TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Starkest Archive

View 0 posts and 23 comments by Starkest on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

If libertarians in general weren't adherents of an explicitly unscientific version of economics, you'd probably have a lot more progressives on board.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 08:27 PM
2

It's cool, man. I'm just interested in hearing more if you manage to track it down.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 03:56 AM
4

Citation?
/r/MensRights16/02/15 03:09 AM
17

I downvoted. Partially it's because of the tone of the posts, but mostly it's because I don't think it's appropriate to use the MRM as a platform for preaching.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 06:28 PM
5

It's not a perfect sentence, but I understood it fairly easily.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 11:44 PM
1

This is not really a compelling argument. You could switch a few words around to make it about any label. However, some quick googling has shown that some trans people consider it a slur, so I'll continue to treat it the way I do other off-colour words in the interest of being polite. BTW, you're not going to convince many people on the internet of much of anything if you appeal to political correctness. Just a suggestion.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 04:14 PM
1

Since when is tranny a slur?
/r/MensRights05/02/15 06:46 AM
2

I think I understand the glee thing. I don't support Democrats or Republicans, but I think I feel something similar when I see a prominent feminist put their foot in their mouth. On the unity thing, though, that's why I think it's a bad idea to mingle MR stuff with other potentially divisive opinions. I'd hate to see the movement fractured by infighting on par with that in feminism. I'm getting the idea that I'm in the minority with this POV, though, so like I said, don't mind me.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 08:35 PM
1

Fair enough, man. I don't quite identify as an MRA, as I'm here more as an opponent of the insane social justice movement, but I do think it's pretty cool that people in this movement can generally disagree and remain civil.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 08:27 PM
4

I've literally never seen conservative bashing on this sub (on reddit in general, though? Oh yeah), but i would make the same comment if I did. I don't really identify with either side in american politics, so I don't have a dog in the fight. Anyway, you've clearly put some thought in to this before, so don't mind me.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 03:52 AM
16

I'm not a leftist, really, but that kind of talk (in the edit) could steer a fair amount of more moderate liberals away from men's rights. Not telling you how to live your life, just pointing out something to consider.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 11:59 PM
6

How about we leave "that's not funny" to the feminists?
/r/MensRights15/12/14 04:15 PM
5

He didn't even mention flat-earthers. Geocentrism, on the other hand, was definitely a thing, as your info on plato shows.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 02:44 PM
1

I agree with you. I don't think it's an issue, either, but I was more commenting on the wage gap accusation. I guess it could be viewed as a marriage benefit for women (depends on the people in question, really), but I don't really view that as a problem.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 05:53 AM
2

Not quite. While the wage gap is a myth, there is a pay gap that's largely due to the subject matter: women getting married, having kids, and putting their career on the back burner.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 05:23 AM
34

Funny how there's no debate when an small, aggressive man takes a hit from a bigger guy he's been provoking. But when it's a woman, you have assholes like this guy framing self-defense as pathetic, pseudo tough guy behavior.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 03:05 AM
6

As far as I saw, the functionality issue was brought up by you and people responded with rebuttals. That was certainly the case between you and I. I was the guy who suggested beating children, and I didn't delete it. I think you missed the point on that one (it was an analogy in response to specific arguments), but whatever. And yeah, everyone is biased in some way. That being said, you continue to use arguments that have been refuted in this very comment thread without bothering to address the …
/r/MensRights01/11/13 07:01 PM
10

Jesus christ, dude. There's scientific literature available on the functions of the foreskin; stop making ignorant declarations and read up on the issue. At the very least, the medical benefits of both circumcision and foreskin are uncertain, but IMO you've got to go out of your way to achieve that viewpoint. The hypotheticals are an attempt to let you see the issue from another angle, as you're obviously coming into this discussion with some sort of bias. When you compare circumcision to simila…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 06:06 PM
6

My (our) argument doesn't require that it has a function, but IIRC there's various sexual benefits, among other things.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 05:44 PM
8

And even if they could, it's still a surgery with a risk of error. It's painful, and if anybody buys into the "they won't remember it" argument, BRB while I beat the shit out of a baby. Don't worry, they won't remember it.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 05:12 PM
10

Upon adulthood, a name can be changed, a person can stop brushing their teeth, they can set their own bedtime, pick up smoking, etc... It's about parental choices that extend into the child's adult life. Enforcing standards for the mental impact of a childhood would be difficult to do, and is often viewed as too intrusive by the majority of people, but we still have a system in place to deal with emotionally abusive parents that have crossed a certain line determined by society. Physical abuse (…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 05:00 PM
15

Banning permanent body modifications on non-consenting children is not oppression. The notion of religious "rights" over another person's body is antithetical to the entire concept of civil rights. Granted, it's not as clear-cut a question concerning a parent/child relationship as it would be between adults, but when you take religion out of the equation, most people draw the line somewhere before permanent physical alterations.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 04:32 PM
5

How pretentious. Sure, a lot of people become atheists for silly reasons, but it certainly doesn't require years of research and study on religion and history.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 05:29 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter