TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

StackOfFiveMarmots Archive

View 1 post and 44 comments by StackOfFiveMarmots on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Being a member of the conservative party is an entirely different thing than identifying as a conservative though. That is kind of my point. Not all feminists are supporting bigoted feminist organizations through memberships/funding/whatever.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 02:17 AM
0

I agree with what you're saying, but I fear that it isn't that simple. It's not as if feminists lobby for donations to the Feminist Fund and then do whatever they want with that money. The movement is comprised of a number of disparate organizations, most of which are not elected and answer to no central body. It's like telling a conservative they need to abandon that label because many conservatives are anti-gay. Or liberals need to find a new label if they have qualms with affirmative action. …
/r/MensRights05/01/14 01:54 AM
0

The fact that you reworded your answer from how I phrased the question seems like you might be acknowledging the distinction I've been basing my comments on. There is a difference between today's feminism in politics/academia and feminists as a whole. I mean we could even look at countries outside the West where there is nothing even resembling equality for women. It's the same as any other ideology. Very stupid things are done in the name of liberalism and conservatism, but that doesn't mean al…
/r/MensRights05/01/14 12:24 AM
0

So all feminists are the gender equivalent of KKK members in your mind?
/r/MensRights05/01/14 12:08 AM
1

It might be inaccurate or idiotic for them to identify solely as feminists, which is why they identify as MRAs too. It just doesn't make sense to assume entire groups of people are evil. It might be appealing to lump all feminists into a neat little labelled box, but doing so doesn't even help this movement, it only feeds some base tribal desire to identify the enemy and close ranks. Why would you want to alienate those who might actually agree with you?
/r/MensRights04/01/14 11:46 PM
1

Perhaps they manage it by disagreeing with some feminist initiatives while supporting others. Would you unquestioningly support anything done under the banner of Men's Rights? No? Me neither. Feminists are the same way.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 11:25 PM
7

Equality of opportunity is what I meant by "equality". Obviously men run faster than women, women give birth. Reasonable people don't argue these things. I agree, though, the trend towards equality of outcomes is truly fucked up.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 10:40 PM
0

Not only that, but what is his basis for believing that differences in intellect are responsible for "much of it"? The comment lacks substance and seems only to be a vehicle for pointing out this divisive fact. "Hey check out this fact I know! You won't like it, but it's still a fact!". Alright.. great.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 10:14 PM
-2

You really don't believe there are any feminists who believe in equality? This is the kind of blindness and division that gender politics breeds. What an absurd statement. There are all sorts of people who identify as feminist. Many of those people are a part of this movement as well.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 09:59 PM
1

I was just trying to explain why white women are considered a minority without injecting my own opinion. However, I do believe women are disadvantaged in some areas, just like men are. The degree to which men and women are disadvantaged varies quite a bit between different countries or societies, though.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 03:44 PM
3

Within sociology a minority is any group which is disadvantaged. It doesn't have to do with race, necessarily, nor does it have to do with numbers. This is the basis on which all women qualify as a "minority", although the phrase "women and minorities" may be more common in everyday speech.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 03:59 AM
6

Just because someone writes a book or directs a show doesn't mean they are the ultimate authority on moral questions which that work raises. That is an incredibly silly notion. Vince Gilligan can have his own opinions about how people react to the characters and where their flaws lay, while viewers have their own. Neither is more valid than the other.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 12:29 PM
17

Its not just one big privilege point contest though. He never said women have it good in India, and forcing this man to pay 60% of his salary has nothing to do with the rape problem there.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 06:06 PM
0

Might I trouble you with a request for a brief summary of these events? I don't follow the movement all that closely but your comment and the one you replied to sparked my curiosity. I tried googling for more info but could only find very biased accounts of what happened.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 08:16 PM
2

I don't understand the significance, so perhaps you can enlighten me?
/r/MensRights01/03/13 04:45 PM
6

However, we shouldn't try to emulate the behaviors which we find fault with in others.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 06:47 AM
1

I think it is safe to say that anytime men and women are being obviously held to different standards by our judicial system, it is an MR issue. However, I do agree that real discussion is far more constructive than raging.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 08:07 PM
2

The problem I have with the phrase is that it serves to enforce gender roles. If I lack a certain characteristic then I deemed to be a fake man? Fuck that. People are all different, and the world is a more interesting place for that fact.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 08:00 PM
3

I understand where you're coming from, but he never called it a Muslim problem. He just pointed out that they make up a larger portion of rape cases, just like you made a similar statement about blacks in America. I didn't read it as racist or xenophobic, just factual (assuming his claims are accurate, I haven't checked).
/r/MensRights21/10/12 12:41 AM
2

Can you refute his claims?
/r/MensRights20/10/12 10:28 PM
1

I've been subscribed to this sub for a long time. I wish to one day be able to peruse the comments without coming across an honest question that is downvoted for no other reason than the presumption of disagreement which is apparently based solely on the fact that said question was asked.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 11:50 AM
2

Edit trolls are funny. I don't recall exactly what it said last night, but it was completely non-misogynistic.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 12:14 PM
3

Is it actually cheap?
/r/MensRights30/08/12 02:18 AM
3

Many feminists do believe this. They define sexism as prejudice + power, and therefore see it as an impossibility for women to be sexist.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 02:17 AM
0

It is a true admission, but not one often admitted to by feminists. That explains the first couple sentences from the OP. I can't speak to the rest of it though. Perhaps he wished for a more comprehensive list which included men explicitly?
/r/MensRights31/07/12 11:40 PM
2

I don't think he was taking issue with the overall message of what was quoted. He took issue with the admission that feminism is only about furthering the rights of women to the exclusion of everyone else. Particularly the rights of privileged women.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 11:11 PM
1

Sadly, this story is not all that uncommon in China, and especially in Nanjing. I once came across a wikipedia list of documented cases of sexual assault in which the penis was removed and it really seems to be an epidemic there. All the worse, these women are given very lenient sentences due to the "but he was cheating!" argument. Sometimes they receive no punishment at all.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 05:41 AM
8

I was agreeing with you until the last part of this comment. There is really something to be said for civility.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 02:51 AM
1

Why are you equating marriage to enslavement? No one forced her to marry, either.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 04:28 AM
2

Well he equated "more power" with "lives longer", seemingly, which is a bit confusing.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 09:09 PM
1

I don't think that's in implication anyone is really making. When analyzing the gender differences of this issue the discussion may sound cold, but its intentionally being stripped down to issues of monetary obligation because what we're getting at is the difference between what women can do and what men can do and the financial differences.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 08:05 PM
2

I saw it as replacing discrimination with what amounts to the choice of these women. If they choose to be saddled with most of the childcare work when they decide to have children, that is between them and their husbands.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 12:42 AM
2

I agree with your general assertion, however, if your family was murdered in front of you while all of you were at a facility where there is a reasonable expectation of "provided safety," then you might also have a civil case against the operators of said facility. It is also unclear what exactly made her civil claim reasonable in the eyes of the system. Perhaps it was the example I gave, or perhaps the school refused to investigate. We don't know enough, unless I missed something.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 12:22 PM
7

I identify as "leftist" and was initially going to request that your elaborate on your statement. Then I realized that this was simply a knee-jerk reaction on my part. I know why you said it and there is some grain of truth there. The furthering of "women and minorities" by the left is not, by itself, an ignoble goal. In fact, I roundly support the concept. However, it can't be denied that there is a dark side to this agenda which manifests in the form of what is actually sexism and racism hidde…
/r/MensRights10/03/12 04:56 AM
1

I don't call people niggers, though. However, if I did go around calling strangers nigger then it would be understandably offensive and racist. But if I was merely telling a story in which someone else used the word, and therefore uttered the word myself, then that would not be racist. Context and intent. Is it racist when black people use the word amongst themselves? Most would say no. The world isn't as black and white as you seem to wish it to be. I know its simpler when you don't actually ha…
/r/MensRights27/01/12 05:49 PM
2

In order to determine if there is sexism present in cases where such words are used you need to try to gauge intent and take context into account. When none is detected outside of the use of such a word then I would tend to give the person the benefit of the doubt. I have no reason to believe they are sexist by default and without them proving to me that they are. People who get offended or who brand words as sexist/racist/etc in any and all instances of their use are preoccupied with political …
/r/MensRights27/01/12 04:27 PM
4

They're just words as long as they aren't associated with explicit misogynistic statements or actions. I don't get upset when people use the word "dick" disparagingly.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 04:09 PM
2

All you're willing to do is link to a wiki article that you wish were relevant? Good day, sir.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 05:05 PM
2

Yeah, Wikipedia has an article about most things. Ask yourself why such a sign is deemed necessary to begin with. Scare tactics and media frenzy have made adult/child interactions so scrutinized that it is sickening. But the results of this have mainly only affected men in unfair ways. Trying taking your son or nephew to a park as a man and you will quickly realize the other people there are trying to convey their assumption of pedophiliac nature through dirty looks. I don't care so much about t…
/r/MensRights02/06/11 04:50 PM
4

Except no unaccompanied woman would be seen as a threat, let alone reported. Women are innocent creatures. Men are vile, untrustworthy, and deviant. Did you not know this? This sign is the equivalent of a "colored only" segregation sign, but with a PC facade that makes it acceptable. The sign says one thing but society knows what it really means, even if they don't conciously process the discriminatory reprecussions or their own misandrist assumptions.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 04:00 PM
5

Except he didn't actually incite anyone to do anything. He is acting like a child there, but he didn't request for anyone here to downvote anything over there. It was just a simple link. I won't defend that comment of his, but your original comment came off like an accusation aimed at all of r/MR.
/r/MensRights31/12/10 07:35 PM
7

Downvote brigade? Posting a link to a different subreddit wherein a topic is being discussed which is relevant to this subreddit is not, by itself, calling for any sort of action. It is simply starting a discussion about said topic here, while having the benefit of access to the linked submission's comments as evidence/topics/etc. If downvotes result, well then you're getting a wider pool of opinions. Deal with it.
/r/MensRights31/12/10 07:00 PM
7

There's a problem with that woman, yes. Are you trying to suggest this is something all women would do?
/r/MensRights29/12/10 02:12 AM
20

Yes, exactly. The original analogy itself is glaringly flawed. Obviously you can be an expert on something without owning it.
/r/MensRights31/10/10 11:54 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter