TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

StandardHelp9493 Archive

View 0 posts and 56 comments by StandardHelp9493 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It most certainly is not unrelated. If they are talking about locking up "males" in cryogenic sleep, the law requires a legal definition. There are many legal questions here - is a biological male that identifies as female Exempt? A biological female who identifies as a man? How long must you have identified as a man to be included, how long must you identify as a woman to be exempt? If, after the law takes effect, a woman begins to identify as a man does she get put to sleep? These are the ques…
/r/MensRights01/01/26 11:03 PM
1

Define "male."
/r/MensRights01/01/26 10:30 PM
2

More accurately, calling it "believe men" is a straw man. But I getcha.
/r/MensRights30/12/25 10:39 PM
1

Setting aside the question of misandry, 'believe women" is completely ridiculous, the opposite of equality, and is a lie of the type that destroys civilizations. It demands that all involved deny the clear evidence of their eyes and ears and believe, willingly or under threat of violence, something that is patently absurd. Those who believe absurdities will commit atrocities. And those who will command you to believe absurdities will command you to commit atrocities.
/r/MensRights30/12/25 10:38 PM
2

They fought "tooth and nail" for cafeteria style rights and equality. Brutal misogyny my foot. The layer upon layer upon layer of EEO laws have produced a system in which a stray look or mistimed joke can ruin mens lives. I've spent my life in these jobs and have seen it myself. You can bullshit the fans, you can't bullshit the players. Further, they aren't even attempting to show any interest in these jobs or in being equally represented in them. They were letting women into combat arms until t…
/r/MensRights26/12/25 05:17 PM
2

That movie really kick started it. It was a brilliantly entertaining work of fiction. But people watch a movie like that and think they are suddenly qualified to weigh in on the "truth." The truth is that movie contained very little of it. That movie depicted the feminist and LGBTQ politically correct narrative. Just as "Karla" about Karla Hormolka pushed a victim femme narrative. It didn't wash with Karla Hormolka, but only because there was videotape. Also the fact that they executed her. Now …
/r/MensRights25/12/25 07:04 PM
4

I don't complain. They always need garbagemen, sewer and pipeline workers, sewage treatment workers dumpworkers, Masons apprentices, concrete workers, roofers, landscaping, etc. And those spaces are overwhelmingly male. Because women don't even apply for those jobs. Because women don't WANT those jobs. Women think they are entitled to have what men worked up from nothing to get just handed to them. And then they still aren't happy. When I see women lining up to apply for those jobs I'll take wom…
/r/MensRights25/12/25 06:41 PM
4

While women cheered them on. And made sure the right to vote didn't subject them to the draft. Men don't send men off to mines, taxis, uber - necessity does. The necessity of providing for women. Who are, at best never satisfied. Women love it when men hate women invading their spaces. Thats why they did it and there are no men's spaces left. So dry up.
/r/MensRights25/12/25 06:33 PM
2

God Bless you for your understanding heart. I just feel that if someone has the grace to bear more responsibility than they have too, I should have the grace tell them its not necessary and open my heart to what they have to say. I'm sorry that some men are still too angry for that - I was myself for a long time. Have a wonderful day.
/r/MensRights25/12/25 05:29 PM
2

I am sorry you are getting flak about using the term "feminist." I get what you are saying and it should be clear to anyone. Merry Christmas and I hope we hear from you again. As far as I am concerned you are welcome anytime.
/r/MensRights25/12/25 05:22 PM
28

I thank you for what you have said so this is not an attack - why keep calling yourself a feminist? An egalitarian is more accurate, and feminism is not egalitarian. Merry Christmas an thank you for your post.
/r/MensRights24/12/25 07:23 PM
1

Soooo we won't be hearing any more about women being raped or other wise assaulted? What with women being highly evolved killing machines and all. So was it just kindness that has up until now kept all the female victims of violence from devastating their attackers? JFC. Time and time and time and time again women get their asses handed to them and still there exist people who put out complete crap like this and think they are doing women any favors.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 09:12 PM
5

Offer to trade. Or tell her you are taking a less demanding and lower paying job to help her around the house. I think her attitude will change.
/r/MensRights21/12/25 06:34 PM
5

This is humble bragging. If you are sorry, get off the internet and go truly make amends to the people to whom you have behaved like a privileged little psychopath who knows she will never be held accountable for her actions. You are trolling here and using a truly deranged strategy to hide your true intentions. Maybe this is a sincere post. Maybe there's a Bigfoot. If so, do what I said anyway.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 06:05 PM
2

Oh no. Feminism is a perfect movement. That's right. Perfect. People who say nothing is perfect are wrong. Feminism is perfect. As are feminists. There is absolutely no downside to feminism. Never has feminism been wrong, gone too far, exploited emotion for callow, selfish interests. No way. Feminists either. Each and every feminist who ever lived had motives as pure as driven snow and are never motivated by any low, mean or childish goals. So no, I would absolutely cry my eyes out if you and ev…
/r/MensRights17/12/25 05:17 PM
12

It happens a lot and has been happening for decades. I am watching a new generation discover issues we were talking about in the "90's. I'm not putting anyone down, these issues are simply not discussed in the mainstream. But I always want to point it out so feminists can't pull the "Oh, thats never been an issue and isn' t an issue now because if it barely happens if it happens at all." Oh it happens a lot, its why feminists turn purple at the idea of mandatory DNA testing at birth, and feminis…
/r/MensRights14/12/25 09:58 PM
5

Of course they are. It is one of the oldest Motte and Bailey arguments in our society.
/r/MensRights12/12/25 07:49 PM
2

Yes. Feminists and conservatives do not get along. That in no way makes conservatives friends of men.
/r/MensRights11/12/25 04:51 PM
1

I agree with some other commenters here that as theleft could not have gotten away with this if not for the opportunistic pultroons on the right. To cite just one example - YER DAYYUM RIGHT MAH LIL PRINCESS CAN BE A NAVY SEAL IF SHE WANTS TA BE! AINT NOOOOOBODY GONNA TELL MAH LIL PRINCESS WUT SHE CAN OR CAN'T DEWWW!!! SHE'S AS GOOD AS ANY MAN!! Turns very quickly into - HELLLL NAW YOU AIN"T GONNA DRAFT MAH LIL PRINCESS!! WE NEED TEW PROTECT WOMEN!!! My enemies enemy is my enemies enemy, no more …
/r/MensRights04/12/25 05:27 PM
1

"Women want men who aren't afraid to cry" is like "people respect you more if you walk away from a fight," "It was only sex with those guys it meant nothing" and "lying by omission isn't lying." Also, "he doesn't want to sleep with me he's just a really nice guy" and "No I'm not attracted to that jerk." I'm sorry brother, it really really sucks to be encouraged to do something on the one hand and judged as a weak loser for doing it on the other. We have been fed an ocean of lies, and most of us …
/r/MensRights29/11/25 06:27 PM
5

"TIL that its heads you win, tails I lose."
/r/MensRights29/11/25 06:14 PM
11

Thank you for clarifying you are not from the west. Now I understand you are sincere. I absolutely agree with you about basic requirements. But what you described is derided by Western Feminists as the "Trad wife" model, and any woman who fits that model is "unenlightened" and in thrall to "patriarchy." That is why more and more western men seek wives outside of the west. Thank you for your answer, and thank you for caring enough to post here and ask the question.
/r/MensRights25/11/25 07:21 PM
23

that is exactly why I ask when this comes up, "having entered a marriage, what does the woman owe the man?" It generates some interesting responses.
/r/MensRights25/11/25 06:53 PM
10

I'm granting the benefit of very large doubt by replying to you. I don't mean to be disrespectful, but speaking frankly means speaking frankly. That you would ask what being held accountable looks like in practice says a lot about the accountability gap between men and women in western society. I mean this question to provoke conversation - having entered a marriage, what does the woman owe the man?
/r/MensRights25/11/25 06:51 PM
0

When you engage, they win. Do not engage.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 08:16 PM
8

just like smoking. Some people smoke all their lives and never have any problems. Smoking makes sense for some people but not others.
/r/MensRights17/11/25 09:21 PM
13

Evil people stick together. It is their chief source of strength. Alexander Solzhenitsyn
/r/MensRights15/11/25 08:30 PM
1

Um, no. Before accusing people of being all over the place, try to keep up. I did not put up that article for review. I put that article up as an example of the impossibility of men receiving anything like a fair hearing on virtually any question that might yield an answer other than "women are disadvantaged in society therefor believe all women." I'll type this slowly - as to the question of whether institutions have become too feminized, which if true would certainly militate against the idea …
/r/MensRights13/11/25 09:01 PM
3

By the way, concerning the group that called her a skank, why did they call her that? Is she? I don't know, but I'm not going to pretend I do just because "my team rah rah my team."
/r/MensRights13/11/25 08:17 PM
1

Yeah I think the point here is a glaring example of a discussion that affects men and women being discussed by a panel of...women. And this headline is published with a straight face. In a publication started by a woman of the left yes, but a person who has stood up for the unbiased search for truth and has the scars to show for it. Whether this "male hegemony that holds power" that I keep hearing about cares about women or not, the quite obvious fact that women are, and have been calling the sh…
/r/MensRights13/11/25 08:13 PM
4

"Have American Institutions Become Overly Feminized? Seven women discuss." No. I don't think that's more likely.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 06:10 PM
3

Good copy on OJ. One can refer to Tammy Bruce for a description of how feminists faded into the bushes on that one. I think my point still stands even though thirty years ago seems like just...well thirty years ago.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 06:06 PM
5

Isn't Everyone Innocent Unless Proven Guilty? Jesus Harold Christ on a Unicycle Man. Where have you been? NO. No, everyone is not innocent unless proven guilty. Men are guilty of (insert accusation). I hope you don't have to find this out the hard way.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 05:33 PM
23

Are you kidding? This is garden variety feminist lack of self awareness. Go to your nearest college and take a walk around campus if you think I'm lying.
/r/MensRights12/11/25 05:47 PM
9

You will never go broke selling people the idea that their problems are caused by someone else, or that they are superior to someone else.
/r/MensRights08/11/25 09:51 PM
2

No.
/r/MensRights04/11/25 08:41 PM
23

It's not silent and it's nothing new.
/r/MensRights04/11/25 08:39 PM
5

Because women are perfect just the way they are and men need to do what they are told. Because "Equality." Or something.
/r/MensRights03/11/25 10:20 PM
1

"Normal feminist: advocate for gender equality" Yes, that is the "motte" in your Motte and Bailey argument. The bailey is "normal feminists" at best remaining silent and at worst being a hallelujah chorus for extreme feminists enforcing a Calvinball version of equality in practice.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 07:16 PM
2

Solzhenitsyn said - "When violence is your method, the lie becomes your principle." If that is true, the inverse must also be true. If the lie is your principle, violence is your method. What comeback is sufficient against a person like this? What come back is going to open their eyes, make them reflect, change their minds or the minds of the mob they are lying to rally? It is like saying to you "everything I say is a lie." Do you believe me? There is only one way to deal with people like that a…
/r/MensRights17/10/25 04:43 PM
1

Still a good question,
/r/MensRights16/10/25 05:30 PM
2

What a brilliant question.
/r/MensRights16/10/25 03:52 PM
3

"I'm a Klansman. Do ya'll wanna have a civil conversation about civil rights?" I'd love to have a conversation about that. But not with you. For whatever reason a feminist wants to have a "civil conversation" with a man about men's rights, or anything really, it's not for any reason that is to that man's benefit. I stand only to lose by my participation.
/r/MensRights15/10/25 06:06 PM
5

"Remember that there are good, real, feminists that actually care for men's problems and strive for a complete, two-sided, gender equality, and it doesn't matter if it's 95, 50 or even 20 percent. " Horseshit. As to one point, I will agree. Working to address Men's issues, it would useful to address those issues in a standalone manner, as though feminists and their...apologists do not exist. Simply make the appeal based on the facts of the issue and/or case, and not invite feminists to attack us…
/r/MensRights15/10/25 05:50 PM
12

Mercy is a male quality.
/r/MensRights15/10/25 03:47 PM
1

I think you are thoughtful and appreciate the response. I do not believe that there is any baby in the feminist bathwater - if there ever was - and regard no one claiming that label as any ally of mine. Good Luck and Gods Blessings.
/r/MensRights15/10/25 03:15 PM
2

There are feminists who take that position. I am aware of no feminists denouncing such a measure in no uncertain terms and policing the movement of any and all who would take such a position. It is characteristic of feminists to shout "feminism is not monolithic" when it suits them and say "Thats not REAL feminism" when that suits them better. Unless you can direct me to a mission statement (beyond the very tired cop out to the dictionary definition), charter, constitution platform or similar do…
/r/MensRights14/10/25 09:07 PM
2

I would like to think you are asking this in good faith, but I don't really believe so. But just in case you are as well as for the record, I would say "Academic Feminists" who, at tax payer expense and with the benefit of generous government programs churn out atrocities like VAWA ( Mackinnon and Dworkin were so shocked it passed, Dworkin commented that it just goes to show you legislators don't read what they are signing), the Duluth model, 1 in 3 or 1 in 4 or 1 in 5 women are raped by the tim…
/r/MensRights14/10/25 07:34 PM
2

The ERA would have made women equal. Women rejected it in one of feminism's most humiliating defeats. I believe the same dynamic that rejected it is what kept the majority of women from supporting suffrage, until they could be assured it would not subject women to the draft. Whatever its dictionary definition, feminism in practice has always been a push for the power of men, the privileges of women and the accountability of children. I can see where I think you may be coming from and if I am cor…
/r/MensRights14/10/25 07:17 PM
5

Yes, I just had a similar experience re: marriage on another reddit sub, confessions. I think the narrative here is we should be glad a woman wants us at all, and the fact that one would reject a woman based on her visual appeal is a monstrous manifestation of the "male gaze." Or something. It is basically of a piece with the overall shaming of men's sexuality. Men are visually attracted first. It is an immutable characteristic. So attack it as a "social construct" only a neanderthal would defen…
/r/MensRights14/10/25 07:05 PM
212

I really want to show grace to people like her. But kindness to the cruel is cruelty to the kind. She has reaped what she has sown, and I think the world can use more of that.
/r/MensRights13/10/25 08:15 PM
1

Nothing wrong with either choice if its an adult making it.
/r/MensRights25/08/25 10:16 PM
2

I suspect its because answering the question acknowledges the double standard.
/r/MensRights14/08/25 10:30 PM
1

Because men and women are equal....or something.
/r/MensRights14/08/25 05:36 PM
2

That is a good question. Been asking that one for about 30 years. Been called a lot of names for asking, never got an answer that wasn't special pleading.
/r/MensRights14/08/25 05:32 PM
1

I didn't. Then I found myself in Afghanistan. I knew I couldn't handle combat and that rage I still carried. So I decided that just until I get back from deployment, shelve the memory. Let it go. Just for now. If I want to go back to being a rage filled hate machine when I get home, OK. But right now, I don't have time or energy for it. When I got back, I decided I preferred to not pick all that back up. I'm not saying "just forgive and move on." I'm saying what I do is say "just for today, I de…
/r/MensRights06/08/25 03:24 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter