TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

SquirmyBurrito Archive

View 0 posts and 217 comments by SquirmyBurrito on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
46

The company I work for overwhelmingly employs women. My site has hundreds of women but ~6 guys and two of those guys are IT and hide in their cave as much as possible. I’ve seen some truly toxic shit between women. The most mild of which was one woman getting sent home for dressing unprofessionally (a track suit, everything was covered). Meanwhile, I’m walking around in a wife beater, slides, and those jogger-style pants (not the jeans). Mind you, we only ever interact with customers via the pho…
/r/MensRights05/07/26 05:20 PM
1

Vasectomies aren’t guaranteed to be reversible with the length of time you have it further decreasing the chances of a successful reversal. So snipping every baby boy would be both cruel and horrible for the population as a whole.
/r/MensRights31/01/26 01:59 PM
2

Most of these types live in the suburbs, they don’t understand that guys are careful too. I’ve lived in some bad parts of already bad cities, gunshots were an everyday thing. You just learned to stay out of situations and areas that might turn you into a target.
/r/MensRights13/01/26 04:14 PM
2

Want an example of misandry raping and killing men? Men in prison are raped at far higher rates than women in first world countries, yet very few people care enough to push for reform and many MANY more outright wish for it to happen to anyone who gets locked up. Another example: in times of war and dangerous events men are the overwhelming majority of those sent to deal with it. Often women could fill similar roles, but their lives are inherently treated as more valuable. When a men die it’s ju…
/r/MensRights13/01/26 04:09 PM
9

Let’s get more women in infrastructure jobs before y’all start talking about a society of just women
/r/PussyPassDenied05/01/26 07:42 AM
87

Male privilege is being sick and moving seats, potentially just to be closer to the exit?
/r/MensRights04/12/25 02:56 AM
-1

That was law, it wasn't cultural. Laws don't always align with the culture of the nation (see: prohibition). Listing examples of cultural shift over time isn't evidence that aspects of culture MUST change over time, nor is it an argument for it. I never said that culture cannot change, only that this is the state of modern western culture and shouldn't be immediately dismissed simply because another part of the world follows a DIFFERENT set of cultural norms. ​ Also just to circle back to your '…
/r/MensRights28/12/22 01:55 PM
1

Male handholding isn’t part of most western cultures, it’s just that simple. I know people like to disregard the culture argument when the group of people are predominantly white, but that’s just your bias. The argument is still valid. Why do we need to change this aspect of our culture and how we choose to express ourselves?
/r/MensRights28/12/22 11:24 AM
1

Pull your head out of the sand and reread the op. Most of the statements are nonspecific and are literally just broad sexist statements. I’m black, am I not allowed to be offended when I see or hear someone being racist to a different black person or poc? Same exact concept. Your bigotry doesn’t have to directed at me for it to be offensive. Shitting in the middle of the room still stinks up the entire space.
/r/MensRights16/12/22 12:01 PM
16

No clue why people envy insects. Bee colonies aren’t led by the queen, this is just a fundamental misunderstanding of how eusociality works. If you reframe the colony as one big organism , the female queen in eusocial insect colony functions like the reproductive organs of the colony. She isn’t in charge of anything, she has no real control, her only role is to produce more offspring. No clue why anyone would envy this. Seems like reducing a woman to a biological role would be counterproductive.…
/r/MensRights10/12/22 03:19 PM
25

I feel like that only works when the absurd is acknowledged. This is like creating satire, and then forgetting halfway through that this isn’t supposed to be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 03:13 PM
2

How are you not understanding how a group of people making broad, sexist, generalizations about men can be considered offensive to men?
/r/MensRights02/12/22 11:27 AM
1

No, being obese is the average in some countries, but that doesn’t make it the rule.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 11:47 AM
12

What’s the point of the prison sentence if you think we should just starve people to death afterwards? He was already serving time in punishment for his actions.
/r/MensRights14/11/22 12:07 PM
23

I think the rule of three applies to people of normal body weights. Being obese means you can go longer without food, but that’s the exception.
/r/MensRights14/11/22 12:02 PM
6

Your quote encapsulates the opinion of the author, it doesn’t contain facts that the other poster just happened to miss. To claim that there are no risks that men will suffer from getting someone else pregnant is simply false.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 11:38 AM
2

Probably don’t assume that any guy being homophobic is an mra. Because it sounds like you’re trying to force MRA to take ownership of the actions of all men.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 11:25 AM
26

You do you, I’d personally want to know.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 11:36 AM
3

None of that is free or was handed to me in the US. So I guess it depends on your country of origin.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 11:21 AM
8

Depends on if it’s medically necessary. Even if you do get told it is, like I was, consider getting a second opinion. I trusted my first doctor only to have another tell me, after I had the procedure, that it was completely unnecessary and that I was likely only told that as it was the “easiest” option. They could have given me a steroid treatment. So, TL;dr ask your doctor, and then ask another doctor.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 12:23 PM
6

"#metoo" isn’t a justice system. It’s a rumor mill that leverages public perception as a tool of destruction. There is no lawyer with your interests at heart. No impartiality, no facts, and no consequences for the accuser should it be revealed they had malicious intentions. As shitty as the us justice system is, the #metoo movement is nothing close. And Forbes doesn’t quantify shit. So those really were baseless statistics meant only to diminish and distract. Try harder. edit: fixed weird editin…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/09/22 11:47 AM
10

Bro, drop it. I never once said I agree with the shitty justice system. You’re literally trying to use something I detest to argue I favor of something else I detest. And your quote is literally just fluff unless you can cite sources that actually back up those statistics. With noting is that car accidents aren’t usually caused on purpose as a spiteful way of harming others. #metoo cannot say the same when it is weaponized.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/09/22 11:43 AM
10

I never said anything about the broken ass legal system in the us. Please don’t attempt to argue by throwing useless whataboutisms at me. Especially when I never expressed agreement with them. The “justice system” is a mask for legalized slavery. Stay on topic and don’t put shit in my mouth.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/09/22 11:33 AM
7

I said reading comprehension, not copying abilities. I’m going to assume English isn’t your first language, in which case you’re doing fine. But yea, you do still have room for improvements.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/09/22 11:31 AM
8

/s is a thing that SOME redditors use. It isn’t a requirement, and isn’t even part of our language. Up your reading comprehension. Detecting sarcasm isn’t really that hard when you have context. It being text just means you no longer get access to tonal signifiers.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/09/22 11:29 AM
9

/s is a Reddit thing, it isn’t an actual feature of the English language. Don’t expect people to use it, learn to detect sarcasm.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/09/22 11:24 AM
7

Yea seems you need to work on reading comprehension.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/09/22 11:23 AM
12

We can say #metoo is bad because it leads to a belief driven system instead of one based on facts. No one should have to worry about losing their career over baseless accusations. The victimization of innocent people via the abuse of systems meant to protect victims is heinous and absolutely worth demonizing the entire movement.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/09/22 11:21 AM
2

If you’re about to fuck someone, yet when you whip out the condom they get judgmental, simply don’t fuck them and move on.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 10:56 AM
3

For the man involved, yes.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 11:08 AM
3

The number of times I’ve had some random person first be offenders on my behalf ( poc) and then accuse me of just being a racist white guy is hilariously high. I don’t even get mad anymore. I think it’s just funny to watch them back themselves into a corner.
/r/MensRights11/08/22 11:41 AM
24

The former gets called a strong independent single mother, the latter is called a deadbeat. I’d you’re trying to imply men are encouraged to have children with multiple partners, you’re thoroughly mistaken
/r/MensRights05/08/22 11:17 AM
1

This isn’t about men not taking criticism. Good job missing the point entirely.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 10:57 AM
6

Substitute “black people” for “contractors” and that should explain why you sound so nonsensical.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/22 12:30 PM
3

He might have been salty because she called an end to it Would you still feel this way if the sexes were reversed?
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/22 05:11 PM
2

That's a personal decision. Either way, you're still deciding to take on the risk of another party. That should remain a choice, not an expectation.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/01/22 11:56 PM
2

I'm referring to the individual asking another individual for their seat. They're doing so in an attempt to reduce their own risk. But that request carries the consequence of just transferring risk to another party by asking them to stand in your stead.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/22 05:57 PM
5

I get what you're saying, my issue is that, unless his country has free healthcare, he is essentially taking on their risk for no benefit, while knowing that should anything happen, it will fall on his shoulders to deal with. Just seems odd to ask a stranger to take on your risk when we usually pay insurance companies to do that for us.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/22 04:53 PM
7

So, because he MAY walk away with a lighter injury, it is still on him to needlessly subject himself to an increased risk of injury? You seem to have a 'collective' view of this whereas I am viewing each individual as an individual. To explain: Who would pay for his medical bills? Would the person who he gave his seat to be responsible for his injuries? If not, why is he responsible for the injuries they may sustain? It is true that him giving up his seat lessens the chances of them being injure…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/22 04:49 PM
5

Where does the act of kindness end? Is politely telling the person asking “no” instead of just ignoring them not already an act of kindness? They aren’t entitled to my time anymore than they would be my seat. And why is the kindness only in one direction? Is it not kind to just accept the “no” and move on to ask someone else? And is it still an act of kindness when it is expected of you?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/22 03:52 PM
6

I guess I just don't agree with the implied "you don't have to do it, but you kind of do if you don't want us to hold it against you regardless" for something that stems from an inaction. There is a difference between choosing to not stand, and actively treating service staff like shit, I don't even see them as comparable. Morals are relative, you may view this as a violation of your set of morals, but not giving up your seat doesn't even have a place on my list of morality. Some disabilities ar…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/22 02:45 PM
9

What about situations like this one, where the “offense” is inaction. And the resulting injury isn’t your responsibility?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/22 02:09 PM
12

Is not wanting to put yourself at greater risk of injury considered selfish now?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/22 02:05 PM
13

So, because he might be able to recover better, he should needlessly subject himself to injury? Why? And who will pay for his medical bills?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/22 02:02 PM
10

Ah so in the event of a potential problem, it is better that this man potentially get injured, rather than a pregnant woman or an elderly person? Why?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/22 01:34 PM
3

I don’t get how this got so much attention that someone decided to write an article on it. Did she ask more than once? Or is this purely noteworthy because he allegedly explained his internal reasoning for not giving up his seat? If you ask someone for their seat and they say no, move on. You aren’t entitled to their seat.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/22 01:31 PM
9

“ man enough” in what way does this man’s gender hinge on his decision to not give up his seat?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/22 01:28 PM
0

That’s not my responsibility.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/01/22 06:50 PM
1

That’s the same line of logic that cops use during interrogation to get people to talk. Why should it ever be my responsibility to prove innocence?
/r/PussyPassDenied01/01/22 02:04 PM
2

Sounds like the opposite of innocent until proven guilty if we’re expected to prove our money was attained legitimately.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/12/21 01:21 PM
5

Sadly, I'm not even surprised. I've given up on seeing the equality that seemed to be on the horizon back in the 90s-00s.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 11:51 AM
11

Debtor's prison all over again
/r/MensRights05/05/21 10:08 AM
14

Is paternal fraud not a crime?
/r/MensRights05/05/21 10:06 AM
21

Because other white people shout you guys down and call you racist for complaining. It's honestly a strange feeling to be relieved that I'm not white. Nobody calls me a racist for pointing out when someone is being racist towards me.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 10:22 AM
18

They are
/r/MensRights14/04/21 10:05 AM
3

Custom isn't always better or worth the cost. On this subject, I'd be highly resistant to calling OF content higher quality than what you can already find for free.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 08:01 PM
9

I'm black, the only counterargument I need is "Well, should I also cross the street because it might make racists uncomfortable?" If they say yes, they aren't worth speaking to. If they try to claim that 'this is different', they aren't worth speaking to.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 05:55 PM
63

A man can be made erect without his consent and can be raped by a woman. This is an actual thing that you're grossly erasing for zero logical reason.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 10:46 AM
8

Are you daft? Women getting shorter sentences because of their gender implicitly means that men receive longer sentences for THEIR gender. If they weren't men, they'd receive shorter sentences. Are you even trying to use your critical thinking skills? How are the men's sentences NOT disproportionately higher?
/r/MensRights06/03/21 05:57 PM
5

Men sentenced to much longer sentences than women, how are men NOT most affected? This really isn't a hard concept...
/r/MensRights06/03/21 05:48 PM
10

It clearly is a men's rights issue. Gendered sentencing differences are a men's rights issue. You declaring that it isn't doesn't fake you correct. She committed homicide, it's posted here because of the uk sentencing disparity issue. This is a small example of a win for sentencing disparity.
/r/MensRights06/03/21 05:46 PM
5

When women are given less strict sentences for the same crimes, it creates a hostile environment for men. Try harder.
/r/MensRights06/03/21 05:41 PM
22

This is a sub about men's rights, NOT a sub about people getting sentenced for doing bad shit. Your whataboutism makes zero sense because you're clearly not arguing in good faith.
/r/MensRights06/03/21 05:39 PM
2

Completely miss the point of what they were saying, by assuming they were saying women don't pay taxes. The words after the comma add much needed context that you lost by not reading further.
/r/MensRights22/02/21 04:50 AM
2

To avoid doing what you just did, yeah.
/r/MensRights22/02/21 03:59 AM
4

Did you stop reading after the word taxes?
/r/MensRights22/02/21 03:07 AM
16

I'm not normally one for canceling, but if any situation were to warrant it, this would be one.
/r/MensRights20/02/21 07:41 PM
0

Shit dude, glad you came to your senses and saw the light. Have a good day, and remember to sacrifice two and a half goats every night or your car won't start.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/21 04:37 PM
-1

What? We can agree to disagree (even though this is literally the first time you've even said that), I just don't like you blatantly misrepresenting my argument. You haven't even tried to address my actual arguments, you just bailed as soon as you realized that you couldn't defend your own position. Likely because your reasoning is literally based on emotions with no logic to act as its backbone. You tried to lie and claim that I only had the one argument, and then when I gave you a nice lil lis…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/21 04:29 PM
-1

Its the only argument you have Read my replies in full, you choosing to skim and missing most of what I type is your fault, not mine. But to summarize, They aren't at fault because: They aren't dating you. Therefore, they aren't betraying you. They don't always know about you. Even if they did, they aren't dating you therefore have zero obligation to your relationship. Your partner is the one cheating, therefore the only one doing anything wrong. You don't own your partner, therefore someone fuc…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/21 04:19 PM
0

I have been cheated on, don't make the mistake of assuming that you misplacing your anger is something that we all have to do. I'm not telling you how to feel, I'm telling you that the way you feel is nonsensical and a clear misdirection of your justified anger. But sure, keep misreading my replies. Quote where I strawmanned you, I'll wait. No, I'm sorry your worldview is so narrow that you think everyone has to agree with you, but that isn't the case. Being cheated on sucks, but none of that is…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/21 03:57 PM
-2

No, they're wrong for the reasons I already explained that you failed to even address. Something being the decent thing to do doesn't mean that you're a piece of shit when you don't. The bike analogy is horrible and I explained why. You don't get to just hand-wave the whole possession issue of the analogy. With a stolen bike, it isn't owned by the person selling it to you. A cheater owns their body. The problem isn't that they're fucking someone else, it's that they're doing so behind their part…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/21 03:25 PM
-2

My point is you really don't know whether or not they know, and that even if they did it doesn't matter. They aren't the cheater, your partner is. Nothing narrow-minded about telling you that you are legitimately misplacing your anger, because your are. You don't have any good reason to be angry at him. He didn't rape her, therfore it is reasonable to assume consent was involved. Getting upset, because someone fucked your willing partner is nonsensical. But yeah, do you...
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/21 03:15 PM
-7

No, again you're just misplacing anger. You literally do not know what "most" cheaters know unless you're implying that you're a cheater and speak for the lot... Either way, the 'other (wo) man' isn't the one cheating, you're getting upset with them for 'stealing' something that was given to them willingly. Your bike analogy fails because you don't own your partner.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/21 03:04 PM
-6

You don't know that. And to be frank, even if they did know, they aren't the one dating you, they aren't betraying anyone. You're making the mistake of misplacing your justified anger. All blame lies with the cheater.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/21 02:54 PM
0

I agree with everything except putting any of the blame of cheating on the person your partner cheated with. That person isn't part of your relationship, they have zero obligation to it. The cheater gets 100% of the blame.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/21 02:47 PM
6

Just cut the tape off and use the urinal, those 'modifications' are almost never sanctioned by the establishment and honestly, what's the worst they're going to do to you?
/r/MensRights07/02/21 07:11 PM
1

The entirety of your comment is composed of insults, you have completely given up on an even half-decent argument. Tag me however you like, it's not like I can see it anyway.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/02/21 11:58 PM
1

Pick one? Nothing I said contradicts itself. Why is it not just as bad? That silence allows others to perpetuate violence. Do you have any actual arguments left? Or are you now in full ad hominem mode?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/21 04:01 PM
1

Do you legitimately have a reading comprehension problem? If so, ask your parents to help you understand because I can't be expected to accommodate your inability further than I already have.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/21 03:53 PM
1

What exactly are you trying to convey by quoting my old comments? That I stand by the notion that ACAB? Because a brief read of the past few comments in this thread would have told you that. Keeping your head down and doing your job does not make you a good cop. Why do you want to discuss planting drugs on black people in a thread about a white woman who was arrested for drunk driving? Ask yourself, why would "the good cops" be relevant in a conversation on police brutality and other acts of atr…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/21 03:52 PM
1

No, this isn't a fantasy world where everything is black and white. Not being the cop committing the act of atrocity and therefore the 'bad cop' doesn't mean you're a good cop. Many wrongfully consider themselves to be one of the 'good ones' because they personally don't do any of that shit. But that's the entire point, they're just as bad. The silent majority of the police force. The group that often considers themselves good. It's only confusing for you because you continue to assert that ther…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/21 03:42 PM
1

It's in the name, take a few more minutes to allow your brain the time it needs to process sentences that are more than three words long. All Cops Are Bad is what ACAB stands for. Take your time. Still haven't gotten it? If you protect those who do bad deeds, you are just as bad as they are. Cops continuing to hold the blue line of silence just furthers the ACAB argument.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/21 03:18 PM
1

You entered a conversation about ACAB and yet have still deluded yourself into thinking this is a conversation on good cops? Try again.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/21 02:29 PM
0

No, you're the one who keeps trying to bring up the good cops in some sort of dismissive whataboutism argument. Unless you want to claim that it's the 'good ones' that are responsible for the police brutality that the conversation was about...
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/21 02:16 PM
1

The good ones are entirely irrelevant to a conversation about the bad ones, yet you keep bringing them up. No, but with how shitty your non-arguments are I think you might be.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/01/21 02:14 PM
1

And a wife-beater can be a loving parent, what's your point? The benefits to society do not erase the police brutality. Please stop being so grossly dismissive.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/01/21 07:09 AM
1

That's true, but is also why I'm in the camp of just leaving the things on at all times. That stops individual officers from being held responsible for what would be equipment malfunction instead of the 'oops, forgot to turn it back on after shitting' we sometimes get.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/21 04:37 PM
1

How does any of what you said detract from me saying if there are defects THIS bad it's on the police as an organization to fix their shit? Bodycams aren't a new thing, relatively yes, but they've been around for years at this point.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/21 03:31 PM
2

I get that you like to blame the victim in this situation, but please pull your head out of the sand and realize that not all of those killed by police are even involved in a crime. And resisting arrest shouldn't inherently carry a death sentence. The police aren't supposed to be the judge, the jury, OR the executioner. No amount of perspective shift allows you to put the blame on the victim in these situations. Teach cops to be less trigger happy and be more reliant on their less-lethal options…
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/21 02:19 PM
0

Sorry, but no. Even if the problem is purely technical, it is still their responsibility to ensure that they have working equipment. If there is a defect on this scale that is being ignored, that is still problematic.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/21 02:01 PM
0

When you do bad things, and your group protects you from the consequences, it becomes reasonable to hold the entire group responsible.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/21 01:56 PM
8

If the alternative is you guys 'forgetting' to turn them back on, then sure.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/21 01:52 PM
2

Let's not pretend like all cops are innocent and never make huge mistakes that cost innocent lives. People are 100% within their right to hold the police responsible for what they do and for what they band together to hide.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/21 01:50 PM
12

Fuck that. Men have just as much a right to body autonomy as women do. It doesn't matter who is doing the groping, all unwanted groping is wrong. Good for you, not every guy feels the way you do. I too have been groped in the States, on multiple occasions. I've never taken it as a compliment that someone thought so little of me that they decided to grope me without even asking. Why is it not a big deal for men and why the fuck do you seem to think you get to speak for the majority of us? You may…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/01/21 09:57 PM
16

Men who don't want to be groped are delicate?
/r/PussyPassDenied13/01/21 08:20 PM
3

Oh, I see, so you just have a major reading comprehension issue. That's okay, we all have our own areas of weakness, fortunately, yours is one that can be worked on quite easily. Would you like me to link you to some resources that you can use to improve your 2nd grader level reading comprehension? I pointed out that it would be battery, not assault. That's the gist of my contribution to this conversation. Please feel free to explain how you managed to pull misogyny out of that. Especially when …
/r/MensRights09/01/21 07:12 PM
7

I asked for an explanation of your double-standard, not an example.
/r/MensRights09/01/21 06:52 PM
4

Not directly, but by claiming her rights have been violated you are definitely claiming that crime has been committed. Try harder. you could see how wrong it was - you WILL see how wrong it is, when it happens to a man. What are you trying to imply here?
/r/MensRights09/01/21 06:50 PM
5

How do you maintain such a degree of cognitive dissonance? She's innocent until proven guilty? Okay, then so are the cops and everyone else you claimed to have participated in the ALLEGED violation of her rights. Explain your double standard. Leave the insults at the door, I already don't respect you, the insults only lower my opinion of you.
/r/MensRights09/01/21 06:47 PM
4

Then why go so far as to diminish the victim of battery? Seems to me if your only intent here was the defense of Americans that have their rights violated, you would be championing BOTH parties here. The minor was victimized by the adult, and the adult was 'victimized' by the police... Actually, according to you, whether she has actually been victimized is 'for the judge/jury' to decide. Why the double-standard?
/r/MensRights09/01/21 06:42 PM
9

Wrong, there is video evidence. That same video will be used as proof in court. I know that you're trying REALLY hard to be technically correct, but you've reached too far. She hasn't been convicted of a crime yet, that does not mean she hasn't committed one or that the rest of us are blind and dumb. OJ did nothing wrong, Epstein killed himself, etc. Try harder.
/r/MensRights09/01/21 06:33 PM
3

So, you posted to counter a strawman of your own creation? Because I'm not seeing a huge push for her to have her rights violated. Pushing for her to be punished for the crime she committed on camera in no way supports the position you're attacking. No, in this battery case there is only one victim, the person who was battered. Do you make a point of defending the attacker in situations like this? If not, why did you feel so compelled to defend this woman to the point of even trying to paint her…
/r/MensRights09/01/21 06:26 PM
4

And? How is that so relevant that you needed to make a comment painting her as the victim when she STILL BATTERED A MINOR ON CAMERA. No amount of saying 'well, she didn't commit assault so...' changes anything here.
/r/MensRights09/01/21 05:57 PM
9

Sue who? The taxpayer? Because she doesn't have a leg to stand on in a countersuit against the minor that SHE battered. The 'no injury, no case' angle that you were pushing so hard falls completely apart when you refocus your attention on the ACTUAL crime.
/r/MensRights09/01/21 05:50 PM
7

We have video evidence of the act. Arguing that a good lawyer might be able to get her off doesn't actually change the facts. I'm not going to waste my time prefacing my statements with 'allegedly'.
/r/MensRights09/01/21 05:47 PM
14

Google it, why the fuck are you asking me?
/r/MensRights09/01/21 05:44 PM
9

She literally committed battery against a minor.
/r/MensRights09/01/21 05:33 PM
13

She committed battery, yes on reddit people tend to confuse the two, but what she did constitutes battery in most jurisdictions.
/r/MensRights09/01/21 05:32 PM
1

Why not start by providing an actual rebuttal? There argument is flimsy af.
/r/MensRights20/11/20 11:47 PM
0

you're attacking my personal pas Quote these attacks of mine. and actually replying to the parts that matter No, I'm just done wasting time replying to irrelevant side-bullshit that you people like to bring up every time you realize your argument doesn't actually make any sense. Half of your comment is devoted to you exploring the definition of words and trying to use that as an argument... And that argument doesn't even make sense. I just learned it is better to outright ignore your bullshit th…
/r/MensRights04/10/20 11:33 AM
0

Please tell me how I am downplaying it? One is much more serious than the other Bro, come on, did you really need my help with that? You keep acting like i'm completely freeing her of No I didn't, learn to read. The world isn't black/white and there exists territory in the middle. You can downplay something without outright claiming it didn't exist/happen. If the entirety of your counterargument is "I didn't downplay that because I didn't say she should go free" you're wasting both of our times …
/r/MensRights04/10/20 11:22 AM
0

That's the thing though, you ARE downplaying it. You keep acting like you aren't, but you are. I'm not arguing from emotion, you're the one bringing up your personal experience and trying to use it as leverage... And dismissing it would be saying she deserves to go free which I never did. Do you not understand the concept of scale? Is the world really white/black to you? she shouldn't have to spend her entire life in prison over one mistake. Why? That's exactly what happens to other people for c…
/r/MensRights03/10/20 03:09 PM
0

Saying you've been a victim of something doesn't prevent you from dismissing it, as you did. In fact, I'd take it a step further by saying you only brought up your shit to lend credence to your downplaying. Calling me immature isn't a counter argument.
/r/MensRights03/10/20 11:01 AM
1

You don't need to be raped despite being innocent for a false allegation to be worse. Just being found guilty despite being innocent is enough to color the perception of those around you.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 09:33 PM
0

Yes, I can. Both ruin a life. I disagree with your dismissal of false rape accusations.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 09:32 PM
2

Weird, then why is that the answer for other serious crimes, like murder?
/r/MensRights01/10/20 12:53 PM
7

False accusations of sexual assault are worse than actual sexual assault.
/r/MensRights01/10/20 11:36 AM
4

Why aren't you okay with her life being ruined when false accusations ruin lives?
/r/MensRights01/10/20 11:32 AM
1

Thank you, for what its worth, I initially thought you might have meant higher than average for men. Hence why I asked for clarification.
/r/MensRights10/09/20 08:03 PM
2

No, just shows that I'd rather ask than assume when I then plan on asking that person to substantiate their claim. For all your talk on critical thinking, you seem to completely fail to grasp my intentions.
/r/MensRights10/09/20 01:17 PM
2

In context, the question is perfectly valid, try harder. If you don't think any of the words I've used are "big words", why the fuck did you bring it up? I asked clarifying questions. Bitch, sometimes it gets boring calling every idiot you come across the same few insults. Are you really trying to police what insults I can throw at you?
/r/MensRights10/09/20 12:59 PM
0

Asking for a source is never a stupid question. If you think any of these words qualify as "big words", you're only highlighting your own stupidity.
/r/MensRights10/09/20 12:43 PM
-2

Yes, and willfully no less. Take your own advice, it will help you appear like less of a troglodyte in the future.
/r/MensRights10/09/20 12:31 PM
-7

Stop being willfully obtuse. A claim was made, I asked questions about it and YOU chose to step in, thus taking on the claim, and answer questions about it. Don't try to act like you didn't shoulder responsibility for the substantiation of a claim you were pushing. Why the fuck would I waste my time googling the validity of claims when I can just ask the maker (or other supporters) to cite it themselves. Surely, if anyone had evidence, it would be them. That is much faster than getting on google…
/r/MensRights10/09/20 12:29 PM
3

I didn't make the claim, not my job to substantiate it. No idea why I've been running into so many of you weirdos lately.
/r/MensRights10/09/20 12:21 PM
-7

Source?
/r/MensRights10/09/20 12:10 PM
-4

High compared to what?
/r/MensRights10/09/20 11:48 AM
1

... uBlock is on pc.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/09/20 08:06 PM
1

Number 3 is a little too outlandish for me not to at least assume that this started out as satire. No way does someone really think that a man going out of his way to stop and help someone, needs to also be reminded not to rape that person.
/r/MensRights26/08/20 01:01 PM
1

Family often puts up with a lot of crazy, that doesn't mean they aren't offended.
/r/MensRights21/08/20 12:39 PM
4

I expect everyone to be able to either cook for themselves, or have a job that pays so ridiculously well that they can afford to eat take-out every day on their own dime. Anyone entering a relationship without one of those is looking to mooch in some capacity.
/r/MensRights14/08/20 03:33 PM
1

I hope you understand that the "who cares about X, Y over here is worse" argument that you just used to dismiss police shootings, is the same argument that is used to dismiss male genital mutilation. People can be against police shootings and against black on black crime. No, one does not need to bring up the latter, every time they wish to discuss the former.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 06:04 PM
1

Your claims up to this point have been entirely different. Don't try to act like this is somehow my misunderstanding.
/r/MensRights02/08/20 07:45 PM
1

That isn't what you were claiming and that text doesn't support your claim. Your claim was that black people commit more crime, your source clearly indicates that white people commit more crime, black people just do it at a rate that isn't consistent with the percentage of the population that they account for.
/r/MensRights02/08/20 05:39 PM
1

Do me a favor, quote the bit of text from your source that claims that black people commit more violent crime. I could be missing it, but I've read through it several times now and can't seem to find anything actually supporting that notion. The numbers on table 12 (page 12) seems to disagree as it lists 2,669,900 for number of violent inicidents involving a white offender. For Black people it lists a smaller 1,155,670. Either I missed the important part, or your source doesn't back the claim yo…
/r/MensRights02/08/20 03:29 AM
1

Hilarious that you again outline your inability to grasp what the statistics are actually highlighting. Black people are convicted of violent crime at a higher rate than white people. Your ignorance is obvious so I guess I'll just be direct, there is more to crime than violent crime. Why bother misquoting statistics when everyone can read your source and see that it doesn't back you up?
/r/MensRights02/08/20 01:35 AM
-1

do commit more crime You have no proof of this claim, either substantiate it or stop making it. There is a big difference between committing more crimes, and being convicted at a higher rate.
/r/MensRights02/08/20 01:00 AM
1

How does that change anything I said?
/r/MensRights01/08/20 10:02 PM
2

You've got it wrong, the statistics indicate that black people are convicted of crime at a higher rate than white people. That is NOT the same as proving that black people commit more crime. The statistic you're thinking of is also specifically violent crime, and is skewed by our flawed judicial system and police with clear biases.
/r/MensRights01/08/20 08:27 PM
0

No, what I described is exactly how it worked. Women being taken and children being killed doesn't actually take set a tribe back by much. As long as the men were still alive, they were still capable of raiding other tribes. If a tribe's home was destroyed, that tribe would not have the warriors anymore to raid. (Except for some rare and special cases) Please think about what you just said logically. Unless the warriors are present and killed during the raid, they would still be alive and more t…
/r/MensRights29/07/20 03:33 PM
-2

women required protection because to lose the women of the tribe means to lose the tribe. Generally, when villages were raided, the men and children were killed, and the women were taken and assimilated into the raiding party's group. If your group's women were somehow taken while you were away, you could always just go raiding yourself.
/r/MensRights29/07/20 01:56 AM
3

This hasn't been a real issue for at least a few hundred years. Humans are far away from reaching any sort of breeding bottleneck.
/r/MensRights29/07/20 01:51 AM
2

Gaming is good stimulation for your brain, it is also not an inherently unhealthy habit... so one could make that argument, yes. It would also have more data to back it than an argument to the contrary.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/20 04:30 PM
1

Yeah, that is totally different. I'd be cool with that.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/07/20 05:44 PM
0

Nah, asking for a bite and then helping yourself without waiting for my answer is a definite split the bill, no second date, situation.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/07/20 03:53 PM
1

This is literally false, incel stands for INVOLUNTARY celibate...
/r/PussyPassDenied18/07/20 04:35 AM
2

I guess I missed that part.
/r/MensRights16/07/20 04:14 PM
-1

You didn't say anything about consent.
/r/MensRights16/07/20 04:06 PM
-4

No, you said give them lawyers.
/r/MensRights16/07/20 03:43 PM
0

No, unless they have the full consent of each prisoner, that shit should be illegal. Prisons are corrupt enough as is. Forgive me, I'm fucking dumb.
/r/MensRights16/07/20 03:07 PM
12

Experimenting on prisoners should be illegal if it isn't already.
/r/MensRights16/07/20 02:47 PM
1

Personally I want neither to happen As do I, hence my confusion over you trying to pick apart a hypothetical situation by posing a hypothetical situation. I would 100% rather a person be killed by a criminal than have their life ended by the justice system for a crime they didn't even commit. None of us have a solution for 100% wiping out crime, so in the absence, I'd rather our system err on the side of innocent until proven guilty, instead of guilty until proven innocent. A wrongfully convicte…
/r/MensRights14/07/20 11:00 PM
1

Could you clarify what it is you're asking me? Because I feel like I've made my position abundantly clear.
/r/MensRights14/07/20 10:03 PM
1

That doesn't change my position at all.
/r/MensRights14/07/20 08:58 PM
3

I would agree if men and women were both responsible for the decision to birth a child, but they aren't. Her body, her choice. Due to that, it muddies the water on responsibility, in my opinion.
/r/MensRights05/07/20 03:17 AM
17

Being anti-feminism doesn't mean being anti-equality as feminism doesn't inherently mean being pro-equality. This is a realization that many of these people simply have not had yet. They're still so thoroughly entrenched in the dogma and constant demonization of men that they can't/won't see what is so obvious to the rest of us. That's why outside of this community I just refer to myself as an egalitarian and refuse to let them relabel me to better fit the strawman they want to shoutdown.
/r/MensRights04/07/20 05:33 PM
14

No, that is absolutely sexist. You've been brainwashed by society into complacency. Biologically speaking many (if not most) male organisms do not stick around to care for young. Sticking around to continue to provide money for a child you never see is admirable, but it doesn't make you any more of a man, and choosing to break free of that forced financial servitude doesn't make you any less of a man.
/r/MensRights04/07/20 04:53 PM
50

Yeah, because being a man means being financially enslaved until the child you never get to see hits 18-21. And then, after all that is done, you get rewarded with a child that hates your guts because, surprise, its pretty hard to prove parental alienation and other bullshit when the mother is doing everything in her power to disrupt your ability to be anything more than an ATM to your child.
/r/MensRights04/07/20 04:03 PM
6

Weird, I only found out about the 'good feminists' existing from the internet. I have only ever seen them push for sexist bullshit under the guise of equality. They've always seemed like a unicorn (the 'good ones') to me.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 08:57 PM
160

At what point do we stop making excuses for their shittiness? Just accept that some feminists don't actually want equality.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 05:50 PM
3

If anyone ever hints at someone looking 16 or younger, you probably shouldn't bang them. Doing so and then pretending like you had no idea is disingenuous at best, predator at worst.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 09:29 PM
4

Explain this bit from the article then: Newcastle Crown Court heard she had ignored warnings about his age and failed to take steps to ensure he was over 16.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 07:44 PM
1

Repeating the same lie over and over again doesn't make it true.
/r/MensRights25/06/20 04:09 PM
49

I would rather some rapists go unpunished than even one innocent person lose their life to a lie.
/r/MensRights24/06/20 04:23 PM
3

Good luck convincing the jury that it is self-defense and not obvious first-degree murder.
/r/MensRights13/06/20 08:46 PM
6

Still not an excuse to poison someone to death.
/r/MensRights13/06/20 06:56 PM
14

It isn't really a state of undress... Boxers cover more skin than your average woman's bikini does. Boxers are just shorts.
/r/MensRights09/06/20 05:49 PM
4

There is no wrongful firing in an at will state unless it’s illegal Please tell me this is just you trolling... because wrongful termination is illegal so of course you can't be wrongfully fired unless they do so for an illegal reason. https://employment.findlaw.com/losing-a-job/at-will-employment-and-wrongful-termination.html Wrongful termination is still a thing in at-will states, you have legal protections, stop giving them away by sticking to willful ignorance.
/r/MensRights06/06/20 05:56 PM
3

Sure, but that requires forethought on their part AND a willingness to lie about something like this. Believe me, you aren't truly powerless in at will states.
/r/MensRights06/06/20 05:47 PM
12

Not true, even in at will states, you still have protection for wrongful firing. edit: Wrongful termination is still very much a thing in at-will states.
/r/MensRights06/06/20 05:30 PM
2

This is what happens when someone thinks they're clever and comes up with the acronym before they've figured out what it is supposed to stand for.
/r/MensRights04/06/20 09:44 AM
0

Sure, but the vast majority of those cases occur in third world countries. In the western-world, a man is more likely to be raped than a woman is, although that number is skewed by the sheer scale of the prison rape issue.
/r/MensRights26/05/20 05:55 PM
5

Shouldn't have been funded in the beginning.
/r/MensRights30/01/20 06:49 PM
38

You just focus on all the negative feedback you get.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 04:04 PM
7

If she actually falsely accused 12 people of rape, she effectively got off with a slap on the wrists. A month in jail is laughable considering what her accusation would do to the accused if convicted.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 03:23 PM
2

I'm never understand these people using incel ad an insult. Actual incels self-label themselves and aren't going to be offended by the term. The rest of us can't be incels because we aren't celibate, involuntarily or otherwise.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 04:18 PM
2

I usually avoid the subject because people can be testy about anything that isn't 100% pro-japan.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 07:58 PM
2

If the prosecutors can't be 100% certain they'll win, they usually don't bother taking you to trial and you eventually get let go without even being charged or tried. I can link you a really good video on it if you'd prefer that. Edit: Note, those waiting to be officially charged are often kept in inhumane conditions.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 06:35 PM
1

No, I strongly recommend reading the wiki page on the subject as it goes way further in depth than I can (and cites sources). Put really simply, the issue is that Japanese prosecutors will only take you to trial if they feel certain that they can get a conviction. If they aren't certain, you eventually just get released. So, if you commit a crime, but they can't 100% prove you did it (you refuse to confess despite all the BS they do to you), you almost always just get let off. Jailing the obviou…
/r/MensRights19/12/19 06:33 PM
1

Dude, there is more than one flat-earther too, there being two or three of you idiots with poor reading comprehension sounds about right for reddit. You're wrong, just move on.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 07:24 PM
1

I assumed you were joking, is this your r/iamverybadass r/iamverysmart satire account? Because no way this is real. I made a statement of fact, and you misread it. Is your ego really so fragile that you can't accept that you made a mistake?
/r/MensRights16/12/19 11:33 PM
1

Look, your poor reading comprehension isn't my problem. You're right, I'm not a service member, I was just repeating what I was taught by my parents, who are both now retired from their years in the military. But sure, I guess only those who have served get to tell you that you're being cringy.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 11:21 PM
-1

I'm sorry you're ignorant, but AR is an incredibly commonly used abbreviation for assault rifle. I didn't make it up, I'm flattered that you thought I was creative and unique enough to have been the originator.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 11:01 PM
-1

Believe it or not, abbreviations can stand for multiple things.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 10:52 PM
2

Its cringy as fuck and no self-respecting service member current or retired would ever boast about their experience in a completely unrelated context.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 10:28 PM
1

That was my comment. I was literally just stating facts. I wasn't trying to give you a platform to spout r/iamverybadass type shit.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 09:36 PM
0

Exactly why I tried to be specific.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 09:10 PM
-1

No, I'm not. I'm stating that it is an actual assault rifle and not an assault weapon. I wanted to clear up any potential misconception. Never in a million years did I think a bunch of people would so grossly misunderstand such a simple statement. Happy Cake Day.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 09:07 PM
1

I specified full auto because people often misuse the term assault rifle(AR), I wanted it to be clear that I meant an actual AR, not the media 'assault weapon'.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 09:02 PM
0

You two seem to have managed to pull meaning from a comment that didn't even spell out two lines for you to read between.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 09:00 PM
1

Please point out in my comment where I said anything to the contrary or otherwise made a statement about the spectrum of effective lethality in firearms.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 08:12 PM
4

...did you accidentally reply to the wrong person?
/r/MensRights16/12/19 07:02 PM
14

I can start by linking you the wikipedia page on Japan's conviction rate. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_justice_system_of_Japan Lots of innocent people being locked up, and lots of guilty people not even going to trial. Japan is NOT that safe. There was also a shooting involving the Yakuza and an actual AR (yes, full auto) ~recently. As for why your friend hadn't heard, I'm not sure. Maybe the government really is trying to keep it all quiet.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 04:55 PM
28

No, Japan just underreports their own crime. They also have a shitty justice system with a nearly 100% incarcerationconviction rate. Japan is not nearly as safe as they pretend.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 04:37 PM
26

Yeah luckily for me I had an AMAZING doctor who convinced us that, due to my phimosis, I HAD to get circumcised. He said it was the only option. /s I'm still angry about that. If we had just been more educated I'd still be whole.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 05:45 PM
28

That's because, unlike FGM, MGM isn't illegal and is actually encouraged in western society.
/r/MensRights23/11/19 06:04 PM
3

I literally do not want kids. Imagine how it feels to be a dude who doesn't want kids trying to navigate their way through a world that, in one night and one mistake, can end in you being shackled to something you never wanted for 18+ years. Meanwhile, the woman involved can just decide to abort or put the child up for adoption.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 05:57 PM
3

It is complete bullshit to tell a man that if he get's someone pregnant he needs to step up and either support that child as a father, or step back and instead support that child financially until they are X years old. Meanwhile, that same child's mother can: Get an abortion, give birth and then put that child up for adoption, or they can choose parenthood. I don't understand how you can see that inequality of options and think that's totally fine. If I'm not actively trying to have a child, it …
/r/MensRights04/11/19 05:48 PM
2

My expectation as a man is that if a woman can choose not to be a parent (abortion/adoption) I get that same choice, but in a manner that doesn't infringe on my partner's right to control her body. But no, don't want a kid? Too bad, you're paying for it anyway. The responsibility argument is absolute bullshit used to try to convince men that we are supposed to be batteries for society to draw on and toss away after we're used up. If women aren't required to keep the baby, why am I? Edit: what if…
/r/MensRights04/11/19 04:28 PM
14

Being forced to pay for a child that you didn't want, that only exists because your partner decided to keep them isn't fair. Child support shouldn't exist in its current, non-voluntary state.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 05:22 AM
6

I've had both since I was circumcised much later in life. I get telling yourself that you are happy the way you are, but seriously dude, you have zero experience with the opposite, you literally don't know how much sensitivity you lost. And if you're too lazy to clean your dick, maybe you have a problem. No, parents should have absolutely no say on whether or not their child is circumcised. How can you say "it's okay for people to make their own decisions" while literally suggesting that men sho…
/r/MensRights05/10/19 03:10 PM
2

Yes
/r/MensRights18/08/19 11:44 PM
5

Complements make me super uncomfortable for this very reason
/r/MensRights18/08/19 05:06 PM
1

Nothing you said countered anything I said.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 05:03 PM
2

Ypu don't need to legally obtain a firearm that you're just going to use for suicide... Not if you're successful. You also don't need a concealed carry permit. You latched onto the wrong point.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 04:48 PM
4

Technically they could abort or put the child up due adoption. I'm neither condoning nor condemning these, just pointing out that they do have options. Personally, I'm cf so it doesn't affect me.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 06:15 PM
2

Send me a picture of you and I'll genuinely compliment you on something.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 11:06 PM
11

MRAs often do attempt to get laws changed (see MGM), the problem is that those efforts are often directly opposed by feminists. This opposition leads to much animosity between the two camps that should just band together for the greater, egalitarian, good.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 08:52 PM
28

I was circumcised later in life for medical reasons. There was/is a noticeable decrease in sensitivity.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 06:49 PM
1

"Dear white males, you are not the source of all the world's problems." or something like that.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 05:29 PM
9

Can't say I was ever taught to refrain from defending myself when I was being attacked. It shouldn't matter if the person attacking you is weaker, self-defense is self-defense. He hit her hard enough to end the engagement. If you don't understand that, it is you who is the idiot.
/r/MensRights24/09/16 02:59 PM
1

Thanks for all the information, if I had the money to give I'd give you gold. Remind me in one month and I promise I'll give you gold (unless I'm dead, lol).
/r/MensRights11/01/16 01:31 AM
1

Would I be correct in assuming that there is a good reason for that? Or am i being too optimistic?
/r/MensRights10/01/16 11:11 PM
2

I've been wondering for a while where all these people were getting that "Women get raped more" claim from, now I know they've been pulling it out of their ass. Thanks.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 05:19 AM
3

Are prison rapes really not taken into consideration when rape statistics are compiled?
/r/MensRights10/01/16 03:12 AM
4

Since when is having an affair illegal? Why should it come with financial burden as a punishment? Was the guy a shining example of a good husband? No, not even close. But why should that even matter?
/r/MensRights06/06/15 03:53 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter