~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | The New Erasure of MenYeah, it definitely doesn't help anyone who wasn't aware of the issues at hand and stopped for a moment to think "why didn't they just say men?" | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 17/10/21 09:26 AM |
| 1 | The New Erasure of MenI'm already educated on the issue, and I wouldn't have noticed the wording if it hadn't been the theme of this entire post. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 17/10/21 09:05 AM |
| 7 | The New Erasure of MenI'm a man. Someone born differently than me but of the same gender as me does not demean or diminish myself or my existence, just as my existence doesn't demand or diminish them. However, I don't think this small minority is cause enough to remove 'men' and 'women' from our language as completely as possible Cool. Delineate the point where the minority becomes large enough to be worthy of representation. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 17/10/21 07:56 AM |
| 4 | The New Erasure of MenNothing is wrong with male, but male is different than men. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 17/10/21 07:06 AM |
| 9 | The New Erasure of MenIf only men were capable of erections, then it would make sense to use the term men. Since that isn't the case, I don't see an issue with neutral terminology. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 17/10/21 05:59 AM |
| -1 | Wow, what logic!No, I'm just the kind of guy that doesn't believe scumbags when they talk about their accomplishments without proof. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/21 01:06 PM |
| 0 | Wow, what logic!Is he a multi-millionaire? | /r/MensRights | 13/09/21 11:49 AM |
| -4 | Wow, what logic!And he promptly lost it. Tru.p has consistently underperformed the stock market. He's a buffoon. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/21 11:48 AM |
| -29 | Wow, what logic!has been unbelievably rich and powerful for most of his life. I was talking about Donald Trump. Who are you talking about? | /r/MensRights | 13/09/21 11:27 AM |
| -55 | Wow, what logic!Yeah. It's weird that someone would name something in such a way as to inform people about it's nature through aforementioned name, right? | /r/MensRights | 13/09/21 11:26 AM |
| -73 | Wow, what logic!Yeah, I understood what it was from the name. I still don't think it applies to Drumpf. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/21 11:23 AM |
| -1 | Wow, what logic!Republican smear campaign? | /r/MensRights | 13/09/21 10:57 AM |
| -117 | Wow, what logic!I've never heard of the Apex Fallacy, but I'm 99% sure it's not applicable to Drumpf. Edit: oops, didn't realize what sub I'm in. I'm going to peace out because winning an argument against literal retards isn't fair. | /r/MensRights | 13/09/21 10:56 AM |
| 1 | Blaming men for all the miseries of women is only causing more issues in society.If the gender wage gap were real, you would be the reason. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/08/21 01:48 AM |
| 14 | Blaming men for all the miseries of women is only causing more issues in society.There's a ton of things they could do that don't boil down to "I need pussy". They could quit perpetuating the gender wage gap myth. They could not fucking attack any dude that is affectionate towards children, especially when that child is his or a close relative. They could knock it off with the "oh, must be giving mommy a day off" bullshit anytime they see a father taking care of his children. They could refuse to participate in a system if family law that heavily favors and rewards them for … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/08/21 05:09 AM |
| 24 | Blaming men for all the miseries of women is only causing more issues in society.You're the one who brought up "what women could do to make things better." And you're the one that completely twisted the meaning into something with no resemblance to the initial point, thus proving OPs entire point. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/08/21 01:52 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter