TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SpoffyLikesCoffee Archive

View 0 posts and 38 comments by SpoffyLikesCoffee on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
26

Record every conversation Start documenting any evidence you can for your age discrimination suit
/r/MensRights24/01/20 04:19 AM
1

Touché
/r/MensRights24/01/20 01:20 AM
3

It’s much easier to blame a woman for one’s very poor choice than to accept responsibly for having made such choice. Men’s rights is about advocating for things that we are not allowed a choice in! Holy fuck some of these guys are as bad as radical feminists.
/r/MensRights24/01/20 01:17 AM
-3

So allowing yourself to be manipulated by a woman into mutilating your genitals, when you were free at all times to simply tell her to “fuck off and die”, is a men’s rights issue?! That’s fucking grade A rejection of personal responsibly in favor of a victim mentality. Weak.
/r/MensRights24/01/20 01:13 AM
2

I know. It’s pretty hypocritical to be angry at feminists for their hyper-judgmental and narrow-minded views towards men and then turn around and do literally the exact same thing to another guy. I was circumcised as an infant. My son is not circumcised because I recognize his right to choose. That said, I prefer the way my uncircumcised penis looks. Does that mean if I had to do it over again I would still be circumcised? Fuck no, but I do recognize that the results were not completely horrible…
/r/MensRights24/01/20 12:36 AM
1

Plenty
/r/MensRights24/01/20 12:21 AM
-2

I fully expect to be downvoted by whiny self-righteous man children who represent exactly the type of fragile insecure men that feminists equate all men as being.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 11:36 PM
7

I agree. A stupid decision made by a man because a woman said he should has nothing to do with men’s rights. He’s an adult and responsibly for his bad choices rests solely with him.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 11:07 PM
1

No it’s not. Use condoms correctly and every single time Dump that bitch and find someone whose views more closely align Withhold sex Vasectomy is literally his only option for having unprotected sex with this entitled hag
/r/MensRights23/01/20 11:04 PM
5

Agreed. If you’re an adult man then it’s your penis to mutilate as you see fit.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 11:01 PM
2

If Seinfeld was written by Larry David’s paranoid couch.
/r/MensRights15/01/20 04:02 PM
0

A dude probably posted that. Women don’t take our power, we give it to them.
/r/MensRights13/01/20 05:16 AM
1

Sexist!
/r/MensRights13/01/20 05:09 AM
3

I used to be a crusader for good too, and then I realized that one person cannot make a difference in this world but they can make a difference in their own life. All you can do with others is just state your case and hope for the best, but remember that most people are pretty much mindless drones.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 04:28 AM
2

My ex-wife’s and her family is Jewish (and all women, literally no men at all) and they really tried to pressure me into acquiescing. I didn’t budge an inch right from the start. I didn’t even engage in a discussion. I said “This is my son and he’s not being circumcised. End of discussion and if you keep at this you can forget about ever seeing him.” And thank you for being empathetic and understanding. This isn’t just a men’s rights issue it’s a human rights issue. Circumcision is child abuse, …
/r/MensRights12/01/20 04:09 AM
40

Men are only entitled to have feelings in circumstances and under conditions where women believe men should. Except that men should always be sensitive and accommodating to women. But not too sensitive. And not too accommodating. Because women don’t want a doormat, except when they do. Men should stand up for themselves, but never to a woman. Because women are never wrong. If a woman is wrong about something it’s only because she’s being gaslit by a man. Men are also required to be mind-readers …
/r/MensRights11/01/20 11:48 PM
5

As a male I think it’s fun to compete in sports with other males. It’s not fun when your self-worth is dependent on winning these competitions. It’s really not fun when an adult’s self-worth is dependent on children winning these competitions.
/r/MensRights11/01/20 11:45 PM
3

I admire your desire to protect innocent children from mutilation, and I wish you the best of luck in your quest. If you have legal questions I may be able to help with then feel free to message me.
/r/MensRights11/01/20 11:41 PM
2

Don’t circumcise your son. That’s why I did. Crusades generally fail even if they are motivated by sound logic and true righteousness. Society is full of stupid, brainwashed idiots and the vast majority of these people have no interest at all in being proven wrong.
/r/MensRights11/01/20 11:36 PM
3

By the time you’ve sold enough of your soul to get elected to an office where you could actually work to outlaw circumcision you won’t care about anything else but money and power. Politics are by and for the greedy and heartless. Also Muslims and Jews are going to rage against your “religious persecution” of them for their belief that they are commanded by God to mutilate little boys.
/r/MensRights11/01/20 11:04 PM
1

Be a billionaire or soulless multinational corporation and buy off politicians.
/r/MensRights11/01/20 10:57 PM
3

I’m completely on your side as a man and as a victim of non-consensual circumcision, but as someone in civil litigation practice (although admittedly not personal injury practice) I have to say that in my opinion the chances are slim of a case even making it past a motion to dismiss, let alone prevailing at trial. I’m not aware of any cases where a jury has awarded damages strictly for non-consensual childhood circumcision. I hope you prove me wrong.
/r/MensRights11/01/20 10:53 PM
0

The doctor has no liability for “correctly” performing a lawful procedure at the behest of parents. The lawsuit angle just isn’t going to work for this cause. You’re better off working to try and change the laws that allow this mutilation.
/r/MensRights11/01/20 10:15 PM
2

Statute of limitations Procedure was (ostensibly) done with parental consent Lack of provable damages No case law establishing a precedent for such a suit
/r/MensRights11/01/20 10:12 PM
2

Secret recording is admissible as a defense exhibit even if it was recorded illegally.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 05:44 PM
1

It’s really a shitty situation all around that we have to conceivably break the law just to protect ourselves from sociopathic lying women.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 05:43 PM
1

It’s 100% admissible as exculpatory evidence at trial. The person replying that it’s not admissible was wrong and deleted their reply. Admittedly I was probably a bit harsh in my tone but as men we need to protect ourselves. A rape prosecution based upon false allegations can literally destroy a man’s life even if he’s found not guilty. Even seeking a finding of “factually innocent” (assuming the jurisdiction has such remedy) isn’t going to erase the attorney’s fees and time/stress caused by def…
/r/MensRights09/01/20 11:51 PM
2

That’s 100% false in the United States and every other legal system based upon English common law. You’re conflating the act of unlawfully privately recording (of what would be exculpatory evidence) with the exclusionary rule, which only applies to evidence illegally obtained and presented by the government in a prosecution. Exculpatory evidence that is not hearsay (or hearsay falling under one of the exceptions to the rule of hearsay) is nearly always admissible regardless of how the evidence i…
/r/MensRights09/01/20 08:23 PM
6

A man is an adult male. He has at least one Y chromosome. A woman is an adult female. She has no Y chromosomes. Anything else is wishful thinking. You’re not male or female because of what you feel, you’re male or female based upon biology. Everyone is free to fully engage with their own psychological and neurobiological pathologies, just don’t expect objective reality to change.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 07:48 PM
5

Second this. Even if it’s against the law in your state, at the very least audio record every sexual encounter. Rape is always a more serious crime than “eavesdropping” and if you have a choice between indicted for rape and indicted for eavesdropping, well that’s an easy decision to make.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 07:25 PM
1

It’s pretty simple, really: Never trust a woman but never let on that you don’t. If you consider this rationally, any possible relative benefit that may come from trusting a woman is generally overwhelmingly outweighed by the potential negative consequences. Therefore, the correct course of action is to simply never give a woman your trust and to keep this fact a secret both in your words and in your deeds. Be measured in all of your responses, do not let her make you lose control of your emotio…
/r/MensRights09/01/20 02:11 AM
3

Well, to be fair I wasn’t really targeting you specifically. I was making more of a generalization that common sense and general ethical principles dictate that chopping off a piece of someone’s penis without their consent is wrong. So I apologize if you felt attacked — that wasn’t my goal.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 05:47 PM
2

Okay. That makes more sense. Sorry for the confusion.
/r/MensRights06/01/20 12:37 AM
1

Anyone who allows themselves to be coerced by the government to murder others deserves whatever they get. A righteous person will always choose incarceration over murder.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 08:46 PM
3

What’s wrong with it is that no one has the right to slice off a piece of another person without consent of that person or absolute medical necessity in the case of a person who cannot legally consent. The fact that this needs to be explained to anyone is really insane.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 08:37 PM
5

I wasn’t aware that you were the spokesperson for all women everywhere. Congratulations on reaching such a lofty achievement!
/r/MensRights05/01/20 08:28 PM
1

Men can’t be raped. Didn’t you know? A woman said it so it must be truth.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 08:25 PM
11

...and then when men disavow sex, as in MGTOW, they’re mocked by women. Do you not see how fundamentally irrational women are? Of course not, because that would require objective introspection and apparently estrogen completely inhibits this ability. If women “feel” it then it must be so, because to women feelings are always more reliable than objective reasoning. And besides, objective reasoning takes effort. Why put forth effort when one can just assume that feelings = reality and act accordin…
/r/MensRights05/01/20 08:10 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter