TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SpinozaFan Archive

View 0 posts and 9 comments by SpinozaFan on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

What do you mean downvoted? It's +27. Is there a way to determine how many downvotes and how many upvotes a post gets?
/r/MensRights11/01/12 12:31 AM
1

Yes, it is a fact that a woman can abort her pregnancy. But abandoning her responsibility for her child is wrong. Just like it is his wrong for the father to abandon (or "opt out of" if you will) his responsibility. At least we agree with the notion that with choice comes responsibility. Your "solution" is unfair to the child. Sure, one can argue that the mother could abort or choose adoption. But if she doesn't, then you are placing the so-called "rights" of the father above the real rights of …
/r/MensRights10/01/12 05:24 AM
1

He can be forced into fatherhood There you go again. The only thing that is "forcing" him into fatherhood is the fact that the woman he impregnated decided not to have an abortion. Why should the child suffer then? You are saying that the father should not be responsible for his responsibility. No one is forcing this responsibility on him. It is already there. Look, there are only two alternatives (since the man can't go back in time and undo what he did): Society can force the woman to have an …
/r/MensRights10/01/12 04:21 AM
1

Children deserve to have support? Yes. Absolutely they do. Well, isn't it weird how the child's rights take a backseat when the mother unilaterally decides so? A child's rights should never take a backseat to the so-called rights of either parent. You are advocating a selfish, irresponsible position, which is clearly to the detriment of society. My point is that forcing each parent into equal responsibility with one has virtually no choice into taking on parenthood is the problem. Your point is …
/r/MensRights10/01/12 12:00 AM
1

Actually your point is the nonsequitur. The real point is that children deserve to have support. If we don't "force" parents to support their children, then the children (and ultimately society) will suffer the consequences. If people are over 18 when they engage in behavior that can result in offspring, then unless these adults have a very low IQ, they need to act as the adults they are and raise and support their children. If there are people who don't want that possible responsibility, they n…
/r/MensRights09/01/12 11:04 PM
1

I've always been pro-choice when it comes to abortion, but it sickens me that men get absolutely no say whatsoever as to whether she can kill the child or not! Interesting. Very few people who identify as "pro-choice" use language such as "kill the child."
/r/MensRights09/01/12 05:37 AM
1

If parents (whether they are married or divorced) don't raise and support their children, then who will?
/r/MensRights09/01/12 05:29 AM
2

I have heard that if a woman is forced to have PIV sex against her will, then she will often lubricate, which would prevent greater injury from occurring. Is this true? And not that it happens as often, but I wonder if a woman somehow was able to force a man to have PIV sex against his will, would he be able to get an erection? I can't imagine he would. I suppose she could force him to take Viagra or wear a strap-on...
/r/MensRights11/12/11 07:02 PM
1

There is no hope for your relationship to survive. You should move on. You should focus only on your life and getting sole custody... Wait, what?
/r/seduction25/05/11 04:34 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter