TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Spirited-Direction-9 Archive

View 0 posts and 15 comments by Spirited-Direction-9 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Don't know the exact number as its over the last 5 years or so but yes between 35 and 40 of them
/r/TheRedPill19/04/22 12:51 AM
2

I'm an average Joe. I've probably asked only counting random people around 100 people in my life for their number and to go on a date. Of that 100 I got I would say at least 70 numbers and went on a date with nearly all of them. Your numbers are horrific bro you are doing something severely wrong if you are being rejected 97% of the time AT BEST
/r/TheRedPill18/04/22 11:11 PM
2

If I approached 1000 women and only railed 30 of them I'm not gunna like I'd be fuming. Anything below a 20% success rate is an utterly embaressing performance tbh. 0 5-3% success rate is just an ungodly amount of wasted time and energy. I imagine fucking Mormons would be pulling these figures. A normal average Joe would be around 7% the fact a self confessed guru trying his absolute hardest and employing all his tactics and knowledge and only getting 0 5% is utterly pitiful
/r/TheRedPill18/04/22 07:54 PM
1

Unless it's ANY case where a female makes a claim against a man then it's guilty until proven innocent. As soon as the case is made the male more often than not is Immediately convicted on social media and utterly vilified and ripped to pieces. He will also lose his job , his kids , his friends, his family even if there Is little to no evidence.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 05:59 PM
-3

Isn't he whatever he choses to identify as , at that given time obviously he can change that identity at any time he feels like it depending on how he is feeling what part of the gender spectrum he feels like he is on. So unless you can somehow see where on the spectrum he is at the specific time of youn commenting I'm really failing to see how you have come to the conclusion on " MAN " Can you help me understand please
/r/MensRights18/04/22 03:08 PM
3

It's glaringly obvious you are a woke obsessed radical feminist that holds contempt and disgust for men
/r/MensRights18/04/22 02:02 PM
2

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.lbc.co.uk/news/staring-on-tube-unhealthy-sexual-behaviour/
/r/MensRights18/04/22 02:01 PM
1

Yes we did read the article. This is a direct quote from it "Just last month a man was sentenced to 22 weeks in prison after a woman reported him for "continuously staring" at her on a train in Berkshire" So you are completely wrong it IS enforceable and IS punishable. People have and are under CRIMINAL investigation and have and are bring CRIMINALLY convicted for the crime of staring. I now expect you to retract your comment and admit you were completely wrong and just made up what you said
/r/MensRights18/04/22 01:52 PM
1

Yes we did read the article. This is a direct quote from it "Just last month a man was sentenced to 22 weeks in prison after a woman reported him for "continuously staring" at her on a train in Berkshire" So you are completely wrong it IS enforceable and IS punishable. People have and are under CRIMINAL investigation and have and are bring CRIMINALLY convicted for the crime of staring. I now expect you to retract your comment and admit you were completely wrong and just made up what you said
/r/MensRights18/04/22 01:52 PM
1

Yes we did read the article. This is a direct quote from it "Just last month a man was sentenced to 22 weeks in prison after a woman reported him for "continuously staring" at her on a train in Berkshire" So you are completely wrong it IS enforceable and IS punishable. People have and are under CRIMINAL investigation and have and are bring CRIMINALLY convicted for the crime of staring. I now expect you to retract your comment and admit you were completely wrong and just made up what you said
/r/MensRights18/04/22 01:50 PM
6

Wrong Yes we did read the article. This is a direct quote from it "Just last month a man was sentenced to 22 weeks in prison after a woman reported him for "continuously staring" at her on a train in Berkshire" So you are completely wrong it IS enforceable and IS punishable. People have and are under CRIMINAL investigation and have and are bring CRIMINALLY convicted for the crime of staring. I now expect you to retract your comment and admit you were completely wrong and just made up what you sa…
/r/MensRights18/04/22 01:48 PM
1

Yes we did read the article. This is a direct quote from it "Just last month a man was sentenced to 22 weeks in prison after a woman reported him for "continuously staring" at her on a train in Berkshire" So you are completely wrong it IS enforceable and IS punishable. People have and are under CRIMINAL investigation and have and are bring CRIMINALLY convicted for the crime of staring. I now expect you to retract your comment and admit you were completely wrong and just made up what you said
/r/MensRights18/04/22 01:44 PM
1

They have prosecuted and are currently actively successfully prosecuting people for staring this is a quote from the article "Just last month a man was sentenced to 22 weeks in prison after a woman reported him for "continuously staring" at her on a train in Berkshire. " 4 and a half months in jail for staring. Next people will be getting prosecuted because people will accuse other people of thinking things and because there is no way to prove you weren't thinking something that is more than suf…
/r/MensRights18/04/22 01:41 PM
1

Then like what happens in every other scenario like this then the women is right and celebrated and the man is wrong arrested charge and imprisoned.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 01:13 PM
2

A man has already been jailed for 22 weeks for intense staring as the charge
/r/MensRights18/04/22 01:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter