TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Spigot_AT4 Archive

View 0 posts and 134 comments by Spigot_AT4 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Judging by your responses you are misinterpreting what they're actually saying
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/23 10:02 AM
1

Telling women that they need to engage with males who they find ugly Who is saying that? The entire point of the post is that no one is seriously lobbying for this "solution" in the first place. It's an ancient strawman, but it has run its course now. You aren't fooling anyone anymore by using it so it's time to give it a rest.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/23 09:48 PM
2

Because even women like you, who are initially open to dating short guys eventually realize they are happier with a tall guy
/r/AllPillDebate29/05/23 07:07 AM
2

Depression fuel ngl... Like someone else said, there is no female equivalent to height. Men's height preferences are too mild compared to women's. You can't view the sexes as some sort of balanced game system where everyone cares equally about the other gender's traits equally. Or of they care less about one, then they care more about the other and vice versa. In reality, it's all very asymmetrical. It's not right or wrong either, but you can understand why it makes us salty and frustrated. I wo…
/r/AllPillDebate29/05/23 06:33 AM
1

I didn't say a person is a thing a man gets. I said that sex is something women get (and men).
/r/AllPillDebate27/12/22 01:48 PM
1

Sex isn't a person tho
/r/AllPillDebate27/12/22 04:57 AM
1

The analogy is about women "obtaining" sex, not men "obtaining" women lmao. But putting that blunder aside, you are reading too deep into it and the point of the analogy completely flew over your head as a result.
/r/AllPillDebate26/12/22 10:50 PM
2

That's exactly the point of my analogy. Just because you get something doesn't have to mean you're in position to give advice on how to obtain it, especially if it's handed out to you.
/r/AllPillDebate25/12/22 12:23 AM
1

Women just have to exist to get laid tbh. Toddlers aren't struggling to find food, does that mean I should get foraging advice from toddlers?
/r/AllPillDebate24/12/22 08:47 PM
1

Not only is it not a double standard, but it's also completely irrelevant to the moral dilemma. If someone shamed both men and women for sleeping around, that would still be bad. You thinking that arguing against something being a double standard means justifying it is silly. Inb4: "but in op's comment they aren't shaming both men and women" I already explained why that also isn't a double standard: it's because the circumstances are different. There are many things that are bad that also aren't…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/22 01:56 PM
0

The irony
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 10:05 PM
1

I explicitly said that shaming is not justified. Other than that I also argued the phrase "double standard" is incorrectly applied here. Somehow you interpret that as me saying that shaming is justified lol. You can't be serious. Having a different set of standards for different situations is not a double standard. That doesn't mean that slut shaming is good, it just means the term you used was wrong. It's not that hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 02:44 PM
0

I wanted an example with more pronounced differences because it better illustrates what is or isn't a double standard. Don't go intentionally missing the point now. And yes our situations are quite different. It's near effortless for an average young, able-bodied woman to have infinite sex partners so it doesn't make sense to view virginity as a failure. It takes much more effort and skill to get laid as an average straight man, so being able to do that is seen as an achievement and being unable…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 10:34 AM
0

Not really. A double standard is when you apply different standards to the same situation, not when you have different standards for different situations. For example if you need to feed two dogs, but you give one of them meat and the other one you give cabbage then that's a double standard. But if you need to feed a dog and a rabbit and you give one of them meat and the other one cabbage, then that's not a double standard. Even though the standard is different, it's justified because the situat…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 08:31 AM
5

If a woman is a virgin she is pure, honorable, valuable. If a man is a virgin he's a loser, weird, creepy. It's not a double standard, it's different standards for different situations.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/22 09:53 PM
1

A 6'2, blonde, blue eyes and sharp jawline guy isn't going to attract a chick if he literally pisses his pants trying to talk to a woman. Anecdotally, I know guys like that who pull.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/22 01:50 PM
3

I said: I'm not blaming you, you just shared your perspective, nothing wrong with that. So once again, no, I don't find any issue with you sharing your view based on your personal experience. That's perfectly fine and I wasn't expecting a study. My point was how the sub's community is wildly inconsistent with their standard of evidence. One moment they are scrutinizing and nit-picking the sources to the finest detail and in the next they immediately accept a claim where the only source is a pers…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 05:06 PM
5

Earlier I saw a post here generalizing women and the post must've referenced close to a 100 studies, but it was still dragged through mud because of some studies' methodologies, sample sizes and what have you. Here you have a generalizing claim that cites no studies at all and is getting praise and awards. What a meme sub lol. I'm not blaming you, you just shared your perspective, nothing wrong with that. It's the sub's shifting standard of evidence that's hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 07:19 AM
2

If you like nuance so much and if you lurk long enough you'll probably notice that just because a man is a permavirgin doesn't automatically mean his take is worthless or that he couldn't possibly know anything about women's preferences. Even you said just now that you'd pick stats over anecdotes. So in a way, the permavirgins here base their opinion on a more reputable source of information than sexually successful men (considering most succesful men don't bother reading dating studies). Two re…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 02:53 PM
3

Of course there are limitations to statistics, but tbh there are countless more limitations to personal experiences.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 02:30 PM
2

We are not pretending to know what you want. There are questionaire studies invloving thousands of women who share their preferences. We live in the internet era, it's not like women's preferences are some sacred forbidden knowledge unaccessible to virgins. All you have to do is ask, observe, and write it all down. E.g. if women say they prefer taller men and if most women reject short men and aim towards dating a tall man then you can draw some conclusions about what women like in regards to he…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 02:06 PM
2

I appreciate folks like you who don’t judge others by their height But also in an earlier comment: A man shorter than me wouldn't respect my femininity Ironic. Same as you, I also respect folks who don't judge others by their height lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 06:07 AM
1

I think smaller women are more likely to be dominant tbh, at least from what I've seen online (bigger women tend to say they're insecure about their femininity so they aim for a hyper-masculine man). Even still, a petite woman who is dominant is extremely rare. A tall + muscular + dominant woman is unicorn tier.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 09:21 PM
7

Thing is that tall and muscular women aren't necessarily dominant. They still want a man who's taller and stronger than they are and who has a dominant/protective inclination. I see it a lot in tallgirls sub. They hate it when people assume they're dominant because of their size. If anything, they're more likely to want a bigger man than smaller women in order to feel small and feminine next to their partner. Perhaps some exceptions exist, but this is how it generally is.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 09:17 PM
2

Google Fisherian runway
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 04:13 AM
3

Idk man, when I go out I only see men a head or so taller than me partnered up. Men my height and shorter do exist, but they're almost never with a gf. Women and girls are the most giddy when their bf is like three times their size, otherwise they act unenthusiastic. This is strictly about younger people, I see plenty of boomers who break this stereotype. Judging by the couples I see it looks like older generations of women had much more varied taste in men. Perhaps that could explain your exper…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 10:55 AM
4

Scroll up to the first comment in the thread lol
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/22 08:11 PM
5

just showing their observations in society. Personal observations are biased. People tend to attribute positive traits to good looking people and negative traits to bad looking people. It's a proven and extensively documented human bias. The commenter's sentiment is such a tired cliche and it just fits perfectly into this.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/22 08:08 PM
11

Overestimating your own attractiveness = being cocky = bad trait. Underestimating yourself = being humble = good trait.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/22 07:53 PM
17

Ah yes. Attractive men = good, unattractive men = bad. Timeless classic.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/22 07:40 PM
6

Reddit problem it seems
/r/PussyPassDenied17/06/22 04:23 PM
3

I haven't read the whole study, but the part you quoted doesn't prove your point at all. More concensus doesn't equal less varied taste. Men in general are attracted to more women which is a huge thing that should be accounted for because it means more overlap. For example, let's say there are 10 men judging 10 women and 10 women judging 10 men. Let's say men as a collective like the top 8 most attractive women from the group, but every individual man only likes 6 women among the top 8. For wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/22 04:43 PM
7

Yes, men who read studies are more knowledgeable than married men with married friends Yes, they are. Being married doesn't give you authority to decide women's preferences for them. If women self-report that height is a big deal, you don't get to decide that it's not just because you got married lol. Do you realize how silly your thinking process is? You guys have no experience with women, but claim to know everything. No. If anything you are the one who claims to know everything and from what …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/22 08:25 PM
5

And yet in questionnaire studies women put a lot of importance on male height. But apparently you know women better than they know themselves lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/22 06:25 PM
9

Point: awkward permavirgins are more dangerous than sexually successful men Counter point: Actually no, it's sexually successful men who are more dangerous You: See? You're just proving the point. Do you read at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 04:12 AM
3

Let's say you are looking for a man who is in the age range of 20-40, is at least 6' tall, earns 80k or more, is not obese and let's also exclude married men. That sounds like a pretty lax standard for a woman to have, right? Well, wouldn't you know it, only 0.61% of men in the US fit this standard. So if we're talking about monogamous relationships (which is what most women want), then it's simply impossible for all women to date this tiny group of men. This is not an opinion, it's just a matte…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 04:50 PM
1

No, I still see men approaching women a lot more than vice versa. This is definitely not specific to my location either, it's cross-cultural. I don't think there is a single piece of data suggesting otherwise. When women approach, it's usually an exceptionally attractive guy, like really out of the norm attractive. The only guy I know that got approached more than once in his lifetime was around 190 tall (6'7). Less than 1% of people are this height. Forget about 80/20 lol, if it really were tru…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 01:16 PM
2

If he were to ask out 1 woman a year for ten years and he was rejected by all except the last one whom he ended up marrying, that would make this hypothetical man's failure rate 90% just like the post described. Does that sound like someone who is "running after his dick all the time" lol?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 01:21 PM
4

That's certainly out of the norm. How tall is he?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 01:01 PM
10

I know a guy who openly says feminism should be canceled and he has a gf. There are tons of famous people who are raging sexists who were popular with women, like Picasso. Bobby Fischer thought women were subhuman and in one interview said they shouldn't play chess, that they have no business in any intellectual affairs and that their only role should be to wait for their husband to come home and then fuck him. He dated and married a female chess player funnily enough. I say I agree that women d…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 07:20 AM
4

I think when talking about looks you should consider more than just facial beauty. You can't conflate ugly with unattractive. I also know of one undeniably ugly guy who is successful with women, but he's around 190 cm tall, so not exactly unattractive. When it comes to truly unattractive guys (short and/or small build, obese, deformed, etc.) I don't know any who are successful. Sure, they might get a GF once in a blue moon, but they're still generally unsuccessful and undesirable. One other thin…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 05:17 PM
3

Yeah the "mistery" got solved pretty quickly lol. Not the first one of its kind and it certainly won't be the last. Honestly, dating preferences are so predictable. People who say they're subjective and complex just don't pay attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/22 12:51 PM
1

Thannnk you Yw, bro. I think it’s one of the many issues causing people in general to be less satisfied with relationships. Like I said, if you got no data to back it up then it's just a hunch.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 04:24 PM
1

It's spelled masturbation, not masterbation. I think the term for masterbation needs to be expanded. No, it's better the way it is now. Expanding its' meaning would only make it more messy. If you mentioned masturbation, are you talking about stimulation of one's own genitals or are you talking about protected sex? You would have to clarify yourself every time. Did I say it makes them less satisfied? Yes. You literally said "I think this is why relationship satisfaction is going down" in the pos…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 04:19 PM
1

No, that's just false. You can only call it masturbating if you rewrite the dictionary and change the definitions of words masturbating and sex. Otherwise it's not. I don't think contraceptives make couples less satisfied. Do you have any stats to back this all up? If not, this is just a random, baseless guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 04:05 PM
1

The reason people disagree over who is chad and who isn't is the same reason people disagree over which person is more attractive and which person is less attractive. But just because there's no consensus doesn't mean that the concept of attractiveness is not a real.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 07:51 PM
1

Thanks for the answer. It seems like it should've been obvious from the start when you put it like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/22 07:28 PM
0

Is it really that hard to imagine? I'm sure you'd have no problem recognizing there are probably a lot of people who have a better personality than your husband (more knowledgeable, smarter, funnier, more pleasant to talk to, etc.) It's also pretty likely that a lot of such people would be better looking as well, it's not a big stretch at all. I'm not asking if you would leave your husband, just if there would be a feeling of missing out if someone like that showed clear interest in you.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/22 05:21 PM
1

That's not exactly what I asked. What I asked was: would you feel like you're missing out by staying with your current partner? So you are already dating him, but his roommate is superior in almost every quality.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/22 05:12 PM
2

Being in shape matters, but it's secondary to height. Money is even below that. It's too simplistic to just say you're unattractive because you're overweight. You're still considered hotter than men who are in good shape, but are also shorter.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/22 05:00 PM
1

That's an interesting situation. What if roommate also had a charming personality to match his looks, maybe even a better/more interesting personality than your partner? Would you feel like you're missing out by staying with your current partner?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/22 04:58 PM
9

No one had time for leisure. Which period of history? Most of the time and in most places, people had way more leisure time than they do today. Even today any less technologically advanced culture has more leisure time. You mentioned farming. What do farmers of the past do during the winter? Nothing. Even during the working season, people would still find time to do fuckall occasionally. Think of all of the millions of little holidays invented by the church that no one practices anymore today. C…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 04:10 AM
3

But it’s not your height, it’s your attitude. Even when women specifically say that it's height? All of these "it's not your height" sentiments are beginning to sound like a conspiracy theory. Like am I supposed to assume so many women are lying? Am I supposed to discard women's opinions and instead trust men's opinions on what women find attractive?
/r/seduction10/04/22 11:57 AM
0

Or he's just lying lol. On reddit we see so many bald, 5'2, ugly guys who are succesful with women, but where are they irl?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/22 01:48 PM
3

lol
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 09:17 PM
3

So you say it's not true that you refuse to date 50/50 men and then in the same paragraph you say "I'm just not willing to swim in shark infested waters for them." ...So in other words, you do refuse to date them. But it's only true when you say it. When I say it, it's not true? What's going on here?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 12:15 PM
3

"I'm in favour of 50/50. It's just that I think not going 50/50 leads to better results, I also refuse to date 50/50 men and in my experience those who go 50/50 are assholes and abusers." Sure, sure. "I am a devout christian. It's just that I don't believe in God, I don't uphold any christian values and in my personal experience christians are assholes and abusers" How convinced would you be by a story like that?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 10:49 AM
2

Let's assume that really is the case. The point is that there's no argument against a personal experience. So why were you expecting one? How do you disprove someone's personal experience? You can't. In our scenario, I'm a Christian that's saying that christians are evil assholes. Let's be real here, this is not the case. You're arguing in favour of men paying, how does that put you in the 50/50 camp? That's like saying you're a christian, but don't believe in God.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 09:56 AM
4

And I would absolutely love to date someone that has my views, which include 50/50 on dates Yeah that's definitely the impression you give lol Point is, you can say literally anything about what happened in your personal experience to support whichever narrative you want and there's no argument against it. It's just too convenient that all the people who don't fit your narrative are assholes. You know how much I see this kind of sentiment? There are christians who say all atheists in their perso…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 09:39 AM
6

No argument at all. "Speaking from my personal experience, people who share my views are good and wholesome. People who don't are all scum. But just my personal experience tho. You can't disprove that this is what I personally experienced." How would you argue against it? I'm curious.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 09:16 AM
3

And, again, as someone who doesn't even fucking like that custom: I have no fucking choice. We appreciate your noble sacrifice. I hope you can get through it. 🙏
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 08:34 AM
6

You haven't addressed most of the questions. What about interracial dating? There's a pay gap between races. Should it be taken into account? What about childfree couples? Do they still have to take childrearing into account just because? How does it make any sense that a small risk of death on the date should be financially compensated for? Most everyday activites carry a small risk of death, usually more so for men than women, but saying you ought to be paid for it is such a non-sequitur. All …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 08:27 AM
40

You have the same issue as many other ppd women in that you think your standards and preferences are the only ones in existence or that all other women's preferences are modeled after yours. They aren't. I don't know many men who very overtly don't have any long-term passions or plans, but I still know some who are successful with women. What they have in common is good looks. Perhaps you wouldn't find them attractive, but plenty of women do (probably the ones who are like them). I’ve noticed th…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 07:37 AM
0

No you can't lmao. You can pick any random person off the street and chances are that if they were indoctrinated from birth to be a nazi, then they'd end up being a nazi. That doesn't make them a nazi tho, just because they have that capacity. Our life circumstances influence who we become to a large degree. Circumstances that make up an average woman's life generally shape her into someone picky, whereas an average man generally becomes non-picky. If he's not picky, then he's not picky. Doesn't…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 10:50 PM
4

So you're arguing they're both picky No. I think the argument here is that different circumstances make different people. Circumstances of an average woman shape her into a picky person with an inflated self-image. With men it's the opposite. If they had the same circumstances as women, that would likely shape into them into a similar person, yes, but they don't. So they're not. You can't argue that they are that kind of person just on the basis that they had the capacity to become one if only t…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 06:21 PM
3

women who prefer confident, attractive men are decent judges of character. Yeah good looks = good character, of course. Women may agree with that sentiment, but it's far from reality lol. Chad isn't always evil. The whole point of the post was it doesn't matter if Chad is evil or not as long as he's Chad. That doesn't make women good judges of character as much as good judges of genetics and resources. Stalin was pretty popular with the ladies, he must've had a great character lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 10:11 AM
6

One of the rare posters who actually fit the description from the post and she posts without even answering the question. What's the point?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 05:30 AM
1

Did any of these studies include height as a factor? It doesn't seem so. Women care about height a lot more than any other factor so a study that excludes it can be discarded on the spot imo. It's like trying to get people to rate food, but they're not allowed to taste and smell the food, only to probe it for its texture and visual aesthetic. That would not accurately measure people's food preferences. I also like caption291's take. It actually explains a lot and is probably even more relevant t…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/22 08:54 AM
3

So you come in here explaining to me how I judge people and when I tell you that you are wrong that's gaslighting? Are you fucking broken? I'm not excluding the possibility you're replying in the wrong thread because you're making no sense whatsoever. The original comment I was replying to was challenging the notion that most men are automatically feared and respected. I, for one, have never been feared and respected in my entire life, but I don't doubt that's the case with taller, more imposing…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 10:36 PM
5

I can only speak for myself, but I only dismiss what women are saying if it directly contradicts data on the subject. E.g. "height doesn't matter" and similar bs. Look, I'm sorry I'm not naive enough to just take every rando's word at face value. If I were, then all of my money would go to nigerian royalty larpers, so I hope you can see eye to eye with me here.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 07:15 PM
43

Apex fallacy occurs most of the time when women talk about men. I'd guess she is thinking about 6'2 and up because anyone else is invisible.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 05:17 AM
6

I don't know anything about this controversy, but yeah height is pretty much what makes a man a Chad and also what makes a man a permavirgin. Everything else is somewhat subjective, but height is universal.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 05:36 PM
3

You're the one being vague. In what context do you disagree with the claim AWALT? AWALT is not just a phrase thrown around without context. It can be correct or incorrect depending on the context. You can say awalt in the context of talking about gold diggers (claiming all women are gold diggers). That would be an incorrect statement. You can say awalt when talking about attraction to masculinity (claiming all straight women are attracted to masculinity). That would be a correct statement. Simpl…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 02:54 PM
3

You step foot in a gym ONCE. You are above average I highly doubt this is the case in Netherlands or any place on Earth really. I know a guy who studied in Netherlands and his experience is very different. Gym culture is actually very prevalent. But the best thing about this statement I qouted is that even if we take it at face value, it still proves that women's standards are higher. Women don't need to set a foot into the gym, they don't have to build their bodies to be attractive. They just k…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 01:35 PM
1

No reaction to someone insulting you is not completely unbelievable, there are people who operate like that, but it's still odd. If you ever hung around other people, you'd probably notice most people take offense at being insulted. You wouldn't be baffled at something like this if you had life experience or went outside at all. Also it's known in psychology and criminilogy that it's usually (not always) the guilty ones who stay calm and collected while being accused and try to rationally prove …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 01:05 PM
1

So you only date men who you consider significantly more attractive than you. Among the men you dated there was one man who wasn't more attractive than you and you ended it with him for that very reason. Now you've come here with the claim that it's men who want partners more attractive than themselves, not women. I'm not saying this proves anything and I'm sure you were probably already aware of this irony even before I brought it up. I just think it's worth pointing out.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/22 08:23 AM
3

Of course everyone ideally wants someone more attractive than them, both men and women. Men, however, can be attracted to less ideal looking members of the opposite sex. I'm not sure that's the case with women. I think you've got it all backwards considering the data like 80/20 and even the human anatomy itself. Sexual dimorphism in any species means few top-tier males get to reproduce with all females. So it's not men who want someone better looking, they'll be satisfied with literally any tier…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/22 07:58 AM
1

If you think sexually successful men would eventually become interested (which is not impossible), then why also not women?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 08:54 AM
1

Henry Cavill because he's such a nerd ofc 😋
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 07:12 AM
2

Im saying that most normal kind people dont have trouble attracting partners. If u re a cool person, interesting, having ur own hobbies, having a good education and a decent job. No, that's not what you were saying. You said women pick the best genes, with more specific examples including height and physical strength. There's no gene for hobbies, selfishness, teeth brushing, nor is there a gene that prevents you from wearing shirts with holes. What you're saying now contradicts your previous com…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 12:24 AM
8

U qs a man, are taller than women bc some female Neanderthal 30k years ago decided to fuck a tall Neanderthal instead of a short one. Nice one, professor. Except we are not descendants of Neanderthals, we are Homo Sapiens. Modern human lineage sperated from Neanderthals more than half a million years ago. Neanderthals are extinct. Now, men dont like that, bc they have to put in the effort. What do you expect us to do, hit up a height gym? You wanna give others biology lessons lol, bro, are you f…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 05:57 PM
5

Men are attracted to almost any body type and the overwhelming majority of women their age and they are the ones who need to lower their standards? There simply isn't any room left to lower the standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 06:08 PM
1

You'll miss out on some pretty hilarious irony if you don't take a step back now and reflect on what you just wrote in relation to the post I linked. Those women are not talking about OLD profiles.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 02:23 AM
1

I actually don't. Most couples I see have the male a full head or more taller. In rare cases less than a full head tall. I see plenty of men who are shorter, but never partnered up in public.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 02:08 AM
1

as long as he is around my height it's fine. If by that you mean 21 cm taller lol: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.12.019 Women are attracted to average men. If by average you mean top 1-5% lmao: https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/rugya9/women_on_reddit_women_do_not_think_80_of_men_are/
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 02:04 AM
1

especially younger women. You know what, I could probably give you that much, but what happens when you grow up and you still possess those features? There is no self-improvement that targets this. Most of the things that make men unattractive are out of range of any kind of self-improvement and you're gonna see a lot of bitching from adult males who are salty over this fact. It's not unreasonable bitching tho, no sane person would be happy about that sort of thing. It's only natural. Lots of wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 06:30 PM
1

No one is using gay as a roast nor indult You can't possibly be that naive. How old are you honestly? Maybe you think you haven't seen it yet, but trust me, people use gay as an insult all the damn time as sad as it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 06:17 PM
1

3-4 days of lifting? Goodness gracious, the things you'll hear on this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 08:46 AM
1

Right. So if I'm short, have a small frame and delicate features, how exactly am I supposed to work on my appearance? It's easy to work on your appearance when it involves skin care, make up, fitting clothes, etc. It's a little bit harder when it involves cutting your bones under general anesthesia and inserting metal parts into it. It's not exactly as risk-free and easily available.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 08:37 AM
0

Like I said you can't willingly change your sexuality. If you have a problem with that then take it up with scientists in the field. If you give the "just turn gay" advice, you're either believing in pseudoscientific nonsense or you're using homosexuality as an attempted roast, i.e. you're a homophobe. Of course, those two possibilities are not mutually exclusive. I'm not giving anyone who spouts this junk the benefit of the doubt.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 10:34 PM
10

You can't willingly change your sexuality. Do you actually think "just be gay" is good advice? Doubt it. You're just using gay as an insult. Hence why you are homophobic.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 06:22 PM
1

It could be that anti-preference men and pro-preference men are two separate groups. Another thing is that people often mistake pro-preference people who are salty about their looks and think that makes them anti-preference. I am fully pro-preference. If you're only attracted to 6' and up, then go for it. But since I myself am short and ugly, then I'm kinda salty that I don't fit anyone's preference. I relate to memes and posts that aim to be relatable to unattractive men, but that doesn't mean …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 08:52 AM
6

I'm not saying no woman ever would date a chubby man. Women can date chubby men and prefer fit, muscular men at the same time. In spite of that chubby men can still find a date, especially if they have some other desirable qualities like height or status. But we are talking about what is considered attractive. Just because you can overcome the burden of being fat doesn't mean that's desirable in a man. But for women being flat or being apple or whatever shape is not necessarily a burden to begin…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 01:39 AM
7

I already said I agree the picture is a bad representation. Only weebs into under age anime girls say “flat is justice”. Blatantly untrue. Read any experiences of adult flat women. None of them have trouble finding a partner. A lot of them say they are insecure about their flat tits/ass despite their boyfriends loving those features. Some men just genuinely like that body type, it has nothing to do with pedophilia. I could just as easily point to a minority of women who prefer fat men. No, you c…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 10:41 PM
6

Where are they? Fucking a man or woman of their choosing while having a dedicated group of simps specifically for their body type. Ever heard "flat is justice"? It's not exactly a mainstream preference, but it's still very prevalent. I agree the pictures above aren't a good representation of all the different body types, but the point still stands: there are various female body types that are attractive, but there's only one male body type that is attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 10:23 PM
2

Of course I know that. And yet, I can't help but feel mad at this post and others like it. It should be pretty obvious why. It's not my fault, it's not the lack of empathy or ability to see it from the other side, I don't think there's anything wrong with women having these preferences either. You asked us to put ourselves in your shoes, now I ask you to put yourself in our shoes. Imagine you were a short, unimpressive man. Would you just stay perfectly calm and unaffected and silently nod in ag…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/21 12:27 PM
3

Omg so brave of you to say this. Except no, this is the default belief. Literally no one disagrees with this. The only ones who keep bringing up this point are 99% women who disagree with it and the remaining 1% are the most extreme incels who no one takes seriously. There is no real opposition to this. So why even bring it up as a topic of discussion? This is on the same level as saying "stealing is wrong and you shouldn't do it".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/21 01:47 AM
2

What so unbelievable about a hot ugly? If a man had a big asymmetrical nose he would probably classify as ugly. But if he's also tall, has broad shoulders, deep voice, he could be the hottest man in the world to a lot of women. Voila, a superhot ugly. Not really that big of a stretch, is it? Not an oxymoron either. Also, the guy who first responded to you to did an edit to clarify some things.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/21 02:01 PM
1

What stats did you put for SO? If you put in the exact same stats that your SO has, then of course the calculator will give you impossible odds because it will assume you are only looking for that one specific individual and nothing else. For example if your SO is black and you input that, the calculator assumes you are only searching for black people with those traits, so it reduces your dating pool and the probability of finding a partner. I think a better way of using that site would be to ty…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 12:04 PM
1

FDS kinda fits every point in your description. Narcissists who want a partner who kisses their ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 09:46 AM
2

I can't wrap my head around how women from reddit manage to function in modern society without something as basic as walking the street alone after dark. It's the most banal sight you can see. Women going from work, from school, grocery shopping, going for a run, etc. Everyone from elderly women to little teenage girls does it daily and yes, a lot of them are in groups, but a lot of them are alone too and no one bats an eye.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 02:54 PM
10

I guess the park in my vicinity has a lot of fake women lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/21 09:43 AM
3

"They" Don't you mean "us" lmao? If you're not exclusive, you're owed zero sexual exclusivity Sure, if you're not exclusive then you are not exclusive. Very eloquently said. Thing is, they wouldn't allow the man to act the same way i.e. to date multiple women at the same stage of the relationship that FDSers are dating multiple men. Rules for thee, but not for me. I can link you posts that prove that, but you probably already know about that. Also, words mean things. Women being strategic about …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/21 02:09 PM
3

Dude, FDS literally says it's ok for women to cheat, but not men and that sentiment is so prevalent that it has its own name (scrotation). This in of itself brings up a new point, they have a dedicated slur for men. They hate men. There was a post recently saying that all men are predators and creeps until proven otherwise. Stuff like this is just stuff I came across recently from other subs. Just spare me with all the "FDS just teaches self-love for women and to have boundaries", are you joking…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/21 05:15 AM
7

Yeah that's the narrative media seems to be pushing, but whenever a woman gives her honest answer it gives a completely different picture. Does any woman actually buy a small or even average sized dildo/vibrator? Oh they are all significantly above the average dick size? So yes, they absolutely do crave huge dick. It may sound conspiratorial, but you can't trust the mainstream media on this topic when it doesn't align with reality in the slightest. Maybe they're doing that to reduce anxiety and …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 07:34 AM
1

When you start changing things about hypothetical person A and B, you are doing the exact same thing as in my example with cars. Somehow with even less self-awareness this time than in the previous reply. Incredible.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/21 08:42 PM
1

Hahaha are you serious? It's because it defeats the whole purpose of the question. Imagine someone asked if you'd rather have: A) a flashy fast race car, but it's impractical and consumes too much fuel Or B) a plain looking, slow, but economical and practical car Then you come along and say "Yeaaah, but car A is probably more economical and more practical than car B, and car B is probably not at all economical and likely very impractical, so I'd rather have car A because it's fast AND practical.…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/21 11:02 AM
1

Do you ever go outside? You mentioned "likes south park" in another comment. I know a guy who leans right, has ok looks, is 6'3, has a spectacular career AND he even likes south park. He isn't religious and I don't know if he has any 50/50 hobbies, but your criteria is so ridiculously specific I'm surprised this guy even checked so many boxes. Wdym "can't see him survive in that environement"? Some of his colleagues are right wing to the point of being conspiracy nuts. He of course hangs out wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/21 06:47 AM
0

I think with these questions you are supposed to work with options you're given as they are, not add on to them with your own fanfiction lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/21 06:25 AM
1

Are you listening to yourself? The premise is in the title. You can't explain it away. You can hack op's account and edit it out if you want it gone so badly, but that's about it. Unless you can do that, you'll have to face reality lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/21 08:32 AM
1

Well yeah, anyone would consider it boring if it were easy to obtain and if there wasn't social stigma attached to being unable to get it. It makes perfect sense to find that kind of grind boring from your perspective, but you could try viewing things from different perspectives.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/21 07:49 AM
1

I don't think most of them are judged that harshly. I know some couples with extreme height difference. They aren't judged at all. Those who announce they exclusively date above a certain number are judged as shallow, which is fair imo. Reducing humans to a number is pretty shallow. Also the ones who actually do argue for the eradication of "short genes". I don't think that in of itself is a bad sentiment, but it is extreme to your average normie, so they are gonna be judged for it. I don't have…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 10:31 PM
1

First of all she never says a short guy is out of the question Naaah, she only said she wants tall "offspring" so she chooses partners based on height, that's completely different, right? Lmfao If you wanna play dumb then knock yourself out, but you can count me out.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 06:39 PM
1

What do you mean hold herself to the same standard? What would that even look like? To her, having a kid with a short man is out of the question because that could mean short offspring. However, she is also short. If she held herself to the same standard, she too wouldn't wanna reproduce because her reproducing could also result in short offspring. Where is the hypocrisy or entitlement here? The fact that she wants bio children at all? Well, yes in a way. I mean she clearly acknowledges that sho…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 11:41 AM
2

How is she delusional? Well, she's filtering out short men out of the dating pool with the intention to prevent short offspring, but she herself is short. She even mentions a possibility that she'll produce short offspring. "I've done everything I could". Really now? If you wanna be so generous and if your dating choices are for a noble cause of preventing short children, well who is forcing YOU to spread around your "short genes"? Why not, say, adopt? She wants to hold everyone to a certain sta…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 10:32 PM
1

Nothing in the post implies coercion. What exactly made you think this?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/21 07:56 AM
5

Because humans feel attraction and visuals are the biggest part of it? I guess there are people who don't, like asexuals and demisexuals. But most people experience attraction through visuals and it's the most common and banal thing imaginable. Are you actually surprised that this is a thing? Come on lol
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/21 09:57 PM
3

Nothing on reddit and online made me quite as hopeless as taking notice of real life couples. Every single time, the guy is at least a full head taller than the girl (oftentimes more) and around 3/4 head or more taller than me. There are of course plenty of guys out in public who are around my height or shorter, but they're never with partners. It's exclusively tall guys that are partnered. Maybe the shorter guys girlfriends don't like to show affection in public as opposed to tall guys, but tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 07:03 AM
–

Sure thing, I have much respect for reddit wannabe psychologists and psychoanalysts.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/21 05:03 PM
6

No lol. Just because a post implied some crazy shit doesn't mean it's true. He speaks for no one but himself.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/21 04:23 AM
2

It's not a one-time payment that you just get over once, but that's besides the point anyway. I'm not arguing which is worse, I'm just saying this thought process doesn't make sense. If I had that option, I wouldn't be spending time with someone I dislike and then be satisfied, because hey, at least I didn't pay for food. That sounds like an awful deal. I'd just find someone I do like spending time with, someone who I wouldn't feel needs to compensate me with money just for being in my company l…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/21 03:53 PM
1

This analogy is flawed on so many levels that I just lost interest.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/21 03:41 PM
4

Lol I just don't get it. You'd think if a person doesn't enjoy someone's company the sensible thing to do would be to stop being in the company of that person. But no apparently, what you actually do is you continue being in their company, but demand monetary compensation for your troubles. Clown world.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/21 04:14 AM
2

Thanks for the answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/21 10:48 PM
1

Do they have a leg up is what I'm asking.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/21 10:22 PM
1

Do you think that since women undoubtetly have a leg up in the looks department, that men could have a leg up in the personality department? I don't mean in a way that men are all-around better people, just that their personality is more "hot", like being more dominant, more confident, funnier, etc. Talking in a general sense of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/21 10:11 PM
2

The name came from incels (femcels merely copy incel terminology), but the idea is as old as time. Incels didn't invent any new concept here, they just invented a new name. I think most people agree that "looksmatch" is a thing and it seems pretty absurd to say otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/21 07:01 PM
7

I don't think I have ever seen even one. I've seen plenty of women who do it tho, namely on tiktok, twitter and reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 04:06 PM
2

Studies mostly. Not perfect by any means, but it's as accurate and objective as you could realistically get.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/20 03:46 PM
0

Any woman that has ever answered this question tbh. If you're female yourself, I'm interested what you think about it as well. And I obviously didn't say saggy face and acne scars are attractive or whatever you're trying to imply, it's the act of skin care itself that women generally find unattractive in men for whatever reason. Also most men don't use any and yet plenty of them don't have much visible acne scars (at least not more than women) or saggy face (which correlates only with age really…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/20 11:30 PM
1

Because by their own admission, women either don't care or actively dislike men who follow beauty tips that are generally practiced by women (like skin care). Exercise and proper diet is all good and those kind of tips are common among men. How you came to think anyone would consider exercise and nutrition gay is simply beyond me.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/20 09:41 PM
3

I'm a storage house worker and ideally I would like to be doing fuck all tbh. Why yes, I do have a 300 IQ, how did you know?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 09:06 PM
2

I don't see why women couldn't have all of these and more (except T and the number 9, although the latter is a weird flex and very few would see it as an advantage). Some of your points are vague to the point of being meaningless, like "true value" and "truly respected". Many perceive that women do have value and are respected, what does "true" and "truly" mean in your post is anyone's guess. I don't think you can easily assess which gender has it better in general, it depends on a lot of factor…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/20 07:31 PM
2

The definitions can vary wildly. OP should really clarify.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 12:53 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter