TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Squarg Archive

View 0 posts and 24 comments by Squarg on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Not covered != discrimination. Contraception is not optional for most women for obvious reasons, this is simply not a problem that men have. Also I want everything to be covered, so does that mean that I should be against a law that covers most things just because it doesn't cover everything? Is it perfect? No. Is it better than what we had before? Absolutely.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 09:42 PM
0

Yeah I can't find any credence in that claim aside from idiots like Alex Jones so yeah, have fun being bitter and stupid.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 09:12 PM
1

Ok fine, if you really need this explained to you then fine. That isn't how discrimination works. Having one specific procedure covered and another specific procedure not covered is not discrimination. If you had one procedure covered for women and not for men then that would be discrimination. Since that is not the case and there is specific language in the law that prohibited you are incorrect. SEC. 1557 ø42 U.S.C. 18116¿. NONDISCRIMINATION. (a) IN GENERAL.—Except as otherwise provided for in …
/r/MensRights28/09/13 08:53 PM
1

I did already, you just won't listen.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 08:35 PM
0

I always love a nice does of ignorant conservatism in my equality movements.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 08:25 PM
0

Not under the ACA. It specifically says that you can not discriminate by sex. And that is the law in question.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 05:52 PM
0

Who says I support discriminatory auto payments? I want equal costs for both because that is how equality works.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 05:36 PM
0

So then men should pay more for auto insurance because they get in more accidents right?
/r/MensRights28/09/13 03:53 PM
-1

I meant in healthcare. And as one of those men I definitely want to get rid of discriminatory auto rates but just because one injustice exists doesn't mean we shouldnt stop others. It's hypocrisy plain and simple.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 08:45 PM
0

It the only reason it is increasing is because it is no longer legal to discriminate based upon gender. It says in the article.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 07:18 PM
0

It isn't charging men more than women it is putting men and women at the same level. Women pay more right now.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 07:10 PM
-1

Hey my taxes went down and I'm employed now, I don't see a problem.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 11:30 PM
0

I bet you are convinced Obama wasn't born in the US as well.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 09:07 PM
1

If you like ignorance.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 08:37 PM
0

Really? Police state? Give me a break.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 05:11 PM
3

Maybe we are all stupid after all.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 03:29 PM
1

It is an important tool to keep Republicans out of the White House. I am completely fine with them voting it through. Please, make the House Republicans vote it down so that a few more of those safe seats come into play.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 04:51 AM
1

To be fair, I laugh at anything that appears on Fox New as well.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 04:45 AM
3

Could you re-phrase that in the form of a question?
/r/MensRights29/01/13 01:46 AM
2

People who are against SS don't realize that it is a great way to limit the governments involvement in unnecessary war. How soon do you think that public opinion on Iraq would have soured if people were getting drafted for it.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 10:08 AM
1

Except that in terms of race the factual differences are minuscule and that type of analysis never actually happens. The reason "black" names are passed over is because black culture is subconsciously associated with the poor and uneducated.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 06:09 PM
5

As a white man, I can say it is probably because of the slavery and oppression. That type of thing kinda leaves a bad taste in peoples mouths.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 11:05 PM
1

It may be comfortable but your actions and what you wear is your own responsibility and you need to deal with the consequences. You know that low cut shirts are meant for showing off and even if you want to wear them for other reasons you still know what is going to happen. If you were to wear a shirt with a swastika on it would you be surprised if you got a few stares even if the only reason you wore it was because you were hindu?
/r/MensRights03/12/12 08:07 AM
-5

Well there is. Just because there are men's rights issues that need to be addressed does not mean that there are no politicians that are trying to curtail the rights of women. I mean there are no limits to men's civil rights in a plank of a major party platform.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 04:34 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter