TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SpicyTigerPrawn Archive

View 2 posts and 2,393 comments by SpicyTigerPrawn on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,393 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

If you willingly wasted two full years on a situationship that's your own fault. I feel the same way about a guy spending two years simping from the friend zone. Either have some pride and GTFO or live with the consequences.
/r/MensRights19/08/26 12:31 AM
9

it is different, women read books about gay love, they dont watch porno the same way men do. Getting off to a book about men raping other men is not the wholesome morality mic drop you seem to think it is.
/r/MensRights14/08/26 12:58 AM
15

I cancelled my subscription after watching the Depp v. Heard miniseries back when that was all the rage. That trial was the perfect time for Netflix to rethink their staunchly anti-male content and admit that some men are genuine victims and some women are compulsive liars and vindictive manipulators. Instead they simply doubled down yet again. It was so biased and hypocritical that I threw in the towel and never looked back.
/r/MensRights13/08/26 05:05 AM
17

Lives can get closer or drift further apart over time. There is no rule that everyone is always super close at seven years. If men start separating earlier they’ll reduce the lead time. In some regions cohabited partnerships can become enforceable in as few as six months now.
/r/MensRights12/08/26 07:26 PM
19

All she has to do is say he abused her and any “benefit” for him vanishes. He can make the same claim of course but his word is only worth 3/5’s as much as hers so good luck with that.
/r/MensRights12/08/26 07:13 PM
18

So long as lonely men keep paying for "benefits" there will always be a market keeping them limping along.
/r/MensRights12/08/26 05:05 AM
22

The Guardian used to focus on actual important issues, but like so many it has morphed into 90% male bashing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/08/26 09:38 PM
20

What makes you think it will ever die off? I used to watch a lot of true crime content and it seems that hating all men and believing all women is here to stay and is creating a world where women feel that attacking or even killing a man just isn't that big of a deal anymore. We have yet to see the worst of this trend and the reason I had to stop watching was too many prosecutors plea bargaining premeditated murder down to manslaughter. A few years of girl prison is not going to make anyone regr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/08/26 09:36 PM
1

What makes you think it will ever die off? I watch a lot of true crime content and it seems that hating all men and believing all women is not only here to stay but is creating a world where women feel that attacking or even killing a man just isn't that big of a deal anymore.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/08/26 09:31 PM
37

Misandry is not just normalized, it's also weaponized and fetishized by many women and male feminists. I cannot even begin to imagine what it's like for boys growing up today. They see the same hatred the rest of us do but unlike us they're not aware that it wasn't always this bad and it's not their fault regardless.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/08/26 09:26 PM
2

Do people not understand what sarcasm is anymore? LOL
/r/MensRights08/08/26 03:48 AM
1

Why can’t he admit that caring about mens issues has suddenly gone mainstream and thanks to this new awareness women are totally on board and we’re just a couple years away from true equality? Is he just dense?
/r/MensRights07/08/26 10:15 PM
6

Ireland has a minimum quota for female candidates of 40%. It used to be 30% but is increasing over time. Any party that does not field at least 40% female candidates forfeits half of the party's funding. A party focusing on men's rights would likely be defunded but even if it somehow prevailed it too would need to field at least 40% women at the national level. The UN is actively pushing Ireland to raise the mandatory quota to 50% female candidates and to apply this new minimum to all levels of …
/r/MensRights07/08/26 05:16 AM
8

Feminist groups and movements have fought to update laws on sexual assault and rape against men for example. In most states and countries "rape" remains a crime that is only charged against men. Forced and manipulated copulation committed by an adult women is rarely charged or punished as rape despite being the same crime. When feminists unleashed MeToo and BelieveWomen (aka DisbelieveMen) they pushed back against men talking about abuse at the hands of women. If feminists cared about equality t…
/r/MensRights07/08/26 03:40 AM
10

I feel like none of you understand true feminism is the fight for equality. Ignoring the No True Scotsman fallacy, the people who want and fight for equality are called egalitarians. Feminism does not fight for men, has never sacrificed anything for men, and treats equality as a zero sum battle for resources.
/r/MensRights07/08/26 03:17 AM
43

"We don't need no man...but don't expect us to join you on the front lines...or anywhere else for that matter."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/26 11:36 AM
37

What's the range of potential punishments for her charges? I'm expecting a plea deal that leads to probation and fines at worse, but I really hope I'm wrong.
/r/MensRights02/08/26 02:59 AM
6

Even if you're attractive at some point there is going to be a falling out, or there will be an unattractive woman who is upset you're not into her, and other women will absolutely believe them over you. Men might believe you in private but they risk collateral damage if they support you in public. Even managers who know an accuser is a compulsive liar will feel obligated to side with her if it avoids a lawsuit or social media war against them and the company.
/r/MensRights01/08/26 07:39 PM
8

Equal rights would be the win, as in removing gender from consideration for granting opportunities and establishing responsibilities, not "boys are better than girls" or whatever other trolling nonsense you intend to post next.
/r/MensRights01/08/26 04:07 AM
9

Why not simply say you're an egalitarian? What is gained by muddying the water with a wishy-washy shell game?
/r/MensRights01/08/26 04:01 AM
10

Blaming any and all bad behavior on men being present is the golden ticket that absolves every responsibility. Even if the management realized it was bullshit they're probably super scared of a woman running off to social media to blame them for anything, even if she's the one at fault. By the time the record is corrected the damage is done.
/r/MensRights31/07/26 08:20 PM
11

A father who fails to support a compulsive lying daughter at the start of every performative wimper is considered a horrible dad in modern America. Good luck fixing a system working exactly as intended by the dominant social cult.
/r/MensRights31/07/26 08:14 PM
11

Exactly. An American woman accused of assaulting or murdering a man is still afforded a presumption of absolute innocence. An American woman can even admit to murdering a man in cold blood if she claims she was abused or trafficked (by him or anyone) which in America is a defense taken on faith with no evidence needed.
/r/MensRights31/07/26 08:06 PM
1

Unless it's a woman accused of murdering a man like Karen Read. A woman can also admit to murdering a man in cold blood if she says she was abused or trafficked, which in American is a defense taken on faith with no evidence or witnesses needed to prove anything.
/r/MensRights31/07/26 08:02 PM
1

What did it say?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/26 03:32 AM
1

In my experience, AI is not very biased. There are tons of examples of swapping he/she, him/her, boyfriend/girlfriend, or husband/wife resulting in completely different answers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/26 04:45 PM
13

They may not have created it but they're doing everything they can to ensure isolated and disaffected men have absolutely nobody else to turn toward. We reap what we sow.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/26 04:08 PM
1

The cult that shouts the loudest about the need for equality (feminism) is also the primary roadblock to achieving it.
/r/MensRights15/07/26 03:57 PM
8

HR works for the company and will almost always side with a woman. Which is why you need to document everything in detail and go to a lawyer before you talk to anyone else. Yes HR is predisposed to believe women and disbelieve men, but always being believed means many women become lazy and complacent with their lies. If you're able to bring receipts and all she has are feelings you can still win in the end. It might be a settlement in lieu of continued employment but that's just how these things…
/r/MensRights15/07/26 02:19 AM
8

Equality is also anti-feminist, so I guess we can forget about that. Even the issues I might have agreed with are perverted into protections exclusive to women and girls at the vindictive exclusion of men and boys. This is why trolls and blackmailers have started targeting boys over girls. Men today receive no help, no sympathy, and no protection from harm and feminism will ensure this imbalance only grows and worsens over time.
/r/MensRights15/07/26 12:45 AM
10

Point taken.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/26 09:35 PM
8

It’s a quote from 1984.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/26 08:02 PM
9

“It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party.”
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/26 07:47 PM
22

More? Do women have prostates now? Then again maybe I shouldn’t ask. 🤣
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/26 07:40 PM
5

Agreed. This is a rant about publicity reframed as men being the exclusive gender of bad behavior with women treated as innocent victims no matter what they say or do toward men.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 10:39 PM
1

Women can (and do) engage in creepy and disrespectful acts toward men and boys, but they are immune from being treated like creeps in the gynocentric matriarchy prevalent in Western countries. Men can be gracious and respectful and still be treated like creeps simply because their smile or friendliness is interpreted as romantic interest.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 10:33 PM
0

It's not just modern dating that's toxic, it's modern hetero relationships period.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 02:01 AM
17

Bingo. In places like Haiti emergency assistance is reserved for women and families. Emergency assistance is not provided to single men, including critical needs like food and water. This means those men are forced to steal or die in the streets. This rule may also apply to abandoned boys for all I know; the article I read was unclear on that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/26 10:55 PM
9

Got ya. I misunderstood what you were trying to say.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/26 10:39 PM
30

maybe they mean at the centre of rescue efforts as in doing the rescuing So the UN wants women and girls to do the super dangerous and physical task of rescuing while men and boys do what? Stand back and watch them? Even under the most generous interpretation that makes zero sense. They clearly want rescued women and girls prioritized above men and boys.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/26 10:30 PM
1

We need links and details. Not that I don't believe you but ammo is only useful when you can find it quickly in the heat of battle.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 02:54 AM
27

Looks like you're attempting to invite cross-sub fighting and brigading by overtly posting direct links to extremely toxic subs. I articulated several important claims in my post and instead of responding to the core message in good faith you instead focused on my use of the word "hustle" as if that somehow invalidates everything else I said.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/26 03:56 PM
32

It's interesting when female focused content creators try to explain that it's women doing most of the hating and men have become collateral damage to their never ending rage.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/26 01:29 PM
37

One of the biggest complaints on women focused subs is when a male partner does not make enough or does not work/hustle enough. Men still have to be providers, supporters, and defenders like always. That has not changed. What has changed is in addition to being a provider and supporter and defender men are also expected to be liberally educated, task focused, goal oriented, and (most of all) emotionally attuned to her needs and concerns.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/26 01:23 PM
12

They can get in trouble for harming or killing other women or kids, but that’s about it. In most states they have a license to attack, abuse, or frame men and even if they kill one the prosecutor and judge normally offer them an involuntary manslaughter plea at worst. Some only get probation for what would be called murder if a man did it
/r/MensRights05/06/26 11:03 PM
14

declaring himself a feminist can make him more appealing Not in my experience. Maybe it helped decades ago but fourth wave feminists are so anti-male they'll just assume you're being a performative "nice guy" if you claim any moral or ethical high ground.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/26 05:56 AM
1

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/05/26 04:26 PM
1

One wrong move and "yes, he is a great developer and I recommend him" changes to "actually, he is a bigoted fuckwit and should not be hired". Meanwhile female programmers (any women in IT really) can be as sexist and bigoted as they please with no fear of being canned or cancelled.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/05/26 04:12 PM
1

Why didn't you talk to a lawyer / solicitor to confirm you were safe and in the clear? Women know how to game the system and have no problem lying to make it happen. Men don't know shit and need all the help they can get.
/r/MensRights18/05/26 09:04 PM
20

like most feminists, they hate and denigrate prostitution and prostitutes. No, they hate and denigrate the customers of prostitution while viewing the sellers as victims. This is how you end up with the Nordic "Equality" Model that legalizes the advertising and selling of sex while criminalizing the buying of sex. Countries that have adopted some version of the Nordic Equality Model: Sweden (1999), Norway (2009), Iceland (2009), Canada (2014), Northern Ireland (2015), France (2016), Ireland (201…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/26 01:47 PM
1

It's workplace discrimination at a minimum. Hostile work environment may have a higher bar that involves refusal to correct or willingness to retaliate. Best to talk to a lawyer in either case.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 08:22 PM
1

It may or may not qualify as a hostile work environment, but gender is a protected class where I live and saying entire genders are trash would qualify as discrimination. As for whether anything they've said or done is legally actionable you'd need to consult an expert where you live. If nothing else I'd suggest keeping an encrypted list of every time they say or do something sexist and maybe consult an employment lawyer if things get to the point you can no longer tolerate it.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 08:17 PM
6

At least one country (PH) has made being in the presence of unrelated children in a non-public place illegal for adult men. No specific action required, just proximity, and of course unrelated women are given a pass.
/r/MensRights05/05/26 08:43 PM
10

UK, Ireland, Australia, and Canada seem to be the worst right now. Some are trying to replace SA/SB juries with "trauma informed" judges that believe the accuser by default and block the defendant from asking "hurtful" questions.
/r/MensRights05/05/26 08:40 PM
–

I've never heard a man say anything like this, outside of quoting a certain movie for laughs. This sounds like some weird fascination with a very specific event/dream that the OP is struggling to get over. Best of luck to you OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 12:08 PM
1

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/26 08:45 PM
–

We're all waiting for the fun and happy one to show up but for many of us the only choices are boring or vindictive.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 07:03 AM
1

I know lots of perpetually broke women but lack of funds has never prevented them from dating or having relationships. They go out four times a week and wonder why I'm not dating several women at once like they date men. Having to explain to a grown adult that dating four women at once would require three jobs and leave almost no time to actually go anywhere or do anything is a surreal experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 07:00 AM
8

Traditionally it's the man's job to protect the mother of his children from physical harm and her job to give her life for the children if it comes to that, but modern women do whatever they want and single fathers are statistically better parents than single mothers. I'd reframe this obligation as being responsible enough to avoid places where your family might be gunned down and if it's her idea you say no. That's what "submitting" means. She's not a slave to his whims, she just gives him the …
/r/MensRights28/04/26 06:54 AM
69

A typical post on there reads like this... "Men never prioritize women because they are selfish and lazy and ignorant and lack any compassion or empathy." They seem to have no sense of basic objectivity let alone higher order awareness like introspection.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 06:47 AM
1

A typical response reads like this... "Men never prioritize woman because they are selfish and lazy and ignorant and lack any compassion or empathy." They seem to have no sense of objectivity or introspection.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 06:43 AM
1

Traditionally it's the man's job to protect the mother of his children from physical harm, but that's because raising the man's kids is on her. And really it's more about the man being responsible enough to not take his family where they'll be randomly gunned down and if it's her idea he says no. That's what "submit" to a husband means. She's not a slave to his whims, she just gives him the final say on things like safety since it's his ass on the line if they fuck up.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 06:26 AM
8

serial killer Aileen Wuornos If she was still alive today she'd be sprung by the Kardashian murderer release program like Cyntoia Brown or Pieper Lewis. Just say the "T" word and you're granted a license to kill any man, no admission or evidence required.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 07:10 PM
4

Presumably the women around them just keep rejecting them so they eventually give up and stop trying or move on to whatever will not reject them.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 03:42 PM
10

They're trained on data from real women so they might, but there's no law to be broken...yet. My bet is that Western politicians will make "offensive or abusive behavior toward an AI girlfriend" just as illegal as it would be toward a human woman. If you engage in sexual role play and any point the AI girlfriend fails to shout affirmative messages then you've 'raped' her and the log of your interaction can send you to jail for 20 years to life.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 03:37 PM
6

The way jobs turn you down and bosses reject your idea is just part of life, whereas modern women don't just turn down unwanted interest; they try to tear you down by making a scene. Keep approaching long enough and eventually you end up on TikTok or some Tea app as another creepy guy everyone loves to hate. What the article really seems to be freaking out about is that men are no longer being controlled by an overwhelming need to be with women.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 03:30 PM
20

What a stupid premise. Some men with little or no chance at productive dating are using the one option available to them and of course it's painted in the worst possible light as evil men needing complete control and zero rejection. What a load of shit.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 03:15 PM
16

Since when is responding to "hi" having a relationship? It's just basic common courtesy. Or at least it used to be.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 09:53 PM
7

All this guilt-by-association brainwashing must make your life truly miserable.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 09:19 PM
1

80% of us men are literal trash, most don't care about living under elite pedophiles. Just back to work and paying taxes for a state that literally traffics your women and children. Men protectors my ass. Women are waking up. Your life must be truly miserable having been brainwashed to think this way.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 09:15 PM
1

It looks like he's trying to bridge the gap and reverse the trend by showing basic common courtesy. This is the kind of person who might notice something odd or amiss and report it, potentially helping someone in danger. But I guess to modern women it's preferable if friendly men stay inside where they cannot see or harm anyone with hi's and hello's.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 09:10 PM
1

Since when is saying "hi" having a relationship? It's not just kids either, Western women refuse to show anything but disgust and disdain toward most men, especially elderly men. Even in retirement homes female staff treat male residents like an unwanted nuisance.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 08:55 PM
29

I'm surprised you're just noticing this now since women and girls have been actively avoiding "the male gaze" for at least a decade where I live. This creates all kinds of weird secondary effects like female cashiers flinching when I reach out for the receipt or to hand them a tip. Because they're hypervigilant but also avoiding eye contact they're constantly caught off guard, which seems super stressful and counterproductive, but I guess that's on them.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 03:33 AM
2

Men grow up thinking women are angles because that's what our feminist mothers raise us to believe. Nobody warns us that women judge very harshly, remember every mistake and misstep for future arguments, and spread every private fear and doubt to friends and family. By the time a man realizes this his most intimate fears and failures have been broadcast to all and sundry. I'm not saying you're out to destroy us; just that we're your collateral damage.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 01:29 AM
-1

Absolutely. Men with little romantic experience think a relationship will be the answer to all their problems when in reality there is no problem a guy can have that adding a hetero relationship won't make worse. Guys need to be at their absolute strongest and most stoic to handle the endless judgement and criticism of modern hetero relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 12:44 AM
10

Without feminists women wouldn't be able to vote or work. Even with feminists right now women are being jailed for having miscarriages. If men were the only people who could vote then it took men voting to make it possible for women to vote. Most of those men were not feminists. Today there are more voting age women than voting age men, so if women are suffering the effect of laws today it took other women voting for that law to make that possible. But as usual it's men who are uniquely responsi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 09:26 PM
32

if women simply did the initiation or showed basic appreciation first it would make most men feel so valued and special that they'd be far more likely to want to take her on a "real" date. Women do initiate and do act appreciative...when they want to sell you something or scam you or increase their tips. Which is why I no longer respond to women who initiate. It never comes from any genuine interest and always segues into a sales pitch or sob story, so why would I think the 101st time is real?
/r/MensRights19/04/26 07:19 PM
1

if women simply did the initiation or showed basic appreciation first it would make most men feel so valued and special that they'd be far more likely to want to take her on a "real" date. Women do initiate and do act appreciative...when they want to sell you something or scam you or increase their tips. Which is why I no longer respond to women acting interested. It never means what I hoped it meant and always ends in an awkward segue into a sales pitch so why would I suddenly think the 101st t…
/r/MensRights19/04/26 07:15 PM
5

...with her.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 04:48 PM
1

According to PPDW whenever it's something flattering or reasonable women are a monolith. Whenever it's unflattering or unreasonable women are all different so don't paint with a big brush. The inverse is assumed for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 06:45 PM
–

According to PPD whenever it's something flattering or reasonable women are a monolith. Whenever it's unflattering or unreasonable women are all different so don't paint with a big brush. The inverse is true for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 06:41 PM
1

Whenever it's something flattering or reasonable women are a monolith, just like whenever it's something unflattering or unreasonable men are a monolith, and vice versa.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 06:37 PM
0

All the washing and cleaning and emotional tending is what men love about women. Are these mythical all-washing all-cleaning all-tending angels in the room with us? Your claim might work if selfless women were still a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 02:26 AM
-6

Sex is super overrated. Sex between equally desiring lovers is amazing. Sex with low libido barely hetero women is super overrated.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 01:48 AM
1

Sex is super overrated. Sex between equally excited lovers is amazing. Sex as a performance to impress barely hetero women is super overrated.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 01:44 AM
8

Here's what the radical feminist wrote before blocking us and running away... What I said wasn’t “it matters less when it happens to men.” It was that not all harms exist on the same intersection. Meaning folks are more likely to be offensive to men unintentionally, and pretending they do it for maximum malice is how you end up with disproportionate reactions. That’s not hypocrisy, that’s basic proportional thinking, you infant. If every offense gets treated like the worst possible offense, then…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/26 02:49 AM
8

Replying with an absolute that she hates all men and regrets having a boy is too far for me. If someone posted me saying "We need to teach girls to stop becoming vindictive manipulative harpies." you'd rightfully assume I hate women. Well rape is so much worse than that and you're still defending her from accusations of "probably" hating men and "likely" regret of birthing a future rapist. Stop defending the indefensible.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/26 07:59 PM
15

you likely understand she doesn't hate men. Anyone who assumes all men gravitate to rape unless specifically taught not to probably does hate men on some level and likely regrets having a boy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/26 07:12 PM
11

At this point "rape culture" = not trying to talk her out of it. You need to anticipate how she'll feel tomorrow, next month, or thirty years later...and choose accordingly. Will she ever regret this night, even for a moment? It's on the guy to make sure that never happens and if that means aggressively refusing her advances so be it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/26 07:07 PM
6

"We do need to teach boys that no means no, yes means maybe, and anything a girl later regrets is considered rape." We have no idea what the true rate of paternity fraud is because most people never check and even fewer discuss it publicly, but apparently it's bad enough that companies selling DNA kits had to add warnings that you could get more than you bargained for. We also have movies like Alyssa Milano's (of metoo and weaponized sex fame) Temping Fate where a wife cheats on and guilt trips …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/26 06:42 PM
5

There’s never been a time or place where being female meant you had more rights than being male. There is now. I've got a spreadsheet of everything I could find. I just need to flesh it out so it has explanations and is digestible for people willing and able to consider the perspective of non-feminist men. And what do you men by punishing men? Ascribing every bad thing that happens (or good thing that does not happen) as always being a man's fault. Victim blaming men. Turning every dollar of soc…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 06:06 PM
16

So many replies boil down to a need or desire to punish innocent men for the perceived sins of their forefathers and endlessly relitigating the deeds of the dead in such a way that women who never suffered such injustices can fabricate a plausible excuse for punishing men who never harmed them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 05:52 PM
21

The redpill conveniently also forgets that decades ago, women weren’t allowed to vote, control their own money, and needed a man’s permission to do anything. She was a males property. OK, so the women who were always able to vote and control their own money are still focused on retribution against men who never kept anyone from voting or controlled anyone's money. How many decades of blaming and punishing innocent people will it take before feminists are satisfied that two wrongs have finally ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 05:46 PM
2

I'm not sure if you're completely incapable of understanding the question or if you're just too invested in the myth to admit you're wrong. Either way I fail to see the point of continuing to talk in circles with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 04:06 PM
1

I never referenced hate speech. It's the flippant indifference and mockery toward actual violence toward and murder of men that moves the needle. The more you victim blame the more men wake up to the true nature of feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 04:04 PM
3

Just giving you the post-feminist male perspective. Leaving feminism seems very similar to leaving Scientology. The people still inside will never acknowledge it's a cult or that it has any flaws.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 04:00 PM
1

This kind of attitude is what black pills men, not Andrew Tate or any of your other cartoonish boogeymen. Please don't stop or change. It's much easier to grow the manosphere into a real movement with man-hating posts like yours propagating all over the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 12:39 AM
2

Which specific state allowed a husband to physically force his wife to endure intercourse against her will as legal behavior in 1992? Either name the state or admit no such state exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 12:37 AM
5

I don't know many men who think strong powerful women are all that appealing as a romantic prospect. Most of them act like wannabe alpha men, and unless a dude is into other dudes he's probably not into that. There is no worse existence for a liberal man than to partner with a liberal woman. He will not be respected, will have to walk on egg shells, and need to perform humiliation rituals anytime she's unhappy with the world, which is basically always.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 09:39 PM
3

In which state are you claiming it was legal to physically force a spouse to have sex against their will in 1992?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 08:47 PM
2

Men reporting violence by women remains as socially taboo as women reporting violence by men was in the 1950's. Despite this fact there is a sub full of examples and your reaction is to crack a joke about it not being enough for you to care. This kind of attitude is what black pills men, not Andrew Tate or any of your other cartoonish boogeymen. Please don't ever change. It's much harder to grow the manosphere into a major movement without people like you.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 07:48 PM
0

Who says women are not killing men? There's a sub called Women are Violent Too which is chock full of violent, murderous, and sexually depraved women. It's becoming so prevalent even mainstream true crime channels are starting to notice and cover these stories. Go take a look and educate yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 07:22 PM
4

I was raised to be an unquestioning ally of feminism even as it morphed into vindictive female chauvinism. You had me fooled and working against myself and the interests of many kind and blindly supportive men for a long time, but you took it to such extremes that even I eventually realized I was being played like a pawn.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 07:19 PM
2

For example "men suck" isn't even misandry, it could be frustration. Try making posting the same phrase against blacks or gays and see if you still feel it's harmless and justified.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 07:11 PM
6

martial rape was legal until the 90s. Marital rape was not legal until the 1990's. It was sexual battery at a minimum. This revisionist history stuff is getting old, but trying to convince feminists that compulsive lying does not help their cases seems an impossible ask.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 07:03 PM
41

By automating it they’re removing any friction to signing up and soon it will be completely forgotten…until they initiate another draft with it.
/r/MensRights09/04/26 02:07 PM
2

The more they streamline it the less people have to think about it. Soon people will forget it even exists at all.
/r/MensRights09/04/26 02:04 PM
18

A lottery that somehow never picks the children of the rich and powerful.
/r/MensRights09/04/26 01:59 PM
1

Yeh I don’t understand this logic of “if she did it with him, she must do it with me” like huh? Every relationship is different and people change. It’s just goofy. There's that phantom "must" again. It's simply percentages and probabilities. If we see women make rules for guys they're not into only to break those same rules for guys they truly want we remember that and factor it into our future attempts. The more times we see it the more we factor it into our perspective. Sure we'll get it wrong…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 12:40 AM
4

Straight men view hetero sex as something wonderful and beautiful. Always have, and probably always will. Meanwhile, straight women seem to view hetero sex as the grossest, most disgusting, and most demeaning thing they will ever do. I have no answer on what to do about it, I just find the ever widening disconnect rather fascinating.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 08:02 PM
3

I feel bad for men who are so lonely or lovesick they're willing to sink months of effort and presumably thousands of dollars on hopes and dreams while you consider thinking about maybe coming to a conclusion on how you view them. Best of luck to whichever man is willing to go that far to meet your needs.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 07:57 PM
6

If she's showing interest, initiating from her side, and increasing intimacy from one date to the next it's more believable that she wants you. If she's never initiating and only declining then it's time to bail. It can be fun to deny release if both people are into it and neither party is playing games or getting their release elsewhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 07:45 PM
3

"I'm not sure you're worth agreeing with. Keep expanding this post with new information while I consider my options." LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 07:40 PM
1

Who (besides you) is saying women "must" do or think anything? Obviously there are exceptions but women who want to wait should probably be aware that many guys will interpret waiting as being uninterested. Not because women are monolith or because they view sex the same way men do or because it's wrong to wait, but because so many of us have seen women make such rules for one guy only to break the same rules for another guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 07:31 PM
–

Interesting question and one that I've had myself many times. It's also interesting to read people's responses. Personally I feel like many (not all) PPD women do not take what men say seriously and many do not seem to read what we write before responding to it. That being said I feel like there's a sub-within-a-sub where men read and react to each other in a more intentional manner than that seen between men and women. So, even if a thread I find appealing is zeroed out karma wise I can still g…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 10:20 PM
0

Birth rate is being eroded by many factors, not just women wanting fewer babies. Everything from higher costs, stagnant wages, hookup culture, the death of third spaces, danger of meeting at work/home, at-home DNA testing, popularity of vasectomies, easy access to pron, AI girlfriends, etc. On the horizon we have an expectation of adult robots, a pill for men, and further deterioration hetero pair bonding.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 08:58 PM
2

The solution to not being able to create is not destruction. The safer and more supportive society treats women the fewer babies they have. This correlation has yet to be broken. Maybe the "solution" is to plan for a day when the last person left will sweep up and turn out the lights.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 08:39 PM
2

multiple women will vouch for him and tell that girl how lucky she is. None of my successes came from women vouching for me or telling anyone how lucky they are to have me. That shit comes after interest is already established and cultivated, not before.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 03:59 PM
5

Yeah this is the part I'm wondering too. Either they're genuine and actually try to help or they're not and he finds out the truth. Either way he's better off than before.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 03:56 PM
1

they do let me vent to them So what do they say when you mention having zero romantic interest from any women? If they're as close as you seem to think they are surely they're looking for people who would date you and offering to be your wing woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 03:51 PM
5

You don't have to look good to be friend zoned. So long as you're not prideful or hideous you can be a girl group's trusted eunuch.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 03:48 PM
3

He's saying that he's bought into all the feminist nonsense and he's superior to all those misogynists out there. In Western culture virgin men are inferior to almost everyone, up to and including routine criminals and repeat abusers. I'm not saying I think it should be that way, but that's how people react to them where I live.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 03:43 PM
4

I don't see any reference to being rejected which makes it sound like you never risk trying to flirt or asking anyone on an actual date. If you treat women as platonic friends they will respond by treating you as a platonic friend back. Most women are not going to pursue a man so you need to be the one to break the ice and start flirting with them first.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 08:30 AM
–

So are you saying you're illiterate or just too lazy to bother reading anything that contradicts your assumptions?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 02:15 AM
17

You've provided no source or even a definition for what "losing your health" means.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 10:57 PM
4

It's only sexist if it's true and according to the women who were adults at the time it's not true. I'm not sure why feminists have no problem with routinely lying but I guess it comes with the territory of being part of a cult.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 10:47 PM
3

The bulk of special access cases are the children of current and past benefactors, regardless of gender. The bulk of gender-specific scholarships are for women (>90%). There are no male-only benefits for getting into college, which is one reason why the gender ratio is worse now than it was when Title IX was created.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 08:46 PM
5

An account that requires multiple signatures is a co-signed account where the liability is shared across all signees. These were personal accounts liable only to the women who opened them. Your insistence on knowingly spreading false narratives is proof that feminism has no respect for men or for reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 08:42 PM
1

women weren't allowed bank accounts until the 70s I asked my mom and my aunt about this. They both had personal bank accounts long before the 1970's and my late grandmother had her own bank account long before they did. The only thing my grandmother lacked was her own line of revolving credit, which many single men also lacked until credit scoring was standardized by law. Rather than making up false narratives feminists could draw attention to the 1978 Supreme Court case Marquette National Bank …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 08:32 PM
0

women weren't allowed bank accounts until the 70s I asked my mom and my aunt about this. Turns out they had bank accounts long before the 1970's and this claim is made up feminist propaganda. Even my late grandmother had her own bank account long before they did. The only thing my grandmother did not have was her own line of revolving credit, which many single men did not have access to either. Just another example of how feminism is willing to say anything to score points and could not care les…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 08:21 PM
32

In every country where the retire age is different it's lower for the gender that lives longer (women) and higher for the gender that dies younger (men). In what way is his country an outlier? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retirement_age
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 08:02 PM
15

The myth that autistic men are as valued and desired as any other man but simply cannot sense when women are into them needs to die already. The real truth is that most women want nothing to do with socially awkward men, including autistic women, and the few that do are usually looking for someone who is easy to manipulate.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 06:11 PM
1

Checkmate, India.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 05:59 PM
28

The latest trend is the Nordic "Equality" Model which legalizes and protects the selling and advertising of sex while exclusively criminalizing the buying of sex. Rather than create actual equality this model merely flips the power imbalance so a customer who suffers violence or theft has no recourse since reporting a crime against them results in being prosecuted for buying sex. By law the advertiser and seller of sex must be treated as a victim of the customer who is prosecuted as an abuser fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 05:47 AM
1

The latest legal trend is the Nordic "Equality" Model which legalizes and protects the selling and advertising of sex while exclusively criminalizing the buying of sex. This creates a power imbalance where a customer who suffers violence or fraud has no recourse since the act of reporting a crime against them results in being prosecuted for buying sex. If two consenting adults are caught in a country using the Nordic Model (or either reports the other) the advertiser and seller of sex is treated…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 05:44 AM
–

Men's prejudice? I haven't heard a man using "gay" as a slur in many years and gay men are welcome in the big bad evil manosphere. Thanks to listening to gay men I now understand that straight women who treat hetero interest as something disgusting and shameful when a man does it have no problem groping, grabbing, and pawing gay men in public. If gay men push back those women go on the offensive and try to blame them for being offended.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 04:28 AM
3

I've never seen a red piller suggest killing all women. I guess making fun of women and wanting all men murdered is exactly the same level of crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 02:09 AM
2

Are you really this lost on basic human biology? Or are you so predisposed to argue in bad faith that you do not seem the problem?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 02:04 AM
1

There are dozens of formerly common words nobody can use in almost any context simply because they risk offending women. People get fired and whole subs get banned for using the wrong words to describe women. Modern women will even take offense over words used to describe people with nothing to do with them. I agree with your premise but let's not play dumb over who is policing what is allowed in modern speech.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 02:01 AM
–

Do women think men live thousands of years or that views cannot change in twenty years? Did you never take biology in school?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 01:51 AM
–

It works because men fear it. Women are perfectly within their rights... So feminism is just female chauvinism after all.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 01:49 AM
–

You're just trading one bad situation for another equally bad situation and treating it like enlightenment. All of your posts seem to be bad faith projection.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 01:47 AM
–

Are anecdotes not the beginning of research design? I used to laugh when women referenced "the ick" to judge and criticize random men. Then I realized that they use "an ick" as a scientific term denoting a social construct that has undergone rigorous statistical analysis.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 01:34 AM
–

Most adults alive today experimented at some point in their youth. You're not kindly informing anyone about something they never knew. You're intentionally ignoring the fact that orientation is not a choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 01:19 AM
4

Men are at the bottom of the queer list just as they are on the hetero list. Whenever there's a freakout over queer behavior it's always the men that are seen as the problem or threat, not the women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 01:14 AM
12

Arguing in bad faith seems to be your MO.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 01:08 AM
13

So why not simply say asexual? Because these women want to make it clear that it's meant to land as a slur.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 01:04 AM
13

When men commit violence or murder it's often in the service of "protecting" women who claim another man is abusing them. More than once women have tried to manipulate me into something only to realize it was mostly or entirely made up. Lacking the ability to murder with their hands does not stop them from being lethal in other ways.
/r/MensRights03/04/26 04:07 AM
1

if women are complaining u arent doing enough dont take it as an attack and listen to them Better yet men can simply stop listening to women, who will always blindly support each other and never be satisfied with any man no matter what he does, and start enjoying life again. Everybody wins!
/r/MensRights02/04/26 03:25 PM
14

I only want the grace to be quiet or angry (on my own) sometimes, but the way women force every issue to be discussed on their schedule and even block you from simply walking away turns minor events into big arguments.
/r/MensRights02/04/26 03:21 PM
12

If you mean Mǝnsl!b I could not agree more, but if you mean the other leftist version they're no friends of feminism.
/r/MensRights02/04/26 03:18 PM
7

Feminism is sexist, hypocritical, and full of bullshit, but the country that started this war has little if any feminism controlling anything. Men are cannon fodder on both sides of the political spectrum.
/r/MensRights30/03/26 08:18 PM
46

Anytime a woman has a kid but lacks something she'd prefer to have the comments always blame the father for failing to pay up. This includes stories where the father dies, is in prison, or was never told he had a child. When the child has everything they could want but the father spends most of his day to earning money to pay for it he's still a horrible parent. You need to earn executive level money from a part time job that allows you spend half of every day raising your kids and doing chores …
/r/MensRights30/03/26 05:26 PM
1

I watch a lot of YT content and anytime a woman has a kid without all the money she could ever need the comments always blame the father for failing to pay up. This includes documentaries where the father died, is in prison, or was never told he had a child. When the child has everything they could possibly need but the father spends most of his day earning that money he's still a horrible parent. Even if you're somehow able to make executive level money from a part time job that allows you spen…
/r/MensRights30/03/26 05:23 PM
4

The core message of the sub is popular and widely shared, but who is allowed to say it and in what context is highly controversial. The vast majority of visitors agree with the sub's main theme but they also want to make sure men feel really bad for being unwanted.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 04:47 PM
–

Hetero men desire women so strongly that if they cannot get with one they will change and change and change again until they can. The men who do not change were already desirable enough to get with women as they are (or were so undesirable that nothing improved their chances so they gave up). Men put women on pedestals because that's what our mothers taught us to do. Also, I don't equate "hipster" with "authentic" no matter the context, so there's that too.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 04:35 PM
–

Yeah, but I don't think we're supposed to be too obvious with referencing other subs since it can result in problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 04:07 PM
–

Women love to import foreigners, but they rarely want to date them, and even feel uncomfortable around them. I don't agree with this one. I watch a ton of true crime content and there are so many examples of Western women going out with the children of first generation immigrants. Then they're beaten or killed and everyone acts like the laws are too permissive somehow. Western woman is killed by immigrant, Western laws get even more strict, another woman is killed by an immigrant, laws get even …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 04:01 PM
1

You can be supportive of someones rights without wanting to fuck them. - Lysa_Bell There you go. Feel free to argue amongst yourselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 03:52 PM
1

Non-sequiturs to the rescue! I've see so many of these that I'm starting to wonder if the women here even read anything before replying.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 03:49 PM
–

There's a sub based on most women having zero desire to be with most men and the posts right themselves because there is so much content from supposedly hetero women to support the premise. The main difference between that sub and others is that they realize even the mythical "chad" exception is not desired the way a man desires a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 03:45 PM
–

men prioritize masculinity If straight women want hetero men to act a certain way they only need to consistently respond in a positive manner to the desired behavior. If women rarely respond positively to effeminate hipsters then men will cease that behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 03:41 PM
–

I've never seen the people who consider themselves "emotionally intelligent" show much empathy or self-awareness.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 04:52 PM
–

They're not radicalized white knight feminists?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 04:46 PM
1

That wasn't how I took it but when I went to self sure enough the rules implied all romantic venting was off limits. Maybe it was mostly men complaining when the rules changed but I have no idea since I never go there.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 12:25 AM
9

"Sounds perfectly healthy to me." - Reddit
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 09:12 PM
0

I know a lot of guys who have been friend-zoned. None of those girls were drawing clear lines or rooting for them or setting them up. They were bread crumbing them and dangling false hope in order to get free labor, free trauma dumping, and free money. That's the problem with friend zoning. An actual friend makes it clear and obvious. I'm glad drinks alone is considered "perfectly acceptable" but they run $20+ per where I live. A couple rounds and tip is $100+ and the chance of being a good matc…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 09:08 PM
2

So why not ban hatred in both directions instead of only one?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 08:54 PM
4

I think men start with a very limited understanding of romantic pairing and that sharing experiences helps men look for red flags so they can dodge people and situations they were never taught to avoid growing up. Some men need to realize it's okay to give up and stop chasing for their own mental health and sanity. To realize they're better off focusing on their own happiness and things they can control rather than succumbing to false hope and increasing bitterness. Reminding each other that jus…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 08:47 PM
2

Who said it's a problem? So far as I can tell this is just a natural progression of social and societal changes that have been on the move since the 1960's. I'm done buying drinks at today's prices and they're done with anything more than drinks, so it's not like a bunch of dead bars changes anything at this point. Modern bars are for people who already know each other rather than as a place to meet new people from outside your social circle.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 06:55 PM
2

Gaslighting is a term from a play originally made popular by a movie based on the play. It was not originally created by or for modern therapy, your flippant response notwithstanding. I guess that "emotional maturity" requires that men never disagree with a woman or prefer honest answers over just world fallacies.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 07:12 AM
1

Good enough to just NOT be lazy, toxic, and emotionally immature. Can we please stop with the gaslighting?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 05:07 AM
5

They mostly seem interested in the laziest, shittiest and most abusive men they can find, which I only know because they cannot stop talking about all the horrible men they've dated in the past, but if simpathizing with the narrative that all single men are horrible creeps helps you get some then more power to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 03:45 AM
5

Where I live bars and clubs are still open but they're either mostly empty, full of single men, or hosting couples and groups doing their own thing. This is very different from my younger days where bars and clubs were full of random people showing up in ones and twos open to meeting other random people.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 03:32 AM
9

If you're attractive but introverted or charismatic but overweight you can probably improve those factors, but a lot of the "get better" stuff are things that are immutable (race, autism) or require expensive time consuming surgery (height, attractiveness). The dating and relationship markets are getting more selective and discriminating over time leaving some of today's winners as tomorrow's losers no matter how much they improve.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/26 03:24 AM
21

Even if you agree both boys and girls are being discriminated against in education/workplace, it's clear we're only trying to help one side and have no problem leaving the other side to fend for themselves with no concern or sympathy. That’s the issue I have with this topic. The hypocritical and arbitrary way modern society responds to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 05:50 AM
2

Supposedly not that many men still apply for teaching, but that could potentially be improved buy putting modern cameras in every room and creating a fund to cover legal and living costs of teachers acquitted of false accusations. I'm not making a statement on how common or uncommon this is, just that having such a fund would be an answer to people who decline to apply for fear such threats.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 05:46 AM
12

driven by bitterness and self victimhood Sounds similar to transfeminism. So long as we treat both sides of the bitter victim coin identically I'm cool with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 02:41 AM
1

I mean, if they’re always being rejected by those same women, then they’re aiming too high 🤷‍♀️ At this point below average men need to realize their SMV equivalent is a baby momma living on the street with a severe drug addiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 05:08 PM
0

If anything they're probably too kind. The only times I had any romantic success I was acting like a presumptuous prick. I did not want that to be the case but it was literally the only time I made any progress. But that wasn't the real me so eventually I went back to my old ways and all the attention dried up and drained away.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 05:01 PM
3

what if instead of being wired to sob and cry you're wired to shut down or be angry in times of significant adversity? are all emotions valid or just crying?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 08:06 PM
5

From what I've seen women like men who cry at the right times for the right reasons. If they cry at the wrong times for the wrong reasons it's a huge ick. Like many men I'm not wired to cry over most shit, not because I'm holding back but because that's not how I react to adversity. I sometimes get emotional in other ways, but those reactions do not fit within the box modern women consider acceptable for modern men so they have to be ignored/suppressed.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 07:27 PM
–

Pornhub has no idea what your true gender is anymore than they know your true age. It's possible men are watching tons of trans porn or maybe it's women or trans people.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 08:37 AM
–

I assume you're joking but in the ForeverAlone subs single men often express losing interest in porn as the premise of achieving access to hetero sex becomes increasingly farcical to them. It makes me wonder what future porn will do to create a plausible enough theme to suspend disbelief when sexually frustrated men see little or no chance in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 08:21 AM
1

Pornhub has no idea what your true gender is anymore than they know your true age. It's possible men are watching tons of trans porn or maybe it's mostly women or trans people. The charts and statistics are all super limited in scope and detail, to the point that it seems they've been sanitized to remove anything that might call the "huge increase" into question.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 08:03 AM
5

I think most men do care and do have interest, even if that interest has little chance of being reciprocated. During my lifetime we've made the world safer than it ever used to be and despite this fact women are even more suspicious and distrustful of men than they were in the past. This is probably because the world is so interconnected that news of every injustice is immediately available to everyone everywhere. It seems we also determined that undesirable men wanting women for icky sex stuff …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 05:44 AM
1

I think most men do care and do have interest, even if that interest has little chance of being reciprocated. During my lifetime we've made the civilized world safer than it ever used to be and despite this fact women are even more suspicious and distrustful of men than they were in the past. This is probably because the world is so interconnected that news of every bad thing is immediately available to everyone. At some point we decided that undesirable men wanting women for icky sex stuff is a…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 05:38 AM
1

The jury admitted in interviews that they wanted so badly to find her innocent and vindicate her actions. They seemed traumatized by having to find her guilty due to overwhelming evidence against her.
/r/MensRights24/03/26 03:15 AM
1

The only solution to male loneliness is for other men to recognize it, to reach out to lonely men around them, and support each other through hard times. Most women see male loneliness as a male problem and will never play a positive role in this or any other problem men might have. The sooner men realize this fact the better it will be for all.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 09:34 PM
1

I have no idea what yearn means other than you need to have long term goals because doing the same shit for too long is going to bore her. Act like a gentleman means do not judge or criticize her in public, but also accept that she's going to criticize and exaggerate every little annoyance to her friends and family. Looks aren't everything = you need confidence, charisma, and a good job too.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 04:36 PM
88

So I asked: "If someone claimed I assaulted her, would you believe her over me?" She said yes, without hesitation. Feminism is a gender supremacy movement. It does not care about facts or evidence or justice or neutrality. It only cares that women are always trusted and men are never believed, as your sister has helpfully demonstrated. The metoo and believewomen movements have done an amazing job of placing the Sword of Damocles above every man's head. The best you can do is acknowledge it, miti…
/r/MensRights23/03/26 04:43 AM
18

FWB guy is the attractive one. LTR guy is the clueless provider too busy catering to her whims to notice the roster.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 04:17 AM
1

Every Andrew Tate wannabe could die a horrible death tomorrow and posts like yours would keep the manosphere railroad running day and night.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 04:12 AM
12

And yes, women express interest during this stage if she likes you. Yes, but some men never get that interest and do not realize that if they have to ask she's probably not into them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 04:03 AM
2

No problem there needs to be fixed. Roughly 92% of sex-specific scholarships are women only. Guess inequality only matters when women suffer. Stop blaming women for men’s choices. I was blaming feminists, which includes many men and excludes many women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 09:52 PM
1

Men can CHOOSE to sign up and go if they want still to this day. Not if they're poor they can't. No problem there needs to be fixed. Roughly 92% of sex-specific scholarships are women only. Guess inequality only matters when women suffer. Stop blaming women for men’s choices. I was blaming feminists, which includes many men and excludes many women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 09:35 PM
1

Men can CHOOSE to sign up and go if they want still to this day. Not if they're poor they can't. No problem there needs to be fixed. Roughly 92% of sex-specific scholarships are women only. Guess inequality only matters when women suffer. Stop blaming women for men’s choices. I was blaming my government. Maybe you should stop excusing inequality whenever it benefits women?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 09:27 PM
1

Men can CHOOSE to sign up and go if they want still to this day. Not if they're poor they can't. Poor women get a lot more help here. No problem there needs to be fixed. Roughly 92% of sex-specific scholarships are women only. Guess inequality only matters when women suffer for it. Stop blaming women for men’s choices. I was blaming my government. Maybe you should stop excusing inequality whenever it benefits women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 09:03 PM
1

Yes, out of the relationship. Stop chasing ghosts and unicorns. Modern dating and modern relationships suck. Not just for guys who struggle like me but even for the guys who do all the right things the right way for the right reasons. Single life may not be perfect but it's so much better than being a slave to a bunch of thankless chivalry.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 05:32 PM
2

Don't be afraid to check out either. Most people are not worth dating or pairing with. I know I'm no prize myself, but I also know guys who tick every green flag I can think of and even they get treated like yesterday's dog shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 04:57 PM
4

When women are the minority in college, in high wage jobs, and in executive roles it's society's fault. When men are doing worse than women were before Title IX was passed we blame men alone for not doing better. If feminism really cared about equality it would have fought for the Equal Rights Amendment instead of benevolent sexism.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 04:48 PM
4

There is no "happy guy, happy life" phrase because a man's happiness starts out as secondary and moves further on down the line the longer they stay together. One of the more eye opening threads was posted by a man who said he happily told his GF he'd do anything to save her in an emergency and she responded by saying she'd save her dog over him. He was concerned that this meant she was trying to tell him she was no longer into him but the responses were hundreds of women saying she was right to…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 04:40 PM
7

So, as a woman, the sexual desire from [men] is really worthless. Which is why men are "desired" for status and productivity instead. It's what men do rather than who you are that matters, and which is being undermined by outsourcing many male partner tasks to the state. There is a whole sub about this very dynamic. When I realized just how little women have ever desired men things finally made sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 02:46 PM
10

I mostly have neutral interactions with regular (non-feminist) women, and some have been open to hearing how feminism is just another form of chauvinism, whereas feminist men piss me off just as much as feminist women.
/r/MensRights22/03/26 02:16 AM
4

You put "should" in quotes and ended the post with feeling uncomfortable so I wanted clarification. Thank you for explaining.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 02:05 AM
1

This is how it “should” be in my mind. I’d like to add that I felt uncomfortable. So is there a way for interested men to show that interest correctly or is the act of wanting company (and looking for interest) all it takes to creep women out?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 01:54 AM
1

Man: Gender wars are getting worse Woman: No they're not - prove it LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 07:37 PM
2

It’s a look, an expression, eye contact, a text message with extra enthusiasm and emotes. [...] I think it should be mutual where both are giving clear signals before asking for a number, a date or initiating physical touch. I agree that men should only initiate/escalate when clear and definable signals are on display. Unfortunately all but one of of the indicators you listed cold be signs of strictly platonic friendliness and even overt flirting does not necessarily mean there is actual romanti…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 07:31 PM
12

I'd like to see a real study on this, but all I can find is that Gen Z romantic pairing seems to be the lowest in modern history by a wide margin. The gender wars are only getting worse over time so it's little wonder that each successive generation dislikes and distrusts each other more than the last. The main difference with Gen Z is that they apparently jumped way ahead of the trend line.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 07:14 PM
1

If you're average you'll end up with an average woman. A lot of average looking men are autistic and they generally don't end up with anyone. If we were honest with autistic boys they might not waste decades of effort and untold sums chasing false hope. Personally I think that would do more to better their lives than feeding them a bunch of normie dating advice that is unlikely to work for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 04:23 PM
1

Men refuse to approach nowadays and I think that’s shooting themselves in the foot. The men who stopped approaching never received any positive feedback so I doubt they're missing out on anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 03:44 PM
6

Thanks for being honest. Work is no good for guys since any trouble risks our career and livelihood and perpetually single guys are generally the last people to be invited to parties. Dating apps require looking good and I think we can agree that most women do not find most men attractive enough to match with let alone date or pair with.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 03:38 PM
1

Autistic men in shambles.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 03:35 PM
1

Fair point, but by stopping the guy in his tracks to fawn over the dog are they not inviting interaction? Seems like it would be better to let it go and save him the trouble of being turned into a prop while they film the dog.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 03:33 PM
1

Men refuse to approach nowadays and I think that’s shooting themselves in the foot. The men who stopped approaching received no positive feedback so I doubt they're really missing out on anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 03:26 PM
0

Learn how to read nonverbal communication, if you see welcoming body language, approach (with sufficient caution). If you don't, then you were never going to be wanted by them no matter what you did. If you never see welcoming body language you can try to become someone completely different or find something else to do with your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 03:24 PM
2

Can't get laid but also can't get fired/canceled, convicted, thrown in jail, etc. Our jails are nothing like your jails.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 03:17 PM
1

Fair point, but by making a scene over the dog and stopping the guy in his tracks are they not inviting interaction? I Treating the owner like he doesn't exist surprised me. First time I saw this I thought they're just weird. Third time I realized that adding a dog is unlikely to be more productive than approaching without a dog if you're already struggling.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 03:13 PM
1

By making a huge scene over the dog and stopping the guy in his tracks they're inviting interaction...only to treat the owner like he doesn't exist when he responds. I fail to see the point. First time I saw this I thought they're just weird. Third time I realized that "approach with a dog" is unlikely to be more productive than approaching without a dog.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 03:08 PM
8

Welcome to the club. By the time I realized how things really worked I had run out of motivation to keep trying. It's tempting to complain about what could have been but those days are long gone. Best of luck to you though.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 07:08 AM
10

I'm not saying this is a bad suggestion, and I'm assuming it can work for some, but I've seen women go crazy over a cute dog while completely ignoring its owner's attempts to engage socially. If I was that dude I think I'd rather have never left the house that day.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 07:06 AM
59

A mere accusation robs a man of his ability to work and earn money, but a woman can survive formal DV convictions without being cancelled somehow. A woman's word can speak her innocence and his guilt into existence. Only the embarrassment of seeing the leaked video finally got her in hot water.
/r/MensRights20/03/26 06:51 AM
–

I guess dating is still fun for some people, but I can only choose from among those who are willing to participate, and in my experience they're just not fun people and frankly don't have the personality for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 09:49 PM
–

Dating looks like a total blast in movies and TV shows from the 1970's to the 1990's. Then you look at what dating has become today, and it feels like a pointless experience that drains your time and money with no meaningful payoff.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 09:20 PM
24

Almost any man (below president or billionaire) can be metoo'd into unemployable oblivion. He does not need to be a politician or activist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/03/26 06:59 AM
2

Most women in IRL have not been in abusive relationships nor do they proclaimed to be. They have and do, at least from what I've seen and heard where I live and travel.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 10:34 PM
4

most women have never been abused. I've yet to meet a single Western women who has not, at least according to their own claims and definitions. Literally every single one has an abusive ex story she shares with anyone who will listen.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 10:26 PM
23

Now it seems we barely even have male sideline reporters anymore. I cannot recall the last time I saw one. They're all women now.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 07:55 PM
42

"Officer, he grabbed my phone and took it into the men's bathroom where he attacked and raped me!" Remember Mahendra Patel who was arrested and locked up in jail because a woman at Walmart claimed he tried to kidnap her kid? He spent two months in jail despite the fact that video evidence proved her claims never happened. Two months and she faced no repercussions for lying. Since most restrooms have no cameras you may never get out depending on what she's willing to claim against you.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 07:50 PM
–

1 - Because civilization is a mitigating factor to violence, but the more we abandon civilized behavior the more we weaken the mitigating influence. Be careful what you wish for. 2 - Right now nobody is being forced to pair with anyone else and men are allowed to say that modern dating is a shit deal for them. You're the one who has a problem with this, not my mother. 3 - Having women in my life was key to understanding the neurotic hypocrisy that guides feminism and the manipulative gaslighting…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 03:10 PM
–

I don't think you really want us to toss out "fairness" in dating, because if you knew what pre-fairness "dating" was like you'd probably want to run back to fairness real damn quick. What a brain dead take.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 02:23 PM
1

I think men are slowly learning that opening up emotionally to a woman is one of the worst decisions we can make since they quietly record those admissions for misuse and abuse when they're mad at us.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 02:00 PM
11

Wealthy breadcrumbs seem to be more desired than a blue collar heart.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 01:50 PM
1

It's only bad when it's a white man saying negative things I guess.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 08:00 PM
11

Most people try for as long as they can manage. You don't need to be hideous to give up, you just need zero positive feedback for long enough that you run out of hope.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 07:17 PM
–

MGTOW is Black Pill, which is not allowed on PPD, so even though Red Pill does not really fit I guess it was the best option the OP could pick. I'm not so sure how fringe giving up on love is since I hear women talk about it all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 05:22 PM
20

If you're honestly offended by this or that song then you're the problem She's not calling men useless, the song is just satire and a cathartic way to criticize a specific behavior — the emotional immaturity and neglect that many men have in modern-day relationships (posted by DomBolais) So calling an entire gender useless is "emotional maturity" when women do it but when a man expresses solidarity against anti-male sexism he's the problem? Feminism is a gender supremacist movement and sexist pe…
/r/MensRights17/03/26 05:01 PM
13

If you stop long enough for her to get a name or face or license plate or description of your vehicle you’re already too involved. Keep driving and call for assistance from a safe place where she cannot identify you.
/r/MensRights16/03/26 08:34 PM
39

It was a man, not a human (to them) so treating like shit and punishing him for helping does not count against her morals or ethics.
/r/MensRights16/03/26 07:11 PM
8

About half are divorced and the other half are with kids in a dead bedroom situation. It's stable in the sense that nothing changes. That sounds bad but it's a similar story with the guys who waited for something better.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/26 11:14 PM
14

Many/most guys are put off approaching IRL due to changing social norms and having never experienced a positive response that ever resulted in a date. If you refuse to meet men online (the most common way today) then that's on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/26 08:54 PM
5

I hope your future wife always exclusively fantasizes about men that look completely different from you It must be exhausting to be this petty and vindictive.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/26 08:46 PM
7

They think the average woman can get into a relationship with any man she wants. The guys I know do not think women can get relationships with any man she wants. We do think almost any woman can get into a relationship if she wants one because we've seen all the fattest and ugliest women we ever knew get into multiple relationships with relative ease while below average men can go decades with zero success.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/26 08:41 PM
2

Men can afford to be alone their entire lives, yes. Although that is getting dicey with how much everything costs for people living on their own without access to race/gender scolorships, DEI initiatives, and divorce windfalls.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/26 08:35 PM
9

Many of the guys I knew in HS ended up with the first girl who showed them any interest. Sure top guys are super picky, but many average guys are ecstatic to have any girl who is not a blimp, and some even prefer fat assed women. The women on Sir Mixalot's Baby Got Back would be considered skinny today. There is no equivalent of women liking (let alone preferring) fat stomached men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/26 08:29 PM
11

Literally? So you swipe right on every single guy and every one of them says no to a relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/26 08:23 PM
21

If random women were as undesired as random men you'd be swiping right on everyone too. If men were as selective as women they'd have zero matches. How women still struggle to accept this basic fact is beyond my comprehension.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/26 08:16 PM
13

Violent crime has been on the decline for decades... Incidence and severity of violent behavior has been falling for centuries if not millennia. The further you go back in time the more violent everyday life was and the worse things were for everyone, including women. But you cannot say that to modern women, who consider the safest period in human history to be an "epidemic of violence" against them. Just goes to show that no matter how much things improve they'll always be outraged and never sa…
/r/MensRights12/03/26 08:06 AM
1

More like millennia. The further you go back in time the more violent it was and the worse it was for women, but the safest women who have ever existed distrust and despise men now more than ever.
/r/MensRights12/03/26 07:55 AM
–

Because it teaches men to put women on pedestals, to distrust our intuition, and ignore red flags. It also makes flirting and dating extra tedious and difficult. I'd still want to be raised as an egalitarian, just not a feminist stooge.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 05:08 PM
–

I would not choose to be born a woman, but I would choose to not be raised as a male feminist.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 04:54 PM
8

When people feel forced into secrecy, the conversation just becomes more polarized instead of more honest. Now that feminism has become the dominant mainstream narrative gender issues are treated like a zero sum debate and men speaking openly are just asking to be silenced and cancelled. That's why the few who do always include stipulations and preconditions that women have it worse and we need to solve their problems first and foremost.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 02:26 AM
1

If I approach the back of the vehicle and stop without getting in both male and female drivers will take that as wanting help with the luggage. The difference is that most male drivers will get out and pick it up to put it in whereas most female drivers will get out and...wait for me to put it in. Some will pretend that holding the trunk open is helping me in some way but I fail to see the point. I do not doubt that women drivers are helping women travelers, but they're not helping me.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 06:02 PM
30

Male drivers help with luggage while female drivers ignore luggage or pretend to "hold" the trunk open so I can put it in myself. Gee, thanks ma'am. Remember "equal pay for equal work?" Yeah, they're done with the equal effort part.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 06:00 AM
72

"Equality through exclusion."
/r/MensRights10/03/26 02:04 AM
9

Not just make it easier to arrest innocent men but to also remove juries and leave SH/SA/SB trials to "trauma informed" judges who are trained to walk on eggshells to avoid challenging or refuting the accuser's claims.
/r/MensRights09/03/26 09:46 AM
1

Who says they need to be attractive? Simps gonna simp regardless.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 09:40 AM
1

I'm not any kind of mom. You got that right.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 09:36 AM
3

Even the most naive good guy will find out the truth when she tires of pretending to like him. Some will keep pretending all the way until the last kid leaves college but most will lose interest and cash out way before then.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 09:30 AM
–

Do you realize most women fucking hate being in a relationship with a man Yes. It's one of the most prominent themes on my news feeds. A growing number of women seem to really despise men and no matter how safe, supportive, and sympathetic we become it may simply never be enough for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 09:23 AM
-1

Do you realize most women fucking hate being in a relationship with a man Yes. We hear about it all the time. Outside of literal war it's the most prominent theme on my news feeds. "Today on the topic of women finding another way to despise post-pubescent males..." I think women are predisposed to hate men and no matter how safe, supportive, and sympathetic we make this world it will never be enough for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 09:10 AM
1

I was making a reference to the fact that a lot of dudes seem incredibly paranoid about their partners motivations for being in a relationship. How is therapy going to nullify women dropping them like yesterday's garbage as soon as a hotter, wealthier, or more charismatic guy showed interest in her? I can admit I'm not a great catch so dumping me is whatever, but watching women repeatedly treat the best guys I ever knew like a steaming pile of dog shit was a lesson I'll never forget and nothing …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 11:37 PM
14

Fair point, but often there is considerable overlap that blue pill still refuses to acknowledge exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 08:30 PM
–

Do women still not understand that what a man desires for porn, hookups, and relationships are three different things?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 06:16 PM
8

The one thing that seems to unite the blue pill is a tendency to see relationships through a "just world" lens. If you're not getting any interest it's because you're a bad person or you're lazy or you suffer from wrong think. But this mindset means blue pill advice is very limited in what it can solve and if you've done all the "right" things and you're still failing then blue pill has no more answers. A lot of people see red pill as competing with blue pill but to me it's more like an addendum…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 10:24 AM
2

Dresses conservatively, spends their free time at home, uninterested in sex, isn't funny, and barely speaks to men? Yes. I know bipolar and antisocial women who cannot stop talking about how much they hate men and even they are partnered and often have kids. It takes some truly severe antisocial behavior (like schizophrenia or hard drug addictions) for a woman to end up completely undateable where I live.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 08:02 AM
3

Her being "nice" just simply isn't enough. I know several women like you describe. They're all partnered with kids. Being a nice woman does not exclude you from anything. I assume some nice guys succeed, but the ones I know are perpetually single.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 07:32 AM
–

What they leave out is that therapy is not setup to help single lonely men succeed romantically. At best it may help you feel better about always being rejected.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 10:49 AM
1

What they leave out is that therapy is not setup to help single lonely men succeed romantically. At best it may help you feel better about always being rejected. That's it. That's all it does.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 10:43 AM
–

Anything you tell a woman will be remembered and no matter how she reacted in the moment that information will be used against you when she's angry and wants to hurt you. Or at least that has been my experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 10:33 AM
3

It's also possible to avoid those auto-bans if you take the necessary action before you start posting here (or there).
/r/MensRights06/03/26 10:31 PM
3

Even if we agree it's mostly because men being honest about what they like in women gets them shamed and cancelled for being shallow and not liking the woman for things we'd never know just by walking up to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 04:54 PM
6

Being attracted to someone's personality does not mean you'll date the ugliest man around; he still needs to meet her minimum standards for looking dateable. I don't know why this is so hard for so many women to admit to others but performative people gonna virtue signal I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 04:51 PM
–

if you aren't filtering just as ruthlessly as you are being filtered you aren't even playing the same game, you're literally just equipment If most men filtered as ruthlessly as most women do the frequency of dating and relationships would plummet into oblivion. I'm not saying your advice is bad or wrong, just that it's not practical for many guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 08:34 AM
–

How much fairer can you get? We could make paternity fraud a crime and make cheating invalidate divorce windfalls for starters.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 08:29 AM
1

This is a totally relatable and understandable response. Five stars. The question then becomes why do feminist mothers raise their boys to put women on pedestals? Because that's what happened to me and it sure as hell created all sorts of problems when it did not need to.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 05:14 PM
15

The guys checking out of dating are the ones who took everything women said to heart and stopped risking annoying them. The guys who could not care less what women say or think are still approaching. Everybody wins.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 09:30 AM
6

men complain about women's unrealistic standards [...] yet when you tell men to have their own standards, they dont want to hear it Men should follow the WoPPD advice of raising their standards from zero good options to...zero good options. LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 09:24 AM
12

I was raised as progressive as they come and spent $300+ per hour for years of professional mental health therapy. The factors that cause my depression are not covered by my insurance and are not well understood by the mental health resources available in my area. I have put more time, money, and effort into my mental health than most of the people I know regardless of gender or ideology and it's still not making things better. When women say therapy works for them I believe them. So why do wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 09:04 PM
16

I believe them when they say they can't. They are probably depressed, and need professional help. One common causes of suicide in men is feeling a lack of purpose and lack of connection with other humans. Studies have found that most men who commit suicide have sought professional help. The presumption that men simply don't know or don't care about therapy is incorrect. I think a bigger problem is that current mental health therapy is simply not geared and insurance rarely covers the kinds of is…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 08:29 PM
22

They're only treating you like shit because your great great grandfather might have whistled at a woman as she crossed the street and since he can't be punished you have to be punished in his place.
/r/MensRights02/03/26 05:02 PM
56

MenEngage is MensLib style "activism," which feminists already think goes too far down the path of "helping" men at the expense of women, girls, and gender fluid people. What a time to be a man. Blamed by all, appreciated by none.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/26 05:35 AM
67

It's even worse than a mere disclaimer because it repeatedly and explicitly recommends only covering issues men face when they can be wrapped into a lesson about the bigger needs of girls, women, gays, and trans people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/26 05:34 AM
1

MenEngage = MensLib style "activism," which feminists already think goes too far down the path of "helping" men. It'd be funny if it wasn't so fucking pathetic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/26 05:30 AM
1

red pillers fundamentally reject egalitarian relationships I've never heard red pill people suggest or endorse dating kids. That sounds like a feminist straw man fever dream. I remember when I was a boy the girls at school were learning emotional warfare and constantly turning on each other and learning what it took to crush someone with nothing but their words. Boys never learned any of that, and our feminist mothers brainwashed us into trusting women implicitly and putting them on pedestals, w…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 08:42 AM
3

You meet a friend of a friend, you add each other to whatever, you start texting, relationship happens. For a lot of guys relationships do not just happen like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 07:10 AM
25

If you're young sure, but if you're not most parties will be filled with couples rather than singles and if you're a perpetually single guy you're going to be clocked from a mile away. I'm not saying it's useless advice but the odds plummet as you get older and beyond a certain age you need insane luck to find someone on the same wavelength.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 07:04 AM
4

From my perspective at least the male hive mind differs enough to include a half-dozen "pillspectives" while it seems like the female hive is mostly limited to different shades of blue and zero tolerance for black pill. Another difference is that most of the women here say they're partnered while most of the men seem to be single. If I was partnered or married I would struggle to find the motive and free time to go online just to punch down on lonely people.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 11:35 AM
18

Many feminists are supportive or indifferent toward gay men. It's mostly bi and straight men that they despise, and any man who pays a surrogate to carry a child is inhuman scum to them. This is a positive story but I don't think it's going to change any feminist views so enjoy it for what it is but understand that ideological cults expect perfection.
/r/MensRights22/02/26 09:47 PM
–

I'm related to some lifelong feminists and I work with some diehard MAGA people. They are two sides of the same crazy coin my friend. They may be diametrically opposed but they also succumb to the same binary brainwashing and militant tribalism as the other. My advice is to steer clear since you're not changing either group at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 03:00 AM
–

If a man wants to be treated like an equal he needs to avoid people who make it a point to "other" him.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/26 02:51 AM
4

It used to be easy to be the fun guy, because dating itself used to be fun, but it's not fun anymore and I'm not trying to win anyone over. You can keep your endless lists of flags and icks and date whatever kind of man enjoys being treated like they're working a job where they wear a dozen hats in exchange for a negative wage. Enjoy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 11:37 PM
1

You are angry at what you imagined women will do in the future I'm not angry, I'm just disgusted by what feminists have done in the past, like rehabilitate Lorena Bobbit. Guess I just "imagined" that. Do you see how crazy that sounds? You mean like how crazy it is to interpret any disagreement as "anger" or to conflate feminists with all women? Yeah, that's pretty crazy. Anyway, when that happens let us know! I don't follow the shows she's likely to visit so you'll probably know before me.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 05:54 PM
1

My source is watching feminists rehabilitate the image of diabolical women because only men can be bad people. If it makes you feel any better all movement seems to be toward pardoning Maxwell's crimes and letting her go free, presumably to visit The View and write a best self-serving revisionist book about how she was tricked into being evil.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 05:36 PM
2

I see is all rich men free sunbathing in their mansions and the only person in jail is a woman. At a low security woman's prison with perks no other prisoners are getting. You think she'd prefer the dead camera Epstein treatment? Also, "can see" as in "can envision happening" (in the future).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 04:19 PM
1

I'm not attacked by being told to decenter women, that's honest and welcome advice. No, I'm attacked by being called an incel for lacking a female partner or when I disagree with the femisphere. If y'all can find a way to stop doing that more men could find their way to a decentered life. Everybody wins.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 04:01 PM
3

I think you hit the nail on the head and I really could not agree more. But it's still just more reason to decenter women and head to the chopper.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 03:56 PM
5

Also, you'll be out of practice being a boyfriend which is bad. Is it though? Being a good boyfriend often involves devaluing yourself for the benefit of someone who probably does not feel the same way about you as you do about them. If they did feel that way they'd want a happy partner more than they'd want an attentive boyfriend. I'm still on the path toward decentering women and it's the only way I could keep my sanity let alone my self esteem. Relationships that modern women consider healthy…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 03:55 PM
1

Feminism is not the mastermind behind Epstein but Ghislaine was critical to his operation and I can see feminists giving her the same presto-chango revisionist rehab treatment they gave Loretta Bobbit. Imagine a man who mutilated a woman's vagina with a knife living freely and being defended for his actions because she deserved it. Nobody would put up with that nonsense, but if it's a woman everything is different. So long as Ghislaine renounces all agency and joins the chorus of blaming men for…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 03:44 PM
–

I’m afraid that I’ll just creep the young guys out The only women who ever approached me were old enough to be my mother but they always get a pass because only men can be creepy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 04:38 AM
–

We all know the base filter is going to weed out less attractive guys but any guy who looks too skinny, short, skinflint, autistic, or introverted is going to have little reason to bother with dating apps at this point. Sure, if they're not hideous they might land one or two dates in a year but you can't perform well when that's all the experience you get.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/26 04:05 AM
1

The answer depends on the laws of each state, but yes a trust can be very protective of premarital assets where statutes and case law support that use. (Sucks to see this thread has been removed)
/r/MensRights20/02/26 07:58 PM
5

The financial windfall she expects is perfectly legal to put in a contract, but intimacy he expects is impossible to put into a contract. You can plan as much as you please and it won't mean shit for the guy because his interests are not actionable. That's why marriage will never be a two way street and is best avoided in Western countries.
/r/MensRights20/02/26 02:12 PM
16

A prenuptial agreement keeps the total damage to around 50% of assets acquired/appreciated during marriage. If you try to move the needle much beyond that it's considered "unconscionable" to her interests. The only way you leave with everything you came with is if your wife has the same wealth, experience, and job history you do. If she's less wealthy or less experienced (or just lazy) then you're going to pay with or without a prenup.
/r/MensRights20/02/26 02:04 PM
3

I was referring to the "brotherhood" part rather than the feminist part.
/r/MensRights18/02/26 02:03 PM
1

I never intended to imply that LWMA was feminist, only that someone might have confused it with a pro-feminist sub like Menslib.
/r/MensRights18/02/26 01:59 PM
1

You should do whatever you think is safe of course. What I find annoying is the disparity between what women expect a man to provide versus what they're willing to provide themselves. Surely both of participants should expect the same level of safety from each other. I guess the fact that most men have no line of "next ones" waiting for them is why this imbalance persists.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 05:21 AM
26

That sucks. Are you sure you're not thinking of something like r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates?
/r/MensRights18/02/26 04:10 AM
92

Menslib is a feminist-approved men's space and it's every bit as useless and depressing as that sounds. On the other hand it does a great job proving feminism cannot and will not do anything meaningful or productive for men's issues.
/r/MensRights18/02/26 04:02 AM
74

Men start dying off in their 50's and those who can make it to 70+ have lost a lot of their critical thinking skills, short term memory, and social awareness. Even if they say or do something that appears to be a come-on or proposition it's most likely based on a very confused and distorted view of the world around them, but you cannot make that point to a modern Western woman since they truly believe most men are secretly perverse if not downright evil.
/r/MensRights16/02/26 03:07 AM
–

We might have less war, tho. Unlikely. The findings show that women leaders were more likely to participate in war than male leaders during this period, challenging many norms and perceptions of women in leadership positions. https://alumniandfriends.uchicago.edu/s/uchicago-review-story/a4X1U000000syMoUAI/the-wars-of-queens
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 09:02 AM
–

We're a long way from losing the Y chromosome and even if that were to happen those who survive would end up with another chromosome serving the same function. This is before we get into all the disgusting, dangerous, and physically difficult tasks that are necessary for survival but most women will never touch. Humanity will probably kill itself off or suffer an apocalyptic tragedy long before then anyway. Your post is full of naive rambling based on a misunderstanding. A better subject would b…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 08:53 AM
17

The “attempted” suicide is a performative action intended to bring help and support rather than death or permanent injury. Actual suicide is something like 90% fatal with the other 10% being severe injuries.
/r/MensRights12/02/26 08:23 PM
9

A majority of white women voted for Trump but liberal women never seem to have much to say about that, probably because they're too busy blaming men for every bad thing they've ever seen or heard about.
/r/MensRights12/02/26 06:02 PM
9

I used to argue this point but my entire life has been trying to teach me this lesson over and over again. Women often talk about waiting for Mr. Right™ but most men just want a woman who accepts them for who they are and we're lovesick enough to believe in absurd just world fallacies and spending decades chasing false hope.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 08:28 AM
2

Being natural does not make something good. Cheating is natural. So are harems. Even murder and rape. Monogamy is completely unnatural, which is why it needs societal conditioning to enforce, but that does not necessarily mean it's bad. It keeps the worker cogs running and building and hoping. We got so progressive we abandoned monogamy before inventing a new carrot for the worker cogs to chase, which has led to some rather predictable problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 08:18 AM
8

Men and women are really not that different on the inside. If we were so similar we should be able to compromise more, but the best arguments from each gender seem irrelevant to the views and positions of the other. That makes me think we're honestly very different.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 06:21 PM
18

This is an interesting premise. What is blue pill's version of expected courting tasks for women? I've only ever heard blue pill bash men before now.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 06:14 PM
30

Oh wow, this sounds like FDS which is like the women's own version of blackpill. FDS is the female version of red pill. Black pill has no dating strategy because black pill believes anyone who needs a strategy has already failed to meet the minimum requirements to succeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 06:09 PM
1

I'm only advocating for men to expect basic 1:1 reciprocation, not this 10x mommy bang maid nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 05:40 PM
0

He leans more into "pleasure dom" if I'm allowed to say so. Sure, so long as you're okay with misogynists using similar excuses to explain women who are brainwashed into putting their husband's pleasure first and foremost above them. It's only a problem if you're a hypocrite about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 04:23 PM
-1

His post sounds just like something a housewife would say about living to please her husband back in the 1950's. Would you take her word for it? Why is it so hard for modern women to just call a spade a spade once in a while?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 03:36 PM
0

Can you imagine saying this to a woman who advises other women to only think of pleasing men and never daring to want or expect anything for themselves? If a woman posted this we'd be concerned that she's being used and manipulated, but when a man posts the same lopsided nonsense it's celebrated. Feminism is just reverse chauvinism.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 11:39 AM
14

I'm starting to think the OP is/was on OF because that is the easiest explanation for why this is such a big deal to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 02:13 AM
0

Men with no romantic options are being sold fake intimacy from manipulative con artists and a few feminist trolls are dunking on them with no mention of the bloated middle aged single mothers who keep falling for the scam of wealthy globe trotting men wanting them for a wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 02:04 AM
6

"These smokers, drinkers, and drug users really seem to love being addicts."
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 01:48 AM
4

Do you think that men’s IQ is genuienly so low that they would think it’s a real relationship? Men in general? No. But men who have been romantically rejected for decades will think it's the best they can do and hope it will somehow turn into a real relationship because that's the story they're being sold by manipulative con artists. Do you also ask women conned by tinder scams why they thought a CEO with a private jet would want a bloated middle aged single mother for his wife or are you only h…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 01:45 AM
1

Do you think that men’s IQ is genuienly so low that they would think it’s a real relationship? They think it's the best they can do and they hope that it will somehow turn into a real relationship because that's the story they're sold by manipulative women with the morals and ethics of a con artist.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 01:36 AM
1

Do you think that men’s IQ is genuienly so low that they would think it’s a real relationship? Here comes the victim blaming. Sounds like you're just another disingenuous troll who only comes here to punch down on men.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 01:27 AM
55

If you look closely you'll notice that none of these studies say women actually want to date any of the guys who approach them, so maybe they just like the status and validation that comes from rejecting random men.
/r/MensRights06/02/26 07:48 AM
17

I don't think you're wrong or overreacting. Feminists saw that women were being treated unfairly and they "fixed it" by reversing the roles and ensuring that men would be treated like shit instead. It's the exact same script just flipped to treat men like second class citizens and prevent them from pushing back without being silenced or worse.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/02/26 06:19 AM
14

you claim society is collapsing because men aren’t getting pussy Me: "compassion and respect" You: "pussy" Liberal women think they only need the most fervent of self-loathing male feminists to back them up. In reality you need way more voting age men than that, but rather than join forces with mutual respect and understanding you keep telling us we're only good for shooting and killing and raping and so on. Well, enjoy the complete and utter shit show that your binary blame all men for everythi…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 06:11 AM
16

A majority of white women voted for the same pedo racist fascist you blame men for electing. Funny how women are never part of any social problem. No, it's always men who are exclusively at fault and the more you remind us the less we care. You need male supporters more now than ever but you've spent the last decade telling men we're unworthy of any compassion and respect. Going back to the gilded age is going to be bad for everyone, but especially for women, so you'd think they'd be eager to jo…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 05:51 AM
41

Personally I probably would report it as others have suggest and I honestly think that would make me feel better if I was in your shoes. Even if it did not change anything right away I'd feel like I did my part to make it clear this was not okay regardless of gender and help nudge the Overton window toward some genuine equality and accountability. I know it's not easy though, and I hope you find a way to get past it regardless of what you choose to do.
/r/MensRights03/02/26 05:30 AM
1

Be the gay best friend who happens to be straight and therefore totally dateable. I don't think this would work on anyone outside of your commune but even if it did you're suggesting straight men give up everything that makes then straight men and become lesbians in male bodies.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 05:20 AM
1

So certain guys choose to pivot from the serious straight edge student to party animals. I'm guessing this is something a group of men can do whereas the OP on his own deciding to pivot into "party guy" mode is unlikely to see a similar reaction.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 05:05 AM
3

these were men I worked with Where I live the staff at any job worth keeping are off limits to all but the densest and most reckless of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 05:01 AM
3

I'm surprised that works. I would have thought it would come across as performative and a bit on the nose.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 04:57 AM
1

these were men I worked with Work is great for getting to know someone because you're forced to interact with people you'd probably never meet otherwise, but any job worth keeping is off limits to all but the densest and most reckless of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 04:45 AM
1

The new standard is Positive, Enthusiastic, and Perpetually Reaffirmed Consent. If at any moment she ever stops commanding you to continue you're committing rape as per UK, US*, CA, and AU. *Started with "Blue" states but is spreading to Purple and Red states over time.
/r/MensRights02/02/26 08:28 PM
1

I'm so turned off by all the male hating that I generally avoid interacting on a personal level, but every once in a while a woman will say something kind or bubbly or empathetic and it will stop me in my tracks and remind me of what I used to find so appealing about them.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 09:03 AM
0

These days I'm so turned off by all the male hating that I mostly avoid interacting with women on a personal level, but every once in a while a random woman will say something kind or bubbly or empathetic and it will stop me in my tracks and remind me of what I used to find so appealing about them back before the gender wars made everything so miserable.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 08:16 AM
1

Where I live women do approach. It's rarely as blatant and obvious as when a man does it, but they absolutely will show their interest first if they're into you (or want access to something you possess). I think some men struggle to pick up on it, other men understandably assume it must be a scam or a setup, and even guys who see it for what it is are rarely in the right headspace to shift gears and react accordingly before she loses interest and moves on.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 06:01 AM
–

sure, but that's a lot of words that don't disagree with mine I'm not disagreeing with how the Epstein list has played out (so far), but I would disagree with the premise that all SA/SB accusations are being handled like the Epstein list. Outside of Epstein any accusation of SA/SB is still treated like a conviction, and so far as I can tell most people want it that way regardless if it turns out to be right or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 05:35 AM
–

I just don't see the kind of rush to judgment that you're claiming here. I think the main difference here is that there are so many names it kind of dilutes the impact and the subject most associated with Epstein has faced no obstacles, hindrances, or punishments. So it kind of goes in a loop of "we need to investigate these people, but the ring leader is off limits because reasons, so it's mainly the subordinates and second tier participants who are punishable, but even they can be pardoned wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 05:09 AM
1

People with chronic health issues and disability deserve love too. Probably, but the sexual revolution has brought capitalism to romantic encounters making anyone who is undesirable fundamentally unworthy of love. In theory anyone can swim against the current and save whoever they think deserves it, but few will try and even fewer will succeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 02:21 AM
1

If we're talking about guys who never dared to approach women okay sure they self-selected themselves out of the dating pool, but if we're talking about guys who approached dozens or hundreds of times over decades always listening to advice and changing whatever people thought was the problem then they are absolutely unfuckable.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 01:56 AM
1

That's why renters shouldn't pursue options who make it harder for you to live. OK, so that first house with all the requirements is never pursued. Same result. No options to filter or narrow down. Average single men would need to pursue thousands of rentals to build a list of options long enough for this thread's premise to have any relevance to them. Even men that do extremely well generally only have two or maybe three options at a time. No need for all this granularity to pick A or B.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 01:49 AM
3

I think it's the same with women as well, but men are so infatuated with being in a relationship (and socially penalized for being alone) that they'll put up with almost anything from anyone these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 01:35 AM
4

Since this thread is about real estate, let's go into real estate analogy. OK, following the real estate analogy you want a new place so you go out driving through neighborhoods calling numbers on for rent signs. After dozens of calls one owner finally picks up and tepidly agrees to show the one house in their portfolio during a brief downtime window between showing to other renters. You like the house but it has many other guys making offers and the agent says the contract to live in the house …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 01:19 AM
2

I'm not interested in hitting on anyone, but it is interesting that your example of acceptable places does not include any where women can get to know a man over a period of time to form an emotional connection and give the man time to demonstrate acceptable views and opinions on topics that matter to her. That's not happening at a modern singles event or on swiping apps. I have seen it happen at work and other routine interactions but those are off limits for obvious reasons. If we take this th…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 05:38 PM
0

All we can know for certain is that anytime genders do not fully align or understand each other completely it's because males are at fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 05:09 PM
3

After watching hundreds of men ridiculed and shouted at for the sin of approaching a woman with romantic intent, with the women supposedly risking death and dismemberment by responding so viciously, the answer does seem to be that most men are hideous to most women. This is often framed as not wanting complete strangers to approach random women, but these same women also react this way when friends and friends of friends show interest.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 05:02 PM
1

I agree that everybody should try but if it's not working at some point it's more productive to simply move on. Men who don't need help are already in relationships and the men who do need help will probably end up in toxic relationships if they manage to find anything at all. The best thing we can do is stop blaming men for failing to attract women partners and start teaching them how to live alone and unwanted. I believe this change would have made a world of difference in my own life if someo…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 10:13 PM
1

What kills it for me is not the insane rejection rate but the realization that even when you finally get a yes the act of dating has lost the little joys that made it fun and enjoyable in the past. These days if feels like a job you have to pay and perform to keep and the moment you fail to anticipate whatever your boss expects next you're fired. You don't even get the benefit of an exit interview so you can learn from your mistakes. Get rinsed, feel regret, repeat.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 08:56 PM
1

Exposure therapy works best when there is an eventual breakthrough. For instance, a man finally starts getting dates he was afraid would never materialize, but for unattractive and socially awkward guys it's just one rejection after another. Even if you're able to compartmentalize endless rejections eventually you're going to run out of reasons to keep trying and eventually give up simply because it's a wasteful and unproductive use of your time.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 07:12 PM
20

I think he means they're using victimization as a weapon, not that they're actual victims, aka weaponized vicitimhood.
/r/MensRights30/01/26 06:33 PM
5

So it's not hot at all and does nothing for men (besides humiliate them) but it gives women something to humble-brag about so it's worth it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 05:19 PM
1

You need several fake numbers before you get a real one, several real numbers before you get a meaningful response, several responses before you get ghosted, and several ghosts before you get a real date.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 05:17 PM
1

The incentive used to be that someone might say yes. Now that the myth of cold approach is finally dying off and the reality that even if you get a number you'll just be ghosted anyway fewer men are bothering to engage with all these pointless humiliation rituals.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 05:16 PM
4

Men can swipe on everyone or swipe on a few select women but the success rate is roughly the same. We either get matches where one or both parties are uninterested or we get nothing. It wasn't always like that but it is now.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 05:06 PM
1

The few times I've had to actually reject a woman (much older, much heavier, or intoxicated) I actually felt bad about it despite trying my best to be calm and discreet about it. When I see women relish the opportunity to aggressively reject men and laugh about it with her girlfriends and followers it makes me realize just how different we are.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 05:00 PM
1

I think what happens is single men go once or twice, get zero interest from any of the women even when they're charged to attend and then inform other men there was no point. I don't think men are turned off by in-person events so much as they fail to see the benefit of attending.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 04:02 PM
13

If you check their reactions after attending managed dating events it seems that most women show up in groups or with coupled friends as a lark rather than with with genuine romantic intent. The main attraction seems to be having something new to talk about on social media rather than finding a new guy. Even the women who go alone admit they mostly ignored the men and focused on comparing dating stories with other women instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 06:01 AM
26

We're failing the test by not successfully turning these words against them. This is the kind of shit that should be able to doom any cause that associates with people like her. It should also be enough to force an investigation into her parenting and help her sons find a less hate filled place to live and learn.
/r/MensRights29/01/26 10:24 PM
1

There are charts that show what people typically look like in the ten basic leagues that most guys refer to when judging others. The ones I've seen are based on how men view SMV, but I'm guessing a female version would be similar except with every woman being an 8-10 and every man below 8 being unattractive and hideous below 5.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 09:49 PM
30

I would really like to know how do I stop feeling so worthless. In my experience the only way is to distance yourself and decenter modern women (and male feminists) from your life. No matter how hard you try they simply cannot be convinced that any abuse or adversity a man faces is worthy of concern or compassion. Whatever any man is alleged to have done is the sin of all men for all time, even if the person judging us suffered no harm and we had yet to be born at the time. Best of luck to you i…
/r/MensRights27/01/26 02:23 AM
1

Ironically it's the "everybody can win if you just demonstrate good qualities" gaslighting that opens the door to assholes like Andrew Tate. Also, you sound way more blue pill than red pill rn.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 04:52 PM
1

If you told me "it's the guy in movie X" or "guy from season Y of series Z" I could look him up with a quick Google search. I cannot look up your dad and no guy I know is going to accept A-list examples unless they're delusional about what is practically attainable.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 04:46 PM
3

I agree that their wealth, social status, and physical attractiveness are downplayed, but that does not stop the message from getting lost in the exceptional rarity of the people being used as examples to emulate.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 04:40 PM
0

There is a vast middle ground between A-list celebrities and your dad. I get that it needs to be someone people can find and relate to in some way, but I agree with the OP that the usual examples are a bit too perfect to be relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 04:34 PM
4

So it's random chance that the primary examples just happen to tick every conventional high status qualifier? Do you think most lonely men are anti-trans tyrants who relish the chance to mistreat a spouse?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 04:31 PM
–

For the longest time I failed to realize that having straight sex without promises of food, lodging, labor, status, and negotiable gifts feels like being used to many women. The irony being that most of the non-sex things that I love about women are being retired or abandoned in rapid succession, leaving sex as the only incentive left to dangle.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 09:59 AM
27

It's not a phase. I've known lots of feminists and none of them ever "passed through" it to something less radical. And why would they? Feminism gives them carte blanch to do anything they want and if anybody gets screwed they can blame it on the patriarchy or toxic masculinity or some other bogeyman.
/r/MensRights22/01/26 06:36 AM
–

Zoomers just hate sex. Something tells me it's more about fearing sex than hating it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/26 06:30 AM
67

If you want to see false accusations watch YT videos of American women being arrested. For a while I was recording how many women made a false statements claiming a male officer had attacked or assaulted them in a sexual way. It was around 15%. If you included implications they were touched inappropriately it was closer to 20%. If you limited it to drunk women exclusively it was nearly 30%. None of these women were ever charged with false reporting, fabricating evidence, or bearing false witness…
/r/MensRights20/01/26 06:13 AM
–

Sounds like severe life-altering levels of avoidant personality disorder.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/26 04:38 AM
33

The Madonna whore complex, for those who don’t know - relates to the subconscious perception that a woman is either a sexually appealing seductress or a pure, innocent maternal figure. Sounds like the eunuch predator complex through which modern women judge men. Two sides of the same coin.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 12:50 AM
3

Dating sucks. It sucks for everyone. I do not disagree but imagine for a moment what it's like for people who cannot even get to the point of being disappointed by a date that went poorly. People who cannot find anyone to give them a chance to even go on a date. Not because they're bad people but because they're just not appealing to anyone around them. I think that goes well beyond the shared annoyance, frustration, and eventual heartbreak everyone else faces.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 08:53 PM
2

They hypocrisy of choosing to make nearly any physical or sexual comment about women completely off limits while allowing men to be mocked for traits that have nothing to do with character and are well beyond anyone's control is the main issue for me. It makes it hard for me to care about any of the things they say are offensive to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 08:46 PM
0

people claim as a society we shouldn’t be ableist yet people call people retarded as an insult all the time. The main difference being that it's generally not the same person saying don't be ableist and don't be retarted while the people saying sex is not important but being a male virgin means you're a bad person are often the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 08:41 PM
8

Yeah, just keep hitting the gym and buying fancier clothes and haircuts until the autism washes off with your tenth shower of the day and you're all set. SMH
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 08:31 PM
2

You can technically survive decades of mental and physical torture as well. Does that mean that being tortured does not make your life a living hell? This is such a weird hill to die on but you do you I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 08:29 PM
5

I cannot remember the last time I saw someone disparage a woman's character by calling her a virgin, and even if they did it's such a rare condition it seems like there would be little of any collateral damage.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 08:24 PM
4

Cold approaching women alone has always been stupid unless you are mega hot, that’s why you have fucking friends and go out with them. That's why you go out with friends? I'd rather just enjoy being out and about than use my friends as pawns or props in yet another humiliation ritual where I validate/annoy someone who already gets way more attention than she can preemptively dismiss and turn away. Or at least that's how I see it based on my personal experiences.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 07:24 PM
1

It seems to vacillate between feminist and black pill logic, but the overall premise is valid. It does need some moderation though.
/r/MensRights10/01/26 05:04 AM
47

I know plenty of smart people who are super boring in most settings. I think the bigger issue is that women are not expected to develop a interesting personality and mostly focus on feeding their own narcissism instead.
/r/MensRights10/01/26 05:00 AM
1

The way most women initiate is to show openness to being approached. The problem for guys is that it's easy to misinterpret what many women see as clear interest because it's not that different than what some other woman did that turned out to be anything but romantic interest. I think the main reason women avoid being too obvious with their interest is because they're honestly just not that skilled at approaching men smoothly and they know it. It's the same reason many guys avoid approaching wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 04:26 AM
0

Friend zoning is when they dissuade your advance but continue to humor and bread crumb you just enough to keep you orbiting them in the hope they'll eventually give you a chance sometime in the future. If they reject you, tell you it's never going to happen, and don't judge you for wanting to separate to heal that is not friend zoning. Get it?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 10:12 PM
1

What I never understood is why she wasn't banned a long time ago. Just the same miserable drivel over and over. Supposedly some guy she cheated on got tired of her bullshit and left and it broke her brain. I wonder if her supporters realize that threads like this do more to push guys into the manosphere than anything a guy could say.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 06:14 PM
1

I have no particular opinion on this specific accusation, but at some point every man with real wealth will be accused at least once. I'm pro peace and anti violence but if someone accuses me of horrible shit they know I never did they just wrote the last page of their story. If you play life altering games you win life altering prizes.
/r/MensRights09/01/26 06:04 PM
–

A random Reddit comment about leagues is more likely to piss a sensitive person off than make them contemplate the fact that certain qualities are probably holding them back. Most redditors have zero problems posting some of the most insensitive and judgemental retorts at single men. Even if they're being super careful to not blame anyone they rarely get any kid glove treatment like this woman received in spades. I think the imbalance and hypocrisy is what sets most men off. Either be nice to ev…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 05:25 PM
–

Colonblast7 seems really adamant that we reinterpret everything to be as favorable to the woman as possible. Women are not monolith, they just all know what any other woman really meant to say to avoid looking petty. LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 05:15 PM
–

I don't think being picky is a problem. I don't think complaining is a problem. But I do think being picky while also complaining that nobody is ever good enough is kind of obnoxious. If a random overweight dude did little or nothing to sharpen up and went to nine dating events where he found nobody worthy of dating I would have no problem asking if he was trying to land someone out of his league.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 04:51 PM
–

I guarantee they've been asked that. Once apparently, but it's unlikely she ever saw it since it was immediately downvoted into the wrongthink bin.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 04:44 PM
–

I guarantee you if this was a man posting he would be attacked for being so picky. Au contraire. Nothing would make a mainstream redditor feel more smug and satisfied than hearing that a lonely guy struck out nine times and gave up.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 04:41 PM
–

OP is being silly. He should have waited for a plain Jain that went to 30+ events with zero attractive men before mentioning pickiness.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 04:37 PM
–

Men complaining about their singleness tend to focus it on looks way more. Other than morbidly obese women I mainly see single men complaining about their own looks (as the reason they cannot get anyone) with single women complaining about how bad single men look. I'm not sure why it's controversial to admit women generally find random men a lot less attractive than most men find random women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 04:33 PM
71

MGTOW is about decentering women. Anything from dropping out of active dating to avoiding women completely. It's not one size fits all and some guys might maintain casual hookups but marriage and cohabitation go against the MGTOW ethos. The idea is to be as self sufficient and shielded from manipulation and abuse as is practical.
/r/MensRights09/01/26 02:19 PM
6

Why would anyone need to create a whole new society just to end marriage? Just stop getting married and it's over. There are thousand of laws on the books that no longer affect anyone because they're written for things nobody does anymore. Feminist logic seems to be all about making simple fixes as complicated as possible and then handing it over to men to do for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 12:51 PM
33

I thought AOC falling five spots down might wake up the Dems but instead there was Halle Berry saying she'll never vote for the most popular candidate (Newsom) because he doesn't pass her women-over-everything purity test. Will this party ever wake up or is it determined to never be in power again? If they pick someone like AOC I honestly think they prefer being impotent over saying anything that might offend women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/26 08:13 AM
7

Actually it does. Reading what women think online, hearing what they say when they think everyone in room agrees with them, and watching how they treat others has really opened my eyes. Even your "success" stories often sound like servitude for the partner you supposedly love. When I was young and naive I loved everything about women. You were everything I was curious about and everything wanted to be around, but now that I know what being with a woman is really like I'm no longer interested. I'…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 06:49 AM
1

Where I live women getting beat because they left the house or wore the wrong thing hasn't been a thing in decades. Or at least I assume I'd know since crimes against women are the number one topic on the news. That's not to say DV is uncommon here, just that it's almost entirely done by women against men. Which makes sense since they know they're basically untouchable and few men would dare risk reporting abuse for fear that he gets blamed instead. Rather than solving the DV problem we just fli…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 06:39 AM
6

I'll take splitting hairs for 500, Alex. The mind and identity of many modern women is complaining about how horrible men are, how every bad thing is our fault, and how men are never good enough for you. Why would anybody want to center their life around people who hate them? It's telling that giving up and moving on is still not good enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 06:14 AM
2

"I gave it up with every string attached but just like his last dozen conquests he did the deed and dipped out." That's what 90% of "he controlled me" stories can be distilled to if you read between the lines. The reason women can control men is because boys are raised by mothers to trust other women implicitly. If we could just fix that part men could see the dating landscape clearly and decenter women from their lives when they're still young. Everybody wins.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 06:10 AM
4

If it works, that's on you. We stopped saying that to women in abusive relationships decades ago. Guess we only learned half of the lesson.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 06:02 AM
7

Marriage doesn’t benefit women. If that's true then it does not benefit anyone and we should probably do away with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 05:52 AM
7

The studies I've seen claiming that married men benefit more than married women could easily be reinterpreted as women choosing men who are healthier, wealthier, and happier rather than marriage making everything better for random everyday men in a way nobody can explain without resorting to outdated cliches from the 1950's.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 05:50 AM
5

He’s obviously a beta simp, so I have a great marriage. Yuck. Hopefully he gets something out of it too, even if it's by oversight or accident.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 05:39 AM
20

Blue pill logic wasted decades of my life blindly following irrational advice and chasing just world fallacies. I eventually tried some red pill advice and some of it worked, but it was not something I enjoyed and by that time I no longer cared enough to keep going. I eventually went black pill for my own peace and sanity. Maybe it's more of a dark grey pill since I'm not completely closed off, but I'm no longer doing anything to demonstrate interest in whatever counts as romance today. If blue …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 02:58 AM
1

But then the foreign woman takes on more risk if things go south because the passport bro has less financial responsibility. He won’t be the one stuck with income loss and a kid to take care of. Yes, in the East he can dip and she'll get screwed. Just like women can dip out and screw men over in the West. Neither situation is fair and both need to be rationalized. That said if a passport bro is middle aged there's a good chance he'll be expected to take care of someone else's kids (and her exten…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 11:33 PM
1

Fair point. Some passport bros are looking for a forever wife, but others are probably looking to monkey branch if they can. The main difference is that a foreign girl gets to keep whatever she receives while they are together and the passport bro gets no divorce windfall if he leaves. If men could tangibly benefit from being a stepping stone because monkey branchers were paying for shared expenses and divorce law was changed so men did not risk financial collapse by picking the wrong girl the h…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 10:50 PM
1

Woman enjoy sex too, which is why they date. I'm starting to wonder just how many of them actually enjoy straight sex, because it seems that many of them merely tolerate it and then get super pissed "traumatized" if they don't receive something valuable in return.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 10:17 PM
0

modern women will offer to pay for at least something in the date, they just don't want to autistically split bills Feminism is what made meticulous measuring of every effort and resource such a huge deal. The problem with autistic men is that they take such ranting at face value. They're not socially alert enough to realize you only measure precisely when it benefits the fairer sex. You covered $100 worth of dinner and drinks while she cleaned out her coin purse for $5 Dairy Queen? That's moder…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 09:54 PM
10

you can never be too safe. Yes you can. The left's constantly moving goal posts of what is allowed to be said and who is allowed to say it lead to frustration and exasperation that eventually create openings for people like Donald Trump. I was never seduced by the manosphere; I was pushed out of the Left by endless revisions to what men should be allowed to say and think.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/26 08:02 AM
0

It sounds so simple but your wholesomely motivated approach could still be seen as scary by someone who was traumatized or neurotic. That's where the seemingly obvious dividing line breaks down and I've seen lots of men get caught out by this. They think motive plays a significant role in whether someone will be reported and punished but that's not how it actually works. If the receiver was scared, or at least says they were and sticks to it, then he's in trouble. Many men just want a clear divi…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 07:53 AM
11

the majority of this sub doesn't do this, but that doesn't mean everyone is aware that you're not supposed to Seems like splitting hairs to me. There will always be MR overlap, rando tourists, and false flags trying to stir the pot.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/26 07:37 AM
0

Wtf are you even talking about? I was abused as a boy, by women, and I got the same response back then that you're giving me today. Nobody has compassion for you because you don't deserve it you self centered piece of shit Yeah, you're a real piece of work yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 07:22 AM
30

Falling for someone who does not love you back is a power imbalance that is easy to manipulate. Rather than making you desirable it's a festering wound that makes you miserable and never heals. Better to separate and create some distance so nobody has to end up orbiting in vain. Asking why friendzoning is detrimental to the lovesick is no different than asking why falling for a player is toxic. It's two sides of the same coin.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 07:16 AM
–

Your concern and compassion is appreciated. No wonder you have zero reports of women doing anything when you respond to them like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 07:05 AM
–

never saw/heard a child being touched or raped by a woman though I was, but people like you never took it seriously because your spidey sense only "works" one way. You're so busy going after every man who gave you an ick you never notice women quietly doing horrible things on their own volition. But I'm not surprised; people like you have been one-siding this shit my whole life from childhood through metoo.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 06:57 AM
6

I mean, who wouldn’t want to be freeloading off someone with money? Anyone with a sense of pride would not want to be a burden on others, but these people have been told they're already perfect no matter what they do their entire lives, so they don't see being an unproductive parasite living on other people's hard work as anything bad. For the really spoiled ones it's literally all they've ever known.
/r/MensRights07/01/26 08:24 AM
-1

Still, most people in committed relationships learn to manage.. or so it looks that way to me. I think this is starting to change as modern relationships seem to separate over almost anything these days. Some people in the past stayed well beyond the point of no return but today they seem to give up and throw in the towel over almost any disagreement or setback.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 03:31 AM
–

I don't see how anything you wrote comes from anything I wrote. Did you respond to the wrong person?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 02:41 AM
1

More like "guy pretends to be okay with it but deep down the wound never heals and he gets stuck in a toxic orbit that prevents him from healing up and moving on."
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 07:16 PM
7

Yeah I'll get extra selective with this huge list of options women assume all men have. Funny how suggesting a coffee date became a "red flag" as soon as men started exercising the one option they did have.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 02:26 AM
1

I don’t think dating itself is ever “unfair,” it’s an ecosystem that keeps itself balanced because it takes two to tango. In the early days of OLD it was a lot more even but I'm not seeing much balance anymore. I don't agree that women only accept the top 10% or whatever men but even if we lower that to the top 65% it's still a huge imbalance compared to what men will accept.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 10:01 PM
–

No woman is competing for men with a history of being fat, broke, and homeless. That said, drug peddling convicts with buckets of confidence and stacks of cash seem to be all the rage these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 09:48 PM
12

Is it really worth pretending to be someone different just so a woman will give you a chance to impress her? At some point you're going to be exhausted always pretending to be someone else and then she'll dump your ass anyway. Men who receive no romantic interest need to stop chasing unicorns and decenter women for their own sanity.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 09:43 PM
6

It's not about wanting to never pay, it's about getting tired of always paying.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 09:35 PM
1

And I’m just thinking “what sort of brainworm do you have that your approach to trying to date women is to argue with the about feminism??” Like maybe start with a little small talk about the weather first bro. Fair point, but eventually we'll be expected to pretend we're borderline feminists in one way or another (even in deep red states) so why not get that shit out of the way before the bill comes.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 09:31 PM
1

The “nice guy” stereotype [...] type of guy that sees his kindness as transactional and expects something in return. The OP is literally implying "do this, get that" in this thread. OP does not appear to be a “nice guy”, he seems to have a genuine positive attitude. Not about himself. He seems to have a strong inferiority complex that he counters by excessively spoiling women. What’s the alternative? Having enough self esteem that you don't feel the need to spoil strangers like they're royalty?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 01:50 AM
1

OP does not appear to be a “nice guy”, he seems to have a genuine positive attitude. Not about himself he doesn't. He seems to have a strong inferiority complex that he counters by excessively spoiling random women. The “nice guy” stereotype that gives women the ick is more of a type of guy that sees his kindness as transactional and expects something in return. The OP is literally implying "do this, get that." in this thread. What’s the alternative? Having enough self confidence that you don't …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 01:33 AM
13

Why does every action seem to revolve around never being good enough and needing to make up for it? These are just regular women you're meeting and not supermodels or celebrities? Yet you feel the need to coddle and dote on them like royalty. I'd rather be alone than have a partner I had to treat like some sort of queen.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 12:58 AM
–

Everything he describes is still simp behavior, he's just saying that simping "worked" for him.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 12:53 AM
3

garage collector I've seen many women fill up a garage with "collectibles." lol
/r/MensRights02/01/26 12:16 AM
2

Was your mother a devout feminist? Because this post is dripping with surrogate guilt wrapped in an inferiority complex. I couldn't say or do half the stuff you mention in here without wincing it's so cringe. The only times I've gotten anywhere is when I did the opposite of this.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 12:07 AM
18

As I explained in the post to which you never replied more men are killed and go missing than women. Your zero sum whataboutism retort answers everything as to why women and feminists are the focus of MRA's.
/r/MensRights30/12/25 03:34 AM
19

The people focused on painting men in the worst possible light, singling them out for all blame (real or imagined), and punishing them as harshly as possible are women and feminists. Earlier today I read about Mahendra Patel who spent 47 days in jail on nothing more than a woman's word. Even with video evidence proving her claims never happened he still spent weeks in jail with no bail and lost his livelihood because his word was nothing compared to hers.
/r/MensRights30/12/25 02:20 AM
22

Men are the primary victims of violence. More men are murdered than women and more men go missing than women. If we include prisoners men are raped just as much as women are. This is true worldwide. But thanks to women and feminists male victims of violence are mostly ignored and forgotten.
/r/MensRights30/12/25 02:17 AM
1

The people focused on painting men in the worst possible light, singling them out for all blame (real or imagined), and punishing them as harshly as possible, are women and feminists. Earlier today I was reading about Mahendra Patel who spent 47 days in jail on nothing more than a woman's word. Even with video evidence proving her claims never happened he still spent months in jail and lost everything he built over decades based on nothing more than a woman's word.
/r/MensRights30/12/25 02:10 AM
8

The people making these decisions need to hear why you stopped donating and understand that if they start including men and boys in future PSA's and stop regifting funds to female-only services your donations can return. A bit of carrot to go along with the stick, so to speak.
/r/MensRights29/12/25 09:26 AM
1

The people making these decisions need to hear why you stopped donating and understand that if they start featuring men and boys in PSA's and stop regifting funds to female-only services your donations will return. A bit of carrot to go along with the stick, so to speak.
/r/MensRights29/12/25 09:25 AM
11

"Just don't be a bum and have a good personality". Blue pill is the ultimate simple answer pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 03:59 PM
1

Dating in middle school is more about learning about romantic bonding and socializing one-on-one with girls rather than "scoring" as you so crudely put it. But please don't stop. Posts like this do more to expose blue pill intransigence than anything red pill could say.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 03:55 PM
7

Middle school boys are having problems socializing but they are not the target audience because they still have blind hope things will turn around. Lonely men who have been spoon fed impotent blue pill propaganda that never went anywhere are the audience most willing to consider red pill counterarguments.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 03:51 PM
23

And mostly, this is done by the people they know rather than a stranger. Yes, it's mostly the people they choose to be with them and not the random nobodies they fear for being creepy.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 10:59 PM
11

men can want whatever the fuck they want, not my problem. Although you sure seem to be doing your best to make it your problem, for whatever reason and purpose who knows. Hopefully you'll get past it at some point.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/25 06:08 PM
83

Keeping your head down and your eyes cast astray prevents you from seeing the real threat. You focus on avoiding the risk of a lonely nobody saying hi and completely miss a violent grapist because you never dared to look up.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 05:40 PM
7

The average woman has a vocabulary well beyond the average man. They absolutely can articulate what they actually want and they do articulate it...around other women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 09:54 PM
7

He wasn't an asshole at the start. Yes he was. Ask any of your honest guy friends if they clocked this asshole from a mile away. Guys can see asshole traits women never want to acknowledge until after they break-up/divorce. I'm not sure if you're truly attracted to assholes, or you're just terrible at seeing people for who they really are, just stop pretending it's a disqualifier.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 09:46 PM
1

He wasn't an asshole at the start. Yes he was. Ask any of your guy friends if they saw this disaster coming from a mile away. Funny how they can see asshole traits women can only acknowledge after they break-up/divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 09:41 PM
1

There’s always a reason dude. Men should maybe do some more reflecting on themselves instead of believing women are just rejecting them “for no reason” Okay so there's a reason but how exactly are guys supposed to guess this reason with no feedback? Back in the day we'd get at least a hint of what the problem was when she said she did not want to see us again, but now that dating people you live/work/study with is risky and ghosting has become the default way to end everything a man who never ge…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 05:31 PM
1

whoosh
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 05:10 PM
–

Did you label yourself [Purple Pill Man] as a sarcastic joke or something? You sound like the darkest shade of feminist black pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/25 11:06 AM
2

Mothers, sisters, aunts, teachers, etc. are setting many boys up for romantic failure with virtue signaled brainwashing and just world fallacies. Red pill ignores a lot of nuance and oversimplifies many issues, but at least it does not kick men while they're already down. If you're not attractive enough for blue pill dating and not charismatic enough for red pill dating then black pill is there to accept and validate you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 08:15 PM
5

The men I've known as perpetual failures (romantically) were often selfless to a fault. The men who were selfish beyond belief did just fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 07:51 PM
3

She's a self-acknowledged unrepentant cheater. The only thing she shares with incels is a perpetual distrust of other genders. If love is what she wanted she'd have found some and moved on long ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 08:17 PM
1

Ricky Gervais is a supremely confident bully type and George Carlin was tall and attractive when he was dating age. Kevin Hart is the only one that comes close to fitting into her agenda and he's crazy famous. It's almost like she keeps blindly repeating this same lazy trope without considering what it's actually saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/25 08:11 PM
18

The silence is deafening.
/r/MensRights14/12/25 07:34 PM
19

there's a need to start that conversation on a gendered leaning due to an already existing imbalance. The existing imbalance is that girls are presumed to be wholesome and innocent while boys are presumed to be guilty and malicious. How does expanding and formalizing a preexisting gender imbalance make anything better?
/r/MensRights14/12/25 07:32 PM
0

I was born to a woman who thought a lot like you did, but I wish I was never born and never met or knew her. I can only hope someone like you never gives birth to a boy because I would never wish my fate on anyone else.
/r/MensRights08/12/25 08:59 PM
1

Also, a lot of women out-earn and/or out-save men money-wise as well. It must be easy when women enjoy most of available financial help while assigning dating and courtship costs to men.
/r/MensRights08/12/25 08:54 PM
0

I don't know any man who wants his own children to suffer financially. The only thing most men want is some evidence the money they send is actually going to the child, which no state in the union allows.
/r/MensRights08/12/25 08:49 PM
4

How the "Octomom" was covered by state and federal welfare is beyond my comprehension. It just goes to show how lopsided our safety net has become. Endless financial help for the laziest and least productive moms but no financial consideration for even the most honest and agreeable fathers. Even if they lose their house, car, career, and savings to a deadbeat mom the courts insist they can make more wealth materialize simply by willing it into existence.
/r/MensRights08/12/25 08:46 PM
2

You do know that stat you mentioned is about heterosexual relationships before being with a woman, right? The study I saw did not say "back when you were still straight" which is what it would need to say to mean what you claim it does. I've seen a lot of domestic violence myself, enough to call it an epidemic, but 90% of it has come from women. Which makes sense since (unlike men) very few women are told to never hit anyone for any reason and if they do lash out and hit someone they generally g…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 07:51 PM
2

Sounds like a relationship with modern women is not for him. Perhaps the reason lesbian couples beat the shit out of each other is because modern women are horrible at relationships. With neither side being raised to do all the work to keep the other partner happy they end up with two abusive parasites who starve the relationship to death.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 06:50 PM
5

Yes, we can all thank guilt-by-association for explaining why most women dislike most men.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 06:37 PM
6

So, that's how they value sex. Just collecting notches i guess. Yeah, the guys who can never find a partner are probably just looking to collect stories of all the times they had sex. That must be it. If only they focused on improving the thing they never get a chance to try they'd finally be desirable and have more options. No absurd cart-before-horse thinking here.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/25 06:32 PM
1

The first several times I approached it was because a girl looked right at me and smiled warmly. Those all turned out to be miscues so I soon realized I needed to look for more than that. After a series of rejections I would wait for another “obvious” hint to happen before I would approach the next time. Eventually it got to the point that I needed several seemingly blatant hints before I would bother showing any interest and even that was not enough in most cases. Some guys can pull it off but …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 08:33 AM
1

"Your male ancestors might have done some bad shit to one or more women, but they and their presumed victims are dead so someone you never wronged is going to treat you like shit and call it progress." Feminists intentionally confusing opportunistic vengeance for some sort of inter-generational justice is the new modern day chauvinism.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 10:42 PM
1

Friend-zoning and pump-n-dump are two sides of the same coin. One dangles fake commitment and the other dangles fake interest in order to manipulate the target into providing something of value.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 10:02 PM
5

Answer being lies and abuse tactics so they can feel in control. Answers being tactics that work but may feel wrong or manipulative since most boys are raised to believe blue pill logic. If a man is attractive enough the blue pill will probably work, but if he's below average adhering to the blue pill only leads to shame and misery.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 09:59 PM
4

Men are much more likely to be avoidant in relationships compared to women but okay. According to the articles I read average men are far more likely to hang on and far less likely to give up on a relationship, even to their own personal detriment. They are also more likely to forgive cheating and less likely to initiate a separation. Which is understandable since finding a mate is harder for men. Men becoming more socially alert and more willing to cut bad actors out of their lives would be a g…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 09:55 PM
3

Your feelings aren't reality no matter how much you believe them to be. Almost everything you say could be used to invalidate your own posts. It's almost like you've never had to endure a real debate in your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 09:50 PM
10

Good. From what I've seen most women are terrible judges of character and even those who find a good kind guy cannot handle the typical ups and downs of a real relationship without abandoning a partner they supposedly love.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 09:47 PM
1

This is an personal anecdote, this has no basis in reality or the general population. Millions of men are living these anecdotes and although imperfect the red pill does have answers for them. All the blue pill has is endless blaming and shaming for a life devoid of success. The world doesn't revolve around you and your feelings. I guess it revolves around you and yours then?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 09:43 PM
2

A woman not giving up her pussy to a guy is abuse to these men I have to laugh Do you also laugh at women who think giving it up to a man that bangs and leaves was abusing her?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 09:40 PM
8

Being friends with someone as an abusive dating tactic is wild That's not what "friend zoning" means. It means she knows he wants more and rather than shut it down she dangles just enough closeness to make him think he might get what he wants while never giving in. The result being that he'll do almost anything in the hope she'll eventually change her mind. The red pill says men should watch out for this and shut it down themselves for their own sanity. The blue pill has no answer for this becau…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 09:30 PM
32

I assumed they still wanted subpar men to think they had a chance so they'd keep doing all the hottest, nosiest, and most dangerous jobs without complaining. If you read feminist forums they're fine with millions of depressed men teetering on the verge of suicide but super annoyed at the idea of men discussing how lonely and isolated they are.
/r/MensRights05/12/25 05:26 PM
11

You’re severely overestimating men’s ability to hide their views on women Every woman I know has story after story of all the horrible men she regrets being with. So were they all blind to the guy's views or did they simply not care until the honeymoon period was finally over?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 05:13 PM
17

It may have started as a counterargument to the red pill, but the primary tenets of blue pill seem to be a bunch of survivor bias and just world fallacies. Red pill gets a lot wrong but at least it does not pretend every good kind person wins in the end. Which is probably why the main movement is from blue pill to red pill rather than the reverse.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 05:10 PM
4

"My girlfriend tried online dating as a man, and she was surprised how EASY it was" - nobody says that. No but they do say "just be X, Y, and Z and women will be happy to date you" as if it's super obvious to fix. If it's so simple and easy why are Blue Pillers not showing their Lonely Guy friends following Blue Pill advice to success?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 05:02 PM
26

I'm sure she'll repay his life savings now that she can collect a $200,000 salary after years of financial help and unpaid emotional labor. No chance she just moves on like he owed her everything in return for fickle love. Right?
/r/MensRights04/12/25 10:53 PM
1

The concept of withholding intimacy for moral or religious reasons is not considered "sex positive" by today's meaning. Where I live most religious girls were just as sexually active as atheist girls. The main difference was that they said yes to the back door and no to the front door.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 05:57 AM
22

A woman's job or money changes nothing for a man. Her money is her money and there is no socially acceptable method for a man to push her to spend it on him like women can.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 06:41 PM
16

Protecting loyal and grateful women is a noble act, but since those no longer exist I see no reason to continue trading our lives for theirs. Compare social media accounts of Ukrainian women living their best lives with telegram footage of the tortured and mutilated Ukrainian men and tell me how their sacrifice is recognized let alone honored.
/r/MensRights30/11/25 06:18 PM
12

If I were in your shoes I'd consider taking this to an employment lawyer and see if it's actionable. Women have been able to win judgements that let them retire for less than what you're describing.
/r/MensRights30/11/25 04:33 AM
76

Scammers and blackmailers have pivoted toward targeting boys because they have no support networks, no sympathy from society, are easier to manipulate into risky behavior, and are more likely to kill themselves than to speak out when under duress. We fall all over ourselves to protect women and girls from every possible threat, but a boy who admits he's been manipulated into doing something risky or shameful is ignored or victim blamed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/11/25 03:43 PM
22

The hypocrisy is treating unwanted male approaches as creepy while still expecting men to do most of the approaching. This creates a scenario where women feel creeped out and men feel like creeps until they either luck out or lose their confidence and give up. I think what most women would say is that they're already approaching men they like and if you're not being approached it's because nobody wants you. But it's a relatively small subset of men who are actively approached by women. Which lea…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/25 06:11 PM
2

The hypocrisy is treating unwanted male approaches as "creepy" while expecting men to do most of the approaching. This creates a scenario where many men are treated like creeps over and over again until they eventually luck out or lose their confidence and give up trying. The solution is to have the "never creepy" gender do most of the approaching so that nobody has to feel creepy or creeped on. I think what most women would say is that they're already approaching men they like and if you're not…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/25 06:02 PM
7

everybody here is a seething misogynist. - Ok_Animal8250 From another thread two hours ago. Bad faith arguing is all you do.
/r/MensRights21/11/25 04:30 PM
9

Im not rage baiting man everybody here is a seething misogynist. LOL!
/r/MensRights21/11/25 04:23 PM
10

Because he’s made uncomfortable by something most people dont really care about in a university setting. In actual classes and seminars? No way would this be tolerated if men were openly blabbing about their sex life in class. You're beyond dense.
/r/MensRights21/11/25 04:22 PM
45

if you flipped the genders it'd be called "locker room talk" which is [...] completely inappropriate in a class room. Even an actual locker room is no longer appropriate for "locker room talk" if it's coming from men.
/r/MensRights21/11/25 04:11 PM
–

get a prenup and set boundaries around finances. "That's called financial abuse and it's a huge red flag." LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/25 12:18 AM
–

Not that helpful and autistic people are supposedly more likely to fall victim to frauds and embezzlers.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 11:34 PM
–

If you can reply this quickly and resolutely it's clear you're not actually digesting anything you respond to and are just mindlessly regurgitating the same talking points over and over again. On the plus side your selective gender-focused empathy does a better job of proving the OP's point than I could ever do on my own, so thank you for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 09:21 PM
–

So spend decades creating groups with men. We are but these things take time obviously. Social clubs still exist. Social clubs aren't support clubs and decades of feminist bigotry has painted men's clubs in the worst possible light. So again, it takes time to undo the damage and get things back on track. Y'all refuse and say, "nope, can't do it, because women, women, women." The only people I see refusing are the blue pills who say we can't have men's groups because they're evil and we need to s…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 09:09 PM
7

The majority of the discourse in this subreddit is "that women have it easy". Could have something to do with most PPD women having a partner they love or being happily single while most PPD men seem to have no partner, few friends and little hope of finding anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 06:28 PM
4

So why can't men be social support for each other? Men used to have thousands of male focused clubs across many social and economic strata. Then feminists said that was unfair and misogynistic and men were forced to open them to women or shut them down. The clubs that were closed no longer exist and the clubs that were opened to women were no longer suitable for issues specific to men. Even when new male focused groups are created (like Men Sheds and Movember) they are pushed to accept women who…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 06:20 PM
17

They already know, they just find it easier to punch down on lonely men with straw men nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 02:19 PM
3

How many of your mistakes and missteps were recorded in 4K UHD and uploaded to sites where they could quickly ruin reputations in your whole city, state, or even nationwide? That's the difference boys face today.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/25 07:07 PM
1

just for boys tho? If your main concerns are under-reporting, inactive prosecution, and societal indifference, then adding male victims to your social justice crusade seemed like a good match. Guess I misunderstood your goals.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 11:11 PM
1

I’m telling you that a wife could not take her husband to court for rape. You previously said it was perfectly legal to rape your wife, which is factually incorrect. It was considered assault and battery long before anyone passed a law specifically banning "marital rape." Most SA/SB is prosecuted at the state level but even at the federal level there are Western countries that restrict rape to specific genders for reasons known only to the people who wrote those laws. Also, what on EARTH makes y…
/r/MensRights13/11/25 08:53 PM
2

Your saying “marital rape was legal” doesn’t mean marital rape was legal? I'm saying that lack of a law specifically forbidding an "ice pick to the head" does not make it legal to attack people's heads with ice picks. If you want a legal hill to die on maybe you should consider how in some states it's impossible to prosecute a woman for raping a man today. Or that a man who is raped as a boy by an adult woman can be forced to pay child support to his abuser when he turns 18. Not back in the 1960…
/r/MensRights13/11/25 07:01 PM
2

Lacking a unique crime of "marital rape" does not make raping a spouse legal. It still fell under the more general charge of physical attack, like punching a parent or sibling.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 06:49 PM
5

Only in SA cases and only in a couple countries so far. It's being challenged so maybe it will go back, but anytime you see "trauma informed" justice you should read that as "with thumbs on the scale."
/r/MensRights13/11/25 06:42 PM
1

Many of the "red flags" that get the most attention (and are actually followed) are focused on things autistic guys would do or would miss. Which would make sense if autistic guys were known for treating women like shit, but if anything they seem to error on the side of being almost too enamored and supportive.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 06:34 PM
–

I've known lots of assholes in my life. None of them has ever struggled with women. Some women are able to admit this, but many others refuse to accept this could ever be true, and the advice those women give is useless to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 06:27 PM
8

SA was never taken seriously Realizing that making a claim without any evidence is not enough for a conviction does not mean we did not take it seriously. Them problem is we "fixed" the impasse by putting our thumbs on the scale to ensure "she said" would prevail over "he said." For example SA of a spouse historically wasn’t a crime but has been made one relatively recently. It was always a crime for people alive today, just like beating your spouse was always a crime. Lack of enforcement and la…
/r/MensRights13/11/25 06:19 PM
9

If men weren’t likely to r8pe a woman then no amount of protected sex wud be dangerous. The vast majority of men never grape anyone. So we kept changing the meaning until it got to the point that virtually anything behind closed doors could be called grape so long as that was how the claimant felt afterward. Not just later that day but months, years, or even decades later. At this point the accused needs a video of the claimant constantly asking for more to beat a grape accusation, except that e…
/r/MensRights13/11/25 05:47 PM
11

Let me just ask, how wud a woman’s sexual history affect whether the men were guilty or not? Why should the (presumed innocent) accussed not be allowed to introduce any history of intentionally reckless behavior that led to erroneous accusations indicating the claimant has a history of compulsive lying? We don't shield any other claimant from this sort of investigation, so why do we carve out this one specific accusation as irrefutable?
/r/MensRights13/11/25 05:24 PM
–

If a guy is ugly or autistic his chances for finding a partner are going to be extremely poor. In the past wars were the great equalizer. Men were massacred in vast numbers by weapons that did not care about looks or personality, and those who returned had decent odds since women depended on them for protection and income. Now that everything a man used to do for a woman has been outsourced a growing number of men will never find anyone. This is the new reality that nobody is telling boys and th…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 05:53 AM
13

They don't give a single flying fuck about men's issues. That's honestly the main lesson I get from reading PPD. What do women think about men? Other than the handful they allow to tip toe around them they honestly seem to despise us (if they think about us at all). Which may seem harsh but it's still an important lesson I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 11:10 PM
1

And do all men really want kids? Really really? Good point. I'd hate to bring an innocent boy into a society that assumes he's a monster, that's for damn sure, and I have no idea how to raise a non-feminist daughter so that's it for kids on my end.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 09:10 PM
2

it was mostly men that were pressuring each other to join and not women You might want to look into the White Feather Campaign sometime.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 09:05 PM
28

I've seen women punished...but only when they wronged other women or girls. So long as they only betray men and boys they barely get a slap on the wrist anymore.
/r/MensRights10/11/25 07:50 PM
5

when men say they want to be vulnerable Straw man much?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 06:18 PM
6

Disingenuous posts that intentionally misunderstand the problem used to really annoy me. Now they just make me sad for the men in your life and the way they have to tiptoe around people like you.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 06:14 PM
1

People need to earn your vulnerability. Maybe she needs to earn their emotional labor? But no, it's always the man having to earn everything, including the job of unpaid therapist and emotional whipping post.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 04:44 PM
3

due to leading sheltered lives That barely scratches the surface since a lot of boys were raised to be spineless simps by single feminist mothers.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 09:29 PM
1

My female coworkers always focus on hours worked and never on tasks completed.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 03:34 PM
1

Women work an hour more a day than men on average when you add domestic work and childcare Guess that makes up for the three hours of gabbing and watching men do the heavy lifting at work.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 03:32 PM
8

a 35 year old chubby single mom is the league of a lot of men who also don’t have much going for them The reason single moms are willing to take productive men they didn't want in their 20's is because nobody they're attracted wants to be with them anymore. The men with good jobs, bills paid, and realistic budgeting are only valued for what they can do for women who can't take care of their own needs. As soon as these men hit a rough spot or get tired of being bled dry for the sake of some other…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 09:33 PM
131

That's not true! We can have all of the hot, noisy, dangerous, and low paying jobs to ourselves.
/r/MensRights06/11/25 04:10 PM
2

Chris Farley "got pussy" because he paid for it. When he overdosed the pussy he paid for walked around him barely breathing face down on the way to the door. It's possible he was going to die anyway but by not alerting anyone (even anonymously) she made sure of it. Now tell us again how great (you assume) it is to be a jester.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 04:56 AM
5

Men: I've been told I'm hilarious and women laugh at my jokes all the time, but I've had little or no romantic success. There does not seem to be much if any correlation between being funny and being attractive. You: Your lived experiences are no match for my assumptions.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 04:46 AM
3

A woman's type is whichever man she's attracted to. For many men their type of woman is whoever accepts him.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/25 05:05 AM
6

“You’re not exactly revolting but the idea that anyone could find you romantically attractive is hilarious.” LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 07:21 PM
3

If personality is a distant secondary factor what does blue pill think is the most important factor for romantic pairing?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/25 07:17 PM
1

Recycled coffee dates avoid spending excessive money, but they also avoid creating a memorable experience, which is something most guys need to do to get anywhere in the dating sphere. I can afford one "real" date a week, but my coworker can go on four or five dates in the same time, so when she asks why I don't quadruple my odds by going out four times a week like she does I have to explain that her $20 date night is a $200 night for the guy. # GirlMath
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 08:03 PM
1

Setbacks like ridesharing to a closed venue or finding out your event tickets are invalid or the prices recently doubled. Recycled coffee dates avoid spending excessive money, but they also avoid creating a memorable experience, which is something most guys need to do to get anywhere in the dating sphere. I can afford one "real" date a week, but my coworker can go on four or five dates in the same time, so when she asks why I don't quadruple my odds by going out four times a week like she does I…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 07:32 PM
4

In middle school the girls claimed to be dating high school boys. In high school they claimed to be dating college age guys. Maybe they lied. All I know is what they said they were up to and it sounded believable at the time. I have no idea what the motive to lie would be, especially since this was before being a slut was considered healthy and normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 06:38 PM
2

It is like hanging out...with a friend who always plans, always pays, resolves any setbacks, and is shamed if they expect anything in return...with the bonus that if you should feel like fooling around you know they're ready to go. If I was a woman I'd be going out several times a week like all the other women I know. The real question is why so many perpetually single men keep trying to date women who show little or no romantic interest in them.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 06:27 PM
1

One thing I appreciate about modern women is the compassion and understanding they bring to discussions about the male experience. Their willingness to set aside assumptions and stereotypes in order to listen and learn from the lived experiences of others is very refreshing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 05:14 PM
4

I think a lot of them are autistic and were bullied or brainwashed into maladaptive coping mechanisms that are difficult or maybe impossible to outgrow if not addressed early in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 04:28 PM
10

Which is often consumed by women so no surprise that it uses the same standards women find appealing. Compare this to erotica made for straight men which features women of all shapes, sizes, and ages. Remember, the issue is not what genders actually like so much as how the content they consume differs from what they claim to desire.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 03:33 PM
–

If you are not at least a 7 or an 8 I won't even talk to you. Unfortunately some people just don't have the looks to date. I appreciate the honesty. I think part of what holds so many men back is that they get so much mixed messaging and not enough honest feedback. Then when they compare the messaging to their own experiences nothing lines up.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/25 08:58 PM
4

young sexless men are invited to join I don't know why this myth persists but no, single men are not invited and they are not allowed to attend if they ignore the rules and invite themselves anyway, your weird grape fantasy "documentary" notwithstanding.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/25 02:52 PM
9

Like other posts have mentioned, most clubs expect men to bring a woman and be admitted as a couple. A perpetually sexless man is unlikely to know anyone who will go with him as his partner and vouch for him, not to mention there's a good chance he gets kicked out anyway for failing to fit in with the rest of the participants.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/25 12:43 PM
1

Many western countries have legalized or at least decriminalized the selling of sex. Now they focus on punishing the purchase of sex. Even in the US you're more likely to be charged and convicted for buying sex than selling sex in many states. This means many years on the sex offender registry and basically being unemployable.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/25 12:34 PM
19

Most alt-sex clubs expect men to bring a woman and be admitted as a couple. They're inclusive in the sense that kinks are not shamed, but not in the sense that sexless men are wanted or admitted.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/25 12:26 PM
3

Where I live alt-sex clubs generally expect men to bring a woman and be admitted as a couple. They're inclusive in the sense that kinks are not shamed, but not in the sense than sexless men are wanted or admitted without someone vouching for them first. So then it becomes a matter of who would be willing to vouch for you if nobody knows what you're like in bed because you never get that far. Kind of a chicken and egg problem with no obvious solution.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/25 12:10 PM
3

Funny how it always takes a man to make this glaringly obvious point. Rarely made or even acknowledged by the ♀ of PPD, let alone considered in any serious sense. They come here to punch down and if one salvo does not land they simply square up and punch again.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/25 01:51 AM
1

is it bad for me to desire it? If you're a man it is. If you deserved it you'd already have more sex than you knew what to do with and if you don't have any sex then you're the worst kind of person who has ever lived. Don't bother looking up the worst people who ever lived and the women who gave them sex because that was a different era and today's women only give sex to men of the highest moral and ethical standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/25 01:39 AM
48

Even shouting is domestic abuse now...unless it's a woman shouting, then it's a cry for help.
/r/MensRights13/10/25 10:00 PM
2

But if it's a concern, just don't tell your date. That's private info anyways. I do not disagree, but it is interesting seeing a comment like this from a blue pill guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 08:14 PM
–

ugly or awkward or shy, which are not red flags Maybe not in the past but today they are huge red flags and barring some exceptional circumstance are treated like instant disqualifiers. Not saying it's right or rational, just how unsuccessful men are treated in modern dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/25 08:06 PM
2

You said there was a right way for men to say they want to raise their standards above fat single mothers with ink piercings and colored hair, he called your bluff by asking you say it the right way so we can see the difference, and you immediately folded. If anything you proved his point by tacitly admitting there is no "right way" for men to express their standards without opening themselves to criticism.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 11:12 PM
–

As men we're expected to ensure we never have an intensely negative reaction to anything and if it's unavoidable we're expected to leave and take care of it ourselves far away from anyone who might be offended or repulsed.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 07:50 AM
–

her observations may be completely 100% accurate for 2004, but it’s 2025 and I don’t think that reflects the current social landscape If anything it was more accepted to show actual sympathy and genuine compassion toward the hardships of men in the early 2000's. Many of the women on PPD seem to come here primarily to have a laugh and dunk on men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 07:42 AM
5

every single time, they...ASKED me to tell them my insecurities and weaponized it later or dumped me Same story with me and several other men I know. I don't expect much from modern society. Certainly no sympathy, empathy, or support. I only expected people to keep my personal life private and not turn my insecurities into cheap man-hating gossip or weaponize my fears against me. Turns out even that expectation was naive and misplaced.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 02:23 AM
3

Men get turned off and exhausted having to reassure partners that she’s not fat, ugly, bad teeth, annoying, etc. Where I live men are expected to show sympathy and support and dare not show disinterest let alone disapproval.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 02:10 AM
1

Men get turned off and exhausted having to constantly reassure their partner that she’s not fat, ugly, bad teeth, socially annoying, etc. Tired or not men are expected to show nothing but sympathy and support.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 02:06 AM
2

Maybe it's different for women but my therapists seemed confused and annoyed by the idea that I wanted actual solutions rather than smoke blowing platitudes that never went anywhere productive.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 01:55 AM
1

Men get turned off and exhausted having to constantly reassure their partner that she’s not fat, ugly, bad teeth, socially annoying, etc. Tired or not men are expected to show nothing but sympathy and support every time our partner brings up her latest fear or insecurity.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 01:47 AM
8

I guess the hypocrisy has become so obvious it's no longer worth arguing.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 01:41 AM
18

But it’s better than giving up or being afraid of life. Therapy is $300/hr where I live and years of going to multiple therapists has achieved nothing more than making them rich at my expense. They're even more confused at my failures than I am, but in their defense nothing in their training prepared them to help with men raised by single mothers. Maybe in another few decades they'll figure it out.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 01:40 AM
1

every single time, they...ASKED me to tell them my insecurities and weaponized it later or dumped me for having them Same story with me and dozens of other men I know. I don't expect much from modern women. Certainly no sympathy, empathy, or support. I only expected them to keep my personal life private and not turn my insecurities into cheap girl gossip or weaponize them against me. Turns out I was wrong because boundaries are "unfair" to her. Some people complain about modern women refusing to…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 01:33 AM
5

Most of my news comes from left leaning sources and I've never seen anyone on the left crying for equality for the draft / selective service. Also, women are not deployed to front line combat roles so it was always going to be men and boys being slaughtered no matter what. You're just making up shit to fit your flimsy narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 09:17 PM
1

I do not think Lysa_Bell is a narcissist, although I probably could have been clearer about that. I simply think that I would have to be a narcissist to ignore all feedback I had received and replaced it with feedback I had never received from anyone. That was the point I was attempting to make.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 07:05 PM
–

I cannot create a narrative out of nothing because I'm not a narcissist and I was raised to see my value in how much women appreciated me. I've seen many therapists but they mostly agreed with how my mother raised me (single parent projecting her insecurities onto a naive autistic boy) and did nothing to fill in the gaps or expose the fundamental flaws in her thinking. By the time I finally realized how much I was setup for failure from the start and what I should have been doing all these years…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 06:53 PM
–

Someone who reacts to 100% negative feedback with 100% positive vibes is a narcissist at best and a psychopath at worst. I'm sure some people do look at you weird, but I'm equally sure you also receive some positive reactions and are able to choose which set to focus on when evaluating your own self worth. That's the difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 06:30 PM
–

If working out and wearing provocative clothing got random men the kind of looks and compliments average women receive I'm sure they would be all over it. Even when I was looking my very best it was mostly crickets with the random sarcastic acknowledgement here and there. Many times I started to smile only to realize the compliment was entirely backhanded. That's a path that leads to self doubt rather than self confidence. It's no wonder that a gender that is openly mocked, shamed, or hated when…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 06:17 PM
15

Over on the iPhone Siri's default voice is vaguely feminine and if you want others I think it has to download them before they become active. Maybe the OS upgrade wiped out the other voices and the setting defaulted to the only voice left. I don't talk to my phone that much, except when I'm driving, and in those cases I usually have it set to a snobby sounding Australian or British woman because it "fits" the way Siri reacts to many requests. If Siri was more useful I might change it to somethin…
/r/MensRights30/09/25 06:03 PM
1

That doesn't happen in real life. I have personally witnessed several men fired for acting on mistakes and miscues that had them thinking someone was interested in them, not just at the office but in private situations outside of work hours. A typical arrest situation is like this. Guy misjudges interest, girl plays along but asks for "angel shot" or side eyes man to staff, manager calls police as a precaution when trespassing man from premises, police arrive and man is arrested for disorderly c…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 10:22 AM
6

You'll fail...get branded a creep, put on blast on TikTok, get doxxed, risk arrest or termination, lose your motivation to live...etc. This is not the time to force yourself to keep trying when every sense of self preservation is telling you to stop. Maybe future generations will return to the days when social mistakes and misfires were not so dangerous and punitive, but for now it's best to stop forcing the issue and move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 09:42 AM
1

You'll fail...get branded a creep, put on blast on TikTok, get doxxed, lose your job, risk jail time, lose your motivation to live...etc. This is not the time to force yourself to keep trying when every sense of self preservation is telling you to stop. Maybe future generations will return to the days when mistakes and misfires were not so dangerous and punitive, but for now it's best to stop forcing the issue and move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 09:38 AM
3

You seem to think we can choose what we find attractive or repulsive in a mate. Well, good luck with that. I guess you also think people can choose to be gay or straight based on the perceived morality of such behavior. Good luck with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 08:21 PM
1

Women determine how much a man being a slut matters and men determine how much a woman being a slut matters. For whatever reasons women are okay with (if not desiring of) promiscuous men but suspicious of men who rarely or never have sex. Meanwhile, men are okay with (if not desiring of) women who rarely or never had sex before them but turned off by women who treat sex like a free buffet.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 07:39 PM
–

Anxious women who would shut you down if you cold approach are much more receptive after you are thier friend Except then you're accused of being deceitful by pretending to be a friend when all you really wanted was to get into her pants. We live under a bunch of contradictory rules that only work if we can read minds, which we can't.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 09:13 AM
–

The opening premise is flawed because the OP's "gotcha" question is not a contradiction to modern women. Yes most mothers want their sons to be successful, but they also want them to be harmless and humble toward other women more than they want them to be successful romantically. That's how we got here in the first place, mothers raising sons to be extremely safe and boring despite also making them romantically undesirable.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 09:08 AM
9

feminism needs men more than the other way around In what possible way do men "need" feminism at all? Now that feminism has become an unapologetic gender supremacist movement guided by sexist bigots the only thing men need is for it to lose all power and relevance.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/25 05:00 PM
6

Who says it needs to be replaced? When I consider my options I don't see anyone that is worth half my stuff let alone half of my sanity.
/r/MensRights01/09/25 12:20 PM
1

their salary is just for themselves rather than spending it on men His money is "our" money and her money is...her money. This was always the case because feminism was always about opportunism, no de-centering necessary.
/r/MensRights29/08/25 06:41 PM
–

You're really good at being intentionally dense so you never have to understand what anyone is actually saying to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 03:01 PM
–

Taught by who? I already answered this... mostly from the women in our lives. Meaning moms, sisters, female friends, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 02:48 PM
–

Many men were taught that romantic success is based on being excessively kind and blindly supportive to women since they were children, mostly from the women in our lives. Unfortunately that's actually terrible advice and it takes a lot of clear and consistent messaging to undo all the brainwashing and gaslighting.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 07:43 AM
1

Threads like that make it so much easier to bring more men into the MR movement. Telling every left-of-center MR supporter to piss off is how we lose support.
/r/MensRights28/08/25 07:10 AM
11

Dagogo Altraide touches on several of the core issues but he also reiterates that he supports every initiative that pushed men aside and waived women ahead and he does not support rolling any of them back despite the damage they continue to cause. He basically gives up on Gen Z men and his solutions for future generations are vague, indirect, and mostly unfunded. We know what works because we've watched it work for decades, but rather than acknowledging that men are failing by design he expects …
/r/MensRights27/08/25 08:13 PM
1

I bet those men prefer a SAHM dynamic. They can’t complain about something they probably courted and intentionally sought it out. The husbands are obviously okay with it but the prevailing assumption that the men somehow demand their helpless wives never work against her will or better judgement is a myth that needs to die already.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 09:47 PM
2

makes her cum. I’d say that means he is fulfilled. "He does what she wants and that means he is fulfilled." Y'all are so brainwashed you don't even see the absurdity.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 08:28 PM
1

Most of my male coworkers are married to SAHM's. I have yet to meet a woman with a SAHD as her spouse. I'm not saying it never happens because there are exceptions published in tabloids, but it's a fraction of a fraction of SAHM's.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 08:25 PM
2

Take that money and have a great honeymoon!! Weddings are meh. You can have an amazing honeymoon for a quarter of a wedding's cost and use the rest to help establish yourselves and save for a rainy (or opportunistic) day when having some extra cash will make all the difference in the world. The only reason your friends suffer through it is for the reception. They're also good for meeting people and catching up. Weddings are one of the few places men can meet women without looking/feeling creepy,…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 07:45 PM
2

Your feelings aren't a reflection of reality, I cannot believe how many men need this to be explained to them. So men's lived experiences are blind and clueless, but women's assumptions are so objectively true they can see through any amount of time and space. LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 07:38 PM
3

Becoming unemployable to raise kids is not an option for most men, so while they may be legally entitled in concept the option is not really theirs to choose.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 07:31 PM
3

Men may be entitled to alimony in an abstract sense, but the 3% of alimony payments that are actually awarded to men are little more than a rounding error.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 07:19 PM
1

Are you unable to fathom a relationship of equals? Yes, in fact I seem to be the only one who sees a long list of "what he does/avoids for my benefit" and realizes that it's anything but equal. makes her cum. I’d say that means he is fulfilled. "He does what I want and that means he is fulfilled." Y'all are so biased and brainwashed you don't even see the absurdity of your positions.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 07:14 PM
1

Yeah that's not really true. I guess your assumption of how things work where I live is far more accurate than what I can see and hear with my own eyes and ears. Thank you for telling me what to think so I know what to say next time.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 05:00 PM
3

If someone gives up their independence to take care of kids they are entitled to support. Anything else would be immoral. If a man "gave up" his right to work so he could stay at home and acted like his wife owed him a lifetime of free support after leaving her we'd call him a bum and send him off to go live on the streets. Expecting us to live by different standards and expectations is its own kind of immorality.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 04:56 PM
1

women are brainwashed from a young age Where I live they're all being told they're perfect just the way they are and that they should never compromise or settle for anything less than perfect. It's 2025, not 1925.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 04:05 PM
2

I know you're being sarcastic but I'd need have to have zero respect for a partner to talk about them the way PPD women talk about their partners. Even when you're trying to build them up you make them sound spineless and unfulfilled. Hopefully the reality is not nearly as one sided and bleak as y'all make it sound.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 04:01 PM
1

Supporting her isn't even just empathy, it's just basic social skills. The sense of entitlement has become so extreme it's like you cannot even see the bias and hypocrisy anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 03:52 PM
2

Men are viewed as "whipped" if they express desire to marry their partners and women are viewed as not good enough if their men don't want to marry them. No, men are viewed as whipped if they express sincere doubt and disinterest only to end up bullied into it anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 03:44 PM
14

Yeah, nobody is preventing the men from trying to gaslight everyone that he's more than a well groomed prop and silent benefactor on her adult princess day.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 03:42 PM
3

Sexless guys are likely to take such suggestions literally because that's how their brain is wired. It could be due to a developmental problem or the result of routine bullying, but either way they're not going to read between the lines.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 08:10 AM
2

Women tell guys here to go to therapy to solve the deep issues that are causing the sexlessness. Saying therapy can "solve" issues causing sexlessness implies therapists can help guys get sex, but that's not how therapy actually works. At best it makes a sexless life slightly more productive and a little less depressing. If people who recommend therapists were clear and honest with the expected outcome we'd never have to discuss this again.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 07:00 AM
2

Really kept me from being vulnerable and made me numb to my emotions The only thing keeping me from being vulnerable around women is...all the times I was vulnerable around women. There's a pervasive assumption that hard men are simply born that way. If anything we are raised to be way too open and honest and have to teach ourselves to stop trusting people who favor drama and gossip over genuine bonding.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 06:47 AM
1

Most guys here confuse therapy with a dating coach. Guys who have trouble with dating are often told to go to therapy (mostly by women) if they mention these problems. It's true that therapy does little if anything to improve dating success, but it's not like guys go around dropping $300 per hour on a lark. The sooner we stop telling guys therapy will help them find a date the better.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 06:33 AM
5

"We cannot know who is safe and who is not so we default to assuming all strangers are dangerous people." Seems almost identical to me. Same concept, same motivation, same result.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 09:14 PM
8

So it's basically Donald Trump's poison Skittles metaphor? It's amazing how much liberal Feminists and conservative MAGA people view life through the same lens without realizing it.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 08:17 PM
3

Why do these not get that much exposure? Or at the very least a Netflix documentary... Any Netflix documentary would be from the girls' perspective claiming they're actually good people just acting out because they were tricked/manipulated into behaving badly, just like the documentary about the American girl who spent months badgering a male classmate into killing himself for kicks and giggles. The only time women/girls are painted in negative light is when they're caught doing something horrib…
/r/MensRights18/08/25 06:13 PM
1

Why do these not get that much exposure? Or at the very least a Netflix documentary... If this got a Netflix documentary it would be from the girls' perspective showing how they're actually good people just acting out because they were tricked/manipulated into behaving badly, just like the documentary about the American girl who spent months badgering a male classmate into killing himself and even gloating about her "accomplishment."
/r/MensRights18/08/25 06:02 PM
–

But you don’t strike me as someone who’s able to budge from your preconceived notions If by "preconceived notions" you mean "lived experiences" then I guess you're right. Women my age still expect the guy to approach, plan, and pay in exchange for showing up. BTW, "sugar daddy" refers to someone in the top few percent of wages/wealth. It's not something a regular guy can choose to be, even one who spends freely.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/25 07:53 PM
–

It’s a win-win. It sure is. What society needs is for more men to wake up and realize they're completely undateable and will never be good enough no matter what they do. The undateable men can stop dreaming and get back to being better worker cogs with more realistic goals and the dateable men will be faster to find and easier to share. Everybody wins.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/25 07:30 PM
–

So I just kind of power through the exhausting dating phases to hopefully get to the relationship. I never considered how exhausting it must be to accept someone's interest and show up to see what they planned and paid for you. Hopefully you can power through the really tough parts long enough to get to the good stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/25 07:24 PM
6

There really is a silent plurality of woman who like to be approached. This does seem to be somewhat true but what interviews and questionnaires leave out is that much of the appeal is in denying the approach, sometimes very openly and cruelly, and gossiping about it later. Most women view most men as undateable (ask them who they think is dateable in any random crowd and you'll see what I mean) so desiring the approach is mostly about being offered free validation on a silver platter.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 08:04 PM
8

I don’t know why people make these hard rules for themselves, it just results in you stomping all over your own dicks, because you think you “arent allowed” to do anything. Why? Because we were raised by feminist mothers who raised us under gynocentric ideology, which leads to doubting, questioning, and overthinking yourself into a life of perpetual celibacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 07:54 PM
35

It may feel small today but the numbers are growing fast and single men in some cultures (Japan, Korea, etc) may reach majority status in anther decade or two.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 07:39 PM
13

Men are prepped by single mothers to trust gynocentric gaslighting.
/r/MensRights13/08/25 08:46 PM
6

Any woman making a lot of money, no matter her political leanings, has every right to not date a man who makes any amount of money. I don't think anyone disputes that progressive women have the right to choose who they date, even if it makes them look like disingenuous hypocrites. The only question is why we continue taking what they say at face value.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 08:19 PM
6

She's not on the dole, either. She's on the dole in the sense that she keeps getting jobs she's incapable of doing. Where I live a man this unreliable would only get one or two chances to prove himself before any more job offers would dry up and wither away.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 06:26 PM
11

If the man gets depressed and loses his job, he is much more likely to lose access to those services. He often loses his spouse/partner in the process. Basically a man is his job. If he loses it (regardless of the reason) he is worthless to everyone, including the people he naively thinks will support him. Only when he is completely abandoned does he realize his true value to society, which is nothing. And that's why so many men die from suicide.
/r/MensRights08/08/25 02:45 PM
3

But then he has no idea what he did wrong Have you read any feminists subs/forums? Ensuring men get ghosted never find out what set off the alert is intentional and women who tell men what they did wrong get shamed into submission.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 02:27 AM
1

"A guy did it so nobody can ever question why it has become the de facto way women interact with men."
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 02:23 AM
13

Men are not worth even the most minor social courtesy is more like it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 02:21 AM
6

"At this stage treating people like trinkets (objects) to be tossed aside is totally allowed."
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 02:16 AM
7

In Australia the judicial branch is just as biased as the legislative and executive branches so I doubt most lawsuits would go anywhere productive.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 05:23 PM
115

Women: Men need to open up more. Men: expresses feelings Women: Now I have every private fear and failure I need to crush him emotionally and spread as gossip to my girlies.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/25 01:56 PM
23

This and the post it's replying to match my experience exactly. The autistic boys/men who receive acceptance from women are gay/asexual. If you're cishet autistic you're treated like shit the moment you fail to mask sufficiently.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 04:29 PM
2

It’s not a debate if you agree with them, chief. See men, to be a good guy you just have to always agree with her, no matter what she thinks or why. That's the bar.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 04:16 PM
18

"It's because of your immaturity and weaponized incompetence that I'm forced to do this for you, even if you claim it's unnecessary."
/r/MensRights26/06/25 09:40 PM
9

In feminist spaces having kids is often painted as "what men have always expected of us," as if the act of procreation itself is fundamentally oppressive, while not having kids is painted as power and freedom from the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 09:37 PM
3

Where I live women and feminism are two distinct groups whereas "all men" means all men without limitation or exclusion. Of all the hills to die upon you choose this?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 04:43 PM
1

Bingo.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 04:39 PM
2

Are you saying that all women are feminists or that you cannot separate one concept from the other? Women are a vast group of people that include all manner of views and perspectives. Feminism, at least as it exists today, has devolved into chauvinistic hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 04:39 PM
–

all men All men? Feminists can't even pretend to be remotely objective anymore. You'd make a terrible man-hating mother to an innocent little boy who depended on you for guidance and support, so thank god you're not looking to become one.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 01:59 PM
–

What's it like to make generational victimhood your whole identity?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 01:55 PM
1

My grandmother said some men did some bad stuff to some women once upon a time so I'm holding you personally responsible their their presumed transgressions even though you never harmed anyone. Guilt by association. Punishment by presumption. Feminism in a nutshell.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 01:53 PM
3

Having a preference is not why they're being called out.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 01:18 PM
40

How did Australia become so anti-male? I understand Australian feminists hate men and blame them for every bad thing, real or perceived. I understand Australian feminists want men to feel like second or third class citizens with no hope of being believed or protected from fraud and abuse. But how did Australian men end up going along with it? Do most Aussie men never vote? It just beggars belief how it got this bad without any push back. I remember reading some article where Australian governmen…
/r/MensRights10/06/25 07:55 AM
0

The honest answer is that we don't really know. It's not like there have been routine studies to back this up. But god forbid we imply that the tribe of presumed innocence might be up to bad things.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 08:13 PM
2

Men had incentives to marry back then The question is what incentives the man has today. I've seen male friends go through divorce and frankly I did not see any benefit other than she expected it and he believed it meant things would get even better instead of much worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 08:09 PM
1

Now marriage gives both parties completely equal rights and its cultural significance has persisted. I've watched friends go through divorce and from what I've seen it's not equal at all. When Covid hit family court was being streamed from Zoom and that really proved how completely dysfunctional modern marriage has become.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 08:07 PM
1

I find it interesting that "social norms" and "expected but not demanded" is considered a worthy counterargument.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 07:52 PM
1

Marriage also exists to preserve accumulated wealth. These days marriage exists to distribute accumulated wealth. I used to think this was an exception or exaggeration but watching family court over zoom during Covid opened my mind to the reality of modern marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 03:04 PM
1

I mean they wouldn't be fucking the married man if the married man just kept his vow and stayed loyal to his wife, since he's the one obliged to do so - not the other woman So the "other woman" has no agency of her own and depends entirely on men to do all the decision making for her? Do people who talk like this even realize how absurd this sounds?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 03:00 PM
1

I don't. But I've seen what happens to men who do. I cannot even count the times I've heard women proudly explain they will not do something in the job description because it's "man's work." And rather than point out the hypocrisy the men are expected to rush in and do it for her. Imagine a man saying something like that and not being fired. It's absurd and hypocritical but that's the era we live in.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 07:13 PM
–

Making every gender-specific benefit open to single men at equal numbers would be a good start (tuition, work leave, legal aid, victim support, anti-violence measures, etc.). Making same crime = same punishment and returning he said / she said to a draw in our justice system would also be huge. Look at the random guys who have been put away on nothing more than a woman's accusation only to be freed weeks or months later (with no job or support) when video shows they did nothing wrong. His life i…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 07:06 PM
1

It's also accepted to punch down on unattractive lonely single women. Where I live if you're a guy openly blaming women for virtually anything (even softly or mildly) that attitude will get you a trip to HR and in most cases an exit interview. Conversely, calling a guy an inkwell simply because you don't like him has never resulted in any disciplinary action in any situation I've witnessed.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 06:56 PM
–

You previously asked about society, and I answered as asked. Now you're saying the government specifically. Okay, how about requiring that any benefit available to women or families is also available to single men? That way we're on an even playing field without respect to gender or partnership.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 05:32 PM
8

I don't get why MRA's think being vulgar helps make their point. It just makes it easier for women and people in the middle to discount what are often valid criticisms. Feminism can also get really vulgar, but the difference there is that they enjoy mainstream acceptance while MR advocacy is still a fringe concept in the minds of many.
/r/MensRights05/06/25 05:28 PM
–

What exactly do you think society should be doing for you in terms of your dating life? Society can stop judging straight men based on their success/failure with impressing prospective romantic partners. Being a lonely or isolated man does not mean you're a bad person, or that you lack moral fiber, or that you're lazy or stupid, but that's how society treats you. Punching down on lonely men is so accepted and so popular it's even become a cherished slur used to shut down any dialog or dissent.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 05:20 PM
–

Well, society has a vested interest in people not dying in a gutter. I guess so long as they die by their own hand somewhere outside a gutter it's all good. Even the people who seem to take this seriously rarely go further than "take the means of death away" as if that somehow solves the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 03:36 PM
20

Question For MenQ4M: if women don't respond well to men being vulnerable, why would we push so hard for it? In my experience it's so you can gain deeply personal knowledge that can be leveraged and weaponized against us when you're angry or turned into cheap drama or petty gossip when you're bored. I do not know a boy or man who really opened up to a woman or girl without having that information eventually used against him at some point.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 08:20 PM
1

The studies that have investigated this claim have found it to be true, even when accounting for wealth and access to the best lawyers. This includes who is investigated, charged, plea bargained, convicted, paroled, and pardoned.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 09:18 PM
1

I'm not gonna doxx my location/neighborhood for some random on the internet who's clearly determined to not give a shit either way. If the only examples you can find are in your personal neighborhood then that's not very convincing as a systemic problem. But you could easily go search through your local sex offender registry and find tons of slap of the wrist nothing sentences for conviction if you wanted to. I agree there are tons of wrist slap punishments for sex offenses, just not for men in …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 09:10 PM
2

You implied gender plays no role in who is offered the plea of manslaughter even when evidence implies premeditated murder. In reality who is offered plea bargains and how much the offer benefits them is largely based on their gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 09:07 PM
38

AI is a reflection of internet bias and popular culture. If almost everything posted in the last decade is trying to lift one gender up while pushing the other gender down this is what you'd expect to see.
/r/MensRights24/05/25 09:01 PM
1

https://www.google.com/search?&q=studies+show+that+gender+impacts+legal+punishment
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 04:54 PM
0

No names, dates, times, dockets, locations...as per usual.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 04:52 PM
1

Even when it is pretty clear that rape happened or when it happened to a minor. If it was clearly rape how did they beat the clear evidence? Or is "pretty clear" a euphemism for she said/he said?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 04:51 PM
1

No names, dates, times, dockets, locations...as per usual.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 04:45 PM
8

It's exceedingly rare for a woman to be convicted of murder since they are usually allowed to plead down to manslaughter if they're prosecuted at all. These sources do not describe any methodology for how they came to their conclusions, a handful of glossed over Sarah Boones is not very convincing to me, and I do not support a license to kill for anyone who claims prior abuse (which seems to be the hope of the second source).
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 03:30 PM
1

First of all, it's exceedingly rare for a woman to be convicted of murder since they are usually allowed to plead down to manslaughter or less. Second, these sources cherry pick their glossed-over examples, do not describe any methodology for how they came to their conclusions, and seem to be pushing for a license to kill for any woman who claims prior abuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 03:27 PM
1

If women consistently get lighter sentences, then it’s female privilege. If everyone does, it’s a broken system. If [males] always get lighter sentences, it’s male privilege. Get your neutral basis and objective logic out of here.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 03:18 PM
1

In my country we have ridiculously light sentencing for rape and it's often in news as wtf. What is a typical sentence for a conviction of rape?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 03:14 PM
-1

I looked up a guy setting a woman on fire, he was charged with attempted murder and facing life in prison. I'm not saying Australia only looks at gender but it's funny how the outcomes always line up the same way every time. It's also weird how when a women attack a man or girls attack a boy it is recorded and reported as "violence against women and girls" as if the very idea that a man can be a victim or tell the truth is an absurd concept.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 03:08 PM
12

I spent a few minutes looking up a man who set fire to a woman. He was charged with attempted murder, which allows life in prison. Far cry from her 4.5 years and who knows how long before she's paroled or pardoned by Australia's "trauma-informed" judicial system.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 03:24 AM
1

So why do you ridicule and our women down and tell them they don’t deserve good treatment? For what? Are you just making things up now? You seem to be one of the most disingenuous posters on here. Get help.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 03:13 AM
–

I don’t get bent out of shape if dudes ignore me and flock to a younger, prettier woman. That’s just life. 🤷‍♀️ Would you get "bent out of shape" if all dudes not only avoided you but also told you to go away when you approached them?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 08:24 PM
2

If they aren’t treating you well then you should leave. We are.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 07:47 PM
–

He's right about everything except the sweatsuit. Obviously do not dress like a bum and do not let yourself go, but the high heels, fancy purses, and elaborate makeup sessions are completely unnecessary for many straight men. The only guys I've heard talk about that stuff like they actually cared were gay or bi.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 07:00 PM
–

"I only have agency when it benefits me more than being helpless."
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 06:37 PM
1

I noticed you replaced "expected" with "wants" before attacking your straw man. Obviously everyone wants good treatment, but on a first date you have no idea who is showing up, and since it's socially acceptable to treat men like shit we really have no idea what we're getting into. Everything from shouting, to throwing drinks, to hitting us, or texting her boyfriend where we are and smiling as she waits for the drama to show up. That's the reality of dating as a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 06:27 PM
-1

I agree that men and women can be healthy and helpful friends (so long as neither party is love sick for the other). It's men befriending feminists that creates problems IMO.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 08:25 PM
1

I agree that men and women can be healthy and helpful friends (so long as neither party is love sick for the other). It's men befriending feminists (and boys raised by feminist mothers) that creates problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 08:21 PM
8

Does regurgitating just world fantasies make you feel better?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 03:43 PM
26

Most of my negative views came from the things they said and did in my presence, not just to me personally, but to the best and brightest men in their lives. I have a lot of faults and frailties so if they only screwed with me it would be one thing, but I've seen them casually burn some of the finest and most honorable men I've ever met, as if they were worthless refuse to be tossed and forgotten. That was something that could not be explained away no matter how hard they tried to defend it and …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 03:32 PM
13

As an American man you have to avoid being around kids or you risk being seen as a creep or a predator. That prevents the kinds of interactions that would previously create a bond and desire to have your own family some day. There have been times kids fell down in front of me and I hesitated helping them up because I did not want to be accused of anything. It feels horrible to view everything through that lens but that's the reality of living in the US.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 09:23 PM
1

It's not just about valuing mothers. As a guy you basically have to avoid being around kids or else you risk being seen as a creep or a predator. That prevents the kind of interactions that would normally create a bond and desire to have your own family. There have been times kids fell down in front of me and I hesitated helping them up because I did not want to be accused of anything. It felt horrible to view everything through that lens but that's the reality of the world around me.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 09:20 PM
1

Birthrate is inversely correlated with feminism, which implies feminist people will eventually extinct themselves, which I fully support. The boys being brainwashed by single feminist mothers are better off unborn.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 07:42 PM
1

There are some Canadian court cases with judgements that look more like the Australian system. It's not the standard outcome (yet) but the possibility is there if you get an activist judge. The idea that anyone should financially benefit from the normal and routine event of separating from a romantic partner is absurd. Outside of paying for some movers to get her stuff out and the basic needs of kids both parties wanted (at the time) everyone should be expected to plan and pay their own way.
/r/MensRights15/05/25 03:06 PM
4

My male friends know I'm not gay and if they see me cry they know it's serious because there is no social incentive for a man to sniffle his way into sympathy or to dodge the repercussions of his in/actions. If they're uncomfortable in that moment it's because they want to know what's wrong and what they can do to help. This is different and distinct from the women to push and prod you to show more emotion only to mock any hint of fear or self doubt for social leverage or as entertainment for th…
/r/MensRights15/05/25 02:52 PM
16

The only people who have repeatedly pushed me to show more emotion only to stab me in the back by gossiping to all and sundry about showing emotions were women. That sounds like toxic femininity to me.
/r/MensRights15/05/25 06:30 AM
18

They might keep them as girls but with a huge dose of "trauma" done by men and other boys who were the "real" cause. Even when they dare to show girls doing horrible things it's never their fault. It's always males and the patriarchy that is at the root of everything bad.
/r/MensRights14/05/25 12:26 PM
11

It's not insane, literally a prenup is all that's needed to get rid of the risks. All a prenup does is prevent the less productive/frugal spouse (usually the woman) from taking more than 50%. That's literally all it does.
/r/MensRights14/05/25 12:13 PM
8

I believe people should be more accustomed to the idea of marriages just not lasting Exactly. And since divorce means the more productive/frugal spouse (usually the man) loses 50% (or more) of his savings as his partner is treated to a legal robbery of his assets there is no point in getting married anymore. Sounds like we agree more than we disagree.
/r/MensRights14/05/25 12:11 PM
21

Once upon a time it was to join families (and their resources) to help both of you in times of need and to keep your relationship monogamous. You invited everyone to enjoy a celebration but also as a notice to the village that you were official and to stay away from your girl. Now that we've banned any social shaming or negative cultural repercussions for manipulative and abusive women marriage has lost all meaning for men.
/r/MensRights14/05/25 11:59 AM
23

More men are finally starting to wise up on marriage, but what many men still do not realize is that in devoutely feminist countries like Australia and Canada casual cohabitation can create many of the same pitfalls and lopsided obligations as an actual marriage even if you do nothing to formalize your relationship.
/r/MensRights14/05/25 11:51 AM
18

If she's college reeducated then it's apparently closer to 90% of the time.
/r/MensRights14/05/25 11:49 AM
2

That's the kind of thing wealthy 60yo men say about dating dirt poor 18yo girls. If that's how you really view your friendship that's your prerogative, but I hope they can find better friends in the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 08:02 PM
2

Once either party has developed strong romantic interest you're no longer friends. Telling them to pretend to remain friends in spite of their needs not being met and their hope directed at someone who will never love them back is selfish and manipulative. People living inside of the friend zone bubble are unlikely to realize this right away. It can take months or even years to see things clearly and the wasted time and effort is where the resentment comes from.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 07:31 PM
3

I consider unrequited feelings to be the problem of the person with the feelings. And whoever cares for that person. If you don't care about their well being what kind of "friend" are you? From my perspective, you sound like a bit of an ass because you'd end a friendship because you think you know better than the other person. I would pause the friendship in the hope that breaking away can put them on a better path where they can find what they need elsewhere. If trying to do the right thing bas…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 07:17 PM
4

Because why would you want to date someone you think is manipulative and abusive? Some people do abuse the situation by dangling the prospect of getting closer knowing full well it's never going to happen. That's where the anger and resentment comes from. I simply cannot imagine keeping a girl as a friend knowing (1) she wants something romantic from me and (2) is not getting that need met anywhere else. Not only because it would be awkward but also because it would be unfair to her. It blows my…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 03:28 PM
4

She really cannot fathom that men don't know what she's thinking and pointing this out is making her so mad she needs italicized all-caps to SNARK SCREAM it at you. LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 03:22 PM
8

Maybe later on when feelings have died down and they've found someone else, but until then the person with unrequited feelings is in a vulnerable state and easily manipulated. Which is why "friendzoning" is not simply being friends and represents a lopsided and easily abused romantic interest.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 03:17 PM
25

Look at the photos from actual human trafficking busts and it's a sea of men and boys going to work as manual labor slaves. When found they're sent back in cuffs and chains. Nobody cares how they got there or why. Meanwhile the photos that accompany stories of sex trafficked women are almost always stock images with a story about how she was tricked into doing the exact same job she did at home and boy does everyone care now. If you give a prostitute a ride across state lines you're basically a …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/25 03:54 PM
1

Look at the photos from actual human trafficking busts and it's a sea of men and boys going to work as manual labor slaves. When found they're sent back in cuffs and chains. Nobody cares how they got there or why. Meanwhile the photos that accompany stories of sex trafficked women are almost always the same stock images with a story about how she was tricked into doing the exact same job she did at home. If you give a prostitute a ride across state lines you're basically a sex trafficker in the …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/25 03:50 PM
14

Japan has more adult virgin men than anywhere, birth rate and romantic pairings are falling off a cliff, and the man is still expected to cover all the financial needs of his family as if the economy never imploded. The method for showing a Japanese girl you like her is to take her out on several "friendship dates" where you pay up but expect nothing in return and eventually ask for a real date where most of the time they'll decline. Decades of stagflation and static gender expectations means ma…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/25 03:33 PM
72

A male teacher was recently sentence to ten years for...licking feet. No sex or nudity. If that's where the line is drawn fine but how can they explain ten years for that and five years for this? The discrepancy is absurd. Worst I've seen so far was an 18y daughter who killed her father by dousing him with drain cleaner (long terrible death) for the sin of being too drunk to take her to get her hair done for her birthday. She got one year in jail, literally one single year, which meant she was i…
/r/MensRights09/05/25 05:42 PM
13

Which is why they're turning every government support system into a females-first or females-only program. Even lopsided divorce paydays and legal paternity fraud is not enough for modern feminism.
/r/MensRights09/05/25 02:31 PM
23

False allegations are rare. The problem is that feminists only count impossible claims (three states away, in jail, or dead) as false while accusations that cannot be proven either way (he said, she said) are treated as always true. That's how the narrative "rapists are rarely prosecuted and nobody fabricates accusations" becomes mainstream dogma; it's based on the premise that women are incapable of lying and men need to "prove a negative" to be trusted.
/r/MensRights08/05/25 09:25 PM
2

If any man is desperate enough to try it he'll probably end up dead under suspicious circumstances.
/r/MensRights06/05/25 03:32 PM
18

They'd lose their job, family and friends would abandon them, and they'd probably end up on the street.
/r/MensRights06/05/25 03:21 PM
39

It was a story on Radio Lab where the female author played yes/no games with interested men and then asked them why they had tried to coerce her into sex on a live microphone. The men were clearly confused and distressed to be tricked into this sham of a documentary but you could hear how much she relished being in control of the narrative and leaving them no option but to apologize for being manipulated into her trap. It was fucking disgraceful.
/r/MensRights05/05/25 05:17 PM
1

It was a story on Radio Lab where the female author used the chance of sex to play games with men and then brought them on her podcast to ask them why they tried to coerce/abuse her on a live microphone. The men were clearly confused and distressed to be tricked into this but you could hear how much she relished being in control of the narrative and leaving them no option but to apologize for...falling into her trap. It was fucking disgraceful.
/r/MensRights05/05/25 05:12 PM
2

Can you guys debunk them? If being male is all it takes to be gifted a privileged life why are so many boys and men doing so horribly? Why are men and boys giving up and killing themselves at an ever increasing rate while women can wear performative harm like a badge that engenders endless sympathy? Each imbalance that feminism sought to "equalize" is now even worse but in the other direction. How do "gender studies" curriculum explain the objectively negative fates of men and boys without resor…
/r/MensRights05/05/25 03:50 PM
1

He also has the worst approval at the 100-day mark for the last 80 years. He's a complete and total fuckup. He fancies himself like a mafia don but unlike the mob he's the only person I know who could bankrupt a casino. Posts like yours remind me of Chris Rock asking what black people thought they "won" after the OJ Simpson trial. Trump is the white version of OJ Simpson.
/r/MensRights05/05/25 03:22 PM
3

Correction: Be as kind to them as they are to you. The moment they start judging or gaslighting you over sexual preferences any obligation to continue being kind is over.
/r/MensRights28/04/25 08:09 PM
0

There is a vast gulf from dressing like a 1950's housewife to growing your hair like a feral primate and shaving your head like a fascist instigator. Your straw man responses expose the flaws in your gaslighting nonsense.
/r/MensRights28/04/25 07:55 PM
0

Are you sure you don’t want women taking care of their appearances? By all means take care of your appearance, but if the makeup is too tedious and expensive, the shoes too uncomfortable, and the dress too impractical then pick something else rather than bitch at us. If you cannot find what you want talk to the women and gay men who design your clothes, not the straight men with no say in anything. why do they continue to do those things after they’re in a relationship? Too keep the fashionista …
/r/MensRights28/04/25 04:08 PM
18

I've had women ask me why men expect them to affix all manner of makeup, wear uncomfortable shoes, and bring a purse because they can't have pockets. I try to tell them that most men do not care about such things and it's mostly the "fashionista" sisterhood that enforces these expectations, but they blame the "patriarchy" anyway.
/r/MensRights28/04/25 04:01 PM
1

RFK is still going back to the vaccine = autism theory, which is the ONLY causation that has been investigated enough to be reasonably excluded at this point. Will he investigate plastics, pesticides, or preservatives? Apparently not. He only seems interested in going after vaccines, again, for the 100th time in a row. His comments about autism are so ignorant they'd be laughable in any other situation, but this is who we put in power so I guess this is what we get.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 04:03 PM
11

The user and the sub are still here. I don't bother with the Instathot app so I cannot comment on that.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 02:39 PM
14

"Woman killed in India, men in her group failed to step up and save her."
/r/MensRights24/04/25 08:54 PM
5

Bingo. This is the reality. "Whoever asks pays." They know it's almost always the man asking but they pretend it could be anyone despite never asking any guys out themselves. If you ask them if they've ever paid for a man they'll bring up the one time they covered a dates meal but leave out his card being declined or his wallet being stolen. Even when I've seen women throw themselves at a man in the hope of a date they still expect him to pay.
/r/MensRights24/04/25 04:17 PM
8

I think splitting is not convenient, better to alternate paying. Yes, it's so much better the guy pay for 100 first dates that mostly go nowhere on the chance he'll be rewarded with 10 paid second dates.
/r/MensRights24/04/25 04:11 PM
31

Judge still has to approve the offer (usually).
/r/MensRights22/04/25 03:33 PM
–

Agreed. Until they had the right to vote it's hard to argue they were not oppressed. We're several generations into women voting so saying they're oppressed today is not a compelling argument to me. Even losing the right to abortions in some states required a majority of white American women to vote with the party that reversed RvW.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/25 07:56 PM
4

liberal white women Avoiding western women is the easiest way to avoid trouble. Employers, prosecutors, and legislatures consider them to be infallible angels despite being the most toxic tribe around, so you're better off leaving them alone.
/r/MensRights21/04/25 04:18 PM
–

You don't have to marry or date to end up owing decades of support spent however she pleases. Any act of plausible procreation puts you at risk.
/r/MensRights18/04/25 02:45 PM
7

I used to agree, but now that apps have reached dystopian wasteland status, shopping/exercising/errands are off limits, bar hopping is mostly for groups and couples, and casual third spaces are going extinct I'm not sure where anyone is supposed to meet anymore. At some point we need to reopen the places we spend half our waking lives.
/r/MensRights18/04/25 02:33 PM
2

It's not the law in most states, but in states where it does exist they generally only apply it if you talk or act like spouses. So long as you stick to just being partners you're good, but you need to correct any "jokes" or "mistakes" your partner makes about this since failure to clarify can be interpreted as agreement.
/r/MensRights17/04/25 08:37 PM
9

It's in Australia, Canada, and US for starters. In most US states it's avoidable so long as you never say or do anything that implies you're spouses, and you also have to correct the record anytime she implies otherwise. Supposedly the best protection is a cohabitation agreement.
/r/MensRights17/04/25 07:21 PM
17

If you do not want sex and he needs sex to feel wanted then you're incompatible and would probably be better off with other partners. It's not like desire can be bartered or negotiated so if you're done with sex and he's growing increasingly frustrated then it's probably time to cut your losses and move on.
/r/MensRights17/04/25 06:38 PM
7

He's constantly sending money to BM for his child, because she refuses to ask for child support, which I find off. By not going through the legal system whatever he sends her will not be counted as paid support and when she does file he'll have to pay everything from day one all over again. He'll also be in arrears for lack of support payments, which can impact him in so many negative ways. He's basically walking into a trap and if he does not get this resolved he could be in a very bad way. Men…
/r/MensRights17/04/25 06:29 PM
3

Today, more clearly than ever, I feel like the whole world is against me. I can see why you think that. Most Americans know fuck all about the world outside our country, and many don't even know that much about anything outside their own state. One of our parties has decided dictators are better friends and completely turned on democracies like yours. The other is so tone deaf they lost all their power and were relegated to the minor leagues. But there are still many of us who support you anyway…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/25 08:26 PM
25

If you go into women's subs or autism subs it's women lamenting a lack of diagnosis (and lifelong debilitating social impediments) as if being autistic is a good thing. As always it's presented as "the male-dominated and male-focused medical industry is ignoring the needs of women" rather than "autism is such a minor issue for women that it's barely noticed until it reaches extreme levels." I guess women are so focused on hugging and supporting each other for every potential and perceived setbac…
/r/MensRights14/04/25 03:20 PM
17

That is not Feminism. When I brought up some problems that modern men struggle with today my own feminist mother said "good, now you know what it feels like" as if I had been secretly harassing, assaulting, and battering women my whole life. She did not see me as the son who had always tried to do right by her and every other woman at the expense of my own well being, she only saw a "man" who deserved to be treated like shit for the presumed actions of other men.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 03:20 PM
1

Bear in mind the only ones commenting like this are the trashiest of the trash. I mean at least they're saying the quiet part out loud; it's the women who silently agree you need to worry about.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 03:13 PM
25

This comment getting downvoted says alot about the current state of « men » (Heiley_Tler) So if women do something trashy we need to emphasize that it's not all women but when someone of unknowable gender down votes a post you agree with men as a group are guilty by association? Hypocrisy much?
/r/MensRights11/04/25 03:12 PM
1

This comment getting downvoted says alot about the current state of « men » (Heiley_Tler) So when women do something trashy we need to remind each other that it's not all women but when someone of unknown gender down votes a post you agree with men as a group are responsible?
/r/MensRights11/04/25 03:09 PM
1

Bear in mind the only ones commenting like this are the trashiest of the trash. I mean at least they're saying the quiet part out loud; it's the women who silently agree you need to worry about.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 03:06 PM
14

There is a vast distance between immediately and twenty years. Just like there is a vast distance between a regrettable hookup and aggravated sexual battery. That's what is being pointed out.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 02:31 PM
4

I think a lot of misandrist men were probably raised by feminist mothers to loath themselves and hate other men.
/r/MensRights10/04/25 09:19 PM
26

The women in my own family mock and shame men who found a way to avoid fighting in Ukraine today. My social media feeds are full of women blaming men for all of the worlds problems and shaming them for not giving their lives to ensure every woman is protected from harm at all times no matter the consequences to him. There is nothing the slightest bit absurd or surprising that women proudly and openly mocked and shamed men for not defending their honor in the Gatling gunned and mustard gassed lin…
/r/MensRights10/04/25 04:24 PM
30

Women have been forced into war plenty of times in history, maybe even more so than men sooo..... You need pictures, articles, and videos to believe an uncontested story that women mocked men for failing to fight but provide no evidence to support a counterclaim that it's men hiding behind a front line of conscripted women?
/r/MensRights10/04/25 04:12 PM
7

This is a president we’re talking about, not a bumbling comic book character. I remember when these used to be two different things.
/r/MensRights07/04/25 09:13 PM
1

However women clearly make up the majority of those who are seriously injured/killed in domestic violence situations, due to the difference in physical strength. I do not dispute this was true in the past but with the rise in so-called "pink crime" it seems to be equalizing over time. These days I see just as much violent behavior from women, including public fighting and road rage, as I do from men. If you read up on what happens to "karens" who attack partners and innocent bystanders, they mos…
/r/MensRights04/04/25 05:38 PM
4

except those two I doubt that's actually true when studied objectively. Gender A is told to never touch or hurt Gender B's feelings and take whatever Gender B dishes out regardless of the reason or severity. While Gender B is told that Gender A is deplorable, subhuman, and undeserving of empathy. It does not take a genius to guess how these two opposing directives pan out in how partners actually treat each other. When Gender A does attack Gender B it's probably because they snapped after having…
/r/MensRights04/04/25 05:16 PM
19

The specific incident I was remembering is from several years ago. It was the first time I remember the article finally admitting it was a setup from the very beginning and everybody knew it, but they still forgave the poor girls who faced no punishment and mostly just shrugged about the man's plight on the premise that it was worth it for him to get permanently screwed so "real victims" would still come forward in the future. This turned into a common refrain where the author admits it's bad fo…
/r/MensRights03/04/25 05:43 PM
11

Women and girls benefit not only with lighter sentences but also in if/what they are charged, if/what they are offered as a plea deal, if/what they are convicted of, if/when they are paroled, if/when they are pardoned, and what they can expunge from their criminal record.
/r/MensRights03/04/25 03:43 PM
48

Creepy if you're lucky. Grade school girls have openly bragged they're going to take down a male teacher with false allegations and even when the allegations are proven false his career is still gone, his social and family life still over, with no practical means of making a living wage. Meanwhile the girls who destroyed him are treated like unpunishable victims. Surely he was about to become an abuser and these poor girls could see it so they reported him, but because he had not broken any laws…
/r/MensRights03/04/25 03:36 PM
–

The government will do nothing for males be it health or education. Oh I think a lot of (re)education is on the way for boys...to become a bunch of quiet impotent eunuchs who no longer question the system that binds and blames them.
/r/MensRights03/04/25 03:21 PM
26

You seem to have a serious problem with reading comprehension.
/r/MensRights31/03/25 09:21 PM
10

I don't think it's fair to extrapolate that we have a "major problem" with boys killing girls. That is a bunch of malarkey. What do you think the accompanying curriculum is going to focus on? It's clear the government considers statistically rare inkwell murders to be an extremely widespread issue, otherwise there is no reason to show it in schools.
/r/MensRights31/03/25 08:29 PM
63

Media existing ≠ media being added to school curricula. For someone who routinely criticizes others for being biased or narrow minded you're really good at intentionally misunderstanding the problem.
/r/MensRights31/03/25 07:53 PM
2

The problem is that the bias exists at every stage of the justice system, so even if they arrest both she'll get the benefit of fewer/weaker charges, better chance of diversion, better terms and options for plea bargain, better chance of acquittal, better chance of parole, better chance of pardon, and better chance of expungement.
/r/MensRights31/03/25 03:16 PM
29

The bears are out in the forest while cities and towns are full of strange men. Where are all these bear-choosing women? In the cities and towns teaming with male humans. Watch what women do, not what women say.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 06:47 PM
25

I thought adult prostitution was legal in UK, and maybe it is, but I guess like most feminist governments they "fixed" the unfair bias of targeting sellers by moving to a system that exclusively shames, blames, and punishes buyers.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 03:56 PM
0

Moms get together as mom groups but honestly dads need dad groups even more since it would take five or more dads to counterbalance one neurotic mother's accusation of a strange man doing strange shit in a playground. Band together, support each other, be the change, and stop listening to women - they're never happy.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 03:13 PM
40

If they really thought all men want to harm them they would remain neutral or nice to avoid a confrontation that may turn violent. The fact they feel safe mocking and ridiculing strange men with impunity shows they have no fear at all.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 02:28 PM
6

I think he means drooling as in there is nothing going on upstairs, not as in they're lusting after anyone.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 02:21 PM
–

These days, no one cares about that. Women call all men bastards (AMAB) regardless of your upbringing so you're damned either way.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 02:18 PM
9

If it worked both ways sure, do whatever, but a man walking into a women's bathroom would be treated like the scum of the earth, so they should stay TF out of men's restrooms. Where I live it's legally mandated that women's restrooms have more fixtures and floor space even in situations where the genders are equally represented. This is why I want the ERA to pass and hopefully bring some actual equality to gender relations.
/r/MensRights27/03/25 09:25 PM
11

That's probably why they changed it to "equity." LOL
/r/MensRights27/03/25 09:18 PM
1

You trust a system with no checks and balances? What will you do if another party comes to power? Will you still trust the new rules then?
/r/MensRights27/03/25 09:14 PM
1

Your lawyer files a writ, the government says you're not in that location anymore, your lawyer files another writ for whatever location the government says is correct, meanwhile you get sent off to El Salvador before any judge can prevent it, the government says it no longer has you, the judge moves on to the next case of someone already reditioned to a foreign prison beyond the jurisdiction of the court. Rinse and repeat.
/r/MensRights27/03/25 09:09 PM
1

Many women say they find male bits ugly or unappealing so appealing to prurient audiences seems unlikely. Maybe it's some sort of power play in the service of misguided "empowerment." Where are all the "intimacy coaches" to warn male actors this is unlikely to be appealing to female audiences and may typecast them in more bi/gay roles.
/r/MensRights27/03/25 08:52 PM
1

All deported people have in common that they violated the border and missed the opportunity to self report in order of getting a chance to return later. None of us know who is being sent away or what they did to get on the list because the process that would confirm any of it is actually true is no longer functioning. When the courts try to exercise any corrective action the administration simply ignores their rulings. It's amazing to see how willing Americans are to give up due process and subm…
/r/MensRights27/03/25 05:47 PM
6

We're all at different stages of awakening. I'm not sure why some members feel the need to tear other members down. The title accurately represents the content of the thread.
/r/MensRights27/03/25 03:50 PM
3

single moms really don't have many great options for partners. They had many great options but they chose poorly (or were just selfish). It's the men at the peak of their ability sifting through a sea of run-through single moms who feel more compassion for the family dog that lack good options.
/r/MensRights27/03/25 03:44 PM
0

You're telling me they don't hsve a chance to clear things up when being deposed? Court hearings are how things "get cleared up" but they never take place because the shell games (moving prisoners across legal boundaries) abuses jurisdiction issues and by the time the courts have ruled on anything you're a prisoner at a jungle prison in El Salvador. US courts do not have jurisdiction over El Salvadorian prisons. Normally the state department would be your last resort, but they're part of the bra…
/r/MensRights27/03/25 03:33 PM
1

Without due process all it takes is an accusation that you're an illegal and your documents are forged. You'll be arrested and shuffled around so your lawyer has to keep filing new writs. By the time the US court rules on anything you're in some jungle prison in El Salvador. How do you get back now that you're in the custody of a foreign country?
/r/MensRights27/03/25 03:30 PM
5

If I'm a natural born American citizen, but they accuse me of being an illegal immigrant my only option is to challenge their accusation in court. By ignoring and sabotaging that process with prisoner shell games anyone can be accused of anything and sent off to almost anywhere without legal recourse. Maybe the court eventually agrees with you but you still lose years of your life and whatever savings you had fighting to get back home again. See the problem?
/r/MensRights27/03/25 03:26 AM
9

The only way we know if someone is innocent or guilty is due process in court. Without that it's just a bunch of wild accusations and "trust me, bro" answers. That's how this works. First you remove the due process and then you do whatever you want because nobody can challenge or contradict it.
/r/MensRights26/03/25 09:40 PM
25

Trump himself said "I look forward to watching the sick terrorist thugs get 20 year jail sentences for what they are doing to Elon Musk and Tesla. Perhaps they could serve them in the prisons of El Salvador, which have become so recently famous for such lovely conditions!" on Truth Social. That may seem to be limited to anti-Tesla arsonists at first glance, but the executive branch has already shown they know how to avoid due process and prevent the courts from interfering with prisoner shell ga…
/r/MensRights26/03/25 09:32 PM
6

Not every woman is a man-hating feminist.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 07:20 PM
6

You can shoot to disable or you can shoot to kill. Shooting to disable saves your life. Shooting to kill prevents anyone from contradicting your self-serving story. Women in the West are being granted one free murder of a man (and sometimes more) so this increasingly common outcome is not surprising at all.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 07:17 PM
5

In addition to your sexist quota problem for jobs and scholarships your cohab laws are competing with Australia for giving female partners a free payday after every breakup. You also have the usual "offering to sell is legal, offering to buy is illegal" hypocrisy and your career cancelling is as bad as any other Western country.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 03:48 PM
29

Can you imagine if they were saying similar things but about young girls It would probably be more accurate in that case. Girls are lured by the "she's always right, he's always wrong" rules of toxic feminism while boys are blamed and persecuted out of the mainstream whether they want to be or not.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 02:58 PM
1

Can you imagine if they were saying similar things but about young girls What's funny is that it would be far more accurate in that case. Girls are lured by the "she's always right and never wrong" rules of toxic feminism while boys are simply pushed out of the mainstream for "always blamed for fault and never credited for good behavior" whether they want to be or not.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 02:51 PM
1

The gender flip would be if an older woman solicited dick pics from an underage boy then said his dick was average. According to your own post the man never requested pictures of her tits. So your gender flip is bullshit, just like the rest of your posts. I've never sent a d-pick, I've never considered sending one, and would refuse to send one if asked/begged. Nor have most of the men I know and associate with. You'd have to be stupid beyond belief to do that since it could put you on a career-d…
/r/MensRights22/03/25 09:18 PM
6

The ways boys lash out have been made illegal while the ways girls lash out are still ignored. Both cause lasting and sometimes life long damage, but we pretend one is terrible and the other his harmless. One side is rarely charged, rarely convicted, and rarely sentenced to actual punishment, leading to this massive discrepancy.
/r/MensRights22/03/25 02:59 PM
8

Here in the real world this will never work in reverse, no matter what you think should or could be different in some perfect world, and the idea that a guy could ever complain that a woman who never asked for his d-pic failed to compliment his junk the way he expected is so absurd I'm wondering how you can argue this nonsense in good faith.
/r/MensRights21/03/25 04:30 PM
64

Leaving the ex-husband with nothing at all would actually be an improvement over this travesty of injustice.
/r/MensRights21/03/25 04:20 PM
75

Young men whom everyone seems to be fighting for the vote of. Writing articles, giving interviews, and telling audiences that not voting for a woman can only be explained by sexism is not fighting for votes. It's fighting to alienate anyone who disagrees. And they were amazingly successful at it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/25 09:04 PM
17

I have no idea what we do about this and as I say I'm just venting, but fucking hell it's rough. Another poster recently had this to say... Say it's crazy talk, say clearly and objectively what you don't agree with. Don't get drawn into a prolonged discussion about it. Don't get angry, don't raise your voice, but don't give in. The pattern is always the same, the first time they will have a tantrum, get heated, maybe call you names. Then treat you with the cold shoulder for a while. Stay firm th…
/r/MensRights19/03/25 08:16 PM
2

What kind of man thinks saving $250 is better than risking $250,000?
/r/MensRights19/03/25 07:41 PM
1

In some countries (like France) it's illegal for a man to demand a paternity test or buy one for home use. His only option is to petition the courts with evidence of fraud and hope the mother does not fight it. It's a huge mess.
/r/MensRights19/03/25 07:40 PM
1

Do be aware that if anyone in your bloodline has used them the database already has enough to find you (with a few extra steps that are no problem for a government).
/r/MensRights19/03/25 07:33 PM
12

Women in other countries are no saints, and they still get mad whenever you do something they do not like, but I can put up with grouchy silent treatment so much easier than endless bitching and virtue signaling.
/r/MensRights14/03/25 09:26 PM
1

MGTOW is mostly about keeping to yourself, and even allows for casual hetero relationships at the lower levels, while 4B seems to be all isolating men from women and only raising children from single mothers.
/r/MensRights14/03/25 09:19 PM
13

It's a bit more complicated than that. Men are charged with more serious crimes for the same actions, men are not offered the same plea bargains for admitting guilt or testifying against others, men receive more convictions with similar evidence, men are given harsher sentences for the same crimes, men are less likely to be paroled or pardoned, and when a man is executed or dies in jail nobody cares, even if the evidence was weak or fabricated.
/r/MensRights14/03/25 07:26 PM
1

In that case recording people in your room who are unaware is illegal and thus inadmissible in court if you were to be accused. Consent is not the only consideration. You could end up with recorded evidence clearing you of one charge (grape) but convicting you of another (recording without consent).
/r/MensRights13/03/25 04:36 PM
0

Only option is to get consent to record the entire encounter and keep the camera and microphone going the whole way. The moment she ceases to make affirmative noises/actions you back off and do not resume, even if she says it's okay. It may sound absurd and it is but it's the best you can do unless and until humanity gets it's sanity back.
/r/MensRights13/03/25 04:25 PM
1

So she offers the witness some of the payout and now they're on her side.
/r/MensRights13/03/25 04:19 PM
6

MRA's tend to have the right idea but struggle to speak calmly and put their views into terms that can survive corporate censorship and get through to moderates. In my case I was pushed away from feminism rather than enticed by men's rights and I would imagine that's still the case for many because the MRA sales pitch is not that polished.
/r/MensRights13/03/25 03:44 PM
4

Probably hook up again like Mary J. Letourneau. I mean, that's the message we're sending them with these sympathetic wrist slap punishments.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 10:08 PM
12

You must be thinking of a man. No woman is doing 35+ years for graping a minor under threat of violence.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 10:06 PM
3

If all men are the solution and they aren't doing anything, then YES all men are the problem. This sentiment is the problem. Stop feeding men's egos while women are being murdered and abused worldwide. #yesallmen At this point I don't even really care anymore. You picked the bear, you poked the bear, and then when it growled you told me to get in between you and subdue the bear. For what? So I can live the rest of my days with a missing arm or worse? No thanks. Your inability to choose wisely an…
/r/MensRights10/03/25 08:20 PM
1

At this point I don't even really care anymore. You picked the bear, you poked the bear, and then when it growled you told me to get in between you and subdue the bear. For what? So I can go back to my job with a missing arm or worse? No thanks. Your inability to choose wisely and your complete lack of accountability is not my problem.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 08:17 PM
45

If you ignore what feminists say and instead watch what feminist do you'll see their idea of equality is arbitrary, contradictory, and lopsided. In many ways modern feminism is just reverse chauvinism. If you want to counter this argument start by naming something important to feminists that they willingly gave up in order to benefit men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/25 02:52 PM
19

They should rename that sub to "Men Are Always the Asshole" since even in discussions about two women they still look for ways to blame a man.
/r/MensRights07/03/25 03:28 PM
19

There is no shame in the act of crying, but you will be shamed for crying in front of a woman. Maybe not in the moment, but when they're angry and want to hurt you they will remember you cried and shame you for it. Meanwhile women crying is never shameful, even when it's faked or forced for the purpose of manipulating men.
/r/MensRights06/03/25 11:44 PM
14

I only say this because there may be genuine remorse on their part There was no remorse when grabbing them. There was no remorse when photographing them. There was no remorse when editing and saving them. There was no remorse when adding them to a dating profile. She's made it clear that she has no moral or ethical qualms with this, so why TF would there be remorse unless someone reports her and she suffers what is likely the first real accountability in her life?
/r/MensRights06/03/25 03:55 PM
12

Reporting is more about what happens to living guys in the future. The more we ignore and normalize sexist behavior the more accepted it becomes.
/r/MensRights06/03/25 03:52 PM
3

If you watch any true crime videos the comments sections are full of women drooling over the idea of male criminals being repeatedly gang graped in prison. If you point out that this also happens to men who are later proven to be innocent they shrug and say it's the patriarchy's fault.
/r/MensRights03/03/25 08:00 PM
3

For this? For everything. That's why they're like 5% of the prison population. Some countries like the UK want to close women's prisons and put them into victim recovery programs (even when they're the violent aggressor) or probation with no threat of meaningful incarceration.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 08:02 PM
51

"this could help women and minorities" = "this could help everyone but straight white men"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/25 07:54 PM
2

Even if he did and confronted her she'd simply divorce him and take half (or more) of his retirement savings on the way out. You're damned if you do the right thing and you're damned if she does the wrong thing.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 05:46 PM
12

Except when it's the man who is unhappy with his marriage. Her vows are merely suggestions but his vows are sacrosanct no matter the details. The three pillars of feminism are pride, arrogance, and hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 05:35 PM
0

ending it would mean "showing weakness" to the rest of the world. The draft is already ended. Only selective service remains.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 05:31 PM
1

V2.0 will include an additional disclaimer of "He probably deserved it."
/r/MensRights14/02/25 04:27 PM
1

I don't think the Dems have a big problem with ending/expanding the draft per se. I think it's more about the precedent of neutral equality that a draft expanding/ending SCOTUS judgement would create.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 04:24 PM
3

Ladies Night Once upon a time this was indirectly beneficial to men since meeting strangers with sexual intent was a common and accepted occurrence. Now it's just a bunch of pointless freeloading and window dressing with no clear benefit for men.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 04:15 PM
6

In her defense, it was likely a lesbian joke. Jokes have setups and punchlines. This is not a joke and my guess is that anything that came after was just another regurgitated trauma dump.
/r/MensRights13/02/25 10:25 PM
84

It sounds like it started pro-male only to be taken over and turned into yet another feminist control mechanism like menslib.
/r/MensRights11/02/25 01:52 PM
19

Women can do the 4B movement but men can’t do a similar thing if they CHOOSE to live like that? My biggest problem with feminism is the hypocrisy. If reddit was neutral TXC would get banned for being hate group.
/r/MensRights11/02/25 01:47 PM
12

This is missing the forest for the trees. It does not need to be done (and is completely impractical to do) as a government service. It only needs to be a mandated requirement of assigning parentage. Get it?
/r/MensRights10/02/25 04:28 PM
7

I mean hey, even if you do trust someone 100%, they can get sick. They can die. They can get run over by a bus. It's just too much of a risk for me to take. Which is why SAHW generally insist buying life insurance policies on the husband. If you suggest buying insurance for both of you they suggest doubling the amount paid on your head instead and might settle for something like 70/30.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 11:28 PM
2

I was on board when woke was about race and poverty because I saw firsthand how those factors could screw people over and I feel the same way about MLK today as I did when I was a kid. Then feminism came along and a bunch of entitled white women commercialized wokeness into a profitable DEI movement and now I no longer support it.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 06:48 PM
143

Men can't comprehend the difficulties women face. Pregnancy. Fear of being raped. Assaults, volatile partner probably missing something... What you're missing is that men are raised to consider women's and girl's difficulties at every stage of their life while women are raised to blame men for everything wrong with their life even if they never met.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 05:20 PM
39

Social media is not the end of activism but it does make a for good beginning as this very thread inadvertently shows.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/25 04:20 PM
1

Amen. This is clear, concise, and correct. Generations of men raised by women to be something nobody wants or respects. Fuck that noise.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/02/25 08:48 PM
15

A male version of "the pill" will hopefully equalize the playing field.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 08:58 PM
1

The male pill will be a game changer like we've never seen before.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 08:54 PM
6

All the shit they say at the end is meant to hurt you as much as possible. They may not believe half of it but they say it anyway because they know it will hurt you to hear it. Next time be less honest/transparent and bring a hardened heart to any future relationship. They will never care about you the way you care for them, and the moment they're done with you the gloves come off and they will inflict as much emotional damage as they can manage. The only thing you can do is live your best life …
/r/MensRights30/01/25 08:34 PM
193

For me it seems that the top 20% is all that matters for girls. The rest of us is just there to take blame for extremist male behaviours. From the modern feminist perspective if you're not amazing then you're nothing. To make real progress you need to be the best guy her social circle has ever seen and even then you'll be kicked to the curb the moment something better comes along. You're just a stopgap dildo with an ATM card until then. That's the reality that the sexual revolution brought us.
/r/MensRights30/01/25 08:02 PM
36

They aren’t getting another dime from me until they reverse course on sexism hard. Bingo. I wasn't suckered into leaving by the right wing, I was pushed out of the left wing with endless blaming and shaming. Imagine having just enough votes to win but choosing to blame and shame your own supporters because they were born with the "wrong" gender. Instead of reversing course we'll get another generation of devout feminist Democrats who paint men as the root of all evil. They need our votes but the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/25 04:55 PM
4

guy being innocent. I'm pretty sure that's been outlawed there.
/r/MensRights30/01/25 04:14 PM
43

"Honey, I had a horrible dream where running over you with the family car was not a benefit to me. Please fix this immediately. It only takes ten minutes to purchase to ensure I'll never have to work again."
/r/MensRights28/01/25 09:49 PM
1

You can ask her to not wear it as it makes you uncomfortable Those were the old rules. The new rules are that men are not allowed to comment on women's clothing. That's why the post saying a woman's outfit is none of her boyfriend's business was praised and validated while the post saying a boyfriend who felt uncomfortable is allowed to express his discomfort was demonized and buried under attacks for daring to question what a woman wears.
/r/MensRights27/01/25 06:05 PM
11

As a man you have no say in what any woman wears or how it makes you feel when you're with them or how it invites unwanted attention or controversy. This includes your girlfriend, wife, daughter, etc. However, the women in your life will act like they have the right to tell you how they think you should dress without the slightest hint of irony in their voice. Modern feminism has reached emperor's new clothes levels of hypocrisy at this point.
/r/MensRights27/01/25 05:51 PM
1

As a man you have no say in what any woman wears or how it makes you feel or how it invites unwanted attention or controversy. This includes your girlfriend, wife, daughter, etc. However, the women in your life do have the right to tell you that your entire wardrobe is trash and needs to be modified to match how they think you should dress. Modern feminism has reached emperor's new clothes levels of hypocrisy at this point.
/r/MensRights27/01/25 05:46 PM
13

So an awareness and concern over increasing gender imbalances and a desire for actual equality is considered "misogynistic" now?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/25 04:26 PM
3

I wish the OP would use actual English instead of whatever that was.
/r/MensRights27/01/25 02:19 PM
10

For a straight man dating is just another job where you do all the work and pay your boss' expenses to keep her from firing you. Fuck that noise. The juice is not worth the squeeze so really who even cares at this point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/01/25 06:19 PM
10

I work in tech and most women don't want to be here and don't care about technology or engineering. They do like the paycheck, though. Bingo. I have no idea where the other guy is getting his perspective from but a position I had to bust my ass to earn is handed out on silver platter to 2X members who demonstrated zero interest, did zero hours of self-training, and had zero certs to their name. Any man lacking demonstrated ability and motivation does not get this job.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/01/25 05:39 PM
1

I work in tech and most women don't want to be here and don't care about technology or engineering. They do like the paycheck, though. Bingo. I have no idea where the other guy is getting his "looks fine from here" perspective but a position I had to bust my ass to earn is handed out on silver platter to 2X members who demonstrated zero interest, did zero hours of self-training, and had zero certs.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/01/25 05:35 PM
1

a lot of companies are abandoning DEI They're not abandoning it so much as they're no longer advertising it or quantifying it with public numbers. It's like saying cops do not have ticket quotas. Sure, okay, but they still need to be within a general range of other cops and it's the same game plan with DEI. Well, could you go back to her? Never go back to an ex. You think breaking into HR is bad? The power imbalance of going back to an ex is even worse than that.
/r/MensRights20/01/25 05:07 PM
58

Back when I had Apple News+ (carried over from Texture) if you searched for "men's rights" as a topic to follow the search only returned women's rights, trans rights, etc. Basically anything besides men's rights. When I noticed that I tried several other topics important to men and most returned nothing or never had new stories. Meanwhile women's rights showed up dozens of times per day even after blocking every variation of the topic and blocking all women-focused news sources. Our news is as s…
/r/MensRights17/01/25 08:54 PM
26

You had better start not having any fucks to give or risk living a life scared like that. I say and do tons of things that feminists love to hate. Disney is simply not worth it to me. But if that's your bag then by all means go for it. *fixed typo
/r/MensRights17/01/25 05:35 PM
281

He had a good excuse (wife and daughter got sick at the last minute) but without that excuse he might have received a lot less support. I would never go to Disney on my own, partly because I've seen it a dozen times already, but also because being a single man this is exactly the sort of reaction I would expect today. I've lost count of the number of times I've been told that men are mostly horrible people and being born a man means you need to spend your life repenting for the sins of all the b…
/r/MensRights17/01/25 04:50 PM
19

What's the sales pitch for male teachers? Come work for a employer that views you as a third class citizen, will take any accusation against you as indisputable fact, will stop paying you without recourse or conviction, and will never rehire you even if said accusation is eventually disproven or admitted to be entirely fabricated? The reason the ratio is terrible is because nobody believes male teachers can be anything but future monsters. Meanwhile female teachers take years to get caught becau…
/r/MensRights16/01/25 09:29 PM
1

What's the sales pitch for more male teachers? Come work for a employer that views you as a third class citizen, will take any accusation against you as indisputable fact, will stop paying you without recourse or conviction, and will never rehire you even if said accusation is eventually proven or admitted to be entirely fabricated? The reason the ratio is terrible is because nobody believes male teachers can be anything but monsters in hiding.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 09:24 PM
1

I heard the same thing about Barbie. But if a theme is so "accidental" that none of the audience sees it that way then is it really pro-male? If audiences and reviewers were making this connection and seeing a green witch as representing men you'd have a point, but I've seen nothing like that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/25 04:55 PM
1

I heard the same thing about Barbie. But if a theme is so "accidental" that none of the audience sees it that way then is it really pro-male?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/25 04:51 PM
9

I'm not a fan of putin but I can understand him not wanting an adversy to have missiles, tank bases, and potentially nukes right on his border. Ukraine had nukes. They gave them back to Russia on condition of peace. Putin gave them war instead.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 01:29 AM
10

There are prejudices against women [...] when victims of SA e.g. she was drunk, dressed slutty, was a tease etc. This may have been true in the 1980's but if you mention anything even hinting at agency or accountability for women putting themselves in dangerous or confusing situations you'll be burned at the stake today. Meanwhile just being a man in the general vicinity means you obviously did whatever she claims no evidence required. Men have been left to rot in jail for weeks or months (and l…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/01/25 08:39 PM
1

The middle and high school girls I knew even bragged about it where I live, but honestly I don't GAF anymore. All of my compassion has been used up by women who I later realized never deserved it so the women who do deserve it get nothing. Oh well.
/r/MensRights09/01/25 09:24 PM
5

Men in their 30s / 40s are a hot commodity A older man's bank account and willingness to remain quiet may be a hot commodity but it seems like the only women they're allowed to date without criticism are single moms of similar or older age with stupid levels of debt and no career to cover the bills who tried to baby trap a lazy life and came up snake eyes. Best of luck to you though.
/r/MensRights09/01/25 09:18 PM
6

You think a father is allowed to ground a feminist daughter against her will? Good luck with that. You'll be fired (or in jail) and she'll be on the victim parade circuit blaming you for every bad thing that ever happened (or could have).
/r/MensRights09/01/25 06:22 PM
16

Women cannot be predators and if you do not believe me just ask any feminist. They'll think up as many absurd excuses as necessary to make every bad action something a woman never did or a man made her do against her will.
/r/MensRights09/01/25 06:19 PM
1

The left has not been rabidly anti-male at its core until relatively recently and neither party GAF about working men. It's wealthy men on one side and women on the other. All this "my favorite billionaire is better than your favorite billionaire" is a pointless distraction. No billionaires GAF about average everyday working men and they never will.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 02:40 PM
1

The left might be super feminist right now but it has not always been like that and it does not need to be like that in the future. People like me are how that changes. People like you are how it stays the same.
/r/MensRights04/01/25 07:02 PM
86

What's even more crazy is that man-blaming "support" subs are still considered "toxic masculinity" by many feminists. When you look at the super soft and very narrow complaints and criticisms allowed on such forums it's basically a mental torture chamber for distraught men who have been bullied into blaming themselves for every problem and setback they experience. I'd be shocked if most of those men ever go on to live healthy lives and not shocked at all if most of them eventually commit suicide…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/01/25 05:11 PM
57

individual who should seek therapy. A surprising number of mental health therapists fully support feminist ideology and are happy to blame "the patriarchy" for the ills of their patients, so good luck getting meaningful help from people like that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/01/25 05:04 PM
1

I'm not a party. I'm a person. Do you even understand the difference anymore?
/r/MensRights03/01/25 03:18 PM
3

There is no non feminist left I'm one of them, you're replying to another, and I know many others. But why grow the MR movement when we can waste our time on clumsy partisanship and dismissive "you're not welcome here" rhetoric.
/r/MensRights02/01/25 09:41 PM
7

For much of my life it was normal for men to approach and women to either talk to them or turn them away. Two women going out drinking with the intention of meeting strange men over drinks and maybe more was as normal as grocery shopping. Now hearing a random unknown male say something in a parking lot in broad daylight is a fucking nightmare to them. This is not "women have always been nervous" levels of concern. This is a cult of victimhood infecting millions of people who think they're in a l…
/r/MensRights26/12/24 09:13 PM
21

The OP is pointing out that these bogus theories show up as real news in his social feeds because women never got the memo that modern feminism is based on and furthered by junk science.
/r/MensRights26/12/24 08:38 PM
10

Had this gone to trial the jury likely would have acquitted. A jury with even one feminist will expect a man accused of SA/SB against a female to "prove a negative" to receive an acquittal. Otherwise it's a conviction or hung jury. It's probably the most difficult accusation to beat in the modern criminal justice system and even when you do beat it nothing ever happens to the person who committed perjury against you. False accusations have become the perfect crime with a high chance of destructi…
/r/MensRights23/12/24 05:11 PM
4

As far as helping men in real life, there are plenty of men's spaces if you look for them where men help other men. Plenty? Women have plenty of women-focused and women-exclusive services and spaces, with a sea of support from men and other women. Men have jack shit. When my male friends end up in a toxic relationship the wife/gf enjoys a presumption of truth and innocence in court as well as free legal and emotional assistance while he has nothing but debt-exploding legal bills, negative judgem…
/r/MensRights18/12/24 05:03 PM
16

Oligarchy and Plutocracy is the problem not the patriarchy windmill. Amen. Swap the gender of every autocrat and plutocrat and nothing improves for the people below them. I wonder how a devout sexist can call themselves a leftist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/12/24 08:55 PM
4

Many of us were raised by feminist mothers to see the world through a feminist lens that brainwashed us into supporting and defending highly toxic women, avoiding male friends and relatives who tried to help us, and basically hating ourselves for being men. So yes, it absolutely is a threat to our well being.
/r/MensRights22/11/24 04:48 PM
1

You want it, then advocate for it. Did you even read what he wrote? The GF thinks she is getting a raw deal. He's correctly saying if that's how she feels the she should advocate for a fairer system rather than blaming her BF on IMD. Get it?
/r/MensRights22/11/24 03:46 PM
2

My mom had the usual reaction to men's rights when I first brought it up but over time she has listened and sees how average everyday men are getting screwed today. She still thinks old school feminism was a good thing but seems to realize that modern feminism is mostly a man-hating and man-blaming movement at this point. On matters like laws being written and enforced in a gender neutral manner she's on board. She also agrees that taking away recess and PE while expecting boys to sit still like…
/r/MensRights20/11/24 04:04 PM
2

Lets hear what "open up" means to you because your vague retort does not match with anything I've seen myself or heard from other men.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 03:32 PM
2

In my experience women are much more bossy, have much thinner skin, and create far more office drama over what should be minor disputes. They also feel little or no obligation to be fair to others or act professional around colleagues and subordinates. Men can be assholes but at least they can be understood and worked around. Women are impossible to comprehend outside of a DSM manual.
/r/MensRights18/11/24 09:11 PM
11

Next time refuse to accommodate. Chances are they won't be honest with their actual plans and take a mile for every inch you give them. Install cameras where you live and record any interactions with strange women whenever possible. Talk may be cheap but the only thing that can override a woman's verbal accusation is audio/video proving that it was clearly a lie, and even that can take days, weeks, or months to resolve. Meanwhile you've potentially lost your job's employment, your family's trust…
/r/MensRights18/11/24 09:02 PM
12

Court mandated tests are legal almost everywhere but that will be up to a judge or magistrate. Private testing is mostly legal (or undefined) but a few countries have made it a civil matter (fines) and at least one (France) has made it a criminal offense. Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA_paternity_testing
/r/MensRights18/11/24 04:28 PM
1

That only North American countries have legalised them and Europe has made them illegal. I believe it's a civil matter but you do risk some pretty serious fines (thousands of euros) if you take a private paternity test without first successfully petitioning a court order in countries like France and Germany. I think they're legal in most English speaking countries.
/r/MensRights18/11/24 04:20 PM
1

Usually, they will say it in a smarter way. If the management has been catering to feminist rhetoric long enough even risky/dangerous commentary will start to feel normal to the staff. The things feminist are willing to say at work are often well beyond the line of punitive action.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/11/24 04:15 PM
21

We're thrown to the wolves as boys, at which point we either learn to act like a wolf or become a target. Then as soon as we're out of school we're expected to swallow every trauma and hardship and only show the world the kindness and compassion never shown to us.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 04:10 PM
3

They're not sharing the blame proportionally. They're saying men caused Trump while the women who voted for him are held blameless. Here in reality if no woman voted for Trump he would have never been elected. Your duplicitous whining does not change the reality of how he got elected or who is being targeted by their selective shaming.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 03:44 PM
16

White women went for Trump all three times but they are given a pass because only men deserve blame and shame. Make it make sense.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 10:53 PM
95

Kate Scott is a PhD candidate in Social and Political Sciences at the University of Sydney. Her current research focuses on deradicalisation within the manosphere, specifically examining the processes that enable or hinder individuals in disengaging from extreme Red Pill Communities. She is interested in the intersection of violent extremism, radicalisation, and gender within digital spaces. Prior to their doctoral studies, Kate completed their honours at the University of Sydney, focusing on on…
/r/MensRights12/11/24 05:00 PM
7

Women don't care as much about looks as men do. I know tall/toned men with six figures in the 4-6 range who struggle to find a fling while obese women in the 2-4 range are married with kids. Guys worse than "tv ugly" lacking obvious wealth are SOL and it's time to stop lying.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 08:49 PM
13

"If a man does it then of course it's horrible but any interpretation that puts me in position of having to explain my behavior is just over thinking it."
/r/MensRights04/11/24 10:50 PM
32

Males are more monster than human to many feminists.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 09:30 PM
100

There's a very high chance that HR would say something like "So what? She's just speaking the truth." Which opens them up to litigation. Feminists have no problem using the system against us so why do we refuse?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/24 08:24 PM
1

I believe the only way to bring about change is to call things out in a professional way every time we see them. Amen.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/24 08:22 PM
23

Men are cancelled for misunderstandings, social faux pas, and not agreeing with feminist dogma. Women do not get cancelled, even when they support the hate crime murder of innocent children. That's the "patriarchy" for you.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 04:39 PM
3

I've heard feminists say it's a pretty woman-hating place. What part of planet earth do feminists not think is a woman-hating place?
/r/MensRights01/11/24 08:00 PM
1

throw the book at her. This is super rare and only seems to happen when they kill another woman or girl. If they murder a man or boy the presumption is that someone or something made them do it resulting in diminished responsibility.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 04:10 PM
1

False accusations are not punishable but publishing the name of a false accuser will get you fined and risk putting you in jail.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 03:37 PM
11

Also society: Where are all the fathers?? More like where is the father's money? The father himself is unwanted.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 03:35 PM
32

If they actually had to apply them to their family, their friends....themselves, those ideas would be rejected I don't think this is as true as people seem to think. How many left wing women have stood by male family and friends when the arrows came his way? It seems extremely rare to me, and mostly done behind the scenes. The left wing woman who treats accusations as accusations rather than presumed truths is super rare in my experience.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/24 08:56 PM
8

I mean some people do the virtuous thing but they generally end up in the ghettos and gulags with the targeted groups and nobody ever hears from them again. They exist, they're just not the majority.
/r/MensRights31/10/24 02:48 PM
3

She could have handed those kids to any stranger and it would have saved their lives. But what if that stranger was male? Better they fall to their death than risk trusting a man.
/r/MensRights31/10/24 02:40 PM
1

They always do that for protected classes (like women).
/r/MensRights31/10/24 02:38 PM
1

She could have handed those kids to any stranger and it would have saved their lives. But what if that stranger was a male? Better they fall to their death than be subjected to the presence of such horrible creatures as men.
/r/MensRights31/10/24 02:33 PM
4

We know the globalists want to reduce births to keep the world population down. I thought globalists want bigger economies with more consumers so they can collect more revenue and governments can collect more taxes. What benefit is a smaller population to them?
/r/MensRights28/10/24 08:11 PM
10

Agreed. Most animal species are hardwired to protect females at the expense of males, up to and including voluntary death for cannibalization after mating. The human version of this is called "women are wonderful."
/r/MensRights28/10/24 07:28 PM
1

Most animal species are hardwired to protect females at the expense of males, up to and including ritual death and dismemberment after mating. The human version of this is called "women are wonderful."
/r/MensRights28/10/24 07:27 PM
5

Same shit that gives "traumatized" women and girls a free murder card. I don't care which standard you pick, but apply it equally instead of by gender.
/r/MensRights25/10/24 02:27 PM
31

The easiest way for a woman to be financially independent is to pair with a man who is rich and take half of his wealth when she tires of him. The easiest way for a man to be financially independent is to cut women out of his life.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 07:36 PM
6

I'm not dancing around anything. The correlation does not simply go away outside of rape and incest. Careless people who cannot plan their way around an unwanted pregnancy also make terrible parents.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 05:06 PM
18

More like be stupid and sign a contract that rewards the less productive spouse. The "benefits" most associated with married men (health, wealth, productivity) are really just requirements to get and maintain a marriage. As soon as any of those levels drops too low she'll take half of everything (more if no prenup) and kick you out on your ass.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 03:48 PM
2

He literally says he'll be "dictator for a day" in his own words. Which is the same as saying dictator for life since you only need to shred the constitution once. I'm not sure who can support that but count me out.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 03:35 PM
11

Unwanted births are highly correlated with mental and physical abuse, serious criminality, and early death. It was a life most people would never want to live and now it's being forced on someone with terrible odds of rising above it.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 03:30 PM
13

This is happening everywhere in the West. In order to make the new "equal pay for unequal work/ability" premise work they have to take money from the gender-inclusive group that would normally admit more men and give it to the gender-exclusive group just for women.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 08:08 PM
1

TLDR: If you make it clear you have no interest in intimacy with women you will not be perceived as a creep. A good way to do this is to pay to dance with older women. With time you will learn their names and they will learn that you are an asexual eunuch who wants to support and validate women all over the world. Everybody wins.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 07:51 PM
–

Feminists think those without companionship are to blame for anything wrong in their life while conservatives think those without money are to blame for anything wrong in their life. Ask either group what the fix is and they'll both say "identify your own faults and fix yourself without expecting help from others." It's the same shit.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 04:08 PM
10

People who were never oppressed blaming people who never oppressed anyone is the most feminist mindset ever.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 04:04 PM
83

I wonder if it’s a crime anywhere. The only example I can think of is the state of Tennessee in the US, but this is a new law that has yet to be tested and settled in court. Amazingly the reverse (dis/proving you're the father with paternity testing) is against the law in France, Switzerland, and Germany.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 03:30 PM
1

I've been told that "female activists" is wrong and it should be "women activists," which ignores the fact that girls are often activists and replacing one succinct word with three clumsy words (girls and women activists) is both stupid and grammatically incorrect. Also, if calling someone female is offensive but calling someone male is not offensive then you know it's just more gender war nonsense rather than a legitimate point being made.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 05:50 PM
13

Many will admit "acting creepy" really just means "unattractive man showing interest" when you get to know them. He can be following all the rules and doing everything correctly but he's still a creep because his interest is unwanted.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/24 05:19 PM
11

In the article's feedback poll the vast majority (>95%) were putting the blame squarely on the wife. There were a few comments also blaming the husband of course but feminists are gonna femsplain.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 04:52 PM
50

Would the wife and kids want to leave you? Something like 90% of them peaced out leaving the men to fight.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 08:28 AM
46

Dominika Yudashkina needs an express ticket to basic training to give those brave men on the front line a rest. Put up or shut up you spineless hypocrite.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 08:22 AM
6

Supposedly a lot of women left male partners over their lack of enthusiasm for the Barbie movie messaging. Even couples that remained together had put the men on notice that they were expected to submit to their wives and girlfriends to remain a couple. Anything less was grounds for termination of the relationship.
/r/MensRights14/10/24 04:43 PM
3

Seems like only men can see/acknowledge the part where she attacks him first and there are more women voters in AU so no need to change anything.
/r/MensRights14/10/24 03:42 PM
3

Where I live it's the vast majority of white women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/24 03:12 PM
100

He clearly had to go, but I would not be surprised if a woman making the same statement would be allowed to remain. It took monumental effort (and the withholding of vast sums) to remove several Ivy League presidents who were oddly okay with students promoting genocide and just happened to be women. All they had to say was that promoting genocide of any group was wrong, but even that was too much for these radicalized feminists.
/r/MensRights14/10/24 03:02 PM
1

I were to say "I know so many women who have been raped by men so I treat every man as a potential rapist" I've heard that exact sentiment expressed more times than I can count by American women. They even created a series of videos to really hit the message home known as "man vs bear." That's no way to live, treating half the population as a threat. Agreed. However, since I have no control over crazy people or the systemic persecution that grants them such vast power I can only control what I d…
/r/MensRights14/10/24 02:53 PM
–

I have. You've seen a crying man wreck someone's career on words and tears alone? If you say nasty things about a co worker don't be surprised by who tells. See, this is the problem right here. You start by claiming talking to women is no different than talking to men and then immediately assume any controversy means "nasty things" were said about innocent coworkers and immediately run with it because you're presumptuous and disingenuous. That's why talking to coworkers like you at work is dange…
/r/MensRights11/10/24 03:24 PM
5

Never seen a dude wreck another dude's career by bursting into tears and running over to HR. Most men start out talking to women like they talk to other men, until we get in trouble for not reading her mind or knowing her specific mix of morals and ethics or simply get tired of having our personal lives turned into drama-seeking gossip.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 09:19 AM
1

I don't think most women want to destroy most men, but I've seen many men's careers suddenly ruined over seemingly minor mistakes and disagreements the years. Since it's shockingly easy for an angry woman to casually wreck a man's career and because men cannot read minds the only safe path is to treat unknown women as if they're a manipulative nutcase ready to burn our reputation to the ground over any perceived slight or misunderstanding. They're probably not, but since men cannot reliably know…
/r/MensRights11/10/24 09:09 AM
1

I don't think all women hate all men but since it's so easy for a crazy woman to casually wreck a man's career and because men cannot read minds the result is that the only safe path is to treat women we do not know as if they're a man-hating nutcase ready to suddenly burn our reputation into the ground on a random Tuesday.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 09:05 AM
1

You're free to join any time you want. When society gives us something worth dying for we'll join you. Until then...
/r/MensRights10/10/24 09:07 PM
12

American troops abandoned on duty by monkey branching wives and girlfriends is so common and widespread it became the basis for the "Dear John" cliche. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dear_John_letter
/r/MensRights10/10/24 08:43 PM
8

well part of it is about equality Modern feminism is a gender supremacy movement masquerading as an equality movement. That's why it seeks to protect female criminals from legal accountability and punishing men for crimes in which they played no role.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 02:08 PM
7

She went to jail because she convinced her boyfriend to kill another woman. If the landlord was a man she'd never have gone to jail in the first place.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 02:04 PM
7

Here's their new commercial September 19, 2022 It's over two years old and barely worth getting triggered. I already boycott Nestle because they're a shit company.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 06:21 PM
2

It would have to be exclusive to non-white and/or non-straight men to be legal under Aussie law and they'd probably support it since (in their view) it would validate their own bullshit.
/r/MensRights07/10/24 08:39 PM
84

The story should be what happened after it was reported.
/r/MensRights07/10/24 08:18 PM
3

When I was still a boy, I was shopping with my aunt. She found a man's wallet on the ground. She looked inside, took all the cash, then threw the wallet together with all documents and cards into the trash. It would not surprise me if most men have memories just like this. I know I certainly do. The difference now is they're empowered and emboldened to brag about acting this way. In their view so long as the victim is a man any mistreatment is earned and deserved. Never mind if he actually harme…
/r/MensRights04/10/24 05:55 PM
1

When I was still a boy, I was shopping with my aunt. She found a man's wallet on the ground. She looked inside, took all the cash, then threw the wallet together with all documents and cards into the trash. It would not surprise me if most men have memories like this as a boy. I know I do. Women have always been like this. The main difference now is that they're empowered and emboldened to brag about it.
/r/MensRights04/10/24 05:51 PM
2

Pot, meet kettle. Unless you think he's lying what he described is pretty clearly one-sided entitlement and this post completely undoes the benefit of doubt I felt for your other post. You're not just wrong, people like you are the reason this lopsided imbalance exists, and judging men you don't know for failing to follow your lead is no better.
/r/MensRights04/10/24 03:40 PM
16

Babysitters would do shit I'm still uncomfortable talking about, not just because it was fucked up to go through that shit, but also because women who hear about it always rush to make excuses for them and conjure up male phantoms who must have done something to force those girls do that shit. Before you know it the discussion has flipped 180 and everyone is talking about those poor babysitters and what must have happened to them to make them abuse me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/10/24 03:19 PM
32

Many boys are raised by feminist/overbearing mothers to always see women as victims and men as manipulators despite all evidence to the contrary. Getting the word out is critical.
/r/MensRights03/10/24 03:02 PM
100

It's still bittersweet since any two men involved in premeditated murdering of a mother would both get life.
/r/MensRights03/10/24 02:52 PM
19

I disagree, I think that all a man really needs is purpose, something to live/die for. And thus begins the Bladerunner dystopia. We are sold animatronic/holographic "partners" to give us purpose.
/r/MensRights01/10/24 07:01 PM
1

I disagree, I think that all a man really needs is purpose, something to live/die for. And that's how we end up with Bladerunner. Males are sold animatronic/holographic "partners" to protect and live/die for a hoax.
/r/MensRights01/10/24 06:58 PM
1

taking a bunch of Tylenol The crazy thing about Tylenol is that many people think it's not that dangerous, probably because it's so common and so easy to access, but in reality it's highly toxic at "cry for help" levels and even being rushed to the hospital often ends in death due to organ failure.
/r/MensRights30/09/24 05:01 PM
4

This gender "war" over which gender has it worse helps absolutely no one. It seems to help one gender lot. They even created a whole movement behind it. We're now in the fourth wave of this movement, not because the first three waves failed but because they were so successful they ran out of demands.
/r/MensRights30/09/24 04:55 PM
5

It's all fun and games until their son, husband, brother or father is on the receiving end I've seen countless posts from women who lost a husband, brother, or father and it's mostly about the burden of loss and how it impacted them. Sounds like sympathy bait to me. The main exception I can think of is losing a son.
/r/MensRights30/09/24 04:52 PM
32

"Because of internalized misogyny! Women are being oppressed by the biggest and most powerful group on earth...other women! That's why we need to force unrelated men to help fund woman-only museums."
/r/MensRights27/09/24 08:12 PM
5

Do brothers not have a right to justice when a sister decides to stab you and blame it on ADHD?
/r/MensRights27/09/24 05:03 PM
34

If you ask a feminist what "toxic femininity" refers to they either say it does not exist or that it's internalized misogyny. Victims of everything, responsible for nothing, incapable of honest debate.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 03:59 PM
3

as accessible as a can of soda It's like a $350 can of flat soda in a machine that needs a reservation two weeks out and only takes new customers every third month.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/24 03:53 PM
3

Pushing back against modern feminism is not the same thing as hating women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/24 03:48 PM
3

So why not simply say you're an egalitarian? Two birds, one stone, and no confusion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/24 03:46 PM
3

I think there are far fewer egalitarian feminists than there are people who believe/present themselves to be egalitarian feminists. I think a lot of men would support first and second wave feminism but after that it became (or was exposed as) a gender supremacist movement and that's what modern feminism means to me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/24 03:44 PM
15

Modern feminism uses many methods and tactics that are virtually indistinguishable from racist MAGA people, and you cannot reason with either group because they never used reason to inform their position in the first place.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/24 03:09 PM
110

Canned and cancelled with millions in gender studies funding granted to root out every other man who dared to say something negative about his experiences with women.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 02:52 PM
11

I flew too close to the sun and blamed the wings that melted off my back.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 02:50 PM
20

I think the term you're looking for is resentful. I wish she was resented instead of coddled by a society that puts the whims of women at the top of every urgent action list while tossing men's issues into the circular file cabinet.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 02:48 PM
10

To their credit, some listened and adjusted Women are repeatedly told anything they do to a man is fair, that men deserve whatever they get from a woman, and that no retaliation from men is socially acceptable no matter what she did to him or why. When women get annoyed and choose to attack us like degenerate barbarians we give them special credit for listening as we explain the most basic concepts of human decency like we're explaining quantum mechanics to an ape.
/r/MensRights26/09/24 07:52 PM
1

You cannot control attraction but you can give people more time to grow on you. Women I found to be very flawed would sometimes grow on me over time. If I happened to act on my attraction it would build into the same honeymoon period as any other relationship. My problems are that modern relationships have become such a completely shit show that I'd rather set my money on fire and blow my brains out than enter another one.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/24 05:31 PM
0

remember female infanticide? I remember it was rage bait. In reality they were selective aborted, raised by other family members, or put up for adoption rather than killed off as infants like feminists blindly proclaim. Please educate yourself.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 04:58 PM
5

the idea that women only offer sex is extremely incel and misogynistic. In prior eras women brought all sorts of amazing qualities to the table. Qualities like understanding, compassion, support, nurturing, and being a loyal confidant. They were the Yin to our Yang. But those amazing traits have been disowned by modern feminist women who equate them with becoming a man's mother, therapist, teacher, etc. Instead of supporting her man as part of a team of partners she instead takes on the role of …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/24 07:18 PM
28

I don't really get racial fetishising. I do understand having preferences or being attracted to certain races, but not fetishising. When women are drawn to a specific color or race it's just a preference. When men like a specific color or race it's a fetish. Calling it a fetish is just a way to denigrate it by making it sound perverse and unnatural.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/24 05:13 PM
140

'The practice...of initiating...proceedings against barristers who make gender-based criticisms of judges and/or their judgments puts women at a particular disadvantage when compared with men. This is because women are overwhelmingly more likely than men to make gender-based criticisms of judges and/or their judgments.' She basically admits that women who make sexist criticisms are being investigated more than men who do not make sexist criticisms. Sounds good to me. Just another gender supremac…
/r/MensRights20/09/24 08:47 PM
1

'The practice [of] pursuing proceedings against barristers who make gender-based criticisms of judges and/or their judgments puts women at a particular disadvantage when compared with men,' she said. This is because women are overwhelmingly more likely than men to make gender-based criticisms of judges...' Wow. She basically admits that women are much more likely to make sexist accusations and are therefore being punished for doing the very thing neither side is allowed to do. Just another gende…
/r/MensRights20/09/24 08:39 PM
1

That doesn't really prove anything considering Wikipedia is easily editable. You asked for info, I gave some suggestions, and the edit history is saved even if the edits themselves are reversed. There is a clear and intransigent bias in how Wikipedia reports on gender topics and many others. Apologies for responding to what you actually wrote instead of what you meant to right.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/24 02:33 PM
1

Compare and contrast the misogyny and misandry topics. Also look up the edit discussion history.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/09/24 08:38 PM
–

Rudd had mental issues dating back to a childhood trauma and said at the time of this incident she was 'clearly a very unwell woman and this was a chaotic, toxic relationship'. Trauma, psychosis, and bad childhoods grant no legal immunity for men, so why TF should they do anything for female abusers?
/r/MensRights19/09/24 04:42 PM
10

There use to be an ombudsman for listener complaints. If they still exist this sounds like a good complaint to lodge. Would be interesting to see what they say in reply.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/09/24 12:07 PM
2

I could not agree more. Men are hesitant to open up because even when we're specifically asked to do so our issues are met with indifference, resentment, and mockery. Sometimes it's from other men but most examples and most of the impact is from the women in our lives. Realizing the people who claim to care about us really just want more leverage in the next argument is why we shut up. Telling me to open up achieves nothing because it's based on a lie.
/r/MensRights17/09/24 05:12 PM
1

Boy Scouts opened up because they were losing members and running out of money.
/r/MensRights17/09/24 04:55 PM
1

The unemployment rate does not purport to include homeless people. I'm not sure where you got that idea but that is not what it measures.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 05:14 PM
1

The unemployment rate does not purport to include homeless people. I'm not sure where you got that idea but that is not what it measures.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 05:14 PM
32

Men die earlier worldwide, but in every country that uses different retirement ages women are able to retire earlier than men. Where I live they even get partial retirement if they never worked a day in their life so long as their spouse paid into a retirement plan. Must be that "patriarchy" always looking out for men and holding women back.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 04:57 PM
1

Vance has insulted Trump in the past, so I don't think your ideology applies here. Insulting Trump seems to be one of the most common traits the people who work with him share. Some insult him beforehand and others insult him afterward, but they all seem to get there in the end.
/r/MensRights11/09/24 07:23 PM
1

Vance has insulted Trump in the past, so I don't think your ideology applies here. You know who else has insulted Trump? Almost everyone who has ever worked with him or for him in virtually any capacity. I'm not saying that to be rude, but it's the facts.
/r/MensRights11/09/24 07:15 PM
-1

Vance has been tight with Peter Theil for many years and has already explained he would have done what Pence refused to do. I'm sure he's promised much more in private. I think it's clear to everyone what Trump expects from a VP. Like Xerxes from 300 he'll accept almost anyone so long as they promise absolute loyalty.
/r/MensRights11/09/24 03:54 PM
-7

Supposedly Trump outsourced most of the vetting to a group headed by Peter Thiel with the main Trump requirement being a VP that would do anything he was told without question or hesitation.
/r/MensRights11/09/24 03:28 PM
1

That risks the future viability of the MR group. Reddit barely tolerates us as it is and will shut us down for suggesting actions like this.
/r/MensRights11/09/24 03:21 PM
6

On that day, some good people, some of them women, will come to your aide. We see stories of innocent men being tossed in jail for days, weeks, or months on a false accusation with the only support that mattered being a camera that just happened to catch the exact moment he did nothing wrong. Even if some women publicly take the man's side and openly question hers it will not count for much in today's world.
/r/MensRights09/09/24 06:26 PM
17

But somehow the 4B movement is considered empowering and brave despite the essence being identical to herbivore men. Herbivore men are not really a movement. They're not forming groups or preaching that women are responsible for everything wrong with modern society. They're just giving up on a society that sees nothing good or valuable in them. Whereas 4B is a movement that blames men for the ills women face and preaches that other women should join to help punish the patriarchy until it recogni…
/r/MensRights09/09/24 01:57 PM
4

It goes against the narrative of never needing support from men and being (fake) egalitarians. They'd never take serious issue with it but it's just another real life example of how feminism is full of hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights03/09/24 07:49 PM
8

Dating is supposed to be fun and care free For the princess being asked I'm sure it's a blast, but for the guy it's a multi-hour interview where you try to buy an unpaid job as a planner, coordinator, chauffeur, storyteller, protector, therapist, and thankless benefactor.
/r/MensRights03/09/24 06:29 PM
18

Bring back firing squads He would be shot dead and unable to defend her next victim who would then be shot to death. Rinse & repeat.
/r/MensRights01/09/24 01:46 AM
4

I stopped watching traditional media in the MT era because so much of it has turned into sexist man-hating trash masquerading as enlightened social commentary. Even supposedly neutral content suffers from Marysue characters and Galbrush scripts with no personal growth or character arcs worthy of significant interest and exploration.
/r/MensRights31/08/24 08:48 PM
3

I sincerely believe that trying to pretend you’re invincible and don’t have vulnerabilities or insecurities is the worst thing to do. It’s going to eventually happen, because as humans we are insecure and vulnerable. If it's serious then discuss those troubles with male friends, close family, or a therapist. The point is to not bring them up with a female partner unless you are okay losing the relationship and the friends you share with her after she puts your fears and failures on blast. Or at …
/r/MensRights31/08/24 08:39 PM
1

men go on all the time how they are hard wired to like 18 year olds What men? I've only ever heard women talk about this and they usually bring it up randomly out of left field like you are right now.
/r/MensRights31/08/24 08:23 PM
5

Trying to paint it as though men shouldn’t be vulnerable in front of women undermines healthy relationships by failing to distinguish the root issue. I'm sure there are women who are okay with a vulnerable man but every man I know who risked a vulnerable admission eventually gave his partner "the ick" and watched the relationship fall apart soon thereafter.
/r/MensRights31/08/24 08:00 PM
10

Men cannot read minds. Nor can we stomach endless negative criticism and judgement. So we come up with practical solutions like "do not assume a request to be vulnerable is genuine and realize it could be weaponized against you." My time for happiness has come and gone already. I'm here to help protect those who come after me. I think you'd be happier with MensLib where anyone who says anything negative about women is permabanned.
/r/MensRights31/08/24 07:55 PM
41

If not you'd end up with a bunch of very violent incels like Elliot Rodgers. The percentage of incels that commit serious violence (not just talk about it) appears to be significantly lower than the general population. It's still a threat obviously but the way it's portrayed like an army of violent boogeyman is kind of absurd. I have personally witnessed and experienced dozens of incidents of domestic violence, all of them against a man with zero negative consequences for the woman. But rather t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/08/24 07:36 PM
11

Did these men who dismissed you repeatedly ask you to confide in them first? Did they tell all their friends you were weak and pathetic? The manipulative dishonesty is what makes it a trap women use against men. If women who get the ick would tell us to never show emotional vulnerability instead of repeatedly telling us to confide in them we would not have to deal with being trapped and betrayed. That is the core of the problem and I'm done looking for unicorns.
/r/MensRights31/08/24 06:34 PM
24

Get away from them if they act like they lack empathy. They act like they do possess empathy and repeatedly ask us to confide in them, just as you're doing right now, only to blame us for being weak because showing actual vulnerability gave them "the ick." That's not a woman trait. It's a sociopath trait and both men and women have done this. How many men blamed you for giving them the ick the moment you showed any emotional vulnerability?
/r/MensRights31/08/24 05:53 PM
1

We do not get many politicians open to men's rights down here either, but among the few we do get most are knocked out in the preliminary round where each party selects who will will the nomination. Down here most voters never bother to vote in the preliminary round (called primaries in the US) only to complain that no men's rights politicians exist, but more accurately it's that none remain in the secondary round (called general election). If MRA put more effort into primary voting they would e…
/r/MensRights30/08/24 07:56 PM
1

You still have the freedom to vote and many politicians who might be open to supporting productive egalitarianism over freeloading feminism get weeded out in the primaries. That would be one area to focus your future efforts.
/r/MensRights30/08/24 07:44 PM
1

Even states that have written common law marriage into law generally make it simple to avoid so long as you never describe, identify, or represent yourselves as anything more than partners. If your partner starts saying or implying you're anything like a married couple you need to make it clear you do not see it that way and shut it down.
/r/MensRights30/08/24 07:38 PM
1

Men shouldn’t be scared of feeling weak or appearing weak. It’s ok to have emotion and feel vulnerable at times I do not have a single positive experience with being vulnerable around women, including women who consider themselves to be extremely progressive. The only question is if she's going to mock and invalidate your concerns immediately or save them up for a future fight when you're not expecting it. Those are the only two outcomes I've experienced so far and I see no reason to keep trying…
/r/MensRights26/08/24 08:08 PM
1

If they can ban one victimless crime they can ban all the rest.
/r/MensRights26/08/24 05:13 PM
12

The majority of relationships are overall positive experiences. Are they? I was a lot more hopeful before I learned how modern relationships actually work. Once you see how the sausage is actually made the last thing you want is another helping. Or at least that is how it was for me.
/r/MensRights23/08/24 06:44 PM
32

For the "all men suddenly vanish" premise they talk about nude sunbathing, night walks, and leaving doors unlocked. Meanwhile power lines are failing, nuclear plants are melting, refineries are exploding, chemical plants are leaking, fires are raging, and female criminals are running rampant like an all-girl version of The Purge. If they could think about it logically it might be an enlightening thought experiment, but instead its just Pollyanna daydreaming.
/r/MensRights23/08/24 03:28 PM
1

For the "men vanish for 24 hours" premise they talk about nude sunbathing, night hikes, and leaving doors unlocked. Meanwhile power lines are vaporizing, nuclear power plants are melting down, refineries are exploding, chemical plants are releasing plumes of toxic gas, fires are raging, and female criminals are running rampant. If they could think about it logically it might even be a learning experience, but instead its just a bunch of Pollyanna nonsense.
/r/MensRights23/08/24 03:07 PM
37

Was the health and wellness of the male swimmers less important than the health and wellness of female swimmers? Studies seem to indicate that men and boys are more impacted by chemical pollution than women and girls, but I guess until a woman or girl complains it's just not a priority.
/r/MensRights22/08/24 07:31 PM
10

You take multiple girls on dates? Ok, you are eligible to be posted on "Are we dating the same guy". That is the plausibly deniable reason why men are posted there. The reality is that you can be posted for any reason or no reason at all by people you've never dated. It's a status poisoning site masquerading as a victim safety site.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 03:28 PM
7

Yes, but you have to word it "How much does he way?" Otherwise it will be caught by the offensive question filter.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 09:17 PM
2

Bingo. Ask a guy about early experiences with nudity and if they know you well enough they'll likely have stories just like this one or worse. To them it was awkward and uncomfortable while the girls remember it like it was all a big joke. I guess the patriarchy made mothers, aunts, and sisters objectify young boys like this.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 04:08 PM
5

Is there an end game to this? The Korean 4B movement might give us some insight into this.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 04:06 PM
1

I wouldn't go that far. Just don't let the doctor do anything like this, report them if they try (and follow-up), and ask your boys if anyone else has.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 03:53 PM
1

Bingo. Ask any guy or girl about early experiences with nudity and they'll likely have stories just like this one or worse. To the guys it was awkward and uncomfortable while the girls tell it like it was all a big joke. I guess the patriarchy made their mothers, aunts, and sisters objectify young boys. Feminists are sexist hypocrites above all else.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 03:51 PM
5

I like where you're going with this and I cannot think of a single reasonable retort this woman could throw back at it. Gotta save this one for future use.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 03:31 PM
5

Except they've already thought of that. Now that "violence" has been redefined to include things like "said something that hurt her feelings" every man is violent against every woman in his life. Feminists may be sexist bigots but they're not idiots. For every rational counterargument they have a dozen irrational explanations.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 03:28 PM
8

It's usually a lot harsher when they kill other women and girls, but rarely the same punishment as a man would get. Women who kill are rarely charged with (let alone convicted of) actual murder, which helps them escape a lot of mandatory sentencing, and they have a much better chance of parole than a man would for the same crime.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 03:23 PM
11

One thing [my sister] taught me that will stay with me forever is that you never truly know someone even after being together for years and to always have a way out so my response/concerns were from what i was taught Interesting how she has no problem harboring perpetual suspicion no matter what someone actually does or how long she knows them, but the moment a man expresses any suspicion he's an abusive cheating asshole. Feminism is the lovechild of sexism and hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 09:53 PM
17

However, most of these women love the men in their lives: their brothers, fathers, partners, friends, coworkers. They might love a male child but the other men in their lives are probably tolerated rather than being loved in the way men love the women in their lives. I've never done anything horrible but the moment I'm accused of something I expect every woman in my life to immediately abandon me without so much as a moment of hesitation.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 09:14 PM
19

Suggest something to a flight attendant and the odds are you’ll have a police escort off the plane. The days of customers expecting flings with flight attendants ended decades ago (if they ever existed at all) and nobody cares if you're in first class. Even on corp and contract aircraft they're friendly but not flirty. They might pretend they did not hear you the first time but if you kept it up you'd risk some very expensive problems.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 07:44 PM
23

A father can be at home and there can still be issues. Even if the father is available and invested there is only so much he is allowed to do. God forbid he scolds or punishes his daughter to the point that she decides to make a report against him. Even if she's super clumsy and stupid with her report and they are unable to throw him in jail he'll never dare to go against her ever again.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 07:27 PM
1

Or go to a place where the system is different and more in your favor (abroad) In the age of smart phones and social media the system abroad is not that different that the system at home. It's just that you happen to be wealthier relative to the men who grew up there.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 02:31 PM
1

I noticed that too, but it seems that presenting boys vs. girls videos as a battle of the sexes while gifting the girls better odds and paying the boys to drop out has generated far less controversy than the other claims against him.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 02:26 PM
1

Not because she is a woman. She was nothing but a spouse of an agent. You really think if the roles were reversed a house husband is (1) allowed to leave and (2) given diplomatic immunity at great political cost that (3) lasts forever?
/r/MensRights09/08/24 02:13 PM
1

Company creates brunch spot that serves women for free while charging male customers to stand outside and wait to be invited. After standing in line for weeks/months/years with no invite even the hungriest of men finally get the message and leave.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 04:04 PM
11

"I'll trade you something that cost me nothing for something you'll work decades to achieve."
/r/MensRights08/08/24 03:19 PM
22

"Women choose partners based on looks, which excludes unattractive men from sex, and that's why straight men are sexist." This is what brainwashing looks like. Or perhaps a brain tumor. Could be both for all I know.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 02:38 AM
59

It's funny how all the things I thought I appreciated and respected in girls (compassion, nurturing, loyalty) turned out to be the very traits modern women withhold from the men in their lives. You might receive it from your mother but after that you're the overly-trusting brainwashed mark women happily abuse and dunk-on behind your back. When called out for their immoral behavior they blame the men for making them do it. Sounds a lot like the 1950's chauvinists feminism still rails against. The…
/r/MensRights07/08/24 04:10 PM
49

She’s entitled, demanding, grating, and worst of all, feels like she’s 100% right. She's probably been told she's amazing and deserves to be treated like a princess from the day she was born.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 08:20 AM
1

As written the agreement seems pretty lopsided in his favor, but since none of us know you or where you live it makes more sense to ask a lawyer and take what they say to heart. Where I live this sort of agreement would never fly as written. You can keep whatever you came with but everything earned/bought while married is divided roughly equally unless it was inherited or part of a trust.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 07:14 PM
2

People change over time and separate for all kinds of reasons, not just because their partner/spouse did something wrong. The honeymoon period only lasts a couple years and they're already at that point.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 07:03 PM
2

I found the only thing worse than being alone was being with a modern (feminist) woman. I'd rather be dead than suffer another round of surrogate punching bag for all the world's problems past and present. That said I hope you get to experience at least one relationship so you can see both sides and choose the path that works for you.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 04:17 PM
5

Even if he did help her and changed his mind a year later, guess what, he'd probably be eligible for child support and alimony for 'setting the precedent'. He'd absolutely get stuck with child support despite not being the actual father and since we treat child support like alimony it's the same thing by a different name at this point.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 03:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter