TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Squeenip Archive

View 1 post and 131 comments by Squeenip on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
29

GeneralSqueenip/r/MensRights02/10/20 02:43 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Smart. Almost didn’t pick it up lol
/r/MensRights17/08/21 10:06 PM
1

Ah alright thanks
/r/MensRights17/08/21 08:26 PM
2

Hmm ok. But how do you know that he A. Did it intentionally and B. That the challenge was supposed to be catered towards women? I checked episode logs for both gma and Kelly/Ryan (I’m not American so I don’t get those shows) and I couldn’t find any challenges like this is there maybe a clip online? Or an episode time stamp perhaps?
/r/MensRights17/08/21 08:16 PM
1

Ah okay and you’re arguing that it was catered towards women because those are household chores and stereotypically women tend to be the house keepers? I’m a little bit confused about everything do you mind elaborating?
/r/MensRights17/08/21 07:57 PM
1

Irrelevant to Op’s post but is your name a Joker reference?
/r/MensRights17/08/21 07:17 PM
3

Out of curiosity, what exactly was the challenge?
/r/MensRights17/08/21 07:14 PM
0

Marxism, Market soc Communism Soc Feudalism Classic Either I just woke up from an acid trip, or you just asked me if there was an economy before capitalism and then told me that communism all the way to capitalism is basically just the latter, and that I’m confused. K thanks
/r/MensRights04/08/21 03:28 AM
0

Yuh feudalism, socialism, communism, classical, Marxism, Market Soc, the list goes on. I was being sarcastic about me not being able to debate. I know what a debate is, thank you
/r/MensRights04/08/21 03:12 AM
0

My most recent debate wasn’t on feminism it was on whether or not capitalism is good for the economy. I debate more then just feminism. I don’t consider myself an expert at all I just like the sport. I guess I’m not actually a good debater because I can’t argue my way out of a paper bag. And alas, my first Reddit post for Squeenip was on this subreddit so I frequent it
/r/MensRights04/08/21 02:59 AM
1

I do formal debate lol. You only have access to my Reddit and you’re surprised that you can only see Reddit post LMFAO ok den. I’ve also been to r/feminism I think it’s my most recent post and again
/r/MensRights04/08/21 02:50 AM
1

Cool I don’t want to debate you dude. I’m not insecure about my points so I don’t rly care if you think I’m just yelling or whatever
/r/MensRights04/08/21 02:42 AM
1

Lol every circle. Especially regarding my sources. Only here have I seen someone try to argue with The Human Rights Watch but ok ig 👨🏻‍🌾
/r/MensRights04/08/21 02:37 AM
1

Ad hominem. Have a nice day
/r/MensRights04/08/21 12:48 AM
1

Wonders of Reddit.com
/r/MensRights04/08/21 12:47 AM
1

Seems like we’re in agreement for some things. Some things, of course. When should I leave an argument?. The takeaway from this is that there’s no end in sight. Besides I care so incredibly little about what you think of me because in almost every other circle regarding inequality my points and experiences hold. Besides it seems that you speak mostly in logical fallacies, ad hominem.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 12:46 AM
1

Eye spy with my little eye: a logical fallacy that makes a bold claim to to ignore the name of the game
/r/MensRights04/08/21 12:23 AM
1

Different sphere go brrrr 🤠✌️
/r/MensRights04/08/21 12:22 AM
1

Pick your favourite dictionary, maybe it’s the Oxford dictionary, maybe it’s the Webster, and then find Marxism. You are the only person I’ve ever met who doesn’t separate two issues.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 12:17 AM
1

I read all of my points lol. It’s pretty clear it helps both sides but thanks anyways
/r/MensRights04/08/21 12:14 AM
1

No I read it, I just don’t wanna continue the convo. Nothing really to do with you specifically it’s just that It’s strayed so far from the original topic And I’ve already provided my sources. Unless you can provide me with evidence that out qualifies (in any way)my own then there’s no point in this conversation. Here’s some of the qualifications of my source in case you were wondering It seems as though you completely disregarded it which is odd because the entire topic is commonly known.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 12:13 AM
1

Tf when did we start talking about Marxism?? Wrong debate dude. Also feel free to do some studying on various ideologies. Marxism =/= feminism lol
/r/MensRights04/08/21 12:03 AM
1

I never brought up Satanic Panic as a whole, and if you look you’ll never find me siting a completely different sphere of this specific issue. The problem is women are the ones still today being equated to witches
/r/MensRights04/08/21 12:00 AM
1

“Hell, if you want to use logical fallacies as arguments, that’s on you”
/r/MensRights03/08/21 07:28 PM
1

You asked for the connection and you got it. Besides I’m not gonna go over this point again, look at my other replies to see what I think about undermining the Men’s Liberation movement and subreddit
/r/MensRights03/08/21 07:22 PM
1

Um what? I’m a Democratic Socialist, I don’t think you understand what Marxism and communism is
/r/MensRights03/08/21 06:31 PM
1

Women weren’t the only ones accused of witchcraft, yes. According to history.com “For the most part, the men of Salem Village were involved in blaming, trying, and convicting the young women whose unusual behavior and outlandish accusations were at the heart of the trials. But soon, men like Proctor were among those being accused, sometimes by neighbors who had longstanding resentments against them.” But only a quarter of the ones tried were male and today only women feel the aftermath of it. (T…
/r/MensRights03/08/21 06:30 PM
1

This is a very different position than earlier when it was said that women were never the property of men 🤔
/r/MensRights03/08/21 06:22 PM
1

You never sited your sources. Also this is to make sure companies aren’t practicing discrimination. You’ll have a hard time finding a verified source that agrees with your stance on this. Now of course I read my own source that pertains to my own country, but if you look at the points you yourself acknowledged you’d see that it’s targeted towards helping men as well as the other genders. And yes, by men being introduced to inequality it will in turn help them. Just because it happens to help wom…
/r/MensRights03/08/21 06:19 PM
1

Hi sorry for the late response I went to sleep. Men’s Lib was inspired directly by the Men’s Liberation Movement. The subreddits founder Matthew Hodges has an article written about him here. In case you don’t want to read through it the quote is “— like the original "men’s liberation movement" of the 1970s, MensLib is explicitly pro-feminist, but its focus is on how restrictive gender roles hurt men in particular.” Also here is an article written about the history of Men's Liberation which got q…
/r/MensRights03/08/21 06:13 PM
0

R/menslib is directly relevant to the Mens Liberation movement in the 70’s. Besides even if it held 0 relevance whatsoever the Men’s Liberation movement was still pro feminism. It still stands that movements dedicated to equality that happen to be pro feminist are good movements and both the og Men’s lib and the subreddit hold the same principles
/r/MensRights03/08/21 07:24 AM
1

In a post regarding feminism and men’s equality. So naturally the discussion of a mMen’s Liberation movement with ties to feminism was brought up by all parties involved
/r/MensRights03/08/21 06:40 AM
1

I already proved this in a reply to another user. Equality, property and equality -chnm. In case you’re wondering about the legitimacy of this source here’s the qualifications of the current director and it’s staff. . Also I’m not confusing pro choice with pro life. It’s indisputable to say that (and I quote) “The only reason abortion is getting real opposition is because other women are afraid of losing the status and privileges that “natural care giver” gets them.” Is of course false seeing as…
/r/MensRights03/08/21 03:39 AM
1

Oh sorry about that lol
/r/MensRights03/08/21 02:56 AM
1

Yet women were considered property for the longest time. I don’t think being stripped of independence is benefiting women. The world would be better off without gender expectations. Women are more likely to label themselves as pro choice than men. Along with the fact that women are more likely than men to say that abortion should be legal in all/most cases and of course vise versa (men are more likely than women to say that abortion should be illegal in most cases) “The only reason abortion is g…
/r/MensRights03/08/21 02:55 AM
2

I never said that. You’ll find that I don’t usually use “homeboy” as my favourite description. More of a dude/man kind of person. Also I don’t see how that’s relevant to what I asked of you
/r/MensRights03/08/21 02:35 AM
1

I can’t find anything saying that California is in violation of the Civil Rights act. Can you send me a legal document of the case you’re sitting? Also trolls usually don’t provide government documents proving ones case Also Sillicon Valley is an almost powerhouse for technology innovation which women usually don’t go into, most of these programs are to encourage women to go into more STEM fields. Similarly the Canadian government has been encouraging men to further explore gender inequality
/r/MensRights03/08/21 02:33 AM
1

Women aren’t as expected to be in a submissive and domestic position because of protests by first-fourth wave feminists. But it’s still fetishized and used against women. Also there is mass protest against abortion. If that’s [women not being forced into the caring role] what abortion is all about then the fact that there are so many protests against it disproves your original statement (paraphrased) that women aren’t expected to be in a caring position. Of course there’s always adoption but wom…
/r/MensRights03/08/21 02:24 AM
0

Ok. Who is protected from employment discrimination “Applicants, employees and former employees are protected from employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy, sexual orientation, or gender identity), national origin, age (40 or older), disability and genetic information (including family medical history.” The 7 protected classes &firstPage=true) •Race. •Color. •Religion or creed. •National origin or ancestry. •Sex (including gender, pregnancy, sexual orien…
/r/MensRights03/08/21 01:32 AM
0

Where did I say that? Find me a quote. Also straw man argument on your behalf
/r/MensRights03/08/21 01:18 AM
0

Men’s Liberation movement was made before Reddit.
/r/MensRights03/08/21 01:17 AM
1

It does matter, because I won’t argue in défense of something I’m against. Slavery by definition is a human being owned by another human, and therefor a slave is is somebody who is owned by another OR deprived of the rights free humans have. Now I don’t necessarily disagree with you on the severity of being a provider but I can tell you that A. That is an issue where in this case it’s the environment under capitalism that’s at fault, not feminists, B. Most incomes are double income households so…
/r/MensRights03/08/21 01:15 AM
0

I’d appreciate if you didn’t undermine my critical thinking skills. Just because you disagree with me doesn’t mean it’s a lack on my part and besides right now your argument is a Red Herring Fallacy
/r/MensRights02/08/21 08:28 PM
0

That’s a logical fallacy. Besides I think an award winning professor might know more than you, he published a textbook for history, he has a PhD, an BA, and a MA, and the fact that he’s endorsed by George Mason University. Of course his staff all have BA’s, PhD’s, MA’s, basically any form of higher education. Besides I’m very happy with my university. E: Source
/r/MensRights02/08/21 08:24 PM
0

It doesn’t say anywhere that guardians are held responsible for neglect of another parent because quite that’s absurd. But I may have missed it so please highlight the quote
/r/MensRights02/08/21 08:01 PM
1

Men’s lib recognized the same societal discrimination that I do. In the 70’s they marched for their lives and to have their lives recognized, being associated with feminism and egalitarianism doesn’t discredit them
/r/MensRights02/08/21 07:33 PM
0

They are the source. It’s a dot education. This is history 101. It’s literally Center of History and New Media, the director is a professor who’s won awards for CHNM. That’s better than any source you’ve given me
/r/MensRights02/08/21 07:31 PM
1

Where does it say that in the UAE a guardian is responsible for the neglect of a child from a parent?
/r/MensRights02/08/21 07:27 PM
0

Most American treated married women according to the concept of coverture, a concept inherited from English common law. Under the doctrine of coverture, a woman was legally considered the chattel of her husband, his possession. The very first paragraph
/r/MensRights02/08/21 07:25 PM
0

The definition I use is quite literally “social organization marked by the supremacy of the father in the clan or family, the legal dependence of wives and children, and the reckoning of descent and inheritance in the male line” what I’m saying is that societal discrimination is prominent towards all genders. This is an indisputable fact
/r/MensRights02/08/21 07:24 PM
0

Asking you to not use my words out of context is just polite. Not rich. Your second point I already explained Thirdly, I don’t know how to communicate this any more clear: Some people want to be responsible for children, when you take this away for no reason besides gender it’s discrimination. You are the only one I have ever seen disagree with human rights watch. Taking away children on the basis of sex is bad, period. And again that’s implying that men don’t want the children and the the UAE j…
/r/MensRights02/08/21 07:20 PM
-1

You’re kind of just regurgitating the same points I already discussed. I never said we shouldn’t make other groups safe. As a reminder: you’re on a subreddit dedicated to discussing gender inequality, so obviously I haven’t brought up irrelevant issues. Do you honestly think that a Canadian lesbian wouldn’t argue for issues relating to race and lgbtq+ (among other things of course). When somebody brings up an issue like the targeted genocide of Indigenous peoples I don’t just go “yeah but femini…
/r/MensRights02/08/21 07:13 PM
0

I’ve said multiple times men and women are oppressed in different ways
/r/MensRights02/08/21 07:08 PM
0

You’re asking me for a source? Ironic given the fact you haven’t provided the ones I’ve asked for. But I am always willing to show proof. Equality, property and marriage And again your own comment that has no linked sources is not verifiable
/r/MensRights02/08/21 07:06 PM
0

I’m not replying to all the point here but 1. Don’t take my words out of context. I never claimed not to care about male victims intact I’ve stayed the opposite multiple times. In a reply I agreed that men needed to be included, I don’t know what you want me to say to this it was never “men cant be rape victims” Literally I said that when men get guardianship superiority women don’t have choice to raise their children. Especially with being shunned economically. You accused me of the opposite. I…
/r/MensRights02/08/21 07:03 PM
0

I never said anything about you. I don’t make attacks on character. Quite frankly I just disagree with you and unless it’s a source I have no reason to think otherwise
/r/MensRights02/08/21 06:51 PM
0

All gender is (e: at least for hate crimes) Not just women. Gender includes everyone. Women are a relatively safe group but- I already gave you an explanation. And I fully intend on continuing to use statistics, which I wish would happen more often on this subreddit
/r/MensRights02/08/21 05:57 PM
0

[Hate crime statistics](https://www.justice.gov/hatecrimes/hate-crime-statistics . Also gender includes all and not just women. I brought it up as an explanation not a comment
/r/MensRights02/08/21 05:45 PM
1

I’m against the draft, you don’t need to remind me that men died in war, thank you. To make a few things clear (ps I’m not fact checking you so I’m taking your information as true) Women were still pushed into a position men weren’t with the witch hunting’s. If you don’t blame society for how society views men then who do you blame? Women have been considered property before. Because they belonged to their husband, brother, or father. Also saying that Men’s Lib is a POS is undermining all their …
/r/MensRights02/08/21 05:43 PM
0

You sited your own comment. However I’m confident in my ability to see that society has had (and still has) negative effects on men, which is what I said.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 05:37 PM
0

I’m giving you an explanation as to why men are killed more often than women, to elaborate on what I said, if men are involved in more dangerous activities, they naturally have a higher risk. It was only an explanation it wasn’t a comment on behaviour
/r/MensRights02/08/21 05:36 PM
-1

Sorry for the long wait, I went to go sleep. But anyways I find that you take my words out of context a lot so I’d appreciate if you didn’t. Firstly to paraphrase my quote and offer some more explanation, “men do have some control over contraceptives and they will have more control because of a recent uptake of interest for male birth control from the science community.” It’s not really a gendered thing about why men don’t have something like the pill, and the reason why women get final say on b…
/r/MensRights02/08/21 05:33 PM
1

You too!
/r/MensRights02/08/21 07:58 AM
0

No, I agree. Men’s issues are so often pushed under the rug and the second wave of feminism got a lot more attention than various men’s rights groups
/r/MensRights02/08/21 07:33 AM
0

For the most part I agree with this. We need to focus a lot of our energy on reducing violence towards and from men. I don’t necessarily agree with the sarcastic remark on the patriarchy, imo such a simple term has been demonized by various political groups when in reality I think the fact that men are expected to die in the front lines for honour comes from the fact that men were supposed to be these warriors that were discarded by the world. Which is a gender stereotype that relates back to th…
/r/MensRights02/08/21 07:08 AM
-3

Don’t worry I get it. I’m on mobile too and god it sure is a pain. But again in my original post I said that women are a relatively safe class but that’s only because: gender is the smallest motive for hate crimes. That includes men. It is true that around 80% of all murder victims are male but it’s also true that most murderers are men, which explains a lot of why men have such a high percentage (even though there are many female killers and I personally don’t believe that anyone deserves death…
/r/MensRights02/08/21 07:04 AM
-6

To your first point: Fewer fathers are in the home and on average with children under 18, fathers spend on average 6.5 hours with their children while mothers spend 12.9 hours on average. -Pew Research Women are much more likely to take on the primary caregiver roles. Mother’s typically feed children from infantry to toddler age which allows a very deep bond between mother and child. Mothers are more likely to take more time off work or stay home entirely with their child than fathers. -Divorce …
/r/MensRights02/08/21 06:55 AM
-12

Idk about that dude. The reason why women are a protected class is because violence towards women is a fairly prominent issue. It’s true that gender compared to ethnicity, sexuality and religion isn’t one of the driving factors as to why people commit hate crimes but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen. The most recent charge of a hate crimein the US at least was an Ohio man who plotted mass murder towards women. He wanted a kill count of around 3000 women and fantasized about humiliating, harmi…
/r/MensRights02/08/21 02:30 AM
0

Oh my god you really changed something within me. Those facts (“blah blah blah blah”) really strengthened your argument. Obviously that was sarcasm but seriously, if that’s your reaction to being proved wrong maybe you shouldn’t be discussing something so “political”. Just a thought 🤔
/r/MensRights07/06/21 08:37 PM
0

“If men suffer hardships women must suffer them, that is equality period.” So obviously it wasn’t just “period”. Countries don’t need a draft. Even the smallest militaries like Costa Rica for example has enough people in their military and don’t need a draft. If it’s a neutral country why should woman be pushed into the draft? They shouldn’t and neither should men. Each country big or small has a plan for defence so why should men and woman be expected to fight a war outside their country? Moreo…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 08:06 PM
1

I’m Canadian dumbass. The news article is about Washington so no shit I used the US because it’s relavent to the topic at hand. Also saying that both men and woman should die at war means you think that men should die fighting a war they didn’t want to fight. You’re on a subreddit about men’s rights and you don’t see the irony in that? So fine don’t rethink your position if you don’t want to listen to the “words of a woman worshipper” but just know that your position hurts men
/r/MensRights07/06/21 07:51 PM
0

Because it’s worst for men it should be worst for women? That’s so fucking stupid I’m sorry but it is. The US Military is #3 overall and has #1 biggest budget. They don’t need a fucking draft so maybe you’ll wanna reevaluate your viewpoint
/r/MensRights07/06/21 07:34 PM
2

I’m also happy to see that we met halfway. Relationships shouldn’t have a leader regardless of who brings in the most income. I doubt women will ever become as domineering as men used to be in relationships but clearly we both want equality we just go about it different ways.
/r/MensRights04/10/20 05:52 AM
1

I’m sorry your wife cheated on you. A FLR is something I’ve heard very little of, and I can understand a relationship where the wife works and the husbands stay home but in my personal opinion a relationship shouldn’t have a leader. Feminist don’t want that at all, feminist want choice, the choice to stay at home, or the choice to work. Essentially just the choice to live their lives how they want their lives lived. An “FLR” will not be the future, because the future is independent, if a man wan…
/r/MensRights03/10/20 05:53 PM
0

Let’s say for my sake you’re talking about the matrix (because I don’t remember much from the doc), were you really the one who took the red pill? I’d argue that you are the one in blissful ignorance.
/r/MensRights03/10/20 05:19 AM
0

That’s good to know. So correct me if I’m wrong you’re referring to “The Red Pill” documentary? Or are you making a point as in “you took the red pill and I’m in blissful ignorance etc etc”? Cause I only watched a bit of the matrix and I saw that documentary like 4 years ago.
/r/MensRights03/10/20 05:17 AM
1

So in those thousand + ways psychotherapy can work, do you really not think one of them can help men deal with trauma?
/r/MensRights03/10/20 02:39 AM
1

All I said was psychotherapy doesn’t cater to one gender. This is just a passage from Wikipedia; “There are over a thousand different psychotherapy techniques, some being minor variations, while others are based on very different conceptions of psychology”
/r/MensRights03/10/20 02:37 AM
1

I read the article and I wasn’t searching for something to exonerate women. I was stating a fact.
/r/MensRights03/10/20 02:01 AM
1

Men and women process trauma differently, I’m aware of that but psychotherapy doesn’t cater to only one gender.
/r/MensRights03/10/20 02:00 AM
1

The APA doesn’t think that there are only 2 ways to deal with emotion. That is a downright lie. The APA supports music therapy and more (not just psychotherapy). Also psychotherapy has been proven to help men and women both that’s why it’s the most common to find.
/r/MensRights03/10/20 12:43 AM
1

It doesn’t mislead. The reason why the article never said when sexual assault was brought into boys will be boys was because it was irrelevant, society still took boys will be boys as an excuse and as I said before a psychology today article explained this. Now, moving on, The APA (American Psychological Association) released a video on why “boys don’t cry” is psychologically damaging. I’m surprised you would argue against the line “boys don’t cry”. Considering that you call yourself a men’s rig…
/r/MensRights02/10/20 11:31 PM
0

44% is the maximum. The numbers of how many rapist are men might be much higher since so many rapes go unreported.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 11:15 PM
2

I’m glad you joined support groups. People are sometimes the plague of earth
/r/MensRights02/10/20 10:56 PM
1

Wow, you really went there. Boys will be boys has been morphed into something different than it originally started as; read this link to see why that rings true, secondly, there is forensic evidence to back up rape cases (body hair, DNA, fingerprints, etc) and most people who don’t come forward right away are scared too because of our victim blaming society, or they’re in denial, so if we want to help victims we need to stop the stigma around sex and rape (and stop victim blaming too) as for the…
/r/MensRights02/10/20 10:55 PM
1

I was talking about my original post do you really disagree with that? Feminism had nothing to do with the penetration rule, in fact it was feminism who pushed the FBI to consider men victims
/r/MensRights02/10/20 10:42 PM
1

I’m so sorry to hear that. It’s really horrible how society can blissfully write off someone else’s pain just because they’re men
/r/MensRights02/10/20 10:39 PM
0

I already answered something similar to this so to summarize; click this link to find out why I’m right about boys will be boys. As for your other point I already answered that in a different comment.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 10:36 PM
0

Hi. I already answered this question. So I’ll just summarize for you: Media has such an important role in our modern society and you be an activist from anywhere in the world. Also I never said that those women aren’t feminist. Karen Straughan is the Phyllis Schlafly on modern society.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 10:33 PM
0

Well thanks, but some of the things you said are actually misleading; “boys will be boys” has been an excuse for boys bad behaviour for years, it installs this idea into boys that their behaviour is justified because that’s what they do but psychologists have actually found that it can be a very dangerous thing to say to your child, psychology today wrote a very great article about this, as for “girls will be girls” there is a reason nobody says this, if you want to learn about that and how boys…
/r/MensRights02/10/20 09:59 PM
0

Not to mention most of these phrases aren’t oppressive towards men; “girl power” isn’t putting down men, “you go girl” isn’t putting down men, “girls can do anything” isn’t putting down men, holding the door is just common courtesy, “woman are strong and don’t need anything from anyone” isn’t oppressing men, “girls have it so hard” is true believe me and isn’t putting down men, toxic masculinity is a real thing just like fragile masculinity, “don’t be that guy” really depends on the context and …
/r/MensRights02/10/20 06:36 PM
0

What about “boys will be boys”? What about people slut shaming women? What about men in power having rape accusations after rape accusations? What about women who defended themselves against their rapist getting 51 years in jail? What about the majority of girls who are sex trafficking victims used for sex and then killed? What about whenever a woman gets raped they have to be re traumatized? What about when a woman tries to speak up against being catcalled on the street and people say “it’s a c…
/r/MensRights02/10/20 06:31 PM
1

I brought up a valid point for men, and you didn’t notice my paragraph you only noticed that I’m a feminist and proceeded to tell me how I am unintentionally hating men by being a feminist.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 05:34 PM
1

What about this is feminist narrative bullshit? Rape has never been accepted but that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t acknowledge that it happens. And a lot of rape reports get buried, that includes rape against men.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 05:33 PM
0

Non consensual sex is rape. Actually not over 40% of victims are men, it’s actually 38%, which is much higher than prior years. Yes I know that envelopment isn’t always rape but it can be considered sexual harassment
/r/MensRights02/10/20 05:30 PM
0

I’m not rejecting the truth I’ve been advocating for that since this post started. More women are raped and there is a reason for that. 1. For years society has been perpetuating this idea that it’s okay for men to rape because “boys will be boys” 2. Most rapist are men and that includes rape against other men. Woman rarely rape. Look it up, that’s the real truth
/r/MensRights02/10/20 03:47 PM
1

If I’m reading this correctly you’re asking what feminist speaks up for men’s rights and I hate to break it to you but, I’m literally one of many. And regarding to the “teach men not to rape” the reason why we say men is because it’s mostly men raping.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 03:37 PM
0

Wow that is mouthful. I never said I was a “true feminist” or that I was “an incredible person who has 0 flaws for women reign supreme etc etc” nobody would say that and I’m proud to say I’ve never said that before. You painted me that way in order to stretch your idea of an overwhelming amount of toxicity in feminism, am I right in assuming this? I don’t bring up all the toxic things on your side because I know how to bring myself up in my debates and feel like that’s more important than discre…
/r/MensRights02/10/20 03:26 PM
0

That’s what you got out of this post? One, that is completely false. Not only are more rapist male, more rape victims are female, and women are still charged with rape at an alarmingly low number but that’s because ALL rapist are charged at an alarmingly low number
/r/MensRights02/10/20 03:18 PM
1

Damn this comment section is hard to navigate. One woman doesn’t mean all women are bad, just like one feminist doesn’t mean all feminist are bad, most people with common decency say that rape is rape. As for looking it thru the “male perspective” I can tell you that 2 years ago give it take I used to only look at it from the male perspective which is why now I advocate for both men and women.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 03:14 PM
1

I need to say this again, really? Toxic feminism. It happens all the time on both sides. Both.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 03:06 PM
-1

No. When feminist say “patriarchy” they mean “patriarchy”. Try not to explain to me how I mean to say things.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 03:05 PM
0

Yes the Supreme Court passed that law, but it was brought to light by feminism, and regarding Malala Yousafzai, she gladly calls herself a feminist and says “it’s just another word for equality”
/r/MensRights02/10/20 03:03 PM
1

There is the fact that an overwhelming majority of rapist are men so obviously men get sentenced more and there’s also the fact that the criminal justice system (at least in America) goes easy on all rapist (which is wrong) and not just women?
/r/MensRights02/10/20 02:55 PM
0

No I came here to talk about the normalization of men’s sexual assault in media. Also it’s not the dumb feminist who doesn’t understand
/r/MensRights02/10/20 02:51 PM
0

In the 1880’s that statement would ring true but now they’re are so many examples of why the world still needs feminism. I also don’t know where you found the comparison of feminism being a white supremacy group, you can see so many examples of women fighting for other women in different nations
/r/MensRights02/10/20 02:47 PM
1

Something much more important than getting plastered is how feminism shifted the FBI into changing the definition of rape to include male victims
/r/MensRights02/10/20 02:35 PM
1

This again? Alright I’ll play. Let’s start with a very easy one that got rid of the stereotype that because women mature faster than men, all men are reckless and feminism helped strike down a law that said women could drink at 18 and men 21
/r/MensRights02/10/20 02:34 PM
1

Yes I saw this, thank you. Regardless of political views I think we can all agree that assault is assault
/r/MensRights02/10/20 02:20 PM
1

Who hurt you? Woman aren’t vindictive and cruel I’d argue that men have been the cruel ones throughout now and history.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 02:18 PM
2

There is toxicity on both of our sides, it’s normal
/r/MensRights02/10/20 06:55 AM
1

Again I’ve never seen the show so I’m taking your word for it, but that is an example of toxicity in feminism
/r/MensRights02/10/20 06:52 AM
1

Western feminism has not completed all it’s goals which all of this has shown because if we’ve learnt anything from this conversation it’s that both men and woman face discrimination based on gender and there are so many other issues that the woman from the 70’s who took to the streets would frown upon. Even in the west. And also feminism is more than western countries.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 06:51 AM
0

Actually it’s existed a few thousand years, a quick google search would prove this
/r/MensRights02/10/20 05:39 AM
1

Whatever I’ll resend it anyways. It doesn’t need to be a talk show to be a comparison most comparisons aren’t exactly the same, for your other question, the documentary didn’t say and I have no idea why you’d need to know that but what we did see is her limp body on the ground and a group of boys joking about how they just raped her and then we see all the tweets blaming her and harassing her. As for where you can see all of this, the documentary is on Netflix
/r/MensRights02/10/20 05:38 AM
1

Did you get my reply I don’t know if it got thru or not
/r/MensRights02/10/20 05:35 AM
1

They are 100% comparable. Those women on his talk show he referenced made fun of a drugged man (which is bad) so I showed you a case where someone was drugged and was made fun of online (just as the talk show did) except this time it was on social media, as for where you can watch it, it’s on Netflix. As for wether or not she was bound or her primary genitalia destroyed, the documentary didn’t say, but we did see her limp body being lifted and the boys joking about raping her on video
/r/MensRights02/10/20 05:34 AM
-1

Why not? Men are affected by society’s cruel expectations too. Also the patriarchy isn’t imagined, it’s been in practice for decades and decades and decades and decades.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 05:05 AM
0

As I said disgusting but have you ever watched the roll red roll documentary? Not only did they drug a poor girl at a high school party they posted it online, where people called her a slut (she was passed out and before she was drunk) and then proceeded to rape her. It happened in 2012 and it went almost unnoticed until 2019 so maybe it’s not that men don’t do that, maybe it’s because you’re not looking.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 04:53 AM
-1

As a rule I don’t finish debates without getting to explain my pov, modern day feminism is mostly fighting against the patriarchy, I and most modern day feminist care deeply about men’s rights because we recognize that it stems from years of society telling men how to feel and what to be like. I find it very upsetting that the thing you picked out from my post was not the normalization of sexual harassment and assault against men but rather the fact that I am a feminist. We are not you’re enemy,…
/r/MensRights02/10/20 04:48 AM
1

Glad to hear you’re eager for my response
/r/MensRights02/10/20 04:26 AM
1

And as for the “posting from your bedroom isn’t feminism” comment, I would like to tell you that with all this new technology that we’ve never had before feminism and activism can come in all shapes and forms and media has greatly helped some great causes so far
/r/MensRights02/10/20 04:22 AM
-1

I like the passion but I’m going to have to disagree with that because what feminism has done to the world so far has completed the suffrage movement (which means women are now allowed to vote in every country since 2015 (Saudi Arabia was the last one to give us rights) and have achieved access to a good education and the right for women to use things like birth control.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 04:20 AM
0

Again disgusting, but most feminist really do mean equal rights and imo there is no room for toxicity in feminism, I’ve also never seen the talk so I’ll take your word for it
/r/MensRights02/10/20 04:09 AM
-5

I’m sorry that you’ve been exposed to toxic feminism. I call that radical left just as you have alt right but please read my reply to gyro
/r/MensRights02/10/20 04:08 AM
-4

Let’s start with men’s Suicide, men have higher rates of suicide because of the stereotype that men shouldn’t show their emotions (which I mentioned in my last reply) as for sexual assault I also mentioned this in my post and my reply, as for gendercide you’ll be interested to know that women right now are being killed in Mexico and they’re calling it the “femicide” so gendercide is less of a male issue and more of a human issue, as for, discrimination in court (specifically when men don’t get c…
/r/MensRights02/10/20 04:06 AM
0

This’ll will take awhile to type hold on one sec
/r/MensRights02/10/20 03:51 AM
0

That is disgusting, I’ve never seen the movie but rape is so traumatic and people have the audacity to treat anyone differently because of gender.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 03:37 AM
0

And for an example of feminist fighting for men’s rights just look at the post I originally made. We’re not the enemy
/r/MensRights02/10/20 03:35 AM
-10

I’d love too actually. As you know we like to talk about the patriarchy and we’re completely against that which includes men always having to be the provider of the household, and men always having to hide their emotions, and men being told to just enjoy sex, and other issues that paints men as bad leadership figures like male preschool teachers and male fathers.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 03:34 AM
-14

Feminism fights for men’s rights idk what to tell you
/r/MensRights02/10/20 03:21 AM
0

Ok hear me out, maybe they’re looking at the men hitting on you?
/r/MensRights02/10/20 02:48 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter