TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Sparkingupwrongtree Archive

View 0 posts and 20 comments by Sparkingupwrongtree on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

See, this? This is why. You are not wrong. Not entirely. But understand, first and foremost, that like all things there is nuance. Healthcare tilts towards male treatment methodology because historically, men were more willing on average to undergo experimental treatment. In the same vein, the mental health fields are tilted in favor of women; they are historically more willing to engage in the ways it requires. So physical healthcare works better for men, mental for women. Unfair, but that's th…
/r/MensRights02/07/26 03:00 PM
1

And there in what you said is my point: After how many decades of 'social planning' and governments more and more invested in the positioning of certain groups- from replacing church charity with the state, fathers with checks, to nations like Canada and Norway blatantly funding programs that propagandize 'female empowerment' and for men to step aside, after pushing female preference in education until they surpassed male graduation rates, after how many decades of that ever-escalating process- …
/r/MensRights01/07/26 06:14 PM
1

Ah, there's the shekels-and-goyim commentary, wondered if that was in there. And humans did. Monarchy is an outgrowth of human hierarchialization (though it has flaws), and you keep arguing 'tech will fix things' but humans aren't wired for artificial wombs. Hell, that might just make things worse as now partners don't even have to try at the oldest, most intense pair-bonding activity, just jerk into the easy-babe oven and call it good. The biological processes underpinning parenthood would get …
/r/MensRights01/07/26 05:54 PM
1

I did, actually, and that's why my criticism is that the prescription you offer is 'reengineer society to be centered around the specific set of ideals and methods we prescribe' rather than accepting certain factors are emergent and inherent in the biological reality of human existence. It's the fault all Marxist analysis falls into, and which you ran face-first into; it's why I asked how the reality plays out and explored it because the only option that works and is humane is to stop putting th…
/r/MensRights01/07/26 05:34 PM
1

So your rationale is: -"We have the technology though it's never been done." -"Biology exists but we can just ignore that." -"it's never succeeded, but people will try anyways." This is why you get dismissed out of hand; a "Marxist Feminist" writing that the solution to the male lonliness epidemic is... more of the things that caused it, neither of which has produced functional and sustainable outcomes when compared to the things they attempted to replace. You are telling people to remove a side…
/r/MensRights01/07/26 11:53 AM
1

And everyone suceeded within the confines of what I described. Nobody has ever produced a large-scale society without the basic model I covered. Nobody. Stop trying to reinvent men. You can't.
/r/MensRights01/07/26 03:45 AM
1

You are describing the Soviet New Man. It didn't work there, either.
/r/MensRights01/07/26 12:11 AM
2

I think you missed a spot. The biological reality is this- in our natural environment, males must be provisionary. It is an instinctual behavior, not merely the product of socialization. Even if we assume women to be otherwise equal to men in performance, they are a reproductive bottleneck; one man can impregnate many females, one female can only go through one complete reproductive cycle a year. This means the female has to be selective; not just in aesthetics but performance. She will enter a …
/r/MensRights30/06/26 08:17 PM
1

Operational costs+ ongoing commitments Let's say they have a billion dollars a year to run. They want to support some program that costs 100 million. That's too much for lump-sum, so they stagger it out over 5 years: 20 million a year. Repeat this over dozens of programs, and now suddenly any dip in income becomes terminal for at least some programs; there's no leeway. But if you cut programs, everyone worries they're next- and they won't commit if they risk getting nothing, so they pull out. Pa…
/r/MensRights03/02/26 04:51 PM
1

When a person (usually used in relation to a woman) performs an action not for the sake of said action, but to see what they can get away with doing, specifically a negative act of some kind. A social 'probing' movement to figure out where the boundaries are. Think children pushing their behavior until parents respond. However, this is normal for children as they need to learn where the boundaries are. Adults should know this, and men are still corrected, so women demonstrate this behavior more,…
/r/MensRights02/02/26 04:42 PM
3

In a lot of turbo-professional places, they actually can't. I've seen dress codes where women are told to dress "reasonably professionally" or some equally vague term... and then men are told they can't remove the suit jacket until like 80.6 degrees and Mercury dominant over Venus or some equally arcane nonsense. It's why AC is low in these places; it is 'sexist' in the sense that it targets men and refuses to allow them control over their dress rather than trying to dictate control over women..…
/r/MensRights29/08/25 02:46 PM
2

Career=money=paying the fine. I'm not sure how that fails to calc for you. You're correct that the last time a conviction was made was 40+ years ago. But a lack of enforcement is not legal clearance. See the current immigration kerfuffle. The government can, and will, change its position the moment it becomes politically useful. It's called principle.
/r/MensRights28/08/25 04:13 PM
1

I don't disagree. Service guarentees citizenship has a solid philosophical underpinning in that by requiring investment into the system as a "buy-in", you lower the likelihood a given voter will be a dipstick. That doesn't have to be military, but it should just plain suck. No cushy AC office nonsense, here's a hazmat suit and a pressure washer, go clean that septic tank.
/r/MensRights28/08/25 08:05 AM
3

Florida, Iowa, and Kentucky require specific approvals via individual application. Most states require full sentence completion, which can include that nice 250k fine. Get slapped with that and good luck ever voting, because felony convictions kill career hopes. It is not de jure restriction, but it is de facto.
/r/MensRights28/08/25 07:59 AM
1

Depends on the perspective. The most extreme right-wing constitutionalist would argue women shouldn't be allowed to vote, as they have no material investment in society (remember: votes used to be landowner-only) wheras men do (via the draft; blood- or the potential for it- for votes). As men are measurably more valuable in that investment than women for a host of reasons, women thus are unable to pay "fair price" as men are charged more by their nature and may be excluded from both. The left-wi…
/r/MensRights27/08/25 10:50 PM
3

Felons can't (usually) vote. That's softened in the past few decades for good and ill, but is still largely true. Not signing up is a felony. Ergo, it is de facto a restriction on voting.
/r/MensRights27/08/25 10:41 PM
0

I think it's important to note that there's two levels to- for lack of a better term- morality. To use the rising ape and falling angels as metaphor, you can act on the ape's instinct or the angel's intellect. In men this manifests as "gentlemanly" behavior. Women unfortunately don't suffer the necessary social pressures to make them "ladylike" unless catalyzed to do so themselves in a lot of cases and so fall to the bestial side. It makes me wonder if "the patriarchy" is their way of complainin…
/r/MensRights21/08/25 11:24 AM
5

Right, so why is exterminating half the populace acceptable here, then?
/r/MensRights19/08/25 10:49 PM
10

"We need to eliminate {ethnic group}". Tell me a place that's acceptable. Please, do so, I want to kick off civil rights suits.
/r/MensRights19/08/25 09:58 PM
1

It seems that a woman with extensive tats that are cohesive- that is, planned out from the start- is less likely to be as... whatever term you want for a woman that has a mishmash of random tattoos collected over a decade. Probably has something to do with planning and commitment but what do I know.
/r/MensRights12/08/25 09:40 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter