| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | When equality law benefits men, women try to get around itYes that's fine. There's all sorts of murky water when it comes to using stats for insurance (race seems like a taboo) but generally the two that seem pretty well accepted are smoking status and sex. | /r/MensRights | 30/08/11 11:17 PM |
| -2 | When equality law benefits men, women try to get around itHeadline is misleading. Equality in this case means charging people what is backed by statistics; it does not mean charging men and women the same insurance rates. It just means the statistical data is analyzed the same way. | /r/MensRights | 30/08/11 06:52 PM |
| 1 | Preparing for massive downvotes, but would like to share my opinionIt seems like every response from men's rights advocates in this thread are suffering from extreme confirmation bias. EVERY interaction they've had with feminists is evil and awful and bashes men, without exception, therefore all feminists must be evil, men-hating people. | /r/MensRights | 14/01/11 06:53 PM |
| -4 | Preparing for massive downvotes, but would like to share my opinion[http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2011/01/07/so-naomi-wolf-is-just-trolling-at-this-point-right/] There's one example I cam across recently. You can dismiss it as a "website no one reads" if you want, but what exactly are would satisfy you as a response? You'd like a "famous feminist" to go on television and denounce the opinion of another? This whole subreddit seems like a bunch of guys afraid of losing privelege, sprinkled with a few who actually have legitimate griefs over unfairness the… | /r/MensRights | 14/01/11 06:51 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter