that logic and reason are mere conceptual constructs that are not universally valid. Two other characteristic postmodern practices are a …
/r/MensRights28/10/21 02:26 PM
1

I didn't know pussypass, only pussypassdenied. Subscribed, thanks.
/r/MensRights28/10/21 02:02 PM
7

I understand what you mean. But that publication is intended for children, and we excuse certain things in children (like girls being "weird") because they aren't fully developed yet, they can't think like an adult. The problem is when we do this only with girls, and another very different thing (pretty much the opposite) with boys. Because in this case the "excuse" is not for being children, but just for being girls.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/21 01:50 PM
32

Nothing. It's to show how differently the author treats boys and girls.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/21 02:56 AM
54

This reminds me to: Boys Are Stupid, Throw Rocks at Them! Girls are Weirdos but They Smell Pretty
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/21 12:27 AM
3

I'm not sure this is real. Look at 1:01. In most cars, the part that's between the wheel and the right rear door (all the door frame actually) belongs to the monocoque frame (don't know the correct term in English), and that's very hard. You can't bend it with one of those shopping carts. I don't know what car is that though.
/r/AntiFeminists27/10/21 11:40 PM
16

If she has a price... she's a... "professional". BTW: you don't key a man's car. That's most low, despicable and cowardly thing on earth. As Lance said: They should be fucking killed. No trial, no jury, straight to execution :D
/r/AntiFeminists27/10/21 10:59 PM
37

Not only serial killers but criminals in general. Women commit horrible crimes, but news about male criminals get more visibility. News about female crime are often found in local news only. And when the perpetrator is a man and the victim is a women it's always amplified and seen as a "feminicide", despite the motive of the crime. The hype is "men bad, women victims". Look at this: "Once we change the language..." I wish there was a subreddit exclusively for female crimes, so we could compile n…
/r/MensRights27/10/21 01:51 PM
13

I agree. I'm not a subscriber, but a relative (who isn't a woke either) gave me access. I've told him to end the subscription whenever he wants, because I don't like it. I don't know if Netflix is what it is due to their beliefs or if they are doing this because "it sells", but I don't care. I'm tired too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/10/21 01:03 PM
29

There are apparently two meanings. One refers to the fact that those who did X were men, which -obviously- is not the same as "men (all men and only men) did X". The problem is that it is ambiguous. Whether the ambiguity is intentional or not depends on the case. The other is when they see this as a class problem. Needless to say, it's completely wrong. In any case they shouldn't say "men", because it means "all men".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/21 07:32 PM
4

They can stay at home if they are so scared of men.
/r/AntiFeminists25/10/21 11:50 PM
6

Don't worry ;) I have so many open tabs in the browser that sometimes I don't know where I'm writing!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/21 01:40 PM
11

I think you're commenting to this post.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/21 01:18 PM
7

Certainly it's not a good example. If we reverse the genders of the characters the movie would be very different. But I guess the average person out there won't get it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/21 11:49 AM
50

You're not called these things for having preferences, but for being a man. There is a war on men. It's called feminism.
/r/MensRights24/10/21 11:34 PM
22

Is there any evidence that they have been spiked actually? Because I can't find it. No positive blood or urine test at all. Not to mention that injecting someone is highly improbable. The spiked drink seems to be mostly a myth.
/r/MensRights24/10/21 10:53 PM
21

> All of the guys I know who get around with girls are selfish and arrogant, They are probably self-confident too. This is a very attractive trait, especially for women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/21 09:17 PM
2

Sorry, "toxic masculinity" does not exist. The questions don't make sense.
/r/MensRights23/10/21 07:50 PM
17

That's wise. > "Because not everybody has a father figure at home – or a male, period, in their life. So just to be here makes a big difference," the dads said. Yes. Dad power! :)
/r/MensRights23/10/21 04:49 PM
2

It's good discussion, don't feel pedantic :)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/21 03:40 PM
1

Couldn't help making the point, but yes, I agree it's commonly used in a loose way. There are even good jokes about it :)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/21 03:24 PM
3

I understand what you say. And to be honest my comment is quite "nerdy" :) What I mean is that the author refers to a regular uncertainty: She doesn't know if he's a rapist it until she gets to know the person. But her actions don't change what he is. He either is or is not a rapist despite she gets to know him or not. This is important because -as you say- most men are not rapists. But that's not what the Schrodinger's cat mean. What this thought experiment illustrates is a paradox: the cat is …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/21 02:51 PM
9

I learned about the "Schrodinger's Rapist" while reading the blog (now closed) of a known feminist sociopath and fat-acceptance writer, Kate Harding. I guess whoever coined it tried to sound intellectual, but it's a big mistake. The uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics has nothing to do with usual uncertainty. The thing is, these people are mentally ill, and they are trying to create mass hysteria. Unfortunately they have the support of a part of the mainstream media. IMO they should be na…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/21 01:13 PM
9

What does this say for our commitment to civil liberties and gender equality? It says that there is a corruption problem there, obviously.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/21 03:48 PM
18

0.08 are false accusations. This is what happens in Spain: False accusations are often not investigated. They find that "there is not enough evidence", and the case is closed. Many times it's an obvious false accusation, but they do nothing about it, the judge doesn't open the investigation, case is closed, and period. I am not the one that's saying this; lawyers are saying it. Apparently, the consensus inside the judiciary is that if they allow people to know the true rate of false accusations,…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/21 03:18 PM
7

That screenshot was then seen by another Ottawa woman, Solit Isak, who is Black and was deeply involved in Black Lives Matter activism on social media. Isak had never met the Lavallees and had not seen the original video, but believed the screenshot showed a racist act of mocking Floyd’s death. Angry, resentful, revengeful BLM followers. She deleted the tweets, but there are still screenshots with pictures and data from the two sisters tweeted by other people. Gosh, how I hate twitter.
/r/MensRights21/10/21 03:21 AM
8

GG gives you an idea of how corrupt journalism is -for those who didn't know it already. But the most interesting part of this is that lots of people already believe the lies, despite all evidence. Anyway, fighting corrupt journalism should be a priority for us. BTW, there should be another version of the wikipedia). The existing one is hijacked by the mob.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/21 06:50 PM
11

Very interesting, thanks for the link!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/10/21 11:32 AM
100

Misandry is mostly a reaction to misogyny and informed by evidence. These kind of statements always remind me of the Grey's Law: "Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/10/21 02:45 AM
21

He doesn't mention where he found it. Isn't it interesting? 2k karma right now. Some idiots will do anything for attention.
/r/AntiFeminists19/10/21 12:43 AM
14

From now on, use your phone to track your position by GPS, including timestamps. There are apps for that. Save the logs to your computer or pen drive periodically. If she ever makes a false report maybe you can prove you were in another place at that moment. It'll be useless when you're near her (at school), so be recording audio too. Keep the files. I'm always recording audio when I visit a female customer.
/r/MensRights18/10/21 12:13 AM
5

Yes, I've noticed a few unfortunate things in that website. That site belongs to Healthline Media, Inc., it was acquired by Red Ventures in 2019. I mean, it's a media company. Business. Controversy: headlines that exaggerate the substance of the article inadequate journalistic and scientific skepticism when reporting "news" failure to balance quotes from vested interests with quotes from interviews of independent sources reported medical "news" that had not yet validated by publication in a peer…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/21 12:41 PM
10

I think the point is that most women's struggles aren't actually misogyny. IMO the whole point of the use of "misogyny" by feminism is to make this a zero sum game. They use the concept of misogyny to erase the idea of women's struggles and convert it into women's victimhood. That's exactly what the oppressed/oppressor game is, a zero sum game. And we need to point this out, because otherwise any male advocacy will be useless.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/21 03:53 PM
14

> Saying that women are the only people that can give birth erases the existence of trans men. No, it doesn't. You can't erase the existence of a person. > If the primary issue a marginalized group faces is the recognition of their identity's validity, and you deny them that, that's bigotry. Their perceived sexual identity is one thing, and their sex is another. You can't force me to "recognize" your sex as whatever you want, because I have a perception too, and it's my right to perceive the wor…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/21 07:57 PM
7

Dave Chappelle doesn’t think trans women are women. He explicitly said "Now, I am not saying that to say that trans women aren't women".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/21 07:29 PM
6

It's a paranoia induced by the media. I think there is a big problem with that. They are inflating statistics, and on the other hand people often misinterpret the figures due to cognitive biases. Also: Humans have the ability to detect dangerous people. It's a survival mechanism, like the ability to detect lies. Yes, you can be fooled, but not always. Have you ever avoided a person or a situation because you thought was dangerous? I've done it many times, particularly when I was living in a big …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/21 06:25 PM
16

Second-wave feminism to present. There are few feminists who don't support the patriarchy theory.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/21 01:40 AM
31

It's consistent if we see the gender roles as men = oppressor and women = oppressed, which is what feminism preaches. For them it's "fair game". If this is not a war on men, I don't know what it is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/21 12:25 AM
12

Also: > Physical abuse by a woman is typically a response to physical abuse by their partner. Sounds like a justification. How about the other way around?. That's not mentioned. I bet in many cases it's mutual abuse.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/21 10:27 AM
1

> To literally include the people left out in the movement. In theory, yes. In practice is more like "the intersectionality calculator says I'm way more oppressed than you, so shut up and listen to me". Not all feminists have good intentions, and it's often difficult to tell which is the case of a given feminist. Also, not all feminists know what they are doing. It's not very different from other political groups. There are very different people in each group regarding their set of beliefs, but …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/10/21 12:45 PM
4

Many white feminists didn't know that at the beginning. Some still don't know it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/10/21 11:29 PM
16

This is from wikipedia: The term was conceptualized and coined by Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw in a paper in 1989 Who's this person? Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw is an American lawyer, civil rights advocate, philosopher, and a leading scholar of critical race theory. Also: Intersectionality broadens the lens of the first and second waves of feminism, which largely focused on the experiences of women who were both white and middle-class, to include the different experiences of women of color, women w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/10/21 07:08 PM
1

I guess so. Because men are seen as predatory, but women aren't.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/10/21 12:07 PM
3

> In my experience, a sizeable number of the leaders suffer from cluster B personality disorders. They do. And I think many journalists do too. That's why MSM is so fucked up.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/10/21 03:11 PM
11

I'm not sure if this (not mine) is related, because they mention "cis gay men", but I've seen many identical tweets with only "men". The issue in those tweets seems to be a reaction to perceived transphobia, but that's just my guess.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/21 04:23 PM
16

> Is our compassion so limited? Very limited when you make two groups and name one oppressed and the other oppressor. I mean, who feels compassion for "the oppressor"?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/21 12:05 AM
12

It is, but then I tell them "That's not an argument" and they -usually- stop talking. Also, you won't believe how effective it is sometimes to simply say "nah." (meaning "you're not right and it doesn't bother me"). I guess it works so well because gaslighting operates at a rational (cognitive) level but also at an emotional level, and when they are told "nah" they feel like they hit a concrete wall. If you want to discuss with manipulative people, cool down your blood first. And if you come acr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/21 02:59 PM
61

Yes, it's one of the reasons. Some people believe men have no issues. In the oppressed/oppressor narrative everything is black or white. "How can you have issues when you have all the power?", they think. So, for some of those people the idea of a MRA is laughable, and for others it's insulting ("how you dare to ask for rights?"). For them it's a class war, and we are the bad guys. I think there is an inherent sexism there. The idea that men hold all the power can be hardly explained unless they…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/10/21 07:25 PM
26

I feel like there's this preconceived idea that women are, by default, more advanced emotionally and more knowledgeable about humans and relationships and that, because they're women, they know everything about the genders and the sexes. That's exactly what I think every time I read feminist literature. They think they are experts, but some ideas are obvious misinterpretations. In radical feminism this is particularly awful. Geez, it's known that Kate Millett was bipolar and Shulamith Firestone …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/21 06:14 PM
4

I think the only rape culture that exists is prison rape. Yes, I know what statutory rape is. I'm not surprised by the comments. They probably are young boys, horny as hell, who think the aggressor is hot. They are imagining a situation in which they'd love to have sex with that woman. It's an idealization. I mean they are not talking about the actual situation, but about an imagined one. If the aggressor were an ugly woman they wouldn't say these things. They are not getting the full picture be…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/21 05:33 PM
1

Fixed, thanks!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/09/21 09:07 PM
37

I've seen a lot of justifications for misandry, like "it's a reaction to misogyny", "you did it to yourself", "you wrote the rules, we're just following suit", etc. Most of the times it seems to be a joke. It's not an issue until someone "learns" that it's somehow justified, and kills another person because "after all, he's one of those oppressors". Or the other way around: a young man with mental issues who is told that he's trash and that girls hate him, until one day he takes a gun and then g…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/09/21 04:42 PM
4

Excellent job. Thanks! This is a lecture by Dr. Murray Straus, one of the researchers you mention. Unfortunately he passed away in 2016. At 30:00 you can read in the slide: Method 7: Harass, threaten and penalize researchers who produce evidence that contradicts feminist beliefs He says that, among other things, they received a bomb threat during the wedding of a colleague's daughter.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/09/21 03:15 PM
6

Couldn't agree more.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/09/21 10:32 AM
7

This lady said that feminism does a great job at advocating for males in the same comment as effectively saying males don't have any gender related issues. You can ask her where or when this happened, but IMO that statement is a sign the discussion is over. I mean she's too far from reality, and the amount of time and effort required to bring her back -if that's possible- is huge. I'd answer something like "nah, this is not true", or "obviously you're not aware of what's happening" and leave the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/21 12:43 PM
10

Done
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/21 11:33 PM
16

Ok I've found it. It's not on the right side, but in the post about the Podcast: EP. 29. There is a fundraiser for $10,000 going on to help grow FDS so they can make more content!! I guess it's not against the rules, but still they are making money out of the whole thing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/21 10:51 PM
3

Take it with a grain of salt, I'm not 100% sure.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/21 10:40 PM
27

I'd swear they had a Patreon link on the right side of the sub a few days ago, but it's no longer there. Too embarrassing? It is on their website though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/21 09:41 PM
0

This is pretty much radical feminism in a nutshell. Do you know why feminism -and especially radical feminism- "works" so well? Because it offers you a bunch of easy (as in "lazy") explanations for all the problems, difficulties, frustrations, etc. you may experience as a woman. Unfortunately, the amount of time and effort it takes to take a person out of that cult is way beyond a CMV post. Hell, it's so difficult that most non-feminists -men and women- don't even try to do such a thing. That sa…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/21 05:34 PM
2

Ok, thanks.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/21 01:31 AM
1

Where is the generalization? Maybe it's my English, it's not my first language. What I mean is some LGBT people side with feminism, the same way that some women join feminism. It's not about being LGBT, it's about voluntarily choosing a problematic movement/ideology. Just wanted to make it clear, I don't wanna start an argument.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/21 01:00 AM
3

> LGBT isn't an ideology True, but ideas like "oppression" and concepts like identity politics lead many of them to groups with certain ideologies. > and not every LGBT person agrees with radical feminism Not the radical feminism of course. But there are many other branches.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/09/21 11:30 PM
1

I meant criticized by feminists women. Regarding feminist guys, do they actually exist? What I've seen is that some guys pretend to be feminists in order to earn the confidence of some women. What actual feminist guys would do is unknown to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 10:14 PM
0

I guess that being told on a daily basis that they are violent, rapists, murderers, that "men are garbage" and that "it is ok to hate men" doesn't help either. I feel especially for the younger ones, who are the most vulnerable to this vile and persistent attack.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 09:53 PM
2

They are criticized by feminists because they are dissidents of feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 09:13 PM
7

It's a feminist subreddit in disguise as a "men's liberation" sub, so no surprise their justification is "because I say so". I don't know what's the ratio men/women there, but it's quite clear that many users are LGBT people, the branch that sides with feminism. Unfortunately, this particular group is very misandrist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/09/21 08:42 PM
4

> The idea that casual sex is the "ideal" mating strategy for males AFAIK nobody is saying that. It makes no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 07:18 PM
0

You can say "husband/wife material" for different reasons. People have very different views and speak in different ways. Given the lack of context, we can't tell what it really means. Saying that it always means "A" and not "B" is a projection of your own thoughts.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 05:24 PM
2

I ask because I am interested in gaining a more in depth perspective of what women truly want and I'm just generally interested in women's perspective. If that's what you're interested in, that's the wrong question. What people think they would do if they were in power is always different from what they do once in power. There are many reasons why this happens, but the most important one is that the average citizen has no freaking idea how politics actually work.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 01:58 PM
11

Every genocide that has happened in human history started the same way: Blaming a group for something a few did. Now you know what you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/21 01:43 PM
3

> Hell, even suggesting this makes people angry and resentful. Yes. Fear is a self-defense mechanism, and sometimes it goes wrong (excessive fear, wrong cause, etc.). When a therapist challenges a patient's fear, it's often met with anger and resentfulness. It's the defense mechanism protecting itself. At a social level -when many people share the same wrong fears- is even worse, because they (people) reinforce each other.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/09/21 01:02 PM
47

For the last decades feminism has been teaching women that men are abusers, rapists and murderers, and that they should be scared. That's how they control people, because fear is the best manipulation tool. Men's fear is irrelevant, of course. I'm sure there are evolutive factors too, but that's a very different story.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/09/21 03:13 AM
2

That's a very broad statement. Why does she belong to that tribe? Is it mainly by chance? Or does she have a strong emotional dependence on it? Is she strong and thoughtful enough to challenge the confirmation bias that she's getting from the tribe? There are many different cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 01:07 PM
1

A bunch of things already mentioned in the comments. I'd add that they're probably seen as challenging, especially towards social rules, and therefore brave in some weird way.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 12:32 PM
4

Lobbies. They are doing a good job.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/21 05:35 PM
1

> Why do you think this is so common, yet denied so heavily by most women? It's probably as common in men as in women, but feminist and the media don't want you to know it. But the answer is that they have issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/21 05:27 PM
2

> Do we even know? We know some things, but aren't aware of many other things. Sexual/emotional attraction is a very complex thing. It involves genetic, psychological and cultural factors, and it's one of those things that operates "automatically" to a big extent: we don't have to consciously think about it; it just happens. Of course we can think about it and try to rationalize this or that. Some things are obvious, many others aren't. There are things we can explain and others we can't. Like m…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/21 02:37 PM
2

Wow, thanks :)
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/21 10:33 AM
5

I get it, but his words make me think he doesn't value himself too much, and that's something others can sense. I bet if he works on his self esteem he'll be much more successful.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/21 10:30 AM
2

It's on YouTube if you want to see it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/21 02:43 AM
0

Have you seen the Red Pill documentary?. I think you'll find some interesting info there.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/21 02:21 AM
12

> When a female doc says: "Men get repulsed when they find out I'm an asshole with an ego the size of the former Soviet Union." That's what she actually meant. Don't get me wrong, most people aren't like that, but some are. This particular case is fucking easy, her word choice betrayed her. "...when they find out I'm a doctor" Yeah, SURE :D
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/21 08:02 PM
6

But as a young man with a lot of testosterone it is hard. I know, but that's why fapping exists!. A man has to empty his balls ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/21 05:40 PM
115

Dude, I'm not trying to blame you or belittle your situation, but it really looks like your self-esteem is below ground level. You shouldn't need a woman, you should want her. The only person you need is yourself. Also, you may have had an Internet overdose. Seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/21 12:57 PM
1

You have to find a match -you like her and she likes you-. You start by looking in your circle, and if there is no match you keep looking outside, it. How long? Until you get tired.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/21 10:39 AM
2

I've had the trio fantasy, but it was just a fantasy, I never wanted to do it IRL. So no. I like monogamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/21 09:59 AM
2

It seems like she's desperate to find a guy, or maybe she has no manners -or lack of social skills. If the goal is just sex I don't see the problem, but if it's LTR then that's a big red flag.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/21 09:50 AM
1

Ricardo Mejide is a Spanish celebrity and TV presenter. When he was 42 he married a 21 years old girl, and now they have a baby. He met her on Instagram two years before. I mean, it's not my thing, but the law allows you to do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/21 03:05 AM
2

This too. I mean too often things have multiple explanations, after all each person is different.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/21 10:11 PM
1

It's a uncomfortable question for them. I've seen this reaction multiple times when it comes to the protection issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/21 08:28 PM
2

If you mean financial dependency is risky, I totally agree. But a couple things: both jobs are obsolete in 2021 Being a housewife is an occupation, not a job. If a person does not financially contribute to the household they are a dependent, not a partner. In this case they are a dependent partner, which -as I said- is risky. Given the high divorce rate, I think women should at least have a job, but that's up to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/21 08:02 PM
2

My point here is that introversion isn't defined as being "non-sociable." You're right. I've been told sometimes "I see you DO know how to socialize. Why don't you do it more?". The answer is "because I don't like it too much". From the wikipedia: The more frequent social participation among extraverts could be explained by the fact that extraverts know more people, but those people are not necessarily their close friends, whereas introverts, when participating in social interactions, are more s…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/21 07:47 PM
1

> I see a lot of posts about how "women are so masculine these days" or "so many women act like men now" I think it's not that women are or act more masculine now, but rather that more masculine women are the actors now, while women that are more feminine have been relegated to some degree. Why?: Feminism. Who's pushing for this?: The media. Is this a good thing?: Of course not, but why should they care?. Business is business.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/21 06:06 PM
2

(Sorry for my english) If you talk with psychologists, they will tell you that "money" usually means "power", "ability" and things like that. Our mind deals with symbols and associations all the time, and part of that work is done subconsciously. Some associations are quite common in people, while others are very different because they depend on your personal experience and traits. That's why attractiveness -among many other things- is so subjective. Actual example: I meet a woman I find mildly …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/21 03:33 PM
2

I'm not whining about loneliness/blue balls, but you're talking about two different things. > The reason why people just think it's just men whining about blue balls is because guys seem extremely reluctant to just go make friends. Male friends can't fix the blue balls problem. Not even female friends can, unless they are "...with benefits" Friendship and romantic/sexual relationships are different domains. You can have friends and feel lonely in the other area. That said, "Reddit" =/= "Men". Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/21 03:01 PM
10

> Is it always true that if a guy says he's not ready for a relationship that the "with you" is silent? No. Nobody knows the reason why someone -men or women- is saying that. Every person is different, has different experiences and circumstances. It's not possible to read others' mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 10:49 PM
1

Rejection just means that the house whose door you are knocking on is empty. Work on yourself, so there are less empty houses, and keep going ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 06:35 PM
2

Where I live this is called "to met the PR girl". The problem with PR types is that they don't tell you that. Sometimes it's because they don't even know it. Next time try to figure out if she pays exactly the same attention to you and to your friend -while both behaving the same way-. If so, she's just being friendly.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 05:38 PM
11

What a coward, bashing a dead man. It's not really about the age. When it comes to bash men any excuse is valid. That's what feminism taught her.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/21 03:19 PM
14

> Women were using this logic to justify her physical violence, Some women -way more you'd imagine- are violent, but mainstream media isn't showing it all. Now we have Youtube, Tiktok, etc. and can see it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/21 11:13 PM
28

That man has a severe emotional dependency issue. He "solved" the problem marrying a dependent person, so now they are codependent but for different reasons. His "superiority" -if that's what he believes- is just a symptom of a disorder.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/21 08:30 PM
1

That's not what I see. I think you're mixing things up. What we don't like is women wanting to have it all, 100% of one thing and 100% of the other. It's common sense. I prefer women who can provide some %. It's better for the two of us.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/21 05:24 PM
1

I would try to seek advice from an stylist. Changing clothes and hair styles may help. > from depression induced insomnia Your depression may be showing in a more o less subtle way. Very young people may not care about this -or even romanticise sadness-, but for older people it's a big red flag. Whatever the case I hope you get better.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/21 04:08 PM
1

Move on with my life and distance myself from her -not because of her, but because of me. When I was very young I tended to go too fast, and then I realized that I wasn't even giving her enough time to get to know me, so sometimes I persisted for a while. BTW, It was a girl who helped me to realize this, and it worked like 50% of the times. Of course I always tried hard to not make her feel uncomfortable.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/21 02:20 PM
1

I've seen it like 10 times or more, but I live in Spain, people here are way less prudish than in the US. Edit: grammar
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/21 03:04 AM
1

No. But I understand it's different for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/21 10:13 PM
4

> why it is appropriate to compliment someone’s hair, but not their breasts? Complimenting breasts is very sexually explicit, but the hair is not -or not so much. The social norm is that you can "show" them but not talk about them -at least in certain situations. You won't feel ashamed nor intimidated if a girl compliments you for your pack or butt, because men feel way less ashamed by sexual things.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/21 10:05 PM
1

Maybe you're taking this too seriously. > Women are the gatekeepers of sex, men are the gatekeepers of relationships. What this means is that women are more likely to withhold sex than men, and men are more likely to withhold relationships than women, IF they happen to be with withholding something. Because sex and relationships mainly depends on attractiveness -both physical and non physical-, not power. The unattractive people that can't improve are not powerless, but unlucky.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/21 02:36 PM
4

For the money, of course. These lunatics are a big part of their readers/customers. As the great Groucho Marx said: "Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others".
/r/MensRights19/11/14 02:33 AM
–

YouCantShutMeUp No problem, I don't want to shut her up. Indeed I want Rachel Giese to show what she is. Take a look at "Rachel Giese's dangerous thinking". It's a short interview (5 min.) about her essay "Bully Pulpit". Quote from the first link: After being called into the principal’s office at her son’s school to talk about his recent bad behaviour, Rachel Giese, senior editor and writer for The Walrus, wondered if all the talk about bullying had gone too far. It looks like she has many diffe…
/r/MensRights06/11/14 04:55 PM
3

Not that I like CNN, but I think that's an ad, coming from an independent ad server. I have seen other ads alike, in Spanish and English, they are always very controversial polls/questions, often presented in an offensive -or almost offensive- way. It's bad taste clickbait, but I don't remember where the click takes you to. I started using the Adblock Plus years ago. Sometimes, secondary ad spaces are rented in bulk to advertising companies without much limitations or supervision (except for the…
/r/MensRights04/11/14 01:54 AM
2

Had to check if it was true. It is, from Vogue India. India.com The film titled ‘Boys don’t cry’ is a part of #VogueEmpower campaign. Madhuri Dixit has joined hands with Vogue in this film to spread a powerful message on a sensitive concept. She says, ‘We teach our “tough boys” not to cry, but instead we should teach them not to make women in their lives cry. If you want change, start with the boys! . Vogue Empower mission IT STARTS WITH YOU To celebrate our seventh anniversary this October, Vog…
/r/MensRights31/10/14 01:39 AM
8

Uh?... The article is completely overblown. It went pretty much unnoticed. Searching now for this I see only 3-4 worth-reading national and regional newspapers reported it. Articles are brief, the usual kind of secondary news or even less. No mention on TV news AFAIK. Only Europa Press news agency (Spanish) mentions the estimated participants: One thousand. No occupation of any office of political or economic institutions. Looks like it was annoying because they blocked the traffic early in the …
/r/MensRights30/10/14 01:29 AM
1

Unless you're the type of person who actually thinks about the question instead of wondering "how many news segments have I seen on that?" It's not that people wonder "how many news segments have I seen on that?". Many people just tend to recall the most impressive memories very quickly, which are likely to be prejudiced depending on their individual experiences and the information (true or false) they receive on a daily basis. Hence the saying: "If you repeat a lie often enough, people will bel…
/r/MensRights26/10/14 05:07 PM
–

Some of you may remember what happened to David Beckham in 2010. The video in unavailable, but there is probably a copy on Youtube or another video site. For other sources, Google: David Beckham sexual assault
/r/MensRights25/10/14 10:29 PM
1

This feeds the availability bias. Long story short, people are more likely to believe/magnify events like those that have been reported recently, AND in a more dramatic way. Psychology Prof. Paul Bloom (Yale) explained it quite well. This is an excerpt of one of his lectures (transcription): The third bias is the "availability bias." And this is simply that if you want to know how frequent something is, how available it is to come to mind is an excellent cue. But this could lead to mistakes. A c…
/r/MensRights25/10/14 09:57 PM
19

Using shootings to stir up outrage and push her agenda... Not too human.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 03:55 AM
3

When asked to elaborate, Warren replied “Nope” twice, but did oblige that she didn't find her treatment surprising. That's why I find politicians so boring. It's lo longer a challenge to tell when they are lying.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 01:19 PM
2

Yeah. Sad but true. Unfortunately, I live in a country where the stupidity per 100,000 population is FUCKING SCARY.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 10:43 PM
1

You have described the availability bias. Clever ;) I agree with the thread.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 03:15 AM
5

You can take back consent as you can take back your decision to pull a gun trigger. If you regret the next morning... OK, but still, you shot. You are responsible for the decisions you make... unless you have been legally pronounced as unable to think by yourself, as happens to people who suffer from severe mental impairment. Geez...
/r/MensRights17/10/14 08:23 PM
–

This gender taliban reminds me to Catherine Comins. Comins argues that men who are unjustly accused can sometimes gain from the experience. "They have a lot of pain, but it is not a pain that I would necessarily have spared them. I think it ideally initiates a process of self-exploration. 'How do I see women?' 'If I didn't violate her, could I have?' 'Do I have the potential to do to her what they say I did?' Those are good questions." Time - Cover Stories Behavior: When Is It RAPE?. By Nancy Gi…
/r/MensRights15/10/14 10:46 PM
5

Just because women don't want me spanking their ass doesn't mean I don't want them spanking mine. While I mainly agree with you, I'd like to make a point: The woman you see in the video looks rather young and attractive. That's pretty much what some men saw in the news a few days ago, when two teachers were arrested for the statutory rape of a college guy. Those men wrote "What a lucky guy!" and things like that. That's called "idealization". Their idea of the event is not rape, but rather a cas…
/r/MensRights10/10/14 11:20 PM
0

http://www.futureswithoutviolence.org/ As far as I've seen, they do not consider men as victims, only aggressors or allies. Take a look at "Our work" -> "Engaging men". It's an interesting fish in the industry: http://www.futureswithoutviolence.org/about-us/our-mission/financials/ http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=6436#.VBscU_ldW05
/r/MensRights05/10/14 02:00 AM
2

OK, It was an exaggeration. But still, I've read a bunch of recommended authors. Long story short: 10% of good intentions and 90% sheer madness. The result: Best self-fulfilling prophecy ever. Nowadays feminism is women's worst enemy. But don't get me wrong: Men make pretty much the same mistakes. Different times and different places, but the same madness.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 11:50 PM
1

As TRPACC just pointed here: "They call you woman haters no matter what". I no longer argue with feminists. I did for a while, but no matter the tone or the arguments, they just don't want to discuss. I am "a misogynist" -they say-, which basically means "No discussion allowed" with some serious tone of hostility. So, OK, message received.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 10:51 PM
1

People who believe in feminism don't like me. That's a good sign.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 08:15 PM
–

I am finding that the majority of content on this sub is slowly becoming an anti feminist. So...? The goal of the mens rights movement and the feminist movement is to gain equal gender rights in society, The feminist movement has nothing to to with equality. Maybe it were its goal years ago, but today??? C'mon, not everybody's a sheep.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 03:23 PM
–

Unsupported claims Unsupported???... WTF? their history is great, As "great" as Stalin's. Seriously. You need to wake up (or go back to SRS if that's where you came from).
/r/MensRights03/10/14 03:14 PM
2

rape is justice. Yeah, that's actually what she's saying. Justice is not "funny", it just doesn't have that property. I mean, if a rape joke can be funny it's due to the same reason that a joke about death can be funny. Jokes are intended to dissociate the story from the real (usually bad, tragic,...) consequences. That's how you know it's a joke. There are many jokes about injustice, but I don't know any joke about justice. I think her rhetoric about jokes is just a dumb excuse to conceal her a…
/r/MensRights03/10/14 11:31 AM
9

Actually, what they are saying is: "Are you man enough... or a faggot?". Yes, they've become the monsters they were fighting. Tell it to them. Tell them also that you're not a sheep, that you have your own brain -and you're using it.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 09:25 AM
9

Females enjoy an advantage because the males, in my opinion, have a perception disability articulating personalities underneath the female body form Like when women see a male body form and think it's an ATM -and for their own only use?... Because that's pretty much the same "perception disability".
/r/MensRights29/09/14 06:32 PM
–

This experiment has been done many times, always with the same results. Still, United Nations says: #HeForShe... How about #WWHypocrisy? And BTW: The bystander effect seems to be a little... uh... sexist.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 09:23 AM
1

Of course. You don't tell the lobby to stop lobbying. You tell the government to stop screwing you.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 11:03 AM
2

As one comment says: She was on the radar of Florida child welfare authorities three years ago. Here's the story: http://www.lohud.com/story/news/investigations/2014/06/18/lacey-spears-investigated-abuse/10750237/ I just have no words.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 08:26 PM
1

Münchausen Syndrome by Proxy As a note: In DSM-5, the diagnostic manual published by the American Psychiatric Association in 2013, this disorder is listed under 301.51 Factitious disorder. This, in turn, encompases two types: Factitious disorder imposed on self – (formerly Münchausen syndrome). Factitious disorder imposed on another – (formerly Münchausen syndrome by proxy); diagnosis assigned to the perpetrator; the victim may be assigned an abuse diagnosis (e.g. child abuse). But the most inte…
/r/MensRights18/06/14 08:07 PM
1

but it only has posts for the past 4 days. You probably didn't see the "Next →" link at the bottom of the page. Depending on your screen size it may be covered by a Tumblr layer (lower-right corner) inviting you to follow that account. Just close that layer and... et voilà. Some posts are NSFW. Or add "/archive" to the end of the URL ("...tumblr.com/archive").
/r/MensRights17/06/14 05:44 PM
11

real men Years ago I was having a drink -Friday night, I think- with my friends, men and women, and there was a new girl I just met that night. At some point I was talking with this girl, and -I don't remember why- she told me "you're not a real man". As a science dude, I calmly explained her the phenomenon. I told her something like: "Well, if I'm not a real man then I'm an unreal man. That is, I do not exist in the real world, but only in your mind. I'm a hallucination you're having, and you'r…
/r/MensRights17/06/14 04:23 PM
12

Maybe she has a DeLorean with a flux capacitor. So she has sex with an uncircumcised guy -who tells her it was so pleasurable-, and then she travels to the past and convince the guy's parents to circumcise him. Back to the future she has sex again with the same guy, but this time he's circumcised ("again" for her, because for him it has never happened before). He still says it was so pleasurable. That test -repeated a given amount of times with different guys- would be the only way for her to be…
/r/MensRights14/06/14 10:03 PM
–

Honest question - do you disagree with feminisms OTT approach to sexual harassment and simultaneously support responding to sexual harassment with an expression relating to murdering the alleged harasser? I completely disagree with the feminist license to say whatever they want and the tone policing we are subjected to.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 01:18 PM
–

I don't know how to talk about it without being laughed at or judged. Well, his behavior is clearly unappropriated and abusive. I don't know why he does it, but anyway you should tell him to stop that shit. There is no reason for him to laugh at you, and his judgement is his fucking problem, not yours. I mean, he can say or think whatever he wants, but the fact is that he is breaking your boundaries. If he's just socially awkward, he will probably laugh trying to play down the importance of the …
/r/MensRights14/06/14 10:55 AM
–

It's only an expression, he's not saying that he's actually gonna kill the guy. Honest question: Did you report it because you (personally) don't like it or because are you afraid of AMR/Futrelle and their usual quote mining?
/r/MensRights14/06/14 10:18 AM
-1

Agreed.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 01:38 AM
1

My advice for young men has been the same for many years (I'm 45): "Listen less to the trope, and more to yourself". And particularly, how stupid are things like this: a promiscuous woman is shamed, but a promiscuous man is idolized. I know, it requires some explanations, because for young people the peer pressure may be very high, and if they go cross-current they may end being seen as weird, outcasts (sorry, my English is not very good). What I mean is that they need to be told the difference …
/r/MensRights09/06/14 07:15 PM
–

Right. Feminism does not tell men that they are all incredibly violent. Feminism tells men that we are the root of all evil. And it's believed by the police and judges. There is even a law (VAWA) built upon the Duluth model, which is basically that idea.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 02:33 PM
–

Maybe with this: [addendum] I have noted the objections of some MRA’s here to the perspective expressed in this article about the etiology of rape. After careful consideration, I reject those concerns. I am not painting men as incapable of controlling their sexual impulses, but simply acknowledging that there is a tiny fraction of men who, for whatever reason, won’t. And I am suggesting that if women are concerned about their safety from a crime like rape, a common sense acceptance of that and c…
/r/MensRights08/06/14 04:28 PM
1

There is still some noise in twitter with #NoMRA. They are accusing us of condoning violence, being rape apologists and "a hate group". It was started by http://fatbodypolitics.tumblr.com/ (@FatBodyPolitics) Both the hashtag and the tumblr have been mentioned here already.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 03:59 PM
1

The conservative government sees prostitutes as victims and johns as the victimizers. That's the bottom line here. Not sure if I understand. Feminists are lefties (I think they are capitalists, but whatever), and many of them also see prostitutes as victims and johns as the victimizers, so they want the get rid of prostitution. The actual reason is that prostitution decreases the sex market value, and that's something women don't want. And what happens with prostitutes? Well, at least in Spain t…
/r/MensRights08/06/14 01:41 PM
3

More than "arguing" I think he's telling what's obvious: She wasn't raped. I just kind of laid there and didn't do anything — I had already said no. I was just tired and wanted to go to bed. I let him finish. Rape is a serious thing. If she as lazy as to stay quiet (instead of telling him this time to fucking leave), that's not rape.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 11:26 PM
1

Yes, consistency would be better. I'm a Spaniard and my English is awful :-S Sometimes I say it as a sort of "disclaimer", but this time I didn't. Thanks for your understanding :)
/r/MensRights07/06/14 06:41 PM
3

Thanks for the quote. Yep, I read it in it's day. The main problem is: The motive of every crime where a man a behaves "violently" against her (ex)partner is automatically assumed as "sexism" by the authorities. But there are hundred possible motives for a crime, even for a crime against a family member. If I (white) attack a black person, it doesn't automatically mean I'm committing a racist crime. If the cause is "because he's black", then I'm a racist, but if it's a matter of money, a random …
/r/MensRights07/06/14 04:34 PM
5

Exactly, the problem is the omission. Some years ago I probably wouldn't be bothered, but after years of constant male bashing, the ingrained idea is that men are always the bad people. It's "the rule". Then, when they do not specify that victims are women and men, the message excludes men by default. This is the problem with all those ads a PSAs. It's all backed by a propaganda that says "men are violent predators", "men are always the aggressors", "men do not respect a 'no'", "we have to stop …
/r/MensRights07/06/14 03:41 PM
1

Yeah, I know, in my country happens pretty much the same. The fuckers don't even hide their dirty games. The way I see it, there is one only possibility: That men -as half of the population, more or less- become so massively affected that the government start to fear a huge backlash (almost a revolution). The reason why I think it's possible is because it keeps affecting more and more men, people who didn't know -or didn't believe- things were so bad. But of course that's only a possibility. It …
/r/MensRights06/06/14 03:13 PM
3

No, that's not what I mean. This movement is made of many different people, liberals and conservatives, and therefore it doesn't identify with one or another ideology. Now, from outside this movement have the hate of "liberals" and the indifference of the "conservatives" (at least of those who have political power). We have zero political support, nobody likes us, nobody supports us. As I said, I don't like politics, but this problem is not gonna go away, we need to face it. This is what I wante…
/r/MensRights06/06/14 02:44 PM
7

Yeah, that's the radical feminism dream. This is one of those groups: Old site: http://radicalhubarchives.wordpress.com/ Current hub: http://radfemcentral.blogspot.com.es/ 50 years ago they would probably be in an asylum, but nowadays (decent) psychiatrists/psychologists are more cautious regarding the line that separates sanity from insanity. It's a difficult and controversial issue. For example, one of the main characteristics of psychopaths is not that they do not have empathy, but that their…
/r/MensRights06/06/14 11:33 AM
8

It's not us. A huge lot of people think the MRM is following the conservative agenda. And this is not gonna disappear by itself. We either solve this or will have to carry with it. I don't like politics, but problems don't have to match my taste.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 03:15 AM
1

In the finallyfeminism101 FAQ there is a definition of "patriarchy" under the title "Isn’t "the Patriarchy" just some conspiracy theory that blames all men, even decent men, for women’s woes? If that's the title of the question... well, I won't be responsible for the brain damage it may cause to any of you. As in the TV shows: reader discretion is advised ;) It's a pile of bullshit on LSD. A psychedelic rewrite of history, very 70's fashioned.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 06:35 PM
10

Good news, isn't it? Finally they are showing their true face: "Feminism is not about equality; fuck men. this is all about women". Yesterday it was the GMP saying "If you are a man, you are part of rape culture.", which as I commented: "That's ALMOST "all men are rapists". I want to see their true face, without the mask. Lately they are being less and less careful with their words.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 05:12 PM
1

Anyone can vote, including AMR, manbooz's minions, SRS... With all respect, it'll be useless.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 05:05 PM
7

It comes from Fat Body Politics, whose author claims to be a moderator in This is Thin Privilege. I think she started the hashtag #NoMRA.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 03:02 PM
8

That's ALMOST "all men are rapists". One little step more and the GMP is done. I gotta see it!, c'mon, GMP!!!
/r/MensRights05/06/14 03:43 AM
1

Some people hear satanic messages in Rock & Roll songs played backwards (well... forwards too, but the scariest ones are backwards). It's known as apophenia
/r/MensRights04/06/14 01:36 PM
13

His analogy is plain stupid. Humans have mechanisms to spot liars/cheaters. They may not work always, but it's infinitely better than eating poisoned M&Ms blindly. This dude seems to be yet another full-time Internet clown. He's not helping the already fucked-up "YesAllWomen" thing. Duh
/r/MensRights04/06/14 11:21 AM
1

Well, you see the controversy. The funny thing is that I never worried if the one who achieved this or that was a man or a woman. I have never claimed that men are more intelligent or creative than women, or vice versa. This is all a feminist issue. I've worked with women programmers (first time was around 1987), few, but women. The only particular thing about it is that there are few. I've suggested other women to become programmers, but all them told me they didn't like the idea of writing cod…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 10:46 AM
1

They love it when they can make another woman's partner's jaw drop when they look at them because it inspires jealousy and conflict in another woman. Yeah. The devil wears a thong, I guess. The problem is when men who aren't following the three rules give them attention as well. These men are called "creeps." I know. But it doesn't matter how ugly I am. She shows, I look (cause-effect in this universe), although it doesn't mean that she ranks 10 out of 10, he!, far from it, actually. She can say…
/r/MensRights03/06/14 04:36 PM
1

Agreed. I addressed it here. I'd add that after the women's sexual liberation -which I think it's to a big extent part of the whole social change towards sex as a taboo-, "slut" or "slut shaming" doesn't make too much sense, unless the "offended" part really wants to be offended. I mean, if a woman have sex with a lot of men... so what?. That's not a bad thing. If someone calls a woman "slut", her answer IMO should be: "Nah", or just plain indifference. And when those -men or women- who try to s…
/r/MensRights03/06/14 02:41 PM
–

I think if they call you "pervert", the least you should call them is: "Prude". I'm quite flexible about dressing (nothing wrong with shorts, for example), but geez... when I see the back "T" of the thong -depending on how deep the vertical string is visible-, it doesn't make uncomfortable, it gives me a boner. That's not my fault, it's my amygdala.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 01:45 PM
–

From the outside there is few or none difference between this and the Bush's War on Terror. It made USA a Police State. Paradoxically, these feminists -allegedly opposed to everything Bush represents- are following the same pattern. This time it's: "Men are Weapons of Mass Rape".
/r/MensRights03/06/14 12:19 PM
1

Look. Words don't come alone into an empty space. Of course the KKK claims they only want to protect white culture, but that's their only way to avoid the FBI. That's not a secret. And yes, the Nazis were afraid from the Jews. So what? Beliefs don't change the facts. You don't try to annihilate a whole race because "you believe it's evil". I'm not a politician, I don't play rhetorical games, and I don't have to listen to bullshit. Arguments exist for a reason. If you don't want to accept that fe…
/r/MensRights02/06/14 09:29 PM
2

It's not I the one who don't give a fuck about biological facts. C'mon, get the facts and use your brain. You can do it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_expectancy#Life_expectancy_variation_over_time https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infant_mortality#Global_trends
/r/MensRights02/06/14 07:41 PM
–

No. They demonize all men as a class for what a few men have done to them, and then get annoyed when a man tells them to stop blaming all men -because it's a lack of respect, and a very stupid thing to do-. Who the hell do those women think they are?. A sort of deity that can't be questioned?... Fuck off. They better get used to it, because that's exactly what every honest and decent man must do. Tell them to stop bitching about all men, and demand some respect. Enough is enough.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 04:15 AM
4

This sub reddit is only for mens rights and it mostly attacks feminism which I implore. But I think that only focusing on men's rights is basically doing the same thing as what the feminists are doing. You're partially right, this sub is focused in men's rights. Because there is a shameless lack of support for men's rights. Do we "attack" (criticize) feminists?... Well, some do. I do, a lot, because feminism embraces the Duluth model embed in VAWA, because feminism uses Goebbelian propaganda to …
/r/MensRights02/06/14 02:10 AM
–

Ugh... Laci Green.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 12:53 AM
4

KKK is about white supremacy. Nazism is about Aryan supremacy. Both have other awful characteristics, but for this matter that's enough. How the fuck is that "equality"??? Feminism: Is is not clear enough that feminism is abusing men?... I don't think the MRM is what you think it is.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 07:51 PM
1

I can't recognize a Beyonce song, because if I ever listened any of them it didn't call my attention, it was just background noise. Our brain constantly discriminates perceptions that are useless, which fade away, and retains the useful ones. Then the latter are sent to the priority pool, where they are classified as "interesting", "interesting to see ASAP", "See now", "Emergency" and "Fucking emergency, for fuck's sake, move your ass NOW!". (Not a scientific explanation, but quite close to it).…
/r/MensRights01/06/14 07:16 PM
–

Regarding what they call "historical social roles", they forget that for the most part of the human existence, it has been necessary to have as many children as possible in order to preserve our species. Probably child after child, from the end of puberty to either the death or the end of the reproductive capability (menopause). Why? Because many of these children didn't survive, and because people who survived and became adults died soon anyway. Life after childcare? That, probably didn't exist…
/r/MensRights01/06/14 05:21 PM
–

Dailykos.com?? That's where the SJWs go once they are tired from Tumblr. Sorry, that site exceeds the level of stupidity I can compute.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 03:51 PM
10

As usual, it's obvious that "feminism" means different things for each one. Ideologies have this problem. IMO, the lack of awareness about -for example- the Duluth model or the wrong statistics, do not justify the support of feminism. I mean "Get the fucking facts, educate yourself and then we can talk". As I've said before, this looks like the fucking Tower of Babel. OK, so it's not that there are 7 billion unique definitions, because some people agree in a given one. How about 1 million meanin…
/r/MensRights01/06/14 03:31 PM
3

Certainly, women shame other women a lot. They judge each other for things that can be very shallow, and sometimes in a ferocious way. This is something that always amazes me. They usually do not tell it to each other, but share it with their respective closest friends, their boyfriends, husbands... "Bitch", "whore", "cunt"... these are the slightest things they call each other. As I said, it amazes me. And have you ever seen what happens when two women -just by chance- meet at a party with the …
/r/MensRights31/05/14 06:42 PM
2

Many downvotes... I'm curious: With "Jailbait" I mean that in the future, she's likely to bring him troubles, and maybe even put him into jail. I've read that article, I know the site. It's awful. Now let's see if this changes the up/downvotes.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 12:37 AM
2

Fear that when cops are called for a domestic dispute that I should pretty much handcuff myself and lay on my stomache because due to being male. In other words, you're fair game in that situation. The social pressure has conditioned the system to be that way. And feminists laugh at the idea that we need rights...
/r/MensRights30/05/14 06:03 PM
–

Jailbait alert! End that relationship ASAP.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 03:31 AM
5

Some years ago I made these two simple charts about suicide distribution in Spain per age and sex in 2008. They use official data from the Spanish Statistical Office. The first shows absolute number of deaths by suicide -men vs. women- (Y axis), along the age spectrum (X axis): http://i.imgur.com/GpLRBnr.jpg The second shows the suicide rate per 100,000 population, -men vs. women- (Y axis), along the age spectrum (X axis): http://i.imgur.com/0LCg26k.jpg Please note that for the latter chart, the…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 06:52 PM
1

Thanks!, I didn't know it. I just have watched it now, and yeah, AFAIK the info is correct. They have a website Spanish/English, -quite crappy TBH, but... better than nothing.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 03:56 PM
–

I am still terrified of the MRM as a whole because there are so many crazy radicals. I have a close friend who was targeted by one of these radicals. He posted her photo and a paragraph of false, hateful info about her on a website. He also included her address. The MRM does not condone the spreading of false, hateful info about anybody. Nobody really owns the movement, there is not an authority on it, we have no political representation. Usually, people name this forum and some sites that are i…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 01:21 PM
5

This is what I call a Darwinian issue, in a broad sense. The fact is that rape happens -as many other crimes do too-. Some criminals don't use a gun of a knife. A good way to steal a car and a pocket with money and cards is to spot an apparently wealthy guy in a bar or pub, try to start a casual conversation to earn some basic sympathy and confidence, and drug him to K.O. It even gives time to the thief to use the car (heaven knows what for) and try to use the cards before the victims wakes-up, …
/r/MensRights29/05/14 11:44 AM
1

Corrected. Thanks :)
/r/MensRights29/05/14 09:19 AM
0

As in this other news, one of the comments say: John Kerry should man up and admit the NSA violated millions of Americans constitutional rights. But that's just one part. The NSA spying was not limited to the U.S. And they plan to keep doing it, even more aggressively. This doesn't make other countries very happy. People here should take a look from time to time to /r/privacy. It matters.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 09:10 PM
1

They feel threatened by women. No. We feel threatened by VAWA -and similar for other countries-, a law built by feminists, that doesn't respect human rights. But for the tone and the words used, I'm sure this person is OK with Guantanamo, the NDAA, the illegal operations of the NSA, the CIA and the FBI, etc. etc. etc. Not to mention the non U.S. countries that cooperate and/or have its own fascist agencies. I wonder if this fucking propagandist loves Joseph Goebbels or if it's just a coincidence…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 03:44 PM
1

Misogyny -as misandry- is a prejudice against a whole sex/gender. You can hate a given set on individuals who intentionally caused damage to you. And you can hate that part of the system that allows -or even aims- people to hurt you. That hate is a consequence of an actual fact, and it's directed to the guilty ones. It's a human reaction, although it must never be a reason to take justice into your own hands. But you can't hate every woman or every man because a few of them have hurt you. It mak…
/r/MensRights28/05/14 03:00 PM
1

Not really: http://pastebay.net/1443552 (964 NSFW links dump) It is not very updated, so it may include some broken links. Actually this is only a tiny sample. The crawler's queue of potential homepage links at that point was HUGE. Anecdotal data: The largest blog in that list has more than 340,000 posts, and growing. This is for science, of course. The search for the truth is a hard job, but someone has to do it :)
/r/MensRights28/05/14 11:51 AM
3

Today's criminals are often well educated people. The reason is probably that nowadays there are more well educated people than ever before. And education doesn't necessarily open your mind to some "inconvenient truths" or makes you a right person. You can just pass the tests, and then be selfish and use double standards when the situation allows you to do it. If anything white-collar crimes will increase. I think it has happened already. For example, law engineering (the most malicious kind) is…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 11:22 AM
2

I haven't seen those things either. That's not the MRM's idea of rights, equality, etc. Indeed it's quite the opposite. Men and women are all free to accept or not any proposition or advance. If anything, what has been said is precisely that an advance is not a demand, and therefore there is no need to reject it (if that's the case) in an angry mood, complaining about a supposed owed. I mean, a "no, thanks" is enough, I don't have to be lectured about "the right to be left alone". We all must be…
/r/MensRights26/05/14 10:10 PM
2

Well, I see the mod already intervened.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 09:18 PM
3

Here is another. dingobait: You have posted it here, but the link goes to the author's page. Some excerpts: As a feminist, I've known of the Men's Rights Activist Movement, or the MRAs, for awhile. They're men who believe women owe them something. They believe feminism is a scourge on the earth. They believe that they are superior to women and that it's the fault of women that they can't get laid, and they don't feel respected. And they hate us. Violently and perniciously. Read The Belle Jar's d…
/r/MensRights26/05/14 06:59 PM
1

De nada ;)
/r/MensRights26/05/14 04:33 PM
12

From wikipedia: Androphobia is the abnormal fear of men. The word is derived from the Greek άνήρ (man) and φόβος (fear). Should not be confused with misandry, the hatred, dislike, contempt for or ingrained prejudice against men and/or boys. But before choosing androphobia or misandry, let's see this: I know the vast majority of men are decent and kind. I know that. I’m married to one of those men. I also know that it’s most likely ‘energy sales guy’ had no intention of hurting me. Maybe he thoug…
/r/MensRights26/05/14 03:08 PM
–

My source was the main pages of the major Spanish newspapers yesterday, for example El Mundo Están llamados a las urnas más de 360 millones de ciudadanos europeos de 28 países ("360 million European citizens from 28 countries are called to vote") As borizz says, it's the election census. It excludes minors and people who are "missing" due to administrative mistakes, outdated records, data loss/incoherence and things like that.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 11:41 AM
–

Today it's the European election day. 28 countries, 360 million people. There is also a lot of noise about some soccer event. "Champions League" or something like that (sorry, I don't know shit about soccer). And it's been the Formula One Monaco Grand Prix too. This has less coverage, but still, it's news. The only thing I've seen is Jessica Valenti for the Guardian: Rodger was reportedly involved with the online men's rights movement: allegedly active on one forum and said to have been followin…
/r/MensRights25/05/14 09:50 PM
8

So true. That's why I hold a personal principle that the great Groucho Marx explained in one of his famous quotes: "I don't want to belong to any club that allows me as a member". You know, I have my friends. But one of the best things is that we agree in that we disagree in some issues. Otherwise I would feel like a sheep... or a clon... or a cloned sheep. And regarding this sub, you do not require a membership to post or comment here; it's completely open. Even more, the diversity of views is …
/r/MensRights24/05/14 02:58 PM
2

This.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 11:11 AM
3

I smell fraud here. As I said time ago, the "Non-profit" orgs are an excellent way to commit low-profile fraud, not necessarily by avoiding taxes, but by "earning" one or more salaries while doing nothing. And lobbying. The server does not respond for endabuse.org, however the domain name is registered by "Organization:Family Violence Prevention Fund" (no response either). A quick search leads to: Futures Without Violence (formerly Family Violence Prevention Fund) Some name changes (the ad seems…
/r/MensRights22/05/14 02:36 PM
3

There is a reason why journalism was called the "fourth estate", but I'm afraid it has joined the interests of the big governments. I wonder how silencing massacres makes them feel.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 12:03 PM
1

Just for the record, I'm the old /u/SpanishGuy with a new account. I got sucked by an admin, and thrown into the ShadowBanned's circle of hell. It wasn't that bad at all. I grew up in hell, so I have the keys, and Cerberus is my puppy.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 07:22 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter