TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Sporky023 Archive

View 1 post and 60 comments by Sporky023 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
131

Sporky023/r/MensRights19/07/11 12:25 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Also does requesting a paternity test, which requires guardian status, itself count as legal admission of guardian status, and the implied responsibilities of fatherhood?
/r/MensRights07/08/11 01:44 AM
1

thanks, that lets me know it's trolls from /r/againstmensrights
/r/MensRights02/08/11 06:42 PM
-4

Will downvoters tell me why they downvoted?
/r/MensRights02/08/11 04:47 PM
-3

I skipped the Salon article because instead of the opinions and speculations of a bunch of academics who have strong incentive not to say anything that would upset anyone, I'd much rather have the opinions of my fellow Redditors. Here's my 2 cents: I'd be on that pill immediately, and I would never come off it until I had decided to have children and was actively trying to get my partner pregnant. The fear of an unwanted pregnancy is much worse for a man because he has completely lost control at…
/r/MensRights01/08/11 07:50 PM
0

I'm not talking about the social phenomenon of alcohol consupmtion vs rohypnol, so a comparison of how easy it is to sneak a dose on someone is beside the point. Instead I'm talking about the concept of alcohol as compared to "stronger" drugs, and I'm saying that alcohol is one of the strongest drugs there is. I'm sure if you took a dose lower than effective of rohypnol a blackout wouldn't be guaranteed either. And likewise a blackout is certainly guaranteed on alcohol if you hit a certain dose.…
/r/MensRights31/07/11 10:54 PM
0

So I believe roofies make you have bad judgment, lose memory, and suffer loss of muscular coordination right? Alcohol does these things.
/r/MensRights31/07/11 01:46 PM
0

If she lies consistently there's a good chance she's a sociopath. Familiarize yourself with the phenomenon, and don't be afraid to threaten her with legal action, as an appeal to the guilt of a sociopath is completely futile.
/r/MensRights31/07/11 03:07 AM
1

There are few drugs stronger than large doses of alcohol. I'm serious. Think of the most fucked up you have ever been on ... heroin. Mushrooms. Ecstasy. etc. By fucked up I mean: can't walk, can't think, vomiting, can't focus eyes, etc. In your experience, haven't you been more incapacitated on alcohol than any of these other drugs?
/r/MensRights31/07/11 02:59 AM
-1

That's really interesting. I was stumped.
/r/MensRights31/07/11 02:58 AM
2

Landing on the beaches at Normandy was an uphill battle.
/r/MensRights31/07/11 02:54 AM
2

this
/r/MensRights30/07/11 12:15 AM
7

We should, from the beginning, from each beginning and each moment, not make the mistake of defining our actions by the reactions of others. We have goals of our own, which consist of improving the lives of men. Our goal is not to be liked by feminists. Nor is our goal not to be attacked by feminists. Let their hateful attacks continue. Let the feminists weed out our women-hating false-MRAs. A movement is not the same thing as an army, or an organization. We can proceed without a unified front f…
/r/MensRights30/07/11 12:14 AM
-2

I think this is the wrong direction to take. A father's consent should be necessary to carry the child to term. In other words, either party should be able to veto a pregnancy, and consensus should be required to have a child.
/r/MensRights27/07/11 09:02 PM
1

You're right, the date on the poster is 2011-07-26 which was the day this was posted. On the other hand, he might have decided to turn it into a hunger strike after finding that he'd eaten nothing for the past couple of days out of despair.
/r/MensRights27/07/11 12:13 PM
11

I did a homeless stint once and went without food for a few days. It really clears your mind but at the same time you conserve energy. That staring straight ahead and letting the sign talk for him seems like the sort of thing extreme hunger brings on. I'm no longer in Chicago, but I think every MRA there should go and sit with this guy for a while. Don't have to talk or gush at him but it might be worthwhile to make a sign that says "I support this guy [arrow]" and spend a few hours with him. ed…
/r/MensRights26/07/11 09:33 PM
3

"Yes this is a rant. Yes I am not sure what my point here is." I'd say this is a cry for sympathy. While it may seem "unmanly" to mention something simply because you want sympathy, the fact of the matter is you do deserve sympathy. You have my sympathy, brother. I see your pain. EDIT: the clarify, I believe that seeking sympathy is a natural human response which is culturally unacceptable for men. Since sympathy is one of the basic emotional "nutrients" the psyche relies on, it is understandabl…
/r/MensRights26/07/11 12:19 PM
1

How do you see this connected to education?
/r/MensRights25/07/11 01:43 PM
4

Who claimed "Look, a young Men's Rights Activist"? I think the claim if any is "Hey Men's Rights Activists: males' rights continue to get violated and this needs to stop."
/r/MensRights25/07/11 12:08 AM
7

+1 flag as child abuse by my YouTube account
/r/MensRights25/07/11 12:07 AM
1

Yeah but Ozzy is Ozzy.
/r/MensRights22/07/11 01:02 AM
2

Three things: I see it as retaliation. She threw a punch at men everywhere with her comments. We threw a punch back by making her lose her job. Retaliation is not morally wrong. If you are getting beat down, you have the right to fight back. If disrespect has gone beyond a certain point, retaliation is the first step to respect. This is why bullies don't pick on kids who hit back. I don't want to sound like I view the world as an unending field of battle. But given the choice between abuse and a…
/r/MensRights21/07/11 08:40 PM
3

Getting someone punished for lambasting men's rights IS a demonstration that it matters. There will be conversations like this (even if it's just someone's thoughts): "Why isn't Sharon on the show?" "She had to leave because of some remarks she made about it being funny when a guy got his dick cut off" "Really? That's ridiculous, it's not even a big deal." "Yeah well a bunch of people thought it was a big deal" "why?" "think about it. What if a woman had been tied up and cut up? And then someone…
/r/MensRights21/07/11 08:34 PM
0

this
/r/MensRights21/07/11 08:29 PM
2

I disagree. She's tainted for life. Our power grows and in the future men's rights will only hold more and more weight. Anyone who hires her in the future will run the risk of being branded with her shame.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 08:29 PM
2

I agree. I totally agree. At the same time, I'm glad that our actions (letter writing, reporting them for hate speech on FB), resulted in something concrete happening. Even if the others didn't get hit like she did, they'll remember the example. I'm also glad for the simple fact that, at least for a while, her voice won't be on the airwaves.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 08:27 PM
1

Simple response: I wasn't talking about how you should behave on reddit. I was referring to real-world interactions and using it as an exercise which will lead to greater understanding of things. As Mr. Miyagi said, "Man who catch fly with chopstick accomplish anything." Applying tit-for-tat is wax-on, wax-off. It is not intended to be a solution to a problem but rather an exercise that creates situations in which one learns
/r/MensRights20/07/11 06:36 PM
7

Let's deconstruct one paragraph from that tl;dr: "We have watched you attempt to intimidate us with volume and tone, physicality and body language. Instead of listening respectfully to our experience of oppression, you consistently attempt to redefine yourself as the victim, when it is you who is in fact the perpetrator." ... says the woman trying to shut us up "You have tried to make us insecure and unconfident by patronising us and undermining our intelligence. But it is not that we have misun…
/r/MensRights20/07/11 06:21 PM
3

I'd say ignore. On the internet a thing is as powerful as the attention it gets. So ignore it.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 05:50 PM
1

Just one thing to clarify. I wish to be as precise as possible, and hope you will read my words on their most literal level because there are some fine distinctions to be made (is not the path of maturity an ability to make finer and finer distinctions?) and I don't want to sound like I'm giving the usual "harden up" advice. As I said, I'm also a highly-sensitive person. For most of my life until a couple of years ago, the conflict of how to balance my own sensitivity with the seeming lack there…
/r/MensRights20/07/11 05:46 PM
2

Benocrates, I just read a collection of your comments from your user page and I see one thing in common in all of them: you're very, very, very polite and spend a lot of time framing things to make it clear that you're not trying to invalidate anything anyone else is saying. In fact I'd say at least 75% of what you say is mollifying and smoothing things over. Now, I only read perhaps 20 of your comments so they're probably all in this context where most of us disagree with you. Perhaps I shouldn…
/r/MensRights20/07/11 01:28 AM
1

Good work. I believe, however, that acting on Facebook is more effective. When you're in a fight with someone, do you appeal to them to help you? Or do you appeal to a third party? Of course it is best to fight your enemies directly, but an email is not fighting. An email is appealing. When one appeals, they should appeal to a third party who mediates the relationship. Why? Because a third party can be swayed, is not so attached to their existing position. In this case that third party is Facebo…
/r/MensRights19/07/11 06:24 PM
2

Hey I'm the OP and I don't think Benocrates should be voted down. He's expressing his opinion respectfully and eloquently. And basically he's just saying he's got a different threshold of acceptability which I'm guessing means he considers all talk to be in the realm of okay and it's only action that should be punishable (am I correct Benocrates?). @Benocrates: I have just a couple of points to make: I respect your opinion. You don't have to join this fight. Those who are inspired to do so will …
/r/MensRights19/07/11 06:18 PM
4

hahahaha! listen to this ass-clown! his name is CutAndLovingIt?? this my friends is the epitome of the pussy-whipped, enslaved man. He's so deeply brainwashed he defends the people who call for his blood. What a waste of air this douchebag is. It'd be really funny if he got beaten to death with some baseball bats. Or fucked to death by a horse. Or eaten alive by his kids. Let's tattoo him with a number and cremate him alive. Wouldn't it be cool to hear him kicking and screaming locked inside a f…
/r/MensRights19/07/11 06:06 PM
-1

I'm not sure either. I do know, however, that it is a weapon, and it is in my hand, and by using it I strike at the show. No corn field or meadow was ever "designed for" a battle to be fought there. War isn't about what's allowed. It's about what you can do.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 06:02 PM
2

anyone know Catherine Kieu's husband's name?
/r/MensRights19/07/11 12:36 PM
2

Report their Facebook page. By association with the show, the page is guilty of hate speech. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/itr56/dear_rmensrights_take_action_against_the_talk/
/r/MensRights19/07/11 12:32 PM
1

report their page on Facebook http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/itr56/dear_rmensrights_take_action_against_the_talk/
/r/MensRights19/07/11 12:31 PM
5

see http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/itr56/dear_rmensrights_take_action_against_the_talk/ This is just one piece of action you can take against them. Action is better than talking about it, and none of us has the power to bring a lawsuit. What you can do is hop over to facebook and give their page yet another abuse report. If enough of those stack up FB will take notice and their page will be taken down. Do what you can.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 12:29 PM
6

In general I think it's good to always find a point of leverage whenever we see something wrong. As activists we should always be asking ourselves "where can we push?"
/r/MensRights19/07/11 12:13 PM
5

fight these bitches Step 1: http://www.facebook.com/TheTalkCBS Step 2: http://imgur.com/mJYoQ
/r/MensRights19/07/11 03:17 AM
17

The OP links to The Talk's FB page: http://www.facebook.com/TheTalkCBS You can punish the show by reporting its FB page which impacts ratings: http://imgur.com/vR15F Upvote this comment to make it rise to the top and be seen by all.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 03:03 AM
9

I love that the girl from Roseanne (Sara Gilbert) just appears out of nowhere and speaks reason. Hasn't aged a day since I last saw her in 1993. The reaction to male mutilation is pretty sick.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 02:26 AM
1

It's a double-bind. It's hard to look a woman in the eye and tell her you don't trust her (if you want to get laid that is; it's pretty easy if you don't care about maintaining any relationship). I'm not arguing against men taking control themselves. I'm just saying it's difficult and one should be prepared for this double-bind.
/r/MensRights14/07/11 10:52 PM
1

Actually I wasn't arguing for creating a new unique key. In fact as a programmer I would argue against it as it creates a redundancy in the "database schema" which must be maintained and does not provide value. If anything, the correct alteration would be to rename the SSN to be called "Citizen ID" or something like that. And might want to make them have more digits too as we will soon see an explosion of citizenry in the form of robots and the assumption that "the population of the US will alwa…
/r/MensRights13/07/11 02:59 PM
0

This is a fight we can win. It may not be as "big a deal" as marching on Washington, or whatever other meatspace activity some might see as "bigger". But we must accept the fact that we are a ragtag bunch of people who meet only on the internet to swap information. We are not highly organized. We do not have strong relationships within the group. What we have is a common set of beliefs, and we have keyboards, and we have respect for intelligent discussion and the ability to change our minds. I'l…
/r/MensRights13/07/11 12:52 PM
0

Not sure why you're getting downvoted, Guy51234. I definitely see where you're going with this. I think what Guy is trying to say is that shit is as big a deal as people make out of it. We need to recognize that we are participating in a very important liberation movement here. While we do not necessarily have all the strategic and tactical polish of more veteran culture-warriors (for instance the women who convinced the completely male-dominated government to give them suffrage back in the day,…
/r/MensRights13/07/11 12:44 PM
1

I guess as long as we're only identifying the unique persons then only the nails who stand up get hammered down. Gotta say I'm not sure you're a database programmer, or got what I was getting at.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 11:46 AM
6

TIL that there are moderators on Reddit.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 04:19 AM
1

I think you shot that one into orbit my friend. astrophysicists, you may be the only ones to get this
/r/MensRights13/07/11 04:11 AM
4

agreed. Don't we all (USAicans) have SSNs already anyway? As a database programmer I'm kind of embarrassed at the term "social security number", which then gets used in all contexts where they later realized that a unique ID might be useful.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 04:10 AM
4

What a man does is stand up and do what's right. In this case that might mean interfering with those brochures ...
/r/MensRights13/07/11 04:07 AM
1

I am aware that unchecked power can cause a lot of harm. I am also aware of the division of state power and federal power set forth in the constitution: basically states do everything except a couple of functions which benefit from a large meta-state: maintaining an army and handling alliances. However I think that the reality is that whereas at the time the constitution was written Massachusetts (for example) was considered to be a sovereign state only loosely constrained by an alliance of othe…
/r/MensRights12/07/11 11:59 PM
2

You got on PorkRocket's case for making a statement of the form "X does not have a right to do Y". So I changed it to "A has a right not to experience B", i.e. changed it from a negative right to a positive right. The right to not be mutilated is based on my principle of maximum reduction of unnecessary anxiety. Physical violence is atrocious, painful, and damaging. One of the worst aspects of physical violence is the long-lasting effects it has on the neurophysiology of the human brain and mind…
/r/MensRights12/07/11 11:49 PM
1

Ignorant of what exactly? You do understand the meaning of the word "ignorance" right?
/r/MensRights12/07/11 11:34 PM
2

Damn
/r/MensRights12/07/11 11:18 PM
1

If the constitution doesn't give our government the ability to create laws to protect personal autonomy then the constitution is wrong. I will continue to vote based on my view of ethics, not some beta version v0.0.1 document written a few centuries ago.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 11:10 PM
1

FTFY: Human beings have a right to be free from mutilation.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 11:07 PM
4

"Should we give Google the benefit of the doubt?" FTFY: "Should we expend energy trying to punish Google for doing this?" No. * There are much more important issues for men's rights and health. * There is a very small chance of success in any kind of fight against Google. * The actual culpability of Google in this is highly questionable and hard to prove. * Our time and energy is limited so we must pick our battles. I recommend instead of spending one more second on this topic, instead focusing …
/r/MensRights12/07/11 11:05 PM
4

I agree. The chances of picking "female" on a two-sided coin three times in a row is 1/8 ... not that unlikely.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 11:02 PM
1

This law is awful, but we should recognize the strategic and cultural evolutionary environment that it represents. Ultimately the reason the legislative process has taken aim at this issue is that our culture is evolving away from circumcision. Basically this law is a reaction where the federal government is noticing that American culture is changing and so it's trying to use law to keep it from changing. The good aspect of all this is that the presence of a push to make law means that the under…
/r/MensRights12/07/11 10:54 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter