TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Squiddlydiddly56 Archive

View 0 posts and 34 comments by Squiddlydiddly56 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
15

100% Fathers and father figures are essential to society. Too many people here forget that.
/r/MGTOW13/04/17 03:16 PM
44

Soooo, fuck adoption in general, then? This is about an innocent kid that is over the moon about the fact that they get to have a Dad. This is about an admirable guy taking on a responsibility he isn't required to, simply out of love. This isn't about sexual politics. This isn't about dick measuring. If you can't see that, you really need to stop and think about where you are in life and why.
/r/MGTOW13/04/17 01:47 PM
-1

The basis of the argument is that there was an evolutionarily advantageous reason for developing ethnocentric cooperation, and that it's in our best interest to respect and adhere to those strictures. We live in a society that has advanced beyond the benefits that racial homogeneity can provide. Racial homogeneity does not guarantee unity. Racial homogeneity is not a priori superior to cultural homogeneity. Cultural Homogeneity is sufficient to serve the needs of civilization.
/r/PussyPass24/03/17 07:56 PM
1

TEEN ARRESTED FOR NO REASON! PLANS TO PRESS CHARGES FOR UNLAWFUL ARREST AND COERCED IQ TEST! RESULTS OF TEST CALLED INTO QUESTION DUE TO A SCORE OF 8 BEING IMPOSSIBLE! SUPPORT GROWS FOR ANTI-PEDO MOVEMENT!
/r/MensRights17/01/17 09:29 PM
1

PEDOPHILE LOBBY INCREASES FUNDING INTO YELLOW JOURNALISM! CLAIMS TEEN FABRICATED STORY OF LYNCH MOB! NON-PEDO WITNESSES BACK HIS STORY! ATTORNEY GENERAL FILES SUIT AGAINST PEDO SUSPECTS!
/r/MensRights17/01/17 09:01 PM
1

NATIONAL GUARD SENT IN TO PROTECT YOUNG AFRICAN AMERICAN FROM PEDOPHILE LYNCH MOB! TEEN PRAISED AS A HERO. THE PRESIDENT WIL BE MAKING HIS COMMENTS SHORTLY.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 01:49 AM
1

Lowing the age of consent to 16? That runs contrary to your argument. If we're going strictly on physical maturity and risk rates the age of 20 is when our bodies start to calm down and the risk associated with pregnancy levels off. The pregnancy issue was not the crux of my argument. It was a supporting detail as to why 13-year-olds shouldn't be guided into a sexual context by adults looking to exploit their new feelings for their own gratification. There is a world of difference between a high…
/r/MensRights15/01/17 06:36 PM
1

The ability to ejaculate does not and should not be taken to indicate biological maturity, but rather a step on the way to it. Biological maturity is when you finish puberty.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 01:07 PM
1

Because 18 can still be a high-schooler. Full adulthood is recognized at 21. Also, you received no offers because no adult in their right mind would want to have sex with a (I hate to keep saying m) barely pubescent 12-year-old.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 01:05 PM
1

When I say young I usually mean <10. But since I'm arguing about 13-year-olds and adults, how many >20-years-old people did you fuck at 13, hmm?
/r/MensRights15/01/17 06:28 AM
1

I just can't bring myself to accept a morally relativistic argument for this topic. Bringing a barely pubescent child into a sexual context so soon after sexual awakening (assuming it's even happened yet) amounts to nothing more than an act of perversion (an innate fixation on the very young). The sexualization of children will only lead to the for the further destruction of childhood at best, and untold suffering from sexual abuse at worse, due to the underlying fact that most young children do…
/r/MensRights15/01/17 02:03 AM
1

My general point still stands. 13-year-olds are still beyond the line.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 10:22 PM
1

You are right. It is a social convention. But almost all moral arguments are based on that circular reasoning, because they all boil down to "it's just wrong". Morality is a feeling. Abusing barely pubescent children is morally wrong. That's as far as I can say.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 10:13 PM
1

Look this is very simple. 13-year-olds are not sexually mature. They are literally children. Adults should not be able to have sex with children. 16 and up? Fair game, no one would question you. Actual children? No dice.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 10:06 PM
1

You conveniently ignored the key phrase age-related that came before power dynamics. It is the crucial idea that explains the fault in your argument. It is a child versus an adult.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 09:39 PM
1

13-year-olds are not biologically mature. Most can't even ejaculate yet. This argument would be better suited towards >16-year-olds.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 09:37 PM
1

Countless is a subjective term. Also, I wonder what the social norms in those societies are? Do they actively encourage having sex with barely pubescent minors?
/r/MensRights14/01/17 09:35 PM
1

Is Europe fucked up for having a lower age of consent than your socially driven line in the sand? Are they pedophilic cultures for having ages of consent as low as 12? This is only in some parts of Eastern Europe, but as an answer to your question, Yes, that is fucked up. 12-year-olds aren't even sexually mature (neither are 13-year-olds for that matter). There is no logical rationale whereby this behavior isn't horribly fucked up. If you feel that they are inferior and need to be purged there m…
/r/MensRights14/01/17 09:21 PM
1

If he calls up a girl thats 12 and encourages her to take off her clothes and then mounts her, he's committing rape on someone who lacks the ability to consent. Unless the boy forces himself on her, then it wouldn't be rape. The problem with ages is the power dynamic between adults and children. That age-related power dynamic doesn't exist in this case. If the lack of ability to consent makes it rape, why should we ever, ever protect people who rape the underage when they're underage as well? I …
/r/MensRights14/01/17 09:10 PM
1

What's of note about the trend of age of consent is the push for anything above 13-14 was strictly a British/US led thing. Most of Europe kept the lower age of consent. Are people from those countries all fucked up from their childhood? Just because it's legal in these places, doesn't mean it is common. Do you know many adults having sex with preteens out there? I now realize that the main point of contention is whether or not adults should be able to have sex with 13 year olds. I, along with ev…
/r/MensRights14/01/17 09:02 PM
2

Yes. Because both parties are children. They both lack the maturity to understand the gravity of their actions.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 08:41 PM
1

Children are not in a position to consent to sexual activity. Adults who take advantage of this inability are sexual predators.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 08:31 PM
1

Let me just say one thing. I am willing to accept what you've said as long as you agree with this one thing: Age of consent should be above 13
/r/MensRights14/01/17 08:29 PM
0

What I learned from your comment: -Not wanting adults to fuck children makes me a nazi -Adults should be able to fuck children -if a family agrees that the adult should be able to fuck their child, it's OK -Not approving of statutory rape makes me a prudish puritan who wants everyone to remain celibate and have sex only for procreation They did this because they, like you, thought that sexuality is inherently damaging and any child exhibiting sexual behaviors are wrong and must have their behavi…
/r/MensRights14/01/17 08:19 PM
1

TIL Statutory rape = Jim Crow
/r/MensRights14/01/17 08:07 PM
1

Don't tell you don't understand the concept of the punishment not fitting the crime. I'm well-aware. I'm just saying that this case is serious enough to warrant serious jail time. Maybe not 10 years, but 5? You won't get any sympathy from me. At what point is the cut-off? 12? 10? 8? These apologetics for clear-cut statutory rape are getting out of hand. the moral crusade is retarded prudishness at its worst, the prototypical "won't somebody please think of the children?" bullshit non-argument Th…
/r/MensRights14/01/17 07:19 PM
1

Was the kid broken because of this? No. Didn't know you were telepathic and could see the future. How about the perpetrator, was this an act of predation for her? No. An adult taking advantage of a 13-year-old kid sexually? An act of predation? Naaaaaahhhh, couldn't be Well if it's a decade sentence surely the family is instigating this. Oh, they were okay with it because their culture lacks puritanical roots. Like those cult families that let their children get raped by the "elders" of the cult…
/r/MensRights14/01/17 06:34 PM
1

Yes, and she should be punished by maybe a year in prison, not 10 for fuck's sake. If you don't got the time... There's a possibility that the kid's psyche might be affected by the sex itself, but the judicial proceedings inevitably cause way more harm than that. We "help" the kid by traumatizing him 10 times more seriously than he was before. By that logic, why would we prosecute anyone ever? Why would we even have trials? Trials are pretty brutal, but that's kinda the point. This woman committ…
/r/MensRights14/01/17 06:23 PM
8

Also, when in the 20th century was it okay for adults to fuck 13-year-olds?
/r/MensRights14/01/17 02:31 PM
6

Live in a closet, then? Learn up on some history, while you're at it, too. 13 is too young in America. Today. For a lot of things. However, most boys start exploring at that age if not sooner. Most. 13 has always been too young. Even in antiquity. Do you think you were going to find 13 year old heads-of-household at any time in history? Do you think a 13-year-old boy is capable of defending his family from attackers, let alone securing an income/providing for the family? Most 13 year olds can't …
/r/MensRights14/01/17 02:30 PM
9

Again, is that a problem? How is this relevant?
/r/MensRights14/01/17 02:21 PM
6

Is that a problem?
/r/MensRights14/01/17 02:04 PM
14

You remember being a 13 year old boy? If not, shut up. Oh yes, I remember. But thankfully, I wasn't sexually abused by an adult right when my balls started to drop and I first learned how sex worked. I didn't even know where exactly the vagina was until I was 15. And I'm 16 now. 13 is too young. Period.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 01:34 PM
28

If you think a 10-year jail sentence is appropriate for having consensual sex with a teen you're out of your mind. This "teen" was 13. That's barely pubescent. That's a 7th grader. There is a line, and she crossed it. Describe to me please the danger this woman presents to society that justifies locking her away for a decade. Oh my god, she might consensually fuck other guys as well! She should be executed! She lacks the self-control to discern between sex partners on a moral/logical basis. That…
/r/MensRights14/01/17 01:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter