TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SpiritofJames Archive

View 9 posts and 571 comments by SpiritofJames on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I think you mean Dobbs v Jackson WHO
/r/MensRights25/06/22 02:41 AM
10

Yes, and vice versa: I support a woman's right to choose, which is precisely what abortion denies female babies.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 02:38 AM
2

This isn't quite accurate. Federal Legislation could overrule States, according to this ruling. Just not Federal Judicial Decree.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 02:37 AM
0

I assumed it was a Home Alone reference
/r/MensRights31/05/22 08:01 PM
1

Basically, she's a bigot and can't see it.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 11:24 PM
8

You should look up what happened since. She was forced to repay the money last I saw
/r/MensRights11/01/22 06:41 PM
11

For sure. So many things can get you going visually but would be the last thing you'd actually want to physically engage in. That should be so obvious to people....
/r/MensRights23/12/21 04:33 PM
2

Because centralization of power and control is good for all of them. Same story as always. The twist that they sell this authoritarian corporatist marriage of State and "private" interests as egalitarian freedom fighting for the little people isn't even new, they've been doing that since at least the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and The New Deal a bit later.
/r/MensRights17/10/21 04:51 PM
3

Figuring out why is easy. It's to win politics via culture.
/r/MensRights17/10/21 03:11 PM
1

One thing that you might benefit from is the consolation that words are not actions. Women very close to me act and behave in fantastic ways, but in words and especially debates they would rarely be the same person. In spheres of rhetoric like social media people don't treat each other or even themselves as actual people, and everything is wrapped up in tribalism and ego protection. What I'm saying is that you're more likely to find a woman that is not a bigot through their actions irl than you …
/r/MensRights12/10/21 12:04 AM
4

I would also check out the .win sites
/r/MensRights04/08/21 02:07 PM
5

I like Typhonblue's take that they're in competition with them by default so they don't see them as human, merely fodder for the system. See her videos on the "apexual male"
/r/MensRights21/06/21 03:35 PM
3

Much of the problem right now lies in the fact that we have no real idea of how many false accusations are made and/or prosecuted, because once a case isn't viable for whatever reason (including acquittal), the default procedure is to simply stop looking into it. The idea of trying to find out whether the accuser was lying deliberately doesn't even cross their minds 99% of the time as a real or important decision.
/r/MensRights10/06/21 05:48 AM
0

I'm on board with this if every case that fails to prosecute successfully then automatically triggers a full investigation into the accusation/accuser. Otherwise they will continue to decline that option.
/r/MensRights10/06/21 02:27 AM
0

That's not the initial, untampered report by the ME.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 08:14 PM
1

He had already died at that point from medical distress that began long before, as the videos clearly show. The knee is irrelevant to that process.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 06:35 PM
1

Love how nobody can actually give a real response to the point: There are multiple videos that cover a time window of ~30 minutes, and if you haven't seen them then you have no idea what actually happened.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 06:00 PM
-1

First of all, no it doesn't look like that. Secondly, no evidence in any legitimate medical report can be construed as indicating that is what happened.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 05:04 PM
0

Lol, typical response when you're frightened by your massive cognitive dissonance
/r/MensRights21/05/21 05:03 PM
1

That's not asphyxiation. And it wasn't happening either.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 05:02 PM
-9

LMAO "The" video -- that's all I need to know about your uninformed opinion. There are multiple videos, and you've only seen one misleading video instead of the rest covering ~30 minutes.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 03:58 PM
-14

The knee was not continually on the neck, and yes it is negligible when the force applied was not enough to cause any damage whatever (not even bruising). No, blocking a wind pipe from behind cannot happen without a lot of force.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 03:57 PM
1

This is much worse since all indications are the cops directly caused the death, whereas in Floyd's case the pressure is negligible and not a cause of death (he OD'd).
/r/MensRights21/05/21 02:48 PM
3

When have they not...?
/r/MensRights12/04/21 01:43 PM
6

Ah, well it's definitely different knowing it's in a public chat. Sad that people are set to react this way....
/r/MensRights07/04/21 04:49 PM
7

If there had been more to the first text this could have gone over very differently. "Can't sleep?" alone is super informal and casual.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 04:42 PM
61

That's the point of the post -- LotF is a good novel, but it's fiction, and does not reflect on the reality much. If anything, it reflects more on the predominant Christian worldview (of the author) which has mankind as inherently fallen, evil, and depraved.
/r/MensRights05/04/21 04:10 PM
-23

Uh, if some dude responded to a question about he lost his virginity, in a public space, and he responded by telling a story that seems tailored to improve his image among his target audience? Like saying he slept with his teacher or something? Or maybe the hottest girl in his class? Or the prom queen? Etc? I think I would, yes.
/r/MensRights17/03/21 08:58 PM
-27

Honestly this doesn't sound true. It could be, but I kind of doubt it. It seems more like a performance/character statement for marketing purposes. But maybe that's just me.
/r/MensRights17/03/21 08:46 PM
3

Lmfao. Let me know the next time you make enough money to support not only yourself and your family but also other people. "Just as easy" my ass. The economic illiteracy of people like you is enough to cause aneurisms.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 03:57 AM
5

Corporations don't pay taxes. People pay taxes. Most often, it's regular people (customers).
/r/MensRights21/10/20 01:17 AM
1

You're trying to say it makes sense that mgm is legal by recourse to its rarity, but you won't discuss its rarity relative to fgm? Weird that....
/r/MensRights01/10/20 02:27 PM
1

Are immigrant males mutilated more or less than immigrant females?
/r/MensRights01/10/20 11:50 AM
19

Uh... are you saying immigrant males are less likely to be mutilated?
/r/MensRights30/09/20 06:02 PM
2

Lmao
/r/MensRights25/09/20 01:50 PM
3

Bandwagon is not just a phenomenon in sports fandom.
/r/MensRights19/09/20 11:58 PM
7

Yea, like being in prison is the place to "become socialized." Bitch, why would you think that being socialized as an inmate is the goal?
/r/MensRights17/09/20 08:21 PM
27

Karen Straughn and Alison Tieman are the real shit. Some of the best old Youtube content on these subjects by both of them.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 05:59 PM
0

Ah, you won't admit that you are not one of those things? Why?
/r/MensRights16/07/20 04:25 PM
0

Be specific. Are you a doctor, psychologist, or psychiatrist? "Referring" kids to one is not being one. It sounds like you are an administrator/educator.
/r/MensRights16/07/20 04:23 PM
1

Are you a doctor? Psychiatrist? Psychologist?
/r/MensRights16/07/20 04:21 PM
0

And if you have any knowledge of what that means you will know that it is completely irrelevant to the question of whether you have knowledge or expertise on the topic merely by dint of having autism or experience with people with autism.
/r/MensRights16/07/20 04:16 PM
0

Something directly related to the topic. What you're saying is close to something like "I was a prison guard for 15 years so you should listen to my opinion on the justice system."
/r/MensRights16/07/20 04:13 PM
-1

You have yet to indicate anything to suggest you have any special knowledge or expertise about ODD.
/r/MensRights16/07/20 04:10 PM
0

It's not experience with ODD in particular.
/r/MensRights16/07/20 04:08 PM
3

That and your work experience in education, which again may be worse for objectivity on this question, are the only substantive supports you've provided for your claims.
/r/MensRights16/07/20 03:04 PM
2

It most certainly is. I'm still waiting for evidence that you have any more expertise than a random person on this specific topic.
/r/MensRights16/07/20 03:00 PM
-5

So?
/r/MensRights16/07/20 02:58 PM
9

Sorry but nothing you're saying actually shows you have any expertise regarding ODD, how it's diagnosed, the potential for misdiagnosis, or the underlying problems with the entire practice of psychiatry. Being diagnosed as Autistic, one of the few more clearly defined and reliable categories, does not grant someone that expertise. Neither does working in the system. In fact being in the system may make it difficult or impossible to see outside it, to see where it malfunctions.
/r/MensRights16/07/20 02:55 PM
12

What does autism have to do with "ODD"?
/r/MensRights16/07/20 02:44 PM
1

Equal in moral value. That's it.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 05:40 PM
1

tHiS sHoWs wHy wE nEed mOaR reGuLaTioNs
/r/MensRights20/06/20 05:51 PM
3

We need a Batman here, people. Someone...? Anyone?
/r/MensRights29/05/20 02:55 PM
20

They got away with Anita Hill, they got away with Kavanaugh, they'll get away with this.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 07:42 AM
14

> Whilst there probably is more actual abuse going on than false charges/reports, I want to take issue with this as the default assumption. If we think as clearly and objectively as we can, isn't it obvious that making an accusation -- since it's literally only words, sometimes spoken, sometimes written, sometimes texted or tweeted -- is significantly easier than actually performing some sort of physical abuse? Even if those words are met with silence or even derision, isn't putting them out the…
/r/MensRights19/03/20 07:04 PM
1

Why is it weird that a girl can be an abuser in a relationship?
/r/MensRights24/02/20 03:51 AM
22

Sure but is that a difference in difficulty or difference in taste?
/r/MensRights12/01/20 08:14 AM
63

You say "no hard negatives" because you've never felt with your foreskin. And "not getting dick cheese" is about the dumbest fucking reason to surgically remove a piece of your body. Imagine -- you could rid yourself forever of ear "cheese," toe "cheese," belly-button "cheese," even finger or elbow "cheese" by surgically removing them!! Why didn't your parents have your best interests at heart, letting you come into the world attached to all of these disgusting cheese-propagating organs?!? What'…
/r/MensRights01/01/20 07:40 AM
1

Ruin your life and body? No thanks.
/r/MensRights01/12/19 04:18 PM
2

More like a struggle session
/r/MensRights26/11/19 01:26 PM
1

Ahem
/r/MensRights10/10/19 06:22 PM
5

Because you're a weakling?
/r/MensRights10/10/19 04:46 PM
12

How about Yes. Freedom of association is a thing.
/r/MensRights21/09/19 04:14 PM
52

Ok, fine. But then it's not sexist for male employers to want women secretaries and male coworkers. For the same reasons.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 04:18 PM
1

Wikipedia might not tell you the obvious fact that many if not most stereotypes are based in realities and relatively accurate.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 03:03 AM
5

Is this really a female? Chances that its trans?
/r/MensRights25/05/19 04:29 PM
1

Yes, it is.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 09:56 AM
7

Systemic racism is a thing though It could be, but it's an empirical question that such fields very rarely attempt to verify rigorously. For them, merely identifying disparate outcomes is enough.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 11:27 PM
57

Some Crit theory or sociology text. Humanities are in shambles atm.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 10:40 PM
8

It's really not at all. I'm cut and can see the truth of the situation easily. Only pussified, defensive cowards react like flapper here.
/r/MensRights07/04/19 05:47 PM
10

Lol it says a lot about you that you ever have crust on your dick, bro....
/r/MensRights07/04/19 05:46 PM
19

You're a fucking moron.
/r/MensRights07/04/19 05:20 PM
42

You wouldn't and couldn't know. You're missing body parts ...
/r/MensRights07/04/19 04:55 PM
0

They're just insecure because they are literally less of a man. Their manhood is missing pieces.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 01:27 AM
-6

No it doesn't. "Male" is "masculino." "Macho" is exactly what /u/dtaylortx described.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 05:23 PM
16

That's code for "we don't want to offend jews or muslims"
/r/MensRights02/03/19 02:11 AM
1

Using .01% to "disrupt" a category is fundamentally wrongheaded, even asinine. If categories can't be defined at that level, the only ones we're left with are those from mathematics. 99.99% is easily enough for a social, conventional binary to not only exist but be standard.
/r/MensRights28/02/19 06:42 PM
32

Or a libertarian? It's the welfare state and the drug war.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 07:28 AM
15

There are no cons. The only "cons" ever proposed are just like the "cons" of having toes because you have to wash them and because they sometimes become ingrown or get warts or fungus or cancer; in other words, absurdities.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 08:02 AM
0

No. Ford is a liar just as much as this woman is.
/r/MensRights03/11/18 06:33 PM
6

No it doesn't, it shows that they exercise that agency just like anyone does. You incentivize something, it's rational on some level to go after it and make certain trade-offs for it.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 04:12 AM
23

Your perceptions of reality aren't reality.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 01:31 PM
36

Apparently WTA allows it. I don't know much more than that.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 05:26 AM
66

It's more that coaching is allowed in many WTA events, so they're used to that dynamic and probably try to get away with it as much as they can at Grand Slams where it's illegal.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 05:11 AM
10

If anyone knows where this is, please send this to the proper authorities.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 09:40 AM
71

What a garbage island.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 04:45 PM
-2

"Climate Change" is also leftist science denial, but dressed up like science because of political orgs and funds. FFS the IPCC itself is a political organization, not an academic or scholarly one.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 05:55 PM
1

Eccentric implies uncommon or unusual. The bad feminists are not that. They are the common and typical variety, but raised to levels of power and influence far beyond the weight and coherence of their positions.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 12:26 PM
2

You need to reread my comment. I'm saying you're trying too hard to apologize for feminism. Not that you need to apologize.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 10:58 AM
2

Lol. So pathetic.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 10:38 AM
2

You're going way too far to apologize for this. Just imagine if someone was jumping through these same hoops for something like white supremacy. It doesn't matter if you have some head-tale about the majority of feminists having pure hearts and good intentions -- the theories, movements, and leaders that they ally themselves with are wrong and often evil, and they're guilty of at least self-interested laziness in supporting such, even if passively.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 03:22 AM
1

Margaret Atwood is delusionally misandric.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 07:36 AM
9

Meh. Illegal immigrants are "valued" by the left currently only as political ammunition against their opponents who have humiliated them by besting them with a reality TV carnival barker as a Presidential candidate.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 04:44 AM
22

The more important thing really is that winning that case made it perfectly clear to gilad that he had not rejected him, so he took him on afterwards.
/r/MensRights16/06/18 07:00 PM
13

It comes from html coding, in which pairs of tags, like <body> </body> , are used to modify sections of text. The tag marking the end of the section always has a "/" in front of it (as before with /body, but also </p>, </header>, </text>, and so on). So "/thread" is a way of saying: this comment ends the thread (because it is so good, or so concise, etc).
/r/MensRights14/05/18 11:05 AM
11

/thread
/r/MensRights14/05/18 10:58 AM
4

He has a dozen schools of though listed in his wikipedia page and none of them are cultural Marxism. Lol. You're relying on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is pure shit, especially when it comes to scholarly topics, and most especially when it is controversial. Sure, but plenty of thinkers have attempted to do this, and none have called themselves cultural Marxists. False. And even if it were true, that's as irrelevant as saying "the stoics didn't call themselves stoics!" Self-identification with a particu…
/r/MensRights19/04/18 06:26 AM
8

But the uses of the term run out after less than a page, quotation marks or no. No they don't. Do I seriously have to go through each page and copy/paste the examples for you? How illiterate are you, exactly? Besides, if it's obvious that cultural Marxism is a distinct entity, then can you actually give me names of people who identify as cultural Marxists? There are already two listed there. Jameson and Brenkman. There are many others. Can you tell me how cultural Marxism differs from regular Ma…
/r/MensRights19/04/18 05:02 AM
10

I got all of 5 hits that actually used the phrase "cultural Marxism," You're lying: Dworkin, Dennis L. Cultural Marxism in postwar Britain: History, the New Left, and the origins of cultural studies. Duke University Press, 1997. Weiner, Richard R. Cultural marxism and political sociology. Vol. 125. SAGE Publications, Incorporated, 1981. Hicks, Emily. "CULTURAL MARXISM-NONSYNCHRONY AND FEMINIST PRACTICE." ARGUMENT 25.MAR (1983): 197-209. Jameson, Fredric. Jameson on Jameson: Conversations on cult…
/r/MensRights19/04/18 04:47 AM
7

No one has ever actually claimed to be a cultural Marxist, This is entirely false. All you have to do is search "cultural marxism" in google scholar to find dozens of examples.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 04:24 AM
19

NPR was always like this. You're just sensitive to the bullshit now.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 10:07 PM
8

"Your opinions make me want to kill you somtimes" -- sounds very unhealthy....
/r/MensRights15/04/18 07:18 PM
2

Spacey came onto a minor inappropriately. Apparently that's enough now to end your career...? Louis C. K. had overtly consensual sexual encounters with women that didn't even involve physical contact, and that's enough for us to condemn him forever? Weinstein is another matter that I haven't followed closely enough to opine on, but labeling accused like Spacey or C. K. as the real "witches" upon which the rest of this hunt is based is a pretty big mistake. The fact of the matter is that small, s…
/r/MensRights14/02/18 03:00 AM
1

The definition of paedophilia is - and I think intentionally so - very hazy No it's not. Pedophilia means inveterate lust for pre-pubescent children. Pre-pubsescents' sexual organs and bodies in general are not developed, meaning that they cannot engage in mutually sexual activity. If they are involved in sexual activity, it is all from the other party in the encounter. it is a fiction of the feminist mind trying to apply their hatred of male sexuality onto the real world You're the one who hasn…
/r/MensRights10/02/18 05:20 PM
0

I can't tell if this is serious or some kind of inside job to discredit men and those who talk about men's issues. There are interesting things to talk about vis a vis "young sexuality," but most emphatically not pedophilia, as by definition the relation cannot be mutually sexual.... So I'm left to think the author is using "pedo" etc for pure shock value and/or to discredit the "manosphere" still further.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 08:19 AM
3

Yes.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 12:44 AM
45

People are very, very uninformed.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 03:44 AM
1

Sure, but that's a feature of all human systems, including every system of justice or law that will ever be devised -- people with more money are simply people with more social pull, and there's no way around that.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 06:46 AM
1

I'm well aware of Jim Crow. Jury applications or enforcement of the law is not "law." It's a separate issue with a different problem and solution set. It's important to be clear on these issues. By letter, the law is quite egalitarian from what I can see. But sometimes its application, or even its motivations and originations may not be. And in these cases simple removal (like repeal of all drug prohibition laws) may be the only good answer.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 04:58 AM
2

How does that work?
/r/MensRights28/12/17 04:57 AM
4

That's not the only causal factor. And that's not a characteristic of the law, but of wealth distribution....
/r/MensRights28/12/17 01:45 AM
8

What evidence is there that the law is biased against black people?
/r/MensRights27/12/17 11:17 PM
0

The Government is much more Administration and Bureaucracy than it is visible.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 03:56 PM
78

And let's face it, unsubstantiated accusations from a man against a woman would never even get attention in the first place.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 09:04 AM
14

Repeat after me: Religion of peace. Multiculturalism. Moral relativism. Religion of peace. Multiculturalism. Moral relativism. Religion of peace. Multiculturalism. Moral relativism. Religion of peace. Multiculturalism. Moral relativism. Religion of peace. Multiculturalism. Moral relativism. Religion of peace. Multiculturalism. Moral relativism.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 05:56 AM
3

Yes. Yes.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 12:25 PM
1

Most of those women have "mental illness."
/r/MensRights10/11/17 10:24 AM
7

It's very simple. It's a sin to be a man and to express your sexuality in any form that isn't directly in service to a woman.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 10:23 AM
-2

Lol calling UK govt right wing
/r/MensRights09/11/17 10:09 PM
9

You mean to say: how hard is it to learn how not to be a perpetrator of DV. Right?
/r/MensRights06/11/17 06:06 AM
2

LOL so there's another metric by which we can see it's failing disastrously
/r/MensRights03/11/17 03:21 AM
1

Right, but grouping people into classes, declaring that they are permanently at war with each other, have different logics, different consciousnesses, and only one side must inevitably be eradicated to make way for Utopia.... That's all Marxism.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 08:32 PM
1

It's Hegel via Marx, as they pick up other Marxist ideas along the way, like class consciousness and a utopian future after a universal revolution.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 11:39 PM
4

And it's essentially identical in form to a lot of other marxist inspired leftist movements.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 11:24 PM
60

Total bullshit ofc
/r/MensRights01/11/17 03:35 PM
20

And the fundamental theories of feminism are wrong other than moral/ethical equality.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 08:50 AM
3

This is so batshit insane. In just the most basic, fundamental, physical and empirical details, it is much more likely that someone is lying about a rape than that the rape actually happened if all you have is the statement. This is for the simple reason that it is many orders of magnitude easier, as well as less risky, to simply verbally state that someone raped you than it is to actually do any raping. How is this not obvious to people? I can falsely accuse millions of people of rape right now…
/r/MensRights19/10/17 12:25 AM
3

Syria is in Europe?
/r/MensRights14/10/17 02:45 AM
31

Some fgm is, others aren't.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 07:24 PM
76

Honestly who knows or cares what Aleppo is
/r/MensRights13/10/17 07:22 PM
12

The Salem Witch Trials were about a lot more than people talk about anymore.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 08:12 PM
3

Agreed
/r/MensRights13/09/17 07:38 PM
12

How's that? And yea, we've had a number of tough conversations. In the end, though, we're both certain that the other is acting in good faith.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 12:07 PM
12

Not here. And I think it's one of the things that made our relationship strong, despite the fact that she considers herself a feminist.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 08:22 AM
20

You have absolutely no clue....
/r/MensRights28/08/17 07:09 PM
15

He hardly extends them anywhere. All he does is make obvious and bland statements that anyone with a basic understanding of statistics and human choice would understand and agree with.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 08:30 AM
15

Nah. The office has every incentive to prosecute as much as possible and absolutely none to declare someone innocent. It's as simple as that.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 06:25 PM
1

I'm not trying to imply any particular judgment, I was just curious about your response and opinion.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 08:51 AM
0

Right. I'm asking what you would think and feel about that if someone of the opposite gender were to make that same confession to you.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 08:46 AM
1

Now, switch the genders... do you still feel that way? Why/why not?
/r/MensRights14/07/17 04:06 AM
3

The word black is not more offensive than the word white.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 05:59 PM
2

Seriously, I have never heard actual people say the things they mock them for saying. At best they'll contort some bland question about nonverbal communication into victim blaming.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 09:25 PM
72

Postmodern feminism. Not even once.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 04:02 AM
1

Larry elder argues that's mostly true
/r/MensRights13/06/17 12:24 AM
4

My grandparents were married at 16....
/r/MensRights31/05/17 07:52 AM
12

I hate the word cuck. I feel like it has no real use. And then I read about shit like this.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 07:38 AM
60

Or they just like them less than they like themselves. I think most of the time it's simply that feminism is a very easy, self-serving place to go if you are a woman. Maybe you don't actually hate men, but you care about yourself more....
/r/MensRights30/04/17 08:14 PM
3

Don't joke, because that's exactly what they're after, even if they don't know it consciously.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 04:02 AM
1

"temporary"
/r/MensRights13/04/17 07:21 PM
5

She was 13
/r/MensRights09/04/17 04:37 AM
18

While it's true that she probably didn't expect his reaction, I think it's reasonable to suspect she was hoping for a strong, negative, even hurtful reaction. Whether or not she was motivated by sadistic humor or malevolence doesn't change that.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 07:34 PM
6

I believe what /u/singuilaire is trying to say is that you'll never see movements explicitly pushing for the equalization of gender or sex representation in the homeless population
/r/MensRights14/03/17 10:18 AM
1

No. Lol. Look it up. https://www.quora.com/Can-one-ovulate-during-menstruation
/r/MensRights13/03/17 09:15 PM
-2

Guys, there are a lot of you in this thread stating that this is similar to "menstruation" or "periods." This is inaccurate. Don't confuse ovulation with menstruation please. It's correct to say sperm ejaculation is somewhat analagous to ovulation, it's completely incorrect to say that it's analagous to menstruation, in which no sexual gametes are actually released.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 05:11 PM
14

Something like 60-70%
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:45 PM
1

I think your comment demonstrates a basic unwillingness to understand my argument. Um. Sure. Ok, bud.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 10:56 PM
5

No context? There has never been and never will be, anywhere, thirteen year olds who are mature enough to consent? I believe that displays a lack of imagination and basic ignorance about life more than anything....
/r/MensRights27/02/17 06:46 PM
9

Simply saying that something has happened is almost infinitely easier than performing the action. Surely it is much, much easier to lie about rape than to actually rape someone. On net, given what we know of human societies, nature, and behavior, we would expect false rape accusations to greatly outnumber actual rapes for this reason alone. This seems trite and obvious to me. Yet people act as if women are different from other people. Even worse, we've built systems that even further incentivize…
/r/MensRights23/02/17 10:56 PM
2

Replace this with any other group.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 02:36 AM
5

The declaration of sentiments is some straight up sexist bullshit
/r/MensRights19/02/17 11:50 AM
1

It's not even "the real last one" according to mormons. See the "Doctrine and Covenants" and the "Pearl of Great Price." And the way you wrote your phrase insinuated that they claimed the Book of Mormon to be "the last one," which is false: they actually preach the exact opposite (that other revelations occur and will occur).
/r/PussyPassDenied05/02/17 10:15 AM
2

it is the real last one ex mormon here. This part isn't right
/r/PussyPassDenied05/02/17 09:21 AM
1

"study"
/r/MensRights01/01/17 11:56 PM
1

Granted +/- 5% isn't enough to disqualify the claim, what's wrong with it?
/r/MensRights01/01/17 08:05 AM
29

Synonym for bullshit
/r/MensRights01/01/17 01:46 AM
2

So you don't actually have any evidence to suggest that women had anything to do with the creation of gender roles or the distribution of power? What are you talking about? So are you trying to say that since the dawn of time women have been nothing but victims, entirely controlled by their environment, powerless non-agents swept away by the opposite sex? That sounds entirely bat-shit crazy and sexist. I largely agree with the rest of what you say here. To me they seem to support the point of vi…
/r/MensRights21/12/16 09:17 PM
3

I'm just going to copy my replies to someone else on this same topic: The history of patriarchy requires a particular interpretation of events. Whether one finds that the most likely interpretation or the best interpretation doesn't matter. It's always just as easy to flip the script and create a women are dominant interpretation. These arguments get us nowhere because they depend on us ascribing intentions to historical people Why must being a publicly acknowledged political leader be a sign of…
/r/MensRights21/12/16 09:08 PM
2

The term feminism and the feminism movement dates all the way back to when the idea of institutional misandry was laughably insane. And this hear tells us all we need to know about your assumptions and your education. If you think institutional misandry isn't a historical reality, your feminist brainwashing has been entirely successful.
/r/MensRights21/12/16 09:02 PM
6

So you're saying a 45 year old male teacher can have sex with 18 and 17 year old female high-school students at the same school?
/r/MensRights13/11/16 05:35 PM
11

Was her hometown, I gather
/r/MensRights01/11/16 06:40 PM
-1

Please put a comma after "embarassment" so as to avoid being an... embarrassment.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 01:57 PM
7

Ah the old standpoint theory. AKA polylogism.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 05:27 PM
15

The new puritans strike again.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 07:02 AM
1

Yes, if you did not consent to the arrangement
/r/MensRights31/08/16 01:12 PM
2

There can't be contracts that force women to get abortions if sex results in a pregnancy. You're right, as with any contract, slavery, murder, torture, etc. are not permissible ways of enforcing them or punishing contract breaking. But there are other ways, like a fine or fee accruing to the other party to the contract.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 05:40 AM
8

If you consent to the risk of having children when you have sex, you consent to gestating that child if you're the mother.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 05:34 AM
7

I think you mean first amendment
/r/MensRights26/08/16 12:58 PM
5

Sure. Just ask them how that's worse than being objects NOT fought over, or even cast aside.
/r/MensRights16/07/16 08:38 PM
1

Can I get a source for #11?
/r/MensRights13/07/16 03:59 PM
2

If only. As others have pointed out, only way it would amount to "equality" is if they were also assigned to combat roles in equal numbers to men.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 12:40 PM
4

Not only this, but it's pretty much guaranteed that the vast, vast majority of them will never get even the faintest whiff of combat duty.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 03:29 AM
12

But muh equality
/r/MensRights11/06/16 01:52 PM
3

We can stop doing that too
/r/MensRights06/06/16 07:48 AM
5

Pretty much the whole of Academia runs on rhetorical ploys
/r/MensRights19/05/16 06:06 AM
3

Neither is there for any evil committed now or in the future....
/r/MensRights28/03/16 02:36 AM
1

A slow backlash against PC.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 12:17 PM
2

Sounds like you're describing anti gamergate.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 08:06 AM
2

*affected
/r/MensRights17/03/16 08:05 AM
10

It's the fundamental error of identity politics: pretending generalities can be instantiated.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 11:37 PM
16

The peach.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 07:33 PM
3

I think that's what all parents want when they have a kid. What a terrible thing that would be.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 06:31 PM
2

Female baboon more likely to have males Is this more likely to give birth to males, or more likely to raise them?
/r/MensRights25/01/16 06:30 PM
3

Narcissism.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 06:29 PM
12

Actually yes you can, especially if that person gives you every reason to believe they are a criminal and that they are going to hurt you.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 02:49 AM
22

Which is absolutely horseshit and in no way would a woman in this country ever be convicted or sentenced if the situation were reversed.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 02:47 AM
27

violating that innocence is a fucking crime. Too bad you can't "violate" something unwittingly.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 02:46 AM
2

puritanical. Ding. Ding.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 02:44 AM
55

He was an 18-year old high school senior who thought she was 16. But yea, I'm sure he definitely decided to "pork" some jailbait.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 02:41 AM
25

Pretty sure if she had been a "kid" none of this would have happened. She was horny and 14. Not a "kid."
/r/MensRights05/12/15 02:39 AM
21

As if that isn't the very same attitude that got them all riled up in the first place; "the issues women tell us they face...."
/r/MensRights17/11/15 10:24 PM
3

Could this be any more patronizing, and thus actually incredibly misogynist??
/r/MensRights28/10/15 06:43 PM
1

This sounds very close to an argument to moderation....
/r/MensRights22/10/15 04:43 PM
7

Alright, thanks for letting me know so quickly that you're a troll. Better to make your target think you're sincere for longer next time.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 04:25 PM
4

Because it presumes men have the gold standard of "rights" before it does its advocacy for "equal" rights. Thus where the assumption is wrong -- which it often disastrously is -- advocacy of "equality" is actually advocacy for supremacism and privilege.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 04:19 PM
1

Mandatory schooling is a prison sentence. Some people can make something out of a prison stint, but for most it's useless.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 08:39 PM
1

Same.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 08:17 PM
2

Also, without knowing why and how those producers became producers, she has absolutely no way of knowing anything about the role of sexism in putting them there. If she had worked with women directors 10 times, and men directors 10 times, who's not to say that there wasn't an extreme level of sexism that put the women there and kept men out? Or vice-versa? You can't determine if sexism is a factor just from looking at empirical results of social processes.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 09:01 PM
4

Pretty sure you can't murder something that doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 08:11 PM
1

50 dollars on the consumers' end, not the insurance....
/r/MensRights27/09/15 03:24 AM
2

Plenty of people make a lot of money from the industry, so yes.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 03:13 AM
8

How many families already do this by any other name? In my experience a woman or girl is first to receive attention and support, including financially, from their family, while a man or boy is expected to pay their own way, and help from the family is given grudgingly or not at all; additionally, it's usually accompanied by a lot of shaming and guilt even when it is given.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 07:34 PM
1

It is of the same kind, if different in degree. The foreskin is a body part with nerve endings and functions. Fingernails, as well as external hair, have function as side-effects, but are dead tissue. They are not of the same kind.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 07:54 PM
2

And the penis suffers from similar problems, if to a lesser degree: drying, loss of sensitivity, eventual dysfunction, etc.. As for your "cultural aesthetic" argument, I'm positive that you would not argue in favor of FGM under the same grounds, so I'm going to assume it's baseless.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 07:02 PM
-2

So if I removed your eyelids against your will, would that be mutilation?
/r/MensRights13/08/15 05:59 PM
3

Circumcising is not a cosmetic operation.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 05:18 PM
8

Those people are alive, I assume...?
/r/MensRights11/08/15 05:26 PM
6

are trying to free ourselves from the archaic idea of a patriarchy, And if one thinks that's a dangerously skewed historical perspective?
/r/MensRights07/08/15 03:52 AM
1

Men low on sexual experience showed implicit sexism to the extent they liked sex. Hmmm, I wonder what the hell this is supposed to mean? What is their definition of "sexism" here? Maybe, possibly, the mere absence of the very effect they're cataloging?
/r/MensRights20/07/15 03:59 PM
1

And here's another decent place to start: https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/moral-landscapes/201501/circumcision-s-psychological-damage
/r/MensRights10/06/15 03:56 AM
1

I mean, give me something besides a website that seems to be trying to paint a certain picture. This is impossible; they all do that. it's widespread use has to make it fairly obvious Not at all true, particularly because we're often talking about psychological issues.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 03:36 AM
2

There is no "conclusion" in here. Beyond that I get the feeling you don't understand how scientific research works....
/r/MensRights09/06/15 09:40 PM
2

...? Perinatal trauma. Circumcision is a form of perinatal (birth) trauma.35 Cansever tested boys before and after circumcision and found that the trauma causes severe disturbance of normal function.6 Taddio and others have documented behavioral changes at six months of age, suggestive of PTSD in circumcised boys.37 Yilmaz et al. have demonstrated PTSD in boys in the phallic period who are undergoing circumcision for phimosis.56 Rhinehart has documented posttraumatic stress disorder resulting fr…
/r/MensRights09/06/15 09:21 PM
3

Here is a decent place to start, with catalogs/references to journals and books: http://www.cirp.org/library/psych/
/r/MensRights09/06/15 08:24 PM
4

The pain and trauma experienced by a baby is so strong that no anesthetic is sufficient to blunt the entirety of the pain. And many are done entirely without anesthetic at all. It's an incredibly violent procedure that permanently affects not only the mutilated organ but also the brain, and consequently the psyche, of extremely young boys in ways we only barely understand. So, violent, highly damaging, and likely to produce or facilitate a great many dysfunctions....
/r/MensRights09/06/15 06:28 PM
4

I think of violent, highly damaging, dysfunctional mangling. That's exactly what circumcision is.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 06:20 PM
34

English major. Can confirm rhetoric is the only thing that seems to matter to most people.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 06:36 AM
2

Yes, they'd much rather they be mopping the floors for the women.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 05:50 PM
21

switch America to the barter system. Wat.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 08:17 PM
2

From their perspective slave labor is just as good. So they make it happen.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 03:17 AM
3

"Builds character." ftfy.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 08:42 PM
9

I also love how the "sexism" scale is basically a leading question. How can you present a scale from 0 to 10 asking someone how sexist someone is/was and pretend that their response counts towards anything remotely resembling objective evidence?
/r/MensRights16/03/15 07:17 PM
6

don't seem to need the validation of self I don't think it has so much to do with this as it does the fact that men aren't on a clock. Indeed their value on the "relationship market" increases over time. Biology dictates that women over a certain age, however, lose value as a reproductive partner. So yes, guys are much more willing to stay in hook-up culture because they're not really losing anything by doing so. Women, on the other hand, lose precious child-bearing/rearing years.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 03:35 PM
1

Theories are made with selections of data and hypothetical causative explanations. People have to both make the selection criteria and concoct these explanations themselves, processes which are notoriously difficult and fraught with innumerable sources of error. And you can't get those explanations from the data themselves.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 08:17 PM
-1

If you think that some blind assemblage of facts simply coalesces into a theory on its own, you're mistaken.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 07:00 PM
-3

Facts do not a theory make.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 06:53 PM
3

She was a libertarian anarchist long before Fox News was even a thing.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 05:22 AM
18

"Just us"?
/r/MensRights13/02/15 01:15 AM
9

It's not really a question of whether women were oppressed--of course they were. The objection is more properly to the claim that women were oppressed more than men, by men collectively, and for their express benefit.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 07:01 AM
1

much of what he wrote about the relationship between labor and capital wasn't wrong. That's pretty debatable. But I'll not get into it here. Suffice it to say that I find his unimpeachable position within the social sciences annoying, especially when his critics both contemporary and modern are usually ignored.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 11:05 PM
2

Of course, but the peculiarly Marxist notions of class consciousness, the downfall of the bourgeois to be followed by the dictatorship of the proletariat and then the advent of a new "classless" society, the "exploitation" of employment, etc. had a very strong influence on feminist theory. Indeed it stands as one of the principal examples of the (very recently redacted) "cultural marxism."
/r/MensRights03/01/15 04:26 PM
4

If by labor movement you mean Marxism then yes.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 10:38 AM
2

Shhhhh, principles of logic aren't allowed!
/r/MensRights11/12/14 10:11 AM
102

So what you're saying is... feels > reals.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 03:55 PM
1

There are certainly benefits to being a man in our society. There tend to be. FTFY
/r/MensRights13/11/14 05:58 AM
2

Biology < feels?
/r/MensRights20/10/14 05:46 AM
5

If it never happens on an individual level, how could it be possible that it happens at a collective level?
/r/MensRights12/10/14 07:33 PM
-11

You forget: women aren't humans. They're not responsible for their actions. (edit: if you think this needs a /s tag, I feel sorry for you)
/r/MensRights07/10/14 02:16 AM
14

In today's American society, "academic" should be considered a pejorative until proven otherwise.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 09:42 PM
2

And it's totally not a sign of cognitive bias, but of level-headed thinking and clear-sighted intuitions!
/r/MensRights04/10/14 03:04 PM
1

You've never actually read Austrian economics, have you?
/r/MensRights02/10/14 03:13 PM
1

hardcore conservative movement austrian economists What.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 10:03 PM
5

The main similarity that both share is unfalsifiability. That is - there is actually no way to disprove their hypotheses or theses. No matter how much history is discovered or evidence accumulated their hypotheses are invulnerable to criticism. This is because they've been "begging the question" since the very beginning and it's never stopped. They simply assume women are disadvantaged relative to men and that's all there is to it; everything else is ex-post facto rationalization for this assump…
/r/MensRights26/09/14 04:05 AM
5

Liberals rely on "the oppressed" classes for their votes. 90% of their rhetoric is pandering to this-or-that "oppressed" class.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 12:35 AM
1

Sure she slapped him, she didn't hurt him by doing so. According to what? Is the only thing that's applicable to domestic violence the physical consequences of the abuse? Does a big strong man have to get slapped around every day simply because there's only minor (or trivial) physical harm done? At what point is he allowed to stop the abuse? And by what means?
/r/PussyPass19/09/14 07:40 PM
0

He's an anarchist...
/r/PussyPass19/09/14 07:24 PM
1

He's a somewhat deranged personality. A number of his videos are good, though.
/r/PussyPass19/09/14 07:24 PM
-2

I fucking hate NPR and always have. Condescending leftist drivel.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 05:20 AM
10

So "special needs" males are capable of consenting to sex? Are "special needs" females also capable?
/r/MensRights24/08/14 08:20 PM
2

You saw a video?
/r/MensRights22/08/14 06:27 AM
2

It is their right to do so, as long as it isn't a for-profit business. So when people offer goods and services for sale, they lose their rights?
/r/MensRights19/08/14 09:31 AM
1

Across time and cultures the tradition of a dowry is exceptionally rare. The vast majority of cultures call(ed) for a bride-price: the male paid for the bride. Dowries existed only in those circumstances in which the groom was considered to be socially more valuable than the bride: specifically, when the groom was part of a family of high social status, a privilege usually conferred on it by the State (think royalty, nobles, esquires, etc.), and women stood to gain not only from the present part…
/r/MensRights19/08/14 09:17 AM
3

Well, really, it was an exchange of taxation and representation, wasn't it? And many women produced no taxable income. The state seemed very happy, however, to shift them into taxable work brackets.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 08:04 AM
4

Calling it a "good" without further contextualization is part of the problem. There are many things that might be "good" or "should" happen if taken out of context. Part of the context in this case is that young males were forced into military service and as a kind of consolation received the vote, whereas women demanded the same rewards/privileges (the vote) without the same risks/responsibilities (the draft). Furthermore the idea that it was good for anyone to "get the vote" presupposes that d…
/r/MensRights18/08/14 05:45 AM
12

I'm really, really tired of the automatic assumption that first-wave feminism was benign. You can make the argument, but the fact that everyone just accepts this idea blindly frustrates me.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 10:36 PM
1

It would seem so.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 04:39 AM
2

Certainly plenty of people have been as detestable as The Prince, but I would be careful about making any kind of statement about leaders of his time using it as a manual or anything like that. I'm unaware of any evidence to suggest this, and if the readings of it as a satire of monarchy/dictatorship (in favor of republican gov't or more liberal government in general) are correct then it seems reasonable to assume that those in power would recognize it as criticism. A brief look at Wikipedia rev…
/r/MensRights10/08/14 03:33 AM
3

There is significant debate over to what degree The Prince is to be taken seriously, and to what degree it should be seen as satire.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 03:13 AM
4

as in the man, Machiavelli, known as one of the greatest callous schemers of all time, to such an extent that we name this shit after him You... you have no idea what you're talking about...
/r/MensRights09/08/14 08:22 PM
1

The brief history at the beginning of this article is a perfect example of what I hate about the typical progressive narrative of history. So facile. Really it's just tripe.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 12:20 AM
1

History is narrative.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 09:10 PM
0

This news blurb doesn't mention anything about the woman at all Except for the fact that she stabbed the guy??
/r/MensRights05/08/14 02:24 PM
3

The comics on that page make me sick.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 10:58 AM
1

That patriarchy in action!
/r/MensRights30/07/14 12:26 PM
26

Unequal outcomes. In other words, the author is batshit.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 08:19 AM
1

Barring actual coercive acts/behavior, high profits indicate a high level of social approval for a business or individual. If people are giving them money for their goods/services willingly, and they're able to provide that value cost effectively, they're serving society at large. Unfortunately in today's world the large corporations, almost without exception, are so entertwined with the coercive forces of government/legislation that their profit often cannot be seen in this way. Nonetheless the…
/r/MensRights23/07/14 02:57 AM
1

You would think so but unfortunately you'd often be wrong.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 06:32 AM
3

After a few days that's what a lot of rape cases become: witnesses and physical evidence are often lacking or non-existent.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 03:01 AM
9

Additionally such cases often come down to more or less a he said she said situation. Trying to determine a person's state of mind becomes incredibly difficult, and even the smallest verifiable evidence will/must be leveraged in order to make any kind of judgment at all. If someone tells you they were raped by their long-term partner but evidence indicates they willingly consumed alcohol with them, entered their apartment with them, wore a "night out" outfit or otherwise alluring clothing, and t…
/r/MensRights19/07/14 08:30 PM
0

You're an idiot.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 12:40 PM
1

You're completely misrepresenting how statistics works and I'm not going to bother explaining it because it's not worth the effort. ps.: It's funny, just yesterday I was arguing that player base is a contributing factor but that it doesn't complete stop women from competing, today I have to argue that yes player base is in fact a contributing factor and not just a made up reason. Yes, it is a made up reason.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 11:25 AM
2

Smaller player pool, smaller potential for good players. No. The size of the pool has no causative relation with the skill level of those players. Again, there's nothing stopping the women who currently do play from being the top dogs of e-sports - at least, nothing more than what's stopping any other average person. I'm not saying that women can't compete, just that they aren't right now and that one contributing factor alongside several others is the tiny player base. This is just a tautology:…
/r/MensRights04/07/14 12:43 AM
4

What I'm saying is that for a number of reasons (one of which being that the female player base is tiny compared to the male player base) women can't compete with men right now at the highest level of play. You make a nice little maneuver here from stating a fact about demographics to implying something about the playing capabilities of an entire gender. The size of the female player base has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not women can or "can't compete." If there were only a single, …
/r/MensRights04/07/14 12:29 AM
2

Contributor from the libertarian magazine Reason. Of course she nails it. :)
/r/MensRights26/06/14 08:57 AM
41

I really just don't understand the idea that no one would lie about rape. I mean... why not? Seriously, why not? How much easier and simpler is it to lie about rape than it is to actually rape? Nowhere else do we find this kind of presumed honesty on the part of accusers. What makes rape so different from every other kind of offense vis a vis the purity of intent on the part of the accuser? I've spoken to people who've told me "almost every girl I know has told me she's been raped." And I believ…
/r/MensRights25/06/14 07:33 PM
6

And yet the image is of a woman collapsed as if from grief or depression, clearly desperately in need of rescue...
/r/MensRights25/06/14 07:30 PM
1

That's my line bud.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 05:30 AM
1

Merely by your phrasing of the issues I can tell you will continue to do little more than regurgitate MSNBC talking points. "Climate change isn't real," "trickle down economics," "social safety net," etc. I have no interest in doing your homework for you, but I will say you don't have to be on the "right" to rebuff or be skeptical, to varying degrees, of almost all of the topics you mention. BTW, the fact that raising minimum wage would eliminate certain jobs doesn't win this debate for you. I c…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 10:25 AM
1

You've clearly never done actual study or research on these topics...
/r/MensRights30/05/14 06:20 AM
1

We're fortunate that for much of the time, the left's dogma happens to coincide with reality. What. Lmfao. Spoken like a true sycophant.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 07:15 PM
8

Feminism is only traditionalism with a shift in rhetoric so that shouldn't be surprising. We have yet to undergo truly radical gender deconstructions/change.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 09:27 PM
2

It's really clear once you realize how many monopoly privileges are granted to cable companies, ISPs, etc. from local governments on up.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 06:07 AM
0

Governmental control of the internet is the entire problem, not the solution.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 05:07 AM
1

Until "Democracry" is no longer a hallowed word, collectivism will retain its place as the social paradigm du jour.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 09:36 PM
19

Sexual repression - the penis is just too scary/strange for them to empathize with, so their reaction is one of discomfort and expressed as humor.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 08:44 PM
0

Niggelplease's point.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 08:39 PM
-9

It isn't a valid point at all.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 02:10 PM
2

Yes.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 08:41 PM
3

Except it's self-proclaimed socialist propaganda, not history.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 05:35 PM
6

Oh, just the absurd idea that children are people and should be free to choose how to learn and how to live just like adults. Peaceful parenting, voluntary schooling, etc. all without violently cramming hordes of unwitting kids into the processing plants of our "education" system.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 08:56 PM
-8

I think you mean anarchist. Dumbass.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 05:36 PM
10

Tell me, if being forced to spend half your day (or more) locked up in a state-run building practically chained to a desk isn't at all oppressive, what actually qualifies as oppressive under your definition? Do they actually have to show you the shackles and the whip before you'll recognize it?
/r/MensRights16/03/14 05:35 PM
1

You clearly can't comprehend my argument. Please consider retaking your remedial high school biology.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 08:32 AM
1

Is wearing a condom murder? You're destroying the potential of a person being born. Did you ever take Biology... even in high-school? A sperm is a haploid cell... incomplete and incapable of reproducing except in combination with an egg. And once fertilized, an egg becomes a unique diploid cell that will reproduce, creating a multi-cellular organism with its own unique DNA - an individual human embryo. Abortion is the same as wearing a condom at a later time. No it is not. Abortion is killing an…
/r/MensRights10/03/14 04:50 AM
-7

Yes it is.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 12:44 AM
8

FEMINISM HELPS MEN TOO.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 02:16 AM
-1

Do you get to demand the government pay for your hookers and blow? Why not? Same reasons apply.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 06:50 PM
5

If your are pretty, smart or witty then the rich people may give you a pass Sometimes... other times they see you as a threat/competition coming from an unworthy place and hate you even more. Not only does your competition make things more difficult as any competition would, but it also challenges any assumptions they have about their self worth. Maybe they aren't so special. Maybe they don't deserve their affluence. Maybe they're just lucky. Many would much rather avoid such self-analysis.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 06:43 PM
26

My favorite by far is the one that says she doesn't need feminism because she is capable of critical thinking. Is that really so rare...
/r/MensRights08/03/14 06:37 PM
3

I hate that anything and everything that you could consider discrimination of a group now falls under the term "phobic." Similarly I hate that anything negative said about a gender automatically means you hate all people of that gender, misogynist, misandrist, etc. As if the only possible positions on any given question are only Perfect Progressive Enlightened Humanist and Woman-hating Gay-Fearing Hillbilly.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 01:30 AM
2

My working theory is that men find a great deal of attraction - probably more than women - in the opposite sex demonstrating acceptance, enjoyment, and even excitement over their sexuality, as it is so often disparaged and looked down upon (whereas many women take it for granted that men want them).
/r/MensRights07/03/14 01:26 AM
5

Nothing wrong with the claim in itself. The problem is when you continue on and say they have been oppressed more than men, by men, for men's express benefit, and so on.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 01:14 AM
1

She's a libertarian, not a conservative.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 04:08 PM
2

No person is entitled to use someone else as life support against their will, no matter what the circumstances are. This is just false, and you know it is false. Regretting a decision doesn't absolve you of responsibility for the decision. If you have a shitty job and three kids who are using you as "life support" and suddenly decide one day that you don't want them anymore, you're still responsible for making good by them because it was your decision to have them. Just because you don't like yo…
/r/MensRights28/02/14 10:17 PM
2

gives consent to having someone hit your car. This analogy doesn't work because you're introducing a third agent with moral responsibility into the scenario - another driver. Having sex consents to pregnancy in the same way that every time we drive we take the risk that when we make a mistake, hit a tree or swerve off the road or lose control over an icy bridge, our safety belt may malfunction and we may fly out the windshield. We understand that operating the vehicle is always dangerous no matt…
/r/MensRights28/02/14 10:14 PM
1

against your will. You had sex, knowing the risks of creating another human being. Hardly "against your will." Just because you regret something doesn't mean you have the right to cancel it, particularly if its a human life. I'm entitled to use you The baby made no fucking decisions - the parents did, so it would be more accurate to say the parents are entitled to kill someone just because they're older and more developed. An unnamed multi-cell organism Naming doesn't matter. Obviously. And you …
/r/MensRights28/02/14 05:22 PM
3

Having sex doesn't mean you want to get pregnant. It has nothing to do with what someone wants. If you have sex, you risk having a kid, period. Every functional adult knows this. And once a kid has been created by you and your partner, you both are responsible for it.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 05:19 PM
2

I think you mean uterii, and yes, they house the fetus. :)
/r/MensRights28/02/14 05:15 PM
11

"This is my house, I can kill you if I want to. Love, Mom"
/r/MensRights28/02/14 03:55 AM
0

All history is revisionist. The question is how honest the historians are about the fact.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 05:27 PM
7

*roles
/r/MensRights23/02/14 06:25 PM
-4

That isn't comparing the two... /smh
/r/MensRights22/02/14 06:08 PM
-2

No I did not.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 05:01 PM
-1

Parents, authority figures, etc.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 04:20 PM
1

I agree.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 04:20 PM
-4

Right, but because of the value they hold in her they may try to restrict her in some way(s) against her will, thinking they are protecting her, her gender, the social order, etc. This is what birthed early discussions about the "woman problem" and eventually feminism.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 07:08 AM
9

Nothing stops women from earning a living. And nothing stops men from "manning up" and sucking up to women for respect and love. Choosing not to work doesn't mean they're "only valued" for what they are. Nice of you to misquote me, at least you have that excuse for your egregious misunderstanding/misinterpretation of what I said. It means that what they are is valued so much that they don't have to work. Often times yes. That's not oppression. Uh... it is if you don't want to be a bird in a cage…
/r/MensRights22/02/14 02:24 AM
63

It says, as many around here have been preaching for a while, that a man is worth little more than what he does, whereas a woman is often worth little more than what she is. This is the backbone of the gender-oppression faced by both men and women.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 09:55 PM
0

Yep, lit grad student, never educated... Your reply was blatantly stupid. I gave you the benefit of the doubt in asking you to rephrase, a generosity of which you proved unworthy. :)
/r/MensRights20/02/14 07:21 PM
0

Say what?
/r/MensRights20/02/14 02:42 PM
23

This is historical "patriarchy" in a nutshell. Mostly fair if you ask me.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 07:22 PM
-3

Now just ask yourself what this issue looks like from someone like me who sees mandatory schooling as legitimized imprisonment...
/r/MensRights19/02/14 05:12 AM
7

A policeman's job is not to protect and it's not to serve: it's to prosecute. Out of deference to their own personal sense of morality they may from time to time perform one of the former functions, but their pay depends entirely on execution of the latter.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 02:11 AM
1

or if she's really just this goddamned retarded. As I grow older the more and more I realize that, often enough, yes they really are just that goddamn retarded.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 01:24 AM
3

Sure but notice she makes sure to protect that 9% so as to retain victim-hood status for women. She could continue on and suggest a multitude of reasons for that additional 9% but she very conveniently leaves that out.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 12:27 PM
14

It's almost like they have an inherent value in their bodies, whereas men have to create that value through hard work...
/r/MensRights27/01/14 04:36 AM
2

There is very little as soul-destroying as the realization that you have little to no inherent value to anyone, not even your parents.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 03:23 PM
2

It will be until they get to how they want to go about achieving their goals, in which case inevitably some will be forced to acquiesce for a majority.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 07:28 PM
2

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harrison_Bergeron
/r/MensRights20/01/14 04:22 AM
46

Honestly while conservatives and traditionalists aren't exactly allies to the cause they're generally not misandrists on the level of the uber-liberal feminists.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 12:03 PM
2

The last section of the article highlighted brilliantly exactly how misogynistic feminist history actually is... They really, truly believe that women have been useless for a hundred thousand years: "This is true."
/r/MensRights12/01/14 05:48 PM
2

Please, just acknowledge the fact that ideologies are not science even if the more correct ones are supported by some pieces of the available evidence and theory. There is no such thing as "Feminist Science" - scientific data and findings, I say again, are neutral. You can take the same datasets from almost anything and use them rhetorically to advance any given ideology, and just because something references scientific studies and findings doesn't make it automatically correct. Each piece of ev…
/r/MensRights11/01/14 08:18 AM
2

So I'm not sure if you're just failing to comprehend what I'm posting or trolling. The actual scientific source of information in this article comes from the US Census Beareau - simple statistics and statistical analysis - paired with an economic projection by the IMF. Statistics and economics. Nothing feminist about it. It's only the author of the article who couches it in a normative, feminist rhetoric, exactly as I described earlier.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 06:02 AM
2

I'm asking you to name one single source that could be properly considered at once scientific and Feminist and you refuse? I'm not surprised honestly because it's not possible. Social sciences like sociology, psychology, economics, etc. can be said to use the scientific method (when their respective practitioners do so at least), but Feminism is only an interpretive or ideological framework in which such science might be interpreted or instigated. There is no more a "feminist science" than there…
/r/MensRights11/01/14 01:10 AM
2

So your definition of "scientific" is peer-reviewed? Do you have any idea how varied and broad a database of publications JSTOR has?
/r/MensRights10/01/14 10:24 PM
1

Name a feminist scientific source.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 10:04 PM
2

Um. No. I'm also talking about academic feminism. I'm a graduate student in English, I deal with this pretty frequently. you go through the same rigor as the other social sciences. ^ This does not follow from : in order to publish you need quantifiable data and sources.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 08:26 PM
2

No... it doesn't. Feminism is a method of interpretation, a theory of gender dynamics, and an ethical paradigm. You can apply feminism to science, such as sociological studies, but that doesn't make Feminism science.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 07:45 PM
2

Well no, we base our knowledge system off the scientific method and inquiry. Um.... what? Feminist theory is the furthest thing from scientific you can reach: it's an unfalsifiable social study and/or method of interpretation. It has absolutely no connection to the scientific method.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 07:40 PM
16

You realize that you could do masculist analysis in the same way, right? And that just because something has a history doesn't make it necessarily any more valuable or correct than an idea that doesn't?
/r/MensRights10/01/14 05:44 AM
29

I'd agree only with the caveat that masculism is too - I'd rather drop both labels and just say "gender analysis" or something similar.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 05:04 AM
7

As an ex-mormon with some experience with unwanted preganancies/adoption in my family I can say with some conviction that the Church often acts anti-male (and/or anti-sex in general). Fuck this shit.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 09:02 AM
0

It's very nice to mention how women didn't own property while neglecting to mention that, her being her husband's ward, he was entirely legally responsible for both her actions and her care. I think being blind to the immense risks and burdens placed on the male by traditional marriage is one of the primary problems with patriarchy theory. I mean not only did you have to care for/pamper your wife and children or face punishment (both social and legal), but you had to take responsibility for them…
/r/MensRights23/12/13 05:54 PM
8

Well I guess I shouldn't have said 'feminism:' she mentioned women's rights and disabled rights while talking about stuff, but who is against those? She didn't actually come out and say 'feminism' or anything bigoted ... Just as I would hate it if everyone ran every time I talked about roles of masculinity or pressures on males, I wouldn't react that way to someone talking about women's problems. But yes, that being said, it made me a little more wary - sometime maybe I'll strike up a conversati…
/r/MensRights04/12/13 05:27 PM
36

Hung out with a fellow grad-student the other day and had to reaaaally tiptoe around a lot of stuff when she started talking about feminism. It makes life inside AND outside of class feel oppressive... ironic, huh?
/r/MensRights04/12/13 03:23 PM
1

"Classes," "institutions," "cultures"... everything comes down to the actions of individuals. How can you have blanket policy towards certain groups of individuals without recognizing you're enforcing injustice on some of them (if not most)?
/r/MensRights19/11/13 11:22 PM
8

Are you a man or a woman? If the latter, should it be surprising you've never seen "such disgraceful behavior"?
/r/MensRights19/11/13 07:07 PM
2

Your analogy lacks any mention of who is responsible for the plight of the "dying person"/"fetus." Suppose a woman chose to cause this person to fall mortally wounded through her own conscious action and choice, but could still act to save them/support them, say, from a blood transfusion. Is it morally acceptable for her to refuse? Why?
/r/MensRights14/11/13 03:46 AM
4

You're the absolute dipshit dumbass here if you actually believe any single one of your examples is properly analogous to the argument, and since you went straight into hyperbolic adhominem from the start I feel absolutely no desire to correct you or deal with you further. Just know you're a fucking disgrace to humankind.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 01:41 AM
4

You've made yourself obviously ridiculous. Thanks for doing my job for me. :)
/r/MensRights14/11/13 01:13 AM
0

A laughably false analogy. A fetus is a discrete entity and being with its own unique DNA, structure, and body, with the potentiality of reason and consciousness. Its existence, and its abject dependence, adhere an enormous moral responsibility on its creator(s).
/r/MensRights13/11/13 11:50 PM
1

Post-structuralism is a movement in literary theory and criticism that basically spawned "culture studies" and "gender studies" as we know them today.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 10:54 PM
6

The fetus is not her body despite being inside it.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 05:54 PM
1

Use a real dictionary. Dumbass.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 08:36 AM
-1

You haven't even bothered to go to a dictionary.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 12:10 AM
2

Please investigate the meaning of the word objective. It is subjective because those who seek a male partner desire these traits you're describing. Just because you mention a fact doesn't change this...
/r/MensRights09/11/13 11:21 PM
-1

TLDR: You are not a special snowflake. Nobody cares about your 4-pack but you. Nobody cares about your e-peen, inflated as it is by your carbo-bars and your skinhead, but you. Stop with this "objectively and subjectively" nonsense. It's just subjective.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 11:05 PM
0

(the brain indicates that said individual is healthy and fit for breeding) Strangely enough, fat deposits of middling sizes are just such indications.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 08:30 PM
0

Read the rest of the thread. Beauty is by definition subjective.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 06:41 PM
2

You don't argue at all - you make assertions using language you don't even understand, then resort to accusing me of being "emotionally invested" because I see through your bullshit and, even worse, telling me to keep my "fedora on" as if to have an operational level of understanding of the english language makes me some kind of nerd or loser by default. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 05:02 PM
1

Hahahaha, this is /r/mensrights dipshit, nobody accepts your hatred here. Now gtfo.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 04:56 PM
0

No, it's safe to assume you have no fucking clue what the words "objective" and "subjective" mean. "Objective" doesn't mean "what, like, pretty much the majority of people, like, likes, you know?" It means independent of subject; beauty is by definition not objective because its existence depends entirely on a subject that observes and appreciates it as such. Try opening a fucking book someday.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 04:51 PM
-1

Beauty is 100% subjective. Case closed.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 03:28 PM
0

There is no such thing as objective beauty.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 02:14 PM
1

Explain how the guy in the comic has 'an unhealthy body type.'
/r/MensRights09/11/13 02:13 PM
1

Many people find themselves in this situation even at healthy weights, in fact I'm pretty sure the guy in this comic would easily fall into what medicine practitioners consider a healthy weight.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 02:10 PM
10

He went into men's rights / antifeminism with his podcast the very next day. I highly recommend a listen: http://youtu.be/72Boihk2p8s?t=2h5m58s
/r/MensRights27/09/13 07:18 AM
2

There is a strong cognitive and emotional bias favoring that theory, and in my experience seems outrageously common.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 02:53 AM
3

Obvious troll is obvious.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 11:17 AM
10

Prostitution should be decriminalized yesterday, and drug use the day before yesterday.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 11:09 AM
3

Letting my Lit degree do some talking here... All communication implicitly has an audience. Sometimes that audience is obvious, sometimes not. When I write you a personal letter, it's obvious that you are the audience. But what about when I write in my diary? If you didn't have an intended audience, you wouldn't write: you'd only have to think if you wanted to communicate strictly with yourself. There are at least two likely audiences for you diary entries. One would be your future self, while o…
/r/MensRights23/09/13 10:57 AM
2

Supply.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 10:35 AM
5

I don't think this sort of thing springs from any sort of "misandry" or man-hate, but rather from old gender stereotypes that render a "weak" woman attacking a "strong" man as inherently absurd. ?
/r/MensRights23/09/13 06:04 AM
13

Yep, just keep telling yourself that men think all women are weak and worthless. I'm sure that's why these types of ads are laughed at by men and women... and that it has nothing to do with them internalizing their roles as servants to the upper class.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 04:31 AM
13

a "weak" "valuable" woman attacking a "strong" "disposable" man ftfy
/r/MensRights23/09/13 04:25 AM
8

Half-literate, bandwagonning mental preteens with irrational overconfidence in both their artisic ability and their ideological relevance.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 08:22 PM
2

Actually... it is a cultural thing in the Mormon community as well.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 04:42 AM
17

Hiring unqualified people based on [X], (where X is defined unilaterally by government) is one of the worst things that could happen in an economy. FTFY
/r/MensRights03/09/13 08:37 PM
-1

The obvious answer is "nice guys" need to lift. This is just a way of saying "nice guys need to become the not-nice guys." It just doesn't work that way.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 02:11 AM
2

Because none of them Break Bad. Oh, and also they're hardly ever truly respectful of Walt and obviously contribute to his problems.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 02:32 AM
1

unnecessarily complex (but vague and meaningless) words You apparently have almost no experience in western political theory or political debate if the very elementary words I used are that confusing, in which case I'm not interested in any discussion with you.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 06:57 AM
-1

I don't want to be rude Clearly not: pseudo-intellectual
/r/MensRights02/08/13 05:23 AM
-5

By "leftist" I mean democratic liberal, ie the typical "left" of modern american politics, including its basis in Marxist class warfare.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 04:24 AM
3

This is a near-perfect criticism of almost all leftist political thought.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 02:56 AM
3

Black outs are not something that can be easily diagnosed by outside observers. People experiencing alcohol black-outs continue to act, speak, and behave normally (relative to their drunken state). If someone has been drinking a lot, and you're engaged in conversation or activity with them, there is a more-than-marginal chance they are actually "blacked out" and won't remember a thing about it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackout_(alcohol-related_amnesia)
/r/MensRights24/07/13 07:09 PM
58

turn anyone gay I think you might have the wrong idea about what makes a person homosexual.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 07:19 PM
10

I love that way more than half are libertarian or "other." Political atheists unite!
/r/MensRights20/06/13 04:42 AM
1

Never once, in the history of feminism, was there ever any bit of activism done out of benevolence or care for men. This is not true, fortunately. See Wollstonecraft - Vindication of the Rights of Man, for example. It is really only after hundreds of years that feminists have been allowed to so shape the discussion as to assume away men's issues.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 01:01 AM
3

Yes, guys again take all the risk and responsibility by default.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 09:13 PM
6

Exactly. Sexual preference is formed by a vast combination of factors, but one thing that is for certain is they are mostly beyond your control.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 08:04 AM
9

The "crux of feminism" is that there is gender inequality that specifically benefits men at the expense of women and needs to be rectified ftfy
/r/MensRights10/05/13 12:23 AM
2

what's supposed to be an unbelievably traumatic moment for a man or a woman At what point is the actor so traumatized?
/r/MensRights05/05/13 07:44 AM
-2

No no no, how can you be so stupid. For approximately 10,000 years, one gender dominated and controlled the other completely, and those poor childr-I mean, women, have just now become smart enough to change it.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 11:38 PM
26

Ask yourself which is the most effective way to end domestic violence against men - asking the ladies to stop, or encouraging men to defend themselves? Then, ask yourself why this article constantly says there is no excuse, no context, in which a man may hit a woman without being the scum of the earth. This article is misandric and disgusting.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 05:22 PM
2

Unfortunately when you have a printing press in your proverbial basement your "bankruptcy" becomes everyone else's.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 10:59 PM
1

At any random time during the nineteenth century, you are more likely to find that a woman author is the most sold and most read. A single example of an author not finding mainstream success during their lifetime does not a trend make.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 10:24 PM
1

They have for hundreds of years.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 01:50 AM
0

The interesting thing is that the "literary world" wasn't ever really ruled by bearded patriarchs... they just made it seem that way in your K-12 education.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 11:14 PM
6

This is a year old... probably too late to do anything.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 04:49 AM
234

And obviously it's the White Man in Power's responsibility to seek out his poor, oppressed bretheren so he can mingle in their colourful lovejuice, cleansing him of his atrocious paleness of soul.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 04:47 AM
10

Please remove this child from her custody immediately. Thank you, The World.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 11:43 AM
-2

You're the one being obtuse. The claim isn't about whether women can "instill good qualities in boys," it's about whether they can "teach them to be a man."
/r/MensRights04/04/13 01:59 AM
6

Just like if I father a daughter in the future, I will mostly leave to the girl's mother the responsibility/privilege of a significant part of her sexual education, I would expect a mother to defer in the same way to a father/son pair. You simply can't teach the core knowledge and instincts we have in our biology.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 01:55 AM
8

And how is this a statement on the argument's validity, exactly?
/r/MensRights04/04/13 01:52 AM
7

So you're saying that someone repeating the victim's own words in a sociological study is "apologia." Get the fuck out of this subreddit you illiterate asshole.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 05:19 AM
0

Yet you're still here.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 10:59 PM
0

You go ahead and write letters to your congressmen. Enjoy your form-letter replies. I'll be here meeting new people, learning new things, and spreading information.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 10:44 PM
0

The number of people affected by "bitching on the internet" is orders of magnitude greater than whatever "good" anyone without deep pockets can do contacting their "representative."
/r/MensRights30/03/13 10:12 PM
0

Everyone is a citizen capable of getting involved in the political process Bullshit. Politicians on the federal level come strictly from the upper classes.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 10:56 PM
0

Normal citizens do not draft or propose legislation. Their political influence is limited to the electoral process.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 09:42 PM
0

More productive than whining on reddit? Definitely Do you have any actual evidence for this? You think your vote has more influence on people than your activities on reddit?
/r/MensRights27/03/13 05:07 PM
1

As if the political process is productive.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 11:25 AM
11

Faith in Anonymous is what I get from this... not so much in all of humanity.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 09:15 PM
5

I hope you realize that nothing in your link describes reductio ad absurdum as a fallacy - in fact it does the exact opposite, explaining how it is a very useful and technically correct way to show flaws in argumentation.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 09:12 PM
14

And clearly she's received ample amounts of affirmative action and support, what with being this retarded and having had such a job at all.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 08:51 PM
3

Yes. And especially, That balancing act is still uppermost in the minds of most young and middle-aged women today, much more so than for their husbands or partners. Fuck this feminist bitch, presuming to know what is uppermost in the minds of husbands and fathers.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 10:14 PM
10

Just like nationalism, racism, etc. etc.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 10:04 PM
1

Uh... I'd say the issue isn't as clear cut as all that.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 07:38 PM
9

At least both of your parents sound reasonable.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 07:37 PM
-8

Shit like this is why I'm an anarchist.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 05:49 PM
1

I am very, very wary of labelling unhappiness and discontentment a strictly physiological phenomenon, with physiological remedies. I think far, far too often people are depressed for legitimate moral or psychological reasons, and to be happy they need to (or society needs to) overcome those problems. In these cases, drugging yourself with anything from alcohol to antidepressants is a hinderance, not a help.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 06:55 AM
5

Thousands of years of "gender-guilt." God damn I want to vomit.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 05:51 AM
20

Had to stop this about 20 seconds in. I don't think I've ever seen psychopathic behavior so clearly, and holy fuck was I disturbed.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 09:28 PM
9

all... according to plaaaan...
/r/MensRights24/02/13 01:11 PM
4

PATRIARCHY
/r/MensRights04/02/13 11:46 PM
2

I agree, but with some misgivings. It seems likely that this will be the reaction from feminists, government, and the mainstream media in general - if anything, they'll try and make it out to be a privilege for men to be considered strong enough to bear harsh sentencing.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 06:39 PM
8

Reading this, you can feel the author(s) jumping through all kinds of mental and syntactical hoops to avoid using the word "sexism."
/r/MensRights16/01/13 04:22 PM
-10

"No there ain't! If you treat all the sexes equally, eventually that'll just balance itself out!" This is a myth.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 04:22 AM
2

I'd just like to point out that discussing and advocating for a particular economic system is not necessarily "apologetics."
/r/MensRights02/01/13 04:01 AM
12

Collectivism is such bullshit.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 05:01 PM
3

The difference is one is actually in the post and the other is strictly in your own head. It's called projection.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 01:04 PM
2

That shit was not misogyny.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 10:52 PM
13

I have to say you sound a lot like myself, and I'm fairly certain that the misinformation fed to me as a child and adolescent about sex, from both religious and feminist sources, has done incredible damage to my psyche and my social availability.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 01:00 AM
5

Do these people just shut their brains off before they speak? Actually I'd bet they shut it off before they get out of bed.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 05:38 PM
1

Once we have no government. So... not very likely anytime soon.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 05:20 PM
2

Wrong.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 05:00 AM
25

Just as a psa to everyone... it's "toe the line," not "tow."
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:31 PM
7

Omg the chrono trigger music and references at the end..... melt
/r/MensRights05/12/12 11:03 PM
1

I'm tempted to call bogus the entire concept of "too drunk to consent." I've never lost my ability to make my own decisions, those decisions simply looked different in my drunken state, and I knew that would happen going in. Unless it is possible to be unconscious yet awake, lucid, active, etc, I just don't see how "I'm drunk" can possibly mean "ignore everything I do or say, I'm as helpless as a child because I'm drunk."
/r/MensRights04/12/12 11:10 PM
3

Yes. Any more questions?
/r/MensRights03/12/12 07:31 PM
0

That's because it is.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 05:22 PM
3

Wish I knew who this guy was. I'd send him a letter of encouragement.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 09:56 AM
13

Right. A spoken "no" while giving a coy glance, and when that no is followed up with a kiss, a chuckle and a "stop" in that lazy, kitten-playing-with-its-food flirtatious way, and then that kiss keeps going, and going, and going... I think you get the picture. Verbal consent and actual, physical consent are two very different things.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 09:54 AM
5

Sorry if my sarcasm wasn't clear :P
/r/MensRights01/12/12 03:38 PM
8

They're not allowed to steal our money for their birth control.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 02:58 PM
8

feelings of oppression Feelings of oppression are not oppression.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 08:38 AM
4

I love this scene... wait, I just love this whole movie.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 05:41 PM
2

religion of statism
/r/MensRights27/11/12 12:31 PM
1

To be fair, if there was a way to prevent corruption, communism would work and be better than capitalism. Unfortunately, no. The basic problems with socialism/communism are not strictly moral or ethical in nature, but also structural. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_calculation_problem http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20101223224219AAMrAuh (i know this is yahoo answers but this is one of the most succinct explanations I've ever seen)
/r/MensRights16/11/12 01:22 AM
0

Well I don't get into politics much in this sub because I'm an anarchist. Arguments like that just don't mean the same thing to me that they do to everyone else.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 01:18 AM
0

Except, the basics of feminism are, 1) its name, 2) everything else. Even ignoring (2), 'feminism' doesn't sound like a particularly great idea to me.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 10:47 PM
1

Well, you see... the secret to these situations is that they're actually just really shitty ideas.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 10:02 PM
1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBtbEpZX7iM&feature=relmfu
/r/MensRights01/11/12 07:47 AM
11

It takes effort to be the person you want to be.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 04:32 AM
0

Further, a few examples: If I empty a man's last waterskin in the middle of the Sahara, I've done great violence to the individual even though I only ever directly influenced an inanimate object; the value of the waterskin to the man was supremely high, as he had essentially invested his entire life in that object. If I burn the last written letter you ever received from your dead spouse, I've done a degree of violence that amounts to emotional harm, equal to the loss and suffering you will expe…
/r/MensRights24/10/12 02:08 AM
0

I didn't equate them - violence against a person exists across a spectrum, just as their influence and personal investment in their environment is expressed across a spectrum. Legitimate property of a person is an extension of themselves, some things being more dear than others, meaning that violence against these objects amounts to varying degrees of violence against the individual.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 11:14 PM
-4

Theft and breaking and entry involve violence against someone's property.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 07:21 PM
-4

There is no such thing as a non-violent crime in my opinion.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 07:13 PM
-11

If they're non-violent, they need no rehabilitation.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 04:51 PM
2

You somehow think the government bureaucrats and the corporate leeches are a different group... Also, I think your post has hit my personal observational record for most number of straw-men in a single paragraph.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 04:04 AM
19

Oh yes, please tell me more about how we need rescued by our saviors in Government.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 01:50 AM
5

This is one of the most insightful points about modern american politics I've read in a while.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 08:56 PM
3

Honestly I've been participating in this subreddit for a couple months, at least, and I've never seen a post that was actual, true-blue misogyny.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 07:21 PM
15

Also, just like women are the only ones allowed to criticize a woman, blacks are the only ones allowed to criticize blacks. The response from the other commentators stems not only from feminist impulses but also a desire to not appear antagonistic or less than sympathetic with a black woman.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 04:32 AM
7

I'm not sure of any precise definition, but just break down the word... gyno- as in gynocology, as in the vagina. normativity as in the dominant cultural attitude. The dominant cultural attitude about vagina; in this case, worship.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 07:40 PM
1

"Just as" in casual, everyday communication refers to something similar, not perfectly identical. Stop your tittering over semantics when you know exactly what that meant.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 09:11 AM
1

You've misrepresented my posts, expanding "majority" to "all," assuming the "same degree," etc.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 05:34 AM
2

I'm a voluntarist, so you'll certainly not get any argument from me. :)
/r/MensRights06/10/12 07:06 PM
1

I disagree completely. The bias is just as strong, but in some cases its hidden. This, in fact, makes it more insidious.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 04:03 PM
0

I didn't say anything about 'radio,' but NPR specifically. I detest the grand majority of publicly marketed news sources, from NPR to CNN to Fox to the New York Times. And yes, there is bias in all of them.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 12:37 PM
-4

NPR is one of the most biased sources of information out there, and it's made worse by the fact that it seems so intellectual and hip.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 11:48 AM
2

A post-industrial economic system in which the means of production are owned privately, by relatively few people. Government and Corporations have long since fused into a plutocracy that controls, by force, almost every aspect of our economy, from money to "intellectual property". edit: wrong word used
/r/MensRights05/10/12 02:45 PM
0

Capitalism is a flawed system from the start. What is capitalism in this context?
/r/MensRights05/10/12 12:37 PM
1

Consensual sex after puberty is natural regardless of age, occupation, etc. Making laws up out of thin air to satisfy the decrepit shadow of christian morality is irrational and oppressive. Such laws should be repealed without exception.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 05:40 PM
1

Hell in some parts of the world people can legally have sex with kids Source?
/r/MensRights29/09/12 05:35 PM
1

Well... she married someone who looks to be three times her age. Why should we be surprised?
/r/MensRights21/09/12 12:25 AM
1

First of all, downvotes are for posts that do nothing to contribute to discussion. The source of the post is immaterial. Secondly, the dissonance in your post is astounding. You manage to contradict yourself within a 3-sentence paragraph. I did not use his misogyny to discount his actual argument. ... I am perfectly willing to hold regular discourse with people who aren't misogynists: Downvoting the post and ignoring the argument is discounting the argument.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 03:38 AM
1

So tell me, are you on reddit to discuss actual arguments or just parade yourself around declaring this person X and this person Y and feeling smug about yourself? The point of a discussion thread is the argument being made, not the person making them.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 02:48 AM
0

Stop with the ad-hom. Seriously.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 02:30 AM
3

So the religious mores of the past couple of millenia don't have anything to do with it?
/r/MensRights18/09/12 12:44 PM
6

Yes, I absolutely hate how the humanities have co-opted the term "social sciences." It's impossible to do true science in social fields because there is no possible control group. Data gathered for sociology studies and such are always suspect, and at best can be useful for speculating about correlations - they're useless for proving causation.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 08:43 AM
4

Isn't this like asking if the abolitionist movement was too focused on being the anti-slave-owning movement?
/r/MensRights12/09/12 05:31 AM
1

You've presupposed that infants are conscious and sentient, and the evidence suggests that infants are less conscious or sentient than crows, dolphins, and chimpanzees. Infants fail the spot test, they can't use tools, and they cannot produce episodic memory. An infant is a human being, with its own unique DNA - its 'level of sentience' is irrelevant. Well that's just an assertion, and a false one at that. If your ethics has to do with something that doesn't exist, it's not rational ethics. How …
/r/MensRights30/08/12 04:53 AM
1

to me, there is a nice easy way to differentiate between person and not-person: the moment of birth I'm reminded of the phrase "Playing God" - you're just making rules up as you go along, putting yourself in the position of final arbiter on things that you actually have no control over. This is pure hubris, very dangerous and bordering on psychopathic.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 07:21 PM
1

You're arguing about something that doesn't matter. It doesn't matter when the baby achieves your idea of 'sentience' - it's still a seperate human being with its own DNA.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 05:42 PM
1

They're both murder : apples and apples. The principle behind why the two acts are 'evil' are the same - therefore the response should be the same on a basic level. Details may differ, but you're being inconsistent to punish one and condone the other.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 05:41 PM
1

I'm so glad we have people who feel themselves to be in a position to rationalize away evil for 'societal good.' To be clear - that's fucking sick.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 05:39 PM
-1

First observation; (starving an embryo by preventing implantation vs dooming an embryo by preventing fertilization) Eggs are not embryos. It doesn't appear to be conscience or sentience either, else infanticide and murder of the mentally vegetative would be acceptable. This is inconsistent. Infanticide is killing a conscious/sentient being, even if that sentience is only in its developmental stage. Instead, what we appear to be valuing is some sort of arbitrary sense of seniority and human supre…
/r/MensRights29/08/12 12:25 AM
2

Sure, but that doesn't fit the common definition of 'murder.' I am a proponent of the Non-aggression Principle - initiating aggressive and/or coercive force is immoral, while defensive force is moral.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 11:55 PM
-2

This applies to murder too. The people who still want to murder [insert victim here] will seek more dangerous methods of doing so, endangering their lives as well. You have to be consistent with your ethical principles.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 11:53 PM
-1

I suggest you spend some time studying secular ethics and philosophy.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 11:52 PM
1

Out of curiosity, what circumstances would make murder "right"?
/r/MensRights28/08/12 11:19 PM
-7

And this is what I meant by being disturbed. Do you have any siblings? Have you been around newborn children, or witnessed a birth? Comparing human babies, whether wrapped in a few inches of their mother's flesh or not, to cows for slaughtering is the definition of inhumane. This kind of thinking betrays a real lack of rational basis for ethical reasoning or conscience.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 11:18 PM
3

A dead fetus is better than a kid growing up unloved and becoming a burden on society. Who are you to make that judgment? Who is 'society' for that matter? Why don't you ask the child if he/she would rather die than grow up 'unloved?' Oh wait... you can't. The same arguments that apply to circumcision being immoral apply to abortion being immoral. If the child feels terrible enough about their life that they want to commit suicide - allow them that option if all cures have failed. However, I don…
/r/MensRights28/08/12 10:39 PM
31

I would personally be very disturbed by anyone who truly believes abortion is murder, yet still supports it.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 10:34 PM
9

As far as the breast cancer thing, it's not really an apt comparison. It's a cost/benefit thing. For most people, the cost of removing a foreskin is low since it doesn't provide a lot of benefits. Let me guess - you're cut. It's ok man, I am too... but you need to realize that somebody disfiguring your junk before you were old enough to even understand what was happening, much less decide for yourself if you wanted your body permanently changed, was a terrible, inhumane act. You don't know what …
/r/MensRights27/08/12 05:44 PM
4

But you can - that's what media is all about.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 09:27 PM
3

For those ignorant of it; The Broken Window Fallacy. Spending billions on circumcisions is akin to breaking a billion windows.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 11:41 PM
1

But, wait - she's a woman. How can she not be the most important person in her son's life? How can she not be the best caretaker for her own child?
/r/MensRights22/08/12 11:30 PM
4

I like being independent, intellectually, emotionally, and physically from the hive-mind that is typically home to women. I like being the 'lone wolf.'
/r/MensRights17/08/12 04:20 PM
0

I'd like to see some information on this that isn't just conjecture.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 08:42 PM
3

they were denied the full range of choices Really? By whom? And who had the 'full range of choices'?
/r/MensRights15/08/12 03:45 PM
5

Personally, and I think that I'm not alone here, I believe that a lot of what gets called 'discrimination' and 'inequality' against women isn't and wasn't, but not that it doesn't exist at all. A good example is the stereo-typical 'repressed 50's housewife.' When trying to look at the entire situation objectively, balancing the various risks and responsibilities between the husband and the wife, I simply can't see how the woman is the one being 'repressed.'
/r/MensRights15/08/12 12:08 PM
0

Very astute.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 02:58 AM
3

Please don't pretend we're actually arguing something. I only called you out because people in this sub need to know that there is more to this topic than your puddle-deep internet-wisdom. Go ahead and tell me to fuck off - it only validates my criticism.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 02:03 AM
5

Your second point is correct. However, your off-handed and lazy dismissal of any potentially logical basis for "rights" as "delusion" is both lazy and dim-witted. Your continuous attacks only confirm that supposition.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 01:52 AM
1

You didn't make any kind of 'argument' - only stated an opinion which you seem to hold as an axiom. Within this context I am under no requirement to produce an argument myself.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 01:44 AM
0

If they're a delusion, allow me to divorce you from them.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 01:26 AM
24

Short answer : yes. Some individuals may be privileged, but "white people" are not, in the same way that "black people" are not inferior.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 02:58 PM
1

Yes. Inflation is just a hidden tax, one of the major ways people in power stay in power.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 01:59 AM
2

"No man would want to be with a woman with all of that ugly skin everywhere. We should just cut it off." /s
/r/MensRights07/08/12 03:37 PM
4

Or go full libertarian - voluntarist here. Don't vote!
/r/MensRights06/08/12 04:28 AM
-5

Maybe I'm being intellectually lazy, but I took her up on her invitation to unsubscribe as soon as she said patriarchy.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 03:34 PM
-2

I ask not because you should be an 'Objectivist' - I wouldn't call myself that. However, some of the philosophy was particularly eye-opening and I think it would likely be very helpful for many MRA's who have for so long been stuck seeing themselves as worthless or disposable.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 11:57 AM
23

Frankly, if men are expected to resist the urge to look at other women, women should be expected to resist the urge to shit-test. Seems to me it has never even been mentioned to them how incredibly inhumane it can be, and I think they really need to learn. Fuck women who do this, even if it's their 'natural tendency.' I'd rather be alone than have to deal with this kind of fucking bullshit.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 05:58 AM
16

I agree completely. It's so strange to discover as you age that it is actually men that tend to care more about their SO's for the person they are.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 05:50 AM
-1

Have you ever looked into Objectivism at all?
/r/MensRights30/07/12 05:48 AM
2

This works up until you try dating.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 10:54 PM
-2

The girl shouldn't be charged. The state, the DA, possibly the mother - anyone involved in the prosecution - should be sued.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 03:18 AM
1

The spirit of the action is certainly Orwellian. I'd bet anything that the majority of those participating in this would take the reigns of government to enforce their hatred if they had half a chance.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 03:15 AM
2

This happened to me too just recently. Check out their subreddit heading. Apparently they're staging some sick kind of preemptive bannings.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 12:05 AM
3

Voluntaryist MRA here. Biggrouphugs!
/r/MensRights28/07/12 12:03 AM
28

It's pretty simple, really - males aren't full humans in the feminist worldview.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 11:37 PM
1

Ah, yes. The old therapy routine. As if mental professionals somehow magically cure all mental illness by their mere existence. Only a small fraction of the people who could very much use psychiatric/psychological help can afford it, and it is by no means guaranteed to succeed.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 01:53 AM
1

I don't blame him for the emotional PTSD, if his story's true, but I still won't excuse it. What does this mean, exactly?
/r/MensRights24/07/12 01:31 AM
1

A rape victim has to learn to trust to be a healthy human being again. This betrays a deep lack of understanding about how trauma affects humans. Trauma can cause physical changes in a person, and telling them they have to just 'learn to trust' and blaming them for failing is incredibly ignorant.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 12:50 AM
1

Movie Bob is really just terrible at his job. Yahtzee, on the other hand...
/r/MensRights22/07/12 06:04 PM
2

It's just a different form of the same aggression. One is physical, the other is social.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 11:01 PM
5

It's really not.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 10:52 PM
3

I think the key is that it is public schooling that is accelerating this process.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 08:44 PM
3

As a white-trash young male, I can confirm this. There is almost nothing lower on the social totem pole than poor white people, as far as I can tell. You're not allowed the type of community and pride associated with the African American or Latin communities, and people judge you more easily and more often.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 06:06 PM
12

Airline steward, nurse, secretary, elementary-school teacher, dancer, veterinarian, waiter...
/r/MensRights18/07/12 10:09 AM
2

Ah I misread him. Thanks for pointing that out. Clearly, people should be able to choose who they associate with without outside interference, period. Racism, Sexism, etc. aren't moral, but it's not moral to shove a gun to their face and tell them to do what you feel is right, either.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 05:52 PM
0

Why shouldn't he be?
/r/MensRights03/07/12 05:31 PM
4

I vomited - mentally.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 01:01 PM
1

I don't intend for you to extend the thought in any particular direction - the important thing is simply asking the question. I'm fairly certain many people have never approached this narrative skeptically.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 01:16 PM
11

Yes - to what degree is the narrative that men were oppressors and women the oppressed actually true? Perhaps not at all. Perhaps whether you were oppressed or an oppressor had nothing to do with your gender whatsoever.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 04:34 AM
4

Because they are the gatekeepers of sex and reproduction, biologically this makes sense.
/r/MensRights23/06/12 05:45 PM
3

Don't you know, males always want sex, the more, the better - I mean, how is being a sex worker not the male dream job. /s
/r/MensRights23/06/12 08:08 AM
2

And I wouldn't call these decisions 'sacrifices' if they value their children more than an extra 20 hours at the office. In fact, it's just as likely that the spouse putting in the hours at the office is actually the one sacrificing.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 04:10 AM
4

Guys, since when is this kind of thing allowed on this subreddit?
/r/MensRights17/06/12 02:24 AM
2

"Nuh-uh." "Yes HUH!" "Nuh-uh." "Yes HUUUUHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" "..." "..." "Nuh uh." Seriously I have to ask, are you a teenager?
/r/MensRights17/06/12 02:17 AM
8

No he doesn't. Did you even read the article? Obama is constantly pandering to feminists and women voters. I'm a voluntarist, so I'm not in favor of Romney, but at least he isn't a feminist suck-up.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 02:12 AM
1

I'm sure Huggies doesn't produce its own ads, and is probably only buying in to what the ad agency is selling. (Like Mad Men?)
/r/MensRights15/06/12 06:30 PM
2

Yes. This article was the blog equivalent of cunnilingus.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 05:25 AM
2

Only thing I've noticed is his very strange view of libertarians, such as myself.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 05:19 AM
6

I really like how Huggies immediately responded. Props to them. I will remember this.
/r/MensRights15/06/12 05:18 AM
2

I understand. The longer I try to combat bullshit, though, the more using the opponent's tactics against them appeals to me - as long as it doesn't carry over into the actual reasoning or debate.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 01:35 PM
6

Appeals to emotion are not legitimate in debate, granted (it's a fallacy). However, as a means to spark that debate, I find it useful.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 11:18 AM
7

There are a vast number of people who are actively engaged in trying to force their ideology or worldview onto reality, when it is impossible to successfully do so because it is plain wrong and/or oversimplified. This applies to religion, politics, science, history, sociology, psychology, etc. etc. To be "open-minded" is to be able to change your viewpoints as you learn more information. On a more fundamental level, it is in the understanding that you, personally, know nothing at all compared to…
/r/MensRights01/05/12 06:16 PM
2

Yes. We now easily produce enough food to feed the world population. It is unfortunate that governments and other criminals prevent free trade that would bring these goods naturally to all who need it.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 02:02 PM
2

Anyone who says we are anywhere near the carrying capacity for the human species on this planet is delusional or trying to delude you.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 12:49 PM
1

I really wish the term 'egalitarian' were more widely used and understood. One of the worst effects of feminism has been define itself as egalitarianism in the popular conscience; so, feminist = moral person in favor of equality, non-feminist = bigot!
/r/MensRights23/04/12 12:39 PM
8

I love my parents, but twenty-eight years still isn't quite enough time to get over having religion imposed on you from birth...
/r/MensRights23/04/12 12:36 PM
1

Relevant.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 07:53 PM
1

This has nothing to do with our current subject.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 10:36 PM
1

Have you ever looked into neurology, neuropsychology, etc...?
/r/MensRights04/03/12 09:57 AM
-2

Physical pain is not subjective -.-
/r/MensRights04/03/12 02:27 AM
0

Define "intelligence" - if you mean speed, capacity, and potentiality of learning, you're mistaken.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 03:32 AM
-1

Everything we know about biology tells us otherwise.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 05:22 AM
5

If this were a man, you can be sure he'd never see the light of day again.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 09:10 PM
4

I subbed today after I found this on Youtube and thought it needed to be on reddit as well. I'm glad that the video author is a redditor, and I doubt she would be disappointed to find reposts! ;)
/r/MensRights10/02/12 08:35 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter