TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Speck_A Archive

View 0 posts and 45 comments by Speck_A on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Just an example of givng a woman power, they go mad with it. Your comment is just misogyny what?
/r/MensRights28/09/20 01:22 AM
2

Indeed I don't think I went to the SU once in the whole time I was there, except from the fresher's fayre once. Individual college politics is better but not by much. Literally nobody voted for SU elections unless you were begged by someone you knew to get involved.
/r/MensRights28/09/20 01:20 AM
5

Disagree - think you're confusing pro-female with feminism. This divisiveness is really bad for both sides.
/r/MensRights28/08/20 12:48 AM
1

tbh I have no idea if that's why it's named that way haha, just the best I can think of. Source: British + getting a maths degree atm
/r/MensRights10/02/18 02:10 AM
9

There's many different areas of mathematics, hence plural.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 03:29 AM
18

Just because it's more men than women isn't the issue. The fact is it's complete minorities of both sexes. it's exactly the same as the 'not all muslims' argument. Nobody supports rape. If you want to effectively combat it, targeting all men and saying they're all rapists is far from the best way to do it and is more likely to get people to turn on your cause (not to turn in favour of rape, just against feminism in general). Furthermore, specific to the rape case, more men are raped than women (…
/r/MensRights20/12/17 05:04 PM
-3

That's sheer speculation though. It's a new rule, and who knows how the university would respond? Your biases are potentially impairing your view. You could be right, but you could also be wrong. I mean, the fact that there's even an article about it is evidence enough that people don't think it's okay regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 08:32 PM
-2

I struggle to see anything MR related here, just seems like a fairly reasonable response from the sororities. Regardless, how is this relevant to us?
/r/MensRights15/12/17 06:22 PM
2

Miss me with that incel shit
/r/MensRights15/12/17 04:33 PM
35

The famous image of the domestic abuse 'help' pages where the men's one is about people afraid of abusing others? Aussie.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 05:27 PM
4

here's the relevant link
/r/MensRights12/10/17 09:31 AM
12

Just terror attacks in general, globally. Honestly it's kind of a grey area, so I'll at least try to give my view. The answer? It depends. I'm sure you could find a stat similar to "the majority of serial killers ate McDonalds at least once a week". Now it'd be ridiculous to criticise McDonalds, because any sane person knows that a correlation doesn't mean anything in this case. A slightly less clear example might be white supremacy and Trump supporters. The vast majority of white supremacists a…
/r/MensRights06/10/17 01:29 AM
31

As soon as you point out that Muslims are also disproportionately responsible they suddenly see sense and tell you that it's an issue with the individual rather than the group. Cognitive dissonance.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 09:58 PM
2

Perhaps, that sounds reasonable
/r/MensRights16/07/17 06:09 PM
4

I believe the test was done on grip strength so perhaps that could be partly to blame, however without finding the actual study I'm not sure.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 04:38 PM
9

There' was a study done on relative strengths that found that the average man is stronger than every single woman. It's been a while since I read it but that was the gist.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 04:07 PM
4

Got a source on that?
/r/MensRights10/07/17 09:50 AM
8

Circumcision isn't all that common in the UK so I doubt they'll approach it from that angle.
/r/MensRights03/07/17 11:15 AM
9

I think you need to elaborate on saying it's just to fill quotas and is therefore irrelevant. Furthermore, I don't really want to speculate as more research is required but it could even be something to do with men signing up military service, men not feeling like they receive sufficient support at school etc.
/r/MensRights09/05/17 11:08 AM
18

Scholarships/grants etc. exclusively for women is the first thing that comes to mind
/r/MensRights09/05/17 10:30 AM
1

100% this. Focus on the quality of our message rather than the volume.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 08:00 PM
1

It's satire
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/17 12:06 PM
17

I think it's because it's drawing attention to the wrong side of the coin. Think of it as if it were poverty - you don't draw attention to poverty by saying "1st world countries are responsible for XX% of global GDP".
/r/MensRights14/04/17 02:51 AM
1

!remindme 7 months
/r/MensRights10/04/17 11:45 AM
3

If you really think that's the beginning of a sentence you have bigger issues here. It's the beginning of a clause, not a sentence.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 11:14 PM

Agreed, but I was arguing with the more general point in the comment. She should certainly be charged, just not for falsely accusing him of rape, in my opinion.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 01:49 PM

I agree, I'm not defending her in anyway. Just saying that some people are almost calling for her to be hanged at this point.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 01:48 PM
3

Ahh yes, rather than argue with my points, just respond​ to a typo in a condescending manner. Speaking of which: it's​ "you're". Not "You're" as it's not a name, nor is it at the start of a sentence.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 01:47 PM

She didn't make up charges, just threatened too. Similarly do we want victims to be afraid to come forward for fear of not enough evidence? Despite this it's certainly an issue and proven false-accusers should be punished more harshly.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 11:32 AM
2

ah fair enough. Tbh I am fed up of all the shit on /r/all but I feel like I miss out when I only browse subscribed subreddits.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/03/17 12:12 AM
1

how do you find new subs/content then?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/03/17 10:35 PM
2

Not quite sure why I'm getting downvoted - archives are more to avoid traffic going to websites who may or may not deserve it. It also preserves the link in case the article changes or gets deleted for future readers.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 11:10 PM
-2

Use an archive
/r/MensRights30/12/16 03:30 PM
1

I scrolled down pretty far, and the timestamps were well before this was posted, so no.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 05:36 PM
2

Not to say she was justified, but it's no different to someone mentally ill committing a crime. Guilty? Yes. Can you truly hate the individual for it? Not necessarily. Poor girl has clearly been through a lot (as has the guy) so I think both need some sympathy and consideration, especially seeing as he was released due to a key piece of evidence being found to be false, rather than being proved innocent.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 02:17 PM
1

In addition to this (well said btw), in the comments on the article apmost everyone is saying "poor guy, she shiuld be imprisoned" etc. So OP also lied about people "defending the girl.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 02:13 PM
3

It gets ridiculous when you start talking about 1% of each 100 parts of business.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/10/16 03:27 PM
16

"I've split my business into 2 parts, and you get 10% of the combined halves." "Oh, so 10% of each half?" "No 5% of each, so 10% total." "Well that's 5% total..."
/r/PussyPassDenied06/10/16 03:13 PM
2

I absolutely agree that this is a ridiculous attempt by SJWs, but is this at home on /r/MensRights?
/r/MensRights05/10/16 10:13 PM
35

Why is she so femotional about this?
/r/MensRights25/08/16 06:22 PM
2

Not sure why you're getting downvoted, any serious statistician will know that combining huge sets of data like this is unlikely to prove a particularly robust conclusion, even if it's indicative of a further trend.
/r/MensRights21/08/16 03:00 AM
1

This is exactly my point. I'm just trying to make sure that we use statistics because they're robust rather than because they fit our agenda. WE ARE BETTER THAN FEMINISTS.
/r/MensRights21/08/16 02:56 AM
0

Attendance at college can be categorised easily, types of crimes cannot. See my reply above.
/r/MensRights20/08/16 04:10 PM
-1

I don't mean circumstantial stuff, more that 'type of crime' is too vague. If you could truly categorise crimes so well then there would be no need for sentencing, just guilty/innocent and the punishment would be predetermined. Edit: It saddens me that I'm getting downvoted for this. Because I won't just blindly accept a statistic I somehow don't deserve to be part of the conversation? I'm not even saying that this number isn't correct or even indicative of a trend, just that it's not very robus…
/r/MensRights20/08/16 04:09 PM
6

Whilst I don't doubt that sentencing is unfair, I feel like such a broad statistic is exactly what we accuse feminists of. There could well be other factors at play that help exaggerste this. Disclaimer: Fixing the justice system for men is absolutely necessary, but I'm worried about such generalised statistics having flaws that could weaken our message.
/r/MensRights20/08/16 02:04 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter