TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

StarFscker Archive

View 5 posts and 409 comments by StarFscker on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

the framework is "interesting", insofar as you don't expect it to be a useful paradigm for explaining or understanding anything.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 04:14 PM
1

What happens when someone questions their place in academia?
/r/MensRights28/05/14 03:46 PM
1

The fact that it is only there due to bullying tactics. The intellectual basis of feminism is so terribly lacking that it has no place in academia. It's only there because they managed to beat anyone opposed to them by calling them rapists. Most academics would rather not bother. If you are skeptical, I implore you to find an actual feminist related debate. Good luck.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 02:06 PM
1

When you get politics involved in business, business gets involved in politics. Politicians never care about their "constituents", they care about who pays them the most. Take the governmetn away from businesses and businesses won't run the world anymore. You can't be king of a hill if that hill doesn't exist. That was an insult, as it was "gilded" or "edged" with gold, but held no real value. It was a shit time for everyone who wasn't rich. No, it was awesome. Millions of people left behind an …
/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:31 AM
1

you get rid of the government, you get rid of business power. Besides, until the leftists destroyed it's reputation, the industrial revolution was called the "gilded age".
/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:13 AM
1

what question?
/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:00 AM
1

yes, but they're the violent monopoly that actually commits the violence. I mean, they don't really do anything of value, but companies make laptops and food and stuff. I think we should get rid of the government first.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:00 AM
1

the government currently does do that.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 11:50 PM
1

Feminism really ruins the validity of academia, but if you monitor how it works in academia, it is simply there due to bullying tactics. It has no place within it, or it shouldn't, not any more than the expanding earth hypothesis does.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 10:35 PM
1

They do if you have money.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 10:02 PM
1

who cares if it's offensive? It's true. The intellectual basis for feminism is so jacked up beyond belief that it's not a wonder that it was mainstream. Seriously, analyze feminist philosophical thought and tell me what it's saving grace is from an intellectual standpoint. It's like socialism without a philosophical backing, it's like liberalism without any self-ownership. It's got Kant's hardline ethics with Aristotle's preference-based mating. If you ask a feminist what feminism is, they'll sa…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 09:55 PM
1

why can't you just hire a company to do the same thing that the government does?
/r/MensRights27/05/14 09:51 PM
1

Not all of them, but the ones people notice are.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 09:05 PM
-1

Well why not get rid of the government?
/r/MensRights27/05/14 09:05 PM
0

That may be true, but it is important to not let the abyss gaze back into oneself.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 08:25 PM
0

nah, I'm okay with classical definitions of men, I think that society needs to have those. I don't care about people judging each other so long as no one is actually using violence to coerce each other.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 07:14 PM
-3

perhaps, but anonymously. Arguing with retards doesn't make you look good.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 07:09 PM
-2

You have to acknowledge that the bully has the ability to hurt you. You don't beat up a 2 year old if it attacks you, and that's what feminism is, it's a weak and annoying minority of retards.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 07:09 PM
1

Beware hypocrisy. We need to support the rights of people to do things that we would be okay with men doing. About half a year ago, there was an issue with CreepShots. I personally have no opinion on such things, but I do think that one should be consistent. If you were outraged by the CreepShots fiasco, then you should not be outraged by this.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 03:36 PM
0

Oh, bitch insulted CAPITALISM? Hell fuckin' naw! How about she runs off to China with all the other pinkos?
/r/MensRights01/09/13 10:07 PM
-2

When you censor speech, you aren't punishing those speaking, you're punishing the rest of us. Now we don't get the privilege of hearing their terrible opinions. Shame on you.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 12:23 AM
1

Sheesh. That sucks. I had a teacher in 10th grade who would do the boys vs girls thing but generally the boys would win, not because he made it so they won, but because they just won. I later dated a girl from that class and she absolutely hated that teacher. Perhaps we should avoid boys vs girls in schools.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 01:28 AM
0

Want or consent? You realize they aren't the same thing, right?
/r/MensRights14/08/13 07:57 AM
0

If you're stupid to not know the difference a goddamned sign isn't going to help you. You can fluff it up however you want, you're one of the many causes of false rape accusations in the world. How many times have we seen women decide, months after the fact, that because they never explicitly agreed to have sex with their boyfriend that just broke up with them, that they are suddenly raped? Too often and it's because of people like you.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 07:38 AM
0

No, you must have a shitty sex life because you're completely out of touch with how real relationships develop. Contracts are not on site. It's about feelings, not about legalise.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 07:29 AM
0

Either way, you suck at constructing sentences. Also, I trust myself to judge body language, you obviously are too dumb to and need people to spell shit out for you. Your romantic life must suck. I can see it now... two people on a bed... Person 1: Aaah, it's so nice to be alone finally. It's hot in here, is it hot to you? Person 2: No, I'm fine. Person 1: Well, I'm gonna take my shirt off, I hope you don't mind... Person 2: That's fine. I don't mind. Person 1: Jeez, I'm getting kinda tense... P…
/r/MensRights14/08/13 07:07 AM
-1

If you're saying "We don't want (to have sex) with (people who don't want to have sex with you)" then it's a pretty nonsensical statement. Rephrase and try again, because the way it's written it says "I don't want to have sex with those losers if they don't like you" and that doesn't make sense in the context.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 06:56 AM
-1

No, it means exactly what it says. I have no idea why you do not understand, but it seems to be on your end. I don't understand it because it's a poorly written sentence that doesn't mean anything. It's the literary equivalent of "Grape are being has can what ciao". Why do you ask? Because if you're going to play the privilege card then you need to check the ever-loving shit out of yours.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 06:47 AM
-2

Ok, so then you're exactly the kind of person who could benefit from education about consent. Oh shut up. You need some education on how people work. According to you, everyone and their mother is a rapist. Because we don't want you to have sex with people who don't want to have sex with you. I hope you don't want to either. Non-sensical statement. Loss of privilege is not the same as a plight. When was the last time you dug a ditch?
/r/MensRights14/08/13 12:56 AM
-1

Because you might have sex with someone who doesn't want to have sex with you. It's not rape unless they say "no" or have really negative body language. If they're trying to get away or holding themselves in a quasi-fetal-position, that's one thing, but I assume people aren't so stupid as to be incapable of deciphering basic body language. I shouldn't have to spell it out. If they are intimidated, incapacitated, or otherwise unable to say no, then the responsibility to clarify consent should not…
/r/MensRights14/08/13 12:32 AM
-1

You can see examples of this just about any time consent is brought up on /r/MensRights, other places on reddit, and AVFM. So many people want very badly to defend their right to have sex with people who don't want to have sex with them. I think that the posters posted recently are wrong. Silence does not mean "no", that's fucking stupid. 90 percent of communication is non-verbal, but in this on area we have to pretend that body language doesn't exist? Why not just tell people to "Just Say No"? …
/r/MensRights13/08/13 11:56 PM
1

why are you still here?
/r/MensRights12/08/13 10:12 PM
0

You're really good at playing the victim, but I don't like victims.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 09:37 PM
1

or if either will achieve the desired result at all.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 09:36 PM
0

I think there are better ways to do it.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 09:02 PM
1

That might be the goal, but perception is different and perception is everything.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 08:56 PM
-1

you can't read, can you?
/r/MensRights12/08/13 08:49 PM
1

It seems to me that we shouldn't draw blood against women, or do anything that would make women as a whole look bad, just because some feminists made all men look bad.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 08:49 PM
1

I would prefer countering the rape hysteria, because there's no need to put up walls between humans who want to interact just because people believe that they're asses are constantly under attack by all manner of rapists.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 08:43 PM
1

It just adds to it. No one is exempt! We can all be the victims of rape! Also, I haven't seen any posters that remind people that women can be rapists, it's all just "men and women can be raped by men and (assumedly gay) men".
/r/MensRights12/08/13 08:40 PM
0

I'm really not looking to convert you.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 07:58 PM
1

If you haven't experienced it then you wouldn't believe the claims, but in certain parts of the country you can't even say hi to people without people screaming "rapist".
/r/MensRights12/08/13 07:57 PM
0

Regardless of intention, it is feeding the rape hysteria.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 07:32 PM
-1

You want statistics for what is considered a growing sentiment? You are stupid.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 07:31 PM
0

I meant "heading toward what we as a group generally see as 'progress'". I wasn't making left-wing references.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 08:28 AM
0

concern-trolls? What are you, some sort of /b/tarded loli-fan?
/r/MensRights12/08/13 08:28 AM
-2

Specimen A: A common feminist tactic where one accuses someone of being an insensitive prick, a racist, or a misogynist simply because they don't agree with the point of view held by the accuser. There's rape education and rape hysteria. You're feeding the latter.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 08:27 AM
1

Wait a tick, why is silence a no? Do we have to verbalize everything? Sometimes words aren't appropriate.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 11:49 AM
1

Hahahahahahahahahahahaa we'd probably be better off for the most part.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 09:59 PM
1

that's fuckin' expensive. Also, why the hell do states require a blood test before marriage?!
/r/MensRights28/07/13 10:22 PM
2

... Cosmopolitan released this article?! That really changes my perception of this magazine.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 05:12 PM
0

Why do people care about such trivial and inane bullshit? Seriously, it's like the MRM is turning into the "Whiny Feminists but Male Movement".
/r/MensRights16/07/13 05:14 PM
1

It really depends on whether or not your sister is considered a real woman...
/r/TheRedPill11/07/13 05:53 AM
-2

Ah, no, I read that and it doesn't say what you said it said.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 05:14 AM
-6

Oh, okay. Well, pretty much her own fault then. Does he say that in another thread or something?
/r/MensRights10/07/13 12:11 AM
1

I love women so much I could fuck them, and in fact I sometimes do!
/r/TheRedPill09/07/13 10:36 PM
1

You statists really need to learn some modesty. Elitism doesn't suit anyone.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 11:28 PM
0

So I'm assuming you're okay with every law out there that is anti-male, then, Javert?
/r/MensRights07/07/13 08:39 PM
0

There is a completely legitimate reason to do that. Money. People will pay her to piss on a stick and that's well within her rights. You aren't the arbiter of truth, and you don't define what is and what is not the opinions of /r/mensrights.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 08:38 PM
1

I do not support feminist-style infringements upon the freedom of individuals, not from the MRM. I have higher standards for this movement, and I may not be the standard for it overall, but I am the standard for myself. Feminism leads to a lack of freedom and I like freedom better than I like a world without offense.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 11:28 PM
-1

You support the rule of law as an absolute?
/r/MensRights06/07/13 11:26 PM
0

Because I live my life according to a set of morals, and those morals include respecting the right of other adults to conduct their private affairs in whatever way they see fit. You are not infallible. Your judgement is not supreme. Why should you concern yourself with the transactions of others?
/r/MensRights06/07/13 10:41 PM
2

Bitch, maybe. My business? No.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 10:33 PM
-3

Why do you feel the need to get involved in the private transactions between consenting adults?
/r/MensRights06/07/13 10:33 PM
-3

Chances are almost everyone has broken some site's TOS at one point. I'm not too concerned.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 10:09 PM
-1

lol. I actually find this more funny than offensive. After all, what do you want to do? Tell her she can't sell her pregnancy test?
/r/MensRights06/07/13 08:17 PM
1

men and women are not the same and pretending they are won't make it happen.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 02:39 AM
-1

"Hey, you know all the issues feminists care about? Let's just reverse the genders and make them mens issues."
/r/MensRights23/06/13 10:36 AM
0

It would, but even if it weren't, then that's just culture.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 02:17 AM
1

Should, but a lot of people sympathize with the less intelligent ones. I don't think it's my place to judge whether or not a private body wants to help them out. It is my place to judge a government that does it with my money.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 11:22 PM
1

woah woah woah... this annoys StarFscker the Egalitarian AND StarFscker the Libertarian.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 10:59 PM
0

did I say that? Or are you misrepresenting what I said? Think about it.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 09:42 PM
2

fun fact.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 09:42 PM
2

It's being milked but I'm saying it should be milked with something other than alcoholism.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 09:41 PM
1

You can't just label shit as sexist, that's a cheap way out of an argument. Try harder.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 07:16 PM
0

no you didn't. Shoo.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 04:23 PM
0

Answer these questions that I posted elsewhere: -Why do women seem to become more sensitive during a 4-5 day stretch every month? -Where did these social norms come from, if not biology? -What ends up happening to all the children that are raised as a different gender? After all, if it is just social conditioning, why wouldn't they enjoy being a boy/girl instead of a girl/boy? -Are the trans-gendered simply full of shit? Did they just not play enough football when they were a kid? That's what yo…
/r/MensRights16/06/13 04:12 PM
0

That's what I said, right?
/r/MensRights16/06/13 04:08 PM
0

You heard it here first, folks. Pink is part of gender identity. What a farce.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 03:50 PM
1

Well I think the survival of the human species depends on having people with backbones, but that's just me.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 03:47 PM
-1

so what you're saying is, irrelevant bullshit like pants and pink aren't genetically hard-coded? Whoda thunk?
/r/MensRights16/06/13 03:46 PM
1

You definitely could have a point here, but do you designate a difference between a charity and a government in this regard?
/r/MensRights16/06/13 03:32 PM
-1

... which is decided by nature predominantly. Sorry, you're defending bullshit like it weren't bullshit.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 03:32 PM
0

uuuuuuuuugh It's this easy, you say: I didn't decide. My only choice was to do something about it, or to suicide without doing something about it. I figured I had nothing to lose giving it a shot. The mismatch brain vs genitals was there since pre-birth however. I didn't will it in existence. Therefore you admit that biology plays a predominant role. Stop it. Go away and defend your idiotic statements elsewhere.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 03:25 PM
0

There is SOME nature, but its mostly individual. Very few things are the exact same for 50% of the population. Menarche is one of those few things. And it answers your "4-5 days stretch every month", though not every woman reacts the same. You have that exactly backwards. Sex identity is NOT the same as gender norms. You can live in a world without gender norms and STILL identify as your sex. It doesn't matter if you played hockey or softball or played with dolls. It's totally irrelevant to your…
/r/MensRights16/06/13 02:59 PM
1

I don't call it "variation", I call it "a bunch of outliers"
/r/MensRights16/06/13 02:48 PM
1

It's not conditioning, it's evolution. Admitting that you failed is admitting that you are not a viable breeding candidate in caveman times.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 02:47 PM
0

Men and women tend to group in behavior/interests because of behavioral control measures put in place by culture to polarize and distinguish the sexes. Scientists disagree with you, right there. I've thoroughly gone through the Nature vs Nurture debate, and the Nature side is right as per my analysis, and the Nurture side is mostly bullocks. You can perform experiments on children less than a week old, before societal pressures even exist, and record the results. To say that men and women would …
/r/MensRights16/06/13 02:41 PM
1

That may be true. I've never knit, I wouldn't know, but I do know several 20-somethings that knit constantly. Perhaps a passing fad?
/r/MensRights16/06/13 02:36 PM
1

What? That they're a liar?
/r/MensRights16/06/13 02:35 PM
1

The "I've got shit to do but the wife is getting in the way" idea. Actually, now that I think about it, a place to get away from your wife, but get work done, isn't just a great way to deal with dv, but a market that has been milked since forever ago.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 02:34 PM
1

You don't think that it's appropriate to give skepticism when you're saying something as absurd as what you did?
/r/MensRights16/06/13 02:30 PM
0

No, it's not like that at all. In fact, I have no idea how you thought that comparison could be made.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 10:44 PM
2

That's a losing battle, I think it'd be much easier, and make men who are like me (not that I'm getting bullied by the wife, but personality-wise) have options that don't make them feel like a failure.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 10:41 PM
2

Perhaps a more "distributed" shelter model could work. Imagine if every bachelor with a spare room registered as an emergency shelter for a man in need in their neighbourhood. A small regional skeleton organisation could take calls and coordinate short-term placements. Kind of like couchsurfing.org but with stricter vetting of hosts, precautions to protect hosts and guests from abuse and regular visits from counsellors to help the guest get their lives back on track. I like this idea. It solves …
/r/MensRights15/06/13 10:40 PM
0

so you're saying culture does influence people?
/r/MensRights15/06/13 10:38 PM
0

Why? Most people don't give a shit about my tax policies.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 10:33 PM
0

Because men are stubborn, and it's not the social stigma that actually exists, it's the mental one. Men don't like admitting to themselves that they are a victim.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 06:03 PM
2

Good? Yes. Effective? I dunno.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 06:02 PM
0

There is much more difference than just "tits and dicks".
/r/MensRights15/06/13 05:58 PM
1

I jogged by and offered to find her a place to stay. Would you do that if there was a dude sleeping in blankets on the sidewalk on top of a bridge? Or would you just think it was a homeless dude?
/r/MensRights15/06/13 05:54 PM
0

so you're throwing me in the same boat as feminists just because it's easier to argue that way? Oddly enough, that's something a feminist would do.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 05:54 PM
-2

Ugh, it's not "moving the goal-post", it's "clarifying my position". Christ.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 05:53 PM
-8

Are they common where you're from? That'd explain a lot.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 05:52 PM
1

I agree that the government should be blind, but at the same time I don't support using tax dollars to fund these sorts of things in the first place. I'm mostly referring to private sector-type stuff.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 04:43 PM
0

Stigma - A man reaching out for help, in most cases is considered laughable and make him "weak" I think defeating the stigma is impossible, so instead we should try to find a way to help men that won't trigger it.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 04:37 PM
-4

Fine, let me restate: To think that there would be more individual variance between a man and a woman than there would between two women or two men is absurd. Men and women act different because they're both filled to the brim with completely different chemical cocktails. Almost every single action completed by any single person on any day of the week seems to confirm this, but somehow people are still trumpeting the "men and women are the same thing" myth like ideologues run amok.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 04:19 PM
-9

Only old people like knitting. That is a stereotype that is blatantly false. I have never seen an old person knit, but have seen many women form knitting circles. I've never seen a man knitting with them unless their mom wanted them to. Lots of women never cry in public, but I've never met a man who does cry in public. Our personalities are not random, that's just psycho-babble that feminists like to tout despite the fact that the scientific consensus is that behavior is tied to gender and other…
/r/MensRights15/06/13 03:19 PM
-9

I see this idea as ignorant. To think that men and women are just random in their behaviors is simply absurd. I know exactly 0 men that like knitting, despite how useful it probably is. I know many many women that love knitting.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 03:05 PM
1

Pretending we're all the same breeds ignorance, because it's obvious that it is not the case.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 03:00 PM
-1

I hate Kirsten Gillibrand for completely unrelated reasons.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 12:29 AM
1

Apparently she thinks really highly of herself...
/r/MensRights12/06/13 10:16 PM
1

That's simply an attempt to justify something that is on it's face already inherently sexist. You can't fight sexism with sexism.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 10:46 PM
1

No, you used it in a sentence in a weird way and that ruined the cohesiveness of the sentence and I still don't know what you were saying.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 12:09 PM
1

I didn't use it as you did. You tell me what you meant by it.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 11:51 PM
1

I don't think that's the correct way to use that word.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 06:44 PM
-4

I don't buy it. That's divisive.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 05:42 PM
-1

why do people think it's okay to gender child abuse? They do it and it's bad. If we do it, it's bad. It's just bad all around.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 03:57 PM
1

Ahhhh, this is what happens when the state gets involved with personal matters. Now the government's in your vagina!
/r/MensRights05/06/13 10:57 PM
0

At the end of the day, even if feminists demanded that women make up 100 percent of the workforce, they would still need women that actually wanted to work.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 12:07 PM
2

snicker.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 01:52 AM
0

who cares? If they don't want to work oil rigs, who is going to make them?
/r/MensRights04/06/13 01:51 AM
-8

New rule! No having opinions on people! None! You need written consent to have opinions on people!
/r/MensRights04/06/13 01:36 AM
1

The same rights under the law as males It varies througout cultures, but many cultures actually punish the husband or father for the crimes of the wife or daughter. The same access to employment as males You cannot judge other nations for this, those classical gender roles kept us alive for the entirety of our history, and the fact that we can question them now is really a luxury. The same access to education as males (the literacy rate for African adult females is 20 points lower than for males…
/r/MensRights09/05/13 03:56 PM
2

They don't have a lot of communal power, but you're telling me women in some societies don't even have social power? I'm a bit skeptical. Women are always jockeying for more social status, just like men are always jockeying for more status in other ways, and they will always end up with a large amount of authority in some way or another. Try to think of a family where the eldest female didn't have some level of push. Even if the mother is out of the picture due to death or some other oddity, the…
/r/MensRights08/05/13 04:22 PM
2

the more you know
/r/MensRights08/05/13 12:45 AM
1

meh, fuck cunts with dicks.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 11:45 PM
1

in the US, students are guaranteed freedom of speech by the supreme court, I believe. Are you an American?
/r/MensRights07/05/13 09:19 PM
1

isn't that a zombie, not a person?
/r/MensRights07/05/13 08:25 PM
0

It makes sense if you are in Africa because the mothers I'm guessing are the teachers...
/r/MensRights07/05/13 08:24 PM
1

Yes, I think the "The, now, adults" part is kinda strange. EDIT: Whoops, found what you were talking about. That's better. :P
/r/MensRights01/05/13 05:23 PM
1

I like the non-annoying color scheme, though some of the grammar needs work.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 04:25 PM
0

*an
/r/MensRights29/04/13 01:50 AM
1

some people never learn anything because they'll never leave their bubble.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 02:38 AM
1

You don't see theft as an act of violence?
/r/MensRights27/04/13 02:37 AM
1

Well it's not really opinion, it's all down to logic, actually. We may have different opinions on the get go, but those can be argued down to the basic elements.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 06:51 PM
1

because that renders the entire conversation pointless.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 06:39 PM
1

You can remove it as many times as you want, but if you're threatening a lawsuit, then you are threatening them with violence. Even if you don't commit the violence yourself, the end result is violence.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 06:31 PM
1

When you sue a business, you are denying money to the people of that business. Therefore, whatever you say about some ethereal thing called a "business" that is not made up of the people that make up that business, you are suing people.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 06:26 PM
1

Businesses are not separate entities from those who own and operate them. A business is an affilation of many people, and those people have rights. Just because you start selling stuff doesn't mean that you lose humanity.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 06:08 PM
1

Businesses are made up of people, and those people have rights.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 06:06 PM
1

What's your reasonable excuse to exclude non-organic milk?
/r/MensRights25/04/13 05:56 PM
1

If a business operates to serve the public, it must serve all of the public within reason, if it is a private club then i have no problem with it. NO business operates to serve the public. The operate to make money. The problem is that people have views on what constitutes criminal, refusal of service to some people is criminal. I cannot force you to buy my brand of milk. That'd be criminal. That'd be theft, essentially. How is a business owner any different?
/r/MensRights25/04/13 05:52 PM
1

Follow on their word? Since when is the defendant of a lawsuit who loses giving their word? It's coercion, plain and simple, and should be left to things that are actually criminal. If you go to a restaurant and they put soap in your soup, and it costs you a lot of money, it is reasonable to sue them. If they just refuse you service for whatever reason, it is not reasonable to sue them.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 05:42 PM
1

That is Opinion not fact, just because you see these things as what you see them is doesn't mean others do, by versing your debate to assume your assumptions as true, you are using a framing tactic, you just accused anyone in the MRM who doesn't agree with you of being a proponent of violence. Suing people IS threat of violence. Just because it's a few parts removed doesn't change that fact.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 05:32 PM
1

The movement isn't a libertarian affair, but I cannot associate with movements that go against my morals. That's the problem with feminism in the first place. Yeah, it's annoying that they spew such hate, but when they use the law to get what they want, they're undermining freedom at the expense of men. All oppression is is the denial of freedom. When men face oppression, due to feminists especially, it is because they are denied freedoms because of the government being in cahoots with the femin…
/r/MensRights25/04/13 05:26 PM
1

some things aren't worth talking about if they aren't interesting.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 05:01 PM
1

The movement is already political, because it deals with laws and politics.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 05:00 PM
1

I can make an accusation all day, and if you do not apologize then I may judge you harshly, but one thing I won't do is get the state involved. I try to be consistent in my philosophy.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 04:41 AM
1

the pro-word is "if".
/r/MensRights25/04/13 04:40 AM
2

I already made a thread and it's got twice as many downs as it does ups. Well, that's how it works, I guess...
/r/MensRights24/04/13 06:49 PM
1

You mean democracy? I think it is okay when committed at the smallest levels of government, so for example, a democratic vote on some basic laws of an area, but when applied to a nation or an area too large, it becomes impossible to escape those laws. It is the minorities that are most worth protecting because they are different, and it is immoral to force a minority to stop what it is doing because everyone else is all for it. I mean, just because everyone in the world thinks that it is okay to…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 06:31 PM
1

I do think that a private bus company should be allowed to determine where people sit on their bus, or even deny service to people on their bus, for any reason, but honestly that'd be the worst business decision possible to make. Not only would you lose out on the money from the people they're discriminating against, but if that group made a big enough fuss about it, they'd lose out on the money of the sympathetic, too.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 06:22 PM
1

Are you against all lawsuits, or specific ones? Not ALL lawsuits, nor specific ones. Just petty ones in general. As I put it, if a business dosn't wrong you to the point where you feel entitled to walk into their place and taking it from the register, or locking them up in your basement, you shouldn't sue them because it's the same thing.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 06:04 PM
1

probably because you're a hypocrite more than anything else...
/r/MensRights24/04/13 06:02 PM
1

You are very condescending for someone who claims that I am pretentious.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 05:53 PM
1

Isn't that just Tumblr in action?
/r/MensRights24/04/13 05:24 PM
1

The first is that if you want people to accept what you are saying you should not insult them and definitely not come off as pretentious. Insult them? Where did I do that? Also, do you realize the hypocrisy of telling me not to insult people, then calling me pretentious? Lawsuits against the government are important. Lawsuits against businesses for chicken-shit problems like ladies nights make us all look childish, and put us on the same plane as the feminists. The moral fiber of this subreddit …
/r/MensRights24/04/13 05:22 PM
1

A lawsuit may be forceful, it may be severe, but it isn't violence. Would you walk into the company and forcibly take the money you feel you're owed after a lawsuit? If they resisted, would you mind locking the owner of such a business up in your basement? That's essentially what you are doing. I recognize people may have different opinions on things, however I will never condone things that run against my morals. I am a Mens Rights Advocate because of my morals. This is a movement of morality. …
/r/MensRights24/04/13 05:15 PM
1

It is, but I wouldn't call anyone a radical for wanting a continuation of the government. That's an undue slander. You should apologize.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 05:06 PM
1

We will never be and your fear of this is irrational We already are. People are lawyering up because someone made a website that allows a more efficient way to gossip about men. I do think you have a bit of a point when it comes to having a radical element; not that I think we need radical elements, but because I think that the most extreme thing we should do is organized protests and boycotts, and we should avoid litigation whenever avoidable. Litigation over a false rape accusation is one thin…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 05:05 PM
0

How absurd.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 05:02 PM
1

I love them. Do more of them.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 05:01 PM
1

so you're opposed to anything that puts you out of a comfort zone? How about this: I don't want to live in a world where, at the slightest offense, the slightest exercise of free will, and the slightest contrary thought, I can have violence done against me by people who would know better how to run my life than I do.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 04:41 PM
0

I can't help it if I'm rather beautiful. ;P
/r/MensRights24/04/13 04:33 PM
-1

Yes, I just noticed almost twice as many downvotes as upvotes. That secures it: This subreddit is heading toward being the male SRS. My efforts were probably in vain.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 04:29 PM
1

We need extremist in the MRM for people to realize that we are not extremists. I completely disagree, if we have extremists in the MRM then people will extend that to all of us. We should shun and disassociate ourselves with extremism in all forms. I would not be happy if the MRM consisted of "radMRM" and then normies, because feminism is evil because of this setup. Also, realize that in your first paragraph you are advocating what I am most opposed to. In fighting feminism we must never become …
/r/MensRights24/04/13 04:25 PM
0

Right, but suing people because they do something rude is not beneficial to the human condition.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 04:18 PM
1

A lawsuit against the private sector when the private sector has done some form of wrong against you is different from one where they simply refuse to service you. Also, pointing out the other thread is not appropriate because I am not talking about that thread; it is perfectly appropriate to sue the government because they're taking your money from you to fund things that aren't right. I'm talking about ladies nights out, people saying rude things, taxis that only serve women, etc.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 04:09 PM
1

Jim told Jack that he must do something on his own property that Jack does not want to do, and said, "If you don't, I'll be forced to warn you. Then I'll give you a letter. Then if you still don't comply, I'll proceed to beat you". Just because the violence is a few steps removed doesn't change the fact that it's there.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 03:59 PM
1

If you're against the slandering and "objectifying" of males and females, then that's a fine social policy. If you are for codifying that into law via judical processes then you are actually not in any way in favor of free speech.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 03:22 PM
2

Perhaps we should collaborate on a thread highlighting this sort of thing?
/r/MensRights24/04/13 03:20 PM
1

All with other people's money! I love it when people make decisions with my property on my behalf.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 08:20 AM
1

I'd say a western one, specifically because misandry is the hatred of men, not the lack of male rights, and because most places in the world can't afford to hate men; they're too busy ensuring everyone's survival.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 04:10 AM
1

I'm not in favor of "mens rights" turning into "deny other people's rights". It's exactly a bunch of people chatting about their ex bfs. Whether they are friends or not is entirely beside the point. It's free speech, and free speech rights are more important to me than almost anything else.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 03:00 AM
1

I'm not trolling, I just think interfering with the free speech rights of others is more shameful than an app that simply serves as a way of publishing them.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 02:49 AM
1

Shoo.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 02:31 AM
1

If a bar wants to exclude black folks, then they can enjoy going out of business for it. Only an idiotic business would limit their pool of potential customers like that.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 02:29 AM
1

more like the communist kind. In order to fund that they need to use threats of violence to take the money, first.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 02:28 AM
1

No, it really isn't.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 02:28 AM
2

Used to be. The MRM is full of bizarro-feminists now, instead of pushing for greater self-reliance without the state ruining your family, they instead are pushing for the ability to ruin other people's lives simply because they think that the other person is mean.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 07:39 PM
1

personal information can already be shared by the people using the app if the app wasn't there.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 07:38 PM
1

either way, again, two wrongs don't make a right. True, however I am not in favor of government regulating rudeness. I think this is a first amendment issue more than anything else. It simply allows the user a more efficient means of gossip, which, though morally questionable, does not equal something I feel should be illegal.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 06:43 PM
-1

what kind of city funds gyms?!
/r/MensRights23/04/13 06:04 PM
1

well you're either calling me a liar, or you're calling me a liar. Men do the same thing, I know because I used to do the same thing.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 06:04 PM
2

Self responsibility and personal accountability are definitely lacking in the MRM recently. In 2007 you wouldn't see this.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 05:39 PM
2

True that, hence why I'm trying to explain to everyone else why I am not interested in suing. I might have a job lined up with another company in another field, hopefully that'll pan out.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 05:13 PM
0

Suing private industry for exploiting a market is the WORST THING about MRAs. Seriously, I have been involved in MR dealings since 2004, and this new spat of suing business owners like a common cat-burglar is alarming. Let the free market be. Start worrying about the REAL problems; you know, the fact that you don't have a right to your kids. The fact that you don't have a right to your foreskin. The fact that you don't have a right to your wealth after marriage. There are REAL issues out there, …
/r/MensRights23/04/13 05:12 PM
1

Accusing people of being a troll for disagreeing with you is a really great way to announce that you haven't a leg to stand on.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 05:09 PM
0

No, I'm not, I'm saying you don't have the right to deny people their freedom of speech. That's not trolling, that's called "Not being a communist"
/r/MensRights23/04/13 05:08 PM
0

show me an app which treats women like objects AND exclusive to males ONLY where extremely personal information is shared and used without their consent. (it's illegal, privacy issues) No, I do not need to do that in order to prove my point. This site does nothing that women don't already have the capability to do. It's just a sewing circle. Nothing new.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 04:02 PM
1

No, I have problems with using a LEGAL SYSTEM to incite social change. That's what feminists do, first off, and now we have an overly PC-world where the freedom of speech ends where someone elses feelings begin. I swear, since I've stopped posting here for 2 months, this place has gone full communist. Your feelings are SECONDARY to someone elses RIGHT to freedom of speech, even if you don't like what they're saying.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 03:56 PM
1

buuuulllshiiiiit. Before I got married I gossiped like a motherfucker.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 03:54 PM
-8

Who gives a shit? Women already talk about men behind our backs. Are you going to sit there and tell me that men don't do the same exact thing?
/r/MensRights23/04/13 12:45 AM
-6

What the hell is with /r/mensrights using the law to incite social change? Seriously, have we decided to stoop as low as the feminists? Using the law to limit speech that hurts your pweshus feewings is just disgraceful. No. Mens Rights Activists should stop being such pussies. Free speech hurts sometimes. Deal with it.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 12:45 AM
1

do you mean that literally? Because, if you want I could give you the info and you could go nuts. I'm personally not willing nor financially capable.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 12:39 AM
0

You sue them. Message me. I'll send you the details. Apply for the position. Then, when they deny you the job, you take action and sue them. If you do, you're twice the whiner I am, but you'll have made your point.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 11:45 PM
1

As I've said elsewhere, I've met about 3 female security officers in my entire career (spanning multiple jobs at different companies). Usually they take the jobs that are essentially just a help-desk, or like a door-person. This particular job, however (seeing as it is for a residential facility for criminal justice clients) probably won't be seeing much of any applicants, let alone female ones.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 11:44 PM
0

You're whining because they want to have an equal work place. Most women don't get into the private security field for the same reason women don't generally mine coal or go crab fishing; it's dangerous. That's unlikely. Actually, when I first discovered the position, it was a month and a half ago. I applied at the time, but because of some other things I had going on, I had to leave the country for a month. When I came back, I checked, and the position was still available. According to the recru…
/r/MensRights22/04/13 11:43 PM
-2

I think it's inherently wrong to sue a company over a government contractual term. It's also absolutely spineless and cowardly to have the government take care of minor issues like this. It's wasteful of tax-payer money, and it hurts society as a whole by introducing more precedents on which our freedom will be eroded. I shared this story because I thought people would find it interesting, but honestly, suing a company because of a government contract they hold? Immature at the least, and overwh…
/r/MensRights22/04/13 10:54 PM
1

Are you serious? Do you know how much time and effort it takes to wage a lawsuit that I might not even win? Do you think I have the money for that sort of thing? Do you think that I don't have anything better to do (such as find a job)? Do you think that I can just somehow make "failure to get an interview" into a lawsuit? I won't do that. I'm not a feminist. I have self-respect and I deal with my problems like an adult, not like some sort of government-dependent layabout. You can't just lob law…
/r/MensRights22/04/13 10:50 PM
2

It's not a whine, it's an account of true events, and a bit of sarcastic good-will. The simple fact of the matter is they're going to be searching for some time.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 10:47 PM
0

New York state
/r/MensRights22/04/13 10:46 PM
-3

no.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 09:03 PM
-3

Eh, I'm a Libertarian, it would be contrary to my ethics to sue a company over this, especially if it's a state contract forcing their hand.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 08:54 PM
-3

I'm not the litigative type. I just think it's kinda silly if they're required to hire a female security officer, those aren't very common.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 08:49 PM
2

I wasn't denied during the job interview, I was denied an interview.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 08:44 PM
2

tut tut tut.... shoo shoo shoo. I have better things to do than talk to statists who are also economic know-nothings.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 05:04 PM
2

is it possible that, if instead of trying to argue with me about things you obviously won't possibly ever agree with me on, you simply acknowledge that I'm a few floors above your basement? You're one of those people who, instead of trying to understand new and complicated knowledge, think that if you don't understand something, the person saying it is stupid.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 02:43 PM
2

it specifically fucking excludes money, so yeah. usually
/r/MensRights22/04/13 05:54 AM
2

"money is both a good and a service" what? no. it's neither. In order for something to be a good it has to have utility outside of being able to purchase things. definition you just made the fuck up. A service is something done by a person so inherently money can't be a service either. shit you just make up. It's both, but I'm not going to bother trying to convince you because you can't even wrap your head around why it's immoral to force people to trade with people they don't like, so it'd just…
/r/MensRights22/04/13 12:49 AM
2

money is both a good and a service but you don't know how economics works, so it really doesn't matter. Shoo.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 12:20 AM
1

right but if you provide money in exchange for good and services, you do have discretion? it's like arguing with a poli-sci major.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 12:14 AM
1

It's a trade. Should you make your money available to everyone?
/r/MensRights22/04/13 12:02 AM
1

Since when do you have a right to the shit Chik-Fil-A is selling? They sell it because they're willing to sell it, they're not your slave, you don't get to tell them that they must sell it. That's called oppression.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 08:52 PM
1

Alright, you're useless. At what point does it become okay to force a person to do something they don't want to do?
/r/MensRights21/04/13 08:22 PM
1

Why are you obsessed with forcing people to like each other? Who cares if they don't like black people or gays or white cis-gendered single fathers? If they don't want to do business with a certain group of people then they won't get that groups money. You shouldn't legislate people from being rude.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 07:38 PM
1

No, people have a right to choose who they provide service to. If you don't like their discriminatory policies: Don't buy their shit. They're out money if you do that.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 07:19 AM
1

well continue to not purchase their chicken. Why do you feel the need to exact some sort of revenge on them for not liking you? Who gives a shit? If they're prejudiced, let them be prejudiced. As long as they're not hurting anyone, why bother?
/r/MensRights20/04/13 09:43 PM
1

They are in business but that's only because people like YOU won't stop buying stuff from them.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 05:27 PM
-1

Why would gay people want to eat at Chik-Fil-A after that bullshit Chik-Fil-A spewed about a year ago? Also, bear in mind that most of the discrimination from Jim Crow didn't come from companies... it came from government mandating that companies couldn't allow people to integrate. You take that away and any business with a sense of money is going to accept white people, black people, and gay people's money. If they don't, then they're out some money, they'll probably go out of business. Mandati…
/r/MensRights19/04/13 01:53 PM
1

Well if the First Nations tribe doesn't approve it, I guess they're like a separate entity in and of themselves, and if the lake is their property, I don't think any mining company should mine there if they don't approve it first. I never said that the world would be perfect in a libertarian wet-dream world, but it definitely beats taking people's money in order to lead witch-hunts against companies that probably aren't doing anything wrong. By the way, I just noticed you are both a Mens Rights …
/r/MensRights19/04/13 01:48 PM
1

Well, if they can't, then their business fails, either way. I'm okay with a business going out of business if they destroy our shared resources.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 05:14 AM
1

You're right, the water is still damaged. My solution? Make the punishment for ruining a water source be that you have to pay for everyones water filtration and purification systems, and then publicize that reaction. Seriously, no small perk in profits is worth paying for the water of an entire town or city. Let it serve as a warning. Companies will think twice before dumping waste into rivers.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 04:58 AM
2

I don't think that central planning is necessarily a bad thing, but it needs to be approved by everyone to whom it applies. Getting liabilities set up for crappily built buildings is complicated, but I think the right of the land-owner outweighs the need for a set of standards for buildings. In other words, if I want to build a house out of twigs, I can go ahead and do that, but if in doing so someone falls through the 3rd floor, then through the second one, then the first, and in the basement d…
/r/MensRights19/04/13 04:44 AM
-4

well that's a decent dose of ad hominem, but if you teach Canzian economics (or Keynesian for that matter) in a high school you're really going to screw over the next generation worse than the current one. At any rate, apart from arguing the semantics of whether or not a bastardized word deserves a dictionary definition, what the hell were we talking about?
/r/MensRights19/04/13 04:11 AM
-3

try harder.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 03:38 AM
-10

then he has a car to sleep in, but why the hell would you want to stay at a hotel that hates you? I mean, fuck, I would never stop at an SRSer's inn.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 03:38 AM
-6

please google "canzian economics" before you start having opinions on economics, because canzian is a bastardization of keynesian to describe a command economy. Keynesian economics is just pussyfooting around the subject.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 02:32 AM
-6

Free market economics are wonderful things. Fun fact: the train industry was a major player in ending Jim Crowe laws, because it was more expensive to have 3 white dudes in one car an 30 black dudes in another than it was just to have 33 dudes in a car. If you don't think capitalism works, then you should really study economics more, because it's self-evident, and the real world has shown time and again that canzian economics don't work.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 02:20 AM
-14

then you're inventing some crazy-assed hypotheticals.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 02:18 AM
-15

I support a business owner's right to discriminate based on sex, race, religion, or any other factor. I also support a consumers right to never utilize their services, and would, in fact, encourage that.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 01:32 AM
-9

sorry, it belongs in /r/mensrants
/r/MensRights18/04/13 03:28 AM
-1

when suddenly you saw some free karma! /r/mensrants
/r/MensRights30/03/13 07:28 AM
1

this poster tells me that only men are rapist, and that I am a rapist, but that there is something I can do about it, sorta like how the christians tell people that they are a sinner and are going to hell but god loves them and can fix their gay or something. Pretty shitty shit.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 11:01 AM
2

I tried forking her repo but it was deprecated.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 10:28 AM
1

Hey, this is interesting, but we're trying to herd facebook and twitter posts to /r/mensrants instead of this place.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 12:20 AM
1

I don't dig on that second one.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 03:09 AM
2

Zing! I thought it was funny but it stil lwould be better if you put this in /r/mensrants instead of /r/mensrights.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 01:36 AM
0

waaaaaaaaaah waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah that guy is meeeeeean waaaaaaaaaaah
/r/MensRights20/03/13 01:28 AM
1

SSRSS. Shit "Shit Reddit Says" Says.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 11:15 PM
2

165 HIGH SCORE!
/r/MensRights16/03/13 09:46 AM
1

/r/MENSRANTS It's a great place to put shit like this.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 05:56 PM
-6

you were wrong, it would fit into /r/mensrants but not here, this is for real issues, not "some people were rude on facebook."
/r/MensRights12/03/13 08:37 PM
1

why did you give this site no one cares about free advertising?
/r/MensRights12/03/13 07:59 PM
1

The comments are hilarious.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 09:39 AM
2

Really great article. Doesn't make emotional pleas, doesn't make an ass of itself, just cuts to the point of what's wrong with arguments from privilege.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 09:04 AM
1

I can't find it, though that's pretty interesting. I think men are very honest about this sort of thing. It's no big deal; it's your dick and you can beat it if you want to.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 03:04 AM
-2

you're welcome.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 12:35 AM
-6

this should go in /r/mensrants. This isn't the place for it.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 12:31 AM
1

this would be better somewhere else, try /r/mensrants.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 12:31 AM
-4

Depression has much higher acceptance. Most shrinks don't diagnose aspbergers because it's obvious horse-shit.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 09:18 AM
-5

right but I don't label myself an "aspbergers sufferer" because it doesn't exist. It's a crutch.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 06:47 AM
-7

Because everyone I met with "aspbergers" is really just an "asshole" who uses their "disease" to give them an excuse.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 05:40 AM
1

we're taller.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 05:39 AM
-13

... people just made it up. It isn't a real thing.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 03:34 AM
2

I love the Cato institute.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 01:24 AM
-14

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/dec/02/aspergers-syndrome-dropped-psychiatric-dsm not anymore it doesn't.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 01:22 AM
-32

Asbergers doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 01:08 AM
-1

hey you should post this somewhere else.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 12:28 AM
2

I find it annoying that as a card-carrying Patriarch, I'm somehow expected to give all her projects the go-ahead. Do it all you want, I don't give a shit.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 09:35 PM
2

somehow they need permission in order to do stuff they're talented at?
/r/MensRights09/03/13 07:48 PM
1

361 people? How many of them had "Sexist" attitudes toward women? All of them? Is it really surprising that the people who like women, and womanly features, are nicer to women? After all, it cited benevolent sexism, aka "female privilege"...
/r/MensRights08/03/13 08:32 AM
-1

Those people are shitty people. People who are too emotional like that are the worst members of society.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 03:49 AM
0

I can see emotional arguments being used to counter emotional arguments but then you're not really using arguments you're really just in the middle of a whine-off.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 03:17 AM
1

Appealing to emotion may be a great way to win an argument but it makes you a worse human being. If you can't defend your ideas with reason and must stoop so low as to make an emotional plea, then you've stopped worrying about the truth and started focusing on winning for the sake of it.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 02:46 AM
1

I disagree to a certain point, though. Although I recognize that it affects men and women in different ways, at the end of the day, I will continue to judge people I don't know based on how they are dressed. I will not tell them to put some clothes on, or wish rape upon them, or anything absurd like that, but I will definitely decide whether they are worth knowing or not. I think everyone does, and in general, it puts the onus on the clothes-wearing people of the world to think about their wardr…
/r/MensRights06/03/13 01:52 AM
1

Most of the time when people dress in a way that others find disgusting, it's because they over-shot it. Women are just as guilty as men (if not moreso sometimes) when it comes to judging people based on their appearance, and men are just as likely to be fashion disasters. As you mentioned before, some skinny kid without any muscle tone wearing a tank-top that's meant for someone much larger than them really just makes them stand out as someone I don't want to meet.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 11:39 PM
-4

I like how a lot of them actually are somewhat self-critical... well at least the women's rights side is, the feminists are just psychotic...
/r/MensRights05/03/13 02:49 AM
0

I am not a star, I fsck stars.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 12:53 AM
1

?
/r/MensRights04/03/13 10:54 PM
1

This is more true than you could know. Seriously, people, if you have no social life and you're fighting for injustice you're actually doing the cause harm. You need to maintain a positive social life, be fun/funny, and have healthy relationships with those you love in order to demonstrate that we aren't just weirdos. Most feminists dress like weirdos (saw one recently with the sides of her head shaved except for right above her ears and purple dye on top like some sort of mullet, also had a lea…
/r/MensRights04/03/13 10:53 PM
1

If someone faults you for wearing a business suit, they need their head examined.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 07:04 AM
1

I am not a juror. I dare not judge.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 12:19 AM
0

right but the OP's post is about comparisons to white-rights groups. Any time you say "Well they have a good point", even if they do about something (not saying whether they do or not, don't know enough about them), it makes you look like a nazi sympathizer. Best to just pretend you didn't hear it.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 12:08 AM
2

I would suggest /r/mensrightsmeta for all meta posts, but then again I'm not a mod. I just think it's funny.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 12:07 AM
1

a fashion discussion in /r/mensrights? Why I never... One thing I notice is that womens clothing seems to be a lot less utilitarian, and if I were a woman that would drive me nuts. If you can't fit your cell phone, keys, wallet, a camera, some loose change, a knife or a leatherman, and a pack of cigarettes in your pockets then I guess you really do need to carry around a purse, but beyond that, it's cold in the winter, I don't see why a lot of women wear these ultra-small kid-sized jackets and t…
/r/MensRights04/03/13 12:05 AM
1

I have no connection with white rights groups and if we present a defense of them, even to undermine a criticism of us, we're giving credence to them and will be judged for it. Ill-advised... though that shit is pretty scary looking.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 03:21 AM
-2

the hypocrisy of a meta post that tells other meta posts to post in the meta sub so we don't have meta posts in the non-meta sub is killing me softly.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 03:18 AM
2

what the hell is this filth?
/r/MensRights03/03/13 03:17 AM
1

I remember in 10th grade I gave my first anti-feminist essay to my feminist teacher... ...I got an A. Congratulations. The girl should be proud of herself.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 03:51 PM
1

I know, I've given you that, I'm just going on a tangent about how I hate social sciences.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 06:54 PM
1

If you have a major problem with differing points of view, then we don't want you anymore.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 06:47 PM
1

That's true, but I still think sociology is just applied psychology, which is in-and-of-itself hardly science.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 06:42 PM
2

I bet it's all popular in "sociology", the least scientific of all the sciences.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 08:46 AM
2

It is a very modest thing, but I think it is so modest that it doesn't even really deserve a name, let alone one such as "rape culture".
/r/MensRights28/02/13 08:38 AM
2

... who approved this campaign?
/r/MensRights27/02/13 11:08 PM
2

the economy is going to hell because clinton made banks give loans to people who couldn't afford them, not because suzie is a lawyer.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 09:32 PM
2

nafalt!
/r/MensRights27/02/13 09:31 PM
2

My hand is always DTF.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 09:30 PM
2

Please point out where I said this, because to my knowledge I haven't said it at all. My apologies, I substituted what another poster said and thought it was what you said. I don't really understand what mentalities in our culture enable rape. As far as I know, rape is the most disguisting crime possible in our culture, which is weird because I think murder should be more obscene, but it's not. We live in an anti-rape culture. The Genderratic blog post seems to be more about catholic subculture,…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 07:14 PM
1

if it weren't for the fact that I'm biologically compelled to like them, I think that, objectively speaking, vaginas look kinda gross, like a gooey roast-beef sandwich. Penises aren't exactly the prettiest things in the world either. Boobies are nice, though... so are butts.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 07:32 AM
2

Perhaps you might use it that way but in the past it has often been used to at least partially shift moral culpability onto the victim. This is why the cultural trope is seen as victim-blaming; whilst it can be used modestly to suggest "there are some things women can do to lower their statistical chance of being raped," it has been used to suggest that "she wasn't truly raped, she was asking for it, look at how she was dressing!" You've said that most of the time it isn't good advice because mo…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 07:25 AM
1

FINALLY, an argument that isn't the same shit! I've debated this with many people, you are the first to make a point that wasn't the same point as everyone else. Victim-blaming aside, it is kinda shitty advice, however at the end of the day, most people aren't comfortable around women who dress like that. If a girl wears leggings for pants, I think that's gross. Women should wear skirts, shorts, or a dress or something over leggings, because leggings are not pants. Also, when women dress like th…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 12:53 AM
2

At the very least the statement can be construed as diminishing the rapist's responsibility. I disagree, that phrase is used without regard to the rapist, it is in regard to the lack of common-sense of the rapee. "I'm a man, I can't help it" Said the rapist. The idea that male sexuality is naturally predisposed to committing acts of rape is offensive to men. It is blatant misandry. Good thing that feminists are pressing that while simultaneously pretending not to. "Tell men not to rape" says tha…
/r/MensRights26/02/13 09:51 PM
2

I've heard this exact argument, always in the same way, a million and a half times. It's unconvincing because nobody is saying the rapist is immune from responsibility. Also, the whole "Idea offensive to men/they can't help it" argument is annoying because it's grouping men in with the rapists, then trying to tell us that "we should be offended" just because rapists exist and we recognize that obvious fact.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 07:29 PM
1

-The belief that rape victims who "dress sexily" were "asking" to be raped I have a problem with this one specifically. A woman who dresses like a slut and goes into shady areas is an idiot for the same reason I'd be an idiot to dress in an expensive suit with gold chains and a rolex and walk through Flatbush in Brooklyn. Also, if you don't lock your door when leaving your house, you're pretty much asking for a break-in. If you don't brush your teeth, you're asking for cavities. If you don't che…
/r/MensRights26/02/13 07:08 PM
1

Not really, also I haven't seen any evidence for the new version, either. Could you give me a few examples, other than jailhouse rape?
/r/MensRights26/02/13 06:24 PM
1

Well, I guess we do agree on that, but the other version of rape culture is entirely new to me.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 06:10 PM
1

I don' think that is congruent with any defense of rape culture I've heard (prison rape, I'm talking about), mostly because only MRAs talk about it, and MRAs have much less acceptance of the idea of rape culture.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 05:41 PM
1

Well, I've never really had the two contrasted, so I can't attack the softer version you're talking about. The real "rape culture" is prison rape culture. It's more commonplace hope people get raped in jail than it is for them to simply go.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 05:39 PM
2

Rape culture is bullshit. Patriarchy can mean two things, either it means what feminists say it is, (a society that oppresses women for the express benefit of men) which is total horseshit, or a society that has grown larger than family-sized groups and therefore is managed by men (whereas smaller tribes are generally guided by either a matriarchal figure or a patriarchal one, depending on the circumstances). The latter definition isn't really anything, the former is an insidious lie to make it …
/r/MensRights26/02/13 07:58 AM
2

You lose this fight you're gonna lose every fight you'll have in the future. Don't marry unless you want to. If she really loves you she will stay, but if she doesn't, the marriage will fail anyway, so you're saving yourself some major hassle down the road.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 10:42 PM
-1

... So? What's wrong with influence?
/r/MensRights25/02/13 09:17 PM
2

how is it brigading?
/r/MensRights25/02/13 09:12 PM
0

It was a hell of a war. I don't like it when /r/mensrights takes the greatest fight against pure evil in the history of the world and politicizes it to be about gender affairs. It seems... cheap.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 09:18 AM
2

True, but I'm assuming you don't want a shitty partner.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 02:25 PM
1

shits sexy.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 06:33 AM
2

Do most guys here believe that as long as you are confident and have good personality, women will be begging to sleep with you - begging - no matter how average looking or below average looking you are? No, you need style, class, and sophistication, too. You can be a confident retard and you're still a retard. I assume puahate expatriots have told you all about looks theory? Women will reject a man instantly if he doesn't meet her looks type or standards. Women assume goodlooking men are confide…
/r/MensRights24/02/13 06:23 AM
1

I actually like the idea of stealing "Mister". "MR" is "Mister", so we could go by "Mr. Activist!" Catchy!
/r/MensRights22/02/13 05:57 PM
1

Reverse-reverse sexism.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 05:31 AM
1

The fact that it ends with "ism" pretty much guarantees it. I will not use the word.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 03:04 AM
1

Well, yeah, but feminists claim to be all about womens rights, doesn't stop it from being an ideology. I think the term masculism will lead down the same bad road feminism has walked.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 02:59 AM
1

Ah, I see.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 09:26 PM
1

Could you give me a link?
/r/MensRights21/02/13 09:18 PM
1

Wow, that must be a world apart from where I was in 2004, because I thought "masculist" was a new thing.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 08:57 PM
1

I don't see any way in which the term "masculist" is any more or less divisive than "male rights". Both of them focus on a subset of phenomena, which I think is allowed and even necessary to get things done. Certain rights are those that women should have and are lacking for women, and those are interests of Women's Rights Activists. Certain other rights aren't really a problem for women, and those go under the folder of "Mens Rights" "Masculism" is a term of ideology, not of rights, and using i…
/r/MensRights21/02/13 08:42 PM
2

right but one is more focused and the other sounds like an ideology of. Therefore, "Mens Rights" is just in regards to the rights of men, whereas "Masculism" is more of an over-reaching ideology based on being male. Just like how a "Womens Rights" activist is someone who focuses on gender inequality, whereas a "Feminist" is an ideologue who thinks that women are superior somehow.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 07:35 PM
1

because it sounds like an ideology, and the opposite of feminism, and serves to divide rather than unite. It has all the failings of feminism in a less "socially acceptable" package.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 07:28 PM
1

What makes you draw that conclusion? It's very different from the other ones posted, so I'm curious what you're basing it on...
/r/MensRights21/02/13 07:28 PM
1

wow, really? When I first found out there were other like-minded folks, I tried the term "masculinist" and it didn't fly with them. This was 2004.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 07:27 PM
1

no, feminism is not about women's rights and empowerment, it's an ideology of female-worship and male demonization, and it's assumed that "masculism" would be the opposite, male-worship and female demonization. Saying feminism is about "women's rights" is like saying islam is about "desert-people rights"; inaccurate to the point of being ridiculous.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 07:22 PM
1

I also don't see the purpose. It seems to me to be a dick-measuring contest of who has it worse, rather than any real significant determination of anything that matters.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 09:14 PM
1

well where does it stop? If I'm taller than someone, am I privileged? What if I floss everyday so my teeth don't rot, am I privileged over someone who doesn't? What if I naturally smell nice? What is "privilege" and what isn't?
/r/MensRights19/02/13 07:37 PM
1

I don't buy the first one. Sounds like communism.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 07:06 PM
1

I haven't ever heard a legitimate defense of it, it seems like just old-fashioned racism and "you don't understand you're not (x)" bullshit.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 08:34 AM
1

I hate the word "privilege".
/r/MensRights19/02/13 03:40 AM
1

if someone tells me to stop drinking because I'll be a target of sexual assault I'm going to tell them to go fuck themselves. I'm a big boy and I can take care of a rapist on my own.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 09:11 PM
1

already twice today.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 07:14 PM
1

isn't she dead now?
/r/MensRights18/02/13 05:17 PM
0

I'd answer but I have no idea what you can do to help...
/r/MensRights18/02/13 02:17 AM
1

ZING.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 02:15 AM
2

Wow, even if this one is really really bad, I still would rather it be posted in /r/mensrants. But holy shit what the fuck is wrong with people.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 06:55 PM
-1

can't you make up your own damn mind on these sorts of things?
/r/MensRights17/02/13 05:55 AM
1

Rupert Murdoch has seen enough stars for his day.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 08:36 PM
1

hey, if you know a better way to ensure the integrity of a hard drive and check for corruption in the file-system, by all means clue me in.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 06:19 PM
1

hahahahahahhahahahahahahahahaahahhhaa I am much cooler than he is.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 01:33 AM
-8

no, you're getting out of hand. Relax.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 01:29 AM
-12

Please post this sort of thing in /r/mensRANTS, not /r/mensrights.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 01:05 AM
1

when I first signed up several years ago, it was 1.6 tb per month, but has increased since then.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 11:32 PM
1

Finally we've discovered common ground, then.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 09:49 PM
1

What's the use of an ignore feature if you still see the people's responses to you? At any rate, I'm sure people can come to the realization that you're a moron and a loony without my assistance.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 09:31 PM
1

well that's my solution, you could hire a hosting provider to host it for you, or you could establish your own web-server, or any number of other things. I have a webserver, and if you buy a domain I will host it for you for freebies (until my bandwidth starts being soaked up to an absurd degree).
/r/MensRights14/02/13 09:29 PM
1

well, get some people to voluntarily seed for you. One thing is for sure, as long as you make sure you never lose the files you get, you can be assured that it won't go anywhere.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 06:55 PM
1

why are you still here? I'm blocking you.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 06:54 PM
-2

If you could post this sort of thing on /r/mensrants instead of /r/mensrights, many would appreciate it.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 11:03 AM
1

this just occurred to you?
/r/MensRights14/02/13 10:59 AM
2

it probably is missing some key info...
/r/MensRights14/02/13 10:58 AM
2

The Pirate Bay is a great place to host files.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 10:57 AM
1

gee, now if only they made one that got me a free beer and wasn't a dude...
/r/MensRights14/02/13 10:52 AM
1

Meh.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 01:09 AM
0

I get a lot of upvotes for directing people to /r/mensrants, usually there's only one or two downvotes... Also, remember, the moderators request people to direct these posts to /r/mensrants. You're the weirdo, get a life and stop complaining about silly things. You're not going to prevent me from doing this, in fact, I'll probably just block you, that's a lot easier.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 12:28 AM
1

buh-dum-PISH
/r/MensRights13/02/13 11:12 PM
2

Holy cow what a cow! this makes my day. I hope she loses. Frivolous lawsuits are too common nowadays. The sense of entitlement this girl has is just overwhelming. she went to college for FREE and is bitching about her degree because her FREE masters degree isn't good enough? What a pathetic and ungrateful cunt.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 11:11 PM
-1

You're a hardcore beta with THAT mentality! I think most women look for a different thing in a potential spouse than they do in boyfriends.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 11:08 PM
1

Well you are in the minority opinion, this has been thoroughly discussed in /r/mensrightsmeta and the decision to steer people towards /r/mensrants was made there. I don't like the upvote/downvote system, that failed as a method for keeping ez-karma off the front page, and I agree with the mods that the best thing to do is to push people to use /r/mensrants.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 10:35 PM
1

the mods have requested people to nudge people toward /r/mensrants, and you're just pursuing this because you don't want to lose, not because you think it's the right thing to do. You should quit while you're not behind.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 09:32 PM
1

it's actually the moderation policy now.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 09:13 PM
-23

No, it's not appropriate here, but it is very appropriate for /r/mensrants
/r/MensRights13/02/13 04:26 AM
1

You're one person amongs millions who've been circumcised, and you don't talk for all of us. I'm circumcised. We call it genital mutilation because that is what it is, it is the mutilation of infant genitals.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:49 AM
1

wow look at everyone laughing at us now! Worse comes to worse we've made atheist friends.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:17 AM
2

please post this sort of annoying content on /r/mensrants
/r/MensRights12/02/13 06:08 PM
-1

Wow she's really dumb.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 04:38 AM
2

Please post this sort of thing in /r/mensrants.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 04:36 AM
-8

they have studies now that publish their findings that confirm what everyone already knows.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 03:45 PM
2

I really don't dig on spammy posts from 4chan. EDIT: Or the term "Masculism". That's stupid, what are we trying to do, copy feminism?
/r/MensRights08/02/13 05:40 AM
1

wow that's something to call the local paper about.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 03:58 AM
1

Please don't post shit from Twitter... it clogs up the board and budges out real content.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 12:37 AM
2

I can relate. I want a job. :c
/r/MensRights07/02/13 06:33 PM
1

So the money isn't even going to her?
/r/MensRights07/02/13 07:28 AM
2

If she thinks that she doesn't need the child support, ask her nicely to cash the checks and give the money back to you.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 02:08 AM
0

I hate it when people post screenshots from facebook. Leave that shit in /r/atheism.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 12:29 AM
1

That black chick is so privileged!
/r/MensRights06/02/13 12:38 AM
1

Absolutely. How the hell does a 5 year old understand blowjobs? Someone fucked up somewhere...
/r/MensRights05/02/13 12:56 AM
-2

I'm in the military and I have two completely opposing points of view. My expressed view is equality is great and women should serve in infantry squads, my real view is that I have never seen an enlisted woman ever perform their duties to anywhere near the same level as the average guy, and think that women in the infantry is just a stupid idea. We don't even have women performing the non-infantry jobs correctly.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 12:38 AM
2

why are either of them the victim? They're pre-schoolers, how can either be responsible for their actions?
/r/MensRights05/02/13 12:35 AM
1

There's a word for this, and that word is "Inspiring". Also, wow, that requires some strength, I'm pretty sure I couldn't do that and I'm a pretty fit dude.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 08:49 PM
0

not for long, after women have to sign up for the draft, they'll contact their representatives.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 08:39 PM
0

oh shut up. They're plenty high enough.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 08:38 PM
-7

well YEAH, but you know what I mean.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 12:22 AM
-13

I'm a libertarian and I don't think anyone has any real obligations, but if they don't do certain things they're lesser people that I can safely ignore.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 10:32 PM
0

yeah, but they're not dead, are they?
/r/MensRights22/01/13 11:21 PM
1

this thread has more responses than the petition does.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 07:48 PM
2

as an aside, I think it's awful that you have to specify where India is.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 06:55 PM
0

Downvoted for the title. Fear mongering is stupid, whether it is half the human race with balls or the other half, the one with the ovaries.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 11:56 PM
0

The relation I drew was that I am an MRA, therefore it is very silly that they'd send me this.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 02:27 AM
0

I have no idea, folks!
/r/MensRights09/01/13 01:21 AM
2

You can only fight emotion with emotion and most guys aren't good at fighting with emotion. It's not really our "thang".
/r/MensRights03/01/13 11:39 PM
1

Internet!
/r/MensRights03/01/13 06:28 AM
1

She is also very modest.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 09:49 PM
1

Adversity breeds greatness. That's why I'm glad my dad was such a miserable bastard. If he weren't I would have grown up soft.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 12:27 PM
1

...That was depressing.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 12:16 PM
1

If a man walked up to you and made a very fascinating argument for court reform, all while wearing a shirt that said "I ASSURE YOU THAT I WILL NOT HAVE SEX WITH YOUR DOGGIE" and a hat with a penis on it, then you are a better man than I if you pay attention to anything the man says.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 11:26 AM
1

They are utterly unrelated.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 11:22 AM
2

Well, if you acknowledge that women also partake, isn't any mental disinclination for positive opinions of men equally applicable to women?
/r/MensRights13/12/12 10:01 PM
1

Don't ask questions.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 10:00 PM
1

Well, those are values that makes a man highly respected among his peers.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 05:33 AM
0

please do, because I think bitching about video games is just asinine.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 06:40 PM
1

I personally reject the term "masculism", I don't like making gender equality gender-specific. A lot of people here are against definitions of masculinity. I'm not with them. I'm big on masculinity in the classical sense, an honest, up-standing citizen who works hard and uses polite language and does the right thing. Also, mountain-climbing. That's pretty manly.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 06:15 PM
0

This was sad, I almost downvoted it on accident just because :c
/r/MensRights12/12/12 06:13 PM
-6

calling bigots shitty is an okay thing to do.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 06:11 PM
2

that's because they're tough. You're talking about the sex whose role in ancient society was to slaughter animals. If we had a bunch of men who weren't tough then society would fail. Emotional arguments and emotional thinking lead to mass stupidity. You need a balance of logic and emotion.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 05:41 PM
-1

my view on men at this point is that they are pretty cold and emotionless due to lack of showing emotions. Are you retarded or something? Just because we don't express emotion doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Hey, genius: Men don't EXPRESS emotions as much because they're supposed to put on a tough face. All the reasons you hate us are really reflections on yourself. All the things you described men as are equally applicable to yourself, because you come across as an unsympathetic and selfish. Men…
/r/MensRights12/12/12 05:25 PM
1

Let's just get this out of the way: "Masculism" is a retarded word and we should kill it.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 05:37 AM
1

I appreciate that you are angry, I know that when you see the things men have to fight against, it may seem like you should fix it, but it isn't your responsibility. You have no obligation to help the MRM. Therefore, you don't need to put yourself down or fill yourself with regret for not doing the things that you think would help us out now, you have your own life to live, and there's nothing wrong with not being a million times more selfless than most people are. We appreciate you for being he…
/r/MensRights12/12/12 05:35 AM
1

as you were.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 05:22 AM
1

Thank you for the support.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 05:15 AM
-1

We had a couple dudes have their marriages hit the rocks during this deployment, I don't want to comment or speculate on it at all, but that must really suck.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 03:43 AM
3

We need more people like you. I'm an MRA who is willing to work with feminists
/r/MensRights11/12/12 06:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter