TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SpectacularFox Archive

View 0 posts and 65 comments by SpectacularFox on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

It shows many women's self serving nature. They support all this left wing bullshit, screwing over men when it helps them but suddenly reject it when they find an area they're disadvantaged.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/20 11:43 AM
0

The democrats and the left in general support this stuff. They are the big pro trans proponents.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/20 11:41 AM
2

Some sports they do. In some tennis tournaments they get the same despite less people caring.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/20 11:40 AM
1

You should get rid of her. She flat out lied to you about what she liked about you then complains when you're nicer to her. It's not like she didn't know what her genuine wants were, she said it during your argument. Not all women are pathologically dishonest.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/19 11:19 PM
2

I do mind my own business. Everyone has a right to an opinion though.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/19 08:55 AM
11

Yep. They're complete retards.
/r/TheRedPill24/01/19 12:03 AM
9

You are right. You don't build shit with endless promiscuity. What really matters in life and for the future is finding one good woman and having a family.
/r/TheRedPill23/01/19 07:25 AM
12

Women don't start out great people then turn into self absorbed, thoughtless cunts. I've never seen that. They're always like that if it's in them. You have to find the ones that aren't like that. Usually the issue is the guy is not perceptive enough or too in love to see what the what the woman is really like. There are decent looking women who are genuinely good people and will be loyal. The challenge is having the discernment and objectivity to identify them.
/r/TheRedPill22/01/19 09:31 AM
6

There is nothing appealing about this ad to any demographic of men though. It's basically insulting all men.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/19 04:37 AM
5

The left are already using those tactics to destroy the right. Using those tactics back at them does not destroy the right anymore than it's already being destroyed.
/r/TheRedPill25/11/18 04:50 PM
3

Yes it is because it highlights to them how awful their own ideology is. When leftist get banned from facebook due to the ever changing parameters of hate speech, some of them might actually consider why it's a bad idea to use these censorial tactics. The shit they use to sabotage the right will come back to bite them. It's the only way they can learn.
/r/TheRedPill25/11/18 04:49 PM
19

Civilisation is already lost if you don't fight back effectively. Everything is going in the left's favor. They control every social media platform going, they control the news media, hollywood and the education system. They are deplatforming and destroying the lives of conservatives at an ever increasing rate. The right, by trying to be magnanimous and oh so principled are doing nothing to slow the left's progress. In the scheme of things it's meaningless. That's why CuckCervative's Democrats a…
/r/TheRedPill25/11/18 09:15 AM
53

Adopting the tactics of the left to destroy them is not blue pilled. It's blue pilled for your civilisation to go down the drain because you were too "alpha" to use every tool at your disposal stop that happening.
/r/TheRedPill25/11/18 08:50 AM
54

I think it's entertaining. Fuck what's alpha or beta.
/r/TheRedPill25/11/18 08:31 AM
57

Who is portraying it as alpha? It's just 4chan trying to sabotage e-sluts. They know most of these women will be Hillary supporters pushing left wing values whilst evading tax like hypocrites, so 4chan are using the same tactics as the left to damage them.
/r/TheRedPill25/11/18 08:27 AM
2

Your personality, attachments, desires etc only change if you want them to though. Yes, we are ultimately malleable but it's really about choices. The physical world is much more in constant change including your body but much less so in regards to a persons psyche. Say someone has a particular personality trait, that isn't in constant flux. It's basically fixed unless they make a major effort to change things. I talked to a guy recently who had suffered sever brain damage after hitting his head…
/r/TheRedPill19/11/18 05:50 PM
19

Fundamentally you are correct, there is no fixed you but basically everyone has very ingrained personalities and ways of doing most things that usually don't change much. For example, occasionally I'll see people I haven't seen is 10-15 years and when you talk to them it's like a day hasn't gone by. They are still fundamentally the same person and so are you, they have the same sense of humour, the same mannerisms etc. Relatively minor things might have changed by their core personality is as it…
/r/TheRedPill16/11/18 11:56 AM
1

Your friends can't have been very close to you if this BS was enough to end the relationship. You don't have to be a leader with proper friends, it's not a female/male dynamic.
/r/TheRedPill14/11/18 08:17 PM
2

I think it depends on the person. People don't actually fundamentally change that much in their life so if you really know someone fully and love them despite their faults I don't see why that would ever fade. There are many people who have decades long loving relationships so I definitely think it's possible. I'm not saying it's easy to find but IMO it's what people should aim for.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/18 06:33 PM
2

Yep. 100%. It's better to put all you effort into finding 1 decent girl to have a family with than fucking a load of sub par women and nothing of real value coming from it.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/18 03:12 PM
5

Be grateful you weren't murdered by a hitman.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/18 03:09 PM
5

You handled it great. She will respect you more now.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/18 12:13 AM
144

They helped cultivate the cancer, now it's turning on them. The left are cannibalistic, they hire people that will destroy them from the inside.
/r/TheRedPill02/11/18 05:03 AM
2

Just forget about her. She didn't respect you the first time. There are far better women out there that would.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/18 09:55 PM
7

Yep. Sad but true. They don't appreciate that stuff.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/18 08:31 PM
4

What are your specific problems with him? The site is always going to host controversial content by its very nature. The people banned from twitter are going to be on the edges.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/18 12:27 AM
20

This isn't true at all. Companies like paypal have been constantly shutting down small sites and voices on the right using their platform. It has nothing to do with public backlash and a threat to their revenue. They are too big to fail at this point. They have no competition. These actions are entirely politically motivated. The people that run these companies have ideologies, they are not robots and they enforce their ideologies, even to the determent of profits.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/18 12:26 AM
2

You smash plates with your frame. Capisce?
/r/TheRedPill28/10/18 03:50 AM
98

Wise words. The annoying thing is most men just want to be honest with women about how they feel but you have to play these stupid fucking games and if you slip up at any point you can end up in the bin.
/r/TheRedPill28/10/18 03:37 AM
3

She probably will cheat if he doesn't up his sex game. If a women isn't getting turned on in the bedroom, especially if she has a history of promiscuity, she probably will cheat. If the relationship breaks down she wins anyway.
/r/TheRedPill20/10/18 12:29 PM
1

It's not about that. This guy had a certain "pure", loyal image of this woman. She probably hardly put out for him and makes sex a chore, then he finds out she's been this rampant depraved slut for a bunch of guys who have done far less than he has for her. That is going to fuck with a dudes mind. It's hard to just sweep that under the carpet and move on. He fell in love with a certain person for certain reasons and he learnt she's not that person at all.
/r/TheRedPill20/10/18 12:21 PM
1

Do you think she cares at all about your pain?
/r/TheRedPill20/10/18 12:11 PM
3

Tragic situation but common. So many women just use men in the most cynical way yet it's men who society says objectify women etc. This women just saw you as a tool, a means to an end that she could exploit. The worst part, as you say, is that you're basically trapped and if you end the situation you will be royally screwed. I feel for you. I think a good lesson from this is don't put looks on a pedestal and vet women, make sure you know their history before committing. It's better to have a 5/1…
/r/TheRedPill20/10/18 12:04 PM
2

Calling out, "hey, this trite new-agey meme you don't realize you're repeating is actually pretty stupid" might not work on the type of folks who aren't smart enough to see such platitudes for what they are, unassisted, in the first place. Yep. Probably why i got downvoted.
/r/TheRedPill10/10/18 11:34 AM
1

Yeah, i was confusing them because i thought ultimately you get to a similar place. A lot of drugs seem to overlap like that. I didn't get very far with dxm. The experience itself was very cool but it left my perception/vision feeling off for a few days afterwards which i didn't like.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/18 11:08 PM
1

Yeah, my mistake. What's actual difference between those 2 states?
/r/TheRedPill09/10/18 09:52 PM
3

Yep. The best advice. Try to bait them into admitting their bs too if possible.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/18 05:40 AM
3

Here SMV is still high. She can get young guys to fuck and pay for her nights out at a moments notice.
/r/TheRedPill07/10/18 10:36 PM
14

She will claim rape if he doesn't.
/r/TheRedPill07/10/18 10:33 PM
9

It's the product of women's suffrage and basically voting for the state to be their provider. Historically women have relied on men for that function and so the average guy could find a woman willing to have a long term relationship and family much more easily. There was no welfare state and divorce was stigmatised. Now you have a system that incentives family break up's by giving women the children and a bunch of a mans earnings and property. When you have no societal social/financial pressures…
/r/TheRedPill06/10/18 02:53 AM
1

I've talked to some teachers and experienced people online. There's really no value in it though, meditation literally changes the brain. It shrinks the amygdala. Talking to someone can't reverse this process.
/r/TheRedPill05/10/18 03:48 PM
1

I never aimed down a specific path. I just did a lot of zen. For a long time i thought it was a harmless form of "mind control". I was better at controlling thought patterns and emotions. Then out of the blue I had this horrendous experience that lasted a few days overall where it felt like my soul was dying and I was falling into this void trying to grasp something solid but I couldn't. Reality also suddenly had this disassociated video game type feel where life felt way more empty and like a b…
/r/TheRedPill05/10/18 12:43 AM
1

I actually have never done hallucinogens. The closest i've come is DXM but i never made it to the k-hole :( Most of what I've learnt about the nature of reality and the "ego" is through meditation. I wish i had done more drugs beforehand because i think i'd have learnt some valuable lessons much earlier and i'd have never pursued meditation. I now explicitly warn people off it.
/r/TheRedPill05/10/18 12:31 AM
1

Yes. There are definitely different forms of attachment and different motivations, good and bad.
/r/TheRedPill05/10/18 12:15 AM
29

Misandry is fine on reddit, anything but 24/7 fawning over women is considered misogyny and will get you banned. I don't think you're going to have much luck appealing to the admins rationality, they are agenda driven. SJW agenda that is.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/18 08:04 PM
2

Very few people have done thousands of hours, that's what i'm talking about. They do a bit of meditation then think they understand the ultimate path it's taking them on, they actually have no idea. Easterners typically have a vastly different view on meditation to us. It's not seen as some self help practice over there but something to be taken very seriously. For years i did meditation and had a generally postie view of it, i saw it as weight lifting for the mind but the longer i did it the mo…
/r/TheRedPill04/10/18 08:01 PM
2

They are both the product of attachment though. That's the point. You were sad because you were attached. You can make things less bad by not intentionally cultivate certain emotions like anger, bitterness etc. but you will always experience sadness of and loss of things you value.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/18 06:53 PM
1

Dwelling on things is unconscious and involuntary to the untrained mind. The untrained mind suffers greatly. Choice - The conscious, "choosing" mind is often the slave of the emotional hindbrain. Choice is most often an illusion. I agree to some extent. Often people rationalise things consciously based on subconscious forces they're not even in control of. Say someone is pissed off one day, they will go around thinking everyone is doing things to make them angry when in reality the anger came fi…
/r/TheRedPill04/10/18 06:49 PM
1

I'm using it as intended. The only reason you have an internal moral compass or set of values is because you intellectually cling to them and try to live by them. If you stopped clinging to them your values would change and you'd be a totally different person.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/18 06:34 PM
1

I've done years of meditation practice. That's why i'm saying what i am. My worldview comes from years of introspection and seeing the effects of mediation on my psyche and attachments. The number of attachements the average person has is so vast and multifaceted. Attachments even encompass the meaning you attribute to particular words. These are concepts your subconscious mind holds on to. I expect you haven't been doing it for that long so your perspective is somewhat limited. I don't say that…
/r/TheRedPill04/10/18 06:28 PM
1

If you really loved a girl, you wouldn't just think it was a bummer if you lost her. You'd be heartbroken. That doesn't mean you were just compensating for some hole in your life, you can be deeply attached to someone just because of who they are. It isn't a requirement to be deficient n some way. What you're basically saying is you current relationships are not that deep if you'd hardly care if they ended. You're probably just with a girl mostly for the sex.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/18 06:23 PM
1

You're very wrong. Positive and negative feelings are inextricably linked to attachment. You feel emotions for things you have psychological attachments to, either positive or negative. Tell me something your life that doesn't fit that. There is a difference between intentionally dwelling on things out of choice and the natural process of losing an attachment. They both involve inevitable suffering but one is where you're consciously inducing suffering. I'm not advocating for that.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/18 05:38 PM
1

You're making semantic differentiations that don't really exist. You fight for what you cling to. Your morals, values etc. are psychological constructs that you cling to. That is what makes you who you are.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/18 05:20 PM
1

Yes. Suffering is a consequence of attachement. You can't have one without the other but there's nothing wrong with that. It is the ying and yang of existence. If you do not suffer from losing something you never truly appreciated it. Your psyche naturally attaches to things it gets enjoyment/value out of. You can't help it. You're saying people can just switch off something that is innate to our very being. There is one way you can switch off this process but i would never suggest you do it and…
/r/TheRedPill04/10/18 05:17 PM
5

There is nothing wrong with being miserable? Try again, this point was less than spectacular, fox. There's not. Temporary sadness or emotional anguish etc. are the direct result of losing something you value. The only way to avoid not suffering is to never care about anything. If that's your aim in life then i don't know why you're even here. How about if you were mentally strong enough to accept that one day your parents will die as well as everyone else, and this being inevitable you should th…
/r/TheRedPill04/10/18 05:10 PM
1

I fundamentally disagree. The mind is a multi layered thing. It can hold multiple concepts/ideas at the same time. It can simultaneously value something and appreciate it deeply whilst being afraid of losing it. Imaging a relationship with a sick family member, are you telling me because you are scared of losing them you can't value them, their characteristic, what they've done for you in life etc? It's actually the opposite of what you say. It's precisely because you value and appreciate thing …
/r/TheRedPill04/10/18 04:31 PM
4

That sounds like some bullshit esoteric quote you'd find on a fridge magnet.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/18 04:26 PM
2

You can live in the moment, deeply appreciating and being attached to the things you have. There is no contradiction there. Yes, you will be anxious and upset if something you value is taken away. Say you had a child. Are you going to tell me you'd rather have no attachment to them just to avoid the negative feelings you'd endure from potentially losing them? That is pure nihilism. You might as well just lay down and die.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/18 04:24 PM
4

Your mind naturally clings to things, you can't help it. Imagine i say "don't cling to the attachement you have or your parents". You can't do that, you have no choice in the matter. You care about them and value them and when they die you will be miserable. How miserable is directly correlated to how much you cared about them. There is nothing wrong with that. If you can't take feeling bad in life you're a pussy. It's part of what gives life its depth.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/18 04:21 PM
2

No. I'm right. Your world view leads to subjection. Those that do cling to things get what they want in society because you just acquiesce and move on. It's like the lefts increasingly authoritarian agenda. You would just sit back and let them dictate the agenda. "Don't cling to the old ways". The end result is we'll be living in hell.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/18 04:13 PM
1

You're advocating for a rootless, shallow existence. That's not what i'm about. I want stuff i can hold on to that i care about a lot.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/18 04:02 PM
-11

That's bad advice. Clinging to things is what gives meaning. You cling to things you value in life and should try and preserve them as much as possible.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/18 04:17 AM
39

Men will take so much shit because it's so much harder for a man to find a woman for a long term relationship than vice versa. The average man simply wants an average looking woman who isn't complete brain damage, the average woman wants way more than that. It creates a total imbalance where men will take a whole bunch of shit just for something women take for granted, the amount of shit goes way up if the woman is decent looking.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/18 05:01 PM
1

Johnathan Bowden is immense. An intellectual giant. Thanks for linking to him.
/r/TheRedPill28/09/18 11:00 AM
4

These "theories" are dreamt up after the fact to justify screwing as much money out of men as possible. Of course they have to make pure theft sound somewhat reasonable.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 12:03 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter