TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SpareDesigner1 Archive

View 0 posts and 20 comments by SpareDesigner1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Couldn’t have put it better myself
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/23 09:57 PM
14

It’s worth noting that depending on where you live, you might become legally married even without signing the marriage registry. https://www.ncsl.org/human-services/common-law-marriage-by-state#:~:text=A%20common%20law%20marriage%20is,and%20public%20policy%20determine%20validity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/05/23 01:25 PM
24

Fuck this world man
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/23 05:43 AM
1

I did not expect to see HP Lovecraft posted on Reddit lmao. He would be appalled, but I think secretly pleased that he has penetrated even into the belly of the Beast.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/23 12:25 AM
4

You’re an idiot
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 10:00 PM
4

Why does that matter?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 03:54 PM
3

The rest?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 03:47 PM
10

30% of males 18-29 are in relationships. 60% of females 18-29 are in relationships. Make that math work. Also your* source
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 11:56 AM
11

Beyond absurd
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/22 06:54 PM
1

I literally don't believe a single word you just wrote, especially the incredible admission that you are dating a 'feminine' man. No woman born of woman would ever use that term about a sexual partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 01:01 PM
3

Death in childbirth was certainly common, but whatever the exact rate was it doesn’t compare to the annihilation of whole male populations. Even after these sorts of tribal conflicts were replaced by state conflicts involving smaller proportions of the population, men were still far more likely to be killed or die of disease in war than women, as it was they who fought in the armies. I think we underestimate just how violent history was. It was like the Eastern Front of WWII year in year out, if…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/21 03:55 PM
6

I would suspect that the historical figures are largely due to conflict and other predominantly male selection factors like deaths to wild animals. I don’t think we can know with any precision what the proportion will be in terms of how many men will go without reproducing, but I think it is capped somewhat by the utility of having two incomes leading to a lot of women pairing up and even reproducing with men for stability and wealth as much as due to any romantic attraction. If I was to give a …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/21 03:33 PM
11

Admittedly this could be less to do with sexual competition in the modern sense of the term and more to do with a much lower life expectancy among men historically due to war. You can actually see something analogous to this today in Russia, where due to a disproportionate number of men dying in the Great Patriotic War, you had millions more women than men for many decades, and this led to a lot of women moving around or even leaving the country to find husbands. In a primitive society where chi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/21 03:21 PM
10

The only way you could believe this is if you had no contact with either homosexuals or homophobes, which admittedly is not impossible
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/21 11:14 AM
9

As someone actually in this position, yes
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/21 11:11 AM
11

As a masculine bi man, this is extremely true. I’ve tried going to a couple of LGBT events and was looked at like I was from a different species. All my male friends are straight for a reason.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/21 11:10 AM
6

There are actually some things for which female police officers are very useful. You need one to search a female detainee, for one thing. They’re also often used in interviews, particularly high-stakes interviews, to unsettle the suspect if they’re male, and to try and see if a soft approach from a female will help to break him down. Beyond that though, yeah, it’s absurd to believe that a running man won’t just overpower a female officer most of the time.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/21 08:02 PM
-22

Well, specifically the reason you don’t ever raise your hands to women or children is less because their particular actions deserve respect or what have you, and more because they’re weaker than you. Can you imagine if a 6’4 man beat up a 5’2 man for being ‘disrespectful’? It would both be morally wrong, and the tall man would be judged for not picking on someone his own size. Even if the 5’2 began hitting the 6’4 man (as long as it was just hitting), the 6’4 should defend himself but not strike…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/21 08:41 PM
1

I don’t think either side I can speak on this with any real authority. You can find plenty of examples of both occurring. I would say that there are definitely a cohort of men who recognise that their wives are less attracted to them physically than emotionally, and that they’re probably not going to be their wives’ favourite sexual partner, but I don’t think that makes their marriages worthless or pointless endeavours. I’d imagine that for most of them, they’re aware of their position and their…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/21 06:57 PM
1

The concern with somebody being attracted to you because you fulfil a fetish of theirs is that you are exchangeable for everybody else that fulfils that fetish, if that makes sense. So like, if you are an Asian girl with a guy with yellow fever, if he sees another Asian girl he prefers for some other reason, he will be perfectly happy to drop you because his fetish will still be fulfilled. It’s being attracted to someone for a part of them rather than the whole.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/21 09:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter