TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Sparrowphone Archive

View 0 posts and 180 comments by Sparrowphone on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
17

Also... Pointing to "no credit cards" in 1970s as an example of recent female oppression while ignoring the Vietnam draft that occurred simultaneously is intellectually dishonest. The two injustices are not even remotely comparable.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/26 01:20 PM
1

for one night stands both go for hot But for evolutionary reasons, women are wired to find wealth and status "hot" in a way that men don't (generally speaking).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/26 12:10 PM
9

Person A is minimizing violence that statistically affects men more often (and more severely) by stating that the gender of the victim is the same as the gender of the attacker. It's wrong/hypocritical to play down violence that men experience and play up violence that women experience because the attacker and victim share a gender. Having a different gender than your attacker doesn't make the harm more severe, yet this is the implication of person A's argument.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/26 03:49 PM
7

My point was a rebuttal to the argument that it was responding to: "Feminism can't promote misandry because misandry came first." The Nazi example shows that it is possible for later ideologies to promote bigotry and bias even if those biases predate the ideology. Nothing in your comment refutes my point. Just because misandry predates feminism doesn't mean that it's impossible for feminism to spread misandry. Try again.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 02:14 AM
7

And anti-Semitism predates the Nazi party, but we don't say that because of that Nazism doesn't spread anti-Semitism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 07:29 AM
101

A patriarchy is a system where men as a class oppress women as a class. This does not describe western democracies.
/r/MensRights03/11/25 05:47 PM
14

The justice systems of all western democracies favour women, both more in letter and in spirit. Paternity tests are illegal in France, while women get less time for the same crime even when all else is equal. Women are seen as having less agency and thus less responsibility. This is bad for both genders.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 04:34 PM
7

"You're an incel!" "Not all of us can trade sex for money as easy as you and your mum!"
/r/MensRights17/10/25 10:35 PM
10

I don't think they want total control (for the most part). I think what they actually want is the advantages of both genders with none of the bad parts of either.
/r/MensRights14/10/25 03:50 PM
21

They should still be forced to stay and support their democracy like the men. Why is it cool for a female doctor or nurse to flee but not a soldier. Nurses and doctors are needed just as badly as soldiers. There are plenty of combat support roles that women are capable of fulfilling.
/r/MensRights06/10/25 04:01 PM
23

It's also worth considering that while "men commit more violence" is true, "strong people commit more violence" is more true. Is violence being committed because of maleness or because the person is above the human average in physically formidable capabilities. If violence was as easy for women as it is for men, and was as effective for women as it is for men they would likely be just as violent as men.
/r/MensRights18/09/25 08:01 PM
4

Juries don't give sentences they give verdicts - guilty or innocent. The judge then takes that verdict and gives a sentence. Average sentence for premeditated murder is 25 to life for state and life without parole for feds
/r/MensRights16/09/25 02:44 PM
3

Agreed.
/r/MensRights14/09/25 08:28 PM
18

I'm having a discussion right now in the forum for my country's left wing party. The NDP is discriminating against cis men in the party leadership ballot. I've been trying to say that in Canada it's the rich who oppress the poor, and how rich women got the vote in Canada before poor men. I'm not getting through. It's like feminism has brainwashed people into believing untrue things. Meanwhile whenever there's talk of young people being radicalized online it's always the manosphere this, or mra's…
/r/MensRights14/09/25 12:36 AM
-1

Exactly this. Implying that if you have 2 siblings one of you is likely the result of paternity fraud is not a great thing to imply. No need to give opponents extra fuel by overstating the frequency as 30% when one per classroom is shocking enough.
/r/MensRights10/09/25 08:28 PM
-1

I think the upper estimate is one in thirty, not 30%. Do you have a source for that 30% claim?
/r/MensRights10/09/25 02:41 PM
24

That's not the usage of "maturing" we're talking about in this thread. You are discussing physical maturity in a forum full of people discussing emotional maturity.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 07:18 PM
1

I'm not married to the notion, but I suspect that women want pristine homes the way that men want high paying jobs - because society judges them on it. If women are judged on the cleanliness of their homes in a way that men are not, then we should not be surprised if they prioritize clean homes in a way that men do not. I've met plenty of high paid women, but generally speaking men earn more. I've met plenty of men who keep a clean home, but generally speaking women do so to a greater degree. Al…
/r/MensRights23/08/25 05:26 PM
1

A woman is way way way more likely to be killed by a doctor or a nurse (due to a preventable medical error) than they are likely to be killed by a man. Do you think that justifies women being afraid of doctors and nurses? If not, why?
/r/MensRights21/08/25 03:27 PM
3

A woman is in far more danger being killed by a man that the other way around. Tell that to Andy Warhol. Men have far more to fear from women than mere mockery. You know this is true. This is the woman and the bear all over again and it's pure misandry. Your average man is not at all a danger to your average women. Framing the situation as "men have nothing to fear but women do" is dishonest because women do kill men. The quote in question says nothing about probabilities, and if you want to tal…
/r/MensRights20/08/25 07:23 PM
16

The lie is in the dishonest framing. Women kill men. Men kill women. A man is in far more danger of being made fun of by a woman than being killed by a woman. A woman is in far more danger of being made fun of by a man than being killed by a man. You are in far more danger of death from distracted driving than death from a violent man. Do you fear listening to podcasts or music while you drive like you fear men? If so, that is an irrational fear. An irrational fear of men is androphobia. Again: …
/r/MensRights20/08/25 01:06 PM
1

I think "woman" and "man" are two tribes that overlap many others, and I also think that "tribes gotta tribe".
/r/MensRights15/08/25 03:13 AM
148

I hope the term dies for good. When a female person perpetuates a harmful gender norm it is framed as "internalized misogyny" When a make person does the same it is framed as "toxic masculinity". This is more of the hypoagency/ hyperagency narrative being played out - women are framed as being passively "acted upon" by external gender norms while men are framed as actively perpetuating harmful norms from within. It's bullshit.
/r/MensRights14/08/25 11:03 PM
29

According to your cultural values it's harassment. According to some women it's a compliment. Stop speaking for all women.
/r/MensRights13/08/25 02:11 AM
2

No
/r/MensRights12/08/25 06:25 PM
1

in very specific male domains, and historically (not now), in leadership No, pretty much everywhere, all the time. Why do you think women get more favourable prison sentences just for being female? Because women are seen as victims and men are seen as perpetrators. Men do. Women are done to. Hyperagency vs hypoagency.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 12:18 PM
-6

Women are seen as less competent and capable just because they are women. Men face the opposite problem See: hypoagency vs hyperagency.
/r/MensRights10/08/25 05:30 PM
-1

No true Scotsman... Colour me surprised.
/r/MensRights03/08/25 09:16 PM
1

Christina Hoff Sommers - Wikipedia https://share.google/CE1Nd5Hwu12k0V18E
/r/MensRights03/08/25 04:27 PM
-1

Well since you've met everyone on the planet I guess that settles it.
/r/MensRights03/08/25 06:23 AM
-5

Yes, it is a fantasy to think that all feminists hate men.
/r/MensRights02/08/25 05:36 PM
-11

Some feminists do care about men. It's almost like you are building some kind of fake opponent to tear down. Some kinda construct made from something soft with poor resistance that's easily damaged. Like cotton, or fabric, or something. There must be a term for that...
/r/MensRights02/08/25 01:21 PM
27

Attempts to successes is an apples to oranges comparison. They are two different things done for different reasons by different people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/25 04:36 PM
9

"Estimating Gender Disparities in Federal Criminal Cases" by Sonja Starr https://share.google/DRlBG1vshCjZKiEMZ
/r/MensRights22/07/25 04:28 PM
11

The person you were talking to made a false equivalency. Suicide attempts do not equal suicide successes, and the reasons behind them can vary wildly. I worked two decades on the front lines of an ER in a city of millions. I've seen and personally talked to thousands of suicide attempts. Very very often the goal of such behaviour was not to end one's suffering, it was control the behavior of others. Example: girl gets in fight with boyfriend. Girl drinks bottle of wine, takes some (but not all!)…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/25 04:06 PM
7

So true, at that job at least. I spent a couple decades working a frontline ED job in a city of millions. Most of my coworkers and literally 100% of management were women. When I hear takes of female software professionals being sexually harassed at work I empathise because that is what I lived through at a mostly female workplace. Your average boomer nurse is as shameless as a redneck trucker when it comes to sex talk / inappropriate discussions in the workplace.
/r/MensRights12/07/25 06:33 AM
27

I didn't. I didn't yet have the vocabulary to express how she made me feel. Now that I do it's easier just not to talk about it. This is why I'm an advocate for men. It's hard to talk about the difficulties men face, because one of the biggest difficulties men face is that people have a hard time seeing men as victims.
/r/MensRights12/07/25 04:49 AM
42

how did you get into men's rights? I told my co-worker that the reason I was tired was because I was fighting with my spouse all night. I told her that my spouse tried to smash my head in with a lamp. She said: "What did you do to deserve that?" I knew in my heart of hearts she would never ask a woman that, and that realization changed everything. That was a long time ago, but I still don't talk to my coworkers about things like that.
/r/MensRights12/07/25 02:32 AM
2

Tribes gotta tribe. Human nature is tribal. Transcending this is not the path of least resistance. There is value in the resistance though.
/r/MensRights12/07/25 12:20 AM
60

Please don't comment here anymore.
/r/MensRights11/07/25 05:21 PM
19

Exactly this. Ask her: "so, if the government said that you had to give birth against your wishes or be thrown in jail, you would be cool with that because men are also forced to serve?" I guarantee you she says no. This is just another example of the empathy gap / men being the disposable gender.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/25 04:42 AM
-1

Well, Chat GPT feeds you what you want to hear! No it doesn't. Chatgpt is sycophantic, but unless you prompt it to lie to you it tells you what it thinks is true and accurate, which might not be what you want to hear.
/r/MensRights06/07/25 11:17 PM
6

Men go for looks women go for status is an oversimplification of a very real phenomenon.
/r/MensRights06/07/25 06:47 PM
17

If it was true that women find status attractive in a way that men don't reciprocate and it was true that there are less high status men available, then that could explain why women perceive there to be fewer attractive men these days. If gay guys are not into status the way that straight women are then that would explain why a gay man would think that the amount of attractive men has not declined. Men whether gay or not don't really talk about finding 6 figures hot the way that women do. "6 foo…
/r/MensRights06/07/25 01:32 AM
1

Yes. People are people. Humans are human. Tribes gotta tribe.
/r/MensRights04/07/25 03:49 PM
-6

First off: don't listen to Reddit when it says the only solution is to break up or cut this person out of your life. Reddit always says that whether it's the right response or not. Now, for the matter at hand: I would admit that in many cases women do have it harder than men I would follow that up by stating that in many cases men do have it worse than women. I would follow that up by insisting that objectivity is impossible here because everyone has a different definition of "worse than" and th…
/r/MensRights03/07/25 05:13 AM
4

Yes. He was being mind controlled by her ex boyfriend at the time.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 06:51 PM
7

The easiest example is wonder woman 1984 where the hero of the movie fucks a guy's body without his consent, then later encounters him and gives him a knowing smirk while ogling him.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 05:18 PM
2

I'm pretty sure trans women are all about being treated the same as other women and would also complain if a woman was given a seat and they were not, or if a man didn't give them a seat. A trans woman who can pass has all the privilege and problems that other women face so I'm not sure why you would frame them as oppressed while other women are privileged.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 05:45 PM
24

If women can financially abandon a child, then men should be able to as well. Instead it's safe harbour for me, but not for thee. You can't say "it's the same except for pregnancy" if after the pregnancy women can legally abandon but men cannot legally abandon.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 12:57 AM
8

The Stanford researchers who coined the term think it’s a result of the so-called male loneliness epidemic. So we trust the Stanford researchers when they say that men are needy, but we don't trust them when they say there is an epidemic of men's loneliness. "So-called male loneliness epidemic" indeed. Your misandry is showing
/r/MensRights17/06/25 08:52 PM
4

When feminists use the term "pick me" they are trying to convey the same concept that MRMs mean when they say "white knight".
/r/MensRights14/06/25 01:57 PM
6

Not American. Although I would never vote for someone like Trump, I would also never vote for someone who says "the true victims of war are women because they have to care for the survivors." like Hillary Clinton did.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/25 03:44 PM
18

7% more hourly for the average man than the average woman, excluding overtime. 7% more for the gender that does the vast majority of the jobs that cause you to lose an arm (lumberjack) 7% more for the people who do the vast majority of the socially isolating jobs (artic oil fields) 7% more for the sex that does the vast majority of jobs that can kill you (roofer). None of this is mentioned by the guardian when discussing the 7%, of course. I would like to see the guardian or the author state yes…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/25 03:17 PM
2

If a hot woman is attracted to a homely rockstar (happens all the time) it is a genuine biological attraction.
/r/BlackPillScience28/05/25 11:56 AM
3

Plenty of women have high social status. I think a better way to conceptualize this phenomenon is that for evolutionary reasons men go for health and use looks as a proxy while women go for good providers and use status as a proxy.
/r/BlackPillScience27/05/25 08:18 PM
27

Why is it wrong to tell someone to stop throwing like a girl, but not-wrong to tell them to stop explaining like a man?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/25 12:09 PM
1

By your own logic: If you are not a man you will not understand men's struggles that's just a fact. Why are you commenting in a subreddit that deals with a topic you will never understand?
/r/MensRights17/05/25 03:15 PM
20

Men go for looks, women go for status. So if you want to attract men, focus on your looks.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 04:43 PM
10

Why don't you go troll the feminist subs and tell them to stop crying about men? I've already explained to you why women need to be part of this discussion, and you utterly failed to reply.
/r/MensRights15/05/25 11:50 AM
9

We can't talk about our shit without discussing women because the problems that men and women face are opposite sides of the same coin. For example, one of the biggest problems that women face is that people think they are less competent than they really are. People think women are weaker than they are. However, those that are considered weak are also considered to be more deserving of help, sympathy and mercy. So when men complain about being the disposable gender they are really saying that pe…
/r/MensRights14/05/25 07:56 PM
1

There would be a race to the bottom. Long lineups at the bindle store.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/25 05:41 AM
2

If it's a woman saying that, then tell them you are listening to them, so what they are saying is obviously untrue.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/25 05:47 AM
3

Well, if equality is choice, I don't think that's something men can have If things really were equal then men could choose to be house-husbands and it wouldn't be a thing for a man to choose that. We're clearly not there now, but there's no reason we can't be someday. Viva le men's rights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/25 03:09 AM
2

I don't save a lot of Reddit comments. I'm saving this. I hope you don't mind me quoting you in the future.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/25 11:32 AM
9

The problem is that one of the ways that men are uniquely oppressed is that they are considered the disposable gender. People care less about the welfare of men than the welfare of women. It's hard to address other male problems if people just don't care. I would say that even mentioning male problems is socially taboo.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 03:47 PM
4

Men go for looks, women go for status. As a consequence of this, women are incentivized to maximize their looks while men are incentivized to maximize their wealth and status. Neither is fair but both are equally unfair.
/r/MensRights05/02/25 02:50 PM
4

Some places yes. Some places they are overrepresented. what is your point? What are you trying to contribute to this discussion?
/r/MensRights28/01/25 04:01 PM
4

according to the Bible you need to be faithfull to one woman your whole life, The Bible I read growing up was all about having multiple wives.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/25 03:40 PM
27

As a non American watching from afar it seems like all your elections basically come down to a vote for "change" or a vote for "more of the same". The American people, whether left, right, or other all seem desperate for change and when one party fails to deliver it they elect the other. A vote for Harris was a vote for "more of the same", and this time the people weren't having it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/24 05:29 PM
1

Yes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/24 08:39 PM
18

Where I live (Canada) rich women got the vote before poor men. Furthermore, women didn't want to vote or bank accounts because they didn't want the responsibilities that men had - conscription and financial accountability laws. When you judge the past by today's morality you run the risk of distorting a very nuanced state of affairs. In the future feminists will describe our present as a time when men prevented women from having abortions. They will be making the same mistake as you - assuming a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/24 05:25 PM
2

I find that feminists refer to "toxic feminity" as "internalized misogyny", while internalized misandry is referred to as "toxic masculinity '.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 05:51 PM
2

Hypoagency. Society treats women as being less capable than they actually are. This causes them many problems that men do not face.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/10/24 09:59 PM
6

This describes the "opposite patriarchy" shown in the Barbie movie. Those Barbies had all the upsides of being women, all the upsides of being men, and none of the disadvantages is either. In a true Opposite patriarchy, most of the teachers and nurses would be Ken's while most of the homeless would be Barbies. It's telling that this was not the case.
/r/MensRights18/09/24 07:52 PM
5

You seem to have a very black and white world view. Society was made by men and women cooperatively. Do you honestly think that Elizabeth and Victoria had no say over the ages named after them? Who was Columbus' patreon, financing his expedition to the new world (and lining her treasury with blood soaked Aztec gold)? Isabella of Spain. Who raises and educated each generation? Women. Who has an equal say in creating social values and norms? Women. To say that women did not shape history is to ign…
/r/MensRights04/09/24 03:26 PM
1

Disagree. "Created to" is different than "has changed into something that".
/r/MensRights28/08/24 07:45 PM
1

"If past grievances make present day hatred okay, does the slaughter of men to satisfy the bloodlust of Queens also make make misogyny okay?" https://qz.com/967895/throughout-history-women-rulers-were-more-likely-to-wage-war-than-men?utm_source=reddit.com
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/24 02:57 PM
12

"Sex" is not a forbidden word, you don't need to censor it.
/r/MensRights26/07/24 01:09 PM
0

How would you know?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/24 02:40 PM
1

Nothing a priori, but immense anecdotal - both in terms of personal experience and in terms of societal observations. When you look at the world around you, doesn't it seem like (when it comes to dating) women prioritize wealth and status more than men?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/24 07:06 PM
2

Selection bias. If there were MGTOW in your life that didn't talk about it you wouldn't know they were MGTOW. Perhaps you just hear the vocal ones and assume they're all like that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/07/24 12:06 PM
49

More like MGTOW are treated like misogynists. Incels are people who want to date but can't.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/24 04:34 PM
11

I firmly believe that there's an evolutionary basis for the everyday observable (but complicated) fact that is best summed up as: Men go for looks, women go for status.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/24 07:58 PM
3

Upvote for Rawls.
/r/MensRights29/06/24 04:41 PM
1

Which parts of Twelve Rules do you dislike?
/r/MensRights29/06/24 04:40 PM
11

There shouldn't be a draft. If you can't convince enough of your populace that a war is worth fighting then maybe it isn't. I strongly feel that when a push comes to a shove, many women drafted will become pregnant to avoid being deployed .
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/24 08:12 PM
11

Bear includes polar bear. Anyone who chooses bear is either a bigot, or is shitty at probabilities.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 04:01 PM
2

Women are seen as having hypoagency which means people perceive them as less competent than they actually are.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 03:54 PM
4

Thanks!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 06:57 PM
32

There are 8 types of bears. Anyone who chooses "bear" with a 1 in 8 chance of getting a polar bear does not understand bears, danger, or probabilities.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/24 03:43 PM
39

Homeless men die of exposure for reasons that have everything to do with misandry.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 03:21 PM
5

Do women rely on social infrastructure like electricity, plumbing, waste disposal, houses, etc? Because that's mostly provided to society by men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/01/24 10:43 PM
2

If they say yes then you know you are dealing with a bigot.
/r/MensRights18/12/23 01:56 AM
55

Point out that most black people are murdered by other black people, or that most people who victimize the poor are poor themselves. Ask them if this means that black murder victims or poor murder victims don't count. If they say "no" then point out the hypocrisy in downplaying like on like violence for gender or but not for race or class.
/r/MensRights16/12/23 09:29 PM
30

Depends. To some women it's having to do things like remember when the childrens doctor appointments etc are, or having to make sure all the extended family members get Christmas cards. To others it's being there for emotional support. Originally it referred to the emotional abuse involved in the customer service industry. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emotional_labor
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/23 09:31 PM
8

Most feminists believe that western democracies are patriarchal. This belief legitimizes "punching up" at men. Of course since there is no patriarchy, it's not punching up it's just more misandry. The belief that western democracies are oppressive patriarchies hurts men and boys. Most feminists propagate this belief.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/11/23 04:05 PM
6

I would love to see some stats on how many allegations are dropped as soon as custody is settled after a divorce. I think false accusation of sexual assault are thought of as a legitimate tactic by women/mothers fighting for their kids.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/23 02:21 AM
5

Not all spouse killings are the same. If they were we wouldn't have murder 1,murder 2, manslaughter, etc. I think it would be illuminating to compare each category individually. I suspect it is far more easier for men to unintentionally kill their spouse than vice versa.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/11/23 04:14 PM
-1

So much of life is explained by the following generalization: Men go for looks, women go for status. I think it's fair for feminists to complain that society judges women by their appearance. Complaining about makeup is a subset of that. But it goes both ways.
/r/MensRights27/10/23 06:45 AM
1

1) money is not a replacement for a father. 2) if it's for everyone's good then the government should supply the funds.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 05:12 PM
1

Modern warfare is no longer about platemail and longswords. What does being a man have to do with defending ones country?
/r/MensRights24/08/23 09:15 PM
9

Care to list some successful ones that have come out this decade? Even James Bond films are respectful to women these days so I'm not sure your point is valid.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 11:44 PM
3

Well argued.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 09:55 PM
9

I'm sure the pioneers of the women's rights movement were similarly dismissed. Western democracies are not Patriarchies, and presenting them as such is harmful to men and boys. You are on the wrong side of history when you dismiss men when they call out misandry in the mainstream media.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 09:41 PM
2

I think that women score higher on "agreeability" scores, and that men and women compete in different ways. These things would absolutely come into play in business meeting settings. People only talk over you if you don't stop them. Stopping them requires being "disagreeable".
/r/MensRights08/06/23 09:39 PM
1

None of the girls at my school got A's by "doing favors". That sounds like a misogynistic bullshit to me.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 09:35 PM
1

I guess it depends on what you mean by "men" and "all the time". Some men saying something some the time isn't the same as all men saying it all of the time. Just because some men frequently say something (like the earth is flat) technically means that men say it it all the time, but I would still say that it's wrong to say: Men say the world is flat all the time. What you are saying is pedanticly true but it's incredibly misleading. I guess I'm just "not all men"-ing you by pointing out your hy…
/r/MensRights31/12/22 05:13 PM
5

That's not a fact at all. Not once has one of my friends ever said "all women are gold-digging whores", or words to that effect.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 03:58 PM
-35

Gender norms oppress everyone. Men are judged on their wealth/status in a way that women just aren't. Conversely, women are judged on their looks in a way that men just aren't. Both kind of judgements are unfair sometimes in a way that qualifies as oppression. Therefor both men and women are gender-oppressed.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 05:06 PM
8

The Orville is the non-woke star trek you are looking for.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 10:37 PM
6

There's a subtle but real difference between being anti woman and being indifferent to women. I enjoy women, I just enjoy being single and relationship -free more. Technically this makes me MGTOW. as a Canadian I can't publicly identify as such because people like you think that it means I hate women. The reason you think that is because of the media.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 04:53 PM
0

This kind of thinking is petty and unproductive. Intending to harm all women to penalize the speech of a few is counterproductive to the pursuit of gender equality. All that is beside the simple fact that abortions can benefit men as well as women, so abstaining from the politics surrounding them hurts men too.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 03:08 PM
1

I think that the problem is that he is an apostate.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 04:10 AM
0

We must live in very different cultures. Most women I know have heard the fish/bicycle thing. You should ask around, I bet it's true for your culture too.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 08:14 PM
1

It's happening by things like Female Dating Strategy normalizing abusive attitudes towards men.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 06:47 PM
6

But have they heard them? Almost certainly. And have they spoken out or corrected the sexist hate behind them? Almost certainly not. And so mainstream misandry carries on.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 05:28 PM
3

This will stop being true the moment you require health care.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 01:22 PM
43

My best friend threatened to quit watching after the rape of Sansa. He said it was too over the top. It bothers me that he had no problems with what was constantly happening to Theon.
/r/MensRights19/09/22 09:21 PM
2

I think Brendan Fraser said that a Hollywood bigwig sexually assaulted him. Afterwards he fell off the radar for a while.
/r/MensRights19/09/22 06:28 PM
1

Like a naturopath? Like a chiropractor? Or like a surgeon that was going to operate on you? Just what are we talking about here? I can't advise you when you're being so evasive.
/r/MensRights19/09/22 01:51 AM
1

You need to clarify your relationship with this care provider. Was it an ER nurse who gave you a cast before asking you out, or was it a psychiatrist you were actively seeing? It matters. The fact that you're still so vague is suspicious. You can state your medical relationship without revealing who you are. Just say "they were my physiotherapist" or whatever.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 11:42 PM
1

There is not enough information here for random people on the internet to advise you. 1) there's a big difference between an ER doctor or nurse dating someone they treated and a psychiatrist dating a patient. If this case is the former then you should stop the formal complaint. If it is the latter, please don't give up. I think you should go to citytv or the CBC if the college of physicians and surgeons doesn't help. If it's the latter you can probably sue the psychiatrist and recover your losse…
/r/MensRights18/09/22 04:27 PM
5

The problem is that having an eternal source on which to blame your failures (like patriarchy) is emotionally comforting for most people and also that it's lucrative to sel a narrative that supports this to women. And so the myth of patriarchy persists.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 02:04 PM
2

Yes.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 01:00 AM
1

As I explained, all other things being equal, men get harsher sentences than women.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 03:53 PM
1

I agree. Do you agree that men are systemically oppressed?
/r/MensRights14/09/22 12:55 PM
2

Yesterday. Today. Tomorrow. The fact that you are even asking this proves the point. But if it didn't, consider this: All other things being equal, black people have worse outcomes in the justice system than white people. Given equal histories, background, demographics, etc black people are given longer sentences than white people. We call that systemic oppression. All other things being equal, male people have worse outcomes than female people. The same methodology that proves black people are …
/r/MensRights14/09/22 04:34 AM
1

Yup. Nobody I know disputes that. Most people I know think of men as oppressors, not the oppressed. Both men and women are oppressed, but society only cares about the suffering of women.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 01:04 AM
1

By that logic, women not voting would not negate the oppression of men being drafted. Personally I would rather give up my vote than be forced to go to kill people (or be killed) in the jungles of Vietnam, or contemporary Ukraine. Tonnes of people abstain from voting as it is, few volunteer for an active battlefield.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 10:33 PM
2

Canada is part of the Americas. All of north america still has gender oppression. Men are systemically discriminated against by the legal systems, for example.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 10:25 PM
2

In Canada, women who owned property could vote before men who didn't. That's class-based oppression, not gender-based.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 09:00 PM
1

Of course I read what you said. You didn't really make a direct argument so I had to infer your position. sorry if I got it wrong. You brought up the fact that making a mistake doesn't mean you are a hypocrite, presumably to advance the position that not everyone is a hypocrite. I then presented evidence that even if that is true... everyone, including you and I, are still huge hypocrites. If I incorrectly inferred your stance, again I'm sorry Could you be more clear?
/r/MensRights11/09/22 01:50 PM
0

Everyone is against slavery, yet everyone consumes things produced by slaves. Hence, everyone is a hypocrite. That's just one example.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 09:55 PM
8

This is why I'm going to give all my baby daughters a totally sweet facial tattoo that guys will be sure to love. Do you think I should go with the rock'n'roll devils horns on the cheek, or a nice simple "the future is Male" across the forehead?
/r/MensRights09/09/22 09:05 PM
1

In that case I agree with you.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 05:51 PM
3

Material concerning the men's rights movement.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 05:50 PM
5

Once you realize and accept that everyone is a hypocrite, including yourself, the world starts to make more sense.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 03:32 PM
2

Honest question: If you had a female friend who had an abusive spouse, and when you asked her about it she said "he's only mean when he drinks" and "he only drinks a few days a month", what would be your advice to her?
/r/MensRights09/09/22 01:47 AM
8

Are the white men limited, or totally absent as OP stated? If everyone in the pool has an equal chance of being the best candidate, and if the pool is mostly "demographic x", it would be quite unlikely for none of the successful candidates to be from "demographic x". Not impossible, but literally improbable.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 02:55 AM
1

JP is to wokism as an apostate is to christianity. The woke have hated him vigorously, even before he went crazy, because he went on national television and said things like "the earnings gap is not due to oppression", or "western democracies are not patriarchal", and they had no defense. Their inability to refute his critiques of their dogma is what produced their initial hatred of him. Then he suffered a mental breakdown,and rather than let the man be they seized upon the opportunity to retroa…
/r/MensRights04/09/22 12:49 PM
2

I also don't think misogynistic language is the route to improving men's lives. I guess I get downvoted for that?
/r/MensRights27/08/22 02:41 AM
0

Maybe don't call random women you've never met "bitches" then.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 02:38 AM
3

But we don't have to call people who disagree with us "bitches".
/r/MensRights27/08/22 02:37 AM
2

Agree. I think the solution is to call out the sexism when you encounter it.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 08:02 PM
1

That's like me saying that there were times when some women could vote and some men couldn't. Or are you saying that it's fine if poor men couldn't vote as long as rich women could?
/r/MensRights24/07/22 11:34 PM
8

But "bitching" is only a derogatory term if you self-identify as a bitch. Mansplaining is derogatory to all men.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 09:51 PM
5

I think you are trying to say that there was a time when all men could vote and all women couldn't. That is simply untrue.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 11:48 PM
0

If you read the article, that is exactly what happened.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 11:44 PM
5

All women and men were finally able to vote in 1960 when native men and women finally got the vote. Before 1960, native men couldn't vote and native women couldn't vote. Therefore, all men and all women got the vote at the same time.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 06:51 PM
10

In that case, women and men got the vote at the same time. This is the opposite of what you stated.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 04:39 PM
15

Where l live (Canada) rich women could vote before poor men. Owning property was the deciding factor, not gender.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 04:33 PM
-5

This has nothing to do with men's rights. People who need to wear a n95 mask to do their job shouldn't have beards. Remember how much it annoys you when feminists make something that's not sexist into sexism? Don't be like that.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 02:20 PM
2

Single parent, working min wage job in the 70s. My mother inspired me.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 01:18 PM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 01:00 PM
16

That's one case. Another is not telling a man he is a father for ten years, then hitting him up for ten years of back child support all at once. How is that fair?
/r/MensRights29/06/22 02:30 PM
2

Experienced the HUGE empathy gap for male victims of domestic violence vs the default support that female victims receive. Real friends were dismissive in a way that I know they would not be if the genders were reversed.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 10:45 PM
2

I enjoy having female friends immensely. My mom is also super cool. I have zero desire for a wife, though.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 04:49 PM
1

Yes. Also... Telling men to "grow some balls" makes you part of the problem. Next you'll tell me to "man up".
/r/MensRights21/04/22 06:28 PM
0

Post partum depression is no joke.
/r/MensRights13/01/22 10:40 PM
1

If the money comes from taxpayers, why does it matter what the reason is?
/r/MensRights13/11/21 11:36 PM
1

In my country, there is such a thing as "orphans benefits". This should apply to these kids
/r/MensRights13/11/21 09:45 PM
6

Do you condone rape victims being forced to have monthly contact with their abusers, and that they should also be forced to pay them money monthly?
/r/MensRights13/11/21 07:25 PM
20

It was me, one other young man, and a class full of feminists. Other guy kept his head down all semester. I would engage in discussion. I was literally told that my opinions didn't matter because of my gender. Yup.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 10:26 PM
48

1) studying Feminism in university. 2) being the victim of domestic violence. 3) having conversations with Feminists about the wage gap etc.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 01:29 PM
18

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/change-gender-identification-insurance-alberta-1.4754416
/r/MensRights29/10/21 08:23 PM
29

1 but people who are not overqualified do deserve more money if they have more qualifications. 2 experience often makes you more valuable to your employer. Such value deserves compensation. 3 just... What? 4 some work can't be ended when the shift ends. Do you want a fireman about to save you to stop and say "end of shift!" 5 no firemen on weekends. Got it. Either you're a troll, or you just plain can't think about this topic critically.
/r/MensRights26/10/21 09:06 PM
2

Where I live men pay more for car insurance because science says that men are genetically predisposed to taking risks. Perhaps there are more male shooters not because men are more violent than women, but because they are more impulsive.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 07:34 PM
1

As a man, yes I do.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 01:49 PM
24

It's comedy. It's supposed to push the boundaries of what's acceptable. It's fine if you didn't think it was funny, but if comedy was censored everytime someone was offended comedy would become bland pretty quickly.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 01:48 PM
1

Most assaults are by men... who are friends and family members of the victim. I bet she's not as androphobic of them...
/r/MensRights27/09/21 09:37 PM
8

It's pretty easy to prove that we don't live in a patriarchy, as long as you call them out when they motte and bailey their definition. It's simply not true that men as a class oppress women as a class. Half the ruling class are women: when you look around you at who is living in the nice neighborhoods, driving the expensive cars and wearing the designer clothes, is it mostly men? The ruling class are rich and half of them are women.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 11:55 PM
40

I love how this "hate sub" thread consistently advocates for rationality and empathy.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 01:04 AM
1

Disagree. Sorry but here's your downvoted.
/r/MensRights20/07/21 02:21 AM
1

Please no.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 02:17 AM
1

Like... You don't believe the woman exists?
/r/MensRights16/06/21 09:16 PM
10

I'm sad you're getting downvoted. This community should be better than that.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 12:56 PM
1

Having never had a beard, but having once sported a glorious elbow length mane, wouldn't something like Pantine work?
/r/MensRights11/06/21 01:47 AM
3

Shaming a man for having a hairy neck is like shaming a woman for having hairy legs. They are both harmful.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/21 02:51 PM
5

His comment was inappropriate. But so is going into a men's space that is known for attracting men who have been victimized because they were men and making the conversation all about your cause. I'm not saying you are a bad person or that your point was inaccurate or that your cause is not legit. I'm am merely pointing out that you walked into a room of victims and said "Well actually..."
/r/MensRights09/04/21 11:09 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter