TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Spare_Ingenuity8363 Archive

View 3 posts and 42 comments by Spare_Ingenuity8363 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Even at this angle you look better than most women aiming downwards with a Snapchat filter.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/26 12:10 AM
–

By ugly do you mean a lack of secondary sex characteristics or lack of facial harmony.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/26 12:08 AM
–

Well God Speed
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/26 12:05 AM
1

They probably find these women unattractive because they lack biologically feminine traits to a certain degree so maybe they could just change their wording. The same goes for men that lack biologically masculine features. Even other men will talk down to them and view them as not men given their lack of biological masculinity. I may be slightly too autistic when it comes to semantics and language though. On a side note, this is one explanation for the passport bro phenomenon; different environm…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/26 05:16 AM
2

Ironically when you look at the reality, women are actually more red pilled than men. You see so many women in positions of power actually defending abusive men or at least giving them a chance for redemption and self-improvement (so they don't have to be abusive in the future). It's often men who want maximum punishment. Whether this is just to perpetrate the revolving door of the industrial complex is obviously up for debate and highly plausible. If you study the phenotypes across the world, i…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 12:12 PM
2

He also had quiet charisma and fairly decent looks in his younger years, which was of course contributed to by his financial success. If you watch videos of him, you always see he's calm and collected despite the pressure. He just had a contempt for social norms and mores. As for his penis shape, I assume he was at least once on some kind of medication (possibly forced) given his lifestyle, it's well known for these kind of side effects for certain meds.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 05:19 PM
2

TBF it's mostly other men that openly hate Epstein, men that either have a vested interest in hating him or just need a scapegoat for their own problems/projections. This has been the case for pretty much every man who is a sexual deviant of some kind. If you go by the Chad/Beta dichotomy then using money, connections and a private island to have sex with women, you could assume he's genetically inferior, but then again OLD wasn't really a thing back then.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 05:13 PM
1

A lot of violent misogynists are weak which is why they become violent misogynists. Ironically their situation is usually caused by other men and they are stuck in their situation because of other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 05:07 PM
1

Depends on how I was doing in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 05:05 PM
3

There are valid reasons for demonizing this: Passport bros go to countries where the men are less attractive given certain traits are just poorly suited for male offspring. This gives the passport bros a better advantage in the dating market while screwing over their sons. A lot of these families end up being very abusive and manipulative because of said traditional values from these more patriarchal societies.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/26 09:50 AM
–

From real world experience the guys getting the most casual sex just have the lowest standards, a lot of them openly admitting to just paying outright. They don't worry about the shame or guilt of being with an unattractive woman, directly paying her, or what her N count is. I've seen a lot of average or below average men with children with multiple women and likewise for women with multiple men. These people are just horny, impulsive and lack the shame for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 09:16 AM
–

Liberal/progressive social customs utterly ruin the dating environment for average and below men. The simple act of politely approaching is often demonized for men, while women are encouraged to have casual sex (something average and below men often don't get to partake in). Liberal/progressive social customs give weak and unattractive men more opportunities to improve their SMV and have access to more women (especially if he fits the frail archetype). It is also ultimately men who enforce these…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 09:07 AM
–

What are red pillers truths? , not even red pillars agree exactly. They have changed over the years. Original Red Pill: Disregarding traditional gender roles since most men don't benefit from it. Disregard the mainstream narrative. Realize that you were lied to and manipulated. Look good, make money, be attractive, tell mainstream institutions to fuck off. A man is not obligated to protect a random woman or child if they have no relationship to him. Use acronyms and slang to condense verbose def…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 08:49 AM
–

If that's the case, why are most red pillers right wing or tradcon? Grifting and dissociating from the original red pill to be more accepted within the confines of the mainstream political spectrum. Original RP criticized trad ideology as being gynecentric and white knight.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 08:22 AM
–

I remember a lot of early redpillers accused trad/right wing as being gynecentric and white knight and the solution is maximizing SMV along with accepting TRP as truth. By maximizing SMV a man wouldn't have to settle for bullshit or be emotionally attached to a woman since he has a constant and readily available supply which allows him to see "the truth". TRP became more dumbed down and tainted over time as it needed to be more accepted by mainstream bro culture and dissociate with the term in**…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 08:15 AM
–

That's about the only thing in common with trad and right wing. Right wing and trad view "other men" as "the enemy" since they are a form of sexual competition. RP does not, RP encourages maximizing SMV and charisma. Trad/right wing promote negative competition by viewing women with scarcity, whereas RP promotes positive competition by encouraging men to increase their SMV and have more options. In RP, N count is irrelevant as long as the man in question is equal to or better than the other men …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 07:41 AM
–

There's a lot of things a man can do in modern day to improve his SMV. It's usually other men that are discouraging him from taking full advantage of said opportunities and often outright preventing him (at least indirectly). The men discouraging this are usually older and/or right wing. Simple stuff like eating healthy, getting adequate sleep, avoiding stress are viewed as weak and lazy by right wingers and trad. Plastic surgery, fillers and PEDs are ironically also viewed as weak and lazy by r…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 06:52 AM
–

Shit, it had a brief period where half the voices were from Muslim communities. This was really the point where it just turned into a grifting scheme. There's also partly because of trying to dissociate with black pill. Andrew Tate, Sneako and Peterson turned a really solid ideology into a steaming pile of shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 06:44 AM
–

Red Pill does encourage all of this. Right wing and Tradcon does not, risking life and limb for a society that hates you doesn't help a man get in shape. Having a shitty diet and sleep because of an extremely demanding and low-paying job doesn't help a man get in shape or improve his looks. Treating self-care as weak and feminine doesn't help a man increase his SMV. Lying about one's status and peacocking to get laid is heavily discouraged by Trad and right wing. All of the opportunities that av…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 06:40 AM
–

None of that is trad. Trad advocates for sexual exclusivity and trad gender roles, which leads to higher mortality in men, and reinforces sexual exclusivity at the expense of other dead men. RP is against all of that. RP is against traditional gender roles since it views it as harmful to average and low status men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 06:33 AM
–

Ok fair enough. Could be that RP became conflated with right wing ideology to avoid association with in**** (which the entire platform is based on achieving equality of outcome via modern technology). Ironically in*** ideology is less sexist since it recognizes that biological hierarchy applies to both men and women and obviously women have male offspring. It actually encourages both men and women to pursue equity via modern technology.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 06:26 AM
–

From redpill logic, female hypergamy is enabled by high status men and society (operated and controlled by men), which is why they advocate controlling women to achieve equality of outcome. The argument is that equality of outcome is strongly opposed by Tradcon ideology.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 06:19 AM
–

Dude RP is pro equality of outcome (ie looksmaxxing and hating on hypergamy). Historically, progressive and left wing ideologies have been pushed by men of low status and high potential (ie disenfranchised able-bodied young men and elite overproduction) Historically, patriarchal societies were extremely polygynous (to the point of rampant inbreeding) in which the polygyny was enforced by punishment. A percentage of single mothers having children by multiple men still gives the average man much b…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 06:09 AM
–

TRP advocates for equality of outcome within the male population by promoting looksmaxxing and hating on women for being hypergamous. While hypergamy does lead to some inequity, men still have a much better chance at being sexually successful in a progressive and liberal society where women are viewed as being equal to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 05:56 AM
–

Problem is that most men supporting TRP are low status and unattractive. RW ideology does not encourage low status men improving their SMV or any prospects of getting more attractive women. RW ideology encourages polygyny which would treat low status men as a potential liability because of numbers and sexual competition. TRP advocates for men becoming higher status does it not? Improve their "sexual market value" and whatnot? Being seen as an equal to women doesn't do that. So it means naturally…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 05:51 AM
1

Imo N count doesn't matter as long as there are no children or STDs involved. But then again I have no interest in marriage whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 05:09 AM
7

Ayyye look at you thinking big!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 05:08 AM
2

Say what you will but women having high N counts has leveled the playing field for men moreso than the past where polygyny was more extreme. Patriarchal societies constantly experienced genetic bottlenecks to where a large portion of the population was inbred.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 05:07 AM
1

Ironically the past hurt other men and further reinforced polygyny and traditional gender norms (which hurt men). Both sides of this argument are ridiculous; the other side being men that support something that treats them as a potential liability to other men because of sexual competition.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 05:05 AM
1

I'm not sure if it's a source of pride or just a counterargument to a narrative
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 05:02 AM
1

The counterargument is just that the man's penis is too small
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 05:01 AM
-4

Well if a woman can't handle a big dick, it's a subconscious indicator of poor reproductive capacity. iow small vagina = less fertile. Most don't necessarily have a breeding fetish though.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 09:10 AM
-2

It's the notion that a woman with a large vagina would prefer a bigger dick which makes sense. Also women with larger vaginas would be considered more suitable for giving birth. This would explain why bigger dicks are seen as better since attractiveness is correlated with fertility, especially for hookups and ONS (both men and women are like this)
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 09:07 AM
3

Average person in 50 years (according to this sub) <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 08:45 AM
1

Can I change the flair and repost
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 03:08 AM
1

That's a coin toss and it can easily go very far in the wrong direction.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 02:52 AM
1

Whatever standards and pickiness women have is ultimately set by and enforced by angry old men with money. Angry old men are usually the ones who enforce the boundaries and punish anyone who tries to violate said boundaries in a society. Angry old men with money are still men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 02:44 AM
–

I see a lot of younger guys adapting or have already entered into adulthood like this, it's usually the men in my age bracket and above who are holding onto the classical romantic ideals, and likewise trying to enforce them on other men. As a man whose financial and bodily health has fluctuated greatly over the years, I just learned that love is conditional and that were not that different than other primates. Funny enough canines are the most romantic and monogamous species on the planet, us pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 09:14 PM
0

Men create and enable whatever standards there are
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 04:12 AM
4

Bruh what?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 04:04 AM
12

I have to agree with this, if a man wants to be a single father and shoulder all of those responsibilities by himself then God Speed to him
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 03:30 AM
0

Alternate title: Women are seen as assets until proven otherwise while men are seen as liabilities until proven otherwise
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 03:28 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter